Early Post-Renal Transplant Hyperglycemia

Management of Early Post-Transplant Hyperglycemia by Dedicated Endocrine Care Improves Glycemic Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Early post-transplant hyperglycemia (EPTH) is an independent risk factor for hospital readmissions, acute rejection, infections and developing post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). Close glycemic control is prudent in the early post-transplant period. The management of EPTH was evaluated among a cohort of kidney transplant recipients, who either received routine care (RC) or dedicated endocrine care (DEC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on kidney transplant recipients from 2019 to 2023. The impact of DEC on post-transplant glycemic control was investigated. Hospitalized patients receiving post-transplant insulin therapy were included. DEC involved at least twice-daily blood glucose (BG) assessment by an endocrinologist, while the RC received usual care. A mixed-model analysis was employed to assess differences in BG trajectories between DEC and RC over an eight-day period. Additionally, various glycemic control metrics were compared, including glucose variability, time-in-range for target BG, rates of hypoglycemia and response to hyperglycemia.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 113 patients. In the DEC group, 91% had pre-transplant DM compared to 15% in the RC group (p < 0.001). Patients under DEC had higher baseline BG and glycated hemoglobin compared to those under RC (p < 0.001, for both). The DEC group displayed a lower trajectory of BG over time compared to the RC group (p = 0.002). Patients under DEC were more likely to receive insulin if BG measured above 200 mg/dL (66% vs. 46%) and displayed less below-range BG (<110 mg/dL) compared to those under RC (12.9% vs. 23.6%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Management of EPTH by DEC improves glycemic outcomes in renal transplant recipients.

Association of early post-transplant hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus on outcomes following heart transplantation

AIMS

Early post-transplant hyperglycaemia (EPTH) and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) are common following solid organ transplantation and may be associated with adverse outcomes. We studied the prevalence of EPTH and cumulative 5-year prevalence of PTDM in a modern cohort of heart transplant recipients who were free from diabetes at baseline as well as the association of EPTH, PTDM and pre-transplant T2DM with adverse transplant-related outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of heart transplant recipients followed for 5 years at a single centre in Sydney, Australia.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were included, of whom 25 had pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and 116 were free from diabetes at baseline. In patients without pre-existing T2DM, 88 of 116 (76%) experienced EPTH, which was associated with higher rates of acute rejection and hospitalizations, and lower 5-year survival. PTDM developed in 45 of 116 (39%) patients, all of whom had experienced EPTH. Both PTDM and pre-existing T2DM were associated with increased rates of graft rejection and hospitalization, and greater than three-fold increased likelihood of death compared to patients that remained free from diabetes.

CONCLUSION

EPTH and PTDM are highly prevalent following cardiac transplantation. EPTH develops within days of transplant and is strongly associated with progression to PTDM. Pre-existing T2DM, PTDM and EPTH are associated with greater hospitalization, increased episodes of rejection and worse 5-year survival compared to patients who remained free from diabetes during follow-up.

Early post-transplant hyperglycemia and post-transplant diabetes mellitus following heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Heart transplantation is an important treatment for end-stage heart failure. Early post-transplant hyperglycemia (EPTH) and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) are common following heart transplantation and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of EPTH and PTDM in cardiac transplant patients, incorporating findings from non-cardiac solid organ transplant studies where relevant due to limited heart-specific research.

EXPERT OPINION

EPTH following heart transplantation is common yet understudied and is associated with the later development of PTDM. PTDM is associated with adverse outcomes including infection, renal dysfunction, microvascular disease, and an increased risk of re-transplantation and mortality. Risk factors for EPTH include the post-operative immunosuppression regimen, recipient and donor age, body mass index, infections, and chronic inflammation. Early insulin treatment is recommended for EPTH, whereas PTDM management is varied and includes lifestyle modification, anti-glycemic agents, and insulin. Given the emerging evidence on the transplant benefits associated with effective glucose control, and the cardioprotective potential of newer anti-glycemic agents, further focus on the management of EPTH and PTDM within heart transplant recipients is imperative.

International consensus on post-transplantation diabetes mellitus

Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) remains a leading complication after solid organ transplantation. Previous international PTDM consensus meetings in 2003 and 2013 provided standardized frameworks to reduce heterogeneity in diagnosis, risk stratification and management. However, the last decade has seen significant advancements in our PTDM knowledge complemented by rapidly changing treatment algorithms for management of diabetes in the general population. In view of these developments, and to ensure reduced variation in clinical practice, a 3rd international PTDM Consensus Meeting was planned and held from 6-8 May 2022 in Vienna, Austria involving global delegates with PTDM expertise to update the previous reports. This update includes opinion statements concerning optimal diagnostic tools, recognition of prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance), new mechanistic insights, immunosuppression modification, evidence-based strategies to prevent PTDM, treatment hierarchy for incorporating novel glucose-lowering agents and suggestions for the future direction of PTDM research to address unmet needs. Due to the paucity of good quality evidence, consensus meeting participants agreed that making GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) recommendations would be flawed. Although kidney-allograft centric, we suggest that these opinion statements can be appraised by the transplantation community for implementation across different solid organ transplant cohorts. Acknowledging the paucity of published literature, this report reflects consensus expert opinion. Attaining evidence is desirable to ensure establishment of optimized care for any solid organ transplant recipient at risk of, or who develops, PTDM as we strive to improve long-term outcomes.

A randomized trial of continuous glucose monitoring to improve post-transplant glycemic control

INTRODUCTION

This study examines whether the use of inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitors provides improved glycemic control over finger-stick glucose monitoring post-transplant.

METHODS

This is a single-site, prospective randomized controlled trial of 40 patients receiving conventional finger-stick glucose monitoring or continuous monitoring using the Medtronic Guardian Sensor 3 during the first 5 days post-transplant. Included patients were adult renal transplant recipients with a diagnosis of diabetes. Assessed endpoints included post-transplant daily median glucose level, hyperglycemic (≥180 mg/dL) and hypoglycemic (≤80 mg/dL) episodes, number of post-transplant bacterial infections and length of stay.

RESULTS

Groups were well matched in demographic variables. Median daily glucose was significantly lower in the intervention group. There were also significantly less episodes of hyperglycemia on postoperative days 2, 3, 4, and 5. There were no differences in the incidences of hypoglycemia, postoperative bacterial infections, or length of stay.

CONCLUSION

In this randomized study, the use of a continuous glucose monitor to guide post-transplant glucose management significantly lowered the incidence of hyperglycemic episodes and median glucose levels through the first 5 days post-transplant without increasing the number of hypoglycemic episodes. The use of these devices can be considered in the immediate post-renal transplant setting.

Pre-transplant HbA1c and risk of diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: a single center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus occurs in 10-40% of kidney transplant recipients and is associated with increased risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. Early identification of patients with a higher risk of developing diabetes could allow to take timely measures. However, no validated model exists to predict the risk of post-transplant diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes 267 adult patients who underwent kidney transplantation at the Antwerp University Hospital between January 2014 and August 2021. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus was diagnosed based on the American Diabetes Association definition at 3 months post-transplant. First, a logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Second, criteria to identify patients with a high risk (> 35%) of developing post-transplant diabetes mellitus at 3 months were established.

RESULTS

At 3 months post-transplantation, 54 (20.2%) patients developed post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Univariable analysis showed that age, body mass index and HbA1c on the day of transplantation were associated with post-transplant diabetes mellitus. However, in a multivariable model with the same parameters, only HbA1c remained statistically significant. An absolute increase in HbA1c of 0.1% increases the odds for developing post-transplant diabetes mellitus by 28% (95% confidence interval 1.15-1.42). An HbA1c level ≥ 5.3% at transplantation, regardless of age or body mass index, is sufficient to identify patients with a post-transplant diabetes mellitus risk of ≥ 35% with a positive predictive value of 39% and a negative predictive value of 88%.

CONCLUSIONS

The HbA1c value at transplantation was the strongest predictor for post-transplant diabetes mellitus at 3 months post-transplant. Furthermore, at least in our population, a pre-transplant HbA1c of ≥ 5.3% can be used as an easy tool to identify patients at high risk of early post-transplant diabetes mellitus.

Hyperglycemia and Hyperlipidemia with Kidney or Liver Transplantation: A Review

Although solid organ transplantation in persons with diabetes mellitus is often associated with hyperglycemia, the risk of hyperlipidemia in all organ transplant recipients is often underestimated. The diagnosis of diabetes often predates transplantation; however, in a moderate percentage of allograft recipients, perioperative hyperglycemia occurs triggered by antirejection regimens. Post-transplant prescription of glucocorticoids, calcineurin inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors are associated with increased lipid concentrations. The existence of diabetes mellitus prior to or following a liver transplant is associated with shorter times of useful allograft function. A cycle involving Smad, TGF beta, m-TOR and toll-like receptors has been identified in the contribution of rejection and aging of allografts. Glucocorticoids (prednisone) and calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) induce hyperglycemia associated with insulin resistance. Azathioprine, mycophenolate and prednisone are associated with lipogenesis. mTOR inhibitors (rapamycin) are used to decrease doses of atherogenic agents used for immunosuppression. Post-transplant medication management must balance immune suppression and glucose and lipid control. Concerns regarding rejection often override those relative to systemic and organ vascular aging and survival. This review focuses attention on the underlying mechanism of relationships between glycemia/lipidemia control, transplant rejection and graft aging.

Topical Glucocorticoid Use and the Risk of Posttransplant Diabetes

Systemically administered glucocorticoids constitute an essential part of the immunosuppressive regimen for transplant recipients, yet their known risks of causing hyperglycemia or posttransplant diabetes require close monitoring and minimisation of use, when possible, to prevent detrimental effects on patient morbidity and graft survival. Topical glucocorticoids, on the other hand, are rarely considered to affect glucose metabolism and therefore seldomly monitored, despite their wide and in some cases, long-term use. We report a case of a renal transplant recipient presenting with acute hyperosmolar hyperglycemia after treatment with topical glucocorticoids and present a mini review of the literature.

Sitagliptin Versus Placebo to Reduce the Incidence and Severity of Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus After Kidney Transplantation-A Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Postkidney transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) affects cardiovascular, allograft, and recipient health. We tested whether early intervention with sitagliptin for hyperglycemia (blood glucose >200 mg/dL) within the first week of transplant and discontinued at 3 mo could prevent development of PTDM in patients without preexisting diabetes.

METHODS

The primary efficacy objective was to improve 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) by > 20 mg/dL at 3 mo posttransplant. The secondary efficacy objective was to prevent new onset PTDM, defined as a normal OGTT at 3 mo.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients consented, and 50 patients were analyzed. The 3-mo 2-h OGTT (end of treatment) was 141.00 ± 62.44 mg/dL in the sitagliptin arm and 165.22 ± 72.03 mg/dL ( P  = 0.218) in the placebo arm. The 6-mo 2-h OGTT (end of follow-up) was 174.38 ± 77.93 mg/dL in the sitagliptin arm and 171.86 ± 83.69 ng/dL ( P  = 0.918) in the placebo arm. Mean intrapatient difference between 3- and 6-mo 2-h OGTT in the 3-mo period off study drug was 27.56  +  52.74 mg/dL in the sitagliptin arm and -0.14  +  45.80 mg/dL in the placebo arm ( P  = 0.0692). At 3 mo, 61.54% of sitagliptin and 43.48% of placebo patients had a normal 2-h OGTT ( P  = 0.2062), with the absolute risk reduction 18.06%. There were no differences in HbA1c at 3 or 6 mo between sitagliptin and placebo groups. Participants tolerated sitagliptin well.

CONCLUSION

Although this study did not show a significant difference between groups, it can inform future studies in the use of sitagliptin in the very early posttransplant period.