Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Measures of First-phase Insulin Response and Their Predictive Ability for Type 1 Diabetes

A Glucose Fraction Independent of Insulin Secretion: Implications for Type 1 Diabetes Progression in Autoantibody-Positive Cohorts

Objective: We assessed whether there is an impactful glucose fraction independent of insulin secretion in autoantibody-positive individuals. Research Design and Methods: Baseline 2-h oral glucose tolerance test data from the TrialNet Pathway to Prevention (TNPTP; n = 6190) and Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1; n = 705) studies were used. Linear regression of area under the curve (AUC) glucose versus Index60 was performed to identify two fractions: dependent (dAUCGLU) or independent (iAUCGLU) of insulin secretion. Results: The lack of correlation (r = 0.06) of iAUCGLU and the inverse correlation of dAUCGLU (r = -0.59) with the first-phase insulin response from DPT-1 were consistent with the independent and dependent designations of the glucose fractions. Correlations of AUC C-peptide were inverse with dAUCGLU and positive with iAUCGLU (TNPTP: r = -0.72, r = 0.57; DPT-1: r = -0.56, r = 0.60). The explained variance of AUC C-peptide increased markedly after separating AUC glucose into its fractions (from 4% to 85% in TNPTP; from 1% to 67% in DPT-1). The independent fraction contributed more to the increased glycemia of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) than did the dependent fraction. Both dAUCGLU and iAUCGLU predicted IGT and type 1 diabetes (T1D) (P < 0.0001 for all). However, whereas dAUCGLU was more predictive of T1D (chi-square: 849 vs. 249), iAUCGLU was more predictive of IGT (chi-square: 451 vs. 176). Conclusions: A glucose fraction independent of insulin secretion was identified that was appreciable in autoantibody-positive individuals. It provides insight into the relation between glucose and C-peptide, contributes substantially to the glycemia of IGT, and predicts both T1D and IGT, particularly the latter.

Revisiting the Pattern of Loss of β-Cell Function in Preclinical Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from β-cell destruction due to autoimmunity. It has been proposed that β-cell loss is relatively quiescent in the early years after seroconversion to islet antibody positivity (stage 1), with accelerated β-cell loss only developing around 6-18 months prior to clinical diagnosis. This construct implies that immunointervention in this early stage will be of little benefit, since there is little disease activity to modulate. Here, we argue that the apparent lack of progression in early-stage disease may be an artifact of the modality of assessment used. When substantial β-cell function remains, the standard assessment, the oral glucose tolerance test, represents a submaximal stimulus and underestimates the residual function. In contrast, around the time of diagnosis, glucotoxicity exerts a deleterious effect on insulin secretion, giving the impression of disease acceleration. Once glucotoxicity is relieved by insulin therapy, β-cell function partially recovers (the honeymoon effect). However, evidence from recent trials suggests that glucose control has little effect on the underlying disease process. We therefore hypothesize that the autoimmune destruction of β-cells actually progresses at a more or less constant rate through all phases of T1D and that early-stage immunointervention will be both beneficial and desirable.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Quantifying beta cell function in the preclinical stages of type 1 diabetes

Clinically symptomatic type 1 diabetes (stage 3 type 1 diabetes) is preceded by a pre-symptomatic phase, characterised by progressive loss of functional beta cell mass after the onset of islet autoimmunity, with (stage 2) or without (stage 1) measurable changes in glucose profile during an OGTT. Identifying metabolic tests that can longitudinally track changes in beta cell function is of pivotal importance to track disease progression and measure the effect of disease-modifying interventions. In this review we describe the metabolic changes that occur in the early pre-symptomatic stages of type 1 diabetes with respect to both insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity, as well as the measurable outcomes that can be derived from the available tests. We also discuss the use of metabolic modelling to identify insulin secretion and sensitivity, and the measurable changes during dynamic tests such as the OGTT. Finally, we review the role of risk indices and minimally invasive measures such as those derived from the use of continuous glucose monitoring.

Oral delivery of bi-autoantigens by bacterium-like particles (BLPs) against autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice

Induction of oral tolerance by vaccination with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)-associated autoantigens exhibits great potential in preventing and treating this autoimmune disease. However, antigen degradation in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) limits the delivery efficiency of oral antigens. Previously, bacterium-like particles (BLPs) have been used to deliver a single-chain insulin (SCI-59) analog (BLPs-SCI-59) or the intracellular domain of insulinoma-associated protein 2 (IA-2ic) (BLPs-IA-2ic). Both monovalent BLPs vaccines can suppress T1DM in NOD mice by stimulating the corresponding antigen-specific oral tolerance, respectively. Here, we constructed two bivalent BLPs vaccines which simultaneously deliver SCI-59 and IA-2ic (Bivalent vaccine-mix or Bivalent vaccine-SA), and evaluated whether there is an additive beneficial effect on tolerance induction and suppression of T1DM by treatment with BLPs-delivered bi-autoantigens. Compared to the monovalent BLPs vaccines, oral administration of the Bivalent vaccine-mix could significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in T1DM. Treatment with the bivalent BLPs vaccines (especially Bivalent vaccine-mix) endowed the mice with a stronger ability to regulate blood glucose and protect the integrity and function of pancreatic islets than the monovalent BLPs vaccines treatment. This additive effect of BLPs-delivered bi-autoantigens on T1DM prevention may be related to that SCI-59- and IA-2-specific Th2-like immune responses could be induced, which was more beneficial for the correction of Th1/Th2 imbalance. In addition, more CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) were induced by treatment with the bivalent BLPs vaccines than did the monovalent BLPs vaccines. Therefore, multiple autoantigens delivered by BLPs maybe a promising strategy to prevent T1DM by efficiently inducing antigen-specific immune tolerance.

β-Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity in Youth With Early Type 1 Diabetes From a 2-Hour 7-Sample OGTT

CONTEXT

The oral minimal model is a widely accepted noninvasive tool to quantify both β-cell responsiveness and insulin sensitivity (SI) from glucose, C-peptide, and insulin concentrations during a 3-hour 9-point oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

OBJECTIVE

Here, we aimed to validate a 2-hour 7-point protocol against the 3-hour OGTT and to test how variation in early sampling frequency impacts estimates of β-cell responsiveness and SI.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis on 15 lean youth with stage 1 type 1 diabetes (T1D; ≥ 2 islet autoantibodies with no dysglycemia) who underwent a 3-hour 9-point OGTT. The oral minimal model was used to quantitate β-cell responsiveness (φtotal) and insulin sensitivity (SI), allowing assessment of β-cell function by the disposition index (DI = φtotal × SI). Seven- and 5-point 2-hour OGTT protocols were tested against the 3-hour 9-point gold standard to determine agreement between estimates of φtotal and its dynamic and static components, SI, and DI across different sampling strategies.

RESULTS

The 2-hour estimates for the disposition index exhibited a strong correlation with 3-hour measures (r = 0.975; P < .001) with similar results for β-cell responsiveness and SI (r = 0.997 and r = 0.982; P < .001, respectively). The agreement of the 3 estimates between the 7-point 2-hour and 9-point 3-hour protocols fell within the 95% CI on the Bland-Altman grid with a median difference of 16.9% (-35.3 to 32.5), 0.2% (-0.6 to 1.3), and 14.9% (-1.4 to 28.3) for DI, φtotal, and SI. Conversely, the 5-point protocol did not provide reliable estimates of φ dynamic and static components.

CONCLUSION

The 2-hour 7-point OGTT is reliable in individuals with stage 1 T1D for assessment of β-cell responsiveness, SI, and DI. Incorporation of these analyses into current 2-hour diabetes staging and monitoring OGTTs offers the potential to more accurately quantify risk of progression in the early stages of T1D.