1
|
Sosa F, Santos JEP, Rae DO, Larson CC, Macchietto M, Abrahante JE, Amaral TF, Denicol AC, Sonstegard TS, Hansen PJ. Effects of the SLICK1 mutation in PRLR on regulation of core body temperature and global gene expression in liver in cattle. Animal 2022; 16:100523. [PMID: 35468510 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
The SLICK1 mutation in bovine PRLR (c.1382del; rs517047387) is a deletion mutation resulting in a protein with a truncated intracellular domain. Cattle carrying at least one allele have a phenotype characterized by a short hair coat (slick phenotype) and increased resistance to heat stress. Given the pleiotropic nature of prolactin, the mutation may affect other physiological characteristics. The liver is one organ that could potentially be affected because of the expression of PRLR. The mutation is a dominant allele, and heterozygous animals have a similar hair coat to that of animals homozygous for the mutation. Present objectives were to determine whether inheritance of the SLICK1 mutation affects liver gene expression and if animals homozygous for the SLICK1 allele differ from heterozygotes in liver gene expression and regulation of body temperature during heat stress. In one experiment, rectal and ruminal temperatures were less for Holstein heifers that were heterozygous for the SLICK1 allele compared with wildtype heifers. There were 71 differentially expressed genes in liver, with 13 upregulated and 58 downregulated in SLICK1 heterozygotes. Among the ontologies characteristic of differentially expressed genes were those related to immune function and fatty acid and amino acid metabolism. In a prospective cohort study conducted with adult Senepol cattle, body temperature and hepatic gene expression were compared between animals heterozygous or homozygous for the SLICK1 mutation. There were no differences in ruminal temperatures between genotypes, rectal temperature was higher in animals homozygous for the SLICK1 mutation, and there was only one gene in liver that was differentially expressed. It was concluded that inheritance of the SLICK1 allele can exert functional changes beyond those related to hair growth although changes in liver gene expression were not extensive. Results are also consistent with the SLICK1 allele being dominant because there were few differences in phenotype between animals inheriting one or two copies of the allele.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Froylan Sosa
- Department of Animal Sciences, D.H. Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program, and Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0910, USA
| | - José E P Santos
- Department of Animal Sciences, D.H. Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program, and Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0910, USA
| | - D Owen Rae
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0136, USA
| | - Colleen C Larson
- Okeechobee County Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida/Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Okeechobee, FL 34972, USA
| | - Marissa Macchietto
- Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Juan E Abrahante
- Informatics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Thiago F Amaral
- Department of Animal Sciences, D.H. Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program, and Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0910, USA
| | - Anna C Denicol
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | | | - Peter J Hansen
- Department of Animal Sciences, D.H. Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program, and Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0910, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sosa F, Carmickle AT, Jiménez-Cabán E, Ortega MS, Dikmen S, Negrón-Pérez V, Jannaman EA, Baktula A, Rincon G, Larson CC, Pagán-Morales M, Denicol AC, Sonstegard TS, Hansen PJ. Inheritance of the SLICK1 allele of PRLR in cattle. Anim Genet 2021; 52:887-890. [PMID: 34642995 DOI: 10.1111/age.13145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The slick-hair phenotype in cattle is due to one of a series of mutations in the prolactin receptor (PRLR) that cause truncation of the C-terminal region of the protein involved in JAK2/STAT5 activation during prolactin signaling. Here we evaluated whether the inheritance of the SLICK1 allele, the first slick mutation discovered, is inherited in a fashion consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. It was hypothesized that any deleterious effect of inheriting the allele on embryonic or fetal function would result in reduced frequency of the allele in offspring. A total of 525 Holstein and Senepol cattle produced from matings involving one or both parents with the SLICK1 allele were genotyped. The observed frequency of the SLICK1 allele (0.247) was not significantly different than the expected frequency of 0.269. These results support the idea that inheritance of the SLICK1 allele does not act in the embryo or fetus to modify its competence to complete development to term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Sosa
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0910, USA
| | - A T Carmickle
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - E Jiménez-Cabán
- Department of Animal Science, University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez, Mayagüez, PR, 00680, USA
| | - M S Ortega
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MI, 65211, USA
| | - S Dikmen
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, 16059, Turkey
| | - V Negrón-Pérez
- Department of Animal Science, University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez, Mayagüez, PR, 00680, USA
| | - E A Jannaman
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0910, USA
| | | | - G Rincon
- Zoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA
| | - C C Larson
- Okeechobee County Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida/Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Okeechobee, FL, 34972, USA
| | - M Pagán-Morales
- Department of Animal Science, University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez, Mayagüez, PR, 00680, USA
| | - A C Denicol
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | | | - P J Hansen
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0910, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Subramani R, Nandy SB, Pedroza DA, Lakshmanaswamy R. Role of Growth Hormone in Breast Cancer. Endocrinology 2017; 158:1543-1555. [PMID: 28379395 DOI: 10.1210/en.2016-1928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers diagnosed in women. Approximately two-thirds of all breast cancers diagnosed are classified as hormone dependent, which indicates that hormones are the key factors that drive the growth of these breast cancers. Ovarian and pituitary hormones play a major role in the growth and development of normal mammary glands and breast cancer. In particular, the effect of the ovarian hormone estrogen has received much attention in regard to breast cancer. Pituitary hormones prolactin and growth hormone have also been associated with breast cancer. Although the role of these pituitary hormones in breast cancers has been studied, it has not been investigated extensively. In this review, we attempt to compile basic information from most of the currently available literature to understand and demonstrate the significance of growth hormone in breast cancer. Based on the available literature, it is clear that growth hormone plays a significant role in the development, progression, and metastasis of breast cancer by influencing tumor angiogenesis, stemness, and chemoresistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramadevi Subramani
- Center of Emphasis in Cancer Research, Department of Biomedical Sciences MSB1, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, Texas 79905
| | - Sushmita B Nandy
- Center of Emphasis in Cancer Research, Department of Biomedical Sciences MSB1, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, Texas 79905
| | - Diego A Pedroza
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79905
| | - Rajkumar Lakshmanaswamy
- Center of Emphasis in Cancer Research, Department of Biomedical Sciences MSB1, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, Texas 79905
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79905
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vitorino Carvalho A, Eozenou C, Healey GD, Forde N, Reinaud P, Chebrout M, Gall L, Rodde N, Padilla AL, Delville CG, Leveugle M, Richard C, Sheldon IM, Lonergan P, Jolivet G, Sandra O. Analysis of STAT1 expression and biological activity reveals interferon-tau-dependent STAT1-regulated SOCS genes in the bovine endometrium. Reprod Fertil Dev 2017; 28:459-74. [PMID: 25116692 DOI: 10.1071/rd14034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2014] [Accepted: 07/12/2014] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins are critical for the regulation of numerous biological processes. In cattle, microarray analyses identified STAT1 as a differentially expressed gene in the endometrium during the peri-implantation period. To gain new insights about STAT1 during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy, we investigated STAT1 transcript and protein expression, as well as its biological activity in bovine tissue and cells of endometrial origin. Pregnancy increased STAT1 expression on Day 16, and protein and phosphorylation levels on Day 20. In cyclic and pregnant females, STAT1 was located in endometrial cells but not in the luminal epithelium at Day 20 of pregnancy. The expression of STAT1 during the oestrous cycle was not affected by progesterone supplementation. In vivo and in vitro, interferon-tau (IFNT) stimulated STAT1 mRNA expression, protein tyrosine phosphorylation and nuclear translocation. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation in IFNT-stimulated endometrial cells, we demonstrated an increase of STAT1 binding on interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1), cytokine-inducible SH2-containing protein (CISH), suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 and 3 (SOCS1, SOCS3) gene promoters consistent with the induction of their transcripts. Our data provide novel molecular insights into the biological functions of STAT1 in the various cells composing the endometrium during maternal pregnancy recognition and implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Vitorino Carvalho
- INRA, UMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - C Eozenou
- INRA, UMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - G D Healey
- Centre for Reproductive Immunology, Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - N Forde
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - P Reinaud
- INRA, UMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - M Chebrout
- INRA, UMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - L Gall
- INRA, UMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - N Rodde
- INRA, UPR1258 Centre National des Ressources Génomiques Végétales, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
| | - A Lesage Padilla
- INRA, UMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - C Giraud Delville
- INRA, UMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - M Leveugle
- INRA, UR1077 Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - C Richard
- INRA, UMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - I M Sheldon
- Centre for Reproductive Immunology, Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - P Lonergan
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - G Jolivet
- INRA, UMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - O Sandra
- INRA, UMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abdoon AS, Giraud-Delville C, Kandil OM, Kerboeuf-Giraud A, Eozénou C, Carvalho AV, Julian S, Sandra O. Maternal recognition of pregnancy and implantation are not associated with an interferon response of the endometrium to the presence of the conceptus in dromedary camel. Theriogenology 2017; 90:301-308. [DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Revised: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 11/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
6
|
Liu Y, Zhang Y, Jiang J, Lobie PE, Paulmurugan R, Langenheim JF, Chen WY, Zinn KR, Frank SJ. GHR/PRLR Heteromultimer Is Composed of GHR Homodimers and PRLR Homodimers. Mol Endocrinol 2016; 30:504-17. [PMID: 27003442 DOI: 10.1210/me.2015-1319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
GH receptor (GHR) and prolactin (PRL) receptor (PRLR) are homologous transmembrane cytokine receptors. Each prehomodimerizes and ligand binding activates Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathways by inducing conformational changes within receptor homodimers. In humans, GHR is activated by GH, whereas PRLR is activated by both GH and PRL. We previously devised a split luciferase complementation assay, in which 1 receptor is fused to an N-terminal luciferase (Nluc) fragment, and the other receptor is fused to a C-terminal luciferase (Cluc) fragment. When receptors approximate, luciferase activity (complementation) results. Using this assay, we reported ligand-independent GHR-GHR complementation and GH-induced complementation changes characterized by acute augmentation above basal signal, consistent with induction of conformational changes that bring GHR cytoplasmic tails closer. We also demonstrated association between GHR and PRLR in T47D human breast cancer cells by coimmunoprecipitation, suggesting that, in addition to forming homodimers, these receptors form hetero-assemblages with functional consequences. We now extend these analyses to examine basal and ligand-induced complementation of coexpressed PRLR-Nluc and PRLR-Cluc chimeras and coexpressed GHR-Nluc and PRLR-Cluc chimeras. We find that PRLR-PRLR and GHR-PRLR form specifically interacting ligand-independent assemblages and that either GH or PRL augments PRLR-PRLR complementation, much like the GH-induced changes in GHR-GHR dimers. However, in contrast to the complementation patterns for GHR-GHR or PRLR-PRLR homomers, both GH and PRL caused decline in luciferase activity for GHR-PRLR heteromers. These and other data suggest that GHR and PRLR associate in complexes comprised of GHR-GHR/PRLR-PRLR heteromers consisting of GHR homodimers and PRLR homodimers, rather than GHR-PRLR heterodimers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Liu
- Department of Medicine (Y.L., Y.Z., J.J., S.J.F.), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; Department of Radiology (K.R.Z.); and Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology (S.J.F.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore and Department of Pharmacology (P.E.L.), National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077; Department of Radiology (R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304; Department of Biological Sciences (J.F.L., W.Y.C.), Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634; and Endocrinology Section (S.J.F.), Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Medicine (Y.L., Y.Z., J.J., S.J.F.), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; Department of Radiology (K.R.Z.); and Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology (S.J.F.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore and Department of Pharmacology (P.E.L.), National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077; Department of Radiology (R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304; Department of Biological Sciences (J.F.L., W.Y.C.), Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634; and Endocrinology Section (S.J.F.), Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
| | - Jing Jiang
- Department of Medicine (Y.L., Y.Z., J.J., S.J.F.), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; Department of Radiology (K.R.Z.); and Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology (S.J.F.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore and Department of Pharmacology (P.E.L.), National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077; Department of Radiology (R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304; Department of Biological Sciences (J.F.L., W.Y.C.), Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634; and Endocrinology Section (S.J.F.), Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
| | - Peter E Lobie
- Department of Medicine (Y.L., Y.Z., J.J., S.J.F.), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; Department of Radiology (K.R.Z.); and Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology (S.J.F.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore and Department of Pharmacology (P.E.L.), National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077; Department of Radiology (R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304; Department of Biological Sciences (J.F.L., W.Y.C.), Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634; and Endocrinology Section (S.J.F.), Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
| | - Ramasamy Paulmurugan
- Department of Medicine (Y.L., Y.Z., J.J., S.J.F.), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; Department of Radiology (K.R.Z.); and Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology (S.J.F.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore and Department of Pharmacology (P.E.L.), National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077; Department of Radiology (R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304; Department of Biological Sciences (J.F.L., W.Y.C.), Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634; and Endocrinology Section (S.J.F.), Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
| | - John F Langenheim
- Department of Medicine (Y.L., Y.Z., J.J., S.J.F.), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; Department of Radiology (K.R.Z.); and Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology (S.J.F.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore and Department of Pharmacology (P.E.L.), National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077; Department of Radiology (R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304; Department of Biological Sciences (J.F.L., W.Y.C.), Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634; and Endocrinology Section (S.J.F.), Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
| | - Wen Y Chen
- Department of Medicine (Y.L., Y.Z., J.J., S.J.F.), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; Department of Radiology (K.R.Z.); and Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology (S.J.F.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore and Department of Pharmacology (P.E.L.), National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077; Department of Radiology (R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304; Department of Biological Sciences (J.F.L., W.Y.C.), Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634; and Endocrinology Section (S.J.F.), Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
| | - Kurt R Zinn
- Department of Medicine (Y.L., Y.Z., J.J., S.J.F.), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; Department of Radiology (K.R.Z.); and Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology (S.J.F.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore and Department of Pharmacology (P.E.L.), National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077; Department of Radiology (R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304; Department of Biological Sciences (J.F.L., W.Y.C.), Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634; and Endocrinology Section (S.J.F.), Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
| | - Stuart J Frank
- Department of Medicine (Y.L., Y.Z., J.J., S.J.F.), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; Department of Radiology (K.R.Z.); and Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology (S.J.F.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore and Department of Pharmacology (P.E.L.), National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077; Department of Radiology (R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304; Department of Biological Sciences (J.F.L., W.Y.C.), Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634; and Endocrinology Section (S.J.F.), Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Petridou B. Differences in affinities between the homologous and the heterologous rabbit prolactin-receptor interaction with respect to proliferation and differentiation activities. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2015; 213:118-29. [PMID: 25449135 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2012] [Revised: 09/08/2014] [Accepted: 10/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Interspecies differences in PRL-receptor binding and their relationship with bioactivity deserve investigation since cross-reactivity is relevant to the design of many experiments. We have previously shown that the lower affinity of rabbit prolactin (rbPRL) binding to its homologous receptor is due to its faster and more complete dissociation compared with that of ovine PRL (oPRL). In order to obtain sufficient amounts of rbPRL to study the functional consequences of its low affinity homologous interaction, rbPRL was expressed recombinantly in Escherichia coli (rec rbPRL) as insoluble inclusion bodies, refolded and purified to homogeneity, yielding electrophoretically pure, over 98% monomeric rec rbPRL. Proper renaturation of rec rbPRL was evidenced by comparison of its CD spectra, binding parameters and bioactivity with those determined for the rbPRL. The binding potency of rec rbPRL to its receptor, expressed either endogenously in the mammary gland or recombinantly in mammalian cells is one log unit lower than that to the receptor expressed recombinantly in insect cells. This difference is probably related to differences in cell-dependent receptor densities. The proliferation potency of rbPRL or rec rbPRL was one log unit lower than that of oPRL, consistent with its lower binding affinity, but the differentiation potencies of these PRLs were similar. Thus, the proliferation activity is sensitive to PRL-receptor affinity and dissociation kinetics, whereas the differentiation response is marginally modulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Petridou
- UMR 1313 Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, F-78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carvalho AV, Reinaud P, Forde N, Healey GD, Eozenou C, Giraud-Delville C, Mansouri-Attia N, Gall L, Richard C, Lonergan P, Sheldon IM, Lea RG, Sandra O. SOCS genes expression during physiological and perturbed implantation in bovine endometrium. Reproduction 2014; 148:545-57. [PMID: 25187621 DOI: 10.1530/rep-14-0214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
In mammals, suppressor of cytokine signalling (CISH, SOCS1 to SOCS7) factors control signalling pathways involved in the regulation of numerous physiological processes including pregnancy. In order to gain new insights into the biological functions of SOCS in the endometrium, a comprehensive analysis of SOCS gene expression was carried out in bovine caruncular (CAR) and intercaruncular (ICAR) tissues collected i) during the oestrous cycle, ii) at the time of maternal recognition of pregnancy and at implantation in inseminated females, iii) following uterine interferon-tau (IFNT) infusion at day 14 post-oestrus, iv) following a period of controlled intravaginal progesterone release and v) following transfer of embryos by somatic-cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). The regulatory effects of IFNT on in vitro cultured epithelial and stromal cells were also examined. Altogether, our data showed that CISH, SOCS4, SOCS5 and SOCS7 mRNA levels were poorly affected during luteolysis and pregnancy. In contrast, SOCS1, SOCS2, SOCS3 and SOCS6 mRNA levels were strongly up-regulated at implantation (day 20 of pregnancy). Experimental in vitro and in vivo models demonstrated that only CISH, SOCS1, SOCS2 and SOCS3 were IFNT-induced genes. Immunohistochemistry showed an intense SOCS3 and SOCS6 staining in the nucleus of luminal and glandular epithelium and of stromal cells of pregnant endometrium. Finally, SOCS3 expression was significantly increased in SCNT pregnancies in keeping with the altered immune function previously reported in this model of compromised implantation. Collectively, our data suggest that spatio-temporal changes in endometrial SOCS gene expression reflect the acquisition of receptivity, maternal recognition of pregnancy and implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Vitorino Carvalho
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - P Reinaud
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - N Forde
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - G D Healey
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - C Eozenou
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - C Giraud-Delville
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - N Mansouri-Attia
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - L Gall
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - C Richard
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - P Lonergan
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - I M Sheldon
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - R G Lea
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| | - O Sandra
- INRAUMR1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FranceSchool of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandCentre for Reproductive ImmunologyInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, UKDepartment of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USASchool of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leicestershire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ellens ER, Kittilson JD, Hall JA, Sower SA, Sheridan MA. Evolutionary origin and divergence of the growth hormone receptor family: insight from studies on sea lamprey. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2013; 192:222-36. [PMID: 23726998 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2013] [Revised: 05/06/2013] [Accepted: 05/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Sea lamprey, one of the oldest extant lineages of vertebrates, Agnatha, was used to clarify the evolutionary origin and divergence of the growth hormone receptor (GHR) family. A single full-length cDNA encoding a protein that shares amino acid identity with GHRs and prolactin receptors (PRLRs) previously characterized from teleost fish was identified. Expression of the GHR/PRLR-like transcript was widespread among tissues, including brain, pituitary, heart, liver, and skeletal muscle, which is consistent with the broad physiological roles of GH-family peptides. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that the lamprey possess an ancestral gene encoding a common GHR/PRLR that diverged to give rise to distinct GHRs and PRLRs later in the course of vertebrate evolution. After the divergence of the Actinopterygian and Sarcopterygian lineages, the GHR gene was duplicated in the Actinopterygian lineage during the fish-specific genome duplication event giving rise to two GHRs in teleosts, type 1 GHR and type 2 GHR. A single GHR gene orthologous to the teleost type 1 GHR persisted in the Sarcopterygian lineage, including the common ancestor of tetrapods. Within the teleosts, several subsequent independent duplication events occurred that led to several GHR subtypes. A revised nomenclature for vertebrate GHRs is proposed that represents the evolutionary history of the receptor family. Structural features of the receptor influence ligand binding, receptor dimerization, linkage to signal effector pathways, and, ultimately, hormone function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth R Ellens
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xu J, Sun D, Jiang J, Deng L, Zhang Y, Yu H, Bahl D, Langenheim JF, Chen WY, Fuchs SY, Frank SJ. The role of prolactin receptor in GH signaling in breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol 2012. [PMID: 23192981 DOI: 10.1210/me.2012-1297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
GH and prolactin (PRL) are structurally related hormones that exert important effects in disparate target tissues. Their receptors (GHR and PRLR) reside in the cytokine receptor superfamily and share signaling pathways. In humans, GH binds both GHR and PRLR, whereas PRL binds only PRLR. Both hormones and their receptors may be relevant in certain human and rodent cancers, including breast cancer. GH and PRL promote signaling in human T47D breast cancer cells that express both GHR and PRLR. Furthermore, GHR and PRLR associate in a fashion augmented acutely by GH, even though GH primarily activates PRLR, rather than GHR, in these cells. To better understand PRLR's impact, we examined the effects of PRLR knockdown on GHR availability and GH sensitivity in T47D cells. T47D-ShPRLR cells, in which PRLR expression was reduced by stable short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expression, were compared with T47D-SCR control cells. PRLR knockdown decreased the rate of GHR proteolytic turnover, yielding GHR protein increase and ensuing sensitization of these cells to GHR signaling events including phosphorylation of GHR, Janus kinase 2, and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5). Unlike in T47D-SCR cells, acute GH signaling in T47D-ShPRLR cells was not blocked by the PRLR antagonist G129R but was inhibited by the GHR-specific antagonist, anti-GHR(ext-mAb). Thus, GH's use of GHR rather than PRLR was manifested when PRLR was reduced. In contrast to acute effects, GH incubation for 2 h or longer yielded diminished STAT5 phosphorylation in T47D-ShPRLR cells compared with T47D-SCR, a finding perhaps explained by markedly greater GH-induced GHR down-regulation in cells with diminished PRLR. However, when stimulated with repeated 1-h pulses of GH separated by 3-h washout periods to more faithfully mimic physiological GH pulsatility, T47D-ShPRLR cells exhibited greater transactivation of a STAT5-responsive luciferase reporter than did T47D-SCR cells. Our data suggest that PRLR's presence meaningfully affects GHR use in breast cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Xu
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Carter AM. Evolution of Placental Function in Mammals: The Molecular Basis of Gas and Nutrient Transfer, Hormone Secretion, and Immune Responses. Physiol Rev 2012; 92:1543-76. [DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00040.2011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Placenta has a wide range of functions. Some are supported by novel genes that have evolved following gene duplication events while others require acquisition of gene expression by the trophoblast. Although not expressed in the placenta, high-affinity fetal hemoglobins play a key role in placental gas exchange. They evolved following duplications within the beta-globin gene family with convergent evolution occurring in ruminants and primates. In primates there was also an interesting rearrangement of a cassette of genes in relation to an upstream locus control region. Substrate transfer from mother to fetus is maintained by expression of classic sugar and amino acid transporters at the trophoblast microvillous and basal membranes. In contrast, placental peptide hormones have arisen largely by gene duplication, yielding for example chorionic gonadotropins from the luteinizing hormone gene and placental lactogens from the growth hormone and prolactin genes. There has been a remarkable degree of convergent evolution with placental lactogens emerging separately in the ruminant, rodent, and primate lineages and chorionic gonadotropins evolving separately in equids and higher primates. Finally, coevolution in the primate lineage of killer immunoglobulin-like receptors and human leukocyte antigens can be linked to the deep invasion of the uterus by trophoblast that is a characteristic feature of human placentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony M. Carter
- Cardiovascular and Renal Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bouilly J, Sonigo C, Auffret J, Gibori G, Binart N. Prolactin signaling mechanisms in ovary. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 356:80-7. [PMID: 21664429 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2011] [Accepted: 05/18/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Prolactin is a hormone that is essential for normal reproduction and signals through two types of receptors. Not only is the classical long form of the prolactin receptor identified, but so are many short form receptors in rodents and human tissues. Mouse mutagenesis studies have offered insight into the biology of prolactin family, providing compelling evidence that the different isoforms have independent biological activity. The possibility that short forms mediate cell proliferation is important for a variety of tissues including mammary gland and ovarian follicles. This review summarizes our current knowledge about prolactin signaling and its role in reproduction through either long or short isoform receptors.
Collapse
|
13
|
Biener E, Charlier M, Ramanujan VK, Daniel N, Eisenberg A, Bjørbaek C, Herman B, Gertler A, Djiane J. Quantitative FRET imaging of leptin receptor oligomerization kinetics in single cells. Biol Cell 2012; 97:905-19. [PMID: 15771593 DOI: 10.1042/bc20040511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND INFORMATION Leptin, an adipocyte-secreted hormone, signals through activation of its membrane-embedded receptor (LEPR). To study the leptin-induced events occurring in short (LEPRa) and long (LEPRb) LEPRs in the cell membrane, by FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) methodology, the respective receptors, tagged at their C-terminal with CFP (cyan fluorescent protein) or YFP (yellow fluorescent protein), were prepared. RESULTS The constructs encoding mLEPRa (mouse LEPRa)-YFP and mLEPRa-CFP, mLEPRb-YFP and mLEPRb-CFP were tested for biological activity in transiently transfected CHO cells (Chinese-hamster ovary cells) and HEK-293T cells (human embryonic kidney 293 T cells) for activation of STAT3 (signal transduction and activators of transcription 3)-mediated LUC (luciferase) activity and binding of radiolabelled leptin. All four constructs were biologically active and were as potent as their untagged counterparts. The localization pattern of the fused protein appeared to be confined almost entirely to the cell membrane. The leptin-dependent interaction between various types of receptors in fixed cells were studied by measuring FRET, using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy and acceptor photobleaching methods. CONCLUSIONS Both methods yielded similar results, indicating that (1) leptin receptors expressed in the cell membrane exist mostly as preformed LEPRa/LEPRa or LEPRb/LEPRb homo-oligomers but not as LEPRb/LEPRa hetero-oligomers; (2) the appearance of transient leptin-induced FRET in cells transfected with LEPRb/LEPRb reflects both a conformational change that leads to closer interaction in the cytosolic part and a higher FRET signal, as well as de novo homo-oligomerization; (3) in LEPRa/LEPRa, exposure to leptin does not lead to any increase in FRET signalling as the proximity of CFP and YFP fluorophores in space already gives maximal FRET efficiency of the preoligomerized receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Biener
- The Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xu J, Zhang Y, Berry PA, Jiang J, Lobie PE, Langenheim JF, Chen WY, Frank SJ. Growth hormone signaling in human T47D breast cancer cells: potential role for a growth hormone receptor-prolactin receptor complex. Mol Endocrinol 2011; 25:597-610. [PMID: 21310852 DOI: 10.1210/me.2010-0255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
GH receptor (GHR) and prolactin (PRL) receptor (PRLR) are structurally similar cytokine receptor superfamily members that are highly conserved among species. GH has growth-promoting and metabolic effects in various tissues in vertebrates, including humans. PRL is essential for regulation of lactation in mammals. Recent studies indicate that breast tissue bears GHR and PRLR and that both GH and PRL may impact development or behavior of breast cancer cells. An important facet of human GH (hGH) and human PRL (hPRL) biology is that although hPRL interacts only with hPRLR, hGH binds well to both hGHR and hPRLR. Presently, we investigated potential signaling effects of both hormones in the estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-positive human T47D breast cancer cell line. We found that this cell type expresses ample GHR and PRLR and responds well to both hGH and hPRL, as evidenced by activation of the Janus kinase 2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 pathway. Immunoprecipitation studies revealed specific GHR-PRLR association in these cells that was acutely enhanced by GH treatment. Although GH caused formation of disulfide-linked and chemically cross-linked GHR dimers in T47D cells, GH preferentially induced tyrosine phosphorylation of PRLR rather than GHR. Notably, both a GHR-specific ligand antagonist (B2036) and a GHR-specific antagonist monoclonal antibody (anti-GHR(ext-mAb)) failed to inhibit GH-induced signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 activation. In contrast, although the non-GHR-specific GH antagonist (G120R) and the PRL antagonist (G129R) individually only partially inhibited GH-induced activation, combined treatment with these two antagonists conferred greater inhibition than either alone. These data indicate that endogenous GHR and PRLR associate (possibly as a GHR-PRLR heterodimer) in human breast cancer cells and that GH signaling in these cells is largely mediated by the PRLR in the context of both PRLR-PRLR homodimers and GHR-PRLR heterodimers, broadening our understanding of how these related hormones and their related receptors may function in physiology and pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Xu
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0012, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Cytokine-activated receptors undergo extracellular domain dimerization, which is necessary to activate intracellular signaling pathways. Here, we report that in prolactin (PRL)-treated cells, PRL receptor (PRLR) undergoes cytoplasmic loop dimerization that is acetylation-dependent. PRLR-recruited CREB-binding protein (CBP) acetylates multiple lysine sites randomly distributed along the cytoplasmic loop of PRLR. Two PRLR monomers appear to interact with each other at multiple parts from the membrane-proximal region to the membrane-distal region, relying on the coordination among multiple lysine sites neutralized via acetylation. Cytoplasmic loop-dimerized PRLR activates STAT5, which is also acetylated by CBP and undergoes acetylation-dependent dimerization. PRLR dimerization and subsequent signaling are enhanced by treating the cells with deacetylase sirtuin (SIRT) inhibitor nicotinamide or histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor trichostatin A but inhibited by expressing exogenous deacetylase SIRT2 or HDAC6. Our results suggest that acetylation and deacetylation provide the rheostat-like regulation for the cytokine receptor PRLR in its cytoplasmic loop dimerization and subsequent STAT5 activation.
Collapse
|
16
|
Binart N, Bachelot A, Bouilly J. Impact of prolactin receptor isoforms on reproduction. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010; 21:362-8. [PMID: 20149678 DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2010.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2009] [Revised: 01/13/2010] [Accepted: 01/15/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Prolactin is a hormone involved in growth, development, reproduction, metabolism, water and electrolyte balance, brain and behavior, and immunoregulation. Its actions on reproductive processes represent the largest group of functions identified for this hormone. Besides the classic long form of the prolactin receptor, many short form receptors have been identified in rodents and human tissues. Mouse mutagenesis studies have offered insight into the biology of the prolactin family, providing compelling evidence that different isoforms have independent biological activity. The possibility that short forms mediate cell proliferation is important for a variety of tissues including mammary glands and ovarian follicles. This review summarizes the current knowledge about prolactin signaling and its role in reproduction through either long or short isoform receptors.
Collapse
|
17
|
Clevenger CV, Gadd SL, Zheng J. New mechanisms for PRLr action in breast cancer. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2009; 20:223-9. [PMID: 19535262 DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2009] [Revised: 03/05/2009] [Accepted: 03/06/2009] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Prolactin (PRL) is a pleiotrophic hormone that contributes to the growth of normal and malignant breast tissues. PRL signals through its receptor (PRLr), a transmembrane receptor that belongs to the cytokine receptor family. The mechanism of how the PRL:PRLr interaction triggers activation of signaling networks remains enigmatic. This review examines the effect of ligand binding on PRLr and the processes that initiate receptor-associated signaling. Evidence for PRLr predimerization in the absence of ligand and the actions of the prolyl isomerase cyclophilin A in ligand-induced activation of PRLr-associated Jak2 kinase are discussed. These studies reveal that ligand-induced conformational change of the PRLr complex is necessary for its function and open avenues for therapies to inhibit PRLr action in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles V Clevenger
- Department of Pathology and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Langenheim JF, Chen WY. Development of a novel ligand that activates JAK2/STAT5 signaling through a heterodimer of prolactin receptor and growth hormone receptor. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 2009; 29:107-12. [DOI: 10.1080/10799890902845252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
19
|
Nguyen N, Stellwag EJ, Zhu Y. Prolactin-dependent modulation of organogenesis in the vertebrate: Recent discoveries in zebrafish. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 2008; 148:370-80. [PMID: 18593647 DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2008.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2008] [Revised: 05/19/2008] [Accepted: 05/19/2008] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The scientific literature is replete with evidence of the multifarious functions of the prolactin (PRL)/growth hormone (GH) superfamily in adult vertebrates. However, little information is available on the roles of PRL and related hormones prior to the adult stage of development. A limited number of studies suggest that GH functions to stimulate glucose transport and protein synthesis in mouse blastocytes and may be involved during mammalian embryogenesis. In contrast, the evidence for a role of PRL during vertebrate embryogenesis is limited and controversial. Genes encoding GH/PRL hormones and their respective receptors are actively transcribed and translated in various animal models at different time points, particularly during tissue remodeling. We have addressed the potential function of GH/PRL hormones during embryonic development in zebrafish by the temporary inhibition of in vivo PRL translation. This treatment caused multiple morphological defects consistent with a role of PRL in embryonic-stage organogenesis. The affected organs and tissues are known targets of PRL activity in fish and homologous structures in mammalian species. Traditionally, the GH/PRL hormones are viewed as classical endocrine hormones, mediating functions through the circulatory system. More recent evidence points to cytokine-like actions of these hormones through either an autocrine or a paracrine mechanism. In some situations they could mimic actions of developmentally regulated genes as suggested by experiments in multiple organisms. In this review, we present similarities and disparities between zebrafish and mammalian models in relation to PRL and PRLR activity. We conclude that the zebrafish could serve as a suitable alternative to the rodent model to study PRL functions in development, especially in relation to organogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Biology, Howell Science Complex, East Carolina University, 1000 E. 5th Street, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Haig D. Placental Growth Hormone-Related Proteins and Prolactin-Related Proteins. Placenta 2008; 29 Suppl A:S36-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2007.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2007] [Revised: 09/25/2007] [Accepted: 09/26/2007] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
21
|
Gadd SL, Clevenger CV. Ligand-Independent Dimerization of the Human Prolactin Receptor Isoforms: Functional Implications. Mol Endocrinol 2006; 20:2734-46. [PMID: 16840534 DOI: 10.1210/me.2006-0114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Prolactin (PRL) contributes to the growth of normal and malignant breast tissues. PRL initiates signaling by engaging the PRL receptor (PRLr), a transmembrane (TM) receptor belonging to the cytokine receptor family. The accepted view has been that PRL activates the PRLr by inducing dimerization of the receptor, but recent reports show ligand-independent dimerization of other cytokine receptors. Using coimmunoprecipitation assays, we have confirmed ligand-independent dimerization of the PRLr in T47D breast cancer and HepG2 liver carcinoma cells. In addition, mammalian cells transfected with differentially epitope-tagged isoforms of the PRLr indicated that long, intermediate, and DeltaS1 PRLrs dimerized in a ligand-independent manner. To determine the domain(s) involved in PRLr ligand-independent dimerization, we generated PRLr constructs as follows: (1) the TM-ICD, which consisted of the TM domain and the intracellular domain (ICD) but lacked the extracellular domain (ECD), and (2) the ECD-TM, which consisted of the TM domain and the ECD but lacked the ICD. These constructs dimerized in a ligand-independent manner in mammalian cells, implicating a significant role for the TM domain in this process. These truncated PRLrs were functionally inert alone or in combination in cells lacking the PRLr. However, when introduced into cells containing endogenous PRLr, the ECD-TM inhibited human PRLr signaling, whereas the TM-ICD potentiated human PRLr signaling. These studies indicate that the ECD-TM and the TM-ICD are capable of modulating PRLr function. We also demonstrated an endogenous TM-ICD in T47D cells, suggesting that these findings are relevant to PRL-signaling pathways in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha L Gadd
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Lurie 4-107, 303 East Superior Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Biener-Ramanujan E, Ramanujan VK, Herman B, Gertler A. Spatio-temporal kinetics of growth hormone receptor signaling in single cells using FRET microscopy. Growth Horm IGF Res 2006; 16:247-257. [PMID: 16950496 DOI: 10.1016/j.ghir.2006.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2006] [Revised: 06/13/2006] [Accepted: 06/14/2006] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The growth hormone (GH) receptor (R)-mediated JAK2 (Janus kinase-2)-STAT5 (signaling transducer and activator of transcription-5) pathway involves a cascade of protein-protein interactions and tyrosine phosphorylations that occur in a spatially and temporally sensitive manner in cells. To study GHR dimerization or GH-induced conformational change of predimerized GHRs and STAT5 activation kinetics in intact cells, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and live-cell imaging methods were employed. FRET measurements at the membrane of HEK-293T cells co-expressing GHRs tagged at the C-terminus with cyan (C) and yellow (Y) fluorescent proteins (FPs) revealed transient GHR dimerization lasting 2-3 min, with a maximum at 3 min after GH stimulation, which was sufficient to induce STAT5 activation. The transient nature of the dimerization or GH-induced conformational change of predimerized GHRs kinetics was not a result of GHR internalization, as neither potassium- nor cholesterol-depletion treatments prolonged the FRET signal. YFP-tagged STAT5 recruitment to the membrane, binding to GHR-CFP, and phosphorylation, occurred within minutes of GH stimulation. Activated STAT5a-YFP did not show nuclear accumulation, despite nuclear pSTAT5 increase, suggesting high turnover of STAT5 nuclear shuttling. Although GHR dimerization and STAT5 activation have been reported previously, this is the first spatially resolved demonstration of GHR-signaling kinetics in intact cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Biener-Ramanujan
- The Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science, and Nutrition, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Teilum K, Hoch JC, Goffin V, Kinet S, Martial JA, Kragelund BB. Solution structure of human prolactin. J Mol Biol 2005; 351:810-23. [PMID: 16045928 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2005] [Revised: 06/16/2005] [Accepted: 06/17/2005] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
We report the solution structure of human prolactin determined by NMR spectroscopy. Our result is a significant improvement over a previous structure in terms of number and distribution of distance restraints, regularity of secondary structure, and potential energy. More significantly, the structure is sufficiently different that it leads to different conclusions regarding the mechanism of receptor activation and initiation of signal transduction. Here, we compare the structure of unbound prolactin to structures of both the homologue ovine placental lactogen and growth hormone. The structures of unbound and receptor bound prolactin/placental lactogen are similar and no noteworthy structural changes occur upon receptor binding. The observation of enhanced binding at the second receptor site when the first site is occupied has been widely interpreted to indicate conformational change induced by binding the first receptor. However, our results indicate that this enhanced binding at the second site could be due to receptor-receptor interactions or some other free energy sources rather than conformational change in the hormone. Titration of human prolactin with the extracellular domain of the human prolactin receptor was followed by NMR, gel filtration and electrophoresis. Both binary and ternary hormone-receptor complexes are clearly detectable by gel filtration and electrophoresis. The binary complex is not observable by NMR, possibly due to a dynamic equilibrium in intermediate exchange within the complex. The ternary complex of one hormone molecule bound to two receptor molecules is on the contrary readily detectable by NMR. This is in stark contrast to the widely held view that the ternary prolactin-receptor complex is only transiently formed. Thus, our results lead to improved understanding of the prolactin-prolactin receptor interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaare Teilum
- Department of Protein Chemistry, Institute of Molecular Biology and Physiology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tan D, Johnson DA, Wu W, Zeng L, Chen YH, Chen WY, Vonderhaar BK, Walker AM. Unmodified Prolactin (PRL) and S179D PRL-Initiated Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer between Homo- and Hetero-Pairs of Long and Short Human PRL Receptors in Living Human Cells. Mol Endocrinol 2005; 19:1291-303. [PMID: 15695371 DOI: 10.1210/me.2004-0304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractWe have used bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) to examine the interaction between human prolactins (PRLs) and the long (LF) and two short isoforms (SF1a and SF1b) of the human PRL receptor in living cells. cDNA sequences encoding the LF, SF1a, and SF1b were subcloned into codon-humanized vectors containing cDNAs for either Renilla reniformis luciferase (Rluc) or a green fluorescent protein (GFP2) with a 12- or 13-amino acid linker connecting the parts of the fusion proteins. Transfection into human embryonic kidney 293 cells demonstrated maintained function of Rluc and GFP2 when linked to the receptors, and confocal microscopy demonstrated the localization of tagged receptors in the plasma membrane by 48 h after transfection. All three tagged receptors transduced a signal, with the LF and SF1a stimulating, and SF1b inhibiting, promoter activity of an approximately 2.4-kb β-casein-luc construct. Both unmodified PRL (U-PRL) and the molecular mimic of phosphorylated PRL, S179D PRL, induced BRET with all combinations of long and short receptor isoforms except SF1a plus SF1b. No BRET was observed with the site two-inactive mutant, G129R PRL. This is the first demonstration, 1) that species homologous PRL promotes both homo- and hetero-interaction of most long and short PRLR pairs in living cells, 2) that both U-PRL and S179D PRL are active in this regard, and 3) that there is some aspect of SF1a-SF1b structure that prevents this particular hetero-receptor pairing. In addition, we conclude that preferential pairing of different receptor isoforms is not the explanation for the different signaling initiated by U-PRL and S179D PRL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dunyong Tan
- Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California-Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521-0121, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Goffin V, Bernichtein S, Touraine P, Kelly PA. Development and potential clinical uses of human prolactin receptor antagonists. Endocr Rev 2005; 26:400-22. [PMID: 15814850 DOI: 10.1210/er.2004-0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
There is a large body of literature showing that prolactin (PRL) exerts growth-promoting activities in breast cancer, and possibly in prostate cancer and prostate hyperplasia. In addition, increasing evidence argues for the involvement of locally produced (autocrine) PRL, perhaps even more than pituitary-secreted (endocrine) PRL, in tumor growth. Because dopamine analogs are unable to inhibit PRL production in extrapituitary sites, alternative strategies need investigation. To that end, several PRL receptor antagonists have been developed by introducing various mutations into its natural ligands. For all but one of these analogs, the mechanism of action involves a competition with endogenous PRL for receptor binding. Such compounds are thus candidates to counteract the undesired actions of PRL, not only in tumors, but also in dopamine-resistant prolactinomas. In this review, we describe the different versions of antagonists that have been developed, with emphasis on the controversies regarding their characterization, and the limits for their potential development as a drug. The most recently developed antagonist, Delta1-9-G129R-hPRL, is the only one that is totally devoid of residual agonistic activity, meaning it acts as pure antagonist. We discuss to what extent this new molecule could be considered as a lead compound for inhibiting the actions of human PRL in the above-mentioned diseases. We also speculate on the multiple questions that could be addressed with respect to the therapeutic use of PRL receptor antagonists in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Goffin
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unit 584, Faculté de Médecine Necker, 156, rue de Vaugirard, 75730 Paris Cedex 15, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Martens N, Uzan G, Wery M, Hooghe R, Hooghe-Peters EL, Gertler A. Suppressor of cytokine signaling 7 inhibits prolactin, growth hormone, and leptin signaling by interacting with STAT5 or STAT3 and attenuating their nuclear translocation. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:13817-23. [PMID: 15677474 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m411596200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
We report here the role of one of the less studied members of the family of suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS), namely SOCS-7, in cytokine signaling. We demonstrate that SOCS-7 inhibits prolactin (PRL), growth hormone (GH), or leptin (LEP) signaling mediated through STAT3 and STAT5 in a dose-dependent manner. SOCS-7 also attenuated STAT3 and STAT5 signaling induced by overexpression of JH1, the catalytic subdomain of JAK2. Since SOCS-7 interacted with phosphorylated STAT3 or STAT5, we assumed that SOCS-7 acts at the level of STAT proteins. Indeed, we showed that SOCS-7 inhibits PRL- and leptin-induced STAT5 and STAT3 phosphorylation and prevented the nuclear translocation of activated STAT3. Taken together, our results indicate that SOCS-7 is a physiological dysregulator of PRL, leptin, and probably also GH signaling and that its mode of action is a novel variation of SOCS protein inhibition of cytokine-inducible STAT-mediated signal transduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nele Martens
- Neuroendocrine Immunology, and Pharmacology Department, Medical School, Free University, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Soares MJ. The prolactin and growth hormone families: pregnancy-specific hormones/cytokines at the maternal-fetal interface. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2004; 2:51. [PMID: 15236651 PMCID: PMC471570 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-2-51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2004] [Accepted: 07/05/2004] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) gene families represent species-specific expansions of pregnancy-associated hormones/cytokines. In this review we examine the structure, expression patterns, and biological actions of the pregnancy-specific PRL and GH families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Soares
- Institute of Maternal-Fetal Biology, Division of Cancer & Developmental Biology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Martin C, Pessemesse L, De La Llosa-Hermier MP, Martal J, Djiane J, Charlier M. Interferon-τ upregulates prolactin receptor mRNA in the ovine endometrium during the peri-implantation period. Reproduction 2004; 128:99-105. [PMID: 15232067 DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Our objective was to determine the effect of ovine interferon-τ (IFN-τ) on prolactin receptor (PRL-R) gene expression in the ovine endometrium. IFN-τ is an embryonic cytokine which, via its paracrine anti-luteolytic activity, plays a critical role in maternal recognition of pregnancy in ruminants. Using ribonuclease protection assay procedures, we compared endometrial PRL-R mRNA levels in ewes that were intrauterine injected with either 2 mg bovine serum albumin or 2 mg recombinant ovine IFN-τ on day 10 of the oestrous cycle (day 0 = day of oestrus). IFN treatment significantly increased the abundance of both the long and short forms of PRL-R mRNA in the ovine uterus, but had no effect on the long:short form ratio.In situhybridization experiments revealed that the increase in abundance of PRL-R mRNA in the uterus was localized to the glandular compartment of the endometrium. In pregnant ewes, a similar increase in PRL-R mRNA abundance was found to occur in ovine endometrium on days 14–15 post conception. Collectively, these data provided strong evidence that IFN-τ modulates the level of lactogenic hormone receptor mRNA in the ovine uterus. Whether the effect of IFN-τ on PRL-R expression is mediated directly or influenced, at least in part, by progesterone remains to be elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Martin
- Neuroendocrinologie Moléculaire de la Prise Alimentaire, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Production of growth promoting substances by the placenta is regulated differently from the way production of similar compounds is regulated by maternal organs in various cases. Gene duplication is one of the mechanisms that facilitated the evolution of placental specific endocrine activity. Cattle, sheep and goats, although evolutionarily related, differ significantly from each other in the way their placental growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL)-like hormones have evolved. Cattle carry one copy of the GH gene and there is no evidence yet for expression of that single GH gene copy in the placenta. On the other hand, the ovine GH gene has been duplicated and both oGH copies are expressed in the placenta during early stages of gestation. Prolactin gene duplication in ruminants resulted in the formation of specific placental-expressed prolactin-related genes including the placental lactogen (PL) gene. In homologous state, ovine PL manifests PRL activity, but antagonizes GH activity. Ovine PL activity which can be mediated by PRL receptors or by hetero-dimerization of GH and PRL receptors, provide a novel regulatory mechanism for somatogenic activity dependent on the coexistence of both GH and PRL receptors in the same cells. Another mechanism for specific placental endocrine activity is silencing of the alleles through genetic imprinting. Disruption of genetic imprinting of placental genes has been proposed as one of the explanations for the loss of cloned fetuses generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Gootwine
- Institute of Animal Science, ARO, The Volcani Center, POB 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Eisenberg A, Biener E, Charlier M, Krishnan RV, Djiane J, Herman B, Gertler A. Transactivation of erbB2 by short and long isoforms of leptin receptors. FEBS Lett 2004; 565:139-42. [PMID: 15135067 DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.03.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2004] [Revised: 03/28/2004] [Accepted: 03/28/2004] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
We generated kinase-positive and kinase-negative erbB2 tagged with YFP and the long form of leptin receptor (LEPRb) tagged with CFP. Both were as active as their untagged analogs. Both short and long isoforms of leptin receptor phosphorylated and thereby activated erbB2 upon leptin binding and enhanced MAPK activity. Our results unveil a novel route by which leptin may provoke erbB2's phosphorylation and thus enhance its oncogenic potential independently of HER family ligands or its overexpression. Using FRET technology in living cells, we found no evidence of complex formation between erbB2 and prolactin or leptin receptors, indicating that the transactivation occurs through an indirect interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avital Eisenberg
- Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|