S179D-human PRL, a pseudophosphorylated human PRL analog, is an agonist and not an antagonist

Prolactin: A hormone with diverse functions from mammary gland development to cancer metastasis

Prolactin has a rich mechanistic set of actions and signaling in order to elicit developmental effects in mammals. Historically, prolactin has been appreciated as an endocrine peptide hormone that is responsible for final, functional mammary gland development and lactation. Multiple signaling pathways impacted upon by the microenvironment contribute to cell function and differentiation. Endocrine, autocrine and paracrine signaling are now apparent in not only mammary development, but also in cancer, and involve multiple cell types including those of the immune system. Multiple ligands agonists are capable of binding to the prolactin receptor, potentially expanding receptor function. Prolactin has an important role not only in tumorigenesis of the breast, but also in a number of hormonally responsive cancers such as prostate, ovarian and endometrial cancer, as well as pancreatic and lung cancer. Although pituitary and extra-pituitary sources of prolactin such as the epithelium are important, stromal sourced prolactin is now also being recognized as an important factor in tumor progression, all of which potentially signal to multiple cell types in the tumor microenvironment. While prolactin has important roles in milk production including calcium and bone homeostasis, in the disease state it can also affect bone homeostasis. Prolactin also impacts metastatic cancer of the breast to modulate the bone microenvironment and promote bone damage. Prolactin has a fascinating contribution in both physiologic and pathologic settings of mammals.

Prolactin-mediated regulation of lipid biosynthesis genes in vivo in the lactating mammary epithelial cell

Prolactin (PRL) is known to play an essential role in mammary alveolar proliferation in the pregnant mouse, but its role in lactation has been more difficult to define. Genetic manipulations that alter expression of the PRL receptor and its downstream signaling molecules resulted in developmental defects that may directly or indirectly impact secretory activation and lactation. To examine the in vivo role of PRL specifically in lactation, bromocriptine (BrCr) was administered every 8 h to lactating mice on the second day postpartum, resulting in an ~95% decrease in serum PRL levels. Although morphological changes in secretory alveoli were slight, by 8 h of BrCr, pup growth was inhibited significantly. Phosphorylated STAT5 fell to undetectable levels within 4 h. Decreased milk protein gene expression, β-casein, and α-lactalbumin, was observed after 8 h of treatment. To assess mammary-specific effects on lipid synthesis genes, we isolated mammary epithelial cells (MECs) depleted of mammary adipocytes. Expression of genes involved in glucose uptake, glycolysis, pentose phosphate shunt, de novo synthesis of fatty acids, and biosynthesis of triacylglycerides was decreased up to 19-fold in MECs by just 8 h of BrCr treatment. Glands from BrCr-treated mice showed a twofold reduction in intracellular cytoplasmic lipid droplets and a reduction in cytosolic β-casein. These data demonstrate that PRL signaling regulates MEC-specific lipogenic gene expression and that PRL signals coordinate the milk synthesis and mammary epithelial cell survival during lactation in the mouse.

The rhythmic secretion of mating-induced prolactin secretion is controlled by prolactin acting centrally

Artificial copulomimetic cervical stimulation (CS) induces an immediate release of oxytocin (OT) and prolactin (PRL) followed by a daily PRL rhythm characterized by nocturnal and diurnal surges. Although we have shown that the initial release of PRL is induced by the immediate release of OT, we tested whether the PRL that is released in response to CS is responsible for the initiation and maintenance of the subsequent PRL surges. Thus, we injected OVX rats centrally or peripherally with ovine PRL (oPRL) at 2200 h. Central oPRL induced PRL surges in OVX rats that were similar in size and timing to those of CS rats, whereas peripheral oPRL induced surges that were of smaller amplitude and delayed. We then infused a PRL antagonist (S179D, 0.1 ng/h) centrally into OVX and OVX-CS rats and measured the release of endogenous PRL and the activity of neuroendocrine dopaminergic neurons. Central infusion of S179D did not influence basal PRL secretion in OVX rats but prevented the expression of the CS-induced PRL surges and the accompanying noontime increase of CS-induced dopaminergic activity when continued for 3 d. However, central infusion of S179D only on the day of CS did not prevent the daily rhythm of PRL surges. These results demonstrate that PRL acts centrally to induce the PRL rhythm and that PRL in the brain is essential for the maintenance but not for the initiation of the CS-induced rhythmic PRL surges.

Analysis of site-specific histidine protonation in human prolactin

The structural and functional properties of human prolactin (hPRL), a 23 kDa protein hormone and cytokine, are pH-dependent. The dissociation rate constant for binding to the extracellular domain of the hPRL receptor increases nearly 500-fold over the relatively narrow and physiologic range from pH 8 to 6. As the apparent midpoint for this transition occurs around pH 6.5, we have looked toward histidine residues as a potential biophysical origin of the behavior. hPRL has a surprising number of nine histidines, nearly all of which are present on the protein surface. Using NMR spectroscopy, we have monitored site-specific proton binding to eight of these nine residues and derived equilibrium dissociation constants. During this analysis, a thermodynamic interaction between a localized triplet of three histidines (H27, H30, and H180) became apparent, which was subsequently confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis. After consideration of multiple potential models, we present statistical support for the existence of two negative cooperativity constants, one linking protonation of residues H30 and H180 with a magnitude of approximately 0.1 and the other weaker interaction between residues H27 and H30. Additionally, mutation of any of these three histidines to alanine stabilizes the folded protein relative to the chemically denatured state. A detailed understanding of these complex protonation reactions will aid in elucidating the biophysical mechanism of pH-dependent regulation of hPRL's structural and functional properties.

From bench to bedside: future potential for the translation of prolactin inhibitors as breast cancer therapeutics

A role for prolactin (PRL) in the pathogenesis of breast cancer has been confirmed at the cellular level in vitro, with multiple transgenic and knockout models in vivo, and within sizable patient populations through epidemiologic analysis. It is the obvious "next step" that these findings are translated into meaningful therapies to block PRL/PRLr function in human breast cancer. Several broad categories of PRL/PRLr antagonists are discussed in their pre-clinical context, including inhibitors of endocrine PRL elaboration, mutant ligand antagonists, ligand chimeras, and inhibitors of PRL-induced signaling and transactivation. The clinical potential for GHr antagonists are also discussed. These varied approaches all have demonstrated as proof-of-principle that PRL/PRLr antagonism can inhibit the in vitro and in vivo growth of breast cancer. Further pre-clinical development is required for most, however, before translation to clinical trials in breast cancer patients can occur.

Paradigm-shifters: phosphorylated prolactin and short prolactin receptors

Since the discovery of physiologically-regulated prolactin (PRL) phosphorylation, one focus of the laboratory has been an examination of the different functions of the unmodified and phosphorylated hormone. In the mammary gland, unmodified PRL promotes growth activities, whereas phosphorylated or pseudophosphorylated PRL antagonizes this while also being a superior agonist for changes that favor differentiation. Phosphorylated PRL also increases expression of the short forms of the PRL receptor. These short forms of the receptor have functions beyond the accepted dominant negative and in mammary epithelial cells are capable of generating an intracellular signal leading to increased tight junction formation and beta-casein expression.

Prolactin regulation of mammary gland development

Mammary morphogenesis is orchestrated with other reproductive events by pituitary-driven changes to the systemic hormone environment, initiating the formation of a mammary ductal network during puberty and the addition of secretory alveoli during pregnancy. Prolactin is the major driver of development during pregnancy via regulation of ovarian progesterone production (in many species) and direct effects on mammary epithelial cells (in all species). Together these hormones regulate two aspects of development that are the subject of intense interest: (1) a genomic regulatory network that integrates many additional spatial and temporal cues to control gene expression and (2), the activity of a stem and progenitor cell hierarchy. Amalgamation of these two aspects will increase our understanding of cell proliferation and differentiation within the mammary gland, with clear application to our attempts to control breast cancer. Here we focus on providing an over-view of prolactin action during development of the model murine mammary gland.

Rational design of competitive prolactin/growth hormone receptor antagonists

There is increasing evidence that prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) act as growth-promoters of breast tumors. Recent arguments have accumulated to suggest that when they are locally-produced within the mammary tissue, these hormones, acting by an autocrine-paracrine mechanism may have enhanced, or even specific functions compared to endocrine PRL and GH. Classical drugs blocking pituitary hormone production (dopamine and somatostatin analogs) are ineffective on extrapituitary expression of PRL/GH genes, therefore the undesirable effects of these locally-produced hormones remain a target of interest for alternative strategies. This has encouraged the development of competitive PRL and/or GH receptor antagonists, which involve engineered variants of natural receptor ligands (PRL or GH) aimed at blocking receptor activation rather than hormone production in peripheral tissues. This article overviews the rational design of this new class of molecules, their specific molecular features (receptor specificity, biological properties, etc.) and whenever available, the data that have been obtained in cell or animal models of breast cancer.

Structural and Thermodynamic Bases for the Design of Pure Prolactin Receptor Antagonists

Competitive antagonists of the human prolactin (hPRL) receptor are a novel class of molecules of potential therapeutic interest in the context of cancer. We recently developed the pure antagonist Del1-9-G129R-hPRL by deleting the nine N-terminal residues of G129R-hPRL, a first generation partial antagonist. We determined the crystallographic structure of Del1-9-G129R-hPRL, which revealed no major change compared with wild type hPRL, indicating that its pure antagonistic properties are intrinsically due to the mutations. To decipher the molecular bases of pure antagonism, we compared the biological, physicochemical, and structural properties of numerous hPRL variants harboring N-terminal or Gly(129) mutations, alone or combined. The pure versus partial antagonistic properties of the multiple hPRL variants could not be correlated to differences in their affinities toward the hPRL receptor, especially at site 2 as determined by surface plasmon resonance. On the contrary, residual agonism of the hPRL variants was found to be inversely correlated to their thermodynamic stability, which was altered by all the Gly(129) mutations but not by those involving the N terminus. We therefore propose that residual agonism can be abolished either by further disrupting hormone site 2-receptor contacts by N-terminal deletion, as in Del1-9-G129R-hPRL, or by stabilizing hPRL and constraining its intrinsic flexibility, as in G129V-hPRL.

S179D prolactin: antagonistic agony!

The aims of this review are three-fold: first, to collate what is known about the production and activities of phosphorylated prolactin (PRL), the latter largely, but not exclusively, as illustrated through the use of the molecular mimic, S179D PRL; second, to apply this and related knowledge to produce an updated model of prolactin-receptor interactions that may apply to other members of this cytokine super-family; and third, to promote a shift in the current paradigm for the development of clinically important growth antagonists. This third aim explains the title since, based on results with S179D PRL, it is proposed that agents which signal to antagonistic ends may be better therapeutics than pure antagonists-hence antagonistic agony. Since S179D PRL is not a pure antagonist, we have proposed the term selective prolactin receptor modulator (SPeRM) for this and like molecules.

The effect of estrogen on phosphorylation of prolactin in the mouse pituitary gland

Several studies have indicated that prolactin (PRL) assumes oligomeric, proteolytically cleaved, phosphorylated and glycosylated forms. Phosphorylated PRL (PPRL) is considered to be the most important posttranslationally modified form in the rat. In the present study, we examined whether or not PRL is present in the mouse pituitary gland in the phosphorylated form. Mouse pituitary PRL was digested with acid phosphatase, resolved by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, stained with Coomassie brilliant blue, and then immunoblotted against the anti-PRL, anti-phosphoserine and anti-phosphothreonine antibodies. We also examined whether PRL is phosphorylated by protein kinases and semi-quantified the ratios of PPRL to PRL in the pituitary gland. The results indicated that three types of PRL are present in the pituitary glands of both male and female mice. One was non-phosphorylated (isoform 1), and the other two were immunoreactive to anti-phosphoserine (isoform 2) and/or anti-phosphothreonine (isoform 3) antibodies. The ratio between isoforms 2 and 1 of the 30-day-old female mice was higher than that of the 20-day-old female mice. However, the ratios among the three isoforms in the male pituitary glands did not differ with age. The ratio of PPRL to isoform 1 was obviously reduced after ovariectomy (OVX), and it recovered with estrogen replacement. These results suggest that estrogen influences PRL phosphorylation in female mice.

Therapeutic potential of S179D prolactin – from prostate cancer to angioproliferative disorders: the first selective prolactin receptor modulator

Increasing evidence suggests an important role for autocrine/paracrine prolactin in breast and prostate cancers and other disease states. Prolactin production in these extrapituitary sites is not governed by dopamine agonists, a finding that has spurred the production of prolactin receptor antagonists. This review focuses on one such antagonist, S179D prolactin, which was produced by mimicking a natural antagonist, phosphorylated prolactin. S179D prolactin is a very effective growth antagonist, partly because it inhibits signalling from unmodified prolactin and partly because it produces its own intracellular signal. This signal results in cell differentiation, cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis depending on dose, duration of treatment and cellular context. S179D prolactin is also a potent antiangiogenic and initial studies have shown it to be a potent anti-inflammatory agent. In light of these additional modes of action, it is suggested that S179D prolactin should now be more aptly referred to as a selective prolactin receptor modulator.

Development and potential clinical uses of human prolactin receptor antagonists

There is a large body of literature showing that prolactin (PRL) exerts growth-promoting activities in breast cancer, and possibly in prostate cancer and prostate hyperplasia. In addition, increasing evidence argues for the involvement of locally produced (autocrine) PRL, perhaps even more than pituitary-secreted (endocrine) PRL, in tumor growth. Because dopamine analogs are unable to inhibit PRL production in extrapituitary sites, alternative strategies need investigation. To that end, several PRL receptor antagonists have been developed by introducing various mutations into its natural ligands. For all but one of these analogs, the mechanism of action involves a competition with endogenous PRL for receptor binding. Such compounds are thus candidates to counteract the undesired actions of PRL, not only in tumors, but also in dopamine-resistant prolactinomas. In this review, we describe the different versions of antagonists that have been developed, with emphasis on the controversies regarding their characterization, and the limits for their potential development as a drug. The most recently developed antagonist, Delta1-9-G129R-hPRL, is the only one that is totally devoid of residual agonistic activity, meaning it acts as pure antagonist. We discuss to what extent this new molecule could be considered as a lead compound for inhibiting the actions of human PRL in the above-mentioned diseases. We also speculate on the multiple questions that could be addressed with respect to the therapeutic use of PRL receptor antagonists in patients.

Prolactin and the prolactin receptor: new targets of an old hormone

Prolactin (PRL) is one of a family of related hormones including growth hormone (GH) and placental lactogen (PL) that are hypothesized to have arisen from a common ancestral gene about 500 million years ago. Over 300 different functions of PRL have been reported, highlighting the importance of this pituitary hormone. PRL is also synthesized by a number of extra-pituitary tissues including the mammary gland and the uterus. Most of PRL's actions are mediated by the unmodified 23 kDa peptide, however, PRL may be modified post-translation, thereby altering its biological effects. PRL exerts these effects by binding to its receptor, a member of the class I cytokine receptor super-family. This activates a number of signaling pathways resulting in the transcription of genes necessary for the tissue specific changes induced by PRL. Mouse knockout models of the major forms of the PRL receptor have confirmed the importance of PRLs role in reproduction. Further knockout models have provided insight into the importance of PRL signaling intermediates and the advent of transcript profiling has allowed the elucidation of a number of PRL target genes.

Inhibition of prolactin (PRL)-induced proliferative signals in breast cancer cells by a molecular mimic of phosphorylated PRL, S179D-PRL

Posttranslational modifications of prolactin (PRL), including phosphorylation, vary with physiologic state and alter biologic activity. In light of the growing evidence for a role for PRL in proliferation in mammary cancer, we examined the ability of a mimic of phosphorylated human PRL, S179D-PRL, to initiate signals to several pathways in mammary tumor cells alone and in combination with unmodified PRL. Unmodified PRL employed multiple pathways to increase cellular proliferation and cyclin D1 levels in PRL-deficient MCF-7 cells. S179D-PRL was a weak agonist compared with unmodified PRL with regard to cellular proliferation, cyclin D1 levels, and phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and ERKs. However, S179D-PRL was a potent antagonist of unmodified PRL to these endpoints. In contrast to the reduced levels of the long isoform of the PRL receptor observed in response to a 3-d incubation with unmodified PRL, S179D-PRL up-regulated expression of this isoform, 4-fold. These studies support the utility of this mutant as a PRL antagonist to proliferative signals in mammary epithelial cells, including a potential role in breast cancer therapeutics.

Development of pure prolactin receptor antagonists

Prolactin (PRL) promotes tumor growth in various experimental models and leads to prostate hyperplasia and mammary neoplasia in PRL transgenic mice. Increasing experimental evidence argues for the involvement of autocrine PRL in this process. PRL receptor antagonists have been developed to counteract these undesired proliferative actions of PRL. However, all forms of PRL receptor antagonists obtained to date exhibit partial agonism, preventing their therapeutic use as full antagonists. In the present study, we describe the development of new human PRL antagonists devoid of agonistic properties and therefore able to act as pure antagonists. This was demonstrated using several in vitro bioassays, including highly sensitive assays able to detect extremely low levels of receptor activation. These new compounds also act as pure antagonists in vivo, as assessed by analyzing their ability to competitively inhibit PRL-triggered signaling cascades in various target tissues (liver, mammary gland, and prostate). Finally, by using transgenic mice expressing PRL specifically in the prostate, which exhibit constitutively activated signaling cascades paralleling hyperplasia, we show that these new PRL analogs are able to completely revert PRL-activated events. These second generation human PRL antagonists are good candidates to be used as inhibitors of growth-promoting actions of PRL.

Development of new prolactin analogs acting as pure prolactin receptor antagonists

Prolactin (PRL) promotes tumor growth, as recently highlighted by the spontaneous appearance of prostate hyperplasia and mammary neoplasia in PRL transgenic mice. Increasing experimental evidence argues for the involvement of autocrine PRL in this process. Human (h)PRL receptor antagonists have been developed to counteract these undesired proliferative actions of PRL. However, all PRL receptor antagonists obtained to date exhibit partial agonism, limiting their therapeutic use as full antagonists. This is the case for the first generation antagonists (the prototype of which is G129R-hPRL) that we developed ten years ago, which display antagonistic activity in some, but not all in vitro bioassays, and fail to inhibit PRL activity in transgenic mice expressing this analog. We recently developed new human PRL antagonists devoid of agonistic properties, and therefore able to act as pure antagonists. This was demonstrated using several in vitro bioassays, including assays able to detect extremely low levels of receptor activation. These new compounds also act as pure antagonists in vivo, as demonstrated by their ability to competitively inhibit PRL-triggered signaling cascades in various target tissues (liver, mammary gland and prostate). Finally, using transgenic mice specifically expressing PRL in the prostate, which have constitutively activated signaling cascades and prostate hyperplasia, these new PRL analogs are able to completely revert PRL-activated events to basal levels. These second generation antagonists are good candidates to be used as inhibitors of the growth-promoting actions of hPRL.

The role of prolactin in mammary carcinoma

The contribution of prolactin (PRL) to the pathogenesis and progression of human breast cancer at the cellular, transgenic, and epidemiological levels is increasingly appreciated. Acting at the endocrine and autocrine/paracrine levels, PRL functions to stimulate the growth and motility of human breast cancer cells. The actions of this ligand are mediated by at least six recognized PRL receptor isoforms found on, or secreted by, human breast epithelium. The PRL/PRL receptor complex associates with and activates several signaling networks that are shared with other members of the cytokine receptor superfamily. Coupled with the recently identified intranuclear function of PRL, these networks are integrated into the in vitro and in vivo actions induced by ligand. These findings indicate that antagonists of PRL/PRL receptor interaction or PRL receptor-associated signal transduction may be of considerable utility in the treatment of human breast cancer.

Opposite effects of unmodified prolactin and a molecular mimic of phosphorylated prolactin on morphology and the expression of prostate specific genes in the normal rat prostate

BACKGROUND

In the current study, we have investigated the individual roles of unmodified, wild-type prolactin (WT PRL) and a molecular mimic of phosphorylated prolactin (S179D PRL) in the normal rat prostate.

METHODS

In the first animal experiment, recombinant WT PRL and S179D PRL were delivered to adult male rats at a rate of 14 microg/kg per day for 3 weeks. In the second animal experiment, two subcutaneous (200 microg/kg) injections of long-acting forms of the two PRLs were given to adult male rats on day 1 and day 22 for a total of 5.5 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

The different forms of PRL had opposite effects on the normal rat prostate, independently of androgens. WT PRL promoted morphologic changes in prostate epithelium consistent with preparation for cell proliferation, whereas S179D PRL produced morphologic evidence of a more differentiated epithelium. Northern blot analysis of expression of the two major prostate specific proteins, prostatein and probasin, showed that WT PRL decreased, whereas S179D PRL increased, the expression of the mRNAs for these two proteins. At the same time, S179D PRL reduced both testosterone and dihydrotestosterone levels.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that PRL is an important modulator of normal rat prostate biology and that different forms of PRL have specific functions. The molecular mimic of phosphorylated PRL, S179D PRL, is the most important in terms of epithelial cell differentiation.

Prolactin regulation of neonatal ovine uterine gland morphogenesis

Uterine gland development or adenogenesis in the neonatal ovine uterus involves budding, proliferation, and branching morphogenesis of the glandular epithelium (GE) from the luminal epithelium (LE) between birth (postnatal day or PND 0) and PND 56. This critical developmental event is coincident with increases in serum PRL and expression of long and short PRL receptors specifically in the nascent and proliferating GE. In study one, ewes were treated with a placebo pellet as a control (CX) or a bromocryptine mesylate pellet from PNDs 0-56. On PND 56, the endometrium of bromocryptine mesylate ewes contained fewer glands, particularly in the stratum spongiosum that contained numerous coiled and branched glands in CX uteri. In study two, ewes were treated with saline as a CX or recombinant ovine PRL from PNDs 0-56. Treatment with PRL increased gland number and density on PND 14 and PND 56. In study three, expression of signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) 1, 3, and 5 proteins was detected in the developing glands from PNDs 7-56. In study four, Western blot analyses indicated that PRL increased levels of phosphorylated STATs 1 and 5, but not STAT 3, and phosphorylated ERK 1 and 2 MAPKs and c-Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase proteins in explanted PND 28 ovine uteri. Collectively, results indicate that PRL regulates endometrial adenogenesis in the neonatal ovine uterus.