The Role of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor and Mineralocorticoid Receptor-Directed Therapies in Heart Failure

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current understanding and future prospects

The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), part of the steroid hormone receptor subfamily within nuclear hormone receptors, is found in the kidney and various non-epithelial tissues, including the heart and blood vessels. When improperly activated, it can contribute to heart failure processes such as cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, stiffening of arteries, inflammation, and oxidative stress. MR antagonists (MRAs) have shown clear clinical benefits in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, in cases of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), there is considerable diversity due to its complex underlying mechanisms, resulting in conflicting findings regarding the effectiveness of MRAs in relevant studies. The concept of phenomapping presents an encouraging avenue for investigating different intervention targets and novel therapies for HFpEF. Post hoc analysis of the TOPCAT trial identified certain HFpEF phenotypes that responded favorably to spironolactone. Growing clinical and preclinical evidence suggests that non-steroidal MRAs, which exhibit greater receptor selectivity, stronger anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory properties, and fewer hormone-related side effects, may emerge as another promising treatment option for HFpEF alongside sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. This review aims to outline the structural and functional characteristics of MR, discuss the physiological effects of its activation and inhibition, and delve into the potential for personalized MRA therapy based on the concept of HFpEF phenotype.

Safety and efficacy of bilateral superselective adrenal arterial embolization for treatment of idiopathic hyperaldosteronism: a prospective single-center study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bilateral superselective adrenal arterial embolization (SAAE) in patients with bilateral idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA), a subtype of PA.

METHODS

Ninety-eight patients with bilateral IHA underwent bilateral SAAE between August 2022 and August 2023. Sixty-eight patients were followed up for up to 12 months. The study outcomes were evaluated using the criteria provided by the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) guidelines.

RESULTS

The mean reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 27.4 ± 21.3 mmHg and 23.1 ± 17.4 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.001). The rates of clinical success and biochemical success after adrenal artery ablation were 63.2% (43/68) and 39.7% (27/68), respectively. Overall, there were significant reductions in daily defined doses (DDD), aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR), and plasma aldosterone levels (p < 0.001). Plasma renin levels increased by a mean value of 10.4 ± 39.0 pg/mL (p = 0.049), and potassium levels increased by 0.40 ± 0.63 mmol/L (p < 0.001). No significant adverse events were reported during SAAE or the follow-up period of up to one year. Additionally, no abnormalities were detected by adrenal 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT scans before or after SAAE.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral SAAE appears to lead to sustained improvements in blood pressure and biochemical parameters in patients with bilateral PA, with minimal adverse effects. This suggests that bilateral SAAE could serve as an effective alternative approach for treating bilateral IHA, potentially curing this condition.

Myocardial fibrosis and prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of 12 cohort studies

OBJECTIVES

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a syndrome with significant clinical heterogeneity. Myocardial fibrosis has been considered a common pathological process in the development and progress of HFpEF. This study aimed to consolidate data on the prognostic effect of myocardial fibrosis, evaluated by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with HFpEF.

METHODS

Three medical databases were searched for potentially related articles up to February 28, 2023. Cohort studies reporting associations between myocardial fibrosis and risk of all-cause mortality or composite major adverse cardiac outcomes (MACE) were included. Cardiac fibrosis was evaluated by CMR metrics, including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) or myocardial extracellular volume (ECV). The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the outcomes for higher myocardial fibrosis were calculated.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 2787 patients with HFpEF were included for analysis. After a median follow-up duration of 31.2 months, a higher level of cardiac fibrosis was associated with a significant increase in the risk of MACE (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.14-1.57) and all-cause mortality (HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.27-2.39), respectively. Furthermore, the increased risk of outcomes was both observed when cardiac fibrosis was defined according to LGE or ECV, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher burden of myocardial fibrosis evaluated by CMR can predict a poor prognosis in patients with HFpEF. Evaluation of LGE or ECV based on CMR could be recommended in these patients for risk stratification and guiding further treatment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Inclusion of cardiovascular magnetic resonance examination in the diagnostic and risk-evaluation algorithms in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction should be considered in clinical practice and future studies.

KEY POINTS

• Myocardial fibrosis is a common pathological process in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. • A higher myocardial fibrosis burden on cardiac magnetic resonance predicts a poor prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. • Evaluation of myocardial fibrosis may be useful in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction for risk stratification and treatment guidance.

Potential Impact of Non-Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Cardiovascular Disease

Inappropriate mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation in different cardiovascular cell types has deleterious effects on cardiac remodeling and function. Therefore, MR inhibition is a crucial pharmacological strategy to overcome cardiovascular dysfunction. Despite efficient blockade of MR with steroidal MR antagonists (MRAs), their clinical application is unsatisfactory due to the adverse effects. Newer non-steroidal MRAs with greater potency could be suitable for clinical application, especially in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Although clinical evidence has shown the beneficial effects of non-steroidal MRAs on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Therefore, comparative pharmacological characterization of non-steroidal MRAs over classic steroidal MRAs is crucial. Here, we summarize the pre-clinical evidence of non-steroidal MRAs, which suggests an improvement in cardiac dysfunction, as well as the underlying molecular mechanisms in animal models mimicking different clinical conditions. In addition, we discuss up-to-date information from clinical trials regarding the beneficial effects of non-steroidal MRAs on meaningful cardiovascular outcomes. Both pre-clinical and clinical evidence support treatment with non-steroidal MRAs in patients with cardiovascular disease.

An overview of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists as a treatment option for patients with heart failure: the current state-of-the-art and future outlook

INTRODUCTION

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure. These benefits of MRAs vary in different heart failure populations based on left ventricular ejection fraction and associated comorbidities.

AREAS COVERED

We define the pharmacologic properties of MRAs and the pathophysiological rationale for their utility in heart failure. We outline the current literature on the use of MRAs in different heart failure populations, including reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF/ HFpEF), and acute heart failure decompensation. Finally, we describe the limitations of currently available data and propose future directions of study.

EXPERT OPINION

While there is strong evidence supporting the use of MRAs in HFrEF, evidence in patients with HFpEF or acute heart failure is less definitive. Comorbidities such as obesity or atrial fibrillation could be clinical modifiers of the response to MRAs and potentially alter the risk/benefit ratio in these subpopulations. Emerging evidence for new non-steroidal MRAs reveal promising preliminary results that, if confirmed in large randomized clinical trials, could favor a change in clinical practice.

Association of Antihypertensive Effects of Esaxerenone with the Internal Sodium Balance in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Hypertensive Rats

Background: The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker esaxerenone is effective in reducing blood pressure (BP). Objective: In this study, we investigated esaxerenone-driven sodium homeostasis and its association with changes in BP in Dahl salt-sensitive (DSS) hypertensive rats. Methods: In the different experimental setups, we evaluated BP by a radiotelemetry system, and sodium homeostasis was determined by an approach of sodium intake (food intake) and excretion (urinary excretion) in DSS rats with a low-salt diet (0.3% NaCl), high-salt diet (HSD, 8% NaCl), HSD plus 0.001% esaxerenone (w/w), and HSD plus 0.05% furosemide. Results: HSD-fed DSS rats showed a dramatic increase in BP with a non-dipper pattern, while esaxerenone treatment, but not furosemide, significantly reduced BP with a dipper pattern. The cumulative sodium excretion in the active period was significantly elevated in esaxerenone- and furosemide-treated rats compared with their HSD-fed counterparts. Sodium content in the skin, skinned carcass, and total body tended to be lower in esaxerenone-treated rats than in their HSD-fed counterparts, while these values were unchanged in furosemide-treated rats. Consistently, sodium balance tended to be reduced in esaxerenone-treated rats during the active period. Histological evaluation showed that esaxerenone, but not furosemide, treatment attenuated glomerulosclerosis, tubulointerstitial fibrosis, and urinary protein excretion induced by high salt loading. Conclusions: Collectively, these findings suggest that an esaxerenone treatment-induced reduction in BP and renoprotection are associated with body sodium homeostasis in salt-loaded DSS rats.

Genetic Profiling of Glucocorticoid (NR3C1) and Mineralocorticoid (NR3C2) Receptor Polymorphisms before Starting Therapy with Androgen Receptor Inhibitors: A Study of a Patient Who Developed Toxic Myocarditis after Enzalutamide Treatment

Enzalutamide is a nonsteroidal inhibitor of the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway and is used to treat patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, the risk of cardiovascular-related hospitalization in patients with no contraindications for the use of enzalutamide is about 1–2%. To date, the underlying molecular basis of this has not been established. The androgen receptor, glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) are nuclear receptors that share structural similarities and have closely related DNA-binding sites and coregulators. In non-epithelial cells, a fine balance of the activities of these receptors is essential to ensure correct cellular function. In this study, we present a molecular characterization of these nuclear receptors in a prostate cancer patient who developed congestive heart failure after enzalutamide treatment. White cell RNAseq revealed a homozygous rs5522 MR polymorphism and both the rs143711342 and rs56149945 GR polymorphisms, carried in different alleles. No different specific splice isoforms were detected. Recent research suggests that AR inhibition by enzalutamide makes available a coregulator that specifically interacts with the rs5522-mutated MR, increasing its activity and producing adverse effects on cardiovascular health. We suggest an evaluation of the MR rs5522 polymorphism before starting therapy with AR inhibitors.

Mineralocorticoid receptor actions in cardiovascular development and disease

Mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) are transcriptional regulators that mediate the diverse physiological and pathophysiological actions of corticosteroid hormones across many tissues. In the kidney aldosterone control of sodium/water resorption via DNA-binding actions of the MR is established. MRs also regulate tissues not involved in electrolyte homeostasis such as the heart, adipose tissue, brain, and inflammatory cells where the MRs can respond to both aldosterone and cortisol. The pathology of inappropriate MR activation in non-epithelial tissues are well-described, and steroidal antagonists of the MR have been clinically beneficial in the management of heart failure and blood pressure for decades. However, the role of cortisol-dependent MR activation in the physiological setting is less well defined. Like other steroid hormone receptors, the MR also regulates non-DNA-binding pathways including MAPK pathways and G protein coupled receptors to provide diversity to MR signaling. Whether nonDNA binding pathways are more relevant for MR activation in non-epithelial, versus epithelial, tissues remain unclear. This review will focus on molecular regulation of ligand-dependent MR activation and the physiology and pathophysiology of MR actions in the heart with a focus on the cardiomyocyte and provide a discussion of relevant genomic and non-genomic MR pathways and potential new transcriptional partners for the MR and their relevance for health and disease. Understanding MR actions in the heart will provide new insights into cell-selective mechanisms that underpin the therapeutic benefits of MRAs, and are a critical step towards developing next-generation tissue selective MR modulators with improved safety profiles.