Stereotactic radiosurgery XVI: a treatment for previously irradiated pituitary adenomas

Case Report: Radioactive Holmium-166 Microspheres for the Intratumoral Treatment of a Canine Pituitary Tumor

Introduction: In this case study, a client-owned dog with a large pituitary tumor was experimentally treated by intratumoral injection of radioactive holmium-166 microspheres (166HoMS), named 166Ho microbrachytherapy. To our knowledge, this is the first intracranial intratumoral treatment through needle injection of radioactive microspheres. Materials and Methods: A 10-year-old Jack Russell Terrier was referred to the Clinic for Companion Animal Health (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands) with behavioral changes, restlessness, stiff gait, and compulsive circling. MRI and CT showed a pituitary tumor with basisphenoid bone invasion and marked mass effect. The tumor measured 8.8 cm3 with a pituitary height-to-brain area (P/B) ratio of 1.86 cm-1 [pituitary height (cm) ×10/brain area (cm2)]. To reduce tumor volume and neurological signs, 166HoMS were administered in the tumor center by transsphenoidal CT-guided needle injections. Results: Two manual CT-guided injections were performed containing 0.6 ml of 166HoMS suspension in total. A total of 1097 MBq was delivered, resulting in a calculated average tumor dose of 1866 Gy. At 138 days after treatment, the tumor volume measured 5.3 cm3 with a P/B ratio of 1.41 cm-1, revealing a total tumor volume reduction of 40%. Debulking surgery was performed five months after 166HoMS treatment due to recurrent neurological signs. The patient was euthanized two weeks later at request of the owners. Histopathological analysis indicated a pituitary adenoma at time of treatment, with more malignant characteristics during debulking surgery. Conclusion: The 40% tumor volume reduction without evident severe periprocedural side effects demonstrated the feasibility of intracranial intratumoral 166HoMS treatment in this single dog.

[Use of chemotherapy in the treatment of aggresive pituitary adenomas]

AIM

To clarify the concept of 'aggressive pituitary adenoma' using analysis of the current concepts, as well as to determine the optimal treatment algorithm for this disease and the place of chemotherapy in this treatment. Pituitary adenomas comprise from 10 to 15% of intracranial neoplasms. Despite the fact that pituitary adenomas are benign neoplasms, in 25-55% of cases they demonstrate invasive growth, growing into the surrounding structures (sphenoid sinus, cavernous sinus, etc.). Due to the lack of a standard definition of aggressive pituitary adenomas (due to the lack of clear criteria for this disease), there are no studies in the literature reporting optimal treatment for this group of patients, except for several publications describing the use of Temozolomide as palliative therapy.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Residual and Recurrent Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas: A Contemporary Case Series of GammaKnife and CyberKnife Radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

In patients with residual or recurrent nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) after transsphenoidal resection, both GammaKnife (GKRS) and CyberKnife (CKRS) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are viable treatment options.

OBJECTIVES

We report a retrospective single center series comparing assessing the effectiveness and complications from of these 2 commonly used SRS techniques.

METHODS

A total of 53 patients with prior surgical resection and residual or recurrent NFPAs who underwent GKRS or CKRS and minimum 3-month follow-up between January 2002 and February 2017 at a single center were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients underwent GKRS and 19 received CKRS. CKRS patients had a larger maximal tumor diameter (P = 0.005) and tumor volume treated (P = 0.001). Differences between GKRS and CKRS treatment parameters included target volume, target volume treated, prescribed dose, maximum dose, prescription isodose line, and conformity index (P < 0.05). The mean follow-up time was 53.74 months for GKRS and 41.48 months for CKRS patients. Tumor progression developed in 6% of cases after GKRS versus 5% after CKRS. The mean progression-free survival was 48.44 months after GKRS and 38.57 months after CKRS (P = 0.61). Five-year actuarial tumor control rates were 91% after GKRS versus 89% after CKRS (P > 0.99). There were no differences in worsened vision or rates of hypopituitarism.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing single fraction GKRS versus fractionated CKRS for NFPAs, both modalities had similar rates of tumor control, new hypopituitarism, and visual morbidity despite varying indications. This study validates the versatile use of these 2 SRS modalities for patients meeting their relative criteria, especially based on proximity to the optic apparatus and normal pituitary gland.

Multimodal therapy in aggressive pituitary tumors

The concept of aggressive pituitary tumor (APT) has been precisely defined in recent years. These tumors are characterized by morphological (radiological or histopathological) data of invasion, proliferative activity superior to that of typical adenomas and a clinical behavior characterized by resistance to standard therapies and frequent recurrences. The absence of cerebrospinal or distant metastases differentiates them from the pituitary carcinoma. APTs account for about 10% of all pituitary neoplasm. Proper diagnostic implies participation not only of radiological and hormonal investigation but also a thorough pathological assessment including proliferation markers and immunohistochemistry for hormones and transcription factors. Surgical resection, aiming gross total resection or tumor debulking, is the mainstay initial therapy in most patients. Most patients with APTs need more than one surgical intervention, pituitary radiation, sometimes on more than one occasion, and multiple sequential or combined medical treatments, to finally be doomed to unusual treatments, such as alkylating agents (temozolomide alone or in combination), molecular targeted therapies, or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Multimodal therapy, implemented by experts, preferably in specialized centers with high volume caseload, is the only way to improve the prognosis of patients with these uncommon tumors. The research needs in this area are multiple and include a greater knowledge of the molecular biology of these tumors, establishment of protocols for monitoring and sequencing of treatments, development of multicenter studies and international registries.

RADIOTHERAPY VERSUS RADIOSURGERY IN TREATING PATIENTS WITH ACROMEGALY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

OBJECTIVE

When patients with acromegaly have residual disease following surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy is considered. Both stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (RT) are utilized. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the existing evidence and compare outcomes for SRS and RT in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

We searched Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus through April 2014 for studies in which SRS or RT were used in patients with acromegaly. Outcomes evaluated were serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and growth hormone (GH) levels, biochemical remission, all-cause mortality, hypopituitarism, headaches, and secondary malignancies. We pooled outcomes using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The final search yielded 30 eligible studies assessing 2,464 patients. Compared to RT, SRS was associated with a nonsignificant increase in remission rate at the latest follow-up period (52% vs. 36%; P = .14) and a significantly lower follow-up IGF-I level (-409.72 μg/L vs. -102 μg/L, P = .002). SRS had a lower incidence of hypopituitarism than RT; however, the difference was not statistically significant (32% vs. 51%, respectively; P = .05).

CONCLUSION

SRS may be associated with better biochemical remission, and it had a lower risk of hypopituitarism with at least 1 deficient axis when compared with RT; however, the confidence in such evidence is very low due to the noncomparative nature of the studies, high heterogeneity, and imprecision.

Stereotactic radiosurgery XX: ocular neuromyotonia in association with gamma knife radiosurgery

We report three patients who developed symptoms and signs of ocular neuromyotonia (ONM) 3–6 months after receiving gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for functioning pituitary tumours. All three patients were complex, requiring multi-modality therapy and all had received prior external irradiation to the sellar region. Although direct causality cannot be attributed, the timing of the development of the symptoms would suggest that the GKS played a contributory role in the development of this rare problem, which we suggest clinicians should be aware of as a potential complication.

Radiotherapy vs. Radiosurgery in Treating Patients with Acromegaly: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

When patients with acromegaly have residual disease following surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy is considered. Both stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (RT) are utilized. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the existing evidence to compare outcomes with SRS and RT in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

We searched Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus through April 2014 for studies in which SRS or RT were used in patients with acromegaly. Outcomes evaluated were serum IGF-1 and GH levels, biochemical remission, all-cause mortality, hypopituitarism, headaches and secondary malignancies. We pooled outcomes using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

The final search yielded 30 eligible studies enrolling 2464 patients. When compared to RT, SRS was associated with a non-significant increase in remission rate at the latest follow-up period (52% vs. 36%; p = 0.14), and a significantly lower follow-up IGF-1 level (decline of - 409.72 μg/1 vs. -102 μg/1; p = 0.002). SRS was associated with lower incidence of hypopituitarism than RT; however the difference was not statistically significant [(32% vs.51%, respectively; p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

SRS may be associated with better biochemical remission and lower risk of hypopituitarism with at least one deficient axis when compared with RT; however, the confidence in such evidence is very low due to the non-comparative nature of the studies, high heterogeneity, and imprecision.

Treatment of acromegaly patients with risk-adapted single or fractionated stereotactic high-precision radiotherapy: High local control and low toxicity in a pooled series

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work was to evaluate a prospectively initiated two-center protocol of risk-adapted stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with acromegaly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total 35 patients (16 men/19 women, mean age 54 years) were prospectively included in a treatment protocol of SRS [planning target volume (PTV < 4 ccm, > 2 mm to optic pathways = low risk] or SRT (PTV ≥ 4 ccm, ≤ 2 mm to optic pathways = high risk). The mean tumor volume was 3.71 ccm (range: 0.11-22.10 ccm). Based on the protocol guidelines, 21 patients were treated with SRS and 12 patients with SRT, 2 patients received both consecutively.

RESULTS

The median follow-up (FU) reached 8 years with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 87.3% [confidence interval (CI): 70.8-95.6%] and 5-year local control rate of 97.1% (CI: 83.4-99.8%). Almost 80% (28/35) presented tumor shrinkage during FU. Endocrinological cure was achieved in 23% and IGF-1 normalization with reduced medication was achieved in 40% of all patients. An endocrinological response was generally achieved within the first 3 years, but endocrinological cure can require more than 8 years. A new adrenocorticotropic hypopituitarism occurred in 13 patients (46.4%). A new visual field disorder and a new oculomotor palsy occurred in 1 patient, respectively. Patients with occurrence of visual/neurological impairments had a longer FU (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Our SRS/SRT protocol proved to be safe and successful in terms of tumor control and protection of the visual system. The timing and rate of endocrine improvements are difficult to predict. One has to accept an unavoidable rate of additional adrenocorticotropic hypopituitarism in the long term.

Treatment of pituitary carcinomas and atypical pituitary adenomas: a review

Atypical pituitary adenomas (APAs) are aggressive tumors, harboring a Ki-67 (MIB-1) staining index of 3% or more, and positive immunohistochemical staining for p53 protein, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification in 2004. Pituitary carcinomas (PC) usually develop from progressive APAs and predominantly consist of hormone-generating tumors, defined by the presence of disseminations in the cerebrospinal system or systemic metastases. Most of the cases with these malignant pituitary adenomas underwent surgeries, irradiations and adjuvant medical treatments, nevertheless, the therapies are mainly palliative. Recently, the efficacy of temozolomide (TMZ), an orally administered alkylating agent, has been reported as an alternative medical treatment. However, some recent studies have demonstrated a significant recurrence rate after effective response to TMZ. Further clinical and pathological researches of malignant pituitary adenomas will be required to improve the outcome of patients with these tumors.

Characteristics of acromegaly in Korea with a literature review

Acromegaly is a slowly progressive disease caused by excessive growth hormone (GH), which is related to a GH secreting pituitary tumor in most cases. Herein, we describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment of acromegaly in Korea with a literature review. The average annual incidence of acromegaly in Korea was 3.9 cases per million people, which was within the range of previous Western studies. The primary treatment for acromegaly was also transsphenoidal adenomectomy, which accounted for 90.4% of patients whose primary therapeutic options were known. The overall surgical remission rates were 89%, 87%, 64%, 70%, and 50% for modified Hardy classification I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV, respectively. An updated and larger study regarding the treatment outcome of medical/radiotherapy in Korean acromegalic patients is needed.

Acromegaly: a single centre's experience of stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy for growth hormone secreting pituitary tumours with the linear accelerator

Primary treatment for growth-hormone secreting pituitary adenomas usually involves surgery, with treatment options for recurrent and persistent disease including repeat surgery, medication and radiation therapy. The majority of previously published series for radiation therapy in acromegaly in the past 20 years have been based on Gamma-Knife (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) surgery. To our knowledge, we present the largest series of linear accelerator-based treatment for this disease, with a review of 121 patients treated at our institution; since 1990, 86 patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 10 patients underwent fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and for the purposes of comparison we also reviewed 25 patients who underwent conventional radiotherapy prior to 1990. Tumour volume control in all three groups was excellent and consistent with previously reported literature - only three of 86 (4%) patients undergoing SRS had a documented increase in tumour size, and none of the patients undergoing FSRT had a documented increase in size following a median follow-up of 5.5 and 5.1 years for SRS and FSRT, respectively. Target growth hormone levels of <2.5 ng/mL were met by 12 of 86 (14%) of the SRS group, and by two of 10 (20%) in the FSRT group. Target insulin-like growth factor-1 levels of age and sex matched controls were achieved in 16 of 86 patients (18.6%) post-SRS and five of 10 patients (50%) post-FSRT. New hormonal deficits requiring replacement therapy were identified in 17 of 86 (19.8%) patients post-SRS which is consistent with previously published radiosurgical series. Identified non-hormonal morbidity was low (<5%).

Treatment of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: what were the contributions of the last 10 years? A critical view

OBJECTIVES

All evidence for treatment and follow-up for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFMA) is based on observational studies. The objective was to critically review the contributions of the last 10 years on treatment of NFMA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic review.

RESULTS

Transsphenoidal surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment of NFMA. When compared to the microsurgical procedure, some, but not all, studies favor endoscopy, but endocrinological outcome is not different. Radiosurgery results in a high and durable rate of tumor control, including in those previously treated by conventional radiotherapy, but the risk of developing hypopituitarism is comparable to the risk after conventional radiotherapy. In selected patients without visual field defects, a wait-and-see approach with frequent evaluation of visual fields is possible, without the risk of irreversibly compromising visual function. Tumor progression in NFMA is difficult to predict, but the MIB-1 LI is clinically useful and is indicative of invasiveness, but does not predict recurrence. To date, the potential contribution of other proliferation markers still requires further validation, and effective medical treatment strategies are not available. New features are the role of temozolomide and rapamicin as potential therapeutical targets, combined with octreotide. Although chimeric sst-DA analogues effectively inhibit proliferation in vitro, the effects of these molecules have not yet been evaluated in clinical trials with patients with NFMA.

CONCLUSION

Surgery, followed by radiotherapy or radiosurgery in case of remnant or recurrence, remains the cornerstone of treatment of NFMA. Currently, medical treatment cannot yet be incorporated in routine clinical practice.

Comprehensive review of stereotactic radiosurgery for medically and surgically refractory pituitary adenomas

Despite advances in surgical techniques and medical therapies, a significant proportion of pituitary adenomas remain endocrinologically active, demonstrate persistent radiographic disease, or recur when followed for long periods of time. While surgical intervention remains the first-line therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery is increasingly recognized as a viable treatment option for these often challenging tumors. In this review, we comprehensively review the literature to evaluate both endocrinologic and radiographic outcomes of radiosurgical management of pituitary adenomas. The literature clearly supports the use of radiosurgery, with endocrinologic remission rates and time to remission varying by tumor type [prolactinoma: 20–30%, growth hormone secreting adenomas: ~50%, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)-secreting adenomas: 40–65%] and radiographic control rates almost universally greater than 90% with long-term follow-up. We stratify the outcomes by tumor type, review the importance of prognostic factors (particularly, pre-treatment endocrinologic function and tumor size), and discuss the complications of treatment (with special attention to endocrinopathy and visual complications). We conclude that the literature supports the use of radiosurgery for treatment-refractory pituitary adenomas, providing the patient with a minimally invasive, safe, and effective treatment option for an otherwise resistant tumor. As such, we provide literature-based treatment considerations, including radiosurgical dose, endocrinologic, radiographic, and medical considerations for each adenoma type.

Stereotactic Irradiation of GH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas

Radiotherapy (RT) is often employed in patients with acromegaly refractory to medical and/or surgical interventions in order to prevent tumour regrowth and normalize elevated GH and IGF-I levels. It achieves tumour control and hormone normalization up to 90% and 70% of patients at 10-15 years. Despite the excellent tumour control, conventional RT is associated with a potential risk of developing late toxicity, especially hypopituitarism, and its role in the management of patients with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas remains a matter of debate. Stereotactic techniques have been developed with the aim to deliver more localized irradiation and minimize the long-term consequences of treatment, while improving its efficacy. Stereotactic irradiation can be given in a single dose as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or in multiple doses as fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). We have reviewed the recent published literature on stereotactic techniques for GH-secreting pituitary tumors with the aim to define the efficacy and potential adverse effects of each of these techniques.

Clinical review: Pituitary carcinoma: difficult diagnosis and treatment

CONTEXT

Although pituitary tumors are common, pituitary carcinoma is very rare and is only diagnosed when pituitary tumor noncontiguous with the sellar region is demonstrated. Diagnosis is difficult, resulting in delays that may adversely effect outcome that is traditionally poor. Barriers to earlier diagnosis and management strategies for pituitary carcinoma are discussed.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed was employed to identify relevant studies, a review of the literature was conducted, and data were summarized and integrated from the author's perspective.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The available data highlight the difficulties in diagnosis and management and practical challenges in conducting clinical trials in this rare condition. They suggest that earlier diagnosis with aggressive multimodal therapy may be advantageous in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although pituitary carcinoma remains difficult to diagnose and treat, recent developments have led to improved outcomes in selected cases. With broader use of molecular markers, efforts to modify current histopathological criteria for pituitary carcinoma diagnosis may now be possible. This would assist earlier diagnosis and, in combination with targeted therapies, potentially improve long-term survival.

Therapy of aggressive pituitary tumors

INTRODUCTION

Aggressive tumors of the pituitary gland are classically defined as pituitary tumors with a massive invasion of the surrounding anatomical structures and rapid growth. They are notoriously difficult to manage and are associated with poor prognosis because the therapeutic options are limited and the tumors are generally unresponsive to therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on treatment options for aggressive pituitary tumors, including surgery, radiotherapy and medical treatment, as well as focusing on the promising therapeutic options for aggressive pituitary tumors, evaluating the literature of the last 15 years. With the exception of prolactinomas, surgery is the first-line option, but most aggressive pituitary tumors often require repeated surgery. Pharmacotherapies are useful when surgery is unlikely to improve symptoms, or as an adjunct therapy to surgery. In prolactinomas, dopamine agonists are the first-line treatment and normalize prolactin levels in most patients, even those with macroprolactinomas. Somatostatin analogs are effective agents for primary therapy, pre-operatively or post-operatively to control tumor re-expansion of pituitary adenomas. However, dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogs are not as effective as they are for the treatment of non-aggressive adenomas. When surgery and pharmacotherapy fail, radiotherapy is a useful third-line strategy. Conventional chemotherapy is poorly effective but recent case reports with the temozolomide, an alkylating agent, have provided better results in the short term.

EXPERT OPINION

Aggressive pituitary tumors are associated with poor prognosis as therapeutic options are limited. Moreover, they tend to recur quickly after initial treatment, are generally unresponsive to therapy, and are difficult to manage. To improve the overall response rate, the early application of current therapeutic approaches with the incorporation of new therapeutic developments is mandatory.

A systematic analysis of disease control in acromegaly treated with radiosurgery

Object

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an adjuvant radiation-based therapy for pituitary adenomas. Here, the authors present a systematic analysis of SRS for growth hormone–secreting adenomas to characterize the efficacy of SRS in the treatment of acromegaly.

Methods

A comprehensive search of the English language literature revealed 970 patients with new, recurrent, or persistent acromegaly that had been treated using SRS along with assessable and quantifiable outcome data. Articles published between June 1998 and September 2009 were included in the analysis. Patient outcome data were aggregated and investigated based on tumor size, radiosurgery dose, and clinical outcomes both with and without medication.

Results

The overall disease control rate without medication was 48%–53%, and the overall disease control rate with or without medication was 73%. The overall mean duration of the reported follow-up was 48.5 ± 25.8 months. The mean overall tumor volume in this analysis was 2.11 ± 1.16 cm3. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient for tumor volume and cure rate was not significant (r = 0.0668, p = 0.8546).

Conclusions

Data from this analysis suggest that tumor size may not be a significant prognostic factor in disease control after radiosurgery for acromegaly. The overall disease control rate was approximately 48% without suppressive medications after radiosurgery for acromegaly. With the advancement of increasingly sophisticated stereotactic planning and tumor targeting, the precision of radiosurgery may continue to improve in the treatment of acromegaly.

The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the multimodal management of growth hormone–secreting pituitary adenomas

Growth hormone (GH)–secreting pituitary adenomas represent a common source of GH excess in patients with acromegaly. Whereas surgical extirpation of the culprit lesion is considered first-line treatment, as many as 19% of patients develop recurrent symptoms due to regrowth of previously resected adenomatous tissue or to continued growth of the surgically inaccessible tumor. Although medical therapies that suppress GH production can be effective in the management of primary and recurrent acromegaly, these therapies are not curative, and lifelong treatment is required for hormonal control. Stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged as an effective adjunctive treatment modality, and is an appealing alternative to conventional fractionated radiation therapy. The authors reviewed the growing body of literature concerning the role of radiosurgical procedures in the treatment armamentarium of acromegaly, and identified more than 1350 patients across 45 case series. In this review, the authors report that radiosurgery offers true hormonal normalization in 17% to 82% of patients and tumor growth control in 37% to 100% of cases across all series, while minimizing adverse complications. As a result, stereotactic radiosurgery represents a safe and effective treatment option in the multimodal management of primary or recurrent acromegaly secondary to GH-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Focal radiation therapy for patients with persistent/recurrent pituitary adenoma, despite previous radiotherapy

With the stricter endocrine definitions of cure following conventionally planned and fractionated radiotherapy for functioning pituitary adenomas, together with the move in the profession (since the advent of high quality MRI) to postpone radiation therapy until macroscopic disease appears after surgery, it is now realised that cure rates following conventional radiotherapy approximate three out of four rather than the >90% cited for more than a decade. Patients with persistent active tumours may be successfully further treated by focal radiation therapy by one of the stereotactic focal techniques. We have experience of such re-treatment radiation therapy in 50 patients. With careful case selection, we here demonstrate that in acromegaly, for example, normalisation of both GH and IGF levels may be achieved in 37-58% of these previously irradiated patients with low risk of late morbidity. Unquestionably, growth delay occurs in many cases but the long term tumour control rate has yet to be established.

Radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas

This article describes the technical aspects and the clinical results of conventional radiotherapy and modern stereotactic radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas. Systematic review of the published literature provides a factual basis for the comparison and the selection of appropriate radiation technique in patients who have secreting and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas not cured with surgery and medical therapy.

Nonfunctioning pituitary tumors and pituitary incidentalomas

Clinically nonfunctioning adenomas (CNFAs) range from being completely asymptomatic, and therefore detected at autopsy or as incidental findings on head MRI or CT scans performed for other reasons, to causing significant hypothalamic/pituitary dysfunction and visual field compromise because of their large size. Patients with incidental adenomas should be screened for hypersecretion and hyposecretion. In the absence of hypersecretion, hypopituitarism, or visual field defects, patients may be followed by periodic screening by MRI for enlargement. Symptomatic patients with CNFAs are generally treated by transsphenoidal resection. Postoperative MRI scans are done at 3 to 4 months after surgery to assess for completeness of resection and then repeated yearly for 3 to 5 years and subsequently less frequently to assess for regrowth. The regrowth rate may be substantially reduced with the use of dopamine agonists and radiotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of CyberKnife radiosurgery for acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is a disease characterized by GH hypersecretion, and is typically caused by a pituitary somatotroph adenoma. The primary mode of therapy is surgery, and radiotherapy is utilized as an adjuvant strategy to treat persistent disease. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery in acromegaly.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of biochemical and imaging data for subjects with acromegaly treated with CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery between 1998 and 2005 at Stanford University Hospital.

PATIENTS

Nine patients with active acromegaly were treated with radiosurgery using the CyberKnife (CK).

MEASUREMENTS

Biochemical response based on serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), anterior pituitary hormone function, and tumor size with MRI scans were analyzed.

RESULTS

After a mean follow up of 25.4 months (range, 6-53 months), CK radiosurgery resulted in complete biochemical remission in 4 (44.4%) subjects, and in biochemical control with the concomitant use of a somatostatin analog in an additional subject. Smaller tumor size was predictive of treatment success: baseline tumor volume was 1.28 cc (+/- 0.81, SD) vs. 3.93 cc (+/- 1.54) in subjects with a normal IGF-1 vs. those with persistent, active disease, respectively (P = 0.02). The mean biologically effective dose (BED) was higher in subjects who achieved a normal IGF-1 vs. those with persistent, active disease, 172 Gy(3) (+/-28) vs. 94 Gy(3) (+/-17), respectively (P < 0.01). At least one new anterior pituitary hormone deficiency was observed after CK in 3 (33%) patients: two developed hypogonadism, and one developed panhypopituitarism.

CONCLUSIONS

CK radiosurgery may be a valuable adjuvant therapy for the management of acromegaly.

Treatment of acromegaly: is there still a place for radiotherapy?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of radiotherapy on acromegaly treatment.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

We followed retrospectively 99 acromegalic patients for at least one year after radiotherapy (RT). RT had been performed after unsuccessful surgery in 91 patients and as primary treatment in eight. Time elapsed between surgery and RT was 1.4 +/- 2.4 years. Mean follow-up after RT was 5.9 +/- 4.7 years (1-16 years). All patients were treated with linear accelerator, 89 by conventional (3240-6000 cGY) and ten by stereotactic RT.

MEASUREMENTS

Biochemical remission was defined as GH < 2.5 ng/ml and IGF-I normalization.

RESULTS

At latest follow-up, 54% of patients had serum GH level <2.5 ng/ml; 42% had normal IGF-I and 38% of patients achieved normalization of both. Controlled patients had lower baseline GH and IGF-I levels compared to uncontrolled ones. They achieved remission after 3.8 +/- 2.4 years, a significantly lower time length compared to maximum follow-up of uncontrolled (6.0 +/- 4.9 year). Results regarding GH and IGF-I levels were similar in patients treated either primarily or after surgery. No patient showed tumor growth. Visual field defects were observed in four, seizures in one, and mental disorders in two patients, although cognitive function were not properly assessed. At the last follow-up, 47% of patients had acquired at least one hormonal deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

There is still a place for RT in acromegaly treatment, mainly for: after non-curative surgery and poor response or inaccessibility to medical treatment; growth restraining of aggressive macroadenomas; co-morbidities that contraindicate surgery and surgery refusal. However, side effects and latency period to achieve disease control should be kept in mind.

Gamma Knife surgery after fractionated radiotherapy for acromegaly

Object

Acromegaly that has not been cured by microsurgery is usually treated with fractionated radiotherapy; however, it is not possible to repeat such a treatment with effective radiation doses if it should fail. The authors pose the question: Can stereotactic radiosurgery be used as an effective, alternative method for retreatment by irradiation?

Methods

A retrospective study of 12 patients was performed to compare patients treated with Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) after initial, failed radiotherapy and 37 patients treated with GKS only. The mean dose for the initial fractionated radiotherapy was 44.6 Gy (range 40–54 Gy). The mean maximum GKS dose was 45.1 Gy (range 27–50 Gy) in the pretreated group and 49.5 Gy (range 25–70 Gy) in the group undergoing GKS alone. The mean interval between the two treatments was 10.6 years (range 3–20.6 years). The age-related insulin-like growth factor–I (IGF-I), assessed at 3-month intervals, was the main follow-up parameter. An IGF-I normalization rate of more than 80% was achieved in both patient groups; however, the latency of endocrinological normalization was longer in the patients who had undergone failed fractionated radiotherapy (median time to cure 35.4 months compared with 13.5 months).

Conclusions

Treatment with GKS is successful in patients with acromegaly even after failed fractionated radiotherapy; GKS represents a therapeutic tool in patients with no therapeutic options life-long octreotide. It must be noted that the incidence of neurological complications is higher (p < 0.01, 2 × 2 crosstab). The remaining dose fraction after previous fractionated radiotherapy appears to be approximately 50%. Maintenance of other endocrinological functions may be better after GKS alone; however, the difference is not significant.

Role of radiotherapy in the management of acromegaly

Active acromegaly can be treated effectively by transsphenoidal surgery, radiotherapy and medical treatment in the form of somatostatin analogs and growth hormone receptor antagonists. Many patients will require a combination of treatment modalities to normalize growth hormone excess and associated increased mortality, and to improve comorbidity. Following postoperative radiotherapy, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I levels gradually decrease and normalization of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I is achieved in 50% of patients after 5 years and 75% after 10 years. Disadvantages of radiotherapy include the long interval until hormone levels have sufficiently decreased and the high incidence of radiation-induced hypopituitarism. Radiotherapy was associated with increased mortality in some but not other studies. Limitations in the design and confounding factors, such as years spent with active disease and changing treatment strategies, make it impossible to draw conclusions on this topic. Gamma knife radiosurgery may combine faster decline of growth hormone excess with a lower incidence of hypopituitarism in eligible cases, but long-term results of this radiation technique are lacking. At present, patients will preferentially be treated by primary surgery and/or somatostatin analog treatment, followed, if necessary, by growth hormone receptor antagonist treatment, while radiotherapy is reserved for selected cases only. The indications for radiotherapy and radiosurgery need to be revisited in the near future, when longer follow-up results for medical treatment and radiosurgery have become available. This review summarizes the recent literature on efficacy and side effects of radiotherapy and radiosurgery in acromegaly and discusses the place of radiation treatment in the treatment algorithm of acromegaly.

Is there still a role for radiotherapy in acromegaly?

External radiotherapy (ideally 3-field radiotherapy with a daily fractional dose no higher than 1.8 Gy or conformal irradiation) has been used extensively in the treatment of acromegaly, and virtually all studies have documented a predictable but slow reduction in growth hormone (GH) excess, which is at its maximum in the first year after treatment (30-50%) and continues at an average rate of 10-15% thereafter in the long term. Therefore, achievement of 'safe' GH concentrations in an acceptable time interval after radiotherapy will be realized only in those patients who have lower GH concentrations prior to irradiation either as a result of mild disease or previous surgery. Recent studies have demonstrated the value of stereotactic radiotherapy (either as multiple arc X-irradiation or as 'gamma knife' therapy) in the post-surgical treatment of acromegaly or as salvage therapy for disease persisting after conventional external irradiation. The development of potent medical therapies for acromegaly (somatostatin analogues and the GH receptor antagonist) has called into question the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of this disease. However, even if the concept of primary, open-ended medical therapy for selected patients is accepted, reference to the success rates of surgery and response rates to somatostatin analogues indicates that approximately 10-20% of all patients with acromegaly will require consideration of radiotherapy for hormonal or tumour mass control. For these reasons, radiotherapy (both conventional external and stereotactic irradiation) continues to have a major role in controlling acromegaly in selected patients.

Acromegaly

Acromegaly is a slowly progressive disease characterized by 30% increase of mortality rate for cardiovascular disease, respiratory complications and malignancies. The estimated prevalence of the disease is 40 cases/1000000 population with 3-4 new cases/1000000 population per year. The biochemical diagnosis is based upon the demonstration of high circulating levels of GH and IGF-I. A random GH level lower than 0.4 microg/l and an IGF-I value in the age- and sex-matched normal range makes the diagnosis of acromegaly unlikely. In doubtful cases, the lack of GH suppressibility below 1 microg/l (0.3 microg/l according to recent reports) after an oral glucose load will confirm the diagnosis. A pituitary adenoma is demonstrated in most cases by CT scan or MRI. A negative X-ray finding or the presence of empty sella do not exclude the diagnosis. Cardiovascular complications (acromegalic cardiomyopathy and arterial hypertension) should be looked for and, if present, followed-up by echocardiography and 24h-electrocardiogram. Sleep apnoea, when clinically suspicious, should be confirmed by polisomnography. At the moment of diagnosis all patients should undergo colonscopy. Lipid profile should be obtained and glucose tolerance evaluated. Surgery, radiotherapy and medical treatment represent the therapeutic options for acromegaly. The outcome of transsphenoidal surgery is far better for microadenomas (80-90%) than for macroadenomas (less than 50%), which unluckily represent more than 70% of all GH-secreting pituitary tumours. Therefore, pituitary surgery is the first line treatment for microadenomas. Medical therapy is based on GH-lowering drugs (somatostatin receptor agonists and, in some cases, dopaminergic agents) and GH receptor antagonists (pegvisomant). The former are traditionally indicated after unsuccessful surgery and while awaiting the effectiveness of radiation therapy. However, GH-lowering drugs are also used as primary therapy when surgery is contraindicated or in the case of large GH-secreting macroadenomas which are not likely to be completely removed by surgery. These compounds may also be indicated in the preoperative management of some acromegalic patients in order to lower the risk of surgical and anaesthetic complications. For the moment pegvisomant is indicated for patients resistant to the GH-lowering drugs and there is no evidence for drug-induced enlargement of the pituitary tumour. In order to avoid this possibility, however, a combination of pegvisomant and GH-lowering compound can also be conceived. With pegvisomant, IGF-I plasma levels are the marker of therapeutic efficacy and normalize in 97% of patients. Radiotherapy is employed sparingly due to the number of side effects (80% of hypopituitarism). It is indicated after unsuccessful surgical and/or medical treatment and allows the control of hormonal secretion and tumour growth in approx. 40% and 100% of cases, respectively. Acromegaly is defined as controlled when, in the absence of clinical activity, IGF-I levels are in the age- and sex-matched normal range and GH is normally suppressible by the oral glucose load.

Treatment of pituitary tumors: radiation

In this paper, the role of conventional radiotherapy and radiosurgery in the management of pituitary tumors is reviewed. After a short summary of the mechanism of action of irradiation therapy and the types of different irradiation techniques, the therapeutic effects and side effects are analyzed in patients with different types of pituitary tumors, including our own experience with conventional radiotherapy and radiosurgery in patients with acromegaly. Conventional fractionated radiotherapy has long been used to control growth and/or hormonal secretion of residual or recurrent pituitary tumors. However, patient selection for conventional radiotherapy still remains a controversial issue, because a number of potentially significant side effects, including hypopituitarism and other complications, have been described. Stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery methods have several potential advantages over conventional radiotherapy, including their use in patients with residual or recurrent pituitary tumors who had previously been treated by conventional radiotherapy, but long-term follow-up data with these relatively new techniques are still limited.

GH receptor antagonist: mechanism of action and clinical utility

This review focuses on the development of GH receptor antagonist as a novel agent for treatment of acromegaly, its mechanism of action and potential areas of use. A brief overview of acromegaly, its diagnosis and existing medical, surgical and radiotherapy options of treatment is necessary to justify the addition of yet another therapeutic modality to the already vast therapeutic armamentarium.

Diagnosis and treatment of pituitary tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treatment of pituitary adenomas remains an interdisciplinary challenge involving neurosurgeons, endocrinologists and radiation oncologists. The different disciplines inaugurated advanced techniques to improve the already relatively high standard of outcome for the benefit of patients, covering molecular pathogenesis, novel therapeutic strategies for the different adenoma subtypes, developments in perioperative magnetic resonance imaging and radiosurgical management of pituitary adenomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the progress achieved in medical treatment of hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas throughout recent years, surgery remains the primary therapy of choice except for prolactinomas. Recent studies in molecular pathogenesis aiming to find novel therapy targets and reports on new pharmacological drugs effecting GH-secreting pituitary adenomas are reviewed (for example, lanreotide 60, SOM320 and pegvisomant). Advances in surgical treatment of pituitary macroadenomas are obtained by pre- and especially by intraoperative (high-field) MRI offering a higher rate of safe and complete tumor removal. Therapy pitfalls mentioned in the literature throughout the last year as well as key points in the management of pituitary adenomas with focus on acromegaly and Cushing's disease are reported. Adjuvant irradiation for recurrent or residual adenomas is often a necessity. In comparison to standard conventional radiation strategies an increasing number of radiation oncologists and neurosurgeons report their experience with radiosurgery especially for smaller tumor remnants in pituitary adenomas.

SUMMARY

Recent molecular studies suggest a new level of complexity in the tumorigenisis of pituitary adenomas in terms of possible cell-type-specific molecular changes. Except for prolactinomas surgery remains the primary treatment for pituitary adenomas. New pharmacological drugs achieve very encouraging endocrine results although no long-term follow-up is available so far. The results of trans-sphenoidal surgery will further improve by modern imaging techniques, especially by applying intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging and neuronavigation. The results of radiosurgical techniques with regard to tumor control are mostly convincing, but definitive conclusions on long-term recurrence and/or late complications are not reliable so far.

Treatment of Acromegaly

Mortality is increased in individuals with acromegaly unless serum growth hormone (GH) levels are below 2 microg/l and serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels are normal following treatment. These combined criteria have been used to define remission of the disorder in this review. Transsphenoidal surgery achieves remission targets in an average of 55% of patients. For those not in remission following surgery, options include repeat surgery or use of adjuvant therapy. Fractionated external beam pituitary radiotherapy achieves 10-year remission rates of 47% but leaves patients exposed to excess GH until remission occurs. Stereotactic radiotherapy and gamma knife radiosurgery achieve remission rates of 40% over 3 years, and dopamine agonists produce remission in about 20% of patients. Somatostatin analogues induce remission in 59% of patients within the first year of treatment. The GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant leads to remission in 90% of patients, using IGF-I levels for assessment. Optimal treatment for a patient with acromegaly thus depends on the likely efficacy of treatment, cost, surgical skill, severity of side effects, tolerability, control of tumour growth, and improvement in complications related to tumour mass. A primary surgical approach, followed by medical therapy for those not in remission, remains the preferred option in most centres.