Growth hormone receptor antagonist treatment reduces exercise performance in young males

Body Composition Changes with Long-term Pegvisomant Therapy of Acromegaly

Context

In active acromegaly, the lipolytic and insulin antagonistic effects of growth hormone (GH) excess alter adipose tissue (AT) deposition, reduce body fat, and increase insulin resistance. This pattern reverses with surgical therapy. Pegvisomant treats acromegaly by blocking GH receptor (GHR) signal transduction and lowering insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels. The long-term effects of GHR antagonist treatment of acromegaly on body composition have not been studied.

Methods

We prospectively studied 21 patients with active acromegaly who were starting pegvisomant. Body composition was examined by whole body magnetic resonance imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of liver and muscle and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and endocrine and metabolic markers were measured before and serially during 1.0 to 13.4 years of pegvisomant therapy. The data of patients with acromegaly were compared with predicted and to matched controls.

Results

Mass of visceral AT (VAT) increased to a peak of 187% (1.56-229%) (P < .001) and subcutaneous AT (SAT) to 109% (–17% to 57%) (P = .04) of baseline. These remained persistently and stably increased, but did not differ from predicted during long-term pegvisomant therapy. Intrahepatic lipid rose from 1.75% to 3.04 % (P = .04). Although lean tissue mass decreased significantly, skeletal muscle (SM) did not change. IGF-1 levels normalized, and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance and HbA1C were lowered.

Conclusion

Long-term pegvisomant therapy is accompanied by increases in VAT and SAT mass that do not differ from predicted, stable SM mass and improvements in glucose metabolism. Long-term pegvisomant therapy does not produce a GH deficiency-like pattern of body composition change.

Influence of pegvisomant on serum ghrelin and leptin levels in acromegalic patients

INTRODUCTION

Pegvisomant (peg) is a GH receptor antagonist. In de novo acromegalic patients with high GH levels, ghrelin and leptin levels are reduced, suggesting a direct GH-mediated effect. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether peg treatment in acromegalic patients may abolish the GH impact on ghrelin and leptin levels.

METHODS

Ghrelin, leptin and endogenous GH were measured in ten peg-treated acromegalic patients (three females/seven males, 47 years (28-57)), ten patients with active (act) and ten patients with inactive disease (inact) as well as in ten gender-, age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched healthy volunteers (controls). Endogenous GH was measured using a special in-house assay without interference by peg; total ghrelin and leptin were determined using a commercial RIA and an immunofluorometric in-house assay respectively.

RESULTS

Age and BMI did not differ significantly between groups. Endogenous GH was significantly higher in peg (6.3 μg/l (1.5-41)) and act (9.3 μg/l (1.7-70)) compared with controls (0.1 μg/l (0.1-3.1)) and inact (0.35 μg/l (0.1-2.0), P<0.001). Ghrelin was significantly higher in peg (232  ng/l (96-351)) compared with act (102 ng/l (33-232), P<0.01), whereas ghrelin was not significantly different between the other groups. Leptin was highest in controls (19 μg/l (4-57)) and lowest in act (6 μg/l (2-21)), but this difference did not reach significance.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with peg seems to disrupt the feedback loop of ghrelin and GH, leading to elevated ghrelin levels. Furthermore, peg therapy appears not to have a strong impact on leptin levels, as acromegalic patients with and without peg treatment showed similar leptin levels.