1
|
Shashi KK, Weldon CB, Voss SD. Positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and management of primary pediatric lung tumors. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:671-683. [PMID: 38231400 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05847-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Primary pediatric lung tumors are uncommon and have many overlapping clinical and imaging features. In contrast to adult lung tumors, these rare pediatric neoplasms have a relatively broad histologic spectrum. Informed by a single-institution 13-year retrospective record review, we present an overview of the most common primary pediatric lung neoplasms, with a focus on the role of positron emission tomography (PET), specifically 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET, in the management of primary pediatric lung tumors. In addition to characteristic conventional radiographic and cross-sectional imaging findings, knowledge of patient age, underlying cancer predisposition syndromes, and PET imaging features may help narrow the differential. While metastases from other primary malignancies remain the most commonly encountered pediatric lung malignancy, the examples presented in this pictorial essay highlight many of the important conventional radiologic and PET imaging features of primary pediatric lung malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kumar K Shashi
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Radiology, Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Way, Little Rock, AR, 72202, USA
| | - Christopher B Weldon
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Stephan D Voss
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
von Hessert-Vaudoncourt C, Lelek S, Geisler C, Hartung T, Bröker V, Briest F, Mochmann L, Jost-Brinkmann F, Sedding D, Benecke J, Freitag H, Wolfshöfer S, Lammert H, Nölting S, Hummel M, Schrader J, Grabowski P. Concomitant inhibition of PI3K/mTOR signaling pathways boosts antiproliferative effects of lanreotide in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumor cells. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1308686. [PMID: 38375032 PMCID: PMC10875132 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1308686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are commonly used in the treatment of hormone hypersecretion in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), however the extent to which they inhibit proliferation is much discussed. Objective: We studied the antiproliferative effects of novel SSA lanreotide in bronchopulmonary NETs (BP-NETs). We focused on assessing whether pretreating cells with inhibitors for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and mammalian target for rapamycin (mTOR) could enhance the antiproliferative effects of lanreotide. Methods: BP-NET cell lines NCI-H720 and NCI-H727 were treated with PI3K inhibitor BYL719 (alpelisib), mTOR inhibitor everolimus and SSA lanreotide to determine the effect on NET differentiation markers, cell survival, proliferation and alterations in cancer-associated pathways. NT-3 cells, previously reported to express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) natively, were used as control for SSTR expression. Results: SSTR2 was upregulated in NCI-H720 and NT-3 cells upon treatment with BYL719. Additionally, combination treatment consisting of BYL719 and everolimus plus lanreotide tested in NCI-H720 and NCI-H727 led to diminished cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Production of proteins activating cell death mechanisms was also induced. Notably, a multiplexed gene expression analysis performed on NCI-H720 revealed that BYL719 plus lanreotide had a stronger effect on the downregulation of mitogens than lanreotide alone. Discussion/Conclusion: We report a widespread analysis of changes in BP-NET cell lines at the genetic/protein expression level in response to combination of lanreotide with pretreatment consisting of BYL719 and everolimus. Interestingly, SSTR expression reinduction could be exploited in therapeutic and diagnostic applications. The overall results of this study support the evaluation of combination-based therapies using lanreotide in preclinical studies to further increase its antiproliferative effect and ultimately facilitate its use in high-grade tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Lelek
- Medical Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christina Geisler
- Medical Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Teresa Hartung
- Medical Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vanessa Bröker
- Medical Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franziska Briest
- Medical Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Liliana Mochmann
- Medical Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Jost-Brinkmann
- Medical Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dagmar Sedding
- Medical Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joana Benecke
- Medical Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Helma Freitag
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Wolfshöfer
- Medical Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hedwig Lammert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Svenja Nölting
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zurich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Hummel
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Schrader
- I. Department of Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Patricia Grabowski
- Medical Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al-Toubah T, Montilla-Soler J, El-Haddad G, Haider M, Strosberg J. Somatostatin Receptor Expression in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Analysis of DOTATATE PET Scans. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1895-1898. [PMID: 37797976 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in metastatic lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has not been well characterized using PET imaging. Understanding the degree and uniformity of SSTR expression is important to establish the role of SSTR-targeted treatments in lung NETs. Methods: A retrospective institutional review of patients with metastatic lung NETs who underwent DOTATATE PET imaging from March 2017 to February 2023 was performed. Results: In total, 48 patients with metastatic lung NETs who underwent 68Ga- or 64Cu-DOTATATE PET imaging were identified. Four had completely negative SSTR expression, and 10 had very weak expression (less than in a normal liver). Among the remaining 34 patients, 21 had uniformly positive DOTATATE PET scans, and 13 had heterogeneous expression. Only 44% had uniformly positive receptor expression, identifying them as candidates for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Conclusion: Most metastatic lung NETs lack uniform SSTR expression and are thus suboptimal candidates for SSTR-targeted therapy. SSTR imaging in lung NETs should be evaluated carefully for uniformity of expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taymeyah Al-Toubah
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; and
| | - Jaime Montilla-Soler
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ghassan El-Haddad
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Mintallah Haider
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; and
| | - Jonathan Strosberg
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; and
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oron-Herman M, Kirmayer D, Lupp A, Schulz S, Kostenich G, Afargan M. Expression prevalence and dynamics of GPCR somatostatin receptors 2 and 3 as cancer biomarkers beyond NET: a paired immunohistochemistry approach. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20857. [PMID: 38012197 PMCID: PMC10682014 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47877-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin receptors are clinically validated GPCR biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment of various neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Among the five somatostatin receptors, SST2 and SST3 are associated with apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, making these receptor subtypes better differentiated targets in precision oncology. In this study we performed immunohistochemistry of paired tissue microarrays containing 1125 cores, representing 43 tumor types, each stained for SST2 and SST3. A 12-point immunoreactive scoring (IRS) range was used for interpretation of the staining results. We analyzed the results twice, using the conventional positivity IRS cutoffs ≥ 3 and more stringent ≥ 6. Evaluation of receptors expression dynamics was performed for tumor-nodes-metastases (TNM) defined subgroups (ovarian and hepatocellular adenocarcinomas) as a function of their tumor stage. Our results indicate that two-thirds of tested cores exhibit clinically significant expression of at least SST2 or SST3 (IRS ≥ 6). The expression prevalence of both receptors tends to decline with tumor progression. However, an unexpected upregulation of both SST2 and SST3 reemerged in metastases suggesting conserved receptors genetic potential during tumor life cycle. We suggest that SST2 and SST3 should be further explored as potential biomarkers and therapeutic tools for maximizing the efficiency of somatostatin-based precision oncology of solid tumors beyond NET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mor Oron-Herman
- Starget Pharma, 26 Snir st., 4704086, Ramat Hasharon, Israel.
| | - David Kirmayer
- Starget Pharma, 26 Snir st., 4704086, Ramat Hasharon, Israel
| | - Amelie Lupp
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Drackendorfer Str. 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Stefan Schulz
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Drackendorfer Str. 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Genady Kostenich
- Starget Pharma, 26 Snir st., 4704086, Ramat Hasharon, Israel
- The Advanced Technology Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 5262000, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Michel Afargan
- Starget Pharma, 26 Snir st., 4704086, Ramat Hasharon, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fagerstedt KW, Vesterinen T, Leijon H, Sihto H, Böhling T, Arola J. Somatostatin receptor expression in Merkel cell carcinoma: correlation with clinical data. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1001-1007. [PMID: 37540574 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2239481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) of the skin. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are G protein-linked receptors that regulate cell proliferation and growth. SSTRs are expressed in many NENs; however, scant information is available on their expression in MCCs or their association with clinical parameters and patient outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study was conducted at Helsinki University Hospital and the University of Helsinki. Using a tissue microarray, we investigated SSTR1-5 expression by immunohistochemistry in 99 MCC tissue samples. Samples were collected between 1983 and 2017 and coupled with the patients' clinical data. RESULTS SSTR2-SSTR5 were detected in 69%, 6%, 4%, and 1% of the tumours, respectively. However, SSTR1 expression was not observed. Cytoplasmic SSTR2 positivity was associated with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.009), but it did not correlate with disease-specificity or overall survival. CONCLUSION SSTR2-5 expression was observed in MCCs. In particular, SSTR2 expression is clinically valid because it is associated with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and can thus serve as a prognostic marker. Moreover, SSTR2 overexpression provides a molecular basis for tumour imaging and treatment with somatostatin analogues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus W Fagerstedt
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tiina Vesterinen
- HUS Diagnostic Centre, Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Helena Leijon
- HUS Diagnostic Centre, Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Harri Sihto
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tom Böhling
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johanna Arola
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- HUS Diagnostic Centre, Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haq A, Rayamajhi S, Ponisio MR, Prasad V. New horizon of radiopharmaceuticals in management of neuroendocrine tumors. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023; 37:101797. [PMID: 37468403 DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2023.101797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms are rare and heterogenous group of tumors with varying degrees of clinical presentations and involvement of multiple organ systems in the body. In the modern clinical practice somatostatin receptor molecular imaging and targeted radioligand therapy plays a vital role in the diagnosis and management of the disease. Several new and promising radiotracers for NET imaging and theranostics, belonging to various groups and classes are being studied and investigated. This exponential growth of radiotracers poses concerns about the indication, clinical benefit, and safety profile of the agents. We discuss the basis behind these radiotracers clinical use, receptor targeting and intra and inter tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, role of dual tracer imaging, combination therapy and potential applications of dosimetry in predicting treatment outcome and safety profile is reviewed. Individualized precision medicine with better tumor characterization, maximum therapeutic benefit and minimum toxicity is the way forward for future medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeel Haq
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
| | - Sampanna Rayamajhi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| | - Maria Rosana Ponisio
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| | - Vikas Prasad
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
La Salvia A, Modica R, Rossi RE, Spada F, Rinzivillo M, Panzuto F, Faggiano A, Cinieri S, Fazio N. Targeting neuroendocrine tumors with octreotide and lanreotide: Key points for clinical practice from NET specialists. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 117:102560. [PMID: 37088017 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
Octreotide and lanreotide are the two somatostatin analogs (SSA) currently available in clinical practice. They have been approved first to control the clinical syndrome (mainly carcinoid syndrome) associated with functioning neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and later for tumor growth control in advanced low/intermediate grade NET. Although evidence regarding their role, especially as antiproliferative therapy, has been increasing over the years some clinical indications remain controversial. Solicited by AIOM (Italian Association of Medical Oncology) a group of clinicians from various specialties, including medical oncology, endocrinology, and gastroenterology, deeply involved in NET for their clinical and research activity, addressed eight open questions, critically reviewing evidence and guidelines and sharing clinical take-home messages. The questions regarded the use of long-acting octreotide and lanreotide in the following settings: functioning and non-functioning NET refractory to label dose, first-line metastatic pulmonary NET, combination with other therapy with an antiproliferative intent, maintenance in NET responding to other therapies, adjuvant treatment, Ki-67-related cut-off, somatostatin receptor imaging, safety, and feasibility. The level of evidence is not absolute for the majority of these clinical contexts, so it is recommended to distinguish routine versus sporadic utilization in very selected cases. Mention of such specific issues by the main European guidelines (ENETS, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and ESMO, European Society for Medical Oncology) was explored and their position reported. However, different clinical decisions on single patients could be made if the case is carefully discussed within a NET-dedicated multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A La Salvia
- National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, National Institute of Health (ISS), Rome, Italy.
| | - R Modica
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Endocrinology Unit of Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - R E Rossi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - F Spada
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - M Rinzivillo
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - F Panzuto
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy; Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - A Faggiano
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - S Cinieri
- Medical Oncology Division and Breast Unit, ASL Brindisi, Brindisi, Italy.
| | - N Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Historical Review of Brain Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14061283. [PMID: 35745855 PMCID: PMC9229021 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The history of brain drug delivery is reviewed beginning with the first demonstration, in 1914, that a drug for syphilis, salvarsan, did not enter the brain, due to the presence of a blood-brain barrier (BBB). Owing to restricted transport across the BBB, FDA-approved drugs for the CNS have been generally limited to lipid-soluble small molecules. Drugs that do not cross the BBB can be re-engineered for transport on endogenous BBB carrier-mediated transport and receptor-mediated transport systems, which were identified during the 1970s-1980s. By the 1990s, a multitude of brain drug delivery technologies emerged, including trans-cranial delivery, CSF delivery, BBB disruption, lipid carriers, prodrugs, stem cells, exosomes, nanoparticles, gene therapy, and biologics. The advantages and limitations of each of these brain drug delivery technologies are critically reviewed.
Collapse
|
9
|
Correlation of somatostatin receptor PET/CT imaging features and immunohistochemistry in neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: a retrospective observational study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:4182-4193. [PMID: 35674739 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05848-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To correlate somatostatin receptor (SSTR) and proliferative activity profile (SSTR2, SSTR5, Ki-67) at immunohistochemistry (IHC) with SSTR-PET/CT imaging features in a retrospective series of lung neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Proliferative activity by Ki-67 and 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters (when available) were also correlated. METHODS Among 551 patients who underwent SSTR-PET/CT with 68Ga-DOTA-somatostatin analogs (SSA) between July 2011 and March 2020 for lung neuroendocrine neoplasms, 32 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of NET were included. For 14 of them, 18F-FDG-PET/CT was available. PET/CT images were reviewed by qualitative and semi-quantitative analyses. Immunohistochemistry for SSTR2, SSTR5, and Ki-67 was assessed. Inferential analysis was performed including kappa statistics and Spearman's rank correlation test. RESULTS Definitive diagnosis consisted of 26 typical carcinoids-G1 and six atypical carcinoids-G2. Positive SSTR2-IHC was found in 62.5% of samples while SSTR5-IHC positivity was 19.4%. A correlation between SSTR2-IHC and SSTR-PET/CT was found in 24/32 cases (75.0%, p = 0.003): 20 were concordantly positive, 4 concordantly negative. For positive IHC, 100% concordance with SSTR-PET/CT (both positive) was observed, while for negative IHC concordance (both negative) was 33.3%. In 8 cases, IHC was negative while SSTR-PET/CT was positive, even though with low-grade uptake in all but one. A significant correlation between SUVmax values at SSTR-PET/CT and the SSTR2-IHC scores was found, with low SUVmax values corresponding to negative IHC and higher SUVmax values to positive IHC (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION This retrospective study showed an overall good agreement between SSTR2-IHC and tumor uptake at SSTR-PET/CT in lung NETs. SSTR-PET/CT SUVmax values can be used as a parameter of SSTR2 density. Within the limits imposed by the relatively small cohort, our data suggest that SSTR2-IHC may surrogate SSTR-PET/CT in selected lung NET patients for clinical decision making when SSTR-PET/CT is not available.
Collapse
|
10
|
Majala S, Vesterinen T, Seppänen H, Mustonen H, Sundström J, Schalin-Jäntti C, Gullichsen R, Schildt J, Kemppainen J, Arola J, Kauhanen S. Correlation of Somatostatin Receptor 1-5 Expression, [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC, [ 18F]F-FDG PET/CT and Clinical Outcome in a Prospective Cohort of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010162. [PMID: 35008325 PMCID: PMC8750461 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The need for prognostic and predictive biomarkers in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) is great. Overexpression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) provides a molecular basis for imaging these tumors with 68Ga-labeled somatostatin (SST) PET/CT and for treatment with somatostatin analogs. We evaluated all 5 somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-5) with immunohistochemistry and prospectively compared the results with both [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in a cohort of 21 non-functional (NF) PNENs. SSTR2 was the only SSTR subtype to correlate with [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. High SSTR5 expression correlated with a low Ki-67 proliferation index, suggesting a better prognosis for these patients. Thus, our results confirm that SSTR2 has the highest impact on SSTR PET signaling of PNENs. Abstract Purpose: The aim of this study was to correlate immunohistochemical (IHC) tissue levels of SSTR1-5 with the receptor density generated from [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC uptake in a prospective series of NF-PNENs. Methods: Twenty-one patients with a total of thirty-five NF-PNEN-lesions and twenty-one histologically confirmed lymph node metastases (LN+) were included in this prospective study. Twenty patients were operated on, and one underwent endoscopic ultrasonography and core-needle biopsy. PET/CT with both [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC and [18F]F-FDG was performed on all patients. All histological samples were re-classified and IHC-stained with monoclonal SSTR1-5 antibodies and Ki-67 and correlated with [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT. Results: Expression of SSTR1-5 was detected in 74%, 91%, 80%, 14%, and 77% of NF-PNENs. There was a concordance of SSTR2 IHC with positive/negative [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC finding (Spearman’s rho 0.382, p = 0.043). All [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC-avid tumors expressed SSTR2 or SSTR3 or SSTR5. Expression of SSTR5 was higher in tumors with a low Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) (−0.353, 95% CI −0.654–0.039, p = 0.038). The mean Ki-67 PI for SSTR5 positive tumors was 2.44 (SD 2.56, CI 1.0–3.0) and 6.38 (SD 7.25, CI 2.25–8.75) for negative tumors. Conclusion: SSTR2 was the only SSTR subtype to correlate with [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. Our prospective study confirms SSTR2 to be of the highest impact for SST PET/CT signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Majala
- Department of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland; (R.G.); (S.K.)
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland;
- Correspondence:
| | - Tiina Vesterinen
- HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 400, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland; (T.V.); (J.A.)
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 20, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hanna Seppänen
- Translational Cancer Medicine Research Program, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 340, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland; (H.S.); (H.M.)
| | - Harri Mustonen
- Translational Cancer Medicine Research Program, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 340, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland; (H.S.); (H.M.)
| | - Jari Sundström
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland;
| | - Camilla Schalin-Jäntti
- Abdominal Center, Division of Endocrinology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 340, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Risto Gullichsen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland; (R.G.); (S.K.)
| | - Jukka Schildt
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, P.O. Box 340, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Jukka Kemppainen
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland;
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Johanna Arola
- HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 400, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland; (T.V.); (J.A.)
| | - Saila Kauhanen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland; (R.G.); (S.K.)
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stolniceanu CR, Moscalu M, Azoicai D, Tamba B, Volovat C, Grierosu I, Ionescu T, Jalloul W, Ghizdovat V, Gherasim R, Volovat S, Wang F, Fu J, Moscalu R, Matovic M, Stefanescu C. Improved Personalised Neuroendocrine Tumours' Diagnosis Predictive Power by New Receptor Somatostatin Image Processing Quantification. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11101042. [PMID: 34683183 PMCID: PMC8539645 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11101042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Although neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are intensively studied, their diagnosis and consequently personalised therapy management is still puzzling due to their tumoral heterogeneity. In their theragnosis algorithm, receptor somatostatin scintigraphy takes the central place, the diagnosis receptor somatostatin analogue (RSA) choice depending on laboratory experience and accessibility. However, in all cases, the results depend decisively on correct radiotracer tumoral uptake quantification, where unfortunately there are still unrevealed clues and lack of standardization. We propose an improved method to quantify the biodistribution of gamma-emitting RSA, using tissular corrected uptake indices. We conducted a bi-centric retrospective study on 101 patients with different types of NETs. Three uptake indices obtained after applying new corrections to areas of interest drawn for the tumour and for three reference organs (liver, spleen and lung) were statistically analysed. For the corrected pathological uptake indices, the results showed a significant decrease in the error of estimating the occurrence of errors and an increase in the diagnostic predictive power for NETs, especially in the case of lung-referring corrected index. In conclusion, these results support the importance of corrected uptake indices use in the analysis of 99mTcRSA biodistribution for a better personalised diagnostic accuracy of NETs patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cati Raluca Stolniceanu
- Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (C.R.S.); (I.G.); (T.I.); (W.J.); (V.G.); (R.G.); (C.S.)
| | - Mihaela Moscalu
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
- Correspondence:
| | - Doina Azoicai
- Department of Epidemiology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Bogdan Tamba
- Advanced Center for Research and Development in Experimental Medicine (CEMEX), “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700454 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Constantin Volovat
- Department of Medicine III—Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (C.V.); (S.V.)
| | - Irena Grierosu
- Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (C.R.S.); (I.G.); (T.I.); (W.J.); (V.G.); (R.G.); (C.S.)
| | - Teodor Ionescu
- Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (C.R.S.); (I.G.); (T.I.); (W.J.); (V.G.); (R.G.); (C.S.)
| | - Wael Jalloul
- Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (C.R.S.); (I.G.); (T.I.); (W.J.); (V.G.); (R.G.); (C.S.)
| | - Vlad Ghizdovat
- Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (C.R.S.); (I.G.); (T.I.); (W.J.); (V.G.); (R.G.); (C.S.)
| | - Roxana Gherasim
- Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (C.R.S.); (I.G.); (T.I.); (W.J.); (V.G.); (R.G.); (C.S.)
| | - Simona Volovat
- Department of Medicine III—Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (C.V.); (S.V.)
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China; (F.W.); (J.F.)
| | - Jingjing Fu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China; (F.W.); (J.F.)
| | - Roxana Moscalu
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, School of Medical Sciences Manchester, The University of Manchester, Manchester M139PT, UK;
| | - Milovan Matovic
- Clinical Center Kragujevac, Center for Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia;
| | - Cipriana Stefanescu
- Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (C.R.S.); (I.G.); (T.I.); (W.J.); (V.G.); (R.G.); (C.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Juntikka T, Vaittinen S, Vahlberg T, Jyrkkiö S, Minn H. Somatostatin Receptors and Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 in Lymphomas: A Histopathological Review of Six Lymphoma Subtypes. Front Oncol 2021; 11:710900. [PMID: 34307181 PMCID: PMC8299948 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.710900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) and chemokine receptor CXCR4 are expressed in lymphomas, while the abundance is known to be heterogeneous in different subtypes of lymphomas. Targeting tumor cells expressing these receptors might add to therapeutic opportunities while radiolabeled ligands for both imaging and therapy have been developed. The aim of this study was to establish SSTR subtype 2, 3 and 5 and also CXCR4 status immunohistochemically in six different lymphoma subtypes: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), mucosa-associated marginal B-cell lymphoma (MALT), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Material and Methods This study included a total of 103 lymphoma patients (24 DLBCL, 22 FL, 18 HL, 9 MALT, 20 MCL and 10 PTCL) diagnosed in the Southwest hospital district of Finland during 2010-2019. SSTR 2, 3 and 5 and CXCR4 expression was analyzed immunohistochemically (IHC) in lymphoma samples obtained from local archival Biobank tissue repository. Immunopositivity of each receptor was scored on a four-point scale accounting for staining intensity and proportion of positively stained tumor cells. Results Of different SSTR subtypes SSTR2 immunopositivity was most common and seen predominantly at the cell membrane of the malignant cells in 46-56% of DLBCL, HL and FL. CXCR4 co-expression was frequently present in these cases. SSTR3 and SSTR5 IHC were negative in DLBCL and FL but in HL SSTR expression was more heterogenous and SSTR3 and SSTR5 positivity was found in cytoplasm in 35% and 25% of cases. 2/4 blastoid MCL variants and one pleomorphic MCL variant had positive CXCR4 IHC whilst all other MCL cases (85%) were negative for all receptors. 30% (n=3) of the PTCL patients had positive SSTR5 IHC and CXCR4. MALT lymphomas were negative for all receptors. Conclusion SSTR2 and CXCR4 are found in DLBCL, FL and HL and co-expression of these receptors is common. Although in general expression of SSTRs and CXCR4 is heterogenous and very low in some subtypes such as MCL and MALT there are also patients with abundant expression. The latter are candidates for trials studying SSTR2 and/or CXCR4 based treatments in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiina Juntikka
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Samuli Vaittinen
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Tero Vahlberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Sirkku Jyrkkiö
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Heikki Minn
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
PET/computed tomography (CT) imaging increasingly is used in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) for diagnosis, staging, monitoring, prognostication, and choosing treatment. Somatostatin PET analog tracers have added to the specificity by obtaining higher affinity to somatostatin receptors with 68Ga-labeled or 64Cu-labeled DOTA peptides compared with single-photon emission CT imaging isotopes. PET uptake correlates to tumor grade and is an essential part of theranostics with peptide receptor radionuclide treatment. This article focuses on the literature on head-to-head studies and meta-analyses of different combinations of peptide agonists and a few antagonists. Overall, the published data support the diagnostic capability of PET/CT imaging in NENs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Bardram Johnbeck
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jann Mortensen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Medical Faculty, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Volante M, Mete O, Pelosi G, Roden AC, Speel EJM, Uccella S. Molecular Pathology of Well-Differentiated Pulmonary and Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors: What Do Pathologists Need to Know? Endocr Pathol 2021; 32:154-168. [PMID: 33641055 PMCID: PMC7960615 DOI: 10.1007/s12022-021-09668-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Thoracic (pulmonary and thymic) neuroendocrine tumors are well-differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms that are classified into typical and atypical carcinoid tumors based on mitotic index cut offs and presence or absence of necrosis. This classification scheme is of great prognostic value but designed for surgical specimens, only. Deep molecular characterization of thoracic neuroendocrine tumors highlighted their difference with neuroendocrine carcinomas. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung are characterized by a low mutational burden, and a high prevalence of mutations in chromatin remodeling and histone modification-related genes, whereas mutations in genes frequently altered in neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare. Molecular profiling divided thymic neuroendocrine tumors into three clusters with distinct clinical outcomes and characterized by a different average of copy number instability. Moreover, integrated histopathological, molecular and clinical evidence supports the existence of a grey zone category between neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid tumors) and neuroendocrine carcinomas. Indeed, cases with well differentiated morphology but mitotic/Ki-67 indexes close to neuroendocrine carcinomas have been increasingly recognized. These are characterized by specific molecular profiles and have an aggressive clinical behavior. Finally, thoracic neuroendocrine tumors may arise in the background of genetic susceptibility, being MEN1 syndrome the well-defined familial form. However, pathologists should be aware of rarer germline variants that are associated with the concurrence of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung or their precursors (such as DIPNECH) with other neoplasms, including but not limited to breast carcinomas. Therefore, genetic counseling for all young patients with thoracic neuroendocrine neoplasia and/or any patient with pathological evidence of neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia-to-neoplasia progression sequence or multifocal disease should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Volante
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Ozgur Mete
- Departments of Pathology, University Healthy Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Giuseppe Pelosi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Anja C Roden
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ernst Jan M Speel
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Silvia Uccella
- Dept. of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nie H, Qiu J, Wen S, Zhou W. Combining Bioinformatics Techniques to Study the Key Immune-Related Genes in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Front Genet 2020; 11:579215. [PMID: 33362847 PMCID: PMC7758434 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.579215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximately 13,000 people die of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) every year. This study aimed to identify the immune response-related genes that play important roles in AAA using bioinformatics approaches. We downloaded the GSE57691 and GSE98278 datasets related to AAA from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, which included 80 AAA and 10 normal vascular samples. CIBERSORT was used to analyze the samples and detect the infiltration of 22 types of immune cells and their differences and correlations. The principal component analysis showed significant differences in the infiltration of immune cells between normal vascular and AAA samples. High proportions of CD4+ T cells, activated mast cells, resting natural killer cells, and 12 other types of immune cells were found in normal vascular tissues, whereas high proportions of macrophages, CD8+ T cells, resting mast cells, and six other types of immune cells were found in AAA tissues. In the selected samples, we identified 39 upregulated (involved in growth factor activity, hormone receptor binding, and cytokine receptor activity) and 133 downregulated genes (involved in T cell activation, cell chemotaxis, and regulation of immune response mediators). The key differentially expressed immune response-related genes were screened using the STRING database and Cytoscape software. Two downregulated genes, PI3 and MAP2K1, and three upregulated genes, SSTR1, GPER1, and CCR10, were identified by constructing a protein-protein interaction network. Functional enrichment of the differentially expressed genes was analyzed, and the expression of the five key genes in AAA samples was verified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction, which revealed that MAP2K1 was downregulated in AAA, whereas SSTR1, GEPR1, and CCR10 were upregulated; there was no significant difference in PI3 expression. Our study shows that normal vascular and AAA samples can be distinguished via the infiltration of immune cells. Five genes, PI3, MAP2K1, SSTR1, GPER1, and CCR10, may play important roles in the development, diagnosis, and treatment of AAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Nie
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Jiacong Qiu
- Divison of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Si Wen
- Xinjian District People's Hospital of Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi, China
| | - Weimin Zhou
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dong S, Liang J, Zhai W, Yu Z. Development and Validation of an Individualized Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients With Typical Lung Carcinoid Tumors. Am J Clin Oncol 2020; 43:607-614. [PMID: 32889829 PMCID: PMC7515482 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aim to develop and validate an effective nomogram prognostic model for patients with typical lung carcinoid tumors using a large patient cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from patients with typical lung carcinoid tumors between 2010 and 2015 were selected from the SEER database for retrospective analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis was performed to clarify independent prognostic factors. Next, a nomogram was formulated to predict the probability of 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS). Concordance indexes (c-index), receiver operating characteristic analysis and calibration curves were used to evaluate the model. RESULTS The selected patients were randomly divided into a training and a validation cohort. A nomogram was established based on the training cohort. Cox analysis results indicated that age, sex, T stage, N stage, surgery, and bone metastasis were independent variables for OS. All these factors, except surgery, were included in the nomogram model for predicting 3- and 5-year OS. The internally and externally validated c-indexes were 0.787 and 0.817, respectively. For the 3-year survival prediction, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the areas under the curve in the training and validation cohorts were 0.824 and 0.795, respectively. For the 5-year survival prediction, the area under the curve in the training and validation cohorts were 0.812 and 0.787, respectively. The calibration plots for probability of survival were in good agreement. CONCLUSION The nomogram brings us closer to personalized medicine and the maximization of predictive accuracy in the prediction of OS in patients with typical lung carcinoid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shenghua Dong
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wenxin Zhai
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province
| | - Zhuang Yu
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
A Novel Gene Signature-Based Model Predicts Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 12:cancers12010001. [PMID: 31861273 PMCID: PMC7017310 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract: Currently, decision-making regarding biochemical recurrence (BCR) following prostatectomy relies solely on clinical parameters. We therefore attempted to develop an integrated prediction model based on a molecular signature and clinicopathological features, in order to forecast the risk for BCR and guide clinical decision-making for postoperative therapy. Using high-throughput screening and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) in the training set, a novel gene signature for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) was established. Validation of the prognostic value was performed in five other independent datasets, including our patient cohort. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the importance of risk for BCR. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (tROC) was used to evaluate the predictive power. In combination with relevant clinicopathological features, a decision tree was built to improve the risk stratification. The gene signature exhibited a strong capacity for identifying high-risk BCR patients, and multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the gene signature consistently acted as a risk factor for BCR. The decision tree was successfully able to identify the high-risk subgroup. Overall, the gene signature established in the present study is a powerful predictor and risk factor for BCR after radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
|
18
|
Storvall S, Leijon H, Ryhänen E, Louhimo J, Haglund C, Schalin-Jäntti C, Arola J. Somatostatin receptor expression in parathyroid neoplasms. Endocr Connect 2019; 8:1213-1223. [PMID: 31336364 PMCID: PMC6709562 DOI: 10.1530/ec-19-0260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Parathyroid carcinoma represents a rare cause of primary hyperparathyroidism. Distinguishing carcinoma from the benign tumors underlying primary hyperparathyroidism remains challenging. The diagnostic criteria for parathyroid carcinoma are local and/or metastatic spreading. Atypical parathyroid adenomas share other histological features with carcinomas but lack invasive growth. Somatostatin receptors are commonly expressed in different neuroendocrine tumors, but whether this also holds for parathyroid tumors remains unknown. AIM Our aim is to examine the immunohistochemical expression of somatostatin receptor 1-5 in parathyroid typical adenomas, atypical adenomas and carcinomas. METHODS We used a tissue microarray construct from a nationwide cohort of parathyroid carcinomas (n = 32), age- and gender-matched typical parathyroid adenomas (n = 72) and atypical parathyroid adenomas (n = 27) for immunohistochemistry of somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5. We separately assessed cytoplasmic, membrane and nuclear expression and also investigated the associations with histological, biochemical and clinical characteristics. RESULTS All parathyroid tumor subgroups expressed somatostatin receptors, although membrane expression appeared negligible. Except for somatostatin receptor 1, expression patterns differed between the three tumor types. Adenomas exhibited the weakest and carcinomas the strongest expression of somatostatin receptor 2, 3, 4 and 5. We observed the largest difference for cytoplasmic somatostatin receptor 5 expression. CONCLUSIONS Parathyroid adenomas, atypical adenomas and carcinomas all express somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5. Somatostatin receptor 5 may serve as a potential tumor marker for malignancy. Studies exploring the role of somatostatin receptor imaging and receptor-specific therapies in patients with parathyroid carcinomas are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Storvall
- Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Helena Leijon
- Department of Pathology and Huslab, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eeva Ryhänen
- Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johanna Louhimo
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Caj Haglund
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Camilla Schalin-Jäntti
- Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johanna Arola
- Department of Pathology and Huslab, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Correspondence should be addressed to J Arola:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Patients With Advanced Lung Carcinoids. Clin Lung Cancer 2019; 20:e376-e392. [PMID: 30910575 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Revised: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a family of malignancies of diverse origin, including the lung, gastrointestinal tract, and pancreas. Lung NEN include well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) classified as typical carcinoids or atypical carcinoids, and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas classified as small-cell lung carcinoma or large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. According to a recent analysis of a large, population-based registry, approximately one-third of all patients with lung typical/atypical carcinoids have distant metastases at diagnosis, and median survival for these patients is 24 months. At present, only 1 therapy is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with advanced lung typical/atypical carcinoids, everolimus, indicating a clear need for more treatment options in this patient population. Although not yet supported by results from randomized prospective trials, somatostatin analogues are considered an acceptable treatment option for patients with lung typical/atypical carcinoids expressing somatostatin receptors. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic NET; however, the role of PRRT in patients with lung typical/atypical carcinoids remains unclear, because they were not included in the pivotal NETTER-1 (Neuroendocrine Tumors Therapy) trial. Herein we provide a comprehensive review of the available clinical evidence for efficacy and safety of PRRT in patients with lung typical/atypical carcinoids. On the basis of the preliminary evidence of efficacy and the consistent safety profile in this patient group, we propose that experienced multidisciplinary NET teams may consider PRRT alongside everolimus as an option for patients with advanced somatostatin receptor-positive lung typical/atypical carcinoids whose disease is progressing during first-line treatment with somatostatin analogues.
Collapse
|