Somatotropic function in short stature: evaluation by integrated auxological and hormonal indices in 214 children. The Italian Collaborative Group of Neuroendocrinology

Short procedure of GHRH plus arginine test in clinical practice

Either in children or in adults, arginine (ARG) alone and combined with GHRH (GHRH+ARG) are reliable tests for the diagnosis of GH deficiency. The procedures of these tests generally include GH measurement every 15 min from baseline up to 90-120 min. Aim of our study was to verify if the procedure of these tests could be usefully shortened in clinical practice. To this goal we have studied 173 normally growing children and adolescents (C, 117 M and 56 F, age: 11.3 +/- 0.4 yr.) and 125 young and middle aged normal adults (A, 68 M and 57 F, age: 30.0 +/- 0.6 yr.). ARG alone test was performed by 81 C and 33 A (0.5 g/kg arginine, i.v., from 0 to +30 min, up to a maximum of 30 g) while GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v. bolus at 0 min) + ARG test was performed by 92 C and 92 A. After ARG alone, taking into account data from +15 to +105 min, GH values above the 3rd centile limit of arbitrary cut-off (7 or 10 microg/l in C and 5 microg/l in A) occurred in 85% or 64% and 94% subjects, respectively. After GHRH+ARG test, taking into account only data at +30, +45, +60 min GH values above the 3rd centile limit (20 microg/l in C and 16.5 microg/l in A) occurred in 99% of subjects in both groups. Taking into account only these 3 timing points, the percentage of GH peak above the third centile limits after ARG alone was never higher than 60% in C and 85% in A. In conclusion, this study shows that single GHRH+arginine test can be reliably performed in a shortened procedure which makes easier the clinical practice and further reduces costs.

Impairment of GH responsiveness to GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) in Prader-Willi syndrome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the GH-releasing activity of a synthetic hexapeptide, GHRP-6, in the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Sixteen PWS patients (7 males and 9 females, aged 12.7-38.3 yr), 15 with essential obesity (OB) (7 males and 8 females, aged 12.9-42.9 yr), and 8 short normal children (SN; 3 males and 5 females, aged 10.2-14.3 yr) underwent 2 tests on separate occasions, being challenged with GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg, iv) or GHRH (1 microg/kg, iv)+PD (60 or 120 mg for children or adults, po). Moreover, in 11 patients with PWS and in the group of SN, the GH response to at least 2 stimulation tests had been previously determined. GH was analyzed either as mean peak values (GHp, mcg/l), or as the area under the curve (AUC, mcg/l/h) and the net incremental area under the curve (nAUC, mcg/l/h). In the group of PWS subjects, GH responses to both GHRP-6 (GHp: 11.4+/-2.0; AUC: 588+/-113; nAUC: 483+/-108) and GHRH+PD (GHp: 7.3+/-1.8; AUC: 486+/-122; nAUC: 371+/-250) were significantly lower than those observed either in OB (GHRP-6: GHp: 25.7+/-3.2, p<0.003; AUC: 1833+/-305, p<0.005; nAUC: 1640+/-263, p<0.0001. GHRH+PD: GHp: 15.1+/-2.4, p<0.009; AUC: 1249+/-248, p<0.003; nAUC: 918+/-230, p<0.006) or in SN patients (GHRP-6: GHp: 39.1+/-3.1, p<0.0001; AUC: 2792+/-158, p<0.0001; nAUC: 2705+/-165, p<0.00005. GHRH+PD: GHp: 27.5+/-3.7, p<0.0001; AUC: 1873+/-251, p<0.0001; nAUC: 1692+/-219, p<0.0005). Unlike control groups, in PWS patients GH levels after GHRP-6 did not differ from those obtained after GHRH+PD. Interestingly, low IGF-I values were present in all PWS subjects. Furthermore, no patient with PWS showed normal GH response to the previously performed GH stimulation tests. As already reported, GH release after GHRP-6 or GHRH+PD was significantly lower in OB than in SN subjects. In conclusion, our data indicate that: 1) GH response to GHRP-6 is clearly impaired in PWS; 2) the blunted GH responses to the provocative stimuli in PWS are not an artifact of obesity; 3) short stature in PWS is caused by a complex dysfunction of the hypothalamo-pituitary structures.

Hexarelin-induced growth hormone response in short stature. Comparison with growth hormone-releasing hormone plus pyridostigmine and arginine plus estrogen

Hexarelin (HEX) is a synthetic hexapeptide with strong GH-stimulating activity. We evaluated GH response (expressed as maximum value after stimulus [Cmax] and as area under the curve [AUC]) to HEX at the doses of 1 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 1) and 2 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 2), in comparison with the responses to GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v.) + pyridostigmine (PD, 60 mg po) and to arginine (ARG, 0.5 mg/kg i.v.) + ethinylestradiol (EE, 1 mg/day po for 3 days before the stimulation), in 5 subjects with familial short stature (FSS), 11 with constitutional growth delay (CGD), 6 with GH neurosecretory dysfunction (NSD), and 5 with isolated growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 1 were 26.8+/-10.5 ng/ml and 1448+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 23.6+/-14.4 ng/ml and 1146+/-750 ng/min x ml in CGD, 36.9+/-21.5 ng/ml and 2048+/-1288 ng/min x ml in NSD, 9.4+/-5.8 ng/ml and 498+/-200 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS and CGD, p<0.05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 2 were 37.7+/-16 ng/ml and 1979+/-888 ng/min x ml in FSS, 32.5+/-16.2 ng/ml and 1613+/-237 ng/min x ml in CGD, 39.7+/-20.7 ng/ml and 2366+/-1569 ng/min xml in NSD, 13.4+/-4.2 ng/ml and 645+/-293 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax in FSS, CGD and NSD p<0.01 vs GHD; AUC in NSD, p<05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after GHRH+/-PD were 46.6+/-8.8 ng/ml and 3294+/-1031 ng/min x ml in FSS, 25.9+/-11.2 ng/ml and 1464+/-735 ng/min x ml in CGD, 38.8+/-21.7 ng/ml and 2428+/-1399 ng/min x ml in NSD, 8.4+/-6.2 ng/ml and 685+/-572 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, p<0.001 vs CGD and GHD; Cmax in CGD and NSD, p<0.001 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after ARG+EE were 21.3+/-4.2 ng/ml and 1432+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 14.8+/-10 ng/ml and 805+/-489 ng/min x ml in CGD, 22.2+/-12.8 ng/ml and 1199+/-309 ng/min x ml in NSD, 4.6+/-2.5 ng/ml and 247+/-191 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, CGD and NSD, p<0.01 vs GHD). Specificity was 62% for HEX 1 and 75% for HEX 2, GHRH+PD and ARG+EE. From a diagnostic point of view, HEX 1 + HEX 2 was the association with the largest percentage of false positives (20% in FSS, 27% in CGD and 33% in NSD), HEX 1 +GHRH+PD resulted in 9% in CGD, while the combined use of HEX 1 or HEX 2 with GHRH+PD or ARG+EE and of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE did not show false positive responses.

IN CONCLUSION

I) the most effective dose of HEX was 2 microg/kg i.v.; 2) HEX did not show more specificity than GHRH+PD and ARG+EE; 3) the association of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE could yield the best results at lower costs, confirming these tests as first-line tools in evaluating GH secretion.

Impairment of growth hormone responsiveness to growth hormone releasing hormone and pyridostigmine in patients affected by Prader-Labhardt-Willi syndrome

In order to evaluate the impairment of GH response in patients affected by Prader-Labhardt-Willi (PLW) syndrome, in 18 patients we studied GH response to clonidine and to GHRH + pyridostigmine, a cholinergic drug which enhances GHRH induced GH responsiveness in obese patients. After clonidine GH response was abnormal in 14/18 subjects (mean GH peak: 4.1 +/- 1.3 micrograms/l; area under curve: 208.1 +/- 74.2 micrograms/l.h) while all but 5 patients showed an inadequate GH response to GHRH + pyridostigmine (mean GH peak: 13.4 +/- 2.5 micrograms/l; area under curve: 903.4 +/- 171.0 micrograms/l.h). However, in the three patients with low adiposity index, GH response to GHRH + pyridostigmine was significantly higher than that observed in fatter subjects. In addition, GH response to GHRH + pyridostigmine was negatively correlated to age and adiposity index. In conclusion, our data are consistent with the hypothesis of the existence of a complex derangement of GH neuroendocrine regulation in these subjects.

Growth hormone response to oral clonidine test in normal and short children

We evaluated the growth hormone (GH) response to an acute clonidine test (0.15 mg/m2 po) in 30 normal prepubertal children (stature between the 3rd and 97th centile), in 29 short children (stature < 3rd centile for age) with height velocity (HV) > 10th centile and in 20 short children with HV < 10th centile. The three groups had comparable chronological ages. After clonidine administration mean peak GH levels were similar in the three groups (19.4 +/- 9.8, 17.7 +/- 8.8 and 14.6 +/- 8.9 micrograms/l, mean +/- SD, respectively). By choosing 10 micrograms/l as the limit for a normal response we found that stimulated GH levels had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 83% in identifying children with suspected GHD (short children with subnormal HV). The diagnostic accuracy was almost superimposable, for cut-off values of 10 and 12 micrograms/l. Eight of the 10 children with subnormal HV and a GH peak < 10 micrograms/l had a GH peak < 10 micrograms/l also after a second stimulation test. Six of the 29 short children with normal HV had a GH peak < 10 micrograms/l. Only one of them had a GH peak < 10 micrograms/l after a second stimulation test. Five of the normal children had peak GH levels < 10 micrograms/l. These results indicate that HV is a useful variable to predict the GH response to an acute GH stimulus, since the great majority of children with a normal growth rate had a normal GH response to at least one stimulation test.