An Approach to Nonsuppressed Testosterone in Transgender Women Receiving Gender-Affirming Feminizing Hormonal Therapy

Transgender Women With Suppressed Testosterone Display Lower Burden of Coronary Disease Than Matched Cisgender Men

Context

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) in transgender women (TW) may be affected by gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and HIV, but few data compare TW on contemporary GAHT to well-matched controls.

Objective

We compared CVD burden and biomarker profiles between TW and matched cisgender men (CM).

Methods

Adult TW on GAHT (n = 29) were recruited for a cross-sectional study (2018-2020). CM (n = 48) from the former Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study were matched 2:1 to TW on HIV serostatus, age ±5 years, race/ethnicity, BMI category and antiretroviral therapy (ART) type. Cardiac parameters were measured by CT and coronary atherosclerosis by coronary CT angiography; sex hormone and biomarker concentrations were measured centrally from stored samples.

Results

Overall, median age was 53 years and BMI 29 kg/m2; 69% were non-white. All participants with HIV (71%) had viral suppression on ART. Only 31% of TW had testosterone suppression (<50 ng/dL, TW-S). Traditional CVD risk factors were similar between groups, except that TW-S had higher BMI than TW with non-suppressed testosterone (TW-T). TW-S had no evidence of non-calcified coronary plaque or advanced coronary stenosis, whereas TW-T and CM had similar burden. TW had lower prevalence of any coronary plaque, calcified plaque and mixed plaque than CM, regardless of testosterone concentrations and HIV serostatus. Estradiol but not testosterone concentrations moderately and negatively correlated with the presence of coronary plaque and stenosis. Small sample size limited statistical power.

Conclusion

Older TW with suppressed total testosterone on GAHT had no CT evidence of non-calcified coronary plaque or advanced coronary stenosis. Longitudinal studies to understand relationships between GAHT and CVD risk in TW are needed.

Effectiveness and Safety of Different Estradiol Regimens in Transgender Females: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

A goal of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for transgender women is to use estradiol to suppress endogenous production of testosterone. However, the effects of different estradiol regimens and route of administration on testosterone suppression is unknown. This is the first open-label randomized trial comparing different GAHT regimens for optimal estradiol route and dosing.

Objective

To evaluate 1 month and 6 months testosterone suppression <50 ng/dL with pulsed (once- or twice-daily sublingual 17-beta estradiol) and continuous (transdermal 17-beta estradiol) GAHT.

Methods

This study was conducted at an outpatient adult transgender clinic. Thirty-nine transgender women undergoing initiation of GAHT were randomly assigned to receive either once-daily sublingual, twice-daily sublingual, or transdermal 17-beta estradiol. All participants received spironolactone as an antiandrogen. Doses were titrated at monthly intervals to achieve total testosterone suppression <50 ng/dL.

Results

Transdermal 17-beta estradiol resulted in more rapid suppression of total testosterone, lower estrone levels, with no differences in estradiol levels when compared to once-daily and twice-daily sublingual estradiol. Moreover, there was no difference in the mean estradiol dose between the once-daily and twice-daily sublingual 17-beta estradiol group.

Conclusion

Continuous exposure with transdermal 17-beta estradiol suppressed testosterone production more effectively and with lower overall estradiol doses relative to once or twice daily sublingual estradiol. Most transgender women achieved cisgender women testosterone levels within 2 months on 1 or 2 0.1 mg/24 hours estradiol patches. Given no difference between once- or twice-daily sublingual estradiol, pulsed 17-beta estradiol likely provides no benefit for testosterone suppression.

Gender-affirming pharmacotherapy and additional health considerations: A contemporary review

BACKGROUND

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals in the United States face health care disparities compounded with discrimination and limited access to necessary medical services. Gender-affirming interventions have been shown to mitigate gender dysphoria and psychiatric comorbidities, yet United States legislation limiting such interventions has increased. As medication experts, pharmacists can facilitate access to care and appropriate use of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and educate other health care providers on best practices for caring for TGD individuals in a variety of settings.

OBJECTIVES

To provide pharmacists with a contemporary review of GAHT and associated medication-related concerns.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for articles published until December 2022. MeSH terms such as transgender, transsexual, gender diverse, gender variant, or gender nonconforming in combination with phrases like gender-affirming care, treatment, pharmacotherapy, or hormone therapy were used to capture desired articles.

RESULTS

Feminizing hormone therapy (FHT), such as estrogen and antiandrogen agents, increases female secondary sex characteristics while suppressing male secondary sex characteristics. Masculinizing hormone therapy (MHT) achieves male secondary sex characteristics and minimizes female secondary sex characteristics using testosterone. For both FHT and MHT, the choice of therapy and formulation ultimately involves the patient's treatment goals, preferences, and tolerability. GAHT has additional health considerations pertaining to renal drug dosing, fertility, cardiovascular, and cancer risks. Pharmacists may provide crucial guidance and education to both patients and health care providers regarding risks associated with GAHT.

CONCLUSION

Many pharmacists feel unprepared to help provide, manage, and optimize GAHT. For many TGD individuals, GAHT is medically necessary and a life-saving treatment. Therefore, pharmacists should be provided tools to close knowledge gaps and improve their ability to care for these patients. By offering a thorough updated overview of GAHT, pharmacists can gain confidence to provide appropriate care for this increasingly visible population.

A Mouse Model to Investigate the Impact of Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy with Estradiol on Reproduction

Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) can help transgender and/or gender diverse (TGD) individuals achieve emobidment goals that align with their transition needs. Clinical evidence from estradiol (E)-GAHT patients indicate widespread changes in tissues sensitive to E and testosterone (T), particularly in the reproductive system. Notably, E-GAHTs effects on hormones and reproduction vary greatly between patients. With the goal of informing clinical research and practice for TGD individuals taking E, this study examines intact male mice implanted with capsules containing one of three different E doses (low 1.25 mg; mid 2.5 mg; high 5 mg), or a blank control capsule. All E-GAHT doses suppress T and follicle stimulating hormone levels while elevating E levels. Only the high E-GAHT dose significantly supresses luteinizing hormone levels. All E-GAHT doses affect epididymis tubule size similarly while seminiferous tubule morphology and bladder weight changes are dose-dependent. E-GAHT does not alter the presence of mature sperm, though E-exposed sperm have altered motility. These data represent the first evidence that mouse models offer an effective tool to understand E-GAHTs impact on reproductive health and the dose-dependent effects of this model permit examinations of diverse patient outcomes.

Cardiovascular disease and feminizing gender-affirming hormone therapy: Implications for the provision of safe and lifesaving care

Sex recorded at birth, gender identity, and feminizing gender-affirming hormone therapy (fGAHT) likely contribute to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in transgender women. Understanding the interplay of these factors is necessary for the provision of safe, affirming, and lifesaving care. Among transgender women taking fGAHT, data show increases in CVD mortality and rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and venous thromboembolism compared to reference populations, depending on study design and comparators. However, most studies are observational with a paucity of contextualizing information (e.g., dosing, route of administration, gonadectomy status), which makes it difficult to parse adverse fGAHT effects from confounders and interaction with known CVD risk factors (e.g., obesity, smoking, psychosocial and gender minority stressors). Increased CVD risk in transgender women points toward a need for greater attention to CVD management in this population including cardiology referral when indicated and additional research on the mechanisms and mediators of CVD risk.

Gender identity: Current concepts and gender-affirming hormone therapy

In the past five years, healthcare organisation for trans people in Spain has changed as laws intended to protect sexual and gender diversity have been put in place. As a result, endocrinologists are not only on the front lines (understood as prescribing and following up gender-affirming hormone therapy) but also coordinating multidisciplinary healthcare for these individuals. Advances in transgender medicine, the complexity of diverse trans identities and the impact of hormone therapy on quality of life and risk of middle- and long-term complications call for in-depth examination of a personalised biopsychosocial approach to trans people that requires specific training in this field of knowledge as well as updates on the concepts, terminology and drug treatments used.

Southern African HIV Clinicians' Society gender-affirming healthcare guideline for South Africa

No abstract available.