Adrenal effects and pharmacokinetics of CFC-free beclomethasone dipropionate: a 14-day dose-response study

Cost-effectiveness of single-inhaler extrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium in patients with uncontrolled asthma in England

BACKGROUND

In patients with asthma that is uncontrolled by a medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA), a maintenance therapy option is the addition of a long-acting muscarinic agonist, either via multiple inhalers, or single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT). One SITT is the extrafine formulation of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium (BDP/FF/G). We used data from two 52-week clinical trials (TRIMARAN and TRIGGER), both conducted in adults with asthma uncontrolled by ICS/LABA, to investigate the cost-effectiveness of BDP/FF/G.

METHODS

A Markov cohort state transition model (focusing on exacerbations) was used to investigate the cost-effectiveness of medium- or high-dose BDP/FF/G vs medium- or high-dose BDP/FF, and high-dose BDP/FF/G vs high-dose BDP/FF + tiotropium. The model analysed cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and was developed from the England National Health Service perspective (2020 costs). Uncertainty of the inputs was estimated using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Both medium- and high-dose BDP/FF/G were cost-effective vs BDP/FF, with ICERs of £12,224 and £15,587 per QALY gained. High-dose BDP/FF/G was dominant vs BDP/FF + tiotropium, as it was both cheaper and gained QALYs. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base model: medium- and high-dose BDP/FF/G had 94.3% and 88.3% likelihoods to be cost-effective vs BDP/FF; high-dose BDP/FF/G had 100% likelihood to be a dominant strategy vs BDP/FF + tiotropium.

CONCLUSIONS

Both medium- and high-dose BDP/FF/G were cost-effective vs medium- and high-dose BDP/FF in adults with asthma that was uncontrolled by ICS/LABA. In addition, high-dose BDP/FF/G was a dominating strategy to high-dose BDP/FF + tiotropium.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV: NCT02676076 and NCT02676089.

Ethnic Sensitivity Study of the Extrafine, Single-Inhaler, Triple Therapy Beclomethasone Dipropionate, Formoterol Fumarate, and Glycopyrronium Bromide Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler in Japanese and Caucasian Healthy Individuals: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Dose Crossover Study

PURPOSE

A number of single-inhaler, fixed-dose, triple combinations are available for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or asthma. One of these is the extrafine formulation beclomethasone dipropionate, formoterol fumarate, glycopyrronium bromide (BDP/FF/GB). Given that differences in ethnicity can result in differences in systemic exposure, we evaluated the relative pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of BDP/FF/GB in Japanese vs Caucasian healthy volunteers to assess the need for dose adjustment.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, single-dose, 4-way crossover study recruited healthy men and women 20 to 55 years of age; for each Japanese person a Caucasian was enrolled who matched in terms of sex, age, and weight. Study treatments included BDP/FF/GB 200/12/25 and 400/12/25 μg (therapeutic), 800/48/100 μg (supratherapeutic), and placebo. PK blood samples were taken up to 24 hours for evaluation of BDP, beclomethasone 17-monopropionate (B17MP, an active metabolite of BDP), and formoterol and up to 48 h for GB. The primary objective was to characterize the PK profiles of BDP, FF, and GB after administration of a single dose of BDP/FF/GB in Caucasian and Japanese healthy volunteers in terms of the AUC_0-t and C_max of B17MP, formoterol, and GB.

FINDINGS

Of the 32 recruited participants (16 Japanese and 16 Caucasian ), 30 completed the study. A clear plasma exposure dose-response relationship was found for all 4 molecules. B17MP C_max geometric mean ratios for Japanese vs Caucasian participants for the 3 study treatments ranged from 1.17 to 1.26, and AUC_0-t ratios ranged from 1.16 to 1.22; thus, the findings were comparable between the ethnicities. Formoterol exposure was higher in Japanese than Caucasian participants (C_max, 1.22-1.53; AUC_0-t, 1.23-1.40). The GB C_max with BDP/FF/GB 400/12/25 μg (1.09) and AUC_0-t values for all three doses (0.98-1.17) were comparable in the 2 populations, but C_max with 200/12/25 and 800/48/100 μg were higher in Japanese participants (1.32 and 1.42, respectively). Pharmacodynamic (cortisol, potassium, glucose, blood pressure, heart rate, and QT interval with the Fridericia correction) and safety profile results were similar in the 2 ethnicities, with most patients not experiencing any adverse events.

IMPLICATIONS

Exposure to BDP/FF/GB pressurized metered dose inhaler at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses was associated with higher plasma levels in Japanese versus Caucasian healthy volunteers. These PK differences did not translate into meaningful differences in the safety or pharmacodynamic parameters assessed in this study and were consistent with the results of other long-term (52-week) published studies. Dose adjustments in Japanese people are not deemed necessary. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03859414.

Efficacy and safety of inhaled extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate in adults with asthma: a randomized, parallel-group, dose-ranging study (BEAM)

Introduction: This manuscript describes a Phase II, dose-ranging, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group study conducted to identify the appropriate dose of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) to be used in a single-inhaler extrafine formulation triple combination of BDP, formoterol fumarate and glycopyrronium.Methods: Patients aged 18-75 years with poorly-controlled asthma, receiving low/medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), and who had forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV₁) 50-85% predicted, were randomized to inhale BDP 50, 200 or 400 µg twice daily (BID; total daily doses of 100, 400 and 800 µg), placebo, or the active comparator QVAR® 160 µg BID, all via pressurized metered-dose inhalers for 8 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate superiority of BDP over placebo for change from baseline in pre-dose morning FEV₁ at Week 8. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03084718.Results: Of 610 patients randomized, 559 (91.6%) completed the study. For pre-dose morning FEV₁ at Week 8, BDP 200 µg BID was superior to placebo, with a statistically significant difference of 113 ml (95% CI 18, 209); differences vs placebo for BDP 50 and 400 µg BID were not significant (44 [-52, 140] and 93 [-3, 188] ml, respectively). Secondary efficacy endpoint results supported the primary endpoint in identifying BDP 200 µg BID as the appropriate dose. Adverse events were experienced by 23.5, 25.0 and 30.6% patients with BDP 50, 200 and 400 µg BID, 34.7% with placebo, and 30.6% with the active comparator.Conclusion: In this dose-ranging study, BDP 200 µg BID offered the optimal balance of efficacy and safety in patients with asthma poorly controlled on low/medium-dose ICS.Supplemental data for this article is available online at at www.tandfonline.com/ijas .

Inhaled Corticosteroids and Endocrine Effects in Childhood

Asthma is the most common chronic inflammatory disease of children, and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the most effective and commonly used treatment of persistent asthma. ICSs currently approved for and commonly used by children with asthma include beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide, fluticasone propionate, mometasone furoate, ciclesonide, and triamcinolone acetonide. This article reviews 4 areas critical to understanding potential adverse endocrine outcomes of ICSs and placing them in proper perspective: (1) influence of drug/delivery device properties on systemic steroid burden; (2) adrenal insufficiency during ICS treatment; (3) growth effects of ICS and asthma itself; and (4) bone mineral accretion during ICS therapy.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic considerations in choosing an inhaled corticosteroid

Inhaled corticosteroids are effective in controlling airway inflammation. Their anti-inflammatory effect is primarily topical, at the site of deposition in the airways. Consequently, traditional pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic concepts, which rely on measuring blood concentrations of drug, have limited applicability for evaluating the efficacy of topically acting inhaled corticosteroids. Important factors affecting efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids are: (i) intrinsic properties of the drugs, particularly their affinity for the corticosteroid receptor; and (ii) the newer pharmacodynamic concept of deposition characteristics of the drug formulation. Small particle formulations, especially those developed in the metered-dose inhaler with the new hydrofluoroalkane propellant, deposit to a much greater extent in the lung and may consequently have improved clinical efficacy. Lipid conjugation of inhaled corticosteroids within the lung may allow prolonged duration of effect, enabling once-daily administration. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic principles probably do not play a role in describing upper airway adverse effects occurring with inhaled corticosteroids. These are probably also determined by intrinsic properties of the drug and deposition characteristics. However, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic principles seem to be important in addressing systemic safety concerns with inhaled corticosteroids. Those inhaled corticosteroids with a longer serum half-life, especially if they have higher affinity for the corticosteroid receptor, may be associated with greater systemic effects. A new pharmacokinetic concept suggests that increased protein binding within the systemic circulation and high systemic clearance of an inhaled corticosteroid may reduce the risk for systemic effects. These new pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic concepts provide a useful framework for identifying the characteristics of an inhaled corticosteroid with an improved benefit-to-risk profile. Increased lung deposition and reduced deposition in the upper airway should result in an inhaled corticosteroid with favorable clinical efficacy and a decreased risk for topical upper airway adverse effects. An inhaled corticosteroid with high plasma protein binding and rapid clearance might pose much less risk for systemic adverse effects than currently available drugs in this class.

Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: on-demand or continuous use

Continuous inhaled corticosteroid treatment is highly effective in children and adults with mild persistent asthma, although some therapeutic benefits are not lost if treatment is delayed. Many patients do not adhere to continuous treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, but rather take them intermittently, usually at the time of increased symptoms. Based on these observations it has been proposed that for patients with mild persistent asthma inhaled corticosteroids should be used on-demand when symptoms are troublesome, rather than on a continuous basis. The article reviews the pharmacological properties of inhaled corticosteroids used in clinical trials of on-demand treatment, as well as the evidence for the efficacy and safety of on-demand compared with continuous inhaled corticosteroid treatment of mild persistent asthma in adults and children. The place of on-demand treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in the management of asthma is discussed, as well as future directions for different management strategies for this group.

Asthma outcomes and costs of therapy with extrafine beclomethasone and fluticasone

BACKGROUND

Characteristics of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) differ, but data comparing the real-life effectiveness of various ICSs for asthma are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare real-life asthma outcomes and costs of extrafine hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-beclomethasone and fluticasone administered through a pressurized metered-dose inhaler.

METHODS

This retrospective matched cohort study examined database markers of asthma control from a large US longitudinal health care claims database over 1 baseline and 1 outcome year for 10,312 patients with asthma aged 12 to 80 years receiving their first ICS as HFA-beclomethasone or fluticasone and matched on baseline demographic characteristics and asthma severity.

RESULTS

Patients started on HFA-beclomethasone had significantly higher odds (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI; 1.08-1.31) of achieving overall control (risk and impairment), which was defined as no hospital attendance for asthma, oral corticosteroids, or antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infection and less than 2 puffs per day of short-acting β-agonist; they also experienced a lower rate of respiratory-related hospitalizations or referrals (adjusted rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.93) than patients started on fluticasone. Other database outcome measures were similar in the 2 cohorts. Prescribed HFA-beclomethasone doses were lower (P < .001) than fluticasone doses (median, 320 μg/d [interquartile range, 160-320 μg/d] vs 440 μg/d [interquartile range, 176-440 μg/d]). Adjusted respiratory-related health care costs were significantly lower for HFA-beclomethasone than fluticasone (mean, $1869 [95% CI, $1727-$2032] vs $2259 [95% CI, $2111-$2404]), representing a mean annual savings of $390 (95% CI, $165-$620) per patient prescribed HFA-beclomethasone rather than fluticasone.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma treatment outcomes were similar or better with HFA-beclomethasone prescribed at significantly lower doses and with lower costs than fluticasone.

Treatment of the bronchial tree from beginning to end: targeting small airway inflammation in asthma

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease, characterized by airway obstruction and inflammation. Increasing evidence shows that the small airways contribute significantly to the clinical expression and severity of asthma. Traditionally, high levels of disease activity are thought to be necessary before symptoms occur in the small airways because of their large reserve capacity. However, this concept is being challenged and increasing evidence shows small airway disease to be associated with symptoms, disease severity, and bronchial hyper-responsiveness. Particle size and distribution are of key importance when developing inhaled treatments for small airway disease. The availability of small-particle aerosols such as HFA-ciclesonide and HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) enables a higher drug deposition into the peripheral lung and potentially provides additional clinical benefits compared with large-particle treatment. However, improved methods are needed to monitor and assess small airway disease and its response to treatment because conventional spirometry mainly reflects large airway function. This remains a challenging area requiring further research. The aim of the current manuscript is to review the clinical relevance of small airway disease and the implications for the treatment of asthma.

Urinary pharmacokinetic methodology to determine the relative lung bioavailability of inhaled beclometasone dipropionate

AIM

Urinary pharmacokinetic methods have been identified to determine the relative lung and systemic bioavailability after an inhalation. We have extended this methodology to inhaled beclometasone dipropionate (BDP).

METHOD

Ethics Committee approval was obtained and all subjects gave consent. Twelve healthy volunteers received randomized doses, separated by >7 days, of 2000 µg BDP solution with (OralC) and without (Oral) 5 g oral charcoal, 10,100 µg inhalations from a Qvar(®) Easibreathe metered dose inhaler (pMDI) with (QvarC) and without (Qvar) oral charcoal and eight 250 µg inhalations from a Clenil(®) pMDI (Clenil). Subjects provided urine samples at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12 and 24 h post study dose. Urinary concentrations of BDP and its metabolites, beclometasone-17-monopropionate (17-BMP) and beclometasone (BOH) were measured.

RESULTS

No BDP, 17-BMP or BOH were detected in any samples post OralC dosing. Post oral dosing no BDP was detected in all urine samples and no 17-BMP or BOH was excreted in the first 30 min. Significantly more (P < 0.001) BDP, 17-BMP and BOH were excreted in the first 30 min and the cumulative 24 h urinary excretions post Qvar and Clenil compared with Oral. The mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of the 30 min urinary excretions for Qvar compared with Clenil was 231.4 (209.6, 255.7) %.

CONCLUSION

The urinary pharmacokinetic methodology to determine the relative lung and systemic bioavailability post inhalation, using 30 min and cumulative 24 h post inhalation samples, applies to BDP. The ratio between Qvar and Clenil is consistent with related clinical and lung deposition studies.

Small airway disease in asthma and COPD: clinical implications

Asthma and COPD have a high personal, societal, and economic impact. Both diseases are characterized by airway obstruction and an inflammatory process. The inflammatory process affects the whole respiratory tract, from central to peripheral airways that are <2 mm in internal diameter, the so-called small airways. There is an increased interest in small airway disease, and some new insights have been gained about the contribution of these small airways to the clinical expression of asthma and COPD, as reviewed in this article. Newly developed devices enable drugs to target the small airways, and this may have implications for treatment of patients with asthma, particularly those not responding to large-particle inhaled corticosteroids or those with uncontrollable asthma. The first studies in COPD are promising, and results from new studies are eagerly awaited.

Systemic exposure and implications for lung deposition with an extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fixed combination

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Foster is a fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol (BDP/F). It is formulated as an extra-fine solution and delivered via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) using a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant. The aims of this study were to compare the systemic exposure to BDP, to its active metabolite beclometasone-17-monopropionate (B17MP) and to formoterol after administration of BDP/F versus separate administration of a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) formulation of BDP and formoterol HFA, and to explore a possible relationship between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic findings.

METHODS

In this open-label, crossover, placebo-controlled study, 12 healthy male subjects received a single dose of BDP/F 400 microg/24 microg (four inhalations of Foster BDP/F 100 microg/6 microg), single doses of BDP CFC 1000 microg (four inhalations of Becotide Forte 250 microg) plus formoterol 24 microg (four inhalations of Atimos 6 microg) via separate MDIs, or placebo. Continuous pharmacokinetic variables for BDP, B17MP, formoterol, cortisol and potassium were evaluated. Cardiovascular effects, peak flow measurements and tolerability were also examined.

RESULTS

Exposure to BDP was not significantly different between active treatment arms, but lower systemic exposure to B17MP was observed with the fixed combination than with the separate components (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC] from time zero to infinity [AUC(infinity)] 5280 vs 8120 pg.h/mL; p = 0.001). Despite a lower total systemic exposure to B17MP with the fixed combination, B17MP plasma concentrations during the first 30 minutes after administration, indicative of pulmonary absorption, were 86% higher with BDP/F than with the separate components (AUC from 0 to 30 minutes [AUC(30 min)] 353 vs 190 pg x h/mL; p = 0.003). Twenty-four-hour serum cortisol concentrations were significantly higher with BDP/F than with BDP and formoterol administered separately (2.26 vs 1.90 microg x h/mL; p < 0.01). No significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of formoterol and no clinically relevant differences in serum potassium and cardiovascular or spirometric parameters were observed between the treatments. Both active treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

These pharmacokinetic data show that with a BDP dose from Foster that is 2.5 times less than a BDP dose from Becotide Forte, pulmonary absorption is 86% higher; however, systemic exposure is 35% lower, resulting in less cortisol suppression for a similar BDP dosage.

Particle size of inhaled corticosteroids: does it matter?

A question with respect to asthma therapy revolves around the issue of whether better efficacy occurs with an ultrafine-particle inhaled corticosteroid because of better lung deposition into the distal airways. This article reviews particle size and delivery devices of different steroids, clinical outcomes of small- versus large-particle steroids, and the issue of pharmacoeconomics.

Comparison of inhaled corticosteroids: an update

OBJECTIVE

To review the basis for the estimated comparative daily dosages of inhaled corticosteroids for children and adults that are presented in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Expert Panel Report 3; in addition, the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic basis for potential clinical differences among inhaled corticosteroids is discussed.

DATA SOURCES

A complete MEDLINE search was conducted of human studies of asthma pharmacotherapy published between January 1, 2001, and March 15, 2006, followed by a PubMed search up until August 2008, using ciclesonide, inhaled corticosteroids, and pharmacokinetics as key words. Product information on each inhaled corticosteroid was also included.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Comparative clinical trials of inhaled corticosteroids and systematic reviews for efficacy comparisons were evaluated. Extensive literature reviews, meta-analyses, and selected clinical studies that illustrate or represent specific points of view were selected. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data extracted from previously published reviews and specific studies were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pharmacodynamic characteristics (glucocorticoid receptor binding) and lung delivery determine the relative clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetic properties (oral bioavailability, lung retention, systemic clearance) and determine comparative therapeutic index of the inhaled corticosteroids. Secondary pharmacokinetic differences (intracellular fatty acid esterification, high serum protein binding) that have been posited to improve duration of action and/or therapeutic index are unproven, and current comparative clinical trials do not support the hypotheses that they provide an advantage. Ultrafine particle meter-dose inhalers (MDIs) have not demonstrated superior asthma control or improved safety over older MDIs. All of the inhaled corticosteroids demonstrate efficacy with once-daily dosing, and all are more effective when dosed twice daily.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that all of the inhaled corticosteroids have sufficient therapeutic indexes to provide similar efficacy and safety in low to medium doses. Whether or not some of the newer inhaled corticosteroids offer any advantages at higher doses has yet to be determined.

Efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate HFA 200 microg once daily in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchial asthma

The efficacy and safety of once-daily beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP; 200 microg), in combination with the propellant hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) was compared with that of budesonide turbuhaler (BUD-TH) 400 microg twice daily and fluticasone propionate inhaler (FP-IH) 250 microg twice daily in 40 patients with bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. All patients had used inhaled corticosteroids for at least 1 month. On randomization, 20 patients were switched to HFA-BDP and 20 patients remained on their existing BUD-TH or FP-IH treatment. After 8 weeks, HFA-BDP demonstrated a greater improvement in spirometric values, respiratory symptoms and beta2-agonist use. No significant local adverse effects were observed. Blood cortisol levels remained in the normal range in both groups. We conclude that HFA-BDP (200 microg once-daily) offered more benefit in terms of clinical and spirometry indices than BUD-TH (400 microg twice daily) or FP-IH (250 microg twice daily) in patients with moderate asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Pharmacokinetics of inhaled monodisperse beclomethasone as a function of particle size

AIMS

For optimal efficacy, antiasthma drugs should be delivered to the desired region in the airways. To date, the optimal particle size for steroids in adults is not known. The aim of the study was to evaluate the pulmonary bioavailability for inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) aerosols of different particle sizes.

METHODS

In a randomized single-blind crossover trial, 10 mild asthmatic patients inhaled monodisperse BDP aerosols with mass median aerodynamic diameters (MMADs) of 1.5, 2.5 and 4.5 microm. Gastrointestinal absorption was blocked by activated charcoal. Plasma concentrations of 17-beclomethasone monopropionate (17-BMP) were measured by liquid chromatography plus mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Aerosols with MMADs of 1.5 microm, 2.5 microm, and 4.5 microm gave mean maximum concentrations (C(max)) of 17-BMP of 475 pg ml(-1), 1300 pg ml(-1), and 1161 pg ml(-1), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values of 17-BMP for MMADs of 1.5 microm, 2.5 microm, and 4.5 microm were 825 pg ml(-1) h, 2629 pg ml(-1) h, and 2276 pg ml(-1) h, respectively. The mean terminal half-time of 17-BMP for all three aerosol sizes was around 1.5 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Monodisperse BDP aerosols with a MMAD of 1.5 microm gave two-three fold lower values for C(max) and AUC than those with MMADs of 2.5 and 4.5 microm.

Access to inhaled corticosteroids is key to improving quality of care for asthma in developing countries

Asthma is a worldwide public health problem affecting about 300 million people. The majority of persons living with asthma are in the developing world where there is limited access to essential drugs. The financial burden for persons living with asthma and their families, as well as for healthcare systems and governments, is very high. Inadequate treatment and the high cost of medications leads to disability, absenteeism and poverty. Despite the existence of effective asthma medications and international guidelines, and progress made in the implementation of such guidelines over the last decade, the high cost of essential asthma medications remains a major obstacle for patient access to treatment in developing countries. The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease has evaluated this problem and created an Asthma Drug Facility (ADF) so that countries can purchase affordable, good quality essential drugs for asthma. The ADF uses pooled procurement along with other purchasing and supply strategies to obtain the lowest possible prices. Accompanied by the implementation of standardized asthma management, the increased affordability of drugs provided by the ADF should bring rapid and significant health and cost benefits for patients, their communities and governments.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of inhaled beclometasone dipropionate delivered via hydrofluoroalkane-containing devices

Inhaled corticosteroids have a key role in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In recent times, beclometasone dipropionate has been reformulated in pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), using hydrofluoroalkanes (HFAs) as a propellant. Extensive toxicological testing has shown that HFA-propellants are well tolerated. Among the reformulated beclometasone dipropionate-containing pMDIs, only the characteristics of the two Qvar formulations have been thoroughly explored. Compared to the reference beclometasone dipropionate formulation, the mass median aerodynamic diameter of the Qvar formulations are substantially smaller (1.1 vs 4.0 microm), whereas that of Modulite averages 2.6 microm. Scintigraphic and pharmacokinetic studies indicate a higher lung deposition for both the Qvar and the Beclazone formulations, compared with reference beclometasone dipropionate formulation. Since the 2- to 3-fold increase in pulmonary deposition results in a 2.6- to 3-fold difference in relative efficacy for Qvar, half the dose of the reference beclometasone dipropionate formulation has been currently recommended in adult patients with asthma, a recommendation that is supported by a large number of clinical trials. Conversely, the design of the studies conducted to compare the efficacy of Qvar with fluticasone propionate and budesonide does not allow establishing their equivalence on a milligram per milligram basis. Good studies on the bioequivalence between the reference beclometasone dipropionate formulation and the Modulite or Beclazone formulations are not available.

Inhaled beclomethasone versus placebo for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has been, together with inhaled budesonide, the mainstay of anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma for many years. A range of new prophylactic therapies for asthma is becoming available and BDP has been reformulated using a hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) propellant which is free from chlorofluorocarbon (CFC).

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to: (1) Compare the efficacy of BDP with placebo with both CFC and HFA propellants in the treatment of chronic asthma. (2) Explore the possibility that a dose response relationship exists for BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma. (3) To provide the best estimate of the efficacy of BDP as a benchmark for evaluation of newer asthma therapies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches were current as of January 2003.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group design trials for a minimum period of four weeks, in children and adults comparing CFC-BDP or HFA-BDP with placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer extracted data; authors were contacted to clarify missing information. We analysed data with RevMan Analyses 1.0.2.

MAIN RESULTS

60 studies recruiting 6542 participants met the inclusion criteria. CFC-BDP (57 studies): In non-oral steroid treated patients, at doses of 400 mcg/day or less CFC-BDP produced significant improvements from baseline in a number of efficacy measures compared with placebo, including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 360 ml (95% CI 260 to 460); FEV1 (% predicted) WMD 12.41% (95% CI 8.18 to 16.64) and morning peak expiratory flow rate (am PEF) WMD 35.95 L/min (95% CI 27.85 to 44.04). BDP also led to reductions in rescue beta-2 agonist use compared with placebo of -2.32 puffs/d (95% CI -2.55 to -2.09) and reduced the relative risk (RR) of trial withdrawal due to an asthma exacerbation 0.25 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.51). Subgroup analyses based on treatment duration provide support to the proposal that a treatment period of greater than four weeks is required to realise a fuller treatment effect. In oral steroid treated patients BDP led to significantly greater reductions in oral prednisolone use WMD -4.91 mg/d (95% CI -5.88 to -3.94 mg/d) and greater likelihood of withdrawing oral steroid treatment RR 8.02 (95% CI 3.23 to 19.92). HFA-BDP (3 studies): In non-oral steroid-treated patients, HFA-BDP was significantly more effective than placebo in improving FEV1, morning and evening PEF, FEF25 to 75%, reduced asthma symptoms and beta2-agonists daily consumption. Significant effects for such outcomes were apparent after six weeks of treatment. In oral steroid treated patients, HFA-BDP improved significantly FEV1 and am PEF. The summary estimates for these outcomes suggested a high level of heterogeneity, and divergent aims of the studies may contribute to the variation we observed. Limited data on adverse events were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review has quantified the efficacy of CFC-BDP and HFA-BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma and strongly supports its use. Current asthma guidelines recommend titration of dose to individual patient response, but the published data provide little support for dose titration above 400 mcg/d in patients with mild to moderate asthma. There are insufficient data to draw any conclusions concerning dose-response in people with severe asthma.

Add-on therapy options in asthma not adequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids: a comprehensive review

Many patients with persistent asthma can be controlled with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). However, a considerable proportion of patients remain symptomatic, despite the use of ICS. We present systematically evidence that supports the different treatment options. A literature search was made of Medline/PubMed to identify randomised and blinded trials. To demonstrate the benefit that can be obtained by increasing the dose of ICS, dose-response studies with at least three different ICS doses were identified. To demonstrate whether more benefit can be obtained by adding long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA), leukotriene antagonist (LTRA) or theophylline than by increasing the dose of ICS, studies comparing these options were identified. Thirdly, studies comparing the different "add-on" options were identified. The addition of a LABA is more effective than increasing the dose of ICS in improving asthma control. By increasing the dose of ICS, clinical improvement is likely to be of small magnitude. Addition of a LTRA or theophylline to the treatment regimen appears to be equivalent to doubling the dose of ICS. Addition of a LABA seems to be superior to an LTRA in improving lung function. However, addition of LABA and LTRA may be equal with respect to asthma exacerbations. However, more and longer studies are needed to better clarify the role of LTRAs and theophylline as add-on therapies.

Pharmaceutical characteristics that influence the clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the most effective therapy for the management of persistent asthma. The aim of ICS therapy is to achieve a high anti-inflammatory effect in the airways with a concomitant low risk of unwanted local and systemic effects. Direct estimates of clinical efficacy and potency based on studies in humans are difficult to interpret.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the challenges of using alternative estimates of ICS efficacy and potency, including pharmaceutical characteristics.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Articles published from 1990 to 2002 on the potency, efficacy, and tolerability of ICSs were identified using MEDLINE and in-house databases and were then reviewed. Search terms included inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, fluticasone, beclomethasone, mometasone, and potency.

RESULTS

Differences among ICSs can be readily shown using preclinical measures, such as glucocorticoid receptor binding or skin blanching tests. However, pharmaceutical (delivery and pharmacokinetic) differences of ICSs can have a greater impact on clinical efficacy than in vitro potency differences. For example, the unique esterification of budesonide in the airways prolongs its local activity and may contribute positively to its efficacy and therapeutic index. Although comparative clinical trials suggest 6-fold differences in potencies among ICSs, there is currently no evidence to support differences in efficacy when they are administered at equipotent dosages.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater preclinical potency of an ICS does not imply greater clinical efficacy. Pharmacokinetic factors can have a significant impact on relative clinical efficacy.

Local versus total systemic bioavailability of beclomethasone dipropionate CFC and HFA metered dose inhaler formulations

For inhaled formulations, the balance between desired local effects and undesired systemic activity can be expressed by L/T, where L represents bioavailability of drug from the lungs and T represents total systemic bioavailability. L/T is most useful when comparing formulations of the same inhaled substance. A high L/T is desirable as this implies efficient drug delivery to the target site, and minimization of unwanted activity from non-targeted drug delivery. The objective of this publication is to compare L/T for CFC and HFA inhaler formulations of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP). Predictions of the L/T comparison were tested with clinical trials. From five deposition and pharmacokinetic studies, L/T ratios for CFC-BDP and HFA-BDP were calculated as 0.21 and 0.92, respectively. These ratios predicted two differences for the therapeutic use of these products: (1) a smaller dose of HFA-BDP than CFC-BDP may be required for efficacy; and (2) a smaller number of adverse events may be observed for the HFA-BDP product, when delivered at the equivalent dose, compared to the CFC comparitor. A dose-response study confirmed that less than half the dose of HFA-BDP is needed to give the same efficacy as CFC-BDP. Two safety studies that measured adrenal suppression demonstrated less suppression with HFA-BDP than with a comparable efficacious dose of CFC-BDP. It is concluded that L/T is a useful parameter that incorporates the systemic contributions of lung deposition and pharmacokinetics. It is recommended that this parameter be considered whenever deposition and pharmacokinetic data for two formulations of the same inhaled substance are compared.

Beclomethasone, budesonide and fluticasone propionate inhibit human neutrophil apoptosis

Inhaled glucocorticoids are widely used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease without much evidence of efficiency in this disease where neutrophils may contribute to the pathophysiology. This prompted us to test the effects of several currently used inhaled and systemic glucocorticoids on human neutrophil apoptosis. Beclomethasone, budesonide, dexamethasone, fluticasone propionate, hydrocortisone and prednisolone inhibited apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner as assessed by flow cytometric analysis, annexin-V binding and morphological analysis. The maximal inhibition of apoptosis was 50-60%. The order of potency was fluticasone propionate (EC(50) 0.6+/-0.2 nM) approximately equal to budesonide (EC(50) 0.8+/-0.2 nM)> dexamethasone approximately equal to prednisolone approximately equal to beclomethasone approximately equal to hydrocortisone. The inhibitory effects of glucocorticoids were reversed by mifepristone. Moreover, glucocorticoids slightly enhanced the inhibitory effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on neutrophil apoptosis. The present data suggests that budesonide and fluticasone propionate prolong human neutrophil survival by inhibiting apoptosis at clinically relevant drug concentrations via an effect on glucocorticoid receptor.

Efficacy and safety overview of a new inhaled corticosteroid, QVAR (hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone extrafine inhalation aerosol), in asthma

Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-containing inhalers are gradually being phased out and replaced with hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-based alternatives. The reformulation provided the opportunity to improve the inhalation technology and physical characteristics of corticosteroid formulations. QVAR contains HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) with the steroid in solution rather than suspension, which, in combination with improved inhaler technology, produces an extrafine aerosol with a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 1.1 microm (smaller than the 3.5-4.0 microm found with CFC-BDP). It was predicted and demonstrated that the smaller particle size of QVAR would be deposited in the lung to a greater extent than that found with CFC-BDP, particularly in the small airway, a major site of inflammation. Increased lung deposition of QVAR permits a reduction in dosage relative to CFC-BDP. Clinical evidence confirms that adult and elderly patients required approximately half the dose of QVAR to achieve the same degree of asthma control as with CFC-BDP. In long-term assessments, patients taking CFC-BDP could be switched to QVAR at half the daily dose without exacerbation of their asthma symptoms. QVAR was associated with a low overall incidence of side effects and, at the maximum recommended dose of 640 microg/d, caused no more adrenal suppression than 672 microg/d CFC-BDP.

Enhancement of human eosinophil apoptosis by fluticasone propionate, budesonide, and beclomethasone

Beclomethasone, budesonide, dexamethasone, and fluticasone propionate enhanced human eosinophil apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner in vitro as assessed by flow cytometric analysis and morphological analysis. The order of potency was fluticasone propionate (EC(50) 3.7+/-1.8 nM) approximately budesonide (EC(50) 5.0+/-1.7 nM)>beclomethasone (EC(50) 51+/-19 nM)>dexamethasone (EC(50) 303+/-40 nM). Hydrocortisone, prednisolone, and prednisone (up to 1 microM) did not induce any significant increase in eosinophil apoptosis. The apoptosis promoting effects of glucocorticoids on eosinophils were reversed by an antagonist of glucocorticoid receptor mifepristone. The survival-prolonging effect of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha was reversed by dexamethasone and fluticasone (1 microM). In contrast, fluticasone, and dexamethasone (1 microM) did not reverse the survival-prolonging effects of interleukins-3 and -5 or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). The results suggest that fluticasone and budesonide induce eosinophil apoptosis at clinically achievable drug concentrations via an effect on glucocorticoid receptor.

Pulmonary function and adrenal gland suppression with incremental doses of aerosolized beclomethasone dipropionate in horses with recurrent airway obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical response, pulmonary function, and adrenal gland response to incremental doses of beclomethasone dipropionate in horses with recurrent airway obstruction.

DESIGN

Crossover trial.

ANIMALS

8 horses with recurrent airway obstruction.

PROCEDURE

Horses randomly assigned to 4 groups were treated twice daily via aerosol administration of placebo or 500, 1,000, or 1,500 micrograms of beclomethasone dipropionate in a crossover design with a 10-day minimum washout period. Subjective assessment of airway obstruction, serum cortisol concentration, and maximum change in pleural pressure during tidal breathing (delta Pplmax) were determined daily prior to morning drug administration, and delta Pplmax was reevaluated 15 minutes after morning drug administration. Pulmonary resistance and dynamic compliance were determined at baseline and approximately 12 hours after the final treatment.

RESULTS

An immediate treatment effect was not identified. Within 24 hours, delta Pplmax and airway obstruction were lower in horses receiving beclomethasone. Onset and magnitude of response was similar among the 3 beclomethasone dose regimens. Pulmonary resistance was improved only after administration of all 3 doses of beclomethasone, whereas dynamic compliance was improved after administration of 1,000 micrograms and 1,500 micrograms of beclomethasone. Reduction in serum cortisol concentration occurred with all 3 beclomethasone dose regimens; however, the magnitude of adrenal gland suppression was greater in horses receiving 1,000 or 1,500 micrograms of beclomethasone.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Low-dose (500 micrograms) beclomethasone administration caused similar, improvement in pulmonary function, compared with high-dose beclomethasone (1,000 and 1,500 micrograms), with the exception of dynamic compliance, and caused less suppression of endogenous cortisol production.

Inhaled beclomethasone versus placebo for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled beclomethasone diproprionate (BDP) has been, together with inhaled budesonide, the mainstay of anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma for many years. A range of new prophylactic therapies for asthma is becoming available and BDP is now frequently used as the reference treatment against which these newer agents are being compared.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to: a) Compare the efficacy of BDP with placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. b) Explore the possibility that a dose response relationship exists for BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma. c) To provide the best estimate of the efficacy of BDP as a benchmark for evaluation of newer asthma therapies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trial Register (1999) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and Glaxo Wellcome for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-1999).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing BDP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer extracted data; authors were contacted to clarify missing information. Quantitative analyses where undertaken using Review Manager (Revman) 4.0.3 with Metaview 3.1.

MAIN RESULTS

52 studies were selected for inclusion (3459 subjects). The studies were generally of high methodological quality. In non-oral steroid treated patients, BDP produced significant improvements in a number of efficacy measures compared to placebo including FEV1 weighted mean difference (WMD) 340ml (95% CI 190-500ml); FEV1 (% predicted) WMD 6% (95% CI 0.4 to 11.5%) and morning PEFR WMD 50 L/min (95% CI 8 to 92 L/min). BDP also led to reductions in rescue beta2 agonist use compared to placebo WMD 1.75 puffs/d (95% CI 1.4 to 2.4 puffs/d) and reduced the likelihood of trial withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation relative risk (RR) 0.26 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.43). In oral steroid treated patients BDP led to significantly greater reductions in oral prednisolone use WMD 5 mg/d (95% CI 4 to 6 mg/d) and a higher likelihood of discontinuing oral prednisolone RR 0.54 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.67). There was little evidence for a clincially worthwhile dose response effect, but few studies recruited patients with more severe asthma.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This review has quantified the efficacy of BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma and strongly supports its use. Current asthma guidelines recommend titration of dose to individual patient response, but the published data provide little support for dose titration above 400 mcg/d in patients with mild to moderate asthma. There are insufficient data to draw any conclusions concerning dose-response in patients with severe disease.