1
|
Tabatabaei ZS, Mirzazadeh A, Amini H, Mafinejad MK. What we think about professional and unprofessional behaviors: differences between the perception of clinical faculty members and medical students. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:866. [PMID: 36517813 PMCID: PMC9749347 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03874-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Differences in the viewpoints of clinical faculty members and medical students about prioritizing professional norms accepted by the professional community and lack of alignment of these views can lead to distortion of understanding, problems in learning and assessment of professionalism, and failure in students' professional identity formation. This study aimed to identify the differences in viewpoints of clinical faculty members and medical students about prioritizing the importance and prevalence of professional and unprofessional behaviors among undergraduate medical students. METHODS A multi-stage qualitative study was conducted at Tehran University of Medical Sciences during 2020-2021. At first, a systematic search was conducted to identify professional and unprofessional behaviors using the directional content analysis method. A panel of experts was formed to check the codes obtained from reviewing the literature and to evaluate its compliance with the context. Then, the modified nominal group technique sessions were held with clinical faculty members and medical students to strengthen the codes extracted from the studies and systematically integrate their views to achieve a comprehensive list of professional and unprofessional behaviors in accordance with the context. Finally, a consensus was made among them about prioritizing the importance and prevalence of these behaviors in undergraduate medical students. RESULTS A total of 490 codes of professional behaviors and 595 unprofessional behavior codes were identified in the literature review. In the following sessions of the modified nominal group, 13 clinical faculty members listed 105 codes of professional and unprofessional behaviors, and 51 medical students also listed 313 codes. The results of the modified nominal group technique showed that the faculty members reported the importance of unprofessional behaviors higher than professional ones. At the same time, students rated the importance of professional behaviors higher than unprofessional ones. Both faculty members and students rate the prevalence of professional behaviors as high and the prevalence of unprofessional behaviors as low. CONCLUSION The results showed a difference of views between clinical faculty members and medical students about prioritizing professional and unprofessional behaviors. It is essential to align their viewpoints to understand, learn and value professionalism to develop a professional identity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Sadat Tabatabaei
- Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Education Development Office, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Azim Mirzazadeh
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Homayoun Amini
- Department of Psychiatry, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahboobeh Khabaz Mafinejad
- Health Professions Education Research Center, Education Development Center, Department of Medical Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guttormsen S, Gogollari A, Huynh-Do U, Schaufelberger M, Huwendiek S, Kunz A, Lahner FM. Developing an Instrument to Evaluate Undergraduate Healthcare Students' Professionalism. PRAXIS 2022; 111:863-870. [PMID: 36415987 DOI: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Professionalism is a multidimensional quality acquired over time. Undergraduate years lay a foundation for the development of professionalism. Tools monitoring the students' professional development are needed. Our tool development followed three phases: 1) identifying meaningful criteria for professionalism adapted to the education level, 2) developing an evaluation instrument in a process maximising construct validity, 3) testing the evaluation instrument in an interprofessional study. The evaluation instrument proved to be applicable in the field and it meets validity standards. Some differences between professions were found and discussed. Professionality starts to develop during the education, and early monitoring is important to support students' optimal development. The evaluation instrument supports both self- and expert evaluation of healthcare students' professional development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sissi Guttormsen
- Institute for Medical Education, Medical Faculty University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Artemisa Gogollari
- Institute for Medical Education, Medical Faculty University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Uyen Huynh-Do
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Bern Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Sören Huwendiek
- Institute for Medical Education, Medical Faculty University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra Kunz
- Institute for Medical Education, Medical Faculty University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Amt für Justizvollzug of Canton Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tay KT, Ng S, Hee JM, Chia EWY, Vythilingam D, Ong YT, Chiam M, Chin AMC, Fong W, Wijaya L, Toh YP, Mason S, Krishna LKR. Assessing Professionalism in Medicine - A Scoping Review of Assessment Tools from 1990 to 2018. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT 2020; 7:2382120520955159. [PMID: 33150208 PMCID: PMC7580192 DOI: 10.1177/2382120520955159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical professionalism enhances doctor-patient relationships and advances patient-centric care. However, despite its pivotal role, the concept of medical professionalism remains diversely understood, taught and thus poorly assessed with Singapore lacking a linguistically sensitive, context specific and culturally appropriate assessment tool. A scoping review of assessments of professionalism in medicine was thus carried out to better guide its understanding. METHODS Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) approach to scoping reviews was used to identify appropriate publications featured in four databases published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2018. Seven members of the research team employed thematic analysis to evaluate the selected articles. RESULTS 3799 abstracts were identified, 138 full-text articles reviewed and 74 studies included. The two themes identified were the context-specific nature of assessments and competency-based stages in medical professionalism. CONCLUSIONS Prevailing assessments of professionalism in medicine must contend with differences in setting, context and levels of professional development as these explicate variances found in existing assessment criteria and approaches. However, acknowledging the significance of context-specific competency-based stages in medical professionalism will allow the forwarding of guiding principles to aid the design of a culturally-sensitive and practical approach to assessing professionalism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuang Teck Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shea Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jia Min Hee
- National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
| | | | - Divya Vythilingam
- School of Medicine, International Medical University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Annelissa Mien Chew Chin
- Medical Library, National University of Singapore Libraries, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Warren Fong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore
| | - Limin Wijaya
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore
| | - Ying Pin Toh
- Department of Family Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education
- Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tiong JJL, Kho HL, Mai CW, Lau HL, Hasan SS. Academic dishonesty among academics in Malaysia: a comparison between healthcare and non-healthcare academics. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2018; 18:168. [PMID: 30016945 PMCID: PMC6050687 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1274-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was carried out to gauge the prevalence of academic dishonesty among academics in Malaysian universities. A direct comparison was made between academics of healthcare and non-healthcare courses to note the difference in the level of academic integrity between the two groups. In addition, the predisposing factors and implications of academic dishonesty, as well as the different measures perceived to be effective at curbing this problem were also investigated. METHODS A cross-sectional study design with mixed qualitative and quantitative approaches was employed and data collection was carried out primarily using self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS Approximately half (52.5%, n = 74) of all respondents (n = 141) reported having personally encountered at least one case of academic dishonesty involving their peers. The results also revealed the significantly higher prevalence of various forms of academic misconduct among healthcare academics compared to their non-healthcare counterparts. Although respondents were generally conscious of the negative implications associated with academic dishonesty, more than half of all cases of misconduct were not reported due to the indifferent attitude among academics. Low levels of self-discipline and integrity were found to be the major factors leading to academic misdeeds and respondents opined that university managements should be more proactive in addressing this issue. CONCLUSIONS The outcome of this study should serve as a clarion call for all relevant stakeholders to start making immediate amends in order to improve the current state of affairs in academia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Jeh Lung Tiong
- 0000 0004 0647 0003grid.452879.5School of Pharmacy, Taylor’s University, No. 1, Jalan Taylor’s, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
| | - Hui Ling Kho
- 0000 0004 0647 0003grid.452879.5School of Pharmacy, Taylor’s University, No. 1, Jalan Taylor’s, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
| | - Chun-Wai Mai
- 0000 0000 8946 5787grid.411729.8School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, 126, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
| | - Hui Ling Lau
- 0000 0004 0647 0003grid.452879.5School of Pharmacy, Taylor’s University, No. 1, Jalan Taylor’s, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
| | - Syed Shahzad Hasan
- 0000 0000 8946 5787grid.411729.8School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, 126, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|