Evidence of the interactions between immunosuppressive drugs used in autoimmune rheumatic diseases and Chinese herbal medicine: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been shown to be effective in autoimmune rheumatic diseases, but harmful herb-drug interactions might be inherent. We aim to review the evidence regarding herb-drug interactions between immunosuppressive drugs used in autoimmune rheumatic diseases and CHM.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL from inception till 30 April 2023 using keywords that encompassed 'herb-drug interactions', 'herbs' and 'immunosuppressants'. Articles were included if they contained reports about interactions between immunosuppressive drugs used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases with CHM. Level of evidence for each pair of interaction was graded using the algorithm developed by Colalto.

RESULTS

A total of 65 articles and 44 unique pairs of interactions were identified. HDIs were reported for cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, methotrexate, mycophenolic acid, glucocorticoids, sulfasalazine, tofacitinib and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Among these, cyclosporine (n = 27, 41.5%) and tacrolimus (n = 19, 29.2%) had the highest number of documented interactions. Hypericum perforatum had the highest level of evidence of interaction with cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Consumption reduced the bioavailability and therapeutic effects of the drugs. Schisandra sphenanthera had the highest level of evidence of interaction with tacrolimus and increased the bioavailability of the drug. Majority of the articles were animal studies.

CONCLUSION

Overall level of evidence for the included studies were low, though interactions between cyclosporine, tacrolimus, Hypericum perforatum and Schisandra sphenanthera were the most and well-documented. Healthcare professionals should actively enquire about the concurrent use of CHM in patients, especially when drugs with a narrow therapeutic index are consumed.

Establishing language and ethnic equivalence for health-related quality of life item banks and testing their efficiency via computerised adaptive testing simulations

PURPOSE

We aimed to (1) establish linguistic and ethnic equivalence (i.e. lack of bias) for the items in the English and Chinese versions of the Singapore Health and Well Being (SHAWS) Physical Functioning (PF), Positive Mindset (PM) and Social Relationship (SR) item banks (IBs); and (2) evaluate the preliminary efficiency of these IBs using Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) simulations.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 671, 670, and 672 subjects answered 55, 48 and 30 items of the PF, PM, and SR IBs, respectively. Rasch analysis was conducted to assess each IB's psychometric properties, particularly the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) for language and ethnicity. A set of performance criteria related to removing items that displayed notable DIF were employed. CAT simulations determined the mean number of items for high, moderate, and moderate-low measurement precisions (stopping rule: SEM 0.300, 0.387. 0.521, respectively).

RESULTS

Half of subjects were >50 years old (40.9% PF, 42.1% PM, 41.4% SR), Chinese (50.7% PF, 51.0% PM, 50.6% SR) and female (50.0% PF. 49.4% PM, 52.8% SR) respectively. Rasch analysis revealed 4 items with DIF for the PF IB, 9 items with DIF for the PM IB and 2 items with DIF for the SR IB. In CAT simulations, the mean number of items administered was 8.5, 21.6 and 14.5 for the PF, PM and SR IBs, respectively (SEM 0.300), 5.1, 13.0, 8.0 for PF, PM and SR IBs, respectively (SEM 0.387) and 3.1, 5.3 and 4.1 for PF, PM and SR IBs, respectively (SEM 0.521).

CONCLUSION

The PF, PM and SR IBs to measure health-related quality of life revealed minimal DIF for language and ethnicity after remedial efforts. CAT simulations demonstrated that these IBs were efficient, especially when the stopping rule was set at moderate precision, and support the implementation of the SHAWS IBs into routine clinical care.

Comparison of the ASAS Health Index in patients classified as radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) or non-radiographic axSpA in the ASAS Health Index international validation study

OBJECTIVES

To determine if there were differences in the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) scores between patients classified as radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) and non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA), and to identify factors associated with higher ASAS HI scores in both disease phenotypes.

METHODS

This study was an ancillary analysis of the ASAS HI international validation project performed in 23 countries. Patients were included if they were ≥18 years of age and diagnosed with axSpA. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to determine if ASAS HI scores differed between the axSpA phenotypes, and to identify other variables associated with ASAS HI scores. We also tested for potential interactions between the axSpA phenotype and significant variables identified through the multivariable regression.

RESULTS

A total of 976 patients were included, with 703 having r-axSpA and 273 nr-axSpA. Patients with r-axSpA reported higher (worse) ASAS HI scores compared with those with nr-axSpA (6.8 (4.4) vs 6.0 (4.0), p=0.02), but the axSpA phenotype was not associated with ASAS HI scores in the multivariable regression (β: -0.19, 95% CI: -0.56 to 0.19). Female gender, having worse physical function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index), disease activity (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) and anxiety and depressive symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were associated with higher ASAS HI scores. No interactions were found to be significant.

CONCLUSION

Overall health and functioning are similarly affected in patients with r-axSpA and nr-axSpA. Female patients, having worse physical function, disease activity, anxiety and depressive symptoms were independently associated with higher ASAS HI scores.

The impact of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic on the professional identity formation of medical students: A systematic scoping review

Evolving individual, contextual, organizational, interactional and sociocultural factors have complicated efforts to shape the professional identity formation (PIF) of medical students or how they feel, act and think as professionals. However, an almost exclusive reliance on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic offers a unique opportunity to study the elemental structures that shape PIF and the environmental factors nurturing it. We propose two independent Systematic Evidence-Based Approach guided systematic scoping reviews (SSR in SEBA)s to map accounts of online learning environment and netiquette that structure online programs. The data accrued was analysed using the clinically evidenced Krishna-Pisupati Model of Professional Identity Formation (KPM) to study the evolving concepts of professional identity. The results of each SSR in SEBA were evaluated separately with the themes and categories identified in the Split Approach combined to create richer and deeper 'themes/categories' using the Jigsaw Perspective. The 'themes/categories' from each review were combined using the Funnelling Process to create domains that guide the discussion. The 'themes/categories' identified from the 141 included full-text articles in the SSR in SEBA of online programs were the content and effects of online programs. The themes/categories identified from the 26 included articles in the SSR in SEBA of netiquette were guidelines, contributing factors, and implications. The Funnelling Process identified online programs (encapsulating the content, approach, structures and the support mechanisms); their effects; and PIF development that framed the domains guiding the discussion. This SSR in SEBA identifies the fundamental elements behind developing PIF including a structured program within a nurturing environment confined with netiquette-guided boundaries akin to a Community of Practice and the elemental aspect of a socialisation process within online programs. These findings ought to be applicable beyond online training and guide the design, support and assessment of efforts to nurture PIF.

Latent Class Analysis Identifies Distinct Phenotypes of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Predictive of Flares after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: Results from the Coronavirus National Vaccine Registry for ImmuNe Diseases SINGapore (CONVIN-SING)

We recently reported that messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination was associated with flares in 9% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Herein, we focused our analysis on patients from a multi-ethnic Southeast Asian lupus cohort with the intention of identifying distinct phenotypes associated with increased flares after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

METHODS

Six hundred and thirty-three SLE patients from eight public healthcare institutions were divided into test and validation cohorts based on healthcare clusters. Latent class analysis was performed based on age, ethnicity, gender, vaccine type, past COVID-19 infection, interruption of immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatment for vaccination, disease activity and background immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatment as input variables. Data from both cohorts were then combined for mixed effect Cox regression to determine which phenotypic cluster had a higher risk for time to first SLE flare, adjusted for the number of vaccine doses.

RESULTS

Two clusters were identified in the test (C1 vs. C2), validation (C1' vs. C2') and combined (C1″ vs. C2″) cohorts, with corresponding clusters sharing similar characteristics. Of 633 SLE patients, 88.6% were female and there was multi-ethnic representation with 74.9% Chinese, 14.2% Malay and 4.6% Indian. The second cluster (C2, C2' and C2″) was smaller compared to the first. SLE patients in the second cluster (C2 and C2') were more likely to be male, non-Chinese and younger, with higher baseline disease activity. The second cluster (C2″) had more incident flares (hazard ratio = 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.9, p = 0.014) after vaccination. A higher proportion of patients in C2″ had immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatment interruption for vaccination as compared to patients in C1″ (6.6% vs. 0.2%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We identified two distinct phenotypic clusters of SLE with different patterns of flares following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Caution has to be exercised in monitoring for post-vaccination flares in patients with risk factors for flares such as non-Chinese ethnicity, young age, male gender and suboptimal disease control at the time of vaccination.

The role of patients' stories in medicine: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patients' stories provide Palliative Care physicians with a glimpse into the former's lives and their psycho-emotional, sociocultural, and contextual considerations. Yet, few physicians are trained to interpret and apply patients' stories in their practice. Inherent variability in how stories are transmitted and interpreted raises questions over their potential effects on care. Amidst a dearth of accounts in Palliative Care, we map current use of patient stories to guide the training, assessment, and oversight of this 'care influencing' practice in medicine.

METHODS

This systematic scoping review was guided by the Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) to ensure a reproducible and structured approach. The themes and categories identified through the Split Approach's concurrent and independent thematic and directed content analyses provided a comprehensive sketch of the included articles. The Jigsaw Perspective combined the themes and categories identified. The last stage of SEBA compared these results with two recent reviews of storytelling to ensure consistency of the domains created that guided the discussion.

RESULTS

Ten thousand two hundred seven articles were reviewed, 963 full text articles were evaluated, and 199 articles were included. The four domains identified were study characteristics, benefits, approaches, and positive effects and concerns.

CONCLUSION

Stories support patient-centered, personalized, and holistic clinical care. However, variability in the stories, their interpretations and use in care decisions underscore the need for further study on the structuring, teaching, assessing, and delivery of this 'care influencing' practice.

Social cognitive theory to improve symptom appraisal and help-seeking among patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A qualitative study

AIM

Social cognitive theory (SCT) has been successfully employed to improve symptom appraisal and help-seeking among patients with various conditions but is yet to be applied in the context of autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). This study aimed to explore the applicability of SCT in and possible approaches to improving symptom appraisal and help-seeking of patients with ARDs, one of the key barriers to earlier diagnosis.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 ARD patients with a prolonged pre-diagnosis interval (>3 months). We coded the transcripts deductively using SCT as the overarching framework and inductively for approaches identified from the interviews.

RESULTS

All six main concepts of SCT (behavioral capacity, expectations, self-efficacy, observational learning, reinforcements, and reciprocal determinism) were observed in the three stages of symptom appraisal and help-seeking (detection, interpretation, and response) of patients with ARDs. While many participants reported that they were able and confident to detect their symptoms, they lacked the behavioral capacity and self-efficacy to interpret symptoms correctly, which resulted in delayed help-seeking and diagnosis. Possible approaches to address this suggested by participants (such as education of the general population) could improve behavioral capacity and self-efficacy in symptom interpretation and enhance expectations, observational learning, reinforcements, and reciprocal determinism in symptom response.

CONCLUSION

Lack of behavioral capacity and self-efficacy was observed in symptom interpretation of patients with ARDs, which resulted in delayed help-seeking. Approaches could target the behavioral capacity and self-efficacy for symptom interpretation to facilitate early help-seeking and, in turn, earlier diagnosis among individuals with possible ARDs.

Prevalence and factors associated with fatigue in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease associated with significant morbidity. Fatigue, a widely recognized disease manifestation, has considerable impacts on patients' work productivity, physical function and mental well-being. However, the reported prevalence of fatigue varies across studies, and pooled data are currently lacking. We aimed to characterize the prevalence of fatigue in patients with axSpA and to identify factors associated with fatigue.

Methods

A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted to determine the global prevalence of fatigue in patients with axSpA. Databases including CINAHL, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched from inception until April 2023. Data were extracted, and the quality of studies was assessed. A pooled prevalence of fatigue was determined by using a random-effects model. Meta-analyses were used to determine the observed heterogeneity via subgroup analysis and associations between relevant predictors and the presence of fatigue.

Results

Thirty eligible articles were included in the study, including 7893 patients with axSpA. The pooled prevalence of fatigue in patients with axSpA was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.63; I2 = 94.6%), with significant levels of heterogeneity. Among the factors of heterogeneity explored, the geographical region of the study (P = 0.0013) was significant for being a possible source. Poorer quality of life was associated with more fatigue (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

More than half of patients with axSpA experience fatigue, with poorer quality of life being associated with more fatigue.

Symptom Appraisal and Help-Seeking Among Patients With Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Qualitative Study

OBJECTIVE

Long diagnostic delay remains an unsolved problem in many autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). One of the major contributing factors is poor symptom appraisal and the resulting delays in help-seeking by patients themselves. We therefore aimed to understand the symptom appraisal and help-seeking experience among patients with ARDs in a multiethnic urban Asian population and to explore its influencing factors.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews with 33 patients with ARDs were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We coded the transcripts deductively using the reported 3 stages of symptom appraisal (detection, interpretation, and response) as the framework, and inductively for newly emerging themes and subthemes.

RESULTS

All 3 stages of the symptom appraisal and help-seeking journey (ie, symptom detection [by self and by others], symptom interpretation [causes, consequences, and required actions] and symptom response [no action, self-management, seeking help from nonhealthcare professionals, and seeking help from healthcare professionals]) were observed among patients. Interactions among these 3 stages were also observed: symptom interpretation was found to influence subsequent symptom detection, and the outcome of symptom response was found to influence both subsequent symptom detection and symptom interpretation. Various personal and socioenvironmental factors (eg, knowledge and cultural beliefs about the symptom) that influenced symptom appraisal and help-seeking were identified from the interviews.

CONCLUSION

The symptom appraisal and help-seeking journey of patients with ARDs is an iterative process of detection, interpretation, and response, and is influenced by various personal and socioenvironmental factors. Addressing modifiable factors could shorten the symptom appraisal and help-seeking interval and improve patient outcomes.

Prevalence and factors associated with flares following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: a national cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine prevalence and factors associated with flares post Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA).

METHODS

A retrospective multi-centre study was conducted (January 2021 to February 2022). Data were collected during index visit, defined as first post-vaccine visit in which the patient had a physician-defined flare, or if at least 3 months had elapsed since first vaccine dose, whichever came first. Factors associated with flares were identified using mixed effects Cox regression and expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Total of 2377 patients were included (1563 RA, 415 PsA and 399 SpA). Among patients with RA, PsA and SpA, 21.3%, 24.1% and 21.8% experienced a flare respectively. Of those who experienced a flare, only 10.2%, 11.0% and 14.9% were severe in patients with RA, PsA and SpA respectively. Patients with low or moderate/high disease were more likely to flare compared to those in remission in patients with RA only (HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.22-2.31; HR: 2.28, 95% CI 1.50-3.48, respectively). Receiving the Moderna vaccine was associated with a higher HR of flare compared to the Pfizer vaccine in patients with PsA only (HR: 2.21, 95% CI 1.20-4.08). Patients who had two vaccine doses were found to be less likely to flare (HR: 0.08, 95% CI 0.06-0.10). HRs of flares were not significantly different among RA, PsA and SpA.

CONCLUSION

About one-fifth of patients experienced a disease flare post COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, but most flares were non-severe. Patients with active disease prior to vaccination should be monitored closely for disease flares, especially in patients with RA.

Residents' Report of COVID-19 Associated Training Disruptions, Stressors, and Opportunities During the Pandemic-The Singapore Experience

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted residency training. Several studies have been performed to investigate the impact of the pandemic on residency training in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-International (ACGME-I)-accredited institutions. However, these were either limited to certain specialties or failed to consider possible opportunities from the pandemic.

Objective

To determine the stressors on residents as well as the opportunities that arose from the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple specialities in Singapore.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey among SingHealth residents was conducted between July and September 2020. The survey assessed the balance between service and training during hospital postings, the pandemic's influence on examination and teaching, the psychological impact of the pandemic, the level of burnout, and the effect on morale of residents during the pandemic.

Results

The response rate was 27.1% (253 of 934). Out of the 253 residents, 136 (53.8%) felt stressed during the pandemic. Concerns about family's health and safety pertaining to potential COVID-19 infection, progression in training, and completion of examinations were the top 3 stressors. One-hundred and three residents (40.7%) had their training disrupted either by being placed in an interim posting not part of their residency requirements or being deployed to care for patients with COVID-19. Although administrative support and information for virtual teaching were sufficient, only 108 (42.7%) agreed it had the same value as face-to-face sessions. Despite the challenges, 179 (70.8%) thought that experiencing this crisis provided more meaning in their career.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about challenges and learning opportunities for residents.

Recommendations for enhanced primary series (third dose) COVID-19 vaccination for people with rheumatic diseases: Chapter of Rheumatologists, College of Physicians, Singapore

Introduction

This review aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for an enhanced primary series (third dose) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in people with rheumatic diseases (PRDs) in the local and regional context.

Methods

Literature reviews were performed regarding the necessity, efficacy, safety and strategies for enhanced primary series COVID-19 vaccination in PRDs. Recommendations were developed based on evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Evidence was synthesised by eight working group members, and the consensus was achieved by a Delphi method with nine members of an expert task force panel.

Results

Two graded recommendations and one ungraded position statement were developed. PRDs have impaired immunogenicity from the COVID-19 vaccine and are at an increased risk of postvaccine breakthrough severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and poor clinical outcomes, compared to the general population. We strongly recommend that PRDs on immunomodulatory drugs be offered a third dose of the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine as part of an enhanced primary series, after the standard two-dose regimen. We conditionally recommend that the third dose of mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 be given at least 4 weeks after the second dose or as soon as possible thereafter. There is insufficient data to inform whether the third mRNA vaccine should be homologous or heterologous in PRDs.

Conclusion

These recommendations that were developed through evidence synthesis and formal consensus process provide guidance for an enhanced primary series COVID-19 vaccination in PRDs.

Association of anxiety, depression and resilience with overall health and functioning in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between anxiety, depression and resilience with overall health and functioning in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional evaluation of baseline data from a prospective cohort study, with recruitment from January 2018 to March 2021.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic in a tertiary hospital in Singapore.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 21 years and above who were diagnosed with axSpA.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used for assessing anxiety and depression, 10-item Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) for resilience, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) for disease activity, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) for functional limitation and Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Health Index (ASAS HI) for overall health and functioning. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to assess the association between anxiety, depression and resilience with health and functioning.

RESULTS

We included 296 patients in this study. The median (IQR) score for HADS-Anxiety was 5.0 (2.0-8.0), with 13.5% and 13.9% having borderline abnormal and abnormal anxiety, respectively. The median (IQR) score for HADS-Depression was 3.0 (1.0-7.0), with 12.8% and 8.4% having borderline abnormal and abnormal depression, respectively. The median (IQR) CD-RISC-10 score was 29.0 (23.0-32.0) while the median (IQR) ASAS HI score was 4.0 (2.0-7.0). Apart from BASDAI, BASFI and disease duration, anxiety and depression were associated with overall health and functioning (β: 0.12, 95% CI 0.03, 0.20; β: 0.20, 95% CI 0.09, 0.31) in the multivariable linear regression. Level of resilience was not associated with health and functioning.

CONCLUSION

Anxiety and depression, but not resilience, were associated with poorer health and functioning. Clinicians could consider routinely screening for anxiety and depression in their patients, especially in patients with more severe symptoms.

Portfolio use in postgraduate medical education: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Portfolios are increasingly commonplace in postgraduate medical education. However, poor understanding of and variations in their content, quality, and structure have hindered their use across different settings, thus dampening their efficacy.

METHODS

This systematic scoping review on portfolios in postgraduate medical education utilized Krishna's Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA). Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis and Hsieh and Shannon's directed content analysis were independently used to evaluate the data.

RESULTS

In total, 12 313 abstracts were obtained, and 76 full-text articles included. Six key themes/categories were identified: (i) portfolio definitions and functions, (ii) platforms, (iii) design, (iv) implementation, (v) use in assessments, and (vi) evaluations of their usage.

CONCLUSIONS

Portfolios allow for better appreciation and assessments of knowledge, skills, and attitudes in time-, learner-, and context-specific competencies through the establishment of smaller micro-competencies and micro-credentialling. Organized into three broad stages-development, implementation, and improvement-a six-step framework for optimizing and instituting portfolios in postgraduate medical education is offered.

Social Media Use Among Members of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society: Results of a Web-Based Survey

BACKGROUND

The use of social media in health care may serve as a beneficial tool for education, information dissemination, telemedicine, research, networking, and communications. To better leverage the benefits of social media, it is imperative to understand the patterns of its use and potential barriers to its implementation in health care. A previous study in 2016 that investigated social media use among young clinical rheumatologists (≤45 years) and basic scientists showed that there was substantial social media use among them for social and professional reasons. However, there is a limited inquiry into social media use in different areas of rheumatology, such as spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the motivations, barriers, and patterns of social media use among an international group of experts in spondyloarthritis.

METHODS

We distributed a web-based survey via email from March 2021 to June 2021 to 198 members of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society. It contained 24 questions about demographic characteristics, patterns of current social media use, and perceptions of utility. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the characteristics associated with use trends.

RESULTS

The response rate was 78.8% (156/198). Of these, 93.6% (146/156) of participants used at least one social media platform. Apart from internet-based shopping and entertainment, the use of social media for clinical updates (odds ratio [OR] 6.25, 95% CI 2.43-16.03) and research updates (OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.35-8.78) were associated with higher social media consumption. Among the respondents, 66% (103/156) used social media in a work-related manner. The use of social media for new web-based resources (OR 6.55, 95% CI 2.01-21.37), interaction with international colleagues (OR 4.66, 95% CI 1.21-17.90), and establishing a web-based presence (OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.25-13.13) were associated with higher levels of consumption for work-related purposes. Time investment, confidentiality concerns, and security concerns were the top 3 challenges to a wider adoption of social media.

CONCLUSIONS

Most respondents (103/156, 66%) use social media in a work-related manner. Professional development, establishing a web-based presence, and international collaboration were associated with higher use. Challenges to social media adoption should be addressed to maximize its benefits.

Post-mRNA vaccine flares in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: Results from the COronavirus National Vaccine registry for ImmuNe diseases SINGapore (CONVIN-SING)

BACKGROUND

Studies of flares of autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination are limited by small sample size, short follow up or at risk of selection bias.

METHODS

A national retrospective cohort study of consecutive AIIRD patients ≥12 years old, across 8 hospitals who received at least one dose of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Patients were included from the date of 1st vaccine dose and censored at the time of flare or on the date of the clinic visit at least 3 months from cohort entry, whichever came first. Predictors of flare were determined by Cox proportional hazards analysis.

FINDINGS

4627 patients (73% Chinese, 71% female) of median (IQR) age 61 (48, 70) years were included; 42% Rheumatoid arthritis, 14% Systemic lupus erythematosus and 11% Psoriatic arthritis. 47% were in remission, 41% low disease activity, 10% moderate disease activity and 1% in high disease activity. 18% patients flared, of which 11.7% were within the 3-month period of interest. 11.8% patients improved. Median (IQR) time-to-flare was 60 (30, 114) days. 25% flares were self-limiting, 61% mild-moderate and 14% severe. Older patients (53-65 years and >66 years) had a lower risk of flare [HR 0.6 (95% CI 0.5-0.8) and 0.7 (0.6-0.8) respectively]. Patients with inflammatory arthritis and with active disease had a higher risk of flare [HR 1.5 (1.2-2.0) and 1.4 (1.2-1.6), respectively]. Treatment with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), immunosuppression and prednisolone was also associated with an increased risk of flare [HR 1.5 (1.1-2), 1.2 (1.1-1.4) and 1.5 (1.2-1.8) for prednisolone ≤7.5 mg respectively].

INTERPRETATION

There was a moderately high rate of AIIRD flares after mRNA vaccination but also improvement in several patients. Severe flares and hospitalisation were rare. Thus, vaccination remains safe and highly recommended.

Assessing professional identity formation (PIF) amongst medical students in Oncology and Palliative Medicine postings: a SEBA guided scoping review

BACKGROUND

Introduction to a multi-professional team who are working and caring for the dying, and facing complex moral and ethical dilemmas during Oncology and Palliative Medicine postings influence a medical student's professional identity formation (PIF). However, limited appreciation of PIF, inadequate assessments and insufficient support jeopardise this opportunity to shape how medical students think, feel and act as future physicians. To address this gap, a systematic scoping review (SSR) of PIF assessment methods is proposed.

METHODS

A Systematic Evidence-based Approach (SEBA) guided SSR of assessments of PIF in medical schools published between 1^st January 2000 and 31^st December 2021 in PubMed, Embase, ERIC and Scopus databases was carried out. Included articles were concurrently content and thematically analysed using SEBA's Split Approach and the themes and categories identified were combined using SEBA's Jigsaw Perspective. The review hinged on the following questions: "what is known about the assessment of professional identity formation amongst medical students?", "what are the theories and principles guiding the assessment of professional identity formation amongst medical students?", "what factors influence PIF in medical students?", "what are the tools used to assess PIF in medical students?", and "what considerations impact the implementation of PIF assessment tools amongst medical students?".

RESULTS

Two thousand four hundred thirty six abstracts were reviewed, 602 full-text articles were evaluated, and 88 articles were included. The 3 domains identified were 1) theories, 2) assessment, and 3) implementation in assessing PIF. Differing attention to the different aspects of the PIF process impairs evaluations, jeopardise timely and appropriate support of medical students and hinder effective implementation of PIF assessments.

CONCLUSION

The Krishna-Pisupati model combines current theories and concepts of PIF to provide a more holistic perspective of the PIF process. Under the aegis of this model, Palliative Care and Oncology postings are envisaged as Communities of Practice influencing self-concepts of personhood and identity and shaping how medical students see their roles and responsibilities as future physicians. These insights allow the forwarding of nine recommendations to improve assessments of PIF and shape the design of a PIF-specific tool that can direct timely and personalized support of medical students.

Factors associated with cytomegalovirus infection in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: A narrative review

Patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) are vulnerable to opportunistic infections, including cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. This narrative review aims to identify factors associated with CMV infection in patients with AAV. The literature review was conducted on Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The start date of the literature search was unrestricted and the end date was February 2022. CMV infection was defined as (a) CMV pp65 antigenemia or positive CMV DNA viral load by polymerase chain reaction or CMV detection on histological specimens, with associated signs and symptoms compatible with CMV infection; (b) presence of CMV clinical syndrome (defined as presence of compatible symptoms and signs and documentation of CMV by biopsy by virus isolation, rapid culture, immunohistochemistry, or DNA in biopsy material as defined by the CMV Drug Development Forum); and (c) CMV infection as coded by the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision with at least one prescription for CMV treatment. We identified 4505 articles, of which three (2327 patients with AAV) were included. All studies were retrospective and only one of the three studies included only patients with AAV. Low or decreasing lymphocyte counts and higher prednisolone usage were associated with CMV infection in patients with AAV. Patients with AAV with lymphopenia and on high doses of prednisolone should be monitored closely for signs and symptoms of CMV infection, and might benefit from CMV prophylaxis. Prospective studies are urgently needed to better identify causes of CMV infections in patients with AAV.

Approaches to improving symptom appraisal: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

Poor symptom appraisal (detection, interpretation and response to symptoms) plays a major role in prolonged prediagnosis interval in various health conditions. Theories and models have been proposed to study the symptom appraisal process but how they could be employed to improve symptom appraisal remains unclear. We therefore aimed to review approaches to improving symptom appraisal in the literature and to develop a theoretical framework that could guide the development of approaches to improving symptom appraisal among individuals in the general population.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus were searched from inception to 30 March 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included original articles in English in which approaches to improve the detection, interpretation or response to symptoms for symptomatic individuals were described. We excluded articles in which approaches were developed to improve symptom appraisal among healthcare professionals.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

A predefined data extraction form was used to extract the development, characteristics and evaluation of approaches to improving symptom appraisal. This formed the basis for the narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Of 19 046 publications identified from the literature search, 112 were selected for full-text review and 29 approaches comprising provision of knowledge of symptoms/signs and additional components (eg, symptom self-examination and comparison) for symptom appraisal were included in the synthesis. Less than half (41.4%) of these approaches were developed based on theories/models. Interestingly, despite the variety of theories/models adopted in developing these approaches, the components of these approaches were similar.

CONCLUSION

Symptom appraisal is an essential process in a patient's journey that can be targeted to facilitate early diagnosis but is largely unstudied. Building on the literature, we proposed a theoretical framework and approaches to improving symptom appraisal. This could facilitate early identification of a variety of health conditions in the general population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021279500.

POS0200 POST-mRNA VACCINE FLARES IN AUTOIMMUNE INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES: INTERIM RESULTS FROM THE CORONAVIRUS NATIONAL VACCINE REGISTRY FOR IMMUNE DISEASES SINGAPORE (CONVIN-SING)

Background

Published data suggest no increased rate of flare of autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination; however, the studies are limited by small sample size, short follow up or at risk of selection bias (voluntary physician reports or patient surveys).

Objectives

To study flares of AIIRD within three months of the first dose of an anti-SARS-COV2 mRNA vaccine.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive AIIRD patients ≥ 12 years old, across six public hospitals in Singapore who received at least one dose of an mRNA (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna) vaccine. Data were censored at the first post-vaccine clinic visit when the patient had flared or if ≥ three months had elapsed since the first dose of the vaccine, whichever came first. Predictors of flare were determined by Cox proportional hazards analysis and time to flare was examined using a Nelson Aalen cumulative hazard estimate (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Nelson-Aalen curve of flares over time

Results

2339 patients (74% Chinese, 72% female) of median (IQR) age 64 (53, 71) years were included in the interim analysis (Table 1). 2112 (90%) had the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and 195 (8%) had Moderna, with a median (IQR) interval of 21 (21, 23) days between the two doses. The most common AIIRD diagnoses were Rheumatoid arthritis (1063, 45%), Psoriatic arthritis (296, 12.6%) and Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (288, 12.3%). 186 (8%) were treated with biologics/ targeted disease modifying agents. 2125 (91%) patients were in low disease activity or remission. Treatment was interrupted for vaccination in only 18 (0.8%) patients. Seven (0.3%) patients had previous COVID-19 infection.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Baseline characteristicsNo flares(n = 1887, %)Flares within 0—3 months of 1st vaccine dose (n= 272, %)Flares outside of 0 – 3 months after 1st vaccine dose (n = 180, %)Age (median years, IQR)64 (53, 71)61 (50, 69)65 (55, 71)RaceChinese1386 (73)206 (76)129 (72)Malay193 (10)28 (10)20 (11)Indian195 (10)27 (10)26 (14)GenderFemale1367 (72)200 (74)117 (65)Vaccine typePfizer/BioNTech1713 (92)239 (90)160 (90)Moderna149 (8)28 (10)18 (10)DiagnosisRheumatoid Arthritis831 (44)139 (51)93 (52)Systemic Lupus Erythematosus269 (14)20 (7)9 (5)Psoriatic Arthritis225 (12)42 (15)29 (16)Spondyloarthropathies141 (7)21 (7)17 (9)Sjogren’s Syndrome114 (6)15 (6)8 (4)Systemic sclerosis94 (5)4 (1)6 (3)Baseline Physician Disease ActivityRemission1007 (53)99 (36)63 (35)Low Disease Activity731 (39)128 (47)97 (54)Moderate Disease Activity134 (7)40 (15)20 (11)High Disease Activity15 (1)5 (2)0

452 (19%) flares were recorded during 9798.8 patient-months [4.6/100 patient-months, median (IQR) follow up duration 4.2 (3.3, 5.3) months], of which 272 (11.6%) patients flared within the 3-month period of interest and 180 (7.7%) flared outside of the 3-month period (Table 1). Median (IQR) time-to-flare was 40.5 (18, 56.6) days. 60 (22.1%) were mild and self-limiting, 170 (62.5%) were mild-moderate and 42 (15.4%) were severe. 190 (69.8%) of those who flared required escalation of treatment and 15 (5.5%) required hospital admission. 239 (10.2%) had improved disease activity after the vaccine.

On multivariate Cox regression analysis, patients in the oldest age tertile [median (IQR) 74 (71, 79) years] were less likely to flare [HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.63, 1.00), p = 0.05] Patients with inflammatory arthritis (compared with connective tissue disease, vasculitis and others) and patients with baseline active disease were more likely to flare [HR 1.72 (95% CI 1.35, 2.20), p < 0.001 and 1.82 (95% CI 1.39, 2.39), p < 0.001 respectively]

Conclusion

There was a moderately high rate of AIIRD flares after mRNA vaccination; however, there was no clustering of flares in the immediate post-vaccine period to suggest causality. Older patients were less likely to flare, while those with inflammatory arthritis and active disease at baseline were more likely to flare.

Disclosure of Interests

Margaret Ma Grant/research support from: Support grant from multiple companies for the Singapore Biologics registry, Amelia Santosa Speakers bureau: Amgen Talk, Consultant of: Pfizer ad board, Kok Ooi Kong: None declared, Chuanhui Xu: None declared, Johnston Tang Gin Xiang: None declared, Gim Gee Teng Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingleheim, Anselm Mak Speakers bureau: J&J and GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK - the supported studies programme, Sen Hee Tay: None declared, Victoria Wei Wen Ng: None declared, Joshua Zhi En Koh: None declared, Warren Fong Speakers bureau: speaker for Abbvie, DKSH, GSK, Novartis, Li-Ching Chew Speakers bureau: pfizer and Abbvie, Consultant of: Pfizer and Abbvie Advisory Board meeting, Grant/research support from: Abbvie educational grant for ultrasound conference, Andrea Low Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingeilheim, Consultant of: Consultant/steering group committee for BI and J&J, annie law: None declared, Yih Jia Poh: None declared, Siaw Ing Yeo Grant/research support from: Multiple pharmaceutical companies for the support of the National Biologics Registry, Ying Ying Leung Speakers bureau: Abbvie, DKSH, Jassen, Novartis and Pfizer, Wei-Rui Goh: None declared, Chuah Tyng Yu: None declared, Nur Emillia Roslan: None declared, Stanley Angkodjojo Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingeilheim, Consultant of: Abbvie and DKSH, Kee Fong Phang: None declared, Thaschawee Arkachaisri: None declared, Melonie Sriranganathan: None declared, Teck Choon TAN: None declared, Peter Cheung Consultant of: Ad board for Boehringer Ingleheim, novartis, janssen and abbvie, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Manjari Lahiri Speakers bureau: J&J, DSKH, Consultant of: DSKH, Gilead, Grant/research support from: Multiple pharma companies contributed to the Singapore Biologics registry

Novartis

Development of an Item Bank for a health-related quality of life Measure in Spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important aspect in the management of chronic diseases such as spondyloarthritis (SpA). A promising approach to reduce respondent burden when measuring HRQOL is the use of shorter patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) delivered using computer-adaptive tests (CATs). However, the lack of an item bank which covers the entire continuum of the HRQOL domain impedes the development of CAT to measure HRQOL among patients with SpA. We aim to develop an item bank for a HRQOL measure among patients with SpA based on the items from existing validated PROMs.

METHODS

This study is guided by the preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis (PRISMA) and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cooperative Group guidelines. Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed®, Embase®, and PsycINFO® (Ovid) databases. Items from existing PROMs were "binned" and "winnowed" according to the facets of HRQOL in the World Health Organisation (WHO) QOL framework.

RESULTS

We identified 147 relevant articles. 1039 items from 31 PROMs of which permission has been obtained for inclusion into the item bank underwent binning and winnowing. This resulted in 968 items covering 23 domains of HRQOL in the WHO framework, with the number of items within each domain ranging from 1 to 453.

CONCLUSION

We created an item bank to measure HRQOL among patients with SpA using items from validated PROMs. This set can provide the foundation for the development of CATs to measure HRQOL among patients with SpA.

Post graduate remediation programs in medicine: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Recognizing that physicians may struggle to achieve knowledge, skills, attitudes and or conduct at one or more stages during their training has highlighted the importance of the 'deliberate practice of improving performance through practising beyond one's comfort level under guidance'. However, variations in physician, program, contextual and healthcare and educational systems complicate efforts to create a consistent approach to remediation. Balancing the inevitable disparities in approaches and settings with the need for continuity and effective oversight of the remediation process, as well as the context and population specific nature of remediation, this review will scrutinise the remediation of physicians in training to better guide the design, structuring and oversight of new remediation programs.

METHODS

Krishna's Systematic Evidence Based Approach is adopted to guide this Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) to enhance the transparency and reproducibility of this review. A structured search for articles on remediation programs for licenced physicians who have completed their pre-registration postings and who are in training positions published between 1st January 1990 and 31st December 2021 in PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, ASSIA, HMIC, DARE and Web of Science databases was carried out. The included articles were concurrently thematically and content analysed using SEBA's Split Approach. Similarities in the identified themes and categories were combined in the Jigsaw Perspective and compared with the tabulated summaries of included articles in the Funnelling Process to create the domains that will guide discussions.

RESULTS

The research team retrieved 5512 abstracts, reviewed 304 full-text articles and included 101 articles. The domains identified were characteristics, indications, frameworks, domains, enablers and barriers and unique features of remediation in licenced physicians in training programs.

CONCLUSION

Building upon our findings and guided by Hauer et al. approach to remediation and Taylor and Hamdy's Multi-theories Model, we proffer a theoretically grounded 7-stage evidence-based remediation framework to enhance understanding of remediation in licenced physicians in training programs. We believe this framework can guide program design and reframe remediation's role as an integral part of training programs and a source of support and professional, academic, research, interprofessional and personal development.

Improvements in work productivity among patients with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis in the first six months after diagnosis: an inception cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Reduced work productivity (WP), measured by work productivity loss (WPL) and work disability (WD), is common in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and osteoarthritis (OA) but is not well characterised. We aimed to assess if there were any improvements in WP (WPL and WD) from diagnosis (T1) to six months later (T2) and to explore associations between WP at T2 and health status at T1 among these patients.

METHODS

Patients were surveyed for work characteristics, work ability, WP and health status including physical functioning and vitality at T1 and T2. Associations between WP at T2 and health status at T1 were explored using regression models.

RESULTS

Patients with IA (n=109) were younger than those with OA (n=70) (mean age: 50.5 vs. 57.7 years). The median WPL score decreased from 30.0 to 10.0 in patients with IA and from 20.0 to 0.0 in patients with OA, while the proportion reporting WD decreased from 52.3% to 45.3% in patients with IA and increased from 52.2% to 56.5% in patients with OA from T1 to T2. Physical functioning at T1 (coefficient = -0.35) was significantly associated with WPL at T2. Vitality at T1 (coefficient = 0.03) was associated with WD at T2.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater improvements in WP were observed among patients with IA than those with OA in the first six months after diagnosis. This provides a basis for healthcare professionals to aim for greater improvements in work and health status for patients with IA.

Medical Student Portfolios: A Systematic Scoping Review

PHENOMENON

Medical Student Portfolios (MSP)s allow medical students to reflect and better appreciate their clinical, research and academic experiences which promotes their individual personal and professional development. However, differences in adoption rate, content design and practice setting create significant variability in their employ. With MSPs increasingly used to evaluate professional competencies and the student's professional identity formation (PIF), this has become an area of concern.

APPROACH

We adopt Krishna's Systematic Evidence-Based Approach to carry out a Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) on MSPs. The structured search process of six databases, concurrent use of thematic and content analysis in the Split Approach and comparisons of the themes and categories with the tabulated summaries of included articles in the Jigsaw Perspective and Funnelling Process offers enhanced transparency and reproducibility to this review.

FINDINGS

The research team retrieved 14501 abstracts, reviewed 779 full-text articles and included 96 articles. Similarities between the themes, categories and tabulated summaries allowed the identification of the following funnelled domains: Purpose of MSPs, Content and structure of MSPs, Strengths and limitations of MSPs, Methods to improve MSPs, and Use of E-portfolios.

INSIGHTS

Variability in the employ of MSPs arise as a result of a failure to recognise its different roles and uses. Here we propose additional roles of MSPs, in particular, building on a consistent set of content materials and assessments of milestones called micro-competencies. Whislt generalised micro-competencies assess achievement of general milestones expected of all medical students, personalised micro-competencies record attainment of particular skills, knowledge and attitudes balanced against the medical student's abilities, context and needs. This combination of micro-competencies in a consistent framework promises a holistic, authentic and longitudinal perspective of the medical student's development and maturing PIF.

A modified Delphi approach to enhance nurturing of professionalism in postgraduate medical education in Singapore

INTRODUCTION

Nurturing professional identities instils behavioural standards of physicians, in turn facilitating consistent professional attitudes, practice, and patient care. Identities are socioculturally constructed efforts, thus we must account for the social, cultural, and local healthcare factors that shape physicians' roles, responsibilities and expectations. This study aims to forward a program to nurture professionalism amongst physicians in Singapore.

METHODS

A 3-phased-evidenced-based-approach was used. First, a systematic scoping review (SSR) was conducted to identify professionalism elements. Second, a questionnaire was created drawing from the SS's findings. Third, a modified Delphi involving local experts identifying socioculturally appropriate elements to nurture professionalism was conducted.

RESULTS

The 124 included articles in the SSR revealed definitions, knowledge, skills, and approaches to nurturing professionalism. The modified Delphi identified professional traits, virtues, communication, ethical, self-care, teaching and assessment methods, and support mechanisms.

CONCLUSION

Results formed the basis to a holistic and longitudinal program focused on instilling professional traits and competencies over time through personalised and holistic support of physicians. Findings will be of interest to medical communities in the region and beyond.

Early identification of axial spondyloarthritis in a multi-ethnic Asian population

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

To address the diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), we have cross-culturally adapted the Hamilton axSpA questionnaire, a self-administered screening questionnaire, in the Singapore population. In this study, we compared the performance of various scoring methods for this questionnaire in detecting axSpA.

METHOD

The questionnaire was self-administered by eligible subjects. Scoring methods included method A, the original questionnaire scoring, and methods B-E, scoring developed based on the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for inflammatory back pain (IBP) and the referral, classification and both referral and classification of axSpA, respectively. The reference standard was diagnosis by a rheumatologist. Since the ASAS criteria-based scoring methods were mainly based on clinical axSpA features, self-report and rheumatologist-assessment of clinical axSpA features were also compared in subjects with axSpA.

RESULTS

Of 1418 subjects (age: 54 ± 14 years, female: 73%) recruited, 46 were diagnosed with axSpA by a rheumatologist. Sensitivities of methods A-E were 35%, 61%, 63%, 48% and 83%, respectively. Self-report of clinical axSpA features exceeded rheumatologist-assessment for arthritis (83 vs 26%), good response to NSAIDs (37 vs 30%), enthesitis (35 vs 30%), dactylitis (20 vs 2%) and family history for axSpA (13 vs 4%). The reverse was true for IBP (41 vs 63%) and uveitis (4 vs 15%).

CONCLUSIONS

A self-administered questionnaire using the ASAS referral and classification criteria-based scoring yielded relatively high sensitivity in detecting axSpA in subjects newly referred to rheumatology clinics. This supports its evaluation as a screening and referral tool in the general population in future studies. Key Points • A self-administered questionnaire could be used as a screening and referral tool. • ASAS referral and classification criteria-based scoring yielded relatively high sensitivity. • Inaccurate perception of clinical axSpA features was observed in axSpA patients.

Physical activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis in a multi-ethnic south-east Asian country

Background

Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) may experience spinal stiffness and pain, leading to reduced physical function and quality of life. Despite the benefits of physical activity (PA) and exercise, previous studies have demonstrated lower levels of PA among patients with axSpA. This study aims to examine the patterns of PA among patients with axSpA compared to the general population in a multi-ethnic Asian country.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted between May 2016 and Jan 2017. Consecutive patients with axSpA were recruited at an outpatient rheumatology clinic at Singapore General Hospital, the largest tertiary hospital in Singapore. Controls were based on a previous cross-sectional study. PA was assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ).

Results

Seventy-four patients with axSpA were recruited and compared with 2679 controls. Lower proportion of patients with axSpA met the WHO recommendations for PA (axSpA = 77.0%, controls = 89.7%, p <  0.001). More patients with axSpA had high level of sedentary activity compared to controls (axSpA = 56.8%, controls = 36.1%, p <  0.001). Levels of PA did not differ between patients with inactive versus active axSpA disease (p = 0.91).

Conclusions

Proportion of patients with axSpA meeting the WHO recommendations for PA differed significantly from the general population, and level of PA did not differ between patients with active and inactive axSpA disease. Higher levels of sedentary activity were seen in patient with axSpA compared to the general population, highlighting the need for interventions to promote PA among patients with axSpA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-021-00211-5.

Interval between symptom onset and diagnosis among patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases in a multi-ethnic Asian population

AIM

The interval between symptom onset and diagnosis (pre-diagnosis interval) can at times be longer than is ideal in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). In this study, we aimed to characterize this interval and to identify its associated factors.

METHOD

We characterized pre-diagnosis interval into 4 intervals: Interval #1 between symptom onset and first visit to healthcare professionals; Interval #2 between first visit to healthcare professionals and rheumatology referral; Interval #3 between rheumatology referral and first rheumatology assessment; and Interval #4 between first rheumatology assessment and diagnosis. Median regression models were used to identify factors associated with longer pre-diagnosis interval and Interval #1.

RESULTS

Among 259 patients (median age = 52.0 [41.6-61.9] years, 71% female, rheumatoid arthritis [n = 75], axial spondyloarthritis [axSpA] [n = 40] and psoriatic arthritis [n = 35]), median pre-diagnosis interval was 11.5 (4.7-36.0) months. Interval #1 (median = 4.9 months) was significantly longer than Intervals #2-#4 (median = 0.3, 1.5, and 0.0 months, respectively). Patients with axSpA had significantly longer pre-diagnosis interval (median = 38.7 months) and Interval #1 (median = 26.6 months) than patients with the other ARDs. Median regression suggested that patients referred from specialty care had significantly longer pre-diagnosis interval (median difference = 7.7 months) and Interval #1 (median difference = 6.4 months) compared to those referred from primary care.

CONCLUSION

A long pre-diagnosis interval was observed among patients with ARDs (especially axSpA), due largely to a long interval between symptom onset and the first visit to healthcare professionals. This highlights the importance of interventions targeting patients prior to their first visit to healthcare professionals in reducing pre-diagnosis interval.

Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Molding competent clinicians capable of applying ethics principles in their practice is a challenging task, compounded by wide variations in the teaching and assessment of ethics in the postgraduate setting. Despite these differences, ethics training programs should recognise that the transition from medical students to healthcare professionals entails a longitudinal process where ethics knowledge, skills and identity continue to build and deepen over time with clinical exposure. A systematic scoping review is proposed to analyse current postgraduate medical ethics training and assessment programs in peer-reviewed literature to guide the development of a local physician training curriculum.

METHODS

With a constructivist perspective and relativist lens, this systematic scoping review on postgraduate medical ethics training and assessment will adopt the Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) to create a transparent and reproducible review.

RESULTS

The first search involving the teaching of ethics yielded 7669 abstracts with 573 full text articles evaluated and 66 articles included. The second search involving the assessment of ethics identified 9919 abstracts with 333 full text articles reviewed and 29 articles included. The themes identified from the two searches were the goals and objectives, content, pedagogy, enabling and limiting factors of teaching ethics and assessment modalities used. Despite inherent disparities in ethics training programs, they provide a platform for learners to apply knowledge, translating it to skill and eventually becoming part of the identity of the learner. Illustrating the longitudinal nature of ethics training, the spiral curriculum seamlessly integrates and fortifies prevailing ethical knowledge acquired in medical school with the layering of new specialty, clinical and research specific content in professional practice. Various assessment methods are employed with special mention of portfolios as a longitudinal assessment modality that showcase the impact of ethics training on the development of professional identity formation (PIF).

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic scoping review has elicited key learning points in the teaching and assessment of ethics in the postgraduate setting. However, more research needs to be done on establishing Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA)s in ethics, with further exploration of the use of portfolios and key factors influencing its design, implementation and assessment of PIF and micro-credentialling in ethics practice.

POS1411 EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS IN A MULTI-ETHNIC ASIAN POPULATION

Background:

To facilitate earlier diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA), we have previously cross-culturally adapted a self-administered screening questionnaire.

Objectives:

We aimed to improve the sensitivity of this questionnaire as a screening tool by comparing various scoring methods.

Methods:

Subjects newly referred to a rheumatology clinic self-administered the questionnaire before seeing a rheumatologist. Identification of axial SpA by the questionnaire using original scoring (Method A) and scoring based on Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) inflammatory back pain (IBP) criteria (Method B), ASAS referral criteria (Method C), ASAS classification criteria (Method D) and a combination of ASAS referral and classification criteria (Method E) were compared to classification by the ASAS classification criteria and diagnosis by rheumatologist. Since Methods B-E were based on SpA features, we compared self-reported vs rheumatologist-documented features in subjects with axial SpA.

Results:

Of 1418 subjects (age: 54 ± 14 years, female: 73%), 39 were classified as axial SpA cases by classification criteria. Methods A-E yielded sensitivities of 39%, 72%, 67%, 49% and 85%, respectively, among patients newly referred to the rheumatology clinic (Table 1). Rheumatologist-documented clinical SpA features exceeded self-report for IBP (62 vs 44%) and uveitis (15 vs 5%). The reverse was true for arthritis (21 vs 80%), enthesitis (28 vs 33%), dactylitis (3 vs 18%), good response to NSAIDs (33 vs 41%) and family history for SpA (5 vs 10%).

Table 1.

Performance of the five scoring methods for the cross-culturally adapted Hamilton axial SpA questionnaire.

Scoring methodSensitivity(95% confidence interval)Specificity(95% confidence interval)Positive predictive value(95% confidence interval)Negative predictive value(95% confidence interval)Method A38.5(23.4 – 55.4)93.7(92.3 – 94.9)14.7(8.5 – 23.1)98.2(97.3 – 98.8)Method B71.8(55.1 – 85.0)73.1(70.7 – 75.4)7.0(4.7 – 10.0)98.9(98.1 – 99.5)Method C66.7(49.8 – 80.9)77.8(75.5 – 80.0)7.8(5.2 – 11.3)98.8(98.0 – 99.4)Method D48.7(32.4 – 65.2)74.9(72.5 – 77.2)5.2(3.2 – 8.0)98.1(97.1 – 98.8)Method E84.6(69.5 – 94.1)37.2(34.6 – 39.8)3.7(2.5 – 5.1)98.8(97.5 – 99.6)

Method A: the original scoring defined by the questionnaire developers; Method B: a scoring based on the ASAS IBP criteria; Method C: a scoring based on the ASAS referral criteria; Method D: a scoring based on the ASAS classification criteria for axial and peripheral SpA; Method E: a scoring based on a combination of the ASAS referral and classification criteria.

Conclusion:

A self-administered questionnaire scored based on a combination of ASAS referral and classification criteria achieved high sensitivity in identifying axial SpA in subjects referred to a rheumatology clinic. This supports its evaluation as a screening tool for axial SpA in the general population.

References:

[1]Xiang L, Teo EPS, Low AHL, Leung YY, Fong W, Xin X, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Hamilton axial spondyloarthritis questionnaire and development of a Chinese version in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019;22(9):1652-60.

[2]Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2009;68 Suppl 2:ii1-44.

[3]Poddubnyy D, van Tubergen A, Landewe R, Sieper J, van der Heijde D. Development of an ASAS-endorsed recommendation for the early referral of patients with a suspicion of axial spondyloarthritis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2015;74(8):1483-7.

[4]Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Akkoc N, Brandt J, Chou CT, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2011;70(1):25-31.

Acknowledgements:

This work was supported by a Health Services Research Grant (HSRG) from the Singapore Ministry of Health National Medical Research Council [grant number: NMRC/HSRG/0075/2017].

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS1413 INTERVAL BETWEEN SYMPTOM ONSET AND DIAGNOSIS AMONG PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE RHEUMATIC DISEASES IN A MULTI-ETHNIC ASIAN POPULATION

Background:

The interval between symptom onset and diagnosis can often be longer than is ideal in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs).

Objectives:

We aimed to characterise this interval among patients newly diagnosed with ARDs in a multi-ethnic Asian population and to identify factors associated with a longer interval.

Methods:

We used Scott’s model of pathways to treatment to characterise the interval between symptom onset and diagnosis into 4 intervals: #1 between symptom onset and first seeking medical attention, #2 between first medical attention and rheumatology referral, #3 between rheumatology referral and first rheumatology assessment, and #4 between first rheumatology assessment and diagnosis. Linear regression models were used to identify factors associated with a longer the overall interval between symptom onset and diagnosis and Interval #1.

Results:

Among 259 patients (age: 51±15 years, female: 71%, most common three ARDs: rheumatoid arthritis (n = 75), axial spondyloarthritis (n = 40) and psoriatic arthritis (n = 35)), the median overall interval was 11.5 months. Interval #1 (median = 4.9 months) was significantly longer than the other intervals (Table 1). Patients with axial spondyloarthritis had a significantly longer overall interval (median = 38.7 months) and Interval #1 (median = 26.6 months) compared to patients with RA (median = 7.6 and 3.5 months, respectively), PsA (median = 7.0 and 2.6 months, respectively) and the other ARDs. Gender was the only patient-related factor significantly associated with the overall interval (reference = male, coefficient = -15.3, p = 0.033) in regression models.

Conclusion:

A longer than ideal interval between symptom onset and diagnosis was observed among patients with ARDs. This was primarily due to a relatively long interval between symptom onset and first seeking medical attention, and highlights the importance of interventions targeting patients prior to first medical attention in reducing the duration between symptom onset and diagnosis.

References:

[1]Scott SE, Walter FM, Webster A, Sutton S, Emery J. The model of pathways to treatment: conceptualization and integration with existing theory. Br J Health Psychol. 2013;18(1):45-65.

Table 1.

Interval between symptom onset and diagnosis

Overall interval, months, median (lower and upper quartiles)†Interval #1, months, median (lower and upper quartiles)Interval #2, months, median (lower and upper quartiles)Interval #3, months, median (lower and upper quartiles)Interval #4, months, median (lower and upper quartiles)Overall(n = 259)11.5(4.7 – 36.0)4.9(1.0 – 24.0)0.3(0.0 – 3.9)1.5(0.8 – 1.8)0.0(0.0 – 1.2)RA(n = 75)7.6(3.1 – 14.8)3.5(1.3 – 11.6)0.2(0.0 – 2.5)1.3(0.6 – 1.6)0.0(0.0 – 0.2)AxSpA(n = 40)38.7(9.6 – 66.7)26.6(4.2 – 56.1)1.6(0.0 – 7.6)1.6(1.2 – 2.3)0.0(0.0 – 2.0)PsA(n = 35)7.0(3.0 – 28.4)2.6(0.2 – 11.3)0.5(0.2 – 3.9)1.6(0.6 – 1.7)0.0(0.0 – 0.0)Seronegative IA(n = 21)12.0(4.7 – 22.8)6.4(1.9 – 34.4)0.1(0.0 – 4.6)1.4(1.3 – 1.5)0.0(0.0 – 0.8)SjS(n = 27)14.2(6.0 – 48.0)4.6(0.6 – 19.0)0.3(0.0 – 3.9)1.6(0.9 – 1.9)0.8(0.0 – 2.3)UCTD(n = 27)15.7(5.1 – 39.8)2.2(0.7 – 24.0)0.8(0.1 – 8.1)1.6(0.5 – 1.8)1.2(0.0 – 2.1)Other ARDs(n = 34)8.1(5.3 – 36.0)6.3(0.9 – 31.7)0.2(0.0 – 1.1)1.5(1.2 – 1.8)0.3(0.0 – 1.1)

Overall interval and Intervals #1-4: refer to abstract for definitions; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; axSpA: axial spondyloarthritis; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; IA: inflammatory arthritis; SjS: Sjögren’s syndrome; UCTD: undifferentiated connective tissue disease; other ARDs: systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, palindromic rheumatism and overlap syndromes.

†Intervals #1-4 did not sum to the overall interval mainly due to the fact that Intervals #1-4 might not available for all patients.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

18F-FDG PET/CT Manifestations of IgG4-related Disease

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) was not recognised as a systemic condition until 2003, when extra pancreatic manifestations were identified in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis. Since then, IgG4-RD has been described to involve virtually every organ system. It is highly responsive to immunosuppressants but can have detrimental effects if left untreated. Early recognition of the disease is, therefore, critical. The diagnosis of IgG4-RD is frequently challenging owing to its non-specific clinical manifestations, indolent nature and broad differential diagnoses. Although histopathological examination remains the cornerstone of diagnosis, imaging plays an important role in establishing extent of disease and identifying areas suitable for biopsy. ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been demonstrated to be useful in assessing organ involvement, guiding biopsy and monitoring disease response. The ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan is highly sensitive and able to evaluate multiorgan involvement in a single examination, a key advantage over conventional imaging modalities. A potential pitfall is its low specificity. As such, detailed knowledge of the imaging findings in IgG4-related disease is required to avoid misdiagnosis. This pictorial review aims to depict the diverse spectrum of imaging findings of IgG4-RD and the key imaging features to distinguish it from other important differential diagnoses.

Facilitators of and barriers to implementing a traditional Chinese medicine collaborative model of care for axial spondyloarthritis: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Conventional therapy may be inadequate for many patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may be a viable alternative, but its effectiveness for axSpA is unknown. We are currently conducting a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the effectiveness of a TCM collaborative model of care (TCMCMC), which combines usual rheumatologic care with acupuncture for patients with axSpA. This nested qualitative sub-study aims to identify facilitators of and barriers to the implementation of the TCMCMC.

METHODS

We conducted individual in-depth interviews with participants who had completed the acupuncture regimen to elicit opinions on the facilitators of and barriers to the implementation of the TCMCMC. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve participants were included, with data saturation occurring after 10 interviews. The analysis revealed both a number of important 'facilitators' and 'barriers'. Facilitators to the implementation of the TCMCMC included effectiveness of TCM to relieve symptoms, inadequacy of conventional treatment and positive social perceptions of TCM. Barriers included scepticism towards TCM, inability of TCM to provide instant relief, needle-related discomfort, variable effectiveness of TCM influenced by physicians' skills and experience and the high cost of TCM. Recommendations to overcome barriers included further patient education about TCM.

CONCLUSION

Policymakers should take into account the various feasibility factors identified in this study when developing and implementing a TCMCMC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03420404 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

A systematic scoping review of approaches to teaching and assessing empathy in medicine

BACKGROUND

Empathy is pivotal to effective clinical care. Yet, the art of nurturing and assessing empathy in medical schools is rarely consistent and poorly studied. To inform future design of programs aimed at nurturing empathy in medical students and doctors, a review is proposed.

METHODS

This systematic scoping review (SSR) employs a novel approach called the Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) to enhance the reproducibility and transparency of the process. This 6-stage SSR in SEBA involved three teams of independent researchers who reviewed eight bibliographic and grey literature databases and performed concurrent thematic and content analysis to evaluate the data.

RESULTS

In total, 24429 abstracts were identified, 1188 reviewed, and 136 included for analysis. Thematic and content analysis revealed five similar themes/categories. These comprised the 1) definition of empathy, 2) approaches to nurturing empathy, 3) methods to assessing empathy, 4) outcome measures, and 5) enablers/barriers to a successful curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurturing empathy in medicine occurs in stages, thus underlining the need for it to be integrated into a formal program built around a spiralled curriculum. We forward a framework built upon these stages and focus attention on effective assessments at each stage of the program. Tellingly, there is also a clear need to consider the link between nurturing empathy and one's professional identity formation. This foregrounds the need for more effective tools to assess empathy and to better understand their role in longitudinal and portfolio based learning programs.

Recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination in people with rheumatic disease: Developed by the Singapore Chapter of Rheumatologists

Aim

People with rheumatic diseases (PRD) remain vulnerable in the era of the COVID‐19 pandemic. We formulated recommendations to meet the urgent need for a consensus for vaccination against SARS‐CoV‐2 in PRD.

Methods

Systematic literature reviews were performed to evaluate: (a) outcomes in PRD with COVID‐19; (b) efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of COVID‐19 vaccination; and (c) published guidelines/recommendations for non‐live, non‐COVID‐19 vaccinations in PRD. Recommendations were formulated based on the evidence and expert opinion according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology.

Results

The consensus comprises 2 overarching principles and 7 recommendations. Vaccination against SARS‐CoV‐2 in PRD should be aligned with prevailing national policy and should be individualized through shared decision between the healthcare provider and patient. We strongly recommend that eligible PRD and household contacts be vaccinated against SARS‐CoV‐2. We conditionally recommended that the COVID‐19 vaccine be administered during quiescent disease if possible. Immunomodulatory drugs, other than rituximab, can be continued alongside vaccination. We conditionally recommend that the COVID‐19 vaccine be administered prior to commencing rituximab if possible. For patients on rituximab, the vaccine should be administered a minimum of 6 months after the last dose and/or 4 weeks prior to the next dose of rituximab. Post‐vaccination antibody titers against SARS‐CoV‐2 need not be measured. Any of the approved COVID‐19 vaccines may be used, with no particular preference.

Conclusion

These recommendations provide guidance for COVID‐19 vaccination in PRD. Most recommendations in this consensus are conditional, reflecting a lack of evidence or low‐level evidence.

Prevalence and risk factors for falls in patients with spondyloarthritis: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) may have a greater risk of falling due to poor postural balance and decreased mobility. To our best knowledge, there are no published reviews that study falls in patients with SpA. Therefore, we aim to systematically review the literature and identify the prevalence and risk factors of falls in patients with SpA.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review using 5 electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar using controlled vocabulary terms (eg MeSH terms) in the search strategy for the concepts: falls, fall risk, SpA and its subtypes.

RESULTS

We identified 7279 articles, of which 3 studies with a total of 441 patients were included. Prevalence of falls ranged from 13% to 25%. We identified 16 main factors across 5 categories. Under socio-demographic factors, functional limitation, decreased quality of life, advanced age and job loss were associated with an increased risk of falls. Poor balance and mobility and fear of falling were associated with increased risk of falls. Active disease and symptoms of SpA were medical factors that were associated with increased risk of falls. Medication factors including polypharmacy, myorelaxants and antidepressants were not associated with increased fall risk.

CONCLUSION

We identified potentially modifiable risk factors associated with increased risk of falls in patients with SpA, including functional limitation, poor balance and mobility, fear of falling and active disease. Clinicians should recognize these factors and address them in the holistic management of patients with SpA, thereby reducing falls and their complications.

Exploring the Prevalence and Factors Associated With Fatigue in Axial Spondyloarthritis in an Asian Cohort in Singapore

Aim: To evaluate the prevalence of fatigue and the factors associated with fatigue among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) within an Asian population.

Method: We used the baseline data from a clinic registry in a tertiary referral center. All patients fulfilled the 2009 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axSpA. Severe fatigue was defined as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index-fatigue (BASDAI-fatigue) ≥5/10 and vitality domain of Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36 VT) ≤10th percentile of the general population.

Results: We included 262 consecutive patients with axSpA (79% men, 82.4% Chinese). The mean (standard deviation, SD) age and duration of disease were 41.7 (13.7) and 10.1 (8.3) years, respectively. 145 (55.3%) and 52 (31.1%) patients reported severe fatigue by the BASDAI-fatigue and SF-36 VT criteria, respectively. Patients with severe fatigue had worse scores across all disease activity assessments and disease impact measures compared to those without severe fatigue. Using principal component analyses, disease activity and impact were associated with BASDAI-fatigue, while disease activity and impact, and disease chronicity were associated with SF-36 VT. In the univariable analyses, all disease activity assessments and disease impact measures correlated with both BASDAI-fatigue and SF-36 VT. In the multivariable analyses, BASDAI-axial pain, BASFI, BAS-G, and ethnicity were associated with BASDAI-fatigue, while ASQoL and BASDAI-morning stiffness were associated with SF-36 VT.

Conclusion: Fatigue is prevalent amongst patients with axSpA in Asia and is associated with disease activity, disease impact as well as patient related factors.

Professionalism in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) practitioners: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Medical professionalism is important for establishing public trust in doctors. Its definition is culture-sensitive. However, no research has explored medical professionalism in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) practitioners. This study aims to (a) establish the domains of professionalism in TCM practitioners in Singapore, and to (b) compare the domains of professionalism of practitioners trained in TCM and practitioners trained in conventional medicine.

METHODS

Data for this qualitative study was collected through in-depth interviews (IDIs) with TCM practitioners. IDIs were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted by two independent coders using the Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) as a framework. The domains of professionalism in TCM and conventional medicine were then compared, using data from a similar study on professionalism in practitioners trained in conventional medicine.

RESULTS

A total of 27 TCM practitioners (40.7% male) participated in this study. The four domains of professionalism in the P-MEX, namely doctor-patient relationship skills, reflective skills, time management and inter-professional relationship skills, and two new sub-domains, "communicated effectively with patient" and "demonstrated understanding and integrated with conventional medicine", were relevant to TCM practitioners. This is largely similar to that of practitioners trained in conventional medicine, with a few differences, including "ensured continuity of care" and "used health resources appropriately".

CONCLUSION

The domains of professionalism in TCM practitioners were established and they are similar to that of practitioners trained in conventional medicine. This study is the first to define medical professionalism in TCM practitioners. Findings will provide guidance on the education of professionalism in TCM practitioners.

Residual Disease Burden in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Despite Low Disease Activity States in a Multiethnic Asian Population

Objectives

To evaluate the burden of residual disease in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who achieved low disease activity (LDA) status.

Methods

We used baseline data from a clinic registry of SpA in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. For axSpA, LDA was defined as Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ASDAS-ESR) < 2.1 or Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) < 3/10. For PsA, LDA was defined by achieving 5/7 cutoffs in the minimal disease activity (MDA) or Clinical Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) ≤ 13.

Results

In 262 cases of axSpA (21% women; mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 42 ± 14 yrs), 33% and 43% of patients achieved ASDAS-ESR and BASDAI LDA states, respectively, while in 142 cases of PsA (49% women, mean age 51 ± SD 14 yrs), 35% and 63% achieved MDA and cDAPSA LDA, respectively. Both axSpA and PsA patients with LDA had pain scores ranging from 14.0 to 21.4/100 and fatigue scores ranging from 3.1 to 3.6/10. Substantial burden in physical disability and mental well-being were observed, with low physical and mental component summary scores on the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. AxSpa patients in BASDAI LDA had higher ESR and lower disability than those in ASDAS-ESR LDA. cDAPSA classified nearly twice as many PsA patients into LDA than MDA. Compared to PsA patients in MDA LDA, those in cDAPSA LDA had higher active joint counts, dactylitis, enthesitis, pain scores, and patient global assessment.

Conclusion

Despite being in LDA, patients with axSpA and PsA experienced substantial residual burden in pain, poorer physical function, and mental well-being.

Improving sensitivity of the connective tissue disease screening questionnaire: A comparative study of various scoring methods

OBJECTIVES

Early detection of autoimmune rheumatic diseases is crucial given their high morbidity and mortality and short window of opportunity to improve patient outcomes. Self-administered screening questionnaires such as the connective tissue disease screening questionnaire (CSQ) have been shown to promote early detection of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. However, optimal scoring of screening questionnaires may differ with prevalence of clinical features and changes in classification criteria. We compared the performance of 3 scoring methods for the CSQ for early detection of autoimmune rheumatic diseases in a multi-ethnic Asian population.

METHODS

Patients who were newly referred for evaluation of possible autoimmune rheumatic diseases were invited to answer the cross-culturally adapted CSQ. Detection of autoimmune rheumatic diseases using 1) the original CSQ scoring, 2) a modified CSQ scoring and 3) a scoring based on current classification criteria, were compared to classification of autoimmune rheumatic diseases by classification criteria.

RESULTS

Of 819 participants, 85 were classified as having autoimmune rheumatic diseases screened for by the adapted CSQ. The original CSQ scoring yielded relatively lower sensitivities in detecting both any and individual autoimmune rheumatic diseases (67% and 20-57%, respectively) compared to the modified CSQ scoring (81% and 60-73%, respectively) and the scoring based on current classification criteria (89% and 50-88%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The adapted CSQ with the classification criteria-based scoring achieved relatively high sensitivities in detecting autoimmune rheumatic diseases, suggesting this could be employed as the first step in population screening.

Measurement Properties of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Medication Adherence: Systematic Review

Background

Medication adherence is essential for improving the health outcomes of patients. Various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed to measure medication adherence in patients. However, no study has summarized the psychometric properties of these PROMs to guide selection for use in clinical practice or research.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the quality of the PROMs used to measure medication adherence.

Methods

This study was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Relevant articles were retrieved from the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases. The PROMs were then evaluated based on the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

Results

A total of 121 unique medication adherence PROMs from 214 studies were identified. Hypotheses testing for construct validity and internal consistency were the most frequently assessed measurement properties. PROMs with at least a moderate level of evidence for ≥5 measurement properties include the Adherence Starts with Knowledge 20, Compliance Questionnaire-Rheumatology, General Medication Adherence Scale, Hill-Bone Scale, Immunosuppressant Therapy Barrier Scale, Medication Adherence Reasons Scale (MAR-Scale) revised, 5-item Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS-5), 9-item MARS (MARS-9), 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4), 8-item MMAS (MMAS-8), Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Adherence Scale, Satisfaction with Iron Chelation Therapy, Test of Adherence to Inhalers, and questionnaire by Voils. The MAR-Scale revised, MMAS-4, and MMAS-8 have been administered electronically.

Conclusions

This study identified 121 PROMs for medication adherence and provided synthesized evidence for the measurement properties of these PROMs. The findings from this study may assist clinicians and researchers in selecting suitable PROMs to assess medication adherence.

Development of an Item Bank to Measure Medication Adherence: Systematic Review

Background

Medication adherence is important in managing the progression of chronic diseases. A promising approach to reduce cognitive burden when measuring medication adherence lies in the use of computer‐adaptive tests (CATs) or in the development of shorter patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, the lack of an item bank currently hampers this progress.

Objective

We aim to develop an item bank to measure general medication adherence.

Methods

Using the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA), articles published before October 2019 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Items from existing PROMs were classified and selected (“binned” and “winnowed”) according to standards published by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cooperative Group.

Results

A total of 126 unique PROMs were identified from 213 studies in 48 countries. Items from the literature review (47 PROMs with 579 items for which permission has been obtained) underwent binning and winnowing. This resulted in 421 candidate items (77 extent of adherence and 344 reasons for adherence).

Conclusions

We developed an item bank for measuring general medication adherence using items from validated PROMs. This will allow researchers to create new PROMs from selected items and provide the foundation to develop CATs.

Prevalence and variables associated with fatigue in psoriatic arthritis: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of and evaluate the factors associated with fatigue patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in an Asian population.

METHODS

We used baseline data from a registry of patients with PsA attending an outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Demographic data and disease characteristics were evaluated. Fatigue was assessed by question one of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI-F) and the vitality domain of the Medical Outcome Survey, Short-Form 36 (SF-36 VT). We evaluated clusters of variables, and individual variables in association with fatigue.

RESULTS

We included 131 patients (50.4% men, 63.4% Chinese, median PsA duration 21.0 months) with completed data for fatigue. Forty-five patients (34%) experienced severe fatigue (defined by BASDAI-F > 5/10). We used principal component analysis and identified five clusters of variables that explained 62.9% of the variance of all factors. Of these, disease activity and impact, and disease chronicity were significantly associated with BASDAI-F and SF-36 VT. In multivariable analyses, back pain, peripheral joint pain and patient global assessment were associated with BASDAI-F, whereas peripheral joint pain and mental health were associated with SF-36 VT.

CONCLUSION

PsA-associated fatigue is prevalent in this Asian PsA cohort and is associated with disease activity, impact and chronicity.

Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study

BACKGROUND

The importance of medical professionalism and its assessment has been well documented in the literature. However, there is currently no culturally-adapted tool to assess medical professionalism in Singapore. This study sets out to find consensus on relevance of the items from the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore.

METHODS

A two-round Delphi survey was completed by an expert panel consisting of program directors, associate designated institutional officials, and designated institutional official (n = 15) from residency programs in Singapore. Round 1 comprised of 23 items from the P-MEX rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Definitely include, 2 = Possibly include, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Possibly exclude, 5 = Definitely exclude). In round 2, the experts received feedback from the previous round, and were asked to re-rate the items which did not achieve consensus in the previous round. The threshold for consensus in the study was defined as 70% or greater agreement among experts.

RESULTS

Completed questionnaires for both rounds were received from all 15 experts. In round 1, 18 items (78%) achieved consensus to be included. In round 2, 1 (4%) item achieved consensus to be included. However, none of the remaining items achieved consensus to be removed, and they exhibited stability in responses. A list of 19 items covering four domains of medical professionalism (Doctor-patient relationship skills, Reflective skills, Time management and Inter-professional relationship skills) was obtained during the two-rounds of Delphi survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Nineteen items in the P-MEX had garnered consensus and is suitable for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore. The findings of this study can provide guidance for faculty and institutions who want to assess medical professionalism of their medical trainees.

Validity and reliability of EQ-5D-5L among patients with axial spondyloarthritis in Singapore

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of EuroQOL-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) in Singapore.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted involving patients with axial SpA in an Asian tertiary hospital from 2017 to 2018. This study followed the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement Instruments framework. Construct validity was evaluated by testing 22 a priori hypotheses with other patient-reported outcomes measures. Cronbach's alpha was used to estimate the internal consistency of the EQ-5D-5L, while its test-retest reliability was assessed using weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The measurement error was assessed by analyzing minimal detectable change (MDC).

RESULTS

The median age of included patients (n=118) was 35 years (interquartile range: 28, 49). Ninety-six (81.4%) patients were male, while 112 (94.9%) patients were of Chinese ethnicity. The EQ-5D-5L demonstrated good internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.79. The test-retest reliability of the EQ-5D-5L was good with a weighted kappa of ≥0.61 for mobility, self-care, usual activities, and anxiety/depression; the ICC was 0.92 and 0.99 for the EQ-5D-5L index and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, respectively. The weighted kappa for the EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort was moderate [0.53, 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.60]. The MDC for EQ-5D-5L index and VAS scores was 0.06 and 4.5, respectively. Convergent validity was supported as all hypotheses were confirmed in the results.

CONCLUSION

This study supports EQ-5D-5L as a valid and reliable instrument for assessing health-related quality of life among patients with axial SpA in Singapore.

AB0699 RESIDUAL DISEASE BURDEN PRESENT IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS AND PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS PATIENTS ACHIEVING LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY STATES

Background:

Despite achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) states, patients with SpondyloArthritis (SpA) may have considerable residual disease. Sparse data is currently available from Asia.

Objectives:

We aimed to evaluate the burden of residual disease in patients with axial SpondyloArthritis (axSpA) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) who achieved LDA.

Methods:

We used data from a registry of SpA from an outpatient setting in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. For axSpA, LDA was defined as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) <4/10. For PsA, LDA was defined by achieving 5/7 cutoffs in the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) or clinical Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) ≤13.

Results:

From 262 cases of axSpA (21% women; mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 42 ± 14 years), 58% of patients achieved LDA states. While from 142 cases of PsA (49% women; mean ± SD age 51 ± 14 years), 38% and 63% achieved MDA and cDAPSA LDA, respectively. Both axSpA and PsA patients with LDA had pain scores range from 17.2 to 25.7/100 and fatigue scores from 3.3 to 3.5/10. (Table 1). Substantial burden in physical disability and mental well-being were seen as a low physical and mental component summary of SF-36. cDAPSA classified nearly twice as many PsA patients into LDA than MDA. Compared to PsA patients in MDA, PsA patients in cDAPSA LDA had higher pain scores, Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), dactylitis, and enthesitis. axSpA patients in LDA classified by BASDAI had the highest pain and fatigue scores, and PtGA.

Table 1.

Residual disease burden in patients with axSpA and PsA who have achieved LDA

axSpAPsALDA (n=153)LDA by MDA (n=54)LDA by cDAPSA (n=90)Age, years¥42.2 (14.0)52.5 (13.2)52.5 (13.2)Female, n (%)26 (17.0)30 (55.6)45 (50.0)TJC¥0.1 (0.3)0.8 (1.0)1.0 (1.4)SJC¥0.1 (0.3)0.7 (1.3)0.9 (1.3)VAS-pain (0-100)¥25.7 (19.0)17.2 (17.8)20.8 (16.7)BASDAI (0-10)¥2.3 (1.0)2.4 (1.6)2.7 (1.7)BASDAI fatigue (0-10)¥3.5 (2.2)3.3 (2.3)3.4 (2.3)PtGA (0-100)¥27.8 (19.5)20.9 (17.9)23.5 (17.6)Dactylitis (0-20)¥–0.3 (0.5)0.5 (0.9)LEI (0-6)¥–0.1 (0.4)0.2 (0.5)HAQ (0-3)¥0.1 (0.1)0.1 (0.2)0.2 (0.4)HAQ < 0.5, n (%)149 (97.4)52 (96.3)77 (85.6)SF-36 PCS¥46.8 (9.9)45.8 (11.5)45.1 (11.7)SF-36 MCS¥46.4 (11.2)46.1 (11.3)45.6 (10.6)

axSpA, axial Spondyloarthritis; PsA, Psoriatic Arthritis; LDA, Low Disease Activity; MDA, Minimal Disease Activity; cDAPSA, clinical Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis; TJC, tender joint count; SJC, swollen joint count; VAS, Visual Analog Scale; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; PtGA, patient’s global assessment; LEI, Leeds Enthesitis Index; HAQ, Health Assessment Questionnaire; SF-36, Short-Form 36; SF-36 PCS, norm-based Physical Component Summary (mean=50, SD=10); SF-36 MCS, norm-based Mental Component Summary (mean=50, SD=10)

¥mean (SD)

Conclusion:

Despite being in LDA, axSpA and PsA patients experienced substantial pain, fatigue and poorer functional health and mental well-being.

Disclosure of Interests:

Venice Liu: None declared, Warren Fong Consultant of: Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Yu Heng Kwan: None declared, Ying Ying Leung Speakers bureau: Novartis, Janssen, Eli Lilly

Work disability in rheumatic diseases: Baseline results from an inception cohort

AIM

We aimed to characterize work disability in patients with newly diagnosed rheumatic diseases and compare work characteristics between patients with rheumatic diseases and controls without rheumatic diseases at diagnosis.

METHODS

Patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and osteoarthritis (OA), surrogates for autoimmune and non-autoimmune rheumatic diseases, respectively, and controls of working age were surveyed at diagnosis. Patients with rheumatic diseases who were employed before symptom onset were characterized as having work disability if they reported reduced work ability and productivity while remaining in the same job as before symptom onset, changed to a less demanding job or stopped working/retired. Work characteristics at diagnosis were compared between rheumatic diseases patients and controls.

RESULTS

The unemployment rate before symptom onset was lower in patients with IA (20%) compared to patients with OA (32%). Among patients with IA and OA who were employed before symptom onset, 59% and 43% reported work disability, respectively (P = .04). The unemployment rate at diagnosis was comparable in patients with IA (26%) and higher in patients with OA (38%) compared to controls (29%). Employed patients with IA and OA, when compared with controls, reported poorer work ability (score: 37 vs 39 vs 41, P < .01; proportion with poor/moderate work ability: 48% vs 33% vs 21%, P < .01) and greater work productivity loss (score: 32 vs 29 vs 17, P < .01) at diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Rheumatic diseases impose significant work disability at diagnosis, highlighting the need for identification and interventions targeting work disability early in the course of disease.