Utility of MRI Enhancement Pattern in Myelopathies With Longitudinally Extensive T2 Lesions

The absence of antibodies in longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis may predict a more favourable prognosis

BACKGROUND

Isolated first episodes of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) have typically been associated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). However, in some cases, serological testing and screening for other aetiologies are negative, a condition referred to as double seronegative longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (dsLETM).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate comparative outcomes of dsLETM, MOGAD-LETM and NMOSD-LETM.

METHODS

Cohort study of LETM cases seen in the UK NMOSD Highly Specialised Service between January 2008 and March 2022.

RESULTS

LETM = 87 cases were identified (median onset age = 46 years (15-85); median follow-up = 46 months (1-144); 47% NMOSD-LETM = 41 (aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-IgG) positive = 36), 20% MOGAD-LETM = 17 and 33% dsLETM = 29). Despite similar Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at nadir, last EDSS was higher in AQP4-IgG and seronegative NMOSD-LETM (sNMOSD) (p = 0.006). Relapses were less common in dsLETM compared to AQP4-IgG NMOSD-LETM and sNMOSD-LETM (19% vs 60% vs 100%; p = 0.001). Poor prognosis could be predicted by AQP4-IgG (odds ratio (OR) = 38.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-1112.86); p = 0.03) and EDSS 3 months after onset (OR = 65.85 (95% CI = 3.65-1188.60); p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

dsLETM remains clinically challenging and difficult to classify with existing nosological terminology. Despite a similar EDSS at nadir, patients with dsLETM relapsed less and had a better long-term prognosis than NMOSD-LETM.

Immune-Mediated Myelopathies

OBJECTIVE

Immune-mediated myelopathies are conditions in which the immune system attacks the spinal cord. This article describes the distinguishing characteristics of immune-mediated myelopathies and treatment strategies for patients affected by these disorders.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

New biomarkers, such as aquaporin 4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies, in the blood and spinal fluid have led to the identification of antigen-specific immune-mediated myelopathies and approved therapies to prevent disease progression.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

The first step in the diagnosis of an immune-mediated myelopathy is confirming that the immune system is the cause of the attack by excluding non-immune-mediated causes. The second step is to narrow the differential diagnosis based on objective biomarkers such as serology and MRI patterns. The third step is to treat the specific immune-mediated myelopathy by using evidence-based medicine.

Spinal Dorsal Intradural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Natural History, Imaging, and Management

In this review, we describe the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of spinal dorsal intradural arteriovenous fistulas (DI-AVFs), focusing on novel research areas. DI-AVFs compose the most common subgroup of spinal arteriovenous lesions and most commonly involve the thoracic spine, followed by lumbar and sacral segments. The pathogenesis underlying DI-AVFs is an area of emerging understanding, thought to be attributable to venous congestion and hypertension that precipitate ascending myelopathy. Patients with DI-AVFs typically present with motor, sensory, or urinary dysfunction, although a wide swath of other less common symptoms has been reported. DI-AVFs can be subdivided by spinal region, which in turn is associated with 4 distinct clinical phenotypes: craniocervical junction (CCJ), subaxial cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral. Patients with CCJ and lumbosacral DI-AVFs have particularly interesting presentations and treatment considerations. High-value diagnostic findings on MRI include flow voids, missing-piece sign, and T2-weighted intramedullary hyperintensity. However, digital subtraction angiography is the gold standard for diagnosis and localization of DI-AVFs and for definitive treatment planning. Surgical disconnection of DI-AVFs is almost universally curative and frontline treatment, especially for CCJ and lumbosacral DI-AVFs. Endovascular techniques evolve in promising ways, such as improved visualization, distal access, and liquid embolic techniques. The pathophysiology of DI-AVFs is better understood using newly identified radiologic diagnostic markers. Despite new techniques and devices introduced in the endovascular field, surgery remains the gold-standard treatment for DI-AVFs.

Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: an updated consensus approach

Accurate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis requires careful attention to its differential diagnosis-many disorders can mimic the clinical manifestations and paraclinical findings of this disease. A collaborative effort, organised by The International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis in 2008, provided diagnostic approaches to multiple sclerosis and identified clinical and paraclinical findings (so-called red flags) suggestive of alternative diagnoses. Since then, knowledge of disorders in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has expanded substantially. For example, CNS inflammatory disorders that present with syndromes overlapping with multiple sclerosis can increasingly be distinguished from multiple sclerosis with the aid of specific clinical, MRI, and laboratory findings; studies of people misdiagnosed with multiple sclerosis have also provided insights into clinical presentations for which extra caution is warranted. Considering these data, an update to the recommended diagnostic approaches to common clinical presentations and key clinical and paraclinical red flags is warranted to inform the contemporary clinical evaluation of patients with suspected multiple sclerosis.

Identifying specific myelopathy etiologies in the evaluation of suspected myelitis: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Myelopathies require prompt etiologic diagnosis. We aimed to identify a specific myelopathy diagnosis in cases of suspected myelitis to highlight clinicoradiologic differences.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-centre cohort of subjects with suspected myelitis referred to London Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Clinic between 2006 and 2021, we identified those with MS and reviewed the remaining charts for etiologic diagnosis based on clinical, serologic, and imaging details.

RESULTS

Of 333 included subjects, 318/333 (95.5%) received an etiologic diagnosis. Most (274/333, 82%) had MS or clinically isolated syndrome. Spinal cord infarction (n = 10) was the commonest non-inflammatory myelitis mimic characterized by hyperacute decline (n = 10/10, 100%), antecedent claudication (n = 2/10, 20%), axial owl/snake eye (n = 7/9, 77%) and sagittal pencillike (n = 8/9, 89%) MRI patterns, vertebral artery occlusion/stenosis (n = 4/10, 40%), and concurrent acute cerebral infarct (n = 3/9, 33%). Longitudinal lesions were frequent in aquaporin-4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4+NMOSD) (n = 7/7, 100%) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG-associated disorder (MOGAD) (n = 6/7, 86%), accompanied by bright spotty (n = 5/7, 71%) and central-grey-restricted (n = 4/7, 57%) T2-lesions on axial sequences, respectively. Leptomeningeal (n = 4/4, 100%), dorsal subpial (n = 4/4, 100%) enhancement, and positive body PET/CT (n = 4/4, 100%) aided the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Spondylotic myelopathies had chronic sensorimotor presentations (n = 4/6, 67%) with relative bladder sparing (n = 5/6, 83%), localizable to sites of disc herniation (n = 6/6, 100%). Metabolic myelopathies showed dorsal column or inverted 'V' sign (n = 2/3, 67%) MRI T2-abnormality with B12 deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no single feature reliably confirms or refutes a specific myelopathy diagnosis, this study highlights patterns that narrow the differential diagnosis of myelitis and facilitate early recognition of mimics.

Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelits optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part I: Diagnosis and differential diagnosis

The term 'neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders' (NMOSD) is used as an umbrella term that refers to aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and its formes frustes and to a number of closely related clinical syndromes without AQP4-IgG. NMOSD were originally considered subvariants of multiple sclerosis (MS) but are now widely recognized as disorders in their own right that are distinct from MS with regard to immunopathogenesis, clinical presentation, optimum treatment, and prognosis. In part 1 of this two-part article series, which ties in with our 2014 recommendations, the neuromyelitis optica study group (NEMOS) gives updated recommendations on the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of NMOSD. A key focus is on differentiating NMOSD from MS and from myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM; also termed MOG antibody-associated disease, MOGAD), which shares significant similarity with NMOSD with regard to clinical and, partly, radiological presentation, but is a pathogenetically distinct disease. In part 2, we provide updated recommendations on the treatment of NMOSD, covering all newly approved drugs as well as established treatment options.

Advances in the neuroimaging of motor disorders

Neuroimaging is a valuable adjunct to the history and examination in the evaluation of motor system disorders. Conventional imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging depicts important anatomic information and helps to identify imaging patterns which may support diagnosis of a specific motor disorder. Advanced imaging techniques can provide further detail regarding volume, functional, or metabolic changes occurring in nervous system pathology. This chapter is an overview of the advances in neuroimaging with particular emphasis on both standard and less well-known advanced imaging techniques and findings, such as diffusion tensor imaging or volumetric studies, and their application to specific motor disorders. In addition, it provides reference to emerging imaging biomarkers in motor system disorders such as Parkinson disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Huntington disease, and briefly reviews the neuroimaging findings in different causes of myelopathy and peripheral nerve disorders.

Challenging Myelopathy Cases

Misdiagnosis of myelopathies is common and can lead to irreversible disability when diagnosis- and disease-specific treatments are delayed. Therefore, quickly determining the etiology of myelopathy is crucial. Clinical evaluation and MRI spine are paramount in establishing the correct diagnosis and subsequently an appropriate treatment plan. Herein, we review an approach to myelopathy diagnosis focused on the time course of neurologic symptom progression and neuroimaging pearls, and apply them to a variety of inflammatory, structural, and vascular myelopathy cases.

Identification of specific causes of myelopathy in a large cohort of patients initially diagnosed with transverse myelitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Identifying the etiologic diagnosis in patients presenting with myelopathy is essential in order to guide appropriate treatment and follow-up. We set out to examine the etiologic diagnosis after comprehensive clinical evaluation and diagnostic work-up in a large cohort of patients referred to our specialized myelopathy clinic, and to explore the demographic profiles and symptomatic evolution of specific etiologic diagnoses.

METHODS

In this retrospective study of patients referred to the Johns Hopkins Myelitis and Myelopathy Center between 2006 and 2021 for evaluation of "transverse myelitis", the final etiologic diagnosis determined after comprehensive evaluation in each patient was reviewed and validated. Demographic characteristics and temporal profile of symptom evolution were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 1193 included patients, 772 (65%) were determined to have an inflammatory myelopathy and 421 (35%) were determined to have a non-inflammatory myelopathy. Multiple sclerosis/clinically isolated syndrome (n = 221, 29%) and idiopathic myelitis (n = 149, 19%) were the most frequent inflammatory diagnoses, while spinal cord infarction (n = 197, 47%) and structural causes of myelopathy (n = 108, 26%) were the most frequent non-inflammatory diagnoses. Compared to patients with inflammatory myelopathies, patients with non-inflammatory myelopathies were more likely to be older, male and experience chronic symptom evolution (p < 0.001 for all). Hyperacute symptom evolution was most frequent in patients with spinal cord infarction (74%), while chronic symptom evolution was most frequent in patients with structural causes of myelopathy (81%), arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous malformation (81%), myelopathy associated with rheumatologic disorder (71%), and sarcoidosis-associated myelopathy (61%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients initially diagnosed with "transverse myelitis" are eventually found to have a more specific inflammatory or even non-inflammatory cause, potentially resulting in inappropriate treatment and follow-up. Demographic characteristics and temporal profile of symptom evolution may help inform a differential diagnosis in these patients. Etiological diagnosis of myelopathies would provide better therapeutic decisions.

Neuroimaging features in inflammatory myelopathies: A review

Spinal cord involvement can be observed in the course of immune-mediated disorders. Although multiple sclerosis (MS) represents the leading cause of inflammatory myelopathy, an increasing number of alternative etiologies must be now considered in the diagnostic work-up of patients presenting with myelitis. These include antibody-mediated disorders and cytotoxic T cell-mediated diseases targeting central nervous system (CNS) antigens, and systemic autoimmune conditions with secondary CNS involvement. Even though clinical features are helpful to orient the diagnostic suspicion (e.g., timing and severity of myelopathy symptoms), the differential diagnosis of inflammatory myelopathies is often challenging due to overlapping features. Moreover, noninflammatory etiologies can sometimes mimic an inflammatory process. In this setting, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming a fundamental tool for the characterization of spinal cord damage, revealing a pictorial scenario which is wider than the clinical manifestations. The characterization of spinal cord lesions in terms of longitudinal extension, location on axial plane, involvement of the white matter and/or gray matter, and specific patterns of contrast enhancement, often allows a proper differentiation of these diseases. For instance, besides classical features, such as the presence of longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions in patients with aquaporin-4-IgG positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4+NMOSD), novel radiological signs (e.g., H sign, trident sign) have been recently proposed and successfully applied for the differential diagnosis of inflammatory myelopathies. In this review article, we will discuss the radiological features of spinal cord involvement in autoimmune disorders such as MS, AQP4+NMOSD, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), and other recently characterized immune-mediated diseases. The identification of imaging pitfalls and mimics that can lead to misdiagnosis will also be examined. Since spinal cord damage is a major cause of irreversible clinical disability, the recognition of these radiological aspects will help clinicians achieve a correct and prompt diagnosis, treat early with disease-specific treatment and improve patient outcomes.

Case report: Dueling etiologies: Longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesion mimicking spinal cord infarct with simultaneous positive Lyme serology and amphiphysin antibody

Background

Longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions are challenging diagnostic entities as they are uncommon, but various etiologies can cause them.

Case report

We report a case of a 55-year-old man with a past medical history of hypertension. He is an ex-smoker. He presented with chest pain, followed by right lower limb weakness, preceded by 2 weeks of constipation and voiding dysfunction. The examination revealed right lower limb mild flaccid paresis, absent reflexes, reduced anal tone, and urinary retention. His symptoms deteriorated over 24 h, and he developed severe flaccid paraparesis with impaired pinprick sensation below the T4 level. MRI spine showed an abnormal, non-enhancing signal in the anterior aspect of the spinal cord extending from the T4 level to the conus without associated edema. He was commenced on intravenous steroids and had significant improvement after one dose. The imaging was felt to be consistent with spinal cord infarction, and aspirin was started. The cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed elevated protein (0.8 mg/ml). Investigations for stroke and autoimmune pathologies were negative. The Lyme immunoblot confirmed intrathecal production of IgG to Borrelia antigens. The patient was started on ceftriaxone. The paraneoplastic screen identified amphiphysin antibodies. CT-TAP and PET-CT did not identify occult malignancy. The patient had a significant improvement over 2 months, strength was almost fully recovered, and autonomic functions returned to normal.

Conclusion

We describe an unusual steroid-responsive, longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesion with radiological features of spinal cord infarct and a simultaneous finding of intrathecal Lyme antibodies and serum amphiphysin antibodies.

Neurosarcoidosis presenting as longitudinally extensive myelitis: Diagnostic assessment, differential diagnosis, and therapeutic approach

Neurosarcoidosis is an uncommon and multiform clinical entity. Its presentation as an isolated longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) is rare and challenging to identify. We report a case of LETM in a 60-year-old patient with no significant systemic symptoms nor relevant medical history. The peculiar spinal magnetic resonance imaging finding characterized by a posterior and central canal subpial contrast enhancement, the so-called “trident sign,” together with chest computed tomography scan and lymph node biopsy led to the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. We also discuss the main differential diagnoses of LETM and therapeutic options for sarcoidosis-related myelitis.

Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease (MOGAD): A Review of Clinical and MRI Features, Diagnosis, and Management

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is the most recently defined inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Over the last decade, several studies have helped delineate the characteristic clinical-MRI phenotypes of the disease, allowing distinction from aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-IgG+NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS). The clinical manifestations of MOGAD are heterogeneous, ranging from isolated optic neuritis or myelitis to multifocal CNS demyelination often in the form of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), or cortical encephalitis. A relapsing course is observed in approximately 50% of patients. Characteristic MRI features have been described that increase the diagnostic suspicion (e.g., perineural optic nerve enhancement, spinal cord H-sign, T2-lesion resolution over time) and help discriminate from MS and AQP4+NMOSD, despite some overlap. The detection of MOG-IgG in the serum (and sometimes CSF) confirms the diagnosis in patients with compatible clinical-MRI phenotypes, but false positive results are occasionally encountered, especially with indiscriminate testing of large unselected populations. The type of cell-based assay used to evaluate for MOG-IgG (fixed vs. live) and antibody end-titer (low vs. high) can influence the likelihood of MOGAD diagnosis. International consensus diagnostic criteria for MOGAD are currently being compiled and will assist in clinical diagnosis and be useful for enrolment in clinical trials. Although randomized controlled trials are lacking, MOGAD acute attacks appear to be very responsive to high dose steroids and plasma exchange may be considered in refractory cases. Attack-prevention treatments also lack class-I data and empiric maintenance treatment is generally reserved for relapsing cases or patients with severe residual disability after the presenting attack. A variety of empiric steroid-sparing immunosuppressants can be considered and may be efficacious based on retrospective or prospective observational studies but prospective randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to better guide treatment. In summary, this article will review our rapidly evolving understanding of MOGAD diagnosis and management.

Uncommon inflammatory/immune-related myelopathies

The differential diagnosis for immune-mediated myelopathies is broad. Although clinical manifestations overlap, certain presentations are suggestive of a particular myelopathy etiology. Spine MRI lesion characteristics including the length and location, and the pattern of gadolinium enhancement, help narrow the differential diagnosis and exclude an extrinsic compressive cause. The discovery of specific antibodies that serve as biomarkers of myelitis such as aquaporin-4-IgG and myelin-oligodendrocyte -glycoprotein-IgG (MOG-IgG), has improved our understanding of myelitis pathophysiology and facilitated diagnosis. In this review we will focus on the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, imaging findings and treatment and outcomes of uncommon immune-mediated myelopathies.