Direct economic burden of patients with autoimmune encephalitis in western China

RESILIENCE (Retrospective Linkage Study of Autoimmune Encephalitis): protocol for an Australian retrospective cohort study of outcomes in autoimmune encephalitis using data linkage techniques

INTRODUCTION

The autoimmune encephalitides (AE) are a heterogeneous group of neurological disorders with significant morbidity and healthcare costs. Despite advancements in understanding their pathophysiology, uncertainties persist regarding long-term prognosis and optimal management. This study aims to address these gaps, focusing on immunotherapeutic strategies, neoplastic associations and functional outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Retrospective Linkage Study of Autoimmune Encephalitis project will use data linkage techniques to establish a retrospective 10-year population cohort of Australian patients with AE. Two cohorts will be analysed, the Reference Cohort (clinically confirmed AE cases obtained from hospital medical records, n=145) and the Operationally Defined Cohort (AE cases identified through administrative coding data, n≈5000). Univariate statistical methods will identify candidate coding elements for use in the operational case definition and multivariate models and evaluation methods used to identify and internally validate the optimal coding algorithms. The two study cohorts will be analysed separately due to the high likelihood of overlap. Primary outcomes include relapse rate, prevalence and control of epilepsy, cognitive disability, poor educational attainment, delayed tumour diagnosis and mortality. Statistical analyses, including random mixed-effects regression models, will assess treatment effects, covariates and outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This project has been approved by the leading investigators' institutional Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), the St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne HREC, as well as the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare HREC and relevant jurisdictional HRECs where required. The dissemination of findings through peer-reviewed publications and patient advocacy channels will maximise the impact of this research.

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) encephalitis secondary to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy

BACKGROUND

Human herpesvirus (HHV)-6 encephalitis secondary to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapyis relatively rare in clinical practice and needs to be differentiated from immune effector cell-associatedneurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS).

METHODS

We retrospectively reported a case of HHV-6 encephalitis secondary to CAR-T cell therapy.

RESULTS

A male patient from China with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma underwent chimeric CAR-T cell therapy anddeveloped a generalized rash on the 8th day, followed by cognitive changes, memory loss, and disorientation onthe 14th day after CAR-T cell therapy. Initially, ICANS was suspected. A lumbar puncture was performed on the 18th day. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed slightly elevated protein levels and a high presence of HHV-6B sequences by mNGS. Brain MRI showed bilateral hippocampal abnormalities. The patient was ultimatelydiagnosed with HHV-6 encephalitis and treated with ganciclovir and dexamethasone. After one week of treatment,follow-up CSF analysis showed a reduction in HHV-6B sequences. The patient was discharged with improvedmemory and orientation.

CONCLUSION

HHV-6 encephalitis secondary to CAR-T cell therapy may be easily confused with ICANS. Timely andaggressive diagnostic procedures, such as mNGS of CSF and cranial imaging, along with prompt antiviral therapy,are crucial for improving patient outcomes.

Differentiation between viral and autoimmune limbic encephalitis: a prospective cohort study with development and validation of a diagnostic model

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing between viral encephalitis (VE) and autoimmune limbic encephalitis (ALE) presents a clinical challenge due to the overlap in symptoms. We aimed to develop and validate a diagnostic prediction model to differentiate VE and ALE.

METHODS

A prospective observational multicentre cohort study, which continuously enrolled patients diagnosed with either ALE or VE from October 2011 to April 2023. The demographic data, clinical features, and laboratory test results were collected and subjected to logistic regression analyses. The model was displayed as a web-based nomogram and then modified into a scored prediction tool. Model performance was assessed in both derivation and external validation cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 2423 individuals were recruited, and 1001 (496 VE, 505 ALE) patients were included. Based on the derivation cohort (389 VE, 388 ALE), the model was developed with eight variables including age at onset, acuity, fever, headache, nausea/vomiting, psychiatric or memory complaints, status epilepticus, and CSF white blood cell count. The model showed good discrimination and calibration in both derivation (AUC 0.890; 0.868-0.913) and external validation (107 VE, 117 ALE, AUC 0.872; 0.827-0.917) cohorts. The scored prediction tool had a total point that ranged from - 4 to 10 also showing good discrimination and calibration in both derivation (AUC 0.885, 0.863-0.908) and external validation (AUC 0.868, 0.823-0.913) cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction model provides a reliable and user-friendly tool for differentiating between the VE and ALE, which would benefit early diagnosis and appropriate treatment and alleviate economic burdens on both patients and society.

Efficacy of immunotherapy and prognosis in anti-LGI1 encephalitis patients: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for LGI1 antibody encephalitis, and consider the predictors of poor outcomes following immunotherapy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase for articles reporting the immunotherapy data of anti-LGI1 encephalitis patients. The proportions of patients with poor outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score > 2) at 3 months, 12 months, and the last follow-up, as well as the odds ratio [OR] of predictors were pooled.

RESULTS

The review included 162 articles with 1066 patients. The proportion of patients with poor functional outcomes was 21% at 3 months, 14% at 12 months, and 14% at the last follow-up after receiving immunotherapy. The proportion of patients with reported relapse was 16.6%. The mean duration from onset to the first relapse was 15.6 months. Predictors significantly associated with poor outcomes were age (increase of 1 year), the presence of cognitive impairment, and CSF LGI1 antibody positive. We did not find a statistically significant association between the worst mRS score in the acute phase, the presence of faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS), days from symptom onset to immunotherapy, second-line treatment, maintenance immunotherapy, or follow-up time and outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

Although most patients respond to immunotherapy, a minority of patients still have poor outcomes. Advanced age, cognitive impairment, and CSF LGI1 antibody positive are associated with an increased risk of poor outcomes. However, due to the insufficiency of the data, these conclusions need to be interpreted with caution.

Phenotyping the late- and younger-onset neuronal surface antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis: a multicenter study

Neuronal surface antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis (NSAE) occurs across a wide age range. However, few studies focused on the onset age and their related characteristics. We aimed to explore the age-dependent profile of NSAE. A total of 134 patients with a definite diagnosis of NSAE were retrospectively enrolled from 3 tertiary hospitals between July 2014 and August 2020. Demographic, clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic data were collected and compared between the late- (≥45) and younger-onset (<45) groups. The results showed that 56 (41.8%) patients were classified as late-onset NSAE, and 78 (58.2%) as younger-onset NSAE. There were more males, especially in the late-onset group (P = 0.036). Prodromal symptoms were more common in the younger-onset group (P = 0.004). Among the onset symptoms, more late-onset patients presented as seizures, while more younger-onset patients presented as psychiatric symptoms. Throughout the disease course, the late-onset patients were more likely to have memory dysfunction (P < 0.001), but less likely to have central hypoventilation (P = 0.045). The late-onset patients also had a significantly lower modified Rankin Scale score on admission (P = 0.042), required intensive care unit (ICU) admission less frequently during hospitalization (P = 0.042) and had a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.014). Our study revealed that the late- and younger-onset NSAE had a distinct spectrum of demographic features, presentations, and prognoses. More attention is needed for the younger-onset patients, given a higher disease severity on admission, more frequent requirement for ICU admission and longer length of stay.

Limitations on knowledge of autoimmune encephalitis and barriers to its treatment among neurologists: a survey from western China

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a group of severe antibody-mediated brain diseases. The understanding of clinical management of AE has developed rapidly. However, the knowledge level of AE and barriers to effective treatment among neurologists remains unstudied.

METHODS

We conducted a questionnaire survey among neurologist in western China on knowledge of AE, treatment practices, and perspectives on barriers to treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 1113 neurologists were invited and 690 neurologists from 103 hospitals completed the questionnaire with a response rate of 61.9%. Respondents correctly answered 68.3% of medical questions about AE. Some respondents (12.4%) never assayed for diagnostic antibodies if patients had suspected AE. Half (52.3%) never prescribed immunosuppressants for AE patients, while another 7.6% did not know whether they should do so. Neurologists who never prescribed immunosuppressants were more likely to have less education, a less senior job title, and to practice in a smaller setting. Neurologists who did not know whether to prescribe immunosuppressants were associated with less AE knowledge. The most frequent barrier to treatment, according to respondents, was financial cost. Other barriers to treatment included patient refusal, insufficient AE knowledge, lack of access to AE guidelines, drugs or diagnostic test, etc. CONCLUSION: Neurologists in western China lack AE knowledge. Medical education around AE is urgent needed and should be more targeted to individuals with less educated level or working in non-academic hospitals. Policies should be developed to increase the availability of AE related antibody testing or drugs and reduce the economic burden of disease.

Elevated plasma D-dimer levels in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis

PURPOSE

We aimed to explore the difference in coagulation function between healthy individuals and patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis and its relationship with disease severity.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared coagulation function in 161 patients with first-attack anti-NMDAR encephalitis and 178 healthy individuals. The association between D-dimer levels and disease severity was analyzed using binary logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the predictive value of D-dimer levels for the severity of anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

RESULTS

Compared to control individuals, patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis had higher D-dimer levels (median 0.14 vs. 0.05 mg/L, p < 0.001), blood white blood cell (WBC) count (median 8.54 vs. 5.95 × 109/L, p < 0.001), and neutrophil count (median 6.14 vs. 3.1 × 109/L, p < 0.001). D-dimers (median 0.22 vs. 0.10 mg/L, p < 0.001), blood WBC count (median 9.70 vs. 7.70 × 109/L, p < 0.001), neutrophil count (median 7.50 vs. 4.80 × 109/L, p < 0.001), and C-reactive protein (median 2.61 vs. 1.50 mg/l, p = 0.017) were higher; however, eosinophils (median 0.02 vs. 0.06 × 109/L, p < 0.001), and blood calcium (median 2.26 vs. 2.31 mmol/L, p = 0.003) were lower in patients with severe forms of anti-NMDAR encephalitis than in those with mild to moderate forms, and were associated with initial modified Rankin Scale scores. Multivariate analysis showed that D-dimer levels were significantly associated with severity [odds ratio =2.631, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.018-6.802, p = 0.046]. The ROC curve was used to analyze the predictive value of D-dimer levels for disease severity. The area under the curve was 0.716 (95% CI = 0.64-0.80, p < 0.001), and the best cut-off value was D-dimer = 0.147 mg/L (sensitivity 0.651; specificity, 0.705).

CONCLUSION

Serum D-dimer and neutrophil levels were independent predictors of disease severity in patients with first-attack anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for HIV-associated Guillain-Barré syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) added to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and ART alone in people living with human immunodeficiency virus-associated Guillain-Barré syndrome (HIV-associated GBS).

METHODS

The study was a retrospective analysis of clinical records of HIV-associated GBS patients from department of neurology at West China Hospital between January 2015 and October 2020. Patients treated with ART alone were compared with those treated with IVIG + ART. The primary outcome was the GBS disability score at 4 weeks, which was assessed with multivariable ordinal regression. Additional outcomes include the GBS disability scale at 1 week, improvement of ≥ 1 point on the GBS disability score at 1 and 4 weeks, median change in the MRC sum score at 1 and 4 weeks, number of patients who were able to walk independently at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-two (252) individuals living with HIV were recruited in the study. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 HIV-associated GBS patients were finally included, of whom 8 were treated with IVIG + ART and 13 were treated with ART alone. At the fourth weeks after treatment, the GBS disability scale grade was significantly lower in patients treated with IVIG + ART than those with ART alone (1 vs. 2, P = 0.02). The adjusted OR for a lower GBS disability scale was 10.6 (95 % CI 1.15 to 98.05; P = 0.03) for the IVIG + ART group. Moreover, 6 of 8 (75 %) patients treated with IVIG + ART were able to walk independently at four weeks after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of IVIG combined with ART may be efficacious in the treatment of HIV-infected GBS and may provide better clinical outcomes.

Elevated ApoB/ApoA-I ratio is associated with acute anti-N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis, but not disease outcomes

Objective

The purpose of the present study is to clarify the relationship between the apolipoprotein B100/apolipoprotein A-I (ApoB/ApoA-I) ratio and anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis.

Methods

A total of 71 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis were included in this study, and their ApoB/ApoA-I ratios in baseline and follow-up were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The ApoB/ApoA-I ratio was closely correlated with the baseline-modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of >3 in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. A subgroup analysis showed obvious differences between the high and low ApoB/ApoA-I ratio groups. The ApoB/ApoA-I ratio was positively correlated with intensive care unit (ICU) treatment, length of hospital stay, baseline mRS score, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The ratios of the high and low ApoB/ApoA-I groups both improved in the follow-up.

Conclusion

The increased ApoB/ApoA-I ratio is associated with acute anti-NMDAR encephalitis, but not disease outcomes. Serum ApoB/ApoA-I ratio was related to inflammation and immunity in peripheral blood. The findings might provide a new idea for further exploration of the pathogenesis and treatment of anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Second-line immunotherapy and functional outcomes in autoimmune encephalitis: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a neurological disorder caused by autoimmune attack on cerebral proteins. Experts currently recommend staged immunotherapeutic management, with first-line immunotherapy followed by second-line immunotherapy if response to first-line therapy is inadequate. Meta-analysis of the evidence base may provide higher quality evidence to support this recommendation. We undertook a systematic review of observational cohort studies reporting AE patients treated with either second-line immunotherapy or first-line immunotherapy alone, and outcomes reported using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS; search date: April 22, 2020). We performed several one-stage multilevel individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses to examine the association between second-line immunotherapy and final mRS scores (PROSPERO ID CRD42020181805). IPD were obtained for 356 patients from 25 studies. Most studies were rated as moderate to high risk of bias. Seventy-one patients (71/356, 19%) were treated with second-line immunotherapy. We did not find a statistically significant association between treatment with second-line immunotherapy and final mRS score for the cohort overall (odds ratio [OR] = 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .98-3.08, p = .057), or subgroups with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = .45-2.38, p = .944) or severe AE (maximum mRS score > 2; OR = 1.673, 95% CI = .93-3.00, p = .085). Treatment with second-line immunotherapy was associated with higher final mRS scores in subgroups with anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 AE (OR = 6.70, 95% CI = 1.28-35.1, p = .024) and long-term (at least 12 months) follow-up (OR = 3.94, 95% CI = 1.67-9.27, p = .002). We did not observe an association between treatment with second-line immunotherapy and lower final mRS scores in patients with AE. This result should be interpreted with caution, given the risk of bias, limited adjustment for disease severity, and insensitivity of the mRS in estimating psychiatric and cognitive disability.

First-line immunotherapy of neuronal surface antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis: Assessment of therapeutic effectiveness and cost-efficiency

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and cost-efficiency of first-line immunotherapies on neuronal surface antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis (AE) based on a real-world observational study in China.

METHODS

Our study retrospectively collected the clinical and paraclinical data of patients with definite neuronal surface antibody-mediated AE between July 2014 and July 2020. Regular follow-up was performed after administering standard regimens of first-line immunotherapies, including intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and / or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Therapeutic effectiveness was reflected by modified Rankin Scale scores. The health resource utilization and direct medical costs were extracted to analyze the cost-efficiency.

RESULTS

Among the 78 eligible patients, 48 (61.5%) were males with a median age of 40 years. More than half (56, 71.8%) were treated with combination therapy, with the rest receiving IVMP and IVIG monotherapy (both of 11, 14.1%). Related objective variables, i.e., sex, onset age, disease course, onset symptoms, antibody types, abnormal paraclinical results, disease severity, and the health insurance, showed insignificant differences on the selection of therapy. Each therapy showed similar short-term (4-week) and long-term (1-year) therapeutic effects. Yet the single or combination of IVIG had a slightly better effectiveness but higher cost than the monotherapy of IVMP.

CONCLUSION

The combination of IVMP and IVIG was used more frequently than either alone, which may be associated with neurologist's personal experience and patient's wishes. Though with similar therapeutic effectiveness, the use of IVMP alone might be a better choice with a better cost-efficiency.

Risk Prediction Models for Early ICU Admission in Patients With Autoimmune Encephalitis: Integrating Scale-Based Assessments of the Disease Severity

Background

In patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE), the prediction of progression to a critically ill status is challenging but essential. However, there is currently no standard prediction model that comprehensively integrates the disease severity and other clinical features. The clinical assessment scale in autoimmune encephalitis (CASE) and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) have both been applied for evaluating the severity of AE. Here, by combining the two scales and other clinical characteristics, we aimed to investigate risk factors and construct prediction models for early critical care needs of AE patients.

Methods

Definite and probable AE patients who were admitted to the neurology department of Tongji Hospital between 2013 and 2021 were consecutively enrolled. The CASE and mRS scores were used to evaluate the overall symptom severity at the time of hospital admission. Using logistic regression analysis, we analyzed the association between the total scores of the two scales and critical illness individually and then we evaluated this association in combination with other clinical features to predict early intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Finally, we constructed four prediction models and compared their performances.

Results

Of 234 patients enrolled, forty developed critical illness and were early admitted to the ICU (within 14 days of hospitalization). Four prediction models were generated; the models were named CASE, CASE-plus (CASE + prodromal symptoms + elevated fasting blood glucose + elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell (WBC) count), mRS and mRS-plus (mRS + prodromal symptoms + abnormal EEG results + elevated fasting blood glucose + elevated CSF WBC count) and had areas under the ROC curve of 0.850, 0.897, 0.695 and 0.833, respectively. All four models had good calibrations. In general, the models containing “CASE” performed better than those including “mRS”, and the CASE-plus model demonstrated the best performance.

Conclusion

Overall, the symptom severity at hospital admission, as defined by CASE or mRS, could predict early ICU admission, especially when assessed by CASE. Adding other clinical findings, such as prodromal symptoms, an increased fasting blood glucose level and an increased CSF WBC count, could improve the predictive efficacy.

The detection of up-regulated anti-thyroid antibodies and autoimmune thyroid diseases in patients with autoimmune encephalitis: a retrospective study of 221 patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential detection rate of anti-thyroid antibodies' (ATAbs) positivity, thyroid dysfunctions, and autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITDs) in autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and to analyze whether thyroid autoimmunity/dysfunction can affect the clinical course of AE.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty-one AE patients and 229 age- and sex-matched controls were included in this study. We measured the levels of ATAbs (anti-thyroglobulin antibodies [TgAb], anti-thyroid peroxidase anti-bodies [TPOAb]) and thyroid hormones in all the individuals. In addition, the association of thyroid autoimmunity/dysfunctions with functional outcomes of AE was identified by using logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

The prevalence of TPOAb-positive and TgAb-positive was significantly higher in AE patients (16.3% and 16.7%, respectively) as compared with controls (9.6% and 7.4%, respectively; P = 0.034 and P = 0.002, respectively). In addition, the free triiodothyronine (fT3) level was significantly lower in AE patients as compared to the controls (P < 0.001). However, the frequency of AITDs (Hashimoto's thyroiditis and Graves' disease) did not significantly differ between AE patients and control subjects. Importantly, low fT3 was found to be associated with poor functional outcomes at the 3-month follow-up in AE. Adjustment of potential confounders did not change the association. However, the presence of ATAbs did not significantly alert the disease course of AE.

CONCLUSIONS

ATAbs-positive and/or AITD patients with symptomatic encephalopathy should undergo proper surveillance for AE. Moreover, low fT3 could serve as a possible predictor of poor short-term outcome in AE, thereby suggesting that monitoring of thyroid function in AE may be necessary.

The Antibody Assay in Suspected Autoimmune Encephalitis From Positive Rate to Test Strategies

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyze the positive rate and test strategies of suspected autoimmune encephalitis (SAE) based on an antibody assay.

Methods

Patients who were diagnosed with suspected autoimmune encephalitis in Guizhou Province between June 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021 and who had anti-neuronal autoantibodies detected by Guizhou KingMed Diagnostics Group Co., Ltd. were included in this study. The positive rate and the test strategies were analyzed based on the results of the anti-neuronal antibody assay.

Results

A total of 263 patients with SAE were included, 58.2% (153/263) of whom were males, with a median age of 33 years (1-84 years). 84% (221/263) of all patients completed both serum and CSF tests. A total of 46.0% (121/263) of SAE patients received the AE-6 examination package. The antibody-positive rate was 9.9% (26/263) in the current cohort, with an observed incidence of antibody positive of 0.2 in 100,000 (26/11,570,000, 95% CI: 0.15-0.30), and the estimated incidence was 0.9 in 100,000 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95) of the total population. A total of 9 different anti-neuronal antibodies were detected. Anti-NMDAR antibody was the most common antibody in 46.2% (12/26) of subjects, 70.0% (7/10) of whom were children, followed by anti-Caspr2 antibody in 30.8% (8/26); the remaining 7 antibodies were detected in 23.1% (6/26) of the population. There were no obvious differences among age, sex or season in the positive rate of anti-neuronal antibodies. The cost of antibody testing per capita was $439.30 (SD±$195.10). The total cost of AE-14 was the highest at $48.016.81 (41.56%) among all examination packages.

Conclusions

This study described the positive rate associated with AE-related anti-neuronal antibodies and test strategies in the current cohort, which provides a basis for clinicians in clinical practice.

Validation of the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis in Chinese Patients

Background and Objectives

The Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) is a scale for assessing severity in autoimmune encephalitis. We aimed to validate the CASE score in a Chinese population and evaluate its clinical significance.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis were recruited between June 2014 and May 2019 from two hospitals. CASE and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were obtained. Data regarding clinical features, treatment, and available information were gathered from the hospital information system.

Results

Of the 176 patients with autoimmune encephalitis, 11 died and 14 had tumors. Ten patients received second-line treatment. The CASE scores of patients receiving second-line treatment were significantly higher (median CASE: 15) than in those receiving first-line treatment (median CASE: 8) (p<0.001). Twenty-two patients had poor functional status (mRS>2). Areas under the curve of CASE on whether functional status was poor at 1 year were 0.89 (p<0.001). Sixty patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and the CASE scores were positively correlated with days in the ICU (r=0.58, p<0.001). There was no statistically significant association between the CASE scores and relapse (p=0.39>0.05). Additionally, the CASE scores were positively associated with the mRS scores (r=0.85 p<0.001).

Conclusions

The CASE score is suitable for the comprehensive assessment of Chinese patients with autoimmune encephalitis, which may help clinicians to select the appropriate intervention and estimate the disease severity and prognosis.

Disturbance of Gut Bacteria and Metabolites Are Associated with Disease Severity and Predict Outcome of NMDAR Encephalitis: A Prospective Case-Control Study

Objective

We aimed to investigate the associations between the intestinal microbiota, metabolites, cytokines, and clinical severity in anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis and to further determine the predictive value of the intestinal microbiota or metabolites in clinical prognosis.

Methods

In this prospective observational cohort study of 58 NMDAR encephalitis patients and 49 healthy controls, fecal microbiota, metabolites, and cytokines were quantified and characterized by16S rRNA gene sequencing, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, and the Luminex assay, respectively.

Results

There were marked variations in the gut microbiota composition and metabolites in critically ill patients. We identified 8 metabolite modules (mainly characterized by fatty acid, glycerophosphoethanolamines, and glycerophosphocholines) that were distinctly classified as negatively or positively associated with bacterial co-abundance groups (CAGs). These CAGs were mainly composed of Bacteroides, Eubacterium_hallii_group, Anaerostipes, Ruminococcus, Butyricicoccus, and Faecalibacterium, which were substantially altered in patients. In addition, these fecal and serum metabolic modules were further correlated with the serum cytokines. Additionally, the combination of clinical features, microbial marker (Granulicatella), and a panel of metabolic markers could further enhance the performance of prognosis discrimination significantly, which yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of (AUC) of 0.94 (95%CI = 0.7–0.9). Patients with low bacterial diversity are more likely to develop relapse than those with higher bacterial diversity (log-rank p = 0.04, HR = 2.7, 95%CI = 1.0–7.0).

Interpretation

The associations between the multi-omics data suggested that certain bacteria might affect the pathogenesis of NMDAR encephalitis by modulating the metabolic pathways of the host and affecting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, the disturbance of fecal bacteria may predict the long-term outcome and relapse in NMDAR encephalitis.

Comparison of the clinical syndromes of anti-GABAa versus anti-GABAb associated autoimmune encephalitis: A systematic review

The main objective of this article is to improve our understanding of the differences and similarities of these two anti-gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor encephalitis, anti-GABAaR and anti-GABAbR. The data were systematically collected and we found 26 studies: seven studies and 37 patients corresponded to anti-GABAaR encephalitis, and 21 manuscripts and 116 patients were diagnosed with anti-GABAbR encephalitis. Both anti-GABAR encephalitis were marked by prominent seizures. Anti-GABAaR patients were younger and showed multifocal encephalitis. On the other hand, anti-GABAbR patients were older and showed temporal limbic encephalitis. Tumor occurred in a fifth of anti-GABAaR encephalitis and in half of anti-GABAbR encephalitis. The main tumor associated with anti-GABAbR encephalitis is SCLC, whereas the most common tumor associated with anti-GABAaR encephalitis was thymoma. Our data confirms the differences in clinical features between both encephalitis.

Direct economic burden of patients with tuberculous meningitis in western China

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the direct economic burden of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in China for the first time.

METHODS

Patients who were first diagnosed with TBM from December 2015 to December 2018 in Western China Hospital were enrolled. We retrospectively collected data on demographic and clinical features, resource utilization, costs, and long-term outcomes. The patients were followed up for 15-53 months. We performed a cost-of-illness study and analyzed the cost contributors with a generalized linear model.

RESULTS

In total, the cases of 154 TBM patients (95 males, 59 females, aged 14-82 years) were reviewed. The average total direct cost per person was USD (United States dollars) 9,484 (range 1,822-67,285), with a mean direct medical cost of USD 8,901 (range 1,189-67,049). The average inpatient cost and drug cost after discharge were USD 6,837 (range 845-52,921) and USD 1,967 (range 0-60,423), respectively. The mean direct nonmedical cost was USD 583 (range 33-3,817), which accounted for 6.2% of the total direct cost. The average length of stay (LOS) in hospital was 25.0 days (range 6-152). A total of 117 of the patients (76.0%) had good outcomes (mRS = 0-2). There was no significant difference in the costs, LOS, or outcomes between rural and urban patients. Contributors to total direct cost were definite TBM, fever, coma, seizures, multidrug resistance, hydrocephalus, and poor long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the accessibility of medical resources in remote and rural regions has significantly improved in China, the cost of TBM imposes a catastrophic burden on patients.

Neuropsychological Sequelae, Quality of Life and Adaptive Behavior in Children and Adolescents with Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis: A Narrative Review

Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is a rare autoimmune illness characterized by a constellation of often severe, but treatable, psychiatric and neurological symptoms. Whereas symptoms such as psychosis and bizarre and abnormal motor behavior are common in adults, pediatric patients typically present with behavioral changes, irritability and sleep dysfunction. The recovery phase is usually slow and may be associated with longstanding adaptive, behavioral and neuropsychological problems. Very few studies explored the cognitive and adaptive sequelae in children with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. The present review article suggests that, although most children and adolescents return to their daily life and previous activities, they may have a low quality of life and show neuropsychological sequelae involving language, memory, especially verbal memory, and attentional resources, even after several months from the hospital discharge. In particular, the available results reveal difficulties in cognitive skills involving executive functions. This impairment is considered the “core” of the cognitive profile of young patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. On the other hand, some cognitive skills, such as general intelligence, show good overall recovery over time. Additional neuropsychological research evaluating larger samples, more homogenous methods and longitudinal studies is required.