Serum Neurofilament Levels and PML Risk in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Natalizumab

Biomarkers for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: emerging data for use of JC virus DNA copy number in clinical trials

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is a rare but devastating demyelinating disease caused by the JC virus (JCV), for which no therapeutics are approved. To make progress towards addressing this unmet medical need, innovations in clinical trial design are needed. Quantitative JCV DNA in CSF has the potential to serve as a valuable biomarker of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy disease and treatment response in clinical trials to expedite therapeutic development, as do neuroimaging and other fluid biomarkers such as neurofilament light chain. Specifically, JCV DNA in CSF could be used in clinical trials as an entry criterion, stratification factor, or predictor of clinical outcomes. Insights from the investigation of candidate biomarkers for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy might inform approaches to biomarker development for other rare diseases.

Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy: Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Tools, and Potential Biomarkers of Response to Therapy

JC polyomavirus (JCV) establishes an asymptomatic latent and/or persistent infection in most of the adult population. However, in immunocompromised individuals, JCV can cause a symptomatic infection of the brain, foremost progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). In the past 2 decades, there has been increasing concern among patients and the medical community because PML was observed as an adverse event in individuals treated with modern (selective) immune suppressive treatments for various immune-mediated diseases, especially multiple sclerosis. It became evident that this devastating complication also needs to be considered beyond the patient populations historically at risk, including those with hematologic malignancies or HIV-infected individuals. We review the clinical presentation of PML, its variants, pathogenesis, and current diagnostic approaches. We further discuss the need to validate JCV-directed interventions and highlight current management strategies based on early diagnosis and restoring JCV-specific cellular immunity, which is crucial for viral clearance and survival. Finally, we discuss the importance of biomarkers for diagnosis and response to therapy, instrumental in defining sensitive study end points for successful clinical trials of curative or preventive therapeutics. Advances in understanding PML pathophysiology, host and viral genetics, and diagnostics in conjunction with novel immunotherapeutic approaches indicate that the time is right to design and perform definitive trials to develop preventive options and curative therapy for JCV-associated diseases.

Serum Neurofilaments are a reliable biomarker to early detect PML in Multiple Sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

The earliest detection of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is crucial in Natalizumab (NTZ)-treated Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients. This study aims to assess serum Neurofilaments (sNFL) ability to early detect PML in longitudinal patients' follow-up.

METHODS

NFL were retrospectively measured in four PML cases occurred at the Regional Referring Center for MS (CRESM, Italy), in samples collected since one year before PML diagnosis, at PML diagnosis, during PML and in post-PML follow-up. sNFL levels were interpreted according to previously defined reference values. Clinical examination and EDSS were performed at each NTZ infusion. Routinary MRI was undertaken every six months; after PML diagnosis, MRI was performed according to clinical evaluation. sNFL were also measured in 45 NTZ-treated patients experiencing NEDA-3 status for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

Patients showed different PML onsets and manifestations: in 3 patients routinary brain MRI revealed radiological signs of PML preceding different clinical manifestations, while in one patient brain MRI was performed after the clinical onset. PML diagnosis was defined at the time of the first detection of JCV DNA in cerebrospinal fluid. The following different PML phases were considered: 1. Basal (up to 4 months before PML diagnosis): sNFL values were in the normal range in all patients' samples, except for one (median 9.1 pg/ml, range 6.2-15.1 pg/ml) 2. Pre-PML (within 3 months before PML diagnosis): sNFL were elevated in all available samples (median 19.50 pg/ml, range 15.50-33.80 pg/ml). 3. PML diagnosis: sNFL were elevated in all patients (median 59.20 pg/ml, range 11.1-101.50 pg/ml). 4. PML/IRIS: during this phase, sNFL levels reached their peak (median 96.35 pg/ml, range 20.5-272.9) in all patients. 5. Post-PML (recovery phase, starting from the first MRI without enhancement, up to the end of follow-up): sNFL levels showed a decrease (median 12.80 pg/ml, range 9.30-30.60); however, based on reference values, sNFL were still elevated in 2 out of 4 patients at the end of their follow-up (622 and 887 days after PML diagnosis). sNFL were always elevated when MRI scan suggested a suspicious of PML. In NEDA-3 patients, sNFL levels were in the normal range in all patients' samples (median 4.7 pg/ml, range 1.4-8.6 pg/ml).

CONCLUSION

Elevated sNFL were observed not only at PML diagnosis, but also in pre-PML phase. At PML recovery, sNFL weren't normalized in all patients' samples, suggesting ongoing neuronal degeneration. sNFL represent a reliable biomarker and should be introduced in clinical practice as an additional/alternative parameter to MRI to early detect and monitor PML.

Validity of serum neurofilament light chain as a prognostic biomarker of disease activity in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating and neuroinflammatory disease of the human central nervous system with complex pathoetiology, heterogeneous presentations and an unpredictable course of disease progression. There remains an urgent need to identify and validate a biomarker that can reliably predict the initiation and progression of MS as well as identify patient responses to disease-modifying treatments/therapies (DMTs). Studies exploring biomarkers in MS and other neurodegenerative diseases currently focus mainly on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses, which are invasive and impractical to perform on a repeated basis. Recent studies, replacing CSF with peripheral blood samples, have revealed that the elevation of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) in the clinical stages of MS is, potentially, an ideal prognostic biomarker for predicting disease progression and for possibly guiding treatment decisions. However, there are unresolved factors (the definition of abnormal values of sNfL concentration, the standardisation of measurement and the amount of change in sNfL concentration that is significant) that are preventing its use as a biomarker in routine clinical practice for MS. This updated review critiques these recent findings and highlights areas for focussed work to facilitate the use of sNfL as a prognostic biomarker in MS management.

Protein biomarkers in multiple sclerosis

This review aimed to elucidate protein biomarkers in body fluids, such as blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), to identify those that may be used for early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), prediction of disease activity, and monitoring of treatment response among MS patients. The potential biomarkers elucidated in this review include neurofilament proteins (NFs), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), leptin, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1), C-X-C motif chemokine 13 (CXCL13), and osteopontin (OPN), with each biomarker playing a different role in MS. GFAP, leptin, and CHI3L1 levels were increased in MS patient groups compared to the control group. NFs are the most studied proteins in the MS field, and significant correlations with disease activity, future progression, and treatment outcomes are evident. GFAP CSF level shows a different pattern by MS subtype. Increased concentration of CHI3L1 in the blood/CSF of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) is an independent predictive factor of conversion to definite MS. BDNF may be affected by chronic progression of MS. CHI3L1 has potential as a biomarker for early diagnosis of MS and prediction of disability progression, while CXCL13 has potential as a biomarker of prognosis of CIS and reflects MS disease activity. OPN was an indicator of disease severity. A periodic detailed patient evaluation should be performed for MS patients, and broadly and easily accessible biomarkers with higher sensitivity and specificity in clinical settings should be identified.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy genetic risk variants for pharmacovigilance of immunosuppressant therapies

Background

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare and often lethal brain disorder caused by the common, typically benign polyomavirus 2, also known as JC virus (JCV). In a small percentage of immunosuppressed individuals, JCV is reactivated and infects the brain, causing devastating neurological defects. A wide range of immunosuppressed groups can develop PML, such as patients with: HIV/AIDS, hematological malignancies (e.g., leukemias, lymphomas, and multiple myeloma), autoimmune disorders (e.g., psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus), and organ transplants. In some patients, iatrogenic (i.e., drug-induced) PML occurs as a serious adverse event from exposure to immunosuppressant therapies used to treat their disease (e.g., hematological malignancies and multiple sclerosis). While JCV infection and immunosuppression are necessary, they are not sufficient to cause PML.

Methods

We hypothesized that patients may also have a genetic susceptibility from the presence of rare deleterious genetic variants in immune-relevant genes (e.g., those that cause inborn errors of immunity). In our prior genetic study of 184 PML cases, we discovered 19 candidate PML risk variants. In the current study of another 152 cases, we validated 4 of 19 variants in both population controls (gnomAD 3.1) and matched controls (JCV+ multiple sclerosis patients on a PML-linked drug ≥ 2 years).

Results

The four variants, found in immune system genes with strong biological links, are: C8B, 1-57409459-C-A, rs139498867; LY9 (alias SLAMF3), 1-160769595-AG-A, rs763811636; FCN2, 9-137779251-G-A, rs76267164; STXBP2, 19-7712287-G-C, rs35490401. Carriers of any one of these variants are shown to be at high risk of PML when drug-exposed PML cases are compared to drug-exposed matched controls: P value = 3.50E-06, OR = 8.7 [3.7-20.6]. Measures of clinical validity and utility compare favorably to other genetic risk tests, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 screening for breast cancer risk and HLA-B^*15:02 pharmacogenetic screening for pharmacovigilance of carbamazepine to prevent Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.

Conclusion

For the first time, a PML genetic risk test can be implemented for screening patients taking or considering treatment with a PML-linked drug in order to decrease the incidence of PML and enable safer use of highly effective therapies used to treat their underlying disease.

sNFL applicability as additional monitoring tool in natalizumab extended interval dosing regimen for RRMS patients

INTRODUCTION

Extended interval dosing (EID) of Natalizumab (NAT) has been proposed to reduce progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risk associated with standard interval dosing (SID) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previous studies have suggested that NAT effectiveness is maintained in the great majority of patients who switch from SID to EID; monitoring of disease activity is currently based exclusively on clinical and MRI parameters. Frequent MRI are expensive and not always applicable, underlining the need for biological markers able to detect central nervous system lesions. Serum Neurofilament-light chain (sNFL) currently represents the most promising biomarker of disease activity, prognosis and treatment response in MS, and their clinical suitability is increasingly evident. The objective of the present study is to assess the applicability of sNFL as additional/alternative measure of treatment efficacy during EID regimen.

METHODS

We measured sNFL by Simoa technology in longitudinal samples from 63 Relapsing Remitting (RR) MS patients switched from SID to EID.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

diagnosis of RRMS, age 18-60 years; NAT SID for at least 12 months; NEDA-3 (no evidence of disease activity) for at least 12 months; availability of at least 2 serum samples collected 6 months apart. Patients' follow-up time during EID was at least 12 months and 2 blood samples were collected after at least 6 and 12 months. Clinical examination was performed before each infusion, while MRI 6 and 12 months after NAT initiation and according to PML risk during the whole study.

RESULTS

No patients showed clinical or MRI activity during the whole follow-up. sNFL levels measured during SID and EID were comparable, without significant difference between groups. The effect of EID on NFL levels did not show significant effects (LMM, p> 0.05) and sNFL levels did not vary with time during SID or EID protocols (LMM, p> 0.05). Intra-individual sNFL levels demonstrated overall stability during SID and EID (median CV=11% between SID and EID samples). According to our previously published reference values, sNFL levels were in the normal range in all samples, both during SID and EID.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that sNFL quantification can be used as an alternative/additional approach to MRI in managing individual patients. The present work provides a new clinical application of sNFL to monitor NAT efficacy.

Serum neurofilament light chain levels predict long-term disability progression in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis

ObjectiveThere is a lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers for use in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). The study aimed to assess the potential of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels as biomarker of disability progression in patients with progressive MS.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational cohort study in 51 patients with progressive MS who participated in a 2-year phase II single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of interferon-beta. Mean (SD) follow-up duration was 13.9 (6.2) years. Levels of sNfL were measured using a single molecule array immunoassay at baseline, 1, 2 and 6 years. Univariable and multivariable analyses were carried out to evaluate associations between sNfL levels and disability progression at short term (2 years), medium term (6 years) and long term (at the time of the last follow-up).

RESULTS

A sNfL cut-off value of 10.2 pg/mL at baseline discriminated between long-term progressors and non-progressors with a 75% sensitivity and 67% specificity (adjusted OR 7.8; 95% CI 1.8 to 46.4; p=0.01). Similar performance to discriminate between long-term progressors and non-progressors was observed using age/body mass index-adjusted sNfL Z-scores derived from a normative database of healthy controls. A cut-off increase of 5.1 pg/mL in sNfL levels between baseline and 6 years also discriminated between long-term progressors and non-progressors with a 71% sensitivity and 86% specificity (adjusted OR 49.4; 95% CI 4.4 to 2×103; p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

sNfL can be considered a prognostic biomarker of future long-term disability progression in patients with progressive MS. These data expand the little knowledge existing on the role of sNfL as long-term prognostic biomarker in patients with progressive MS.

Multiple sclerosis: Immunopathological heterogeneity and its implications

MS is the most common autoimmune demyelinating disease of the CNS. For the past decades, several immunomodulatory disease-modifying treatments with multiple presumed mechanisms of action have been developed, but MS remains an incurable disease. Whereas high efficacy, at least in early disease, corroborates underlying immunopathophysiology, there is profound heterogeneity in clinical presentation as well as immunophenotypes that may also vary over time. In addition, functional plasticity in the immune system as well as in the inflamed CNS further contributes to disease heterogeneity. In this review, we will highlight immune-pathophysiological and associated clinical heterogeneity that may have an implication for more precise immunomodulatory therapeutic strategies in MS.

Emerging Biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis in the Blood and the CSF: A Focus on Neurofilaments and Therapeutic Considerations

INTRODUCTION

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is the most common immune-mediated chronic neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) affecting young people. This is due to the permanent disability, cognitive impairment, and the enormous detrimental impact MS can exert on a patient's health-related quality of life. It is of great importance to recognise it in time and commence adequate treatment at an early stage. The currently used disease-modifying therapies (DMT) aim to reduce disease activity and thus halt disability development, which in current clinical practice are monitored by clinical and imaging parameters but not by biomarkers found in blood and/or the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Both clinical and radiological measures routinely used to monitor disease activity lack information on the fundamental pathophysiological features and mechanisms of MS. Furthermore, they lag behind the disease process itself. By the time a clinical relapse becomes evident or a new lesion appears on the MRI scan, potentially irreversible damage has already occurred in the CNS. In recent years, several biomarkers that previously have been linked to other neurological and immunological diseases have received increased attention in MS. Additionally, other novel, potential biomarkers with prognostic and diagnostic properties have been detected in the CSF and blood of MS patients.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarise the most up-to-date knowledge and research conducted on the already known and most promising new biomarker candidates found in the CSF and blood of MS patients.

DISCUSSION

the current diagnostic criteria of MS relies on three pillars: MRI imaging, clinical events, and the presence of oligoclonal bands in the CSF (which was reinstated into the diagnostic criteria by the most recent revision). Even though the most recent McDonald criteria made the diagnosis of MS faster than the prior iteration, it is still not an infallible diagnostic toolset, especially at the very early stage of the clinically isolated syndrome. Together with the gold standard MRI and clinical measures, ancillary blood and CSF biomarkers may not just improve diagnostic accuracy and speed but very well may become agents to monitor therapeutic efficacy and make even more personalised treatment in MS a reality in the near future. The major disadvantage of these biomarkers in the past has been the need to obtain CSF to measure them. However, the recent advances in extremely sensitive immunoassays made their measurement possible from peripheral blood even when present only in minuscule concentrations. This should mark the beginning of a new biomarker research and utilisation era in MS.

A Case of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy in a Fumaric Acid-Treated Psoriasis Patient With Severe Lymphopenia Among Other Risk Factors

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a potentially fatal condition caused by a brain infection with JC polyomavirus (JCV), which occurs almost exclusively in immunocompromised patients. Modern immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory treatments for cancers and autoimmune diseases have been accompanied by increasing numbers of PML cases. We report a psoriasis patient treated with fumaric acid esters (FAEs) with concomitant hypopharyngeal carcinoma and chronic alcohol abuse who developed PML. Grade 4 lymphopenia at the time point of PML diagnosis suggested an immunocompromised state. This case underscores the importance of immune cell monitoring in patients treated with FAEs, even more so in the presence of additional risk factors for an immune dysfunction.