Focal seizure symptoms in idiopathic generalized epilepsies

Idiopathic generalized epilepsies in the epilepsy monitoring unit: Systematic quantification of focal EEG and semiological signs

OBJECTIVE

Focal seizure symptoms (FSS) and focal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are common in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs), but dedicated studies systematically quantifying them both are lacking. We used automatic IED detection and localization algorithms and correlated these EEG findings with clinical FSS for the first time in IGE patients.

METHODS

32 patients with IGEs undergoing long-term video EEG monitoring were systematically analyzed regarding focal vs. generalized IEDs using automatic IED detection and localization algorithms. Quantitative EEG findings were correlated with FSS.

RESULTS

We observed FSS in 75% of patients, without significant differences between IGE subgroups. Mostly varying/shifting lateralizations of FSS across successive recorded seizures were seen. We detected a total of 81,949 IEDs, whereof 19,513 IEDs were focal (23.8%). Focal IEDs occurred in all patients (median 13% focal IEDs per patient, range 1.1 - 51.1%). Focal IED lateralization and localization predominance had no significant effect on FSS.

CONCLUSIONS

All included patients with IGE showed focal IEDs and three-quarter had focal seizure symptoms irrespective of the specific IGE subgroup. Focal IED localization had no significant effect on lateralization and localization of FSS.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings may facilitate diagnostic and treatment decisions in patients with suspected IGE and focal signs.

Focal electroclinical features in generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Decision flowchart for a diagnostic challenge

OBJECTIVE

Bilateral tonic-clonic seizures with focal semiology or focal interictal electroencephalography (EEG) can occur in both focal and generalized epilepsy types, leading to diagnostic errors and inappropriate therapy. We investigated the prevalence and prognostic values of focal features in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), and we propose a decision flowchart to distinguish between focal and generalized epilepsy in patients with bilateral tonic-clonic seizures and focal EEG or semiology.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed video-EEG recordings of 101 bilateral tonic-clonic seizures from 60 patients (18 with IGE, 42 with focal epilepsy). Diagnosis and therapeutic response were extracted after ≥1-year follow-up. The decision flowchart was based on previous observations and assessed concordance between interictal and ictal EEG.

RESULTS

Focal semiology in IGE was observed in 75% of seizures and 77.8% of patients, most often corresponding to forced head version (66.7%). In patients with multiple seizures, direction of head version was consistent across seizures. Focal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) were observed in 61.1% of patients with IGE, whereas focal ictal EEG onset only occurred in 13% of seizures and 16.7% of patients. However, later during the seizures, a reproducible pattern of 7-Hz lateralized ictal rhythm was observed in 56% of seizures, associated with contralateral head version. We did not find correlation between presence of focal features and therapeutic response in IGE patients. Our decision flowchart distinguished between focal and generalized epilepsy in patients with bilateral tonic-clonic seizures and focal features with an accuracy of 96.6%.

SIGNIFICANCE

Focal semiology associated with bilateral tonic-clonic seizures and focal IEDs are common features in patients with IGE, but focal ictal EEG onset is rare. None of these focal findings appears to influence therapeutic response. By assessing the concordance between interictal and ictal EEG findings, one can accurately distinguish between focal and generalized epilepsies.

Somatosensory Auras in Epilepsy: A Narrative Review of the Literature

An aura is a subjective experience felt in the initial phase of a seizure. Studying auras is relevant as they can be warning signs for people with epilepsy. The incidence of aura tends to be underestimated due to misdiagnosis or underrecognition by patients unless it progresses to motor features. Also, auras are associated with seizure remission after epilepsy surgery and are an important prognostic factor, guiding the resection site and improving surgical outcomes. Somatosensory auras (SSAs) are characterized by abnormal sensations on one or more body parts that may spread to other parts following a somatotopic pattern. The occurrence of SSAs among individuals with epilepsy can range from 1.42% to 80%. The upper extremities are more commonly affected in SSAs, followed by the lower extremities and the face. The most common type of somatosensory aura is paresthetic, followed by painful and thermal auras. In the primary somatosensory auras, sensations occur more commonly contralaterally, while the secondary somatosensory auras can be ipsilateral or bilateral. Despite the high localizing features of somatosensory areas, cortical stimulation studies have shown overlapping sensations originating in the insula and the supplementary sensorimotor area.

Drug resistance in idiopathic generalized epilepsies: Evidence and concepts

Although approximately 10%-15% of patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE)/genetic generalized epilepsy remain drug-resistant, there is no consensus or established concept regarding the underlying mechanisms and prevalence. This review summarizes the recent data and the current hypotheses on mechanisms that may contribute to drug-resistant IGE. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase for studies on mechanisms of drug resistance published since 1980. The literature shows neither consensus on the definition nor a widely accepted model to explain drug resistance in IGE or one of its subsyndromes. Large-scale genetic studies have failed to identify distinct genetic causes or affected genes involved in pharmacokinetics. We found clinical and experimental evidence in support of four hypotheses: (1) "network hypothesis"-the degree of drug resistance in IGE reflects the severity of cortical network alterations, (2) "minor focal lesion in a predisposed brain hypothesis"-minor cortical lesions are important for drug resistance, (3) "interneuron hypothesis"-impaired functioning of γ-aminobutyric acidergic interneurons contributes to drug resistance, and (4) "changes in drug kinetics"-genetically impaired kinetics of antiseizure medication (ASM) reduce the effectiveness of available ASMs. In summary, the exact definition and cause of drug resistance in IGE is unknown. However, published evidence suggests four different mechanisms that may warrant further investigation.

Semiologic differences between bilateral tonic-clonic seizures of focal onset and generalized onset

BACKGROUND

Focal semiologies have been described in idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) and generalized-onset bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (GBTCS). These focal signs may lead to wrong diagnosis and inappropriate choice of antiseizure medications. We sought to investigate the differences in focal semiologic features between GBTCS and focal-onset bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed video-EEG data of captured GBTCS and FBTCS over a period of five years. The presence or absence of 12 focal signs as well seizure duration and time to head version was tabulated for each seizure. We used the chi-square test for independence and Fisher's exact test to investigate the occurrence of each focal sign in FBTCS compared with GBTCS. Additionally, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to explore if the seizure duration and time to head version from the ictal onset can reliably differentiate between FBTCS and GBTCS. Finally, we employed hierarchical cluster analysis to visualize how these focal signs appear in combination.

RESULTS

Head version (p <.001), preceding automatisms (p <.001), eye version (p <.001), unilateral facial clonic activity (p <.001), and mouth deviation (p =.004) were found to be significantly more frequent in FBTCS. Longer seizures were highly in favor of FBTCS whereas shorter time to head version from the ictal onset indicated GBTCS in the ROC curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Though focal signs occur in GBTCS, careful evaluation of semiology can help the clinician distinguish FBTCS from GBTCS.

Role of Video-EEG in Children

Routine electroencephalogram (EEG) has many limitations, especially the inability to capture reported habitual events in question. A prolonged EEG with synchronized video (video-EEG) overcomes some of these limitations by improving the sensitivity, specificity and the diagnostic yield by attempting to record the habitual events when they are frequent and when indicated. Video-EEG is employed commonly for the diagnosis and classification of epilepsy/epilepsy syndromes, to distinguish between seizures and seizures mimickers, for pre-surgical evaluation and in the management of critically ill children. The duration of recording would vary depending on the indication and frequency of events. Ambulatory EEG is another cost effective and convenient alternative in certain circumstances. However, availability of the machines and expertise, accessibility, affordability and labor intensive nature of the procedure limit widespread use in India. This review explores the role of video-EEG in the management of children with epileptic and non-epileptic paroxysmal events with respect to routine clinical practice in India.

Prognostic Value of Generalized Polyspike Trains and Prolonged Epileptiform EEG Runs

INTRODUCTION

A considerable proportion of patients with genetic/idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) suffer from persistent seizures. In this study, it was questioned if generalized polyspike trains (GPT) or prolonged epileptiform EEG runs allow identification of difficult-to-treat patients in a first seizure clinic setting or after recurrent seizures.

METHODS

The first routine outpatient EEGs from untreated patients (later diagnosed with IGE) and routine EEGs from IGE patients with persistent seizures despite medical treatment were analyzed. Seizure outcome and clinical characteristics were retrospectively assessed based on the patients' records.

RESULTS

In routine EEGs recorded after first seizure in untreated patients (n = 79), the prevalence of GPT (n = 1; 1.3%) and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs (n = 13; 16.5%) was low. At follow-up, 24 patients (30.4%) were not seizure free, and 3 (3.8%) of them developed drug-resistant IGE. None of the interictal discharges studied was associated with long-term seizure outcome. Treated IGE patients with recurrent seizures (n = 69) had a similar prevalence of GPT (n = 3; 4.3%) and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs (n = 7; 10.1%). At follow-up, 42 patients (60.8%) suffered persistent seizures, and 18 (26%) were drug resistant. Generalized polyspike train and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs had a higher prevalence in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (GPT: 11.1% vs. 2%; P = 0.1; prolonged epileptiform EEG runs: 27.8% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.004) and persistent seizures (GPT: 7.1% vs. 0%; P = 0.16; prolonged epileptiform EEG runs: 16.7% vs. 0%; P = 0.03) as compared with nonresistant patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Generalized polyspike train and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs were associated with persistent seizures and drug-resistant IGE, but the overall prevalence was low. In a first seizure clinic setting, the diagnostic value of these biomarkers was limited.

Can semiology differentiate between bilateral tonic-clonic seizures of focal-onset and generalized-onset? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Bilateral tonic-clonic seizures are encountered in both focal and generalized epilepsies. We reviewed the literature regarding the presence of focal signs in generalized-onset tonic-clonic seizures (GOTCS) and the utility of semiology in differentiating those from focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search using four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Psychinfo) and constructed a systematic review in keeping with the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

We included 13 studies on focal semiological features of GOTCS. These studies included a total of 952 participants. The key focal signs described in GOTCS included: early head version, figure of four sign, asymmetric seizure termination, and a multitude of auras as well as automatisms. Additionally, we reviewed five studies that investigated the use of semiology to differentiate GOTCS from FBTCS; these studies had a total of 289 participants. Asymmetry in clonic phase, side-to-side axial movements, asymmetrical seizure termination, figure of four sign, index finger pointing, and fanning posture of the hand were found to be significantly more frequent in FBTCS compared with GOTCS. Furthermore, combinations of focal semiological features occurring in a single seizure were found to be suggestive of FBTCS rather than GOTCS.

CONCLUSION

Focal signs are often evident in GOTCS. Though the observation of multiple focal signs within a given seizure may be in favor of an FBTCS, our findings caution against differentiating between the two seizure types based on semiology alone due to considerable overlap in focal features.

Absence Seizures in Children: Usual and the Unusual

Absence seizures are commonly encountered in clinical practice. The diagnosis is usually straightforward in majority of cases. However, it may be challenging in patients with some atypical clinical or EEG features or less common epilepsy syndromes. This narrative review describes the clinical and EEG features, treatment and prognosis of the usual and the unusual epilepsy syndromes associated with absence seizures. Absence status epilepticus is also discussed briefly.

Absence-to-bilateral-tonic-clonic seizure: A generalized seizure type

Objective

To test the hypothesis that absence seizures can evolve to generalized tonic-clonic seizures, we documented electroclinical features of this novel seizure type.

Methods

In 4 large video-EEG databases, we identified recordings of seizures starting with impaired awareness that, without returning to baseline interictal state, evolved to generalized tonic-clonic seizures. We extracted the detailed semiologic and electrographic characteristics of these seizures, and we documented the clinical background, diagnoses, and therapeutic responses in these patients.

Results

We identified 12 seizures from 12 patients. All seizures started with a period of impaired awareness and bursts of generalized spike or polyspike and slow-wave discharges, the hallmark of absence seizures. Without returning to baseline, the nonmotor (absence) phase was followed by tonic-clonic convulsions. We called this novel generalized seizure type absence-to-bilateral-tonic-clonic seizure. Most patients had idiopathic generalized epilepsies, although with a high incidence of unusual features and poor therapeutic response.

Conclusions

Absence-to-bilateral-tonic-clonic seizures are a novel generalized seizure type. Clinicians should be aware of this seizure for correctly diagnosing patients. This novel seizure type may further elucidate generalized ictogenesis.

Misleading Focal Clinical, Neurophysiologic, and Imaging Features in 2 Children With Generalized Epilepsy Who Underwent Invasive Electroencephalographic (EEG) Monitoring

Children and adults with genetic generalized epilepsy may have focal clinical seizure symptoms as well as electroencephalographic (EEG) findings. This may pose a diagnostic challenge to clinicians, especially when concomitant focal neuroimaging findings exist and the epilepsy is medically refractory. We sought to highlight the challenges that clinicians may face through the description of 2 children with suspected genetic generalized epilepsy who had both focal seizure symptoms and EEG/neuroimaging findings and underwent invasive EEG monitoring. Ultimately, invasive monitoring failed to demonstrate a focal origin for the seizures in both cases, and instead confirmed the presence of genetic generalized epilepsy. We demonstrate that ≥3-Hz generalized monomorphic spike and waves are less likely to represent secondary bilateral synchrony, that focal neuroimaging findings may not always be causal and that repeated hyperventilation is an essential activation procedure for genetic generalized epilepsy.

The semiology of febrile seizures: Focal features are frequent

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the semiology of febrile seizures (FS) and to determine the frequency of FS with symptoms suggestive of focal onset.

METHODS

FS symptoms in children were reported within 24h of seizure onset by the parents using a structured questionnaire consisting principally of closed-ended questions. We focused on events at seizure commencement, including changes in behavior and facial expression, and ocular and oral symptoms. We also investigated the autonomic and motor symptoms developing during seizures. The presence or absence of focal and limbic features was determined for each patient. The associations of certain focal and limbic features with patient characteristics were assessed.

RESULTS

Information was obtained on FS in 106 children. Various events were recorded at seizure commencement. Behavioral changes were observed in 35 children, changes in facial expression in 53, ocular symptoms in 78, and oral symptoms in 90. In terms of events during seizures, autonomic symptoms were recognized in 78, and convulsive motor symptoms were recognized in 68 children. Focal features were evident in 81 children; 38 children had two or more such features. Limbic features were observed in 44 children, 9 of whom had two or more such features. There was no significant relationship between any patient characteristic and the numbers of focal or limbic features.

SIGNIFICANCE

The semiology of FS varied widely among children, and symptoms suggestive of focal onset were frequent. FS of focal onset may be more common than is generally thought.

Prevalence and risk factors of seizure clusters in adult patients with epilepsy

PURPOSE

In the current study, we explored the prevalence of physician-confirmed seizure clusters. We also investigated potential clinical factors associated with the occurrence of seizure clusters overall and by epilepsy type.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of 4116 adult (≥16years old) outpatients with epilepsy at our centers for documentation of seizure clusters. Variables including patient demographics, epilepsy details, medical and psychiatric history, AED history, and epilepsy risk factors were then tested against history of seizure clusters. Patients were then divided into focal epilepsy, idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), or symptomatic generalized epilepsy (SGE), and the same analysis was run.

RESULTS

Overall, seizure clusters were independently associated with earlier age of seizure onset, symptomatic generalized epilepsy (SGE), central nervous system (CNS) infection, cortical dysplasia, status epilepticus, absence of 1-year seizure freedom, and having failed 2 or more AEDs (P<0.0026). Patients with SGE (27.1%) were more likely to develop seizure clusters than patients with focal epilepsy (16.3%) and IGE (7.4%; all P<0.001). Analysis by epilepsy type showed that absence of 1-year seizure freedom since starting treatment at one of our centers was associated with seizure clustering in patients across all 3 epilepsy types. In patients with SGE, clusters were associated with perinatal/congenital brain injury. In patients with focal epilepsy, clusters were associated with younger age of seizure onset, complex partial seizures, cortical dysplasia, status epilepticus, CNS infection, and having failed 2 or more AEDs. In patients with IGE, clusters were associated with presence of an aura. Only 43.5% of patients with seizure clusters were prescribed rescue medications.

CONCLUSION

Patients with intractable epilepsy are at a higher risk of developing seizure clusters. Factors such as having SGE, CNS infection, cortical dysplasia, status epilepticus or an early seizure onset, can also independently increase one's chance of having seizure clusters.

Index-finger pointing in generalized tonic-clonic seizures

OBJECTIVE

Most patients with localization-related epilepsy (LRE) and genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE) are classified based on semiology and video-EEG, but both features occasionally fail to provide a definitive diagnosis. Several reliable lateralizing signs have been described, although hand and finger posturing has received little attention. We sought to investigate the frequency of index-finger pointing (IFP) during generalized motor convulsions as a lateralizing semiology in LRE.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 98 videos of generalized convulsions in 64 consecutive patients who were admitted for diagnostic video-EEG (vEEG). Demographics were recorded, and IFP ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral to vEEG ictal correlate was compared between LRE, GGE, and nonepileptic attacks (NEAs). The angle of IFP was measured to quantify the mean degree of IFP in "pointers" versus "nonpointers". Statistical analysis was completed using JMP 9.0.

RESULTS

Index-finger pointing was more common in epileptic GTC seizures than in convulsive NEAs (83.6% vs 12.0%; p<0.001) and was more common in LRE compared with GGE (96% vs 56.6%; p≤0.001). The frequency of contralateral, ipsilateral, or bilateral IFP did not differ between LRE and GGE. The average angle at the MCP joint in "pointers" was 35.8° (SD 22.0°) and in "nonpointers" 3.0° (SD 7.2°).

SIGNIFICANCE

This is the first study to examine hand and finger postures as a clinical sign to help classify epilepsy type. The presence of IFP was more common in patients with LRE than in patients with GGE and very rarely occurred in NEA. Index-finger pointing and other hand semiologies are potentially quantifiable localizing signs to aid in the characterization of patients with GTC seizures.