1
|
Kerr WT, Ngo LY, Zhu L, Patten A, Cheng JY, Reddy AS, French JA. Time to prerandomization seizure count design sufficiently assessed the safety and tolerability of perampanel for the treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Epilepsia 2024; 65:2412-2422. [PMID: 38864472 PMCID: PMC11325753 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Static assignment of participants in randomized clinical trials to placebo or ineffective treatment confers risk from continued seizures. An alternative trial design of time to exceed prerandomization monthly seizure count (T-PSC) has replicated the efficacy conclusions of traditionally designed trials, with shorter exposure to placebo and ineffective treatment. Trials aim to evaluate efficacy as well as safety and tolerability; therefore, we evaluated whether this T-PSC design also could replicate the trial's safety and tolerability conclusions. METHODS We retrospectively applied the T-PSC design to analyze treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from a blinded, placebo-controlled trial of perampanel for primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (NCT01393743). The safety analysis set consisted of 81 and 82 participants randomized to perampanel and placebo arms, respectively. We evaluated the incidences of TEAEs, treatment-related TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs of special interest that occurred before T-PSC relative to those observed during the full-length trial. RESULTS Of the 67 and 59 participants who experienced TEAEs in the perampanel and placebo arms during full-length trial, 66 (99%) and 54 (92%) participants experienced TEAEs with onset occurring before T-PSC, respectively. When limited to treatment-related TEAEs, 55 of 56 (98%) and 32 of 37 (86%) participants reported treatment-related TEAEs that occurred before T-PSC in the perampanel and placebo arms, respectively. There were more TEAEs after T-PSC with placebo as compared to perampanel (Fisher exact odds ratio = 8.6, p = .035), which resulted in overestimation of the difference in TEAE rate. There was a numerical reduction in serious TEAEs (3/13 occurred after T-PSC, one in placebo and two in perampanel). SIGNIFICANCE Almost all TEAEs occurred before T-PSC. More treatment-related TEAEs occurred after T-PSC for participants randomized to placebo than perampanel, which may be due to either a shorter T-PSC or delayed time to TEAE for placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Advith S Reddy
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jacqueline A French
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Strzelczyk A, Maschio M, Pensel MC, Coppola A, Takahashi S, Izumoto S, Trinka E, Cappucci S, Sainz-Fuertes R, Villanueva V. Perampanel for Treatment of People with a Range of Epilepsy Aetiologies in Clinical Practice: Evidence from the PERMIT Extension Study. Neurol Ther 2024; 13:825-855. [PMID: 38678505 PMCID: PMC11136933 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00618-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is important to assess the effectiveness of an antiseizure medication in treating different epilepsy aetiologies to optimise individualised therapeutic approaches. Data from the PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) Extension study were used to assess the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of perampanel (PER) when used to treat individuals with a range of epilepsy aetiologies in clinical practice. METHODS A post hoc analysis was conducted of PERMIT Extension data from individuals with a known aetiology. Retention was assessed after 3, 6 and 12 months. Effectiveness was assessed after 3, 6 and 12 months and at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness assessments included responder rate (≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit). Safety/tolerability was assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to discontinuation. RESULTS PERMIT Extension included 1945 individuals with structural aetiology, 1012 with genetic aetiology, 93 with an infectious aetiology, and 26 with an immune aetiology. Retention rates at 12 months were 61.1% (structural), 65.9% (genetic), 56.8% (infectious) and 56.5% (immune). At the last visit, responder rates (total seizures) were 43.3% (structural), 68.3% (genetic), 37.0% (infectious) and 20.0% (immune), and corresponding seizure freedom rates were 15.8%, 46.5%, 11.1% and 5.0%, respectively. AE incidence rates were 58.0% (structural), 46.5% (genetic), 51.1% (infectious) and 65.0% (immune), and corresponding rates of discontinuation due to AEs over 12 months were 18.9%, 16.4%, 18.5% and 21.7%, respectively. The types of AEs reported were generally consistent across aetiology subgroups, with no idiosyncratic AEs emerging. CONCLUSION Although PER was effective and generally well tolerated when used to treat individuals with a range of epilepsy aetiologies in clinical practice, variability in its effectiveness and tolerability across the subgroups indicates that PER may be particularly useful for individuals with specific epilepsy aetiologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Strzelczyk
- Goethe-University Frankfurt, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Marta Maschio
- Center for Tumor-Related Epilepsy, UOSD Neuroncology, IRCCS IFO Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Max C Pensel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Antonietta Coppola
- Department of Neuroscience, Odontostomatological and Reproductive Sciences, Epilepsy Centre, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Satoru Takahashi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuichi Izumoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Eugen Trinka
- Department of Neurology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Member of EpiCARE, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Neuroscience Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision-Making and HTA, UMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria
| | | | | | - Vicente Villanueva
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Member of EpiCARE, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ravat S, Rohatgi A, Kulkarni R, Jabeen SA, Patil B, Dash A, Malhotra M. Efficacy and Safety of adjunctive Perampanel in a prospective, real-world, Phase IV study in Indian patients aged ≥12 years for Treatment of focal-onset Epilepsy: Study 508. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9:940-950. [PMID: 38124551 PMCID: PMC11145615 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE ESPRITE (Study 508; NCT03836924) evaluated the real-world safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adjunctive perampanel in patients aged ≥12 years with focal-onset seizures (FOS), with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), in India. METHODS ESPRITE was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, observational, Phase IV study with a 6-month Treatment Period. Patients were aged ≥12 years and had been prescribed perampanel for adjunctive treatment of FOS, with or without FBTCS. Assessments included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; primary endpoint), median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline, 50% responder rates, and seizure-freedom rates. RESULTS Overall, 200 patients were enrolled (199 patients in the Safety Analysis Set and 174 patients who completed all visits in the main efficacy analyses). TEAEs (all mild or moderate in severity) were reported in 18.1% (n = 36/199) of patients (the most common were dizziness [3.0%] and irritability [2.0%]). TEAEs leading to discontinuation of perampanel were reported in 2.0% of patients; no deaths or serious TEAEs occurred. At 6 months, median percent reduction in seizure frequency was 100.0%, 50% responder rate was 83.3%, and seizure-freedom rate was 49.4%. SIGNIFICANCE Adjunctive perampanel (at a mean daily dose of 4 mg/day) was shown to be well tolerated and effective in patients aged ≥12 years with FOS, with or without FBTCS, from India. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Many patients do not receive adequate treatment for epilepsy and need effective seizure control medications. In this 6-month clinical study, 199 patients from India, aged 12 years or older, added perampanel to the anti-seizure medications they were already taking. At 6 months, 49% of patients experienced no seizures since starting perampanel and seizure frequency was reduced by half in 83% of patients. Side effects occurred in 18% of patients (most commonly dizziness and irritability) and caused 2% to stop perampanel; no deaths were reported. Perampanel was an effective and generally safe added medication for patients with epilepsy from India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rahul Kulkarni
- Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research CenterPuneIndia
| | - Shaik A. Jabeen
- Nizam's Institute of Medical SciencesHyderabadTelanganaIndia
| | - Balaji Patil
- Eisai Pharmaceuticals India Pvt. Ltd.MumbaiIndia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steinhoff BJ, Goldmann T, Kockelmann E, Winter Y. PERPRISE: A prospective non-interventional study of PERampanel as only adjunctive treatment in patients with PRImary or SEcondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures: First interim analysis. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9:926-939. [PMID: 38017663 PMCID: PMC11145611 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the interim results of the PERPRISE study (Study 509; NCT04202159), which is evaluating perampanel as the only adjunctive anti-seizure medication (ASM) in adults with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). METHODS PERPRISE is an ongoing 12-month multicenter, prospective, observational, non-interventional study of perampanel in a real-world setting in Germany. Patients are aged ≥18 years with FBTCS or GTCS due to focal or idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Perampanel, as an adjunctive therapy to ASM monotherapy ('add-on therapy') or as a substitute for one ASM in dual therapy ('substitution therapy'), is prescribed in line with its SmPC. The Interim Analysis Set comprises the first 100 patients who received ≥1 dose of perampanel and attended or discontinued prior to the ~6-month visit. Interim endpoints include retention rate, measures of effects on seizure frequency, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS One hundred patients were included in the Interim Analysis Set (add-on, n = 43 [43.0%]; substitution, n = 55 [55.0%]; unknown, n = 2). The 6-month retention rate was 78.0% (add-on, 83.7%; substitution, 72.7%). For the overall population with GTCS and/or FBTCS, seizure-freedom rate at 6 months was 58.8% (add-on, 72.2%; substitution, 47.9%) and 50% responder rate at 6 months was 82.6% (add-on, 89.2%; substitution, 76.6%). Retention rates and seizure outcomes were better with perampanel as an early-line treatment than as a late-line treatment. TEAEs were reported by 48 patients (48.0%), most commonly dizziness (n = 9), fatigue (n = 7), and irritability (n = 7). Sixteen patients (16.0%) withdrew from perampanel treatment due to TEAEs. SIGNIFICANCE The interim analysis of PERPRISE offers insight into the real-world use of perampanel in Germany, including for the first time, clinical practice data from patients with GTCS and switching ASMs within a dual therapy. Further data from PERPRISE will be of value to inform clinical decision-making in this patient cohort. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Patients with epilepsy often take more than one medication for seizure control. This 12month study looked at patients in Germany receiving perampanel as only add-on medication. The interim analysis shows, that at 6 months, over 70% of the 100 patients continued to use perampanel; 59% experienced no seizures during treatment with perampanel, and in 83%, seizure frequency was reduced by half. Side effects occurred in 48% of patients (most commonly dizziness, fatigue, and irritability) and caused 16% to withdraw from the study. Overall, perampanel was a suitable as only add-on medication for patients with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard J Steinhoff
- Kork Epilepsy CenterKehl‐KorkGermany
- Medical FacultyUniversity of FreiburgFreiburg im BreisgauGermany
| | | | | | - Yaroslav Winter
- Mainz Comprehensive Epilepsy and Sleep Medicine CenterDepartment of NeurologyUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg UniversityMainzGermany
- Department of NeurologyPhilipps‐University MarburgMarburgGermany
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim JS, Kim WS, Sung WY, Woo H. Psychiatric and behavioral concerns of perampanel with concomitant levetiracetam in children with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 154:109740. [PMID: 38547767 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Perampanel (PER) is expanding the therapeutic scope for pediatric epilepsy owing to its efficacy and favorable safety profile. However, concerns about psychiatric and behavioral adverse events (PBAEs) in combination therapy with levetiracetam (LEV) continue to contribute to hesitation in its prescription. We investigated the risk profiles for PBAEs when adding PER to pediatric epilepsy treatment and analyzed the differences according to the presence of concomitant LEV. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of children aged 4-18 years with epilepsy who were prescribed PER as adjunctive therapy from March 2016 to February 2023. We compared the occurrence and management of PBAEs between the PER without LEV and PER with LEV groups. The risk factors for PBAEs were also analyzed. RESULTS Ninety-four patients (53 boys and 41 girls) were included in this study. The median age of total patients at the time of adding PER was 14.9 years (12.3-16.4 years), and 53 patients (56.4 %) had concomitant LEV. Forty-seven PBAEs occurred in 34 patients (36.2 %), with no significant differences depending on whether concomitant LEV is present or not. The most common PBAEs were aggression (14.9 %), irritability (9.6 %), affect lability (7.4 %), and acute psychosis (6.4 %). PBAEs occurred at a lower dosage (2-6 mg/day) in 70.6 % of the patients. In addition, 73.5 % of patients with PBAEs continued PER treatment by follow-up observation or by reducing the PER dosage. No risk factors, such as the presence of concomitant LEV or lamotrigine, any comorbid conditions, higher PER dosage (8-12 mg/day), two or more concomitant anti-seizure medications, and younger age (<13 years) at PER add-on, showed significant associations. CONCLUSION When expanding the use of anti-seizure medications in pediatric patients, real-world evidence on safety issues is crucial for pediatric epileptologists. We confirmed that combination therapy with PER and LEV did not increase the risk profile of PBAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Soo Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Seop Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Department of Pediatrics, Chungbuk National University, College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Young Sung
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyewon Woo
- Department of Pediatrics, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moretz K, Wheless J, Santos C, Segal E, Lancman M, Patten A, Malhotra M. Phase IV PROVE study: Perampanel in real-world clinical care of pediatric patients with epilepsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2024; 50:23-30. [PMID: 38569352 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The non-interventional Phase IV PROVE study (NCT03208660) assessed retention, efficacy, safety and tolerability, and perampanel dosing in patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care. This analysis evaluated final data from patients aged <4 years and 4-<12 years. METHODS Data were obtained retrospectively from medical/pharmacy records of patients in the United States initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, according to treating clinician recommendations. Retention rate was the primary endpoint. Secondary assessments included median percent changes in seizure frequency, seizure-freedom rates, investigator impression of seizure effect, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) included 41 patients (<4 years; mean maximum dose, 3.5 mg/day) and 203 patients (4-<12 years; mean maximum dose, 5.3 mg/day); 24-month retention rates were 35.7% (n = 5/14) and 42.0% (n = 47/112), respectively. In the Full Analysis Set, during Months 1-3, median percent reductions in seizure frequency were 33.3% (n = 8 [<4 years]) and 26.0% (n = 32 [4-<12 years]), and seizure-freedom rates were 12.5% in both groups (n = 1/8 and n = 4/32); patient numbers were low at later time points. Most patients showed improvements in seizure control (45.9% [<4 years] versus 52.4% [4-<12 years]) or no change (45.9% versus 34.5%) (SAS). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 12 (<4 years: 29.3%; most common, irritability [7.3%]) and 64 patients (4-<12 years: 31.5%; most common, aggression [6.9%]). CONCLUSIONS Perampanel was generally well tolerated with <21% of TEAEs leading to withdrawal at 24 months, had favorable retention rates (≥50% and >35% at 12 and 24 months, respectively), and sustained efficacy in pediatric patients during routine clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Moretz
- Meridian Clinical Research, LLC, 6602 Waters Avenue, Building C, Savannah, GA, 31406, USA
| | - James Wheless
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, 49 N Dunlap Street, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.
| | - Cesar Santos
- Valley Children's Hospital, 9300 Valley Children's Place Madera, CA, 93636, USA.
| | - Eric Segal
- Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, 30 Prospect Avenue, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA.
| | - Marcelo Lancman
- Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, 30 Prospect Avenue, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA.
| | - Anna Patten
- Eisai Europe Ltd., European Knowledge Centre, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9SN, UK.
| | - Manoj Malhotra
- Formerly: Eisai Inc., 200 Metro Blvd., Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee DA, Lee HJ, Park KM. Structural connectivity as a predictive factor for perampanel response in patients with epilepsy. Seizure 2024; 118:125-131. [PMID: 38701705 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to identify clinical characteristics that could predict the response to perampanel (PER) and determine whether structural connectivity is a predictive factor. METHODS We enrolled patients with epilepsy who received PER and were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months. Good PER responders, who were seizure-free or presented with more than 50 % seizure reduction, were classified separately from poor PER responders who had seizure reduction of less than 50 % or non-responders. A graph theoretical analysis was conducted based on diffusion tensor imaging to calculate network measures of structural connectivity among patients with epilepsy. RESULTS 106 patients with epilepsy were enrolled, including 26 good PER responders and 80 poor PER responders. Good PER responders used fewer anti-seizure medications before PER administration compared to those by poor PER responders (3 vs. 4; p = 0.042). Early PER treatment was more common in good PER responders than poor PER responders (46.2 vs. 21.3 %, p = 0.014). Regarding cortical structural connectivity, the global efficiency was higher and characteristic path length was lower in good PER responders than in poor PER responders (0.647 vs. 0.635, p = 0.006; 1.726 vs. 1,759, p = 0.008, respectively). For subcortical structural connectivity, the mean clustering coefficient and small-worldness index were higher in good PER responders than in poor PER responders (0.821 vs. 0.791, p = 0.009; 0.597 vs. 0.560, p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that early PER administration can predict a good PER response in patients with epilepsy, and structural connectivity could potentially offer clinical utility in predicting PER response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Ah Lee
- Department of Neurology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Ho-Joon Lee
- Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Kang Min Park
- Department of Neurology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Delanty N, Mohanraj R, Shankar R, Wehner T, Stephen LJ, D'Souza W, Cappucci S, McMurray R, Sainz-Fuertes R, Villanueva V. Perampanel for the treatment of epilepsy with genetic aetiology: Real-world evidence from the PERMIT Extension study. Epilepsy Res 2024; 202:107339. [PMID: 38492461 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
Genetic factors contribute to the aetiology of epilepsy in >50% of cases, and information on the use of antiseizure medications in people with specific aetiologies will help guide treatment decisions. The PERMIT Extension study pooled data from two real-world studies (PERMIT and PROVE) to investigate the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of perampanel (PER) when used to treat people with focal and generalised epilepsy in everyday clinical practice. This post-hoc analysis of PERMIT Extension explored the use of PER when used to treat individuals presumed to have epilepsy with a genetic aetiology. Assessments included retention rate (evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months), effectiveness (responder and seizure freedom rates; evaluated at 3, 6, 12 months and the last visit [last observation carried forward) and tolerability (adverse events [AEs]). Of the 6822 people with epilepsy included in PERMIT Extension, 1012 were presumed to have a genetic aetiology. The most common genetic aetiologies were idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE; 58.2%), tuberous sclerosis (1.1%), Dravet syndrome (0.8%) and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+; 0.5%). Retention rates at 3, 6 and 12 months in the total genetic aetiology population were 89.3%, 79.7% and 65.9%, respectively. In the total genetic aetiology population, responder rates at 12 months and the last visit were 74.8% and 68.3%, respectively, and corresponding seizure freedom rates were 48.9% and 46.5%, respectively. For the specific aetiology subgroups, responder rates at 12 months and the last visit were, respectively: 90.4% and 84.4% (IGE), 100% and 57.1% (tuberous sclerosis), 100% and 71.4% (Dravet syndrome), and 33.3% and 20.0% (GEFS+). Corresponding seizure freedom rates were, respectively: 73.1% and 64.6% (IGE), 33.3% and 22.2% (tuberous sclerosis), 20.0% and 28.6% (Dravet syndrome), and 0% and 0% (GEFS+). The incidence of AEs was 46.5% for the total genetic aetiology population, 48.8% for IGE, 27.3% for tuberous sclerosis, 62.5% for Dravet syndrome, and 20% for GEFS+. Tolerability findings were consistent with PER's known safety profile. PER was effective and generally well tolerated when used in individuals with a presumed genetic epilepsy aetiology in clinical practice. PER was effective across a wide range of genetic aetiologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norman Delanty
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Rajiv Mohanraj
- Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Salford Royal Hospital, UK
| | | | - Tim Wehner
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH Foundation Trust, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL, London, UK
| | - Linda J Stephen
- Epilepsy Unit, West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Wendyl D'Souza
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Vicente Villanueva
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Torres-Fortuny A, Aras LM, Duñabeitia JA. Assessment of aggressive behavior in Dravet syndrome: a critical look. Front Integr Neurosci 2024; 18:1403681. [PMID: 38741918 PMCID: PMC11089182 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1403681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luis Miguel Aras
- Asociación ApoyoDravet, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
- Servicio Navarro de Salud-Osasunbidea, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
- Centro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nica A. Drug-resistant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: A literature review. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2024; 180:271-289. [PMID: 38461125 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2024.02.385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
The ILAE's Task Force on Nosology and Definitions revised in 2022 its definition of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), the most common idiopathic generalized epilepsy disorder, but this definition may well change again in the future. Although good drug response could almost be a diagnostic criterion for JME, drug resistance (DR) is observed in up to a third of patients. It is important to distinguish this from pseudoresistance, which is often linked to psychosocial problems or psychiatric comorbidities. After summarizing these aspects and the various definitions applied to JME, the present review lists the risk factors for DR-JME that have been identified in numerous studies and meta-analyses. The factors most often cited are absence seizures, young age at onset, and catamenial seizures. By contrast, photosensitivity seems to favor good treatment response, at least in female patients. Current hypotheses on DR mechanisms in JME are based on studies of either simple (e.g., cortical excitability) or more complex (e.g., anatomical and functional connectivity) neurophysiological markers, bearing in mind that JME is regarded as a neural network disease. This research has revealed correlations between the intensity of some markers and DR, and above all shed light on the role of these markers in associated neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders in both patients and their siblings. Studies of neurotransmission have mainly pointed to impaired GABAergic inhibition. Genetic studies have generally been inconclusive. Increasing restrictions have been placed on the use of valproate, the standard antiseizure medication for this syndrome, owing to its teratogenic and developmental risks. Levetiracetam and lamotrigine are prescribed as alternatives, as is vagal nerve stimulation, and there are several other promising antiseizure drugs and neuromodulation methods. The development of better alternative treatments is continuing to take place alongside advances in our knowledge of JME, as we still have much to learn and understand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Nica
- Epilepsy Unit, Reference Center for Rare Epilepsies, Neurology Department, Clinical Investigation Center 1414, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France; Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gauer L, Baer S, Valenti-Hirsch MP, De Saint-Martin A, Hirsch E. Drug-resistant generalized epilepsies: Revisiting the frontiers of idiopathic generalized epilepsies. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2024; 180:290-297. [PMID: 38508955 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
The 2017 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification suggested that the term "genetic generalized epilepsies" (GGEs) should be used for the broad group of epilepsies with so-called "generalized" seizure types and "generalized" spike-wave activity on EEG, based on a presumed genetic etiology. Within this framework, idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs) are described as a subset of GGEs and include only four epileptic syndromes: childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, and epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone. The recent 2022 ILAE definition of IGEs is based on the current state of knowledge and reflects a community consensus and is designed to evolve as knowledge advances. The term "frontiers of IGEs" refers to the actual limits of our understanding of these four syndromes. Indeed, among patients presenting with a syndrome compatible with the 2022 definition of IGEs, we still observe a significant proportion of patients presenting with specific clinical features, refractory seizures, or drug-resistant epilepsies. This leads to the discussion of the boundaries of IGEs and GGEs, or what is accepted within a clinical spectrum of a definite IGE. Here, we discuss several entities that have been described in the literature for many years and that may either constitute rare features of IGEs or a distinct differential diagnosis. Their recognition by clinicians may allow a more individualized approach and improve the management of patients presenting with such entities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Gauer
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Neurology department, Strasbourg, France; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Reference Centre for Rare Epilepsies (CRéER), Strasbourg, France.
| | - S Baer
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Pediatric Neurology Department, Strasbourg, France; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Reference Centre for Rare Epilepsies (CRéER), Strasbourg, France
| | - M-P Valenti-Hirsch
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Neurology department, Strasbourg, France; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Reference Centre for Rare Epilepsies (CRéER), Strasbourg, France
| | - A De Saint-Martin
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Pediatric Neurology Department, Strasbourg, France; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Reference Centre for Rare Epilepsies (CRéER), Strasbourg, France
| | - E Hirsch
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Neurology department, Strasbourg, France; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Reference Centre for Rare Epilepsies (CRéER), Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Arai Y, Inaji M, Shimizu K, Kondo S, Hashimoto-Fujimoto S, Kiyokawa J, Kawano Y, Yamamoto S, Maehara T. Long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel as an add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2024; 200:107307. [PMID: 38286107 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perampanel (PER) is a newly developed amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist that has been globally approved for the treatment of both focal and generalized seizures. The efficacy and safety of PER have only been reported over short periods of treatment so far. This study aims to clarify the long-term efficacy and safety of PER as an add-on therapy. METHOD This retrospective observational study investigated 176 epilepsy patients who received PER as add-on medical therapy in two Japanese epilepsy centers between June 2016 and July 2022. The adherence, seizure frequency, and plasma concentration of PER were evaluated at three time points: 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months or longer after the start of adjunctive PER treatment. RESULTS 112 patients undergoing PER treatment were evaluated at 6 months, 86 were evaluated at 12 months, and 52 were evaluated at 24 months or longer. Overall, 42.9 % (48/112), 45.4 % (40/86), and 44.2 % (23/52) of the patients were seizure-free at 6, 12, and 24 months or longer, respectively. The rate of PER tolerance was 78.3 %, 69.9 %, and 54.7 % at 6, 12, and 24 months or longer, respectively. At the latest timepoint, the seizure-free group was taking a significantly lower dose of PER than the seizure-remnant group, and the number of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) was associated with seizure outcomes. In addition, the seizure-free rate was significantly higher in patients who received PER as a first add-on than in those who received it as a late add-on. No significant difference was found in the plasma concentration of PER between the seizure-free and seizure-remnant groups at 24 months or longer. Among the patients receiving PER at dose of 2 mg, however, the plasma concentrations were significantly higher in the seizure-free group than in the seizure-remnant group (282.7 ± 109.8 μg/ml vs 94.7 ± 54.9 μg/ml, p = 0.0024). CONCLUSION This long-term retrospective observational study provides evidence of the efficacy and safety of PER over 2 years treatment period in Japan. Notably, patients who started on PER as the first add-on showed a better seizure outcome than those who received it as a late add-on over the long term. Measured plasma concentrations may provide valuable guidance for the management of patients. Higher plasma concentration at low dose PER may suggest the better seizure control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukika Arai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motoki Inaji
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kazuhide Shimizu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shizukoto Kondo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Juri Kiyokawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Kawano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinji Yamamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Taketoshi Maehara
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zeng Y, Wu X. Efficacy and tolerability of perampanel: a Chinese real-world observational study in epilepsy. Front Neurol 2024; 14:1286276. [PMID: 38313406 PMCID: PMC10836157 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1286276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate whether there exists a statistically significant distinction between the effectiveness and tolerance of perampanel (PER) and the number of antiseizure medications (ASMs) that were tried prior to administering PER. Method A prospective, observational study was performed at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The study included patients diagnosed with epilepsy who were prescribed PER and were monitored for a minimum of 6 months. The efficacy of PER was evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12-month intervals by examining the retention rate and the 50% response rate. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York). Results A total of 1,025 patients were identified, of which 836 were included in the analysis. Seven hundred and eighty-nine patients (94.4%) were followed up for a year. The median age of the patients was 29.32 ± 14.06 years, with 45.81% of the patients being male and 17.0% being adolescents. The average duration of epilepsy was 11.22 ± 8.93 years. Overall, PER was discontinued in 49.5% of patients, with the most common reasons being inadequate therapeutic effect and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). At the 6-month follow-up, the retention rate was 54.2% (454/836), and 39.6% of patients had a 50% response. At the 12-month follow-up, the retention rate was 49.4% (340/789), and 44.5% of patients had a 50% response. Patients who received PER as monotherapy had the highest retention rates (P = 0.034) and 50% response rates (P < 0.001) at any follow-up point. TEAEs were reported in 32.0% of patients, and these led to discontinuation in 15.4% of patients. The most common TEAEs were dizziness and somnolence. There was no significant difference between subgroups (P = 0.57), but there was a significant difference between the dosage of PER and TEAEs (P < 0.001). Main findings The study concludes that PER is effective in treating both focal and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Patients who had fewer previous exposures to ASMs exhibited higher response rates to PER. TEAEs related to PER dosage were more prevalent during the first 3 months of treatment and tended to improve with continued use, ultimately demonstrating favorable long-term tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya Zeng
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xintong Wu
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pascarella A, Gasparini S, Manzo L, Marsico O, Torino C, Abelardo D, Cianci V, Iudice A, Bisulli F, Bonanni P, Caggia E, D'Aniello A, Di Bonaventura C, DiFrancesco JC, Domina E, Dono F, Gambardella A, Marini C, Marrelli A, Matricardi S, Morano A, Paladin F, Renna R, Piccioli M, Striano P, Ascoli M, Ferlazzo E, Aguglia U. Perampanel as only add-on epilepsy treatment in elderly: A subgroup analysis of real-world data from retrospective, multicenter, observational study. J Neurol Sci 2023; 455:122797. [PMID: 37976793 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.122797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Drug management of epilepsy in the elderly presents unique but data on this population are scarce. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) used as only add-on to a background anti-seizure medication (ASM) in the elderly in a real-world setting. METHODS We performed a subgroup analysis of patients aged ≥65 years included in a previous 12-month multicenter study on adults. Treatment discontinuation, seizure frequency, and adverse events were recorded at 3, 6 and 12 months after PER introduction. Sub-analyses by early (≤1 previous ASM) or late PER add-on were also conducted. RESULTS The sample included 65 subjects (mean age: 75.7 ± 7.2 years), with mainly focal (73.8%) epilepsy. The mean PER daily dose was ≈4 mg during all follow-up. Retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 90.5%, 89.6%, and 79.4%ly. The baseline median normalized per 28-day seizure number significantly decreased at 3-, 6- and 12-month visits. One year after PER introduction, the responder rate (≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency) was 89.7%, with a seizure freedom rate of 72.4%. Adverse events occurred in 22 (34.9%) patients with dizziness and irritability being the most frequent. No major differences between early (41 patients, 63.1%), and late add-on groups were observed. CONCLUSION Adjunctive PER was effective and well-tolerated when used as only add-on treatment in elderly people with epilepsy in clinical practice, thus representing a suitable therapeutic option in this age category.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Pascarella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Sara Gasparini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Lucia Manzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Oreste Marsico
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Claudia Torino
- Clinical Epidemiology and Physiopathology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension of Reggio Calabria, National Council of Research, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Domenico Abelardo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Vittoria Cianci
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Alfonso Iudice
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Neurology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Bisulli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Full Member of the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (EpiCARE), Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Treviso, Italy
| | | | | | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Fedele Dono
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Antonio Gambardella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Neurologic Clinic, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Carla Marini
- Child Neurology and Psychiatric Unit, G. Salesi Pediatric Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alfonso Marrelli
- Neurophysiopathology Unit, Epilepsy Center, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Rosaria Renna
- Neurological Clinic and Stroke Unit, "Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Marta Piccioli
- UOC Neurology, PO San Filippo Neri, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Striano
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Edoardo Ferlazzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy.
| | - Umberto Aguglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fawcett J, Davis S, Manford M. Further advances in epilepsy. J Neurol 2023; 270:5655-5670. [PMID: 37458794 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11860-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
In 2017, one of us reviewed advances in epilepsy (Manford in J Neurol 264:1811-1824, 2017). The current paper brings that review up to date and gives a slight change in emphasis. Once again, the story is of evolution rather than revolution. In recognition that most of our current medications act on neurotransmitters or ion channels, and not on the underlying changes in connectivity and pathways, they have been renamed as antiseizure (ASM) medications rather than antiepileptic drugs. Cenobamate is the one newly licensed medication for broader use in focal epilepsy but there have been a number of developments for specific disorders. We review new players and look forward to new developments in the light of evolving underlying science. We look at teratogenicity; old villains and new concerns in which clinicians play a vital role in explaining and balancing the risks. Medical treatment of status epilepticus, long without evidence, has benefitted from high-quality trials to inform practice; like buses, several arriving at once. Surgical treatment continues to be refined with improvements in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients, especially with new imaging techniques. Alternatives including stereotactic radiotherapy have received further focus and targets for palliative stimulation techniques have grown in number. Individuals' autonomy and quality of life continue to be the subject of research with refinement of what clinicians can do to help persons with epilepsy (PWE) achieve control. This includes seizure management but extends to broader considerations of human empowerment, needs and desires, which may be aided by emerging technologies such as seizure detection devices. The role of specialist nurses in improving that quality has been reinforced by specific endorsement from the International League against Epilepsy (ILAE).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Fawcett
- Department of Neurology, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
| | - Sarah Davis
- Department of Neurology, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
| | - Mark Manford
- Department of Neurology, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cerulli Irelli E, Cocchi E, Morano A, Gesche J, Caraballo RH, Lattanzi S, Strigaro G, Catania C, Ferlazzo E, Pascarella A, Casciato S, Quarato P, Pizzanelli C, Pulitano P, Giuliano L, Viola V, Mostacci B, Fortunato F, Marini C, Di Gennaro G, Gambardella A, Labate A, Operto FF, Giallonardo AT, Baykan B, Beier CP, Di Bonaventura C. Levetiracetam vs Lamotrigine as First-Line Antiseizure Medication in Female Patients With Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy. JAMA Neurol 2023; 80:1174-1181. [PMID: 37782485 PMCID: PMC10546294 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance After the recent limitations to prescribing valproate, many studies have highlighted the challenging management of female patients of reproductive age with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). However, no study, to the authors' knowledge, has addressed the comparative effectiveness of alternative antiseizure medications (ASMs) in these patients. Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of levetiracetam and lamotrigine as initial monotherapy in female patients of childbearing age with IGE. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, retrospective, comparative effectiveness cohort study analyzing data from patients followed up from 1994 to 2022. Patients were recruited from 22 primary, secondary, and tertiary adult and child epilepsy centers from 4 countries. Eligible patients were female individuals of childbearing age, diagnosed with IGE according to International League Against Epilepsy (2022) criteria and who initiated levetiracetam or lamotrigine as initial monotherapy. Patients were excluded due to insufficient follow-up after ASM prescription. Exposures Levetiracetam or lamotrigine as initial monotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to compare treatment failure (TF) among patients who received levetiracetam or lamotrigine as initial monotherapy. Results A total of 543 patients were included in the study, with a median (IQR) age at ASM prescription of 17 (15-21) years and a median (IQR) follow-up of 60 (24-108) months. Of the study population, 312 patients (57.5%) were prescribed levetiracetam, and 231 (42.5%) were prescribed lamotrigine. An IPTW-adjusted Cox model showed that levetiracetam was associated with a reduced risk of treatment failure after adjustment for all baseline variables (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-0.99; P = .04). However, after stratification according to different IGE syndromes, the higher effectiveness of levetiracetam was confirmed only in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME; IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32-0.68; P < .001), whereas no significant differences were found in other syndromes. Patients treated with levetiracetam experienced adverse effects more frequently compared with those treated with lamotrigine (88 of 312 [28.2%] vs 42 of 231 [18.1%]), whereas the 2 ASMs had similar retention rates during follow-up (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.65-1.23; P = .60). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this comparative effectiveness research study suggest the use of levetiracetam as initial alternative monotherapy in female patients with JME. Further studies are needed to identify the most effective ASM alternative in other IGE syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Enrico Cocchi
- Department of Precision Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | | | - Joanna Gesche
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Roberto H. Caraballo
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Pediatría “Prof. Dr. Juan P Garrahan”, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Gionata Strigaro
- Neurology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Cecilia Catania
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Ferlazzo
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, “Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli” Great Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Angelo Pascarella
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, “Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli” Great Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | | | - Chiara Pizzanelli
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Loretta Giuliano
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “G.F. Ingrassia”, Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Veronica Viola
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Barbara Mostacci
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Carla Marini
- Child Neurology and Psychiatric Unit, Pediatric Hospital G. Salesi, United Hospitals of Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | | | | | - Angelo Labate
- Neurophysiopatology and Movement Disorders Clinic, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesca F. Operto
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | | | - Betul Baykan
- Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology and EMAR Medical Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Christoph P. Beier
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wheless J, Wechsler RT, Penovich P, Segal E, Chez M, Coppola A, Datta A, D'Souza W, Najm I, Cappucci S, Sainz-Fuertes R, Villanueva V. Effectiveness, safety and tolerability of perampanel by age group when used to treat people with focal and generalized epilepsy in clinical practice: The PERMIT Extension study. Epilepsy Behav 2023; 147:109369. [PMID: 37619459 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of perampanel (PER) in people with epilepsy (PWE) treated in everyday clinical practice for focal and generalized seizures, both in the total cohort and by age group. METHODS The PERMIT Extension study was a pooled analysis of data from PWE included in two large previous clinical practice studies (PERMIT and PROVE). Retention was assessed over 12 months. Effectiveness was assessed based on total seizures and by seizure type (focal and generalized) after 3, 6, and 12 months of PER treatment and at final follow-up (last observation carried forward; "last visit"); assessments included responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the previous visit). Safety/tolerability was assessed throughout PER treatment by evaluating adverse events (AEs). All assessments were conducted for the total population and by age category (<12, ≥12 to <18, ≥18 to <65, and ≥65 years at baseline). RESULTS Full Analysis Set included 6,822 PWE (51.1% female; mean age, 36.9 years; mean duration of epilepsy 21.4 years) with 6,433, 4,648, and 6,233 PWE assessed for retention, effectiveness, and safety/tolerability, respectively. The majority of PWE (81.1%) were aged 18-64 at baseline, with 4.5% aged <12 years, 8.4% aged 12-17 years, and 5.9% aged ≥65 years. In the overall population, retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 88.0%, 77.6%, and 61.4%, respectively; responder rates at 12 months were 58.5% for total seizures, 54.6% for focal seizures, and 77.7% for generalized seizures, and corresponding seizure freedom rates were 23.6%, 19.0%, and 51.3%, respectively. PER was effective regardless of age category, although effectiveness was greatest in PWE aged ≥65 years, for both focal and generalized seizures. In the overall population, the incidence of AEs was 49.2% and the most frequent AEs (≥5% of PWE) were dizziness/vertigo (13.4%), somnolence (8.8%), irritability (7.3%), and behavioral disorders (5.3%); AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 18.3% of PWE over 12 months. The incidence of AEs and the discontinuation rate due to AEs increased with increasing age (55.0% and 23.9%, respectively, in PWE aged ≥65 years). CONCLUSION In this study, the largest pooled analysis of PER clinical practice data conducted to date, PER was shown to be effective and generally well tolerated when used to treat people with focal or generalized epilepsy in everyday clinical practice, regardless of age category. No new or unexpected side effects emerged following long-term use in the real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Wheless
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
| | | | | | - Eric Segal
- Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
| | - Michael Chez
- Sutter Neuroscience Institute, Roseville, CA, USA.
| | - Antonietta Coppola
- Department of Neuroscience, Odontostomatological and Reproductive Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - Anita Datta
- BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Wendyl D'Souza
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Imad Najm
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | | | | | - Vicente Villanueva
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang H, Wang H, Liu Y, Zhao J, Niu X, Zhu L, Ma X, Zong Y, Huang Y, Zhang W, Han Y. Efficacy and Safety of Five Broad-Spectrum Antiseizure Medications for Adjunctive Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. CNS Drugs 2023; 37:883-913. [PMID: 37589821 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01029-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overall, up to one-third of epilepsy patients have drug-resistant epilepsy. However, there was previously no meta-analysis to support the guidelines for broad-spectrum antiseizure medication selection for the adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy. In the present meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of three second-generation broad-spectrum antiseizure medications, lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), and topiramate (TPM), and two third-generation broad-spectrum antiseizure medications, perampanel (PER) and lacosamide (LCM), for the adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to July 15, 2022. The studies included in the meta-analysis were required to meet the following criteria: (1) be randomized, double-blind clinical trials; (2) include patients aged >2 years with a clinical diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy; (3) have at least 8 weeks for the treatment period excluding the titration phase; and (4) report the outcomes of seizure response, seizure freedom and the withdrawal rate due to treatment-emergent adverse effects. Data were extracted, and the risk of bias for each study was assessed by two authors independently using RoB2 tools. We performed the network meta-analysis for each outcome through a group of programs in the mvmeta and network packages in Stata. Relative odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated as the result of the analyses. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and mean ranks were used to rank these treatments. RESULTS Forty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (LTG-placebo: n = 6, LEV-placebo: n = 13, TPM-placebo: n = 9, PER-placebo: n = 6, LCM-placebo: n = 7, LEV-TPM: n = 1) with 10257 participants (LTG = 569, LEV = 1626, TPM = 701, PER = 1734, LCM = 1908, placebo = 3719) were included. Levetiracetam had subequal efficacy in 50 % seizure frequency reduction to TPM [odds ratio (OR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.38], and LEV had a higher rate of ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction than LCM (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.01) and PER (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.24-2.29). Levetiracetam was also related to a higher proportion of seizure freedom participants than TPM (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.20-2.89), PER (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.12-4.43), and LCM (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.46-6.05). In addition, LEV was associated with a lower risk of experiencing at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) than PER (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46-0.85) and TPM (OR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.36-0.72) and a lower proportion of patients experiencing TEAEs leading to discontinuation than PER (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.97) and TPM (OR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.27-0.93). CONCLUSIONS Third-generation drugs (PER and LCM) had no advantages in terms of efficacy and safety for adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy compared with several second-generation drugs (LEV and LTG). Levetiracetam was the priority choice for adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy. Perampanel and LCM had no advantages in terms of efficacy and safety among the five drugs. REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number, CRD42022344153; last edited on December 23, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hecheng Wang
- School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, 124221, China
| | - Haoran Wang
- School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, 124221, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Neurology, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Jing Zhao
- School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, 124221, China
| | - Xuewen Niu
- School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, 124221, China
| | - Lei Zhu
- School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, 124221, China
| | - Xiaomin Ma
- School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, 124221, China
| | - Yu Zong
- School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, 124221, China
| | - Yinglin Huang
- Department of Psychiatry, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 453003, China.
| | - Yanshuo Han
- School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, 124221, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Trinka E, Alsaadi T, Goji H, Maehara T, Takahashi S, Jacobs J, Renna R, Gil-López FJ, McMurray R, Sáinz-Fuertes R, Villanueva V. Perampanel for the treatment of people with idiopathic generalized epilepsy in clinical practice. Epilepsia 2023; 64:2094-2107. [PMID: 37114853 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to evaluate perampanel (PER) when used under real-world conditions to treat people with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) included in the PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study. METHODS The multinational, retrospective, pooled analysis PERMIT explored the use of PER in people with focal and generalized epilepsy treated in clinical practice across 17 countries. This subgroup analysis included PERMIT participants with IGE. Time points for retention and effectiveness measurements were 3, 6, and 12 months (last observation carried forward, defined as "last visit," was also applied to effectiveness). Effectiveness was evaluated by seizure type (total seizures, generalized tonic-clonic seizures [GTCS], myoclonic seizures, absence seizures) and included ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom rate (defined as no seizures since at least the previous visit). Safety/tolerability was monitored throughout PER treatment and evaluated by documenting the incidence of adverse events (AEs), including psychiatric AEs and those leading to treatment discontinuation. RESULTS The Full Analysis Set included 544 people with IGE (51.9% women, mean age = 33.3 years, mean epilepsy duration = 18.1 years). At 3, 6, and 12 months, 92.4%, 85.5%, and 77.3% of participants were retained on PER treatment, respectively (Retention Population, n = 497). At the last visit, responder and seizure freedom rates were, respectively, 74.2% and 54.6% (total seizures), 81.2% and 61.5% (GTCS), 85.7% and 66.0% (myoclonic seizures), and 90.5% and 81.0% (absence seizures) (Effectiveness Population, n = 467). AEs occurred in 42.9% of patients and included irritability (9.6%), dizziness/vertigo (9.2%), and somnolence (6.3%) (Tolerability Population, n = 520). Treatment discontinuation due to AEs was 12.4% over 12 months. SIGNIFICANCE This subgroup analysis of the PERMIT study demonstrated the effectiveness and good tolerability of PER in people with IGE when administered under everyday clinical practice conditions. These findings are in line with clinical trial evidence, supporting PER's use as broad-spectrum antiseizure medication for the treatment of IGE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugen Trinka
- Department of Neurology, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Member of EpiCARE, Salzburg, Austria
- Neuroscience Institute, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision-Making, and HTA, UMIT-Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria
| | - Taoufik Alsaadi
- Department of Neurology, American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Hiroko Goji
- Neuropsychiatric Department, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Taketoshi Maehara
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Satoru Takahashi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Julia Jacobs
- Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- University Medical Center Freiburg, Member of EpiCARE, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rosaria Renna
- Neurological Clinic and Stroke Unit, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Vicente Villanueva
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, member of EpiCARE, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Perversi F, Costa C, Labate A, Lattanzi S, Liguori C, Maschio M, Meletti S, Nobili L, Operto FF, Romigi A, Russo E, Di Bonaventura C. The broad-spectrum activity of perampanel: state of the art and future perspective of AMPA antagonism beyond epilepsy. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1182304. [PMID: 37483446 PMCID: PMC10359664 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1182304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Glutamate is the brain's main excitatory neurotransmitter. Glutamatergic neurons primarily compose basic neuronal networks, especially in the cortex. An imbalance of excitatory and inhibitory activities may result in epilepsy or other neurological and psychiatric conditions. Among glutamate receptors, AMPA receptors are the predominant mediator of glutamate-induced excitatory neurotransmission and dictate synaptic efficiency and plasticity by their numbers and/or properties. Therefore, they appear to be a major drug target for modulating several brain functions. Perampanel (PER) is a highly selective, noncompetitive AMPA antagonist approved in several countries worldwide for treating different types of seizures in various epileptic conditions. However, recent data show that PER can potentially address many other conditions within epilepsy and beyond. From this perspective, this review aims to examine the new preclinical and clinical studies-especially those produced from 2017 onwards-on AMPA antagonism and PER in conditions such as mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, idiopathic and genetic generalized epilepsy, brain tumor-related epilepsy, status epilepticus, rare epileptic syndromes, stroke, sleep, epilepsy-related migraine, cognitive impairment, autism, dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases, as well as provide suggestions on future research agenda aimed at probing the possibility of treating these conditions with PER and/or other AMPA receptor antagonists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cinzia Costa
- Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- Neurological Clinic, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Angelo Labate
- Neurophysiopatology and Movement Disorders Clinic, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Claudio Liguori
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Epilepsy Center, Neurology Unit, University Hospital “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Maschio
- Center for Tumor-Related Epilepsy, UOSD Neuro-Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Meletti
- Neurology Department, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic, and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Lino Nobili
- Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, IRCCS Istituto G. Gaslini, Genova, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Child and Maternal Health (DINOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Felicia Operto
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
- Department of Science of Health, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Andrea Romigi
- Sleep Medicine Center, Neurological Mediterranean Institute IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
- Psychology Faculty, International Telematic University Uninettuno, Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Russo
- Department of Science of Health, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Park KI, Hwang S, Son H, Chu K, Jung KY, Lee SK. Five-Year Retention of Perampanel and Polytherapy Patterns: 328 Patients From a Single Center in South Korea. J Clin Neurol 2023; 19:358-364. [PMID: 37417431 DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2022.0338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Perampanel (PER) is an α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid antagonist used to treat focal and generalized epilepsy. Comprehensive data from real-world settings with long-term follow-ups are still scarce. This study aimed to determine the factors related to PER retention and the polytherapy pattern with PER. METHODS We reviewed all patients with epilepsy with a history of PER prescription during 2008-2017 and over a follow-up of >3 years. PER usage patterns and associated factors were analyzed. RESULTS Among the 2,655 patients in the cohort, 328 (150 females, 178 males) were enrolled. The ages at onset and diagnosis were 21.1±14.7 years and 25.6±16.1 years (mean±standard deviation), respectively. The age at the first visit to our center was 31.8±13.8 years. Seizure types were focal, generalized, and unknown onset in 83.8%, 15.9%, and 0.3% of patients, respectively. The most common etiology was structural (n=109, 33.2%). The maintenance duration of PER was 22.6±19.2 months (range=1-66 months). The initial number of concomitant antiseizure medications was 2.4±1.4 (range=0-9). The most common regimen was PER plus levetiracetam (n=41, 12.5%). The median number of 1-year seizures before PER usage was 8 (range=0-1,400). A seizure reduction of >50% was recorded in 34.7% of patients (52.0% and 29.2% in generalized and focal seizures, respectively). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year retention rates for PER were 65.3%, 50.4%, 40.4%, 35.3%, and 21.5%, respectively. A multivariate analysis indicated that lower age at onset was associated with longer retention (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS PER was safely used in patients with diverse characteristics and was maintained for a long time in a real-world setting, especially in patients with a lower age at onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung-Il Park
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sungeun Hwang
- Department of Neurology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyoshin Son
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kon Chu
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Young Jung
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Kun Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kerr WT, Auvin S, Van der Geyten S, Kenney C, Novak G, Fountain NB, Grzeskowiak C, French JA. Time-to-event clinical trial designs: Existing evidence and remaining concerns. Epilepsia 2023; 64:1699-1708. [PMID: 37073881 PMCID: PMC10524279 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
Well-designed placebo-controlled clinical trials are critical to the development of novel treatments for epilepsy, but their design has not changed for decades. Patients, clinicians, regulators, and innovators all have concerns that recruiting for trials is challenging, in part, due to the static design of maintaining participants for long periods on add-on placebo when there are an increasing number of options for therapy. A traditional trial maintains participants on blinded treatment for a static period (e.g., 12 weeks of maintenance), during which participants on placebo have an elevated risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy compared to patients on an active treatment. Time-to-event trials observe participants on blinded treatment until a key event occurs (e.g., post-randomization seizure count matches pre-randomization monthly seizure count). In this article, we review the evidence for these designs based on re-analysis of prior trials, one published trial that used a time-to-second seizure design, and experience from an ongoing blinded trial. We also discuss remaining concerns regarding time-to-event trials. We conclude that, despite potential limitations, time-to-event trials are a potential promising mechanism to make trials more patient friendly and reduce placebo exposure, which are urgent needs to improve safety and increase recruitment to trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T. Kerr
- Department of Neurology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Stéphane Auvin
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Neurologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France
- Université Paris-Cité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale NeuroDiderot, Paris, France
- Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
| | - Serge Van der Geyten
- Janssen Research & Development, a Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
| | | | - Gerald Novak
- Janssen Research & Development, a Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Nathan B. Fountain
- Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Caitlin Grzeskowiak
- Research and New Therapies Program, Epilepsy Foundation of America, Maryland, USA
| | - Jacqueline A. French
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York University, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lim SC, Lee WG, Kim DW, Kim KK, Shon YM, Park J, Lee Y, Seo DW. Safety and effectiveness of perampanel monotherapy after adjunctive therapy through retention rate in subjects with focal-onset seizures with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures: A multicenter retrospective study in Korea. Epilepsy Behav 2023; 145:109291. [PMID: 37336136 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel monotherapy following conversion from adjunctive therapy. METHODS This was a multicenter, retrospective, non-interventional study of Korean patients aged ≥12 years with focal-onset seizures (FOS) with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Data were extracted from electronic medical records of perampanel-treated patients from 1 February 2016 to 31 October 2020. Kaplan-Meier estimated retention rates, effectiveness, and safety were recorded. RESULTS Subjects (n = 66, mean age 46.2 years) were mostly male (68.2%) with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure (71.2%). Mean duration of illness was 86.3 months. Retention rates after conversion to perampanel monotherapy at 3, 6, and 12 months (primary outcome) were 96.0%, 96.0%, and 75.6%, respectively. Overall retention rates in patients receiving perampanel as adjunctive or monotherapy at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after perampanel add-on were 100%, 98.3%, 95.9%, 92.6%, and 92.6%, respectively. Mean retention duration was 41.2 months (overall perampanel administration) and 21.4 months (monotherapy). Mean seizure frequency/28 days in the Full Analysis Set (n = 61) was comparable for adjunctive and monotherapy (0.2 ± 0.79 vs 0.2 ± 0.64; change between adjunctive and monotherapy periods: 0.0 ± 0.59; p = 0.498). Perampanel was well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified. Dizziness (4.6%), only reported during adjunctive therapy, was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event. CONCLUSIONS Conversion to perampanel monotherapy from adjunctive therapy showed promising results in subjects with FOS with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures; further studies in a larger population are needed to confirm these encouraging data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Chul Lim
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Gu Lee
- Department of Neurology, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, University of Kosin College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Neurology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Ki Kim
- Department of Neurology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Min Shon
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Yoona Lee
- Eisai Korea Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae-Won Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pitton Rissardo J, Fornari Caprara AL, Casares M, Skinner HJ, Hamid U. Antiseizure Medication-Induced Alopecia: A Literature Review. MEDICINES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:35. [PMID: 37367730 DOI: 10.3390/medicines10060035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Background: Adverse effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) remain one of the major causes of non-adherence. Cosmetic side effects (CSEs) are among the most commonly reported side effects of ASMs. In this context, alopecia is one of the CSEs that has a high intolerance rate leading to poor therapeutical compliance. Methods: We performed a literature review concerning alopecia as a secondary effect of ASMs. Results: There are 1656 individuals reported with ASM-induced alopecia. Valproate (983), lamotrigine (355), and carbamazepine (225) have been extensively reported. Other ASMs associated with alopecia were cenobamate (18), levetiracetam (14), topiramate (13), lacosamide (7), vigabatrin (6), phenobarbital (5), gabapentin (5), phenytoin (4), pregabalin (4), eslicarbazepine (3), brivaracetam (2), clobazam (2), perampanel (2), trimethadione (2), rufinamide (2), zonisamide (2), primidone (1), and tiagabine (1). There were no reports of oxcarbazepine and felbamate with drug-induced alopecia. Hair loss seen with ASMs was diffuse and non-scarring. Telogen effluvium was the most common cause of alopecia. A characteristic feature was the reversibility of alopecia after ASM dose adjustment. Conclusions: Alopecia should be considered one important adverse effect of ASMs. Patients reporting hair loss with ASM therapy should be further investigated, and specialist consultation is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamir Pitton Rissardo
- Medicine Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil
| | | | - Maritsa Casares
- AdventHealth Orlando Neuroscience Institute, 615 E Princeton Street, Suite 540, Orlando, FL 32803, USA
| | - Holly J Skinner
- AdventHealth Epilepsy at Orlando, 615 E Princeton Street, Suite 540, Orlando, FL 32803, USA
| | - Umair Hamid
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Peoria, IL 61605, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Omatsu H, Watanabe T, Kira R, Ishiba K, Patten A, Takase T, Ngo LY. Open-label study to investigate the safety and efficacy of adjunctive perampanel in pediatric patients (aged 4 to <12 years) with inadequately controlled focal-onset seizures: Japanese subgroup analysis. Seizure 2023; 110:109-116. [PMID: 37336055 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel in a Japanese subpopulation of Study 311 (NCT02849626), which was a global, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of children (aged 4 to <12 years) with inadequately controlled focal-onset seizures (FOS), with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). METHODS Study 311 comprised a Core Study, Extension A, and Extension B; this report focuses on the Japanese patient subgroup in the Core Study only. In the Core Study, Japanese patients (FOS only) received adjunctive perampanel ≤12 mg/day in a 23-week Treatment Phase. Endpoints included safety/tolerability (primary) and median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Patients were stratified by age and concomitant enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medication (EIASM) use. RESULTS Of 65 enrolled Japanese patients, 56 completed the Core Study and nine withdrew. The most common reason for discontinuation was adverse events (AEs) (n = 4 [6.2%]). The mean (standard deviation) daily dose of perampanel in Japanese FOS patients was 5.8 (2.2) mg/day. During the Core Study, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported by 89% of Japanese patients, most commonly nasopharyngitis (28%) and somnolence (28%). The median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline was 37% and the lower limit of the 95% CI was greater than 10.5%, satisfying the pre-defined efficacy criteria. Perampanel was effective regardless of age or concomitant EIASM use. CONCLUSION Perampanel as adjunctive therapy is generally safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious in Japanese children aged 4 to <12 years with FOS (with/without FBTCS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirowo Omatsu
- National Epilepsy Center, NHO Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, Shizuoka, Japan.
| | - Toshihide Watanabe
- Hokkaido Medical Center for Child Health and Rehabilitation, Hokkaido, Japan.
| | | | | | - Anna Patten
- Eisai Europe Ltd., Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Leock Y Ngo
- Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. Approximately 30% of people with epilepsy are considered to be drug-resistant, and usually need treatment with a combination of other antiepileptic drugs. Perampanel is a newer antiepileptic drug that has been investigated as add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of perampanel as add-on therapy for people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 20 October 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials comparing add-on perampanel with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was 1. 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. Our secondary outcomes were 2. seizure freedom, 3. treatment withdrawal due to any reason, 4. treatment withdrawal due to adverse effects, and 5. ADVERSE EFFECTS We used an intention-to-treat population for all primary analyses. We presented the results as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), except for individual adverse effects, which we reported with 99% CIs to compensate for multiple testing. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We included seven trials involving 2524 participants, all aged over 12 years. The trials were double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials with treatment duration of 12 to 19 weeks. We assessed four trials at overall low risk of bias, and three trials at overall unclear risk of bias, due to risk of detection, reporting, and other biases. Compared with placebo, participants receiving perampanel were more likely to achieve a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.95; 7 trials, 2524 participants; high-certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, perampanel increased seizure freedom (RR 2.50, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.54; 5 trials, 2323 participants; low-certainty evidence) and treatment withdrawal (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.63; 7 trials, 2524 participants; low-certainty evidence). Participants treated with perampanel were more likely to withdraw from treatment due to adverse effects compared to those receiving placebo (RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.59 to 3.51; 7 trials, 2524 participants; low-certainty evidence). A higher proportion of participants receiving perampanel reported one or more adverse effects when compared to participants who received placebo (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.24; 7 trials, 2524 participants; high-certainty evidence). Compared with placebo, participants receiving perampanel were more likely to experience ataxia (RR 14.32, 99% CI 1.09 to 188.31; 2 trials, 1098 participants; low-certainty evidence), dizziness (RR 2.87, 99% CI 1.45 to 5.70; 7 trials, 2524 participants; low-certainty evidence), and somnolence (RR 1.76, 99% CI 1.02 to 3.04; 7 trials, 2524 participants). Subgroup analysis indicated that a larger proportion of participants who received perampanel at a dose of 4 mg/day (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.83; 2 trials, 710 participants), 8 mg/day (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.22; 4 trials, 1227 participants), or 12 mg/day (RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.86 to 3.04; 3 trials, 869 participants) achieved a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency compared to placebo; however, treatment with perampanel 12 mg/day also increased treatment withdrawal (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.40; 3 trials, 869 participants). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Add-on perampanel is effective at reducing seizure frequency and may be effective at maintaining seizure freedom for people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Although perampanel was well-tolerated, there was a higher proportion of treatment withdrawals with perampanel compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis suggested that 8 mg/day and 12 mg/day are the most efficacious perampanel doses; however, the use of 12 mg/day would likely increase the number of treatment withdrawals. Future research should focus on investigating the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel with longer-term follow-up, as well as exploring an optimal dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Bresnahan
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ruaraidh A Hill
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Eiro T, Miyazaki T, Hatano M, Nakajima W, Arisawa T, Takada Y, Kimura K, Sano A, Nakano K, Mihara T, Takayama Y, Ikegaya N, Iwasaki M, Hishimoto A, Noda Y, Miyazaki T, Uchida H, Tani H, Nagai N, Koizumi T, Nakajima S, Mimura M, Matsuda N, Kanai K, Takahashi K, Ito H, Hirano Y, Kimura Y, Matsumoto R, Ikeda A, Takahashi T. Dynamics of AMPA receptors regulate epileptogenesis in patients with epilepsy. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:101020. [PMID: 37080205 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
The excitatory glutamate α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptors (AMPARs) contribute to epileptogenesis. Thirty patients with epilepsy and 31 healthy controls are scanned using positron emission tomography with our recently developed radiotracer for AMPARs, [11C]K-2, which measures the density of cell-surface AMPARs. In patients with focal-onset seizures, an increase in AMPAR trafficking augments the amplitude of abnormal gamma activity detected by electroencephalography. In contrast, patients with generalized-onset seizures exhibit a decrease in AMPARs coupled with increased amplitude of abnormal gamma activity. Patients with epilepsy had reduced AMPAR levels compared with healthy controls, and AMPARs are reduced in larger areas of the cortex in patients with generalized-onset seizures compared with those with focal-onset seizures. Thus, epileptic brain function can be regulated by the enhanced trafficking of AMPAR due to Hebbian plasticity with increased simultaneous neuronal firing and compensational downregulation of cell-surface AMPARs by the synaptic scaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Eiro
- Department of Physiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Miyazaki
- Department of Physiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Mai Hatano
- Department of Physiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Waki Nakajima
- Department of Physiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Tetsu Arisawa
- Department of Physiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Yuuki Takada
- Department of Physiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Kimito Kimura
- Department of Physiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Akane Sano
- Department of Physiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Kotaro Nakano
- Department of Physiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Takahiro Mihara
- Department of Health Data Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Data Science, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Yutaro Takayama
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Naoki Ikegaya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Masaki Iwasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira 187-8551, Japan
| | - Akitoyo Hishimoto
- Department of Psychiatry, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Noda
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan
| | - Takahiro Miyazaki
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Uchida
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan
| | - Hideaki Tani
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Nagai
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan
| | - Teruki Koizumi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Nakajima
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan
| | - Masaru Mimura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan
| | - Nozomu Matsuda
- Department of Neurology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Kanai
- Department of Neurology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Takahashi
- Advanced Clinical Research Center, Fukushima Global Medical Science Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ito
- Advanced Clinical Research Center, Fukushima Global Medical Science Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
| | - Yoji Hirano
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan
| | - Yuichi Kimura
- Faculty of Informatics, Cyber Informatics Research Institute, Kindai University, Higashi-Osaka 577-8502, Japan
| | - Riki Matsumoto
- Division of Neurology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
| | - Akio Ikeda
- Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takuya Takahashi
- Department of Physiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; The University of Tokyo, International Research Center for Neurointelligence, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Manole AM, Sirbu CA, Mititelu MR, Vasiliu O, Lorusso L, Sirbu OM, Ionita Radu F. State of the Art and Challenges in Epilepsy—A Narrative Review. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040623. [PMID: 37109008 PMCID: PMC10140944 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy is a common condition worldwide, with approximately 50 million people suffering from it. A single seizure does not mean epilepsy; almost 10% of the population can have a seizure during their lifetime. In particular, there are many other central nervous system disorders other than epilepsy in which seizures occur, either transiently or as a comorbid condition. The impact of seizures and epilepsy is, therefore, widespread and easily underestimated. It is estimated that about 70% of patients with epilepsy could be seizure-free if correctly diagnosed and treated. However, for patients with epilepsy, quality of life is influenced not only by seizure control but also by antiepileptic drug-adverse reactions, access to education, mood, employment, and transportation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aida Mihaela Manole
- Department of Neurology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010242 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Carmen Adella Sirbu
- Department of Neurology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010242 Bucharest, Romania
- Clinical Neurosciences Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Centre for Cognitive Research in Neuropsychiatric Pathology (Neuropsy-Cog), Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Mihaela Raluca Mititelu
- Nuclear Medicine Department, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010242 Bucharest, Romania
- Department No.8, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Octavian Vasiliu
- Department of Psychiatry, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010242, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Lorenzo Lorusso
- Neurology Unit—Neuroscience Dept. A.S.S.T.Lecco, Merate Hospital, 23807 Merate, Italy
| | - Octavian Mihai Sirbu
- Clinical Neurosciences Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Neurosurgery, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010242 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Florentina Ionita Radu
- Department of Gastroenterology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Liguori C, Santamarina E, Strzelczyk A, Rodríguez-Uranga JJ, Shankar R, Rodríguez-Osorio X, Auvin S, Bonanni P, Trinka E, McMurray R, Sáinz-Fuertes R, Villanueva V. Perampanel outcomes at different stages of treatment in people with focal and generalized epilepsy treated in clinical practice: Evidence from the PERMIT study. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1120150. [PMID: 37064177 PMCID: PMC10098362 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1120150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionThe PERMIT study is the largest pooled analysis of perampanel (PER) clinical practice data conducted to date.MethodsThis post-hoc analysis of PERMIT investigated the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of PER when used as early add-on therapy (after failure of one or two previous antiseizure medications) in comparison with late add-on therapy (after failure of three or more previous antiseizure medications). Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months, and at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness was assessed by seizure type (total seizures, focal seizures, generalized tonic-clonic seizures [GTCS]) and assessments included seizure freedom rate and responder rate. Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs.ResultsThe Full Analysis Set included 1184 and 2861 PWE treated with PER as early and late add-on therapy, respectively. Compared to the late add-on subgroup, the early add-on subgroup was characterized by later mean age at epilepsy onset, shorter mean duration of epilepsy, lower rates of intellectual disability and psychiatric comorbidity, and lower frequency of seizures per month, suggesting a less severe form of epilepsy in this subgroup. After 12 months, retention was significantly higher in the early versus late add-on subgroup (67.7% vs. 62.4%; p = 0.004). At the last visit, responder rates in the early versus late add-on subgroup were significantly higher for total seizures (68.2% vs. 39.3%; p < 0.001), focal seizures (65.0% vs. 36.8%; p < 0.001) and GTCS (83.7% vs. 67.2%; p < 0.001), as were seizure freedom rates (total seizures, 35.9% vs. 11.9% [p < 0.001]; focal seizures, 29.4% vs. 8.7% [p < 0.001]; GTCS, 69.0% vs. 48.1% [p < 0.001]). Incidence of AEs was significantly lower in the early versus late add-on subgroup (42.1% vs. 54.7%; p < 0.001), as was the rate of discontinuation due to AEs over 12 months (15.0% vs. 18.1%; p = 0.031).DiscussionThis study demonstrated that PER was effective and generally well tolerated when initiated as early or late add-on therapy, but it was significantly more effective and better tolerated when initiated early. These findings support PER's use as a broad-spectrum, early add-on therapy for use in PWE with focal and generalized seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Liguori
- Epilepsy Centre, Neurology Unit, University Hospital “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Claudio Liguori
| | - Estevo Santamarina
- Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adam Strzelczyk
- Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Rohit Shankar
- Peninsula School of Medicine, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Xiana Rodríguez-Osorio
- Department of Neurology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago, Spain
| | - Stéphane Auvin
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM NeuroDiderot, Paris, France
- APHP, Robert Debré University Hospital, Pediatric Neurology Department, CRMR Epilepsies Rares, EpiCare Member, Paris, France
- Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Epilpesy and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Conegliano, Treviso, Italy
| | - Eugen Trinka
- Department of Neurology, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Member of EpiCARE, Salzburg, Austria
- Neuroscience Institute, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision-Making and HTA, UMIT–Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria
| | | | | | - Vicente Villanueva
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
The Role of Glutamate Receptors in Epilepsy. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11030783. [PMID: 36979762 PMCID: PMC10045847 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11030783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Glutamate is an essential excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system, playing an indispensable role in neuronal development and memory formation. The dysregulation of glutamate receptors and the glutamatergic system is involved in numerous neurological and psychiatric disorders, especially epilepsy. There are two main classes of glutamate receptor, namely ionotropic and metabotropic (mGluRs) receptors. The former stimulate fast excitatory neurotransmission, are N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA), and kainate; while the latter are G-protein-coupled receptors that mediate glutamatergic activity via intracellular messenger systems. Glutamate, glutamate receptors, and regulation of astrocytes are significantly involved in the pathogenesis of acute seizure and chronic epilepsy. Some glutamate receptor antagonists have been shown to be effective for the treatment of epilepsy, and research and clinical trials are ongoing.
Collapse
|
31
|
A Single- and Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetic Study of Oral Perampanel in Healthy Chinese Subjects. Clin Drug Investig 2023; 43:155-165. [PMID: 36746851 PMCID: PMC10011319 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-022-01241-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Perampanel is a once-daily oral anti-seizure medication indicated for focal-onset seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. This study investigated the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of perampanel in healthy Chinese adults. METHODS Study 052 (NCT03424564) was a phase I, single-center, open-label, parallel-group study. In the single-dose part of the study, subjects received a single oral dose of perampanel 2, 4, or 8 mg. In the multiple-dose part, subjects received once-daily oral perampanel 2 mg on Days 1-7 and 4 mg on Days 8-21. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from perampanel plasma concentrations using non-compartmental analysis. Dose proportionality after single doses of perampanel was assessed. Safety and tolerability were evaluated. RESULTS In the single-dose part (N = 30), median time to reach maximum concentration (tmax) was 0.75-1.0 h, mean terminal elimination phase half-life (t½) was 85.6-122 h, mean maximum observed concentration (Cmax) was 77.9-276 ng/mL, and mean area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0-t)) was 4070-15100 ng·h/mL. Single-dose pharmacokinetics were linear for perampanel 2-8 mg. In the multiple-dose part (N = 12), Day 21 steady-state (4 mg/day) parameters were median time at which the highest drug concentration occurs at steady state (tss,max), 1.25 h; mean t½, 109 h; mean maximum observed concentration at steady state (Css,max), 453 ng/mL; and mean area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval on multiple dosing (AUC(0- τ)), 7540 ng·h/mL. For single- and multiple-dose perampanel, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of perampanel in healthy Chinese adults revealed rapid perampanel absorption, slow elimination, and a linear relationship with single perampanel doses of 2-8 mg. Findings were consistent with previous studies of perampanel pharmacokinetics in other ethnic/racial populations of healthy subjects. Single and multiple doses of perampanel were generally safe and well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03424564; registered February 2018.
Collapse
|
32
|
Perampanel Monotherapy for Focal and Generalized Epilepsy in Clinical Practice. Acta Neurol Scand 2023. [DOI: 10.1155/2023/2852853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Objectives. To investigate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of perampanel (PER) when used as monotherapy to treat focal or generalized epilepsy in everyday clinical practice, using data from the PERMIT study. Methods. PERMIT was a pooled analysis of 44 real-world studies from 17 countries, in which people with focal and generalized epilepsy were treated with PER. This post hoc analysis included people with epilepsy (PWE) from PERMIT who were treated with PER monotherapy at baseline. Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months. Effectiveness assessments included ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit). Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs. Results. Overall, 268 PWE were treated with PER monotherapy at baseline. Retention was assessed for 168 PWE, effectiveness for 183 PWE, and safety and tolerability for 197 PWE. Retention rates were 91.1%, 87.3%, and 73.3% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. At 12 months, responder rates were 84.2% overall, 82.9% in PWE with only focal-onset seizures at baseline, and 88.0% in those with only generalized-onset seizures at baseline; corresponding freedom rates were 62.9%, 57.7%, and 80.0%, respectively. AEs were reported for 45.2% of PWE. The most frequently reported AEs (≥5% of PWE) were dizziness/vertigo (16.8%), irritability (11.2%), somnolence (9.1%), and depression (6.6%). Over 12 months, 13.7% discontinued due to AEs. Conclusions. PER was effective when used as monotherapy in clinical practice, particularly in those with generalized-onset seizures, and was generally well tolerated.
Collapse
|
33
|
Liu P, Zhu Z, Wu H. The safety of perampanel in different disorders and doses: A meta-analysis. Seizure 2023; 106:22-28. [PMID: 36724644 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety of perampanel in different disorders and doses. METHODS Embase, the Cochrane Library, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to July 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3 and R 4.2.1 software. RESULTS A total of 17 RCTs with 5711 subjects were included in the final analysis. The double-blind treatment phase was from 12 weeks to 48 weeks. Our results showed that 11 adverse events (aggression, ataxia, balance disorder, dizziness, fall, fatigue, irritability, rash, somnolence, vertigo, and weight increase) were statistically significantly associated with perampanel, and 4 of them (ataxia, dizziness, fatigue, and somnolence) showed a clear dose-response relationship. Psychiatric adverse events occurred most frequently among serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). At 8 mg/day, seven adverse events (aggression, balance disorder, dizziness, fatigue, irritability, vertigo, and weight increase) occurred more frequently in patients with epilepsy than in patients with other disorders, whereas dose discontinuation rates due to adverse events were lower in patients with epilepsy than in patients with other disorders. CONCLUSION The safety profile of perampanel is dependent on diseases and dose. The risk of adverse events was statistically significantly higher, with doses exceeding 4 mg/day. Despite a higher risk of adverse events, patients with epilepsy had a lower perampanel discontinuation rate than patients with other disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Liu
- Graduate School of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China; Department of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital; No. 348, West Heping Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province 050051, China
| | - Zhongning Zhu
- Department of Pharmacology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Huizhen Wu
- Graduate School of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China; Department of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital; No. 348, West Heping Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province 050051, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nakamura Y, Inoue A, Nishikawa M, Ohnishi T, Yano H, Kanemura Y, Ohtsuka Y, Ozaki S, Kusakabe K, Suehiro S, Yamashita D, Shigekawa S, Watanabe H, Kitazawa R, Tanaka J, Kunieda T. Quantitative measurement of peritumoral concentrations of glutamate, N-acetyl aspartate, and lactate on magnetic resonance spectroscopy predicts glioblastoma-related refractory epilepsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 164:3253-3266. [PMID: 36107232 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05363-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased extracellular glutamate is known to cause epileptic seizures in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). However, predicting whether the seizure will be refractory is difficult. The present study investigated whether evaluation of the levels of various metabolites, including glutamate, can predict the occurrence of refractory seizure in GBM by quantitative measurement of metabolite concentrations on magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). METHODS Forty patients were treated according to the same treatment protocol for primary GBM at Ehime University Hospital between April 2017 and July 2021. Of these patients, 23 underwent MRS to determine concentrations of metabolites, including glutamate, N-acetylaspartate, creatine, and lactate, in the tumor periphery by applying LC-Model. The concentration of each metabolite was expressed as a ratio to creatine concentration. Patients were divided into three groups: Type A, patients with no seizures; Type B, patients with seizures that disappeared after treatment; and Type C, patients with seizures that remained unrelieved or appeared after treatment (refractory seizures). Relationships between concentrations of metabolites and seizure types were investigated. RESULTS In 23 GBMs, seizures were confirmed in 11 patients, including Type B in four and Type C in seven. Patients with epilepsy (Type B or C) showed significantly higher glutamate and N-acetylaspartate values than did non-epilepsy patients (Type A) (p < 0.05). No significant differences in glutamate or N-acetylaspartate levels were seen between Types B and C. Conversely, Type C showed significantly higher concentrations of lactate than did Type B (p = 0.001). Cutoff values of lactate-to-creatine, glutamate-to-creatine, and N-acetylaspartate-to-creatine ratios for refractory seizure were > 1.25, > 1.09, and > 0.88, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Extracellular concentrations of glutamate, N-acetylaspartate, and lactate in the tumor periphery were significantly elevated in patients with GBM with refractory seizures. Measurement of these metabolites on MRS may predict refractory epilepsy in such patients and could be an indicator for continuing the use of antiepileptic drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yawara Nakamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Akihiro Inoue
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Nishikawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Takanori Ohnishi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washoukai Sadamoto Hospital, 1-6-1 Takehara, Matsuyama, Ehime, 790-0052, Japan
| | - Hajime Yano
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Yonehiro Kanemura
- Department of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Institute for Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, 2-1-14 Hoenzaka, Osaka, 540-0006, Japan.,Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, 2-1-14 Hoenzaka, Osaka, 540-0006, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ohtsuka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Saya Ozaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Kosuke Kusakabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Satoshi Suehiro
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Daisuke Yamashita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Seiji Shigekawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Hideaki Watanabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Riko Kitazawa
- Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Ehime University Hospital, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Junya Tanaka
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Takeharu Kunieda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lavu A, Aboulatta L, Abou-Setta AM, Aloud B, Askin N, Rabbani R, Shouman W, Zarychanski R, Eltonsy S. Efficacy and safety of perampanel in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Seizure 2022; 102:54-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
36
|
Yamamoto T, Gil-Nagel A, Wheless JW, Kim JH, Wechsler RT. Perampanel monotherapy for the treatment of epilepsy: Clinical trial and real-world evidence. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 136:108885. [PMID: 36150304 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Perampanel, a selective, non-competitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor antagonist, is a once-daily oral anti-seizure medication (ASM) for focal-onset seizures (FOS) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). In the US, perampanel is approved for the treatment of FOS (adjunctive and monotherapy), with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), in patients aged ≥4 years, and as adjunctive treatment of GTCS in patients aged ≥12 years. The monotherapy approvals in the US were based on the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) policy allowing extrapolation of adjunctive data to the monotherapy setting in the absence of randomized controlled monotherapy trials; since then, perampanel monotherapy has received approvals in approximately 48 countries. As there are key differences in clinical evidence of perampanel as adjunctive therapy vs monotherapy, we review the clinical outcomes of perampanel when administered as primary or secondary monotherapy. Eight publications reporting the efficacy and safety outcomes of perampanel monotherapy in clinical trial and real-world settings were selected during our literature search and are included; these comprise three Eisai-sponsored studies in patients with epilepsy: one prospective, open-label, Phase III clinical trial of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy (Study 342 [FREEDOM]) and two retrospective, real-world Phase IV studies of patients with epilepsy who received perampanel during routine clinical care (Studies 504 and 506 [PROVE]); and five retrospective, real-world studies in patients with epilepsy who were prescribed perampanel during routine clinical care. Results from these studies demonstrated that seizure freedom may be achieved following treatment with perampanel monotherapy (either primary or secondary), with favorable retention rates and safety profiles. Overall, the clinical evidence supports the use of perampanel monotherapy both in newly diagnosed patients and in those who have been unable to control their seizures with other ASMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takamichi Yamamoto
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
| | | | - James W Wheless
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center & Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Ji Hyun Kim
- Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kerr WT, Brandt C, Ngo LY, Patten A, Cheng JY, Kramer L, French JA. Time to exceed pre-randomization monthly seizure count for perampanel in participants with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures: A potential clinical end point. Epilepsia 2022; 63:2994-3004. [PMID: 36106379 PMCID: PMC9828687 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the exploratory time to exceed pre-randomization seizure count (T-PSC) in the determination of efficacy of adjunctive perampanel in participants with primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures in generalized-onset epilepsy. METHODS In this multicenter, double-blind study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01393743), participants ≥12 years of age with treatment-resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy were randomized to receive placebo or adjunctive perampanel (≤8 mg/day) across a 17-week double-blind treatment phase (4-week titration; 13-week maintenance). We evaluated the pre-planned exploratory end point of the T-PSC using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. We also re-evaluated the correspondence of the primary end points of median percent seizure frequency change (MPC) and 50% responder rate (50RR) calculated at T-PSC and at the end of the trial. RESULTS The exploratory end point of median T-PSC on placebo was 43 days and >120 days on perampanel (log-rank p < .001). The primary end points calculated at T-PSC did not differ significantly from the end points at the end of the trial (MPC -31% vs -42% at T-PSC; 50RR 32% vs 51% at T-PSC). After T-PSC was reached, participants had a median (interquartile range) of 5 (3-13) additional seizures on placebo and 5 (2-10) on perampanel. SIGNIFICANCE The exploratory end point of T-PSC demonstrated the effectiveness of perampanel despite a shorter duration of monitoring. The seizures that occurred after T-PSC did not influence the conclusions of the trial; therefore, T-PSC may be a viable alternative to traditional trial end points that reduces the risk to participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T. Kerr
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Christian Brandt
- Bethel Epilepsy CenterUniversity Hospital for EpileptologyBielefeldGermany
| | - Leock Y. Ngo
- Department of NeurologyEisai Inc.NutleyNew JerseyUSA
| | | | | | - Lynn Kramer
- Department of NeurologyEisai Inc.NutleyNew JerseyUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wheless J, Chourasia N. Safety evaluation of perampanel as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy in patients with epilepsy. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2022; 21:1239-1247. [PMID: 36263757 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2134856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a need for anti-seizure medications (ASMs) that are well tolerated and effective as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy to reduce the need for adjunctive ASMs to treat newly diagnosed epilepsy, and to reduce the number of concomitant ASMs in patients with refractory epilepsy. Although the pivotal trials of perampanel evaluated its adjunctive use in patients with refractory seizures, open-label/real-world studies support its use in first/second-line settings. AREAS COVERED This paper reviews the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety/tolerability of perampanel, focusing on its use as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy. The safety of perampanel in special populations and its safety/tolerability compared with that of other ASMs is also discussed. EXPERT OPINION Perampanel is a favorable candidate for initial or first adjunctive therapy due to its favorable efficacy and safety/tolerability as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy, its long half-life and ease of use, and its limited drug-drug interactions. The proposed mitigation strategies for managing the risk of serious psychiatric adverse events are appropriate patient selection, use of low doses, and slow titration. The growing body of evidence might shift current treatment strategies towards the early use of perampanel and its use at a low dose (4 mg/day).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Wheless
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Nitish Chourasia
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wang W, Gao R, Ren Z, Yang D, Sun K, Li X, Yan S. Global trends in research of glutamate in epilepsy during past two decades: A bibliometric analysis. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:1042642. [PMID: 36340784 PMCID: PMC9630577 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1042642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy affects more than 70 million people in the world. It is characterized by recurrent spontaneous seizures, and it is related to many neurological, cognitive, and psychosocial consequences. Glutamate neurotransmitter dysfunction has essential functions in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. In this work, bibliometric analysis was conducted to explore the trends, frontiers, and hotspots of the global scientific output of glutamate in epilepsy research in the past 20 years. The Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) was searched to obtain information on publications and records published between 2002 and 2021. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were used to conduct bibliometric and visual analyses on the overall distribution of annual output, major countries, active institutions, journals, authors, commonly cited literature, and keywords. The impact and quality of the papers were assessed using the global citation score (GCS). Four thousand eight hundred ninety-one publications were retrieved in total. During the past two decades, the number of publications (Np) associated with glutamate in epilepsy has risen yearly. The United States has published the most papers; its H-index and number of citations are also the highest. The League of European Research Universities (LERU) was the most productive institution. In 2016, the total score of the paper written by Zhang Y was 854, ranking first. The keywords that appear most frequently are “epilepsy,” “glutamate,” “temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE),” “hippocampus,” and “seizures.” This study showed that although the publications related to epileptic glutamate fluctuated slightly, the Np increased overall. The United States is a great creator and influential country in this field. The first three authors are Eid, T., Aronica, E., and Smolders, I. “spectrum,” “animal model,” “inflammation,” “mutation,” “dysfunction,” and “prefrontal cortex” are increasing research hotspots. By recognizing the most critical indicators (researchers, countries, research institutes, and journals of glutamate release in epilepsy research), the research hotspot of glutamate in epilepsy could help countries, scholars, and policymakers in this field enhance their understanding of the role of glutamate in epilepsy and make decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Runshi Gao
- Department of Functional Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiwei Ren
- Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing Institute of Functional Neurosurgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dongju Yang
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ke Sun
- Department of Functional Neurology, National Center for Children’s Health of China, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoling Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Suying Yan
- Department of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Suying Yan,
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Piña-Garza JE, Villanueva V, Rosenfeld W, Yoshinaga H, Patten A, Malhotra M. Assessment of the long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in adolescent patients with epilepsy: Post hoc analysis of open-label extension studies. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 135:108901. [PMID: 36122531 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This post hoc analysis of four open-label extension (OLEx) studies evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in adolescent patients (aged 12 to ≤17 years) with focal-onset seizures (FOS), with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). METHODS Patients who completed one of six double-blind, placebo-controlled studies could enter one of four OLEx studies comprising a blinded Conversion Period (6-16 weeks) followed by a Maintenance Phase (27 to ≤256 weeks; perampanel dose: ≤12 mg/day). Exposure, retention, seizure outcomes, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed. Efficacy outcomes were analyzed using observed case and last observation carried forward (LOCF) approaches; the latter was used to account for early dropouts. RESULTS The Full Analysis Set comprised 309 adolescents with FOS (FBTCS, n = 109) and 19 with GTCS, and the Safety Analysis Set comprised 311 with FOS (FBTCS, n = 110) and 19 with GTCS. Mean (standard deviation) cumulative duration of perampanel exposure (weeks) was: FOS, 77.7 (58.7); FBTCS, 88.7 (63.8); and GTCS, 97.0 (35.5). Retention rates were maintained for ≤2 years (FOS, 50.0 %; FBTCS, 57.1 %; GTCS, 41.7 %). Seizure control (median percent reduction in seizure frequency/28 days) was sustained for up to 2 years; FOS (59.4 %, n = 113), FBTCS (64.6 %, n = 53), and GTCS (86.5 %, n = 17). At Year 2, 50 % responder rates were: FOS, 58.4 % (n = 66); FBTCS, 54.7 % (n = 29); and GTCS, 82.4 % (n = 14); seizure-freedom rates were: FOS, 5.3 % (n = 6); FBTCS, 24.5 % (n = 13); and GTCS, 35.3 % (n = 6). Long-term seizure control was observed even in LOCF analyses. The incidence of TEAEs was highest during Year 1 (FOS, n = 269 [86.5 %]; FBTCS, n = 95 [86.4 %]; GTCS, n = 15 [78.9 %]), compared with Years 2-4; the most common (≥10 % of patients) were dizziness, somnolence, and nasopharyngitis. No new safety signals emerged with long-term treatment. CONCLUSIONS This post hoc analysis suggests that long-term (≤2 years) adjunctive perampanel (≤12 mg/day) is efficacious and generally well tolerated in adolescent patients with FOS, with or without FBTCS, or GTCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Eric Piña-Garza
- The Children's Hospital at TriStar Centennial, 330 23rd Avenue North, Suite 580, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
| | - Vicente Villanueva
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
| | - William Rosenfeld
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Care Center for Children and Adults, 11134 Conway Road, St. Louis, MO 63131, USA.
| | - Harumi Yoshinaga
- National Hospital Organization, Minami-Okayama Medical Center, 4066 Hayashimacho Hayashima, Tsukubo-gun, Okayama 701-0304, Japan.
| | - Anna Patten
- Eisai Europe Ltd., Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9SN, UK.
| | - Manoj Malhotra
- Formerly: Eisai Inc., 200 Metro Blvd., Nutley, NJ 07110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Alonso-Singer P, Aguilar-Amat Prior MJ, Oliva-Navarro J, Massot-Tarrús A, Giráldez BG, Bermejo P, DeToledo-Heras M, Aledo-Serrano Á, Martínez-Cayuelas E, Tirado-Requero P, Velázquez-Fragua R, López-Sobrino G, Ojeda J. Perampanel as adjuvant treatment in epileptic encephalopathies: A multicenter study in routine clinical practice. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 134:108836. [PMID: 35870432 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are a heterogeneous group of syndromes, including Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), which are refractory to multiple therapies. Perampanel efficacy has been reported in LGS but further real-world evidence is needed in DEEs. METHODS A multicenter, retrospective, 1-year observational study in patients with DEEs on adjuvant perampanel treatment was conducted to assess perampanel safety and effectiveness in this type of patients in a real-world setting. Seizure types [focal onset seizures (FOS), generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), tonic seizures (TS), atonic seizures (AtS), atypical absences (AA), and myoclonic seizures (MS)] and seizure clusters were divided in different frequency groups: daily, weekly, and monthly seizures, and absent or seizure freedom. Patients could have more than one seizure type. For each frequency group, group change and seizure freedom were analyzed. RESULTS Eighty-seven patients diagnosed with DEEs (45 males) of median age 22 [1-70] years were included. The most frequent DEEs were LGS (35.6%) and Lennox-like syndrome (37.9%). At baseline 20 patients had three to five types of seizures, 36 patients had two types of seizures and 31 patients had one predominant type of seizure. The mean number of seizure types per patient at baseline was 2.12 ± 0.97 which was reduced to 1.62 ± 0.91 at 12 months (p < 0.001). Overall, 51.7% of patients had a significant improvement in at least one seizure type. At baseline, 45 patients had GTCS, 42 FOS, 41 TS, 18 AA, 16 AtS, 11 MS, and 30 seizures clusters. Seizure freedom for each specific type at 12 months was significantly achieved by 35% of patients with GTCS (p < 0.001), 17% (p = 0.016) with TS and 37% with seizure clusters (p < 0.001). Patients achieved seizure freedom from other seizure types but with no statistical significance: 7% FOS-free, 28% AA-free, 6% Ats-free, and 18% MS-free. Regarding changes of group at 12 months, 22% of TS and 19% of FOS improved significantly to a group with lower seizure frequency (p = 0.004 and p = 0.02, respectively). In remaining groups (4% of GTCS, 11% of AA, 18% of Ats, 18% of MS, and 13% of seizure clusters), the improvement was not statistically significant. Twenty-nine patients discontinued perampanel: 18 (21%) due to AEs, 8 (9%) due to lack of efficacy, and 3 (3%) due to seizure worsening. Adverse events, mostly mild or moderate, were reported in 53% of patients, and irritability/mood changes (22%) and somnolence (17%) were the most frequent. CONCLUSION This is the first large-scale real-world study with perampanel across different seizure types in patients with DEEs. Perampanel was effective, especially in GTCS, TS, and FOS, as well as in seizure clusters. Perampanel was generally well-tolerated without unexpected AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Alonso-Singer
- Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Service, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | - Andreu Massot-Tarrús
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Neurology, General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz G Giráldez
- Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Service, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pedro Bermejo
- Epilepsy Unit, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain
| | | | - Ángel Aledo-Serrano
- Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, Ruber Internacional Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Joaquín Ojeda
- Neurology Unit, University Hospital Infanta Sofía, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Estévez-María JC, Garamendi-Ruiz I. The real-world effectiveness and safety of perampanel in Europe: A scoping review. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 134:108777. [PMID: 35816832 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In order to characterize the real-world effectiveness and safety of perampanel during clinical use in Europe, we conducted a structured literature search and scoping review of real-world studies conducted in Europe in adolescents (aged ≥ 12 years) or adults who were prescribed perampanel for focal epilepsy or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the context of idiopathic generalized epilepsy, published between January 2016 and July 2021. We identified 29 relevant studies (20 retrospective and 9 prospective) in 3608 patients; median study duration was 12 months. Most patients (76.1%) were receiving two or more antiseizure drugs (ASDs) when perampanel was initiated. The maintenance perampanel dose ranged from 2 to 16 mg/day (most commonly 6 mg/day). Retention rate at 12 months ranged from 46% to 90.5% (median 71.1%). The proportion of patients who were free of seizures during perampanel ranged from 1.8% to 84.6%, but were consistently below 20% in studies where patients had received an average of ≥5 prior ASDs and above 20% where patients had received an average of <5 prior ASDs. The proportion of patients who achieved ≥50% reduction in seizures during perampanel ranged from 20.0% to 85.7%. Across all studies, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) ranged from 18.2% to 67.4% (median 37.1%) and discontinuation due to AEs from 6.2% to 56% (median 12.5%). Discontinuation rates tended to be higher in UK studies than in studies from Italy or Spain. The most commonly reported individual AEs were dizziness/vertigo (median incidence 13.7%), somnolence (median 11.9%), aggression (median 9.8%), irritability (median 9.1%), and cognitive deficits (median 7.0%). There was no relationship between the overall rate of AEs and perampanel dose, perampanel plasma levels, or number of concomitant medications. Our global overview of European observational studies with perampanel provides evidence that this agent is effective and safe in clinical practice in a range of countries, patients, and settings.
Collapse
|
43
|
Operto FF, Orsini A, Sica G, Scuoppo C, Padovano C, Vivenzio V, de Simone V, Rinaldi R, Belfiore G, Mazza R, Aiello S, Vetri L, Donadio S, Labate A, Pastorino GMG. Perampanel and childhood absence epilepsy: A real life experience. Front Neurol 2022; 13:952900. [PMID: 36034267 PMCID: PMC9404324 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.952900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) as first add-on and as second line monotherapy in subjects with childhood absence epilepsy. Methods Our sample consisted of 20 patients with childhood absence epilepsy, aged between 8 and 10, already in therapy with a first antiseizure medication with incomplete seizure control. PER was added as first add-on in a dose ranging from 3 to 8 mg/die with 1- 2 mg/week increments. The patients that were seizure-free were shifted to a PER monotherapy. All patients underwent a standardized neuropsychological evaluation in order to assess non-verbal intelligence and executive functions before adding PER and after 6 months of drug therapy. All parents completed two questionnaires, in order to assess the emotional-behavioral problems and parental stress. Results 15/20 patients responded to add-on PER and were seizure-free, in 3/20 patients we observed a reduction of seizure frequency <50%, and in the 2 remaining patients the add-on therapy with PER did not lead to a reduction in seizures frequency from baseline. The patients who were seizure-free were switched to PER monotherapy. 9/15 patients remained seizure-free in monotherapy with PER. In the first month of therapy with PER 2/20 patients (10%) reported mild, transient side effects of irritability, headache and dizziness, which did not lead to discontinuation of therapy. Adjunctive treatment with PER did not negatively affect non-verbal intelligence, executive functions, emotional/behavioral symptoms of children and parental stress levels. Significance Our clinical experience in real life showed that PER appears to be effective in the control of absence seizures in childhood absence epilepsy, with a favorable tolerability profile. PER would seem effective on absence seizures even in monotherapy. Further studies with larger samples, longer follow-up and controlled vs. placebo (or other first choice antiseizure medications) are needed to confirm our data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Felicia Operto
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
- *Correspondence: Francesca Felicia Operto
| | - Alessandro Orsini
- Pediatric Neurology, Pediatric Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Scuoppo
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Chiara Padovano
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Valentina Vivenzio
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Valeria de Simone
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Rosetta Rinaldi
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Gilda Belfiore
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Roberta Mazza
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Salvatore Aiello
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Luigi Vetri
- OASI Research Institute- IRCCS, Troina, Italy
| | - Serena Donadio
- Department of Psychology, Educational and Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Angelo Labate
- Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Grazia Maria Giovanna Pastorino
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Stritzelberger J, Walther K, Olmes D, Gollwitzer S, Graf W, Welte TM, Lang JD, Reindl C, Schwab S, Kriwy P, Hamer HM. Antiseizure medication and perceived "fair" cost allocation: a factorial survey among neurologists, persons with epilepsy, their relatives and a control group. Epilepsia 2022; 63:2694-2702. [PMID: 35892320 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As resources are limited in modern healthcare systems, the decision on the allocation of expensive drugs can be supported by a public consent. This study examines how various factors influence subjectively perceived "fair" pricing of antiseizure medication (ASM) among four groups including physicians, persons with epilepsy (PWE), their relatives and a control group. METHODS We conducted a factorial survey. Vignettes featured a fictional PWE receiving a fictional ASM. The characteristics of the fictional PWE, ASM and epilepsy varied. Participants were asked to assess the subjectively appropriate annual cost of ASM treatment per year for each scenario. RESULTS 57 PWE (age 37.7 ± 12.3, 45.6 % females), 44 relatives (age 48.4 ± 15.7, 51.1 % females), 46 neurologists (age 37.1 ± 9.6, 65.2 % females) and 47 persons in the control group (age 31.2 ± 11.2, 68.1 % females) completed the questionnaire. The amount of money that respondents were willing to spend for ASM-treatment was higher than currently needed in Germany and increased with disease severity among all groups. All groups except for PWE accepted higher costs of a drug with better seizure control. Physicians and the control group, but not PWE and their relatives, tended to do so also for minor or no side effects. Physicians reduced the costs for unemployed patients and the control group spent less money for older patients. SIGNIFICANCE ASM effectiveness appears to justify higher costs. However, the control group attributed less money to older PWE and physicians allocated fewer drug costs to unemployed PWE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Stritzelberger
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Katrin Walther
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - David Olmes
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Gollwitzer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Graf
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Johannes D Lang
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Caroline Reindl
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stefan Schwab
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter Kriwy
- Institute of Sociology, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Hajo M Hamer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
There are numerous potential factors that may affect growth in children with epilepsy, and these must be evaluated in any child with appetite and weight concerns. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) have potential adverse effects, and many may affect appetite, thus impacting normal growth and weight gain. The aim of this review is to focus on the impact of both epilepsy and ASMs on appetite and weight in children. We systematically reviewed studies using Medline assessing the impact of ASMs on appetite and weight in children. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and open-label studies (open-label extension and interventional) that targeted or included the pediatric population (0-18 years of age). Each study was classified using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Classification of Evidence for Therapeutic Studies, and the level of evidence for impact on appetite and weight in children was graded. ASMs associated with decreased appetite and/or weight loss include fenfluramine, topiramate, zonisamide, felbamate, rufinamide, stiripentol, cannabidiol, brivaracetam and ethosuximide; ASMs with minimal impact on weight and appetite in children include oxcarbazepine, eslicarbazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, lacosamide, carbamazepine, vigabatrin and clobazam. The ASM most robustly associated with increased appetite and/or weight gain is valproic acid; however, both pregabalin and perampanel may also lead to modest weight gain or increased appetite in children. Certain ASMs may impact both appetite and weight, which may lead to increased morbidity of the underlying disease and impaired adherence to the treatment regimen.
Collapse
|
46
|
Kim JH, Kim DW, Lee SK, Seo DW, Lee JW, Kim MY, Lee SA. Perampanel as First Add-On Therapy in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures in the FAME Trial: <i>Post hoc</i> Analyses of Efficacy and Safety Related to Maintenance Dose and Background Antiepileptic Drug Therapy. J Epilepsy Res 2022; 12:13-20. [PMID: 35910326 PMCID: PMC9289376 DOI: 10.14581/jer.22003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: FAME (Fycompa<sup>®</sup> as first Add-on to Monotherapy in patients with Epilepsy; NCT02726074), a previously reported single-arm, phase IV study, showed that perampanel improved seizure control as first add-on to failed anti-seizure medication (ASM) monotherapy in 85 South Korean patients aged ≥12 years with focal-onset seizures (FOS) with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. We present results of three <i>post hoc</i> analyses of FAME that further assessed the efficacy and safety of perampanel.Methods: Patients were stratified by low- (4, 6 mg/day) versus high- (8, 10, 12 mg/day) dose maintenance perampanel, perampanel added to first- versus second-line ASM monotherapy, and concomitant background ASM monotherapy and perampanel dose. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a ≥50% reduction in total seizure frequency during the 24-week maintenance period. Safety was assessed by the descriptive incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).Results: In <i>post hoc</i> analyses, 50% responder rates were significantly higher for low- versus high-dose maintenance perampanel (88.6% vs. 40.0%; <i>p</i><0.001) and when added to first- versus second-line ASM monotherapy (83.5% vs. 33.3%; <i>p</i>=0.013). By concomitant background ASM and perampanel maintenance dose, 50% responder rates were 100% for perampanel 4 mg/day added to carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, or valproic acid, and 85% when added to levetiracetam. Add-on perampanel improved 75% and seizure-free responder rates, and median percent changes from baseline seizure frequency per 28 days. Perampanel was well tolerated when added to ASM monotherapy, with dizziness being the most common TEAE.Conclusions: <i>Post hoc</i> analyses of FAME provide supportive data for the use of perampanel as an effective and well-tolerated first add-on treatment to a broad spectrum of ASM monotherapies in patients with FOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hyun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Neurology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Kun Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dae-Won Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - Sang Ahm Lee
- Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kim DW, Kim JH, Lee SK, Lee SA, Lee JW, Kim MY, Seo DW. Perampanel as First Adjunctive Treatment in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures in the FAME Study: <i>Post hoc</i> Analyses of Dose-Related Efficacy, Safety and Clinical Factors Associated with Response. J Epilepsy Res 2022; 12:6-12. [PMID: 35910330 PMCID: PMC9289380 DOI: 10.14581/jer.22002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Perampanel is approved for the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures (FOS) with or without secondary generalized seizures. The FAME (Fycompa<sup>®</sup> as first Add-on to Monotherapy in patients with Epilepsy; NCT02726074) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of perampanel added to monotherapy in patients with FOS with or without secondary generalized seizures (SGS). <i>Post hoc</i> analyses of the FAME study assessed potential predictors of response and an in-depth evaluation of the safety and efficacy of perampanel.Methods: Efficacy was assessed by reduction of total seizure frequency by ≥50%, ≥75% or 100%, and safety by incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for treatment response were performed.Results: Most patients (82/85) received perampanel doses of 4-8 mg/day during maintenance therapy and the highest efficacy rates were achieved with 4 mg/day, irrespective of efficacy outcome. Doses of 4 or 6 mg/day in patients with FOS with SGS (n=16) produced comparable efficacy outcomes. In multivariate analysis, total perampanel dose was predictive of 50% and 75% response rates; longer total perampanel administration period with 50% response; and concomitant non-anti-seizure medication with a 100% response. Patients developed a TEAE more frequently during the 12-week titration period (60.2%) than the 24-week maintenance period (28.4%), including dizziness (45.5% vs. 9.1%), somnolence (10.2% vs. 0%), and headache (4.5% vs. 3.4%).Conclusions: <i>Post hoc</i> analyses show that even low doses of perampanel may be effective and TEAEs are usually self-limited or well-tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Neurology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Kun Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Ahm Lee
- Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - Dae-Won Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nucera B, Brigo F, Trinka E, Kalss G. Treatment and care of women with epilepsy before, during, and after pregnancy: a practical guide. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2022; 15:17562864221101687. [PMID: 35706844 PMCID: PMC9189531 DOI: 10.1177/17562864221101687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Women with epilepsy (WWE) wishing for a child represent a highly relevant subgroup of epilepsy patients. The treating epileptologist needs to delineate the epilepsy syndrome and choose the appropriate anti-seizure medication (ASM) considering the main goal of seizure freedom, teratogenic risks, changes in drug metabolism during pregnancy and postpartum, demanding for up-titration during and down-titration after pregnancy. Folic acid or vitamin K supplements and breastfeeding are also discussed in this review. Lamotrigine and levetiracetam have the lowest teratogenic potential. Data on teratogenic risks are also favorable for oxcarbazepine, whereas topiramate tends to have an unfavorable profile. Valproate needs special emphasis. It is most effective in generalized seizures but should be avoided whenever possible due to its teratogenic effects and the negative impact on neuropsychological development of in utero-exposed children. Valproate still has its justification in patients not achieving seizure freedom with other ASMs or if a woman decides to or cannot become pregnant for any reason. When valproate is the most appropriate treatment option, the patient and caregiver must be fully informed of the risks associated with its use during pregnancies. Folate supplementation is recommended to reduce the risk of major congenital malformations. However, there is insufficient information to address the optimal dose and it is unclear whether higher doses offer greater protection. There is currently no general recommendation for a peripartum vitamin K prophylaxis. During pregnancy most ASMs (e.g. lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and levetiracetam) need to be increased to compensate for the decline in serum levels; exceptions are valproate and carbamazepine. Postpartum, baseline levels are reached relatively fast, and down-titration is performed empirically. Many ASMs in monotherapy are (moderately) safe for breastfeeding and women should be encouraged to do so. This review provides a practically oriented overview of the complex management of WWE before, during, and after pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruna Nucera
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano-Meran, Italy
| | - Francesco Brigo
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano-Meran, Italy
| | - Eugen Trinka
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Gudrun Kalss
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Ignaz-Harrer-Str. 79, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Perampanel for the treatment of patients with myoclonic seizures in clinical practice: Evidence from the PERMIT study. Seizure 2022; 100:56-66. [PMID: 35777333 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of perampanel (PER) in treating myoclonic seizures in clinical practice, using data from the PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study. METHODS PERMIT was a pooled analysis of 44 real-world studies from 17 countries, in which patients with focal and generalised epilepsy were treated with PER. This post-hoc analysis included patients with myoclonic seizures at baseline. Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months; effectiveness was additionally assessed at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness assessments included responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit). Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs. RESULTS 156 patients had myoclonic seizures (59.0% female; mean age, 32.1 years; idiopathic generalised epilepsy, 89.1%; Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy, 63.1%; monthly median myoclonic seizure frequency [interquartile range], 1.7 [1.0-10.0]; mean [standard deviation] prior antiseizure medications, 2.9 [2.6]). Retention was assessed for 133 patients (mean time, 12.1 months), effectiveness for 142, and safety/tolerability for 156. Responder and seizure freedom rates were, respectively, 89.5% and 68.8% at 12 months, and 85.9% and 63.4% at the last visit. Incidence of AEs was 46.8%, the most frequent being dizziness/vertigo (19.2%), irritability (18.6%) and somnolence (9.6%). AEs led to discontinuation of 14.0% of patients over 12 months. CONCLUSION PER was associated with reduction in myoclonic seizure frequency in patients with myoclonic seizures treated in everyday clinical practice.
Collapse
|
50
|
Altered Calcium Permeability of AMPA Receptor Drives NMDA Receptor Inhibition in the Hippocampus of Murine Obesity Models. Mol Neurobiol 2022; 59:4902-4925. [PMID: 35657456 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-022-02834-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Evidence has accumulated that higher consumption of high-fat diets (HFDs) during the juvenile/adolescent period induces altered hippocampal function and morphology; however, the mechanism behind this phenomenon remains elusive. Using high-resolution structural imaging combined with molecular and functional interrogation, a murine model of obesity treated with HFDs for 12 weeks after weaning mice was shown to change in the glutamate-mediated intracellular calcium signaling and activity, including further selective reduction of gray matter volume in the hippocampus associated with memory recall disturbance. Dysregulation of intracellular calcium concentrations was restored by a non-competitive α-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) antagonist, followed by normalization of hippocampal volume and memory recall ability, indicating that AMPARs may serve as an attractive therapeutic target for obesity-associated cognitive decline.
Collapse
|