Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in 2 patients with multiple sclerosis treated with alemtuzumab

A safety review of current monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have shown efficacy in reducing MS relapse rates, disease progression, and brain lesion activity.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the literature on the use of mAbs for the treatment of MS, including their mechanisms of action, clinical trial data, safety profiles, and long-term outcomes. The review focuses on the three main categories of mAbs used in MS: alemtuzumab, natalizumab, and anti-CD20 drugs. A literature search was conducted using relevant keywords and guidelines and reports from regulatory agencies were reviewed. The search covered studies published from inception to 31 December 202231 December 2022. The article also discusses the potential risks and benefits of these therapies, including their effects on infection rates, malignancies, and vaccination efficacy.

EXPERT OPINION

Monoclonal antibodies have revolutionized the treatment of MS, but safety concerns must be considered, particularly with regards to infection rates, malignancy risk, and vaccination efficacy. Clinicians must weigh the potential benefits and risks of mAbs on an individual patient basis, taking into account factors such as age, disease severity, and comorbidities. Ongoing monitoring and surveillance are essential to ensure the long-term safety and effectiveness of monoclonal antibody therapies in MS.

The role of autoimmune antibodies to predict secondary autoimmunity in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with alemtuzumab: A nationwide prospective survey

Background

Alemtuzumab (ALZ) is an immune reconstitution therapy for treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, ALZ increases the risk of secondary autoimmune diseases (SADs).

Objective

We explored whether the detection of autoimmune antibodies (auto-Abs) could predict the development of SADs.

Methods

We included all patients with RRMS in Sweden who initiated ALZ treatment (n = 124, 74 female subjects) from 2009 to 2019. The presence of auto-Abs was determined in plasma samples obtained at the baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up, as well as in a subgroup of patients (n = 51), it was determined in plasma samples obtained at the remaining 3-month intervals up to 24 months. Monthly blood tests, urine tests, and the assessment of clinical symptoms were performed for monitoring safety including that of SADs.

Results

Autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) developed in 40% of patients, within a median follow-up of 4.5 years. Thyroid auto-Abs were detected in 62% of patients with AITD. The presence of thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAbs) at the baseline increased the risk of AITD by 50%. At 24 months, thyroid auto-Abs were detected in 27 patients, and 93% (25/27) developed AITD. Among patients without thyroid auto-Abs, only 30% (15/51) developed AITD (p < 0.0001). In the subgroup of patients (n = 51) with more frequent sampling for auto-Abs, 27 patients developed ALZ-induced AITD, and 19 of them had detectable thyroid auto-Abs prior to the AITD onset, with a median interval of 216 days. Eight patients (6.5%) developed non-thyroid SAD, and none had detectable non-thyroid auto-Abs.

Conclusion

We conclude that monitoring thyroid auto-Abs, essentially TRAbs, may improve the surveillance of AITD associated with ALZ treatment. The risk for non-thyroid SADs was low, and monitoring non-thyroid auto-Abs did not seem to provide any additional information for predicting non-thyroid SADs.

An unforeseen reality: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis following alemtuzumab treatment for a multiple sclerosis

Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody indicated for treatment of highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (HA-RRMS). It binds to CD52 antigen and produces a rapid and prolonged lymphocyte depletion followed by a different pattern of T and B cell repopulation. Among others, its adverse events are autoimmune diseases.In this article, we present a patient with HA-RRMS, who was subsequently treated with alemtuzumab and afterwards developed hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Albeit rarely, HLH can be triggered by alemtuzumab treatment.HLH can favourably respond to prompt immunosuppressant therapy.Multidisciplinary approach by a team consisting of a neurology, hematology and rheumatology specialist is needed to treat this potentially lethal condition.

Intrathoracic infections in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients may cooperate with HL to trigger hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: A retrospective study

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)-related hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) has been reported in the literature; however, there is almost no literature on the factors related to HL triggering HLH. One hundred forty patients with HL were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of HL-related HLH (we call HL-related HLH as HL-HLH). And all HL-HLH patients in our cohort had HLH as the first manifestation and its clinical characteristics and the role of intrathoracic infection (ITI) in triggering HLH are discussed. The 140 patients with HL mainly included mixed-cellularity classic HL (MCCHL) in 81 (57.9%), nodular sclerosis classic HL (NSCHL) in 36 (25.7%), and lymphacyte-rich classic HL in 14 (10.0%) patients. Of the 137 patients who underwent chest computed tomography scans on admission, 44 had ITI, and most of these ITI were mildly ill and had no respiratory symptoms. Among 140 HL patients, 8 patients from MCCHL were diagnosed as HL-HLH. Among 81 MCCHL patients, 26 patients with ITI had a significantly higher incidence of HL-HLH than those without ITI (26.9% vs 1.8%, P = .002). The median survival time of 8 cases of HL-HLH was only 2 months. When HL patients were first admitted to the hospital, 5.7% had HLH as the first manifestation, and 32.1% had ITI. These ITI can cooperate with HL to trigger HLH, despite their mild illness. The prognosis of HL-HLH was poor.

Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: an Overview with Emphasis on Pregnancy, Vaccination, and Risk Management

Monoclonal antibodies have become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and provide some benefit to patients with primary progressive MS. They are highly precise by specifically targeting molecules displayed on cells involved in distinct immune mechanisms of MS pathophysiology. They not only differ in the target antigen they recognize but also by the mode of action that generates their therapeutic effect. Natalizumab, an [Formula: see text]4[Formula: see text]1 integrin antagonist, works via binding to cell surface receptors, blocking the interaction with their ligands and, in that way, preventing the migration of leukocytes across the blood-brain barrier. On the other hand, the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab work via eliminating selected pathogenic cell populations. However, potential adverse effects may be serious and can necessitate treatment discontinuation. Most importantly, those are the risk for (opportunistic) infections, but also secondary autoimmune diseases or malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies also carry the risk of infusion/injection-related reactions, primarily in early phases of treatment. By careful patient selection and monitoring during therapy, the occurrence of these potentially serious adverse effects can be minimized. Monoclonal antibodies are characterized by a relatively long pharmacologic half-life and pharmacodynamic effects, which provides advantages such as permitting infrequent dosing, but also creates disadvantages regarding vaccination and family planning. This review presents an overview of currently available monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of RMS, including their mechanism of action, efficacy and safety profile. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for risk management, vaccination, and family planning.

Safety of alemtuzumab in a nationwide cohort of Finnish multiple sclerosis patients

Background

Alemtuzumab is an effective disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). However, safety concerns limit its use in clinical practice.

Objectives

To evaluate the safety of alemtuzumab in a nationwide cohort of Finnish MS patients.

Methods

In this retrospective case series study, we analyzed the data of all but two MS patients who had received alemtuzumab in Finland until 2019. Data were systematically collected from patient files.

Results

Altogether 121 patients were identified, most of whom had received previous DMTs (82.6%). Median follow-up time after treatment initiation was 30.3 months and exceeded 24 months in 78 patients. Infusion-associated reactions (IARs) were observed in 84.3%, 57.3%, and 57.1% of patients during alemtuzumab courses 1–3, respectively. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed in 32.2% of patients, serious IARs in 12.4% of patients, and SAEs other than IARs in 23.1% of patients. Autoimmune adverse events were observed in 30.6% of patients. One patient died of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and one patient died of pneumonia. A previously unreported case of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura was documented.

Conclusions

SAEs were more frequent in the present cohort than in previous studies. Even though alemtuzumab is a highly effective therapy for MS, vigorous monitoring with a long enough follow-up time is advised.

Efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab over 6 years: final results of the 4-year CARE-MS extension trial

BACKGROUND

In the 2-year CARE-MS I and II trials, alemtuzumab 12 mg administered on 5 consecutive days at core study baseline and on 3 consecutive days 12 months later significantly improved outcomes versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Here, we present the final 6-year CARE-MS extension trial results (CAMMS03409), and compare outcomes over 6 years in patients randomized to both treatment groups at core study baseline.

METHODS

Over a 4-year extension, alemtuzumab patients (alemtuzumab-only) received as-needed additional alemtuzumab (⩾12 months apart) for disease activity after course 2. SC IFNB-1a patients who entered the extension discontinued SC IFNB-1a and received 2 alemtuzumab 12 mg courses (IFN-alemtuzumab), followed by additional, as-needed, alemtuzumab.

RESULTS

Through year 6, 63% of CARE-MS I and 50% of CARE-MS II alemtuzumab-only patients received neither additional alemtuzumab nor other disease-modifying therapy, with lasting suppression of disease activity, improved disability, and slowing of brain volume loss (BVL). In CARE-MS I patients (treatment-naive; less disability; shorter disease duration), disease activity and BVL were significantly reduced in IFN-alemtuzumab patients, similar to alemtuzumab-only patients at year 6. Among CARE-MS II patients (inadequate response to prior treatment; more disability; longer disease duration), alemtuzumab significantly improved clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes, including BVL, in IFN-alemtuzumab patients; however, disability outcomes were less favorable versus alemtuzumab-only patients. Safety profiles, including infections and autoimmunities, following alemtuzumab were similar between treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the high efficacy of alemtuzumab over 6 years, with a similar safety profile between treatment groups.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIERS

NCT00530348; NCT00548405; NCT00930553.

Clinical Management of Relapsed/Refractory Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Adult Patients: A Review of Current Strategies and Emerging Therapies

Introduction

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a severe disorder with high mortality. The aim of this review is to update clinical management of relapsed/refractory HLH in adults, with a focus on current and new therapies.

Methods

We searched relevant articles in Embase and PUBMED with the MESH term “hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; refractory; relapsing; adult.”

Results

One hundred eight papers were found; of these, 22 were retained for this review. The treatment of HLH in adult is based on the HLH-94 regimen. The response rate is lower than in pediatric patients, and 20–30% are refractory to this therapy. DEP regimen and allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are associated with complete response and partial response in 27% and 49.2%, respectively. However, many patients fail to achieve a stable condition before HSCT, and mortality is higher in them. New drugs have been developed, such as emapalumab, ruxolitinib, and alemtuzumab, and they may be used as bridges to the curative HSCT. They are relatively well tolerated and have few or mild side effects. With these agents, the rate of partial response ranges from 14.2% to 100%, while the rate of complete response is highly variable according to study and medication used. The number of patients who achieved HSCT ranged from 44.8% to 77%, with a survival rate of 55.9% to 100%. However, the populations in these studies are mainly composed of mixed-age patients (pediatric and adult patients), and studies including only adult patients are scarce.

Conclusion

Relapsed or refractory HLH in adult patients is associated with poor outcome, and consolidation with HSCT may be required in some cases. Mortality related to HSCT is mainly due to active HLH disease before HSCT and post HSCT complications. New drugs, such as empalumab, ruxolitinib, and alemtuzumab are interesting since these agents may be used as bridges to HSCT with increases in the numbers of patients proceeding to HSCT and survival rate.

Role of Monoclonal Antibody "Alemtuzumab" in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis

This article will review current treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS) while keeping our primary focus on alemtuzumab, as it is now approved in more than 65 countries. From a pathophysiological point of view, MS is a disabling disease impacting a patient's life both physically and mentally, leading to devastating social and economic impact. This review will elaborate on alemtuzumab's role in treating relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) by comparing its efficacy, side effects, and monitoring with other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) available in the market. It is a point of great concern not only for physicians but also for neurologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, dermatologists, and oncologists when encountering long-term effects of alemtuzumab in the life of treated MS patients. We hope that our review will not only benefit treating faculties but also those who are suffering from this devastating disease.

Prevention and management of adverse effects of disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the currently known side effects of the approved therapies of multiple sclerosis and to suggest monitoring procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The progress in the treatment of multiple sclerosis with new very effective therapies is accompanied by a number of side effects. Some of these have already been described in the approval studies, but some only after approval in a real world situation. The reason for this is the short duration of the clinical studies, the very heterogeneous patient profile in the real world setting with a number of comorbidities, pretherapies, and wider age range. The side effects may occur during application of therapies or afterwards during the course of the treatment. The side effects may range from mild infections, mild laboratory abnormalities, secondary autoimmune diseases to life-threatening side effects such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

SUMMARY

It has to be pointed out that these side effects are not to be considered as final and neurologists should be vigilant against new unknown side effects. The doctor should be aware of these undesirable effects, should weigh the benefits of the therapies against the risks, but at the same time she/he should keep in mind that multiple sclerosis can be a very disabling disease if not treated properly.

Safety of Newer Disease Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for multiple sclerosis has expanded greatly. Newer more potent disease modifying therapies (DMTs) with varying mechanisms of actions are increasingly used early in the disease course. These newer DMTs include oral therapies (teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and cladribine) and infusion therapies (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab), and are associated with better control of disease activity and long-term outcomes in patients with MS compared to older injectable therapies (interferon beta and glatiramer acetate). However, they are associated with safety concerns and subsequent monitoring requirements. Adverse events are initially observed in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, and further long-term data are collected in phase 3 extension studies, case series, and post-marketing reports, which highlight the need to periodically re-evaluate and adjust monitoring strategies to optimize treatment safety in an individualized approach.

Case Report: Adult Still's Disease in an Alemtuzumab-Treated Multiple Sclerosis Patient

Background

Autoimmune adverse events are the most relevant risks of alemtuzumab therapy. We present a patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, who developed adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) following alemtuzumab treatment.

Case Presentation

The patient suffered from sore throat, swallowing difficulties, high spiking quotidian fever, generalized skin rash, arthritis, and myalgia 2 months after the second course of alemtuzumab. Laboratory tests revealed elevated acute-phase reactants, anemia, neutrophilic leukocytosis, and thrombocytosis. Serum calprotectin, interleukin-2, and interleukin-6 levels were strongly increased. Autoimmune, rheumatic, neoplastic, infectious, and granulomatous disorders were excluded. The NLRP1 and NLRP3 gene test, which was performed under the presumption of a cryopyrin-associated autoinflammatory syndrome, was negative. Based on the Yamaguchi and Fautrel criteria, and supported by the histological findings from a skin biopsy of the rash, the diagnosis of AOSD was established. Therapy with the anti-IL-1 agent (anakinra) led to a significant improvement of symptoms and blood parameters. However, anakinra had to be converted to rituximab due to generalized drug eruption. Following therapy with rituximab, the patient has fully recovered.

Conclusion

The current case highlights AOSD as another rare and potentially life-threatening secondary autoinflammatory/autoimmune event following alemtuzumab treatment.

Established and Emerging Immunological Complications of Biological Therapeutics in Multiple Sclerosis

Biologic immunotherapies have transformed the treatment landscape of multiple sclerosis. Such therapies include recombinant proteins (interferon beta), as well as monoclonal antibodies (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, daclizumab, rituximab and ocrelizumab). Monoclonal antibodies show particular efficacy in the treatment of the inflammatory phase of multiple sclerosis. However, the immunological perturbations caused by biologic therapies are associated with significant immunological adverse reactions. These include development of neutralising immunogenicity, secondary immunodeficiency and secondary autoimmunity. These complications can affect the balance of risks and benefits of biologic agents, and 2018 saw the withdrawal from the market of daclizumab, an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody, due to concerns about the development of severe, unpredictable autoimmunity. Here we review established and emerging risks associated with multiple sclerosis biologic agents, with an emphasis on their immunological adverse effects. We also discuss the specific challenges that multiple sclerosis biologics pose to drug safety systems, and the potential for improvements in safety frameworks.

Hemophagocytic syndrome following alemtuzumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD-52, used for treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

We present a case of a 44-year-old male with RRMS who was admitted due to fever and jaundice after starting treatment with alemtuzumab 12 months ago.

RESULTS

He was diagnosed with hemophagocytic syndrome (HS). Liver biopsy revealed images of hemophagocytosis in Kupffer cells of lobular sinusoid. Management consisted of treatment with corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

HS is a severe condition marked by an excessive activation of the immune system that leads to a rapid and progressive multi-organ failure, so it is important to consider it in the differential diagnosis of a fever syndrome following the administration of alemtuzumab.

Managing Risks with Immune Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

Since the introduction of the interferons in the 1990s, a multitude of different immunomodulatory and immunosuppressant disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been developed. They have all shown positive effects on clinical endpoints such as relapse rate and disease progression and are a heterogeneous group of therapeutics comprising recombinant pegylated and non-pegylated interferon-β variants, peptide combinations, monoclonal antibodies, and small molecules. However, they have relevant side effect profiles, which necessitate thorough monitoring and straightforward patient education. In individual cases, side effects can be severe and potentially life-threatening, which is why knowledge about (neurological and non-neurological) adverse drug reactions is essential for prescribing neurologists as well as general practitioners. This paper aims to provide an overview of currently available MS therapies, their modes of action and safety profiles, and the necessary therapy monitoring.

Adverse events with fatal outcome associated with alemtuzumab treatment in multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Sporadic fatal adverse events have been reported during treatment of multiple sclerosis with alemtuzumab. To provide a systematic overview, we searched the centralized European Medicines Agency database of suspected adverse reactions related to medicinal products (EudraVigilance) for fatal adverse events associated with treatment with alemtuzumab (Lemtrada®) for multiple sclerosis. Four independent reviewers with expertise on MS, clinical immunology, infectious diseases and clinical pharmacology reviewed the reports, and scored the likelihood for causality.

RESULTS

We identified nine cases with a probable and one case with a possible causal relationship between alemtuzumab treatment and a fatal adverse event. Six of these patients died within one month after treatment; one from intracerebral hemorrhage, two from acute multiple organ failure and septic shock, one from listeriosis, one from pneumonia and one from agranulocytosis. Four patients died several months after administration of alemtuzumab from either autoimmune hepatitis, immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia or agranulocytosis. Four of the 10 cases had been published previously in case reports or congress abstracts. Fatal adverse events related to treatment with alemtuzumab occur more frequently than previously published in the literature. A significant proportion occurs in the first month after treatment.

Pretreatment anti-thyroid autoantibodies indicate increased risk for thyroid autoimmunity secondary to alemtuzumab: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab is approved for the treatment of active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Alemtuzumab-related secondary autoimmune disorders (sAID) are common, with thyroid sAID being the most frequent, and fundamentally affect the risk-benefit ratio. Therefore, biomarkers indicating the development of sAID are urgently needed to instruct clinical decisions.

METHODS

We evaluated whether the anti-thyroid autoantibodies (ThyAb) anti-thyroglobulin (anti-TG) and anti-thyroid-peroxidase (anti-TPO) detected at baseline by standard testing are able to indicate increased risk for thyroid sAID following alemtuzumab treatment in a multicentre prospective cohort of 106 alemtuzumab-treated RRMS patients. We here present an interim-analysis with a median follow-up of 36 months.

FINDINGS

Baseline characteristics demonstrated no significant differences between patients with or without thyroid sAID. 29/106 (27·4%) patients developed thyroid sAID between 5 and 51 months following alemtuzumab treatment initiation. 14/29 patients (48·3%) were positive for ThyAb at baseline and developed thyroid sAID. Hazard ratio for time to thyroid autoimmunity was 12.15 (95% CI 4.73-31.2) indicating a highly increased risk for ThyAb positive patients. Baseline ThyAb were associated with shorter time to sAID, but not with a specific disease entity of thyroid sAID. Hazard ratios for age, sex, previous treatment, disease duration, disability and smoking status demonstrated no significant association with thyroid autoimmunity.

INTERPRETATION

Standard ThyAb-testing for anti-TPO and anti-TG antibodies at baseline was able to indicate increased risk for clinically manifest thyroid sAID and should therefore be used in clinical decisions concerning alemtuzumab treatment initiation. FUND: German Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology and the German Research foundation.

Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention or depletion of side effects of therapy with alemtuzumab in multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Not only the multiple sclerosis specialist but also the general neurologist and primary care practitioner are increasingly aware of possible adverse events (AEs) by treatment with alemtuzumab (over 47% risk of secondary autoimmune-mediated diseases). Vitamin D supplementation's effect (VDS) to reduce these autoimmune AEs is poorly performed in routine practice. This article seeks to justify why this simple, inexpensive, patient-friendly therapy should be seriously discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients who have developed autoimmunity also show a high basal level of IL-21, a cytokine which increases the growth of auto-reactive T-cells. For side effects such as thyroid dysfunction, autoimmune thrombocytopenia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, autoimmune hepatitis, diabetes mellitus type 1, and alopecia areata/alopecia totalis, VDS may have an impact on the immunological mechanism, in particular lowering levels of IL-17 and IL-21.

SUMMARY

The potential role of vitamin D in influencing autoimmune diseases is evident. If a life-threatening side-effect can be prevented by high-dose VDS, it is ethical to initiate this add-on therapy despite contradictory results in studies on the effectiveness of VDS.

Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy in multiple sclerosis

Whereas drugs used for maintenance/escalation therapy do not maintain their beneficial effect after cessation of therapy, some new highly effective therapies can show prolonged treatment effects after a short treatment course. Such therapies have been named pulsed immune reconstitution therapies or pulsed immunosuppressive therapies, and typical representatives are alemtuzumab and cladribine. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation could be considered as the strongest immune reconstitution therapy. Both alemtuzumab and cladribine induce depletion of lymphocytes, and a common mechanism of action is preferential depletion of class-switched and unswitched memory B-cells. Whereas CD-19+ B-lymphocytes repopulate within 6 months, CD4+ T-cells repopulate at a slower rate, taking 1–2 years to reach the lower level of normal. In general, the depletion of lymphocytes is more profound and the repletion of T-cells is slower after alemtuzumab than after cladribine treatment. Both drugs have a strong effect on relapses and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, and reduce disability worsening. The therapeutic effect is maintained beyond the period of active treatment in a large proportion of patients, which is best documented for alemtuzumab. Adverse effects include reactivation of latent infections such as tuberculosis and risk of herpes zoster. The main disadvantage in alemtuzumab-treated patients is the risk of secondary immune-mediated disorders. Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy is an option as initial therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients with high disease activity and in patients on treatment with another disease-modifying therapy with significant relapse and/or MRI activity.

Longitudinal Characterization of Autoantibodies to the Thyrotropin Receptor (TRAb) During Alemtuzumab Therapy: Evidence that TRAb May Precede Thyroid Dysfunction by Many Years

BACKGROUND

Thyroid autoimmunity, especially Graves' disease or hypothyroidism with positive autoantibodies (TRAb) to the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR), occurs in 30-40% of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis following treatment with alemtuzumab (ALTZ). ALTZ therapy therefore provides a unique opportunity to study the evolution of TRAb prior to clinical presentation. TRAb can stimulate (TSAb), block (TBAb), or not affect ("neutral") the TSHR function, causing hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, or euthyroidism, respectively.

METHODS

A longitudinal retrospective analysis was conducted of TRAb bioactivity over a period of nine years in 45 multiple sclerosis patients receiving ALTZ using available stored serum. Of these 45 patients, 31 developed thyroid dysfunction (TD) and 14 remained euthyroid despite being followed for a minimum of five years (NO-TD). The presence of TRAb was evaluated at standardized time points: (i) before ALTZ, (ii) latest time available following ALTZ and before TD onset, and (iii) following ALTZ during/after TD onset. Serum TRAb were detected by published in-house assays (ihTRAb): flow cytometry detecting any TSHR-binding TRAb, and luciferase bioassays detecting TSAb/TBAb bioactivity. Purified immunoglobulin G was used to verify TSAb/TBAb in selected hypothyroid cases. Standard clinical automated measurements of TRAb, antithyroid peroxidase autoantibodies (TPOAb), thyrotropin, free thyroxine, and free triiodothyronine were also collected.

RESULTS

Before ALTZ, combined ihTRAb (positive with flow cytometry and/or luciferase bioassay) but not automated TRAb were present in 5/16 (31.2%) TD versus 0/14 (0%) NO-TD (p = 0.017). Detectable ihTRAb preceded TD development in 9/28 (32.1%) and by a median of 1.2 years (range 28 days-7.3 years). Combination testing of ihTRAb and TPOAb at baseline predicted 20% of subsequent cases of hyperthyroidism and 83% of hypothyroidism.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence is presented that TRAb measured with custom-made assays can be detected prior to any change in thyroid function in up to a third of cases of ALTZ-related TD. Furthermore, the presence of ihTRAb prior to ALTZ treatment was strongly predictive of subsequent TD. The findings suggest that a period of affinity maturation of TRAb may precede clinical disease onset in some cases. Combined testing of TPOAb and ihTRAb may increase the ability to predict those who will develop TD following ALTZ.

Sarcoidosis following alemtuzumab treatment for multiple sclerosis

Despite proven efficacy of alemtuzumab in multiple sclerosis (MS), approximately 50% of individuals will develop a new autoimmune disease following treatment. To date, these have largely been antibody mediated and organ specific (primarily affecting the thyroid gland). In a retrospective case series of 187 patients from two UK specialist centres (Cardiff and Cambridge) followed up for a median of 10 years, we report three (1.6%) cases of sarcoidosis following alemtuzumab treatment of MS. This report increases the spectrum of auto-inflammatory disease following alemtuzumab and should be considered by clinicians when using this therapeutic agent for MS.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with immunotherapy: brief review and case report

BACKGROUND

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), a rare but potentially fatal syndrome of immune hyperactivation, may be an under-recognized immune-related adverse event (irAE). Unlike other irAEs, HLH triggered by immune checkpoint blockade is not well described; no particular diagnostic guidelines and treatment regimens exist. The HLH-2004 criteria remain as the common diagnostic guide. For the treatment of HLH, various combinations of chemotherapeutic, immunosuppressive and glucocorticoid agents are used.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of HLH in a 58-year-old metastatic melanoma patient who was undergoing immune checkpoint blockade with pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor inhibitor. The patient presented with fever, upper normal sized spleen, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperferritinemia, reduced NK cell activity and elevated sCD163 levels, fulfilling the Histiocyte Society HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria. Our patient was successfully treated with oral prednisone (1 mg/kilogram/day), suggesting that HLH from immune checkpoint inhibitors may respond to steroids alone.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and treatment of HLH are critical to avoid progressive tissue damage, organ failure and possibly death. HLH should be suspected in clinical presentations with fever, cytopenias and hyperinflammatory markers. HLH in the setting of immune checkpoint blockade may be treated with steroids only but further evidence is required.