Progression of Clinical Features in Lewy Body Dementia Can Be Detected Over 6 Months

Post hoc analysis of the characteristics and treatment needs of patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and their caregivers and their physicians' awareness of those treatment needs according to the duration after diagnosis of DLB

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the differences in patient/caregiver characteristics, their treatment needs, and the attending physician's understanding of those treatment needs according to the duration after diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, cross-sectional, questionnaire survey study. A total of 263 patient-caregiver pairs were reclassified into two groups according to the median duration after diagnosis of DLB as follows: short (<24 months; S-group) and long (≥24 months; L-group) post-DLB diagnosis duration. Treatment need was defined as the symptom domain that caused the patient or caregiver the most distress. Concordance rates between patient-physician and caregiver-physician were calculated for physicians' understanding of treatment needs.

RESULTS

In this analysis, 126 pairs (32 physicians) and 137 pairs (34 physicians) were classified as the S- and L-groups, respectively. Patient and caregiver characteristics were broadly similar between groups (mean age for patients 78.7 ± 6.6 vs. 79.8 ± 6.7, for caregivers 64.7 ± 12.9 vs. 64.9 ± 12.8; number of male/female for patients 61/65 vs. 67/70, for caregivers 34/92 vs. 38/99), but the prevalence of parkinsonism (82.5% vs. 66.7%) and autonomic dysfunction (49.6% vs. 33.3%), severity of parkinsonism (MDS-UPDRS Part III total scores, 29.2 ± 22.6 vs. 18.0 ± 16.4; Part II total score, 14.6 ± 12.0 vs. 7.6 ± 7.9), and caregiver burden (J-ZBI_8 score, 9.1 ± 6.7 vs. 7.5 ± 5.8) were higher in the L-group than the S-group. Regarding treatment needs, the invalid answer rates for patients were 34.9% and 46.8%, and those for caregivers were 28.6% and 34.9% in the S- and L groups, respectively. Patients' treatment needs did not significantly differ (p = 0.056), but S-group patients were more likely to select cognitive impairment (p = 0.045) as their treatment need, whereas L-group patients were more likely to select parkinsonism (p = 0.003). Caregivers' treatment needs significantly differed (p = 0.032) between groups. S-group caregivers were more likely to select cognitive impairment (p = 0.001), whereas L-group caregivers were more likely to select other symptom domains such as parkinsonism (S-group vs. L-group: 10.3% vs. 16.7%), psychiatric symptoms (20.6% vs. 24.6%), sleep-related disorder (4.0% vs. 7.1%), and autonomic dysfunction (4.8% vs. 9.5%). Concordance rates between patient-physician and caregiver-physician were low in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were some differences in characteristics according to the duration after diagnosis of DLB. Cognitive dysfunction may be a particular concern for patients and caregivers soon after diagnosis of DLB. Treatment needs of patients and caregivers for parkinsonism, psychiatric symptoms, sleep-related disorder, or autonomic dysfunction were different according to the duration after diagnosis of DLB. Physicians' perception of patients'/caregivers' treatment needs was poor regardless of the duration after diagnosis of DLB.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000041844).

Developing a person-centered stated preference survey for dementia with Lewy bodies: value of a personal and public involvement process

Introduction

The development of high-quality stated preference (SP) surveys requires a rigorous design process involving engagement with representatives from the target population. However, while transparency in the reporting of the development of SP surveys is encouraged, few studies report on this process and the outcomes. Recommended stages of instrument development includes both steps for stakeholder/end-user engagement and pretesting. Pretesting typically involves interviews, often across multiple waves, with improvements made at each wave; pretesting is therefore resource intensive. The aims of this paper are to report on the outcomes of collaboration with a Lewy body dementia research advisory group during the design phase of a SP survey. We also evaluate an alternative approach to instrument development, necessitated by a resource constrained context.

Method

The approach involved conducting the stages of end-user engagement and pretesting together during a public involvement event. A hybrid approach involving a focus group with breakout interviews was employed. Feedback from contributors informed the evolution of the survey instrument.

Results

Changes to the survey instrument were organized into four categories: attribute modifications; choice task presentation and understanding; information presentation, clarity and content; and best-best scaling presentation. The hybrid approach facilitated group brainstorming while still allowing the researcher to assess the feasibility of choice tasks in an interview setting. However, greater individual exploration and the opportunity to trial iterative improvements across waves was not feasible with this approach.

Discussion

Involvement of the research advisory group resulted in a more person-centered survey design. In a context constrained by time and budget, and with consideration of the capacity and vulnerability of the target population, the approach taken was a feasible and pragmatic mechanism for improving the design of a SP survey.

Differences in the treatment needs of patients with dementia with Lewy bodies and their caregivers and differences in their physicians' awareness of those treatment needs according to the clinical department visited by the patients: a subanalysis of an observational survey study

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether the treatment needs of patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and their caregivers, along with their attending physicians' perception of those treatment needs, differ according to the clinical department visited by the patients.

METHODS

This was a subanalysis of a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational survey study. Data from the main study were classified according to the clinical department visited by the patient: psychiatric group (P-group), geriatric internal medicine group (G-group), and neurology group (N-group). The treatment needs of patients and caregivers were defined as "the symptom that causes them the most distress", and the frequency of each answer was tabulated.

RESULTS

This subanalysis included 134, 65, and 49 patient-caregiver pairs in the P-, G-, and N-groups, respectively. Statistically significant differences in patient background characteristics such as patient age; initial symptom domains; use of cholinesterase inhibitors, levodopa, antipsychotics, and Yokukansan; and total scores of the Mini-Mental State Examination, Neuropsychiatric Inventory-12, and Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Parts II and III were shown among the three subgroups. While there were no differences in patients' treatment needs among the subgroups, residual analysis showed that in the N-group, parkinsonism was more of a problem than other symptom domains (p = 0.001). There were significant differences in caregivers' treatment needs among the three subgroups (p < 0.001). The patient-physician concordance rates for the symptom domains that caused patients the most distress were: P-group, 42.9% (kappa coefficient [κ] = 0.264); G-group, 33.3% (κ = 0.135), and N-group, 67.6% (κ = 0.484). The caregiver-physician concordance rates for the symptom domains that caused the caregivers the most distress were: P-group, 54.8% (κ = 0.351), G-group, 50.0% (κ = 0.244), and N-group, 47.4% (κ = 0.170).

CONCLUSION

This subanalysis revealed differences in the treatment needs of patients with DLB and their caregivers according to the clinical department they attended. There might be a lack of awareness of those treatment needs by the attending physicians, regardless of their specialty.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000041844.

Factors Associated with Quality of Life in Patients with Dementia with Lewy Bodies: Additional Analysis of a Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Quality of life (QOL) and treatment needs of patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and their caregivers are important factors to consider when developing treatment strategies.

Objective

To investigate factors associated with QOL in patients with DLB, and to examine factors associated with activities of daily living (ADL) if ADL was associated with QOL.

Methods

We previously conducted a questionnaire survey study to investigate the treatment needs of patients with DLB and their caregivers. This pre-specified additional analysis evaluated the Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) of the Short Form-8 for QOL, and the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II total score for ADL.

Results

In total, 231 patient- caregiver pairs and 38 physicians were included. Multivariable analysis of QOL showed that the MDS-UPDRS Part II total score (standard regression coefficient [β], - 0.432) was associated with the PCS, and presence of depression (β, - 0.330) was associated with the MCS. The severity of postural instability/gait disorder (PIGD) (β, 0.337) and rigidity (β, 0.266), presence of hallucinations (β, 0.165), male sex (β, 0.157), and use of "short stay" or "small-scale, multifunctional home care" (β, 0.156) were associated with worsened ADL.

Conclusions

In patients with DLB, QOL was negatively impacted by severity of ADL disability and depression, and ADL was negatively impacted by severity of PIGD and rigidity, hallucinations, male sex, and use of "short stay" or "small-scale, multifunctional home care."

Sleep disorders in Lewy body dementia: Mechanisms, clinical relevance, and unanswered questions

In Lewy body dementia (LBD), disturbances of sleep and/or arousal including insomnia, excessive daytime sleepiness, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, and restless leg syndrome are common. These disorders can each exert a significant negative impact on both patient and caregiver quality of life; however, their etiology is poorly understood. Little guidance is available for assessing and managing sleep disorders in LBD, and they remain under-diagnosed and under-treated. This review aims to (1) describe the specific sleep disorders which occur in LBD, considering their putative or potential mechanisms; (2) describe the history and diagnostic process for these disorders in LBD; and (3) summarize current evidence for their management in LBD and consider some of the ongoing and unanswered questions in this field and future research directions.

Specific neuropsychiatric symptoms are associated with functional decline trajectories in Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia: a five-year follow-up study

Background

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are often overlooked and under-identified symptoms associated with dementia, despite their significant impact on the prognosis of individuals living with the disease. The specific role of certain NPS in functional prognosis remains unclear.

Aims

To determine the association of different NPS with functional decline in people living with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or Lewy body dementia (LBD).

Methods

This is an analysis of data from the Dementia Study of Western Norway (DemVest) with 196 patients included of which 111 had AD and 85 LBD. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and the Rapid Disability Rating Scale (RDRS-2) for activities of daily living were administered annually for 5 years. NPI total score and individual items with RDRS-2 trajectories were analyzed with linear mixed models.

Results

The LBD group exhibited higher levels of functional impairment and a greater burden of NPS at baseline. Over the 5-year follow-up, hallucinations, aggression, depression, anxiety, apathy, disinhibition, aberrant motor behavior, nighttime behavior disturbances, and abnormal eating patterns were significantly associated with the decline in functional abilities in individuals with AD, as well as irritability and aberrant motor behavior in those with LBD.

Discussion

These results highlight the relevance of early detection and intervention of these particularly relevant NPS, due to its potential of also impacting physical function. Better detection and management of these NPS could improve functional prognosis in people living with dementia.

Conclusion

Specific NPS demonstrate relevant distinct associations with Longitudinal trajectories of functional decline in AD and LBD.

Longitudinal motor decline in dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson disease dementia, and Alzheimer's dementia in a community autopsy cohort

INTRODUCTION

We examined the progression of extrapyramidal symptoms and signs in autopsy-confirmed dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), and Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD).

METHODS

Longitudinal data were obtained from Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disease, with PDD (n = 98), AD (n = 47) and DLB (n = 48) further sub-grouped as with or without parkinsonism (DLB+ and DLB-). Within-group Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) -II and UPDRS-III trajectories were analyzed using non-linear mixed effects models.

RESULTS

In DLB, 65.6% had parkinsonism. Baseline UPDRS-II and III scores (off-stage) were highest (P < 0.001) for PDD (mean ± SD 14.3 ± 7.8 and 27.4 ± 16.3), followed by DLB+ (6.0 ± 8.8 and 17.2 ± 17.1), DLB- (1.1 ± 1.3 and 3.3 ± 5.5) and AD (3.2 ± 6.1 and 8.2 ± 13.6). Compared to PDD, the DLB+ group had faster UPDRS-III progression over 8-years (Cohen's-d range 0.98 to 2.79, P < 0.001), driven by gait (P < 0.001) and limb bradykinesia (P = 0.02) subscales.

DISCUSSION

Motor deficits progress faster in DLB+ than PDD, providing insights about expected changes in motor function.

HIGHLIGHTS

Dementia with Lewy bodies has faster motor progression than Parkinson's disease dementia Linear and non-linear mixed modeling analysis of longitudinal data was utilized Findings have implications for clinical prognostication and trial design.

Cognitive and Motor Decline in Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Parkinson's Disease Dementia

Background

There is a need to better understand the rate of cognitive and motor decline of Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease Dementia (PDD).

Objectives

To compare the rate of cognitive and motor decline in patients with DLB and PDD from the E-DLB Consortium and the Parkinson's Incidence Cohorts Collaboration (PICC) Cohorts.

Methods

The annual change in MMSE and MDS-UPDRS part III was estimated using linear mixed regression models in patients with at least one follow-up (DLB n = 837 and PDD n = 157).

Results

When adjusting for confounders, we found no difference in the annual change in MMSE between DLB and PDD (-1.8 [95% CI -2.3, -1.3] vs. -1.9 [95% CI -2.6, -1.2] [P = 0.74]). MDS-UPDRS part III showed nearly identical annual changes (DLB 4.8 [95% CI 2.1, 7.5]) (PDD 4.8 [95% CI 2.7, 6.9], [P = 0.98]).

Conclusions

DLB and PDD showed similar rates of cognitive and motor decline. This is relevant for future clinical trial designs.

Assessment of clinical features and coexisting geriatric syndromes in newly diagnosed dementia with Lewy bodies: a retrospective study in a tertiary geriatrics setting in Turkey

PURPOSE

Identifying the associated clinical conditions in patients with newly diagnosed dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) may contribute to the disease management. This study aimed to examine the clinical features and coexisting geriatric syndromes of patients with newly diagnosed DLB.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study included newly diagnosed DLB participants who were admitted to a tertiary geriatric outpatient clinic. Of the 857 patients with dementia, 116 DLB diagnoses were eligible for analysis. The core and supportive clinical features of DLB were recorded. Geriatric syndromes including polypharmacy, depression, insomnia, dependency, a history of delirium, falls, malnutrition, urinary incontinence, functional impairment, and living alone, were assessed and recorded at baseline.

RESULTS

The mean age was 79.0 ± 6.9 years, and 50.9% of the participants were female. The majority (63.8%) had mild dementia, 31.9% had moderate, and 4.3% had severe disease. Cognitive fluctuations (78.4%), visual hallucinations (77.6%), and Parkinsonism (73.3%) were the most common clinical features. Functional impairment (59.5%) and urinary incontinence (59.5%) were the leading geriatric syndromes, followed by polypharmacy (56.9%), depressive symptoms (54.7%), falls (52.6%), insomnia (49.1%), malnutrition (24.3%), and delirium (6.0%). Women had more functional impairment and depressive symptoms than men.

CONCLUSION

Although most patients had mild dementia, three-quarters of the DLB cohort had hallucinations, and nearly two-thirds were functionally impaired. The proportion of other serious health conditions also increased, indicating a high comorbidity and geriatric syndrome burden. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is strongly recommended for DLB patients from the time of diagnosis until death to reduce disability and comorbidities.

THE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05052450.

Race and Ethnicity in Lewy Body Dementia: A Narrative Review

Lewy body dementia is the third most common and costliest type of dementia. It is an umbrella term for dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson's disease dementia, both of which place a substantial burden on the person and society. Recent findings outline ethnoracial differences in dementia risk. Delayed and misdiagnosis across ethnoracial groups contribute to higher levels of burden. In this context, we aimed to summarize current knowledge, gaps, and unmet needs relating to race and ethnicity in Lewy body dementia. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of studies on Lewy body dementia focusing on differences across ethnoracial groups and outline several recommendations for future studies. The majority of the findings comparing different ethnoracial groups were from North American sites. There were no differences in clinical prevalence and progression across ethnoracial groups. Compared to people identifying as non-Hispanic White, co-pathologies were more common and clinical diagnostic accuracy was lower for people identifying as Black. Co-morbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertension) were more common and medication use rates (e.g., antidepressants, antiparkinsonian agents) were lower for people identifying as Black or Hispanic compared to people identifying as White. More than 90% of clinical trial participants identified as non-Hispanic White. Despite increasing efforts to overcome disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, inclusion of individuals from minoritized communities in Lewy body dementia studies continues to be limited and the findings are inconclusive. Representation of diverse populations is crucial to improve the diagnostic and therapeutic efforts in Lewy body dementia.

Efficacy of Adjunctive Therapy with Zonisamide Versus Increased Dose of Levodopa for Motor Symptoms in Patients with Dementia with Lewy Bodies: The Randomized, Controlled, Non-Inferiority DUEL Study

BACKGROUND

In patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), it is unknown whether adjunct zonisamide is as effective and safe as increasing levodopa dose when levodopa has inadequate efficacy on parkinsonism.

OBJECTIVE

To compare adjunct zonisamide 25 mg/day versus an increased levodopa dose (increased by 100 mg/day) in patients with DLB treated with levodopa ≤300 mg/day for parkinsonism.

METHODS

The DUEL study was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group, interventional, non-inferiority trial. During the observation period, levodopa was administered at ≤300 mg/day for 4 weeks. Subsequently, patients were randomized to receive adjunct zonisamide 25 mg/day or levodopa increased by 100 mg/day.

RESULTS

Respective adjusted mean changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III total score at 16 and 24 weeks (primary endpoint) were -6.3 and -4.4 in the zonisamide add-on and -0.8 and 2.0 in the levodopa increase groups. The adjusted mean difference at 24 weeks was -6.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] -13.5, 0.7); the upper limit of the 95% CI (0.7) was lower than the non-inferiority margin (3.0). No significant between-group differences were observed in total scores of the MDS-UPDRS Part II, Eating Questionnaire, EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level, Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview, or other secondary endpoints. No notable between-group differences were observed in adverse event incidences.

CONCLUSION

Adjunct zonisamide 25 mg/day may yield moderate improvement in motor symptoms in patients with DLB when the levodopa effect is insufficient, but it could not be verified that the zonisamide 25 mg/day was as effective as levodopa 100 mg/day because levodopa showed no sufficient efficacy as assumed.

Disease progression in dementia with Lewy bodies: A longitudinal study on clinical symptoms, quality of life and functional impairment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) is a heterogeneous disease, with variable signs and symptoms across multiple domains. We aimed to identify associations with rate of change in cognition, everyday functioning (IADL) and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

We included 121 DLB patients (69 ± 6 yrs, 14%F, MMSE: 25 ± 3) in our prospective cohort (follow-up 2 ± 1 yrs). We described progression of symptoms and cognitive decline over time. Mixed models were used to investigate whether changes in symptoms were associated to changes in IADL (FAQ), QoL (QoL-AD) and caregiver burden (ZBI). Last, we investigated whether baseline symptoms and biomarkers predicted decline in cognition (MMSE), IADL (FAQ) and QoL (QoL-AD).

RESULTS

Parkinsonism and RBD were most frequently present early in the disease course, while hallucinations were more likely to develop in a later stage. MMSE (annual change β ± SE = -2.06 ± 0.23), QoL-AD (-1.03 ± 0.20), and FAQ (3.04 ± 0.30) declined over time. Increasing severity of clinical symptoms was associated to increases in FAQ, QoL-AD and caregiver burden. Baseline clinical symptoms were not predictive for decline in these outcomes. By contrast, AD co-pathology (CSF pTau/Aβ42 ratio) was associated to steeper decline in MMSE (-1.23 ± 0.54). Medial temporal atrophy (-0.81 ± 0.26) and global cortical atrophy (-0.73 ± 0.36) predisposed for decline in QoL-AD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings imply that underlying disease processes, rather than clinical symptomatology aid in predicting decline. These findings are relevant for treatment strategies and the development of DLB specific outcome measures.

Clinical outcome measures in dementia with Lewy bodies trials: critique and recommendations

The selection of appropriate outcome measures is fundamental to the design of any successful clinical trial. Although dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is one of the most common neurodegenerative conditions, assessment of therapeutic benefit in clinical trials often relies on tools developed for other conditions, such as Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease. These may not be sufficiently valid or sensitive to treatment changes in DLB, decreasing their utility. In this review, we discuss the limitations and strengths of selected available tools used to measure DLB-associated outcomes in clinical trials and highlight the potential roles for more specific objective measures. We emphasize that the existing outcome measures require validation in the DLB population and that DLB-specific outcomes need to be developed. Finally, we highlight how the selection of outcome measures may vary between symptomatic and disease-modifying therapy trials.

Lewy Body Dementias: Controversies and Drug Development

Lewy body dementia (LBD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative dementias. Clinical trials for symptomatic and disease-modifying therapies in LBD remain a national research priority, but there are many challenges in both past and active drug developments in LBD. This review highlights the controversies in picking the appropriate populations, interventions, target selections, and outcome measures, which are all critical components of clinical trial implementation in LBD. The heterogeneity of LBD neuropathology and clinical presentations, limited understanding of core features such as cognitive fluctuations, and lack of validated LBD-specific outcome measures and biomarkers represent some of the major challenges in LBD trials.