Association of Time to Clinical Remission With Sustained Resolution in Children With New-Onset Infantile Spasms

Optimization of vigabatrin dosage in children with epileptic spasms: A population pharmacokinetic approach

AIMS

Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug used to treat some forms of severe epilepsy in children. The main adverse effect is ocular toxicity, which is related to the cumulative dose. The aim of the study is to identify an acceptable exposure range, both through the development of a population pharmacokinetic model of vigabatrin in children enabling us to calculate patient exposure and through the study of therapeutic response.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including children with epilepsy followed at Necker-Enfants Malades hospital who had a vigabatrin assay between January 2019 and January 2022. The population pharmacokinetic study was performed on Monolix2021 using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach. Children treated for epileptic spasms were classified into responder and nonresponder groups according to whether the spasms resolved, in order to identify an effective plasma exposure range.

RESULTS

We included 79 patients and analysed 159 samples. The median age was 4.2 years (range 0.3-18). A 2-compartment model with allometry and creatinine clearance on clearance best fit our data. Exposure analysis was performed on 61 patients with epileptic spasms. Of the 22 patients who responded (36%), 95% had an AUC0-24 between 264 and 549 mg.h.L-1.

CONCLUSIONS

The population pharmacokinetic model allowed us to identify bodyweight and creatinine clearance as the 2 main factors explaining the observed interindividual variability of vigabatrin. An acceptable exposure range was defined in this study. A target concentration intervention approach using this pharmacokinetic model could be used to avoid overexposure in responder patients.

Exhaustive clinical examination of etiology and initial response to first-line treatment in 577 children with infantile epileptic spasm syndrome children: A 5-year retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

Employing whole-exome sequencing (WES) technology to investigate the etiology of infantile epileptic spasm syndrome (IESS), and determining whether different etiologies exhibit phenotypic variations, while elucidating the potential associated factors, might improve short-term responses to first-line treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with IESS admitted for treatment between January 2018 and June 2023. Clinical phenotypic differences among etiological classifications and clinical manifestations were analyzed. Variable selection using the best subset method was performed, followed by logistic regression analysis to identify the factors influencing treatment response.

RESULTS

A total of 577 patients were included; 412 completed trio-WES. Magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities were detected in 387 patients (67.1%). Patients with etiology as structural abnormalities were likelier to have non-spasms at the initial seizure onset. A total of 532 patients completed the first-line treatment; 273 patients received it for the first time at our hospital (initial response rates: 30.1% and 42.1%, respectively). The response group had a lower proportion of early-onset seizures (≤3 months) than the no-response group (11.3% vs. 23.7%, p < 0.01 and 11.3% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.03, respectively). Logistic regression analysis indicated that earlier initiation of first-line treatment was associated with a higher likelihood of an initial response. However, the etiological classification did not have a significant impact on the initial response.

INTERPRETATION

IESS patients with structural abnormalities are more likely to present with non-spasm seizures at initial onset. Early initiation of first-line treatment is crucial; however, initial responses may be less favorable when seizures occur in early infancy.

Epilepsy and Encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy encompasses more than the predisposition to unprovoked seizures. In children, epileptic activity during (ictal) and between (interictal) seizures has the potential to disrupt normal brain development. The term "epileptic encephalopathy (EE)" refers to the concept that such abnormal activity may contribute to cognitive and behavioral impairments beyond that expected from the underlying cause of the epileptic activity.

METHODS

In this review, we survey the concept of EE across a diverse selection of syndromes to illustrate its broad applicability in pediatric epilepsy. We review experimental evidence that provides mechanistic insights into how epileptic activity has the potential to impact normal brain processes and the development of neural networks. We then discuss opportunities to improve developmental outcomes in epilepsy now and in the future.

RESULTS

Epileptic activity in the brain poses a threat to normal physiology and brain development.

CONCLUSION

Until we have treatments that reliably target and effectively treat the underlying causes of epilepsy, a major goal of management is to prevent epileptic activity from worsening developmental outcomes.

Efficacy of vigabatrin in the treatment of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of vigabatrin (VGB) in treating infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS). Databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. All the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs) of VGB for IESS were included and analyzed separately. The primary outcome was the cessation of epileptic spasms (ES). Five RCTs and nine OSs compared the efficacy of VGB vs hormonal monotherapy for IESS. Meta-analysis of the five RCTs showed that hormonal monotherapy was significantly better than VGB monotherapy (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.20-0.67) for patients with new-onset IESS. Meta-analysis of the nine OSs agrees with the result from RCTs (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.43-0.85). VGB was more effective in patients with TSC than in those with other etiologies (five OSs, OR = 5.59, 95% CI = 2.17-14.41). There was no significant difference in the efficiency of VGB combined with hormonal therapy vs hormonal monotherapy for IESS (two RCTs, OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.09-6.45). Hormonal monotherapy is better than VGB monotherapy for non-TSC-associated IESS. But for patients with IESS due to TSC, VGB is the first choice. VGB combined with hormone therapy does not definitely increase ES control rates compared with that of hormonal monotherapy.