Statin Use and All-Cause Mortality in Nursing Home Residents With and Without Dementia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Claims Data

Do Statins Affect Cognitive Health? A Narrative Review and Critical Analysis of the Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Statins are the first-line treatment for hypercholesterolemia and play a key role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Current studies report mixed effects of statins on cognitive health, including harmful, neutral, and protective outcomes. However, these ongoing controversies about the potential cognitive adverse effects of statins may compromise their use in CVD prevention. Several factors may influence how statins affect cognition, including the unique cholesterol homeostasis in the brain, the limited permeability of the blood-brain barrier to lipoproteins, and the varying lipophilicity of different statins. This review examines the evidence linking statins to cognitive function and considers the effect of different dosages and treatment durations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Earlier studies suggested cognitive disturbances with statins, but recent evidence does not strongly support a link between statins and cognitive impairment. In fact, observational studies suggest potential neuroprotective benefits, though biases like selection bias, confounding and reverse causation limit definitive conclusions. Two large randomized controlled trials, STAREE and PREVENTABLE, are underway, and their results are expected to address some of these gaps in the literature. Due to insufficient evidence in the current literature, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed for a better understanding of statins' effects on cognition. More data is needed regarding statin type, dose intensity, and treatment duration, which may affect cognitive outcomes. Future studies are also needed to examine how statins may affect cognition in specific high-risk groups, such as individuals with mild cognitive impairment, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or chronic kidney disease.

Cholesterol Lowering in Older Adults: Should We Wait for Further Evidence?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current guidelines for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in adults up to age 75 years are well-established. However, recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), particularly for primary prevention, are inconclusive after age 75. In this review, we focus on adults ≥ 75 years to assess low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) as a marker for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, review risk assessment tools, highlight guidelines for LLT, and discuss benefits, risks, and deprescribing strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The relationship between LDL-C and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in older adults is complex and confounded. Current ASCVD risk estimators heavily depend on age and lack geriatric-specific variables. Emerging tools may reclassify individuals based on biologic rather than chronologic age, with coronary artery calcium scores gaining popularity. After initiating LLT for primary or secondary prevention, target LDL-C levels for older adults are lacking, and non-statin therapy thresholds remain unknown, relying on evidence from younger populations. Shared decision-making is crucial, considering therapy's time to benefit, life expectancy, adverse events, and geriatric syndromes. Deprescribing is recommended in end-of-life care but remains unclear in fit or frail older adults. After an ASCVD event, LLT is appropriate for most older adults, and deprescribing can be considered for those approaching the last months of life. Ongoing trials will guide statin prescription and deprescribing among older adults free of ASCVD. In the interim, for adults ≥ 75 years without a limited life expectancy who are free of ASCVD, an LLT approach that includes both lifestyle and medications, specifically statins, may be considered after shared decision-making.