Cognitive effects of topiramate, gabapentin, and lamotrigine in healthy young adults

Topiramate and cognitive impairment: evidence and clinical implications

Topiramate is an antiepileptic drug (AED) with multiple mechanisms of action that has been shown to be effective in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, cognitive dysfunction is frequently observed in such patients, often representing a relevant challenge in their management. Moreover, there is a long-held recognition that AEDs may profoundly affect cognitive functions. This paper reviews available data on cognitive adverse events in patients with neurological disorders treated with topiramate, discussing the role of different contributing factors such as the pharmacological properties of the drug, the specific features of the brain disorder, and other variables pertinent to the discussion. All studies agree that up to 10% of patients may complain of treatment-emergent adverse events on cognition. Such problems occur early during treatment (i.e. within 6 weeks) and emerge in a dose-dependent fashion, suggesting that such prevalence may be significantly reduced using the drug in monotherapy and adopting individualized doses and titration schedules. The magnitude of the problem is generally mild to moderate and the subjective perception of the patient needs to be taken into account. In fact, apart from language problems, data are not conclusive. Comparisons with new AEDs are limited to levetiracetam and lamotrigine, in both cases generally disfavoring topiramate, while data regarding first-generation AEDs show clear differences only for verbal fluency.

Cognitive side-effects of antiepileptic drugs in children

Although the causes of cognitive impairment in patients with epilepsy have not been completely elucidated, three factors are clearly involved: the underlying etiology of epilepsy, the effects of seizures or the epileptiform EEG discharges themselves, and the central nervous system effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). All commonly used AEDs have some effect on cognitive function, and the effect may be substantial when crucial functions are involved, such as learning in children. With phenobarbital, there is a high risk for serious cognitive effects impacting attention and memory. Phenytoin may affect mental speed, mainly in higher dosing and polytherapy. Moderate monotherapy doses do not seem to induce much effect. Valproate does not seem to impair cognition if sufficiently controlled for hyperammonemia. For carbamazepine, there are conflicting reports, which may be due to selection bias or dosing. For oxcarbazepine, there is no evidence for any detrimental change compared to valproate but mild improvements on attentional tests. For topiramate, there is clear evidence for topiramate-induced cognitive impairment (attention, memory, and language function) in adults and children. Although data is sketchy, levetiracetam does not seem to have a negative impact on cognition. For lamotrigine, there is evidence of a cognitive-enhancing effect on attention. No evidence for cognitive side-effects has been found for vigabatrin. Ethosuximide is not associated with cognitive impairment although the evidence is sketchy. For gabapentin, tiagabine, zonisamide, and rufinamide no studies in children are available.

The Effect of Antiepileptic Drugs on Cognition: Patient Perceived Cognitive Problems of Topiramate versus Levetiracetam in Clinical Practice

INTRODUCTION

Neurocognitive complaints may interfere with long-term antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment and are an important issue in clinical practice. Most data about drug-induced cognitive problems are derived from highly controlled short-term clinical trials. We analyzed such cognitive complaints for the two most commonly used AEDs in a clinical setting using patient perceived problems as primary outcome measure.

METHOD

All patients of the epilepsy center Kempenhaeghe that received topiramate (TPM) or levetiracetam (LEV) from the introduction to mid 2004 were analyzed using a medical information system, an automated medical file. Patients were analyzed after 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Four hundred and two patients used either TPM (n = 260) or LEV (n = 142); 18 months retention showed a statistically significant difference, revealing 15% more patients that continued LEV compared to TPM: 18 months retention 46% for TPM and 61% for LEV [F (1.400) = 3.313, p = 0.043]. Neurocognitive complaints accounted for a significant number of drug discontinuations and especially the high frequency of neurocognitive complaints in the first period of TPM treatment appeared to be significant different from LEV [F(2,547) = 3.192, p = 0.042]. In the remaining patients, the difference in neurocognitive complaints was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

cognitive complaints are common in TPM treatment and frequently lead to drug withdrawal. The impact of LEV on cognitive function is only mild. This leads to a much higher (15%) drug discontinuation rate for TPM compared to LEV.

The Effect of the New Antiepileptic Drug Rufinamide on Cognitive Functions

PURPOSE

Rufinamide (RUF 331; 1-(2,6-difluoro-phenyl)methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxamide) is a structurally novel compound that limits the frequency of sodium-dependent neuronal action potentials. So far no data have been published on the cognitive effects of RUF, except for two animal studies.

METHODS

The study used a multicenter, multinational double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled parallel-study design with four different doses of RUF (based on prior studies): 200 mg/day, 400 mg/day, 800 mg/day, and 1,600 mg/day as add-on to the existing medication. All patients had partial seizures, in the age range of 15-64 years (with an average of 37.5 years). Cognitive assessments were performed at baseline (before the start with RUF treatment) and at end point (after 3 months of treatment).

RESULTS

In total, 189 patients were included, divided over the treatment groups: placebo (n = 41), 200 mg/day (n = 33), 400 mg/day (n = 38), 800 mg/day (n = 37), and 1,600 mg/day (n = 40). The most important finding is that for none of the cognitive tests did a statistically significant worsening occur for any of the doses of RUF when the period after 12 weeks of treatment was compared with the baseline before introducing RUF. Also none of the comparisons between dose and placebo showed a statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

RUF is a new AED with no serious cognitive effects even in add-on treatment and even in the higher dose ranges.

Role of risperidone in children with autism spectrum disorder

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

DATA SOURCES

Searches of MEDLINE/PubMed (1992-February 2006) were conducted, as well as an extensive manual review of journals, using the key words autism and risperidone.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Only double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were included for review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

ASD is the most common of the pervasive developmental disorders. The main characteristics (core symptoms) of autism are impairment in social skills, problems communicating, and stereotypical movements. Behavioral manifestations or maladaptive behaviors include aggression, irritability, hyperactivity, inattention, impulsivity, tantrums, and self-injurious behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the data examined, risperidone appears efficacious and safe for treating certain behavioral aspects of autism including irritability, aggression, hyperactivity, and stereotypy. It does not appear to be as effective for the treatment of the core symptoms of autism.

Effects of topiramate on ethanol and saccharin consumption and preferences in C57BL/6J mice

BACKGROUND

Topiramate has recently been found to be more effective than placebo as an adjunct treatment for alcohol dependence, but it has not yet been investigated in animal models of ethanol consumption. The current experiment examined the effects of topiramate on ethanol drinking in mice using a continuous access, two-bottle choice procedure.

METHOD

C57BL/6J male mice were offered a 10% v/v ethanol solution versus tap water over 4 consecutive days per week. Mice were assigned to topiramate (1-50 mg/kg) or saline groups and received injections before the beginning of the dark phase of the light cycle. Topiramate dose increased over 5 successive weeks (1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 mg/kg). Fluid intake was measured 2, 4, and 23 hr after injection. Body weight and food intake were measured at the time of injection. In a second phase, mice were offered saccharin solutions (0.2 and 2.5% w/v) versus tap water after topiramate (50 mg/kg) or saline injections.

RESULTS

Results revealed that high topiramate doses (25 and 50 mg/kg) increased water intake and decreased ethanol preference. Compared with saline controls, topiramate produced dose-dependent, bidirectional effects on ethanol dose, with 25 mg/kg of topiramate increasing ethanol dose at 4 and 23 hr after injection but 50 mg/kg topiramate decreasing ethanol dose at 2 hr after injection. During saccharin exposure, topiramate decreased saccharin preference (for 2.5% w/v saccharin solution) and marginally increased water intake but did not directly alter intake of the saccharin solutions. Topiramate had no effects on body weight or daily food intakes.

CONCLUSIONS

Topiramate reduced ethanol preference in C57BL/6J mice, but this effect was primarily attributable to elevated water intake. Topiramate also reduced saccharin preference, likely through marginally significant increases in water intake. Increases in water intake and bidirectional effects of topiramate on ethanol dose complicate conclusions with regard to the effects of topiramate on ethanol reward.

Topiramate in clinical practice: long-term experience in patients with refractory epilepsy referred to a tertiary epilepsy center

For the treatment of patients with chronic refractory epilepsies, information about the long-term efficacy and safety profile of any new antiepileptic drug is crucial. Topiramate has been proven to be effective in patients with refractory chronic partial epilepsies in short-term controlled clinical trials, but the long-term retention, long-term efficacy, and long-term side-effect profile have not been sufficiently investigated. We analyzed all patients who had been treated with topiramate in the Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe from the introduction of the drug in the spring of 1993 up to a final assessment point in mid-2002. In total, 470 patients were identified. The data show that the clinical dose achieved was about 200mg/day, reached after approximately 6 months of treatment. Further dose escalation in the survivors was slow, with a mean dose of about 300 mg/day after 24 months of treatment. Mean titration dose is 25mg/week, but titration strategy is mostly individual and responds to patient complaints. With respect to seizure frequency, 10-15% of the patients were seizure-free at the 6-month evaluation; 4 patients achieved a 2-year remission. Retention rate was 53% after 1 year, 45% after 2 years, 38% after 3 years, and 30% after 4 years. At 4 years, almost 70% of the patients had discontinued topiramate. The main reason was adverse events, which accounted for about 65% of the discontinuations. Behavioral side effects were dominant, with mental slowing (27.6%), dysphasia (16.0%), and mood problems (agitation: 11.9%) being the most frequently reported side effects. In about 10% of the patients side effects led to discontinuation despite the obvious favorable effects on seizure frequency. Comparisons between the patients who discontinued topiramate treatment and those who continued topiramate showed that discontinuation was associated with comedication (vigabatrin and lamotrigine). Our conclusion is that TPM is associated with a high incidence of side effects in clinical practice, affecting long-term retention. Meaningful prognostic factors that may help us in clinical decision making, i.e., to prevent the side effects or to help us identify those at risk, have not been found.

Mood effects of antiepileptic drugs

This article reviews our knowledge about a specific subgroup of chronic CNS-related side effects of antiepileptic drugs (AED) treatment, i.e., the effects of AEDs on mood. In line with a recent hypothesis, using the experience of AED treatment in psychiatry, we examined whether mood effects are related to the known anticonvulsant mechanisms of action of the AEDs. Specifically we examined whether AEDs, acting through potentiation of GABAergic neurotransmitter release, have "sedating" effects on mood, whereas AEDs that act through the reduction of excitatory glutamate neurotransmitter release have "activating" effects on mood. The results of this review yield evidence that there are relationships between the known anticonvulsant mechanisms of action of the AEDs and mood effects. Mood effects occur especially when the drugs have a sustained effect on neuronal mechanisms, in particular when the inhibitory or excitatory neurotransmitter release is altered. Drugs with "use-dependent" impact on sodium or calcium channels probably have a more transient impact and do not lead to interictal stable mood effects. Drugs with multiple mechanisms of action seem to combine a favorable efficacy profile with an increased risk of severe mood problems. The quality of the evidence, however, is not conclusive and there are many paradoxical results. One reason for this lack of "fit" may be the use in this review of a simplified classification, based only on the predominant mechanism of action to classify a drug. Only a limited number of AEDs (ethosuximide, tiagabine) are characterized by a single anticonvulsant mechanism of action. Probably more detailed coupling of mechanisms of action (e.g., inspecting the type and route of impact on GABA release) and mood effects may give less confusing results. The use of magnetic resonance imaging techniques such as spectroscopy may provide interesting results.

Cognitive effects of atypical antipsychotics: focus on bipolar spectrum disorders

Studies examining cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder have documented neuropsychologic impairment in some patients. Recollection memory, attention, and visual information processing may be particularly impaired in patients with bipolar illness. Cognitive impairment appears to worsen with illness progression, and may have a significant impact on function. Pharmacotherapy to treat bipolar disorder including lithium, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and atypical antipsychotics may have varying effects on cognitive functioning. Treatment with atypical antipsychotics has been associated with improvement in various cognitive measures in patients with schizophrenia, and the little data available in patients with bipolar disorder suggest the potential for similar benefits. Studies to determine if current treatments for bipolar disorder can prevent, delay, or even improve cognitive dysfunction are needed.

Newer antiepileptic drugs and cognitive issues

Although the causes of cognitive impairment in patients with epilepsy have not been completely elucidated, three factors are clearly involved: the underlying etiology of epilepsy, the effects of seizures themselves, and the central nervous system effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). All commonly used AEDS have some effect on cognitive function, and the effect may be substantial when crucial functions are involved, such as learning in children or driving ability in adults, or when already-vulnerable functions are involved, such as memory in elderly patients. The available evidence is insufficient to support definite conclusions about the cognitive effects of three of the newer AEDs, tiagabine, gabapentin, and levetiracetam. Better evidence is available for lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), and, to a lesser degree, oxcarbazepine (OXC). OXC appears not to affect cognitive function in healthy volunteers or adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy, but its cognitive effects in children and adolescents have not been systematically studied. A relatively large number of studies are available for LTG, which has demonstrated a favorable cognitive profile overall, both in volunteers and in patients with epilepsy. Although dose and titration speed may be confounding factors in some of the studies of TPM, there is clear evidence that this agent does affect cognitive function, with specific effects on attention and verbal function. For LTG, attempts have been made to correlate cognitive effects with what is known of the drug's mechanism of action; this is an area of research that deserves further exploration with regard to other AEDs as well, especially TPM.

Effect of antiepileptic drugs on cognitive function in individuals with epilepsy: a comparative review of newer versus older agents

Several 'new' antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), i.e. oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, lamotrigine, zonisamide, gabapentin, tiagabine, topiramate and levetiracetam have been introduced into clinical practice within the last decade. Most of these new drugs are at least as effective as the 'old' AEDs [phenytoin, phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), valproic acid (sodium valproate) and carbamazepine] and, in general, they seem to be better tolerated than the old drugs. The new AEDs might have less influence on cognitive functions but the aspect has not been systematically studied. Neuropsychological testing has been the major method of objectively examining cognitive function related to the use of AEDs but a number of methodological problems blur the results. Alteration of cognition might reflect a chronic adverse effect of AEDs but the negative effects of the drugs are only one of several factors that may influence cognition. In addition, subjective complaints about cognitive deficits (e.g. memory problems or attention) may also reflect other aspects of adverse effects than those concerning specific cognitive functions (e.g. mood and anxiety). This review focuses on studies of the cognitive effects of the new AEDs, and in particular on studies that compare cognitive effects of the old and new drugs. In general, the new AEDs seem to display no or minor negative cognitive effects. In studies in which new AEDs have been compared with old AEDs, there was a tendency in favour of the new AEDs in some of the studies.