1
|
Belvís R, Irimia P, González N, García-Ull J, Pozo-Rosich P, López-Bravo A, Morollón N, Quintas S, Plana A, Baz PG, Tentor A, Gallego Artiles N, León FJ, Pérez Martín M, Rivera I, Ramírez R, Colomina I, Lainez JM, Pascual J. [Migraine treatment consensus document of the Spanish Society of Neurology (SEN), Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (SEMFYC), Society of Primary Care Medicine (SEMERGEN) and Spanish Association of Migraine and Headache (AEMICE) on migraine treatment]. Med Clin (Barc) 2024; 163:208.e1-208.e10. [PMID: 38643025 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is a disease with a high prevalence and incidence, in addition to being highly disabling, causing a great impact on the patient's quality of life at a personal, family and work level, but also social, given its high expense due to its direct (care) and indirect (presenteeism and work absenteeism) costs. The multiple and recent developments in its pathophysiological knowledge and in its therapy require updating and, therefore, in this article the Spanish scientific societies most involved in its study and treatment (SEN, SEMFYC and SEMERGEN), together with the Association Spanish Association for Patients with Migraine and other Headaches (AEMICE), we have developed these updated care recommendations. We reviewed the treatment of migraine attacks, which consisted mainly of the use of NSAIDs and triptans, to which ditans and gepants have been added. We also discuss preventive treatment consisting of oral preventive drugs, botulinum toxin, and treatments that block the action of calcitonin-related peptide (CGRP). Finally, we emphasize that pharmacological treatments must be complementary to carrying out general measures consisting of identifying and managing/deletion the precipitating factors of the attacks and the chronicizing factors, controlling the comorbidities of migraine and eliminating analgesic overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Belvís
- Unidad de Cefaleas y Neuralgias, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España.
| | - Pablo Irimia
- Servicio de Neurología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Pamplona, España
| | - Nuria González
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario San Carlos. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Madrid, España
| | - Jésica García-Ull
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Valencia, España
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Unidad de Cefalea y Grupo de Investigación en Cefalea, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Vall d'Hebron y Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España
| | - Alba López-Bravo
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Sección de Neurología, Hospital Reina Sofía. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS-A). Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Tudela, Navarra, España
| | - Noemí Morollón
- Unidad de Cefaleas y Neuralgias, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España
| | - Sonia Quintas
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de La Princesa. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Madrid, España
| | - Antoni Plana
- ABS Balàfia-Pardinyes-Secà de Sant Pere de Lleida, Àmbit Lleida. Institut Català de la Salut (ICS). Grupo de Trabajo de Neurología SEMFYC, Lleida, España
| | | | | | | | - Francisco Javier León
- Centro de Salut Dúrcal, Distrito Sanitario Granada Metropolitano. Grupo de Trabajo de Neurología SEMFYC, Granada, España
| | | | - Inés Rivera
- C.S. Barranco Grande, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España
| | - Raquel Ramírez
- Servicio de Medicina de Familia, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, España
| | | | - José Miguel Lainez
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Valencia, España
| | - Julio Pascual
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria e IDIVAL. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Santander, España
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ikeda A, Usami K, Danno D, Takeshima T, Tatsuoka Y. [Epileptic seizure and migraine attack: A revisit from the "Borderland of Epilepsy" to clinical implementation of infraslow activity/DC shifts in scalp EEG]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 2024; 64:383-389. [PMID: 38811205 DOI: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Migraine attacks, especially ones with aura, have symptoms similar to epileptic seizures, and the two may sometimes be difficult to differentiate clinically. However, the characteristic minute-by-minute symptom development and progress within 60 min is useful for diagnosis. Although the details of its pathophysiology remain unsolved, cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) is one of the main pathogenetic factors. In epilepsy, clinical data have shown that ictal DC shifts could reflect impaired homeostasis of extracellular potassium by astrocyte dysfunction. Ictal DC shifts were found to be difficult to detect by scalp EEG, but can be clinically recorded from the seizure focus using wide-band EEG method. The similarity between DC shifts and CSD has been gaining attention from the neurophysiology point of view. The clinical implementation of infraslow activity/DC shifts analysis of scalp EEG is expected to elucidate further the pathophysiology of migraine, which may lie in the borderland of epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akio Ikeda
- Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kiyohide Usami
- Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kyoto University Hospital
| | - Daisuke Danno
- Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Tominaga Hospital
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Robblee J, Hakim SM, Reynolds JM, Monteith TS, Zhang N, Barad M. Nonspecific oral medications versus anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Headache 2024; 64:547-572. [PMID: 38634515 DOI: 10.1111/head.14693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) versus nonspecific oral migraine preventives (NOEPs). BACKGROUND Insurers mandate step therapy with NOEPs before approving CGRP mAbs. METHODS Databases were searched for class I or II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CGRP mAbs or NOEPs versus placebo for migraine prevention in adults. The primary outcome measure was monthly migraine days (MMD) or moderate to severe headache days. RESULTS Twelve RCTs for CGRP mAbs, 5 RCTs for topiramate, and 3 RCTs for divalproex were included in the meta-analysis. There was high certainty that CGRP mAbs are more effective than placebo, with weighted mean difference (WMD; 95% confidence interval) of -1.64 (-1.99 to -1.28) MMD, which is compatible with small effect size (Cohen's d -0.25 [-0.34 to -0.16]). Certainty of evidence that topiramate or divalproex is more effective than placebo was very low and low, respectively (WMD -1.45 [-1.52 to -1.38] and -1.65 [-2.30 to -1.00], respectively; Cohen's d -1.25 [-2.47 to -0.03] and -0.48 [-0.67 to -0.29], respectively). Trial sequential analysis showed that information size was adequate and that CGRP mAbs had clear benefit versus placebo. Network meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between CGRP mAbs and topiramate (WMD -0.19 [-0.56 to 0.17]) or divalproex (0.01 [-0.73 to 0.75]). No significant difference was seen between topiramate or divalproex (0.21 [-0.45 to 0.86]). CONCLUSIONS There is high certainty that CGRP mAbs are more effective than placebo, but the effect size is small. When feasible, CGRP mAbs may be prescribed as first-line preventives; topiramate or divalproex could be as effective but are less well tolerated. The findings of this study support the recently published 2024 position of the American Headache Society on the use of CGRP mAbs as the first-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Robblee
- Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Sameh M Hakim
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| | - John M Reynolds
- The Louis Calder Memorial Library, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Teshamae S Monteith
- Division of Headache, Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Niushen Zhang
- Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Meredith Barad
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ciciarelli MC, Simioni CVDMG, Londero RG. Headaches in adults in supplementary health: management. REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA (1992) 2024; 70:e023D701. [PMID: 38511747 PMCID: PMC10941913 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.023d701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Renata Gomes Londero
- Brazilian Academy of Neurology, Porto Alegre Clinical Hospital – Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tseng PT, Zeng BY, Chen JJ, Kuo CH, Zeng BS, Kuo JS, Cheng YS, Sun CK, Wu YC, Tu YK, Stubbs B, Carvalho AF, Liang CS, Chen TY, Hsu CW, Suen MW, Yang CP, Hsu SP, Chen YW, Shiue YL, Hung CM, Su KP, Lin PY. High Dosage Omega-3 Fatty Acids Outperform Existing Pharmacological Options for Migraine Prophylaxis: A Network Meta-Analysis. Adv Nutr 2024; 15:100163. [PMID: 38110000 PMCID: PMC10808921 DOI: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.100163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a highly prevalent neurologic disorder with prevalence rates ranging from 9% to 18% worldwide. Current pharmacologic prophylactic strategies for migraine have limited efficacy and acceptability, with relatively low response rates of 40% to 50% and limited safety profiles. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are considered promising therapeutic agents for migraine prophylaxis. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of various dosages of EPA/DHA and other current Food and Drug Administration-approved or guideline-recommended prophylactic pharmacologic interventions for migraine. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion if they enrolled participants with a diagnosis of either episodic or chronic migraine. All NMA procedures were conducted under the frequentist model. The primary outcomes assessed were 1) changes in migraine frequency and 2) acceptability (i.e., dropout for any reason). Secondary outcomes included response rates, changes in migraine severity, changes in the frequency of using rescue medications, and frequency of any adverse events. Forty RCTs were included (N = 6616; mean age = 35.0 y; 78.9% women). Our analysis showed that supplementation with high dosage EPA/DHA yields the highest decrease in migraine frequency [standardized mean difference (SMD): -1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.32, -0.39 compared with placebo] and the largest decrease in migraine severity (SMD: -2.23; 95% CI: -3.17, -1.30 compared with placebo) in all studied interventions. Furthermore, supplementation with high dosage EPA/DHA showed the most favorable acceptability rates (odds ratio: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.06, 17.41 compared with placebo) of all examined prophylactic treatments. This study provides compelling evidence that high dosage EPA/DHA supplementation can be considered a first-choice treatment of migraine prophylaxis because this treatment displayed the highest efficacy and highest acceptability of all studied treatments. This study was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42022319577.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping-Tao Tseng
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Psychology, Collage of Medical and Health Science, Taichung, Asia University, Taiwan; Prospect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan; Institute of Precision Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Yan Zeng
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Dachang Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jiann-Jy Chen
- Prospect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, E-Da Cancer Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Hsien Kuo
- Department of Psychology, Collage of Medical and Health Science, Taichung, Asia University, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Syuan Zeng
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Cancer Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - John S Kuo
- Neuroscience and Brain Disease Center and Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Shian Cheng
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Psychiatry, Tsyr-Huey Mental Hospital, Kaohsiung Jen-Ai's Home, Taiwan
| | - Cheuk-Kwan Sun
- Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine for International Students, College of Medicine, I-Shou University Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Cheng Wu
- Department of Sports Medicine, Landseed International Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Kang Tu
- Institute of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Dentistry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Brendon Stubbs
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Physiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Positive Ageing Research Institute (PARI), Faculty of Health, Social Care Medicine and Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom
| | - Andre F Carvalho
- Innovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment (IMPACT) Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Chih-Sung Liang
- Department of Psychiatry, Beitou Branch, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tien-Yu Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Brain Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wei Hsu
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Mein-Woei Suen
- Department of Psychology, Collage of Medical and Health Science, Taichung, Asia University, Taiwan; Gender Equality Education and Research Center, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, Asia University Hospital, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Pai Yang
- Department of Neurology, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Nutrition, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Pin Hsu
- Department of Neurology, E-Da hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Wen Chen
- Prospect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Yow-Ling Shiue
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Institute of Precision Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
| | - Chao-Ming Hung
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-Da Cancer Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Kuan-Pin Su
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Mind-Body Interface Research Center (MBI-Lab), China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan.
| | - Pao-Yen Lin
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Institute for Translational Research in Biomedical Sciences, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ashina M, Mitsikostas DD, Ramirez Campos V, Barash S, Ning X, Diener HC. Numbers needed to treat or harm and likelihood of being helped versus harmed for fremanezumab in patients who had prior inadequate response to two to four classes of migraine preventive medications: A post hoc analysis. Headache 2023; 63:1351-1358. [PMID: 37955395 DOI: 10.1111/head.14651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and likelihood of being helped or harmed (LHH) in a post hoc analysis of the phase 3b FOCUS trial. BACKGROUND Fremanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), has demonstrated efficacy, tolerability, and safety in adults with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), with documented previous inadequate response to two to four classes of migraine preventive medications. METHODS In the 12-week double-blind period of the FOCUS study, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to quarterly fremanezumab, monthly fremanezumab, or matched monthly placebo. NNT was based on responder analysis, defined as ≥50% reduction in monthly average number of migraine days at 12 weeks. NNH was based on discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). RESULTS Among patients with CM (n = 509), response rates and discontinuation rates were 27% (45/169) and 0 for quarterly fremanezumab, 29% (50/173) and 2% (3/173) for monthly fremanezumab, and 8% (13/167) and <1% (1/167) for placebo, respectively. These results translated to NNTs of 5.3 and 4.7, NNHs of 1000 and 88, and LHHs of 188 and 19 for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab, respectively. Among patients with EM (n = 328), response rates were 47% (50/107) for quarterly fremanezumab, 43% (47/110) for monthly fremanezumab, and 10% (11/111) for placebo. Discontinuation rates were <1% (n = 1) in all three groups. These results translated to NNTs of 2.7 and 3.0, NNHs of 1000 and 1000, and LHHs of 368 and 328 for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The NNT, NNH, and LHH for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab compare favorably with those for traditional oral preventive medications, including topiramate, valproate, and propranolol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dimos D Mitsikostas
- First Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Steve Barash
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Xiaoping Ning
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty of the University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Biso L, Carli M, Kolachalam S, Monticelli G, Calabrò PF, di Paolo A, Giorgi FS, Bocci G, Scarselli M. A 5-Year Study of Antiseizure Medications (ASMs) Monitoring in Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders in an Italian Clinical Center. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:945. [PMID: 37513857 PMCID: PMC10383891 DOI: 10.3390/ph16070945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite receiving appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs), a relevant percentage of neuropsychiatric patients do not benefit from this approach, and one reason is subtherapeutic ASMs plasma concentration (C(p)) due to improper drug adherence, interindividual pharmacokinetic differences, or metabolic interactions among different drugs. For these reasons, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) by measuring ASMs C(p) is an effective tool that improves pharmacological therapies in clinical practice. Based on these premises, in the present real-world study, we analyzed the C(p) of the most used ASMs in diverse medical conditions, which were assayed during the years 2018-2022 at the University Hospital of Pisa, including about 24,000 samples. This population was largely heterogeneous, and our database did not contain clinical information about the patients. The most used ASMs were Valproate (VPA: 54.5%) and Levetiracetam (LEV: 18.6%), followed by Oxcarbazepine (OxCBZ: 8.3%) and Carbamazepine (CBZ: 7.2%), whereas the associations LEV/VPA, Ethosuximide (ESM)/VPA, and CBZ/VPA were the most frequently proposed. In about 2/3 of assays, ASMs C(p) was in range, except for VPA, which was underdosed in almost half of the samples. Importantly, toxic levels of ASMs C(p) were found very rarely. For VPA, there was a decrease of mean C(p) across ages, from adolescents to older patients, while the C(p) of LEV, CBZ, OxCBZ, and Topiramate (TPM) showed a slight tendency to increase. When we compared females and males, we found that for VPA, the average age was higher for females, whereas women taking Lamotrigine (LTG) and OxCBZ were younger than men. Then, comparing ASMs used in neurologic and psychiatric disorders, based on the request form, it emerged that the mean C(p) of CBZ, OxCBZ, and LTG on samples collected in the Psychiatric Unit was lower compared to the Neurology and Child Neuropsychiatry Units. Finally, the ASMs subjected to multiple dosing starting from an initial subtherapeutic C(p) increased their level at different time points within a year, reaching the reference range for some of them. In conclusion, the present study suggests that TDM is widely applied to monitor ASMs C(p), finding many of them within the reference range, as a demonstration of its utility in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letizia Biso
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Carli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Shivakumar Kolachalam
- Aseptic Pharmacy, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK
| | - Giorgio Monticelli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Pasquale Fabio Calabrò
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonello di Paolo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Filippo Sean Giorgi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Guido Bocci
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Scarselli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lampl C, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R, Jassal T, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, Reuter U, Uluduz D, Versijpt J, Zeraatkar D, Sacco S. The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:56. [PMID: 37208596 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to facilitate comparison between drugs for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to August 13, 2022, for randomized trials of pharmacological treatments for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen references, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis and rated the certainty (quality) of evidence as either high, moderate, low, or very low using the GRADE approach. RESULTS We identified 74 eligible trials, reporting on 32,990 patients. We found high certainty evidence that monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor (CGRP(r)mAbs), gepants, and topiramate increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo. We found moderate certainty evidence that beta-blockers, valproate, and amitriptyline increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, and low certainty evidence that gabapentin may not be different from placebo. We found high certainty evidence that, compared to placebo, valproate and amitriptyline lead to substantial adverse events leading to discontinuation, moderate certainty evidence that topiramate, beta-blockers, and gabapentin increase adverse events leading to discontinuation, and moderate to high certainty evidence that (CGRP(r)mAbs) and gepants do not increase adverse events. CONCLUSIONS (CGRP(r)mAbs) have the best safety and efficacy profile of all drugs for migraine prophylaxis, followed closely by gepants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Lampl
- Department of Neurology, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brüder Linz, Linz, Austria.
- Headache Medical Center Linz, Linz, Austria.
| | | | | | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Tanvir Jassal
- Department of Anesthesia and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Derya Uluduz
- Department of Neurology Istanbul Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dena Zeraatkar
- Department of Anesthesia and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L´Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schiller K, Rauchenzauner M, Avidgor T, Hannan S, Lorenzen C, Kaml M, Walser G, Unterberger I, Filippi V, Broessner G, Luef G. Primary headache types in adult epilepsy patients. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:49. [PMID: 36707895 PMCID: PMC9881350 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01023-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Headache is among the most common comorbidities in epilepsy. This study examined the distribution of different primary headache disorders in a large cohort of patients with diagnosed epilepsy. Headache types were analysed with regard to gender, type of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS In this prospective single-centre study, 500 patients with epilepsy (250 female, mean age: 45.52 ± 17.26 years) were evaluated with regards to primary headache types using a validated German headache questionnaire categorizing for migraine (MIG), tension-type headache (TTH) or trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TAC), their combinations and unclassifiable headache. Data regarding type of epilepsy, seizure-associated headache, AED treatment and seizure freedom were collected. RESULTS Of 500 patients with epilepsy, 163 (32.6%) patients (108 female and 55 male) reported suffering from headaches at least 1 day per month. MIG (without aura, with aura) and TTH were the most frequent headache type (MIG 33.1%, TTH 33.1%). Female epilepsy patients reported headaches significantly more often than male patients (x2 = 8.20, p = 0.0042). In contrast, the type of epilepsy did not significantly affect headache distribution. Of 163 patients with headache, 66 (40.5%) patients reported seizure-associated headache and AEDs were used by 157 patients. Of importance, patients with AED monotherapy suffered from MIG less often when compared to patients on polytherapy (x2 = 4.79, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION MIG and TTH are the most common headache types in epilepsy patients and headache is more frequent among female epilepsy patients. Monotherapy in AEDs might have a beneficial effect on the frequency of headache compared to polytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schiller
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Hospital Ostallgaeu, Kaufbeuren, Germany ,grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Analytical Neurophysiology Lab, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada ,grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Pediatrics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Markus Rauchenzauner
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Hospital Ostallgaeu, Kaufbeuren, Germany ,grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Pediatrics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tamir Avidgor
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Analytical Neurophysiology Lab, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Sana Hannan
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Analytical Neurophysiology Lab, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Carlo Lorenzen
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Unit, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck, 6020 Austria
| | - Manuela Kaml
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Unit, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck, 6020 Austria
| | - Gerald Walser
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Unit, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck, 6020 Austria
| | - Iris Unterberger
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Unit, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck, 6020 Austria
| | - Vera Filippi
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Neurology, Headache Outpatient Clinic, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck, 6020 Austria
| | - Gregor Broessner
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Neurology, Headache Outpatient Clinic, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck, 6020 Austria
| | - Gerhard Luef
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Unit, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck, 6020 Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rollo E, Romozzi M, Vollono C, Calabresi P, Geppetti P, Iannone LF. Antiseizure Medications for the Prophylaxis of Migraine during the Anti- CGRP Drugs Era. Curr Neuropharmacol 2023; 21:1767-1785. [PMID: 36582062 PMCID: PMC10514541 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x21666221228095256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine and epilepsy are fundamentally distinct disorders that can frequently coexist in the same patient. These two conditions significantly differ in diagnosis and therapy but share some widely- used preventive treatments. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are the mainstay of therapy for epilepsy, and about thirty different ASMs are available to date. ASMs are widely prescribed for other neurological and non-neurological conditions, including migraine. However, only topiramate and valproic acid/valproate currently have an indication for migraine prophylaxis supported by high-quality evidence. Although without specifically approved indications and with a low level of evidence or recommendation, several other ASMs are used for migraine prophylaxis. Understanding ASM antimigraine mechanisms, including their ability to affect the pro-migraine calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling pathway and other pathways, may be instrumental in identifying the specific targets of their antimigraine efficacy and may increase awareness of the neurobiological differences between epilepsy and migraine. Several new ASMs are under clinical testing or have been approved for epilepsy in recent years, providing novel potential drugs for migraine prevention to enrich the treatment armamentarium and drugs that inhibit the CGRP pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Rollo
- Dipartimento Universitario di Neuroscienze, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marina Romozzi
- Dipartimento Universitario di Neuroscienze, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Catello Vollono
- Dipartimento Universitario di Neuroscienze, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Neurofisiopatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze dell’invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa-Collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Calabresi
- Dipartimento Universitario di Neuroscienze, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Neurologia, Dipartimento di Scienze dell’invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa-Collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Luigi F. Iannone
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Holdridge A, Buczyner J, Aymat CC, Le A. Prevention of Migraine. Semin Neurol 2022; 42:558-570. [PMID: 36513096 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Migraine, a primary headache disorder is a chronic and complex neurological disease that affects millions of people worldwide, impacting their quality of life. It is one of the most common reasons why individuals seek the advice of their physician, and is one of the most common referrals seen in the offices of general neurologists and headache specialists. In the past decade, there has been robust research on not only the pathophysiology of migraine but in the efforts to treat and, importantly, prevent. The introduction of calcitonin gene related peptide antagonists (CGRP-A) have opened new doors for preventive treatment options. OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) has remained a staple in the treatment of chronic migraine with data emerging with combination therapy. Neurostimulation has offered additional nonpharmacologic approaches to migraine treatment. In addition to lifestyle and behavioral modifications, these have changed the landscape of migraine prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Holdridge
- Department of Neurology and Headache, Advocate Aurora HealthCare, Whitefish Bay, Wisconsin
| | - Jennifer Buczyner
- Department of Neurology, First Choice Neurology, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
| | - Cristina Cabret Aymat
- Department of Neurology and Headache, Ochsner Health Center - Covington, Covington, Louisiana
| | - Ariel Le
- Department of Neurology, First Choice Neurology, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
There are numerous potential factors that may affect growth in children with epilepsy, and these must be evaluated in any child with appetite and weight concerns. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) have potential adverse effects, and many may affect appetite, thus impacting normal growth and weight gain. The aim of this review is to focus on the impact of both epilepsy and ASMs on appetite and weight in children. We systematically reviewed studies using Medline assessing the impact of ASMs on appetite and weight in children. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and open-label studies (open-label extension and interventional) that targeted or included the pediatric population (0-18 years of age). Each study was classified using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Classification of Evidence for Therapeutic Studies, and the level of evidence for impact on appetite and weight in children was graded. ASMs associated with decreased appetite and/or weight loss include fenfluramine, topiramate, zonisamide, felbamate, rufinamide, stiripentol, cannabidiol, brivaracetam and ethosuximide; ASMs with minimal impact on weight and appetite in children include oxcarbazepine, eslicarbazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, lacosamide, carbamazepine, vigabatrin and clobazam. The ASM most robustly associated with increased appetite and/or weight gain is valproic acid; however, both pregabalin and perampanel may also lead to modest weight gain or increased appetite in children. Certain ASMs may impact both appetite and weight, which may lead to increased morbidity of the underlying disease and impaired adherence to the treatment regimen.
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhang CQ, Li HY, Wan Y, Bai XY, Gan L, Wang J, Sun HB. Efficacy, Safety, and Retention Rate of Extended-Release Divalproex Versus Conventional Delayed-Release Divalproex: A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Clinical Trials. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:811017. [PMID: 35479307 PMCID: PMC9037144 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.811017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: A novel once-daily divalproex-extended release (ER) dose formulation has been developed; this formulation prolongs the therapeutic serum levels of the drug, compared with the twice-daily conventional divalproex-delayed release (DR) formulation. This study aimed to systematically examine and compare the efficacy, safety, and retention rates of the ER divalproex (VPA-ER) and conventional DR divalproex (VPA-DR) formulations. Methods: Randomized control trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and medication compliance of ER and DR divalproex were searched in online databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, by searching MeSH words and term words. Observational studies with potential biases were excluded. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software. Findings: Thirteen RCTs, involving 1,028 participants, were included in this meta-analysis. Efficacy, AEs, and drug retention rates were the main study outcomes. According to our study, VPA-ER presented clinically significant benefits compared with the placebo in the population with bipolar disorder (BD) (39.5% versus 27.2%, p < 0.001). A similar efficacy of VPA-ER and VPA-DR in controlling seizures was observed in epilepsy patients (87.4% versus 86.5%, p = 0.769). A significantly lower incidence of AEs was reported in the VPA-ER group than in the placebo group (26.8% versus 34.8%, p = 0.003). By contrast, there was no evidence of difference in safety between VPA-ER and VPA-DR (29.4% versus 30.5%, p = 0.750). In addition, the drug retention rate was significantly lower in the VPA-ER group than in the placebo group (76.0% versus 82.7%, p = 0.020), especially in migraine patients (p = 0.022) and in patients who were treated for fewer than 4 weeks (p = 0.018). Implications: The efficacy of VPA-ER was significantly superior to that of the placebo treatment, which provided efficacy similar to that of conventional VPA-DR. VPA-ER is well tolerated with a low rate of AEs compared to the placebo. In addition, the acceptable medicine compliance of VPA-ER was conducive to the long-term maintenance treatment of chronic diseases. Although we analyzed open labels and crossover design RCTs, large-scale multicenter studies on the efficacy and medicine compliance of new ER formulations with less AEs are required to validate our conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Qi Zhang
- Department of Special-Need Medical, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong Yan Li
- Department of Special-Need Medical, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Yong Wan
- Department of Special-Need Medical, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Xue Yang Bai
- Department of Special-Need Medical, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Lu Gan
- Department of Special-Need Medical, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Juan Wang
- Department of Special-Need Medical, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong Bin Sun
- Department of Neurology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pediatric Headache in Primary Care and Emergency Departments: Consensus with RAND/UCLA Method. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12020142. [PMID: 35207430 PMCID: PMC8877535 DOI: 10.3390/life12020142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Headache is the most frequent neurological symptom in childhood and the main reason for admission to pediatric emergency departments. The aim of this consensus document is to define a shared clinical pathway between primary care pediatricians (PCP) and hospitals for the management of children presenting with headache. For the purposes of the study, a group of hospital pediatricians and a group of PCP from the Emilia Romagna’s health districts were selected to achieve consensus using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Thirty-nine clinical scenarios were developed: for each scenario, participants were asked to rank the appropriateness of each option from 1 to 9. Agreement was reached if ≥75% of participants ranked within the same range of appropriateness. The answers, results, and discussion helped to define the appropriateness of procedures with a low level of evidence regarding different steps of the diagnostic-therapeutic process: primary care evaluation, emergency department evaluation, hospital admission, acute therapy, prophylaxis, and follow-up. The RAND proved to be a valid method to value appropriateness of procedures and define a diagnostic-therapeutic pathway suitable to the local reality in the management of pediatric headache. From our results, some useful recommendations were developed for optimizing the healthcare professionals’ network among primary care services and hospitals.
Collapse
|
15
|
Tack M. Problems with the MetaBLIND study: An examination of data on blinding patients in trials with patient-reported outcomes. J Health Psychol 2021:13591053211059391. [PMID: 34875934 DOI: 10.1177/13591053211059391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
MetaBLIND is the largest meta-epidemiological study on the impact of blinding in randomized trials to date. We examined MetaBLIND data on the impact of blinding patients on patient-reported outcomes. 68 out of 132 included trials tested knowledge recall and had questionable relevance to clinical trials. In 17 out of 18 comparisons, the number of trials in the blinded or nonblinded group was 2 or lower. In several key trials, the blinding status was uncertain. Effect sizes compared in MetaBLIND appear to reflect random differences in study design and setting rather than the impact of blinding trial participants.
Collapse
|
16
|
Vandervorst F, Van Deun L, Van Dycke A, Paemeleire K, Reuter U, Schoenen J, Versijpt J. CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: an efficacy and tolerability comparison with standard prophylactic drugs. J Headache Pain 2021; 22:128. [PMID: 34696711 PMCID: PMC8547103 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01335-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several drugs are available for the preventive treatment of both episodic and chronic migraine. The choice of which therapy to initiate first, second, or third is not straightforward and is based on multiple factors, including general efficacy, tolerability, potential for serious adverse events, comorbid conditions, and costs. Recently, a new class of migraine preventive drugs was introduced, i.e. monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor. METHODS The present article summarizes the evidence gathered with this new migraine preventive drug class from randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. It further puts this into perspective next to the evidence gained by the most widely used agents for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine with an emphasis on efficacy and the robustness with which this efficacy signal was obtained. RESULTS Although being a relatively new class of migraine preventive drugs, monoclonal antibodies blocking the CGRP pathway have an efficacy which is at least comparable if not higher than those of the currently used preventive drugs. Moreover, the robustness of this efficacy signal is substantiated by several randomized clinical trials each including large numbers of patients. In addition, because of their excellent tolerability and with long-term safety data emerging, they seem to have an unprecedented efficacy over adverse effect profile, clearly resulting in an added value for migraine prevention. CONCLUSIONS Balancing the data presented in the current manuscript with additional data concerning long term safety on the one hand and cost issues on the other hand, can be of particular use to health policy makers to implement this new drug class in the prevention of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fenne Vandervorst
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laura Van Deun
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Annelies Van Dycke
- Department of Neurology, General Hospital Sint-Jan Bruges, Bruges, Belgium
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jean Schoenen
- Headache Research Unit, Dept of Neurology-Citadelle Hospital, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
TEPE N. The effect of gender differences on the use of valproic acid for migraine prophylaxis. JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.32322/jhsm.903329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
18
|
Jia G, Wang X, Lv H, Nonyane MSC, Hou H, Ma L, Shan P, Wu X. The efficacy and safety of antiepileptics in the prophylaxis of pediatric migraine: the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Transl Pediatr 2021; 10:1779-1791. [PMID: 34430426 PMCID: PMC8349954 DOI: 10.21037/tp-20-478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is the most common primary headache among children and adolescents. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiepileptic drugs in the prevention of pediatric migraine. METHODS PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched for eligible published RCTs from January 1970 to June 2020. Migraine frequency and ≥50% response rate were measured as the efficacy outcomes. We used "Risk of Bias" tool for quality assessment and RevMan5.3 software for statistical analysis. RESULTS Four articles containing 7 RCTs with 794 participants compared the efficacy of AEDs with placebo. Four RCTs assessed topiramate vs. placebo and 3 RCTs evaluated divalproex sodium extended-release (DVPX ER) vs. placebo. The results demonstrated that children receiving antiepileptic drugs had a significant advantage in remitting the mean monthly migraine days compared to those who received placebo, with an MD of -0.48 (n=930, 95% CI: -0.84 to -0.12, Z=2.60, P=0.009). Topiramate significantly reduced monthly migraine days (MD =-0.70, n=489, 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.25, Z=3.01, P=0.003) but failed to improve the ≥50% response rate (MD =-1.50, n=489, 95% CI: 0.70 to 3.22, Z=1.05, P=0.30). DVPX ER did not significantly reduce monthly headache frequency (n=441, 95% CI: -0.70 to 0.47, Z=0.38, P=0.70) or improve the ≥50% response rate (n=441, 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.25, Z=0.82, P=0.41) compared with placebo. Topiramate and DVPX ER were related to higher rates of side effects and adverse reactions. DISCUSSION Topiramate can reduce monthly headache days in children and adolescents with migraine. However, it failed to improve the ≥50% response rate. DVPX ER showed no difference from placebo in the prophylactic treatment pediatric migraine. Side effects seemed to be more frequent in topiramate and DVPX ER treated children but generally well-tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guoyong Jia
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xingbang Wang
- Department of Geriatrics, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Hongbo Lv
- Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | | | - Haiguang Hou
- Tianjin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin, China
| | - Lin Ma
- Department of Geriatrics, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Peiyan Shan
- Department of Geriatrics, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xinwei Wu
- Department of Geriatrics, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tekin M, Kaya-Yertutanol FD, Çevreli B, Özdoğru AA, Kulaksız H, Uzbay İT. Sodium valproate improves sensorimotor gating deficit induced by sleep deprivation at low doses. Turk J Med Sci 2021; 51:1521-1530. [PMID: 33517611 PMCID: PMC8283464 DOI: 10.3906/sag-2011-229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/aim Sleep deprivation disrupts prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle reflex and can be used to mimic psychosis in ex- perimental animals. On the other hand, it is also a model for other disorders of sensory processing, including migraine. This study aims to assess the effects of sodium valproate, a drug that is used in a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders, on normal and disrupted sensorimotor gating in rats. Materials and methods Sixty-two Wistar albino rats were randomly distributed into 8 groups. Subchronic and intraperitoneal sodium valproate were administrated to the sleep-deprived and nonsleep-deprived rats by either 50–100 or 200 mg/kg/day. Prepulse inhibition test and locomotor activity test were performed. Sleep deprivation induced by the modified multiple platform method. Results Sleep deprivation impaired prepulse inhibition, decreased startle amplitude, and increased locomotor activity. Sodium valpro- ate did not significantly alter prepulse inhibition and locomotor activity in nonsleep-deprived and sleep-deprived groups. On the other hand, all doses decreased locomotor activity in drug-treated groups, and low dose improved sensorimotor gating and startle amplitude after sleep deprivation. Conclusion Low-dose sodium valproate improves sleep deprivation-disrupted sensorimotor gating, and this finding may rationalize the use of sodium valproate in psychotic states and other sensory processing disorders. Dose-dependent effects of sodium valproate on sensorimotor gating should be investigated in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammet Tekin
- Applied Psychology Master’s Program, Institute of Health Sciences, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Fatma Duygu Kaya-Yertutanol
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Turkey,Neuropsychopharmacology Practice and Research Center, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Burcu Çevreli
- Neuropsychopharmacology Practice and Research Center, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Asil Ali Özdoğru
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Hamza Kulaksız
- Neuroscience Master’s Program, Institute of Health Sciences, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - İ. Tayfun Uzbay
- Neuropsychopharmacology Practice and Research Center, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Turkey,Department of Medical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Caprara F, Letícia A, Rissardo JP, Leite MT, Silveira JO, Jauris PG, Arend J, Kegler A, Royes F, Fernando L, Fighera MR. Characteristics of Post-Ictal Headaches in Patients with Epilepsy: a Longitudinal Study. Seizure 2020; 81:244-249. [PMID: 32896689 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
21
|
Tseng PT, Yang CP, Su KP, Chen TY, Wu YC, Tu YK, Lin PY, Stubbs B, Carvalho AF, Matsuoka YJ, Li DJ, Liang CS, Hsu CW, Chen YW, Shiue YL. The association between melatonin and episodic migraine: A pilot network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the prophylactic effects with exogenous melatonin supplementation and pharmacotherapy. J Pineal Res 2020; 69:e12663. [PMID: 32347977 DOI: 10.1111/jpi.12663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Although exogenous melatonin supplementation has been suggested to be effective for episodic migraine prophylaxis, there is no conclusive evidence comparing the efficacy of exogenous melatonin supplementation to the other FDA-approved pharmacotherapy for episodic migraine prophylaxis. The aim of the current network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy of exogenous melatonin supplementation in patients with episodic migraine. The randomized placebo-controlled trials or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) incorporating a placebo in the study designs were included in our analyses. All of the NMA procedures were conducted under the frequentist model. The primary outcome was changes in frequency of migraine days and response rate after migraine prophylaxis with melatonin supplementation or pharmacological interventions. We included 25 RCTs in total with 4499 patients (mean age = 36.0 years, mean female proportion = 78.9%). The NMA demonstrated that migraine prophylaxis with oral melatonin 3 mg/d (immediate-release) at bedtime was associated with the greatest improvement in migraine frequency [mean difference = -1.71 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.27 to -0.14 days compared to placebo] and the second highest response rate (odds ratio = 4.19, 95% CI = 1.46 to 12.00 compared to placebo). Furthermore, oral melatonin 3 mg (immediate-release) at bedtime was the most preferred pharmacological intervention among all of the investigated interventions when improvements in migraine frequency, response rate, dropout rate, and rates of any adverse events were taken into account. This pilot NMA suggests the potential prophylactic role of exogenous melatonin supplementation in patients with episodic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping-Tao Tseng
- WinShine Clinics in Specialty of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Prospect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Pai Yang
- Department of Neurology, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Nutrition, Huang-Kuang University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kuan-Pin Su
- Department of Psychiatry & Mind-Body Interface Laboratory (MBI-Lab), China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Tien-Yu Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Brain Science, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Cheng Wu
- Department of Sports Medicine, Landseed International Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Kang Tu
- Institute of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Dentistry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pao-Yen Lin
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Institute for Translational Research in Biomedical Sciences, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Brendon Stubbs
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Physiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Health, Social Care Medicine and Education, Positive Ageing Research Institute (PARI), Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
| | - Andre F Carvalho
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Addiction & Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yutaka J Matsuoka
- Department of Psychiatry & Mind-Body Interface Laboratory (MBI-Lab), China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Division of Health Care Research, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dian-Jeng Li
- Department of Addiction Science, Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Sung Liang
- Department of Psychiatry, Beitou branch, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wei Hsu
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Wen Chen
- Prospect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yow-Ling Shiue
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Seminowicz DA, Burrowes SAB, Kearson A, Zhang J, Krimmel SR, Samawi L, Furman AJ, Keaser ML, Gould NF, Magyari T, White L, Goloubeva O, Goyal M, Peterlin BL, Haythornthwaite JA. Enhanced mindfulness-based stress reduction in episodic migraine: a randomized clinical trial with magnetic resonance imaging outcomes. Pain 2020; 161:1837-1846. [PMID: 32701843 PMCID: PMC7487005 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an enhanced mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR+) vs stress management for headache (SMH). We performed a randomized, assessor-blind, clinical trial of 98 adults with episodic migraine recruited at a single academic center comparing MBSR+ (n = 50) with SMH (n = 48). MBSR+ and SMH were delivered weekly by group for 8 weeks, then biweekly for another 8 weeks. The primary clinical outcome was reduction in headache days from baseline to 20 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes included activity of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and cognitive task network during cognitive challenge, resting state connectivity of right dorsal anterior insula to DLPFC and cognitive task network, and gray matter volume of DLPFC, dorsal anterior insula, and anterior midcingulate. Secondary outcomes were headache-related disability, pain severity, response to treatment, migraine days, and MRI whole-brain analyses. Reduction in headache days from baseline to 20 weeks was greater for MBSR+ (7.8 [95% CI, 6.9-8.8] to 4.6 [95% CI, 3.7-5.6]) than for SMH (7.7 [95% CI 6.7-8.7] to 6.0 [95% CI, 4.9-7.0]) (P = 0.04). Fifty-two percent of the MBSR+ group showed a response to treatment (50% reduction in headache days) compared with 23% in the SMH group (P = 0.004). Reduction in headache-related disability was greater for MBSR+ (59.6 [95% CI, 57.9-61.3] to 54.6 [95% CI, 52.9-56.4]) than SMH (59.6 [95% CI, 57.7-61.5] to 57.5 [95% CI, 55.5-59.4]) (P = 0.02). There were no differences in clinical outcomes at 52 weeks or MRI outcomes at 20 weeks, although changes related to cognitive networks with MBSR+ were observed. Enhanced mindfulness-based stress reduction is an effective treatment option for episodic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Seminowicz
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
| | - Shana AB Burrowes
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
| | - Alexandra Kearson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 21224
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
| | - Samuel R Krimmel
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
- Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
| | - Luma Samawi
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
| | - Andrew J Furman
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
- Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
| | - Michael L Keaser
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
| | - Neda F. Gould
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 21224
| | - Trish Magyari
- Private Mindfulness-based Psychotherapy Practice, 3511 N Calvert St, Baltimore, MD 21218
| | - Linda White
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 21224
| | - Olga Goloubeva
- University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201
| | - Madhav Goyal
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287
| | - B. Lee Peterlin
- Neuroscience Institute, Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, PA, USA 17601
| | - Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 21224
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Janković SM, Janković SV. Lessons learned from the discovery of sodium valproate and what has this meant to future drug discovery efforts? Expert Opin Drug Discov 2020; 15:1355-1364. [PMID: 32686964 DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2020.1795125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The discovery of the anticonvulsant properties of valproic acid and the development of valproic acid/valproate to market authorization for specific epilepsy types and syndromes, as well as their repurposing for other indications, are illustrative examples of both the strengths and weaknesses of drug development strategies. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes and interprets the development and repurposing history of valproic acid/valproate. The article is based on articles, including original studies and systematic reviews obtained from PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, SCIndeks and Google Scholar databases. EXPERT OPINION Random screening and careful observation of the experimental effects of tested substances were crucial for discovering the anticonvulsant effects of valproic acid, while rational drug design and clinical observation strategies led to repurposing valproic acid and valproate for bipolar disorder maintenance treatmentand prevention of migraine attacks. Early planning and feasibility studies of future clinical trials are essential for obtaining marketing authorization of new substances or new indications of old anticonvulsants. Significant progress has been made recently toward understanding, treatment and prevention of hepatotoxicity caused by valproic acid/valproate, making its long-term administration safer. There are ongoing efforts to repurpose valproic acid/valproate for augmentation with antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Snežana V Janković
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac , Kragujevac, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Togha M, Martami F, Abdollahi M, Mozafari M, Cheraghali H, Rafiee P, Shafaei M. Cinnarizine as an alternative recommendation for migraine prophylaxis: a narrative review. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 20:943-951. [PMID: 32597267 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1787834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the available prophylactic and acute drugs for migraine management, this disabling disorder remains undertreated especially among pediatrics. In this review, the authors aim at assessing the preventive role cinnarizine plays in treating migraine based on previously published studies. AREAS COVERED Randomized clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized open-label trials, and retrospective studies concerning cinnarizine in migraine prevention in children and adults were reviewed. Especial attention was given to the response rate, migraine characteristics, and tolerability. EXPERT OPINION The majority of reviewed trials demonstrated that cinnarizine is comparable to the conventional drugs used in migraine prophylaxis. However, most of the reviewed studies were limited by a non-controlled open-label design. Due to poor planning and possibility of high placebo responses, particularly in children and adolescents, the interpretation of open-label studies' results should be done cautiously. The evidence shows that cinnarizine's effectiveness was more promising in pediatric migraineurs and adults with migraine-associated vertigo such as vestibular migraine. Therefore, while the efficacy of cinnarizine cannot be dismissed, before reaching a definite conclusion on its effectiveness, it is necessary to do further high-quality RCTs among both children and adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansoureh Togha
- Headache Department, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran.,Department of Neurology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahime Martami
- Headache Department, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Abdollahi
- Headache Department, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Mozafari
- Headache Department, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamed Cheraghali
- Students' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran
| | - Pegah Rafiee
- Student Research Committee, (Department and Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Shafaei
- Headache Department, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Oskoui M, Pringsheim T, Billinghurst L, Potrebic S, Gersz EM, Gloss D, Holler‐Managan Y, Leininger E, Licking N, Mack K, Powers SW, Sowell M, Cristina Victorio M, Yonker M, Zanitsch H, Hershey AD. Practice guideline update summary: Pharmacologic treatment for pediatric migraine prevention. Headache 2019; 59:1144-1157. [DOI: 10.1111/head.13625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Oskoui
- Departments of Pediatric and Neurology/Neurosurgery McGill University Montréal Quebec Canada
| | - Tamara Pringsheim
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Canada
| | | | - Sonja Potrebic
- Neurology Department Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles
| | | | - David Gloss
- Department of Neurology Charleston Area Medical Center Charleston WV
| | - Yolanda Holler‐Managan
- Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL
| | | | - Nicole Licking
- Department of Neuroscience and Spine St. Anthony Hospital—Centura Health Lakewood CO
| | - Kenneth Mack
- Department of Neurology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | - Scott W. Powers
- Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center OH
| | - Michael Sowell
- University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program KY
| | - M. Cristina Victorio
- Division of Neurology NeuroDevelopmental Science Center Akron Children's Hospital OH
| | - Marcy Yonker
- Division of Neurology Children's Hospital Colorado Aurora
| | | | - Andrew D. Hershey
- Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center OH
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Episodic migraine is a debilitating condition. Preventive therapy is used to reduce frequency, duration, or severity of attacks. This review discusses principles of preventive treatment with a focus on preventive treatment options for people with episodic migraine. Specifically discussed is evidence and use of new migraine-specific treatment options for episodic migraine, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, a noninvasive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device, and a single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulator device. Also discussed are evidence-based updates from the 2012 American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society guidelines regarding major medication classes recommended for preventive episodic migraine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simy K Parikh
- Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite #200, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite #200, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Oskoui M, Pringsheim T, Billinghurst L, Potrebic S, Gersz EM, Gloss D, Holler-Managan Y, Leininger E, Licking N, Mack K, Powers SW, Sowell M, Victorio MC, Yonker M, Zanitsch H, Hershey AD. Practice guideline update summary: Pharmacologic treatment for pediatric migraine prevention: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society. Neurology 2019; 93:500-509. [PMID: 31413170 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000008105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide updated evidence-based recommendations for migraine prevention using pharmacologic treatment with or without cognitive behavioral therapy in the pediatric population. METHODS The authors systematically reviewed literature from January 2003 to August 2017 and developed practice recommendations using the American Academy of Neurology 2011 process, as amended. RESULTS Fifteen Class I-III studies on migraine prevention in children and adolescents met inclusion criteria. There is insufficient evidence to determine if children and adolescents receiving divalproex, onabotulinumtoxinA, amitriptyline, nimodipine, or flunarizine are more or less likely than those receiving placebo to have a reduction in headache frequency. Children with migraine receiving propranolol are possibly more likely than those receiving placebo to have an at least 50% reduction in headache frequency. Children and adolescents receiving topiramate and cinnarizine are probably more likely than those receiving placebo to have a decrease in headache frequency. Children with migraine receiving amitriptyline plus cognitive behavioral therapy are more likely than those receiving amitriptyline plus headache education to have a reduction in headache frequency. RECOMMENDATIONS The majority of randomized controlled trials studying the efficacy of preventive medications for pediatric migraine fail to demonstrate superiority to placebo. Recommendations for the prevention of migraine in children include counseling on lifestyle and behavioral factors that influence headache frequency and assessment and management of comorbid disorders associated with headache persistence. Clinicians should engage in shared decision-making with patients and caregivers regarding the use of preventive treatments for migraine, including discussion of the limitations in the evidence to support pharmacologic treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Oskoui
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Tamara Pringsheim
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Lori Billinghurst
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Sonja Potrebic
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Elaine M Gersz
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - David Gloss
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Yolanda Holler-Managan
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Emily Leininger
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Nicole Licking
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Kenneth Mack
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Scott W Powers
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Michael Sowell
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - M Cristina Victorio
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Marcy Yonker
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Heather Zanitsch
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| | - Andrew D Hershey
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology/Neurosurgery (M.O.), McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences (T.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada; Division of Neurology (L.B.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurology Department (S.P.), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Los Angeles; Rochester (E.M.G.), NY; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV; Department of Pediatrics (Neurology) (Y.H.-M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; St. Paul (E.L.), MN; Department of Neuroscience and Spine (N.L.), St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO; Department of Neurology (K.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology (S.W.P., A.D.H.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program (M.S.), KY; Division of Neurology (M.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Division of Neurology (M.Y.), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; and O'Fallon (H.Z.), MO
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Krymchantowski AV, Krymchantowski AG, Jevoux C. Sodium Divalproate in Low Alternating Daily Doses for Migraine Prevention: A Retrospective Study. Headache 2019; 59:1080-1083. [DOI: 10.1111/head.13579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
29
|
Consider using selected antiepileptics to reduce the frequency of various types of headaches. DRUGS & THERAPY PERSPECTIVES 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40267-019-00602-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
30
|
Parikh SK, Silberstein SD. Current Status of Antiepileptic Drugs as Preventive Migraine Therapy. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2019; 21:16. [PMID: 30880369 DOI: 10.1007/s11940-019-0558-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are an important class of agents used in the treatment of migraine, a neurological disorder that imparts significant socioeconomic burden. It is important for neurologists to understand the rationale for AEDs in migraine-preventive treatment, as well as each agent's efficacy and tolerability profile, in order to best determine clinical care. PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW This article specifically provides the following: (1) a review of the mechanism of action, efficacy, and tolerability of topiramate and divalproex sodium/sodium valproate, the most widely used AEDs for migraine prevention, (2) a discussion on emerging evidence regarding the efficacy of zonisamide and levetiracetam, and (3) comments on gabapentin, pregabalin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine, AEDs which have insufficient evidence for use in migraine prevention. RECENT FINDINGS The potential role for new extended-release formulations of topiramate in migraine prevention is discussed. There is substantial evidence supporting the use of AEDs in migraine prevention. Specific agents should be chosen based on their efficacy and tolerability profiles. Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy of the newer AEDs, zonisamide and levetiracetam, in migraine prevention and to clarify the role of gabapentinoids in headache management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simy K Parikh
- Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Diener HC, Holle-Lee D, Nägel S, Dresler T, Gaul C, Göbel H, Heinze-Kuhn K, Jürgens T, Kropp P, Meyer B, May A, Schulte L, Solbach K, Straube A, Kamm K, Förderreuther S, Gantenbein A, Petersen J, Sandor P, Lampl C. Treatment of migraine attacks and prevention of migraine: Guidelines by the German Migraine and Headache Society and the German Society of Neurology. CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/2514183x18823377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In collaboration with some of the leading headache centres in Germany, Switzerland and Austria, we have established new guidelines for the treatment of migraine attacks and the prevention of migraine. A thorough literature research of the last 10 years has been the basis of the current recommendations. At the beginning, we present therapeutic novelties, followed by a summary of all recommendations. After an introduction, we cover topics like drug therapy and practical experience, non-effective medication, migraine prevention, interventional methods, non-medicational and psychological methods for prevention and therapies without proof of efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Christoph Diener
- Klinik für Neurologie und Westdeutsches Kopfschmerzzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dagny Holle-Lee
- Klinik für Neurologie und Westdeutsches Kopfschmerzzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Steffen Nägel
- Klinik für Neurologie und Westdeutsches Kopfschmerzzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Thomas Dresler
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Graduiertenschule & Forschungsnetzwerk LEAD, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Charly Gaul
- Migräne- und Kopfschmerzklinik Königstein, Königstein im Taunus, Germany
| | | | | | - Tim Jürgens
- Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Zentrum für Nervenheilkunde, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Rostock, Germany
| | - Peter Kropp
- Institut für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Zentrum für Nervenheilkunde, Rostock, Germany
| | - Bianca Meyer
- Institut für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Zentrum für Nervenheilkunde, Rostock, Germany
| | - Arne May
- Institut für Systemische Neurowissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura Schulte
- Institut für Systemische Neurowissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kasja Solbach
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Straube
- Neurologische Klinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Klinikum Großhadern, München, Germany
| | - Katharina Kamm
- Neurologische Klinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Klinikum Großhadern, München, Germany
| | - Stephanie Förderreuther
- Neurologische Klinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Klinikum Großhadern, München, Germany
| | | | - Jens Petersen
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Swizterland
| | - Peter Sandor
- RehaClinic Bad Zurzach, Bad Zurzach, Swizterland
| | - Christian Lampl
- Ordensklinikum Linz, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Linz Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H., Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Marmura MJ, Kumpinsky AS. Refining the Benefit/Risk Profile of Anti-Epileptic Drugs in Headache Disorders. CNS Drugs 2018; 32:735-746. [PMID: 30073584 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-018-0555-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Anti-epileptic drugs are among the most effective drugs for migraine prophylaxis, and will likely continue to have a role even as new therapies emerge. Topiramate and valproate are effective for the preventive treatment of migraine, and other medications such as gabapentin or lamotrigine may have a role in the treatment of those with allodynia or frequent aura, respectively. Oxcarbazepine, carbamazepine, phenytoin, gabapentin, and others may alleviate pain in trigeminal neuralgia. While many anti-epileptic drugs can be effective in those with migraine or other headaches, most of these agents can potentially cause serious side effects. In particular, valproate, topiramate, carbamazepine, and phenytoin may lead to adverse outcomes for infants of exposed mothers. Valproate should not be given to women of childbearing potential for migraine prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Marmura
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut ST #200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| | - Aliza S Kumpinsky
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut ST #200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cezar LC, Kirsten TB, da Fonseca CCN, de Lima APN, Bernardi MM, Felicio LF. Zinc as a therapy in a rat model of autism prenatally induced by valproic acid. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2018; 84:173-180. [PMID: 29481896 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Autism is characterized by numerous behavioral impairments, such as in communication, socialization and cognition. Recent studies have suggested that valproic acid (VPA), an anti-epileptic drug with teratogenic activity, is related to autism. In rodents, VPA exposure during pregnancy induces autistic-like effects. Exposure to VPA may alter zinc metabolism resulting in a transient deficiency of zinc. Therefore, we selected zinc as a prenatal treatment to prevent VPA-induced impairments in a rat model of autism. Wistar female rats received either saline solution or VPA (400 mg/kg, i.p) on gestational day (GD) 12.5. To test the zinc supplementation effect, after 1 h of treatment with saline or VPA, a dose of zinc (2 mg/kg, s.c.) was injected. The offspring were tested for abnormal communication behaviors with an ultrasound vocalization task on postnatal day (PND) 11, repetitive behaviors and cognitive ability with a T-maze task on PND 29, and social interaction with a play behavior task on PND 30. Tyrosine hydroxylase protein (TH) expression was evaluated in the striatum. Prenatal VPA decreased ultrasonic vocalization, induced repetitive/restricted behaviors and cognitive inflexibility, impaired socialization, and reduced striatal TH levels compared with control group. Zinc treatment reduced VPA-induced autistic-like behaviors. However, we found no evidence of an effect of zinc on the VPA-induced reduction in TH expression. The persistence of low TH expression in the VPA-Zn group suggests that Zn-induced behavioral improvement in autistic rats may not depend on TH activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luana Carvalho Cezar
- University of São Paulo, School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Thiago Berti Kirsten
- Paulista University, Environmental and Experimental Pathology, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Luciano Freitas Felicio
- University of São Paulo, School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Prell T, Perner C. Disease Specific Aspects of Malnutrition in Neurogeriatric Patients. Front Aging Neurosci 2018; 10:80. [PMID: 29628887 PMCID: PMC5876291 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Malnutrition in elderly patients is a common condition. Nevertheless, there is evidence on specific risk factors and problems of malnutrition in geriatric patients with neurological diseases. In this review, we summarize recent knowledge on malnutrition in different neurological diseases with a focus on elderly patients. This overview also provides strategies for a more specific and profound assessment of neurogeriatric patients to improve identification and treatment of malnutrition. Early and consequent treatment of malnutrition can lead to a decreased progression of the neurological disease and to a better quality of life in geriatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tino Prell
- Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Caroline Perner
- Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sarangi SC, Tripathi M, Kakkar AK, Gupta YK. Comparison of body composition in persons with epilepsy on conventional & new antiepileptic drugs. Indian J Med Res 2017; 143:323-30. [PMID: 27241646 PMCID: PMC4892079 DOI: 10.4103/0971-5916.182623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES Certain antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as valproic acid (VPA) are known to affect body weight, and lipid profile. However, evidences regarding effects of AEDs on the body composition are deficient. This cross-sectional study compared the body composition and lipid profile among patients with epilepsy on newer and conventional AEDs. METHODS The patients with epilepsy (n=109) on treatment with conventional and newer AEDs (levetiracetam, lamotrigine and clobazam) for > 6 months were enrolled. Of these, 70 were on monotherapy: levetiracetam (n=12), VPA (n=16), carbamazepine (n=20) and phenytoin (n=22) and the remaining on polytherapy. Their body composition [body fat mass, lean dry mass (LDM), total body water (TBW), intracellular water (ICW), extracellular water (ECW) and basal metabolic rate (BMR) was estimated and biochemical parameters were assessed. RESULTS Levetiracetam group had no significant difference with VPA, carbamazepine, phenytoin and control groups, except low LDM (17.8±2.4) than VPA groups (20.2±2.7, p<0.05). In comparison with control, AEDs monotherapy groups had no significant difference, except higher LDM and ECW in VPA group. Among groups based on conventional and newer AEDs, there was no significant difference in body composition parameters except for higher LDM (as % of BW) in conventional AEDs only treated group than control (p<0.01). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS The alterations observed in body composition with valproic acid in contrast to other AEDs like levetiracetam, carbamazepine and phenytoin could affect treatment response in epilepsy especially in subjects with already altered body composition status like obese and thin frail patients, which needs to be established by prospective studies (CTRI/2013/05/003701).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudhir Chandra Sarangi
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi; Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Manjari Tripathi
- Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Kumar Kakkar
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi; Department of Pharmacology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Yogendra Kumar Gupta
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
He A, Song D, Zhang L, Li C. Unveiling the relative efficacy, safety and tolerability of prophylactic medications for migraine: pairwise and network-meta analysis. J Headache Pain 2017; 18:26. [PMID: 28220376 PMCID: PMC5318356 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-017-0720-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2016] [Accepted: 01/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large number patients struggle with migraine which is classified as a chronic disorder. The relative efficacy, safety and tolerability of prophylactic medications for migraine play a key role in managing this disease. METHODS We conducted an extensive literature search for popular prophylactic medications that are used for migraine patients. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) were carried out sequentially for determining the relative efficacy, safety and tolerability of prophylactic medications. Summary effect for migraine headache days, headache frequency, at least 50% reduction in headache attacks, all-adverse events, nausea, somnolence, dizziness, withdrawal and withdrawal due to adverse events were produced by synthesizing both direct and indirect evidence. RESULTS Patients with three interventions exhibited significantly less average migraine headache days compared with those treated by placebo (topiramate, propranolol, divalproex). Moreover, topiramate and valproate exhibited a significantly increased likelihood of at least 50% reduction in migraine headache attacks compared to placebo. Patients with topiramate and propranolol also exhibited significantly reduced headache frequency compared to those with placebo. On the other hand, patients with divalproex exhibited significantly higher risk of nausea compared to those with placebo, topiramate, propranolol, gabapentin and amitriptyline. Finally, divalproex was associated with an increased risk of withdrawal compared to placebo and propranolol. CONCLUSIONS Topiramate, propranolol and divalproex may be more efficacious than other prophylactic medications. Besides, the safety and tolerability of divalproex should be further verified by future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aijie He
- Department of Neurosurgery, the Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, 264000, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Dehua Song
- Department of Radiotherapy, the Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, 264000, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 264000, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Anesthesia, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 39 Xingfu Road, Zhifu Disctrict, 264000, Yantai, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Osipova VV, Filatova EG, Artemenko AR, Lebedeva ER, Azimova YY, Latysheva NV, Sergeev AV, Amelin AV, Koreshkina MI, Skorobogatyh KV, Ekusheva EV, Naprienko MV, Isaguljan YD, Rachin AP, Danilov AB, Kurushina OV, Parfenov VA, Tabeeva GR, Gekht AB, Yahno NN. Diagnosis and treatment of migraine: Recommendations of the Russian experts. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2017; 117:28-42. [DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20171171228-42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
38
|
Romoli M, Costa C, Siliquini S, Corbelli I, Eusebi P, Bedetti C, Caproni S, Cupini LM, Calabresi P, Sarchielli P. Antiepileptic drugs in migraine and epilepsy: Who is at increased risk of adverse events? Cephalalgia 2016; 38:274-282. [PMID: 27956547 DOI: 10.1177/0333102416683925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background The impact of adverse events (AEs) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have an impact on compliance and dropouts. We compared tolerability of AEs of AEDs among patients with migraine, epilepsy, or both. Methods Overall, 335 patients (epilepsy (n = 142), migraine (n = 131), and both (n = 62)), were evaluated with the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP) to assess the magnitude, profile and occurrence rate of the AEs of valproate, topiramate, and lamotrigine. Results AEs were significantly more common with topiramate treatment (71.0%) and among migraineurs (69.5%), the latter being more prone to discontinue AEDs (46.6%). The profile of AEs with topiramate and valproate differed among groups. Moreover, treatment with both topiramate and valproate was associated, for all groups, with a worse tolerability profile compared to lamotrigine. Conclusion Our data suggest a specific drug and disease AE profile of AEDs. Specifically, migraineurs are the most affected by AEs, even though they receive very low dosages of AEDs. This finding might be considered a clinical implication of central sensitization mechanisms. Both the profile and tolerability of AEs, highly influencing quality of life, depended on the underlying conditions, and deeply impacted on treatment dropout. Therefore, before starting, switching or stopping AED treatment, all options need to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Romoli
- 1 Neurology Clinic, University Hospital of Perugia, Italy
| | - Cinzia Costa
- 1 Neurology Clinic, University Hospital of Perugia, Italy
| | | | | | - Paolo Eusebi
- 2 Regional Health Authority of Umbria, Perugia, Italy
| | - Chiara Bedetti
- 1 Neurology Clinic, University Hospital of Perugia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dutta S, Reed RC, O'Dea RF. Comparative Absorption Profiles of Divalproex Sodium Delayed-Release Versus Extended-Release Tablets—Clinical Implications. Ann Pharmacother 2016; 40:619-25. [PMID: 16569797 DOI: 10.1345/aph.1g617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The distinct absorption characteristics of the conventional enteric-coated, delayed-release (DR) and the novel extended-release (ER) divalproex sodium formulations are not well recognized. Objective: To quantitatively and qualitatively differentiate the absorption characteristics of divalproex-DR and -ER formulations. Methods: Healthy volunteers (N = 28) received single 1000 mg doses of divalproex-DR and divalproex-ER tablets in a crossover fashion. Noncompartmental and compartmental analyses were used to estimate valproic acid (VPA) pharmacokinetics from the plasma concentration–time profiles determined from intensive blood sampling over 48 hours. Results: VPA was not absorbed from divalproex-DR in the first 2 hours (absorption lag-time) after dosing. After VPA release in the intestine, approximately 63% of the dose was absorbed in less than 1 hour, that is, 2.9 hours (mean absorption time) from dosing. Maximum concentration (Cmax) was achieved approximately 4 hours after dosing. VPA absorption was complete (~93% of dose) within 3 absorption half-lives (~4.5 h) post-absorption lag-time, that is, 6–7 hours from dosing. In contrast, VPA absorption from divalproex-ER starts immediately after administration, initially at a modest rate, followed by slow and extended absorption at a constant rate for more than 20 hours; VPA concentrations at 1 and 2 hours were 28% and 40% of Cmax. Approximately 53% of the dose was absorbed within 12 hours (mean absorption time); complete absorption occurred over more than 20 hours without any dose dumping. Conclusions: When antihypertensive treatment options are clinically equivalent, prescribers may first consider using a verapamil SR–based strategy, especially in patients with CAD who have no history of depression. VPA absorption from enteric-coated divalproex-DR is rapid following a lag-time of approximately 2 hours and is complete within 6–7 hours of dosing. In contrast, VPA absorption from divalproex-ER starts immediately after administration, but occurs at a slow, approximately constant rate over more than 20 hours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep Dutta
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL 60064, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Chronic migraine has a great detrimental influence on a patient's life, with a severe impact on socioeconomic functioning and quality of life. Chronic migraine affects 1-2% of the general population, and about 8% of patients with migraine; it usually develops from episodic migraine at an annual conversion rate of about 3%. The chronification is reversible: about 26% of patients with chronic migraine go into remission within 2 years of chronification. The most important modifiable risk factors for chronic migraine include overuse of acute migraine medication, ineffective acute treatment, obesity, depression and stressful life events. Moreover, age, female sex and low educational status increase the risk of chronic migraine. The pathophysiology of migraine chronification can be understood as a threshold problem: certain predisposing factors, combined with frequent headache pain, lower the threshold of migraine attacks, thereby increasing the risk of chronic migraine. Treatment options include oral medications, nerve blockade with local anaesthetics or corticoids, and neuromodulation. Well-defined diagnostic criteria are crucial for the identification of chronic migraine. The International Headache Society classification of chronic migraine was recently updated, and now allows co-diagnosis of chronic migraine and medication overuse headache. This Review provides an up-to-date overview of the classification of chronic migraine, basic mechanisms and risk factors of migraine chronification, and the currently established treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne May
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura H Schulte
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Takeshima T, Suzuki N, Matsumori Y, Shimmoto N, Kurihara Y, Gunji R, Sakai F. Effectiveness and safety of an extended-release tablet of sodium valproate for the prophylactic treatment of migraine: Postmarketing surveillance in Japan. NEUROLOGY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 2016; 4:134-141. [PMID: 27818772 PMCID: PMC5074326 DOI: 10.1111/ncn3.12053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sodium valproate is a standard drug for first-line prophylactic treatment of migraine. However, little information is available of its use in Japanese patients. AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an extended-release tablet of sodium valproate in the prophylactic treatment for Japanese patients with migraine by postmarketing surveillance. METHODS This was a prospective, multicenter and non-interventional observation study in routine clinical practice. A total of 1222 patients with migraine of all age groups (aged <10 to ≤80 years) and both sexes (17.3% men and 82.7% women) from 169 sites were enrolled. RESULTS Migraine frequency during a 4-week period was reduced from 10.2 ± 6.0 days in 1040 patients to 5.0 ± 4.6 days in 944 patients (P < 0.001): 70.8% of patients experienced remission of migraine by ≥30%, 59.0% by ≥50% and 11.8% by ≥100%. Multivariate analysis and stratification sampling showed that this sodium valproate tablet was the most effective in patients with more migraine days, and complete remission was observed in 29% of patients whose migraine days were less than 3 days per 4 weeks at baseline. The extended-release tablet of sodium valproate reduced migraine intensity and duration of migraine attacks. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was 6.3% (67/1070 patients) and well tolerated. However, four pregnancies were discovered in this survey. CONCLUSIONS This first large observation study in Japan suggests that an extended-release tablet of sodium valproate is effective and safe for the prophylactic treatment of patients with migraine in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takao Takeshima
- Department of NeurologyHeadache CenterTominaga HospitalOsakaJapan
| | - Norihiro Suzuki
- Department of NeurologySchool of MedicineKeio UniversityTokyoJapan
| | | | - Naoki Shimmoto
- Post Marketing Surveillance DepartmentKowa CompanyTokyoJapan
| | - Yuji Kurihara
- Post Marketing Surveillance DepartmentKowa CompanyTokyoJapan
| | - Ryoji Gunji
- Post Marketing Surveillance DepartmentKowa CompanyTokyoJapan
| | - Fumihiko Sakai
- Saitama International Headache CenterSaitama Neuropsychiatric InstituteSaitamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
July 2015: This review has been split and updated in a series of four new reviews (Linde 2013a; Linde 2013b; Linde 2013c; Linde 2013d). Readers are referred to those reviews for updated results. This review will not be updated. May 2016: This review has now been withdrawn as it has been replaced by the four new titles listed above. The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward P Chronicle
- University of Hawaii at Manoa(Deceased) Department of PsychologyManoaUSA
| | - Wim M Mulleners
- Canisius Wilhelmina ZiekenhuisDepartment of NeurologyPO Box 9015NijmegenNetherlands6500 GS
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a chronic debilitating disorder. Selected antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are proposed as preventives for migraine. Clinical efficacy and side effects of these AEDs are discussed. SUMMARY OF REVIEW The American Academy of Neurology and the American Society of Headache classify topiramate (TPM) and divalproex sodium (DVPX) as Level-A medications and recommend offering them to patients for migraine prophylaxis. Their mechanism(s) of actions remains not entirely known. Their recognized action as sodium channel blockers may affect the neural component of migraine pain. TPM or DVPX can be considered an obvious choice for those patients with a concomitant seizure disorder. Care must be taken to plan their treatment with their psychiatrist if a mood disorder is present. DVPX tends not to be prescribed as first/second choice due to its potential for weight gain and hepatotoxicity. TPM is generally first choice, but bears severe contraindications. Both medications require education on teratogenesis in childbearing women. Consideration of gabapentin, acetazolamide, leviteracetam, zonisamide, and carbamazipine may be given later as empiric options and in selected patients. Patients must be made aware that there is insufficient scientific support for their use in migraine. CONCLUSIONS Available AEDs to prophylactically treat migraine are few but of robust clinical efficacy. Special care needs to be exerted with respect to their side effects. Future research is needed for a better understanding of their mechanisms of action in migraine. Such research has the potential of providing some insight into the pathophysiology of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janine Good
- Department of Neurology, University of Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sun H, Dodick DW, Silberstein S, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Ashina M, Saper J, Cady R, Chon Y, Dietrich J, Lenz R. Safety and efficacy of AMG 334 for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:382-90. [PMID: 26879279 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)00019-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 269] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2015] [Revised: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway is a promising target for preventive therapies in patients with migraine. We assessed the safety and efficacy of AMG 334, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the CGRP receptor, for migraine prevention. METHODS In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, patients aged 18-60 years with 4 to 14 migraine days per month were enrolled at 59 headache and clinical research centres in North America and Europe, and randomly assigned in a 3:2:2:2 ratio to monthly subcutaneous placebo, AMG 334 7 mg, AMG 334 21 mg, or AMG 334 70 mg using a sponsor-generated randomisation sequence centrally executed by an interactive voice response or interactive web response system. Study site personnel, patients, and the sponsor study personnel were masked to the treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days from baseline to the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. The primary endpoint was calculated using the least squares mean at each timepoint from a generalised linear mixed-effect model for repeated measures. Safety endpoints were adverse events, clinical laboratory values, vital signs, and anti-AMG 334 antibodies. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01952574. An open-label extension phase of up to 256 weeks is ongoing and will assess the long-term safety of AMG 334. FINDINGS From Aug 6, 2013, to June 30, 2014, 483 patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=160), AMG 334 7 mg (n=108), AMG 334 21 mg (n=108), or AMG 334 70 mg (n=107). The mean change in monthly migraine days at week 12 was -3·4 (SE 0·4) days with AMG 334 70 mg versus -2·3 (0·3) days with placebo (difference -1·1 days [95% CI -2·1 to -0·2], p=0·021). The mean reductions in monthly migraine days with the 7 mg (-2·2 [SE 0·4]) and the 21 mg (-2·4 [0·4]) doses were not significantly different from that with placebo. Adverse events were recorded in 82 (54%) patients who received placebo, 54 (50%) patients in the AMG 334 7 mg group, 54 (51%) patients in the AMG 334 21 mg group, and 57 (54%) patients in the AMG 334 70 mg group. The most frequently reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis, fatigue, and headache. Serious adverse events were reported for one patient in the AMG 334 7 mg group (ruptured ovarian cyst) and one patient in the AMG 334 70 mg group (migraine and vertigo); these events were judged to be unrelated to AMG 334 treatment. Nine (3%) of 317 patients had neutralising antibodies. No apparent association was recorded between patients with positive anti-AMG 334 antibodies and adverse events. No clinically significant vital signs, laboratory, or electrocardiogram findings were recorded. INTERPRETATION These results suggest that AMG 334 70 mg might be a potential therapy for migraine prevention in patients with episodic migraine and support further investigation of AMG 334 in larger phase 3 trials. FUNDING Amgen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Sun
- Department of Global Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - David W Dodick
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - Peter J Goadsby
- Department of Neurology NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joel Saper
- Michigan Head Pain and Neurological Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Roger Cady
- Clinvest Research, Banyan Group, Headache Care Center, Springfield, MO, USA
| | - Yun Chon
- Department of Biostatistics, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Julie Dietrich
- Department of Global Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Robert Lenz
- Department of Global Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kabbouche M, Khoury CK. Management of Primary Headache in the Emergency Department and Inpatient Headache Unit. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2016; 23:40-3. [PMID: 27017021 DOI: 10.1016/j.spen.2015.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is a chronic disorder with debilitating exacerbations throughout the lifetime of migraineurs. Children and adolescents are significantly affected. The prevalence of migraine in this age group is higher than predicted in the last decade. Fortunately, this chronic disease is getting more attention and recognition, and better treatments are now being offered to these patients. Different medications are available, mostly for the outpatient management of an attack and include the use of over-the-counter anti-inflammatory medications as well as prescribed medications like the triptans group. These therapies do sometime fail and the exacerbations can last days to weeks. Early aggressive intravenous treatment can be very effective in breaking the attack and allowing the child to be functional faster and sometimes may prevent chronification of an attack.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marielle Kabbouche
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
| | - Chaouki K Khoury
- Texas A&M Health Sciences Center, Round Rock, TX; Baylor University Medical Center and Our Children's House at Baylor, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kacperski J, Kabbouche MA, O’Brien HL, Weberding JL. The optimal management of headaches in children and adolescents. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2016; 9:53-68. [PMID: 26788131 PMCID: PMC4710107 DOI: 10.1177/1756285615616586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The recognition of the diagnosis of migraine in children is increasing. Early and aggressive treatment of migraine in this population with the use of over-the-counter medications has proven effective. The off-label use of many migraine-specific medications is often accepted in the absence of sufficient evidenced-based trials. Mild to severe cases of migraine should be treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with triptans used in moderate to severe headaches unresponsive to over-the-counter therapy. Rescue medication including dihydroergotamine [DHE] should be used for status migrainosus, preferably in the hospital setting. Antiemetics that have antidopaminergic properties can be helpful in patients with associated symptoms of nausea and vomiting through their action on central migraine generation. Furthermore, patients and families should be educated on nonpharmacologic management such as lifestyle modification and avoidance of triggers that can prevent episodic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kacperski
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnett Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Marielle A. Kabbouche
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Hope L. O’Brien
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jessica L. Weberding
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gooriah R, Nimeri R, Ahmed F. Evidence-Based Treatments for Adults with Migraine. PAIN RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 2015; 2015:629382. [PMID: 26839703 PMCID: PMC4709728 DOI: 10.1155/2015/629382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 12/09/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Migraine, a significantly disabling condition, is treated with acute and preventive medications. However, some individuals are refractory to standard treatments. Although there is a host of alternative management options available, these are not always backed by strong evidence. In fact, most of the drugs used in migraine were initially designed for other purposes. Whilst effective, the benefits from these medications are modest, reflecting the need for newer and migraine-specific therapeutic agents. In recent years, we have witnessed the emergence of novel treatments, of which noninvasive neuromodulation appears to be the most attractive given its ease of use and excellent tolerability profile. This paper reviews the evidence behind the available treatments for migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Randa Nimeri
- Department of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
| | - Fayyaz Ahmed
- Department of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kabbouche M. Management of Pediatric Migraine Headache in the Emergency Room and Infusion Center. Headache 2015; 55:1365-70. [PMID: 26486800 DOI: 10.1111/head.12694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2015] [Revised: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is a common disorder that starts at an early age and takes a variable pattern from intermittent to chronic headache with several exacerbations throughout a lifetime. Children and adolescents are significantly affected. If an acute headache is not aborted by outpatient migraine therapy, it often causes severe disability, preventing the child from attending school and social events. Treating the acute severe headache aggressively helps prevent prolonged disability as well as possible chronification. Multiple medications are available, mostly for the outpatient management of an attack and include the use of over-the-counter anti-inflammatory medications as well as prescribed medications in the triptan group. These therapies do sometime fail and the exacerbation can last from days to weeks. If the headache lasts 72 hours or longer it will fall in the category of status migrainosus. Status migrainosus is described as a severe disabling headache lasting 72 hours or more by the ICHD3 criteria. Disability is a major issue in children and adolescents and aggressive acute measures are to be taken to control it as soon as possible. Early aggressive intravenous therapy can be very effective in breaking the attack and allowing the child to be quickly back to normal functioning. This article reviews what is available for the treatment of pediatric primary headaches in the emergency room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marielle Kabbouche
- Division of Neurology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA (M. Kabbouche).,Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA (M. Kabbouche)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rahimdel A, Zeinali A, Yazdian-Anari P, Hajizadeh R, Arefnia E. Effectiveness of Vitamin B2 versus Sodium Valproate in Migraine Prophylaxis: a randomized clinical trial. Electron Physician 2015; 7:1344-8. [PMID: 26516440 PMCID: PMC4623793 DOI: 10.14661/1344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Migraine headache is a prevalent periodical and neurological impairment that is associated with functional disorders. Regarding the side effects of available medications, research is continuing in an effort to identify new, effective pharmaceutical regimens with limited side effects. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of vitamin B2 versus sodium valproate in migraine prophylaxis. Methods This was a single-blind clinical trial conducted on 90 migraine patients in two parallel groups. The first group underwent vitamin B2 treatment (400 mg/day) for three months, and the second group was treated with sodium valproate (500 mg/day). The patients were examined at the beginning of the study and 4, 8, and 12 weeks later. After the administration of the drugs in both groups, we recorded the duration of migraine pain, the frequency of migraine episodes, and the severity of the headaches. Potential complications of this study that were measured were weight gain, dizziness, and gastrointestinal problems. Results The findings showed that the frequency, median duration per month, and severity of the headaches decreased in both groups, but the difference between them was not significant (p > 0.05). However, there were significantly fewer side effects in vitamin B2 group (p = 0.005). Conclusion Sodium valproate and vitamin B2 have similar effects on the reduction of migraine attacks, but vitamin B2 had fewer complications and fewer adverse effects; therefore, vitamin B2 can be administered to patients who are prohibited from taking sodium valproate or who have adverse side effects when they take it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abolghasem Rahimdel
- Neurologist, Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Ahmad Zeinali
- Physiatrist, Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran
| | - Pouria Yazdian-Anari
- Medical student, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Rahele Hajizadeh
- Medical student, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Ehsan Arefnia
- Medical student, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jackson JL, Cogbill E, Santana-Davila R, Eldredge C, Collier W, Gradall A, Sehgal N, Kuester J. A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0130733. [PMID: 26172390 PMCID: PMC4501738 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2014] [Accepted: 05/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness and side effects of migraine prophylactic medications. DESIGN We performed a network meta-analysis. Data were extracted independently in duplicate and quality was assessed using both the JADAD and Cochrane Risk of Bias instruments. Data were pooled and network meta-analysis performed using random effects models. DATA SOURCES PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Trial Registry, bibliography of retrieved articles through 18 May 2014. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES We included randomized controlled trials of adults with migraine headaches of at least 4 weeks in duration. RESULTS Placebo controlled trials included alpha blockers (n = 9), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 3), angiotensin receptor blockers (n = 3), anticonvulsants (n = 32), beta-blockers (n = 39), calcium channel blockers (n = 12), flunarizine (n = 7), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (n = 6), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (n = 1) serotonin agonists (n = 9) and tricyclic antidepressants (n = 11). In addition there were 53 trials comparing different drugs. Drugs with at least 3 trials that were more effective than placebo for episodic migraines included amitriptyline (SMD: -1.2, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.82), -flunarizine (-1.1 headaches/month (ha/month), 95% CI: -1.6 to -0.67), fluoxetine (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI: -0.97 to -0.17), metoprolol (-0.94 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.4 to -0.46), pizotifen (-0.43 ha/month, 95% CI: -0.6 to -0.21), propranolol (-1.3 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.0 to -0.62), topiramate (-1.1 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.9 to -0.73) and valproate (-1.5 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.1 to -0.8). Several effective drugs with less than 3 trials included: 3 ace inhibitors (enalapril, lisinopril, captopril), two angiotensin receptor blockers (candesartan, telmisartan), two anticonvulsants (lamotrigine, levetiracetam), and several beta-blockers (atenolol, bisoprolol, timolol). Network meta-analysis found amitriptyline to be better than several other medications including candesartan, fluoxetine, propranolol, topiramate and valproate and no different than atenolol, flunarizine, clomipramine or metoprolol. CONCLUSION Several drugs good evidence supporting efficacy. There is weak evidence supporting amitriptyline's superiority over some drugs. Selection of prophylactic medication should be tailored according to patient preferences, characteristics and side effect profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L. Jackson
- General Internal Medicine, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth Cogbill
- Department of Medicine, Western Michigan School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Rafael Santana-Davila
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Christina Eldredge
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - William Collier
- Department of Pharmacology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Andrew Gradall
- School of Health Sciences, Gollis University, Hergaisa, Somaliland
| | - Neha Sehgal
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Jessica Kuester
- General Internal Medicine, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|