The Effect of Remifentanil on the Heat Pain Threshold in Volunteers

Opioid Induced Hyperalgesia, a Research Phenomenon or a Clinical Reality? Results of a Canadian Survey

BACKGROUND

Very little is known regarding the prevalence of opioid induced hyperalgesia (OIH) in day to day medical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physician's perception of the prevalence of OIH within their practice, and to assess the level of physician's knowledge with respect to the identification and treatment of this problem.

METHODS

An electronic questionnaire was distributed to physicians who work in anesthesiology, chronic pain, and/or palliative care in Canada.

RESULTS

Of the 462 responses received, most were from male (69%) anesthesiologists (89.6%), in the age range of 36 to 64 years old (79.8%). In this study, the suspected prevalence of OIH using the average number of patients treated per year with opioids was 0.002% per patient per physician practice year for acute pain, and 0.01% per patient per physician practice year for chronic pain. Most physicians (70.2%) did not use clinical tests to help make a diagnosis of OIH. The treatment modalities most frequently used were the addition of an NMDA antagonist, combined with lowering the opioid doses and using opioid rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

The perceived prevalence of OIH in clinical practice is a relatively rare phenomenon. Furthermore, more than half of physicians did not use a clinical test to confirm the diagnosis of OIH. The two main treatment modalities used were NMDA antagonists and opioid rotation. The criteria for the diagnosis of OIH still need to be accurately defined.

Pregabalin for the treatment of syringomyelia-associated neuropathic pain in dogs: A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trial

Pregabalin is the first-line treatment for neuropathic pain (NeP) in humans. Dogs with Chiari-like malformation and syringomyelia (CM/SM) associated with NeP could benefit from pregabalin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin for NeP in dogs with CM/SM. Eight dogs with symptomatic CM/SM were included in a double-masked, randomised, crossover placebo-controlled clinical trial. All dogs received anti-inflammatory drugs as base-line treatment during placebo or pregabalin phase of 14±4 days each. Analgesic efficacy was assessed with a daily numerical rating scale (NRS) recorded by dog owners (0-10, 10=worst pain) and quantitative sensory testing at baseline, placebo and pregabalin phases. Blood samples were collected to report pregabalin exposure and to assess renal function. Daily NRS scores recorded by dog owners in the pregabalin group were lower than in the placebo group (P=0.006). Mechanical thresholds were higher with pregabalin compared to baseline or placebo (P=0.037, P<0.001). Cold latency at 15°C was prolonged on the neck and humeri with pregabalin compared to baseline (P<0.001 for both) or placebo (P=0.02, P=0.0001). Cold latency at 0°C was longer on pregabalin compared to baseline and placebo (P=0.001, P=0.004). There was no pregabalin accumulation between first and last dose. This study demonstrates the efficacy of pregabalin for the treatment of NeP due to CM/SM on daily pain scores recorded by dog owners. Pregabalin significantly reduced mechanical hyperalgesia, cold hyperalgesia (0°C) and allodynia (15°C) compared to placebo. Pregabalin was non-cumulative and well tolerated with occasional mild sedation.

Pharmacokinetics and -dynamics of intramuscular and intranasal naloxone: an explorative study in healthy volunteers

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a model for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies of naloxone antagonism under steady-state opioid agonism and to compare a high-concentration/low-volume intranasal naloxone formulation 8 mg/ml to intramuscular 0.8 mg.

METHODS

Two-way crossover in 12 healthy volunteers receiving naloxone while receiving remifentanil by a target-controlled infusion for 102 min. The group were subdivided into three different doses of remifentanil. Blood samples for serum naloxone concentrations, pupillometry and heat pain threshold were measured.

RESULTS

The relative bioavailability of intranasal to intramuscular naloxone was 0.75. Pupillometry showed difference in antagonism; the effect was significant in the data set as a whole (p < 0.001) and in all three subgroups (p < 0.02-p < 0.001). Heat pain threshold showed no statistical difference.

CONCLUSIONS

A target-controlled infusion of remifentanil provides good conditions for studying the pharmacodynamics of naloxone, and pupillometry was a better modality than heat pain threshold. Intranasal naloxone 0.8 mg is inferior for a similar dose intramuscular. Our design may help to bridge the gap between studies in healthy volunteers and the patient population in need of naloxone for opioid overdose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov : NCT02307721.

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Block Remifentanil-Induced Hyperalgesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Background: Remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (r-IH) involves an imbalance in the inhibitory and excitatory systems. As the transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) modulates the thalamocortical synapses in a top-down manner, we hypothesized that the active (a)-t-DCS would be more effective than sham(s)-tDCS to prevent r-IH. We used an experimental paradigm to induce temporal summation of pain utilizing a repetitive cold test (rCOLDT) assessed by the Numerical Pain Score (NPS 0-10) and we evaluated the function of the descending pain modulatory system (DPMS) by the change on the NPS (0–10) during the conditioned pain modulation (CPM)-task (primary outcomes). We tested whether a-tDCS would be more effective than s-tDCS to improve pain perception assessed by the heat pain threshold (HPT) and the reaction time during the ice-water pain test (IPT) (secondary outcomes).

Methods: This double-blinded, factorial randomized trial included 48 healthy males, ages ranging 19–40 years. They were randomized into four equal groups: a-tDCS/saline, s-tDCS/saline, a-tDCS/remifentanil and s-tDCS/remifentanil. tDCS was applied over the primary motor cortex, during 20 min at 2 mA, which was introduced 10 min after starting remifentanil infusion at 0.06 μg⋅kg^-1⋅min^-1 or saline.

Results: An ANCOVA mixed model revealed that during the rCOLDT, there was a significant main effect on the NPS scores (F = 3.81; P = 0.01). The s-tDCS/remifentanil group presented larger pain scores during rCOLDT, [mean (SD) 5.49 (1.04)] and a-tDCS/remifentanil group had relative lower pain scores [4.15 (1.62)]; showing its blocking effect on r-IH. a-tDCS/saline and s-tDCS/saline groups showed lowest pain scores during rCOLDT, [3.11 (1.2)] and [3.15 (1.62)], respectively. The effect of sedation induced by remifentanil during the rCOLDT was not significant (F = 0.76; P = 0.38). Remifentanil groups showed positive scores in the NPS (0–10) during the CPM-task, that is, it produced a disengagement of the DPMS. Also, s-tDCS/Remifentanil compared to a-tDCS showed lower HPT and larger reaction-time during the IPT.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that effects of a-tDCS prevent the summation response induced by r-IH during rCOLDT and the a-tDCS blocked the disengagement of DPMS. Thereby, tDCS could be considered as a new approach to contra-regulate paradoxical mechanisms involved in the r-IH. Clinical trials identification: NCT02432677. URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH): a real clinical problem or just an experimental phenomenon?

Although opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) is mentioned as a potential cause of opioid dose escalation without adequate analgesia, true evidence in support of this notion is relatively limited. Most studies conducted in the context of acute and experimental pain, which seemingly demonstrated evidence for OIH, actually might have measured other phenomena such as acute opioid withdrawal or tolerance. OIH studies in patients with chronic pain have used various experimental pain models (such as cold pain tolerance or heat pain intensity). Therefore, the fact that they have yielded inconsistent results is hard to interpret. Thus far, with the exception of a few clinical case reports on OIH in patients with cancer pain and one prospective study in patients with chronic neuropathic pain, evidence for OIH in patients with chronic or cancer-related pain is lacking. Whether experimental pain models are necessary for establishing the clinical diagnosis of OIH, and which specific model is preferred, are yet to be determined.

Effects of Propofol, Sevoflurane, Remifentanil, and (S)-Ketamine in Subanesthetic Concentrations on Visceral and Somatosensory Pain–evoked Potentials

Background:

Although electroencephalographic parameters and auditory evoked potentials (AEP) reflect the hypnotic component of anesthesia, there is currently no specific and mechanism-based monitoring tool for anesthesia-induced blockade of nociceptive inputs. The aim of this study was to assess visceral pain–evoked potentials (VPEP) and contact heat–evoked potentials (CHEP) as electroencephalographic indicators of drug-induced changes of visceral and somatosensory pain. Additionally, AEP and electroencephalographic permutation entropy were used to evaluate sedative components of the applied drugs.

Methods:

In a study enrolling 60 volunteers, VPEP, CHEP (amplitude N2-P1), and AEP (latency Nb, amplitude Pa-Nb) were recorded without drug application and at two subanesthetic concentration levels of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, or (s)-ketamine. Drug-induced changes of evoked potentials were analyzed. VPEP were generated by electric stimuli using bipolar electrodes positioned in the distal esophagus. For CHEP, heat pulses were given to the medial aspect of the right forearm using a CHEP stimulator. In addition to AEP, electroencephalographic permutation entropy was used to indicate level of sedation.

Results:

With increasing concentrations of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, and (s)-ketamine, VPEP and CHEP N2-P1 amplitudes decreased. AEP and electroencephalographic permutation entropy showed neither clinically relevant nor statistically significant suppression of cortical activity during drug application.

Conclusions:

Decreasing VPEP and CHEP amplitudes under subanesthetic concentrations of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, and (s)-ketamine indicate suppressive drug effects. These effects seem to be specific for analgesia.

Morning types are less sensitive to pain than evening types all day long

BACKGROUND

Diurnal variations in pain have been observed in experimental protocols, post-surgery states and pathological conditions. Chronotype is considered to have the most profound effect on diurnal variations, and in addition, previous studies suggest that evening types may be more vulnerable to pain than morning types. This study aimed to examine whether or not morning and evening chronotypes differ in terms of their daily levels and diurnal fluctuations of pain sensitivity.

METHODS

A total of 16 morning-healthy and 15 evening-healthy men were selected using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire and underwent nine measurements during 1 day (between 08:15 and 20:15 h), each consisting of five heat stimuli situated at the ventral side of the wrist.

RESULTS

A marked difference between chronotypes was found, with morning types showing less sensitivity to pain than evening types all day long [M = 50.1; standard error (SE) = 1 and M = 47.2; SE = 1, respectively; pain thresholds in centigrade]. Diurnal variations in pain were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that chronotype could be an important factor determining sensitivity to pain, regardless of time of day.

Assessment of the analgesic effect of remifentanil using three pain models in healthy Korean volunteers: a randomized, controlled study

Quantitative pain assessment in human beings is useful for developing new analgesics. This study assessed the analgesic effect of remifentanil in 20 healthy Korean men using three pain models to investigate whether these models can be used in Asians. The study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way cross-over study. The subjects received intravenous remifentanil with doses starting at 0.01 μg/kg/min. and increasing by 0.01 μg/kg/min. up to 0.10 μg/kg/min. in one session; they received placebo in another session. Heat pain thresholds were assessed at dose levels of 0.02, 0.05, 0.08 and 0.10 μg/kg/min. Pressure pain threshold and tolerance and mechanical pain threshold were assessed at 0.08 μg/kg/min. Remifentanil dose-dependently increased the heat pain threshold. The differences (95% confidence interval) between remifentanil and placebo were 1.54°C (0.78, 2.31), 1.82°C (1.11, 2.54) and 2.47°C (1.55, 3.38) at 0.05, 0.08 and 0.10 μg/kg/min. remifentanil, respectively. Remifentanil conferred a significantly higher pressure pain threshold and tolerance than placebo (p = 0.0001). There was a trend of increasing mechanical pain threshold with remifentanil, although it was not statistically significant. The results suggest that heat pain and pressure pain models are valid in East Asians for assessing analgesic effects.

Intravenous opioid testing in patients with chronic non-cancer pain

The clinical use of an intravenous opioid testing can help to predict whether opioids will be beneficial. The determination of individual opioid responsiveness justifies subsequent long-term opioid treatment and is generally recommended. An overview over current testing procedures is given with particular regard to choice of opioid, maximum dose, determination of endpoints and duration of testing and recovery. Remifentanil testing is a new approch and is studied in a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over study in 24 patients suffering from severe non-cancer pain. An ascending infusion of remifentanil and placebo respectively was titrated against endpoints. The testing allowed a disctinction between 11 opioid-responders and 13 non-responders. Complete recovery after end of infusion was rapid with a reach of baseline conditions after 25 min in all patients. Thus the complete remifentanil testing procedure required at utmost 1 h. In conclusion, remifentanil testing offers a more rapid procedure allowing the routine use in an ambulatory setting.

Anesthetic considerations and surgical caveats for awake airway surgery

The evolution of novel techniques for the treatment of laryngeal pathology has led to a significant expansion of the role of diagnostic assessment and the range of laryngeal procedures performed. These procedures typically benefit from an anesthetic approach that diverges from a standard general endotracheal or laryngeal mask airway-based inhalational anesthetic. The shared airway, need for intraoperative assessment of vocal cord function, risk of airway fire, and desire for rapid emergence and discharge are all important factors. In this article the authors undertake a collaborative anesthesia-surgical discussion of anesthetic management for airway procedures that are optimally performed with a spontaneously breathing, cooperative patient. An overview of pharmacologic approaches to airway anesthesia and cooperative sedation, followed by a discussion on the surgical requirements and anesthetic goals of commonly performed procedures, are presented.

The analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects of transcranial electrostimulation with combined direct and alternating current in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Transcranial electrostimulation (TES) has been reported to produce clinically significant analgesia, but randomized and double-blind studies are lacking. We investigated the analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects of TES in validated human experimental pain models.

METHODS

In 20 healthy male subjects we evaluated the analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects of TES(60Hz) and TES(100Hz) to heat and mechanical pain in experimentally induced ultraviolet B skin sunburns and in normal skin. Previous animal studies in our laboratory predicted that TES(60Hz) would provide significant analgesia, and TES(100Hz) was a suitable active control. The study was conducted in a double-blind, randomized, 2-way cross-over fashion. TES was administered for 35 minutes. Quantitative sensory testing evaluating heat and mechanical pain thresholds was conducted before TES, during TES, and 45 minutes after TES.

RESULTS

TES (TES(60Hz) > TES(100Hz)) evoked rapidly developing, significant thermal and mechanical antihyperalgesic effects in the ultraviolet B lesion, and attenuated thermal pain in unimpaired skin. No long-lasting analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects of a single TES treatment were demonstrated in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

TES produces significant, frequency-dependent antihyperalgesic and analgesic effects in humans. The characteristics of the TES effects indicate a high likelihood of its ability to modulate both peripheral sensitization of nociceptors and central hyperexcitability.

Analgesia in conjunction with normalisation of thermal sensation following deep brain stimulation for central post-stroke pain

The aetiology of central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is poorly understood and such pains are often refractory to treatment. We report the case of a 56-year-old man, who, following a temporo-parietal infarct, suffered from debilitating and refractory hemi-body cold dysaesthesia and severe tactile allodynia. This was associated with thermal and tactile hypoaesthesia and hypoalgesia on his affected side. Implantation of a deep brain stimulating electrode in his periventricular gray (PVG) region produced an improvement in his pain that was associated with a striking normalisation of his deficits in somatosensory perception. This improvement in pain and thermal sensibility was reversed as stimulation became less effective, because of increased electrode impedance. Therefore, we postulate that the analgesic benefit may have occurred as a consequence of the normalisation of somatosensory function and we discuss these findings in relation to the theories of central pain generation and the potential to engage useful plasticity in central circuits.

Assessing analgesic actions of opioids by experimental pain models in healthy volunteers - an updated review

AIM

Experimental pain models may help to evaluate the mechanisms of action of analgesics and target the clinical indications for their use. This review addresses how the efficacy of opioids can be assessed in human volunteers using experimental pain models. The drawback with the different study designs is also discussed.

METHOD

A literature search was completed for randomized controlled studies which included human experimental pain models, healthy volunteers and opioids.

RESULTS

Opioids with a strong affinity for the micro-opioid receptor decreased the sensation in a variety of experimental pain modalities, but strong tonic pain was attenuated more than short lasting pain and non-painful sensations. The effects of opioids with weaker affinity for the micro-opioid receptor were detected by a more narrow range of pain models, and the assessment methods needed to be more sensitive.

CONCLUSION

The way the pain is induced, assessed and summarized is very important for the sensitivity of the pain models. This review gives an overview of how different opioids perform in experimental pain models. Generally experimental pain models need to be designed with careful consideration of pharmacological mechanisms and pharmacokinetics of analgesics. This knowledge can aid the decisions needed to be taken when designing experimental pain studies for compounds entering phase 1 clinical trials.

[Remifentanil-based intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative pain therapy. Is there an optimal treatment strategy?]

Remifentanil is a synthetic opioid derivate with an agonist activity at mu-opioid receptors. The pharmacokinetic profile differs from other synthetic opioids. Remifentanil is rapidly metabolised by unspecific blood and tissue esterases and the metabolites have almost no intrinsic activity. According to its unique pharmacokinetic profile, remifentanil-based anaesthesia might be associated with a high level of postoperative pain, therefore, an appropriate postoperative pain management is an import aspect. In addition, remifentanil withdrawal induces a compensatory up-regulation of secondary messenger pathways, inducing hyperalgesia. This review provides a comprehensive summary of basic and clinical research concerning the intraoperative use of remifentanil and postoperative pain therapy. The relative contribution of rapid degradation and withdrawal-induced hyperalgesia to postoperative pain will be discussed. In addition, this review attempts to identify potential clinical implications and treatment strategies.

The effects of the TRPV1 antagonist SB-705498 on TRPV1 receptor-mediated activity and inflammatory hyperalgesia in humans

TRPV1 is a cation channel activated by a range of noxious stimuli and highly expressed in nociceptive fibres. TRPV1 receptors are involved in pain and sensitisation associated with tissue injury and inflammation; hence, TRPV1 antagonists are potentially useful for the treatment of such pain states. SB-705498 is a potent, selective and orally bioavailable TRPV1 antagonist with demonstrated efficacy in a number of preclinical pain models. In this first-time-into-human study, we have investigated the pharmacodynamic and antihyperalgesic activity of SB-705498. The compound was safe and well tolerated at single oral doses up to 400mg. In a cohort of 19 healthy volunteers, we used a randomised placebo-controlled single-blind cross-over design to assess the effects of SB-705498 (400mg) on heat-evoked pain and skin sensitisation induced by capsaicin or UVB irradiation. Compared with placebo, SB-705498 reduced the area of capsaicin-evoked flare (P=0.0047). The heat pain threshold on non-sensitised skin was elevated following SB-705498 (estimated difference from placebo [95% confidence intervals]: 1.3 degrees C [0.07,2.53], P=0.019). Following capsaicin sensitisation, the heat pain threshold and tolerance were similar between SB-705498 and placebo. However, SB-705498 increased heat pain tolerance at the site of UVB-evoked inflammation (estimated difference from placebo: 0.93 degrees C [0.25,1.6], P=0.0054). The magnitude of the pharmacodynamic effects of SB-705498 appeared to be related to plasma concentration. These results indicate that SB-705498, at a clinically safe and well-tolerated dose, has target-specific pharmacodynamic activity in humans. These data provide the first clinical evidence that a TRPV1 antagonist may alleviate pain and hyperalgesia associated with inflammation and tissue injury.

Modulation of Remifentanil-Induced Postinfusion Hyperalgesia by Propofol

BACKGROUND

Experimental and clinical studies suggest that brief opioid exposure can enhance pain sensitivity. During anesthesia, however, opioids are commonly administered in combination with either IV or inhaled hypnotic drugs. In this investigation we sought to determine the analgesic and antihyperalgesic properties of propofol in subhypnotic concentrations on remifentanil-induced postinfusion hypersensitivity in an experimental human pain model.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy volunteers were included in this randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study in a cross-over design. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation at high current densities (41.7 +/- 14.3 mA) induced spontaneous acute pain (numerical rating scale = 6 of 10) and stable areas of hyperalgesia. Pain intensities and areas of hyperalgesia were assessed before, during and after a 30 min target-controlled infusion of propofol (1.5 microg/mL) and remifentanil (0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), either alone or in combination (propofol 1.5 microg/mL with remifentanil 0.025 or 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)).

RESULTS

During infusion, propofol significantly reduced the electrically evoked pain to 72% +/- 21% of control. Subhypnotic concentrations of propofol did not lead to any hyperalgesic effects. Coadministration of remifentanil led to synergistic analgesic effects (to 62% +/- 26% and 58% +/- 25% of control, for 0.025 or 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively), but upon withdrawal, pain and hyperalgesia increased above control level.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest clinically relevant interactions of propofol and remifentanil in humans, since propofol led to a delay and a weakening of remifentanil-induced postinfusion anti-analgesia in humans. Nevertheless, pronociceptive effects were not completely antagonized by propofol, which may account for the increased demand for analgesics after remifentanil-based anesthesia in clinical practice.

The impact of opioid-induced hyperalgesia for postoperative pain

Clinical evidence suggests that--besides their well known analgesic activity - opioids can increase rather than decrease sensitivity to noxious stimuli. Based on the observation that opioids can activate pain inhibitory and pain facilitatory systems, this pain hypersensitivity has been attributed to a relative predominance of pronociceptive mechanisms. Acute receptor desensitization via uncoupling of the receptor from G-proteins, upregulation of the cAMP pathway, activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor system, as well as descending facilitation, have been proposed as potential mechanisms underlying opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Numerous reports exist demonstrating that opioid-induced hyperalgesia is observed both in animal and human experimental models. Brief exposures to micro-receptor agonists induce long-lasting hyperalgesic effects for days in rodents, and also in humans large-doses of intraoperative micro-receptor agonists were found to increase postoperative pain and morphine consumption. Furthermore, the prolonged use of opioids in patients is often associated with a requirement for increasing doses and the development of abnormal pain. Successful strategies that may decrease or prevent opioid-induced hyperalgesia include the concomitant administration of drugs like NMDA-antagonists, alpha2-agonists, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioid rotation or combinations of opioids with different receptor/selectivity.

Remifentanil

Remifentanil (Ultiva), a 4-anilidopiperidine derivative of fentanyl, is an ultra-short-acting micro-opioid receptor agonist indicated to provide analgesia and sedation in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil is a useful option for mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU setting. Its unique properties (e.g. organ-independent metabolism, lack of accumulation, rapid offset of action) set it apart from other opioid agents. Remifentanil is at least as effective as comparator opioids such as fentanyl, morphine and sufentanil in providing pain relief and sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Moreover, it allows fast and predictable extubation, as well as being associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and quicker ICU discharge than comparators in some studies. In addition, remifentanil is generally well tolerated in this patient population. Thus, remifentanil is a welcome addition to the currently available pharmacological agents employed in the management of mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Opioidvermittelte Analgesie und Hyperalgesie

Opioids are frequently used for the treatment of moderate to severe acute and chronic pain. However, clinical evidence suggests that opioids can elicit increased sensitivity to noxious stimuli suggesting that administration of opioids can activate both, pain inhibitory and pain facilitatory systems. Acute receptor desensitization via uncoupling of the receptor from G proteins, upregulation of the cAMP pathway, activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor system and descending facilitation have been proposed as potential mechanisms underlying opioid-induced hyperalgesia. The tolerance results from a pain sensitization process more than from a decrease in the opioid effectiveness. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance are observed both in animal and human experimental models. Brief exposures to mu-receptor agonists induce long-lasting hyperalgesic effects for days. Furthermore, the prolonged use of opioids in patients often requires increasing doses and may be accompanied by the development of abnormal pain. Successful strategies that may decrease or prevent opioid-induced hyperalgesia include the concomitant administration of drugs such as NMDA antagonists, alpha(2)-agonists, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), opioid rotation, or combinations of opioids with different receptor selectivity.

Remifentanil

Remifentanil (Ultiva), a fentanyl derivative, is an ultra-short acting, nonspecific esterase-metabolised, selective mu-opioid receptor agonist, with a pharmacodynamic profile typical of opioid analgesic agents. Notably, the esterase linkage in remifentanil results in a unique and favourable pharmacokinetic profile for this class of agent. Adjunctive intravenous remifentanil during general anaesthesia is an effective and generally well tolerated opioid analgesic in a broad spectrum of patients, including adults and paediatric patients, undergoing several types of surgical procedures in both the inpatient and outpatient setting. Remifentanil is efficacious in combination with intravenous or volatile hypnotic agents, with these regimens generally being at least as effective as fentanyl- or alfentanil-containing regimens in terms of attenuation of haemodynamic, autonomic and somatic intraoperative responses, and postoperative recovery parameters. The rapid offset of action and short context-sensitive half-time of remifentanil, irrespective of the duration of the infusion, makes the drug a valuable opioid analgesic option for use during balanced general inhalational or total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) where rapid, titratable, intense analgesia of variable duration, and a fast and predictable recovery are required.

Testing of a new pneumatic device to cause pain in humans

BACKGROUND

Surgical pain typically combines superficial and deep pain. We wished to generate pain that resembled surgical pain, reliably and reproducibly, in volunteers.

METHODS

We constructed a computer-controlled pneumatic device to apply pressure to the anterior tibia. The reproducibility of the pain was tested by rating the pressure that caused pain rated 4-5 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) on days 0, 7, and 24 in 10 volunteers. The effect of remifentanil (0.025, 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 microg kg-1 min-1) on pain tolerance in another set of volunteers (n=11) was used as an indirect measure of the reliability of pain production.

RESULTS

The pressure needed (0.7 (0.3) to 0.9 (0.4) atm (mean (SD)) to induce pain rated 4-5 (VAS) did not vary, showing long-term reproducibility of the method. When pressure was applied to cause increasing pain in volunteers (n=11) 0.05 microg kg-1 min-1 remifentanil increased pain tolerance by 50%. An approximate doubling of the dose (0.1 microg kg-1 min-1) increased pain tolerance significantly more. The linear logarithmic dose-effect relationship shows that the device causes pain reliably, and this can be reduced with opioid treatment.

CONCLUSION

This pneumatic device can apply pain reliably and reproducibly.

The Effects of Remifentanil and Gabapentin on Hyperalgesia in a New Extended Inflammatory Skin Pain Model in Healthy Volunteers

We tested the responsiveness of measures of hyperalgesia in a model of UVB-induced inflammatory hyperalgesia with remifentanil, gabapentin, and the combination of both drugs in a double-blinded, active placebo-controlled, 4-way-crossover design in 16 volunteers. A circular skin area was irradiated with UVB-light 20 h before the application of gabapentin (600 mg) and 2 h later remifentanil (0.08 microg.kg(-1).min(-1), 40 min). In the sunburn spots we observed stable decreases of the heat pain perception thresholds (HPPT, mean difference, 4.45 degrees C; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.32 degrees -5.59 degrees ) and heat pain tolerance thresholds (HPTT; mean difference, 5.43 degrees C; 95% CI, 4.50 degrees -6.35 degrees ) compared with normal skin. Further, large areas of mechanical hyperalgesia to pinprick adjacent to the erythema spots developed in all subjects. Overall remifentanil increased the HPPT (mean increase, 2.47 degrees C; 95% CI, 1.86 degrees -3.09 degrees, P < 0.001) and HPTT (mean increase, 3.18 degrees C; 95% CI, 2.65 degrees -3.71 degrees, P < 0.001) and reduced the area of secondary hyperalgesia by 59% (mean decrease, 5326 mm(2); 95% CI, 4233-6419 mm(2), P < 0.001) compared with placebo. In the sunburn remifentanil markedly increased the HPTT by 86% compared with normal skin (additional increase, 2.57 degrees C; 95% CI, 1.71 degrees -3.43 degrees). This different effect was not seen in the HPPT. With the exception of a small increase of HPTT in the sunburn (P = 0.02) gabapentin had no noticeable effect on either hyperalgesia. In conclusion, opioid analgesia was reliably demonstrated in this new extended pain model.

IMPLICATIONS

Opioid analgesia was reliably demonstrated in a new inflammatory model of primary and secondary hyperalgesia. Gabapentin showed no antihyperalgesic and no opioid-enhancing effect in this model.

Comparison of different quantitative sensory testing methods during remifentanil infusion in volunteers

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare thermal and current sensory testing stimuli with respect to opioid responsiveness.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers were randomized in a placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study to receive an infusion of remifentanil 0.08 micro g kg(-1) min(-1) or saline for 40 min. Test procedures included determination of pain perception thresholds (PPT) and pain tolerance thresholds (PTT) to heat, cold, and current at 5, 250 and 2000 Hz, at baseline and at the end of the infusion.

RESULTS

Both current at 5 Hz (PPT 3.69 (SD 2.48) mA vs 2.01 (1.52) mA; PTT 6.42 (2.79) mA vs 3.63 (2.31) mA; P<0.001) and 250 Hz (PPT 4.31 (2.42) mA vs 2.89 (1.57) mA; PTT 7.08 (2.68) mA vs 4.81 (2.42) mA; P<0.001) and heat (PPT 47.4 (2.7) degrees C vs 45.2 (3) degrees C; PTT 51.1 (1.8) degrees C vs 49.7 (1.8) degrees C; P<0.05) detected a significant analgesic effect of remifentanil compared with placebo. No analgesic effect was shown on cold or current at 2000 Hz. The magnitude of responsiveness of current stimuli at 5 Hz and 250 Hz was superior to heat stimuli.

CONCLUSION

Both current (5 and 250 Hz) and heat sensory testing detected a significant analgesic effect of a remifentanil infusion compared with saline. There was more response to current testing.

The absence of acute tolerance during remifentanil infusion in volunteers

The development of acute opioid tolerance in humans remains controversial. We tested the hypothesis that continuous remifentanil infusion leads to rapid development of opioid tolerance. Twenty healthy male volunteers were enrolled onto a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, cross-over design study to receive a 3 h continuous infusion of remifentanil (0.08 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or saline. Test procedures included determination of pain perception thresholds and pain tolerance thresholds to heat and cold and neuroselective sine wave constant current at 5 Hz and 250 Hz. Test procedures were performed at baseline and then repeated at 25, 55, 85, 115, and 160 min (heat/cold) and at 35, 65, 95, 125, and 170 min (electrical current) during infusion. No significant decrease of the pain threshold devolutions between 55 and 180 min after the start of infusion of remifentanil could be detected. In conclusion, no development of acute opioid tolerance was observed during constant remifentanil infusion of 3 h in volunteers.

IMPLICATIONS

The opioid remifentanil was applied to 20 volunteers at a constant concentration for 3 h while pain thresholds to temperature and current were repeatedly assessed. Our aim was to study whether thresholds decrease over time because of the rapid development of opioid tolerance. No development of rapid opioid tolerance was observed.