“Houston, We Have a Problem!”

Opioid free analgesia after return home in ambulatory colonic surgery patients: a single-center observational study

BACKGROUND

Because of the adverse effects of morphine and its derivatives, non-opioid analgesia procedures are proposed after outpatient surgery. Without opioids, the ability to provide quality analgesia after the patient returns home may be questioned. We examined whether an opioid-free strategy could ensure satisfactory analgesia after ambulatory laparoscopic colectomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational single-center study (of prospective collected database) including all patients eligible for scheduled outpatient colectomy. Postoperative analgesia was provided by paracetamol and nefopam. Postoperative follow-up included pain at mobilization (assessed by a numerical rating scale, NRS), hemodynamic variables, temperature, resumption of transit and biological markers of postoperative inflammation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with moderate to severe pain (NRS > 4) the day after surgery.

RESULTS

Data from 144 patients were analyzed. The majority were men aged 59 ± 12 years with a mean BMI of 27 [25-30] kg/m2. ASA scores were 1 for 14%, 2 for 59% and 3 for 27% of patients. Forty-seven patients (33%) underwent surgery for cancer, 94 for sigmoiditis (65%) and 3 (2%) for another colonic pathology. Postoperative pain was affected by time since surgery (Q3 = 52.4,p < 0.001) and decreased significantly from day to day. The incidence of moderate to severe pain at mobilization (NRS > 4) on the first day after surgery was (0.19; 95% CI, 0.13-0.27).

CONCLUSION

Non-opioid analgesia after ambulatory laparoscopic colectomy seems efficient to ensure adequate analgesia. This therapeutic strategy makes it possible to avoid the adverse effects of opioids.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was retrospectively registered and approved by the relevant institutional review board (CERAR) reference IRB 00010254-2018 - 188). All patients gave written informed consent for analysis of their data. The anonymous database was declared to the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) (reference 221 2976 v0 of April 12, 2019).

Child and Adolescent Bariatric Surgery in an Urban Tertiary Center: Special Anesthetic Considerations for Obesity

Children and adolescents with obesity who present for weight loss surgery are a unique subset of patients. A thorough understanding of the perioperative needs of these individuals is essential to avoid deleterious complications. This review illustrates the necessity for specialized care, including the continued need of specified drug dosing and a systematic approach in the management of the pediatric bariatric patient.

Rumors of Psychedelics, Psychotropics and Related Derivatives in Vachellia and Senegalia in Contrast with Verified Records in Australian Acacia

There are almost 1000 species of Acacia sensu stricto in Australia, while the 44 species and 4 subspecies in southern Africa were taxonomically revised in the year 2011 to Senegalia and Vachellia. There are rumors of a chemical similarity between the Australian Acacia and their southern African sister genera. Chemical analysis has unequivocally demonstrated the presence of tryptamines (i.e., DMT), β-carbolines, histamines, and phenethylamines in Australian species. However, reliable published data were not found in support of similar alkaloids in southern African (or even African) species, indicating the need for exploratory phytochemical analysis. Interestingly, the Australian species are more like the Vachellia and Senegalia from the Americas. While many reliable chemical studies have been found, there are several more that report only tentative results. Tentative data and anecdotal accounts are included in the current review to guide researchers to areas where further work can be done. For example, the current review encourages further phytochemical work to confirm if the two metabolite families, tryptamine and β-carboline alkaloids, occur together in a single specimen. Tryptamines and β-carbolines are the prerequisite ingredients of the South American psychotropic drink ayahuasca, which utilizes two different species to create this synergistic combination. These observations and others are discussed in light of geochemical variability, the potential ethnobotanical implications, and the need for further research to confirm or nullify anecdotal reports and tentative chromatographic/spectroscopic data in southern African species.

Pain management for the Nuss procedure: comparison between erector spinae plane block, thoracic epidural, and control

Objective

Pectus excavatum is a congenital deformity characterized by a caved-in chest wall. Repair requires surgery. The less invasive Nuss procedure is very successful, but postoperative pain management is challenging and evolving. New pain management techniques to reduce opioid reliance include the erector spinae plane (ESP) block. We retrospectively examined opioid consumption after Nuss procedure comparing three pain management techniques: ESP block, thoracic epidural (TE), and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study compared pain management outcomes of three patient groups. Seventy-eight subjects aged 10–18 years underwent Nuss procedure at our institution between January 2014 and January 2020. The primary outcome measure was opioid consumption measured in morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary measures included pain ratings and length of stay (LOS). Pain was quantified using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Analysis of variance was performed on all outcome measures.

Results

Average cumulative opioid use was significantly lower in the ESP block (67 mg) than the TE (117 mg) (p=0.0002) or the PCA group (172 mg) (p=0.0002). The ESP block and PCA groups both had a significantly shorter average LOS (3.3 and 3.7 days, respectively) than the TE group (4.7 days). ESP block performed best for reducing opioid consumption and LOS. Reduced opioid consumption is key for limiting side effects. This study supports use of ESP block as a superior choice when choosing among the three postoperative pain management options that were evaluated.

Conclusion

ESP resulted in reduced opioid consumption postoperatively and shorter LOS than TE or PCA for patients undergoing the Nuss procedure for surgical repair of pectus excavatum.

Evaluation of antihyperalgesic and analgesic effects of 35% nitrous oxide when combined with remifentanil: A randomised phase 1 trial in volunteers

BACKGROUND

Remifentanil is an effective drug in peri-operative pain therapy, but it can also induce and aggravate hyperalgesia. Supplemental administration of N2O may help to reduce remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of 35 and 50% N2O on hyperalgesia and pain after remifentanil infusion.

DESIGN

Single site, phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised crossover study.

SETTING

University Hospital, Germany from January 2012 to April 2012.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one healthy male volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation induced spontaneous acute pain and stable areas of hyperalgesia. Each volunteer underwent the following four sessions in a randomised order: 50 to 50% N2-O2 and intravenous (i.v.) 0.9% saline infusion (placebo); 50 to 50% N2-O2 and i.v. remifentanil infusion at 0.1 μg kg-1 min-1 (remifentanil); 35 to 15 to 50% N2O-N2-O2 and i.v. remifentanil infusion at 0.1 μg kg-1 min-1 (tested drug) and 50 to 50% N2O-O2 and i.v. remifentanil infusion at 0.1 μg kg-1 min-1 (gas active control). Gas mixtures were inhaled for 60 min; i.v. drugs were administered for 30 min.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Areas of pin-prick hyperalgesia, areas of touch-evoked allodynia and pain intensity on a visual analogue scale were assessed repeatedly for 160 min.

RESULTS

Data from 20 volunteers were analysed. There were significant treatment and treatment-by-time effects regarding areas of hyperalgesia (P < 0.001). After the treatment period, the area of hyperalgesia was significantly reduced (P < 0.001) in the tested drug and in the gas active control (30.6 ± 9.25 and 24.4 ± 7.3 cm2, respectively) compared with remifentanil (51.0 ± 17.0 cm2). There was also a significant difference between the gas active control and the tested drug sessions (P < 0.001). For the area of allodynia and pain rating, results were consistent with the results for hyperalgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of 35% N2O significantly reduced hyperalgesia, allodynia and pain intensity induced after remifentanil. It might therefore be suitable in peri-operative pain relief characterised by hyperalgesia and allodynia, such as postoperative pain, and may help to reduce opioid demand.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT-No.: 2011-000966-37.

Analgesic use and associated adverse events in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treating pain in the context of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging because of altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, with an increased risk of toxicity and drug adverse events in this population. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to assess the prevalence of analgesic use and establish the risk of analgesics-related adverse events, in patients with CKD.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched until January 2021. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were conducted to pool and summarise prevalence data and measures of association between analgesic use and adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty-two studies relevant to the prevalence of analgesic use and 33 to analgesic-related adverse events were included, combining data on 2.3 and 3 million individuals, respectively. Pooled analyses found that 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35-48) of the CKD population regularly use analgesia. The annual period prevalence was estimated at 50% for opioids and 21% for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Overall, 20% and 7% of patients with CKD are on chronic opioid or NSAID therapy, respectively. Opioid use was associated with an increased risk of death (1.61; 95% CI, 1.12-2.31; n= 7, I²= 91%), hospitalisation (1.38; 95% CI, 1.32-1.45; n=2, I²=0%), and fractures (1.51; 95% CI, 1.16-1.96; n=3, I²=54%).

CONCLUSION

High levels of analgesic consumption and related serious adverse outcomes were found in patients with CKD. Consideration needs to be given to how these patients are assessed and managed in order to minimise harms and improve outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42019156491 (PROSPERO).

Out of pocket expenses: effect of fee-waivers on opioid prescribing and dispensing

INTRODUCTION

Pharmaceutical reimbursement policies should aim for satisfactory health care at reasonable prices and assure treatment adherence while avoiding wasteful pharmaceutical spending. In Belgium, the maximum billing system, also called "Maximum Amount Fixed" system (MAF), ensures that out-of-pocket payments beyond a ceiling are fully reimbursed to guarantee pharmaceutical treatment in vulnerable population groups (e.g. low-income people and chronic patients). Starting from 2015, a policy change occurred and these expenses were waived during the same calendar year once this ceiling was reached instead of reimbursing these expenses in the next fiscal year. Each subsequent fiscal year, out-of-pocket payments were reintroduced in January.

METHODS

Longitudinal dispensing trends, from early 2013 to mid-2020, for 13 prevalent reimbursed opioids were investigated.

RESULTS

For MAF patients, significant seasonal increases in opioid dispensing reoccurred towards the end of the year. This pattern was absent for non-MAF patients and was only observed after the 2015 policy change. Periodic changes in out-of-pocket expenses, a characteristic of the reimbursement policy in Belgium, clearly influences opioid availability in an already at-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

Out-of-pocket reimbursement policies should be urgently re-evaluated to minimize unnecessary opioid exposure, while preserving the affordability of pain treatment for vulnerable patients.

The Utilization of an Opioid-Free Anesthetic for Pediatric Circumcision in an Ambulatory Surgery Center

Circumcision is one of the most common urologic procedures performed at pediatric ambulatory centers. Emerging data on the short- and long-term effects of perioperative opioid administration has highlighted the importance of an opioid-free anesthetic regimen. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of an opioid-free anesthetic in pediatric circumcision and its correlation with ambulatory surgery center efficiency. Patients, 3 years of age and younger, who underwent circumcision or circumcision revision by two surgeons pre and post introduction of an opioid-free anesthetic fast-track regimen at an outpatient surgical center were included. There were 100 patients included in this analysis, with 50 patients in each cohort. On univariate analysis, fast-tracking was associated with a decrease in median combined in-room and post-anesthesia care unit times (102.5 vs. 129.0 min, p-value < 0.001). This difference continued after multivariable analysis with an adjusted median combined in-room and post-anesthesia care unit time difference of -15.6 min (95% CI -34.2 to -12.7 min, p-value 0.018). In addition, the fast-track cohort received less intraoperative morphine equivalents without an increase in post-operative analgesic administration or change in postoperative questionnaire score. This demonstrates that opioid-free anesthesia may be used effectively in pediatric circumcision while also allowing for significant time savings for surgical centers.

Impact of opioid-free anaesthesia on postoperative nausea, vomiting and pain after gynaecological laparoscopy - A randomised controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Opioid-free anaesthesia may enhance postoperative recovery by reducing opioid-related side effects such as nausea, hyperalgesia or tolerance. The objective was to investigate the impact of multimodal opioid-free general anaesthesia on postoperative nausea, vomiting, pain and morphine consumption compared to the traditional opioid-based approach.

DESIGN

This study was conducted as a prospective parallel-group randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Perioperative Care.

PATIENTS

152 adult women undergoing elective inpatient gynaecological laparoscopy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned for opioid-free anaesthesia (Group OF) with dexmedetomidine, esketamine and sevoflurane or to have opioid-based anaesthesia (Group C) with sufentanil and sevoflurane.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome was the occurrence of nausea within 24 h after surgery. Patients were assessed for the incidence and severity of PONV, postoperative pain and morphine consumption and recovery characteristics.

MAIN RESULTS

Patients in both groups had comparable clinical and surgical data. 69.7% of patients in the control group and 68.4% of patients in the opioid-free group met the primary endpoint (OR 1.06, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (0.53; 2.12) p = 0.86). The incidence of clinically important PONV defined by the PONV impact scale was 8.1% (Group C) vs 10.5% (OF); p = 0.57). Antiemetic requirements, pain scores and morphine consumption were equivalent in both groups. Postoperative sedation was significantly increased in group OF (p < 0.001), and the median length of stay at the post-anaesthesia care unit was 69.0 min (46.5-113.0) vs 50.0 (35.3-77.0) minutes in the control group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid-free multimodal general anaesthesia is feasible but did not decrease the incidence of PONV, or reduce pain scores and morphine consumption compared to an opioid-containing anaesthetic regimen.

In the Arms of Morpheus without Morphia; Mitigating the United States Opioid Epidemic by Decreasing the Surgical Use of Opioids

The opioid epidemic is a major public health issue in the United States. Exposure of opioid naïve-patients to opioids in the perioperative period is a well-documented source of continued use with one in 20 opioid-naïve surgical patients continuing to use opioids beyond 90 days. There is no association with magnitude of surgery, major versus minor, and the strongest predictor of continued use is surgical exposure. Causal factors include over reliance on opioids for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia and excessive ambulatory opioid prescribing. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia can paradoxically result from intraoperative (anesthesia controlled) opioid administration. Increasing size of initial prescription is a strong predictor of continued use necessitating procedure specific supplies limited to under 3-days. Alternative multimodal pain management (non-opioid medications and regional anesthesia) that limit opioid use must be a high priority with opioids reserved for severe breakthrough pain. Barriers to implementation of opioid-sparing pathways include reluctance to adopt protocols and apprehension about opioid elimination. Considering the number of surgeries performed annually in the United States, perioperative physicians must aggressively address modifiable factors in surgical patients. Patient care pathways need to be constructed collaboratively by surgeons and anesthesiologists with continuing feedback to optimize patient outcomes including iatrogenic opioid dependence.

Opioids in the Management of Acute Pediatric Pain: An Update in a Time of Crisis

Management of acute pain in children is fundamental to our practice. Its myriad benefits include reduced suffering, improved patient satisfaction, more rapid recovery, and a reduced risk of developing postsurgical chronic pain. Although a multimodal analgesic approach is now routinely used, informed and judicious use of opioid receptor agonists remains crucial in this treatment paradigm, as long as the benefits and risks are fully understood. Further, an ongoing public health response to the current opioid crisis is required to help prevent new cases of opioid addiction, identify opioid-addicted individuals, and ensure access to effective opioid addiction treatment, while at the same time continuing to safely meet the needs of patients experiencing pain.

The opioid epidemic in pediatrics: a 2020 update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last 3 years and for the first time in 60 years, life expectancy in the United States has declined across all racial groups primarily because of drug overdoses, alcohol abuse, and suicide. A public health response to the opioid crisis must expand its focus to more broadly include children, adolescents, and young adults while increasing efforts toward preventing new cases of opioid addiction, early identification of individuals with opioid-abuse disorder, and ensuring access to effective opioid addiction treatment, while simultaneously continuing to safely meet the needs of patients experiencing pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although a multimodal approach to pain management is fundamental in current practice, opioids remain an essential building block in the management of acute and chronic pain and have been for over 5000 years as they work. Left over, unconsumed opioids that were appropriately prescribed for pain have become the gateway for the development of opioid use disorder, particularly in the vulnerable adolescents and young adult patient populations. How to reduce the amount of opioids dispensed, improve methods of disposal in an environmentally safe way, and proactively make naloxone, particularly nasal spray, readily available to patients (and their families) receiving prescription opioids or who are at risk of opioid use disorder are highlighted in this review.

SUMMARY

We describe the historical use of opioids and the scope of the current opioid crisis, review the differences between dependence and addiction, and the private and public sectors response to pain management and highlight the issue of adolescent vulnerability. We conclude with a proposal for future directions that address both public and patient health needs.

Perioperative opioid analgesia-when is enough too much? A review of opioid-induced tolerance and hyperalgesia

Opioids are a mainstay of acute pain management but can have many adverse effects, contributing to problematic long-term use. Opioid tolerance (increased dose needed for analgesia) and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (paradoxical increase in pain with opioid administration) can contribute to both poorly controlled pain and dose escalation. Hyperalgesia is particularly problematic as further opioid prescribing is largely futile. The mechanisms of opioid tolerance and hyperalgesia are complex, involving μ opioid receptor signalling pathways that offer opportunities for novel analgesic alternatives. The intracellular scaffold protein β-arrestin-2 is implicated in tolerance, hyperalgesia, and other opioid side-effects. Development of agonists biased against recruitment of β-arrestin-2 could provide analgesic efficacy with fewer side-effects. Alternative approaches include inhibition of peripheral μ opioid receptors and blockade of downstream signalling mechanisms, such as the non-receptor tyrosine kinase Src or N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Furthermore, it is prudent to use multimodal analgesic regimens to reduce reliance on opioids during the perioperative period. In the third paper in this Series we focus on clinical and mechanism-based understanding of tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and discuss current and future strategies for pain management.

Are opioids indispensable for general anaesthesia?

The drug-induced, reversible coma of anaesthesia requires three clinical outcomes: unconsciousness, immobility, and the control of autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses to surgical stimulation. Producing the anaesthetised state with a single anaesthetic agent, such as an inhaled vapour or propofol, is challenging, primarily because suppressing ANS responses requires very high anaesthetic concentrations, resulting in haemodynamic depression and prolonged recovery. The antinociceptive effects of opioids (i.e. minimum alveolar concentration reduction) are thus central to the well-entrenched 'balanced anaesthesia' concept. In recent years, the notion of 'multimodal general anaesthesia' has extended the concept of balanced anaesthesia to include more drugs that target different neuroanatomical circuits and multiple neurophysiologic mechanisms. The opioid epidemic has provided some of the motivation to move away from opioids toward other adjunct drugs. Persistent opioid use after surgery is a component of the opioid epidemic and is a major concern for perioperative physicians. Potential solutions to the problem of persistent opioid use after surgery have focused on proper 'opioid stewardship' after operation, wherein opioids are used conservatively in combination with other analgesic adjuncts, and excessive opioid prescribing for home use is avoided. But there is a paucity of data on how intraoperative opioid usage patterns may be contributing to persistent opioid use after surgery. There are cogent reasons to moderate perioperative opioid use, including intraoperative opioids, but whether these changes in practice integral to the multimodal general anaesthesia concept will improve anaesthesia outcomes, including persistent opioid use after surgery, is unknown. Studies investigating these issues are an important research priority.

Pain Management in Trauma in the Age of the Opioid Crisis

It is imperative to find the balance between pain control and addressing the opioid epidemic. Opioids, although effective in the acute pain management, have multiple side effects and can lead to dependence, abuse, overdose, or death. Physicians should identify patients who abuse opioids, using their states' prescription drug-monitoring programs and use screening tools to identify patients at increased risk of developing opioid dependence. Multimodal analgesic plans, incorporating regional techniques, and nonopioid medications should be employed to reduce the amount of opioids received by patients.

Regional Anesthesia and Analgesia for Acute Trauma Patients

Regional anesthesia for the acute trauma patient is increasing due to the growing appreciation of its benefits, development of newer techniques and equipment, and more robust training. Block procedures are expanding beyond perioperative interventions performed exclusively by anesthesiologists to paramedics on scene, emergency medicine physicians, and nurse-led services using these techniques early in trauma pain management. Special considerations and indications apply to trauma victims compared with the elective patient and must be appreciated to optimize safety and clinical outcomes. This review discusses current literature and future directions in the growing role of regional anesthesia in acute trauma care.