Intraoperative Methadone in Same-Day Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Dose-Finding Pilot Study

The Effects of Intraoperative Methadone on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review

Inadequate perioperative pain control has deleterious effects on children's development and can lead to heightened pain experiences and the avoidance of future medical procedures. Reports of perioperative use of methadone in children are increasing, as it has a favorable pharmacodynamic profile; however, the effectiveness of methadone in reducing postoperative pain has not been established. We, therefore, aimed to provide a scoping review of the literature comparing the effect of intraoperative methadone versus other opioids on postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and adverse events in pediatric patients. We identified studies in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases from inception to January 2023. Postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and adverse events were extracted for analysis. We screened 1864 studies, of which 83 studies were selected for full-text review. Five studies were included in the final analysis. Postoperative opioid consumption was decreased overall in children who received methadone compared to those who did not. The majority of studies indicated that methadone was superior to other opioids in reported pain scores, while the frequency of adverse events was similar between the groups. Although the data reviewed highlight a potential benefit of intraoperative methadone in pediatric patients, 4 of the 5 studies had serious methodological concerns. Thus, we cannot make strong recommendations for the regular use of methadone in the perioperative setting at this time. Our results highlight the need for large, well-designed randomized trials to fully evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraoperative methadone in diverse pediatric surgical populations.

Respiratory Depression Following Intraoperative Methadone: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Methadone is used as a perioperative analgesic in the management of postoperative pain. Despite positive outcomes from randomized trials favoring methadone, concerns about its safety persist, particularly regarding respiratory depression (RD) and excessive sedation. In this study, we compared the incidence of naloxone administration between patients administered intraoperative methadone and those administered intraoperative morphine as a measure of severe RD. Time spent at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was used as a proxy variable for excessive sedation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients aged ≥18 years who underwent surgery between March 2019 and March 2023 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. We assessed the association between intraoperative administration of either methadone or morphine and postoperative naloxone administration within the first 24 hours using logistic regression (primary outcome). An analogous linear regression model was used for the secondary outcome of time spent in the PACU after surgery. Patients were weighted using propensity scores to adjust for potential confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 14,522 patients were included in the analysis. Among the 2437 patients who received intraoperative methadone, 15 (0.62%) patients received naloxone within the first 24 hours after surgery compared to 68 of 12,0885 (0.56%) who received intraoperative morphine. No statistical difference was observed in the odds of naloxone administration between patients administered methadone or morphine (adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 [0.40-2.02]). Patients who were administered intraoperative methadone had a mean PACU length of stay (LOS) of 334 minutes (standard deviation [SD], 382) compared to 195 minutes (SD, 228) for those administered intraoperative morphine. The adjusted PACU LOS of patients administered intraoperative methadone was 26% longer compared to those administered intraoperative morphine (adjusted ratio of the geometric means 95% CI, 1.26 [1.22-1.31]).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of naloxone administration to treat severe RD was low. No difference was observed in the odds of naloxone administration to treat severe RD between patients administered intraoperative methadone or intraoperative morphine. Intraoperative methadone was associated with longer stays at the PACU; however, this result should be interpreted with care. Our findings suggest that intraoperative methadone has a safety profile comparable to that of morphine with regard to severe RD.

Intraoperative methadone for day-case gynaecological laparoscopy: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial

Optimal pain relief in day-case surgery is imperative to patient comfort and timely discharge from hospital. Short-acting opioids are commonly used for analgesia in modern anaesthesia, allowing rapid recovery after surgery. Plasma concentration fluctuations from repeated dosing of short-acting opioids can cause patients to oscillate between analgesia with potential adverse effects, and inadequate analgesia requiring rescue dosing. Methadone's unique pharmacology may offer effective and sustained analgesia with less opioid consumption, potentially reducing adverse effects. Using a double-blind, randomised controlled trial, we compared post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption between day-case gynaecological laparoscopy patients who received either intravenous methadone (10 mg), or short-acting opioids intraoperatively. The primary outcome was post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption, discharge opioid consumption, pain scores (0-10) until discharge, adverse effects (respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, excess sedation), and rate of admission. Seventy patients were randomly assigned. Patients who received methadone consumed on average 9.44 mg fewer oral morphine equivalents in the post-anaesthesia care unit than the short-acting group (18.02 mg vs 27.46 mg, respectively, 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 18.88, P = 0.050) and experienced lower postoperative pain scores at every time point, although absolute differences were small. There was no evidence of lower hospital or discharge opioid consumption. No significant differences between the methadone and short-acting groups in other outcomes were identified: respiratory depression 41.2% versus 31.4%, Padjusted >0.99; postoperative nausea and vomiting 29.4% versus 42.9%, Padjusted >0.99; overnight admission 17.7% versus 11.4%, Padjusted >0.99; excess sedation 8.82% versus 8.57%, Padjusted >0.99. This study provides evidence that, although modestly, methadone can reduce post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores after day-case gynaecological laparoscopy. There were no significant differences in any secondary outcomes.

Methadone for Emergence Delirium in Ambulatory Pediatric Strabismus Surgery

Background: Emergence delirium in children following strabismus surgery is a distressing and potentially dangerous condition and is likely attributable to visual disturbances, pain, and anesthetic gases. We explored whether a single intraoperative dose of methadone could reduce emergence delirium. Methods: Our study was an institutional review board-approved prospective, controlled, before-and-after investigation. Inclusion criteria were age <18 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 1 or 2. Patients were excluded for obesity, documented sleep apnea, significant neurologic disease, or inpatient status. Control group patients were recruited sequentially, and the anesthetic was performed per preference. The study group was recruited similarly and received an intravenous dose of methadone 0.15 mg/kg at induction. The primary outcome was peak score on the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale. Secondary outcomes included time to anesthetic emergence, postoperative pain scores, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay, and postdischarge respiratory complications. Results: Forty-nine control group and 55 study group patients were recruited. No significant differences were found between groups for age, sex, weight, ASA classification, or duration of surgery. The control group received more preoperative midazolam, intraoperative fentanyl, and intraoperative ketorolac. Compared to the control group, the study group had 42% and 85% reductions in peak and severe PAED scale scores, respectively, in the PACU and required less rescue pain medications. Anesthetic emergence time and length of stay were not different between the groups. No significant postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion: Emergence delirium following outpatient pediatric strabismus surgery was substantially mitigated by the use of intraoperative methadone without affecting PACU throughput. No significant complications occurred. Further study is warranted to corroborate routine use of this drug for emergence delirium.

Intraoperative Methadone in Next-day Discharge Outpatient Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Dose-finding Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Contemporary perioperative practice seeks to use less intraoperative opioid, diminish postoperative pain and opioid use, and enable less postdischarge opioid prescribing. For inpatient surgery, anesthesia with intraoperative methadone, compared with short-duration opioids, results in less pain, less postoperative opioid use, and greater patient satisfaction. This pilot investigation aimed to determine single-dose intraoperative methadone feasibility for next-day discharge outpatient surgery, determine an optimally analgesic and well-tolerated dose, and explore whether methadone would result in less postoperative opioid use compared with conventional short-duration opioids.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, dose-escalation feasibility and pilot study in next-day discharge surgery compared intraoperative single-dose IV methadone (0.1 then 0.2, 0.25 and 0.3 mg/kg ideal body weight) versus as-needed short-duration opioid (fentanyl, hydromorphone) controls. Perioperative opioid use, pain, and side effects were assessed before discharge. Patients recorded pain, opioid use, and side effects for 30 days postoperatively using take-home diaries. Primary clinical outcome was in-hospital (intraoperative and postoperative) opioid use. Secondary outcomes were 30-day opioid consumption, pain, opioid side effects, and leftover opioid counts.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) intraoperative methadone doses were 6 (5 to 7), 11 (10 to 12), 14 (13 to 16), and 18 (15 to 19) mg in 0.1, 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 mg/kg ideal body weight groups, respectively. Anesthesia with single-dose methadone and propofol or volatile anesthetic was effective. Total in-hospital opioid use (IV milligram morphine equivalents [MME]) was 25 (20 to 37), 20 (13 to 30), 27 (18 to 32), and 25 (20 to 36) mg, respectively, in patients receiving 0.1, 0.2, 0.25 and 0.3 mg/kg methadone, compared to 46 (33 to 59) mg in short-duration opioid controls. Opioid-related side effects were not numerically different. Home pain and opioid use were numerically lower in patients receiving methadone.

CONCLUSIONS

The most effective and well-tolerated single intraoperative induction dose of methadone for next-day discharge surgery was 0.25 mg/kg ideal body weight (median, 14 mg). Single-dose intraoperative methadone was analgesic and opioid-sparing in next-day discharge outpatient surgery.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Clinical effectiveness and safety of intraoperative methadone in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised, blinded clinical trial

Background

Laparoscopic hysterectomy is often carried out as day-stay surgery. Minimising postoperative pain is therefore of utmost importance to ensure timely discharge from hospital. Methadone has several desirable pharmacological features, including a long elimination half-life. Therefore, a single intraoperative dose could provide long-lasting pain relief.

Methods

Patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly allocated to receive methadone (0.2 mg kg-1) or morphine (0.2 mg kg-1) intraoperatively, 60 min before tracheal extubation. Primary outcomes were opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents in milligrams) at 6 and 24 h. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity at rest and during coughing, patient satisfaction, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and adverse events up to 72 h after completion of surgery.

Results

The postoperative median opioid consumption was reduced in the methadone group compared with the morphine group at 6 h (35.5 [0-61] mg vs 48 [31-74.5] mg; P=0.01) and 24 h (42 [10-67] mg vs 54.5 [31-83] mg; P=0.03). On arrival at the PACU, pain at rest was significantly lower in patients receiving methadone (numeric rating scale: 3 [2-5] vs 5 [3-6]), whereas pain scores at rest and coughing were not significantly different throughout the rest of the observation period. No differences in other secondary outcomes were found.

Conclusions

In this randomised, blinded, controlled trial, opioid consumption was reduced during the first 24 postoperative hours in patients receiving methadone without causing an increase in adverse events. The difference observed might be considered as small and of limited clinical relevance.

Clinical trial registration

NCT03908060; EudraCT no. 2018-004351-20.

Postoperative Rebound Pain: Our Current Understanding About the Role of Regional Anesthesia and Multimodal Approaches in Prevention and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rebound pain (RP) is a common occurrence after peripheral nerve block placement, especially when blocks are used for orthopedic surgery. This literature review focuses on the incidence and risk factors for RP as well as preventative and treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The addition of adjuvants to a block, when appropriate, and starting patients on oral analgesics prior to sensory resolution are reasonable approaches. Using continuous nerve block techniques can provide extended analgesia through the immediate postoperative phase when pain is the most intense. Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are associated with RP, a frequent phenomenon that must be recognized and addressed to prevent short-term pain and patient dissatisfaction, as well as long-term complications and avoidable hospital resource utilization. Knowledge about the advantages and limitations of PNBs allows the anesthesiologists to anticipate, intervene, and hopefully mitigate or avoid the phenomenon of RP.

Comparison of oral versus intravenous methadone on postoperative pain and opioid use after adult spinal deformity surgery: A retrospective, non-inferiority analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy of oral versus intravenous (IV) methadone on postoperative pain and opioid requirements after spine surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-academic center cohort study evaluating 1010 patients who underwent >3 level spine surgery from January 2017 to May 2020 and received a one-time dose of oral or intravenous methadone prior to surgery. The primary outcome measured was postoperative opioid use in oral morphine equivalents (ME) and verbal response scale (VRS) pain scores up to postoperative day (POD) three. Secondary outcomes were time to first bowel movement and adverse effects (reintubation, myocardial infarction, and QTc prolongation) up to POD 3.

RESULTS

A total of 687 patients received oral and 317 received IV methadone, six patients were excluded. The IV group received a significantly greater methadone morphine equivalent (ME) dose preoperatively (112.4 ± 83.0 mg ME versus 59.3 ± 60.9 mg ME, p < 0.001) and greater total (methadone and non-methadone) opioid dose (119.1 ± 81.4 mg ME versus 63.9 ± 62.5 mg ME, p < 0.001), intraoperatively. Although pain scores for the oral group were non-inferior to the IV group for all postoperative days (POD), non-inferiority for postoperative opioid requirements was demonstrated only on POD 3. Based on the joint hypothesis for the co-primary outcomes, oral methadone was non-inferior to IV methadone on POD 3 only. No differences in secondary outcomes, including QTc prolongation and arrhythmias, were noted between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral methadone is a feasible alternative to IV methadone for patients undergoing spine surgery regarding both pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption.

Pro-Con Debate: Role of Methadone in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols-Superior Analgesic or Harmful Drug?

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are standardized and designed to provide superior analgesia, reduce opioid consumption, improve patient recovery, and reduce hospital length of stay. Yet, moderate-to-severe postsurgical pain continues to afflict over 40% of patients and remains a major priority for anesthesia research. Methadone administration in the perioperative setting may reduce postoperative pain scores and have opioid-sparing effects, which may be beneficial for enhanced recovery. Methadone possesses a multimodal profile consisting of µ-opioid agonism, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism, and reuptake inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine. Furthermore, it may attenuate the development of chronic postsurgical pain. However, caution is advised with perioperative use of methadone in specific high-risk patient populations and surgical settings. Methadone's wide pharmacokinetic variability, opioid-related adverse effects, and potential negative impact on cost-effectiveness may also limit its use in the perioperative setting. In this PRO-CON commentary article, the authors debate whether methadone should be incorporated in ERAS protocols to provide superior analgesia with no increased risks.

Retrospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Intraoperative Methadone for Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Elective Intracranial Surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing intracranial surgery experience significant perioperative pain and are typically treated with short-acting opioids. Methadone, with its prolonged half-life and multimodal central nervous system effects, presents a promising option for managing postcraniotomy pain. Despite its proven efficacy in other types of surgeries, the use of methadone in patients undergoing craniotomy has not yet been explored.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted for 60 adult patients ranging in age from 18 to 81 years who received methadone during intracranial surgeries. The primary outcome of interest was the total opioid consumption in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and patient-reported pain scores within 24 hours and up to 72 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

The methadone dosage varied from 5 to 20 mg. In the infratentorial group, the median total MME on postoperative day 1, 2, and 3 was 30.5, 17, and 0.8, respectively, with mean pain scores of 3.56, 3.91, and 2.71. In the supratentorial group, the median total MME on postoperative day 1, 2, and 3 was 17.85, 15.4, and 1.2, with mean pain scores of 2.31, 1.68, and 2.21, respectively. Patients who were chronic opioid users had significantly higher pain scores and average opioid use (P < 0.05). None of the patients required administration of naloxone or airway interventions. Comparison with the historical control showed that our study patients had lower pain scores and MME.

CONCLUSIONS

The single intraoperative dose of methadone is well tolerated by adult patients undergoing various types of intracranial surgeries, with minimal side effects, including elderly patients aged 65 years or older.

Short-acting versus long-acting opioids for pediatric postoperative pain management

INTRODUCTION

Opioids are potent analgesics commonly used to manage children's moderate to severe perioperative pain in children. A wide range of short and long-acting opioids are used to treat surgical pain and will be reviewed in this article.

AREAS COVERED

Both short- and long-acting opioids contain unique therapeutic benefits and adverse effects; however, due to the side effect profile and safety concerns, lack of familiarity, and evidence with long-acting opioids to treat surgical pain, shorter-acting opioids have traditionally been used in children. Almost all opioids work by binding to the mu receptor. Methadone, a long-acting opioid, is an exception because it also has beneficial N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist properties. Clinically methadone's properties could translate to improved analgesic outcomes, reduced risk of adverse events, less risk for acute hyperalgesia, tolerance and abuse potential, faster recovery, and reduced risk for chronic persistent surgical pain. This review article summarizes and compares the evidence of commonly used short and long-acting opioids for perioperative pain control in the pediatric population.

EXPERT OPINION

Individualized methadone therapy using pharmacogenomics has the potential to transform opioid use in pain management by improving patient safety and analgesic outcomes, thereby addressing the gaps in current standardized ERAS protocols.

Intravenous Methadone for Perioperative and Chronic Cancer Pain: A Review of the Literature

Intravenous methadone may be useful in acute and chronic pain management compared with other opioids because of its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, including the long duration of effect and ability to modulate both pain stimuli propagation and analgesic descending pathways. However, methadone is underused in pain medicine because of several misperceptions. A review of studies was performed to assess data regarding the use of methadone in perioperative pain and chronic cancer pain. The majority of studies have shown that intravenous methadone produces an effective postoperative analgesia and lowers opioid consumption in the postoperative period, without more adverse effects in comparison with other opioid analgesics, and has an interesting potential to prevent persistent postoperative pain. A minority of studies investigated the use of intravenous methadone for cancer pain management. These studies were mostly case series that showed promising activities of intravenous methadone for difficult pain conditions. There is sufficient evidence suggesting that intravenous methadone is effective in perioperative pain, while more studies are needed in patients with cancer pain.

Intraoperative Methadone and Short Stay Spine Surgery: Possible Barriers to Implementation and Future Opportunities

The frequency of shorter stay spine surgery is increasing. Acute pain is a common barrier to discharge following spine surgery. Long-acting opioid medications like methadone have the potential to provide sustained analgesia when given intraoperatively. Methadone has been effectively used in complex spine surgery, cardiac surgery, and more recently applied to ambulatory procedures. In this article, we summarize the pertinent available literature on the use of intraoperative methadone for spine surgery as well as the recent data on intraoperative methadone for ambulatory surgery. The aim of this perspectives article is to describe the potential opportunities for applying intraoperative methadone to shorter stay spine surgery as well as barriers to more widespread use. While there are currently no trials that have specifically studied methadone for shorter stay spine surgery specifically to date, it is a promising area for future research.

Rediscovery of Methadone to Improve Outcomes in Pain Management

Clinically, methadone is most known for its use in the treatment of opioid maintenance therapy. However, methadone's pharmacological profile makes it an excellent analgesic that can enhance acute and chronic pain management. It is a potent μ-receptor agonist with a longer elimination half-life than most clinically used opioids. In addition, methadone inhibits serotonin and norepinephrine uptake, and it is an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist. These distinct analgesic pathways mediate hyperalgesic, allodynic, and neuropathic pain. Its unique analgesic properties provide several essential benefits in perioperative use, neuropathic pain, cancer, and noncancer pain. Despite these proven clinical utilities, methadone has not been used widely to treat acute and chronic pain in opioid naïve patients. This article describes the unique pharmacology of methadone and provides emerging evidence to support its application in acute and chronic pain management. Pain management options and guidelines for surgical patients on methadone are discussed as well.

Opioids and Public Health: The Prescription Opioid Ecosystem and Need for Improved Management

While U.S. opioid prescribing has decreased 38% in the past decade, opioid deaths have increased 300%. This opioid paradox is poorly recognized. Current approaches to opioid management are not working, and new approaches are needed. This article reviews the outcomes and shortcomings of recent U.S. opioid policies and strategies that focus primarily or exclusively on reducing or eliminating opioid prescribing. It introduces concepts of a prescription opioid ecosystem and opioid pool, and it discusses how the pool can be influenced by supply-side, demand-side, and opioid returns factors. It illuminates pressing policy needs for an opioid ecosystem that enables proper opioid stewardship, identifies associated responsibilities, and emphasizes the necessity of making opioid returns as easy and common as opioid prescribing, in order to minimize the size of the opioid pool available for potential diversion, misuse, overdose, and death. Approaches are applicable to opioid prescribing in general, and to opioid prescribing after surgery.

The place of S-ketamine in fibromyalgia treatment (ESKEFIB): study protocol for a prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, dose-escalation controlled trial

Background

Fibromyalgia is a chronic multidimensional pain disease with no curative treatment currently available. Its management relies on a multimodal approach involving pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic elements. Because a suggested factor in its etiology is a central sensitization phenomenon involving the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), NMDAR antagonists have been proposed as a treatment target. Ketamine and its levogyre form, S-ketamine, have been used to treat chronic pain for many years without consensus about their therapeutic efficiency. We aim to assess the efficacy of S-ketamine as a co-treatment for fibromyalgia.

Methods

This prospective, randomized, single-center, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-escalation trial will compare a co-treatment with S-ketamine (intervention) to a control treatment without S-ketamine (control). It will consist of two successive cohorts with 2:1 randomization ratio (S-ketamine at two different doses: control) with 105 participants in each cohort. The protocol follow-up time will be 12 weeks, including 3 visits for the treatment (week 0, week 2, and week 4) and 3 visits for follow-up (week 6, week 9, and week 12). Our primary outcome, pain relief and/or better patient function, will be assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire. The statistical analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. If the primary outcome is reached at the end of follow-up in the first cohort with low-dose S-ketamine (0.2 mg/kg), the trial will end. If not, the trial will continue with the second cohort and high-dose S-ketamine (0.4 mg/kg).

Discussion

The challenge of our trial is the inclusion of a large number of participants in comparison to other trials involving ketamine or S-ketamine infusions for chronic pain management. The originality of our protocol is to include functionality in addition to pain relief as a primary outcome because these two endpoints are not linked in a linear way. For some patients, functional status is more important than pain relief.

Trial registration

EudraCT reference: 2020-000473-25, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04436250, first posted June 18, 2020; last updated July 21, 2020. Protocol version 2.2 issued on September 30, 2020, after a revision by the ethics committee. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04436250

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05814-4.

Intraoperative Methadone Reduces Postoperative Opioid Requirements in Nuss Procedure for Pectus Excavatum

INTRODUCTION

Surgical correction of pectus excavatum by Nuss procedure, commonly referred to as minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE), often results in significant postoperative pain. This study investigated whether adding intraoperative methadone would reduce the postoperative opioid requirement during admission for patients undergoing MIRPE.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort chart review was conducted for 40 MIRPE patients between 2018 and 2020. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: those who received multimodal anesthesia (MM, n = 20) and those who received multimodal anesthesia with the addition of intraoperative methadone (MM + M, n = 20). Data collected included total opioid consumption during hospital stay (morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]), hospital length of stay (LOS), pain scores, time to ambulation, and time to tolerating solid food.

RESULTS

Addition of intraoperative methadone for patients undergoing MIRPE significantly reduced postoperative opioid requirements (MME/kg) during admission (P = .007). On average, patients in the MM group received 1.61 ± .55 MME/kg while patients in the MM + M group received 1.16 ± .44 MME/kg. Hospital opioid (non-methadone) total was also significantly reduced between the MM (1.87 ± .54) and MM + M group (1.37 ± .46), P = .003. There was no significant difference in hospital opioid total MME/kg administered between the groups. There were no significant differences observed in hospital LOS, pain scores, time to ambulation, or time to toleration of solid food.

DISCUSSION

Incorporating intraoperative methadone for patients undergoing MIRPE reduced postoperative opioid requirements and hospital opioid (non-methadone) totals without a significant change in pain scores. Patients undergoing the Nuss procedure may benefit from the administration of intraoperative methadone.

Intraoperative Methadone Use in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of intraoperative methadone to standard of care opioids such as fentanyl and morphine on pain scores, opioid consumption, and adverse effects in adults undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, followed by a manual search using reference lists of the identified articles. Search terms included a combination of intraoperative methadone, methadone, and cardiac surgery. Our review includes four studies published between 2011 and 2020. Quality assessment of the studies was performed.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 715 articles with 461 duplicates removed, and 236 eliminated based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eighteen articles underwent full-text review. Four studies evaluating a total of 435 patients with various cardiothoracic procedures were included in this review. We found that intraoperative methadone decreases acute postoperative pain and reduces postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours in patients who received 0.1-0.3 mg/kg intraoperative methadone in comparison to morphine and fentanyl. No difference was found in adverse effects between the groups. Quality assessment of the studies showed a low risk of bias in three of the randomized controlled trials and a high risk of bias in the retrospective review because of the baseline confounding bias in the study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative methadone use reduces acute postoperative pain and lowers opioid consumption in comparison to morphine and fentanyl. Initial results suggest that methadone may be an equivalent opioid to be administered during cardiothoracic procedures to reduce acute post-surgical pain, though further research is warranted.

In-hospital opioid usage following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Does methadone offer an advantage when used with an ERAS pathway?

PURPOSE

Intraoperative methadone has been shown to decrease opioid medication requirement following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). No study to date has investigated the effect of methadone on opioid medication requirement when used in conjunction with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol following PSF.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single, tertiary care pediatric hospital. Patients with AIS undergoing PSF were consecutively given a single intra-operative methadone dose and matched 1:2 to a AIS control group without methadone. Patients were matched for age, curve magnitude, levels fused, blood loss, and operating time. All children followed a standard ERAS protocol with methadone being the only change in the post-operative regimen. In-hospital data for opioid and non-opioid medication use, surgical, and patient variables were recorded and compared between cohorts.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients received methadone (average 15.1 ± 1.9 years) and were matched with 52 control patients without methadone (average 14.7 ± 2.2 years). There were no significant differences in total opioid usage at any time-interval prior to hospital discharge or in cumulative opioid usage. Additionally, patients had a similar VAS pain level at discharge (methadone: 4.0 ± 2.3 vs control: 3.8 ± 1.9; P = 0.572). Total opioid usage was correlated with LOS. There were no opioid-related medication complications in either cohort.

CONCLUSION

There was no decrease of in-hospital opioid usage when methadone was used with an ERAS protocol. Total opioid usage is correlated with hospital LOS following PSF.

Comparison of three intraoperative analgesic strategies in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of immediate postoperative outcomes

Introduction and objectives

Multimodal Analgesia (MMA) has shown promising results in postoperative outcomes across a broad spectrum of surgeries, including bariatric surgery. We compared the analgesic effect immediately after Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery (LBS) of the combined effect of MMA and methadone against two techniques that were based mainly on the use of high-potency medium-acting opioids.

Methods

Two hundred seventy-one patients were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score > 3/10 measured by the Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS) during the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU) stay. The three protocols of intraoperative analgesia were: (P1) sufentanil at anesthetic induction followed by remifentanil infusion; (P2) sufentanil at induction followed by dexmedetomidine infusion; and (P3) remifentanil at induction followed by MMA including dexmedetomidine, magnesium, lidocaine, and methadone. Only P1 and P2 patients received morphine toward the end of surgery. Poisson regression was used to adjust confounding factors and calculate Prevalence Ratio (PR).

Results

Postoperative VNS > 3 was recorded in 135 (49.81%) patients, of which 93 (68.89%) were subjected to P1, 25 (18.56%) to P2, and 17 (12.59%) to P3. In the final adjusted model, both anesthetic techniques (P3) (PR = 0.10; 95% CI [0.03–0.28]), and (P2) (PR = 0.42%; 95% CI [0.20–0.90]) were associated with lower occurrence of VNS > 3, whereas age range 20–29 was associated to higher occurrence of VNS > 3 (PR = 3.21; 95% CI [1.22–8.44]) in PACU. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) was distributed as follows: (P1) 20.3%, (P2) 31.25% and (P3) 6.77%; (P3 < P1, P2; p < 0.05). Intraoperative hypotension occurred more often in P3 (39%) compared to P2 (20.31%) and P1 (17.46%) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

MMA + methadone was associated with higher incidence of intraoperative hypotension and lower incidence of moderate/severe pain in PACU after LBS.

Effect of intraoperative methadone vs other opioids on postoperative outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

ABSTRACT

Recent randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy between intraoperative methadone and other opioids on postoperative outcomes have been limited by their small sample sizes and conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials which investigated outcomes between methadone and an opioid control group. Primary outcome data included postoperative opioid consumption, number of patients who received postoperative opioids, time to first analgesic, and pain scores. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation and incidence of nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Nine studies comprising 632 patients were included. There was no statistically significant reduction in opioid consumption postoperatively between the groups. Forty-seven percentage of patients in the methadone group received a dose of opioid postoperatively compared with 55% in the other opioids control group, which was not statistically significant. (P = 0.25) There was no difference in average time to receiving first postoperative analgesic among the groups. Pain scores within 24 hours were significantly lower in the methadone group when compared with other opioids (8 studies, n = 622, -0.49 [-0.74, -0.23], P = 0.002). However, there was no difference between 24 and 72 hours. There was no difference among the groups with respect to extubation time, nausea, vomiting, or respiratory depression. This meta-analysis concludes that there is currently insufficient evidence for the use of intraoperative methadone, when compared with other opioids. Although there was a decrease in average pain scores with methadone when compared with controls at 24 hours, there was no difference between 24 and 72 hours.

Mechanisms, diagnosis, prevention and management of perioperative opioid-induced hyperalgesia

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) occurs when opioids paradoxically enhance the pain they are prescribed to ameliorate. To address a lack of perioperative awareness, we present an educational review of clinically relevant aspects of the disorder. Although the mechanisms of OIH are thought to primarily involve medullary descending pathways, it is likely multifactorial with several relevant therapeutic targets. We provide a suggested clinical definition and directions for clinical differentiation of OIH from other diagnoses, as this may be confusing but is germane to appropriate management. Finally, we discuss prevention including patient education and analgesic management choices. As prevention may serve as the best treatment, patient risk factors, opioid mitigation, and both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic strategies are discussed.

Perioperative Pain Management and Opioid Stewardship: A Practical Guide

Surgical procedures are key drivers of pain development and opioid utilization globally. Various organizations have generated guidance on postoperative pain management, enhanced recovery strategies, multimodal analgesic and anesthetic techniques, and postoperative opioid prescribing. Still, comprehensive integration of these recommendations into standard practice at the institutional level remains elusive, and persistent postoperative pain and opioid use pose significant societal burdens. The multitude of guidance publications, many different healthcare providers involved in executing them, evolution of surgical technique, and complexities of perioperative care transitions all represent challenges to process improvement. This review seeks to summarize and integrate key recommendations into a "roadmap" for institutional adoption of perioperative analgesic and opioid optimization strategies. We present a brief review of applicable statistics and definitions as impetus for prioritizing both analgesia and opioid exposure in surgical quality improvement. We then review recommended modalities at each phase of perioperative care. We showcase the value of interprofessional collaboration in implementing and sustaining perioperative performance measures related to pain management and analgesic exposure, including those from the patient perspective. Surgery centers across the globe should adopt an integrated, collaborative approach to the twin goals of optimal pain management and opioid stewardship across the care continuum.

Impact of Intravenous Methadone Administered Intraoperatively on Postoperative Opioid Utilization

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that intravenous methadone intraoperatively can reduce opioid usage postoperatively.

OBJECTIVE

This study's purpose was to evaluate the effect of intravenous methadone on postoperative opioid use.

METHODS

A prospective, single-center observational study was conducted to evaluate patients who received intravenous methadone intraoperatively. A control group was identified by matching procedure, gender, and age in a 1:3 ratio of methadone to control. Exclusion criteria included patients less than 18 years old or on methadone maintenance therapy. The primary outcome was morphine milligram equivalents (MME) administered 24h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included MME administered 48h and 72h postoperatively, discharge prescription MME, daily mean postoperative pain scores, and length of hospital stay. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing opioid-naïve patients.

RESULTS

A total of 240 patients were included in the analysis. At 24h, postoperative MME was increased in the methadone group (142.6 vs 84.5; P = 0.0026). Postoperative MME was also increased in the methadone group at 48h and 72h. Daily pain scores were similar between both groups at all time intervals. Discharge prescription MME was reduced in the methadone group compared with controls, but not statistically significant. A subgroup analysis of opioid-naïve patients showed a significant reduction in MME at 48h (P = 0.0240) and daily pain scores at 24h (P = 0.0366) in the methadone group.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Intravenous methadone intraoperatively did not show a significant reduction in postoperative opioid use and discharge prescription MMEs when comparing all patients; however, benefit was seen when examining opioid-naïve patients.

A Novel Perioperative Multidose Methadone-Based Multimodal Analgesic Strategy in Children Achieved Safe and Low Analgesic Blood Methadone Levels Enabling Opioid-Sparing Sustained Analgesia With Minimal Adverse Effects

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative methadone, a long-acting opioid, is increasingly used for postoperative analgesia, although the optimal methadone dosing strategy in children is still unknown. The use of a single large dose of intraoperative methadone is controversial due to inconsistent reductions in total opioid use in children and adverse effects. We recently demonstrated that small, repeated doses of methadone intraoperatively and postoperatively provided sustained analgesia and reduced opioid use without respiratory depression. The aim of this study was to characterize pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of a multiple small-dose methadone strategy.

METHODS

Adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for idiopathic scoliosis or pectus excavatum (PE) repair received methadone intraoperatively (0.1 mg/kg, maximum 5 mg) and postoperatively every 12 hours for 3-5 doses in a multimodal analgesic protocol. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours postoperatively and analyzed for R-methadone and S-methadone, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidene (EDDP) metabolites, and alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AAG), the primary methadone-binding protein. Peak and trough concentrations of enantiomers, total methadone, and AAG levels were correlated with clinical outcomes including pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), respiratory depression, and QT interval prolongation.

RESULTS

The study population included 38 children (10.8-17.9 years): 25 PSF and 13 PE patients. Median total methadone peak plasma concentration was 24.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 19.2-40.8) ng/mL and the median trough was 4.09 (IQR, 2.74-6.4) ng/mL. AAG concentration almost doubled at 48 hours after surgery (median = 193.9, IQR = 86.3-279.5 µg/mL) from intraoperative levels (median = 87.4, IQR = 70.6-115.8 µg/mL; P < .001), and change of AAG from intraoperative period to 48 hours postoperatively correlated with R-EDDP (P < .001) levels, S-EDDP (P < .001) levels, and pain scores (P = .008). Median opioid usage was minimal, 0.66 (IQR, 0.59-0.75) mg/kg morphine equivalents/d. No respiratory depression (95% Wilson binomial confidence, 0-0.09) or clinically significant QT prolongation (median = 9, IQR = -10 to 28 milliseconds) occurred. PONV occurred in 12 patients and was correlated with morphine equivalent dose (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Novel multiple small perioperative methadone doses resulted in safe and lower blood methadone levels, <100 ng/mL, a threshold previously associated with respiratory depression. This methadone dosing in a multimodal regimen resulted in lower blood methadone analgesia concentrations than the historically described minimum analgesic concentrations of methadone from an era before multimodal postoperative analgesia without postoperative respiratory depression and prolonged corrected QT (QTc). Larger studies are needed to further study the safety and efficacy of this methadone dosing strategy.

Methadone for Pain Management: A Pharmacotherapeutic Review

Methadone is increasingly being used for its analgesic properties. Despite the increasing popularity, many healthcare providers are not familiar with methadone's complex pharmacology and best practices surrounding its use. The purpose of this narrative review article is to discuss the pharmacology of methadone, the evidence surrounding methadone's use in acute pain management and both chronic cancer and non-cancer pain settings, as well as highlight pertinent safety, monitoring, and opioid rotation considerations. Methadone has a unique mechanism of action when compared with all other opioids and for this reason methadone has come to hold a niche role in the management of opioid-induced hyperalgesia and central sensitization. Understanding of the mechanisms of variability in methadone disposition and drug interactions has evolved over the years, with the latest evidence revealing that CYP 2B6 is the major determinant of methadone elimination and plays a key role in methadone-related drug interactions. From an acute pain perspective, most studies evaluating the use of intraoperative intravenous methadone have reported lower pain scores and post-operative opioid requirements. Oral methadone is predominantly used as a second-line opioid treatment for select chronic pain conditions. As a result, several oral morphine to oral methadone conversion ratios have been proposed, as have methods in which to rotate to methadone. From an efficacy standpoint, limited literature exists regarding the effectiveness of methadone in the chronic pain setting with most of the available efficacy data pertaining to methadone's use in the treatment of cancer pain. Many of the prospective studies that exist feature low participant numbers. Few clinical trials investigating the role of methadone as an analgesic treatment are currently underway. The complicated pharmacokinetic properties of methadone and risks of harm associated with this drug highlight how critically important it is that healthcare providers understand these features before prescribing/dispensing methadone. Particular caution is required when converting patients from other opioids to methadone and for this reason only experienced healthcare providers should undertake such a task. Further randomized trials with larger sample sizes are needed to better define the effective and safe use of methadone for pain management.

Intra-operative methadone effect on quality of recovery compared with morphine following laparoscopic gastroplasty: a randomised controlled trial

The effect of intra-operative intravenous methadone on quality of postoperative recovery was compared with morphine after laparoscopic gastroplasty. We included 137 adult patients with a body mass index > 35 kg.m^-2 who underwent bariatric surgery. Patients were allocated at random to receive either intra-operative methadone (n = 69) or morphine (n = 68). All patients received the same postoperative care and analgesia. The primary outcome of postoperative quality of recovery was assessed using the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire total score 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were assessed in the post-anaesthesia care unit the night of the day of surgery (T1), in the morning after surgery (T2); and at night on the day following surgery (T3). The median (IQR [range]) total Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire score of 194 (190-197 [165-200]) was higher (p < 0.0001) in the methadone group compared with the score of 181 (174-185.5 [121-200]) in the morphine group. In the post-anaesthesia care unit, the pain burden; incidence of nausea and vomiting; rescue morphine dose; and time to discharge, were significantly lower in the methadone group. On the ward, the methadone group had a lower: incidence of rescue morphine requests at T1 (5.8 vs. 54.4%, p < 0.0001) and T2 (0 vs. 20.1%, p < 0.0001); and incidence of nausea (21.7 vs. 41.2%, p = 0.014), compared with the morphine group. We conclude that intra-operative intravenous methadone improved quality of recovery in patients who underwent laparoscopic gastroplasty, compared with intra-operative morphine. Methadone also reduced postoperative pain, postoperative opioid consumption and the incidence of opioid-related adverse events.

Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Requirements in the First Year after Intraoperative Methadone for Complex Spine and Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Methadone is a long-acting opioid that has been reported to reduce postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements and may attenuate development of chronic postsurgical pain. The aim of this secondary analysis of two previous trials was to follow up with patients who had received a single intraoperative dose of either methadone or traditional opioids for complex spine or cardiac surgical procedures.

METHODS

Preplanned analyses of long-term outcomes were conducted for spinal surgery patients randomized to receive 0.2 mg/kg methadone at the start of surgery or 2 mg hydromorphone at surgical closure, and for cardiac surgery patients randomized to receive 0.3 mg/kg methadone or 12 μg/kg fentanyl intraoperatively. A pain questionnaire assessing the weekly frequency (the primary outcome) and intensity of pain was mailed to subjects 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Ordinal data were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test, and nominal data were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability test. The criterion for rejection of the null hypothesis was P < 0.01.

RESULTS

Three months after surgery, patients randomized to receive methadone for spine procedures reported the weekly frequency of chronic pain was less (median score 0 on a 0 to 4 scale [less than once a week] vs. 3 [daily] in the hydromorphone group, P = 0.004). Patients randomized to receive methadone for cardiac surgery reported the frequency of postsurgical pain was less at 1 month (median score 0) than it was in patients randomized to receive fentanyl (median score 2 [twice per week], P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Analgesic benefits of a single dose of intraoperative methadone were observed during the first 3 months after spinal surgery (but not at 6 and 12 months), and during the first month after cardiac surgery, when the intensity and frequency of pain were the greatest.

Intraoperative Methadone Reduces Pain and Opioid Consumption in Acute Postoperative Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Methadone is a potent opioid exerting an analgesic effect through N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism and the inhibition of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake. It has also been used in several procedures to reduce postoperative pain and opioid use. This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether the intraoperative use of methadone lowers postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in comparison to other opioids.

METHODS

Double-blinded, controlled trials without language restrictions were included from MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and CINAHL via EBSCOhost. The included studies tracked total opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, opioid-related side effects, and patient satisfaction until 72 hours postoperatively. Mean difference (MD) was used for effect size.

RESULTS

In total, 476 articles were identified and 13 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. In 486 patients (7 trials), pain at rest (MD, 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.47-0.72; P < .00001) and at movement (MD, 2.48; 95% CI, 3.04-1.92; P = .00001) favored methadone 24 hours after surgery. In 374 patients (6 trials), pain at rest (MD, 1.47; 95% CI, 3.04-1.02; P < .00001) and at movement (MD, 2.03; 95% CI, 3.04-1.02; P < .00001) favored methadone 48 hours after surgery. In 320 patients (4 trials), pain at rest (MD, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.65-0.39; P = .001) and at movement (MD, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.82-0.87; P < .00001) favored methadone 72 hours after surgery. A Trial Sequential Analysis was performed and the Z-cumulative curve for methadone crossed the monitoring boundary at all evaluations, additionally crossing Required Information Size at 24 and 48 hours at rest. Methadone group also showed lower postoperative opioid consumption in morphine equivalent dosage (mg) at 24 hours (MD, 8.42; 95% CI, 12.99-3.84 lower; P < .00001), 24-48 hours (MD, 14.33; 95% CI, 26.96-1.91 lower; P < .00001), 48-72 hours (MD, 3.59; 95% CI, 6.18-1.0 lower; P = .007) postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative use of methadone reduced postoperative pain scores compared to other opioids, and Trial Sequential Analysis suggested that no more trials are required to confirm pain reduction at rest until 48 hours after surgery. Methadone also reduced postoperative opioid consumption and led to better patient satisfaction scores through 72 hours postoperatively compared to other opioids.