A randomized, dose-response study of sugammadex given for the reversal of deep rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade under sevoflurane anesthesia

The impact of sugammadex dosing and administration practices on potential cost savings for pharmacy departments

PURPOSE

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are commonly used during surgery, and restoring neuromuscular function at the end of surgery is vital in preventing complications of residual paralysis. Recent guidelines from the American Society of Anesthesiology recommend using sugammadex over neostigmine; however, sugammadex is significantly more expensive than neostigmine and may increase drug expenditure for pharmacy departments. This review summarizes evidence evaluating sugammadex dose adjustments and the potential of these dose adjustments to lead to cost savings for pharmacy departments.

SUMMARY

We found evidence suggesting that the manufacturer-recommended sugammadex dose may not be needed in many patients and that dosing based on an adjusted body weight or based on depth of neuromuscular blockade may lead to lower sugammadex usage. Combining sugammadex with neostigmine could also decrease the dose of sugammadex required. We have highlighted the importance of objective neuromuscular monitoring to guide sugammadex dosing and evaluation for residual neuromuscular blockade. Cost savings for pharmacy departments may be realized by these alternative dosing strategies and/or vial-splitting practices.

CONCLUSION

Implementing practices related to sugammadex vial splitting and dose adjustment based on body weight and depth of neuromuscular blockade shows potential benefits in terms of sugammadex cost savings.

Evaluation of Sugammadex Dosing for Neurological Examination in the Emergency Department

Background: Prolong effects of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents after rapid sequence intubation may prevent meaningful neurological examination, delaying appropriate diagnosis and neurosurgical intervention. Sugammadex is indicated for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate low- (2 mg/kg) vs standard-dose (4 mg/kg) sugammadex for rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular blockade reversal in the emergency department (ED) by achieving a post-treatment train-of-four (TOF) of 4 to facilitate neurological examination. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study evaluating low-vs standard-dose sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal in the ED. Results: 34 patients were identified within the designated time period, 24 of which were included in the final analysis ([n = 9 low-dose], [n = 15 standard-dose]). Median sugammadex doses were 2.3 mg/kg and 4.1 mg/kg for low- and standard-dose, respectively. The majority of patients presented for intraparenchymal hemorrhage (54.2%). No significant difference in success rate of NMBA reversal was found between low- and standard-dose sugammadex ([100.0% vs 93.3%], P = 1.000). A total of 9 patients had a neurosurgical procedure performed after sugammadex administration. Low-dose sugammadex was associated with significantly less acquisition cost compared to the standard dose (P < .001). Conclusion: Low- (2 mg/kg) and standard-dose (4 mg/kg) sugammadex successfully reversed rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular blockade in the ED by achieving a post-treatment TOF of 4 to facilitate neurologic examination. Low-dose sugammadex may be a viable option for deep NMBA reversal in the ED and is associated with decreased institutional cost.

Sugammadex vs Neostigmine, a Comparison in Reversing Neuromuscular Blockade: A Narrative Review

The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) has grown due to the development of laparoscopic and minimally invasive procedures. Respiratory insufficiency, an elevated risk of aspiration, postoperative pulmonary complications, and subsequent reintubation are among the risks linked to the residual block. The normal clinical practice calls for the pharmacologic "reversal" of these agents with either sugammadex or neostigmine prior to extubation. The administration of neostigmine is linked to a number of potential complications. In response, anaesthesiologists have begun to prescribe sugammadex more frequently for treating residual block and reversing blockade with NMBA. This review article compares and assesses neostigmine and sugammadex thoroughly in order to determine the extent to which they work as agents to reverse neuromuscular blockade. The review's findings highlight sugammadex's considerable advantages - Sugammadex's ability to quickly and reliably achieve desired train-of-four (TOF) ratios - over neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in a variety of surgical settings. In contrast, neostigmine's limitations regarding efficacy and rate of reversal were consistently noted in all of the reviewed studies, despite the fact that it is still widely used due to its lower cost and extensive clinical experience. Sugammadex is a superior option for reversing neuromuscular blockade, but incorporating it into standard clinical practice necessitates carefully weighing its potential benefits and drawbacks. Sugammadex provides notable benefits over neostigmine in terms of speed, predictability, and safety.

Under-dosing and over-dosing of neuromuscular blocking drugs and reversal agents: beware of the risks

The phenomena of residual curarisation and recurarisation after the use of long-acting non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking drugs such as tubocurarine and pancuronium were well recognised 60 years ago. But the incidence seemed to decline with the introduction of atracurium and vecuronium. However, recently there have been an increasing number of reports of residual and recurrent neuromuscular block. Some of these reports are a result of inappropriate doses of rocuronium, sugammadex or both, together with inadequate neuromuscular monitoring. We urge clinicians to review their practice to ensure the highest standards of clinical care when using neuromuscular blocking drugs and reversal agents. This includes the use of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring whenever neuromuscular blocking drugs are administered.

Low-dose sugammadex reverses moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block in horses

BACKGROUND

Neuromuscular block (NMB) during general anaesthesia has an implicit risk of inadvertent residual NMB during recovery. Reversal of NMB is commonly encouraged to decrease this risk, and has historically been performed with neostigmine/atropine, two agents with important cardiac and gastrointestinal side effects. Sugammadex is a new selective relaxant binding agent that can reverse rocuronium-induced NMB efficiently and without these complications. Recommended doses are possibly cost-prohibitive.

OBJECTIVES

To measure the recovery time from rocuronium-NMB after administration of low-dose sugammadex, compared with spontaneous recovery.

STUDY DESIGN

Nonrandomised in vivo experiments.

METHODS

Fourteen adult horses undergoing different research procedures were anaesthetised with detomidine and isoflurane. All horses received NMB with rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg IV. Neuromuscular function was measured with acceleromyographic train-of-four (TOF) ratio. Recovery occurred spontaneously in five horses weighing (median [range]) 548 (413-594) kg and was enhanced with sugammadex 200 mg (total dose) in nine horses (433 [362-515]) kg. Recovery time from moderate NMB to a TOF ratio 1.0, and total duration of NMB were compared between groups. Cases of recurarisation (decrease in the TOF ratio <0.9 after recovery) were identified within 30 min after sugammadex.

RESULTS

The dose of sugammadex was 0.46 (0.39-0.55) mg/kg. The recovery period lasted 21 (17-39) minutes for spontaneous and 4 (3-7) minutes for sugammadex. Total duration of NMB was 58 (41-70) minutes for spontaneous and 36 (21-43) for sugammadex (both p ≤ 0.003). There were no instances of recurarisation.

MAIN LIMITATIONS

Small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

A dose of sugammadex of approximately 0.5 mg/kg substantially shortened the recovery period from rocuronium-induced NMB from a median of 21 to 4 min, when given at a moderate depth of NMB. No recurarisation was observed within the next 30 min.

Cardiac Arrest in the Post-anesthesia Care Unit (PACU): Postoperative Recurrence of Neuromuscular Block After Sugammadex Reversal

Sugammadex has transformed clinical practice by enabling the rapid reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block (NMB) at any depth. We present a case of cardiac arrest following postoperative recurarization despite the sugammadex-induced transient reversal of NMB. Despite its proven clinical reliability, this case highlights the often overlooked aspects that must be considered when using this drug. An 84-year-old male patient was scheduled for a laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for gastric cancer. At the end of the procedure, reversal of NMB was evidenced by an acceleromyographic train-of-four (TOF) ratio of ≥0.9 following sugammadex administration. In the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), pulseless electrical activity was perceived, with a regression of TOF count to 1. After providing successful advanced cardiac life support, additional sugammadex administration led to uneventful extubation. When the concentration of free rocuronium decreases in the central compartment following sugammadex administration, redistribution of rocuronium from the peripheral to the central and effect-site compartments may cause recurarization. Special care is required in cases involving obese and elderly patients as well as those with renal impairment or hypothermia. To provide effective and predictable reversal of NMB, proper use of sugammadex should be pursued, including adequate dosing and monitoring.

Postoperative Risk of Transfusion After Reversal of Residual Neuromuscular Block With Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Sugammadex and neostigmine are routinely used to reverse residual neuromuscular blocks at the end of surgery. Sugammadex has been linked with prolongation of laboratory coagulation markers, but clinical relevance on postoperative blood loss and transfusions remains unclear.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center, cohort study, we analyzed medical records of adult patients having noncardiac surgery who were given sugammadex or neostigmine from May 2016 to December 2020. Our primary outcome was the incidence of any postoperative transfusion of red blood cells, and/or fresh-frozen plasma, and/or platelets. Secondary outcomes were duration of hospitalization, need for resurgery, and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission. After propensity score weighting, the odds ratio (OR) for postoperative transfusion was assessed in both groups (sugammadex versus neostigmine) using a generalized estimation equation to count within-subject correlation weighted by the inverse propensity score.

RESULTS

Out of 39,325 eligible surgeries, 33,903 surgeries in 29,062 patients were included in the analysis; with 4581 patients receiving sugammadex and 29,322 patients receiving neostigmine. The raw incidence of postoperative transfusion was 7.40% in sugammadex and 7.45% in the neostigmine group. After weighting by propensity score, the incidence of postoperative transfusion was 8.01% in the sugammadex and 7.38% in the neostigmine group (OR, 1.11 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.26; P = .118]). There was no difference in duration of hospitalization and need for resurgery, but odds of postoperative ICU admission were significantly higher for patients receiving sugammadex than those receiving neostigmine (OR, 1.33 [98.33% CI, 1.17-1.52; P < .0001]). Our a priori planned analysis of coagulation laboratory parameters could not be completed because of a high amount of missing laboratory data.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no statistically significant nor clinically important difference in the risk of postoperative transfusion in patients receiving sugammadex or neostigmine.

Retrospective observational study of the effects of residual neuromuscular blockade and sugammadex on motor-evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery in Japan

Given neuromuscular blockade (NMB) can affect the amplitude and detection success rate of motor-evoked potentials (MEP), sugammadex may be administered intraoperatively. We evaluated the factors affecting the degree of residual NMB (i.e., the train-of-four [TOF] ratio) and the relationship between TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate in Japanese patients undergoing spine surgery. This single-center retrospective observational study included adults who underwent spine surgery under propofol/remifentanil anesthesia, received rocuronium for intubation, and underwent myogenic MEP monitoring after transcranial stimulation. TOF ratios were assessed using electromyography. Sugammadex was administered after finishing the MEP setting and the TOF ratio was ≤0.7. To identify factors affecting the TOF ratio, TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate were simultaneously measured after finishing the MEP setting; to compare the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery between sugammadex and spontaneous recovery groups, multivariable analyses were performed. Of 373 cases analyzed, sugammadex was administered to 221 (59.2%) cases. Age, blood pressure, hepatic impairment, and rocuronium dose were the main factors affecting the TOF ratio. Patients with higher TOF ratios (≥0.75) had higher MEP detection success rates. The time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery was significantly shorter in patients administered sugammadex versus patients without sugammadex (P < .0001). The MEP detection success rate was higher in patients with a TOF ratio of ≥0.75. Sugammadex shortened the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery.

Appropriate dosing of sugammadex for reversal of rocuronium-/vecuronium-induced muscle relaxation in morbidly obese patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

To conduct a meta-analysis to compare different dosing scalars of sugammadex in a morbidly obese population for reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB).

Methods

PubMed®, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Google Scholar were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing lower-dose sugammadex using ideal body weight (IBW) or corrected body weight (CBW) as dosing scalars with standard-dose sugammadex based on total body weight (TBW) among morbidly obese people after NMB. Mean difference with SD was used to estimate the results.

Results

The analysis included five RCT with a total of 444 morbidly obese patients. The reversal time was significantly longer in patients receiving sugammadex with dosing scalar based on IBW than in patients receiving sugammadex with dosing scalar based on TBW (mean difference 55.77 s, 95% confidence interval [CI] 32.01, 79.53 s), but it was not significantly different between patients receiving sugammadex with dosing scalars based on CBW versus TBW (mean difference 2.28 s, 95% CI –10.34, 14.89 s).

Conclusion

Compared with standard-dose sugammadex based on TBW, lower-dose sugammadex based on IBW had 56 s longer reversal time whereas lower-dose sugammadex based on CBW had a comparable reversal time.

Pro-Con Debate: Do We Need Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring in the Era of Sugammadex?

In this Pro-Con article, we debate the merits of using quantitative neuromuscular blockade monitoring. Consensus guidelines recommend their use to guide the administration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade and reversal agents. A major impediment to this guideline is that until recently, reliable quantitative neuromuscular blockade monitors have not been widely available. Without them, anesthesia providers have been trained with and are adept at using a variety of qualitative neuromuscular blockade monitors otherwise known as peripheral nerve stimulators. Although perhaps less accurate, anesthesia providers find them reliable and easy to use. They have a long track record of using them with the perception that their use leads to effective neuromuscular blockade reversal and minimizes clinically significant adverse events from residual neuromuscular blockade. In the recent past, 2 disruptive developments have called upon anesthesia care providers to reconsider their practice in neuromuscular blockade administration, reversal, and monitoring. These include: (1) commercialization of more reliable quantitative neuromuscular monitors and (2) widespread use of sugammadex, a versatile reversal agent of neuromuscular blockade. Sugammadex appears to be so effective at rapidly and effectively reversing even the deepest of neuromuscular blockades, and it has left anesthesia providers wondering whether quantitative monitoring is indeed necessary or whether conventional, familiar, and less expensive qualitative monitoring will suffice? This Pro-Con debate will contrast anesthesia provider perceptions with evidence surrounding the use of quantitative neuromuscular blockade monitors to explore whether quantitative neuromuscular monitoring (NMM) is just another technology solution looking for a problem or a significant advance in NMM that will improve patient safety and outcomes.

Potential Neuroprotective Role of Sugammadex: A Clinical Study on Cognitive Function Assessment in an Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Approach and an Experimental Study

Background

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction affects the quality of recovery, particularly affecting the elderly, and poses a burden on the health system. We hypothesize that the use of sugammadex (SG) could optimize the quality of postoperative cognitive function and overall recovery through a neuroprotective effect.

Methods

A pilot observational study on patients undergoing cardiac surgery with enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) approach, was designed to compare SG-treated (n = 14) vs. neostigmine (NG)-treated (n = 7) patients. The Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PQRS) was used at different times to evaluate cognitive function and overall recovery of the patients. An online survey among anesthesiologists on SG use was also performed. Additionally, an animal model study was designed to explore the effects of SG on the hippocampus.

Results

Sugammadex (SG) was associated with favorable postoperative recovery in cognitive domains particularly 30 days after surgery in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement by cardiopulmonary bypass and the ERACS approach; however, it failed to demonstrate a short-term decrease in length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay. The survey information indicated a positive appreciation of SG recovery properties. SG reverts postoperative memory deficit and induces the expression of anti-inflammatory microglial markers.

Conclusion

The results show a postoperative cognitive improvement by SG treatment in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement procedure by the ERACS approach. Additionally, experimental data from an animal model of mild surgery confirm the cognitive effect of SG and suggest a potential effect over glia cells as an underlying mechanism.

Comparison of a new EMG module, AF-201P, with acceleromyography using the post-tetanic counts during rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular block: a prospective, multicenter study

Recent advances in neuromuscular monitors have facilitated the development of a new electromyographic module, AF-201P™. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between post-tetanic counts (PTCs) assessed using the AF-201P™ and the acceleromyographic TOF Watch SX™ during rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular block. Forty adult patients consented to participate in this study. The integrated AF-201P™ stimulating and sensing electrode was placed over the ulnar nerve on the distal volar forearm and the belly of the abductor digiti minimi muscle of one arm. The TOF Watch SX™ was applied with the provided hand adaptor on the opposite arm, to observe twitch responses of the adductor pollicis muscle. After stabilization of train-of-four (TOF) responses, rocuronium 0.9 mg kg^-1 was administered intravenously. Then, PTCs were observed every 3 min using both monitors. Whenever the TOF count was detected with the TOF Watch SX™, rocuronium 0.2 mg kg^-1 was administered, and successive PTC measurements were continued. A total of 1732 paired PTC data points were obtained and analyzed. Regression analysis showed no significant difference in PTCs between the two monitors (PTCs measured by the TOF Watch SX™ = 0.78·PTCs measured by AF-201P™ + 0.21, R = 0.56). Bland-Altman analysis also showed acceptable ranges of bias [95% CI] and limits of agreement (0.3 [0.2 to 0.5] and - 4.6 to 5.3) for the PTCs. The new EMG module, AF-201P™, showed reliable PTCs during deep neuromuscular block, as well as the TOF Watch SX™.

Comparison of Sugammadex Dose for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Thyroid Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To compare effect of 1 and 2 mg/kg of sugammadex on the incidence of intraoperative bucking and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) quality in thyroid surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients qualified for thyroid surgery with IONM were eligible for this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. After tracheal intubation with 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium, 1 or 2 mg/kg of sugammadex was administered to patients in group I or II, respectively. The quality of the IONM for the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) was evaluated (strong/intermediate/weak). The initial amplitude of electromyography for the vagus nerve (V1) and the recurrent laryngeal nerve (R1) were recorded. Intraoperative bucking movements was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients (51 in each group) completed the study. Time from sugammadex administration to initial checking for the EBSLN was not different between group I and II (25.0 ± 7.9 vs. 25.5 ± 9.0 minutes, P = .788). There was no difference in the neuromonitoring quality for the EBSLN between group I and II (strong/intermediate/weak: 46/5/0 vs. 50/1/0, P = .205). The amplitudes of V1 (1,086.3 ± 673.3 μV vs. 1,161.8 ± 727.5 μV, P = .588) and R1 (1,328.2 ± 934.1 μV vs. 1,410.5 ± 919.6 μV, P = .655) were comparable between the groups. Patients who experienced bucking were significantly fewer in the group I than the group II (13.7% vs. 35.3%, P = .020).

CONCLUSION

A dose of 1 mg/kg sugammadex induced less bucking than 2 m/kg while providing comparable IONM quality during thyroid surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Laryngoscope, 131:2154-2159, 2021.

Utilization Patterns of Perioperative Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal in the United States: A Retrospective Observational Study From the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group

BACKGROUND

Following the introduction of sugammadex to the US clinical practice, scarce data are available to understand its utilization patterns. This study aimed to characterize patient, procedure, and provider factors associated with sugammadex administration in US patients.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted across 24 Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group institutions in the United States with sugammadex on formulary at the time of the study. All American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-IV adults undergoing noncardiac surgery from 2014 to 2018 receiving neuromuscular blockade (NMB) were eligible. The study established 3 periods based on the date of first documented sugammadex use at each institution: the presugammadex period, 0- to 6-month transitional period, and 6+ months postsugammadex period. The primary outcome was reversal using sugammadex during the postsugammadex period-defined as 6 months after sugammadex was first utilized at each institution. A multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model controlling for institution was developed to assess patient, procedure, and provider factors associated with sugammadex administration.

RESULTS

A total of 934,798 cases met inclusion criteria. Following the 6-month transitional period, sugammadex was used on average in 40.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.8-40.2) of cases receiving NMB. Multivariable analysis demonstrated sugammadex use to be associated with train-of-four count of 0-1 (adjusted odds ratio = 4.06; 95% CI, 33.83-4.31) or 2 (2.45; 2.29-2.62) vs 3-4 twitches before reversal; the amount of NMB administered (3.01; 2.88-3.16) for the highest effective dose 95 quartile compared to the lowest quartile; advanced age (1.83; 1.71-1.95) compared to age <41; male sex (1.36; 1.32-1.39) compared to female sex; major thoracic surgery (1.26; 1.13-1.39); congestive heart failure (1.17, 1.07-1.28); and ASA III or IV (1.13; 1.10-1.16) versus ASA I or II.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate broad early clinical adoption of sugammadex following Food and Drug Administration approval. Sugammadex is used preferentially in cases with higher degrees of NMB before reversal and in patients with greater burden of comorbidities and known risk factors for residual blockade or pulmonary complications.

Non-linear regression analysis for estimating the intraoperative motor evoked potential recovery time after bolus neuromuscular blockade

The recovery time of the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude following a neuromuscular blockade (NMB) during surgery is useful for interpreting low-amplitude waveforms or selecting the baseline waveform. In this study, the MEP data of 195 orthopedic cases who received a bolus dose of rocuronium at the beginning of surgery, between June 2009 and January 2016 were used. A non-linear regression analysis was applied to MEP amplitude data of multiple patients. The time taken for 90% of the maximum-amplitude recovery was estimated from the identified time series model. The 90% amplitude recovery time was 88.6 min in the pharmacological model and 89.4 min in the logistic model. These results were included in the 95% confidence interval of the previous studies. Although MEP amplitude is relatively unstable because of anesthesia, the averaged time series model of MEP amplitude can be estimated by using a large number of data.

The future of neuromuscular blocking agents

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review provides a summary of the literature on recent development of new neuromuscular blocking agents and presents clinically well established and new reversal agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Anesthesiologists are still waiting for the ideal neuromuscular blocking agent with a succinylcholine-like rapid onset and offset without side effects. Recent drug development led to a new series of neuromuscular compounds, called the chlorofumarates such as gantacurium, CW002, and CW011. These drugs have a promising pharmacodynamic profile; importantly, they can rapidly be reversed by L-cysteine adduction without relevant side effects. In addition, a new spectrum of reversal agents are currently examined in preclinical studies: adamgammadex sodium, a modified γ-cyclodextrin derivate that forms an inactive tight inclusion complex with rocuronium or vecuronium and calabadions, capable of reversing both benzylisoquinolines and steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents.

SUMMARY

Although the recent advancements in neuromuscular research are very promising, to date, the presented drugs are currently not available for clinical use. Clinical studies will determine the role of these developments in anesthesia practice. Therefore, well established combinations such as rocuronium-sugammadex are popular in clinical practice to offer quick paralysis for intubation and to optimize surgical conditions, while providing a fast neuromuscular recovery at the end of surgery.

THYROID SURGERY, IONM AND SUGAMMADEX SODIUM RELATIONSHIPS: BENEFITS IN SUGAMMADEX SODIUM USE FOR IONM

Background

It is important to protect recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) during thyroid surgery. Thus, intra- operative neuromonitoring (IONM) has got popularity. But, the half life of neuromuscular blocking agents used has a reverse correlation with reliability and effectiveness of IONM. This study aimed to research the effect of Sugammadex Sodium, a specific nemuromuscular blocking agent antagonist, on nerve conduction and IONM.

Materials and methods

Twenty patients who underwent thyroidectomy under IONM followed an enhanced NMB recovery protocol-rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg at anesthesia induction and sugammadex 2 mg/kg at the beginning of operation. To prevent laryngeal nerve injury during the surgical procedures, all patients underwent intraoperative monitoring. At the same time, the measurement of TOF-Watch acceleromyograph of the adductor pollicis muscle response to ulnar nerve stimulation was performed; recovery was defined as a train-of-four (TOF) ratio ≥ 0.9. Age, sex, recurrent laryngeal nerve transmission speeds prior to and after operation, BMI, duration of surgery, the change in nerve transmission after drug administration and complications were analyzed.

Results

The mean age and the mean BMI were 47.6±11.82 years and 28.74±3.20, respectively. The mean operation duration was 52.65±5.51 minutes. There was no difference in either right or left RLN monitoring values before and after surgery. Following the drug injection, the TOF guard measurements on the 1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd and 4^th minutes were 23.5±4.90; 69.5±6.86; 88±4.1 and 135.9±10.62, respectively.

Conclusion

Neuromuscular blocking antagonist use and monitoring nerve transmission speed with TOF-guard can provide a safer resection.

Potency estimation of sugammadex for the reversal of moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a non-randomized dose-response study

PURPOSE

There is no report investigating the precise potency of sugammadex for antagonizing various intensities of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ED₉₅ of reversibility of sugammadex and reveal the safety factor of 2 mg/kg of sugammadex for moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block.

METHODS

Fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. After induction of anesthesia, we recorded the adductor pollicis muscle response to ulnar nerve stimulation using acceleromyography. All patients received 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. When the first twitch (T1) of the train-of-four (TOF) response reappeared, rocuronium infusion was commenced to maintain T1 at 10% of the control. After the surgery was completed and infusion of rocuronium was stopped, patients were given sugammadex by a cumulative dose technique. The effective doses of sugammadex that led to recovery of the amplitude of T1 and the TOF ratio by 95% (ED₉₅) were calculated from the regression lines of least-squares regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean ED₉₅ of sugammadex for recovery of T1 and the TOF ratio from rocuronium-induced moderate neuromuscular block was 1.34 (0.24) and 1.14 (0.24) mg/kg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ED₉₅ of sugammadex for the recovery of T1 was significantly greater than that for the TOF ratio. However, a sugammadex dose of 2 mg/kg is equivalent to about 1.5 times the ED₉₅ of sugammadex for reversal of moderate rocuronium-induced block, indicating its safety margin.

Use of intraoperative neuromuscular monitor reduces the reversal dose of sugammadex: a single-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

We compared the reversal doses of sugammadex in surgical cases in which intraoperative neuromuscular monitor were used, to cases in which intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring was not used, retrospectively.

METHODS

Data were collected by reviewing the electronic medical records of patients who received rocuronium and sugammadex during general anesthesia at Asahikawa Medical University Hospital between May 1, 2017 and April 30, 2018. The primary outcome was the reversal dose of sugammadex per patient actual body weight (mg/kg) between the group in which intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring was used (NM+ group) and the group in which intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring was not used (NM- group).

RESULTS

A total of 3496 patients were evaluated, with 2544 patients (73%) included in NM+ group and 952 patients (27%) in NM- group. The reversal doses of sugammadex per actual body weight were significantly higher in NM- group compared to NM+ group. In the NM+ group, 521 patients (20%) received < 2 mg/kg sugammadex, 1377 patients (54%) received 2 ~ 2.5 mg/kg sugammadex, and 646 patients (25%) received > 2.5 mg/kg sugammadex. In contrast, 128 patients (13%) received < 2 mg/kg sugammadex, 362 patients (38%) received 2 ~ 2.5 mg/kg sugammadex and 462 patients (49%) received > 2.5 mg/kg sugammadex in NM- group.

CONCLUSION

This single-center retrospective study demonstrated that the use of intraoperative neuromuscular monitor reduced the reversal dose of sugammadex.

Neuromuscular Blockade Correlates with Hormones and Body Composition in Acromegaly

Tumor resection is the first-line therapy for acromegaly patients. In some cases, unsatisfactory intraoperative neuromuscular blockades (NMBs) lead to failed operations. The purpose of this study was to investigate and quantify the NMB status of acromegaly patients and explore the relationship between NMB status and hormone levels and body composition. Twenty patients with untreated acromegaly and seventeen patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas as controls were enrolled in this study. NMB was assessed using the train-of-four (TOF) technique with TOF-Watch® SX. The onset time of NMB, deep neuromuscular blockade duration (DNMBD), and clinical neuromuscular blockade duration (CNMBD) were monitored. We found a significantly longer onset time (110.25 ± 54.90 vs. 75.00 ± 27.56, s, p=0.017), shorter DNMBD (21.99 ± 5.67 vs. 34.96 ± 11.04, min, p < 0.001), and shorter CNMBD (33.26 ± 8.09 vs. 46.21 ± 10.89, min, p < 0.001) in acromegaly patients compared with the controls. DNMBD and CNMBD decreased in patients with decreasing body fat percentage and increasing growth hormone (GH) level, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level, and GH and IGF-1 burden. The onset time increased with increasing IGF-1 level and GH and IGF-1 burden. Taken together, a unique NMB status was identified in acromegaly patients with the following characteristics: prolonged onset time and shortened DNMBD and CNMBD. Changes in the levels and burdens of GH and IGF-1 and body composition were linearly correlated with intraoperative NMB in acromegaly patients.

Effect of intraoperative neuromonitoring on efficacy and safety using sugammadex in thyroid surgery: randomized clinical trial

Purpose

The use of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) may affect intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during anesthesia used during thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Methods

The use of sugammadex was evaluated in a prospective clinical study during thyroid surgery. Between July 2018 and January 2019, 129 patients were prospectively randomized to either the sugammadex group (group B) or the control group (group A). Group A patients underwent standardized IONM during thyroidectomy, while group B patients used an NMBA-reversal protocol comprised of rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) in anesthesia induction and sugammadex (2 mg/kg) after first vagal stimulation (V0). A peripheral nerve stimulator was used to monitor the neuromuscular transmission.

Results

In our clinical study, it took 26.07 ± 3.26 and 50.0 ± 8.46 minutes to reach 100% recovery of laryngeal electromyography at injection of the sugammadex group (2 mg/kg) and the control group, respectively (P < 0.001). The train-of-four ratio recovered from 0 to >0.9 within 4 minutes after administering 2 mg/kg of sugammadex at the beginning of resection. Surgery time was significantly shorter in group B than in group A (P < 0.001). Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis was detected in 4 patients from group A and in 3 patients from group B (P = 0.681). There was no permanent RLN paralysis in the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Our clinical study showed that sugammadex effectively and rapidly improved the inhibition of neuromuscular function induced by rocuronium. The implementation of the nondepolarizing neuromuscular block recovery protocol may lead to tracheal intubation as well as favorable conditions for IONM in thyroid surgery.

[Deep neuromuscular blockade : Benefits and risks]

Neuromuscular blockade (TOF count = 0) can improve tracheal intubation and microlaryngeal surgery. It is also frequently used in many surgical fields including both nonlaparoscopic and laparoscopic surgery to improve surgical conditions and to prevent sudden muscle contractions. Currently there is a controversy regarding the need and the clinical benefits of deep neuromuscular blockade for different surgical procedures. Deep neuromuscular relaxation improves laparoscopic surgical space conditions only marginally when using low intra-abdominal pressure. There is no outcome-relevant advantage of low compared to higher intra-abdominal pressures, but worsen the surgical conditions. Postoperative, residual curarisation can be avoided by algorithm-based pharmacological reversing and quantitative neuromuscular monitoring.

Delayed Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal With Sugammadex After Vecuronium, Desflurane, and Magnesium Administration: A Case Report

A variety of factors are known to prolong neuromuscular blockade, including several medications commonly used in anesthetic practice. We present a patient who underwent general anesthesia using desflurane, vecuronium, and magnesium infusion with delayed neuromuscular blockade reversal after sugammadex administration. A higher than anticipated total dose of sugammadex was required for adequate reversal, and quantitative neuromuscular monitoring was essential to ensuring complete neuromuscular recovery before extubation in this case.

Reversal of residual neuromuscular block: complications associated with perioperative management of muscle relaxation

The use of anticholinesterases to reverse residual neuromuscular block at the end of surgery became routine practice in the 1950s. These drugs could only be used when recovery from block was established [two twitches of the train-of-four (TOF) count detectable] and concern was expressed about their cholinergic side-effects. By the 1990s, it was recognized that failure to reverse residual block adequately to a TOF ratio (TOFR) >0.7 was associated with increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (POPCs) following the long-acting non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drug (NDNMBD) pancuronium. By 2003, and the introduction of acceleromyography, a TOFR ≥0.9 was considered necessary to protect the airway from aspiration before tracheal extubation. It was also considered that four, not two, twitches of the TOF should be detectable before neostigmine was given. Use of any NDNMBD was subsequently shown to be associated with increased risk of POPCs, but it was thought that neostigmine reduced that risk. Recently, there has been conflicting evidence that use of neostigmine might increase the incidence of POPCs. Although sugammadex has been shown to rapidly reverse profound neuromuscular block from aminosteroidal agents, there is currently no evidence that sugammadex is superior to neostigmine in its effect on POPCs. Other new antagonists, including cysteine to degrade CW002 and calabadion 1 and 2 to antagonize aminosteroidal and benzylisoquinolium NDNMBDs, are being studied in preclinical and clinical trials. Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is essential whenever a NDNMBD is used to ensure full recovery from neuromuscular block.

Is lower-dose sugammadex a cost-saving strategy for reversal of deep neuromuscular block? Facts and fiction

BACKGROUND

Sugammadex, a γ-cyclodextrin derivative, belongs to a new class of selective relaxant binding agents. Sugammadex was approved 10-years ago by the European medicines agency and today is used in clinical anesthesia and emergency medicine globally. In this review, indications for neuromuscular block, the challenge of neuromuscular monitoring and the practice of under-dosing of sugammadex as a potential cost-saving strategy are discussed.

MAIN BODY

Reversal of neuromuscular block is important to accelerate the spontaneous recovery of neuromuscular function. Sugammadex is able to reverse a rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block rapidly and efficiently from every depth of neuromuscular block. However, since sugammadex was introduced in clinical anesthesia, several studies have reported administration of a lower-than-recommended dose of sugammadex. The decision to under-dose sugammadex is often motivated by cost reduction concerns, as the price of sugammadex is much higher than that of neostigmine outside the United States. However, under-dosing of sugammadex leads to an increased risk of recurrence of neuromuscular block after an initial successful (but transient) reversal. Similarly, when not using objective neuromuscular monitoring, under-dosing of sugammadex may result in residual neuromuscular block in the postoperative care unit, with its attendant negative pulmonary outcomes. Therefore, an appropriate dose of sugammadex, based on objective determination of the depth of neuromuscular block, should be administered to avoid residual or recurrent neuromuscular block and attendant postoperative complications. Whether the reduction in perioperative recovery time of the patient can be translated into additional procedural cases performed, faster operative turnover times, or improved organizational resource utilization, has yet to be determined in actual clinical practice that includes verification of neuromuscular recovery prior to tracheal extubation.

CONCLUSIONS

The current review addresses the indications for neuromuscular block, the challenge of neuromuscular monitoring, the practice of under-dosing of sugammadex as a potential cost-saving strategy in reversal of deep neuromuscular block, the economics of sugammadex administration and the potential healthcare cost-saving strategies.

Differences of Recovery from Rocuronium-induced Deep Paralysis in Response to Small Doses of Sugammadex between Elderly and Nonelderly Patients

Editor’s Perspective

What We Already Know about This Topic

What This Article Tells Us That Is New

Background

Complete recovery from rocuronium-induced muscle paralysis with sugammadex is reported to be delayed in elderly patients. The authors tested a hypothesis that recovery from deep neuromuscular block with low-dose sugammadex is slower (primary hypothesis) and incidence of recurarization is higher (secondary hypothesis) in elderly patients than in nonelderly patients.

Methods

In anesthetized elderly (n = 20; 76.9 ± 5.0 yr of age) and nonelderly patients (n = 20; 53.7 ± 12.8 yr of age) under deep paralysis with rocuronium, change of train-of-four ratio per minute (primary outcome variable) was measured with an acceleromyograph neuromuscular monitor during spontaneous recovery from rocuronium-induced muscle paralysis (0.6 mg/kg) and after infusion of low-dose sugammadex (50 µg · kg-1 · min-1). Recurarization was defined as the negative change of train-of-four ratio.

Results

Spontaneous train-of-four ratio recovery rate was significantly slower in the elderly group (median [25th percentile, 75th percentile]: 1.89 [1.22, 2.90] %/min) than in the nonelderly group (3.45 [1.96, 4.25] %/min, P = 0.024). Train-of-four ratio change rate in response to low-dose sugammadex was significantly slower in elderly (0.55 [–0.29, 1.54] %/min) than in the nonelderly group (1.68 [0.73, 3.13] %/min, P = 0.024). Incidence of recurarization was significantly higher in the elderly group than in the nonelderly group (35% vs. 5%, P = 0.044). Multiple linear regression analyses indicate that slower spontaneous train-of-four ratio recovery rate and impaired renal function are two major contributing factors that decrease train-of-four ratio change rate in response to low-dose sugammadex.

Conclusions

Elderly patients are at greater risk for recurarization and residual muscle paralysis when low-dose sugammadex is administered.

Monitoring of Sugammadex Dosing at a Large Tertiary Care Pediatric Hospital

Introduction:

Anesthesiologists use sugammadex to reverse neuromuscular blockade (NMB) produced by rocuronium and vecuronium. Its mechanism involves encapsulation of the neuromuscular blocking agent. Sugammadex dosing is based on the depth of NMB, assessed by measuring the train-of-four (TOF).

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed procedures under general anesthesia in patients older than 1 year of age if they included sugammadex reversal of rocuronium-induced NMB. Documentation of TOF monitoring before and after reversal was noted, along with the dose of sugammadex administered. TOF was considered correctly documented if the anesthesia provider recorded the number of twitches before and after NMB reversal, or if they recorded 4 twitches before NMB reversal. We defined appropriate sugammadex dosing if it was within 10% of the recommended dose for the depth of NMB. We repeated this review after staff education and creating a reminder in the electronic health record system.

Results:

We included 100 patients in the preintervention analysis, of whom 30% had correct TOF documentation. Among patients with TOF assessment before sugammadex administration, the dose was appropriate in 34 of 40 cases. In the postintervention analysis, we reviewed 75 cases and found that correct documentation improved to 45% (P = 0.024). Among postintervention cases with TOF documented before sugammadex administration, sugammadex dosing was appropriate in 62 patients.

Conclusion:

Documentation of TOF was low (30%) before intervention and improved to only 45% after the interventions, suggesting that additional interventions are needed. Even before the intervention, with or without TOF documentation, the dose of sugammadex was generally consistent with recommendations.

Reversal of Deep Pipecuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block With Moderate Versus Standard Dose of Sugammadex: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND

Certain surgical interventions may require a deep neuromuscular block (NMB). Reversal of such a block before tracheal extubation is challenging. Because anticholinesterases are ineffective in deep block, sugammadex 4 mg/kg has been recommended for the reversal of rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced deep NMB. However, this recommendation requires opening 2 vials of 200 mg sugammadex, which results in an increase in drug costs. Therefore, we sought a less expensive solution for the induction and reversal of deep NMB. Although the optimal dose of sugammadex for antagonism of deep block from pipecuronium has not been established, data pertaining to moderate block are available. Accordingly, we hypothesized that sugammadex 2 mg/kg would be a proper dose to reverse deep pipecuronium block, enabling us to avoid cost increases. In the present study, we compared sugammadex 2 mg/kg with the standard dose of 4 mg/kg for reversal of deep block from pipecuronium.

METHODS

This single-center, randomized, double-blind, 2 parallel-arms, noninferiority study comprised 50 patients undergoing general anesthesia with propofol, sevoflurane, fentanyl, and pipecuronium. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed with acceleromyography (TOF-Watch SX). Noninferiority margin was specified beforehand as an increase in reversal time of no >10% (corresponding to 1 minute for the primary outcome). When the block spontaneously recovered to posttetanic count 1, the patients randomly received sugammadex 2 or 4 mg/kg, and the time from the injection to the train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 1.0 was measured. Primary outcome was the time to achieve the normalized TOF ratio of 0.9 in a particular patient. Residual or recurrent postoperative NMB was additional end point.

RESULTS

Each patient recovered to the normalized TOF ratio of 0.9. In the 2 mg/kg group, reversal time was 1.73 ± 1.03 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-2.13; n = 25), and in the 4 mg/kg group, reversal time was 1.42 ± 0.63 minutes (mean ± standard deviation) (95% CI, 1.17-1.67; n = 25). The mean difference in reversal times between the 2 groups was 0.31 minutes (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.8), and the upper limit of CI was below the noninferiority margin of 1 minute. Postoperative block did not occur.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of sugammadex 2 mg/kg was noninferior to that of 4 mg/kg in reversing posttetanic count-1 degree pipecuronium block. Sugammadex reversal of deep pipecuronium block appears to be effective.

Use of Sugammadex in Patients With Obesity: A Pooled Analysis

A growing proportion of patients undergoing surgical procedures are obese, providing anesthesiologists with numerous challenges for patient management. The current pooled analysis evaluated recovery times following sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular blockade by body mass index (BMI) in general, and in particular, in patients with BMIs ≥30 kg/m (defined as obese) and <30 kg/m (defined as non-obese). Data were pooled from 27 trials evaluating recommended sugammadex doses for reversal of moderate [reappearance of the second twitch of the train-of-four (TOF); sugammadex 2 mg/kg] or deep (1-2 post-tetanic counts or 15 minutes after rocuronium; sugammadex 4 mg/kg) rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. All doses of sugammadex were administered based on actual body weight. The recovery time from sugammadex administration to a TOF ratio ≥0.9 was the primary efficacy variable in all individual studies and in the pooled analysis. This analysis comprised a total of 1418 adult patients treated with sugammadex; 267 (18.8%) of these patients had a BMI ≥30 kg/m. The average time to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.9 was 1.9 minutes for rocuronium-induced blockade and 3.0 minutes for vecuronium-induced blockade. No clinically relevant correlation was observed between BMI and recovery time. The recommended sugammadex doses based on actual body weight provide rapid recovery from neuromuscular blockade in both obese and non-obese patients; no dose adjustments are required in the obese patient.

Recent advances in neuromuscular block during anesthesia

Muscle relaxation is a routine part of anesthesia and has important advantages. However, the lingering effects of muscle relaxants in the postoperative period have historically been associated with postoperative adverse events. Neuromuscular reversal, together with neuromuscular monitoring, is a recognized strategy to reduce the rate of postoperative residual relaxation but has only marginally improved outcome in the past few decades.

Sugammadex, a novel reversal agent with unique encapsulating properties, has changed the landscape of neuromuscular reversal and opened up new opportunities to improve patient care. By quickly and completely reversing any depth of neuromuscular block, it may reduce the rate of residual relaxation and improve respiratory recovery. In addition, sugammadex has made the use of deep neuromuscular block possible during surgery. Deep neuromuscular block may improve surgical working conditions and allow for a reduction in insufflation pressures during selected laparoscopic procedures. However, whether and how this may impact outcomes is not well established.

Preparing for the unexpected: special considerations and complications after sugammadex administration

Sugammadex, a modified gamma-cyclodextrin, has changed clinical practice of neuromuscular reversal dramatically. With the introduction of this selective relaxant binding agent, rapid and reliable neuromuscular reversal from any depth of block became possible. Sugammadex can reverse neuromuscular blockade without the muscarinic side effects typically associated with the administration of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. However, what remained unchanged is the incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade. It is known that sugammadex cannot always prevent its occurrence, if appropriate dosing is not chosen based on the level of neuromuscular paralysis prior to administration determined by objective neuromuscular monitoring. Alternatively, excessive doses of sugammadex administered in an attempt to ensure full and sustained reversal may affect the effectiveness of rocuronium in case of immediate reoperation or reintubation. In such emergent scenarios that require onset of rapid and reliable neuromuscular blockade, the summary of product characteristics (package insert) recommends using benzylisoquinolinium neuromuscular blocking agents or a depolarizing agent. However, if rapid intubation is required, succinylcholine has a significant number of side effects, and benzylisoquinolinium agents may not have the rapid onset required. Therefore, prior administration of sugammadex introduces a new set of potential problems that require new solutions. This novel reversal agent thus presents new challenges and anesthesiologists must familiarize themselves with specific issues with its use (e.g., bleeding risk, hypermagnesemia, hypothermia). This review will address sugammadex administration in such special clinical situations.

Reversal of Vecuronium-induced Neuromuscular Blockade with Low-dose Sugammadex at Train-of-four Count of Four

Background

Rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block that spontaneously recovered to a train-of-four count of four can be reversed with sugammadex 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg. We investigated whether these doses of sugammadex can also reverse vecuronium at a similar level of block.

Methods

Sixty-five patients were randomly assigned, and 64 were analyzed in this controlled, superiority study. Participants received general anesthesia with propofol, sevoflurane, fentanyl, and vecuronium. Measurement of neuromuscular function was performed with acceleromyography (TOF-Watch-SX, Organon Teknika B.V., The Netherlands ). Once the block recovered spontaneously to four twitches in response to train-of-four stimulation, patients were randomly assigned to receive sugammadex 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg; neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg; or placebo. Time from study drug injection to normalized train-of-four ratio 0.9 and the incidence of incomplete reversal within 30 min were the primary outcome variables. Secondary outcome was the incidence of reparalysis (normalized train-of-four ratio less than 0.9).

Results

Sugammadex, in doses of 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg, reversed a threshold train-of-four count of four to normalized train-of-four ratio of 0.9 or higher in all patients in 4.4 ± 2.3 min (mean ± SD) and 2.6 ± 1.6 min, respectively. Sugammadex 0.5 mg/kg reversed the block in 6.8 ± 4.1 min in 70% of patients (P &lt; 0.0001 vs. 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg), whereas neostigmine produced reversal in 11.3 ± 9.7 min in 77% of patients (P &gt; 0.05 vs. sugammadex 0.5 mg/kg). The overall frequency of reparalysis was 18.7%, but this incidence varied from group to group.

Conclusions

Sugammadex 1.0 mg/kg, unlike 0.5 mg/kg, properly reversed a threshold train-of-four count of four vecuronium-induced block but did not prevent reparalysis.

Dexamethasone does not diminish sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular block - clinical study in surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia

Background

Sugammadex reverses neuromuscular block (NMB) through binding aminosteroid neuromuscular blocking agents. Although sugammadex appears to be highly selective, it can interact with other drugs, like corticosteroids. A prospective single-blinded randomized clinical trial was designed to explore the significance of interactions between dexamethasone and sugammadex.

Methods

Sixty-five patients who were anesthetized for elective abdominal or urological surgery were included. NMB was assessed using train-of-four stimulation (TOF), with rocuronium used to maintain the desired NMB depth. NMB reversal at the end of anaesthesia was achieved using sugammadex. According to their received antiemetics, the patients were randomized to either the granisetron or dexamethasone group. Blood samples were taken before and after NMB reversal, for plasma dexamethasone and rocuronium determination. Primary endpoint was time from sugammadex administration to NMB reversal. Secondary endpoints included the ratios of the dexamethasone and rocuronium concentrations after NMB reversal versus before sugammadex administration.

Results

There were no differences for time to NMB reversal between the control (mean 121 ± 61 s) and the dexamethasone group (mean 125 ± 57 s; P = 0.760). Time to NMB reversal to a TOF ratio ≥0.9 was significantly longer in patients with lower TOF prior to sugammadex administration (Beta = −0.268; P = 0.038). The ratio between the rocuronium concentrations after NMB reversal versus before sugammadex administration was significantly affected by sugammadex dose (Beta = −0.375; P = 0.004), as was rocuronium dose per hour of operation (Beta = −0.366; p = 0.007), while it was not affected by NMB depth before administration of sugammadex (Beta = −0.089; p = 0.483) and dexamethasone (Beta = −0.186; p = 0.131). There was significant drop in plasma dexamethasone after sugammadex administration and NMB reversal (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Administration of dexamethasone to anesthetized patients did not delay NMB reversal by sugammadex.

Trial registration

The trial was retrospectively registered with The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on February 28th 2012 (enrollment of the first patient on February 2nd 2012) and was given a trial ID number ACTRN12612000245897 and universal trial number U1111-1128-5104.

Recovery of laryngeal nerve function with sugammadex after rocuronium-induced profound neuromuscular block

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of sugammadex in reversing profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block at the laryngeal adductor muscles using motor-evoked potentials (mMEPs).

DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

SETTING

University surgical center.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I-II status who underwent propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for the surgery of the thyroid gland.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were enrolled for reversal of profound neuromuscular block (sugammadex 16 mg/kg, 3 minutes after rocuronium 1.2 mg/kg). To prevent laryngeal nerve injury during the surgical procedures, all patients underwent neurophysiologic monitoring using mMEPs from vocal muscles. At the same time, the registration of TOF-Watch acceleromyograph at the adductor pollicis muscle response to ulnar nerve stimulation was performed; recovery was defined as a train-of-four (TOF) ratio ≥0.9.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

After injection of 16 mg/kg of sugammadex, the mean time to recovery of the basal mMEPs response at the laryngeal adductor muscles was 70 ± 18.2 seconds. The mean time to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.9 was 118 ± 80 seconds. In the postoperative period, 12 patients received follow-up evaluation of the vocal cords and no lesions caused by the surface laryngeal electrode during electrophysiological monitoring were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery from profound rocuronium-induced block on the larynx is fast and complete with sugammadex. In urgent scenarios, "early" extubation can be performed, even with a TOF ratio ≤0.9. However, all procedures to prevent postoperative residual curarization should still be immediately undertaken.

Sugammadex: A Comprehensive Review of the Published Human Science, Including Renal Studies

Although neuromuscular block (NMB) allows immobility for airway management and surgical exposure, termination of its effect is limited by and associated with side effects of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Sugammadex is a selective relaxant binding agent that has been shown to reverse deep NMB, even when administered 3 minutes following a 1.2 mg/kg dose of rocuronium. This novel drug is a modified gamma cyclodextrin, that through encapsulation process terminates the effects of rocuronium and vecuronium (aminosteroid muscle relaxants), and enables the anesthesiologists rapidly to reverse profound NMB induced by rocuronium or vecuronium, in a "can't ventilate, can't intubate" crisis. In this review, data from published phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials are reviewed and presented. In addition, clinical trials on special patient populations (patients with pulmonary disease and renal insufficiency) are evaluated. Each article reviewed will conclude with a discussion of relevance, focus on adverse event profile, and clinical usefulness.