The impact of timing of maximal crystalloid hydration on early graft function during kidney transplantation

Perioperative management of kidney transplantation in China: A national survey in 2021

Perioperative anaesthesia management has an important significance for kidney transplantation; however, the related consensus remains limited. An electronic survey with 44 questions was developed and sent to the chief anaesthesiologist at 115 non-military medical centres performing kidney transplantation in China through WeChat. A response rate of 81.7% was achieved from 94 of 115 non-military medical centres, where 94.4% of kidney transplants (10404 /11026) were completed in 2021. The result showed an overview of perioperative practice for kidney transplantations in China, identify the heterogeneity, and provide evidence for improving perioperative management of kidney transplantation. Some controversial therapy, such as hydroxyethyl starch, are still widely used, while some recommended methods are not widely available. More efforts on fluid management, hemodynamical monitoring, perioperative anaesthetics, and postoperative pain control are needed to improve the outcomes. Evidence-based guidelines for standardizing clinical practice are needed.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of goal-directed fluid therapy on postoperative outcomes in renal transplantation surgeries

Introduction

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of intraoperative goal-directed therapy (GDT) compared with conventional fluid therapy on postoperative outcomes in renal transplantation recipients, addressing this gap in current literature.

Method

A systematic search of patients aged ≥18 years who have undergone single-organ primary renal transplantations up to June 2022 in PubMed, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL Plus was performed. Primary outcome examined was postoperative renal function. Secondary outcomes assessed were mean arterial pressure at graft reperfusion, intraoperative fluid volume and other postoperative complications. Heterogeneity was tested using I² test. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO.

Results

A total of 2459 studies were identified. Seven eligible studies on 607 patients were included. Subgroup assessments revealed potential renal protective benefits of GDT, with patients receiving cadaveric grafts showing lower serum creatinine on postoperative days 1 and 3, and patients monitored with arterial waveform analysis devices experiencing lower incidences of postoperative haemodialysis. Overall analysis found GDT resulted in lower incidence of tissue oedema (risk ratio [RR] 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.78, P=0.01) and respiratory complications (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.90, P=0.03). However, quality of data was deemed low given inclusion of non-randomised studies, presence of heterogeneities and inconsistencies in defining outcomes measures.

Conclusion

While no definitive conclusions can be ascertained given current limitations, this review highlights potential benefits of using GDT in renal transplantation recipients. It prompts the need for further standardised studies to address limitations discussed in this review.

Use of Intramuscular Ephedrine Sulfate During Kidney Transplantation

Hypotension during kidney transplantation can be common. Vasopressor use during these procedures is often avoided, with a fear of decreasing renal perfusion in the transplanted kidney. However, adequate perfusion for the rest of the body is also necessary, and given that these patients often have underlying hypertension or other comorbid conditions, an appropriate mean arterial pressure (MAP) has to be maintained. Intramuscular injections of ephedrine have been studied in the anesthesiology literature in a variety of case types, and it is seen as a safe and effective method to boost MAP. We present a case series of three patients who underwent renal transplantation and who received an intramuscular injection of ephedrine for hypotension control. The medication worked well for increasing blood pressures without apparent side effects. All three patients were followed for more than one year, and all patients had good graft function at the end of that time period. This series shows that while further research is necessary in this arena, intramuscular ephedrine may have a place in the management of persistent hypotension in the operating room during kidney transplantation.

Crystalloid Solutions in Hospital: A Review of Existing Literature

Intravenous fluids (IVF) like normal saline (NS) and Ringer's lactate (RL) are often crucial in the management of hospitalized patients. Mishandling these fluids can lead to complications in about 20% of patients receiving them. In this review, we present the current evidence through the identification of observational studies and randomized trials that observed the optimal use of IVF. We found that NS may cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis in surgical patients, but there is no clear difference in mortality and long-term outcomes between NS and balanced crystalloids. Critically ill patients, particularly those in sepsis, benefit from balanced crystalloids, as high chloride content fluids like NS increase the risk of complications and mortality. In pancreatitis, NS has been shown to increase the risk of ICU admission when compared to RL; however, there is no significant difference in long-term outcomes and mortality between the fluids. RL is preferred for burns due to its isotonicity and lack of protein, preventing edema formation in an already dehydrated state. Plasma-lyte may resolve diabetic ketoacidosis faster, while prolonged NS use can lead to metabolic acidosis, acute kidney injury, and cerebral edema. In conclusion, NS, RL, and plasma-lyte are the most commonly used isotonic IVF in the hospital population. Incorrect choice of fluids in a different clinical scenario can lead to worse outcomes.

Goal-Directed Haemodynamic Therapy Improves Patient Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation

Introduction: Kidney transplant graft function depends on optimised haemodynamics. However, high fluid volumes risk hypervolaemic complications. The Edwards Lifesciences ClearSight™ device permits fluid titration through markers of preload and beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring. We evaluated the implementation of a novel goal-directed haemodynamic therapy protocol to determine whether patient outcomes had improved. Design: A retrospective evaluation of standard care versus goal-directed haemodynamic therapy in adults undergoing kidney transplantation was performed in a single centre between April 2016 and October 2019. Twenty-eight standard-of-care patients received intraoperative fixed-rate infusion and 28 patients received goal-directed haemodynamic therapy. The primary outcome was volume of fluid administered intraoperatively. Secondary outcomes included blood product and vasoactive drug exposure, graft and recipient outcomes. Results: Intraoperative fluid administered was significantly reduced in the goal-directed haemodynamic therapy cohort (4325 vs 2751 ml, P < .001). Exposure to vasopressor (67.9% vs 42.9%, P = .060) and blood products (17.9% vs 3.6%, P = .101) was unchanged. Immediate graft function (82.1% vs 75.0%, P = .515), dialysis requirement (14.3% vs 21.4%, P = .729) and creatinine changes post-operatively were unchanged. In the goal-directed haemodynamic therapy cohort, 1 patient had pulmonary oedema (3.6%) versus 21.4% in the standard cohort. Patients in the goal-directed haemodynamic therapy group were more likely to mobilise within 48 hours of surgery (number needed to treat = 3.5, P = .012). Conclusions: Protocolised goal-directed haemodynamic therapy in kidney transplantation was safe and may improve patient, graft, and surgical outcomes. Clinical trials assessing goal-directed approaches are needed.

Value of Central Venous Pressure Monitoring in the Patients with Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Background. Although the measurement of central venous pressure (CVP) is a common clinical tool, the role of CVP monitoring in the outcome of sepsis is controversial because threshold values of CVP are uncertain, and there are only limited data on short-term survival of patients with septic acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods. This retrospective cohort study was based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database (source of the training dataset). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to clarify the relation between CVP measurement and clinical outcomes, and a univariate regression model after propensity score matching was utilized to validate our findings. A mortality prediction model for septic AKI and a risk stratification scoring approach were developed, and the emergency intensive care unit (eICU) database was used for external validation. Results. Of the 9170 patients in the training set, 2446 (26.7%) underwent CVP measurement. No significant association was found between CVP monitoring and 28-day mortality among patients with septic AKI (odds $\text{ratio}=0.479$ ; 95% confidence interval 0.213-1.076, $P=0.075$ ), even after adjustments (propensity score matching; $P=0.178$ ). Length of ICU stay and hospital stay was markedly reduced in patients undergoing CVP measurement within 3 hours (median 6.2 and 10.9 days, respectively, $P<0.001$ ). The addition of the mean perfusion pressure initial, CVP, and the magnitude of the CVP change within 48 hours to the model significantly increased model discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.867 and 0.780, respectively, $P<0.001$ ). Conclusions. These findings suggest that CVP measurement alone has little effect on the outcome of septic AKI. Nonetheless, initial CVP levels and the dynamic changes in CVP within the first 48 hours after ICU admission and the mean perfusion pressure initial can improve the accuracy of outcome prediction models.

Effects of the Type of Intraoperative Fluid in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Perioperative fluid management in kidney transplant recipients is crucial to supporting the fluid, acid-base, and electrolyte balance required for graft perfusion. However, the choice of intraoperative crystalloids in kidney transplantation remains controversial. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study to evaluate the impact of intraoperative fluids on acid-base and electrolyte balance and graft outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 282 living donor kidney transplant recipients from January 2010 to December 2017. Patients were classified into two groups based on the type of intraoperative crystalloids used (157 patients in the half saline group and 125 patients in the balanced crystalloid solutions group, Plasma-lyte).

RESULTS

Compared with the half saline group, the Plasma-lyte group showed less metabolic acidosis and hyponatremia during surgery. Hyperkalemia incidence was not significantly different between the two groups. Changes in postoperative graft function assessed by blood urea nitrogen and creatinine were significantly different between the two groups. Patients in the Plasma-lyte group exhibited consistently higher glomerular filtration rates than those in the half saline group at 1 month and 1 year after transplantation after adjusting for demographic differences.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative Plasma-lyte can lead to more favorable results in terms of acid-base balance during kidney transplantation. Patients who received Plasma-lyte showed superior postoperative graft function at 1 month and 1 year after transplantation. Further studies are needed to evaluate the superiority of intraoperative Plasma-lyte over other types of crystalloids in relation to graft outcomes.

Balancing the tug of war: intraoperative and postoperative management of multiorgan transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiorgan heart transplants (MOHT) have steadily increased and account for approximately 4% of all heart transplants performed. Although long-term outcomes of MOHT are similar to heart transplant alone, perioperative management remains an issue with nearly double the rate of prolonged hospitalization. Better understanding of hemodynamic environments encountered and appropriate therapeutic targets can help improve perioperative management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Accurate and precise hemodynamic monitoring allows for early identification of complications and prompt assessment of therapeutic interventions. This can be achieved with a multimodal approach using traditional monitoring tools, such a pulmonary artery catheter and arterial line in conjunction with transesophageal echocardiography. Specific targets for optimizing graft perfusion are determined by phase of surgery and organ combination. In some circumstances, the surgical sequence of transplant can help mitigate or avoid certain detrimental hemodynamic environments.

SUMMARY

With better understanding of the array of hemodynamic environments that can develop during MOHT, we can work to standardize hemodynamic targets and therapeutic interventions to optimize graft perfusion. Effectively navigating this perioperative course with multimodal monitoring including transesophageal echocardiography can mitigate impact of complications and reduce prolonged hospitalization associated with MOHT.

Crystalloid fluids and delayed graft function in kidney transplant: A cohort study

Background:

Normal saline is commonly used in the perioperative kidney transplant period; its high chloride content can cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis giving a possible advantage to balanced electrolyte solutions due to their lower chloride content. The evidence regarding the best practices in fluid management during kidney transplantation and its effect on the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) is still limited.

Materials and Methods:

One hundred thirty-eight patients were included and followed up for seven days after surgery. Administered crystalloid type and volume were compared among patients with and without DGF, along with additional patient and surgical variables. To investigate whether intraoperative fluid type/amount influence DGF, patients were categorized into three groups: those who received mainly (>50%) lactated Ringer's solution, normal saline, or plasmaLyte. A logistic regression analysis was used to define variables independently correlated with DGF, and odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.

Results:

The incidence of DGF was 8.7%. Cold ischemia time independently increased the odds of DGF (OR = 1.006 (95% CI: 1.002–1.011) while fluid type (saline versus PlasmaLyte OR = 5.28, 95% CI: 0.76–36.88) or amount (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00–1.01) did not significantly modify the odds of DGF. Central venous pressure, systolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were higher in the non-DGF group, but this was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Significant intraoperative acidosis developed in patients who received normal saline compared to those in PlasmaLyte and lactated Ringer's groups; however, acid–base balance and electrolytes did not vary significantly between the DGF and non-DGF groups.

Conclusion:

DGF was primarily influenced by surgical factors such as cold ischemia time, whereas intraoperative fluid type or amount did not affect DGF incidence.

The effect of pulse pressure variation compared with central venous pressure on intraoperative fluid management during kidney transplant surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, fluid administration during kidney transplant surgery is guided by central venous pressure (CVP) despite its limited reliability as a parameter for assessing intravascular fluid volume, particularly in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The recommended goals at graft reperfusion are a mean arterial pressure of 90 mm Hg and a CVP of 12-14 mm Hg. This approach may increase the risk of significant adverse effects due to volume overload. Perioperative fluid therapy guided by dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness has been shown to optimize intravascular volume and prevent complications associated with overzealous administration of fluids in major abdominal surgeries. We hypothesized that pulse pressure variation (PPV)-guided fluid administration would result in better optimization of intravascular fluid volume compared with a CVP-guided strategy during kidney transplant surgery.

METHODS

In this single-centre randomized double blinded trial, 77 end-stage renal disease patients, who underwent kidney transplant surgery under general anesthesia with epidural analgesia, were randomized to receive either CVP-guided (n = 35) or PPV-guided (n = 35) fluid therapy using predefined hemodynamic endpoints. The primary outcome was the total volume of intraoperative fluids administered. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative hemodynamic changes, serum lactate levels, serum creatinine, need for dialysis within the first week, creatinine elimination ratio, and incidence of immediate and delayed graft dysfunction.

RESULTS

Results were analyzed for 70 patients. Eighty percent of the patients underwent living-related donor allograft kidney transplant. Operative variables related to donor characteristics, duration of surgery, graft cold ischemia time, and blood loss were comparable in both groups. The mean (standard deviation) volume of intravenous fluids administered intraoperatively was 1,346 (337) mL in the PPV-guided group vs 1,901 (379) mL in the CVP-guided group (difference in means, 556 mL; 95% confidence interval, 385 to 727; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Pulse pressure variation -guided fluid administration significantly decreased the total volume of crystalloids compared with CVP-guided fluid therapy during the intraoperative period in patients who underwent kidney transplant surgery. Nevertheless, our study was underpowered to detect differences in secondary outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2018/01/011638); registered 31 January 2018.

Effects of Plasma-Lyte® and 0.9% saline in renal function after deceased-donor kidney transplant: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The influence of different crystalloid solutions infused during deceased-donor kidney transplant on the incidence of delayed graft function remains unclear. We investigated the influence of Plasma-Lyte® vs. 0.9% saline on the incidence of delayed graft function in deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial of 104 patients aged 18 to 65 years who underwent deceased-donor kidney transplant under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Plasma-Lyte® (n = 52) or 0.9% saline (n = 52), at the same infusion volume, for intraoperative fluid replacement. The primary outcome was the occurrence of delayed graft function. Secondary outcomes included metabolic and electrolytic changes at the end of surgery.

RESULTS

Two patients in the Plasma-Lyte® group and one in the 0.9% saline group died postoperatively and were not included for analysis. The incidence of delayed graft function in Plasma-Lyte® and 0.9% saline groups were 60.0% (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI 46.2-72.4]) and 74.5% (95% CI 61.1-84.4), respectively (p = 0.140). Mean (standard deviation) values of immediate postoperative pH and serum chloride levels in Plasma-Lyte® and 0.9% saline groups were 7.306 (0.071) and 7.273 (0.061) (p = 0.013), and 99.6 (4.2) mEq.L^-1 and 103.3 (5.6) mEq.L^-1, respectively (p < 0.001). All other postoperative metabolic and electrolyte variables were not statistically different at the immediate postoperative period (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients, the incidence of delayed graft function is not influenced by Plasma-Lyte® or 0.9% saline used for intraoperative fluid replacement.

Intraoperative fluid management and kidney transplantation outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing kidney transplantation traditionally receive liberal amounts of fluid during surgery. However, excessive fluids can lead to fluid overload and ileus. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared the effect of restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy on kidney transplantation outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent deceased-donor kidney transplantation at Mayo Clinic from January 2014 to March 2019 were included. Those who received <3 L of intravenous fluids intraoperatively were categorized as "restrictive;" those who received ≥3 L were categorized as "liberal." The primary outcome was incidence of delayed graft function (DGF). Secondary outcomes included length of stay, readmission within 30 days, time to return of bowel function, and incidence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of the 1171 patients included, 557 were in the restrictive group and 614 in the liberal group. The mean (SD) fluid intake was 2.17 (.54) L in the restrictive group and 3.67 (.68) L in the liberal group (P<.001). There was no difference in DGF (relative risk, 1.03; P = .56), length of stay (P = .34), readmission (P = .80), return of bowel function (P = .71), or other postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative restrictive fluid therapy during kidney transplantation was not associated with DGF or worse outcomes when compared with liberal fluid therapy.

Fluid Management During Kidney Transplantation: A Consensus Statement of the Committee on Transplant Anesthesia of the American Society of Anesthesiologists

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative fluid management may affect the outcome after kidney transplantation. However, the amount and type of fluid administered, and monitoring techniques vary greatly between institutions and there are limited prospective randomized trials and meta-analyses to guide fluid management in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) committee on transplantation reviewed the current literature on the amount and type of fluids (albumin, starches, 0.9% saline, and balanced crystalloid solutions) administered and the different monitors used to assess fluid status, resulting in this consensus statement with recommendations based on the best available evidence.

RESULTS

Review of the current literature suggests that starch solutions are associated with increased risk of renal injury in randomized trials and should be avoided in kidney donors and recipients. There is no evidence supporting the routine use of albumin solutions in kidney transplants. Balanced crystalloid solutions such as Lactated Ringer are associated with less acidosis and may lead to less hyperkalemia than 0.9% saline solutions. Central venous pressure is only weakly supported as a tool to assess fluid status.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations may be useful to anesthesiologists making fluid management decisions during kidney transplantation and facilitate future research on this topic.

Early perioperative fluid overload is associated with adverse outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation

Kidney transplant recipients are often treated with a large volume of infusion to attain adequate graft perfusion in the early perioperative period. However, it remains unknown whether this fluid therapy is renal responsive or a contributing factor to fluid overload complications. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of all recipients who received deceased donor kidney transplantation at an academic teaching hospital from January 2015 to April 2019. Our exposure of interest was early perioperative fluid balance. The primary outcome was graft function at 1, 6, and 12 months after transplantation. The secondary outcome was cardiopulmonary and gastrointestinal complications. Fluid balance was not significantly correlated with graft function in short- or long-term periods. Postoperative complications were higher in recipients with increased fluid balance. Delayed graft function was significantly related to cardiopulmonary and gastrointestinal complications. Cardiovascular disease and high BMI of recipients were strong risk factors for cardiopulmonary complications. Fluid overload was prevalent in the early perioperative period of kidney transplantation. It did not promote renal recovery, but was associated with a high risk of complications. Our findings might be a useful indicator to optimize the perioperative fluid management of kidney transplant recipients.

Combined Liver Kidney Transplant in Adult Patient With Alagille Syndrome and Pulmonary Hypertension

In this article, we describe a case of a 33-year-old female with Alagille syndrome complicated by bilateral branch pulmonary artery stenosis resulting in moderate pulmonary hypertension, end-stage liver disease complicated by portal hypertension, and chronic renal disease who presented for combined liver-kidney transplant. Alagille syndrome is an autosomal dominant disease affecting the liver, heart, and kidneys. Multidisciplinary preoperative evaluation was performed with a team consisting of a congenital heart disease cardiologist, a cardiac anesthesiologist, a nephrologist, and a transplant surgeon. We describe Alagille syndrome and our intraoperative management. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a combined liver-kidney transplant in an adult patient with Alagille syndrome.

Hemodynamic Management During Kidney Transplantation: A French Survey

BACKGROUND

Hypovolemia or excess fluid load during kidney transplantation may have detrimental effects on the recipient and graft. The aim of our survey was to examine hemodynamic monitoring during kidney transplantation (KT) in French KT centers.

BASIC PROCEDURES

The online survey covered the organization of anesthesia, the type of hemodynamic monitoring available in each center, the frequency of use of each hemodynamic parameter, and the hemodynamic algorithm used to manage fluid administration.

MAIN FINDINGS

Twenty-four centers answered the survey (70% of all the 34 French KT centers) and reported performing 2029 KTs in 2016. Anesthesia for KT was performed either by a general team (n = 12, 48%) or less often, by a specific team during open hours (n = 7, 28%), a specific 24-hour/24-hour team (n = 5, 20%), or an emergency team (n = 1, 4%). The centers reported that up to 8 different hemodynamic monitoring techniques were available for KT. Central venous pressure (CVP) is the most frequently used hemodynamic parameter (1278 KT, 63%). Among the 17 centers using CVP monitoring, 9 had no specific algorithm and the other 8 centers used a different algorithm to manage fluids with CVP. The total fluids administered during KT varied from 1000 mL to 3500 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

CVP was still the main hemodynamic parameter used in France during KT in 2016. Our results suggest that a large randomized controlled trial should be performed to specifically address the question of hemodynamic management during KT.

The effect of mannitol on oxidation-reduction potential in patients undergoing deceased donor renal transplantation-A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Mannitol, an osmotic diuretic, is proposed to be an oxygen radical scavenger. Mannitol is often used in renal transplantation to attenuate oxidative stress and thus to protect renal graft function. We tested the hypothesis that mannitol reduces overall oxidative stress during deceased donor renal transplantation.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 34 patients undergoing deceased donor renal transplantation to receive a solution of mannitol or placebo shortly before graft reperfusion until the end of surgery. We evaluated oxidative stress by measuring the static oxidative-reduction potential (sORP) and the capacity of the oxidative-reduction potential (cORP). sORP and cORP were measured pre-operatively, before and within 10 minutes after graft reperfusion, and post-operatively.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were enrolled in the mannitol group and 17 patients were enrolled in the placebo group. Mannitol had no significant effect on sORP (148.5 mV [136.2; 160.2]) as compared to placebo (143.6 mV [135.8; 163.2], P = .99). There was also no significant difference in cORP between the mannitol (0.22 µC [0.16; 0.36]) and the placebo group (0.22 µC [0.17; 0.38], P = .76).

CONCLUSION

Mannitol showed no systemic redox scavenging effects during deceased donor renal transplantation. To evaluate the direct effect of mannitol on the renal graft further studies are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02705573.

Mannitol and renal graft injury in patients undergoing deceased donor renal transplantation - a randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

Ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is associated with renal tissue damage during deceased donor renal transplantation. The effect of mannitol to reduce I/R injury during graft reperfusion in renal transplant recipients is based on weak evidence. We evaluated the effect of mannitol to reduce renal graft injury represented by 16 serum biomarkers, which are indicators for different important pathophysiological pathways. Our primary outcome were differences in biomarker concentrations between the mannitol and the placebo group 24 h after graft reperfusion. Additionally, we performed a linear mixed linear model to account biomarker concentrations before renal transplantation.

Methods

Thirty-four patients undergoing deceased donor renal transplantation were randomly assigned to receive either 20% mannitol or 0.9% NaCl placebo solution before, during, and after graft reperfusion. Sixteen serum biomarkers (MMP1, CHI3L1, CCL2, MMP8, HGF, GH, FGF23, Tie2, VCAM1, TNFR1, IGFBP7, IL18, NGAL, Endostatin, CystC, KIM1) were measured preoperatively and 24 h after graft reperfusion using Luminex assays and ELISA.

Results

Sixteen patients in each group were analysed. Tie2 differed 24 h after graft reperfusion between both groups (p = 0.011). Change of log2 transformed concentration levels over time differed significantly in four biomarkers (VCAM1,Endostatin, KIM1, GH; p = 0.007; p = 0.013; p = 0.004; p = 0.033; respectively) out of 16 between both groups.

Conclusion

This study showed no effect of mannitol on I/R injury in patients undergoing deceased renal transplantation. Thus, we do not support the routinely use of mannitol to attenuate I/R injury.

Trial registration

NCT02705573. Registered on 10th March 2016.

[Pulse pressure variation guided fluid therapy during kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial]

PURPOSE

Kidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for end stage renal disease. Although different hemodynamic variables, like central venous pressure and mean arterial pressure, have been used to guide volume replacement during surgery, the best strategy still ought to be determined. Respiratory arterial Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) is recognized to be a good predictor of fluid responsiveness for perioperative hemodynamic optimization in operating room settings. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a PPV-guided fluid management strategy is better than a liberal fluid strategy during kidney transplantation surgeries. Identification of differences in urine output in the first postoperative hour was the main objective of this study.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. We enrolled 40 patients who underwent kidney transplantation from deceased donors. Patients randomized in the PPV Group received fluids whenever PPV was higher than 12%, patients in the Free Fluid Group received fluids following our institutional standard care protocol for kidney transplantations (10mL.kg^-1.h^-1).

RESULTS

Urinary output was similar at every time-point between the two groups, urea was statistically different from the third postoperative day with a peak at the fourth postoperative day and creatinine showed a similar trend, being statistically different from the second postoperative day. Urea, creatinine and urine output were not different at the hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

PPV-guided fluid therapy during kidney transplantation significantly improves urea and creatinine levels in the first week after kidney transplantation surgery.

Pulse pressure variation guided fluid therapy during kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

Kidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for end stage renal disease. Although different hemodynamic variables, like central venous pressure and mean arterial pressure, have been used to guide volume replacement during surgery, the best strategy still ought to be determined. Respiratory arterial Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) is recognized to be a good predictor of fluid responsiveness for perioperative hemodynamic optimization in operating room settings. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a PPV guided fluid management strategy is better than a liberal fluid strategy during kidney transplantation surgeries. Identification of differences in urine output in the first postoperative hour was the main objective of this study.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. We enrolled 40 patients who underwent kidney transplantation from deceased donors. Patients randomized in the “PPV” group received fluids whenever PPV was higher than 12%, patients in the “free fluid” group received fluids following our institutional standard care protocol for kidney transplantations (10 mL.kg^-1. h^-1).

Results

Urinary output was similar at every time-point between the two groups, urea was statistically different from the third postoperative day with a peak at the fourth postoperative day and creatinine showed a similar trend, being statistically different from the second postoperative day. Urea, creatinine and urine output were not different at the hospital discharge.

Conclusion

PPV guided fluid therapy during kidney transplantation significantly improves urea and creatinine levels in the first week after kidney transplantation surgery.

Identification of Factors Associated With Acute Tubular Necrosis Following Kidney Transplant in Northern Mexico: Increased Risk With Cold Ischemia After 8 Hours

AIM

To identify potential risk factors associated with the incidence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) following kidney transplant in a sample of patients from northern Mexico.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of data extracted from clinical files of patients who underwent a kidney transplant between 2000 and 2017 at Christus Muguerza Hospital in the city of Chihuahua. The final sample with complete data included 485 patients. ATN was diagnosed in 13.2% of patients using pathologic, clinical, and laboratory criteria. Adjusted odds ratio (ORs) with 95% CIs from multivariate binary logistic regression were used to identify predictors of ATN.

RESULTS

Only 4 of 21 variables analyzed remained statistically significant in the final adjusted model. Cold and warm ischemia followed time-trend patterns with higher odds with longer ischemia times. For cold ischemia, compared with 0 to 240 minutes, ORs were 1.32 (95% CI, 0.49-3.51) for 241-480 minutes, 4.87 (95% CI, 2.29-10.3) for 481-960 minutes, and 10.0 (95% CI, 2.86-35.0) for > 960 minutes; for warm ischemia, compared with 40 to 59 minutes, these were 6.27 (95% CI, 1.95-20.8) for 60-70 minutes and 10.32 (95% CI, 1.95-54.4) for 71-110 minutes. Hypotension during surgery was associated with a higher chance of ATN (OR, 15.9; 95% CI, 4.97-50.9). When the recipients' age was 30 years or older, the probability also increased significantly (OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.09-7.57). The final model fitted well and explained 27% of the probability to develop ATN after a kidney transplant.

CONCLUSION

Shortening the duration of ischemia and avoiding hypotension during surgery is essential to prevent ATN following a kidney transplant.

A retrospective study of the relationship between postoperative urine output and one year transplanted kidney function

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the most obvious method of treating a patient with end-stage renal disease. In the early stages of KT, urine production is considered a marker of successful reperfusion of the kidney after anastomosis. However, there is no clear conclusion about the relationship between initial urine output after KT and 1-year renal function. Thus, we investigated the factors that affect 1-year kidney function after KT, including urine output.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated the relationship between urine output in the 3 days after KT and transplanted kidney prognosis after 1-year. In total, 291 patients (129 living-donor and 162 deceased-donor transplant recipients) were analyzed; 24-h urine volume per body weight (in kilograms) was measured for 3 days postoperatively. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), determined by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease algorithm, was used as an index of renal function. Patients were grouped according to eGFR at 1-year after KT: a good residual function group, eGFR ≥60, and a poor residual function group, eGFR < 60.

RESULT

Recipients' factors affecting 1-year eGFR include height (P = 0.03), weight (P = 0.00), and body mass index (P = 0.00). Donor factors affecting 1-year eGFR include age (P = 0.00) and number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches (P = 0.00). The urine output for 3 days after KT (postoperative day 1; 2 and 3) was associated with 1-year eGFR in deceased-donor (P = 0.00; P = 0.00 and P = 0.01). And, postoperative urine output was associated with the occurrence of delayed graft function (area under curve (AUC) = 0.913; AUC = 0.984 and AUC = 0.944).

CONCLUSION

Although postoperative urine output alone is not enough to predict 1-year GFR, the incidence of delayed graft function can be predicted. Also, the appropriate urine output after KT may differ depending on the type of the transplanted kidney.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service of the Korea National Institute of Health in the Republic of Korea (KCT0003571).

Perioperative Comparison of Preemptive and Non-Preemptive Renal Transplant Recipients

Objective

Preemptive transplantation cannot be performed for all patients because of the limited number of donors. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative effects of dialysis before renal transplantation.

Methods

In this study, we retrospectively investigated 666 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at our centre. We divided patients into two groups: patients with pre-transplant dialysis (67.3%, n=448) and patients with preemptive transplant (32.7%, n=218). We carried out preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative comparisons between groups.

Results

No difference was observed in terms of intraoperative blood transfusion, crystalloid and colloid requirement, inotropic-vasopressor agent administration and hemodynamic parameters between the patients with pre-transplant dialysis and preemptive transplant. It was observed that dialysis requirement, delayed graft function and acute rejection development were significantly higher during the postoperative period in patients who underwent dialysis before transplantation. In patients with non-preemptive transplant, the decrease of serum creatinine levels at the first postoperative month was more prominent when compared to patients with preemptive transplant; however, that difference disappeared in the first year follow-up. No significant difference was found for serum albumin levels and proteinuria alterations of the patients in long-term follow-up. Additionally, patient and graft survival comparisons between patients with non-preemptive and preemptive transplant on three-year follow-up revealed no significant difference.

Conclusion

We think that preemptive transplantation treatment is a better option for patients with end-stage renal failure since patients with preemptive transplantation appear to have less metabolic function impairment, complication risk and more successful outcomes in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Intraoperative Fluid Restriction is Associated with Functional Delayed Graft Function in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Background: In 2016 we observed a marked increase in functional delayed graft function (fDGF) in our living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) recipients from 8.5% in 2014 and 8.8% in 2015 to 23.0% in 2016. This increase coincided with the introduction of a goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) protocol in our kidney transplant recipients. Hereupon, we changed our intraoperative fluid regimen to a fixed amount of 50 mL/kg body weight (BW) and questioned whether the intraoperative fluid regimen was related to this increase in fDGF. Methods: a retrospective cohort analysis of all donors and recipients in our LDKT program between January 2014–February 2017 (n = 275 pairs). Results: Univariate analysis detected various risk factors for fDGF. Dialysis dependent recipients were more likely to develop fDGF compared to pre-emptively transplanted patients (p < 0.001). Recipients developing fDGF received less intraoperative fluid (36 (25.9–50.0) mL/kg BW vs. 47 (37.3–55.6) mL/kg BW (p = 0.007)). The GDFT protocol resulted in a reduction of intraoperative fluid administration on average by 850 mL in total volume and 21% in mL/kg BW compared to our old protocol (p < 0.001). In the unadjusted analysis, a higher intraoperative fluid volume in mL/kg BW was associated with a lower risk for the developing fDGF (OR 0.967, CI (0.941–0.993)). After adjustment for the confounders, prior dialysis and the use of intraoperative noradrenaline, the relationship of fDGF with fluid volume was still apparent (OR 0.970, CI (0.943–0.998)). Conclusion: Implementation of a GDFT protocol led to reduced intraoperative fluid administration in the LDKT recipients. This intraoperative fluid restriction was associated with the development of fDGF.

Exposure to Hyperchloremia Is Associated with Poor Early Recovery of Kidney Graft Function after Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

The effects of hyperchloremia on kidney grafts have not been investigated in patients undergoing living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). In this study, data from 200 adult patients undergoing elective LDKT between January 2016 and December 2017 were analyzed after propensity score (PS) matching. The patients were allocated to hyperchloremia and non-hyperchloremia groups according to the occurrence of hyperchloremia (i.e., ≥110 mEq/L) immediately after surgery. Poor early graft recovery was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² during the first 48 hours after surgery. After PS matching, no significant differences in perioperative recipient or donor graft parameters were observed between groups. Although the total amount of crystalloid fluid infused during surgery did not differ between groups, the proportions of main crystalloid fluid type used (i.e., 0.9% normal saline vs. Plasma Solution-A) did. The eGFR increased gradually during postoperative day (POD) 2 in both groups. However, the proportion of patients with eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m² on POD 2 was higher in the non-hyperchloremia group than in the hyperchloremia group. In this PS-adjusted analysis, hyperchloremia was significantly associated with poor graft recovery on POD 2. In conclusion, exposure to hyperchloremia may have a negative impact on early graft recovery in LDKT.

Perioperative management of adult cadaveric and live donor renal transplantation in the UK: a survey of national practice

Background

There is a limited evidence base and no national consensus regarding the perioperative management of patients undergoing renal transplantation. We developed an electronic survey to capture an overview of renal transplant perioperative practice across UK renal transplant centres and determine the need for future guidelines on patient management.

Methods

A 29-question survey was developed to encompass the entire renal transplant perioperative pathway and input was sought from clinicians with expertise in renal transplant surgery, anaesthesia, nephrology and intensive care. The survey was sent to lead renal anaesthetists at each of the 23 transplant centres across the UK.

Results

A 96% response rate was achieved with 22 out of 23 centres returning complete responses. There was limited evidence of guideline-based approaches to preoperative workup. Questions regarding intraoperative fluid management, blood pressure targets, vasopressor administration and central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring identified a broad range of practice. Of note, the routine use of goal-directed fluid therapy based on cardiac output estimation was reported in six (27.3%) centres, while nine centres (40.9%) continue to target a specific CVP intraoperatively. In all, 12 (54.5%) centres perform transversus abdominis plane blocks with fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia as the most common mode of postoperative analgesia. A single centre reported a renal transplant-specific Enhanced Recovery after Surgery programme for cadaveric organ recipients.

Conclusions

This questionnaire highlighted a high degree of heterogeneity in current UK practice as regards the perioperative management of renal transplant recipients. Development of evidence-based national consensus guidelines to standardize the perioperative care of these patients is recommended in order to improve patient outcomes and focus areas of future research.

Perioperative Goal-Directed Therapy during Kidney Transplantation: An Impact Evaluation on the Major Postoperative Complications

Background: Kidney transplantation is considered the first-choice therapy in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Despite recent improvements in terms of outcomes and graft survival in recipients, postoperative complications still concern the health-care providers involved in the management of those patients. Particularly challenging are cardiovascular complications. Perioperative goal-directed fluid-therapy (PGDT) and hemodynamic optimization are widely used in high-risk surgical patients and are associated with a significant reduction in postoperative complication rates and length of stay (LOS). The aim of this work is to compare the effects of perioperative goal-directed therapy (PGDT) with conventional fluid therapy (CFT) and to determine whether there are any differences in major postoperative complications rates and delayed graft function (DGF) outcomes. Methods: Prospective study with historical controls. Two groups, a PGDT and a CFT group, were used: The stroke volume (SV) optimization protocol was applied for the PGDT group throughout the procedure. Conventional fluid therapy with fluids titration at a central venous pressure (CVP) of 8–12 mmHg and mean arterial pressure (MAP) >80 mmHg was applied to the control group. Postoperative data collection including vital signs, weight, urinary output, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, serum potassium, and assessment of volemic status and the signs and symptoms of major postoperative complications occurred at 24 h, 72 h, 7 days, and 30 days after transplantation. Results: Among the 66 patients enrolled (33 for each group) similar physical characteristics were proved. Good functional recovery was evident in 92% of the CFT group, 98% of the PGDT group, and 94% of total patients. The statistical analysis showed a difference in postoperative complications as follows: Significant reduction of cardiovascular complications and DGF episodes (p < 0.05), and surgical complications (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in pulmonary or other complications. Conclusions: PGDT and SV optimization effectively influenced the rate of major postoperative complications, reducing the overall morbidity and thus the mortality in patients receiving kidney transplantation.

Perioperative factors associated with delayed graft function in renal transplant patients

Introduction:

Successful renal transplant and consequent good graft function depend on a good surgical technique, an anesthetic that ensures the hemodynamic stability of the receiver, and appropriate conditions of graft and recipient. Several factors can interfere with the perfusion of the graft and compromise its viability. The objective of this study was to evaluate perioperative factors associated with delayed graft function (DGF) in renal transplantation patients.

Methods:

This is a historical cohort study of patients who underwent renal transplantation between 2011 and 2013. Three hundred and ten transplants were analyzed. DGF was defined as the need for dialysis during the first week post-transplant. Logistic regression with a stepwise technique was used to build statistical models.

Results:

Multivariate analysis revealed the following risk factor for DGF: combined anesthesia technique (OR = 3.81, 95%CI, 1.71 to 9.19), a fluid regimen < 50 mL·kg^-1 (OR = 3.71, 95%CI, 1.68 to 8.61), dialysis for more than 60 months (OR = 4.77, 95%CI, 1.93 to 12.80), basiliximab (OR = 3.34, 95%CI, 1.14 to 10.48), cold ischemia time > 12 hour (OR = 5.26, 95%CI, 2.62 to 11.31), living donor (OR = 0.19, 95%CI, 0.02 to 0.65), and early diuresis (OR = 0.02, 95%CI, 0.008 to 0.059). The accuracy of this model was 92.6%, calculated using the area under the ROC curve. The incidence of DGF in the study population was 76.1%.

Conclusions:

Combined anesthesia technique, dialysis for more than 60 months, basiliximab, and cold ischemia time > 12 hours are risk factor for DGF, while liberal fluid regimens and kidneys from living donors are protective factors.

A case series of perioperative variables in relation to short-term outcomes in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Multiple perioperative variables have been shown in existing literature to influence long-term outcomes of pediatric RTx, such as allograft survival. Their impact on short-term outcomes is not as well-documented. This case series aims to investigate the effects of nine perioperative variables on two short-term outcomes in pRTR: 1-week post-operative eGFR and post-operative LOS. A total of 73 pRTR transplanted over 3 years from 2012 to 2014 at a single center were studied retrospectively and statistical analyses were performed. There was higher 1-week post-operative eGFR in pRTR who received living donor transplants compared to those who received deceased donor transplants (P=.01), with mean eGFR of 135 mL/min/1.73 m² and 82 mL/min/1.73 m² , respectively. Aorta-IVC anastomosis was associated with longer LOS compared to iliac vessel anastomosis (P=.03), with median LOS of 19 and 13 days, respectively. There were no significant effects on 1-week eGFR or LOS of the seven other variables: pRTR age and gender, donor age, preoperative donor SBP, intraoperative mean CVP before graft perfusion, intraoperative median SBP z score after graft perfusion, and intraoperative fluid volume. Living donor transplants were associated with higher 1-week post-operative eGFR compared to deceased donor transplants. Aorta-IVC anastomosis was significantly associated with longer LOS compared to iliac vessel anastomosis.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Transplantation: Update 2018

CONTEXT

The European Association of Urology (EAU) panel on renal transplantation (RT) has released an updated version of the RT guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To present the 2018 EAU guidelines on RT.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise was performed, encompassing all areas of RT guidelines published between January 1, 2007, and May 31, 2016. Databases covered by the search included Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Libraries. Previous guidelines were updated, and levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were assigned.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

It is strongly recommended to offer pure or hand-assisted laparoscopic/retroperitoneoscopic surgery as the preferential technique for living donor nephrectomy. Decisions on the acceptance of a donor organ should not be based on histological findings alone since this might lead to an unnecessarily high rate of discarded grafts. For ureterovesical anastomosis, a Lich-Gregoir-like extravesical technique protected by a ureteral stent is the preferred technique for minimisation of urinary tract complications. It is also strongly recommended to perform initial rejection prophylaxis with a combination therapy comprising a calcineurin inhibitor (preferably tacrolimus), mycophenolate, steroids, and an induction agent (either basiliximab or anti-thymocyte globulin). The long version of the guidelines is available at the EAU website (http://uroweb.org/guidelines).

CONCLUSIONS

These abridged EAU guidelines present updated information on the clinical and surgical management of RT for incorporation into clinical practice.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The European Association of Urology has released the renal transplantation guidelines. The implementation of minimally invasive surgery for organ retrieval and the latest evidence on transplant surgery as well as on immunosuppressive regimens are key factors for minimisation of rejection and achievement of long-term graft survival.

Central venous pressure monitoring in living donor kidney recipients does not affect immediate graft function: A propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

During kidney transplantation, intraoperative fluid management can affect post-transplant graft function. It is unclear whether or not central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring is required to guide fluid therapy during kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We compared post-transplant graft function in recipients of living donor kidney transplants between August 2006 and March 2009 based on the use or absence of intraoperative CVP monitoring. Graft function, assessed using the creatinine reduction ratio on postoperative day 2 (CCR2), was evaluated by multivariable linear regression analysis and in a propensity-matched cohort.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety patients were included in the analysis. Central venous pressure was monitored in 84 patients (29%). There was no difference in post-transplant graft function, as measured by CCR2, between patients with and without CVP monitoring in both unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted analyses. There were also no statistically significant differences in CCR2, delayed graft function, or 3-month renal function between those monitored with CVP and those without, in the propensity-matched cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center analysis, immediate post-transplant renal function was not associated with the use of intraoperative CVP monitoring.

Variation in Frequency of Intraoperative Arterial, Central Venous and Pulmonary Artery Catheter Placement During Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis of Invasive Monitoring Trends

The rapidly increasing number of kidney transplantations warrants assessment of anesthesia care in this patient population. We explored the frequency of arterial catheter (AC), central venous catheter (CVC) and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) placement during kidney transplantation in the USA using data from the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry (NACOR) and assessed the between-facility variation in the frequency of catheter placement. We defined cases of kidney transplantation using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classification Software. Placement of AC, CVC and PAC was defined by respective Current Procedural Terminology codes. The frequency of vascular catheter placement across facility types was compared using Pearson χ2 test. We identified 10,580 cases of kidney transplantation performed in 100 facilities from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014. Placement of an AC was reported in 1700 (16.1%), CVC in 2580 (24.4%) and PAC in 50 (0.5%) of cases. The frequency of placement of specific types of catheters was statistically different across facility types (p < 0.001). Within individual facilities that reported at least 50 cases of kidney transplantation, the percentages of cases performed with AC, CVC and PAC ranged from 0% to 86%, 0% to 90% and 0% to 3%, respectively. Considerable between-facility variation in the frequency of AC, CVC and PAC placement during kidney transplantation raises concerns about the need for better practice standardization. Excess invasive monitoring may represent a safety risk as well as unnecessary additional cost. If kidney transplantation can be safely performed without an AC, CVC or PAC in most patients, facilities with above-average catheter placement rates may have an opportunity for measurable reduction in catheter-related perioperative complications. Optimizing perioperative monitoring is an important component of ensuring high functioning, high-value medical systems.

Perioperative fluid management in kidney transplantation: a black box

The incidence of delayed graft function in patients undergoing kidney transplantation remains significant. Optimal fluid therapy has been shown to decrease delayed graft function after renal transplantation. Traditionally, the perioperative volume infusion regimen in this patient population has been guided by central venous pressure as an estimation of the patient’s volume status and mean arterial pressure, but this is based on sparse evidence from mostly retrospective observational studies. Excessive volume infusion to the point of no further fluid responsiveness can damage the endothelial glycocalyx and is no longer considered to be the best approach. However, achievement of adequate flow to maintain sufficient tissue perfusion without maximization of cardiac filling remains a challenge. Novel minimally invasive technologies seem to reliably assess volume responsiveness, heart function and perfusion adequacy. Prospective comparative clinical studies are required to better understand the use of dynamic analyses of flow parameters for adequate fluid management in kidney transplant recipients. We review perioperative fluid assessment techniques and discuss conventional and novel monitoring strategies in the kidney transplant recipient.

Anesthesia for Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation

Kidney transplants are the most common solid organ abdominal transplant and are occasionally performed simultaneously with pancreas transplants in diabetic patients. Preoperative evaluation of potential transplant recipients should focus on the potential for occult cardiovascular disease while also screening for other signs of end-organ dysfunction. Intraoperatively, it is of utmost importance to ensure adequate graft perfusion to limit the risk of postoperative graft dysfunction or rejection. Postoperative care of the kidney or pancreas transplant patient should focus on ensuring normalization of volume status, electrolyte concentrations, and glycemic control.

Intraoperative hemodynamic factors predicting early postoperative renal function in pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The anesthetic management of kidney transplantation in children remains somewhat empirical. The goal of the present study was to investigate intraoperative hemodynamic factors affecting posttransplantation kidney function.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients undergoing kidney transplantation in our pediatric teaching hospital from 2000 to 2014. Data collected included: donor and recipient demographic data, recipient comorbidities, fluids administered intraoperatively, and intraoperative blood pressure and central venous pressure. The main outcome of the study was the creatinine clearance at day 1 corrected to a body surface area of 1.73 m². Analysis was performed using Classification Tree Analysis with 10-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

One hundred and two patients were included. The following predictors of increased postoperative creatinine clearance at day 1 were identified: decreasing recipient weight, mean blood pressure-to-weight ratio 10 minutes after reperfusion, reduced cold ischemia duration, and increased intraoperative albumin infusion. Increased creatinine clearance was observed when mean blood pressure-to-weight ratio 10 minutes after reperfusion was ≥4.3 in patients weighing 13-21 kg and ≥2.5 in those ≥22 kg. Overall, the model explained 64% (and at cross-validation 60%) of creatinine clearance variability at day 1.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative hemodynamics during kidney transplantation should be optimized in order to increase mean blood pressure according to values indicated by our analyses. Cold ischemia duration should be shortened as far as possible.

Association Between Delayed Graft Function and Graft Loss in Donation After Cardiac Death Kidney Transplants-A Paired Kidney Registry Analysis

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is an established complication after donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidney transplants, but the impact of DGF on graft outcomes is uncertain. To minimize donor variability and bias, a paired donor kidney analysis was undertaken where 1 kidney developed DGF and the other did not develop DGF using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry.

METHODS

Using paired DCD kidney data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, we examined the association between DGF, graft and patient outcomes between 1994 and 2012 using adjusted Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 74 pairs of DCD kidneys followed for a median of 1.9 years (408 person-years), a greater proportion of recipients with DGF had experienced overall graft loss and death-censored graft loss at 3 years compared with those without DGF (14% vs 4%, P = 0.04 and 11% vs 0%, P < 0.01, respectively). Compared with recipients without DGF, the adjusted hazard ratio for overall graft loss at 3 years for recipients with DGF was 4.31 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.13-16.44). The adjusted hazard ratio for acute rejection and all-cause mortality at 3 years in recipients who have experienced DGF were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-1.01) and 1.70 (95% CI, 0.36-7.93), respectively, compared with recipients without DGF.

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients of DCD kidneys with DGF experienced a higher incidence of overall and death-censored graft loss compared with those without DGF. Strategies aim to reduce the risk of DGF could potentially improve graft survival in DCD kidney transplants.

Intraoperative Pleth Variability Index Is Linked to Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is an early postoperative complication of kidney transplantation (KT) predisposing to acute rejection and lower graft survival. Intraoperative arterial hypotension and hypovolemia are associated with DGF. Central venous pressure (CVP) is used to estimate volemia but its reliability has been criticized. Pleth variability index (PVI) is a hemodynamic parameter predicting fluid responsiveness. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between intraoperative PVI and CVP values and the occurrence of DGF.

METHODS

This was a prospective, noninterventional, observational, single-center study. All consecutive patients with KT from deceased donors were included. Recipients received standard, CVP, and PVI monitoring. Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters were recorded from recipients at 5 time points during KT.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled. There was a poor correlation between PVI and CVP values (r² = 0.003; P = .44). Immediate graft function and DGF patients had similar hemodynamic values during KT, with the exception of PVI values, which were significantly higher in the DGF group. In particular, a PVI >9% before unclamping of the renal artery was the only predictive parameter of DGF in our multivariate analysis (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that PVI values >9% during KT are associated with the occurrence of DGF.

Anesthesia for bench surgery

Surgical removal of the kidney tumor outside the body, (ex vivo renal bench surgery) followed by auto transplantation is an emerging and often done procedure to reconstruct the urinary tract. It possesses immense challenges to both the anesthesiologists and the surgeons. The risks are multiplied if you are performing the surgery on a solitary functioning kidney. Here, we are describing the anesthetic management of 70-year-old male post nephrectomy patient undergoing renal auto transplantation by bench surgery. Our primary goals for perioperative management were to maintain a stable hemodynamics throughout the procedure, to reduce fluid overload during the period of extracorporeal surgery, to maintain perfusion for the transplanted solitary kidney, to control bleeding to a minimum, and to provide adequate analgesia for the patient. We made use of a balanced anesthetic technique and stringent monitoring standards to bring forth a successful outcome for the patient. At the end of his hospital stay, patient went home with a healthy, normally functioning kidney.

Pilot study on the feasibility of limited focused real-time echocardiography during pediatric renal transplantation

Pediatric renal transplantation protocols describe supraphysiological blood pressure and CVP to optimize graft perfusion. Ideal CVP and blood pressure targets in children are uncertain and difficult to achieve and/or sustain without incurring morbidity. We correlated intra-operative ECHO with standard monitoring to assess intravascular volume at critical intra-operative stages. A feasibility pilot study of real-time limited ECHO images during four critical stages of pediatric renal transplantation (baseline; venous and arterial clamps on; clamps off; 5-10 min post-clamp release) was conducted. Simultaneous CVP, SBP and DBP measurements were obtained with ECHO images. A surgeon blinded to the ECHO study assessed the quality of graft perfusion. Thirteen patients (nine TTE and four TEE) were enrolled. The CI increased in all patients at vascular clamp removal and the post-resuscitation period (average increase in CI 20%, range 8-49%). SBP, DBP and CVP were inconsistent. ECHO data confirmed an appropriate CI increase even when the targeted CVP and BP values described in protocols were not achieved. The surgeons were satisfied with graft perfusion in 12 of 13 cases, with one locally obstructed vessel. We suggested that aiming for fixed targets in CVP and BP is not necessary to augment CI and encourage good renal perfusion.

Anaesthesia and intensive care for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-centre experience with 12 recipients

Background and Aims:

The perioperative management of patients presenting for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) is a complex process. We analysed SLKTs performed in our institution to identify preoperative, intraoperative and post-operative challenges encountered in the management.

Methods:

We retrospectively studied the case records of 12 patients who underwent SLKT between 2009 and 2014 and analysed details of pre-operative evaluation and optimisation, intraoperative anaesthetic management and the implications of use of perioperative continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and the post-operative course of these patients.

Results:

Of the total 12 cases, 4 were under 16 years of age. The indications for SLKT were primary hyperoxaluria (5), congenital hepatic fibrosis with polycystic kidney disease (2), ethanol-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD) with hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (1). Four patients had ESLD with end-stage renal disease due to other causes. Six recipients received live donor grafts and 6 patients received cadaveric grafts. Seven patients received intraoperative CRRT. Mean duration of surgery was 12.5 h. Cardiac output monitors used were trans-oesophageal echocardiogram (2), pulmonary artery catheter (1) and pulse contour cardiac output monitor (3). There was 1 sepsis-related mortality on 7^th post-operative day.

Conclusion:

A thorough pre-operative evaluation and optimisation, knowledge and anticipation of potential problems, and meticulous intraoperative fluid management guided by appropriate monitoring and use of CRRT when needed can help in achieving successful outcomes.

Normal saline versus lower-chloride solutions for kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The ideal intravenous fluid for kidney transplantation has not been defined, despite the common use of normal saline during the peri-operative period. The high chloride content of normal saline is associated with an increased risk of hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis, which may in turn increase the risk of hyperkalaemia and delayed graft function. Balanced electrolyte solutions have a lower chloride content which may decrease this risk and avoid the need for dialysis due to hyperkalaemia in the immediate post-transplant period. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing this issue have used biochemical outcomes to compare fluids and have been underpowered to address patient-centred outcomes such as delayed graft function.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of lower-chloride solutions versus normal saline on delayed graft function, hyperkalaemia and acid-base status in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant's Specialised Register to 26 November 2015 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs of kidney transplant recipients that compared peri-operative intravenous lower-chloride solutions to normal saline were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent investigators assessed studies for eligibility and risk of bias. Data from individual studies were extracted using standardised forms and pooled according to a published protocol. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies (477 participants) were included in the review. All participants were adult kidney transplant recipients and 70% of participants underwent live-donor kidney transplantation. The overall risk of bias was low for selection bias and unclear for remaining domains. There was no difference in the risk of delayed graft function (3 studies, 298 participants: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.70) or hyperkalaemia (2 studies, 199 participants: RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.04 to 6.10) for participants who received balanced electrolyte solutions compared to normal saline. Intraoperative balanced electrolyte solutions compared to normal saline were associated with higher blood pH (3 studies, 193 participants: MD 0.07, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.09), higher serum bicarbonate (3 studies, 215 participants: MD 3.02 mEq/L, 95% CI 2.00 to 4.05) and lower serum chloride (3 studies, 215 participants: MD -9.93 mmol/L, 95% CI -19.96 to 0.11). There were four cases of graft loss in the normal saline group and one in the balanced electrolyte solution group, and four cases of acute rejection in the normal saline group compared to two cases in the balanced electrolyte solution group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Balanced electrolyte solutions are associated with less hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis compared to normal saline, however it remains uncertain whether lower-chloride solutions lead to improved graft outcomes compared to normal saline.