Neuraxial Blockade in Patients with Preexisting Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Disk Disease, or Prior Spine Surgery

Chronic consequences of accidental dural puncture and postdural puncture headache in obstetric anaesthesia - sieving through the evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Accidental dural puncture (ADP) and postdural puncture headache (PDPH) are relatively common complications of neuraxial anaesthesia and analgesia in obstetrics. Both may result in acute and chronic morbidity. This review intends to discuss the chronic implications of ADP and PDPH and raise awareness of severe and potentially life-threatening conditions associated with them.

RECENT FINDINGS

ADP may be associated with a high rate of PDPH, prolonged hospitalization and increased readmissions. Studies have shown that PDPH may lead to chronic complications such as post-partum depression (PPD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), chronic headache, backache and reduced breastfeeding rates. There are many case reports indicating that major, severe, life-threatening neurologic complications may follow PDPH in obstetric patients including subdural haematoma and cerebral venous thrombosis.

SUMMARY

Many clinicians still believe that ADP and PDPH are benign and self-limiting conditions whereas there may be serious and devastating consequences of both. It is imperative that all women with ADP and PDPH are appropriately diagnosed and treated.

Challenges with two epidural catheters for labor analgesia in a patient with lumbar adhesions: a case report

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of neuraxial analgesia varies with spinal canal pathology. Notably, a secondary epidural catheter has been shown to increase neuraxial labor analgesia in women with spinal lesions. Therefore, we present a case in which catheter withdrawal played a critical role in achieving effective labor analgesia in a woman with epidural adhesions after lumbar discectomy who had inadequate analgesia with two epidural catheters.

CASE PRESENTATION

We encountered a patient with L5 lumbar epidural adhesions who reported pain even after receiving two epidural catheters. The catheters were placed in the L1/2 and L5/S intervertebral spaces. Analgesic effects were exerted when the L5/S catheter was withdrawn by 1 cm, suggesting that the catheter tip was initially placed inside the adhesion.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful consideration of catheter placement and adjustments by withdrawing the catheter are crucial in managing labor analgesia in patients with known epidural adhesions.

Regional Anesthesia Techniques in Modern Neuroanesthesia Practice: A Narrative Review of the Clinical Evidence

Neurosurgical procedures are often associated with significant postoperative pain that is both underrecognized and undertreated. Given the potentially undesirable side effects associated with general anesthesia and with various pharmacological analgesic regimens, regional anesthetic techniques have gained in popularity as alternatives for providing both anesthesia and analgesia for the neurosurgical patient. The aim of this narrative review is to present an overview of the regional techniques that have been incorporated and continue to be incorporated into modern neuroanesthesia practice, presenting in a comprehensive way the evidence, where available, in support of such practice for the neurosurgical patient.

Anesthesia practice among joint arthroplasty patients with a previous lumbar spine surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To analyze the use of neuraxial techniques in total hip or knee arthroplasty patients who previously underwent lumbar spine surgeries.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a national database.

SETTING

U.S. hospitals.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing a total hip or knee arthroplasty, stratified by those with a previous lumbar fusion or decompression procedure.

MEASUREMENTS

Our primary outcome was the use of neuraxial anesthesia; secondary outcomes included combined complications, cardio-pulmonary complications, and prolonged length of stay. Patients with and without a history of a lumbar procedure were compared using mixed-effects regression.

MAIN RESULTS

Among 758,857 THAs 8961 had a history of lumbar fusion and 8599 of decompression. Among 1,387,335 TKAs 15,827 had a history of lumbar fusion and 13,652 of decompression. History of a lumbar fusion was associated with lower odds of neuraxial anesthesia use in THA (OR: 0.74 CI: 0.70-0.79, p ≤0.0001) and TKA (OR: 0.80 CI: 0.77-0.84, p ≤0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Previous lumbar fusion -but not decompression- surgery is associated with lower neuraxial anesthesia in THA/TKA patients, despite its use being universally associated with decreased length of stay. More research is needed to address the importance of neuraxial techniques in patients with prior spine surgery.

Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a review of efficacy and safety

Spine intervention is an important treatment option for the management of spinal pain, and the numbers of the most representative epidural steroid injection (ESI) procedures performed are expected to increase significantly in the future along with increased life expectancy and the increasing prevalence of spinal disorders. Therefore, it is important to understand the efficacy of ESIs according to each spinal disorder they are administered to treat, and one must be familiar with the possible complications. In fact, although numerous ESI-related articles have been published, there is still considerable controversy regarding the efficacy of ESI procedures. Furthermore, due to the rarity of serious complications, most instances have been recorded in the form of case reports. In this article, we aimed to review the indications of cervical and lumbar ESIs and to compare interlaminar ESI (ILESI) and transforaminal ESI (TFESI) techniques in terms of analgesic efficacy, possible complications, and safety profiles. This article includes opinions based on the authors' experience with ESI indications and efficacy, and presents practical tips for coping with specific situations related to each complication. By combining the dedicated anatomical understanding of radiologists with image-guided interventions, ESI is expected to stand out in the rapidly expanding field of spine intervention.

Exacerbation of Spinal Stenosis Symptoms Following Neuraxial Anesthesia in an Achondroplastic Cesarean Section

We report the case of an achondroplastic female who presented with acute neurologic decline following epidural anesthesia for an elective cesarean section. Achondroplasia presents unique anatomical challenges to anesthesiologists in perioperative management, and cesarean sections are standard for achondroplastic pregnancies. High rates of spinal stenosis and lumbar radiculopathy in this patient population make administration of epidural analgesia technically challenging and may increase the risk of neurologic injury. Ultrasound is an effective means of administering epidural anesthesia for most patients; however, its utility is user-dependent and more challenging for those with obesity and abnormal spinal anatomy, both of which are common in achondroplasia. Cephalic and thoracic anatomical features in achondroplasia can also make general anesthesia challenging. Therefore, preoperative imaging may help guide preoperative planning based on patient anatomy and individual risk factors to reduce the risks of complications in this patient population. This report includes details from the patient's prenatal care, cesarean section, and 18 months of follow-up.

Perioperative management of a parturient with VACTERL association for a caesarean section

A parturient with VACTERL association (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, trachea-oesophageal fistula, renal abnormalities and limb abnormalities) was listed for an elective caesarean section. She had a short neck with reduced cervical extension and flexion. Magnetic resonance imaging of her whole spine was performed which showed failure of cervical spine segmentation and cervical stenosis. Neuraxial blockade could have resulted in unpredictable spread of local anaesthetic due to the low volume of the spinal canal, and could have caused myelopathic changes within the spinal cord due to cerebrospinal fluid pressure changes. A general anaesthetic using a rapid sequence induction was also predicted to be challenging due to her fixed, unstable neck and severe cervical spine stenosis. After a multidisciplinary discussion Including neurosurgeons, we planned for awake tracheal intubation followed by general anaesthesia. However, before the date of her planned delivery, she required an urgent caesarean section due to severe preeclampsia. This was performed under general anaesthesia following uncomplicated awake tracheal intubation.

Effectiveness and Safety of a Modified Technique of Transvesical Obturator Nerve Block to Avoid Adductor Contractions during Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified transvesical obturator nerve block (ONB) in the prevention of obturator nerve reflex and consecutive bladder perforations (BPs) during transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBTs). <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of all patients resected in 2014–2015 due to a bladder tumor of the lateral walls, including a follow-up period until December 2018, was performed. Two groups were defined: in the first group, all patients underwent TURBT with a modified transvesical ONB. The second group underwent conventional TURBT with intermittent resection. Primary endpoints were the rates of adductor contractions and BPs. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ninety-four out of 1,145 resected patients presented with tumors on the lateral wall of the bladder and a complete dataset including a long-term follow-up. Thirty-six patients were treated in the ONB group, and 58 patients comprised the control group. The median age in the 2 groups was 70.8 and 71.8 years in the first and second groups, respectively. Adductor spasms were reported in 8.33 versus 25.86% (<i>p</i> = 0.057) and perforation in 2.78 versus 17.24% (<i>p</i> = 0.047) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. After a median follow-up of 32.5 months, there was no significant difference in recurrence rates (52.78 vs. 51.72%, <i>p</i> = 0.672). In a subgroup analysis, lower perforation rates were recorded for the ONB group in patients with tumors &#x3c;3 cm (0/30 vs. 8/46, <i>p</i> = 0.076) and in patients with unifocal tumors (0/12 vs. 5/23, <i>p</i> = 0.141). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> The simplified approach of transvesical ONB demonstrated in this study appears to be an inexpensive, safe, effective, and simple-to-use technique.

Error traps in pediatric regional anesthesia

Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks have revolutionized the way we provide regional anesthesia. By providing effective perioperative pain control, regional anesthesia reduces opioid consumption, decreases length of stay, and increases patient/parental satisfaction. However, error traps (circumstances that lead to erroneous actions) can defeat its inherent benefits and may result in adverse outcomes. This article focuses on promoting a culture of safety by highlighting five common avoidable error traps encountered while providing regional anesthesia for pediatric patients. They include failure to confirm intended block site, failure to optimize ultrasound images and identify artifacts, failure to recognize when regional anesthesia is an acceptable option, failure to implement alternative imaging techniques when anatomy is challenging, and failure to recognize disease states with abnormal anatomy that may require alternative blocks. These issues are easily addressed if the pediatric regionalist is cognizant of the appropriate ways to mitigate them, and, as such, we review strategies to avoid them.

Examination of Spinal Canal Anatomy with MRI Measurements in Lomber Disc Herniation Patients: An Anesthesiologist Viewpoint

Background and Aim:

The aim of this study is to investigate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) to identify the challenges associated with neuraxial anesthesia.

Materials and Methods:

The MRI images in the supine position of 203 patients admitted to hospital with complaints of lower back pain were studied. Medial sagittal slices of the lumbar spine were imaged from L1 to S1. LDH is classified as either bulging, extrusion, or protrusion.

Results:

For this study, 83 males and 120 females with a mean age of 43.18 ± 14.68 years were recruited. The highest herniation level was observed at L4–L5 in 145 (71.4%) patients: 76 instances of disc bulging (37.4%), 56 instances of extrusion (27.6%), and 13 instances of protrusion (6.4%). The longest distance between the skin and spinal cord was 60.06 ± 1.61 mm at L5–S1; the longest distance at width of the epidural space was 6.09 ± 1.95 mm at L3–L4. According to the disc herniation groups, no significant differences were found between the skin-to-dura distance, width of the epidural space, and depth of skin level to spinous process (P > 0.05). Moreover, the anterior dura to cord distances was significantly different from normal patients (P < 0.05). Indeed, there was a statistically weak and negative correlation between both the length and age of the lumbar spinal canal (P < 0.05, r = −0.295).

Conclusions:

Lumbar disc pathologies can cause anatomical derangements in the spinal canal, which may cause neurologic deficits by neuraxial blockade.

Chronic pain in parturients with an accidental dural puncture: A case-controlled prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

We set out to examine incidence of chronic headache and back pain in women with PDPH after accidental dural puncture during labor.

METHODS

Chronic headache, backache, and disability were assessed 18-24 months postpartum. Women with PDPH treated with epidural blood patch (PDPH-EBP) were identified and matched with women who had a PDPH without epidural blood patch (PDPH-no EBP), with women with uncomplicated epidural analgesia and with women without epidural analgesia. Our primary outcome was incidence of chronic headache and backache. Secondary outcome was the effect of epidural blood patch on chronic pain development. We used Chi-square or Fisher's exact test to calculate odds ratios.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in demographic characteristics between groups. In the no epidural group, no women reported chronic headache and 2/116 (1.7%) reported chronic backache. In the uncomplicated epidural group, no women reported chronic headache and 7/116 (6.0%) reported chronic backache. In the PDPH-no EBP group, 9/56 (16.1%) women reported chronic headache and 10/56 (17.9%) reported chronic backache. In the PDPH-EBP group, 12/59 (20.3%) had chronic headache and 14/59 (23.7%) had chronic backache. No women in the no epidural or uncomplicated epidural group reported disability (chronic pain score of 3 or 4). High disability was reported by 8.9% of women in the PDPH-no EBP group and by 8.4% in the PDPH-EBP group.

CONCLUSION

Women with PDPH had a high incidence of chronic headache, back pain, and disability. We did not find a statistically significant difference in chronic pain development between conservatively treated and EBP-treated patients.

Complex Pathology and Management in the Obstetric Patient: A Narrative Review for the Anesthesiologist

Pregnant patients may present with multiple complex comorbidities that can affect peripartum management and anesthetic care. The preanesthesia clinic is the ideal setting for early evaluation of high-risk pregnant patients. Comorbidities may include cardiovascular pathology such as valvular abnormalities, septal defects, aortopathies, arrythmias and cardiomyopathies. Additional comorbidities include pulmonary conditions such as obstructive sleep apnea as well as preexisting neuromuscular and skeletal disorders that may impact anesthetic management. Hematologic conditions involving both bleeding diathesis and thrombophilias may present unique challenges for the anesthesiologist. Patients may also present with endocrinopathies including diabetes and obesity. While not as common, high-risk patients may also have preexisting gastrointestinal conditions such as liver dysfunction, renal failure, and even post-transplant status. Ongoing and prior substance abuse, obstetric conditions such as placenta accreta spectrum disorders, and fetal conditions needing ex utero Intrapartum treatment also require advanced planning. Preanesthesia evaluations also help address important ethical and cultural considerations. Counseling patients regarding anesthetic considerations as well as addressing concerns will play a role in reducing racial and ethnic disparities. Anticipatory guidance by means of pre-anesthetic planning can facilitate multidisciplinary communication and planning. This can allow for an impactful and meaningful role in the care provided, allowing for safe maternal care and optimal outcomes.

Regional anesthesia in pediatric patients with preexisting neurological disease

Preexisting neurological disease in pediatric patients presents unique challenges to the anesthesiologist. In-depth knowledge of the disease processes and awareness of sequalae that uniquely influence the risks and benefits of anesthetics are needed to make informed decisions. Because these vulnerable populations are often susceptible to perioperative airway or cardiopulmonary complications, the use of regional anesthesia can be advantageous. However, these clinical conditions already involve compromised neural tissue and, as such, create additional concern that regional anesthesia may result in new or worsened deficits. The following discussion is not intended to be a full review of each disease process, but rather provides a concise, yet thorough, discussion of the available literature on regional anesthesia in the more common, but still rare, pediatric neurological disorders. We aim to provide a framework for pediatric anesthesiologists to reengage in a healthy discussion about the risks and benefits of utilizing regional anesthesia in this vulnerable population.

Assessment of main complications of regional anesthesia recorded in an acute pain unit in a tertiary care university hospital: a retrospective cohort

Background

Regional anesthesia has been increasingly used. Despite its low number of complications, they are associated with relevant morbidity. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of complications after neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and data related to patients submitted to neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block at a tertiary university hospital from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2017 were analyzed.

Results

From 10,838 patients referred to Acute Pain Unit, 1093(10.1%) had side effects or complications: 1039 (11.4%) submitted to neuraxial block and 54 (5.2%) to peripheral nerve block. The most common side effects after neuraxial block were sensory (48.5%) or motor deficits (11.8%), nausea or vomiting (17.5%) and pruritus (8.0%); The most common complications: 3 (0.03%) subcutaneous cell tissue hematoma, 3 (0.03%) epidural abscesses and 1 (0.01%) arachnoiditis. 204 of these patients presented sensory or motor deficits at hospital discharge and needed follow-up. Permanent peripheral nerve injury after neuraxial block had an incidence of 7.7:10,000 (0.08%). The most common side effects after peripheral nerve block were sensory deficits (52%) and 21 patients maintained follow-up due to symptoms persistence after hospital discharge.

Conclusion

Although we found similar incidences of side effects or even lower than those described, major complications after neuraxial block had a higher incidence, particularly epidural abscesses. Despite this, other serious complications, such as spinal hematoma and permanent peripheral nerve injury, are still rare.

Pragmatic approach to neuraxial anesthesia in obstetric patients with disorders of the vertebral column, spinal cord and neuromuscular system

Neuraxial anesthesia provides optimal labor analgesia and cesarean delivery anesthesia. Obstetric patients with disorders of the vertebral column, spinal cord and neuromuscular system present unique challenges to the anesthesiologist. Potential concerns include mechanical interference, patient injury and the need for imaging. Unfortunately, the existing literature regarding neuraxial anesthesia in these patients is largely limited to case series and rare retrospective studies. The lack of practice guidance may lead to unwarranted fear of patient harm and subsequent avoidance of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery or neuraxial analgesia for labor, with additional risks of exposure to general anesthesia. In this narrative review, we use available evidence to recommend a framework when considering neuraxial anesthesia for an obstetrical patient with neuraxial pathology.

Regional Nerve Blocks-Best Practice Strategies for Reduction in Complications and Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Understanding the etiologies of the complications associated with regional anesthesia and implementing methods to reduce their occurrence provides an opportunity to foster safer practices in the delivery of regional anesthesia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neurologic injuries following peripheral nerve block (PNB) and neuraxial blocks are rare, with most being transient. However, long-lasting and devastating sequelae can occur with regional anesthesia. Risk factors for neurologic injury following PNB include type of block, injection in the presence of deep sedation or general anesthesia, presence of existing neuropathy, mechanical trauma from the needle, pressure injury, intraneural injection, neuronal ischemia, iatrogenic injury related to surgery, and local anesthetic neurotoxicity. The present investigation discusses regional blocks, complications of regional blocks, risk factors, site-specific limitations, specific complications and how to prevent them from happening, avoiding complications in regional anesthesia, and the future of regional anesthesia.

Lumbar epidural analgesia for labor in a parturient with a history of surgery for lumbar intradural ependymoma: Literature review and case presentation

Background:

Ependymomas represent 50–60% of all brain and central nervous system tumors. Previous lumbar spine surgery for resection of an ependymoma should not be considered a relative contraindication for the administration of epidural/subarachnoid anesthesia to patients in labor.

Case Description:

A 34-year-old G1P0, who underwent resection of an L1-L3 intramedullary ependymoma 8 years previously, presented in active labor with residual left leg numbness and tingling. The lumbar magnetic resonance imaging showed scar tissue and the L1-L3 laminectomy defect. With the acute onset of labor pain, the patient underwent continuous lumbar epidural analgesia; the epidural catheter was placed at the L5-S1 level. The patient underwent an emergency cesarean section with surgical anesthesia being attained up to a T4 dermatomal sensory level.

Conclusions:

Neuraxial anesthesia can be performed safely in patients who have previously undergone lumbar resections of intradural ependymomas. However, the anesthesiologist should place the epidural needle/catheter at a nonoperative level (e.g. above/below). Furthermore, epidural local anesthetics and opioids, as in this case, placed at the L5-S1 level below an L1-L3 prior surgical scar, may diffuse intradurally, bypassing the obliterated surgical epidural space and/or attendant scar tissue.

Short-term results of intrathecal injection of low-dose bupivacaine in outpatients with chronic low back and lower extremity pain

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of intrathecal injection as an alternative to epidural injection for analgesia.

METHODS

Seventy consecutive outpatients with chronic low back and lower extremity pain received lumbar intrathecal injection of low-dose isobaric bupivacaine using a 25-gauge pencil-point needle. The patients received 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg of bupivacaine at 1-week intervals to determine the optimal dose. Thereafter, they received two more weekly injections with the optimal dose. The safety and efficacy of the treatment were assessed over a 1-year period.

RESULTS

No serious adverse events were encountered. The optimal dose of bupivacaine (1.0 mg in 60% of patients) alleviated pain and disability (both, p < 0.0001) and provided anesthesia below L1 (L5-T6). Motor block was negligible, and balance impairment improved relative to baseline (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal injection of low-dose bupivacaine offers a safe and effective treatment for chronic low back and lower extremity pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved by the Kitasato University Hospital Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000008670). These slides can be retrieved under electronic supplementary material.

Anesthetic management of two parturients with cerebral palsy and prior selective dorsal rhizotomy

Selective dorsal rhizotomy is a surgical spine procedure used to reduce spasticity in patients with upper motor neuron dysfunction caused by conditions such as cerebral palsy. The optimal anesthetic approach for obstetric patients who have undergone a selective dorsal rhizotomy is unknown. The use and efficacy of neuraxial anesthesia in these patients has not been described. We describe the use of neuraxial anesthesia in two patients with prior selective dorsal rhizotomy. Unless contraindicated for other reasons, a neuraxial anesthetic approach appears to be an effective option in patients with a history of a selective dorsal rhizotomy.

Nerve blocks or no nerve blocks for pain control after elective hip replacement (arthroplasty) surgery in adults

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that over 300,000 total hip replacements are performed each year in the USA. For European countries, the number of hip replacement procedures per 100,000 people performed in 2007 varied from less than 50 to over 250. To facilitate postoperative rehabilitation, pain must be adequately treated. Peripheral nerve blocks and neuraxial blocks have been proposed to replace or supplement systemic analgesia.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the relative effects (benefits and harms) of the different nerve blocks that may be used to relieve pain after elective hip replacement in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 12, 2016), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) (1946 to December Week 49, 2016), Embase (Ovid SP) (1980 to December week 49, 2016), CINAHL (EBSCO host) (1982 to 6 December 2016), ISI Web of Science (1973 to 6 December 2016), Scopus (from inception to December 2016), trials registers, and relevant web sites.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed in adults undergoing elective primary hip replacement and comparing peripheral nerve blocks to any other pain treatment modality. We applied no language or publication status restrictions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two review authors. We contacted study authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 51 RCTs with 2793 participants; of these 45 RCTs (2491 participants: peripheral nerve block = 1288; comparators = 1203) were included in meta-analyses. There are 11 ongoing studies and three awaiting classification.Compared to systemic analgesia alone, peripheral nerve blocks reduced: pain at rest on arrival in the postoperative care unit (SMD -1.12, 95% CI -1.67 to -0.56; 9 trials, 429 participants; equivalent to 3.2 on 0 to 10 scale; moderate-quality evidence); risk of acute confusional status: risk ratio (RR) 0.10 95% CI 0.02 to 0.54; 1 trial, 225 participants; number needed to treat for additional benefit (NNTB) 12, 95% CI 11 to 22; very low-quality evidence); pruritus (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.70; 2 trials, 259 participants for continuous peripheral nerve blocks; NNTB 4 (95% CI 4 to 8); very low-quality evidence); hospital length of stay (SMD -0.75, 95% CI -1.02 to -0.48; very low-quality evidence; 2 trials, 249 participants; equivalent to 0.75 day). Participant satisfaction increased (SMD 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.89; low-quality evidence; 5 trials, 363 participants; equivalent to 2.4 on 0 to 10 scale). We did not find a difference for the number of participants walking on postoperative day one (very low-quality evidence). Two nerve block-related complications were reported: one local haematoma and one delayed persistent paresis.Compared to neuraxial blocks, peripheral nerve blocks reduced the risk of pruritus (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.58; 6 trials, 299 participants; moderate-quality evidence; NNTB 6 (95% CI 5 to 9). We did not find a difference for pain at rest on arrival in the postoperative care unit (moderate-quality evidence); number of nerve block-related complications (low-quality evidence); acute confusional status (very low-quality evidence); hospital length of stay (low quality-evidence); time to first walk (low-quality evidence); or participant satisfaction (high-quality evidence).We found that peripheral nerve blocks provide better pain control compared to systemic analgesia with no major differences between peripheral nerve blocks and neuraxial blocks. We also found that peripheral nerve blocks may be associated with reduced risk of postoperative acute confusional state and a modest reduction in hospital length of stay that could be meaningful in terms of cost reduction considering the increasing numbers of procedures performed annually.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to systemic analgesia alone, there is moderate-quality evidence that peripheral nerve blocks reduce postoperative pain, low-quality evidence that patient satisfaction is increased and very low-quality evidence for reductions in acute confusional status, pruritus and hospital length of stay .We found moderate-quality evidence that peripheral nerve blocks reduce pruritus compared with neuraxial blocks.The 11 ongoing studies, once completed, and the three studies awaiting classification may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.

Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia in Patients With Recent Stable Fractures of Vertebral Column

BACKGROUND

The use of central neuraxial block (CNB) in patients with spinal injuries with or without spinal cord injury continues to be a contentious issue due to paucity of evidence supporting or refuting its use. There are only a few case reports reporting the use of the technique in these patients. We performed a retrospective record review of patients who underwent neuraxial blockade for lower limb orthopedic surgery in the presence of coexisting recent spine injury (defined as spine injury within 1 month) to assess the occurrence of postoperative deterioration of spinal cord function or occurrence of new spinal cord dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The hospital records of patients with recent stable traumatic fractures of the vertebral column who underwent lower limb orthopedic surgery under CNB from January 2010 to December 2013 were reviewed. Data collected included age, sex, level of fracture, number of vertebrae injured, presence of neurological deficits, interval between injury and surgery, number of surgeries, level of CNB, number of vertebral segments between the site of injury and CNB, position of patient used for CNB and surgery, and perioperative adverse hemodynamic events. All patients underwent detailed postoperative neurological examination and any deterioration or occurrence of new spinal cord dysfunction was noted.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients underwent 21 CNBs for lower limb orthopedic procedures. There were 12 men and 7 women. Thoracolumbar area (18/19) was the commonest site of fractures. Two patients had neurological deficits due to cervical spine trauma. More than 50% of the patients had multiple bone fractures and nearly 30% had associated nonorthopedic trauma. Six patients underwent surgery within the first week (4 to 7 d) after trauma. In 80% of the patients, there was a gap of atleast 2 vertebrae between the level of injury and CNB administration. There were no perioperative adverse hemodynamic events requiring prolonged inotropic support. None of the patients had neurological deterioration or new changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal and epidural anesthesia in patients with recent stable fractures of the spine was not associated with adverse neurological events. The findings of this study may be particularly relevant to patients with recent stable vertebral fractures who require surgery but present with conditions that place them at high risk for general anesthesia.

Regional Anesthesia in Total Joint Arthroplasty: What Is the Evidence?

Total joint arthroplasty is one of the most common surgical procedures performed for end-stage osteoarthritis. The increasing demand for knee and hip arthroplasties along with the improvement in life expectancy has created a substantial medical and economic impact on the society. Effective planning of health care for these individuals is vital. The best method for providing anesthesia and analgesia for total joint arthroplasty has not been defined. Yet, emerging evidence suggests that the type of anesthesia can affect morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing these procedures.

Pathophysiology and Etiology of Nerve Injury Following Peripheral Nerve Blockade

This review synthesizes anatomical, anesthetic, surgical, and patient factors that may contribute to neurologic complications associated with peripheral nerve blockade. Peripheral nerves have anatomical features unique to a given location that may influence risk of injury. Peripheral nerve blockade-related peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is most severe with intrafascicular injection. Surgery and its associated requirements such as positioning and tourniquet have specific risks. Patients with preexisting neuropathy may be at an increased risk of postoperative neurologic dysfunction. Distinguishing potential causes of PNI require clinical assessment and investigation; a definitive diagnosis, however, is not always possible. Fortunately, most postoperative neurologic dysfunction appears to resolve with time, and the incidence of serious long-term nerve injury directly attributable to peripheral nerve blockade is relatively uncommon. Nonetheless, despite the use of ultrasound guidance, the risk of block-related PNI remains unchanged.

WHAT'S NEW

Since the 2008 Practice Advisory, new information has been published, furthering our understanding of the microanatomy of peripheral nerves, mechanisms of peripheral nerve injection injury, toxicity of local anesthetics, the etiology of and monitoring methods, and technologies that may decrease the risk of nerve block-related peripheral nerve injury.

Spinal Anaesthesia with Adjunctive Intrathecal Morphine versus Continuous Lumbar Plexus Blockade: A Randomised Comparison for Analgesia after Hip Replacement

Following elective total hip replacement, both continuous lumbar plexus blockade and spinal anaesthesia (with adjunctive intrathecal morphine) have shown early outcome benefits over opioid analgesia and single-injection nerve block. However, the two techniques have not been compared in a prospective randomised manner. Our study examined 50 patients undergoing elective hip joint replacement who were randomised to receive spinal anaesthesia (with adjunctive intrathecal morphine 0.1 mg) or patient-controlled continuous lumbar plexus blockade. All surgery was conducted under general anaesthesia. Measured outcomes included numerically rated postoperative pain, supplemental opioid consumption and indices of mobilisation together with complications. Results show that block placement time was marginally shorter for the spinal group (5 versus 7 minutes, P=0.01). The primary outcome, worst pain on movement/mobilisation during the first 24 hours, was not statistically significantly different between groups. Patients in the lumbar plexus group were given more intraoperative opioid and rescue morphine in the post-anaesthesia care unit (median = 4 versus 0 mg, P <0.001), with correspondingly higher pain scores (median 5/10 versus 0/10, P <0.001). Pain scores during the subsequent 24 hours were similar between groups, but more patients in the spinal group were given rescue morphine (5 versus 0, P=0.02). Physiotherapy mobilisation indices appeared similar between groups. More spinal group patients reported pruritus (12 versus 5, P=0.01), but antiemetic requirements, episodes of disorientation, arterial oxygen desaturation and falls were all similar between groups. Postoperative symptoms suggestive of neurological irritation or injury did not differ between groups. We found that following elective hip joint replacement, compared to continuous lumbar plexus blockade, spinal anaesthesia incorporating adjunctive intrathecal morphine did not result in a statistically significant difference in worst pain on movement/mobilisation during the first 24 hours, although it was associated with better analgesia in the post-anaesthesia care unit. Subsequently, however, these patients appeared to require more rescue morphine and more of them reported pruritus.

Interventional modalities to treat cancer-related pain

Cancer-related pain is a significant cause of morbidity in those affected by both primary and metastatic disease. Although oral, transdermal, and parenteral opioid medications are an integral part of the World Health Organization's analgesic ladder, their use may be limited by side effects. Fortunately, there are advanced interventional pain management strategies effective in reducing pain in the cancer patient while mitigating the aforementioned side effects. Celiac plexus blocks and neurolysis have been proven effective in treating cancers of the abdominal viscera (ie, pancreas). Transversus abdominis plane blocks, neurolysis, and catheter placement can be used to treat cancer pain associated with the abdominal wall. Peripheral nerve blocks and catheter placement at the brachial and lumbosacral plexus or peripheral nerves treat cancer pain associated with the upper and lower limbs, whereas paravertebral and intercostal blocks treat cancer pain associated with the chest wall and ribs. Finally, alternate drug delivery methods such as intrathecal drug delivery systems concentrate medication at central opioid receptors without affecting the peripheral receptors implicated in unwanted side effects. This article provides an overview of these interventions, including indications, contraindications, and potential complications of advanced interventional pain management options available for the treatment of intractable cancer-related pain.

Meralgia paresthetica-like symptoms following epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

Meralgia paresthetica (MP) is generally caused by entrapment of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), and presents with pain and paresthesia in the anterolateral thigh. This paper describes a patient who had MP-like symptoms as a result of continuous epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. The patient with pre-existing left foraminal stenosis at L3-L4 and disc herniations at L4-5 did not complain of paresthesia or pain during the combined spinal-epidural anesthetic procedure. However, during epidural analgesia on the second post-operative day, he complained of paresthesia and pain in the anterolateral thigh of the contralateral leg. Electromyography showed a neurogenic lesion at the level of L3. Although an ultrasound-guided diagnostic block of the LFCN was performed twice post-operatively, the patient's symptoms persisted. The symptoms gradually resolved 12 months after the surgery. In our case, we suggest that the continuous epidural infusate caused neural ischemia of the L3 nerve root by a compressive effect.

Predicting difficulty score for spinal anesthesia in transurethral lithotripsy surgery

BACKGROUND

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the most common regional anesthesia (RA) conducted for many surgical procedures.

OBJECTIVES

The current study aimed to predict the difficulty score of SA, by which to reduce the complications and ultimately improve the anesthesia quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Transurethral Lithotripsy (TUL) surgery candidates were enrolled in this observational study from 2010 to 2011. Before SA, the patient`s demographic information along with the Body Mass Index (BMI), lumbar spinous process status, spinal deformity, radiological signs of lumbar vertebrae, and a history of spinal surgery or difficult SA were recorded, then the patients underwent SA in L3-L4 interspinous process space. Information about Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) visibility at the first attempt (easy SA) and the times of trying with shifting in that space or trying the second space (moderate SA) and the third space (difficult SA) were recorded. Multinominal regression and relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Hundred and one patients were enrolled. Of these patients, 50 (49.5%) underwent SA by the first attempt of the first space, in 36 patients (35.6%) it was moderate and in 15 patients (14.9%) it was difficult. There was no significant relationship between difficulty score of SA and gender, age, height, and history of previous difficult SA. But there was a significant relationship between difficulty score of SA and lumbar spinous process status (P =0.0001), radiological profile of the lumbar spine (P = 0.0001), the status of lumbar deformity (P = 0.007), and BMI (P = 0.006). Then using the ROC curve to predict the difficult SA, the cutoff point was 8.5 with 86.7% and 86% sensitivity and specificity, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that considering the clinical examination of patients before SA focusing on lumbar spinous process status, presence of lumbar deformity, calculation of BMI and radiological signs of lumbar vertebrae can be helpful in predicting SA difficulty.

An analysis of the safety of epidural and spinal neuraxial anesthesia in more than 100,000 consecutive major lower extremity joint replacements

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A feared complication of spinal or epidural anesthesia is the development of epidural or spinal hematoma with subsequent neural element compression. Most available data are derived from the obstetric literature. Little is known about the frequency of hematoma occurrence among patients undergoing orthopedic joint arthroplasty, who are usually elderly and experience significant comorbidities. We sought to study the incidence of clinically significant lesions after spinal and epidural anesthesia and further describe their nature.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a database of all patients who underwent total hip or total knee arthroplasty under neuraxial anesthesia at our institution between January 2000 and October 2010. Patients with radiographically confirmed epidural lesions were identified and further analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 100,027 total knee and hip replacements under neuraxial anesthesia were performed at our institution. Ninety-seven patients underwent imaging studies to evaluate perioperative neurologic deficits (0.96/1000; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.16/1000). Eight patients were identified with findings of an epidural blood or gas collection (0.07/1000; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.13/1000). No patients receiving only spinal anesthesia were affected. All patients diagnosed with hematoma took at least 1 drug that potentially impaired coagulation (5 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, 1 a tricyclic antidepressant, and 1 an antiplatelet drug). No patient incurred persistent nerve damage.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of epidural/spinal complications found in this consecutive case series is relatively low but higher than previously reported in the nonobstetric population. Further research using large data sets could quantify the significance of some of the potentially contributing factors observed in this study.

Regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgery on the lumbar spine: a review of the modern literature

Lumbar spine surgery can be performed using different anesthetic techniques such as general endotracheal anesthesia (GA) or spinal-based regional anesthesia (RA). Several studies have been performed comparing these two anesthetic techniques and have revealed disparate results. As such, we set out to review the relevant literature. We performed a literature search for clinical articles comparing cohorts of patients who underwent RA versus GA for lumbar spine surgeries. We compared results of these studies between groups with respect to the following outcome variables: heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood loss, duration of surgery, time spent in the PACU, post-operative analgesic use or pain scores, urinary retention rates, and nausea or anti-emetic requirements. Eleven studies were identified that compared cohorts of patients who underwent GA or RA. Of these, 4 were randomized control trials, 3 were case control trials, 2 were prospective cohorts, and 2 retrospective analyses. Seven-out-of-seven studies reported reduced HRs and MAPs in the RA compared to GA group, and 7/9 studies reported a lower incidence of post-operative analgesic requirement and/or decreased pain scores for the RA group. Our review of the literature suggests that both RA and GA are safe and effective techniques for lumbar spine surgery and that RA may prove a better alternative than GA for healthy patients undergoing simple lumbar decompression procedures or for patients who are at high risk for general anesthetic complications.