Is Dexamethasone Associated with Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer?

Anesthesia and cancer recurrence: a narrative review

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. With the increasingly aging population, the number of emerging cancer cases is expected to increase markedly in the foreseeable future. Surgical resection with adjuvant therapy is the best available option for the potential cure of many solid tumors; thus, approximately 80% of patients with cancer undergo at least one surgical procedure during their disease. Agents used in general anesthesia can modulate cytokine release, transcription factors, and/or oncogenes. This can affect host immunity and the capability of cancer cells to survive and migrate, not only during surgery but for up to several weeks after surgery. However, it remains unknown whether exposure to anesthetic agents affects cancer recurrence or metastasis. This review explores the current literature to explain whether and how the choice of anesthetic and perioperative medication affect cancer surgery outcomes.

Association Between Intraoperative Dexamethasone and Postoperative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Oncologic Surgery: A Multicentric Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

We examined the effects of dexamethasone on postoperative mortality, recurrence-free survival, and side effects in patients undergoing oncologic operations.

BACKGROUND

Dexamethasone prevents nausea and vomiting after anesthesia and may affect cancer proliferation.

METHODS

A total of 30,561 adult patients undergoing solid cancer resection between 2005 and 2020 were included. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to investigate the effect of dexamethasone on 1-year mortality and recurrence-free survival. Effect modification by the cancer's potential for immunogenicity, defined as a recommendation for checkpoint inhibitor therapy based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, was investigated through interaction term analysis. Key safety endpoints were dexamethasone-associated risk of hyperglycemia >180 mg/dL within 24 hours and surgical site infections within 30 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Dexamethasone was administered to 38.2% (11,666/30,561) of patients (6.5±2.3 mg). Overall, 3.2% (n=980/30,561) died and 15.4% (n=4718/30,561) experienced cancer recurrence within 1 year of the operation. Dexamethasone was associated with a -0.6% (95% confidence interval: -1.1, -0.2, P =0.007) 1-year mortality risk reduction [adjusted odds ratio (OR adj ): 0.79 (0.67, 0.94), P =0.009; hazard ratio=0.82 (0.69, 0.96), P =0.016] and higher odds of recurrence-free survival [OR adj : 1.28 (1.18, 1.39), P <0.001]. This effect was only present in patients with solid cancers who were defined as not to respond to checkpoint inhibitor therapy [OR adj : 0.70 (0.57, 0.87), P =0.001 vs OR adj : 1.13 (0.85, 1.50), P =0.40]. A high (>0.09 mg/kg) dose of dexamethasone increased the risk of postoperative hyperglycemia [OR adj : 1.55 (1.32, 1.82), P <0.001], but not for surgical site infections [OR adj : 0.84 (0.42, 1.71), P =0.63].

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone is associated with decreased 1-year mortality and cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgical resection of cancers that are not candidates for immune modulators. Dexamethasone increased the risk of postoperative hyperglycemia, however, no increase in surgical site infections was identified.

Impact of Perioperative Multiple Doses of Glucocorticoids on Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Subsets and Inflammatory Cytokines in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

Surgery-induced immunosuppression is associated with infectious complications and cancer recurrence. This study aimed to characterize the effects of perioperative multiple doses of glucocorticoids on the peripheral immune environment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

In this retrospective study, surgical patients with lung cancer were included. Lymphocyte subsets, lymphocyte phenotypes, lymphocyte functions, and inflammatory cytokines were evaluated in the peripheral blood preoperatively, then at 1 day and 7 days postoperatively. Levels of immune cells and inflammatory factors were compared between those who did or did not receive glucocorticoids at all time points.

Results

Multiple doses or high doses (15–20 mg dexamethasone equivalents) of glucocorticoids that were all given within 24 h were associated with decreased absolute numbers of T cells, CD4⁺and CD8⁺T cells, B cells, and impaired T cells function at 1 day postoperatively while a single intraoperative low dose (5 mg) of dexamethasone had little influence on the peripheral environment. IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were also more affected by multiple doses of glucocorticoids.

Conclusions

Among patients with lung cancer, perioperative multiple doses of glucocorticoids that are all given within a short time are associated with decreased immune cell counts and impaired T cells functions.

Advantages and drawbacks of dexamethasone in glioblastoma multiforme

The most widespread, malignant, and deadliest type of glial tumor is glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Despite radiation, chemotherapy, and radical surgery, the median survival of afflicted individuals is about 12 months. Unfortunately, existing therapeutic interventions are abysmal. Dexamethasone (Dex), a synthetic glucocorticoid, has been used for many years to treat brain edema and inflammation caused by GBM. Several investigations have recently shown that Dex also exerts antitumoral effects against GBM. On the other hand, more recent disputed findings have questioned the long-held dogma of Dex treatment for GBM. Unfortunately, steroids are associated with various undesirable side effects, including severe immunosuppression and metabolic changes like hyperglycemia, which may impair the survival of GBM patients. Current ideas and concerns about Dex's effects on GBM cerebral edema, cell proliferation, migration, and its clinical outcomes were investigated in this study.

[Update on PONV-What is new in prophylaxis and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting? : Summary of recent consensus recommendations and Cochrane reviews on prophylaxis and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting]

The prophylaxis and treatment of postoperative pain to enhance patient comfort has been a primary goal of anesthesiologists for the last decades; however, avoiding postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is, from a patient's perspective, a highly relevant and equally important goal of anesthesia. Recent consensus-based guidelines suggest the assessment of risk factors including female gender, postoperative opioid administration, non-smoking status, a history of PONV or motion sickness, young patient age, longer duration of anesthesia, volatile anesthetics and the type of surgery and reducing the patient's baseline risk (e.g. through the use of regional anesthesia and administration of non-opioid analgesics as part of a multimodal approach). In general, a liberal PONV prophylaxis is encouraged for adult patients and children, which should also be administered when no risk assessment is made. The basis for every adult patient should be a standard prophylaxis with two antiemetics, such as dexamethasone in combination with a 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist. In patients at high risk, this should be supplemented by a third and potentially a fourth antiemetic prophylaxis with a different mechanism of action. A recently published comprehensive Cochrane meta-analysis comparing available antiemetic prophylaxes reported the highest effectiveness to prevent PONV for the NK₁ receptor antagonist aprepitant (relative risk, RR 0.26), followed by ramosetron (RR 0.44), granisetron (RR 0.45), dexamethasone (RR 0.51) and ondansetron (RR 0.55), thereby revising the dogma that every antiemetic is equally effective. Adverse events of antiemetics were generally rare and reported in less than half of the included studies, yielding a low quality of evidence for these end points. In general, combinations of different antiemetics were more effective than single prophylaxes. In children above 3 years of age, the same principles should be applied as in adults. For these patients, there is a high degree of evidence for the combination of dexamethasone and 5‑HT₃ receptor antagonists. When PONV occurs, the consensus guidelines suggest that antiemetics from a class different than given as prophylaxis should be administered. To decrease the incidence of PONV and increase the quality of care, the importance of the implementation of institutional-level guidelines and protocols as well as assessment of PONV prophylaxis and PONV incidence is highly recommended.

Stress Hormones: Emerging Targets in Gynecological Cancers

In the past decade, several discoveries have documented the existence of innervation in ovarian cancer and cervical cancer. Notably, various neurotransmitters released by the activation of the sympathetic nervous system can promote the proliferation and metastasis of tumor cells and regulate immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, a better understanding of the mechanisms involving neurotransmitters in the occurrence and development of gynecological cancers will be beneficial for exploring the feasibility of using inexpensive β-blockers and dopamine agonists in the clinical treatment of gynecological cancers. Additionally, this article provides some new insights into targeting tumor innervation and neurotransmitters in the tumor microenvironment.

Perioperative Glucocorticoids are Associated with Improved Recurrence-Free Survival After Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score-Matching

Purpose

Perioperative anesthetic management may affect long-term outcome after cancer surgery. This study investigated the effect of perioperative glucocorticoids on long-term survival in patients after radical resection for pancreatic cancer.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study with propensity score-matching, patients who underwent radical resection for pancreatic cancer from January 2005 to December 2016 were recruited. Baseline and perioperative data including use of glucocorticoids for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting were collected. Patients were followed up by qualified personnel for cancer recurrence and survival. The primary outcome was the recurrence-free survival. Outcomes were compared before and after propensity matching. The association between perioperative glucocorticoid use and recurrence-free survival was analyzed with multivariable regression models.

Results

A total of 215 patients were included in the study; of these, 112 received perioperative glucocorticoids and 103 did not. Patients were followed up for a median of 74.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 68.3–79.7). After propensity score-matching, 64 patients remained in each group. The recurrence-free survivals were significantly longer in patients with glucocorticoids than in those without (full cohort: median 12.0 months [95% CI 6.0–28.0] vs 6.9 months [4.2–17.0], P<0.001; matched cohort: median 12.0 months [95% CI 5.8–26.3] vs 8.3 months [4.3–18.2], P=0.015). After correction for confounding factors, perioperative glucocorticoids were significantly associated with prolonged recurrence-free survivals (full cohort: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.92, P=0.015; matched cohort: HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84, P=0.007).

Conclusion

Perioperative use of low-dose glucocorticoids is associated with improved recurrence-free survival in patients following radical surgery for pancreatic cancer.

[Perioperative dexamethasone]

Dexamethasone is a synthetic steroid that has been used for many years in the clinical routine due to its anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic and immunosuppressive properties. Furthermore, dexamethasone has been used for a long time for prophylaxis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. In the meantime dexamethasone has been approved as standard for the prophylaxis and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This review article outlines the indications and side effects of the perioperative administration of dexamethasone.

Impact of Intraoperative Dexamethasone on Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes for Patients with Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Administration of dexamethasone to mitigate postoperative nausea and vomiting has been suggested to improve short- and long-term outcomes after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection. This study aimed primarily to evaluate these hypotheses in a contemporary patient cohort treated with multimodality therapy.

METHODS

The clinicopathologic and perioperative characteristics of consecutive resected PDAC patients (July 2011 to October 2018) were analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Intraoperative administration of dexamethasone (4-10 mg) was retrospectively abstracted from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

The majority of 373 patients (59.8%) received intraoperative dexamethasone. Most of these patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy (75.3%), were potentially resectable at presentation (69.7%), and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (79.9%). Women were more likely to receive dexamethasone than men (69.9 vs 30.1%; p < 0.001). The cohorts were otherwise clinically similar. Intraoperative dexamethasone was not associated with differences in postoperative major complications (PMCs) (21.1 vs 19.3%; p = 0.68), postoperative pancreatic fistulas (6.3 vs 6.7%; p = 0.88), or composite infectious complications (28.7 vs 24.7%; p = 0.39). Dexamethasone was not associated with any improvement in median recurrence-free survival (RFS) (17 vs 17 months; p = 0.99) or overall survival (OS) (46 vs 43 months; p = 0.90). After adjustment for clinical factors including margin status, clinical classification, tumor size, and dexamethasone, the only factors independently associated with OS were pathologic node-positivity (hazard ratio [HR], 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-2.47), perineural invasion (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.23-3.31), multimodality therapy (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.13-0.70), and PMCs (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.17-2.29) (all p < 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone failed to demonstrate any protective advantage in terms of mitigating short-term PMCs or infectious complications, or to confer any long-term survival benefit. Tumor biology, multimodality therapy, and PMCs remain the main prognostic factors after PDAC resection.

Association between perioperative glucocorticoids and cancer metastasis and survival in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A single-center retrospective study

Purpose

Perioperative glucocorticoids have the potential to increase the risk of tumor metastasis. However, the relationship between perioperative glucocorticoids and oncologic outcomes remains controversial. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the association of perioperative glucocorticoids with clinicopathologic outcomes following radical cystectomy (RC).

Materials and Methods

We screened and included 185 patients who underwent radical surgery for bladder cancer in our center between 2009 and 2018. The Kaplan–Meier method was applied, and a log-rank test was used to estimate differences in metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) between the groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze any association of glucocorticoids with clinical outcomes.

Results

A total of 76 (41.1%) patients received perioperative glucocorticoids. Median postoperative follow-up was 2.0 years. Kaplan–Meier survival curve indicated that the glucocorticoids group was significantly associated with increased distant MFS (p=0.008) but not with OS. In the multivariate analysis, no significant differences were observed for MFS between the groups. Interestingly, when the variable of blood transfusion was excluded from the multivariate analysis model, we found that patients receiving glucocorticoids were independently associated with worse MFS (hazard ratio, 1.790; p=0.030). Furthermore, the partial correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between perioperative glucocorticoids and blood transfusion (r=0.604, p<0.001). In the nontransfusion subgroup, propensity score matching showed that patients receiving glucocorticoids had a higher risk of distant metastasis.

Conclusions

Perioperative glucocorticoids were associated with a higher rate of distant metastasis in patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer.

Long-Term Outcomes after Use of Perioperative Glucocorticoids in Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The surgical stress response can accelerate clinical metastasis formation. Perioperative glucocorticoids might modulate this response and the metastatic process. We aimed to describe associations between perioperative glucocorticoids and long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. We searched four databases for eligible trials and performed meta-analyses on frequency and time-to-event data. We included sixteen studies that evaluated eight different cancer types. No association was found between perioperative glucocorticoids and recurrence in either the frequency meta-analysis, risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.87-1.25), or in the time-to-event meta-analysis, hazard ratio (HR) 1.18, 95% CI (0.78-1.79). Increased 1-year overall survival, RR 0.70, 95% (0.51-0.97), and disease-free survival, RR 0.77, 95% CI (0.60-0.97), was found for the glucocorticoid group, but five years after surgery, overall survival was reduced for the glucocorticoid group, RR 1.64, 95% CI (1.00-2.71). An exploratory subgroup analysis revealed decreased overall survival, HR 1.78, 95% CI (1.57-2.03), for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery while receiving glucocorticoids. Perioperative glucocorticoids were not associated with recurrence after cancer surgery. We found neither beneficial or deleterious associations between glucocorticoids and overall survival or disease-free survival. The available evidence remains heterogenous; low in quality and amount; and cancer-specific at present.

Single dose of dexamethasone is not associated with postoperative recurrence and mortality in breast cancer patients: a propensity-matched cohort study

Background

Dexamethasone is widely used in cancer patients despite the concern that perioperative glucocorticoids may potentially cause immunosuppression. However, studies on the influence of dexamethasone on cancer recurrence after curative surgery have produced conflicting results. The goal of our study was to compare postoperative recurrence-free survival and overall survival between patients with breast cancer who received perioperative dexamethasone and those who did not.

Methods

The medical records of 2729 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery between November 2005 and December 2010 were reviewed. These patients were followed up until December 2015. The patients were categorised according whether they received a single dose of intravenous dexamethasone perioperatively or not. Cox regression analyses were conducted to evaluate any associations between dexamethasone usage with postoperative recurrence and mortality. Additionally, we performed a sensitivity test with propensity score matching to adjust for selection bias.

Results

Among the 2628 patients, 236 (8.5%) received perioperative dexamethasone. No increasing risk for recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.442; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.969–2.145; P = 0.071) or mortality (HR, 1.256; 95% CI, 0.770–2.047; P = 0.361) after breast cancer surgery were identified in patients who received dexamethasone. Similarly, propensity score matching did not show significant associations in postoperative recurrence (HR, 1.389; 95% CI, 0.904–2.132; P = 0.133) or mortality (HR, 1.506; 95% CI, 0.886–2.561; P = 0.130) in patients who received dexamethasone.

Conclusions

We found that a perioperative single dose of dexamethasone is not associated with increased recurrence or mortality after curative surgery in breast cancer patients.

Chronic p27Kip1 Induction by Dexamethasone Causes Senescence Phenotype and Permanent Cell Cycle Blockade in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells Over-expressing Glucocorticoid Receptor

Dexamethasone (Dex), co-administered to lung adenocarcinoma patients with pemetrexed chemotherapy, protects against pemetrexed cytotoxicity by inducing reversible G1 arrest, reflected by the effect of Dex on FLT-PET images of patient tumors. However, perioperative Dex treatment increases survival but the mechanism is unknown. In cells with glucocorticoid receptor-α (GR) expression corresponding to higher clinical tumor levels, Dex-induced growth arrest was followed by marked cell expansion, beta-galactosidase expression and Ki67 negativity, despite variable p53 and K-RAS status. Dex induced a transient early surge in p21^Cip1. However, a progressive, irreversible loss of clonogenic growth, whose time of onset was dependent on GR level and Dex dose, was independent of p21^Cip1and caused by gradual accumulation of p27^Kip1 due to transcriptional activation of p27^Kip1 by Dex. This effect was independent of canonical pathways of senescence or p27^Kip1 regulation. The in vitro observations were reflected by growth suppression and P27^Kip1 induction in GR-overexpressing tumor xenografts compared with isogenic low-GR tumors. Extended Dex treatment induces irreversible cell cycle blockade and a senescence phenotype through chronic activation of the p27^Kip1 gene in GR overexpressing lung tumor cell populations and hence could improve outcome of surgery/pemetrexed chemotherapy and sensitize tumors to immunotherapy.

Low-dose glucocorticoids suppresses ovarian tumor growth and metastasis in an immunocompetent syngeneic mouse model

Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate among gynecologic malignancies. Despite chemotherapy and surgical debulking options, ovarian cancer recurs and disseminates frequently with a poor prognosis. We previously reported a novel role of glucocorticoids (GCs) in metastatic ovarian cancer by upregulating microRNA-708. In this study, we used an immunocompetent syngeneic mouse model and further evaluated the effect and optimal dosages of GCs in treating metastatic ovarian cancer. The treatment of C57BL/6-derived ovarian cancer ID-8 cells with a synthetic GC, dexamethasone (DEX), induced the expression of microRNA-708, leading to decreased cell migration and invasion through targeting Rap1B. Administration of DEX at a low dose, as low as 5 μg/kg body weight, inhibited the primary tumor size and abdominal metastasis in mice bearing ID-8 cell-derived ovarian tumors. In the treated primary tumors, microRNA-708 was upregulated, whereas some proinflammatory cytokines, namely interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18, were downregulated. The number of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the tumor microenvironment were reduced. Overall, our study shows that low-dose GCs can suppress ovarian cancer progression and metastasis likely through not only the upregulation of the metastasis suppressor microRNA-708, but also the modulation of TAMs and MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment.

Lack of Association Between Dexamethasone and Long-Term Survival After Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between the use of intraoperative dexamethasone with an increase in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery.

DESIGN

This was a propensity score-matched (PSM) retrospective study.

SETTING

Single academic center.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised patients with stage I through IIIa NSCLC. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years, had missing data, and died within 30 days after surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Primary outcomes of the study were RFS and OS. The data were PSM. RFS and OS were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models after PSM to assess the association between intraoperative dexamethasone use and the primary outcomes. A p value of<0.05 was considered statistically significant. After PSM, 436 patients were included in each treatment group. Adjusting for significant covariates, the multivariate analysis demonstrated no association between the use of dexamethasone and RFS (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.98 [0.78-1.24]; p = 0.915). The multivariate analysis also demonstrated no association between the administration of dexamethasone and OS (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.08 [0.81-1.44]; p = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that intraoperative dexamethasone administration to NSCLC patients was not associated with a significant impact on RFS and OS. The results were similar to a previous study on ovarian cancer patients. A randomized controlled study should be conducted to confirm the results of this study.

Impact of postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis with dexamethasone on the risk of recurrence of endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether antiemetic doses of dexamethasone are associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence in women who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study at an academic university medical center. Women who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer from 2003 to 2007 were identified from a prospectively collected endometrial cancer database. Perioperative records were reviewed to determine administration of dexamethasone. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received dexamethasone 4-10 mg for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis and those who did not receive dexamethasone. We collected information on patient demographics, cancer stage, cancer grade, histology, year of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, duration of surgery, perioperative blood transfusion, receipt of epidural analgesia, dose of dexamethasone given, follow-up time, and co-morbidities.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nine patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences between dexamethasone exposed (n = 107) and non-exposed patients in recurrence-free survival ([5 year estimate (95% CI)] = 71 (62-82) % vs. 71 (64-78) %, p = 1.0), progression-free survival (57 [47-68] % vs. 60 [53-68] %, p = 0.9), or overall survival (68 [59-79] % vs. 71 [64-79] %, p = 1.0). In univariate analysis, significant predictors of recurrence-free survival were tumor stage (p = 0.02), tumor grade (0.003) and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001). In the multivariable model, higher tumor grade (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI] = 2.3 [1.4-3.9], p = 0.002) and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (3.2 [1.8-5.8], p < 0.001), but not dexamethasone (0.9 [0.5-1.5], p = 0.7), were significant predictors of recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone administration was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence in women having surgery for endometrial cancer. Limitations of the study include its retrospective single center design and the fact that administration of dexamethasone was not randomized.

Dose effect of local anesthetics on analgesic outcomes for the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in children: a randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Current knowledge on local anesthetic dosage for the TAP block in pediatric patients is very limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of two escalating local anesthetic doses on postsurgical analgesic outcomes in children receiving a TAP block.

METHODS

The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. Children (<8 years) were randomized to one of the two intervention groups: TAP block with bupivacaine at a dose of 2.5 mg · kg(-1) or 1.25 mg · kg(-1). Analgesic outcomes included pain scores in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), time to analgesic requirement and total number of analgesic requirements.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were recruited in the study. Pain scores in PACU were not different between study groups. The total number of analgesic dosage required in 24 h after surgery was higher in the lower dose group, median (IQR) of 4 (3 to 5) compared to 2.5 (1.5 to 3) in the greater dose group, P = 0.03. There was a clinically but not statistically significant difference in the time to first analgesic requirement in the 2.5 mg · kg(-1) group, median (IQR) of 248 (130 to 367) minutes compared to 146 (95 to 261) minutes in the 1.25 mg · kg(-1) dose group, P = 0.15.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of higher local anesthetic doses for the TAP block in children does not provide benefits on early pain scores but seems to improve analgesic duration and decrease the need for additional analgesics over 24 h after surgery. The use of higher, but yet safe, local anesthetic dosages for TAP blocks is a viable strategy to improve analgesia in children.

A survey of antiemetic dexamethasone administration-frequency of use and perceptions of benefits and risks

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a significant concern for anaesthetists. There are many agents from different classes that are effective in both preventing and treating PONV. Dexamethasone is a very effective antiemetic, but there are concerns regarding its safety. We performed an anonymous survey of a random selection of the fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists to ascertain patterns of practice in relation to PONV prophylaxis and treatment and also to determine awareness of the risks and benefits of perioperative dexamethasone administration. The response rate was 33%. From the responses, 71.2% of all patients undergoing general anaesthesia in the respondents' institutions receive PONV prophylaxis in total and 46.6% receive dexamethasone. No respondent gives more than a single dose of dexamethasone and there was an almost equal split between those who administer 4 and 8 mg, with a smaller number dosing on a weight basis. 5HT-3 receptor antagonists and dexamethasone are the preferred first-line PONV prophylactic agents and 5HT-3 receptor antagonists and droperidol are the preferred first-line PONV therapeutic agents. Concerns relating to the safety of dexamethasone were expressed by 80% of respondents. From this survey, we concluded that the PONV practice of the respondents is largely compliant with recent consensus guidelines, although PONV prophylaxis appears to be given more routinely. It also appears that more education is required on issues regarding dexamethasone safety.

Avoiding perioperative dexamethasone may improve the outcome of patients with rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Perioperative administration of dexamethasone may augment recurrence and mortality after tumor resection possibly by immunosuppression, which, unfortunately, has never been noted. We therefore carried out a retrospective study in rectal cancer to validate the hypothesis.

METHODS

Five hundreds and fifteen patients with stage I to III rectal cancers who underwent a curative resection from June 2007 and June 2011 were enrolled in the current study. Patients who had been given intravenous (IV) dexamethasone (4-10 mg) postoperatively and/or intraoperatively were assigned to dexamethasone group. The outcome of dexamethasone group and non-dexamethasone group were compared. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

dexamethasone group had significant lower three-year DFS (62.3% vs 71.8%, P = 0.026) and OS (74.1% vs 82.9%, P = 0.031) rate in comparison to non-dexamethasone group, the hazard ratios (HRs) of which were 1.59 (95% CI 1.05-2.39, P = 0.028) and 1.77 (95% CI 1.05-3.01, P = 0.034), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that administration of systemic dexamethasone were independently associated with DFS [adjusted HR 1.60 (95% CI 1.03-2.49, p = 0.039)], but for OS, dexamethasone didn't remain significant in this model. In the analyses of a subgroup of 428 patients (55/428 in dexamethasone group) without perioperative blood transfusion, dexamethasone had independently impact on both DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Patients not given dexamethasone had better three-year survival outcomes compared with patients given dexamethasone perioperatively. Our results indicate that rectal cancer patients treated with curative surgery may get survival benefit from avoiding low-dose perioperative dexamethasone.

Factors Associated with Improved Survival after Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Background:

Several retrospective studies suggest that perioperative care and anesthetic management for cancer resection may influence cancer recurrence or patient survival. Various intraoperative techniques such as paravertebral blocks, decreased opioid use, immunomodulation, and perioperative antiinflammatory administration, have previously been assessed for improved patient survival. The aim of this study was to assess associations between perioperative management and survival in patients undergoing resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Methods:

Survival data and anesthetic records for 144 patients who had surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2001 to 2012 were obtained and associations were sought between survival and 19 predefined variables. The authors performed a propensity weighted multivariable statistical analysis using Cox proportional hazards.

Results:

Median length of survival was 562 days with 95% confidence interval (471, 680). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model of survival, the authors found increased survival in patients who received perioperative epidural analgesia and/or intraoperative dexamethasone. There was a 44% hazard ratio reduction, hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (0.38, 0.87), with dexamethasone. Adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy was associated with longer survival. A decrease in survival was noted in patients who received intraoperative blood transfusions, had poorer histologic grade, and advanced tumor stage.

Conclusions:

The authors report an association between perioperative dexamethasone administration and improved survival in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. An association between use of epidural anesthesia during primary pancreatic cancer surgery and prolonged survival was also observed. Previously identified associations between perioperative blood transfusions and poor tumor histologic grade and decreased survival were confirmed. Further investigations regarding the use of perioperative dexamethasone and neuraxial anesthesia in this patient population are warranted.