1
|
Baribeau V, Weinstein J, Wong VT, Sharkey A, Lodico DN, Matyal R, Mahmood F, Mitchell JD. Motion-Tracking Machines and Sensors: Advancing Education Technology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 36:303-308. [PMID: 34551885 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.07.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Graduate medical education is predominantly based on a time-based apprenticeship model, with implied acquisition of proficiency after a pre-set amount of clinical exposure. While motion metrics have been used previously to measure skill performance indicators, these assessments have largely been performed on a summative scale to describe the performance of complete tasks or procedures. By segmenting performances of interest and assessing the essential elements individually, a more comprehensive understanding of the aspects in need of improvement for a learner can be obtained. The purpose of this review is to discuss technologies applicable to motion tracking, their benefits and limitations, approaches to data processing, and potential applications based on recent improvements in this technology. Objective analysis of motion metrics may improve educational standards of learning and efficiency by both standardizing the feedback process for trainees and reducing the volume of instructors required to facilitate practice sessions. With rigorous validation and standardization, motion metric assessment may also prove useful to demonstrate competency in technical procedures as part of a comprehensive certification process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Baribeau
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey Weinstein
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Vanessa T Wong
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Aidan Sharkey
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Derek N Lodico
- Navy Trauma Training Center, Los Angeles County and University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Robina Matyal
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Feroze Mahmood
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - John D Mitchell
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martinelli SM, Chen F, Isaak RS, Huffmyer JL, Neves SE, Mitchell JD. Educating Anesthesiologists During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic and Beyond. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:585-593. [PMID: 33201006 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has altered approaches to anesthesiology education by shifting educational paradigms. This vision article discusses pre-COVID-19 educational methodologies and best evidence, adaptations required under COVID-19, and evidence for these modifications, and suggests future directions for anesthesiology education. Learning management systems provide structure to online learning. They have been increasingly utilized to improve access to didactic materials asynchronously. Despite some historic reservations, the pandemic has necessitated a rapid uptake across programs. Commercially available systems offer a wide range of peer-reviewed curricular options. The flipped classroom promotes learning foundational knowledge before teaching sessions with a focus on application during structured didactics. There is growing evidence that this approach is preferred by learners and may increase knowledge gain. The flipped classroom works well with learning management systems to disseminate focused preclass work. Care must be taken to keep virtual sessions interactive. Simulation, already used in anesthesiology, has been critical in preparation for the care of COVID-19 patients. Multidisciplinary, in situ simulations allow for rapid dissemination of new team workflows. Physical distancing and reduced availability of providers have required more sessions. Early pandemic decreases in operating volumes have allowed for this; future planning will have to incorporate smaller groups, sanitizing of equipment, and attention to use of personal protective equipment. Effective technical skills training requires instruction to mastery levels, use of deliberate practice, and high-quality feedback. Reduced sizes of skill-training workshops and approaches for feedback that are not in-person will be required. Mock oral and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) allow for training and assessment of competencies often not addressed otherwise. They provide formative and summative data and objective measurements of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones. They also allow for preparation for the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) APPLIED examination. Adaptations to teleconferencing or videoconferencing can allow for continued use. Benefits of teaching in this new era include enhanced availability of asynchronous learning and opportunities to apply universal, expert-driven curricula. Burdens include decreased social interactions and potential need for an increased amount of smaller, live sessions. Acquiring learning management systems and holding more frequent simulation and skills sessions with fewer learners may increase cost. With the increasing dependency on multimedia and technology support for teaching and learning, one important focus of educational research is on the development and evaluation of strategies that reduce extraneous processing and manage essential and generative processing in virtual learning environments. Collaboration to identify and implement best practices has the potential to improve education for all learners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Martinelli
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Fei Chen
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Robert S Isaak
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Julie L Huffmyer
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Sara E Neves
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - John D Mitchell
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Introduction: Anesthesiology requires procedure fulfillment, problem, and real-time crisis resolution, problem, and complications forecast, among others; therefore, the evaluation of its learning should center around how students achieve competence rather than solely focusing on knowledge acquisition. Literature shows that despite the existence of numerous evaluation strategies, these are still underrated in most cases due to unawareness.
Objective: The present article aims to explain the process of competency-based anesthesiology assessment, in addition to suggesting a brief description of the learning domains evaluated, theories of knowledge, instruments, and assessment systems in the area; and finally, to show some of the most relevant results regarding assessment systems in Colombia.
Methodology: The results obtained in “Characteristics of the evaluation systems used by anesthesiology residency programs stakeholders in the educational process, a fact that motivated the publishing of this discussion around the topic of competency-based assessment in anesthesiology. Following a bibliography search with the keywords through PubMed, OVID, ERIC, DIALNET, and REDALYC, 110 articles were reviewed and 75 were established as relevant for the research’s theoretical framework.
Results and conclusion: Anesthesiology assessment should be conceived from the competency’s multidimensionality; it must be longitudinal and focused on the learning objectives.
Collapse
|
4
|
Learners and Luddites in the Twenty-first Century: Bringing Evidence-based Education to Anesthesiology. Anesthesiology 2020; 131:908-928. [PMID: 31365369 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000002827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Anesthesiologists are both teachers and learners and alternate between these roles throughout their careers. However, few anesthesiologists have formal training in the methodologies and theories of education. Many anesthesiology educators often teach as they were taught and may not be taking advantage of current evidence in education to guide and optimize the way they teach and learn. This review describes the most up-to-date evidence in education for teaching knowledge, procedural skills, and professionalism. Methods such as active learning, spaced learning, interleaving, retrieval practice, e-learning, experiential learning, and the use of cognitive aids will be described. We made an effort to illustrate the best available evidence supporting educational practices while recognizing the inherent challenges in medical education research. Similar to implementing evidence in clinical practice in an attempt to improve patient outcomes, implementing an evidence-based approach to anesthesiology education may improve learning outcomes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rebel A, DiLorenzo A, Nguyen D, Horvath I, McEvoy MD, Fragneto RY, Dority JS, Rose GL, Schell RM. Should Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Assist the Clinical Competency Committee in Assigning Anesthesiology Milestones Competency? Anesth Analg 2020; 129:226-234. [PMID: 30925556 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000004120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the integration of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations into the Anesthesiology primary board certification process, residency programs may choose to implement Objective Structured Clinical Examinations for resident skill assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate Objective Structured Clinical Examination-based milestone assessment and compare with Clinical Competency Committee milestone assessment that is based purely on clinical evaluations. METHODS An annual Objective Structured Clinical Examination event was used to obtain milestone assessment of clinical anesthesia year 0-clinical anesthesia year 3 residents for selected milestones in patient care, professionalism, and interpersonal/communication skills. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination scenarios were different for each training level. The Clinical Competency Committee evaluated each resident semiannually based on clinical evaluations of resident performance. The Clinical Competency Committee milestone assessments from 2014 to 2016 that were recorded closest to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination event (±3 months) were compared to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination milestone assessments. A total of 35 residents were included in this analysis in 3 different training cohorts: A (graduates 2016, n = 12); B (graduates 2017, n = 10); and C (graduates 2018, n = 13). All residents participated in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations because their clinical anesthesia year 0 year and Clinical Competency Committee milestone data had been reported since December 2014. RESULTS Both assessment techniques indicated a competency growth proportional to the length in training. Despite limited cumulative statistics in this study, average trends in the Objective Structured Clinical Examination-Clinical Competency Committee relationship indicated: (1) a good proportionality in reflecting competency growth; (2) a grade enhancement associated with Clinical Competency Committee assessment, dominated by evaluations of junior residents (clinical anesthesia year 0-clinical anesthesia year 1); and (3) an expectation bias in Clinical Competency Committee assessment, dominated by evaluation of senior residents (clinical anesthesia year 2-clinical anesthesia year 3). CONCLUSIONS Our analysis confirms the compatibility of the 2 evaluation methods in reflecting longitudinal growth. The deviation of Objective Structured Clinical Examination assessments versus Clinical Competency Committee assessments suggests that Objective Structured Clinical Examinations may be providing additional or different information on resident performance. Educators might consider using both assessment methods to provide the most reliable and valid competency assessments during residency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Rebel
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Amy DiLorenzo
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Dung Nguyen
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Ivan Horvath
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Matthew D McEvoy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Regina Y Fragneto
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Jeremy S Dority
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Greg L Rose
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Randall M Schell
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Kwak YL. Redesigning an anesthesiology resident training program to improve practical procedure competency. Korean J Anesthesiol 2017; 70:118-119. [PMID: 28367280 PMCID: PMC5370298 DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Young Lan Kwak
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|