1
|
Al-Rubaiey S, Senger C, Bukatz J, Krantchev K, Janas A, Eitner C, Nieminen-Kelhä M, Brandenburg S, Zips D, Vajkoczy P, Acker G. Determinants of cerebral radionecrosis in animal models: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2024; 199:110444. [PMID: 39067705 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radionecrosis is a common complication in radiation oncology, while mechanisms and risk factors have yet to be fully explored. We therefore conducted a systematic review to understand the pathogenesis and identify factors that significantly affect the development. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search based on the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science databases. The complete search strategy can be found as a preregistered protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42023361662). RESULTS We included 83 studies, most involving healthy animals (n = 72, 86.75 %). High doses of hemispherical irradiation of 30 Gy in rats and 50 Gy in mice led repeatedly to radionecrosis among different studies and set-ups. Higher dose and larger irradiated volume were associated with earlier onset. Fractionated schedules showed limited effectiveness in the prevention of radionecrosis. Distinct anatomical brain structures respond to irradiation in various ways. White matter appears to be more vulnerable than gray matter. Younger age, more evolved animal species, and genetic background were also significant factors, whereas sex was irrelevant. Only 13.25 % of the studies were performed on primary brain tumor bearing animals, no studies on brain metastases are currently available. CONCLUSION This systematic review identified various factors that significantly affect the induction of radionecrosis. The current state of research neglects the utilization of animal models of brain tumors, even though patients with brain malignancies constitute the largest group receiving brain irradiation. This latter aspect should be primarily addressed when developing an experimental radionecrosis model for translational implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanaria Al-Rubaiey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Jan Bukatz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Kiril Krantchev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Anastasia Janas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Chiara Eitner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Melina Nieminen-Kelhä
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Susan Brandenburg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Güliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen SX, Xiao ZJ, Xie M, Chang YQ, Zhou GJ, Wen HM, He DQ, Xu CL, Chen YR, Li YH. Treatment of radiation-induced brain injury with bisdemethoxycurcumin. Neural Regen Res 2023; 18:416-421. [PMID: 35900439 PMCID: PMC9396486 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.346549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy is considered the most effective non-surgical treatment for brain tumors. However, there are no available treatments for radiation-induced brain injury. Bisdemethoxycurcumin (BDMC) is a demethoxy derivative of curcumin that has anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidant properties. To determine whether BDMC has the potential to treat radiation-induced brain injury, in this study, we established a rat model of radiation-induced brain injury by administering a single 30-Gy vertical dose of irradiation to the whole brain, followed by intraperitoneal injection of 500 μL of a 100 mg/kg BDMC solution every day for 5 successive weeks. Our results showed that BDMC increased the body weight of rats with radiation-induced brain injury, improved learning and memory, attenuated brain edema, inhibited astrocyte activation, and reduced oxidative stress. These findings suggest that BDMC protects against radiation-induced brain injury.
Collapse
|
3
|
Park SJ, Lim SH, Kim YJ, Moon KS, Kim IY, Jung S, Kim SK, Oh IJ, Hong JH, Jung TY. The Tumor Control According to Radiation Dose of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Small and Medium-Sized Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2021; 64:983-994. [PMID: 34689476 PMCID: PMC8590918 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) in the treatment of brain metastases is well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maximizing the radiation dose in GKR and the factors influencing tumor control in cases of small and medium-sized brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods We analyzed 230 metastatic brain tumors less than 5 mL in volume in 146 patients with NSCLC who underwent GKR. The patients had no previous radiation therapy for brain metastases. The pathologies of the tumors were adenocarcinoma (n=207), squamous cell carcinoma (n=18), and others (n=5). The radiation doses were classified as 18, 20, 22, and 24 Gy, and based on the tumor volume, the tumors were categorized as follows : small-sized (less than 1 mL) and medium-sized (1–3 and 3–5 mL). The progression-free survival (PFS) of the individual 230 tumors and 146 brain metastases was evaluated after GKR depending on the pathology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score (PS), tumor volume, radiation dose, and anti-cancer regimens. The radiotoxicity after GKR was also evaluated.
Results After GKR, the restricted mean PFS of individual 230 tumors at 24 months was 15.6 months (14.0–17.1). In small-sized tumors, as the dose of radiation increased, the tumor control rates tended to increase (p=0.072). In medium-sized tumors, there was no statistically difference in PFS with an increase of radiation dose (p=0.783). On univariate analyses, a statistically significant increase in PFS was associated with adenocarcinomas (p=0.001), tumors with ECOG PS 0 (p=0.005), small-sized tumors (p=0.003), radiation dose of 24 Gy (p=0.014), synchronous lesions (p=0.002), and targeted therapy (p=0.004). On multivariate analyses, an improved PFS was seen with targeted therapy (hazard ratio, 0.356; 95% confidence interval, 0.150–0.842; p=0.019). After GKR, the restricted mean PFS of brain at 24 months was 9.8 months (8.5–11.1) in 146 patients, and the pattern of recurrence was mostly distant within the brain (66.4%). The small and medium-sized tumors treated with GKR showed radiotoxicitiy in five out of 230 tumors (2.2%), which were controlled with medical treatment.
Conclusion The small-sized tumors were effectively controlled without symptomatic radiation necrosis as the radiation dose was increased up to 24 Gy. The medium-sized tumors showed potential for symptomatic radiation necrosis without signifcant tumor control rate, when greater than 18 Gy. GKR combined targeted therapy improved the tumor control of GKR-treated tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Jee Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Sa-Hoe Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Young-Jin Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Kyung-Sub Moon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - In-Young Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Shin Jung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Seul-Kee Kim
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - In-Jae Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Jong-Hwan Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Tae-Young Jung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| |
Collapse
|