Awake Versus Asleep Craniotomy for Patients With Eloquent Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Awake vs asleep craniotomy for patients with eloquent glioma is debatable. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare awake vs asleep craniotomy for the resection of gliomas in the eloquent regions.

METHODS

MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from inception to December 13, 2022. Primary outcomes were the extent of resection (EOR), overall survival (month), progression-free survival (month), and rates of neurological deficit, Karnofsky performance score, and seizure freedom at the 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were duration of operation (minute) and length of hospital stay (LOS) (day).

RESULTS

Fifteen studies yielded 2032 patients, from which 800 (39.4%) and 1232 (60.6%) underwent awake and asleep craniotomy, respectively. The meta-analysis concluded that the awake group had greater EOR (mean difference [MD] = MD = 8.52 [4.28, 12.76], P < .00001), overall survival (MD = 2.86 months [1.35, 4.37], P = .0002), progression-free survival (MD = 5.69 months [0.75, 10.64], P = .02), 3-month postoperative Karnofsky performance score (MD = 13.59 [11.08, 16.09], P < .00001), and 3-month postoperative seizure freedom (odds ratio = 8.72 [3.39, 22.39], P < .00001). Furthermore, the awake group had lower 3-month postoperative neurological deficit (odds ratio = 0.47 [0.28, 0.78], P = .004) and shorter LOS (MD = -2.99 days [-5.09, -0.88], P = .005). In addition, the duration of operation was similar between the groups (MD = 37.88 minutes [-34.09, 109.86], P = .30).

CONCLUSION

Awake craniotomy for gliomas in the eloquent regions benefits EOR, survival, postoperative neurofunctional outcomes, and LOS. When feasible, the authors recommend awake craniotomy for surgical resection of gliomas in the eloquent regions.

A Novel Portable, Mobile MRI: Comparison with an Established Low-Field Intraoperative MRI System

Background  MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) using low-magnet field strength has unique advantages for intraoperative use. We compared a novel, compact, portable MR imaging system to an established intraoperative 0.15 T system to assess potential utility in intracranial neurosurgery. Methods  Brain images were acquired with a 0.15 T intraoperative MRI (iMRI) system and a 0.064 T portable MR system. Five healthy volunteers were scanned. Individual sequences were rated on a 5-point (1 to 5) scale for six categories: contrast, resolution, coverage, noise, artifacts, and geometry. Results  Overall, the 0.064 T images (M = 3.4, SD = 0.1) had statistically higher ratings than the 0.15 T images (M = 2.4, SD = 0.2) ( p  < 0.01). All comparable sequences (T1, T2, T2 FLAIR and SSFP) were rated significantly higher on the 0.064 T and were rated 1.2 points (SD = 0.3) higher than 0.15 T scanner, with the T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences showing the largest increment on the 0.064 T with an average rating difference of 1.5 points (SD = 0.2). Scanning time for the 0.064 T system obtained images more quickly and encompassed a larger field of view than the 0.15 T system. Conclusions  A novel, portable 0.064 T self-shielding MRI system under ideal conditions provided images of comparable quality or better and faster acquisition times than those provided by the already well-established 0.15 T iMR system. These results suggest that the 0.064 T MRI has the potential to be adapted for intraoperative use for intracranial neurosurgery.

Combined use of intraoperative MRI and awake tailored microsurgical resection to respect functional neural networks: preliminary experience

INTRODUCTION

The combined use of intraoperative MRI and awake surgery is a tailored microsurgical resection to respect functional neural networks (mainly the language and motor ones). Intraoperative MRI has been classically considered to increase the extent of resection for gliomas, thereby reducing neurological deficits. Herein, we evaluated the combined technique of awake microsurgical resection and intraoperative MRI for primary brain tumours (gliomas, metastasis) and epilepsy (cortical dysplasia, non-lesional, cavernomas).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients were treated with the commonly used "asleep awake asleep" (AAA) approach at Lille University Hospital, France, from November 2016 until May 2020. The exact anatomical location was insular with various extensions, frontal, temporal or fronto-temporal in 8 (44.4%), parietal in 3 (16.7%), fronto-opercular in 4 (22.2%), Rolandic in two (11.1%), and the supplementary motor area (SMA) in one (5.6%).

RESULTS

The patients had a mean age of 38.4 years (median 37.1, range 20.8-66.9). The mean surgical duration was 4.1 hours (median 4.2, range 2.6-6.4) with a mean duration of intraoperative MRI of 28.8 minutes (median 25, range 13-55). Overall, 61% (11/18) of patients underwent further resection, while 39% had no additional resection after intraoperative MRI. The mean preoperative and postoperative tumour volumes of the primary brain tumours were 34.7 cc (median 10.7, range 0.534-130.25) and 3.5 cc (median 0.5, range 0-17.4), respectively. Moreover, the proportion of the initially resected tumour volume at the time of intraoperative MRI (expressed as 100% from preoperative volume) and the final resected tumour volume were statistically significant (p= 0.01, Mann-Whitney test). The tumour remnants were commonly found posterior (5/9) or anterior (2/9) insular and in proximity with the motor strip (1/9) or language areas (e.g. Broca, 1/9). Further resection was not required in seven patients because there were no remnants (3/7), cortical stimulation approaching eloquent areas (3/7) and non-lesional epilepsy (1/7). The mean overall follow-up period was 15.8 months (median 12, range 3-36).

CONCLUSION

The intraoperative MRI and awake microsurgical resection approach is feasible with extensive planning and multidisciplinary collaboration, as these methods are complementary and synergic rather than competitive to improve patient oncological outcomes and quality of life.

Review of Intraoperative Adjuncts for Maximal Safe Resection of Gliomas and Its Impact on Outcomes

Maximal safe resection is the mainstay of treatment in the neurosurgical management of gliomas, and preserving functional integrity is linked to favorable outcomes. How these modalities differ in their effectiveness on the extent of resection (EOR), survival, and complications remains unknown. A systematic literature search was performed with the following inclusion criteria: published between 2005 and 2022, involving brain glioma surgery, and including one or a combination of intraoperative modalities: intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI), awake/general anesthesia craniotomy mapping (AC/GA), fluorescence-guided imaging, or combined modalities. Of 525 articles, 464 were excluded and 61 articles were included, involving 5221 glioma patients, 7(11.4%) articles used iMRI, 21(36.8%) used cortical mapping, 15(24.5%) used 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) or fluorescein sodium, and 18(29.5%) used combined modalities. The heterogeneity in reporting the amount of surgical resection prevented further analysis. Progression-free survival/overall survival (PFS/OS) were reported in 18/61(29.5%) articles, while complications and permanent disability were reported in 38/61(62.2%) articles. The reviewed studies demonstrate that intraoperative adjuncts such as iMRI, AC/GA mapping, fluorescence-guided imaging, and a combination of these modalities improve EOR. However, PFS/OS were underreported. Combining multiple intraoperative modalities seems to have the highest effect compared to each adjunct alone.

Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a new paradigm

OBJECTIVE

For patients with surgically accessible solitary metastases or oligometastatic disease, treatment often involves resection followed by postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This strategy has several potential drawbacks, including irregular target delineation for SRS and potential tumor "seeding" away from the resection cavity during surgery. A neoadjuvant (preoperative) approach to radiation therapy avoids these limitations and offers improved patient convenience. This study assessed the efficacy of neoadjuvant SRS as a new treatment paradigm for patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed at a single institution to identify patients who had undergone neoadjuvant SRS (specifically, Gamma Knife radiosurgery) followed by resection of a brain metastasis. Kaplan-Meier survival and log-rank analyses were used to evaluate risks of progression and death. Assessments were made of local recurrence and leptomeningeal spread. Additionally, an analysis of the contemporary literature of postoperative and neoadjuvant SRS for metastatic disease was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients who had undergone neoadjuvant SRS followed by resection of a brain metastasis were identified in the single-institution cohort. The median age was 64 years (range 32-84 years), and the median follow-up time was 16.5 months (range 1 month to 5.7 years). The median radiation dose was 17 Gy prescribed to the 50% isodose. Rates of local disease control were 100% at 6 months, 87.6% at 12 months, and 73.5% at 24 months. In 4 patients who had local treatment failure, salvage therapy included repeat resection, laser interstitial thermal therapy, or repeat SRS. One hundred thirty patients (including the current cohort) were identified in the literature who had been treated with neoadjuvant SRS prior to resection. Overall rates of local control at 1 year after neoadjuvant SRS treatment ranged from 49% to 91%, and rates of leptomeningeal dissemination from 0% to 16%. In comparison, rates of local control 1 year after postoperative SRS ranged from 27% to 91%, with 7% to 28% developing leptomeningeal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant SRS for the treatment of brain metastases is a novel approach that mitigates the shortcomings of postoperative SRS. While additional prospective studies are needed, the current study of 130 patients including the summary of 106 previously published cases supports the safety and potential efficacy of preoperative SRS with potential for improved outcomes compared with postoperative SRS.

Survival After Resection of Newly-Diagnosed Intracranial Grade II Ependymomas: An Initial Multicenter Analysis and the Logistics of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors, including the use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI), impacting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after resections of newly diagnosed intracranial grade II ependymomas performed across 4 different institutions.

METHODS

Analyses of a multicenter mixed retrospective/prospective database assessed the impact of patient, treatment, and tumor characteristics on OS and PFS. iMRI workflow and logistics were also outlined.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were identified (mean age 25.4 years, mean follow-up 52.8 months). The mean OS was 52.8 ± 44.7 months. Univariate analyses failed to identify prognostic factors associated with OS, likely due to relatively shorter follow-up time for this less aggressive glioma subtype. The mean PFS was 43.7 ± 39.8 months. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that gross-total resection was associated with prolonged PFS compared to both subtotal resection (STR) (P = 0.005) and near-total resection (P = 0.01). Infratentorial location was associated with improved PFS compared to supratentorial location (P = 0.04). Log-rank analyses of Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that increasing extent of resection (EOR) led to improved OS specifically for supratentorial tumors (P = 0.02) and improved PFS for all tumors (P < 0.001). Thirty cases (69.8%) utilized iMRI, of which 12 (27.9%) involved additional resection after iMRI. Of these, 8/12 (66.7%) resulted in gross-total resection, while 2/12 (16.7%) were near-total resection and 2/12 (16.7%) were subtotal resection. iMRI was not an independent prognosticator of PFS (P = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater EOR and infratentorial location were associated with increased PFS for grade II ependymomas. Greater EOR was associated with longer OS only for supratentorial tumors. A longer follow-up is needed to establish prognostic factors for this cohort, including use of iMRI.

Indication and eligibility of glioma patients for awake surgery: A scoping review by a multidisciplinary perspective

Background

Awake surgery (AS) permits intraoperative mapping of cognitive and motor functions, allowing neurosurgeons to tailor the resection according to patient functional boundaries thus preserving long-term patient integrity and maximizing extent of resection. Given the increased risks of the awake scenario, the growing importance of AS in surgical practice favored the debate about patient selection concerning both indication and eligibility criteria. Nonetheless, a systematic investigation is lacking in the literature.

Objective

To provide a scoping review of the literature concerning indication and eligibility criteria for AS in patients with gliomas to answer the questions:1) "What are the functions mostly tested during AS protocols?" and 2) "When and why should a patient be excluded from AS?".

Materials and methods

Pertinent studies were retrieved from PubMed, PsycArticles and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), published until April 2021 according to the PRISMA Statement Extension for Scoping Reviews. The retrieved abstracts were checked for the following features being clearly stated: 1) the population described as being composed of glioma(LGG or HGG) patients; 2) the paper had to declare which cognitive or sensorimotor function was tested, or 2bis)the decisional process of inclusion/exclusion for AS had to be described from at least one of the following perspectives: neurosurgical, neurophysiological, anesthesiologic and psychological/neuropsychological.

Results

One hundred and seventy-eight studies stated the functions being tested on 8004 patients. Language is the main indication for AS, even if tasks and stimulation techniques changed over the years. It is followed by monitoring of sensorimotor and visuospatial pathways. This review demonstrated an increasing interest in addressing other superior cognitive functions, such as executive functions and emotions. Forty-five studies on 2645 glioma patients stated the inclusion/exclusion criteria for AS eligibility. Inability to cooperate due to psychological disorder(i.e. anxiety),severe language deficits and other medical conditions(i.e.cardiovascular diseases, obesity, etc.)are widely reported as exclusion criteria for AS. However, a very few papers gave scale exact cut-off. Likewise, age and tumor histology are not standardized parameters for patient selection.

Conclusion

Given the broad spectrum of functions that might be safely and effectively monitored via AS, neurosurgeons and their teams should tailor intraoperative testing on patient needs and background as well as on tumor location and features. Whenever the aforementioned exclusion criteria are not fulfilled, AS should be strongly considered for glioma patients.

Full-course resection control strategy in glioma surgery using both intraoperative ultrasound and intraoperative MRI

Background

Intraoperative ultrasound(iUS) and intraoperative MRI (iMRI) are effective ways to perform resection control during glioma surgery. However, most published studies employed only one modality. Few studies have used both during surgery. How to combine these two techniques reasonably, and what advantages they could have for glioma surgery are still open questions.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a series of consecutive patients who underwent initial surgical treatment of supratentorial gliomas in our center. We utilized a full-course resection control strategy to combine iUS and iMRI: IUS for pre-resection assessment and intermediate resection control; iMRI for final resection control. The basic patient characteristics, surgical results, iMRI/iUS findings, and their impacts on surgical procedures were evaluated and reported.

Results

A total of 40 patients were included. The extent of resection was 95.43 ± 10.37%, and the gross total resection rate was 72.5%. The median residual tumor size was 6.39 cm3 (range 1.06–16.23 cm3). 5% (2/40) of patients had permanent neurological deficits after surgery. 17.5% (7/40) of patients received further resection after the first iMRI scan, resulting in four (10%) more patients achieving gross total resection. The number of iMRI scans per patient was 1.18 ± 0.38. The surgical time was 4.5 ± 3.6 hours. The pre-resection iUS scan revealed that an average of 3.8 borders of the tumor were beside sulci in 75% (30/40) patients. Intermediate resection control was utilized in 67.5% (27/40) of patients. In 37.5% (15/40) of patients, the surgical procedures were changed intraoperatively based on the iUS findings. Compared with iMRI, the sensitivity and specificity of iUS for residual tumors were 46% and 96%, respectively.

Conclusion

The full-course resection control strategy by combining iUS and iMRI could be successfully implemented with good surgical results in initial glioma surgeries. This strategy might stabilize resection control quality and provide the surgeon with more intraoperative information to tailor the surgical strategy. Compared with iMRI-assisted glioma surgery, this strategy might improve efficiency by reducing the number of iMRI scans and shortening surgery time.

A Low Subfrontal Dural Opening for Operative Management of Anterior Skull Base Lesions

Introduction A low subfrontal dural opening technique that limits brain manipulation was assessed in patients that underwent frontotemporal approaches for anterior fossa lesions. Methods A retrospective review was performed for cases using a low subfrontal dural opening including characterization of demographics, lesion size and location, neurological and ophthalmological assessments, clinical course, and imaging findings. Results A low subfrontal dural opening was performed in 23 patients (17F, 6M), median age of 53 years (range 23-81) with median follow-up duration of 21.9 months (range 6.2-67.1). Lesions included 22 meningiomas (9 anterior clinoid, 12 tuberculum sellae, and 1 sphenoid wing), 1 unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysm clipped during a meningioma resection, and 1 optic nerve cavernous malformation. Maximal possible resection was achieved in all cases including gross total resection in 16/22 (72.7%), near total in 1/22 (4.5%), and subtotal in 5/22 (22.7%) in which tumor involvement of critical structures limited complete resection. Eighteen patients presented with vision loss; 11 (61%) improved postoperatively, 3 (17%) were stable, and 4 (22%) worsened. The mean ICU stay and time to discharge was 1.3 days (range 0-3) and 3.8 days (range 2-8). Conclusions A low subfrontal dural opening for approaches to the anterior fossa can be performed with minimal brain exposure, early visualization of the optico-carotid cistern for cerebrospinal fluid release, minimizing need for fixed brain retraction and Sylvian fissure dissection. This technique can potentially reduce surgical risk and provide excellent exposure for anterior skull base lesions with favorable extent of resection, visual recovery, and complication rates.

IgG4-Related Disease of the Skull and Skull Base-A Systematic Review and Report of Two Cases

OBJECTIVE

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is an inflammatory process that uncommonly can present in the skull base and calvarium and mimic a tumor but the nature of this condition is not well summarized in the neurosurgical literature.

METHODS

A review was performed of 2 cases of IgG4-RD in the skull base highlighting the diagnostic challenges with assessment of these skull base lesions, and a systematic review of relevant literature was carried out.

RESULTS

A systematic review of the literature conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines identified 113 articles, with 184 cases of IgG4-RD in the skull base or calvarium. The most commonly affected locations include the meninges, cavernous sinus, base of the posterior fossa, clivus, and mastoid bone. Headache, visual and auditory disturbances, cranial nerve dysfunction, and seizures were the most common presenting symptoms. Medical treatment was highly successful and most commonly consisted of corticosteroids coadministered with immunosuppressive agents such as rituximab. Prevalence seemed to be equal between sexes, and serum IgG4 levels were increased in 61% of patients. Delayed diagnosis and a need for multiple biopsies were reported in numerous cases. Two cases of skull base IgG4-RD from the authors' institution show the variable presentations of this disease. More invasive surgical biopsies were required in both cases, and corticosteroid treatment led to significant clinical improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

IgG4-RD is an uncommon condition with an increasing body of reported cases that can affect the skull base and calvarium and should be in the differential diagnosis, because delay in diagnosis and treatment may be common.

Intraoperative MRI for Brain Tumors

INTRODUCTION

The use of intraoperative imaging has been a critical tool in the neurosurgeon's armamentarium and is of particular benefit during tumor surgery. This article summarizes the history of its development, implementation, clinical experience and future directions.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature focusing on the development and clinical experience with intraoperative MRI. Utilizing the authors' personal experience as well as evidence from the literature, we present an overview of the utility of MRI during neurosurgery.

RESULTS

In the 1990s, the first description of using a low field MRI in the operating room was published describing the additional benefit provided by improved resolution of MRI as compared to ultrasound. Since then, implementation has varied in magnetic field strength and in configuration from floor mounted to ceiling mounted units as well as those that are accessible to the operating room for use during surgery and via an outpatient entrance to use for diagnostic imaging. The experience shows utility of this technique for increasing extent of resection for low and high grade tumors as well as preventing injury to important structures while incorporating techniques such as intraoperative monitoring.

CONCLUSION

This article reviews the history of intraoperative MRI and presents a review of the literature revealing the successful implementation of this technology and benefits noted for the patient and the surgeon.

Impact of combined use of intraoperative MRI and awake microsurgical resection on patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Microsurgical resection of primary brain tumors located within or near eloquent areas is challenging. Primary aim is to preserve neurological function, while maximizing the extent of resection (EOR), to optimize long-term neurooncological outcomes and quality of life. Here, we review the combined integration of awake craniotomy and intraoperative MRI (IoMRI) for primary brain tumors, due to their multiple challenges. A systematic review of the literature was performed, in accordance with the Prisma guidelines. Were included 13 series and a total number of 527 patients, who underwent 541 surgeries. We paid particular attention to operative time, rate of intraoperative seizures, rate of initial complete resection at the time of first IoMRI, the final complete gross total resection (GTR, complete radiological resection rates), and the immediate and definitive postoperative neurological complications. The mean duration of surgery was 6.3 h (median 7.05, range 3.8-7.9). The intraoperative seizure rate was 3.7% (range 1.4-6; I^2 = 0%, P heterogeneity = 0.569, standard error = 0.012, p = 0.002). The intraoperative complete resection rate at the time of first IoMRI was 35.2% (range 25.7-44.7; I^2 = 66.73%, P heterogeneity = 0.004, standard error = 0.048, p < 0.001). The rate of patients who underwent supplementary resection after one or several IoMRI was 46% (range 39.8-52.2; I^2 = 8.49%, P heterogeneity = 0.364, standard error = 0.032, p < 0.001). The GTR rate at discharge was 56.3% (range 47.5-65.1; I^2 = 60.19%, P heterogeneity = 0.01, standard error = 0.045, p < 0.001). The rate of immediate postoperative complications was 27.4% (range 15.2-39.6; I^2 = 92.62%, P heterogeneity < 0.001, standard error = 0.062, p < 0.001). The rate of permanent postoperative complications was 4.1% (range 1.3-6.9; I^2 = 38.52%, P heterogeneity = 0.123, standard error = 0.014, p = 0.004). Combined use of awake craniotomy and IoMRI can help in maximizing brain tumor resection in selected patients. The technical obstacles to doing so are not severe and can be managed by experienced neurosurgery and anesthesiology teams. The benefits of bringing these technologies to bear on patients with brain tumors in or near language areas are obvious. The lack of equipoise on this topic by experienced practitioners will make it difficult to do a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. In the opinion of the authors, such a trial would be unnecessary and would deprive some patients of the benefits of the best available methods for their tumor resections.

The Neurosurgeon's Armamentarium for Gliomas: An Update on Intraoperative Technologies to Improve Extent of Resection

Maximal safe resection is the standard of care in the neurosurgical treatment of high-grade gliomas. To aid surgeons in the operating room, adjuvant techniques and technologies centered around improving intraoperative visualization of tumor tissue have been developed. In this review, we will discuss the most advanced technologies, specifically fluorescence-guided surgery, intraoperative imaging, neuromonitoring modalities, and microscopic imaging techniques. The goal of these technologies is to improve detection of tumor tissue beyond what conventional microsurgery has permitted. We describe the various advances, the current state of the literature that have tested the utility of the different adjuvants in clinical practice, and future directions for improving intraoperative technologies.

Using Histopathology to Assess the Reliability of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Guiding Additional Brain Tumor Resection: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) is a powerful tool for guiding brain tumor resections, provided that it accurately discerns residual tumor.

OBJECTIVE

To use histopathology to assess how reliably iMRI may discern additional tumor for a variety of tumor types, independent of the indications for iMRI.

METHODS

A multicenter database was used to calculate the odds of additional resection during the same surgical session for grade I to IV gliomas and pituitary adenomas. The reliability of iMRI for identifying residual tumor was assessed using histopathology of tissue resected after iMRI.

RESULTS

Gliomas (904/1517 cases, 59.6%) were more likely than pituitary adenomas (176/515, 34.2%) to receive additional resection after iMRI (P < .001), but these tumors were equally likely to have additional tissue sent for histopathology (398/904, 44.4% vs 66/176, 37.5%; P = .11). Tissue samples were available for resections after iMRI for 464 cases, with 415 (89.4%) positive for tumor. Additional resections after iMRI for gliomas (361/398, 90.7%) were more likely to yield additional tumor compared to pituitary adenomas (54/66, 81.8%) (P = .03). There were no significant differences in resection after iMRI yielding histopathologically positive tumor between grade I (58/65 cases, 89.2%; referent), grade II (82/92, 89.1%) (P = .98), grade III (72/81, 88.9%) (P = .95), or grade IV gliomas (149/160, 93.1%) (P = .33). Additional resection for previously resected tumors (122/135 cases, 90.4%) was equally likely to yield histopathologically confirmed tumor compared to newly-diagnosed tumors (293/329, 89.0%) (P = .83).

CONCLUSION

Histopathological analysis of tissue resected after use of iMRI for grade I to IV gliomas and pituitary adenomas demonstrates that iMRI is highly reliable for identifying residual tumor.

Fluorescence Guidance and Intraoperative Adjuvants to Maximize Extent of Resection

Safely maximizing extent of resection has become the central goal in glioma surgery. Especially in eloquent cortex, the goal of maximal resection is balanced with neurological risk. As new technologies emerge in the field of neurosurgery, the standards for maximal safe resection have been elevated. Fluorescence-guided surgery, intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and microscopic imaging methods are among the most well-validated tools available to enhance the level of accuracy and safety in glioma surgery. Each technology uses a different characteristic of glioma tissue to identify and differentiate tumor tissue from normal brain and is most effective in the context of anatomic, connectomic, and neurophysiologic context. While each tool is able to enhance resection, multiple modalities are often used in conjunction to achieve maximal safe resection. This paper reviews the mechanism and utility of the major adjuncts available for use in glioma surgery, especially in tumors within eloquent areas, and puts forth the foundation for a unified approach to how leverage currently available technology to ensure maximal safe resection.

Impact of 3-Dimensional Versus 2-Dimensional Image Distortion Correction on Stereotactic Neurosurgical Navigation Image Fusion Reliability for Images Acquired With Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

Fusion of preoperative and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) studies during stereotactic navigation may be very useful for procedures such as tumor resections but can be subject to error because of image distortion.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of 3-dimensional (3D) vs 2-dimensional (2D) image distortion correction on the accuracy of auto-merge image fusion for stereotactic neurosurgical images acquired with iMRI using a head phantom in different surgical positions.

METHODS

T1-weighted intraoperative images of the head phantom were obtained using 1.5T iMRI. Images were postprocessed with 2D and 3D image distortion correction. These studies were fused to T1-weighted preoperative MRI studies performed on a 1.5T diagnostic MRI. The reliability of the auto-merge fusion of these images for 2D and 3D correction techniques was assessed both manually using the stereotactic navigation system and via image analysis software.

RESULTS

Eight surgical positions of the head phantom were imaged with iMRI. Greater image distortion occurred with increased distance from isocenter in all 3 axes, reducing accuracy of image fusion to preoperative images. Visually reliable image fusions were accomplished in 2/8 surgical positions using 2D distortion correction and 5/8 using 3D correction. Three-dimensional correction yielded superior image registration quality as defined by higher maximum mutual information values, with improvements ranging between 2.3% and 14.3% over 2D correction.

CONCLUSION

Using 3D distortion correction enhanced the reliability of surgical navigation auto-merge fusion of phantom images acquired with iMRI across a wider range of head positions and may improve the accuracy of stereotactic navigation using iMRI images.

Initial Experience Using Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging During a Trans-Sulcal Tubular Retractor Approach for the Resection of Deep-Seated Brain Tumors: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Treatment of deep-seated subcortical intrinsic brain tumors remains challenging and may be improved with trans-sulcal tubular brain retraction techniques coupled with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI).

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a preliminary assessment of feasibility and efficacy of iMRI in tubular retractor-guided resections of intrinsic brain tumors.

METHODS

Assessment of this technique and impact upon outcomes were assessed in a preliminary series of brain tumor patients from 2 centers.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent resection with a tubular retractor system and iMRI. Mean age was 53.2 ± 9.0 yr (range: 37-61 yr, 80% male). Lesions included 6 gliomas (3 glioblastomas, 1 recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma, and 2 low-grade gliomas) and 4 brain metastases (1 renal cell, 1 breast, 1 lung, and 1 melanoma). Mean maximal tumor diameter was 2.9 ± 0.95 cm (range 1.2-4.3 cm). The iMRI demonstrated subtotal resection (STR) in 6 of 10 cases (60%); additional resection was performed in 5 of 6 cases (83%), reducing STR rate to 2 of 10 cases (20%), with both having tumor encroaching on eloquent structures. Seven patients (70%) were stable or improved neurologically immediately postoperatively. Three patients (30%) had new postoperative neurological deficits, 2 of which were transient. Average hospital length of stay was 3.4 ± 2.0 d (range: 1-7 d).

CONCLUSION

Combining iMRI with tubular brain retraction techniques is feasible and may improve the extent of resection of deep-seated intrinsic brain tumors that are incompletely visualized with the smaller surgical exposure of tubular retractors.

Impact of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Other Factors on Surgical Outcomes for Newly Diagnosed Grade II Astrocytomas and Oligodendrogliomas: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Few studies use large, multi-institutional patient cohorts to examine the role of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in the resection of grade II gliomas.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of iMRI and other factors on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for newly diagnosed grade II astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of a multicenter database assessed the impact of patient-, treatment-, and tumor-related factors on OS and PFS.

RESULTS

A total of 232 resections (112 astrocytomas and 120 oligodendrogliomas) were analyzed. Oligodendrogliomas had longer OS (P &lt; .001) and PFS (P = .01) than astrocytomas. Multivariate analyses demonstrated improved OS for gross total resection (GTR) vs subtotal resection (STR; P = .006, hazard ratio [HR]: .23) and near total resection (NTR; P = .02, HR: .64). GTR vs STR (P = .02, HR: .54), GTR vs NTR (P = .04, HR: .49), and iMRI use (P = .02, HR: .54) were associated with longer PFS. Frontal (P = .048, HR: 2.11) and occipital/parietal (P = .003, HR: 3.59) locations were associated with shorter PFS (vs temporal). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed longer OS with increasing extent of surgical resection (EOR) (P = .03) and 1p/19q gene deletions (P = .02). PFS improved with increasing EOR (P = .01), GTR vs NTR (P = .02), and resections above STR (P = .04). Factors influencing adjuvant treatment (35.3% of patients) included age (P = .002, odds ratio [OR]: 1.04) and EOR (P = .003, OR: .39) but not glioma subtype or location. Additional tumor resection after iMRI was performed in 105/159 (66%) iMRI cases, yielding GTR in 54.5% of these instances.

CONCLUSION

EOR is a major determinant of OS and PFS for patients with grade II astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Intraoperative MRI may improve EOR and was associated with increased PFS.

The Ethical Dilemma in the Surgical Management of Low Grade Gliomas According to the Variable Availability of Resources and Surgeon Experience

Low grade gliomas (LGGs) affect young individuals in the prime of life. Management may alternatively include biopsy and observation or surgical resection. Recent evidence strongly favors maximal and supramaximal resection of LGGs in optimizing survival metrics. Awake craniotomy with cortical mapping and electrical stimulation along with other preoperative and intraoperative surgical adjuncts, including intraoperative magnetic resonance and diffusion tensor imaging, facilitates maximization of resection and eschews precipitating neurological deficits. Intraoperative imaging permits additional resection of identified residual to be completed within the same surgical session, improving extent of resection and consequently progression free and overall survival. These resources are available in only a few centers throughout the United States, raising an ethical dilemma as to where patients harboring LGGs should most appropriately be treated.

Image Guidance in Cranial Neurosurgery: How a Six-Ton Magnet and Fluorescent Colors Make Brain Tumor Surgery Better

Maximal safe resection can improve patient outcomes for a variety of brain tumor types including low- and high-grade gliomas, pituitary adenomas, and other pathologies. Numerous intraoperative adjuncts exist to guide surgeons with maximizing extent of resection. Three distinct strategies exist including: 1) surgical navigation; 2) intraoperative imaging; and 3) tumor fluorescence. Surgical navigation involves registration of high-resolution three-dimensional imaging to the patient's cranial surface anatomy, allowing real-time localization of tumor and brain structures. Intraoperative imaging devices like intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI), intraoperative computed tomography (iCT), 3-D fluoroscopy, and intraoperative ultrasonography (iUS) allow near real time visualization to assess the extent of resection. Intraoperative fluorescence via intravenous fluorescein or oral 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) causes brain tumors to "light up", which can be viewed through surgical optics using selective filters and specific wavelength light sources. A general overview, as well as implementation and utilization of some of these image guidance strategies at Washington University and by Siteman Cancer Center neurosurgeons at Barnes Jewish Hospital, is discussed in this review.

A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Factors Influencing Surgical Outcomes for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Grade I Gliomas

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI), extent of resection (EOR), and other factors on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with newly diagnosed grade I gliomas.

METHODS

A multicenter database was queried to identify patients with grade I gliomas. Retrospective analyses assessed the impact of patient, treatment, and tumor characteristics on OS and PFS.

RESULTS

A total of 284 patients underwent treatment for grade I gliomas, including 248 resections (205 with iMRI, 43 without), 23 biopsies, and 13 laser interstitial thermal therapy treatments. Log-rank analyses of Kaplan-Meier plots showed improved 5-year OS (P = 0.0107) and PFS (P = 0.0009) with increasing EOR, and a trend toward improved 5-year OS for patients with lower American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P = 0.0528). Greater EOR was associated with significantly increased 5-year PFS for pilocytic astrocytoma (P < 0.0001), but not for ganglioglioma (P = 0.10) or dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (P = 0.57). Temporal tumors (P = 0.04) and location of "other" (P = 0.04) were associated with improved PFS, and occipital/parietal tumors (P = 0.02) were associated with decreased PFS compared with all other locations. Additional tumor resection was performed after iMRI in 49.7% of cases using iMRI, which produced gross total resection in 64% of these additional resection cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with grade I gliomas have extended OS and PFS, which correlates positively with increasing EOR, especially for patients with pilocytic astrocytoma. iMRI may increase EOR, indicated by the rate of gross total resection after iMRI use but was not independently associated with increased OS or PFS.

Evaluation of pediatric glioma outcomes using intraoperative MRI: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

The use of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) during treatment of gliomas may increase extent of resection (EOR), decrease need for early reoperation, and increase progression-free and overall survival, but has not been fully validated, particularly in the pediatric population.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of iMRI to identify residual tumor in pediatric patients with glioma and determine the effect of iMRI on decisions for resection, complication rates, and other outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a multicenter database of pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years) who underwent resection of pathologically confirmed gliomas.

RESULTS

We identified 314 patients (mean age 9.7 ± 4.6 years) with mean follow-up of 48.3 ± 33.6 months (range 0.03-182.07 months) who underwent surgery with iMRI. There were 201 (64.0%) WHO grade I tumors, 57 (18.2%) grade II, 24 (7.6%) grade III, 9 (2.9%) grade IV, and 23 (7.3%) not classified. Among 280 patients who underwent resection using iMRI, 131 (46.8%) had some residual tumor and underwent additional resection after the first iMRI. Of the 33 tissue specimens sent for pathological analysis after iMRI, 29 (87.9%) showed positive tumor pathology. Gross total resection was identified in 156 patients (55.7%), but this was limited by 69 (24.6%) patients with unknown EOR.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of the largest multicenter database of pediatric gliomas resected using iMRI demonstrated additional tumor resection in a substantial portion of cases. However, determining the impact of iMRI on EOR and outcomes remains challenging because iMRI use varies among providers nationally. Continued refinement of iMRI techniques for use in pediatric patients with glioma may improve outcomes.

Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Glioma Resections in Awake or Asleep Settings and Feasibility in the Context of a Public Health System

Background

Despite the most recent surgical aids and tools, surgical removal of infiltrating brain tumors remains a challenge. Unclear margins, edematous areas, and infiltrative behavior are the main causes for failing gross total removals. Also, excessive resection of peri-tumoral tissue often carries risks of damaging the nearby functioning cortical and subcortical structures with an unacceptable decrease in patient's quality of life and postoperative functional status, and the risk of making patients not eligible to adjuvant treatments. Awake surgery and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) are among the most effective aids in preventing damage to functional brain while maximizing the extent of resection.

Methods

We present our series of 46 patients operated on at Southmead Hospital (North Bristol NHS Trust) in between July 2014 and February 2017 using ioMRI plus or minus awake surgery. Setting, patient features, indications, type and size of tumors, surgical times, extent of resection, morbidity, and survival are analyzed and discussed.

Results

Overall, ioMRI check led to a +43% resections in Group 1 and +58% in Group 2. In grade 2 tumors, GTR was 46% in Group 1 and 55% in Group 2 (41% in control group). In grade 3 tumors, GTR was 57% in Group 1 and 66% in Group 2 (30% in control group). In Grade 4 tumors, GTR was 63% in Group 1, 66% in Group 2 (36% in control group). In terms of theatre occupation, the use of ioMRI added 1/2 operative session; the addition of awake surgery implied the use of another 1/2 operative session. Morbidity did not differ among the groups, with low incidence of permanent post-operative deficits (<5%). Group 2 OS was statistically longer when compared to the control group.

Conclusions

Using ioMRI together with awake surgery is demanding for the anesthetic team, staff nurses, and for the patient. Nevertheless, low morbidity, greater total resections rates, and longer survival suggest its use is effective in making more approachable gliomas of all grades that we would consider “complex” due to their intrinsic features or locations.

The Role of Intraoperative MRI in Awake Neurosurgical Procedures: A Systematic Review

Background: Awake craniotomy for brain tumors remains an important tool in the arsenal of the treating neurosurgeon working in eloquent areas of the brain. Furthermore, with the implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (I-MRI), one can afford the luxury of imaging to assess surgical resection of the underlying gross imaging defined neuropathology and the surrounding eloquent areas. Ideally, the combination of I-MRI and awake craniotomy could provide the maximal lesion resection with the least morbidity and mortality. However, more resection with the aid of real time imaging and awake craniotomy techniques might give opposite outcome results. The goal of this systematic review.is to identify the available literature on combined I-MRI and awake craniotomy techniques, to better understand the potential morbidity and mortality associated.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception up to December 2016. A total of 10 articles met inclusion in to the review, with a total of 324 adult patients.

Results: All studies showed transient neurological deficits between 2.9 to 76.4%. In regards to persistent morbidity, the mean was ~10% (ranges from zero to 35.3%) with a follow up period between 5 days and 6 months.

Conclusion: The preliminary results of this review also suggest this combined technique may impose acceptable post-operative complication profiles and morbidity. However, this is based on low quality evidence, and is therefore questionable. Further, well-designed future trials with the long-term follow-up are needed to provide various aspects of feasibility and outcome data for this approach.

Awake craniotomy in glioma surgery: is it necessary?

INTRODUCTION

The awake craniotomy has evolved from its humble beginnings in ancient cultures to become one of the most eloquent modern neurosurgical procedures. The development of intraoperative mapping techniques like direct electrostimulation of the cortex and subcortical white matter have further argued for its place in the neurosurgeon's armamentarium. Yet the suitability of the awake craniotomy with intraoperative functional mapping (ACWM) to optimize oncofunctional balance after peri-eloquent glioma resection continues to be a topic of active investigation as new methods of intraoperative monitoring and some unfavorable outcome data question its necessity.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The neurosurgery and anesthesiology literatures were scoured for English-language studies that analyzed or reviewed the ACWM or its components as applied to glioma surgery via the PubMed, ClinicalKey, and OvidMEDLINE® databases or via direct online searches of journal archives.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Information on background, conceptualization, standard techniques, and outcomes of the ACWM were provided and compared. We parceled the procedure into its components and qualitatively described positive and negative outcome data for each. Findings were presented in the context of each study without attempt at quantitative analysis or reconciliation of heterogeneity between studies. Certain illustrative studies were highlighted throughout the review. Overarching conclusions were drawn based on level of evidence, expert opinion, and predominate concordance of data across studies in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Most investigators and studies agree that the ACWM is the best currently available approach to optimize oncofunctional balance in this difficult-to-treat patient population. This qualitative review synthesizes the most currently available data on the topic to provide contemporaneous insight into how and why the ACWM has become a favorite operation of neurosurgeons worldwide for the resection of gliomas from eloquent brain.

Chemical and structural variations in hazelnut and soybean oils after ozone treatments

In the present work, the effect of ozone treatments on the structural properties of soybean oil (SBO) and hazelnut oil (HO) were investigated. The study presents the findings and results about the oxidation of HO and SBO with ozone, which has not been fully studied previously. The HO and SBO were treated with ozone gas for 1, 5, 15, 30, 60, 180 and 360 min. The ozone reactivity with the SBO and HO during the ozone treatment was analyzed by 1H, 13C NMR, FTIR and GC. The iodine value, viscosity and color variables (L*, a* and b*) of untreated and ozone treated oils were determined. Reaction products were identified according to the Criegee mechanism. New signals at 5.15 and 104.35 ppm were assigned to the ring protons of 1,2,4- trioxolane (secondary ozonide) in the ozonated oils in 1H and 13C NMR, respectively. Ozonated oils exhibited peaks at 9.75 and 2.43 ppm in 1H and NMR, which corresponded to the aldehydic proton and α-methylene group and to the carbonyl carbon, respectively. The peak at 43.9 ppm in 13C NMR was related to the α-methylene group and to the carbonyl carbon. The new signals formed in the ozonation process gradually increased with respect to ozone treatment time. After 360 min of ozone treatment, the carbon-carbon double bond signal, which belongs to the unsaturated fatty acids, disappeared completely in the spectrum. An increase in viscosity, a decrease in iodine value and a dramatic reduction in b* of the oil samples on (+) axis were observed with increased ozone treatment time.

Contribution of combined intraoperative electrophysiological investigation with 3-T intraoperative MRI for awake cerebral glioma surgery: comprehensive review of the clinical implications and radiological outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the clinical efficiency of combined awake craniotomy with 3-T intraoperative MRI (iMRI)-guided resection of gliomas adjacent to eloquent cortex performed at a single center. It also sought to explore the contribution of iMRI to surgeons' learning process of maximal safe resection of gliomas.

METHODS

All patients who underwent an awake craniotomy and iMRI for resection of eloquent area glioma during the 53 months between January 2011 and June 2015 were included. The cases were analyzed for short- and long-term neurological outcome, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and extent of resection (EOR). The learning curve was assessed after dividing the cohort into Group A (first 27 months) and Group B (last 26 months). Statistical analyses included univariate logistic regression analysis on clinical and radiological variables. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used for further analysis of OS and PFS. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

One hundred six patients were included in the study. Over an average follow-up period of 24.8 months, short- and long-term worsening of the neurological function was noted in 48 (46.2%) and 9 (8.7%) cases, respectively. The median and mean EOR were 100% and 92%, respectively, and complete radiographic resection was achieved in 64 (60.4%) patients. The rate of gross-total resection (GTR) in the patients with low-grade glioma (89.06% ± 19.6%) was significantly lower than that in patients with high-grade glioma (96.4% ± 9.1%) (p = 0.026). Thirty (28.3%) patients underwent further resection after initial iMRI scanning, with a 10.1% increase of the mean EOR. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling demonstrated that the final EOR was a significant predictor of PFS (HR 0.225, 95% CI 0.070-0.723, p = 0.012). For patients with high-grade glioma, the GTR (p = 0.033), the presence of short-term motor deficit (p = 0.027), and the WHO grade (p = 0.005) were independent prognostic factors of OS. Performing further resection after the iMRI (p = 0.083) and achieving GTR (p = 0.05) demonstrated a PFS benefit trend for the patients affected by a low-grade glioma. Over time, the rate of performing further resection after an iMRI decreased by 26.1% (p = 0.005). A nonsignificant decrease in the rate of short-term (p = 0.101) and long-term (p = 0.132) neurological deficits was equally noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined awake craniotomy and iMRI is a safe and efficient technique allowing maximal safe resection of eloquent area gliomas with possible subsequent OS and PFS benefits. Although there is a learning curve for applying this technique, it can also improve the surgeon's ability in eloquent glioma surgery.

"Next Door" intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for awake craniotomy: Preliminary experience and technical note

BACKGROUND

During glioma surgery "maximal safe resection" must be the main goal. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) associated with awake craniotomy (AC) is a valuable tool to achieve this objective. In this article, AC with a "next-door" iMRI concept is described in a stepwise protocol.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 18 patients submitted to AC using iMRI; a stepwise protocol is also discussed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 41.7 years. Hemiparesis, aphasia, and seizures were the main initial symptoms of the patients. Sixty-six percent of the tumors were located in the left hemisphere. All tumors were near or within eloquent areas. Fifty-three percent of the cases were glioblastomas multiforme and 47% of the patients had low grade gliomas. The mean surgical time and iMRI time were 4 h 4 min and 30 min, respectively. New resection was performed in 33% after iMRI. Extent of resection (EOR) higher than 95% was possible in 66.7% of the patients. The main reason of EOR lower than 95% was positive mapping of eloquent areas (6 patients). Eighty percent of the patients experienced improvement of their deficits immediately after the surgery or had a stable clinical status whereas 20% had neurological deterioration, however, all of them improved after 30 days.

CONCLUSION

AC associated with "next-door" iMRI is a complex procedure, but if performed using a meticulous technique, it may improve the overall tumor resection and safety of the patients.

Pathological and Topographical Classification of Craniopharyngiomas: A Literature Review

Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are clinically relevant tumors of the sellar region and are associated with high morbidity and occasional mortality. There are two different subtypes of CPs that differ clinically and pathologically: adamantinomatous CP and papillary CP. The differential diagnosis is still challenging even with developments in preoperative imaging as several tumors of the sellar/parasellar region share a continuum of clinical characteristics and imaging similarities. Several topographical classifications of CPs have been mentioned in literature, but to date, there has not been a consensus on a standard reference classification system and there is need to a develop such a model.

The Value of Pre- and Intraoperative Adjuncts on the Extent of Resection of Hemispheric Low-Grade Gliomas: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

To achieve maximal resection with minimal risk of postoperative neurologic morbidity, different neurosurgical adjuncts are being used during low-grade glioma (LGG) surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of pre- and intraoperative adjuncts on the extent of resection (EOR) of hemispheric LGGs.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed to identify patients of any sex, ≥ 18 years of age, who underwent LGG surgery at X Hospital between January 2005 and July 2013. Patients were divided into eight subgroups based on the use of various combinations of a neuronavigation system alone (NN), functional MRI-diffusion tensor imaging (fMRI-DTI) guided neuronavigation (FD), intraoperative MRI (MR), and direct electrical stimulation (DES). Initial and residual tumors were measured, and mean EOR was compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of all 128 patients, gross total resection was achieved in 23.4%. Overall mean EOR was 81.3% ± 20.5%. Using DES in combination with fMRI-DTI (mean EOR: 86.7% ± 12.4%) on eloquent tumors improved mean EOR significantly after adjustment for potential confounders when compared with NN alone (mean EOR: 76.4% ± 25.5%; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Using DES in combination with fMRI and DTI significantly improves EOR when LGGs are located in eloquent areas compared with craniotomies in which only NN was used.

Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Intracranial Glioma Resection: A Single-Center, Retrospective Blinded Volumetric Study

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IoMRI) was devised to overcome brain shifts during craniotomies. Yet, the acceptance of IoMRI is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate impact of IoMRI on intracranial glioma resection outcome including overall patient survival.

METHODS

A retrospective review of records was performed on a cohort of 164 consecutive patients who underwent resection surgery for newly diagnosed intracranial gliomas either with or without IoMRI technology performed by 2 neurosurgeons in our center. Patient follow-up was at least 5 years. Extent of resection (EOR) was calculated using pre- and postoperative contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR-images. Adjusted analysis was performed to compare gross total resection (GTR), EOR, permanent surgery-associated neurologic deficit, and overall survival between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Overall median EOR was 92.1%, and 97.45% with IoMRI use and 89.9% without IoMRI, with crude (unadjusted) P < 0.005. GTR was achieved in 49.3% of IoMRI cases, versus in only 21.4% of no-IoMRI cases, P < 0.001. GTR achieved was more with the use of IoMRI among gliomas located in both eloquent and noneloquent brain areas, P = 0.017 and <0.001, respectively. Permanent surgery-associated neurologic deficit was not (statistically) more significant with no-IoMRI, P = 0.284 (13.8% vs. 6.7%). In addition, the IoMRI group had better 5-year overall survival, P < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the use of IoMRI was associated with greater rates of EOR and GTR, and better overall 5-year survival in both eloquent brain areas located and non-eloquent brain areas located gliomas, with no increased risk of neurologic complication.

Awake craniotomy for supratentorial gliomas: why, when and how?

Awake craniotomy has become an increasingly utilized procedure in the treatment of supratentorial intra-axial tumors. The popularity of this procedure is partially attributable to improvements in intraoperative technology and anesthetic techniques. The application of awake craniotomy to the field of neuro-oncology has decreased iatrogenic postoperative neurological deficits, allowed for safe maximal tumor resection and improved healthcare resource stewardship by permitting early patient discharge. In this article, we review recent evidence for the utility of awake craniotomy in the resection of gliomas and describe the senior author's experience in performing this procedure. Furthermore, we explore innovative applications of awake craniotomy to outpatient tumor resections and the conduct of neurosurgery in resource-poor settings. We conclude that awake craniotomy is an effective and versatile neurosurgical procedure with expanding applications in neuro-oncology.

Combined high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy increase extent of resection and progression-free survival for pituitary adenomas

PURPOSE

The clinical benefit of combined intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) and endoscopy for transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection has not been completely characterized. This study assessed the impact of microscopy, endoscopy, and/or iMRI on progression-free survival, extent of resection status (gross-, near-, and sub-total resection), and operative complications.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses were performed on 446 transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgeries at a single institution between 1998 and 2012. Multivariate analyses were used to control for baseline characteristics, differences during extent of resection status, and progression-free survival analysis.

RESULTS

Additional surgery was performed after iMRI in 56/156 cases (35.9%), which led to increased extent of resection status in 15/156 cases (9.6%). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression revealed no increase in extent of resection status following iMRI or endoscopy alone; however, combining these modalities increased extent of resection status (odds ratio 2.05, 95% CI 1.21-3.46) compared to conventional transsphenoidal microsurgery. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that reduced extent of resection status shortened progression-free survival for near- versus gross-total resection [hazard ratio (HR) 2.87, 95% CI 1.24-6.65] and sub- versus near-total resection (HR 2.10; 95% CI 1.00-4.40). Complication comparisons between microscopy, endoscopy, and iMRI revealed increased perioperative deaths for endoscopy versus microscopy (4/209 and 0/237, respectively), but this difference was non-significant considering multiple post hoc comparisons (Fisher exact, p = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined use of endoscopy and iMRI increased pituitary adenoma extent of resection status compared to conventional transsphenoidal microsurgery, and increased extent of resection status was associated with longer progression-free survival. Treatment modality combination did not significantly impact complication rate.

Awake craniotomy for gliomas in a high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging suite: analysis of 42 cases

OBJECTIVES

The object of this study was to describe the experience of combining awake craniotomy techniques with high-field (1.5 T) intraoperative MRI (iMRI) for tumors adjacent to eloquent cortex.

METHODS

From a prospective database the authors obtained and evaluated the records of all patients who had undergone awake craniotomy procedures with cortical and subcortical mapping in the iMRI suite. The integration of these two modalities was assessed with respect to safety, operative times, workflow, extent of resection (EOR), and neurological outcome.

RESULTS

Between February 2010 and December 2011, 42 awake craniotomy procedures using iMRI were performed in 41 patients for the removal of intraaxial tumors. There were 31 left-sided and 11 right-sided tumors. In half of the cases (21 [50%] of 42), the patient was kept awake for both motor and speech mapping. The mean duration of surgery overall was 7.3 hours (range 4.0-13.9 hours). The median EOR overall was 90%, and gross-total resection (EOR ≥ 95%) was achieved in 17 cases (40.5%). After viewing the first MR images after initial resection, further resection was performed in 17 cases (40.5%); the mean EOR in these cases increased from 56% to 67% after further resection. No deficits were observed preoperatively in 33 cases (78.5%), and worsening neurological deficits were noted immediately after surgery in 11 cases (26.2%). At 1 month after surgery, however, worsened neurological function was observed in only 1 case (2.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a learning curve with regard to patient positioning and setup times, although it did not adversely affect patient outcomes. Awake craniotomy can be safely performed in a high-field (1.5 T) iMRI suite to maximize tumor resection in eloquent brain areas with an acceptable morbidity profile at 1 month.

Intraoperative cortico-cortical evoked potentials for the evaluation of language function during brain tumor resection: initial experience with 13 cases

OBJECTIVES

The objective in the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEP) monitoring for the intraoperative assessment of speech function during resection of brain tumors.

METHODS

Intraoperative monitoring of CCEP was applied in 13 patients (mean age 34 ± 14 years) during the removal of neoplasms located within or close to language-related structures in the dominant cerebral hemisphere. For this purpose strip electrodes were positioned above the frontal language area (FLA) and temporal language area (TLA), which were identified with direct cortical stimulation and/or preliminary mapping with the use of implanted chronic subdural grid electrodes. The CCEP response was defined as the highest observed negative peak in either direction of stimulation. In 12 cases the tumor was resected during awake craniotomy.

RESULTS

An intraoperative CCEP response was not obtained in one case because of technical problems. In the other patients it was identified from the FLA during stimulation of the TLA (7 cases) and from the TLA during stimulation of the FLA (5 cases), with a mean peak latency of 83 ± 15 msec. During tumor resection the CCEP response was unchanged in 5 cases, decreased in 4, and disappeared in 3. Postoperatively, all 7 patients with a decreased or absent CCEP response after lesion removal experienced deterioration in speech function. In contrast, in 5 cases with an unchanged intraoperative CCEP response, speaking abilities after surgery were preserved at the preoperative level, except in one patient who experienced not dysphasia, but dysarthria due to pyramidal tract injury. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The time required to recover speech function was also significantly associated with the type of intraoperative change in CCEP recordings (p < 0.01) and was, on average, 1.8 ± 1.0, 5.5 ± 1.0, and 11.0 ± 3.6 months, respectively, if the response was unchanged, was decreased, or had disappeared.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring CCEP is feasible during the resection of brain tumors affecting language-related cerebral structures. In the intraoperative evaluation of speech function, it can be a helpful adjunct or can be used in its direct assessment with cortical and subcortical mapping during awake craniotomy. It can also be used to predict the prognosis of language disorders after surgery and decide on the optimal resection of a neoplasm.

Awake craniotomy may further improve neurological outcome of intraoperative MRI-guided brain tumor surgery

BACKGROUND

Results of awake craniotomy are compared to results of resections done under general anesthesia in patients operated with IMRI control. We hypothesized that stimulation of the cortex and white matter during awake surgery supplements IMRI control allowing for safer resection of eloquent brain area tumors.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 20 consecutive patients undergoing awake craniotomy with IMRI control. Resection outcome of these patients was compared to a control group of 20 patients operated in the same IMRI suite but under general anesthesia without cortical stimulation. The control group was composed of those patients whose age, sex, tumor location, recurrence and histology best matched to patients in study group.

RESULTS

Cortical stimulation identified functional cortex in eight patients (40 %). Postoperatively the neurological condition in 16 patients (80 %) in the study group was unchanged or improved compared with 13 patients (65 %) in the control group. In both groups, three patients (15 %) had transient impairment symptoms. There was one patient (5 %) with permanent neurological impairment in the study group compared to four patients (20 %) in the control group. These differences between groups were not statistically significant. There was no surgical mortality in either group and the overall infection rate was 5 %. Mean operation time was 4 h 45 min in the study group and 3 h 15 min in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The study consisted of a limited patient series, but it implies that awake craniotomy with bipolar cortical stimulation may help to reduce the risk of postoperative impairment following resection of tumors located in or near speech and motor areas also under IMRI control.

Awake language mapping and 3-Tesla intraoperative MRI-guided volumetric resection for gliomas in language areas

The use of both awake surgery and intraoperative MRI (iMRI) has been reported to optimize the maximal safe resection of gliomas. However, there has been little research into combining these two demanding procedures. We report our unique experience with, and methodology of, awake surgery in a movable iMRI system, and we quantitatively evaluate the contribution of the combination on the extent of resection (EOR) and functional outcome of patients with gliomas involving language areas. From March 2011 to November 2011, 30 consecutive patients who underwent awake surgery with iMRI guidance were prospectively investigated. The EOR was assessed by volumetric analysis. Language assessment was conducted before surgery and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery using the Aphasia Battery of Chinese. Awake language mapping integrated with 3.0 Tesla iMRI was safely performed for all patients. An additional resection was conducted in 11 of 30 patients (36.7%) after iMRI. The median EOR significantly increased from 92.5% (range, 75.1-97.0%) to 100% (range, 92.6-100%) as a result of iMRI (p<0.01). Gross total resection was achieved in 18 patients (60.0%), and in seven of those patients (23.3%), the gross total resection could be attributed to iMRI. A total of 12 patients (40.0%) suffered from transient language deficits; however, only one (3.3%) patient developed a permanent deficit. This study demonstrates the potential utility of combining awake craniotomy with iMRI; it is safe and reliable to perform awake surgery using a movable iMRI.

"Awake" intraoperative functional MRI (ai-fMRI) for mapping the eloquent cortex: Is it possible in awake craniotomy?

As a promising noninvasive imaging technique, functional MRI (fMRI) has been extensively adopted as a functional localization procedure for surgical planning. However, the information provided by preoperative fMRI (pre-fMRI) is hampered by the brain deformation that is secondary to surgical procedures. Therefore, intraoperative fMRI (i-fMRI) becomes a potential alternative that can compensate for brain shifts by updating the functional localization information during craniotomy. However, previous i-fMRI studies required that patients be under general anesthesia, preventing the wider application of such a technique as the patients cannot perform tasks unless they are awake. In this study, we propose a new technique that combines awake surgery and i-fMRI, named “awake” i-fMRI (ai-fMRI). We introduced ai-fMRI to the real-time localization of sensorimotor areas during awake craniotomy in seven patients. The results showed that ai-fMRI could successfully detect activations in the bilateral primary sensorimotor areas and supplementary motor areas for all patients, indicating the feasibility of this technique in eloquent area localization. The reliability of ai-fMRI was further validated using intraoperative stimulation mapping (ISM) in two of the seven patients. Comparisons between the pre-fMRI-derived localization result and the ai-fMRI derived result showed that the former was subject to a heavy brain shift and led to incorrect localization, while the latter solved that problem. Additionally, the approaches for the acquisition and processing of the ai-fMRI data were fully illustrated and described. Some practical issues on employing ai-fMRI in awake craniotomy were systemically discussed, and guidelines were provided.

The role of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in glioma surgery

For patients with gliomas, the goal of surgery is to maximize the extent of tumor resection while avoiding injury to functional tissue. The hope is to improve patients' survival and maintain the highest quality of life as possible. However, because of the infiltrative nature of gliomas these two goals often oppose each other so a compromise must be met. Many tools have been developed to help with this challenge of glioma surgery. Over the past two decades, intraoperative-magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) has emerged as an increasingly important modality to enhance surgical safety while providing the surgeon with updated information to guide their resection. Here the authors review the studies that demonstrate a positive correlation between extent of resection (EOR) and overall survival (OS), although the data is clearer in patients with low-grade gliomas (LGG) and still somewhat controversial in those with higher-grade tumors. We will then review some of the studies that support the role of iMRI and how it has impacted glioma surgery by increasing the EOR. The value of iMRI usage in regards to overall patient outcome can be extrapolated through its effect on EOR. Overall, available data support the safe use of iMRI and as an effective adjunct in glioma surgery.

Optimizing the extent of resection in eloquently located gliomas by combining intraoperative MRI guidance with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

Several methods have been introduced to improve the extent of resection in glioma surgery. Yet, radical tumor resections must not be attempted at the cost of neurological deterioration. We sought to assess whether the use of an intraoperative MRI (iMRI) in combination with multimodal neurophysiological monitoring is suitable to increase the extent of resection without endangering neurological function in patients with eloquently located gliomas. Fifty-four patients were included in this study. In 21 patients (38.9 %), iMRI led to additional tumor resection. A radiologically complete resection was achieved in 31 patients (57.4 %), while in 12 of these, iMRI had depicted residual tumor tissue before resection was continued. The mean extent of resection was 92.1 % according to volumetric analyses. Postoperatively, 13 patients (24.1 %) showed new or worsening of pre-existing sensory motor deficits. They were severe in 4 patients (7.4 %). There was no correlation between the occurrence of either any new (P = 0.77) or severe (P = 1.0) sensory motor deficit and continued resection after intraoperative image acquisition. Likewise, tumor location, histology, and tumor recurrence did not influence complication rate on uni- and multivariate analysis. We conclude that the combination of iMRI guidance with multimodal neurophysiological monitoring allows for extended resections in glioma surgery without inducing higher rates of neurological deficits, even in patients with eloquently located tumors.