Selective dispersal of avian rhombomere cells in orthotopic and heterotopic grafts

scMultiome analysis identifies embryonic hindbrain progenitors with mixed rhombomere identities

Rhombomeres serve to position neural progenitors in the embryonic hindbrain, thereby ensuring appropriate neural circuit formation, but the molecular identities of individual rhombomeres and the mechanism whereby they form has not been fully established. Here, we apply scMultiome analysis in zebrafish to molecularly resolve all rhombomeres for the first time. We find that rhombomeres become molecularly distinct between 10hpf (end of gastrulation) and 13hpf (early segmentation). While the embryonic hindbrain transiently contains alternating odd- versus even-type rhombomeres, our scMultiome analyses do not detect extensive odd versus even molecular characteristics in the early hindbrain. Instead, we find that each rhombomere displays a unique gene expression and chromatin profile. Prior to the appearance of distinct rhombomeres, we detect three hindbrain progenitor clusters (PHPDs) that correlate with the earliest visually observed segments in the hindbrain primordium that represent prospective rhombomere r2/r3 (possibly including r1), r4, and r5/r6, respectively. We further find that the PHPDs form in response to Fgf and RA morphogens and that individual PHPD cells co-express markers of multiple mature rhombomeres. We propose that the PHPDs contain mixed-identity progenitors and that their subdivision into individual rhombomeres requires the resolution of mixed transcription and chromatin states.

scMultiome analysis identifies embryonic hindbrain progenitors with mixed rhombomere identities

Rhombomeres serve to position neural progenitors in the embryonic hindbrain, thereby ensuring appropriate neural circuit formation, but the molecular identities of individual rhombomeres and the mechanism whereby they form have not been fully established. Here we apply scMultiome analysis in zebrafish to molecularly resolve all rhombomeres for the first time. We find that rhombomeres become molecularly distinct between 10hpf (end of gastrulation) and 13hpf (early segmentation). While the mature hindbrain consists of alternating odd- versus even-type rhombomeres, our scMultiome analyses do not detect extensive odd versus even characteristics in the early hindbrain. Instead, we find that each rhombomere displays a unique gene expression and chromatin profile. Prior to the appearance of distinct rhombomeres, we detect three hindbrain progenitor clusters (PHPDs) that correlate with the earliest visually observed segments in the hindbrain primordium and that represent prospective rhombomere r2/r3 (possibly including r1), r4 and r5/r6, respectively. We further find that the PHPDs form in response to Fgf and RA morphogens and that individual PHPD cells co-express markers of multiple mature rhombomeres. We propose that the PHPDs contain mixed-identity progenitors and that their subdivision into individual mature rhombomeres requires resolution of mixed transcription and chromatin states.

Tissue Rotation of the Xenopus Anterior-Posterior Neural Axis Reveals Profound but Transient Plasticity at the Mid-Gastrula Stage

The establishment of anterior-posterior (AP) regional identity is an essential step in the appropriate development of the vertebrate central nervous system. An important aspect of AP neural axis formation is the inherent plasticity that allows developing cells to respond to and recover from the various perturbations that embryos continually face during the course of development. While the mechanisms governing the regionalization of the nervous system have been extensively studied, relatively less is known about the nature and limits of early neural plasticity of the anterior-posterior neural axis. This study aims to characterize the degree of neural axis plasticity in Xenopus laevis by investigating the response of embryos to a 180-degree rotation of their AP neural axis during gastrula stages by assessing the expression of regional marker genes using in situ hybridization. Our results reveal the presence of a narrow window of time between the mid- and late gastrula stage, during which embryos are able undergo significant recovery following a 180-degree rotation of their neural axis and eventually express appropriate regional marker genes including Otx, Engrailed, and Krox. By the late gastrula stage, embryos show misregulation of regional marker genes following neural axis rotation, suggesting that this profound axial plasticity is a transient phenomenon that is lost by late gastrula stages.

Segmentation and patterning of the vertebrate hindbrain

During early development, the hindbrain is sub-divided into rhombomeres that underlie the organisation of neurons and adjacent craniofacial tissues. A gene regulatory network of signals and transcription factors establish and pattern segments with a distinct anteroposterior identity. Initially, the borders of segmental gene expression are imprecise, but then become sharply defined, and specialised boundary cells form. In this Review, we summarise key aspects of the conserved regulatory cascade that underlies the formation of hindbrain segments. We describe how the pattern is sharpened and stabilised through the dynamic regulation of cell identity, acting in parallel with cell segregation. Finally, we discuss evidence that boundary cells have roles in local patterning, and act as a site of neurogenesis within the hindbrain.

Transplantation of Neural Tissue: Quail-Chick Chimeras

Tissue transplantation is an important approach in developmental neurobiology to determine cell fate, to uncover inductive interactions required for tissue specification and patterning as well as to establish tissue competence and commitment. Combined with state-of-the-art molecular approaches, transplantation assays have been instrumental for the discovery of gene regulatory networks controlling cell fate choices and how such networks change over time. Avian species are among the favorite model systems for these approaches because of their accessibility and relatively large size. Here we describe two culture techniques used to generate quail-chick chimeras at different embryonic stages and methods to distinguish graft and donor tissue.

Cellular organization and boundary formation in craniofacial development

Craniofacial morphogenesis is a highly dynamic process that requires changes in the behaviors and physical properties of cells in order to achieve the proper organization of different craniofacial structures. Boundary formation is a critical process in cellular organization, patterning, and ultimately tissue separation. There are several recurring cellular mechanisms through which boundary formation and cellular organization occur including, transcriptional patterning, cell segregation, cell adhesion and migratory guidance. Disruption of normal boundary formation has dramatic morphological consequences, and can result in human craniofacial congenital anomalies. In this review we discuss boundary formation during craniofacial development, specifically focusing on the cellular behaviors and mechanisms underlying the self-organizing properties that are critical for craniofacial morphogenesis.

Segmental arithmetic: summing up the Hox gene regulatory network for hindbrain development in chordates

Organization and development of the early vertebrate hindbrain are controlled by a cascade of regulatory interactions that govern the process of segmentation and patterning along the anterior-posterior axis via Hox genes. These interactions can be assembled into a gene regulatory network that provides a framework to interpret experimental data, generate hypotheses, and identify gaps in our understanding of the progressive process of hindbrain segmentation. The network can be broadly separated into a series of interconnected programs that govern early signaling, segmental subdivision, secondary signaling, segmentation, and ultimately specification of segmental identity. Hox genes play crucial roles in multiple programs within this network. Furthermore, the network reveals properties and principles that are likely to be general to other complex developmental systems. Data from vertebrate and invertebrate chordate models are shedding light on the origin and diversification of the network. Comprehensive cis-regulatory analyses of vertebrate Hox gene regulation have enabled powerful cross-species gene regulatory comparisons. Such an approach in the sea lamprey has revealed that the network mediating segmental Hox expression was present in ancestral vertebrates and has been maintained across diverse vertebrate lineages. Invertebrate chordates lack hindbrain segmentation but exhibit conservation of some aspects of the network, such as a role for retinoic acid in establishing nested Hox expression domains. These comparisons lead to a model in which early vertebrates underwent an elaboration of the network between anterior-posterior patterning and Hox gene expression, leading to the gene-regulatory programs for segmental subdivision and rhombomeric segmentation. WIREs Dev Biol 2017, 6:e286. doi: 10.1002/wdev.286 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Membrane-mediated regulation of vascular identity

Vascular diseases span diverse pathology, but frequently arise from aberrant signaling attributed to specific membrane-associated molecules, particularly the Eph-ephrin family. Originally recognized as markers of embryonic vessel identity, Eph receptors and their membrane-associated ligands, ephrins, are now known to have a range of vital functions in vascular physiology. Interactions of Ephs with ephrins at cell-to-cell interfaces promote a variety of cellular responses such as repulsion, adhesion, attraction, and migration, and frequently occur during organ development, including vessel formation. Elaborate coordination of Eph- and ephrin-related signaling among different cell populations is required for proper formation of the embryonic vessel network. There is growing evidence supporting the idea that Eph and ephrin proteins also have postnatal interactions with a number of other membrane-associated signal transduction pathways, coordinating translation of environmental signals into cells. This article provides an overview of membrane-bound signaling mechanisms that define vascular identity in both the embryo and the adult, focusing on Eph- and ephrin-related signaling. We also discuss the role and clinical significance of this signaling system in normal organ development, neoplasms, and vascular pathologies.

Segment Identity and Cell Segregation in the Vertebrate Hindbrain

The subdivision of tissues into sharply demarcated regions with distinct and homogenous identity is an essential aspect of embryonic development. Along the anteroposterior axis of the vertebrate nervous system, this involves signaling which induces spatially restricted expression of transcription factors that specify regional identity. The spatial expression of such transcription factors is initially imprecise, with overlapping expression of genes that specify distinct identities, and a ragged border at the interface of adjacent regions. This pattern becomes sharpened by establishment of mutually exclusive expression of transcription factors, and by cell segregation that underlies formation of a straight border. In this review, we discuss studies of the vertebrate hindbrain which have revealed how discrete regional identity is established, the roles of Eph-ephrin signaling in cell segregation and border sharpening, and how cell identity and cell segregation are coupled.

Regulation of cell differentiation by Eph receptor and ephrin signaling

There is increasing evidence that in addition to having major roles in morphogenesis, in some tissues Eph receptor and ephrin signaling regulates the differentiation of cells. In one mode of deployment, cell contact dependent Eph-ephrin activation induces a distinct fate of cells at the interface of their expression domains, for example in early ascidian embryos and in the vertebrate hindbrain. In another mode, overlapping Eph receptor and ephrin expression underlies activation within a cell population, which promotes or inhibits cell differentiation in bone remodelling, neural progenitors and keratinocytes. Eph-ephrin activation also contributes to formation of the appropriate number of progenitor cells by increasing or decreasing cell proliferation. These multiple roles of Eph receptor and ephrin signaling may enable a coupling between morphogenesis and the differentiation and proliferation of cells.

Mechanisms of boundary formation by Eph receptor and ephrin signaling

The formation of sharp borders, across which cell intermingling is restricted, has a crucial role in the establishment and maintenance of organized tissues. Signaling of Eph receptors and ephrins underlies formation of a number of boundaries between and within tissues during vertebrate development. Eph-ephrin signaling can regulate several types of cell response-adhesion, repulsion and tension-that can in principle underlie the segregation of cells and formation of sharp borders. Recent studies have implicated each of these cell responses as having important roles at different boundaries: repulsion at the mesoderm-ectoderm border, decreased adhesion at the notochord-presomitic mesoderm border, and tension at boundaries within the hindbrain and forebrain. These distinct responses to Eph receptor and ephrin activation may in part be due to the adhesive properties of the tissue.

Hox proteins drive cell segregation and non-autonomous apical remodelling during hindbrain segmentation

Hox genes encode a conserved family of homeodomain transcription factors regulating development along the major body axis. During embryogenesis, Hox proteins are expressed in segment-specific patterns and control numerous different segment-specific cell fates. It has been unclear, however, whether Hox proteins drive the epithelial cell segregation mechanism that is thought to initiate the segmentation process. Here, we investigate the role of vertebrate Hox proteins during the partitioning of the developing hindbrain into lineage-restricted units called rhombomeres. Loss-of-function mutants and ectopic expression assays reveal that Hoxb4 and its paralogue Hoxd4 are necessary and sufficient for cell segregation, and for the most caudal rhombomere boundary (r6/r7). Hox4 proteins regulate Eph/ephrins and other cell-surface proteins, and can function in a non-cell-autonomous manner to induce apical cell enlargement on both sides of their expression border. Similarly, other Hox proteins expressed at more rostral rhombomere interfaces can also regulate Eph/ephrins, induce apical remodelling and drive cell segregation in ectopic expression assays. However, Krox20, a key segmentation factor expressed in odd rhombomeres (r3 and r5), can largely override Hox proteins at the level of regulation of a cell surface target, Epha4. This study suggests that most, if not all, Hox proteins share a common potential to induce cell segregation but in some contexts this is masked or modulated by other transcription factors.

Transplantation of neural tissue: quail-chick chimeras

Tissue transplantation is an important approach in developmental neurobiology to determine cell fate, to uncover inductive interactions required for tissue specification and patterning as well as to establish tissue competence and commitment. Avian species are among the favorite model systems for these approaches because of their accessibility and relatively large size. Here we describe two culture techniques used to generate quail-chick chimeras at different embryonic stages and methods to distinguish graft and donor tissue.

Hox genes: choreographers in neural development, architects of circuit organization

The neural circuits governing vital behaviors, such as respiration and locomotion, are comprised of discrete neuronal populations residing within the brainstem and spinal cord. Work over the past decade has provided a fairly comprehensive understanding of the developmental pathways that determine the identity of major neuronal classes within the neural tube. However, the steps through which neurons acquire the subtype diversities necessary for their incorporation into a particular circuit are still poorly defined. Studies on the specification of motor neurons indicate that the large family of Hox transcription factors has a key role in generating the subtypes required for selective muscle innervation. There is also emerging evidence that Hox genes function in multiple neuronal classes to shape synaptic specificity during development, suggesting a broader role in circuit assembly. This Review highlights the functions and mechanisms of Hox gene networks and their multifaceted roles during neuronal specification and connectivity.

Boundary formation in the development of the vertebrate hindbrain

The formation of a sharp interface of adjacent subdivisions is important for establishing the precision of tissue organization, and at specific borders it serves to organize key signaling centers. We discuss studies of vertebrate hindbrain development that have given important insights into mechanisms that underlie the formation and maintenance of sharp borders. The hindbrain is subdivided into a series of segments with distinct anteroposterior identity that underlies the specification of distinct neuronal cell types. During early stages of segmentation, cell identity switching contributes to the refinement of borders and enables homogenous territories to be maintained despite intermingling of cells between segments. At later stages, there is a specific restriction to cell intermingling between segments that is mediated by Eph receptor and ephrin signaling. Eph-ephrin signaling can restrict cell intermingling and sharpen borders through multiple mechanisms, including the regulation of cell adhesion and contact inhibition of cell migration.

Model organisms inform the search for the genes and developmental pathology underlying malformations of the human hindbrain

Congenital malformations of the human hindbrain, including the cerebellum, are poorly understood largely because their recognition is a relatively recent advance for imaging diagnostics. Cerebellar malformations are the most obvious and best characterized hindbrain malformations due to their relative ease of viewing by magnetic resonance imaging and the recent identification of several causative genes (Millen et al. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18:12-19, 2008). Malformations of the pons and medulla have also been described both in isolation and in association with cerebellar malformations (Barkovich et al. Ann Neurol 62:625-639, 2007). Although little is understood regarding the specific developmental pathologies underlying hindbrain malformations in humans, much is known regarding the mechanisms and genes driving hindbrain development in vertebrate model organisms. Thus, studies in vertebrate models provide a developmental framework in which to categorize human hindbrain malformations and serve to provide information regarding disrupted developmental processes and candidate genes. Here, we survey the basic principles of vertebrate hindbrain development and integrate our current knowledge of human hindbrain malformations into this framework.

Hox genes and segmentation of the vertebrate hindbrain

In the vertebrate central nervous system, the hindbrain is an important center for coordinating motor activity, posture, equilibrium, sleep patterns, and essential unconscious functions, such as breathing rhythms and blood circulation. During development, the vertebrate hindbrain depends upon the process of segmentation or compartmentalization to create and organize regional properties essential for orchestrating its highly conserved functional roles. The process of segmentation in the hindbrain differs from that which functions in the paraxial mesoderm to generate somites and the axial skeleton. In the prospective hindbrain, cells in the neural epithelia transiently alter their ability to interact with their neighbors, resulting in the formation of seven lineage-restricted cellular compartments. These different segments or rhombomeres each go on to adopt unique characters in response to environmental signals. The Hox family of transcription factors is coupled to this process. Overlapping or nested patterns of Hox gene expression correlate with segmental domains and provide a combinatorial code and molecular framework for specifying the unique identities of hindbrain segments. The segmental organization and patterns of Hox expression and function are highly conserved among vertebrates and, as a consequence, comparative studies between different species have greatly enhanced our ability to build a picture of the regulatory cascades that control early hindbrain development. The purpose of this chapter is to review what is known about the regulatory mechanisms which establish and maintain Hox gene expression and function in hindbrain development.

EphA4 and EfnB2a maintain rhombomere coherence by independently regulating intercalation of progenitor cells in the zebrafish neural keel

During vertebrate development, the hindbrain is transiently segmented into 7 distinct rhombomeres (r). Hindbrain segmentation takes place within the context of the complex morphogenesis required for neurulation, which in zebrafish involves a characteristic cross-midline division that distributes progenitor cells bilaterally in the forming neural tube. The Eph receptor tyrosine kinase EphA4 and the membrane-bound Ephrin (Efn) ligand EfnB2a, which are expressed in complementary segments in the early hindbrain, are required for rhombomere boundary formation. We showed previously that EphA4 promotes cell-cell affinity within r3 and r5, and proposed that preferential adhesion within rhombomeres contributes to boundary formation. Here we show that EfnB2a is similarly required in r4 for normal cell affinity and that EphA4 and EfnB2a regulate cell affinity independently within their respective rhombomeres. Live imaging of cell sorting in mosaic embryos shows that both proteins function during cross-midline cell divisions in the hindbrain neural keel. Consistent with this, mosaic EfnB2a over-expression causes widespread cell sorting and disrupts hindbrain organization, but only if induced at or before neural keel stage. We propose a model in which Eph and Efn-dependent cell affinity within rhombomeres serve to maintain rhombomere organization during the potentially disruptive process of teleost neurulation.

Analysis of Lrrn1 expression and its relationship to neuromeric boundaries during chick neural development

Background

The Drosophila leucine-rich repeat proteins Tartan (TRN) and Capricious (CAPS) mediate cell affinity differences during compartition of the wing imaginal disc. This study aims to identify and characterize the expression of a chick orthologue of TRN/CAPS and examine its potential function in relation to compartment boundaries in the vertebrate central nervous system.

Results

We identified a complementary DNA clone encoding Leucine-rich repeat neuronal 1 (Lrrn1), a single-pass transmembrane protein with 12 extracellular leucine-rich repeats most closely related to TRN/CAPS. Lrrn1 is dynamically expressed during chick development, being initially localized to the neural plate and tube, where it is restricted to the ventricular layer. It becomes downregulated in boundaries following their formation. In the mid-diencephalon, Lrrn1 expression prefigures the position of the anterior boundary of the zona limitans intrathalamica (ZLI). It becomes progressively downregulated from the presumptive ZLI just before the onset of expression of the signalling molecule Sonic hedgehog (Shh) within the ZLI. In the hindbrain, downregulation at rhombomere boundaries correlates with the emergence of specialized boundary cell populations, in which it is subsequently reactivated. Immunocolocalization studies confirm that Lrrn1 protein is endocytosed from the plasma membrane and is a component of the endosomal system, being concentrated within the early endosomal compartment.

Conclusion

Chick Lrrn1 is expressed in ventricular layer neuroepithelial cells and is downregulated at boundary regions, where neurogenesis is known to be delayed, or inhibited. The timing of Lrrn1 downregulation correlates closely with the activation of signaling molecule expression at these boundaries. This expression is consistent with the emergence of secondary organizer properties at boundaries and its endosomal localisation suggests that Lrrn1 may regulate the subcellular localisation of specific components of signalling or cell-cell recognition pathways in neuroepithelial cells.

Neural crest cell plasticity. size matters

Patterning and morphogenesis of neural crest-derived tissues within a developing vertebrate embryo rely on a complex balance between signals acquired by neural crest cells in the neuroepithelium during their formation and signals from the tissues that the neural crest cells contact during their migration. Axial identity of hindbrain neural crest is controlled by a combinatorial pattern of Hox gene expression. Cellular interactions that pattern neural crest involve signals from the same key molecular families that regulate other aspects of patterning and morphogenesis within a developing embryo, namely the BMP, SHH and FGF pathways. The developmental program that regulates neural crest cell fate is both plastic and fixed. As a cohort of interacting cells, neural crest cells carry information that directs the axial pattern and species-specific morphology of the head and face. As individual cells, neural crest cells are responsive to signals from each other as well as from non-neural crest tissues in the environment. General rules and fundamental mechanisms have been important for the conservation of basic patterning of neural crest, but exceptions are notable and relevant. The key to furthering our understanding of important processes such as craniofacial development will require a better characterization of the molecular determinants of the endoderm, ectoderm and mesoderm and the effects that these molecules have on neural crest cell development.

Differential control of cell affinity required for progression and refinement of cell boundary during Drosophila leg segmentation

Domain boundary formation in development involves sorting of different types of cells into separate spatial domains. The segment boundary between tarsus 5 (Ta5) and the pretarsus (Pre) of the Drosophila leg initially appears at the center of the leg disc and progressively sharpens and expands to its final position, accompanied by down-regulation of the cell recognition molecule Capricious and Tartan and cell displacement from Ta5 to Pre across the boundary. Capricious and Tartan are controlled by transcription factor Bar and Al, and their loss of function leads to reduction of cell affinity to wild type neighbors and cell displacement activities. In addition, although the mutant cells formed Ta5/Pre boundary, its progression and sharpening were compromised. Cells overexpressing Capricious or Tartan became invasive within Ta5 and Pre, sometimes escaping the compartmental restriction of cell movement. Dynamic spatiotemporal regulation of cell affinity mediated by Capricious and Tartan is a key property of refinement of the Ta5/Pre boundary.

Specification of dorsoventral polarity in the embryonic chick mesencephalon and its presumptive role in midbrain morphogenesis

The chick midbrain is subdivided into functionally distinct ventral and dorsal domains, tegmentum and optic tectum. In the mature tectum, neurons are organized in layers, while they form discrete nuclei in the tegmentum. Dorsoventral (DV) specification of the early midbrain should thus play a crucial role for the organization of the neuronal circuitry in optic tectum and tegmentum. To investigate regional commitment and establishment of cellular differences along the midbrain DV axis, we examined the commitment of gene expression patterns in isolated ventral and dorsal tissue in vivo and in vitro, and studied their cell mixing properties. Use of explant cultures, and grafting of dorsal midbrain into a ventral environment or vice versa, revealed a gradual increase in the autonomy of region-specific gene regulation between stages 12 and 18 (embryonic day 2 to 3). This process becomes independent of the activity of midline organizers, such as floor and roof plate, by stage 16. Once the DV axis polarity is fixed, cells from dorsal and ventral midbrain adopt differential adhesive properties. Thus between stages 18 to 23 (embryonic day 3 and 4), cells of dorsal and ventral origin start to separate from each other, at a time-point when the majority of midbrain cells is not yet differentiated. Hence, our results suggest that progressive specification of the midbrain DV axis is accompanied by progressively reduced cell mixing between dorsal and ventral precursors, leading to a partial regionalization of midbrain tissue into autonomous units of precursor cell populations.

Hox genes and their candidate downstream targets in the developing central nervous system

1. Homeobox (Hox) genes were originally discovered in the fruit fly Drosophila, where they function through a conserved homeodomain as transcriptional regulators to control embryonic morphogenesis. Since then over 1000 homeodomain proteins have been identified in several species. In vertebrates, 39 Hox genes have been identified as homologs of the original Drosophila complex, and like their Drosophila counterparts they are organized within chromosomal clusters. Vertebrate Hox genes have also been shown to play a critical role in embryonic development as transcriptional regulators. 2. Both the Drosophila and vertebrate Hox genes have been shown to interact with various cofactors, such as the TALE homeodomain proteins, in recognition of consensus sequences within regulatory elements of their target genes. These protein-protein interactions are believed to contribute to enhancing the specificity of target gene recognition in a cell-type or tissue- dependent manner. The regulatory activity of a particular Hox protein on a specific regulatory element is highly variable and dependent on its interacting partners within the transcriptional complex. 3. In vertebrates, Hox genes display spatially restricted patterns of expression within the developing CNS, both along the anterioposterior and dorsoventral axis of the embryo. Their restricted gene expression is suggestive of a regulatory role in patterning of the CNS, as well as in cell specification. Determining the precise function of individual Hox genes in CNS morphogenesis through classical mutational analyses is complicated due to functional redundancy between Hox genes. 4. Understanding the precise mechanisms through which Hox genes mediate embryonic morphogenesis requires the identification of their downstream target genes. Although Hox genes have been implicated in the regulation of several pathways, few target genes have been shown to be under their direct regulatory control. Development of methodologies used for the isolation of target genes and for the analysis of putative targets will be beneficial in establishing the genetic pathways controlled by Hox factors. 5. Within the developing CNS various cell adhesion molecules and signaling molecules have been identified as candidate downstream target genes of Hox proteins. These targets play a role in processes such as cell migration and differentiation, and are implicated in contributing to neuronal processes such as plasticity and/or specification. Hence, Hox genes not only play a role in patterning of the CNS during early development, but may also contribute to cell specification and identity.

Compartments and their boundaries in vertebrate brain development

Fifteen years ago, cell lineage restriction boundaries were discovered in the embryonic vertebrate hindbrain, subdividing it into a series of cell-tight compartments (known as rhombomeres). Compartition, together with segmentally reiterative neuronal architecture and the nested expression of Hox genes, indicates that the hindbrain has a truly metameric organization. This finding initiated a search for compartments in other regions of the developing brain. The results of recent studies have clarified where compartment boundaries exist, have shed light on molecular mechanisms that underlie their formation and have revealed an important function of these boundaries: the positioning and stabilization of local signalling centres.

EphA4 is required for cell adhesion and rhombomere-boundary formation in the zebrafish

The formation of boundaries between or within tissues is a fundamental aspect of animal development. In the developing vertebrate hindbrain, boundaries separate molecularly and neuroanatomically distinct segments called rhombomeres. Transplantation studies have suggested that rhombomere boundaries form by the local sorting out of cells with different segmental identities. This sorting-out process has been shown to involve repulsive interactions between cells expressing an Eph receptor tyrosine kinase, EphA4, and cells expressing its ephrinB ligands. Although a model for rhombomere-boundary formation based on repulsive Eph-ephrin signaling is well established in the literature, the predictions of this model have not been tested in loss-of-function experiments. Here, we eliminate EphA4 and ephrinB2a proteins in zebrafish with antisense morpholinos (MO) and find that rhombomere boundaries are disrupted in EphA4MO embryos, consistent with a requirement for Eph-ephrin signaling in boundary formation. However, in mosaic embryos, we observe that EphA4MO cells and EphA4-expressing cells sort from one another, an observation that is not predicted by the Eph-ephrin repulsion model but instead suggests that EphA4 promotes cell adhesion within the rhombomeres in which it is expressed. Differential cell adhesion is known to be an effective mechanism for cell sorting. We therefore propose that the well-known EphA4-dependent repulsion between rhombomeres operates in parallel with the EphA4-dependent adhesion within rhombomeres described here to drive the cell sorting that underlies rhombomere-boundary formation.

Segmentation and compartition in the early avian hindbrain

For the comparative embryologists of the early 20th century, the segment-like bulges that appear transiently during the early stages of vertebrate hindbrain development were both the object of fascination and the subject of vigorous dispute. Conflicting views were held as to the significance of these 'rhombomeres' to brain development and their more general relevance to head evolution. Whether rhombomeres are inconsequential bumps in the embryonic brain or true segments-iterative or metameric units-has only recently been resolved. A number of studies using more modern techniques (such as immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridisation, axonal tracing, single cell labelling, heterotopic and orthotopic grafting, and the manipulation of gene expression by electroporation) have shown that the hindbrain has a truly metameric cellular organisation. The avian embryo has played a particularly prominent role in such studies by virtue of its large size and accessibility, its amenability to microsurgery, and its well-described anatomy. Furthermore, electrophysiological studies, also on avian embryos, have shown that segmentation of the parent neuroepithelium into rhombomeres plays a crucial part in establishing the functional organization of the hindbrain. Segmentation suggests the early allocation of defined sets of precursor cells and is therefore presumed to allow a specific identity for each successive segment to emerge from a common ground plan. This short review will focus on the contribution the avian embryo has made to our understanding of this fly-like region of the vertebrate brain, in respect of its morphology and neuronal architecture, the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in establishing and maintaining the segments, and the molecular controls of segmental identity.

Nlz belongs to a family of zinc-finger-containing repressors and controls segmental gene expression in the zebrafish hindbrain

The zebrafish nlz gene has a rostral expression limit at the presumptive rhombomere (r) 3/r4 boundary during gastrula stages, and its expression progressively expands rostrally to encompass both r3 and r2 by segmentation stages, suggesting a role for nlz in hindbrain development. We find that Nlz is a nuclear protein that associates with the corepressor Groucho, suggesting that Nlz acts to repress transcription. Consistent with a role as a repressor, misexpression of nlz causes a loss of gene expression in the rostral hindbrain, likely due to ectopic nlz acting prematurely in this domain, and this repression is accompanied by a partial expansion in the expression domains of r4-specific genes. To interfere with endogenous nlz function, we generated a form of nlz that lacks the Groucho binding site and demonstrate that this construct has a dominant negative effect. We find that interfering with endogenous Nlz function promotes the expansion of r5 and, to a lesser extent, r3 gene expression into r4, leading to a reduction in the size of r4. We conclude that Nlz is a transcriptional repressor that controls segmental gene expression in the hindbrain. Lastly, we identify additional nlz-related genes, suggesting that Nlz belongs to a family of zinc-finger proteins.

The role of cell mixing in branchial arch development

Compartmental structures are the basis of a number of developing systems, including parts of the vertebrate head. One of the characteristics of a series of compartments is that mixing between cells in adjacent units is restricted. This is a consequence of differential chemoaffinity between neighbouring cells in adjacent compartments. We set out to determine whether mesenchymal cells in the branchial arches and their precursors show cell-mixing properties consistent with a compartmental organisation. In chimaeric avian embryos we found no evidence of preferential association or segregation of neural crest cells when surrounded by cells derived from a different axial level. In reassociation assays using mesenchymal cells isolated from chick branchial arches at stage 18, cells reformed into clusters without exhibiting a preferential affinity for cells derived from the same branchial arch. We find no evidence for differential chemoaffinity in vivo or in vitro between mesenchymal cells in different branchial arches. Our findings suggest that branchial arch mesenchyme is not organised into a series of compartments.

Cellular patterning of the vertebrate embryo

Recent studies show that cell dispersal is a widespread phenomenon in the development of early vertebrate embryos. These cell movements coincide with major decisions for the spatial organization of the embryo, and they parallel genetic patterning events. For example, in the central nervous system, cell dispersal is first mainly anterior-posterior and subsequently dorsal-ventral. Thus, genes expressed in signaling centers of the embryo probably control cell movements, tightly linking cellular and genetic patterning. Cell dispersal might be important for the correct positioning of cells and tissues involved in intercellular signaling. The emergence of cell dispersal at the onset of vertebrate evolution indicates a shift from early, lineage-based cellular patterning in small embryos to late, movement-based cellular patterning of polyclones in large embryos. The conservation of the same basic body plan by invertebrate and vertebrate chordates suggests that evolution of the embryonic period preceding the phylotypic stage was by intercalary co-option of basic cell activities present in the ancestral metazoan cell.

Boundary formation in the hindbrain: Eph only it were simple

Segmentation of the vertebrate hindbrain into rhombomeres is a key step in the development of a complex pattern of differentiated neurons from a homogeneous neuroepithelium. Many of the transcription factors important for establishing the segmental plan and assigning rhombomere identity are now known. However, the downstream effectors that bring about the formation of rhombomere boundaries are only just being characterized. Here we discuss molecules that could be responsible for segregating populations of cells from different rhombomeres. We focus on recent work demonstrating that the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands, the ephrins, function in rhombomere-specific cell sorting and initiation of a structural boundary. We discuss the contributions of two mechanisms -- cell sorting and plasticity -- to the formation of rhombomere boundaries.

Constructing the hindbrain: insights from the zebrafish

The hindbrain is responsible for controlling essential functions such as respiration and heart beat that we literally do not think about most of the time. In addition, cranial nerves projecting from the hindbrain control muscles in the jaw, eye, and face, and receive sensory input from these same areas. In all vertebrates that have been studied, the hindbrain passes through a segmented phase shortly after the neural tube has formed, with a series of seven bulges--the rhombomeres--forming along the anterior-posterior extent of the neural tube. Our current understanding of vertebrate hindbrain development comes from integrating data from several model systems. Work on the chick has helped us to understand the cell biology of the rhombomeres, whereas the power of mouse molecular genetics has allowed investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying their development. This review focuses on the special insights that the zebrafish system has provided to our understanding of hindbrain development. As we will discuss, work in the zebrafish has elucidated inductive events that specify the presumptive hindbrain domain and has identified genes required for hindbrain segmentation and the specification of segment identities.

Stabilizing the regionalisation of the developing vertebrate central nervous system

During embryonic development, a number of tissues are patterned by their subdivision into domains with distinct regional identity. An important question is how sharp interfaces are established and maintained between adjacent domains despite the potential for scrambling due to cell intermingling during tissue growth. Two mechanisms have been found to underlie the maintenance of sharp interfaces: the specific restriction of cell mixing across boundaries, or the switching of identity of cells that cross between domains. We review the evidence for these mechanisms at distinct boundaries in the developing vertebrate central nervous system, and discuss what is known about their molecular mediators.

Boundaries in development: formation and function

Developing organisms may contain billions of cells destined to differentiate in numerous different ways. One strategy organisms use to simplify the orchestration of development is the separation of cell populations into distinct functional units. Our expanding knowledge of boundary formation and function in different systems is beginning to reveal general principles of this process. Fields of cells are subdivided by the interpretation of morphogen gradients, and these subdivisions are then maintained and refined by local cell-cell interactions. Sharp and stable separation between cell populations requires special mechanisms to keep cells segregated, which in many cases appear to involve the regulation of cell affinity. Once cell populations become distinct, specialized cells are often induced along the borders between them. These boundary cells can then influence the patterning of surrounding cells, which can result in progressively finer subdivisions of a tissue. Much has been learned about the signaling pathways that establish boundaries, but a key challenge for the future remains to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanisms that actually keep cell populations separated.

Plasticity in zebrafish hox expression in the hindbrain and cranial neural crest

The anterior-posterior identities of cells in the hindbrain and cranial neural crest are thought to be determined by their Hox gene expression status, but how and when cells become committed to these identities remain unclear. Here we address this in zebrafish by cell transplantation, to test plasticity in hox expression in single cells. We transplanted cells alone, or in small groups, between hindbrain rhombomeres or between the neural crest primordia of pharyngeal arches. We found that transplanted cells regulated hox expression according to their new environments. The degree of plasticity, however, depended on both the timing and the size of the transplant. At later stages transplanted cells were more likely to be irreversibly committed and maintain their hox expression, demonstrating a progressive loss of responsiveness to the environmental signals that specify segmental identities. Individual transplanted cells also showed greater plasticity than those lying within the center of larger groups, suggesting that a community effect normally maintains hox expression within segments. We also raised experimental embryos to larval stages to analyze transplanted cells after differentiation and found that neural crest cells contributed to pharyngeal cartilages appropriate to the anterior-posterior level of the new cellular environment. Thus, consistent with models implicating hox expression in control of segmental identity, plasticity in hox expression correlates with plasticity in final cell fate.

Krox-20 patterns the hindbrain through both cell-autonomous and non cell-autonomous mechanisms

The Krox-20 gene encodes a zinc finger transcription factor, which has been shown previously, by targeted inactivation in the mouse, to be required for the development of rhombomeres (r) 3 and 5 in the segmented embryonic hindbrain. In the present work, Krox-20 was expressed ectopically in the developing chick hindbrain by use of electroporation. We demonstrate that Krox-20 expression is sufficient to confer odd-numbered rhombomere characteristics to r2, r4, and r6 cells, presumably in a cell-autonomous manner. Therefore, Krox-20, appears as the major determinant of odd-numbered identity within the hindbrain. In addition, we provide evidence for the existence of a non cell-autonomous autoactivation mechanism allowing recruitment of Krox-20-positive cells from even-numbered territories by neighboring Krox-20-expressing cells. On the basis of these observations, we propose that Krox-20 regulates multiple, intertwined steps in segmental patterning: Initial activation of Krox-20 in a few cells leads to the segregation, homogenization, and possibly expansion of territories to which Krox-20 in addition confers an odd-numbered identity.

Eph signalling functions downstream of Val to regulate cell sorting and boundary formation in the caudal hindbrain

Rhombomeres are segmental units of the developing vertebrate hindbrain that underlie the reiterated organisation of cranial neural crest migration and neuronal differentiation. valentino (val), a zebrafish homologue of the mouse bzip transcription factor-encoding gene, kreisler, is required for segment boundary formation caudal to rhombomere 4 (r4). val is normally expressed in r5/6 and is required for cells to contribute to this region. In val(−) mutants, rX, a region one rhombomere in length and of mixed identity, lies between r4 and r7. While a number of genes involved in establishing rhombomeric identity are known, it is still largely unclear how segmental integrity is established and boundaries are formed. Members of the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands, the ephrins, are candidates for functioning in rhombomere boundary formation. Indeed, expression of the receptor ephB4a coincides with val in r5/6, whilst ephrin-B2a, which encodes a ligand for EphB4a, is expressed in r4 and r7, complementary to the domain of val expression. Here we show that in val(−) embryos, ephB4a expression is downregulated and ephrin-B2a expression is upregulated between r4 and r7, indicating that Val is normally required to establish the mutually exclusive expression domains of these two genes. We show that juxtaposition of ephB4a-expressing cells and ephrin-B2a-expressing cells in the hindbrain leads to boundary formation. Loss of the normal spatial regulation of eph/ephrin expression in val mutants correlates not only with absence of boundaries but also with the inability of mutant cells to contribute to wild-type r5/6. Using a genetic mosaic approach, we show that spatially inappropriate Eph signalling underlies the repulsion of val(−) cells from r5/6. We propose that Val controls eph expression and that interactions between EphB4a and Ephrin-B2a mediate cell sorting and boundary formation in the segmenting caudal hindbrain.

Patterning the cranial neural crest: hindbrain segmentation and Hox gene plasticity

Understanding the patterning mechanisms that control head development--particularly the neural crest and its contribution to bones, nerves and connective tissue--is an important problem, as craniofacial anomalies account for one-third of all human congenital defects. Classical models for craniofacial patterning argue that the morphogenic program and Hox gene identity of the neural crest is pre-patterned, carrying positional information acquired in the hindbrain to the peripheral nervous system and the branchial arches. Recently, however, plasticity of Hox gene expression has been observed in the hindbrain and cranial neural crest of chick, mouse and zebrafish embryos. Hence, craniofacial development is not dependent on neural crest prepatterning, but is regulated by a more complex integration of cell and tissue interactions.

Roles of Eph receptors and ephrins in segmental patterning

Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and their membrane-bound ligands, ephrins, have key roles in patterning and morphogenesis. Interactions between these molecules are promiscuous, but largely fall into two groups: EphA receptors bind to glycosylphosphatidyl inositol-anchored ephrin-A ligands, and EphB receptors bind to transmembrane ephrin-B proteins. Ephrin-B proteins transduce signals, such that bidirectional signalling can occur upon interaction with the Eph receptor. In many tissues, there are complementary and overlapping expression domains of interacting Eph receptors and ephrins. An important role of Eph receptors and ephrins is to mediate cell contact-dependent repulsion, and this has been implicated in the pathfinding of axons and neural crest cells, and the restriction of cell intermingling between hindbrain segments. Studies in an in vitro system show that bidirectional activation is required to prevent intermingling between cell populations, whereas unidirectional activation can restrict cell communication via gap junctions. Recent work indicates that Eph receptors can also upregulate cell adhesion, but the biochemical basis of repulsion versus adhesion responses is unclear. Eph receptors and ephrins have thus emerged as key regulators that, in parallel with cell adhesion molecules, underlie the establishment and maintenance of patterns of cellular organization.

Eph receptors and ephrins: regulators of guidance and assembly

Recent advances have started to elucidate the developmental functions and biochemistry of Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and their membrane-bound ligands, ephrins. Interactions between these molecules are promiscuous, but they largely fall into two groups: EphA receptors bind to GPI-anchored ephrin-A ligands, while EphB receptors bind to ephrin-B proteins that have a transmembrane and cytoplasmic domain. Remarkably, ephrin-B proteins transduce signals, such that bidirectional signaling can occur upon interaction with Eph receptor. In many tissues, specific Eph receptors and ephrins have complementary domains, whereas other family members may overlap in their expression. An important role of Eph receptors and ephrins is to mediate cell-contact-dependent repulsion. Complementary and overlapping gradients of expression underlie establishment of a topographic map of neuronal projections in the retinotectal system. Eph receptors and ephrins also act at boundaries to channel neuronal growth cones along specific pathways, restrict the migration of neural crest cells, and via bidirectional signaling prevent intermingling between hindbrain segments. Intriguingly, Eph receptors and ephrins can also trigger an adhesive response of endothelial cells and are required for the remodeling of blood vessels. Biochemical studies suggest that the extent of multimerization of Eph receptors modulates the cellular response and that the actin cytoskeleton is one major target of the intracellular pathways activated by Eph receptors. Eph receptors and ephrins have thus emerged as key regulators of the repulsion and adhesion of cells that underlie the establishment, maintenance, and remodeling of patterns of cellular organization.

Holomeric vs. meromeric segmentation: a tale of centipedes, leeches, and rhombomeres

Explaining the origin and evolution of segmentation is central to understanding the body plan of major animal groups such as arthropods, annelids, and vertebrates. One major shortcoming of current views on segmentation is the failure to recognize the existence of two layers of segmentation. I distinguish here holomeric segmentation, involving the whole body axis (or the whole axis of an appendage) and producing "true" segments (eosegments); and meromeric segmentation, producing merosegments within one or more eosegment(s). In terms of developmental mechanisms, meromeric segmentation is probably the same as compartmentalization. This process follows two rules: (1) merosegments are formed from a stereotyped pattern of subdivisions, where only the merosegments in contact to the anterior or posterior boundary of the eosegment are allowed to divide; (2) contiguous eosegments undergoing meromeric segmentation generate merosegments according to identical lineage patterns apart from possible lineage truncation in one or a few terminal eosegments. The segmentation model proposed in this paper is mainly supported by evidence from comparative morphology, but it is compatible with known cellular and developmental mechanisms. The development of vertebrate rhombomeres, the annulation of leeches, the subdivision of the distal part of insect antenna into flagellomeres and the segmentation of centipedes are interpreted here in terms of meromeric segmentation. Some of these phenomena, like centipede segmentation, have thus far defied all attempts at an explanation, both in mechanistic (developmental) and phylogenetic terms. The model presented in this paper suggests a rich research agenda at all levels, from molecular and genetic to morphological and phylogenetic.