Control of oskar mRNA translation by Bruno in a novel cell-free system from Drosophila ovaries

Proteins rather than mRNAs regulate nucleation and persistence of Oskar germ granules in Drosophila

RNA granules are membraneless condensates that provide functional compartmentalization within cells. The mechanisms by which RNA granules form are under intense investigation. Here, we characterize the role of mRNAs and proteins in the formation of germ granules in Drosophila. Super-resolution microscopy reveals that the number, size, and distribution of germ granules is precisely controlled. Surprisingly, germ granule mRNAs are not required for the nucleation or the persistence of germ granules but instead control their size and composition. Using an RNAi screen, we determine that RNA regulators, helicases, and mitochondrial proteins regulate germ granule number and size, while the proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum, nuclear pore complex, and cytoskeleton control their distribution. Therefore, the protein-driven formation of Drosophila germ granules is mechanistically distinct from the RNA-dependent condensation observed for other RNA granules such as stress granules and P-bodies.

Cup is essential for oskar mRNA translational repression during early Drosophila oogenesis

Study of the timing and location for mRNA translation across model systems has begun to shed light on molecular events fundamental to such processes as intercellular communication, morphogenesis, and body pattern formation. In D. melanogaster, the posterior mRNA determinant, oskar, is transcribed maternally but translated only when properly localized at the oocyte's posterior cortex. Two effector proteins, Bruno1 and Cup, mediate steps of oskar mRNA regulation. The current model in the field identifies Bruno1 as necessary for Cup's recruitment to oskar mRNA and indispensable for oskar's translational repression. We now report that this Bruno1-Cup interaction leads to precise oskar mRNA regulation during early oogenesis and, importantly, the two proteins mutually influence each other's mRNA expression and protein distribution in the egg chamber. We show that these factors stably associate with oskar mRNA in vivo. Cup associates with oskar mRNA without Bruno1, while surprisingly Bruno1's stable association with oskar mRNA depends on Cup. We demonstrate that the essential factor for oskar mRNA repression in early oogenesis is Cup, not Bruno1. Furthermore, we find that Cup is a key P-body component that maintains functional P-body morphology during oogenesis and is necessary for oskar mRNA's association with P-bodies. Therefore, Cup drives the translational repression and stability of oskar mRNA. These experimental results point to a regulatory feedback loop between Bruno 1 and Cup in early oogenesis that appears crucial for oskar mRNA to reach the posterior pole and its expression in the egg chamber for accurate embryo development.

Roles for the RNA-Binding Protein Caper in Reproductive Output in Drosophila melanogaster

RNA binding proteins (RBPs) play a fundamental role in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression within the germline and nervous system. This is underscored by the prevalence of mutations within RBP-encoding genes being implicated in infertility and neurological disease. We previously described roles for the highly conserved RBP Caper in neurite morphogenesis in the Drosophila larval peripheral system and in locomotor behavior. However, caper function has not been investigated outside the nervous system, although it is widely expressed in many different tissue types during embryogenesis. Here, we describe novel roles for Caper in fertility and mating behavior. We find that Caper is expressed in ovarian follicles throughout oogenesis but is dispensable for proper patterning of the egg chamber. Additionally, reduced caper function, through either a genetic lesion or RNA interference-mediated knockdown of caper in the female germline, results in females laying significantly fewer eggs than their control counterparts. Moreover, this phenotype is exacerbated with age. caper dysfunction also results in partial embryonic and larval lethality. Given that caper is highly conserved across metazoa, these findings may also be relevant to vertebrates.

MicroSalmon: A Comprehensive, Searchable Resource of Predicted MicroRNA Targets and 3'UTR Cis-Regulatory Elements in the Full-Length Sequenced Atlantic Salmon Transcriptome

Complete 3′UTRs unambiguously assigned to specific mRNA isoforms from the Atlantic salmon full-length (FL) transcriptome were collected into a 3′UTRome. miRNA response elements (MREs) and other cis-regulatory motifs were subsequently predicted and assigned to 3′UTRs of all FL-transcripts. The MicroSalmon GitHub repository provides all results. RNAHybrid and sRNAtoolbox tools predicted the MREs. UTRscan and the Teiresias algorithm predicted other 3′UTR cis-acting motifs, both known vertebrate motifs and putative novel motifs. MicroSalmon provides search programs to retrieve all FL-transcripts targeted by a miRNA (median number 1487), all miRNAs targeting an FL-transcript (median number 27), and other cis-acting motifs. As thousands of FL-transcripts may be targets of each miRNA, additional experimental strategies are necessary to reduce the likely true and relevant targets to a number that may be functionally validated. Low-complexity motifs known to affect mRNA decay in vertebrates were over-represented. Many of these were enriched in the terminal end, while purine- or pyrimidine-rich motifs with unknown functions were enriched immediately downstream of the stop codon. Furthermore, several novel complex motifs were over-represented, indicating conservation and putative function. In conclusion, MicroSalmon is an extensive and useful, searchable resource for study of Atlantic salmon transcript regulation by miRNAs and cis-acting 3′UTR motifs.

Different roles for the adjoining and structurally similar A-rich and poly(A) domains of oskar mRNA: Only the A-rich domain is required for oskar noncoding RNA function, which includes MTOC positioning

Drosophila oskar (osk) mRNA has both coding and noncoding functions, with the latter required for progression through oogenesis. Noncoding activity is mediated by the osk 3' UTR. Three types of cis elements act most directly and are clustered within the final ~120 nucleotides of the 3' UTR: multiple binding sites for the Bru1 protein, a short highly conserved region, and A-rich sequences abutting the poly(A) tail. Here we extend the characterization of these elements and their functions, providing new insights into osk noncoding RNA function and the makeup of the cis elements. We show that all three elements are required for correct positioning of the microtubule organizing center (MTOC), a defect not previously reported for any osk mutant. Normally, the MTOC is located at the posterior of the oocyte during previtellogenic stages of oogenesis, and this distribution underlies the strong posterior enrichment of many mRNAs transported into the oocyte from the nurse cells. When osk noncoding function was disrupted the MTOC was dispersed in the oocyte and osk mRNA failed to be enriched at the posterior, although transport to the oocyte was not affected. A previous study did not detect loss of posterior enrichment for certain osk mutants lacking noncoding activity (Kanke et al., 2015). This discrepancy may be due to use of imaging aimed at monitoring transport to the oocyte rather than posterior enrichment. Involvement in MTOC positioning suggests that the osk noncoding function may act in conjunction with genes whose loss has similar effects, and that osk function may extend to other processes requiring those genes. Further characterization of the cis elements required for osk noncoding function included completion of saturation mutagenesis of the most highly conserved region, providing critical information for evaluating the possible contribution of candidate binding factors. The 3'-most cis element is a cluster of A-rich sequences, the ARS. The close juxtaposition and structural similarity of the ARS and poly(A) tail raised the possibility that they comprise an extended A-rich element required for osk noncoding function. We found that absence of the poly(A) tail did not mimic the effects of mutation of the ARS, causing neither arrest of oogenesis nor mispositioning of osk mRNA in previtellogenic stage oocytes. Thus, the ARS and the poly(A) tail are not interchangeable for osk noncoding RNA function, suggesting that the role of the ARS is not in recruitment of Poly(A) binding protein (PABP), the protein that binds the poly(A) tail. Furthermore, although PABP has been implicated in transport of osk mRNA from the nurse cells to the oocyte, mutation of the ARS in combination with loss of the poly(A) tail did not disrupt transport of osk mRNA into the oocyte. We conclude that PABP acts indirectly in osk mRNA transport, or is associated with osk mRNA independent of an A-rich binding site. Although the poly(A) tail was not required for osk mRNA transport into the oocyte, its absence was associated with a novel osk mRNA localization defect later in oogenesis, potentially revealing a previously unrecognized step in the localization process.

Drosophila decapping protein 2 modulates the formation of cortical F-actin for germ plasm assembly

In Drosophila, the deposition of the germ plasm at the posterior pole of the oocyte is essential for the abdomen and germ cell formation during embryogenesis. To assemble the germ plasm, oskar (osk) mRNA, produced by nurse cells, should be localized and anchored on the posterior cortex of the oocyte. Processing bodies (P-bodies) are cytoplasmic RNA granules responsible for the 5'-3' mRNA degradation. Evidence suggests that the components of P-bodies, such as Drosophila decapping protein 1 and Ge-1, are involved in the posterior localization of osk. However, whether the decapping core enzyme, Drosophila decapping protein 2 (dDcp2), is also involved remains unclear. Herein, we generated a dDcp2 null allele and showed that dDcp2 was required for the posterior localization of germ plasm components including osk. dDcp2 was distributed on the oocyte cortex and was localized posterior to the osk. In the posterior pole of dDcp2 mutant oocytes, osk was mislocalized and colocalized with F-actin detached from the cortex; moreover, considerably fewer F-actin projections were observed. Using the F-actin cosedimentation assay, we proved that dDcp2 interacted with F-actin through its middle region. In conclusion, our findings explored a novel function of dDcp2 in assisting osk localization by modulating the formation of F-actin projections on the posterior cortex.

The molecular machinery of translational control in malaria parasites

Translational control regulates the levels of protein synthesized from its transcript and is key for the rapid adjustment of gene expression in response to environmental stimuli. The regulation of translation is of special importance for malaria parasites, which pass through a complex life cycle that includes various replication phases in the different organs of the human and mosquito hosts and a sexual reproduction phase in the mosquito midgut. In particular, the quiescent transmission stages rely on translational control to rapidly adapt to the new environment, once they switch over from the human to the mosquito and vice versa. Three control mechanisms are currently proposed in Plasmodium, (1) global regulation that acts on the translation initiation complex; (2) mRNA-specific regulation, involving cis control elements, mRNA-binding proteins and translational repressors; and (3) induced mRNA decay by the Ccr4-Not and the RNA exosome complex. The main molecules controlling translation are highly conserved in malaria parasites and an increasing number of studies shed light on the interwoven pathways leading to the up or downregulation of protein synthesis in the diverse plasmodial stages. We here highlight recent findings on translational control during life cycle progression of Plasmodium and discuss the molecules involved in regulating protein synthesis.

Germ granules in Drosophila

Germ granules are hallmarks of all germ cells. Early ultrastructural studies in Drosophila first described these membraneless granules in the oocyte and early embryo as filled with amorphous to fibrillar material mixed with RNA. Genetic studies identified key protein components and specific mRNAs that regulate germ cell‐specific functions. More recently these ultrastructural studies have been complemented by biophysical analysis describing germ granules as phase‐transitioned condensates. In this review, we provide an overview that connects the composition of germ granules with their function in controlling germ cell specification, formation and migration, and illuminate these mysterious condensates as the gatekeepers of the next generation.

Translation initiation by cap-dependent ribosome recruitment: Recent insights and open questions

Gene expression universally relies on protein synthesis, where ribosomes recognize and decode the messenger RNA template by cycling through translation initiation, elongation, and termination phases. All aspects of translation have been studied for decades using the tools of biochemistry and molecular biology available at the time. Here, we focus on the mechanism of translation initiation in eukaryotes, which is remarkably more complex than prokaryotic initiation and is the target of multiple types of regulatory intervention. The "consensus" model, featuring cap-dependent ribosome entry and scanning of mRNA leader sequences, represents the predominantly utilized initiation pathway across eukaryotes, although several variations of the model and alternative initiation mechanisms are also known. Recent advances in structural biology techniques have enabled remarkable molecular-level insights into the functional states of eukaryotic ribosomes, including a range of ribosomal complexes with different combinations of translation initiation factors that are thought to represent bona fide intermediates of the initiation process. Similarly, high-throughput sequencing-based ribosome profiling or "footprinting" approaches have allowed much progress in understanding the elongation phase of translation, and variants of them are beginning to reveal the remaining mysteries of initiation, as well as aspects of translation termination and ribosomal recycling. A current view on the eukaryotic initiation mechanism is presented here with an emphasis on how recent structural and footprinting results underpin axioms of the consensus model. Along the way, we further outline some contested mechanistic issues and major open questions still to be addressed. This article is categorized under: Translation > Translation Mechanisms Translation > Translation Regulation RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications.

ME31B globally represses maternal mRNAs by two distinct mechanisms during the Drosophila maternal-to-zygotic transition

In animal embryos, control of development is passed from exclusively maternal gene products to those encoded by the embryonic genome in a process referred to as the maternal-to-zygotic transition (MZT). We show that the RNA-binding protein, ME31B, binds to and represses the expression of thousands of maternal mRNAs during the Drosophila MZT. However, ME31B carries out repression in different ways during different phases of the MZT. Early, it represses translation while, later, its binding leads to mRNA destruction, most likely as a consequence of translational repression in the context of robust mRNA decay. In a process dependent on the PNG kinase, levels of ME31B and its partners, Cup and Trailer Hitch (TRAL), decrease by over 10-fold during the MZT, leading to a change in the composition of mRNA-protein complexes. We propose that ME31B is a global repressor whose regulatory impact changes based on its biological context.

Translation of CircRNAs

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are abundant and evolutionarily conserved RNAs of largely unknown function. Here, we show that a subset of circRNAs is translated in vivo. By performing ribosome footprinting from fly heads, we demonstrate that a group of circRNAs is associated with translating ribosomes. Many of these ribo-circRNAs use the start codon of the hosting mRNA, are bound by membrane-associated ribosomes, and have evolutionarily conserved termination codons. In addition, we found that a circRNA generated from the muscleblind locus encodes a protein, which we detected in fly head extracts by mass spectrometry. Next, by performing in vivo and in vitro translation assays, we show that UTRs of ribo-circRNAs (cUTRs) allow cap-independent translation. Moreover, we found that starvation and FOXO likely regulate the translation of a circMbl isoform. Altogether, our study provides strong evidence for translation of circRNAs, revealing the existence of an unexplored layer of gene activity.

The organization and regulation of mRNA-protein complexes

In a eukaryotic cell, each messenger RNA (mRNA) is bound to a variety of proteins to form an mRNA-protein complex (mRNP). Together, these proteins impact nearly every step in the life cycle of an mRNA and are critical for the proper control of gene expression. In the cytoplasm, for instance, mRNPs affect mRNA translatability and stability and provide regulation of specific transcripts as well as global, transcriptome-wide control. mRNPs are complex, diverse, and dynamic, and so they have been a challenge to understand. But the advent of high-throughput sequencing technology has heralded a new era in the study of mRNPs. Here, I will discuss general principles of cytoplasmic mRNP organization and regulation. Using microRNA-mediated repression as a case study, I will focus on common themes in mRNPs and highlight the interplay between mRNP composition and posttranscriptional regulation. mRNPs are an important control point in regulating gene expression, and while the study of these fascinating complexes presents remaining challenges, recent advances provide a critical lens for deciphering gene regulation. WIREs RNA 2017, 8:e1369. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1369 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

The mRNA-bound proteome of the early fly embryo

Early embryogenesis is characterized by the maternal to zygotic transition (MZT), in which maternally deposited messenger RNAs are degraded while zygotic transcription begins. Before the MZT, post-transcriptional gene regulation by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) is the dominant force in embryo patterning. We used two mRNA interactome capture methods to identify RBPs bound to polyadenylated transcripts within the first 2 h of Drosophila melanogaster embryogenesis. We identified a high-confidence set of 476 putative RBPs and confirmed RNA-binding activities for most of 24 tested candidates. Most proteins in the interactome are known RBPs or harbor canonical RBP features, but 99 exhibited previously uncharacterized RNA-binding activity. mRNA-bound RBPs and TFs exhibit distinct expression dynamics, in which the newly identified RBPs dominate the first 2 h of embryonic development. Integrating our resource with in situ hybridization data from existing databases showed that mRNAs encoding RBPs are enriched in posterior regions of the early embryo, suggesting their general importance in posterior patterning and germ cell maturation.

Rapid Ovary Mass-Isolation (ROMi) to Obtain Large Quantities of Drosophila Egg Chambers for Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization

Isolation of large quantities of tissue from organisms is essential for many techniques such as genome-wide screens and biochemistry. However, obtaining large quantities of tissues or cells is often the rate-limiting step when working in vivo. Here, we present a rapid method that allows the isolation of intact, single egg chambers at various developmental stages from ovaries of adult female Drosophila flies. The isolated egg chambers are amenable for a variety of procedures such as fluorescent in situ hybridization, RNA isolation, extract preparation, or immunostaining. Isolation of egg chambers from adult flies can be completed in 5 min and results, depending on the input amount of flies, in several milliliters of material. The isolated egg chambers are then further processed depending on the exact requirements of the subsequent application. We describe high-throughput in situ hybridization in 96-well plates as example application for the mass-isolated egg chambers.

Region-specific activation of oskar mRNA translation by inhibition of Bruno-mediated repression

A complex program of translational repression, mRNA localization, and translational activation ensures that Oskar (Osk) protein accumulates only at the posterior pole of the Drosophila oocyte. Inappropriate expression of Osk disrupts embryonic axial patterning, and is lethal. A key factor in translational repression is Bruno (Bru), which binds to regulatory elements in the osk mRNA 3' UTR. After posterior localization of osk mRNA, repression by Bru must be alleviated. Here we describe an in vivo assay system to monitor the spatial pattern of Bru-dependent repression, separate from the full complexity of osk regulation. This assay reveals a form of translational activation-region-specific activation-which acts regionally in the oocyte, is not mechanistically coupled to mRNA localization, and functions by inhibiting repression by Bru. We also show that Bru dimerizes and identify mutations that disrupt this interaction to test its role in vivo. Loss of dimerization does not disrupt repression, as might have been expected from an existing model for the mechanism of repression. However, loss of dimerization does impair regional activation of translation, suggesting that dimerization may constrain, not promote, repression. Our work provides new insight into the question of how localized mRNAs become translationally active, showing that repression of osk mRNA is locally inactivated by a mechanism acting independent of mRNA localization.

Mosaic Analysis in the Drosophila melanogaster Ovary

Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis is a versatile model system used to address many important questions of cell and developmental biology such as stem cell regulation, cell determination, cell polarization, cell-cell signaling, cell-cell adhesion, and cell-cycle regulation. The ovary is composed of germline and somatic cells of different origins and functions. Mosaic analysis using the powerful genetic tools available in Drosophila melanogaster allows deciphering the contribution of each cell type in the different processes leading to the formation of a mature egg. Germ cells and follicle cells are produced by actively dividing stem cells, which permit the use of recombinases, such as FLP, to generate genetic mosaics using mitotic recombination. This chapter summarizes the different methods used to create genetic mosaics in the germline and in somatic cells of adult ovaries. We briefly introduce the morphology and development of the adult female ovary. We then describe in practical terms how to generate mosaics with examples of cross schemes and recombining strains. We also explain how to identify the appropriate progeny and how to prepare clonal tissues for phenotypic analysis.

Cytoplasmic polyadenylation assays

Basic research in Drosophila melanogaster has benefited from a plethora of powerful genetics tools. Detailed biochemical analysis, however, has often been difficult due to the lack of in vitro systems that faithfully recapitulate the observations made in vivo. In the field of posttranscriptional regulation, the recent establishment of robust in vitro systems from embryo and ovary material has fueled the mechanistic understanding of a variety of processes. Here we describe protocols to obtain and use extracts from Drosophila embryos that are competent for cytoplasmic polyadenylation and translation of exogenously added transcripts.

Methods for studying IRES-mediated translation of positive-strand RNA viruses

Internal ribosome entry sites are RNA elements that mediate translation in a cap-independent manner. A subset of positive strand RNA viruses utilize an IRES mechanism as a viral strategy to ensure efficient viral protein synthesis. IRES elements vary in sequence, structure, and factor requirements between virus families. Here, we describe methods to determine IRES activity and approaches to study the regulation and function of IRES-mediated translation both in vitro and in vivo. Finally, we describe a new IRES-directed reporter system which exploits the 2A 'self-cleavage' or 'stop-go' peptide for optimal detection of IRES activity.

Roles of cytoplasmic RNP granules in intracellular RNA localization and translational control in the Drosophila oocyte

Intracellular mRNA localization and translation are ways to achieve asymmetric protein sorting in polarized cells, and they play fundamental roles in cell-fate decisions and body patterning during animal development. These processes are regulated by the interplay between cis-acting elements and trans-acting RNA-binding proteins that form and occur within a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex. Recent studies in the Drosophila oocyte have revealed that RNP complex assembly in the nucleus is critical for the regulation of cytoplasmic mRNA localization and translation. Furthermore, several trans-acting factors promote the reorganization of target mRNAs in the cytoplasm into higher-order RNP granules, which are often visible by light microscopy. Therefore, RNA localization and translation are likely to be coupled within these RNP granules. Notably, diverse cytoplasmic RNP granules observed in different cell types share conserved sets of proteins, suggesting they have fundamental and common cellular functions.

Multiple RNA binding domains of Bruno confer recognition of diverse binding sites for translational repression

Bruno protein binds to multiple sites - BREs - in the oskar mRNA 3' UTR, thereby controlling oskar mRNA translation. Bruno also binds and regulates other mRNAs, although the binding sites have not yet been defined. Bruno has three RRM type RNA binding motifs, two near the amino terminus and an extended RRM at the C terminus. Two domains of Bruno, the first two RRMs (RRM1+2), and the extended RRM (RRM3+) - can each bind with specificity to the oskar mRNA regulatory regions; these and Bruno were used for in vitro selections. Anti-RRM3+ aptamers include long, highly constrained motifs, including one corresponding to the previously identified BRE. Anti-RRM1+2 aptamers lack constrained motifs, but are biased towards classes of short and variable sequences. Bruno itself selects for several motifs, including some of those bound by RRM3+. We propose that the different RNA binding domains allow for combinatorial binding, with extended Bruno binding sites assembled from sequences bound by the individual domains. Examples of such sites were identified in known targets of Bruno, and shown to confer Bruno-dependent translational repression in vivo. Other proteins with multiple RRMs may employ combinatorial binding to achieve high levels of specificity and affinity.

Firm wheat-germ cell-free system with extended vector usage for high-throughput protein screening

The wheat germ cell-free system is composed out of five basic steps, growth of Escherichia coli harboring plasmid, first colony-PCR, second PCR, transcription, and translation. Improvements of culture medium, colony based PCR, and modifications within the split primer set of the second PCR amplify both DNA and RNA levels. This yields more than 5 times increase in protein amount for pEU-originated templates. Especially, for the low PCR-amplifiable vectors with pET-origin, it leads to 30 fold higher product amount in translation. This broadens the range of usable vectors, overcoming the existing cell-free system limitations for high-throughput protein screening. Noteworthily, the system successfully maintains translation by S-30 cell-free extract below 30 OD. In conclusion, this improved firm cell-free system reduces cost and enables robotic automation and high-throughput thermodynamic analysis, especially for proteins that are difficult to be expressed.

The novel gene twenty-four defines a critical translational step in the Drosophila clock

Daily oscillations of gene expression underlie circadian behaviours in multicellular organisms1. While attention has been focused on transcriptional and posttranslational mechanisms1–3, other posttranscriptional modes have been less clearly delineated. Here we report mutants of a novel Drosophila gene twenty-four (tyf) that display weak behavioural rhythms. Weak rhythms are accompanied by dramatic reductions in the levels of the clock protein PERIOD (PER) as well as more modest effects on TIMELESS (TIM). Nonetheless, PER induction in pacemaker neurons can rescue tyf mutant rhythms. TYF associates with a 5′-cap binding complex, poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) as well as per and tim transcripts. Furthermore, TYF activates reporter expression when tethered to reporter mRNA even in vitro. Taken together, these data suggest that TYF potently activates PER translation in pacemaker neurons to sustain robust rhythms, revealing a novel and important role for translational control in the Drosophila circadian clock.

Preparation of a highly active cell-free translation system from immature Xenopus laevis oocytes

Understanding mechanisms of post-transcriptional control of gene expression has come under much scrutiny in recent years. A key question in this field is how the translation of specific mRNAs is activated or repressed both spatially and temporally in a given cell. In oocytes of the frog Xenopus laevis a number of mRNAs are localized early in oogenesis and subsequently translated at later stages. We have developed a highly active cell-free translation system from oocytes in the early stages of oogenesis that is applicable to the study of translation and translational control of both endogenous and exogenous mRNAs.

Vasa protein expression is restricted to the small micromeres of the sea urchin, but is inducible in other lineages early in development

Vasa is a DEAD-box RNA helicase that functions in translational regulation of specific mRNAs. In many animals it is essential for germ line development and may have a more general stem cell role. Here we identify vasa in two sea urchin species and analyze the regulation of its expression. We find that vasa protein accumulates in only a subset of cells containing vasa mRNA. In contrast to vasa mRNA, which is present uniformly throughout all cells of the early embryo, vasa protein accumulates selectively in the 16-cell stage micromeres, and then is restricted to the small micromeres through gastrulation to larval development. Manipulating early embryonic fate specification by blastomere separations, exposure to lithium, and dominant-negative cadherin each suggest that, although vasa protein accumulation in the small micromeres is fixed, accumulation in other cells of the embryo is inducible. Indeed, we find that embryos in which micromeres are removed respond by significant up-regulation of vasa protein translation, followed by spatial restriction of the protein late in gastrulation. Overall, these results support the contention that sea urchins do not have obligate primordial germ cells determined in early development, that vasa may function in an early stem cell population of the embryo, and that vasa expression in this embryo is restricted early by translational regulation to the small micromere lineage.

Establishment of a lipid accumulation model in an insect cell line

The study of adipocyte differentiation and lipid accumulation in insects has been limited by the lack of a system suitable for analysis of molecular mechanisms. Here, we describe the establishment of a model system of lipid accumulation in BmN4 cells, which are derived from silkworm ovary. In BmN4 cells, dexamethasone treatment induced accumulation of lipid, suppressed cellular proliferation, and caused the cells to form aggregates. We isolated the Bombyx mori fatty acid binding protein 1 gene (BmFABP1), which is the silkworm homologue of mouse Fabp4 (aP2), a marker of adipocyte differentiation in mammals. BmFABP1 expression was increased by dexamethasone treatment. We also isolated the BmFABP1 promoter, and found that it was activated by a combination of drugs that included dexamethasone. The demonstration of dexamethasone-stimulated lipid accumulation and BmFABP1 expression in BmN4 cells provides a useful model of inducible adipogenesis. This system should be valuable for investigation of the molecular mechanisms of fat body formation, adipocyte differentiation, and lipid accumulation in the silkworm and other Lepidopteran insects.

Regulating translation of maternal messages: multiple repression mechanisms

The dowry of mRNAs and proteins that mothers provide their progeny as part of a common developmental strategy to permit rapid embryogenesis necessitates precise translational regulation of the deposited mRNAs. Recent studies with Drosophila uncovered diverse mechanisms to control translation of the transcripts for genes that control the cell cycle and embryonic patterning. The newly delineated mechanisms include: alternative ways to disrupt eIF4E action and the formation of the preinitiation complex b y the eIF4E homologous protein, d4EHP; recruitment of the deadenylase complex by the SMAUG and PUMILIO proteins; both poly(A)-dependent and -independent promotion of translation by the PNG kinase complex; and 5' cap-independent translational regulation b y BRUNO.

A late phase of Oskar accumulation is crucial for posterior patterning of the Drosophila embryo, and is blocked by ectopic expression of Bruno

In Drosophila, posterior embryonic body patterning and germ cell formation rely on Oskar, a protein that is concentrated at the posterior pole of the oocyte. A program of mRNA localization and translational regulation ensures that Oskar is only expressed at the proper location. One key regulatory factor is Bruno, which represses translation of oskar mRNA before its localization. Ectopic expression of a bruno cDNA prolongs repression, even after oskar mRNA is localized, and posterior body patterning is efficiently and selectively blocked. Surprisingly, the initial accumulation of Oskar, while frequently reduced, is not eliminated, arguing that levels of Oskar previously thought to be sufficient for patterning do not suffice, or that Bruno acts at a downstream step in patterning. Expression of the bruno cDNA does not inhibit posterior patterning when Oskar is expressed independent of Bruno-mediated regulation, ruling out a downstream requirement for Bruno. Notably, an Oskar::GFP reporter protein reveals continual accumulation during the late phases of oogenesis. Taken together, these results strongly argue that a late phase in accumulation of Osk protein, typically not monitored because of imperviousness of late stage oocytes to antibodies, is crucial for body patterning.

Oligomerization of EDEN-BP is required for specific mRNA deadenylation and binding

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

mRNA deadenylation [shortening of the poly(A) tail] is often triggered by specific sequence elements present within mRNA 3' untranslated regions and generally causes rapid degradation of the mRNA. In vertebrates, many of these deadenylation elements are called AREs (AU-rich elements). The EDEN (embryo deadenylation element) sequence is a Xenopus class III ARE. EDEN acts by binding a specific factor, EDEN-BP (EDEN-binding protein), which in turn stimulates deadenylation.

RESULTS

We show here that EDEN-BP is able to oligomerize. A 27-amino-acid region of EDEN-BP was identified as a key domain for oligomerization. A mutant of EDEN-BP lacking this region was unable to oligomerize, and a peptide corresponding to this region competitively inhibited the oligomerization of full-length EDEN-BP. Impairing oligomerization by either of these two methods specifically abolished EDEN-dependent deadenylation. Furthermore, impairing oligomerization inhibited the binding of EDEN-BP to its target RNA, demonstrating a strong coupling between EDEN-BP oligomerization and RNA binding.

CONCLUSIONS

These data, showing that the oligomerization of EDEN-BP is required for binding of the protein on its target RNA and for EDEN-dependent deadenylation in Xenopus embryos, will be important for the identification of cofactors required for the deadenylation process.

Studying Translational Control in Drosophila Cell-Free Systems

Classically, Drosophila cell-free translation systems have been used to study the response of the translational machinery to heat shock treatment. We and others have developed optimized Drosophila embryo and ovary extracts, and their use has expanded to the study of a variety of translational control events. These extracts recapitulate many of the aspects of mRNA translation observed in vivo and retain critical regulatory features of several translational control processes. Indeed, their use is rapidly improving our knowledge of molecular mechanisms of translational control. In this chapter we provide general guidelines and detailed protocols to obtain and use translation extracts derived from Drosophila embryos and ovaries.

Sex-lethal is a target of Bruno-mediated translational repression in promoting the differentiation of stem cell progeny during Drosophila oogenesis

The RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) type RNA binding protein Bruno is required for the differentiation of cystoblasts, the committed daughters of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. To understand how Bruno controls cystoblast differentiation, we used a bioinformatics approach to identify potential mRNA targets of Bruno. One such target is the Sex-lethal (Sxl) transcript MS11, which contains four Bruno Response Elements (BREs) in its 3' untranslated region. Electrophoresis mobility shift assays demonstrated that Bruno specifically binds to the BREs of Sxl MS11 mRNA. Tagged transgenic Sxl MS11 cDNA constructs were used to show that Bruno represses the translation of the Sxl MS11 mRNA via the BRE-containing region in the 3'UTR. The lack of either Bruno or the BRE-containing region leads to overexpression of SXL, which in turn causes defects in cystoblast differentiation similar to the Bruno mutant phenotype. Therefore, Sxl MS11 represents a novel target of Bruno-mediated translational repression required for cystoblast differentiation.

The C2H2 zinc-finger protein SYD-9 is a putative posttranscriptional regulator for synaptic transmission

Communication between neurons is largely achieved through chemical synapses, where neurotransmitters are released from synaptic vesicles at presynaptic terminals to activate postsynaptic cells. Exo- and endocytosis are coordinated to replenish the synaptic vesicle pool for sustained neuronal activity. We identified syd-9 (syd, synapse defective), a gene that encodes multiple C2H2 zinc-finger domain-containing proteins specifically required for synaptic function in Caenorhabditis elegans. syd-9 loss-of-function mutants exhibit locomotory defects, a diffuse distribution of synaptic proteins, and decreased synaptic transmission with unaffected neurodevelopment. syd-9 mutants share phenotypic and ultrastructural characteristics with mutants that lack synaptic proteins that are required for endocytosis. syd-9 mutants also display genetic interactions with these endocytotic mutants, suggesting that SYD-9 regulates endocytosis. SYD-9 proteins are enriched in the nuclei of both neuron and muscle cells, but their neuronal expression plays a major role in locomotion. SYD-9 isoforms display a speckle-like expression pattern that is typical of RNA-binding proteins that regulate premRNA splicing. Furthermore, syd-9 functions in parallel with unc-75 (unc, uncoordinated), the C. elegans homologue of the CELF/BrunoL family protein that regulates mRNA alternative splicing and processing, and is also required specifically for synaptic transmission. We propose that neuronal SYD-9 proteins are previously uncharacterized and specific posttranscriptional regulators of synaptic vesicle endocytosis.

Rethinking some mechanisms invoked to explain translational regulation in eukaryotes

Real progress in understanding translational regulatory mechanisms lags behind the claims of progress. Novel mechanisms were proclaimed in recent months for some important regulatory proteins from Drosophila (e.g. Bruno, Sex-lethal, Reaper), but the evidence is thin. Many flaws in the design and interpretation of new experiments can be traced to older experiments which came to be accepted, not because the evidence was overwhelming, but because the ideas were appealing. Two of these classic examples of translational regulation are discussed before taking up the newer findings. One paradigm concerns regulation of 15-lipoxygenase production during reticulocyte maturation. The mechanism postulated for 15-lipoxygenase was pieced together in vitro and has never been linked in a meaningful way to what happens naturally in reticulocytes; nevertheless, these experiments have guided (or misguided) thinking about how sequences near the 3' end of an mRNA might regulate translation. The second paradigm concerns the regulation of cyclin B1 translation in Xenopus oocytes by a protein called Maskin, which purportedly interacts with initiation factors. A third topic discussed in some detail concerns the idea that in eukaryotes, as in prokaryotes, initiation of translation might involve base-pairing between mRNA and ribosomal RNA. Recent experiments undertaken to test this idea in yeast are far from conclusive. Many of the experimental defects brought to light in this review are simple-absence of controls, reliance on indirect tests, failure to test a new test system before using it; these things are fixable. Special problems are posed by the practice of using internal ribosome entry sequences (IRESs) as tools to figure out how translation might be regulated by other components. Unanswered questions about the IRESs themselves have to be resolved before they can be used confidently as tools.

Miranda couples oskar mRNA/Staufen complexes to the bicoid mRNA localization pathway

The double-stranded RNA binding protein Staufen is required for the microtubule-dependent localization of bicoid and oskar mRNAs to opposite poles of the Drosophila oocyte and also mediates the actin-dependent localization of prospero mRNA during the asymmetric neuroblast divisions. The posterior localization of oskar mRNA requires Staufen RNA binding domain 2, whereas prospero mRNA localization mediated the binding of Miranda to RNA binding domain 5, suggesting that different Staufen domains couple mRNAs to distinct localization pathways. Here, we show that the expression of Miranda during mid-oogenesis targets Staufen/oskar mRNA complexes to the anterior of the oocyte, resulting in bicaudal embryos that develop an abdomen and pole cells instead of the head and thorax. Anterior Miranda localization requires microtubules, rather than actin, and depends on the function of Exuperantia and Swallow, indicating that Miranda links Staufen/oskar mRNA complexes to the bicoid mRNA localization pathway. Since Miranda is expressed in late oocytes and bicoid mRNA localization requires the Miranda-binding domain of Staufen, Miranda may play a redundant role in the final step of bicoid mRNA localization. Our results demonstrate that different Staufen-interacting proteins couple Staufen/mRNA complexes to distinct localization pathways and reveal that Miranda mediates both actin- and microtubule-dependent mRNA localization.

Bruno acts as a dual repressor of oskar translation, promoting mRNA oligomerization and formation of silencing particles

Prior to reaching the posterior pole of the Drosophila oocyte, oskar mRNA is translationally silenced by Bruno binding to BREs in the 3' untranslated region. The eIF4E binding protein Cup interacts with Bruno and inhibits oskar translation. Validating current models, we directly demonstrate the mechanism proposed for Cup-mediated repression: inhibition of small ribosomal subunit recruitment to oskar mRNA. However, 43S complex recruitment remains inhibited in the absence of functional Cup, uncovering a second Bruno-dependent silencing mechanism. This mechanism involves mRNA oligomerization and formation of large (50S-80S) silencing particles that cannot be accessed by ribosomes. Bruno-dependent mRNA oligomerization into silencing particles emerges as a mode of translational control that may be particularly suited to coupling with mRNA transport.

Bruno inhibits the expression of mitotic cyclins during the prophase I meiotic arrest of Drosophila oocytes

Animal oocytes undergo a highly conserved developmental arrest in prophase of meiosis I. The maintenance of the prophase I arrest requires the silencing of Cdk1 activity. Drosophila oocytes inhibit the accumulation of the mitotic cyclins, the activating subunits of Cdk1, via a poorly defined posttranscriptional mechanism. Here, we demonstrate that the translational repressor Bruno binds the 3' UTR and inhibits the translation of the mitotic cyclin Cyclin A during prophase of meiosis I. In the absence of Bruno, ovarian cysts enter meiosis but rapidly accumulate high levels of mitotic cyclins and return to the mitotic cycle. Based on our results, we propose a model in which Bruno and the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome act together to restrict the accumulation of the mitotic cyclins, and thus Cdk1 activity, during the prophase I arrest of the Drosophila oocyte.

Bruno: A Double Turn-off for Oskar

In Drosophila, the posterior localization of oskar mRNA and its translational regulation are essential for axis specification and germline formation. Recently in Cell, demonstrated that Bruno inhibits cap-dependent translation of oskar mRNA and uncovered a novel Bruno-dependent assembly of oskar mRNA into multimeric RNP particles, which are inaccessible to the translational machinery. This work provides a novel link between mRNA localization, particle formation, and translational regulation.

A dual inhibitory mechanism restricts msl-2 mRNA translation for dosage compensation in Drosophila

Drosophila MSL-2 is the limiting component of the dosage compensation complex. Female flies must inhibit msl-2 mRNA translation for survival, and this inhibition is mediated by Sex-lethal (SXL) binding to sites in both the 5' and the 3' untranslated regions (UTRs). Here, we uncover the mechanism by which SXL achieves tight control of translation initiation. SXL binding to the 3'UTR regulatory region inhibits the recruitment of 43S ribosomal preinitiation complexes to the mRNA. Ribosomal complexes escaping this block and binding to the 5' end of the mRNA are challenged by SXL bound to the 5'UTR, which interferes with scanning to the downstream initiation codon of the mRNA. This failsafe mechanism thus forms the molecular basis of a critical step in dosage compensation. The results also elucidate a two step principle of translational control via multiple regulatory sites within an mRNA.

RNA-binding proteins in early development

RNA-binding proteins play a major part in the control of gene expression during early development. At this stage, the majority of regulation occurs at the levels of translation and RNA localization. These processes are, in general, mediated by RNA-binding proteins interacting with specific sequence motifs in the 3'-untranslated regions of their target RNAs. Although initial work concentrated on the analysis of these sequences and their trans-acting factors, we are now beginning to gain an understanding of the mechanisms by which some of these proteins function. In this review, we will describe a number of different families of RNA-binding proteins, grouping them together on the basis of common regulatory strategies, and emphasizing the recurrent themes that occur, both across different species and as a response to different biological problems.

Translational regulation during oogenesis and early development: the cap-poly(A) tail relationship

Metazoans rely on the regulated translation of select maternal mRNAs to control oocyte maturation and the initial stages of embryogenesis. These transcripts usually remain silent until their translation is temporally and spatially required during early development. Different translational regulatory mechanisms, varying from cytoplasmic polyadenylation to localization of maternal mRNAs, have evolved to assure coordinated initiation of development. A common feature of these mechanisms is that they share a few key trans-acting factors. Increasing evidence suggest that ubiquitous conserved mRNA-binding factors, including the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and the cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein (CPEB), interact with cell-specific molecules to accomplish the correct level of translational activity necessary for normal development. Here we review how capping and polyadenylation of mRNAs modulate interaction with multiple regulatory factors, thus controlling translation during oogenesis and early development.

How strong is the case for regulation of the initiation step of translation by elements at the 3' end of eukaryotic mRNAs?

The belief that initiation of translation requires communication between the 5' and 3' ends of the mRNA guides--or misguides--the interpretation of many experiments. The closed-loop model for initiation creates the expectation that sequences at the 3' end of eukaryotic mRNAs should regulate translation. This review looks closely at the evidence in three prominent cases where such regulation is claimed. The mRNAs in question encode 15-lipoxygenase, ceruloplasmin, and histones. Vertebrate histone mRNAs lack a poly(A) tail, instead of which a 3' stem-loop structure is said to promote translation by binding a protein which purportedly binds initiation factors. The proffered evidence for this hypothesis has many flaws. Temporal control of 15-lipoxygenase production in reticulocytes is often cited as another well-documented example of translational regulation via the 3' untranslated region, but inspection of the evidence reveals significant gaps and contradictions. Solid evidence is lacking also for the idea that a ribosomal protein binds to and shuts off translation of ceruloplasmin mRNA. Some viral RNAs that lack a poly(A) tail have alternative 3' structures which are said to promote translation via circularization of the mRNA, but in no case has this been shown convincingly. Interpretation of many experiments is compromised by possible effects of the 3' structures on mRNA stability rather than translation. The functional-half-life assay, which is often employed to rule out effects on mRNA stability, might not be adequate to settle the question. Other issues, such as the possibility of artifacts caused by overexpression of RNA-binding proteins, can complicate studies of translational regulation. There is no doubt that elements at the 3' end of eukaryotic mRNAs can regulate gene expression in a variety of ways. It has not been shown unequivocally that one of these ways involves direct participation of the 3' untranslated region in the initiation step of translation.

Hrp48, a Drosophila hnRNPA/B homolog, binds and regulates translation of oskar mRNA

Establishment of the Drosophila embryonic axes provides a striking example of RNA localization as an efficient mechanism for protein targeting within a cell. oskar mRNA encodes the posterior determinant and is essential for germline and abdominal development in the embryo. Tight restriction of Oskar activity to the posterior is achieved by mRNA localization-dependent translational control, whereby unlocalized mRNA is translationally repressed and repression is overcome upon mRNA localization. Here we identify the previously reported oskar RNA binding protein p50 as Hrp48, an abundant Drosophila hnRNP. Analysis of three hrp48 mutant alleles reveals that Hrp48 levels are crucial for polarization of the oocyte during mid-oogenesis. Our data also show that Hrp48, which binds to the 5' and 3' regions of oskar mRNA, plays an important role in restricting Oskar activity to the posterior of the oocyte, by repressing oskar mRNA translation during transport.

Drosophila Cup Is an eIF4E Binding Protein that Associates with Bruno and Regulates oskar mRNA Translation in Oogenesis

Translational control is a critical process in the spatio-temporal restriction of protein production. In Drosophila oogenesis, translational repression of oskar (osk) RNA during its localization to the posterior pole of the oocyte is essential for embryonic patterning and germ cell formation. This repression is mediated by the osk 3' UTR binding protein Bruno (Bru), but the underlying mechanism has remained elusive. Here, we report that an ovarian protein, Cup, is required to repress precocious osk translation. Cup binds the 5'-cap binding translation initiation factor eIF4E through a sequence conserved among eIF4E binding proteins. A mutant Cup protein lacking this sequence fails to repress osk translation in vivo. Furthermore, Cup interacts with Bru in a yeast two-hybrid assay, and the Cup-eIF4E complex associates with Bru in an RNA-independent manner. These results suggest that translational repression of osk RNA is achieved through a 5'/3' interaction mediated by an eIF4E-Cup-Bru complex.

Regulation of mRNA translation by 5'- and 3'-UTR-binding factors

The translational regulation of specific mRNAs is important for controlling gene expression. The past few years have seen a rapid expansion in the identification and characterization of mRNA regulatory elements and their binding proteins. For the majority of these examples, the mechanism by which translational regulation is achieved is not well understood. Nevertheless, detailed analyses of a few examples show that almost every event in the initiation pathway, from binding of the cap complex to the joining of the 60S ribosomal subunit, is subject to regulation.

Bruno regulates gurken during Drosophila oogenesis

Translational regulation of localized transcripts is a powerful mechanism to control the precise timing and localization of protein expression within a cell. In the Drosophila germline, oskar transcript must be translationally repressed until its localization at the posterior pole of the oocyte, as ectopic production of Oskar causes severe patterning defects. Translational repression of oskar mRNA is mediated by the RNA-binding protein Bruno, which binds to specific motifs in the oskar 3'UTR. Here we show that Bruno over-expression causes defects in antero-posterior and dorso-ventral patterning, consistent with a role of Bruno in both oskar and gurken mRNA regulation. We also show that Bruno and gurken interact genetically. Finally, we show that Bruno binds specifically to the gurken 3'UTR and that the dorso-ventral defects caused by Bruno over-expression are due to a reduction of Gurken levels in the oocyte. We conclude that Bruno plays similar roles in translational regulation of gurken and oskar.

Ovarian differentiation and human embryo quality. 1. Molecular and morphogenetic homologies between oocytes and embryos in Drosophila, C. elegans, Xenopus and mammals

Knowledge on the formation of oocytes and follicles in Drosophila, C. elegans and Xenopus, and the genetic regulation of polarities and embryo growth, has been related to comparable data in mammalian oocytes and embryos. Initially, details of the nature of the regulatory processes in the non-mammals are described, with considerable attention being paid to the role of individual genes and their specific functions. The molecular genetic aspects of these developmental processes are discussed in detail. Attention then turns to mammals, to identify, describe and evaluate their homologies with the lower animals and flies. Several of these homologies are described, including genes regulating primary ovarian failure and various aspects of early embryonic growth. The polarized distribution of genes in mammalian oocytes and embyros is discussed, together with the implications in the form of differentiation in the early embryo. Morphogenetic systems operative during follicle maturation, fertilization and cleavage are described and related to similar processes in lower forms. These events include ooplasmic and pronuclear rotations, the form of ooplasmic inheritance in early blastomeres and the establishment of embryonic axes. Models of early mammalian development are considered.

Rat vasopressin mRNA: a model system to characterize cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors involved in dendritic mRNA sorting

The genes encoding the vasopressin (VP) and oxytocin (OT) precursors are expressed in magnocellular neurons of the hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal system. The neuropeptides have a dual function: (1) they are secreted from the nerve terminals into the systemic circulation to act as hormones on various peripheral target organs; and (2) VP and OT are also released from the dendrites into the central nervous system where they presumably play a role as either neurotransmitters or as modulators of the classical transmitters. Substantial amounts of VP and OT mRNAs are sorted to both axons and dendrites. Since the latter are equipped with components of the translation machinery, the peptide hormone precursors are likely to be locally synthesized in dendrites of magnocellular neurons. Evidence for axonal precursor synthesis, on the other hand, has not been obtained. Subcellular mRNA localization is a complex pathway. It is determined by sequences (cis-acting elements) within the RNA and proteins (trans-acting factors) which interact with these elements in order to guide the molecules to their ultimate destination. We have investigated the mechanisms involved in mRNA targeting in neurons by using VP mRNA as a model system. Recombinant eukaryotic expression vectors harboring the VP cDNA have been microinjected into the cell nuclei of cultured superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons. The subcellular distribution of the vector-expressed mRNAs was determined by non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques. This revealed transport of VP mRNA to the dendrites, but not to the axonal compartment of SCG neurons. A complex dendritic localizer sequence (DLS) that spans part of the coding region as well as the 3'-untranslated region was identified by microinjecting constructs encoding partial sequences of the VP mRNA. In order to characterize trans-acting factors interacting with this element, protein/RNA binding experiments with radiolabeled in vitro synthesized VP RNA probes and proteins extracted from rat brain have been carried out. A protein specifically interacts with the DLS of the VP mRNA but not with sequences that obviously lack a role in subcellular RNA transport. Biochemical purification revealed that this protein is the multifunctional poly(A)-binding protein (PABP). It is well known for its ability to bind with high affinity to poly(A) tails of mRNAs, prerequisite for mRNA stabilization and stimulation of translational initiation, respectively. With lower affinities, PABP can also associate with non-poly(A) sequences. The physiological consequences of these PABP/RNA interactions include functions such as translational silencing. The translational state of mRNAs subject to dendritic sorting is most likely influenced by external stimuli. Consequently, PABP could represent one of several components necessary to regulate local synthesis of the VP precursor and possibly of other proteins.

VASA localization requires the SPRY-domain and SOCS-box containing protein, GUSTAVUS

VASA (VAS), a key protein in establishing the specialized translational activity of the Drosophila pole plasm, accumulates at the posterior pole of the developing oocyte. We identified a gene, gustavus (gus), that encodes a protein that interacts with VAS. A gus mutation blocks posterior localization of VAS, as does deletion of a segment of VAS containing the GUS binding site. Like VAS, GUS is present in cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particles. Heterozygotes for gus or a deletion including gus produce embryos with fewer pole cells and posterior patterning defects. Therefore, GUS is essential for the posterior localization of VAS. However, gus is not required for the posterior localization of oskar (osk). Apparent gus orthologs are present in mammalian genomes.