Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap and Silicone Implant Followed by Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

About 30% to 50% of women with breast cancer undergo mastectomy, and approximately 50% of them will receive adjuvant radiotherapy (ART). This study evaluates the medium- and long-term impact of ART after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (LDM) flap and silicone implants.

METHODS

Clinical, surgical, and oncological data were retrospectively collected and analyzed based on the medical records of 176 patients who had undergone IBR with LDM flap and silicone implants.

RESULTS

The data showed that 7.4% of patients had a history of previous radiotherapy, 56.3% received ART, 31.8% developed capsular contracture with a mean follow-up of 58.1 months, and 14.2% of surgeries were categorized as procedures with a prolonged operating time, lasting above 1 SD of the observed mean. Those who experienced prolonged operating time (odds ratio, 4.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-12.93; P = 0.003) and those who received ART (odds ratio, 7.38; 95% confidence interval, 3.18-17.10; P < 0.001) were more likely to develop capsular contracture. Thirty-two patients (18%) underwent capsulectomy with implant replacement, and 7 patients (4%) had the implant removed. The mean time between IBR and reoperation was 29.1 months. Patients who received ART were 2.84 times more likely to experience reconstruction failure or undergo implant-related reoperation ( P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that IBR with LDM flap and silicone implant followed by ART is a safe procedure, resulting in low rates of reconstruction failure. However, ART increased the likelihood of capsular contracture development and implant-related reoperation, having a negative effect on reconstructed breasts.

Evaluation of satisfaction and the quality of life after bilateral breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The demand of breast reconstruction is growing, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the satisfaction and quality of life of patients who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction.

METHODS

In this cohort retrospective study, patients who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction in our department between September 2009 and December 2019 were asked to complete BREAST-Q questionnaire based on the timing of the reconstruction received following mastectomy, thus dividing them into three groups: (1) bilateral immediate breast reconstruction(BIBR), (2) immediate breast reconstruction in one side and delayed reconstruction on the other side (mixed group), (3) bilateral delayed breast reconstruction(BDBR). Surgical techniques were divided into prosthesthetic (permanent implant and expander), flaps (pedicle or free), mixed technique (associating flap and prosthesis).

RESULTS

Seventy-one out of 94 patients responded to our BREAST-Q questionnaire, with a response rate of 84.5%. A high score is associated with a better result, except in physical well-being where a lower score indicates better outcome. The average score for psychosocial well-being is 63.0 (±17.2) achieving the lowest among the BDBR group. Physical well-being score is 26.0 (±18.6) scoring the highest in BIBR group. Sexual well-being score is 52.2 (±17.4) and seen highest among BDBR group. Satisfaction with breast score is 54.1 (±10.0) and was highest among mixed group.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic proposal was personalized based on patient profile and choice. The best reconstruction treatment enhancing the quality of life and patient satisfaction remains the option chosen by the patient and whose advantages and disadvantages are accepted by them.

Development and Initial Validation of a Novel Professional Aesthetic Scale for the Female Abdomen

BACKGROUND

A growing body of literature aims to describe abdominal aesthetic goals in order to tailor surgical and non-surgical treatment options to meet patient goals. We aimed to integrate lay-person perceptions into the design of a novel professional aesthetic scale for the abdomen.

METHODS

An iterative process of expert consensus was used to choose 5 domains -1) abdominal muscle lines, 2) abdominal shape, 3) scar, 4) skin, and 5) umbilicus. A survey was developed to measure global and domain-specific aesthetic preferences on 5 abdomens. This was distributed through Amazon Mechanical Turk to 340 respondents. Principal component analysis was used to integrate survey data into weights for each of the scale's sub-questions. Attending plastic surgeons then rated abdomens using the final scale, and reliability and validity were calculated.

RESULTS

The final scale included eleven sub-questions - hourglass shape, bulges, hernia, infraumbilical skin, supraumbilical skin, umbilicus shape, umbilicus medialization position, umbilicus height position, semilunar lines, central midline depression, scar - within the 5 domains. Central midline depression held the highest weight (16.1%) when correlated to global aesthetic rating, followed by semilunar lines (15.8%) and infraumbilical skin (11.8%). The final scale demonstrated strong validity (Pearson r=0.99) and was rated as easy to use by 7 attending plastic surgeons.

CONCLUSION

The final scale is the first published professional aesthetic scale for the abdomen that aims to integrate lay-person opinion. In addition, this analysis and survey data provide insights into the importance of eleven components in overall aesthetic appeal of the abdomen.

Abdullah A, Alkhalidi H, Alrehaili M. Early onset of capsular contracture after breast augmentation with implant: report of two cases & review of literature

Capsular contracture (CC) is a local complication caused by an inflammatory reaction that leads to fibrosis. CC commonly occurs after one year of surgery. Hence, there has been no previously reported early onset of CC. Therefore, we report two unusual cases of early onset of post-breast reconstruction capsular contracture.

Comparison of nine methods of immediate breast reconstruction after resection of localized breast cancer: A cost-effectiveness Markov decision analysis of prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Women undergoing immediate breast reconstruction without radiation therapy have reconstruction methods available with uncertain long-term costs associated with complications requiring surgery and revisions. We evaluated cost-effectiveness of nine methods of immediate breast reconstruction for women with localized breast cancer.

METHODS

Markov modeling was performed over 10-years for unilateral/bilateral breast reconstructions from healthcare/societal perspectives. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched to derive data from 13,744 patients in 79 prospective studies. Complications requiring surgery (mastectomy necrosis, total/partial flap necrosis, seroma, hematoma, infection, wound dehiscence, abdominal hernia, implant removal/explantation) and revisions (fat necrosis, capsular contracture, asymmetry, scars/redundant tissue, implant rupture/removal, fat grafting) were evaluated over yearly cycles. Reconstructions included: direct-to-implant (DTI), tissue expander-to-implant (TEI), latissimus dorsi flap-to-implant (LDI), latissimus dorsi (LD), pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM), free TRAM, deep inferior epigastric perforator/superficial inferior epigastric artery (DIEP/SIEA), thigh-based, or gluteal based flaps. Outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) and net monetary benefits (NMB). Willingness-to-pay thresholds were $50,000 and $100,000.

RESULTS

From a healthcare perspective for unilateral reconstruction, compared to LD, the ICER for DTI was -$42,109.35/quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), LDI was -$25,300.83/QALY, TEI was -$22,036.02/QALY, DIEP/SIEA was $8307.65/QALY, free TRAM was $8677.26/QALY, pedicled TRAM was $13,021.44/QALY, gluteal-based was $17,698.99/QALY, and thigh-based was $23,447.82/QALY. NMB of DIEP/SIEA was $404,523.47, free TRAM was $403,821.40, gluteal-based was $392,478.64, thigh-based was $387,691.70, pedicled TRAM was $376,901.83, LD was $370,646.93, DTI was $339,668.77, LDI was $334,350.30, and TEI was $329,265.84.

CONCLUSIONS

All nine methods of immediate breast reconstruction were considered cost-effective from healthcare/societal perspectives. LD provided the lowest costs, while DIEP/SIEA provided the greatest effectiveness and NMB.

External Validation of a Predictive Model for Acute Skin Radiation Toxicity in the REQUITE Breast Cohort

Background: Acute skin toxicity is a common and usually transient side-effect of breast radiotherapy although, if sufficiently severe, it can affect breast cosmesis, aftercare costs and the patient's quality-of-life. The aim of this study was to develop predictive models for acute skin toxicity using published risk factors and externally validate the models in patients recruited into the prospective multi-center REQUITE (validating pREdictive models and biomarkers of radiotherapy toxicity to reduce side-effects and improve QUalITy of lifE in cancer survivors) study.

Methods: Patient and treatment-related risk factors significantly associated with acute breast radiation toxicity on multivariate analysis were identified in the literature. These predictors were used to develop risk models for acute erythema and acute desquamation (skin loss) in three Radiogenomics Consortium cohorts of patients treated by breast-conserving surgery and whole breast external beam radiotherapy (n = 2,031). The models were externally validated in the REQUITE breast cancer cohort (n = 2,057).

Results: The final risk model for acute erythema included BMI, breast size, hypo-fractionation, boost, tamoxifen use and smoking status. This model was validated in REQUITE with moderate discrimination (AUC 0.65), calibration and agreement between predicted and observed toxicity (Brier score 0.17). The risk model for acute desquamation, excluding the predictor tamoxifen use, failed to validate in the REQUITE cohort.

Conclusions: While most published prediction research in the field has focused on model development, this study reports successful external validation of a predictive model using clinical risk factors for acute erythema following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. This model retained discriminatory power but will benefit from further re-calibration. A similar model to predict acute desquamation failed to validate in the REQUITE cohort. Future improvements and more accurate predictions are expected through the addition of genetic markers and application of other modeling and machine learning techniques.

Immediate Latissimus Dorsi and Prosthetic Reconstruction in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiation: An Analysis of 376 Breast Reconstructions

BACKGROUND

In immediate breast reconstruction, the plastic surgeon must strive to create an aesthetically pleasing result while minimizing complications. The latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap has long been used a workhorse flap in breast reconstruction. Often times, it is used a salvage flap after other methods of breast reconstruction have failed. In this study, we review the use of this flap in conjunction with prosthetic devices, regardless of the need for adjuvant radiation, to determine the safety and efficacy of this approach as a primary method of reconstruction.

METHODS

A single surgeon practice with a standardized reconstructive algorithm was reviewed. This compromises a 2-stage approach involving the use of LD myocutaneous flaps and tissue expanders for immediate reconstruction after mastectomy, followed by exchange for implants at a secondary surgery. A retrospective chart review was performed on 201 patients (376 breast reconstructions) who met inclusion criteria. Patient demographics and outcomes were compared based on radiation status. The primary outcome, reconstructive success, was defined as no need for further autologous reconstruction beyond the 2-stage approach utilized.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis was performed on both patient demographics, complications, and reconstructive outcomes. Demographics were equivalent between the 2 groups. When analyzing complications and outcomes, there was no difference between nonradiated patients and radiated patients except when looking at reconstructive loss, which was 3.6% in the nonradiated group and 16.6% in the radiated group (P = 0.03). However, one third of the patients in the radiated group who had reconstructive losses were due to reasons not related to radiation therapy. Taking this into account, overall reconstructive success showed no statistical significance between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this study show that immediate reconstruction with LD myocutaneous flaps in conjunction with prosthetic devices is a reliable and safe option, even in the setting of adjuvant radiation therapy, as the autologous tissue mitigates many sequelae of radiation therapy. Not only does this type of reconstruction provide an aesthetically pleasing result in 2 stages, but also has a favorable complication profile and success rate.

Immediate Breast Reconstruction Allows for the Timely Initiation of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy

BACKGROUND

Complications from breast reconstruction may delay postmastectomy radiation therapy and impact breast cancer outcomes. The authors hypothesized that immediate breast reconstruction may be associated with delays in the initiation of radiation, but that this delay would not significantly impact overall patient survival.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, the authors identified women with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and received postmastectomy radiation therapy. Delayed radiation was defined as treatment initiated 6 months or more after surgery in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy or 12 weeks or more after surgery in patients who received neoadjuvant or no chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Women undergoing breast reconstruction had an increased time to postmastectomy radiation therapy, 154 days versus 132 days (p < 0.001), and were more likely to experience a delay in initiating radiation (OR, 1.25; 95 percent CI, 1.188 to 1.314). Other factors associated with delayed radiation included increased Charlson/Deyo scores, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nonprivate insurance, and black race. Cox proportional hazards models revealed no evidence of a reduced adjusted overall survival in the immediate breast reconstruction group (hazard ratio, 0.836; 95 percent CI, 0.802 to 0.871; p < 0.001). Restricted cubic spline analysis identified the threshold number of days at which the start of radiation began to impact survival at 169 days (95 percent CI, 160 to 190 days), 75 days (95 percent CI, 42 to 90 days), and 71 days (95 percent CI, 41 to 90 days) in patients undergoing adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and no chemotherapy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Immediate breast reconstruction is associated with a modest delay in initiating postmastectomy radiation therapy but does not impact overall survival.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Delayed breast reconstruction with transverse latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap using Becker expander implants in patients submitted to radiotherapy: A series of cases

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap associated with a breast implant is a well-established procedure. However, there are few published articles regarding latissimus association with expanders and radiotherapy. This study assess data of breast reconstructions using a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap associated with Becker expander implant (TLDMF/E) in patients submitted to radiotherapy.

METHODS

This is a descriptive study consisting of a series of cases. Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent mastectomy, radiotherapy, and delayed LDMF/E breast reconstruction. A minimum 6-month follow-up period was established, and descriptive variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three patients were selected. The mean age of the patients was 45.1 years. Contralateral breast procedures were performed in 68 patients to achieve symmetry with substitution of the expander for an implant, with the majority of patients with an implant larger than the expander (74.0%) The nipple-areola complex was reconstructed in 77 patients (62.6%). In the donor site area, 116 patients (94.3%) had no complications. Minor complications were seroma in one patient and partial dehiscence in another patient. In the reconstructed breast, 11 patients (8.9%) had minor complications such as hematomas, partial necrosis of the native irradiated breast skin (3 cm or smaller), local infections, and partial exposition of the injection port. Major complications in the reconstructed breast were necrosis (larger than 3-5 cm) of the native irradiated breast skin in 5 patients (4.0%) who needed repair to avoid exposure of the expander. One patient needed expander removal due to a larger exposition.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed breast reconstruction with TLDMF/E is a reliable option to selected patients with mastectomy and radiotherapy sequel.

Breast Shape Analysis With Curvature Estimates and Principal Component Analysis for Cosmetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery

Background

Breast shape is defined utilizing mainly qualitative assessment (full, flat, ptotic) or estimates, such as volume or distances between reference points, that cannot describe it reliably.

Objectives

The authors quantitatively described breast shape with two parameters derived from a statistical methodology denominated by principal component analysis (PCA).

Methods

The authors created a heterogeneous dataset of breast shapes acquired with a commercial infrared 3-dimensional scanner on which PCA was performed. The authors plotted on a Cartesian plane the two highest values of PCA for each breast (principal components 1 and 2). Testing of the methodology on a preoperative and posttreatment surgical case and test-retest was performed by two operators.

Results

The first two principal components derived from PCA characterize the shape of the breast included in the dataset. The test-retest demonstrated that different operators obtain very similar values of PCA. The system is also able to identify major changes in the preoperative and posttreatment stages of a two-stage reconstruction. Even minor changes were correctly detected by the system.

Conclusions

This methodology can reliably describe the shape of a breast. An expert operator and a newly trained operator can reach similar results in a test/re-testing validation. Once developed and after further validation, this methodology could be employed as a good tool for outcome evaluation, auditing, and benchmarking.

Level of Evidence 4

Surgical Outcome and Cosmetic Results of Autologous Fat Grafting After Breast Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 222 Fat Grafting Sessions in 109 Patients

BACKGROUND

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT) often lead to breast deformity. Reconstruction of these defects is a surgical challenge. Lately, the popularity of autologous fat grafting in these patients is growing. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes and aesthetic results of autologous fat grafting after BCS and RT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A database of all patients who underwent fat grafting after BCS and RT was prospectively maintained. Patient demographics, clinical and surgical characteristics and intra- and postoperative complications were analysed. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative photographs were evaluated by a four-member expert-panel assessing the aesthetic outcome (Harvard scale, five-point aesthetic scale and an overall score).

RESULTS

Between June 2008 and January 2016, 109 consecutive patients (114 breasts) underwent 222 fat grafting procedures. The mean clinical postoperative follow-up was 26 ± 19 months (range 10-97). The median number of fat grafting sessions sufficient for a satisfactory surgical result was two (range 1-6). Localized infections occurred in four patients, all treated effectively with oral antibiotics. Fat necrosis that required excision under local anaesthesia occurred once. The overall cosmetic appearance was rated 5.1/10 before and 7.2/10 after reconstruction (p < 0.01). A significant improvement was noted in breast symmetry, volume, shape and scarring.

CONCLUSION

Fat grafting after BCS and RT provides significant aesthetic improvement of the breast. It has a positive effect on the postsurgical scar and irradiated tissue and helps to restore the volume deficit, which makes it suitable as a reconstructive approach in this patient group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Effect of the Timing of Radiotherapy on Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction: A 10-Year Study

Background:

Breast reconstruction (BR) is considered to be adversely affected by radiotherapy (RT), particularly when an implant is used. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes after expander-assisted latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction depending on the timing of RT.

Methods:

Patients undergoing BR over a 10-year period (follow-up mean, 56 [14–134] months) were divided into 3 groups. Group 1, RT after mastectomy and BR, Group 2, RT before mastectomy and BR, and Group 3, RT after mastectomy but before BR. The primary endpoints were early and late surgical interventions. Validated questionnaires were circulated to all study patients and matched controls.

Results:

Three hundred thirteen patients underwent 389 BRs. One hundred eighteen patients received RT, of which 65 had undergone expander-assisted latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Both use and timing of RT influenced clinical outcomes. Overall, use of RT resulted in a 3-fold increase in complications (P = 0.003). Postreconstruction RT resulted in more than double the number of complications compared with prereconstruction RT (P = 0.008) and delaying BR until after mastectomy and RT reduced complications to levels observed in control patients (P = nonsignificant). Complications were halved in patients undergoing autologous LD reconstruction (P = 0.0001). Patient-reported outcomes were similar for emotional well-being, satisfaction, and shoulder symptoms, although a nonsignificant increase in chronic breast symptoms was reported by the RT group.

Conclusion:

The timing and type of LD reconstruction chosen by patients receiving RT has a significant impact on the risk of subsequent complications and unplanned interventions but has little impact on longer term patient well-being or satisfaction.

Patient-reported outcomes and their predictors at 2- and 3-year follow-up after immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and adjuvant treatment

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to estimate the impact 2 and 3 years after surgery of implant-assisted latissimus dorsi (LDI) and autologous latissimus dorsi (ALD) flap breast reconstructions on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and, secondarily, to determine whether baseline characteristics can predict PROs.

METHODS

This was a multicentre prospective cohort study. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and breast cancer module (QLQ-BR23), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) PROs were completed before surgery and at 2 and 3 years after breast reconstruction. The effects of LDI and ALD, adjusted for baseline clinicodemographic characteristics, were estimated with multiple linear regressions. Effect sizes above 0·5 were considered clinically important.

RESULTS

Some 206 patients (LDI 93, ALD 113) were recruited in 2007-2013; 66·5 per cent were node-negative and 34·6 per cent received radiotherapy. Women with adverse clinicopathological factors were more likely to have received radiotherapy and to undergo ALD. Patients in both surgical groups showed clinically important effects at 2 and 3 years, including improvements in emotional scales, but worse physical functioning, social well-being, body image and anxiety. Radiotherapy adversely affected social functioning at 2 years (P = 0·002). Women undergoing ALD reconstruction had significantly improved sexual functioning at 3 years (P = 0·003) relative to those who had LDI procedures, even after adjusting for case mix (P = 0·007). At 3 years, younger women experienced worse physical well-being than older women (P = 0·006), and chemotherapy was associated with worse arm symptoms (P = 0·005).

CONCLUSION

Clinically important changes occurred in physical functioning, breast symptoms, body image and psychological distress. These results will guide selections of key PRO domains and sample-size calculation of future studies.

Trends in Immediate Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in the United Kingdom

Background:

The study aimed to evaluate local and national trends in immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) using the national English administrative records, Hospital Episode Statistics. Our prediction was an increase in implant-only and free flap procedures and a decline in latissimus flap reconstructions.

Methods:

Data from an oncoplastic center were interrogated to derive numbers of implant-only, autologous latissimus dorsi (LD), LD-assisted, and autologous pedicled or free flap IBR procedures performed between 2004 and 2013. Similarly, Hospital Episode Statistics data were used to quantify national trends in these procedures from 1996 to 2012 using a curve fitting analysis.

Results:

National data suggest an increase in LD procedures between 1996 (n = 250) and 2002 (n = 958), a gradual rise until 2008 (n = 1398) followed by a decline until 2012 (n = 1090). As a percentage of total IBR, trends in LD flap reconstruction better fit a quadratic (R² = 0.97) than a linear function (R² = 0.63), confirming a proportional recent decline in LD flap procedures. Conversely, autologous (non-LD) flap reconstructions have increased (1996 = 0.44%; 2012 = 2.76%), whereas implant-only reconstructions have declined (1996 = 95.42%; 2012 = 84.92%). Locally, 70 implant-assisted LD procedures were performed in 2003 -2004, but only 2 were performed in 2012 to 2013.

Conclusions:

Implants are the most common IBR technique; autologous free flap procedures have increased, and pedicled LD flap procedures are in decline.

Current attitudes to breast reconstruction surgery for women at risk of post-mastectomy radiotherapy: A survey of UK breast surgeons

Decision-making for women requiring reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) includes oncological safety, cosmesis, patient choice, potential delay/interference with adjuvant treatment and surgeon/oncologist preference. This study aimed to quantitatively assess surgeons' attitudes and perceptions about reconstructive options in this setting, and to ascertain if surgical volume influenced advice given. A questionnaire was sent to surgical members of the UK Association of Breast Surgery (ABS) in March-June 2014. The questionnaire elicited information on surgeon volume, reconstructive practice and drivers influencing decision-making. Response rate was 42% (148/355), representing 71% of UK breast units. Delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) was offered more commonly than immediate implant, delayed-immediate or immediate autologous reconstruction (p < 0.05). Cosmesis was thought to be equivalent between IBR and DBR by 15% of surgeons, and 26% believe IBR and DBR offer similar Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL). Surgeon volume had no effect on reconstruction choice. Common decision-making drivers included negative effects of radiotherapy upon reconstructive and cosmetic outcome. The majority of surgeons (77%) believe the current evidence base is insufficient to guide decision-making. Despite surgeons believing that cosmesis and quality of life are not equivalent between IBR and DBR, DBR remains the commonest approach to this difficult clinical scenario. Surgeons perceive they are using a variety of newer techniques such as Delayed-Immediate Reconstruction and Acellular Dermal Matrices to try to ameliorate the effects of PMRT. This survey demonstrates that there is wide variation in reported surgical practice in this difficult setting. There is widespread acknowledgement of the lack of evidence to guide decision-making.

Patient-reported outcome measures in reconstructive breast surgery: is there a role for generic measures?

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes provide an invaluable tool in the assessment of outcomes in plastic surgery. Traditionally, patient-reported outcomes have consisted of either generic or ad hoc measures; however, more recently, there has been interest in formally constructed and validated questionnaires that are specifically designed for a particular patient population. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether generic measures still have a role in the evaluation of breast reconstruction outcomes, given the recent popularity and push for use of specific measures.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify all articles using patient-reported outcomes in the assessment of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Frequency of use was tabulated and the most frequently used tools were assessed for success of use, using criteria described previously by the Medical Outcomes Trust.

RESULTS

To date, the most frequently used measures are still generic measures. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey was the most frequently used and most successfully applied showing evidence of responsiveness in multiple settings. Other measures such as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Hopwood Body Image Scale, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale were able to show responsiveness in certain settings but lacked evidence as universal tools for the assessment of outcomes in reconstructive breast surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the recent advent of measures designed specifically to assess patient-reported outcomes in the breast reconstruction population, there still appears to be a role for the use of generic instruments. Many of these tools would benefit from undergoing formal validation in the breast reconstruction population.

Systematic Review: Aesthetic Assessment of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes by Healthcare Professionals

BACKGROUND

Achieving an aesthetic outcome following postmastectomy breast reconstruction is both an important goal for the patient and plastic surgeon. However, there is currently an absence of a widely accepted, standardized, and validated professional aesthetic assessment scale following postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify all articles that provided professional assessment of the aesthetic outcome following postmastectomy, implant- or autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction. A modified version of the Scientific Advisory Committee's Medical Outcomes Trust (MOT) criteria was used to evaluate all professional aesthetic assessment scales identified by our systematic review. The criteria included conceptual framework formation, reliability, validity, responsiveness, interpretability, burden, and correlation with patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 120 articles were identified: 52 described autologous breast reconstruction, 37 implant-based reconstruction, and 29 both. Of the 12 different professional aesthetic assessment scales that exist in the literature, the most commonly used scale was the four-point professional aesthetic assessment scale. The highest score on the modified MOT criteria was assigned to the ten-point professional aesthetic assessment scale. However, this scale has limited clinical usefulness due to its poor responsiveness to change, lack of interpretability, and wide range of intra- and inter-rater agreements (Veiga et al. in Ann Plast Surg 48(5):515-520, 2002).

CONCLUSIONS

A "gold standard" professional aesthetic assessment scale needs to be developed to enhance the comparability of breast reconstruction results across techniques, surgeons, and studies to aid with the selection of procedures that produce the best aesthetic results from both the perspectives of the surgeon and patients.

Phase III development of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire module for women undergoing breast reconstruction

Background

Comprehensive outcome assessments after breast reconstruction (BRR) require surgery-specific patient-reported outcome measures. The aims of this study were to assess the relevance, acceptability and redundancy of questions/items (phase III pretesting) of a new BRR questionnaire evaluating patients' health-related quality of life before and after BRR. Phase III occurred in collaboration with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) following earlier development phases that identified 31 items.

Methods

The EORTC BRR subgroup applied decision-making rules to each question according to eight EORTC criteria. A total of 197 patients (from the UK, Austria, Belgium, Italy and Sweden) were recruited. Forty-seven patients completed pre- and post-BRR questionnaires prospectively, and 150 reported post-BRR questionnaires only retrospectively. Qualitative debriefing interviews were undertaken in 189 patients. Preliminary psychometric analyses were performed.

Results

Thirty-one items fulfilled ‘relevance’, with none producing ‘difficulties’. Ten items were not a priority for 10 per cent of respondents. Of these, two questions concerning muscle twitching in the affected breast and problem with donor-site swelling were deleted. Three redundant items were deleted: weakness in arm, which correlated significantly to the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) BR23 breast questionnaire, and shape and colour of the affected nipple. Descriptive statistics reduced the module to 26 items conceptualized into three provisional scales (disease treatment/surgery-related symptoms, sexuality and cosmetic outcome) within the newly completed questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-BRR26.

Conclusion

The QLQ-BRR26 is available for psychometric validation in a large-field international sample. The intended use for QLQ-BRR26 is alongside EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23, in women treated by mastectomy for breast cancer and undergoing all types of BRR.

Comparing five alternative methods of breast reconstruction surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of five standardized procedures for breast reconstruction to delineate the best reconstructive approach in postmastectomy patients in the settings of nonirradiated and irradiated chest walls.

METHODS

A decision tree was used to model five breast reconstruction procedures from the provider perspective to evaluate cost-effectiveness. Procedures included autologous flaps with pedicled tissue, autologous flaps with free tissue, latissimus dorsi flaps with breast implants, expanders with implant exchange, and immediate implant placement. All methods were compared with a "do-nothing" alternative. Data for model parameters were collected through a systematic review, and patient health utilities were calculated from an ad hoc survey of reconstructive surgeons. Results were measured in cost (2011 U.S. dollars) per quality-adjusted life-year. Univariate sensitivity analyses and Bayesian multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

Pedicled autologous tissue and free autologous tissue reconstruction were cost-effective compared with the do-nothing alternative. Pedicled autologous tissue was the slightly more cost-effective of the two. The other procedures were not found to be cost-effective. The results were robust to a number of sensitivity analyses, although the margin between pedicled and free autologous tissue reconstruction is small and affected by some parameter values.

CONCLUSIONS

Autologous pedicled tissue was slightly more cost-effective than free tissue reconstruction in irradiated and nonirradiated patients. Implant-based techniques were not cost-effective. This is in agreement with the growing trend at academic institutions to encourage autologous tissue reconstruction because of its natural recreation of the breast contour, suppleness, and resiliency in the setting of irradiated recipient beds.

Is immediate autologous breast reconstruction with postoperative radiotherapy good practice?: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

There remains controversy as to whether immediate autologous breast reconstruction with postoperative radiotherapy is associated with acceptable complications and aesthetic outcomes. This systematic review analyses the literature regarding outcomes of immediate autologous breast reconstruction with postoperative radiotherapy compared with no radiotherapy, as well as with delayed autologous breast reconstruction following post-mastectomy irradiation.

METHODS

Pubmed (1966 to October 2012), Ovid MEDLINE (1966 to October 2012), EMBASE (1980 to October 2012), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 10, 2012) were searched. Overall complications (including fat necrosis), fat necrosis, revisional surgery, loss of volume, and aesthetic outcome, were analysed individually. Comparable data from observational studies were combined for meta-analysis where possible and quality assessment of the studies was performed.

RESULTS

The majority of studies of immediate autologous breast reconstruction and postoperative radiotherapy reported satisfactory outcomes (19 of 25 studies; n=1,247 patients). Meta-analysis of observational studies demonstrated no significant differences in total prevalence of complications (p=0.59) or revisional surgery (p=0.38) and a summary measure for fat necrosis favouring the group without radiotherapy (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.35-5.92, p=0.006). The majority of studies comparing immediate reconstruction and postoperative radiotherapy with delayed reconstruction following post-mastectomy radiotherapy (10 of 12 observational studies; n=1,633 patients) reported satisfactory outcomes following immediate reconstruction. Meta-analysis of observational studies demonstrated no significant difference in overall incidence of complications (p=0.53) and fat necrosis (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.29-1.38, p=0.25), and a summary measure for revisional surgery (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.48, p=0.001) favouring the delayed surgery group. No randomised-controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, and all of the observational studies included were missing more than one important component for reporting of observational studies.

DISCUSSION

The majority of studies reported satisfactory outcomes and a similar incidence of complications for immediate autologous breast reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy when compared with no radiotherapy or delayed reconstruction following radiotherapy; the proportion that required revisional surgery was higher though for immediate than delayed breast reconstruction. The findings are limited by the paucity of high quality data in the published literature, and until better data is available the findings of this review suggest that immediate autologous breast reconstruction should at least be considered when adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy is anticipated.

Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

After surgery for localised breast cancer, radiotherapy (RT) improves both local control and breast cancer-specific survival. In patients at risk of harbouring micro-metastatic disease, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) improves 15-year survival. However, the best sequence of administering these two types of adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of different sequencing of adjuvant CT and RT for women with early breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

An updated search was carried out in the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's Specialised Register (20 May 2011), MEDLINE (14 December 2011), EMBASE (20 May 2011) and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (20 May 2011). Details of the search strategy and methods of coding for the Specialised Register are described in the Group's module in The Cochrane Library. We extracted studies that had been coded as 'early', 'chemotherapy' and 'radiotherapy'.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials evaluating different sequencing of CT and RT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed the eligibility and quality of the identified studies and extracted data from the published reports of the included trials. We derived odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) from the available numerical data. Toxicity data were extracted, where reported. We used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis and conducted analyses on the basis of the method of sequencing of the two treatments.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials reporting two different sequencing comparisons were identified. There were no significant differences between the various methods of sequencing adjuvant therapy for local recurrence-free survival, overall survival, relapse-free survival and metastasis-free survival based on 1166 randomised women in three trials. Concurrent chemoradiation increased anaemia (OR 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 2.15), telangiectasia (OR 3.85; 95% CI 1.37 to 10.87) and pigmentation (OR 15.96; 95% CI 2.06 to 123.68). Treated women did not report worse cosmesis with concurrent chemoradiation but physician-reported assessments did (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.42 to 3.07). Other measures of toxicity did not differ between the two types of sequencing. On the basis of one trial (244 women), RT before CT was associated with an increased risk of neutropenic sepsis (OR 2.96; 95% CI 1.26 to 6.98) compared with CT before RT, but other measures of toxicity did not differ.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The data included in this review, from three well-conducted randomised trials, suggest that different methods of sequencing CT and RT do not appear to have a major effect on recurrence or survival for women with breast cancer if RT is commenced within seven months after surgery.

Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction

Within the field of breast reconstruction there is increasing focus on patient-reported outcomes related to satisfaction, body image, and quality of life. These outcomes are deemed highly relevant because the primary goal of breast reconstruction is to recreate the appearance of a breast (or breasts) that is satisfying to the patient. Prominent researchers have suggested the need to develop improved standards for outcome evaluation which can ultimately benefit patients as well as physicians. The purpose of this article is to summarize key findings in the area of patient-reported outcomes for breast reconstruction and introduce a theoretical framework for advancing research in this field. We conducted an extensive literature review of outcome studies for breast reconstruction focusing on patient-reported results. We developed a theoretical framework illustrating core patient-reported outcomes related to breast reconstruction and factors associated with these outcomes. Our theoretical model highlights domains and distinguishing features of patient satisfaction, body image, and quality of life outcomes for women undergoing breast reconstruction. This model further identifies a broad range of variables (e.g., historical/premorbid influences, disease and treatment-related factors) that have been found to influence patient-reported outcomes and need to be taken into consideration when designing future research in this area. Additional attention is given to examining the relationship between patient reported outcomes and outside evaluation of breast reconstruction. Our proposed theoretical framework suggests key opportunities to expand research in this area with the goal of optimizing body image adjustment, satisfaction, and psychosocial outcomes for the individual patient.

Breast reconstruction with the denervated latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap

OBJECTIVE

To analyze clinical implications of the thoracodorsal nerve division in the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective cohort study was conducted on 29 patients. Breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap was performed unilaterally in 20 patients or bilaterally in 9 women (38 breasts). Thoracodorsal nerve was divided during reconstruction of 20 breasts (group 1) and was preserved for 18 breasts (group 2). Height, width, projection, area of the covering skin and volume of the reconstructed and healthy breasts were measured on the 3D images of the anterior chest wall, taken 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively with the Di3D 3D camera. Data regarding tissue consistency, painfulness and animation of the reconstructed breast, symmetry of both breasts and overall satisfaction after the surgery were collected at 6 months.

RESULTS

The reconstructed and healthy breasts decreased in volume in group 1 (-45.85 cm(3) ± 48.41 cm(3), p = 0.0004; -29.13 cm(3) ± 14.98 cm(3), p = 0.0009) and in group 2 (-31.5 cm(3) ± 25.35 cm(3), p = 0.0001; -15.4 cm(3) ± 21.96 cm(3), p = 0.0537). There were no differences in decrease in volume between groups 1 and 2 (p > 0.05). Respondents in group 1 in comparison to group 2 showed similar satisfaction of the tissue consistency of the reconstructed breast (p > 0.05) and the level of symmetry between both breasts (p > 0.05), gave lower scores for painfulness (p < 0.0001), animation (p < 0.0001) and higher scores for the overall satisfaction about the reconstructed breast (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We suggest that division of the thoracodorsal nerve during latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap breast reconstruction is a useful undertaking to minimize unnatural animation of the reconstructed breast.

Postmastectomy radiation of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap reconstruction is well tolerated in women with breast cancer

Chest wall irradiation decreases locoregional recurrence and breast cancer-related mortality in women at high risk for recurrence after mastectomy. Many women undergoing mastectomy desire immediate breast reconstruction. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), however, increases the risk of surgical complications and may adversely affect the reconstructed breast. We compared outcomes of immediate latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (Lat Flap) versus tissue expander/implant (EI) reconstruction after mastectomy followed by PMRT in 29 women with invasive breast cancer treated at a single institution between 2009 and 2011. Although patients undergoing EI reconstruction were slightly younger and more frequently underwent bilateral mastectomy, there were no major differences between the groups with respect to patient or tumor characteristics. With a median follow-up of 11 months (Lat Flap) and 13 months (EI) after completion of PMRT, there was a trend toward more wound complications requiring reoperation, including expander/implant loss (n=3), in the EI group. Capsular contracture was the most common sequela of PMRT in the Lat Flap group (67%) but this was easily treated with capsulotomy at the time of nipple-areola reconstruction. Immediate breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap is a viable option for women undergoing mastectomy who are likely to require chest wall irradiation.

Randomized clinical trial on the effect of fibrin sealant on latissimus dorsi donor-site seroma formation after breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Latissimus dorsi (LD) flap procedures comprise 50 per cent of breast reconstructions in the UK. They are frequently complicated by seroma formation. Fibrin sealants may reduce seroma volumes at the donor site. The aim was to investigate the effect of fibrin sealant (Tisseel(®)) on total seroma volumes from the breast, axilla and back (donor site) after LD breast reconstruction. Secondary outcomes were specific back seroma volumes together with incidence and severity of wound complications.

METHODS

Consecutive women undergoing implant-assisted or extended autologous LD flap reconstruction were randomized to either standard care or application of fibrin sealant to the donor-site chest wall. All participants were blinded for the study duration but assessors were only partially blinded. Non-parametric methods were used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 107 women were included (sealant 54, control 53). Overall back seroma volumes were high, with no significant differences between control and sealant groups over 3 months. Fibrin sealant failed to reduce in situ back drainage volumes in the 10 days after surgery, and did not affect the rate or volume of seromas following drain removal.

CONCLUSION

This randomized study, which was powered for size effect, failed to show any benefit from fibrin sealant in minimizing back seromas after LD procedures.

Integration of patient-reported outcome measures with key clinical outcomes after immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and adjuvant treatment

BACKGROUND

Clinical evidence on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in breast reconstruction is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate PROMs in implant-assisted latissimus dorsi (LDI) or tissue-only autologous latissimus dorsi (ALD) flap reconstruction in relation to complications and adjuvant treatments.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study involving six UK centres. Eligible patients had primary early-stage breast cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-BR23, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer scale (FACT-B), Body Image Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were completed before operation and at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 182 patients (82 LDI and 100 ALD) were recruited between 2007 and 2010 with symptomatic (59·9 per cent) or screen-detected (39·6 per cent) cancers. Some 64·3 per cent had lymph node-negative disease; 30 per cent of the LDI group had radiotherapy, compared with 53·0 per cent in the ALD group (P = 0·004). Early complications up to 3 months after surgery were reported in 66 and 51·0 per cent of patients in the LDI and ALD groups respectively (P = 0·062) and long-term complications (4-12 months) in 48 and 45·0 per cent (P = 0·845). Role functioning and pain (P = 0·002 for both) were adversely affected in the ALD group compared with results in the LDI group, with no significant effects of radiotherapy on any health-related quality of life (HRQL). Chemotherapy and early complications adversely affected HRQL, which improved between 3 and 12 months after surgery (P < 0·010 for all).

CONCLUSION

There is evidence of similar HRQL between types of latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction for up to a year after surgery. There appear to be no overarching effects for radiotherapy after mastectomy on the specific HRQL domains studied in the short term. The identification of variables that affect HRQL is important, including their integration into the analysis of PROMs.

Current controversies in breast cancer surgery

Contemporary management of the axilla in breast cancer surgery remains in evolution. Axillary lymph node status in breast cancer is a major prognostic factor and remains integral to guiding adjuvant treatment decisions. There remains controversy regarding the management of the node-positive axilla in clinically node-negative primary breast cancer. Trials to date have suggested re-evaluation of the historical therapeutic strategy that a positive sentinel node requires axillary node dissection. However, further evidence is required before modern clinical management of the axilla should be altered. As patient awareness and technical expertise grow, national rates of breast reconstruction after mastectomy continue to rise. Oncoplastic techniques continue to evolve and many patients are suitable for a plethora of reconstructive options. Despite the widespread practice of breast reconstruction globally, there is limited randomised evidence comparing the optimal type and/or timing of breast reconstruction on which to base practice. Breast reconstruction type is either purely autologous, implant-based or a combination of these two techniques. We explore the benefits and limitations of these techniques and some of the key findings of the National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit. The timing of reconstruction after mastectomy is either immediate (a single procedure) or delayed (for an indefinite period after mastectomy). The ideal reconstruction is one that is best aligned to the patient's expectations, as this will achieve the highest levels of long-term patient satisfaction. Selecting the optimal type of breast reconstruction at the right time for the right patient remains the key challenge in breast reconstruction.

The early development phases of a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module to assess patient reported outcomes (PROs) in women undergoing breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

A comprehensive evaluation of breast reconstruction (BRR) surgery includes measurement of patient reported outcomes (PROs). There is, however, a lack of validated BRR-specific PRO measures (PROMs) that adequately assess relevant issues. This study is developing a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire/module specific for PROs in BRR to supplement the cancer-core and breast cancer EORTC questionnaires, respectively: the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23.

METHODS

Phases I and II of questionnaire development followed EORTC guidelines including a systematic literature review to identify all potential 'issues' (concepts relevant to PROs) and semi-structured interviews with 89 patients and 9 European multi-disciplinary health care professionals (HCPs) (Sweden, Italy and the United Kingdom [UK]). Interviewers asked participants the 'relevance' of outcomes identified in the literature and captured additional 'issues' of importance.

RESULTS

The literature search and interviews of patients and HCPs yielded 69 issues relating to BRR operationalised into 31 provisional items (single questions) for the module, which was conceptualised to contain five scales: treatment/surgery related symptoms (affecting the shoulder, arm and reconstructed breast), body image, sexuality, cosmetic outcomes (pertaining to three areas: breast, donor site and nipple) and overall satisfaction.

DISCUSSION

The provisional development of the EORTC BRR module has 31 items addressing issues of importance to patients as well as HCPs. Further international testing is underway as a UK National Cancer Research Network trial to ensure that this PROM will be psychometrically and clinically robust and applicable for use in clinical trials, cohort studies, national audit and clinical practice.

Comparison between endoscope-assisted partial mastectomy with filling of dead space using absorbable mesh and conventional conservative method on cosmetic outcome in patients with stage I or II breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies comparing cosmetic outcome between conventional conservative method (CCM) and endoscope-assisted partial mastectomy (EAPM) are scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 111 patients with stage I or II breast cancer who underwent CCM (n=51) or EAPM (n=60) were reviewed. Evaluation of cosmetic outcome consisted of a 3-level scoring method; breast retraction assessment (0-2), nipple deviation (0-2), atrophy (0-2), skin change (0-2), and scar (0-2). Total scores ≥7 were considered satisfactory. Score 2 was considered satisfactory for analysis by each scoring criterion.

RESULTS

EAPM had a higher rate of satisfactory results compared with CCM (71.7% vs. 52.9%; P=0.042), particularly for atrophy (55.0% vs. 29.4%; P=0.007), and scar (55.0% vs. 31.4%; P=0.012) and for location B (70.0% vs. 12.5%; P=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

EAPM is superior to CCM for postoperative cosmetic outcome with respect to atrophy, scar, and lower tumor location.

Does post-mastectomy radiotherapy represent a contraindication to skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: an update

The use of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) to facilitate breast reconstruction is increasing due to a wide acceptance of improved cosmetic outcomes and evidence of equivalence in oncologic outcomes. The rates of patients undergoing mastectomy for whom post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) will be recommended is increasing as evidence of decreased loco-regional recurrence and increased survival mounts. PMRT may adversely effect complication rates and cosmetic outcomes for patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction and PMRT--although the evidence for this is methodologically flawed. This article summarises the above evidence and highlights a reconstructive algorithm that may be used to mitigate the possible deleterious effects of PMRT on results.

Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women and has a lifetime incidence of one in nine in the UK. Curative treatment requires surgery, and may involve adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapy. In many women, post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is essential to restore body image and improve quality of life. Timing of reconstruction may be immediately at the time of mastectomy or delayed until after surgery. Outcomes such as psychosocial morbidity, aesthetics and complications rates may differ between the two approaches.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group (CBCG) Specialised Register on 22 July 2010, MEDLINE from July 2008 to 26 August 2010, EMBASE from 2008 to 26 August 2010 and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 26 August 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immediate breast reconstruction versus delayed or no reconstruction in women in any age group and stage of breast cancer. We considered any recognised methods of reconstruction to one or both breasts undertaken at the same time as mastectomy or at any time following mastectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened papers, extracted trial details and assessed the risk of bias in the one eligible study.

MAIN RESULTS

We included only one RCT that involved that involved 64 women.We judged this study as being at a high risk of bias. Post-operative morbidity and mortality were not addressed, and secondary outcomes of patient cosmetic evaluations and psychosocial well-being post-reconstruction were inadequately reported. Based on limited data there was some, albeit unreliable, evidence that immediate reconstruction compared with delayed or no reconstruction, reduced psychiatric morbidity reported three months post-operatively.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current level of evidence for the effectiveness of immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer was based on a single RCT with methodological flaws and a high risk of bias, which does not allow confident decision-making about choice between these surgical options. Until high quality evidence is available, clinicians may wish to consider the recommendations of relevant guidelines and protocols. Although the limitations and ethical constraints of conducting RCTs in this field are recognised, adequately powered controlled trials with a focus on clinical and psychological outcomes are still required. Given the paucity of RCTs in this subject, in future versions of this review we will look at study designs other than RCTs specifically good quality cohort and case-controlstudies.

Assessment of cosmesis after breast reconstruction surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction (BR) is undertaken to improve cosmetic outcomes, but how this is optimally assessed is uncertain. This review summarises current methods for assessing cosmesis after reconstructive surgery and makes recommendations for future practice.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review identified all studies with 20 or more participants that evaluated the cosmetic outcome of BR. Four evaluation criteria (reporting of study inclusion criteria, type and timing of BR and timing of assessment) were used to assess study quality. Articles reporting at least three of the four criteria were considered robust and further summarised to report methods of cosmetic assessment, assessor details and the scoring systems used.

RESULTS

122 primary papers assessed cosmesis in 11,308 women with median follow-up of 28.8 months (range 18.0-42.9 months). Cosmesis was assessed by either healthcare professionals or patients in 33 (27.1%) and 37 studies (30.3%), respectively, and by both professionals and patients in 52 (42.6%). Professional assessments included 43 (40.2%) clinical, 49 (45.8%) photographic and 13 (12.1%) geometric assessments conducted by between 1 and 26 observers. Surgeons were most frequently involved in assessments (n = 71, 67.6%), but in 38 (36.1%) papers the assessor's profession was not reported. Twenty-seven (25.7%) papers used previously published assessment scale. Patients' views were assessed in 89 studies, using questionnaires (n = 63) or interviews (n = 12); 14 (15.7%) did not report how patients' views were obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Current methods for assessing the cosmetic outcome of BR vary widely. A valid patient-centred assessment method is required to fully understand the outcomes of BR and to inform decision-making.

Clinical outcomes of video-assisted skin-sparing partial mastectomy for breast cancer and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi muscle flap as breast-conserving therapy

BACKGROUND

Skin-sparing partial mastectomy (SSPM) has yet to be investigated as a breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer. We report the clinical outcomes for video-assisted SSPM (VA-SSPM) with immediate breast reconstruction using autogenous tissue.

METHODS

VA-SSPM is indicated for early-stage breast cancer arising in the upper-outer or lower-outer quadrant without skin involvement. An incision is placed along the midaxillary line, and SSPM is performed under endoscopic guidance using subcutaneous tunneling and lifting methods. Through the same incision, a latissimus dorsi muscle flap is harvested for breast reconstruction. From January 2000 to October 2007, 168 patients (Tis, n = 24; T1, n = 37; T2, n = 107) underwent VA-SSPM, and morbidity, curability, and postoperative patient satisfaction were investigated.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications included skin necrosis (2.4%, n = 4) and muscle flap necrosis (0.6%, n = 1), but no severe complications were observed. After a mean follow-up of 58.6 months, eight patients (4.8%) experienced local recurrence. Sixty-month distant metastasis-free survival rates for Tis, T1, and T2 were 100%, 97%, and 83.3%, respectively, with an overall rate of 88.4%. Furthermore, overall survival rates for Tis, T1, and T2 were 100%, 94.1%, and 94.4%, respectively, with an overall survival rate of 95% for all patients. A patient satisfaction survey showed that 81.6% of patients evaluated the surgery as "good."

CONCLUSIONS

VA-SSPM for early-stage breast cancer improves cosmetic results and achieves high patient satisfaction without increasing local or distant organ recurrence. This method offers a useful local therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Achieving autologous breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is now associated with long-term disease-free and overall survival, and in the setting of mastectomy, long term psycho-sexual health becomes an important consideration. To this end, breast reconstruction has been shown to significantly improve quality of life for mastectomy patients. With adjuvant radiotherapy often required in the setting of breast reconstruction, it is unclear what interaction the two can have.

METHODS

A thorough literature review was undertaken to assess the impact of radiotherapy on autologous breast reconstruction, and in particular, the influence of its timing on vessel selection, post-operative complications and both oncologic and cosmetic outcomes.

RESULTS

A clear benefit was established for delaying reconstruction until after radiotherapy to improve cosmetic outcomes. Although the timing of radiotherapy administration may influence vessel selection and the nature of post-operative complications encountered, overall outcomes were not dissimilar. Likewise, oncologic outcomes have not been shown to be significantly affected by the timing of radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Both immediate and delayed breast reconstruction are safe modes of treatment, however patients that are expected to require adjuvant radiotherapy may benefit from delaying reconstruction until completion of oncologic treatment.

Breast reconstruction with the latissimus dorsi flap: women's preference for scar location

BACKGROUND

Refinements made in latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction have improved the aesthetic appearance of the breast without changing the donor-site location. The optimal location for donor-site placement, from a patient's perspective, is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess women's preference for the latissimus dorsi donor-site location; the reasons for donor-site choice; and the correlation between donor-site location preference and factors such as, age, body mass index, body image, and clothing options.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty women between the ages of 20 and 80 years were surveyed. Participants analyzed patients' pictures and ranked the scar locations from most desirable to least desirable. The reason for preference and additional factors were assessed. The data were then collected and analyzed using contingency tables with p < 0.005.

RESULTS

The low and middle transverse donor sites were the most preferred sites, 54 percent and 22 percent, respectively. The most common reasons for choosing a donors site were ability to conceal the scar in a low-back top and contour improvement. Women younger than 50 years were more concerned about the ability to conceal the scar (64 percent). Women older than 50 years were focused on contour improvement (40 percent) and concealing the scar while clothed (42 percent) (p < 0.05). No direct correlation with age, body mass index, body image, or clothing options was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Women overwhelmingly prefer the low and middle transverse scar locations. Physicians should consider using these locations primarily in suitable patients, as this may improve overall patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction.

[Evaluation of immediate breast reconstruction and radiotherapy: factors associated with complications]

OBJECTIVES

To determine prospectively the factors associated with reconstruction failure (i.e. requiring expander removal) and capsular contracture in patients undergoing mastectomy and immediate two-stage breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and implant, and radiotherapy for breast cancer. This is a multi-institutional prospective nonrandomized trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2/1998 and 9/2006, we prospectively evaluated 141 consecutive patients who received 141 implants after mastectomy and underwent chest wall radiotherapy (46 to 50 Gy in 23 to 25 fractions). Patients were evaluated after 24 to 36 months by two senior physicians (radiation oncologist and surgeon).

RESULTS

Medical follow-up was 37 months. Baker 1 and 2 capsular contracture was observed in 67.5% of patients, Baker 3 and 4 in 32.5%. There were 32 reconstruction failures. In a univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with Baker 3 and 4 capsular contracture: surgeon, use of hormonotherapy and smoking, of which only one remained in the multivariate analysis: surgeon. In a univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with reconstruction failure: tumor size T3 or T4, smoking, pN+ axilla. Three factors remained associated with reconstruction failure in a multiple logistic regression: large tumors T3/T4, smoking and pN+ axilla.

CONCLUSIONS

Mastectomy, radiotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and implant should be considered when breast conserving surgery has been denied. Adequate patients can be easily selected by using three factors of favourable outcome.