Unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a multimodal treatment using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (gemcitabine plus stereotactic radiosurgery) and subsequent surgical exploration

Sharing Mono-Institutional Experience of Treating Pancreatic Cancer with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an evolving treatment for the local management of pancreatic cancer (PC). The main purpose of this study is to report our initial experience in terms of local control (LC) and toxicity for PC patients treated with SBRT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with SBRT using abdominal compression (AC) or an end-expiratory breath-holding (EEBH) technique. The median prescribed dose was 35 Gy, delivered in five fractions. Toxicities were recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0, and survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2023, 17 PC patients were offered SBRT. Their median age was 69 years. The median follow-up from the date of diagnosis was 22.37 months. The overall survival (OS) was 94% at 1 year and 60.9% at 2 years. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 63.1% at 6 months and 56.1% at 9 months. The median OS was 26.3 months, and the median PFS was 20.6 months. The 6-month and 1-year LC rates were 71% and 50.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We are successful in implementing the SBRT program at our centre. SBRT appears to be a promising treatment option for achieving LC with limited acute toxicities.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Introduction

For patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), who are candidates for radiation therapy, dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) offers unique benefits over traditional radiation techniques. In this review, we present a historical perspective of dose-escalated RT for LAPC. We also outline advances in SBRT delivery, one form of dose escalation and a framework for selecting patients for treatment with SBRT.

Results

Techniques for delivering SBRT to patients with LAPC have evolved considerably, now allowing for dose-escalation and superior respiratory motion management. At the same time, advancements in systemic therapy, particularly the use of induction multiagent chemotherapy, have called into question which patients would benefit most from radiation therapy. Multidisciplinary assessment of patients with LAPC is critical to guide management and select patients for local therapy. Results from ongoing trials will establish if there is a role of dose-escalated SBRT after induction chemotherapy for carefully selected patients.

Conclusion

Patients with LAPC have more therapeutic options than ever before. Careful selection for SBRT may enhance patient outcomes, pending the maturation of pivotal clinical trials.

Impact of Short-Course Palliative Radiation Therapy on Pancreatic Cancer-Related Pain: Prospective Phase 2 Nonrandomized PAINPANC Trial

PURPOSE

Clinical evidence is limited regarding palliative radiation therapy for relieving pancreatic cancer-related pain. We prospectively investigated pain response after short-course palliative radiation therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe pancreatic cancer-related pain.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this prospective phase 2 single center nonrandomized trial, 30 patients with moderate-to-severe pain (5-10, on a 0-10 scale) of pancreatic cancer refractory to pain medication, were treated with a short-course palliative radiation therapy; 24 Gy in 3 weekly fractions (2015-2018). Primary endpoint was defined as a clinically relevant average decrease of ≥2 points in pain severity, compared with baseline, within 7 weeks after the start of treatment. Secondary endpoint was global quality of life (QoL), with a clinically relevant increase of 5 to 10 points (0-100 scale). Pain severity reduction and QoL were assessed 9 times using the Brief Pain Inventory and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C15-PAL, respectively. Both outcomes were analyzed using joint modeling. In addition, acute toxicity based on clinician reporting and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 29 of 30 patients (96.7%) received palliative radiation therapy. At baseline, the median oral morphine equivalent daily dose was 129.5 mg (range, 20.0-540.0 mg), which decreased to 75.0 mg (range, 15.0-360.0 mg) after radiation (P = .021). Pain decreased on average 3.15 points from baseline to 7 weeks (one-sided P = .045). Patients reported a clinically relevant mean pain severity reduction from 5.9 to 3.8 points (P = .011) during the first 3 weeks, which further decreased to 3.2 until week 11, ending at 3.4 (P = .006) in week 21 after the first radiation therapy fraction. Global QoL significantly improved from 50.5 to 60.8 during the follow-up period (P = .001). Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 3 patients and no grade 4 to 5 toxicity was observed. Median OS was 11.8 weeks, with a 13.3% 1-year actuarial OS rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-course palliative radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer-related pain was associated with rapid, clinically relevant reduction in pain severity, and clinically relevant improvement in global QoL, with mostly mild toxicity.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in pancreatic cancer allows high delivery of radiation doses on tumors without affecting surrounding tissue. This review aimed at the SBRT application in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

DATA SOURCES

We retrieved articles published in MEDLINE/PubMed from January 2017 to December 2022. Keywords used in the search included: "pancreatic adenocarcinoma" OR "pancreatic cancer" AND "stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)" OR "stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)" OR "chemoradiotherapy (CRT)". English language articles with information on technical characteristics, doses and fractionation, indications, recurrence patterns, local control and toxicities of SBRT in pancreatic tumors were included. All articles were assessed for validity and relevant content.

RESULTS

Optimal doses and fractionation have not yet been defined. However, SBRT could be the standard treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in addition to CRT. Furthermore, the combination of SBRT with chemotherapy may have additive or synergic effect on pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT is an effective modality for patients with pancreatic cancer, supported by clinical practice guidelines as it has demonstrated good tolerance and good disease control. SBRT opens a possibility of improving outcomes for these patients, both in neoadjuvant treatment and with radical intent.

Proton Therapy for Unresectable and Medically Inoperable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Results From a Multi-Institutional Prospective Registry

Purpose

Compared with photon-based techniques, proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) may improve the therapeutic ratio of radiation therapy (RT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), but available data have been limited to single-institutional experiences. This study examined the toxicity, survival, and disease control rates among patients enrolled in a multi-institutional prospective registry study and treated with PBT for LAPC.

Methods and Materials

Between March 2013 and November 2019, 19 patients with inoperable disease across 7 institutions underwent PBT with definitive intent for LAPC. Patients received a median radiation dose/fractionation of 54 Gy/30 fractions (range, 50.4-60.0 Gy/19-33 fractions). Most received prior (68.4%) or concurrent (78.9%) chemotherapy. Patients were assessed prospectively for toxicities using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to analyze overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, time to locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis-free survival, and time to new progression or metastasis for the adenocarcinoma cohort (17 patients).

Results

No patients experienced grade ≥3 acute or chronic treatment-related adverse events. Grade 1 and 2 adverse events occurred in 78.7% and 21.3% of patients, respectively. Median overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and time to new progression or metastasis were 14.6, 11.0, 11.0, and 13.9 months, respectively. Freedom from locoregional recurrence at 2 years was 81.7%. All patients completed treatment with one requiring a RT break for stent placement.

Conclusions

Proton beam RT for LAPC offered excellent tolerability while still maintaining disease control and survival rates comparable with dose-escalated photon-based RT. These findings are consistent with the known physical and dosimetric advantages offered by proton therapy, but the conclusions are limited owing to the patient sample size. Further clinical studies incorporating dose-escalated PBT are warranted to evaluate whether these dosimetric advantages translate into clinically meaningful benefits.

Comparative Effectiveness of Chemotherapy Alone Versus Radiotherapy-Based Regimens in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Analysis (PAULA-1)

Different options for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are available based on international guidelines: chemotherapy (CHT), chemoradiation (CRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, the role of radiotherapy is debated in LAPC. We retrospectively compared CHT, CRT, and SBRT ± CHT in a real-world setting in terms of overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). LAPC patients from a multicentric retrospective database were included (2005-2018). Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox analysis was performed to identify predictors of LC, OS, and DMFS. Of the 419 patients included, 71.1% were treated with CRT, 15.5% with CHT, and 13.4% with SBRT. Multivariable analysis showed higher LC rates for CRT (HR: 0.56, _95%CI 0.34-0.92, p = 0.022) or SBRT (HR: 0.27, _95%CI 0.13-0.54, p < 0.001), compared to CHT. CRT (HR: 0.44, _95%CI 0.28-0.70, p < 0.001) and SBRT (HR: 0.40, _95%CI 0.22-0.74, p = 0.003) were predictors of prolonged OS with respect to CHT. No significant differences were recorded in terms of DMFS. In selected patients, the addition of radiotherapy to CHT is still an option to be considered. In patients referred for radiotherapy, CRT can be replaced by SBRT considering its duration, higher LC rate, and OS rate, which are at least comparable to that of CRT.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as an Effective Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer

Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows the delivery of an ablative radiation dose to the tumor with minimal toxicity. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided SBRT appears to be a promising approach in the modern era, X-ray image-guided SBRT is still used worldwide for pancreatic cancer. This study aims to evaluate the results of X-ray image-guided SBRT in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methodology Medical records of 24 patients with unresectable LAPC who underwent X-ray image-guided SBRT between 2009 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was utilized for all analyses. Results The median age was 64 years (range = 42-81 years), and the median tumor size was 3.5 cm (range = 2.7-4 cm). The median total dose of SBRT was 35 Gy (range = 33-50 Gy) in five fractions. After SBRT, 30% of patients showed complete and 41% showed partial response, whereas 20% had stable disease and 9% had progression. Median follow-up was 15 months (range = 6-58 months). During follow-up, four (16%) patients had local recurrence, one (4%) had a regional recurrence, and 17 (70%) had distant metastasis (DM). The two-year local control (LC), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS), and DM-free survival (DMFS) rate was 87%, 36%, 37%, and 29%, respectively. In univariate analysis, a larger tumor size (>3.5 cm) and higher cancer antigen 19-9 level (>106.5 kU/L) significantly decreased the OS, LRFS, and DMFS rates. No severe acute toxicity was observed. However, two patients had severe late toxicity as intestinal bleeding. Conclusions X-ray image-guided SBRT provides a good LC rate with minimal toxicity for unresectable LAPC. However, despite modern systemic treatments, the rate of DM remains high which plays a major role in survival.

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with intradermal heat-killed mycobacterium obuense (IMM-101) vaccination for non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer, after induction chemotherapy with (modified)FOLFIRINOX - The LAPC-2 trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In this phase I/II trial, non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients after (modified)FOLFIRINOX therapy were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with heat-killed mycobacterium (IMM-101) vaccinations. We aimed to assess safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this treatment approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

On five consecutive days, patients received a total of 40 Gray (Gy) of SBRT with a dose of 8 Gy per fraction. Starting two weeks prior to SBRT, they in addition received six bi-weekly intradermal vaccinations with one milligram of IMM-101. The primary outcomes were the number of grade 4 or higher adverse events and the one-year progression free-survival (PFS) rate.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included and started study treatment. Median follow-up was 28.4 months (95 %CI 24.3 - 32.6). We observed one grade 5, no grade 4 and thirteen grade 3 adverse events, none related to IMM-101. The one-year PFS rate was 47 %, the median PFS was 11.7 months (95 %CI 11.0 - 12.5) and the median overall survival was 19.0 months (95 %CI 16.2 - 21.9). Eight (21 %) tumors were resected, of which 6 (75 %) were R0 resections. Outcomes were comparable with the outcomes of the patients from the previous LAPC-1 trial, in which LAPC patients were treated with SBRT, without IMM-101.

CONCLUSION

Combination treatment with IMM-101 and SBRT was safe and feasible for non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients after (modified)FOLFIRINOX. No improvement in the progression-free survival could be demonstrated by adding IMM-101 to SBRT.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) of Pancreatic Cancer-A Critical Review and Practical Consideration

Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the developed world and is predicted to become the second by 2030. A cure may be achieved only with surgical resection of an early diagnosed disease. Surgery for more advanced disease is challenging and can be contraindicated for many reasons. Neoadjuvant therapy may improve the probability of achieving R0 resection. It consists of systemic treatment followed by radiation therapy applied concurrently or sequentially with cytostatics. A novel approach to irradiation, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), has the potential to improve treatment results. SBRT can deliver higher doses of radiation to the tumor in only a few treatment fractions. It has attracted significant interest for pancreatic cancer patients, as it is completed quickly, requires less time away from full-dose chemotherapy, and is well-tolerated than conventional radiotherapy. In this review, we aim to provide the reader with a basic overview of current evidence for SBRT indications in the treatment of pancreatic tumors. In the second part of the review, we focus on practical information with respect to SBRT treatment plan preparation the performance of such therapy. Finally, we discuss future directions related to the use of magnetic resonance linear accelerators.

Pain Relief after Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review

Severe pain is frequent in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDCA). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides high local control rates in these patients. The aim of this review was to systematically analyze the available evidence on pain relief in patients with PDCA. We updated our previous systematic review through a search on PubMed of papers published from 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2021. Studies with full available text, published in English, and reporting pain relief after SBRT on PDCA were included in this analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out using the MEDCALC statistical software. All tests were two-sided. The I2 statistic was used to quantify statistical heterogeneity (high heterogeneity level: >50%). Nineteen papers were included in this updated literature review. None of them specifically aimed at assessing pain and/or quality of life. The rate of analgesics reduction or suspension ranged between 40.0 and 100.0% (median: 60.3%) in six studies. The pooled rate was 71.5% (95% CI, 61.6−80.0%), with high heterogeneity between studies (Q2 test: p < 0.0001; I2 = 83.8%). The rate of complete response of pain after SBRT ranged between 30.0 and 81.3% (median: 48.4%) in three studies. The pooled rate was 51.9% (95% CI, 39.3−64.3%), with high heterogeneity (Q2 test: p < 0.008; I2 = 79.1%). The rate of partial plus complete pain response ranged between 44.4 and 100% (median: 78.6%) in nine studies. The pooled rate was 78.3% (95% CI, 71.0−84.5%), with high heterogeneity (Q2 test: p < 0.0001; I2 = 79.4%). A linear regression with sensitivity analysis showed significantly improved overall pain response as the EQD2α/β:10 increases (p: 0.005). Eight papers did not report any side effect during and after SBRT. In three studies only transient acute effects were recorded. The results of the included studies showed high heterogeneity. However, SBRT of PDCA resulted reasonably effective in producing pain relief in these patients. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of SBRT in this setting based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With or Without Hypofractionated Elective Nodal Irradiation

PURPOSE

Pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is limited to gross tumor without elective coverage for subclinical disease. Given a better understanding of recurrence patterns, we hypothesized that the addition of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) to pancreatic SBRT would be tolerable and would decrease locoregional progression.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a retrospective 1:2 propensity-matched cohort study to compare toxicity and locoregional progression among patients treated with pancreatic SBRT with or without ENI. In the SBRT + ENI cohort, an elective target volume was delineated per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines and treated to 25 Gy in 5 fractions alongside 40 Gy in 5 fractions to gross disease. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of locoregional progression, with death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

Among 135 candidate controls treated with SBRT alone, 100 were propensity-matched to 50 patients treated with SBRT + ENI. All patients completed SBRT. Median potential radiographic follow-up was 28 months. The incidence of late and serious acute toxicity was similar between matched cohorts. However, SBRT + ENI was associated with a statistically significant increase in acute grade 1 to 2 nausea (60% vs 20%, P < .001). The 24-month cumulative incidences of locoregional progression with and without ENI were 22.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0%-35.1%) versus 44.6% (95% CI, 34.8%-54.4%; multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.87; P = .021). This was stable in sensitivity analyses of uniform prescription dose, multiagent chemotherapy, and resectability. There were fewer peripancreatic (0% vs 7%), porta hepatis (2% vs 7%), and peri-aortic/aortocaval (5% vs 12%) recurrences after SBRT + ENI, but no difference in survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic SBRT + ENI was tolerable and did not increase late or serious acute toxicity relative to a matched cohort undergoing SBRT alone, but did increase acute grade 1 to 2 nausea. The addition of ENI to SBRT was associated with decreased locoregional progression but not improved survival. Further studies are warranted to determine whether ENI offers meaningful benefit.

Online adaptive MR-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for unresectable malignancies in the upper abdomen using a 1.5T MR-linac

BACKGROUND

Introduction of online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy enables stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of upper abdominal tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of MR-guided SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-linac in patients with unresectable upper abdominal malignancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients treated at the UMC Utrecht (April 2019 to December 2020) were identified in the prospective 'Multi-OutcoMe EvaluatioN of radiation Therapy Using the MR-linac' (MOMENTUM) study. Feasibility of treatment was arbitrarily defined as an on-table time interval of ≤60 min for >75% of delivered fractions and completion of >95% of fractions as scheduled, reflecting patient tolerability. Acute treatment-related toxicity was assessed at 3 months of follow-up and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 5.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-five consecutive patients with a median follow-up time of 8 (range 4-23) months were treated with 35 Gray (n = 4) and 40 Gray (n = 21) in five fractions over 2 weeks. For all fractions, contours were adapted based on the daily anatomy and delivered within 47 min/fraction (range 30-74). In 98/117 fractions (84%), adapted treatment was completed within 1 h. All patients received the scheduled irradiation dose as planned. No acute grade 3 toxicity or higher was reported. Treatment resulted in pain alleviation in 11/13 patients.

DISCUSSION

Online adaptive MR-guided SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-linac is feasible and well-tolerated in patients with unresectable upper abdominal malignancies. Dose escalation studies, followed by comparative studies, are needed to determine the optimal radiation dose for irradiation of upper abdominal malignancies.

Current status of non-surgical treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the 7th leading cause of death due to cancer in industrialized countries and the 11th most common cancer globally, with 458918 new cases (2.5% of all cancers) and 432242 deaths (4.5% of all cancer deaths) in 2018. Unfortunately, 80% to 90% of the patients present with unresectable disease, and the reported 5-year survival rate range between 10% and 25%, even after successful resection with tumor-free margins. Systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and minimally invasive image-guided procedures that have emerged over the past years, are used for the management of non-operable PC. This review focuses on currently available non-surgical options of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

[Extreme hypofractionated radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer]

Pancreatic cancer has poor prognosis and a continuously growing incidence. By 2030, it should become the second cause of death by cancer worldwide and in France. The only curative treatment is surgery that is achievable in only 20% of patients at the time of initial diagnosis, with a high rate of incomplete resection. Neoadjuvant treatments using chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy are more often admitted to play an important role by selecting non-progressing cases who will benefit from surgery, by increasing the number of complete resection, and by making locally advanced and borderline tumours accessible to resection. However, the role of radiotherapy is still debated. Because of its dosimetric advantages, its short total duration, and its good tolerance with reduced volumes of irradiation, stereotactic radiotherapy has been largely studied. Compared to chemoradiotherapy, this technique could improve the therapeutic index helping to preserve the general status of patients in order to give them access to secondary surgery. It remains a promising technique still under evaluation, to be delivered ideally, as part of a clinical trial, or within an experimented team.

Survival outcome after stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

•

For LAPC, median OS was 14.1 months; pooled 1/2/3-year OS rates were 57%, 19% and 10%.

•

The median PFS was 10 months; pooled 1/2/3-year PFS rates were 36%, 12% and 4%.

•

Pooled rates of acute GI, acute hematologic and late GI toxicities were 2%, 4% and 8%.

•

For BRPC, median OS was 17.5 months; pooled 1/2-year OS rates were 75% and 29%.

•

The median PFS was 12.2 months; pooled 1/2-year PFS rates were 48% and 18%.

Background

Some studies reported stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has demonstrated superior therapeutic results than conventional radiotherapy. Nevertheless, this statement is controversial and the trial attempting to prove this is underway. We conducted this systemic review and meta-analysis aiming to combine the latest and most complete information about the survival outcomes and toxicities following SBRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC).

Methods

Items involving SBRT and pancreatic cancer were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and Web of Science. Median overall survival (OS), 1/2/3-year OS, median progression-free survival (PFS), 1/2/3-year PFS and incidence of grade 3–5 toxicities were the endpoints of interest in this meta-analysis. These endpoint proportions were pooled and analyzed using R.

Results

For the LAPC series, the median OS was 14.1 months; pooled 1/2/3-year OS rates were 57%, 19% and 10%, respectively; the median PFS was 10 months; pooled 1/2/3-year PFS rates were 36%, 12% and 4%; pooled incidence rates of acute gastrointestinal (GI), acute hematologic and late GI toxicity (grade≥3) were 2%, 4% and 8%. For the BRPC series, the median OS was 17.5 months; pooled 1/2-year OS rates were 75% and 29%; the median PFS was 12.2 months; pooled 1/2-year PFS rates were 48% and 18%; the incidence rates of toxicity (grade ≥ 3) were all 0%.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis based on published results of OS, PFS and incidence rates of toxicity demonstrated that SBRT does not show desirable therapeutic result than the standard therapies for LAPC and BRPC.

SPARC, a phase-I trial of pre-operative, margin intensified, stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Following resection of pancreatic cancer, risk of positive margins and local recurrence remain high, especially for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). We aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose of a margin-intensified five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimen designed to treat the region at risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective multicentre phase-1 rolling-six dose-escalation study. BRPC patients received pre-operative SBRT, with one dose to the primary tumour and an integrated boost to the region where tumour was in contact with vasculature. Four dose-levels were proposed, with starting dose 30 Gy to primary PTV and 45 Gy to boost volume (PTV_R), in five daily fractions. Primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose (MTD), defined as highest dose where zero of three or one of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).

RESULTS

Twelve patients were registered, eleven received SBRT. Radiotherapy was well tolerated with all treatment completed as scheduled. Dose was escalated one level up from starting dose without encountering any DLT (prescribed 32.5 Gy PTV, 47.5 Gy PTV_R). Nine serious adverse reactions or events occurred (seven CTCAE Grade 3, two Grade 4). Two patients went on to have surgical resection. Median overall survival for SBRT patients was 8.1 months. The study closed early when it was unable to recruit to schedule.

CONCLUSION

Toxicity of SBRT was low for the two dose-levels that were tested, but MTD was not established. Few patients subsequently underwent resection of pancreatic tumour after SBRT, and it is difficult to draw conclusions regarding the safety or toxicity of these therapies in combination.

[Stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A systemic review]

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is an emerging treatment option. Most studies showed local control of approximately 75% with no evidence of improved overall survival. Gastrointestinal toxicities could be significant, ranging up to 22% for acute toxicities≥grade 3+ and 44% for late toxicities≥grade 3+. Currently, no standardized guidelines for treatment and management scheme. We conducted a systemic review of published prospective and retrospective trials to evaluate the efficacy, safety, technical data, and discuss future directions.

Transarterial fiducial marker implantation for CyberKnife radiotherapy to treat pancreatic cancer: an experience with 14 cases

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transarterial fiducial marker implantation for CyberKnife radiotherapy to treat locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen pancreatic cancer patients were enrolled for transarterial marker implantation. Embolization platinum coils were implanted as a fiducial marker within 20 mm of the cancer edge, and preferably within 3 mm. The technical success of the implantation was defined as implantation of at least one fiducial marker within 20 mm of the target tumor. Irradiation was performed using the CyberKnife system.

RESULTS

For 14 of 15 patients, transarterial implantation was successfully performed, and for 13 of 14 patients, the tracking marker was implanted within 3 mm of the cancer. Tracking instability was observed in two patients, but irradiation was accomplished in all 14 patients. No major complications caused by the implantation procedure were observed. The median overall survival after irradiation was 13.8 months, and the 1- and 2-years survival rates were 62.9% and 32.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Transarterial fiducial marker implantation for pancreatic cancer can be safely performed for tracking, and it will be a valuable alternative approach to percutaneous fiducial marker implantation.

Maximizing Tumor Control and Limiting Complications With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy is being increasingly used for pancreatic cancer (PCa), particularly in patients with locally advanced and borderline resectable disease. A wide variety of dose fractionation schemes have been reported in the literature. This HyTEC review uses tumor control probability models to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the various SBRT treatment regimens used in the treatment of patients with localized PCa.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A PubMed search was performed to review the published literature on the use of hypofractionated SBRT (usually in 1-5 fractions) for PCa in various clinical scenarios (eg, preoperative [neoadjuvant], borderline resectable, and locally advanced PCa). The linear quadratic model with α/β= 10 Gy was used to address differences in fractionation. Logistic tumor control probability models were generated using maximum likelihood parameter fitting.

RESULTS

After converting to 3-fraction equivalent doses, the pooled reported data and associated models suggests that 1-year local control (LC) without surgery is ≈79% to 86% after the equivalent of 30 to 36 Gy in 3 fractions, showing a dose response in the range of 25 to 36 Gy, and decreasing to less than 70% 1-year LC at doses below 24 Gy in 3 fractions. The 33 Gy in 5 fraction regimen (Alliance A021501) corresponds to 28.2 Gy in 3 fractions, for which the HyTEC pooled model had 77% 1-year LC without surgery. Above an equivalent dose of 28 Gy in 3 fractions, with margin-negative resection the 1-year LC exceeded 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled analyses of reported tumor control probabilities for commonly used SBRT dose-fractionation schedules for PCa suggests a dose response. These findings should be viewed with caution given the challenges and limitations of this review. Additional data are needed to better understand the dose or fractionation-response of SBRT for PCa.

A prospective trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer testing ablative doses

Background

We explored the safety and efficacy of ablative doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Methods

This phase I/II trial included patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer previously treated with any number of cycles of induction chemotherapy. Patients were enrolled according to a 3+3 dose escalation design at 10, 12.5, and 15 Gy ×3, with subsequent patients at the maximally tolerated dose (MTD). Treatment was delivered to gross tumor delineated with MRI fusion using image-guidance to fiducial markers. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3+ toxicity within 30 days. Secondary endpoints included late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, freedom from local failure (FFLF), and survival.

Results

Fifteen patients received a median 10 cycles of chemotherapy. There were no DLTs, and the MTD was 15 Gy ×3. Thirty-day toxicity included grade 2 nausea (46%) and grade 2 diarrhea (7%). Median survival after SBRT was 12.8 months (23 months after diagnosis) and median relapse-free survival was 7 months. At 1-year, FFLF was 80%. Four patients had grade 3+ GI bleeding after 30 days (median 6 months). Grade 3+ GI bleeding was associated with tumor volume (P=0.01), heterogeneity of dose within the planning target volume (PTV) (V120, P=0.03), and duodenal dose (V26-30 Gy, P<0.2).

Conclusions

This aggressive SBRT regimen demonstrated limited 30-day morbidity, a moderate degree of local control, and a moderate risk for late GI bleeding. Further work is necessary to define the most appropriate hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) regimen in the ablative dose range.

Chemotherapy-based split stereotactic body radiation therapy for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: study protocol of a prospective, single-arm phase II trial

INTRODUCTION

The question of how to administer adequate chemotherapy to synchronise stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment strategy to maximise the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for the improved prognosis of patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer is a challenging and debatable issue. No studies have yet evaluated the efficacy of split-course SBRT as the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen. We aimed to study whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus split-course SBRT results in better outcomes in BRPC and LAPC patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Treatment-naïve patients with radiographically confirmed BRPC or LAPC, supporting biopsy results and no severe comorbidities will be enrolled. They will be treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P+Gem) chemotherapy plus split-course SBRT, followed by an investigator's choice of continuation of treatment with nab-P+Gem or surgery. nab-P+Gem chemotherapy will commence on day 1 for each of six cycles: nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m² intravenous infusion over approximately 30-45 min, followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² intravenous infusion over about 30 min on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. During the first and second cycles of chemotherapy, SBRT will be given as a single irradiation of 10 Gy four times (days 2 and 16 of each 28-day cycle). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival; while the secondary outcomes are the time to treatment failure, disease control rate, overall response rate, overall survival, R0 resection rate and incidence of adverse effects.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiehe Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (No. 2019YF015-01). Results from our study will be disseminated in international peer-reviewed journals. All study procedures were developed in order to assure data protection and confidentiality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04289792.

Hypofractionated sequential radiotherapy boost: a promising strategy in inoperable locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the potential benefits of a hypofractionated radiotherapy boost (HRB) after chemotherapy (CT) and concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. Primary endpoints were early and late toxicity, local control (LC) and pain-free progression (PFP) assessment. Two-years overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were secondary endpoints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients (pts) affected by unresectable non-metastatic LAPC, previously treated with CT and CRT in upfront or sandwich setting, were selected for sequential HRB. Total prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 5 fractions (fr) to pancreatic primary lesion. Dose de-escalation was allowed in case of failure in respecting organs at risk constraints. Early and late toxicity were assessed according to CTCAE v.4.0 classification. The Kersh-Hazra scale was used for pain assessment. Local Control, PFP, MFS and DFS were calculated from the date of HRB to the date of relapse or the date of the last follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-one pts affected by unresectable, non-metastatic LAPC were consecutively enrolled from November 2004 to October 2019. All pts completed the planned HRB. Total delivered dose varied according to duodenal dose constraint: 20 Gy in 5 fr (N: 6; 19.4%), 20 Gy in 4 fr (N: 5; 16.2%), 25 Gy in 5 fr (N: 18; 58.0%) and 30 Gy in 6 fr (N: 2; 6.4%). Early and late toxicity were assessed in all pts: no Grade 3 or 4 acute gastrointestinal toxicity and no late gastrointestinal complications occurred. Median LC was 19 months (range 1-156) and 1- and 2-year PFP were 85% and 62.7%, respectively (median 28 months; range 2-139). According to the Kersh-Hazra scale, four pts had a Grade 3 and four pts had a Grade 1 abdominal pain before HRB. At the last follow-up only 3/31 pts had residual Grade 1 abdominal pain.Median MFS was 18 months (range 1-139). The 2-year OS after HRB was 57.4%, while 2-year OS from diagnosis was 77.3%.

CONCLUSION

Treatment intensification with hypofractionated radiotherapy boost is well tolerated in pts affected by unresectable LAPC previously treated with CT/CRT. Its rates of local and pain control are encouraging, supporting its introduction in clinical practice. Timing, schedule and dose of HRB need to be further investigated to personalize therapy and optimize clinical advantages.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy

Simple Summary

Cancer therapies should improve patient survival or at least improve the quality of their life as they receive treatment for their disease. This is particularly important in pancreatic cancer, where current treatments often have to balance between limiting tumor growth and minimizing patient toxicity. There has been an increasing appreciation among physicians to capture the patient’s voice using tools called patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). In this article, we describe the available PROMs and their relative strengths and weaknesses to help oncologists make sense of this rapidly growing field. Finally, we present a decision-making tool that can help researchers and clinicians select the ideal PROM that fits their needs.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer and its treatment often dramatically impact patients’ quality of life (QoL). Given this, as well as increased focus on QoL measures in clinical oncology, there has been a rise in the number of instruments that measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this review, we describe the landscape of different PRO instruments pertaining to pancreatic cancer, with specific emphasis on PRO findings related to pancreatic cancer patients receiving radiotherapy (RT). Twenty-five of the most commonly utilized PROs are compared in detail. Notably, most of the PRO tools discussed are not specific to pancreatic cancer but are generic and have been used in various malignancies. Published findings concerning PROs in pancreatic cancer involving RT are also extracted and summarized. Among the measures used, the European Organization for Research and Treatment Cancer QLQ-C30 was the most commonly utilized. We recommend a careful selection of PRO measures in clinical pancreatic cancer research and care and encourage the use of a combination of symptom-specific and global QoL tools to more fully capture patients’ perspectives.

Role of endoscopic ultrasonography guided fiducial marker placement in gastrointestinal cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dose escalation radiation therapy such as those delivered by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has shown to improve local disease control in multiple types of malignancies. This requires fiducial placement to improve accuracy of treatment and avoid adverse events to adjacent radiosensitive organs during respiration phases. The purpose of this review is to provide updates of recent high-quality articles related to endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided fiducial placement for gastrointestinal malignancies, particularly in pancreatic cancer, which is expected to be the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the USA within this decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that EUS-guided fiducial placement for gastrointestinal malignancies has excellent technical success and safety profile. Comparative studies of most commercially available fiducial types via a 22-gauge needle system showed that a 0.035 mm diameter and 10 mm long gold fiducial with coiled configuration, hollow core and external helical design might be favoured due to its most balanced performance of visibility, artifact and migration.

SUMMARY

A fine balance of performance characteristics of fiducials should be discussed with radiation oncologists to select a suitable and preferred type of fiducials. The comparative studies of other newly developed platinum fiducials and liquid fiducial are pending.

Intensified systemic therapy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy dose for patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

We aimed to report the long-term impact of modern chemotherapy and SABR dose regimens on oncologic outcomes of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the treatment characteristics and outcomes of all patients who received multi-fraction SABR for unresectable PA between February 2007 and August 2018 at our institution. Time-to-events were calculated from date of diagnosis treating death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 15 months (range: 5-47). Median SABR dose was 33 Gy (range: 20-45) delivered in 5 fractions in 143 patients, and 3 or 6 fractions in 6 patients. 107 patients (72%) received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy while 31 (21%) received modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX). Median OS was 16 months (95% CI, 14-17), with a 1-year cumulative incidence of LF of 14%. The combination of SABR doses ≥40 Gy and mFFX (n = 21) showed a superior PFS and OS to the use of GEM-based chemotherapy with <40 Gy SABR doses (median PFS: 14 vs. 10 months, HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29-0.71, P = 0.003; median OS: 24 vs. 14 months, HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.22-0.59, P = 0.002), with 1-year PFS and OS of 67% and 90% compared to 35% and 59% for those who received GEM-based chemotherapy with <40 Gy SABR doses, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of mFFX and a SABR dose ≥40 Gy in 5 fractions may be superior compared to regimens that utilize gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or SABR doses <40 Gy.

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Protection in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

AIMS

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and simultaneous integrated protection (SIP) in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients receiving SBRT following induction chemotherapy from January 2017 to December 2018 were included in this observational analysis. SBRT was delivered in five consecutive daily fractions by administering 30 Gy to the planning target volume while simultaneously delivering a 50 Gy SIB to the tumour-vessel interface. SIP was created by lowering the dose to 25 Gy on the overlap area between the planning target volume and the planning organ at risk volume. The primary end point was acute and late gastrointestinal grade ≥3 toxicity. Secondary end points were freedom from local progression, overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine consecutive patients (27 borderline resectable and 32 locally advanced) were included. Fifty-eight patients (98.3%) completed the SBRT planned treatment and 35 patients (59.4%) received surgical resection following SBRT. No acute or late grade ≥3 SBRT-related adverse events were observed. The median follow-up time was 15.1 months in the overall cohort and 18.1 months in censored patients. One- and 2-year freedom from local progression rates were 85% and 80% versus 79.7% and 60.6% in resected and unresected patients, respectively (P = 0.33). The median overall survival and PFS were 30.2 months and 19 months from diagnosis and 19.1 months and 10.7 months from SBRT in the entire cohort. Resected patients had improved 2-year overall survival rates (72.5% versus 49%, P = 0.012) and median PFS (13 months versus 5 months; P < 0.001) relative to unresected patients. There was no survival difference between borderline resectable and locally advanced patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT with SIB/SIP had an excellent toxicity profile and could be administered safely on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients, even in a total neoadjuvant setting.

Radiation as a Single-Modality Treatment in Localized Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is managed with multimodality therapy. We aim to evaluate the outcome of single-modality radiation therapy for LAPC.

METHODS

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients were identified between 2004 and 2013 using the National Cancer Database excluding patients who received chemotherapy or surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 6590 patients were included. The mean age was 73.5 (range, 28-90) years, 83.2% were white, and 54.4% were female. Tumors of 4 cm or greater (>T3 stage) accounted for 52.7%. The median radiation dose was 39.6 Gy. Stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) delivered to 64 patients and external-beam/intensity modulated radiotherapy in 416 patients. Radiation therapy was associated with improved overall survival (OS) compared with no treatment in univariate and multivariable analyses. The medians OS for patients who received SBRT, external-beam/intensity modulated radiotherapy, or no radiation were 8.6, 6.7, and 3.4 months, respectively (P < 0.001). There is a significant difference in 12-month OS for the SBRT cohort (31.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20.9%-43.5%) compared with patients who received no radiation (15.1%; 95% CI, 14.2%-16.0%), and on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38-0.65; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study suggests potential benefit for radiation therapy alone in comparison with no treatment in LAPC.

Basics and Frontiers on Pancreatic Cancer for Radiation Oncology: Target Delineation, SBRT, SIB technique, MRgRT, Particle Therapy, Immunotherapy and Clinical Guidelines

Pancreatic cancer represents a modern oncological urgency. Its management is aimed to both distal and local disease control. Resectability is the cornerstone of treatment aim. It influences the clinical presentation’s definitions as up-front resectable, borderline resectable and locally advanced (unresectable). The main treatment categories are neoadjuvant (preoperative), definitive and adjuvant (postoperative). This review will focus on (i) the current indications by the available national and international guidelines; (ii) the current standard indications for target volume delineation in radiotherapy (RT); (iii) the emerging modern technologies (including particle therapy and Magnetic Resonance [MR]-guided-RT); (iv) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), as the most promising technical delivery application of RT in this framework; (v) a particularly promising dose delivery technique called simultaneous integrated boost (SIB); and (vi) a multimodal integration opportunity: the combination of RT with immunotherapy.

Radiobiological model-based approach to determine the potential of dose-escalated robust intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy in reducing gastrointestinal toxicity in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer of the head

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine the potential of escalated dose radiation (EDR) robust intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (ro-IMPT) in reducing GI toxicity risk in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC) of the head in term of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) predictive model.

Methods

For 9 patients, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was compared with ro-IMPT. For all plans, the prescription dose was 59.4GyE (Gray equivalent) in 33 fractions with an equivalent organ at risk (OAR) constraints. Physical dose distribution was evaluated. GI toxicity risk for different endpoints was estimated using published NTCP Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) models for stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and combine stomach and duodenum (Stoduo). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for dosimetry parameters and NTCP values comparison.

Result

The dosimetric results have shown that, with similar target coverage, ro-IMPT achieves a significant dose-volume reduction in the stomach, small bowel, and stoduo in low to high dose range in comparison to IMRT. NTCP evaluation for the endpoint gastric bleeding of stomach (10.55% vs. 13.97%, P = 0.007), duodenum (1.87% vs. 5.02%, P = 0.004), and stoduo (5.67% vs. 7.81%, P = 0.008) suggest reduced toxicity by ro-IMPT compared to IMRT. ∆NTCP _{IMRT – ro-IMPT} (using parameter from Pan et al. for gastric bleed) of ≥5 to < 10% was seen in 3 patients (33%) for stomach and 2 patients (22%) for stoduo. An overall GI toxicity relative risk (NTCP_ro-IMPT/NTCP_IMRT) reduction was noted (0.16–0.81) for all GI-OARs except for duodenum (> 1) with endpoint grade ≥ 3 GI toxicity (using parameters from Holyoake et al.).

Conclusion

With similar target coverage and better conformity, ro-IMPT has the potential to substantially reduce the risk of GI toxicity compared to IMRT in EDR of LAUPC of the head. This result needs to be further evaluated in future clinical studies.

Preoperative radiotherapy improves overall survival of pT4 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients after surgical resection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of delivering radiotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients was to sterilize vessel margin, increase R0 resection rate and delay local progression. Whether preoperative radiotherapy could prolong overall survival of surgical candidates remained unknown.

METHODS

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients receiving radical resection from surveillance, epidemiology and end result database were enrolled. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance difference in baseline characteristics, and survival analyses were performed to compare overall survival between preoperative radiotherapy and upfront resection groups. Cox proportional hazard regression model and subgroup analyses were utilized to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 11 665 and 597 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients receiving upfront resection and preoperative radiotherapy followed by resection from 2004 to 2016 were identified, respectively, while baseline characteristics were distinct between groups. After propensity score matching, preoperative radiotherapy was not associated with better overall survival (upfront resection vs preoperative radiotherapy, 26 vs 27 months). Subgroup analyses showed that preoperative radiotherapy was a protective factor in pT4 (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.88) but a negative predictor in pT1 (hazard ratio = 1.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-2.97) patient populations. Survival analyses showed that preoperative radiotherapy improved overall survival of patients with pT4 stage (upfront resection vs preoperative radiotherapy, 19 vs 25 months) and involvement of celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery and aorta (upfront resection vs preoperative radiotherapy, 20 vs 27 months), while preoperative radiotherapy was associated with worse overall survival in patients with pT1 tumor (upfront resection vs preoperative radiotherapy, 39 vs 24 months).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative radiotherapy could improve survival of resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with pT4 stage or with celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery and aorta invasion.

Volume de-escalation in radiation therapy: state of the art and new perspectives

PURPOSE

New RT techniques and data emerging from follow-up for several tumor sites suggest that treatment volume de-escalation may permit to minimize therapy-related side effects and/or obtain better clinical outcomes. Here, we summarize the main evidence about volume de-escalation in RT.

METHOD

The relevant literature from PubMed was reviewed in this article. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched for clinical trials related to the specific topic.

RESULTS

In Lymphoma, large-volume techniques (extended- and involved-field RT) are being successfully replaced by involved-site RT and involved-node RT. In head and neck carcinoma, spare a part of elective neck is controversial. In early breast cancer, partial breast irradiation has been established as a treatment option in low-risk patients. In pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy may be used to dose escalation. Stereotactic radiosurgery should be the treatment choice for patients with oligometastatic brain disease and a life expectancy of more than 3 months, and it should be considered an alternative to WBRT for patients with multiple brain metastases.

CONCLUSION

Further clinical trials are necessary to improve the identification of suitable patient cohorts and the extent of possible volume de-escalation that does not compromise tumor control.

Clinical Limitations of Photon, Proton and Carbon Ion Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer

Introduction: Despite improvements in radiation therapy, chemotherapy and surgical procedures over the last 30 years, pancreatic cancer 5-year survival rate remains at 9%. Reduced stroma permeability and heterogeneous blood supply to the tumour prevent chemoradiation from making a meaningful impact on overall survival. Hypoxia-activated prodrugs are the latest strategy to reintroduce oxygenation to radioresistant cells harbouring in pancreatic cancer. This paper reviews the current status of photon and particle radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer in combination with systemic therapies and hypoxia activators. Methods: The current effectiveness of management of pancreatic cancer was systematically evaluated from MEDLINE^® database search in April 2019. Results: Limited published data suggest pancreatic cancer patients undergoing carbon ion therapy and proton therapy achieve a comparable median survival time (25.1 months and 25.6 months, respectively) and 1-year overall survival rate (84% and 77.8%). Inconsistencies in methodology, recording parameters and protocols have prevented the safety and technical aspects of particle therapy to be fully defined yet. Conclusion: There is an increasing requirement to tackle unmet clinical demands of pancreatic cancer, particularly the lack of synergistic therapies in the advancing space of radiation oncology.

The role of seed implantation in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using ERCP

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of iodine-125 seed implantation, guided by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or percutanous ultrasound, in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 101 patients with obstructive jaundice due to unresectable pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled between January 2010 and December 2017 in this retrospective study. Of these patients, 50 underwent implantation of iodine-125 seeds under EUS and/or percutaneous ultrasound guidance after receiving a stent via ERCP (treatment group), and 51 received a stent via ERCP without undergoing seed implantation (control group). The clinical data and therapeutic outcomes of these patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the treatment group obtained significant relief of abdominal pain at the 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month followup (p < 0.05), with a significantly lower visual analog scale pain score (p < 0.05). The treatment group obtained a longer median survival (8.8 vs. 6.5 months, p = 0.02), longer median duration of stent patency (10.8 ± 1.4 vs. 6.9 ± 0.8 months, p = 0.02), and prolonged average time to gastric outlet obstruction (6.8 ± 1.6 vs. 5.3 ± 1.3 months, p = 0.02). Differences between liver function and appetite for the two groups were not significant (p > 0.05 and p = 0.59, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Iodine-125 seed implantation after relief of obstructive jaundice via ERCP prolongs survival, biliary stent patency, and time to gastric outlet obstruction and improves patient quality of life by relieving pancreatic pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma.

Dose Escalation in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether increasing biologically effective dose (BED) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is associated with improved local control (LC) or toxicities in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE selection protocol was used to identify 15 studies across 12 institutions in 5 countries where patients received definitive SBRT for nonmetastatic disease. Biologically equivalent doses were calculated with an α/β of 10 (ie, BED10) for LC and acute toxicity and 3 (ie, BED3) for late toxicity. Fixed and random effects models were used to characterize LC and grade 3/4 toxicities by BED.

RESULTS

There were 508 patients included with a median follow-up time of 9.1 months. The median dose was 30 Gy, and the most common regimen was 30 Gy/5 fractions. There was no significant difference in LC rates at 1 year between the BED10<70 Gy versus ≥70 Gy groups, with an estimate of 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.81) versus 0.83 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97), respectively. There was no significant difference in acute toxicity rates between the BED10<70 Gy versus ≥70 Gy groups, with an estimate of 0.02 (95% CI, 0.00-0.08) versus 0.05 (95% CI, 0.00-0.22), respectively. Given the dose distribution across studies, 3 intervals were used to characterize BED3. There were no significant differences in late toxicity among those receiving BED3<100, 100 to 200, or >200 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT for pancreatic cancer results in LC rates of 60% to 83% and clinically significant toxicity of <7%. Increasing BED10 beyond 70 Gy was not associated with increased rates of 1-year LC or acute toxicity. Increasing BED3 beyond 100 Gy was not associated with increased rates of late toxicity.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising treatment modality for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We evaluated the clinical outcomes of SBRT in patients with LAPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with LAPC who underwent SBRT at our institution between April 2011 and July 2016. Fiducial markers were implanted using endoscopic ultrasound guidance one week prior to 4-dimensional computed tomography (CT) simulation and daily cone beam CT was used for image guidance. Patients received volumetric modulated arc therapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy using respiratory gating technique. A median dose of 28 Gy (range, 24-36 Gy) was given over four consecutive fractions delivered within one week. Survival outcomes including freedom from local disease progression (FFLP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Acute and late toxicities related to SBRT were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients with LAPC were analyzed, 52 of which (54.7%) had pancreatic head cancers. Most (94.7%) had received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The 1-year FFLP rate was 80.1%. Median OS and PFS were 16.7 months and 10.2 months, respectively; the 1-year OS and PFS rates were 67.4% and 42.9%, respectively. Among 79 patients who experienced failure, the sites of first failures were isolated local progressions in 12 patients (15.2%), distant metastasis in 55 patients (69.6%), and both in 12 patients (15.2%). Seven patients (7.4%) were able to undergo surgical resection after SBRT and four had margin-negative resections. Three patients (3.2%) had grade 3 nausea/vomiting during SBRT, and late grade 3 toxicity was observed in another three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

LAPC patients who received chemotherapy and SBRT had favorable FFLP and OS with minimal treatment-related toxicity. The most common pattern of failure was distant metastasis, which warrants further studies on the optimal scheme of chemotherapy and SBRT.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using proton beams for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We investigated clinical outcomes of proton beam concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records from 42 unresectable LAPC patients (21 male and 21 female, 39-83 years old) with IIB/III clinical staging of 1/41 treated by proton beam CCRT were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve patients received a conventional 50 Gray equivalents (GyE) in 25 fractions protocol and 30 others received a higher dose protocol of 54.0-67.5 GyE in 25-33 fractions. Gemcitabine or S-1 (Tegafur, Gimeracil and Oteracil) was used concurrently. Toxicity, overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were examined.

RESULTS

Acute adverse events of grades 1, 2, 3 and 4 were found in 4, 15, 17 and 2 patients, respectively. All grade 3 and 4 events were hematologic. Late adverse events of grades 1 and 2 were found in 3 and 2 patients, respectively. No late adverse effects of grade 3 or higher were observed. The 1-year/2-year OS rates from the start of CCRT were 77.8/50.8% with median survival time (MST) of 25.6 months. The 1-year/2-year LC rate from CCRT start was 83.3/78.9% with a median time to local recurrence of more than 36 months. Total irradiation dose was the only significant factor in univariate analyses of OS and LC (p = 0.015 and 0.023, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Proton beam CCRT lengthened survival periods compared to previous photon CCRT data and higher dose irradiation prolonged LC and OS for unresectable LAPC patients. Proton beam therapy is therefore safe and effective in these cases.

Application of stereotactic body radiotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancers in Australia

INTRODUCTION

The majority of pancreatic cancers present locally advanced and carry a high mortality rate. Treatment is challenging, with mixed data suggesting use of chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiotherapy. The use of radiotherapy has previously been limited due to lack of ability to deliver radiation to the tumour mass without causing significant toxicity to surrounding organs. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows delivery of higher biologically equivalent dose in a shorter treatment duration. We sought to investigate the safety and application of this technique in our centre.

METHOD

We enrolled 27 patients from 2015, identified as locally advanced unresectable with histologically confirmed, non-metastatic, pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All patients had endoscopically inserted fiducial markers and where possible concurrent chemotherapy was administered. Dose schedules ranged from 25 to 42 Gy in 5 or 3 fractions.

RESULTS

With an overall median follow up of 9 months (range, 3-32.7), the median survival was 11.6 months. Of those alive at 1 year, the local control rate was 67%. Six patients had Grade 3 toxicity, and other six had Grade 2 toxicity. None had Grade 4 or above toxicity. The most common symptom recorded was fatigue.

CONCLUSION

SBRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is technically complex but feasible in a high volume centre. SBRT is unique, allowing safe delivery of high radiation dose resulting in good local control and decreases treatment time making it an attractive option for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Elective nodal irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Analyses of planning feasibility and geometrically driven DVH prediction model

PURPOSE

We evaluate the feasibility of the elective nodal irradiation strategy in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Three simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-SBRT plans (Boost1, Boost2, and Boost3) were retrospectively generated for each of 20 different patients. Boost1 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV2, respectively. Boost2 delivered 40, 33, and 25 Gy to boostCTV, PTV1, and PTV2, respectively. Boost3 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV3, respectively. PTV1 covered the initial standard SBRT plan (InitPlan) gross tumor volume (GTV). PTV2 covered CTVgeom which was created by a 10-mm expansion (15 mm posterior) of GTV. PTV3 covered CTVprop which included elective nodal regions. The boostCTV included GTV as well as involved vasculature. The planning feasibility in each scenario and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed and compared with the InitPlan (delivered 33 Gy only to PTV1) by paired t-test. Next, a novel DVH prediction model was developed and its performance was evaluated according to the prediction accuracy (AC) of planning violations. Then, the model was used to simulate the impacts of GTV-to-organs at risk (OAR) distance and gastrointestinal (GI) OAR volume variations on planning feasibility.

RESULTS

Significant dose increases were observed in GI-OARs in SIB-SBRT plans when compared with InitPlan. All dose constraints were met in 63% of cases in InitPlan, Boost1, and Boost2, whereas Boost3 developed DVH violations in all cases. Utilizing previous patient anatomy, the novel DVH prediction model achieved a high AC in the prediction of violations for GI-OARs; the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AC were 66%, 90%, and 84%, respectively. Experiments with the model demonstrated that the larger proximity volume of GI-OAR at the shorter distance substantially impacted on planning violations.

CONCLUSIONS

SIB-SBRT plan with geometrically defined prophylactic areas can be dosimetrically feasible, but including all nodal areas with 25 Gy in five fractions appears to be unrealistic.

Computed tomography based radiomic signature as predictive of survival and local control after stereotactic body radiation therapy in pancreatic carcinoma

PURPOSE

To appraise the ability of a radiomics signature to predict clinical outcome after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreas carcinoma.

METHODS

A cohort of 100 patients was included in this retrospective, single institution analysis. Radiomics texture features were extracted from computed tomography (CT) images obtained for the clinical target volume. The cohort of patients was randomly divided into two separate groups for the training (60 patients) and validation (40 patients). Cox regression models were built to predict overall survival and local control. The significant predictors at univariate analysis were included in a multivariate model. The quality of the models was appraised by means of area under the curve and concordance index.

RESULTS

A clinical-radiomic signature associated with Overall Survival (OS) was found significant in both training and validation sets (p = 0.01 and 0.05 and concordance index 0.73 and 0.75 respectively). Similarly, a signature was found for Local Control (LC) with p = 0.007 and 0.004 and concordance index 0.69 and 0.75. In the low risk group, the median OS and LC in the validation group were 14.4 and 28.6 months while in the high-risk group were 9.0 and 17.5 months respectively.

CONCLUSION

A CT based radiomic signature was identified which correlate with OS and LC after SBRT and allowed to identify low and high-risk groups of patients.

Technical Assessment of an Automated Treatment Planning on Dose Escalation of Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy has been suggested to provide high rates of local control for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the close proximity of highly radiosensitive normal tissues usually causes the labor-intensive planning process and may impede further escalation of the prescription dose.

PURPOSE

The present study aims to evaluate the consistency and efficiency of Pinnacle Auto-Planning for pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy with original prescription and escalated prescription.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with pancreatic cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy were studied retrospectively. The prescription is 40 Gy over 5 consecutive fractions. Most of patients (n = 21) also had 3 other different dose-level targets (6 Gy/fraction, 5 Gy/fraction, and 4 Gy/fraction). Two types of plans were generated by Pinnacle Auto-Planning with the original prescription (8 Gy/fraction, 6 Gy/fraction, 5 Gy/fraction, and 4 Gy/fraction) and escalated prescription (9 Gy/fraction, 7 Gy/fraction, 6 Gy/fraction, and 5 Gy/fraction), respectively. The same Auto-Planning template, including beam geometry, intensity-modulated radiotherapy objectives and intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization parameters, were utilized for all the auto-plans in each prescription group. The intensity-modulated radiotherapy objectives do not include any manually created structures. Dosimetric parameters including percentage volume of PTV receiving 100% of the prescription dose, percentage volume of PTV receiving 93% of the prescription dose, and consistency of the dose-volume histograms of the target volumes were assessed. Dmax and D1 cc of highly radiosensitive organs were also evaluated.

RESULTS

For all the pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy plans with the original or escalated prescriptions, auto-plans met institutional dose constraints for critical organs, such as the duodenum, small intestine, and stomach. Furthermore, auto-plans resulted in acceptable planning target volume coverage for all targets with different prescription levels. All the plans were generated in a one-attempt manner, and very little human intervention is necessary to achieve such plan quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Pinnacle3 Auto-Planning consistently and efficiently generate acceptable treatment plans for multitarget pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy with or without dose escalation and may play a more important role in treatment planning in the future.

Review and current state of radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is characterized by a high rate of metastatic spread and overall poor prognosis. Yet 30% of patients have progressive local disease at the time of death, and local progression can cause significant morbidity. Approximately 30-40% of patients present with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) that is not surgically resectable, and the optimal treatment for these patients continues to evolve. The role of radiation in the management of LAPC is an area of controversy, and the recent LAP07 randomized trial reported no survival benefit of radiation following gemcitabine plus or minus erlotinib. However, the efficacy of modern systemic regimens has improved since the design of the LAP07 study, and radiation therapy may be of greater benefit in the context of more effective systemic therapy. Advances in radiation delivery including the increasing use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have the potential to improve outcomes through dose escalation and better treatment tolerability. In addition, the combination of radiation therapy and immune therapy is an area of promising research. These advances suggest that radiation therapy will continue to play an integral role in the management of LAPC.

Stereotactic radiotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review on pain relief

Locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) has a poor prognosis and the purpose of treatment is survival prolongation and symptom palliation. Radiotherapy has been reported to reduce pain in LAPC. Stereotactic RT (SBRT) is considered as an emerging radiotherapy technique able to achieve high local control rates with acceptable toxicity. However, its role in pain palliation is not clear. To review the impact on pain relief with SBRT in LAPC patients, a literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (January 2000-December 2017) for prospective and retrospective articles published in English. Fourteen studies (479 patients) reporting the effect of SBRT on pain relief were finally included in this analysis. SBRT was delivered with both standard and/or robotic linear accelerators. The median prescribed SBRT doses ranged from 16.5 to 45 Gy (median: 27.8 Gy), and the number of fractions ranged from 1 to 6 (median: 3.5). Twelve of the 14 studies reported the percentage of pain relief (in patients with pain at presentation) with a global overall response rate (complete and partial response) of 84.9% (95% CI, 75.8%-91.5%), with high heterogeneity (Q ² test: P<0.001; I2=83.63%). All studies reported toxicity data. Acute and late toxicity (grade ≥3) rates were 3.3%-18.0% and 6.0%-8.2%, respectively. Reported gastrointestinal side effects were duodenal obstruction/ulcer, small bowel obstruction, duodenal bleeding, hemorrhage, and gastric perforation. SBRT achieves pain relief in most patients with pancreatic cancer with an acceptable gastrointestinal toxicity rate. Further prospective studies are needed to define optimal dose/fractionation and the best systemic therapies modality integration to reduce toxicity and improve the palliative outcome. Finally, the quality of life and, particularly, pain control should be considered as an endpoint in all future trials on this emerging treatment technique.

Five-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and Chemotherapy for the Local Management of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer are diagnosed with metastatic disease at presentation. Nevertheless, local progression is responsible for up to 30% of deaths and can lead to significant morbidity. As a consequence, further exploration of effective methods of local control and palliation is essential. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a widely utilized technique for the treatment of localized pancreatic cancer. Here, we report our experience with SBRT and chemotherapy for the local treatment of the metastatic patient population.

METHODS

This single institution retrospective review analyzed 20 patients with pathologically diagnosed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. All patients underwent fiducial placement under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. SBRT was delivered in five fractions to a total dose of 25 to 30 Gy. Patients received concurrent (given within 1 week of the start of SBRT) or sequential chemotherapy. Local tumor control was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. Local control and overall survival were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Patient median age was 64 years, and the median pre-treatment Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1. All patients received chemotherapy and half of the patients (10 of 20) received concurrent chemotherapy with folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin or fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. Nearly all patients (19 of 20) received post-SBRT chemotherapy. Median time from pathological diagnosis to SBRT was 3.9 months. The twelve-month local control and overall survival were 43 and 53%, respectively. However, in patients with planning target volume (PTV) targets smaller than the population median, the 12-month local control was 78%. Median time to local progression (17.8 vs. 3.0 months, p = 0.02) and overall survival (24.9 vs. 8.8, p = 0.001) were also significantly improved in this smaller PTV cohort. Though not statistically significant, there was a trend towards improvement in local control (17.8 vs. 4.3 months, p = 0.17) and overall survival (16.7 vs. 9.7 months, p = 0.087) for those who received concurrent versus sequential chemotherapy, respectively. Lastly, there were no reported grade 3-5 late toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

As systemic therapies improve, the local management of pancreatic cancer will become increasingly important. Here, we report significantly improved local control with SBRT of smaller PTV tumors with concurrent chemotherapy. Five-fraction SBRT offers a quick and effective modality of local tumor control with minimal toxicity in the metastatic pancreatic cancer population.

MRI guided stereotactic radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE:

We want to explore the safety and technical feasibility of MRI-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS:

A custom-made abdominal corset was manufactured to reduce breathing induced tumour motion. Delineation of the tumour and organs at risk (OARs) was performed on CT and multiparametric MRI. Tumour motion was quantified with cine MRI. After treatment planning, the static dose distribution was convolved with the cine MRI-based motion trajectory to simulate the delivered dose to the tumour and OARs. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was carried out up to a dose of 24 G in three fractions in 1 week.

RESULTS:

From July 2013 to January 2016, 20 patients were included. Tumours and OARs were clearly visible with contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. After simulation of the delivered dose taking the motion into account, an adequate target coverage was achieved with acceptable dose in the OARs. No Grade3 or higher treatment related toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION:

MRI-guided SBRT for pancreatic cancer is technical feasible and safe, with no treatment related grade ≥3 toxicity. New strategies are applied, including an individual corset to reduce breathing motion, MRI-based delineation and simulation of motion-integrated dose distributions.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

This article is the first to describe an MRI-integrated workflow in SBRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, it demonstrated that SBRT with an abdominal corset to reduce tumour motion is feasible and safe.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01898741) on July 9, 2013.

Perioperative outcomes and survival following neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with those receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We analyzed patients receiving neoadjuvant SBRT for borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) (2012-2016). Differences in baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (82.4%) patients received SBRT and 16 (17.6%) received IMRT. There were no differences in surgical resection rates in the SBRT (n = 38, 50.7%) and IMRT (n = 11, 68.8%) groups (P = 0.188). Among resected patients, there was no difference in postoperative outcomes or pathologic outcomes including lymph node status, margin status, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, or pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment (P > 0.05). Among all patients, median PFS and OS were 9.9 and 23.5 months in the SBRT group, respectively, and 15.3 and 21.8 months in the IMRT group, respectively (P > 0.05). Similarly, there was no difference in PFS or OS between groups when stratified by BRPC, LAPC, and surgically resected patients (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the neoadjuvant setting, SBRT and IMRT appear to have similar rates of resection, perioperative outcomes, and survival outcomes, but additional studies with increased sample size and longer follow up are needed.

Postoperative complications after resection of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with conventional radiation or stereotactic body radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

The impact of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy on postoperative complications for patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains unclear. Limited studies have compared neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventional chemoradiation therapy. A retrospective study was performed to determine if perioperative complications were different among patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy.

METHODS

Patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with stereotactic body radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy followed by pancreatectomy at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2008 and 2015 were included. Predictive factors for severe complications (Clavien grade ≥ III) were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RT followed by pancreatectomy. Sixty-one (36%) patients underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy and 107 (64%) patients received chemoradiation therapy. Compared with the chemoradiation therapy cohort, the neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy cohort was more likely to have locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (62% vs 43% P = .017) and require a vascular resection (54% vs 37%, P = .027). Multiagent chemotherapy was used more commonly in the stereotactic body radiation therapy cohort (97% vs 75%, P < .001). Postoperative complications (Clavien grade ≥ III 23% vs 28%, P = .471) were similar between stereotactic body radiation therapy and chemoradiation therapy cohort. No significant difference in postoperative bleeding or infection was noted in either group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with chemoradiation therapy, neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy appears to offer equivalent rates of perioperative complications in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma despite a greater percentage of locally advanced disease and more complex operative treatment.

Albumin and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Predict Survival in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With SBRT

PURPOSE

To determine if pretreatment nutritional status and inflammatory markers correlate with survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 208 patients with newly diagnosed, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with SBRT at our institution from 2002 to 2014. Laboratory values were collected before SBRT, including hemoglobin, platelets, albumin, red blood cell, white blood cell, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio, and tumor markers CA 19-9 and CEA. Patients were followed every 3 months with computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography-CT imaging to monitor for local recurrence and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up after SBRT was 7.5 months (interquartile range, 4.6 to 12.0 mo) for all patients. Median OS for patients with NLR>5 compared with NLR≤5 was 6.9 and 8.5 months, respectively (P=0.0057). On univariate analysis, receipt of chemotherapy (P=0.05, hazard ratio [HR]=0.69), increased albumin (P=0.002, HR=0.64), increased red blood cell (P=0.05, HR=0.75), increased lymphocyte count (P=0.002, HR=0.66), decreased CEA (P=0.01, HR=0.96), and NLR≤5 (P=0.01, HR=0.65) correlated with improved OS. On multivariate analysis, higher albumin (P=0.03, HR=0.70), receipt of chemotherapy (P=0.007, HR=0.56), and NLR≤5 (P=0.02, HR=0.66) correlated with better survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Preradiotherapy low albumin levels and NLR>5 correlate with decreased survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with SBRT, indicating the prognostic value of systemic inflammatory markers (such as NLR) and a role of nutritional supplementation to improve outcomes in these patients. Further investigation is warranted.