Outcome standards for an organ preservation strategy in stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation

Selecting Candidates for Organ-Preserving Strategies After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: Development and Validation of a Model Integrating MRI Radiomics and Pathomics

BACKGROUND

Histopathologic evaluation after surgery is the gold standard to evaluate treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, it cannot be used to guide organ-preserving strategies due to poor timeliness.

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a multiscale model incorporating radiomics and pathomics features for predicting pathological good response (pGR) of down-staging to stage ypT0-1N0 after nCRT.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

A total of 153 patients (median age, 55 years; 109 men; 107 training group; 46 validation group) with clinicopathologically confirmed LARC.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0-T; fast spin echo T₂ -weighted and single-shot EPI diffusion-weighted images.

ASSESSMENT

The differences in clinicoradiological variables between pGR and non-pGR groups were assessed. Pretreatment and posttreatment radiomics signatures, and pathomics signature were constructed. A multiscale pGR prediction model was established. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated and compared to that of the clinicoradiological model.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The χ² test, Fisher's exact test, t-test, the minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression algorithm, regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, Delong method. P < 0.05 indicated a significant difference.

RESULTS

Pretreatment radiomics signature (odds ratio [OR] = 2.53; 95% CI: 1.58-4.66), posttreatment radiomics signature (OR = 9.59; 95% CI: 3.04-41.46), and pathomics signature (OR = 3.14; 95% CI: 1.40-8.31) were independent factors for predicting pGR. The multiscale model presented good predictive performance with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.98) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.78-1.00) in the training and validation groups, those were significantly higher than that of the clinicoradiological model with AUCs of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.55-0.82) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.46-0.91) in both groups.

DATA CONCLUSION

A model incorporating radiomics and pathomics features effectively predicted pGR after nCRT in patients with LARC.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 4.

Predictive value of changes in the level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

AIM

The aim of this work was to explore the predictive value of changes in the level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and after surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHOD

Patients with LARC who underwent nCRT and radical surgery (between 2011 and 2016) were divided into three groups according to pre-nCRT and post-nCRT CA19-9 levels as follows: normal pre-nCRT CA19-9 (normal CA19-9 group), elevated pre-nCRT and normal post-nCRT CA19-9 (normalized group) and elevated pre-nCRT and elevated post-nCRT CA19-9 (nonnormalized group). The pathological nCRT response criteria included ypCR and downstaging (ypStages 0-I). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 721 patients were identified. The normal CA19-9 group was significantly associated with ypCR (n = 159) and downstaging (n = 347) (P < 0.05). The normalized group (n = 76) had worse RFS and OS than the normal CA19-9 group (n = 622) and better RFS and OS than the nonnormalized group (n = 23) (5-year RFS 47.0% vs 66.9% vs 81.5%, P < 0.001; 5-year OS 47.0% vs 75.4% vs 85.0%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, CA19-9 group and ypTNM stage were independent predictors of RFS and OS. Moreover, for the 23 patients with elevated post-nCRT CA19-9 levels, the RFS and OS of patients with normalized postoperative CA19-9 levels were significantly better than those of patients with elevated postoperative CA19-9 levels (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Following nCRT, changes in the CA19-9 level are a strong prognostic marker for long-term survival, and they may be helpful in the selection of patients who prefer more conservative surgery after chemoradiotherapy.

Predictive value of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 related to downstaging to stage 0-I after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Objective

To explore the value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in predicting downstaging to stage 0–I cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Materials and methods

We respectively investigated pretreatment CEA, pretreatment CA19-9, posttreatment CEA, posttreatment CA19-9, pre–post-CA19-9 ratio, and pre–post-CEA ratio in 674 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer receiving nCRT and determined the patients’ thresholds by using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The association between downstaging (stage 0–I after nCRT), pathological complete response, and clinicopathological parameters was evaluated using the Pearson χ2 test. The clinicopathological parameters which were found to be significantly associated with downstaging were analyzed by logistic regression models and were incorporated into a scoring system.

Results

Multivariate analysis showed that pretreatment CA19-9 level, posttreatment CEA level, pre–post-CEA ratio, and pre–post-CA19-9 ratio were significantly correlated with downstaging. Area under the curve of the scoring system was higher than that of parameters alone.

Conclusion

The 4-factor scoring system with CA19-9 level, posttreatment CEA level, pre– post-CEA ratio, and pre–post-CA19-9 ratio is of more value in predicting downstaging to stage 0–I patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after nCRT than using the parameters alone.

Analysis of Clinical characteristics to predict pathologic complete response for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

To explore clinical characteristics which could be applied to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME). 297 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4 or cN+) who were treated with neo-CRT followed by TME were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical characteristics including age, gender, tumor distance from anus, serum CEA, hemoglobin levels before treatment and clinical TN stage were used to investigate the association with pCR after neo-CRT. Seventy-nine (26.6%) patients achieved pCR after neo-CRT. pCR were achieved in 42 (34.4%) patients in cT1-3 stage and 37 (21.1%) in cT4 stage. pCR rate was 36.4% and 16.4% for patients with pre-treatment serum CEA ≤5.33ng/ml and >5.33ng/ml, respectively. Uni- and multi-variate analyses revealed that pre-treatment serum CEA level ≤5.33ng/ml and clinical T stage, (i.e., cT1-3 versus cT4) were highly correlated with pCR (p < 0.05). Clinical T stage and pre-treatment serum CEA level were strongly associated with pCR for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neo-CRT followed by TME which could be applied as clinical predictors for pCR.

Predictive value of APAF-1 and COX-2 expression in pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma

Purpose

To investigate predictive value of APAF-1 and COX-2 expression in pathologic complete response (pCR) for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME).

Materials and Methods

Immunohistochemistry assay was used to detect expression of APAF-1 and COX-2 in paraffin-wax embedded tissues obtained before neo-CRT for patients with RAC. A 5-point tumor-regression grade (TRG) based on the ratio of residual tumor to fibrosis according to Dworak's scoring system was used to assess neo-CRT response. The relationship between expression of APAF-1 and COX-2 genes and pCR was explored.

Results

pCR (TRG4) was observed in 23 patients (28.0%). pCR were more likely to be achieved for those with APAF-1 over-expression or lower expression of COX-2. pCR rate in patients with combination of high APAF-1 and low COX-2 expression was 56.0%, significantly higher than those with other combination of APAF1 and COX-2 expression. Multivariate analysis showed that over-expression of APAF-1 and suppressed expression of COX-2 were independent predictive factors for pCR.

Conclusion

Immunohistochemical evaluation of APAF-1 and COX-2 expression on pretreatment specimen may be used to predict pCR to neo-CRT in patients with RAC. The potential of the markers in monitoring pCR patient merits further investigation.

A Modified Classification of Prognostic Factors Based on Pathological Stage and Tumor Regression Grade in Patients with Rectal Cancer Who Receive Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The histologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been intimately related to outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer. However, reliable prognostic factors have yet to be established.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study group comprised 198 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received CRT. A modified classification based on the combination of ypStage and tumor regression grade (TRG) was developed. ypStage II with TRG 2 was classified as ypTRGstage IIA, and ypStage II with TRG 3 or 4 was classified as ypTRGstage IIB. ypStage 0 and ypStage I were classified as ypTRGstage I, and ypStage III was classified as ypTRGstage III.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 83% in ypTRGstage I, 86% in ypTRGstage IIA, 57% in ypTRGstage IIB, and 60% in ypTRGstage III (p = 0.0001). The 5-year DFS in ypTRGstage IIA did not differ significantly from that in ypStage 0 (p = 0.865) or ypStage I (p = 0.585). The 5-year DFS in ypStage IIB did not differ from that in ypStage III (p = 0.912). Multivariate analysis showed that ypTRGstage was an independent risk factor for DFS.

CONCLUSION

A modified classification allows patients with ypStage II locally advanced rectal cancer to be clearly divided into two groups: responders and nonresponders.

Gene expression levels of gamma-glutamyl hydrolase in tumor tissues may be a useful biomarker for the proper use of S-1 and tegafur-uracil/leucovorin in preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer

Purpose

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is the standard of care for rectal cancer. The effect of additional chemotherapy during the period between the completion of radiotherapy and surgery remains unclear. Predictive factors for CRT may differ between combination chemotherapy with S-1 and with tegafur-uracil/leucovorin (UFT/LV).

Methods

The subjects were 54 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received preoperative CRT with S-1 or UFT/LV. The pathological tumor response was assessed according to the tumor regression grade (TRG). The expression levels of 18 CRT-related genes were determined using RT-PCR assay.

Results

A pathological response (TRG 1-2) was observed in 23 patients (42.6%). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis for pathological response, the overall expression levels of four genes, HIF1A, MTHFD1, GGH and TYMS, were significant, and the accuracy rate of the predictive model was 83.3%. The effects of the gene expression levels of GGH on the response differed significantly according to the treatment regimen. The total pathological response rate of both high-GGH patients in the S-1 group and low-GGH patients in the UFT/LV group was 58.3%.

Conclusion

Additional treatment with 5-FU-based chemotherapy during the interval between radiotherapy and surgery is not beneficial in patients who have received 5-FU-based CRT. The expression levels of four genes, HIF1A, MTHFD1, GGH and TYMS, in tumor tissues can predict the response to preoperative CRT including either S-1 or UFT/LV. In particular, the gene expression level of GGH in tumor tissues may be a useful biomarker for the appropriate use of S-1 and UFT/LV in CRT.

Selecting stage ypT0-1N0 for locally advanced rectal cancer following preoperative chemoradiotherapy: implications for potential candidates of organ-sparing management

AIM

Local excision or a wait-and-see policy may offer the possibility of organ preservation for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Identifying associated factors of good responders (GR) with stage ypT0-1N0 would probably influence the selection of potential candidates who were theoretically eligible for organ-sparing management. This study was to establish a scoring system to select stage ypT0-1N0 for LARC following preoperative CRT.

METHOD

Between 2009 and 2014, 262 patients with middle and low LARC were treated with CRT and radical surgery. Clinicopathological data which were found to be significantly associated with GR were incorporated into a scoring system.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven (21.8%) patients were GR with stage ypT0-1N0 in the operative specimen. Multivariate analyses indicated that a low level of pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and post-treatment CEA <2.55 ng/ml (P = 0.008 and P = 0.009 respectively) and long-axis diameter of residual tumours (P = 0.006) were independently associated with stage ypT0-1N0. The three factors were incorporated into a scoring system. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we determined a cutoff value of -0.3 for scores, at which the system's sensitivity was 71.9% and specificity 73.1%. When applied to testing samples, the sensitivity was 74.1% and specificity 76.2%.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that low levels of pretreatment and post-treatment CEA and the long-axis diameter of residual tumours were associated with stage ypT0-1N0 for LARC after CRT. Therefore, the three-factor scoring system may be used to select potential candidates for organ-sparing management.

Adjuvant therapy sparing in rectal cancer achieving complete response after chemoradiation

AIM: To evaluate the long-term results of conventional chemoradiotherapy and laparoscopic mesorectal excision in rectal adenocarcinoma patients without adjuvant therapy.

METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum staged cT3-T4 by endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging received neoadjuvant continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil for five weeks and concomitant radiotherapy. Laparoscopic surgery was planned after 5-8 wk. Patients diagnosed with ypT0N0 stage cancer were not treated with adjuvant therapy according to the protocol. Patients with ypT1-2N0 or ypT3-4 or N+ were offered 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant treatment on an individual basis. An external cohort was used as a reference for the findings.

RESULTS: One hundred and seventy six patients were treated with induction chemoradiotherapy and 170 underwent total mesorectal excision. Cancer staging of ypT0N0 was achieved in 26/170 (15.3%) patients. After a median follow-up of 58.3 mo, patients with ypT0N0 had five-year disease-free and overall survival rates of 96% (95%CI: 77-99) and 100%, respectively. We provide evidence about the natural history of patients with localized rectal cancer achieving a complete response after preoperative chemoradiation. The inherent good prognosis of these patients will have implications for clinical trial design and care of patients.

CONCLUSION: Withholding adjuvant chemotherapy after complete response following standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and laparoscopic mesorectal excision might be safe within an experienced multidisciplinary team.

Can We Predict Complete or Major Response after Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer by Noninvasive Methods? Results of a Prospective Study on 61 Patients

Rectal preservation has been proposed as an alternative to radical resection in patients with presumed complete or major response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital rectal examination (DRE) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict major or complete rectal cancer response to CRT. Over 2 years, 61 patients underwent radical resection after CRT for rectal cancer. DRE and MRI were carried out before and 6 to 8 weeks after the end of CRT. Data from DRE and MRI post-CRT were compared with pathological examinations. At pathological examination, major/complete responses were recorded for tumors classified ypT1N0 and ypT0N0, respectively. DRE post-CRT showed major/complete response in 26 cases, of which 14 (54%) were confirmed by pathology. The positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of DRE to predict major/complete response were 54 and 88 per cent, respectively. MRI post-CRT showed major/complete response in 12 cases, of which nine (75%) were confirmed by pathology. The PPV and NPV of MRI to predict major/complete response were 75 and 82 per cent, respectively. Data from DRE and RMI post-CRT were concordant in 45 patients. The PPV and NPV of concordant DRE and MRI to predict major/complete response were 82 and 91 per cent, respectively. DRE and MRI do not appear to be sufficiently accurate for safe selection of patients appropriate for a rectum-sparing strategy because the risk of leaving an invasive tumor untreated is 18 per cent.

Value of transrectal ultrasonography for tumor node metastasis restaging in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) for tumor node metastasis (TNM) restaging for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT).

METHODS

One hundred and forty-nine patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4 or cN+) who underwent TRUS after neo-CRT were retrospectively reviewed. TRUS restaging was compared with the results of post-operative pathological TNM findings.

RESULTS

After neo-CRT, the accuracy of TRUS for diagnosing T-staging was 30.9%, with 60.4% (90/149) of cases overestimated. The sensitivity of TRUS for T-staging (T0 vs T1 vs T2 vs T3 vs T4) were 16.3%, 0%, 12.5%, 42.6% and 75.0%, respectively. The accuracy of TRUS for diagnosing N-staging after neo-CRT was 81.2%, with the sensitivities of N0 and N+ were 93.3% and 31.0%, respectively. After neo-CRT, 27.5% (41/149) of patients achieved pathologically complete response (pCR). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values of TRUS for pCR were 17.1%, 99.1%, 87.5% and 75.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TRUS can be applied for restaging T4 and N0, and has potential for screening out patients with pCR in those with locally advanced rectal cancer after neo-CRT, although some stages are overestimated for T-staging and its sensitivity for predicting pCR is low.

Clinicopathologic Comparison of High-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy versus Conventional Chemoradiotherapy in the Neoadjuvant Setting for Resectable Stages II and III Low Rectal Cancer

Purpose. To assess for differences in clinical, radiologic, and pathologic outcomes between patients with stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma treated neoadjuvantly with conventional external beam radiotherapy (3D conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)) versus high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (EBT). Methods. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant EBT received 4 consecutive daily 6.5 Gy fractions without chemotherapy, while those undergoing 3DRT or IMRT received 28 daily 1.8 Gy fractions with concurrent 5-fluorouracil. Data was collected prospectively for 7 EBT patients and retrospectively for 25 historical 3DRT/IMRT controls. Results. Time to surgery was less for EBT compared to 3DRT and IMRT (P < 0.001). There was a trend towards higher rate of pathologic CR for EBT (P = 0.06). Rates of margin and lymph node positivity at resection were similar for all groups. Acute toxicity was less for EBT compared to 3DRT and IMRT (P = 0.025). Overall and progression-free survival were noninferior for EBT. On MRI, EBT achieved similar complete response rate and reduction in tumor volume as 3DRT and IMRT. Histopathologic comparison showed that EBT resulted in more localized treatment effects and fewer serosal adhesions. Conclusions. EBT offers several practical benefits over conventional radiotherapy techniques and appears to be at least as effective against low rectal cancer as measured by short-term outcomes.

Neoadjuvant treatment response as an early response indicator for patients with rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer is associated with improved local control and may result in complete tumor response. Associations between tumor response and disease control following radical resection should be established before tumor response is used to evaluate treatment strategies. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare oncologic outcomes associated with the degree of pathologic response after chemoradiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with locally advanced (cT3-4 or cN+ by endorectal ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging) rectal carcinoma diagnosed from 1993 to 2008 at our institution and treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical resection were identified, and their records were retrospectively reviewed. The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis (DM), and local recurrence (LR) rates were compared among patients with complete (ypT0N0), intermediate (ypT1-2N0), or poor (ypT3-4 or N+) response by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

In all, 725 patients were classified by tumor response: complete (131; 18.1%), intermediate (210; 29.0%), and poor (384; 53.0%). Age, sex, cN stage, and tumor location were not related to tumor response. Tumor response (complete v intermediate v poor) was associated with 5-year RFS (90.5% v 78.7% v 58.5%; P < .001), 5-year DM rates (7.0% v 10.1% v 26.5%; P < .001), and 5-year LR only rates (0% v 1.4% v 4.4%; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing radical resection is an early surrogate marker and correlate to oncologic outcomes. These data provide guidance with response-stratified oncologic benchmarks for comparisons of novel treatment strategies.

Impact of interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and TME for locally advanced rectal cancer on pathologic response and oncologic outcome

BACKGROUND

The interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer has arbitrarily been set at 6-8 weeks. However, tumor regression is variable. This study aimed to evaluate whether the interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery had an impact on pathologic response and on surgical and oncologic outcome.

METHODS

A total of 356 consecutive patients with clinical stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma were identified. Median age was 63 years, and 65 % were men. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy) with a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil. Data on neoadjuvant-surgery interval, type of surgery, pathology, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, disease recurrence, and survival were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery: ≤ 7 weeks (short interval, n = 201) and >7 weeks (long interval, n = 155).

RESULTS

The complete pathologic response rate was 21 %. It was significantly higher after a longer interval (28 %) than after a shorter interval (16 %, p = 0.006). A longer interval did not affect morbidity or length of hospital stay. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, the 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 83 % in the short-interval group versus 91 % in the long-interval group (p = 0.046), and the free-from-recurrence rate was 73 versus 83 %, respectively (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, there seems to be an association between a longer interval after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and complete pathologic response without affecting postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay, and with no detrimental effect on oncologic outcome.

Long-term outcome of patients with complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for cT3 rectal cancer: implications for local excision surgical strategies

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by radical surgery including total mesorectal excision (TME) is standard treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Emerging data indicate that patients with complete pathologic response (ypCR) after CRT have favorable outcome, suggesting the possibility of less invasive surgical treatment. We analyzed long-term outcome of cT3 rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant CRT in relation to ypCR and type of surgery.

METHODS

The study population comprised 139 patients (93 men, 46 women; median age 62 years) with cT3N0-1M0 mid and distal rectal adenocarcinoma treated by CRT and surgery (110 TME and 29 local excision) at our institution between 1996 and 2008. At pathology, ypCR was defined as no residual cancer cells in the primary tumor.

RESULTS

Tumors of 42 patients (30.2%) were classified as ypCR. After a median follow-up of 55.4 months, comparing patients with ypCR to patients with no ypCR, 5-year disease-specific survival was 95.8% versus 78.0% (P = 0.004), and 5-year disease-free survival was 90.1% vs. 64.0% (P = 0.004). In patients with ypCR, no statistically significant outcome difference was observed between TME and local excision. In patients treated by local excision, comparing patients with ypCR to patients with no ypCR, 5-year disease-free survival was 100% vs. 65.5% (P = 0.024), and 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 92.9% vs. 66.7% (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

With retrospective analysis limitations, our data confirm favorable long-term outcome of cT3 rectal cancer with ypCR after CRT and warrant clinical trials exploring local excision surgical strategies.

Lymphovascular invasion is a significant prognosticator in rectal cancer patients who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision

PURPOSE

This study was designed to identify the significance of lymphovascular invasion as a prognosticator for tumor recurrence and survival in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME).

METHODS

Between January 2003 and October 2010, the study included 328 patients with primary rectal cancer who had received preoperative CRT followed by TME. We analyzed the clinicopathologic factors that may be associated with survival, such as age, gender, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) value, pathologic T and N stage, tumor response, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and perineural invasion.

RESULTS

Higher pathologic T and N stage, poor tumor response, high-grade histology, and positive LVI were adverse prognostic factors for both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) on the multivariate analysis. Perineural invasion was a significant adverse prognostic factor affecting DFS (P=0.046) but not OS (P=0.08). Increased T and N stage and distant recurrence, but not local recurrence, were significant factors associated with LVI. The LVI-negative group had a higher DFS (71.4 vs. 56.2%, P=0.012) and OS rate (86.7 vs. 63.4%, P=0.020) at 5 years than the LVI-positive group did.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive LVI had a negative impact on survival in patients with rectal cancer who received preoperative CRT and TME and is significantly associated with an increased chance of distant recurrence. Based on this finding, more tailored adjuvant chemotherapy is warranted for advanced rectal cancer patients with LVI to reduce the distant dissemination of tumor.