Exploring the landscape of oesophageal discontinuity procedures and creation of cervical oesophagostomy in the modern era: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Oesophageal discontinuity remains a challenge for thoracic and foregut surgeons globally. Whether arising emergently after catastrophic oesophageal or gastric disruption or arising in the elective setting in the case of staged reconstruction for esophagectomy or long gap atresia in the paediatric population, comprehensive review of this patient population remains unexplored within the surgical literature.The goal of this scoping review is to map the landscape of literature exploring the creation and takedown of cervical oesophagostomy with the intent to answer four questions (1) What are the primary indications for oesophageal discontinuity procedures? (2) What are the disease-specific and healthcare utilisation outcomes for oesophageal discontinuity procedures? (3) What is the primary indication for reversal procedures? (4) What are the disease-specific and healthcare utilisation outcomes for reversal procedures?

METHODS

This review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework for scoping reviews. Paediatric (<18 years old) and adult (>18 years old) patients, who have received a cervical oesophagostomy in the context of a gastrointestinal discontinuity procedure or those who have had reversal of a cervical oesophagostomy, will be included for analysis. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases for papers from 1990 until 2023. Interventional trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies, reviews, case series and qualitative study designs will be included. Two authors will independently review all titles, abstracts and full texts to determine which studies meet the inclusion criteria.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethics approval is required for this review. Results will be disseminated through scientific presentations and relevant conferences targeted for researchers examining upper gastrointestinal/foregut surgery.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

This protocol is registered with Open Science Framework (osf.io/s3b4g).

Multi-stage surgery to treat oesophageal fistula that developed after chemoradiotherapy in two patients with oesophageal cancer: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Oesophageal fistula is a severe complication that may occasionally develop after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for oesophageal cancer and is difficult to treat.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 51-year-old man who had undergone CRT for oesophageal cancer presented with haematemesis and was diagnosed with a descending aortic aneurysm and an oesophageal fistula. Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair was performed to achieve haemostasis. After 3 days, the patient underwent subtotal oesophagectomy and cervical oesophagostomy with delivery of a pedicled omental flap to the exposed aortic stent. Six months later, ileocecal reconstruction was performed. The second patient was a 49-year-old woman who had undergone CRT 1 year previously. She complained of leg weakness and gait disorder. After a workup, she was diagnosed with perforation of the posterior wall of the cervical oesophagus with abscess formation and purulent spondylitis. After two spinal fusion surgeries, we performed tracheotomy and drained the cervical region to reduce local infection. After 7 days, she underwent pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy and reconstruction using a gastric conduit, to which a large section of the omental flap was attached. After the multi-stage surgery, oral intake became possible, and both patients were discharged.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The optimal treatment strategy for post-CRT oesophageal fistula remains controversial. Radical surgery, including oesophagectomy, is the treatment of choice, although it is associated with high mortality rates. Multi-stage surgery may be useful for reducing surgical stress in moribund patients.

CONCLUSION

We reported two cases involving radiation-induced oesophageal fistula successfully treated by multi-stage surgery without major complications.

Successful multidisciplinary treatment for synchronous advanced esophageal and cecal cancers after total gastrectomy with reconstruction by jejunal interposition

BACKGROUND

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is characterized by field cancerization, wherein multiple cancers occur in the esophagus, head and neck, and stomach. Synchronous esophageal and colorectal cancers are also encountered with a certain frequency. A good prognosis can be expected if the tumors in both locations can be safely and completely removed. For patients with multiple cancers that occur simultaneously with esophageal cancer, it is necessary to perform a staged operation, taking into consideration the associated surgical invasiveness. It is also necessary to select multidisciplinary treatment depending on the degree of progression of the multiple lesions. We report our rare experience with a staged operation for a patient with synchronous advanced cancers of the esophagus and cecum who had previously undergone total gastrectomy with reconstruction by jejunal interposition for gastric cancer.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 71-year-old man with a history of reconstruction by jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy was diagnosed as having multiple synchronous esophageal and cecal cancers. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we performed a planned two-stage operation, with esophagectomy and jejunostomy in the first stage and ileocecal resection and jejunal reconstruction with vascular anastomosis in the second. Postoperatively, the patient was relieved without major complications, and both tumors were amenable to curative pathologic resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our procedure reported here may be recommended as an option for staged resection and reconstruction in patients with simultaneous advanced esophageal and cecal cancer after total gastrectomy.

Safe and curative modified two-stage operation for T4 esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy: a case report

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of esophageal cancer (EC) with organ invasion is extremely poor. In these cases, definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by salvage surgery can be planned; however, the issue of high morbidity and mortality rates persists. Herein, we report the long-term survival of a patient with EC and T4 invasion who underwent a modified two-stage operation after definitive CRT.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 60-year-old male presented with type 2 upper thoracic EC with tracheal invasion. First, definitive CRT was performed, which resulted in tumor shrinkage and improvement in the tracheal invasion. However, an esophagotracheal fistula subsequently developed, and the patient was treated with fasting and antibiotics. Although the fistula recovered, severe esophageal stenoses made oral intake impossible. To improve quality of life and cure the EC, a modified two-stage operation was planned. In the first surgery, an esophageal bypass was performed using a gastric tube with cervical and abdominal lymph node dissections. After confirming improved nutritional status and absence of distant metastasis, the second surgery was performed with subtotal esophagectomy, mediastinal lymph node dissection, and tracheobronchial coverage of the fistula. The patient discharged without major complications after radical resection and has been recurrence-free for 5 years since the start of treatment.

CONCLUSION

A standard curative strategy could be difficult for EC with T4 invasion due to differences in the invaded organs, presence of complications, and patient condition. Therefore, patient-tailored treatment plans are needed, including a modified two-stage operation.

Outcomes of Standardized Protocols in Supercharged Pedicled Jejunal Esophageal Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of long-segment supercharged pedicled jejunal (SPJ) interposition after implementation of a dedicated multidisciplinary pathway and technical refinements.

METHODS

This study was a 6-year review of consecutive patients who underwent complex esophageal reconstruction with SPJ interposition. Clinical data were abstracted, and PRO data were collected prospectively by using the Upper Digestive Disease mobile application (UDD App). This standardized questionnaire comprised domains for mental and physical health, pain, dysphagia, reflux, hypoglycemia dumping, and gastrointestinal dumping symptoms. Operative refinements were comprehensively established by 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients were included in the study, 15 of whom had a history of esophageal malignant disease and neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Most patients (18; 95%) underwent delayed reconstruction after diversion. There was no 90-day mortality or flap loss. Most patients (18; 95%) achieved an enteral diet. Seven patients (37%) experienced early complications (<90 days) requiring procedural intervention. The incidence of any medical or surgical complication was similar in the earlier (2015-2017) and late (2018-2020) cohorts, but aspiration events, surgical site infections, anastomotic leak rates, and median hospital stay (reduced from 15 days [IQR, 10-21 days] to 9 days [IQR, 9-13 days]) improved in the contemporary cohort. PRO data were collected in 14 of 15 (93%) living patients. Severe symptoms in at least 1 domain were reported by most patients (11; 79%) and improved over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Dedicated care pathways allow standardization of complex procedures, and targeted modifications may optimize recovery and patient outcomes. This cohort of patients may report severe symptoms that require ongoing monitoring and intervention.

Handgrip strength predicts early postoperative dysphagia after thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy in male patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia after esophagectomy, especially in the early postoperative period, remains a severe complication. The association between sarcopenia and dysphagia has received attention in geriatric non-cancer populations. This study aimed to determine the associations between sarcopenia parameters and early postoperative dysphagia after esophagectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 201 consecutive male patients undergoing thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE) for esophageal cancer between October 2018 and December 2020. We used three sarcopenia parameters: handgrip strength (HGS), skeletal muscle index, and gait speed. Postoperative swallowing function was assessed by videofluoroscopy using the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS; range 1-8). Logistic regression analyses were used to predict factors associated with postoperative aspiration (PAS 6-8). Furthermore, we compared values in patients with symptomatic aspiration (PAS 6-7) and with silent aspiration (PAS 8).

RESULTS

Aspiration occurred in 38 of 201 patients (18.9%). On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of aspiration included age [odds ratio (OR) 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.17; p < 0.001], low HGS (OR 3.05; 95% CI 1.06-8.78; p = 0.039), upper third esophageal cancer (OR 2.79; 95% CI 1.03-7.54; p = 0.044) and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.26-7.06; p = 0.013). Furthermore, among patients with aspiration (PAS 6-8), low HGS was significantly associated with silent aspiration (OR 6.43; 95% CI 1.06-39.00; p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Low HGS was significantly associated with early postoperative aspiration and impairment of airway protective reflexes after TLE.

Salvage treatment after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is performed for patients with cT4 disease without distant metastasis and also for those with cStage I-III who are unable to tolerate or who refuse surgery. The rates of clinical complete response (cCR) after dCRT differ depending on the cStage, and patients who once achieved cCR frequently experience tumor recurrence. For those with residual tumor or with recurrence, salvage treatment is performed to achieve a cure. Several procedures have been reported as salvage treatments. Salvage esophagectomy is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, but can offer long-term survival. With R0 resection, with cCR to dCRT, pulmonary complications appear to be important prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS). Lymphadenectomy is performed for the patients with lymph node metastasis without recurrence of primary lesions or distant metastasis, but the contribution to long-term OS is unclear. Metastasectomy is performed when distant metastasis is limited to the lung and there are few lesions, possibly contributing to long-term OS. Endoscopic resection and photodynamic therapy are indicated for cT1a and cT1-2 residual or recurrent tumors, respectively, and can yield favorable outcomes. Re-CRT and re-radiotherapy are performed for the patients with contraindications for surgery, but neither appears to contribute to long-term OS despite high incidences of esophageal fistula and perforation.

Patient selection for salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

With the widespread use of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), salvage surgery for recurrence/residual patients became prevalent. However, survival impact of salvage surgery remains obscure at present.

METHODS

The updated clinical outcomes of salvage surgery were investigated to know its survival impact. Of the 155 ESCC patients who underwent dCRT between 2009 and 2016, we included 85 patients with recurrence or residual disease. The median follow-up was 65 months.

RESULTS

Of the 85 patients with progression disease, there were 42 and 43 patients of recurrence and residual disease, respectively. Salvage surgery was performed in 27 patients after dCRT, including 15 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of salvage surgery and otherwise patients was 66.1% and 14.5%, and the patients with salvage surgery had a significantly better prognosis (p < 0.0001). In the 15 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy, residual disease, lymph node metastasis-positive (ycN+) after dCRT, and pathological lymph node metastasis-positive (ypN+) were significantly associated with poor prognosis (p = 0.0492, p = 0.0006, p = 0.0276), and the 5-year OS rates for the ycN/ypN combinations were 90%, 33.3%, and 0% in ycN-/ypN-, ycN+/ypN-, and ycN+/ypN+ patients, respectively (p = 0.0026). In a multivariate analysis, ycN+ was an independent poor prognostic factor (HR 13.6, 95% CI 1.65-286.8, p = 0.0154).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival impact of salvage surgery after dCRT is robust, and lymph node metastasis after dCRT may help determine the indication for salvage esophagectomy.

Successful two-stage operation for esophageal necrosis due to proton beam therapy followed by sorafenib in a case of large hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is unsuitable for standard locoregional therapies, remains a challenge to manage. Among the recently developed treatments, proton beam therapy (PBT) has been reported to achieve good local control. However, in patients with large HCC adjacent to the esophagus, high-dose PBT may rarely lead to radiation-induced esophageal necrosis or perforation. Furthermore, the optimal strategy to safely treat these fatal complications remains unclear.

Case presentation

A 49-year-old man who was diagnosed with a large (16 cm) HCC in the right lobe with tumor thrombosis in the main trunk of the portal vein (PVTT) received high-dose hypofractionated PBT in another hospital. A total dose of 66 GyE in 10 fractions was administered to the primary tumor and the PVTT. After 5 months, a 1-cm solitary nodule was noted in the upper lobe of the right lung. Therefore, sorafenib was started. About 6 months after the PBT, lower esophageal mucosal inflammation that progressed to an ulcer was noted. About 7 months after the PBT, the lower esophagus developed full-thickness necrosis. Therefore, emergency thoracoscopic esophagectomy was performed, followed by two-stage reconstruction 2 months later. The operation and postoperative clinical course were mostly uneventful, except for a minor anastomotic leakage. The outcome of the primary HCC, including the PVTT, was graded as a complete response, which has been maintained for 51 months after the PBT.

Conclusion

PBT is a promising option for patients with locally advanced HCC; however, for large tumors adjacent to the esophagus, ischemic esophageal necrosis due to antiangiogenic effects may occur, particularly with the combined use of PBT and sorafenib. In such a life-threatening condition, the thoracoscopic esophagectomy and the two-stage reconstruction are a safe option that can prevent critical postoperative complications due to the poor general condition, effects of PBT on the remnant gastric conduit, and use of sorafenib.

Treatment of aortoesophageal fistula developed after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a questionnaire survey study

BACKGROUND

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a life-threatening late complication that can occur after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). More data are required to identify the optimal treatment strategy for AEF developed after TEVAR. The aim of this study was to clarify the current status of surgical treatments for AEF developed after TEVAR and the outcomes of these treatments.

METHODS

The Japan Esophageal Society conducted a questionnaire survey targeting authorized or semi-authorized institutes at Authorized Institutes for Board Certified Esophageal Surgeons. Thirty-nine patients with AEF developed after TEVAR were identified from 15 institutes. Data on patient demographics, treatment performed, and survival rate were obtained by the questionnaire. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and differences in the survival rates.

RESULTS

Esophagectomy and aortic replacement were performed in 32 and 22 patients, respectively, and 22 underwent both procedures. Postoperative complications were observed in 24 patients (75.0%). Complications with Clavien-Dindo Grade III or higher were observed in 53.1% of patients. Operative and hospital mortality rates were 3.1% and 18.8%, respectively. The survival rate in patients who underwent esophagectomy was higher than in those who did not (P < 0.0001). The survival of patients who underwent both esophagectomy and aortic replacement was also higher than in those who did not (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Esophagectomy combined with aortic replacement can offer a long-term treatment strategy with higher survival rates in patients who develop AEF after TEVAR. Because of the high incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality, these types of surgery should only be performed in centers with both experienced esophageal and cardiovascular surgical teams.

Staged esophagectomy: surgical legacy or a bailout option?

Staged esophagectomy was developed in the mid-twentieth century in an attempt to reduce high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Nowadays, the operation has almost been abandoned due to its significant disadvantages, especially the need for multiple surgeries, inability of patients to feed between operations, and morbidity of esophageal stoma. However, staged esophagectomy is still occasionally useful for very high-risk patients and in particular cases, for example multiple cancers of the aerodigestive tract and emergent esophagectomy. Staged esophagectomy is based on the division of surgical stress into two operations, which gives the patient time to recover before final restoration. Gastric tube ischemic preparation may be a more important mechanism in staged esophagectomy. This approach may survive and expand with the application of ischemic gastric pre-conditioning through embolization or laparoscopic ligation of the gastric arteries, which is a less explored and promising technique.

Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus Synchronously Associated with Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this study was to clarify the treatment strategy for synchronous squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (ESCC) and head and neck cancer (HNC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment outcomes of 91 patients with synchronous ESCC and HNC were evaluated. Thirty-eight patients received simultaneous definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and 15 patients underwent simultaneous resection.

RESULTS

Among the patients who received simultaneous CRT, adverse events (grade 3-5) were recognized in 14 patients (40%), including one case of death due to aspiration pneumonia. Complete response was observed in 22 patients with ESCC (58%) and 19 patients with HNC (50%). The five-year survival rate was 44%. There were no in-hospital deaths after simultaneous resection; however, postoperative complications were recognized in 4 patients. The five-year OS was 70%.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of synchronous ESCC and HNC must be decided by adopting a strategy that is appropriate for each case. Both simultaneous CRT and simultaneous resection are feasible and effective treatment options.

Ileum preserving expanded jejunectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy with combined resection of the superior mesenteric artery for huge retroperitoneal solitary fibrous tumor

We encountered a patient with a large retroperitoneal solitary fibrous tumor, in whom we could preserve approximately 150 cm of the ileum even after pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with resection of the superior mesenteric artery, thus preventing short bowel syndrome.

Prognostic Significance of Postoperative Complications After Curative Resection for Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to elucidate the impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND

The relation between postoperative complications and long-term survival after curative surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is controversial; thus, this issue should be resolved with a large-scale, well-designed study.

METHODS

Clinicopathological features and survival of 580 consecutive patients who received curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were investigated according to the development of postoperative pulmonary complications and anastomotic leakage.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rates of patients with pStage 0, I, and II disease with postoperative complications (n = 116) were significantly poorer than those of patients without postoperative complications (n = 288) (overall 69.6% vs 46.9%, P < 0.0001; disease-specific; 76.7% vs 58.9%, P < 0.0022), whereas no differences were found in patients with pStage III and IV disease (n = 176). In the univariate and multivariate analyses for disease-specific survival, pT3, pT4, pN positivity, and development of postoperative complications were significant prognostic factors in all patients. Also, when the analysis was limited to the pStage 0, I, and II patients, development of postoperative complications, and pT3, pT4, and pN positivity, were found to be independent poor prognostic factors in multivariate analyses (hazard ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.41, P = 0.0476).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of postoperative complications is an independent disease-specific poor prognostic factor after curative resection for patients with less-advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Salvage esophagectomy for persistent or recurrent disease after definitive chemoradiation

Locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer is treated by some oncologists with definitive chemoradiation. The optimal strategy to treat persistent or recurrent disease after definitive chemoradiation is controversial. We reviewed the literature to determine current treatment options and optimal approaches. Salvage esophagectomy of relapsed or recurrent esophageal cancer has traditionally been associated with increased risk. Modern literature, however, suggests that in specialized high volume centers the risk of salvage esophagectomy when accompanied with various risk-reducing approaches (anastomosis in non-radiated esophagus, omental transposition, selective use of alternative conduits and two stage procedures) is similar to planned esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Long-term survival rates following salvage esophagectomy are also achievable and similar to planned esophagectomy. Since there are no other potentially curable treatment options, we recommend that all physiologically fit patients with locoregionally persistent or recurrent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiation be referred to a specialized high volume esophageal center for salvage esophagectomy.

Treatment results of two-stage operation for the patients with esophageal cancer concomitant with liver dysfunction

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of two-stage operation for the patients with esophageal cancer who have liver dysfunction.

METHODS

Eight patients with esophageal cancer concomitant with liver dysfunction who underwent two-stage operation were analyzed. The patients initially underwent an esophagectomy, a cervical esophagostomy and a tube jejunostomy, and reconstruction with gastric tube was performed after the recovery of patients' condition.

RESULTS

The average time of the 1(st) and 2(nd) stage operation was 410.0 min and 438.9 min, respectively. The average amount of blood loss in the 1(st) and 2(nd) stage operation was 433.5 ml and 1556.8 ml, respectively. The average duration between the operations was 29.8 days. The antesternal route was selected for 5 patients (62.5%) and the retrosternal route was for 3 patients (37.5%). In the 1(st) stage operation, no postoperative complications were observed, while, complications developed in 5 (62.5%) patients, including 4 anastomotic leakages, after the 2(nd) stage operation. Pneumonia was not observed through two-stage operation. No in-hospital death was experienced.

CONCLUSION

A two-stage operation might prevent the occurrence of critical postoperative complications for the patients with esophageal cancer concomitant with liver dysfunction.

Esophageal anastomosis - how the granulation phase of wound healing improves the incidence of anastomotic leakage

A two-stage esophagectomy with an interval for reconstruction of the esophagus creates an opportunity for the esophageal stump to recover from vessel injury and allows the formation of granulation tissue rich in proangiogenic factors, including transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), which may have an impact on anastomosis healing. The present study comprised 25 patients (27 in total, 2 succumbed to complications following surgery) who underwent two-stage esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma in the Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Wrocław Medical University (Wrocław, Poland) between January 2007 and December 2012. Immunohistochemical staining for VEGF-A and TGF-β was performed to evaluate esophageal wall specimens at the time of esophagostomy construction and prior to anastomosis, in which the cervical esophagus was connected with the colon or ileum. At the time of reconstructive surgery, a significant increase in microvessel density was observed in all esophageal specimens (P<0.03). Significant differences were also identified in the immunohistochemical staining intensity of TGF-β and VEGF-A in the epithelium of all esophageal specimens between biopsies obtained from normal esophageal tissues at the time of esophagectomy and during reconstructive surgery. Delayed anastomosis construction provides an advantage for the esophageal stump to accumulate proangiogenic growth factors, which overlap with the subsequent proliferative stage of the anastomosed tissue and thus supports its recovery, creating an optimal environment for the healing of any fistulas.

Curative two-stage resection for synchronous triple cancers of the esophagus, colon, and liver: Report of a case

INTRODUCTION

Cases of synchronous triple cancers of the esophagus and other organs curatively resected are rare.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 73-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with bloody feces. He was diagnosed with synchronous triple cancers of the esophagus, colon, and liver. We selected a two-stage operation to safely achieve curative resection for all three cancers. The first stage of the operation comprised a laparoscopy-assisted sigmoidectomy and partial liver resection via open surgery. The patient was discharged without complications. Thirty days later, he was readmitted and thoracoscopic esophagectomy was performed. Although pneumonia-induced pulmonary aspiration occurred as a postoperative complication, it was treated conservatively. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 24.

DISCUSSION

Esophagectomy is a highly invasive procedure; thus, simultaneous surgery for plural organs, including the esophagus, may induce life-threatening, severe complications. Two-stage surgery is useful in reducing surgical stress in high-risk patients. For synchronous multiple cancers, the planning of two-stage surgery should be considered for each cancer to maintain organ function and reduce the stress and difficulty of each stage.

CONCLUSION

We successfully treated synchronous triple cancers, including esophageal cancer, by a two-stage operation.

Technical improvement of total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

Total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (PLE) is highly invasive, and the subsequent reconstruction is difficult. The purpose of this study was to clarify the techniques that can decrease the surgical stress and allow for safe reconstruction after this operation.

METHODS

The surgical method and clinical outcomes of total PLE were reviewed in 12 patients with either cervicothoracic esophageal cancer or double cancer of the esophagus and pharynx. Microscopic venous anastomosis was principally performed, and arterial anastomosis was added, if needed.

RESULTS

A narrow gastric tube was used in ten patients, including two patients who underwent free jejunal interposition, while the colon was used as the main reconstructed organ in two other patients. Staged operations were performed in three high-risk patients. All six patients treated after 2010 were able to undergo thoracoscopic and/or laparoscopic surgery. No critical postoperative complications developed, although minor anastomotic leakage developed in two patients who were successfully treated conservatively.

CONCLUSION

When performing PLE, it is important to decrease the surgical stress and ensure a reliable reconstruction by adopting techniques that are appropriate for each case, such as thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery, staged operations, microvascular anastomosis, and muscular flaps.

Surgical strategies for esophageal cancer associated with head and neck cancer

Esophageal cancer is frequently associated with squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Both cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption are risk factors for multiple cancers of the head and neck, as well as the esophagus. Routine screening and close follow-up for second cancers are important in patients with esophageal cancer or head and neck cancer. For this purpose, endoscopy with Lugol's staining, as well as narrow-band imaging combined with magnifying endoscopy, is a powerful tool for the early detection of esophageal cancer. Multimodal therapy is essential for patients with double cancers. When considering surgical treatment, the curability of both cancers must be carefully evaluated. If both tumors are potentially curable, each lesion should be treated individually. In patients with metachronous double cancers, the prior treatment of the first primary carcinoma often affects the treatment of the second cancer. Close cooperation among medical staff members is essential for complicated surgeries for double cancers. Techniques that are appropriate for each case must be adopted, such as careful dissection, staged operations, muscular flaps and microvascular anastomosis.

Surgical resection for esophageal cancer synchronously or metachronously associated with head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is frequently associated with head and neck cancer, and esophagectomy is usually difficult in such a case. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical significance of esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer associated either synchronously or metachronously with head and neck cancer.

METHODS

The clinical outcomes of surgical resections for esophageal cancer were compared between 26 patients with head and neck cancer (double cancer group) and 176 without head and neck cancer (control group).

RESULTS

Staged operations were performed in 5 patients in the double cancer group, while microvascular anastomosis as well as a muscle flap was added for 3 and 4 patients, respectively. The mortality and morbidity of the double cancer group were 0 and 35 %, respectively, which were not significantly different from those of the control group (3 and 31 %, respectively). There were no significant differences in overall survival in the double cancer and control groups, which had 5-year survival rates of 59 and 49 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophagectomy can be an effective treatment when techniques are adopted that are appropriate for each case, such as staged operations, muscular flaps, and microvascular anastomosis, even in patients with double cancers of the esophagus and the head and neck.

Esophageal replacement by colon interposition with microvascular surgery for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: the utility of superdrainage

Replacing the thoracic esophagus with the colon is one mode of reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. There is, however, a high incidence of postoperative necrosis of the transposed colon. This study evaluated the outcomes of colon interposition with the routine use of superdrainage by microvascular surgery. Twenty-one patients underwent colon interposition from 2004 to 2009. The strategy for colon interposition was to: (i) use the right hemicolon; (ii) reconstruct via the subcutaneous route; (iii) perform a microvascular venous anastomosis for all patients; and (iv) perform a microvascular arterial anastomosis when the arterial blood flow was insufficient. The clinicopathologic features, surgical findings, and outcomes were investigated. The colon was used because of a previous gastrectomy in 18 patients (85.7%) and synchronous gastric cancer in three patients (14.3%). Eight patients (38.1%) underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy including three (14.3%) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Seven patients (33.3%) underwent microvascular arterial anastomosis to supplement the right colon blood supply. Pneumonia occurred in four patients (19.0%). Anastomotic leakage was observed in five patients (23.8%); however, no colon necrosis was observed. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were both 50.6%. Colon interposition with superdrainage results in successful treatment outcomes. This technique is one option for colon interposition employing the right hemicolon.

Clinical significance of salvage esophagectomy for remnant or recurrent cancer following definitive chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal cancer on the postoperative course, and to determine the clinical significance of salvage esophagectomy after definitive CRT.

METHODS

Based on their preoperative treatment, 477 patients with esophageal cancer were classified into three groups: 253 patients who received surgery alone (Group I), 197 who received planned CRT (30-45 Gy, Group II), and 27 who received a salvage esophagectomy (radiation ≥60 Gy, Group III).

RESULTS

Postoperative complications developed in 25, 40, and 59% of the patients in Groups I, II, and III, respectively, with pulmonary complications developing in 10, 15, and 30%, and anastomotic leakage developing in 13, 23, and 37%, respectively. Mortality rates were 2.4, 2.0, and 7.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative therapy to be an independent factor associated with postoperative risks: the odds ratios (ORs) of Groups II and III compared to Group I were 1.8 and 4.0 for pulmonary complications, while they were 1.9 and 2.8, respectively, for anastomotic leakage. No critical complications developed in the 14 patients who received salvage surgery performed with strict surgical indications after 2005. The survival of Group III was not significantly different from that of Groups I and II. Most patients who received an R1/R2 resection after definitive CRT died within 2 years after salvage surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative CRT is associated with postoperative complications especially in patients with R2 resection, while long-term survival can be achieved after R0 resections. Salvage surgery should be considered for carefully selected patients in whom R0 resection can be achieved.