Re-resection for isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer is feasible, safe, and associated with encouraging survival

Progression of Site-specific Recurrence of Pancreatic Cancer and Implications for Treatment

OBJECTIVE

To analyze postrecurrence progression in the context of recurrence sites and assess implications for postrecurrence treatment.

BACKGROUND

Most patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) recur within 2 years. Different survival outcomes for location-specific patterns of recurrence are reported, highlighting their prognostic value. However, a lack of understanding of postrecurrence progression and survival remains.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included surgically treated patients with PDAC at NYU Langone Health (2010-2021). Sites of recurrence were identified at the time of diagnosis and further follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox regression analyses were applied to assess survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Recurrence occurred in 57.3% (196/342) patients with a median time to recurrence of 11.3 months (95% CI: 12.6-16.5). The first site of recurrence was local in 43.9% of patients, liver in 23.5%, peritoneal in 8.7%, lung in 3.6%, whereas 20.4% had multiple sites of recurrence. Progression to secondary sites was observed in 11.7%. Only lung involvement was associated with significantly longer survival after recurrence compared with other sites (16.9 vs 8.49 months, P = 0.003). In local recurrence, 21 (33.3%) patients were alive after 1 year without progression to secondary sites. This was associated with a CA19-9 of <100 U/mL at the time of primary diagnosis ( P = 0.039), nodal negative disease ( P = 0.023), and well-moderate differentiation ( P = 0.042) compared with patients with progression.

CONCLUSION

Except for lung recurrence, postrecurrence survival after PDAC resection is associated with poor survival. A subset of patients with local-only recurrence do not quickly succumb to systemic spread. This is associated with markers for favorable tumor biology, making them candidates for potential curative re-resections when feasible.

Prognostic Factors for Early Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

More than half of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) recur within 12 months after curative-intent resection. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify all reported prognostic factors for early recurrence in resected PDACs.

METHODS

After a systematic literature search, a meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Separate analyses were performed for adjusted vs unadjusted effect estimates as well as reported odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, and evidence was rated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation recommendations.

RESULTS

After 2,903 abstracts were screened, 65 studies were included. Of these, 28 studies (43.1%) defined early recurrence as evidence of recurrence within 6 months, whereas 34 (52.3%) defined it as evidence of recurrence within 12 months after surgery. Other definitions were uncommon. Analysis of unadjusted ORs and HRs revealed 41 and 5 prognostic factors for early recurrence within 6 months, respectively. When exclusively considering adjusted data, we identified 25 and 10 prognostic factors based on OR and HR, respectively. Using a 12-month definition, we identified 38 (OR) and 15 (HR) prognostic factors from unadjusted data and 38 (OR) and 30 (HR) prognostic factors from adjusted data, respectively. On the basis of frequency counts of adjusted data, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 9-9, N status, nondelivery of adjuvant therapy, grading, and tumor size based on imaging were identified as key prognostic factors for early recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Reported prognostic factors of early recurrence vary considerably. Identified key prognostic factors could aid in the development of a risk stratification framework for early recurrence. However, prospective validation is necessary.

Salvage Ablative Radiotherapy for Isolated Local Recurrence of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma following Definitive Surgery

Introduction: The rate of isolated locoregional recurrence after surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) approaches 25%. Ablative radiation therapy (A-RT) has improved outcomes for locally advanced disease in the primary setting. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of salvage A-RT for isolated locoregional recurrence and examine the relationship between subsequent patterns of failure, radiation dose, and treatment volume. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all consecutive participants who underwent A-RT for an isolated locoregional recurrence of PDAC after prior surgery at our institution between 2016 and 2021. Treatment consisted of ablative dose (BED10 98-100 Gy) to the gross disease with an additional prophylactic low dose (BED10 < 50 Gy), with the elective volume covering a 1.5 cm isotropic expansion around the gross disease and the circumference of the involved vessels. Local and locoregional failure (LF and LRF, respectively) estimated by the cumulative incidence function with competing risks, distant metastasis-free and overall survival (DMFS and OS, respectively) estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and toxicities scored by CTCAE v5.0 are reported. Location of recurrence was mapped to the dose region on the initial radiation plan. Results: Among 65 participants (of whom two had two A-RT courses), the median age was 67 (range 37-87) years, 36 (55%) were male, and 53 (82%) had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy with a median disease-free interval to locoregional recurrence of 16 (range, 6-71) months. Twenty-seven participants (42%) received chemotherapy prior to A-RT. With a median follow-up of 35 months (95%CI, 26-56 months) from diagnosis of recurrence, 24-month OS and DMFS were 57% (95%CI, 46-72%) and 22% (95%CI, 14-37%), respectively, while 24-month cumulative incidence of in-field LF and total LRF were 28% (95%CI, 17-40%) and 36% (95%CI 24-48%), respectively. First failure after A-RT was distant in 35 patients (53.8%), locoregional in 12 patients (18.5%), and synchronous distant and locoregional in 10 patients (15.4%). Most locoregional failures occurred in elective low-dose volumes. Acute and chronic grade 3-4 toxicities were noted in 1 (1.5%) and 5 patients (7.5%), respectively. Conclusions: Salvage A-RT achieves favorable OS and local control outcomes in participants with an isolated locoregional recurrence of PDAC after surgical resection. Consideration should be given to extending high-dose fields to include adjacent segments of at-risk vessels beyond direct contact with the gross disease.

Peak Risk of Recurrence Occurs during the First Two Years after a Pancreatectomy in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX

No codified/systematic surveillance program exists for borderline/locally advanced pancreatic ductal carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and a secondary resection. This study aimed to determine the trend of recurrence in patients who were managed using such a treatment strategy. From 2010, 101 patients received FOLFIRINOX and underwent a pancreatectomy, in a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Seventy-one patients (70%, R group) were diagnosed with recurrence after a median follow-up of 11 months postsurgery. In the multivariable analysis, patients in the R-group had a higher rate of weight loss (p = 0.018), higher carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) serum levels at diagnosis (p = 0.012), T3/T4 stage (p = 0.017), and positive lymph nodes (p < 0.01) compared to patients who did not experience recurrence. The risk of recurrence in patients with T1/T2 N0 R0 was the lowest (19%), and all recurrences occurred during the first two postoperative years. The peak risk of recurrence for the entire population was observed during the first two postoperative years. The probability of survival decreased until the second year and rebounded to 100% permanently, after the ninth postoperative year. Close monitoring is needed at reduced intervals during the first 2 years following a pancreatectomy and should be extended to later than 5 years for those with unfavorable pathological results.

Currently Debated Topics on Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Narrative Review on Surgical Treatment of Borderline Resectable, Locally Advanced, and Synchronous or Metachronous Oligometastatic Tumor

BACKGROUND

Previously considered inoperable patients (borderline resectable, locally advanced, synchronous oligometastatic or metachronous pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC)) are starting to become resectable thanks to advances in chemo/radiotherapy and the reduction in operative mortality.

METHODS

This narrative review presents a chosen literature selection, giving a picture of the current state of treatment of these patients.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is generally recognized as the treatment of choice before surgery. However, despite the increased efficacy, the best pathological response is still limited to 10.9-27.9% of patients. There are still limited data on the selection of possible NAT responders and how to diagnose non-responders early. Multidetector computed tomography has high sensitivity and low specificity in evaluating resectability after NAT, limiting the resection rate of resectable patients. Ca 19-9 and Positron emission tomography are giving promising results. The prediction of early recurrence after a radical resection of synchronous or metachronous metastatic PDAC, thus identifying patients with poor prognosis and saving them from a resection of little benefit, is still ongoing, although some promising data are available.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, high-level evidence demonstrating the benefit of the surgical treatment of such patients is still lacking and should not be performed outside of high-volume centers with interdisciplinary teams of surgeons and oncologists.

Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Response to Initial Adjuvant Chemotherapy Predicts Survival and Failure Pattern of Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma but Not Which Patients Are Suited for Additional Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy: From a Prospective Randomized Study

PURPOSE

The predictive value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) for adjuvant chemo(radiation) therapy of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is undefined.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed CA19-9 levels in patients with resected PDAC in a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with or without additional chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Patients with postoperative CA19-9 ≤92.5 U/mL and serum bilirubin ≤2 mg/dL were randomized to 2 arms: patients in 1 arm received 6 cycles of gemcitabine, whereas those in the other received 3 cycles of gemcitabine followed by CRT and another 3 cycles of gemcitabine. Serum CA19-9 was measured every 12 weeks. Those who had CA19-9 levels always <3 U/mL were excluded from the exploratory analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled in this randomized trial. Twenty-two patients with CA19-9 levels always ≤3 U/mL were excluded from the analysis. For the 125 participants, median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were 23.1 and 12.1 months, respectively, with no significant differences between the study arms. Postresection CA19-9 levels and, to a lesser extent, CA19-9 change predicted OS (P = .040 and .077, respectively). For the 89 patients who completed the initial 3 cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine, the CA19-9 response was significantly correlated with initial failure over the distant site (P = .023) and OS (P = .0022). Despite a trend of less initial failure over the locoregional area (P = .031), neither postoperative CA19-9 level nor CA19-9 response helped to select patients who might have a survival benefit from additional adjuvant CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

CA19-9 response to initial adjuvant gemcitabine predicts survival and distant failure of PDAC after resection; however, it cannot select patients suited for additional adjuvant CRT. Monitoring CA19-9 levels during adjuvant therapy for postoperative patients with PDAC may guide therapeutic decisions to prevent distant failure.

Do patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma to the lung have improved survival?

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease often diagnosed with synchronous metastatic disease involving the liver. Tumors with extra-abdominal spread that bypass the liver are thought to represent a unique molecular subgroup and those with isolated pulmonary metastatic disease are thought to have a more favorable clinical phenotype.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with pathologically confirmed PDAC treated between the years 2007 and 2020 at a Scripps Health hospital. The final study sample (N = 205) included patients with isolated pulmonary metastasis (IL), isolated liver metastasis or synchronous liver and lung metastasis (LL), or metastasis to any site other than the liver or lung (NLL). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Each survival outcome was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards tests.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were seen between the three groups in OS, PFS, or RFS. Median OS for the IL group was 561 days, 341 days for the LL group, and 441 days for the NLL group. Median RFS was 748 days for the IL group, 574 days for the LL group, and 545 days for the NLL group. Median PFS was 307 for the IL group, 236 for the LL group, and 265 for the NLL group. When comparing only the IL and LL groups, a statistically significant difference in OS was seen favoring the IL group (HR1.59 LL vs IL [ref], CI 1.04-2.41, p = 0.031) CONCLUSION: Though statistically significant differences in survival outcomes were not seen in our population, there was a trend toward improved survival for patients with isolated lung metastases. When comparing only the IL to LL group, statistically significant overall survival favoring the IL group was seen. These findings highlight a potential prognostic indicator of metastatic PDAC.

Presence of low-grade IPMN at the pancreatic transection margin does not have prognostic significance after resection of IPMN-associated pancreatic adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Resection margin status is a well-established prognosticator in pancreatic cancer. The prognostic impact of IPMN dysplasia at the pancreatic transection margin in IPMN-associated carcinoma (IPMN-Ca) remains unclear, hence institutional practices on additional resections vary.

METHODS

Patients undergoing partial pancreatectomy or attempted partial pancreatectomy converted to total pancreatectomy for IPMN-Ca between 04/2002 and 12/2018 were identified. Final pathology of the definitive pancreatic transection margin was identified. The association between the presence of IPMN dysplasia at the margin and overall survival (OS) was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 302 patients with IPMN-Ca, 181 (59.9%) patients received partial pancreatoduodenectomy, 61 (20.2%) distal pancreatectomy, and 60 (19.9%) were converted to total pancreatectomy. Median OS was 98.6 months in R0 (≥1 mm), 39.3 months in R1 (<1 mm), and 22.0 months in R1(direct) resected patients, respectively (p < 0.0001). No IPMN dysplasia at the definitive margin was present in 103 (34.1%), low-grade in 131 (43.4%), and high-grade/R1 in 8 (2.6%) patients. Low-grade dysplasia or total pancreatectomy were not associated with shorter OS compared to dysplasia-free margin across the entire cohort. Sensitivity analyses confirmed a lack of prognostic relevance of low-grade IPMN dysplasia at the pancreatic margin in R0 resected IPMN-Ca and in R0 resected UICC stage IA/IB IPMN-Ca.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-grade IPMN at the transection margin is not associated with shorter overall survival after partial pancreatectomy for IPMN-Ca. Additional resections for low-grade dysplasia, up to total pancreatectomy do not result in a survival benefit and should be omitted. Due to limited sample size, high-grade dysplasia could not be analyzed.

Computed Tomography-based Radiomics Evaluation of Postoperative Local Recurrence of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate an effective model for identifying patients with postoperative local disease recurrence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

A total of 153 patients who had undergone surgical resection of PDAC with regular postoperative follow-up were consecutively enrolled and randomly divided into training (n = 108) and validation (n = 45) cohorts. The postoperative soft-tissue biopsy results or clinical follow-up results served as the reference diagnostic criteria. Radiomics analysis of the postoperative soft-tissue was performed on a commercially available prototype software using portal vein phase image. Three models were built to characterize postoperative soft tissue: computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics, clinicoradiological, and their combination. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) was used to evaluate the differential diagnostic performance. A nomogram was used to select the final model with best performance. One radiologist's diagnostic choices that were made with and without the nomogram's assistance were evaluated.

RESULTS

A seven-feature-combined radiomics signature was constructed as a predictor of postoperative local recurrence. The nomogram model combining the radiomics signature with postoperative CA 19-9 elevation showed the best performance (training cohort, AUC = 0.791 [95%CI: 0.707, 0.876]; validation cohort, AUC = 0.742 [95%CI: 0.590, 0.894]). In the validation cohort, the AUC for differential diagnosis was significantly improved for the combined model relative to that for postoperative CA 19-9 elevation (AUC = 0.742 vs. 0.533, p < 0.001). The calibration curve and decision curve analysis demonstrated the clinical usefulness of the proposed nomogram. The diagnostic performance of the radiologist was not significantly improve by using the proposed nomogram (AUC = 0.742 vs. 0.670, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

The combined model using CT radiomic features and CA 19-9 elevation effectively characterized postoperative soft tissue and potentially may improve treatment strategies and facilitate personalized treatment for PDAC after surgical resection.

Efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy for locoregional recurrent pancreatic cancer after radical resection

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for locoregional recurrent pancreatic cancer after radical resection.

Methods

Patients with locoregional recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgery treated with SBRT in our institution were retrospectively investigated from January 2010 to January 2020. Absolute neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) recorded at pretreatment were analyzed. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and cumulative incidences of local failure (LF) and metastatic failure (MF).

Results

A total of 22 patients received SBRT with a median prescribed dose of 40 Gy (range of 30-50 Gy)/4 to 7 fractions. The median OS of all patients was 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.6-17.5 months). 0-1 performance status (HR 12.10, 95% CI 2.04-71.81, P=0.006) and ≤2.1 pre-SBRT NLR (HR 4.05, 95% CI 1.21-13.59, P=0.023) were significant predictors of higher OS on multivariable analysis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the cohort was 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.5-8.5 months). The median time to LF and MF were 15.6 months and 6.4 months, respectively. The rate of MF as a first event was higher than that of first event LF. Pain relief was observed in all patients (100%) 6 weeks after SBRT. In terms of acute toxicity, grade 1 including fatigue (6, 27.3%), anorexia (6, 27.3%), nausea (4, 18.2%) and leukopenia (4, 18.2%) was often observed. No acute toxicity of grade 4 or 5 was observed. In terms of late toxicity, no treatment-related toxicity was found during follow-up.

Conclusion

This study showed that SBRT can significantly reduce pain, effectively control local tumor progression, and have acceptable toxicity for patients with locoregional recurrence after radical resection of primary pancreatic cancer. Good performance status and lower pre-SBRT NLR were associated with improved overall survival.

Efficacy and Safety of Reirradiation with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to report on outcomes of a cohort of patients who were treated with reirradiation with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for locally recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with SBRT reirradiation for locally recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma from December 2009 to April 2020 were included in the study. Descriptive statistics were used to record patient demographics, tumour and treatment characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall survival, local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

In total, 27 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up time from local recurrence was 19.7 months (range 4.2-43.1 months). Most patients received five-fraction SBRT (26/27, 96%). The median overall survival after local recurrence treatment was 18.3 months (range 3.0-42.6 months), with 6-month, 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates of 88.5%, 73.1% and 33.6%. The median LPFS after local recurrence treatment was 16.2 months (range 2.3-33.6 months), with 6-month, 1-year and 2-year LPFS rates of 95.8%, 62.9% and 27.2%. Peri-SBRT chemotherapy improved LPFS (median 17.5 versus 8.5 months; P = 0.010) and overall survival (median 19.3 versus 5.5 months; P = 0.049). Tumours ≤ 3 cm in the greatest dimension showed better local control (median LPFS 19.2 versus 10.2 months; P = 0.130). There was one case (4%) of acute grade 3 pain and one case (4%) of late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Reirradiation with five-fraction SBRT is safe, but local control remains suboptimal. Patients with smaller tumours experienced improved outcomes, as did patients whose treatment plan included the administration of peri-SBRT chemotherapy.

Resection of Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer: Who Can Benefit?

Background

Recurrence after resection of pancreatic cancer occurs in up to 80% of patients in the first 2 years after complete resection. While most patients are not eligible for surgical treatment due to disseminated disease, a certain group of patients can be evaluated for re-resection of local recurrence. This review summarizes the current literature on surgical treatment of recurrent pancreatic cancer and potential prognostic factors.

Summary

Re-resection of recurrent pancreatic cancer provides a significant survival benefit to selected patients with acceptable procedure-related mortality. Median overall survival after re-resection of recurrent pancreatic cancer is up to 28 months. The most relevant clinical parameters associated with a prognostic benefit are young patient age (<65 years), time to initial resection (>10 months), and preoperative chemotherapy before re-resection. Molecular markers are currently under investigation and might help to improve patient selection in the future.

Key Message

Re-resection of recurrent pancreatic cancer is safe and feasible in experienced hands. Selected patients benefit from surgical treatment, but future studies are needed to identify reliable prognostic markers predicting survival.

Open irreversible electroporation for isolated local recurrence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after primary surgery

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an emerging treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) which in some cohorts has been associated with severe complications. Additionally, re-resection of isolated local recurrence (ILR) after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can improve survival. We investigated safety, feasibility and oncologic outcomes in the first report on open IRE for unresectable ILR of PDAC in a staged surgical approach.

METHODS

Records of the prospectively documented institutional database were screened for patients undergoing laparotomy in IRE-standby due to questionable resectability. Endpoints were morbidity, mortality and overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Data of LAPC and ILR were compared statistically for safety and feasibility analysis.

RESULTS

Intraoperative IRE was performed in 11 ILR and 14 LAPC. Six (54.5%) ILR and 10 (71.4%) LAPC patients had postoperative complications, type and frequency did not differ significantly. Major complications occurred in one ILR and two LAPC patients. Median OS was 20.0 months (95% CI: 2.7-37.3) after IRE for ILR and 28 (17.4-38.6) for LAPC. Median PFS after IRE was seven months for both ILR (4.1-9.9; n = 9) and LAPC (2.3-11.7; n = 13).

CONCLUSION

Open IRE for unresectable ILR was associated with acceptable perioperative risk. In this small, highly selected subset of patients with limited therapeutic options ancillary treatment with IRE might improve survival. Randomized treatment studies are required to establish the definitive role of IRE as compared to palliative standards of care in unresectable recurrence of PDAC and inconvertible LAPC.

Iodine concentration and tissue attenuation in dual-energy contrast-enhanced CT as a potential quantitative parameter in early detection of local pancreatic carcinoma recurrence after surgical resection

PURPOSE

Due to the difficult differentiation from non-specific postoperative soft tissue formation (PSF), early diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma recurrence remains challenging. Thus, we investigated the diagnostic potential of dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced CT.

METHOD

After potentially curative pancreatic carcinoma resection, 31 consecutive patients with PSF were examined via DE perfusion CT, acquiring 34 images (80 kVp/140 kVp) every 1.5 s, as the initial purpose of this study was evaluating CT-Perfusion. Corresponding time points of arterial, pancreatic, and early venous phase were calculated from bolus trigger times in prior conventional CT. Iodine and 120 kVp-equivalent images were calculated. Regions of interest were placed in each soft tissue formation. Diagnosis of local recurrence was confirmed by regular follow-up or histopathology.

RESULTS

Final diagnosis was local recurrence in 17 patients and non-specific PSF in 14 patients. Iodine concentrations in early venous phase were significantly higher in recurrent carcinoma than in non-specific PSF (1.47 mg/ml vs. 0.96 mg/ml, p = 0.007). In earlier contrast phases iodine concentrations tended to be higher, but not significantly. CT numbers in recurrent carcinoma in 120 kVp-equivalent images in venous phase were significantly higher, too (74HU vs 47HU, p = 0.002). ROC-curve analysis for iodine concentrations in early venous phase suggests a cut-off value of ≥ 1.55 mg/ml for local recurrence (AUC = 0.78, specificity = 1.0, sensitivity = 0.53) and for CT numbers in 120kVp-equivalent images a cut-off value of ≥ 57HU (AUC = 0.82, specificity = 0.82, sensitivity = 0.71).

CONCLUSION

In difficult cases, measuring iodine concentrations or CT numbers in PSF in (early) venous phase DECT could be a valuable additional parameter for differentiating local recurrence from non-specific PSF.

Surgical Resection or Ablation for Recurrent Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Analysis of Oncologic Outcomes According to the Recurrence Type

Objective

To evaluate the survival benefits of curative-intent treatment (CIT, including surgery or ablation) for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) depending on the recurrence type and compared the survival outcomes with other treatment modalities.

Background

The treatment for recurrent PDAC is mostly chemotherapy or best supportive care (BSC). Still, the role of CIT for recurrent PDAC is not well established.

Methods

PDAC patients who underwent pancreatectomy between 2004 and 2019 were included. Recurrences were categorized as locoregional (LR), distant, or disseminated. Recurrent PDAC management was classified as CIT, chemotherapy ± radiation therapy (CTX ± RTX), or BSC. The survival after recurrence (SAR) rate was measured from the first day of recurrence to the date of death or last follow-up.

Results

Two hundred eighteen patients had recurrent PDAC and were analyzed (27 CIT, 128 CTX ± RTX, 63 BSC). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year SAR rates were 65.4%, 11.5%, and 11.5% for CIT, 42.1%, 4.0%, and 0% for CTX ± RTX, and 15.9%, 1.6%, and 0% for BSC, respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated the SAR rate was significantly better in the CIT group than in the CTX ± RTX and BSC groups in LR type (P = 0.027) and distant type (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the albumin level at recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-18.3, P = 0.038) and operation time of the second operation (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-0.99, P = 0.021) were associated with a favorable prognosis of SAR in the CIT group.

Conclusions

CIT should be considered in recurrent PDAC for LR and distant metastases in selected patients.

Carbon ion radiotherapy as definitive treatment in locally recurrent pancreatic cancer

Purpose

Data on management of locally recurrent pancreatic cancer (LRPC) after primary resection are limited. Recently, surprisingly high overall survival rates were reported after irradiation with carbon ions. Here, we report on our clinical experience using carbon ion radiotherapy as definitive treatment in LRPC at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT).

Methods

Between 2015 and 2019, we treated 13 patients with LRPC with carbon ions with a median total dose of 48 Gy (RBE) in 12 fractions using an active raster-scanning technique at a rotating gantry. No concomitant chemotherapy was administered. Overall survival, local control, and toxicity rates were evaluated 18 months after the last patient finished radiotherapy.

Results

With a median follow-up time of 9.5 months, one patient is still alive (8%). Median OS was 12.7 months. Ten patients (77%) developed distant metastases. Additionally, one local recurrence (8%) and two regional tumor recurrences (15%) were observed. The estimated 1‑year local control and locoregional control rates were 87.5% and 75%, respectively. During radiotherapy, we registered one gastrointestinal bleeding CTCAE grade III (8%) due to gastritis. The bleeding was sufficiently managed with conservative therapy. No further higher-grade acute or late toxicities were observed.

Conclusion

We demonstrate high local control rates in a rare cohort of LRPC patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy. The observed median overall survival rate was not improved compared to historical in-house data using photon radiotherapy. This is likely due to a high rate of distant tumor progression, highlighting the necessity of additional chemotherapy.

Nomogram and competing risk model to predict recurrence after curative surgical resection of PDAC

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, a number of patients get disease recurred in a short time post-operation. Few studies have focused on the predictors of different recurrence patterns of PDAC.

OBJECTIVE

To try to establish and verify a nomogram to predict recurrence free survival (RFS) in PDAC patients, and to distinguish the risk factors of local recurrence first and distant metastasis first via competing risk model.

METHODS

Patients who underwent radical pancreatectomy for PDAC in our center from 2010 to 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify the clinicopathological predictors of recurrence post-operation. And then, a nomogram was constructed and validated. Competing risk regression model was used to compare the predictors between local recurrence group and distant metastasis group.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were included into the final analysis, and 153 patients got disease relapsed post-operation. CA19-9 level, vascular resection, tumor differentiation, lymph node ratio (LNR) and adjuvant chemotherapy were identified as independent risk factors for recurrence free survival (RFS) and incorporated into the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.650. Competing risk model indicated that the status of lymph-node metastasis was significantly associated the patterns of first relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Nomogram and competing risk model were constructed to quantify the risk of recurrence following surgery for PDAC. Our findings may be useful for predicting RFS and recurrence pattern in clinical work.

Impact of surveillance among patients with resected pancreatic cancer following adjuvant chemotherapy

Background

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma carries a high risk of recurrence even after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Current guidelines do not endorse routine surveillance imaging due to lack of evidence supporting a survival benefit. With current first-line palliative chemotherapy options, it is unclear whether surveillance allows for early detection of asymptomatic disease and therefore an improved opportunity to offer chemotherapy to fit patients. We sought to describe patterns of surveillance of resected pancreatic cancer at British Columbia (BC) Cancer and determine whether utilization of computerized tomography (CT) scans affected likelihood of receiving palliative chemotherapy at the time of recurrence.

Methods

A retrospective review was completed to identify patients treated at BC Cancer centres between 2010-2016 who had undergone curative intent resection and received at least one cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy. Information was collected on baseline characteristics, imaging scans done between adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence, and receipt of palliative chemotherapy. Two cohorts were defined based on number of scans done between completion of adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence: those with only 1 scan were defined as "symptomatic" recurrences and patients who had undergone more than 1 scan were considered "surveillance" recurrences.

Results

In total, 142 patients were included of which 115 (81%) patients developed recurrence. There were 22 patients (19%) in the "symptomatic" cohort and 93 patients (81%) in the "surveillance" cohort. Median time to recurrence 274 days (9.1 months) in the symptomatic cohort compared to 471 days (15.7 months) in the surveillance group. Patients who underwent surveillance scans were more likely to receive palliative chemotherapy at the time of recurrence, though statistical significance was not reached: 51% in surveillance group versus 27% in symptomatic group [odds ratio (OR) 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-6.58, P=0.17].

Conclusions

Despite the absence of surveillance recommendations, the majority of patients underwent surveillance imaging. We demonstrated a non-significant increase in the likelihood of receiving palliative chemotherapy among patients who underwent surveillance scans. With more efficacious palliative chemotherapy options available, studies to determine whether receipt of chemotherapy in asymptomatic recurrences translates into improved survival and/or quality of life are warranted.

Late recurrences of pancreatic cancer in patients with long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer remains a relevant clinical problem due to poor prognosis. Even after curative pancreaticoduodenectomy tumor recurrences occur in up to 80%. Risk factors for postoperative tumor recurrences have been identified before, but data on risk factors for tumor recurrences in patients with long-term-survival is scarce.

METHODS

In this retrospective study consecutive long-term survival-patients (defined as at least 60 months survival) undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer from 2007-2014 were identified in the 2nd largest pancreatic surgery center in Germany. Clinical, pathohistological and laboratory values were analyzed to identify risk factors for tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

Thirty-four of one-hundred-sixty-seven patients were identified as long-term-survival-patients in the study period. Of those, 10 patients (29.4%) suffered from tumor recurrence. Lymph vessel invasion was identified as an independent risk factor (P=0.031, hazard ratio 13.127, 95% confidence interval: 1.270-135.698). Median postoperative time to tumor recurrence in long-term-survival-patients was 49 months. Overall survival after diagnosis of tumor recurrence was 33 months. 80% (N=8) of the patients were asymptomatic. Half of the patients (N=5) suffered from local disease, with 40% undergoing curative tumor resection. CA 19-9 levels were significantly elevated at 57 U/mL (normal <27 U/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor recurrence in long-term-survival-patients is typically asymptomatic. Especially long-term-survival-patients with lymph vessel invasion are more likely to develop tumor recurrence. Therefore, a structured follow-up program including CT-scans and CA 19-9 surveillance must be continued in all patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy even in cases of long-term-survival.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical Treatment for Isolated Local Recurrence of Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the outcome of surgical treatment for isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.

RESULTS

Six studies concerning 431 patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis: 176 underwent redo surgery, and 255 received non-surgical treatments. Overall survival and post-recurrence survival were significantly longer in the re-resected group (ratio of means (ROM) 1.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.54-2.56, I² = 75.89%, p = 0.006, and ROM = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.48-2.83, I² = 76.39%, p = 0.002, respectively) with a median overall survival benefit of 28.7 months (mean difference (MD) 28.7; 95% CI, 10.3-47.0, I² = 89.27%, p < 0.001) and median survival benefit of 15.2 months after re-resection (MD 15.2; 95% CI, 8.6-21.8, I² = 58.22%, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Resection of isolated pancreatic cancer recurrences is safe and feasible and may offer a survival benefit. Selection of patients and assessment of time and site of recurrence are mandatory.

Site of relapse of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas affects survival after multimodal therapy

BACKGROUND

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies. To date, no guidelines exists for isolated resectable metachronous disease. It is still unknown, which patients may benefit from relapse surgery. The aim of our study was to compare disease free survival (DFS) and post relapse survival (PRS) in patients with isolated local recurrence, metachronous hepatic or pulmonary metastases.

METHODS

Patients with isolated resectable local recurrence, metachronous hepatic or pulmonary metastases were included for survival analyses. PRS of surgically treated patients (local (n = 11), hepatic (n = 6) and pulmonary metastases (n = 9)) was compared to conservatively treated patients (local (n = 17), hepatic (n = 37) and pulmonary metastases (n = 8)).

RESULTS

Resected PDAC patients suffering from isolated metachronous hepatic metastases initially had a higher T-stage and venous invasion (V1) compared to the other patients. DFS in the metachronous pulmonary metastases group was longer compared to DFS of the hepatic metastases and local recurrence groups. Surgical resection significantly improved PRS in patients with local recurrence and pulmonary metastases, when compared to patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Very-long term survivors (> 5 years) were detected following secondary resection of local recurrence and 45% of these patients were still alive at the end of our study period.

CONCLUSION

Although DFS in PDAC patients suffering from isolated local recurrence was dismal and comparable to that of patients with isolated hepatic metastases, very-long term survivors were present only in this group. These results indicate that a surgical approach for isolated local recurrence, if anatomically possible, should be considered.

Management problems in patients with pancreatic cancer from a surgeon's perspective

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal gastrointestinal tumor entities. Surgery is the only chance for cure; however, only a minority of patients can be offered this option. Due to the anatomic location of the gland, tumor-related problems and complications affecting the surrounding structures are common, leading to biliary and gastric outlet obstruction as well as portal vein thrombosis. This review article summarizes the management of pancreatic cancer-related problems from a surgical point of view. We further describe surgical treatment options in unresectable, metastasized and recurring pancreatic cancer, highlighting potential resection of oligometastatic disease in selected settings.

Value of regular endosonography and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT after surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction, stomach or pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Most patients undergo follow-up after surgery for cancers of the gastro-oesophageal junction, stomach or pancreas, but data to support which modalities to use and the frequency of investigation are limited.

METHODS

Patients in the EUFURO study were randomized to either visits to the outpatient clinic at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery (standard), or to the addition of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy to clinical assessments (intervention). Data from the intervention arm were used to analyse the diagnostic performance of endosonography or [18F]FDG PET-CT in detecting recurrences.

RESULTS

During the scheduled follow-up, 42 of 89 patients developed recurrence; PET-CT and EUS in combination detected 38 of these recurrences. EUS detected 23 of the 42 patients with recurrent disease during follow-up and correctly diagnosed 17 of 19 locoregional recurrences. EUS was able to detect isolated locoregional recurrence in 11 of 13 patients. In five patients, EUS was false-positive for isolated locoregional recurrence owing to missed distant metastases. PET-CT detected locoregional recurrence in only 12 of 19 patients, and isolated locoregional recurrence in only 7 of 13. False-positive PET-CT results in 23 patients led to a total of 44 futile procedures.

CONCLUSION

Accuracy in detecting recurrences by concomitant use of PET-CT and EUS was high (90 per cent). PET-CT had moderate to high sensitivity for overall recurrence detection, but low specificity. EUS was superior to PET-CT in the detection of locoregional and isolated locoregional recurrences.

Efficacy and feasibility of re-irradiation using carbon ions for pancreatic cancer that recurs after carbon-ion radiotherapy

•

Carbon-ion re-irradiation for pancreatic cancer; feasibility and efficacy.

•

Adjuvant chemotherapy improve local control of re-irradiation using carbon ions.

•

Carbon-ion radiotherapy for recurrent pancreatic cancer; reasonable option.

Background and purpose

Patients who receive carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for primary pancreatic cancer may experience locoregional recurrence; however, the treatment options for such patients are limited. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of carbon-ion re-irradiation for patients with pancreatic cancer who experienced recurrence after initial C-ion RT.

Materials and methods

Twenty-one patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer who underwent repeat C-ion RT between December 2010 and November 2016 at our institute were retrospectively evaluated. The sites of post-initial C-ion RT failure were in-field central in 16 patients (76.2%) and marginal in 5 (23.8%). The median doses of initial and repeat C-ion RT were both 52.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]). Thirteen patients (61.9%) received concurrent chemotherapy with re-irradiation, while 11 (52.4%) received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

The median follow-up period after re-irradiation was 11 months. The 1-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 53.5%, 24.5%, and 48.7%, respectively. Toxicity data was obtained from the patients’ charts. Only 1 patient (4.8%) developed grade 3 acute toxicities and none developed grade ≥3 late toxicities. Univariate analysis indicated that patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly improved local control rates compared with those who did not; the 1-year local control rates were 80.0% and 0.0%, respectively (P = 0.0469).

Conclusion

Repeating C-ion RT may be a reasonable option with tolerable toxicity for patients with recurrent pancreatic cancers. Adjuvant chemotherapy appears to improve the local control rate. This is the first study to examine re-irradiation using C-ion for recurrent pancreatic cancer after initial C-ion RT.

Periarterial divestment in pancreatic cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Modern pancreatic cancer surgery changed with the introduction of effective neoadjuvant therapies. Complete tumor resection is the mainstay for long-term, disease-free, and overall survival and has been a prerequisite for decreasing local recurrence. The medial resection margin in the area of the superior mesenteric vessels limits the radicalness of the resection, especially in borderline and locally advanced cases. Therefore, the periarterial soft tissue around the peripancreatic visceral arteries must be completely cleared. This procedure, namely periarterial divestment, is technically demanding but often represents an alternative to arterial resection.

OBJECTIVE

Here we describe the technique and our initial experience with periarterial divestment along the peripancreatic visceral arteries during pancreatic surgery. This technique, in combination with previously published resection strategies, such as artery first maneuver and mesenterico-portal venous bypass first, enables tumor resection in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSION

Periarterial divestment can prevent the need for arterial resection in borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, especially after neoadjuvant therapy. The feasibility, improved safety, and oncologic equivalence of arterial divestment versus arterial resection for pancreatic cancer surgery must be evaluated by clinical trials.

[Surgery for isolated local recurrence and metachronous oligometastasis in pancreatic cancer]

BACKGROUND

Most patients with pancreatic cancer suffer a relapse, which occurs either locally or systemically in the sense of liver and the lung metastases. Surgery for pancreatic cancer has become more radical due to the increased use of multimodal treatment concepts; however, the role of surgery in cases of recurrence remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

This review summarizes the surgical treatment options for isolated local recurrence and metachronous oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A selective literature search was carried out and the current evidence for surgical treatment is summarized.

RESULTS

There are currently no randomized studies on surgery for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Currently available data, however, show that after surgery long-term survival of up to 32-47 months after metastasectomy can be achieved, especially in patients with local recurrence or isolated pulmonary metastases with low morbidity and mortality. Individualized treatment concepts including surgical resection after initial systemic therapy seem promising even for liver metastases. The greatest survival benefits are consistently shown for all localizations in patients with a long as possible disease-free interval after the first operation.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of isolated local recurrence or metachronous oligometastatic pancreatic cancer is an interdisciplinary challenge that should be performed in specialized pancreatic treatment centers only. Surgical resection embedded in a multimodal treatment concept can be meaningful in selected cases.

[Surgery of pancreatic cancer: techniques to avoid local recurrence]

BACKGROUND

In addition to the prognostically important systemic recurrence, a high rate of local recurrence is a relevant problem of pancreatic cancer surgery. Improvement of local control is a requirement for surgical resection as a prerequisite for a potentially curative treatment.

OBJECTIVES

Summary of the current evidence on frequency, relevance, and risk factors of local recurrence. Presentation of strategies for reduction of local recurrence with a special focus on surgical resection techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Analysis and appraisal of currently available scientific literature on the topic.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Local recurrences occur as the first manifestation of tumor recurrence in 20-50% of patients after resection of pancreatic cancer. The considerable variations of reported local recurrence rates depend on the quality of surgery, regimens of (neo)adjuvant therapy as well as the design of surveillance and duration of follow-up. An R1 status is an important risk factor for local recurrence highlighting the relevance of a local radical resection. The majority of local recurrences consist of perivascular and lymph node recurrences. Therefore, lymphadenectomy, radical dissection directly at the celiac and mesenteric vessels including resection of the periarterial nerve plexus and vascular resection are starting points for improving surgical resection techniques. The safety and efficacy of radical resection techniques in the context of multimodal treatment of pancreatic cancer have to be further evaluated in prospective studies.

Independent predictors of secondary invasive pancreatic remnant tumors after initial resection of an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: a nationwide large-scale survey in Japan

PURPOSE

There is no standardized surveillance protocol after intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) resection. We report the findings of a large-scale survey in Japan, investigating the independent predictors of secondary invasive tumors by analyzing the epidemiology of secondary tumors of the remnant pancreas after initial IPMN resection.

METHODS

An institutional questionnaire about the remnant pancreas after pancreas resection was distributed at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery in Tokyo. We retrospectively analyzed the patient data including pathological diagnosis, postoperative outcomes, and evaluation methods.

RESULTS

Redo pancreatectomy was performed for secondary disease in 213 (1.4%) of a total 15,777 patients. Eighty-eight of these 213 patients had undergone initial resection of IPMN. The types of secondary tumors after IPMN resection significantly depended on those of the primary tumors. Through short-interval and long-term follow-up, most of the secondary tumors were detected within 1-4 years. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the initial pathological diagnosis of invasive IPMN was an independent predictor of secondary invasive tumors in the remnant pancreas.

CONCLUSION

Primary invasive IPMN proved to be a significant predictor of secondary invasive IPMN. Both short-interval and long-term follow-up may help to determine the prognosis of patients after IPMN resection.

Metastases or primary recurrence to the lung is related to improved survival of pancreatic cancer as compared to other sites of dissemination. Results of a systematic review with meta-analysis

There are demonstrations that the prognosis of patients with isolated pulmonary dissemination of pancreatic cancer is more favorable than that of patients with other patterns of disease progression. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of pulmonary vs. non-pulmonary metastasis of patients with pancreatic cancer. A total of 11 916 patients with secondary spread of pancreatic cancer were included from 15 primary reports. In the setting of single-organ disease dissemination, the lung demonstrated a significant survival advantage over hepatic, locoregional, or peritoneal localization. In particular, patients who recurred in the lung after pancreatectomy, showed a significant survival benefit as compared to those patients with hepatic and locoregional relapse in terms of disease-free survival, survival after recurrence and overall survival.

Three Curative Pancreatectomies for the Metachronous Appearance of Pancreatic Invasive Ductal Adenocarcinoma

We report a rare case of a patient who underwent 3 successful curative operations for the metachronous appearance of pancreatic cancer. In July 2007, a 54-year-old woman underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. In March 2010, a tumor measuring 9 mm in diameter was detected in the tail of the pancreas on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging. The pancreas tail was subsequently resected while preserving the pancreatic body. In February 2011, CT revealed a cystic tumor measuring 2.5 cm in diameter in the remnant pancreatic body without any metastasis; therefore, total resection of the residual pancreas was performed in April 2011. The first resected tumor was histopathologically diagnosed as undifferentiated adenocarcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells. Additionally, the third resected tumor had similar undifferentiated components. Contrarily, the second resected tumor was diagnosed as a well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. We consider that the tumor from the third operation was an intra-pancreatic metastasis of the primary cancer and that the tumor from the second operation was the second primary cancer. The patient responded well with good control of surgical diabetes for 92 months since the last pancreatectomy. This case suggested that aggressive repeated resection for recurrent pancreatic invasive ductal adenocarcinoma is beneficial in limited cases.

Sustained Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Predicts Progression and Survival

BACKGROUND

As neoadjuvant therapy of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is becoming more widely used, better indicators of progression are needed to help guide therapeutic decisions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all patients with BRPC who received 24 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with chemotoxicity or medical comorbidities limiting treatment completion and nonexpressors of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) were excluded. Serum CA19-9 response was analyzed as a predictor of disease progression, recurrence, and survival.

RESULTS

One hundred four patients were included; 39 (37%) progressed on treatment (18 local and 21 distant) and 65 (63%) were resected (68% R0). Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that the percent decrease in CA19-9 from baseline to minimum value (odds ratio [OR] 0.947, p ≤ .0001) and the percent increase from minimum value to final restaging CA19-9 (OR 1.030, p ≤ .0001) were predictive of progression. A receiver operating characteristics curve analysis determined cutoff values predictive of progression, which were used to create four prognostic groups. CA19-9 responses were categorized as follows: (1) always normal (n = 6); (2) poor response (n = 31); (3) unsustained response (n = 19); and (4) sustained response (n = 48). Median overall survival for Groups 1-4 was 58, 16, 20, and 38 months, respectively (p ≤ .0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with initially elevated CA19-9 levels who do not have a decline to a sustained low level are at risk for progression, recurrence, and poor survival. Alternative treatment strategies prior to an attempt at curative resection should be considered in this cohort.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study identified percent changes in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 blood levels while on chemotherapy that predict tumor growth in patients with advanced pancreas cancer. These changes could be used to better select patients who would benefit from surgical removal of their tumors and improve survival.

Long-term outcomes and significance of preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in patients with invasive pancreatic neoplasms after repeat pancreatectomy

Background

Invasive pancreatic neoplasms have a high propensity for recurrence even after curative resection. Recently, patients who underwent pancreatectomy have an opportunity of undergoing secondary pancreatic resection, so-called “repeat pancreatectomy” to achieve curative operation and prolong their survival. We evaluated the long-term clinical outcomes and identified the prognostic factors, including systemic inflammation markers and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) of patients who underwent repeat pancreatectomy for invasive pancreatic tumors.

Methods

Twenty-eight consecutive patients with invasive pancreatic neoplasms (22 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, 2 pancreatic acinar cell carcinomas, and 4 invasive intra-papillary mucinous carcinomas) with isolated local recurrence only in the remnant pancreas were analyzed retrospectively. To identify factors for the selection of optimal patients who should undergo repeat pancreatectomy, perioperative clinical parameters were analyzed by Cox proportional regression models.

Results

Of 28 patients, 12 patients experienced recurrence within 3 years after repeat pancreatectomy. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the median cancer-specific overall survival time of patients with invasive pancreatic neoplasms was 61 months, showing favorable outcomes. High preoperative LMR (LMR ≥ 3.3) (p = 0.022), no portal vein resection (p = 0.021), no arterial resection (p = 0.037), and pathological lymph node negative (p = 0.0057) were identified as favorable prognostic parameters on univariate analysis, and LMR ≥ 3.3 (p = 0.0005), and pathological lymph node negative (p = 0.018) on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Preoperative LMR is potentially a good indicator for selecting suitable patients to undergo repeat pancreatectomy in patients with isolated local recurrence of invasive pancreatic neoplasms.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a radiomics nomogram outperforms clinical model and TNM staging for survival estimation after curative resection

OBJECTIVES

To identify a CT-based radiomics nomogram for survival prediction in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

A total of 220 patients (training cohort n = 147; validation cohort n = 73) with PDAC were enrolled. A total of 300 radiomics features were extracted from CT images. And the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm were applied to select features and develop a radiomics score (Rad-score). The radiomics nomogram was constructed by multivariate regression analysis. Nomogram discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness were evaluated. The association of the Rad-score and recurrence pattern in PDAC was evaluated.

RESULTS

The Rad-score was significantly associated with PDAC patient's disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (both p < 0.001 in two cohorts). Incorporating the Rad-score into the radiomics nomogram resulted in better performance of the survival prediction than that of the clinical model and TNM staging system. In addition, the radiomics nomogram exhibited good discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness in both the training and validation cohorts. There was no association between the Rad-score and recurrence pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomics nomogram integrating the Rad-score and clinical data provided better prognostic prediction in resected PDAC patients, which may hold great potential for guiding personalized care for these patients. The Rad-score was not a predictor of the recurrence pattern in resected PDAC patients.

KEY POINTS

• The Rad-score developed by CT radiomics features was significantly associated with PDAC patients' prognosis. • The radiomics nomogram integrating the Rad-score and clinical data has value to permit non-invasive, low-cost, and personalized evaluation of prognosis in PDAC patients. • The radiomics nomogram outperformed clinical model and the TNM staging system in terms of survival estimation.

Management of isolated recurrence after surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of pancreatic cancer after primary pancreatectomy occurs in the vast majority of patients. The role of surgical treatment for recurrent pancreatic cancer is not well established.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary pancreatectomy with curative intent from 2000 to 2014 at a single large-volume centre were evaluated retrospectively. CT or PET was used to select patients with an isolated recurrence. The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes were compared according to treatment modalities.

RESULTS

Of the 1610 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent resection, 1346 (83·6 per cent) were diagnosed with recurrent pancreatic cancer. Recurrence was locoregional in 366 patients (27·2 per cent), distant multifocal in 251 (18·6 per cent), distant isolated in 188 (14·0 per cent), locoregional plus distant in 153 (11·4 per cent) and peritoneal seeding in 388 (28·8 per cent). Of the 1346 patients with recurrence, 197 (14·6 per cent) had isolated recurrence; of these, 48 (24·4 per cent of all isolated recurrences; 3·6 per cent of all recurrences) underwent resection. Median survival of the 197 patients after diagnosis of isolated recurrence was 14·7 months; it was longer in patients who underwent surgical resection than among those treated non-surgically (23·5 versus 12·0 months; P = 0·014). Multivariable analysis showed that chemotherapy and resection for recurrence were associated with better prognosis. Median survival after recurrence was longest in the 23 patients with isolated pulmonary recurrence (33·3 months). Survival after recurrence was better in patients who underwent resection of isolated recurrence in the remnant pancreas (median 28·0 versus 12·0 months, P = 0·010) and lung (median 36·5 versus 9·5 months; P = 0·010) than in those who did not undergo resection.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection may be considered an option for treatment of patients with isolated recurrent pancreatic cancer.

Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced and Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer (PANFIRE-2): A Multicenter, Prospective, Single-Arm, Phase II Study

Background Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer have a dismal prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 12-14 months with systemic therapies. Irreversible electroporation (IRE), a nonthermal ablative technique, may prolong survival of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Purpose To investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous IRE for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and locally recurring pancreatic cancer in a prospective phase II trial. Materials and Methods Between December 2012 and September 2017, participants with locally advanced pancreatic cancer or postresection local recurrence were prospectively treated with percutaneous CT-guided IRE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01939665). The primary end point was median OS from diagnosis. The target median OS was 11.6 months for participants receiving no induction chemotherapy or gemcitabine-based induction chemotherapy and 14.9 months for those receiving induction 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX). Results Fifty participants (25 men and 25 women; median age, 61 years [interquartile range, 56-69 years]; 40 with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and 10 with local recurrence) were included. Median OS measured by using the Kaplan-Meier method was 17 months from diagnosis of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15 months, 19 months) and 10 months from IRE (95% CI: 8 months, 11 months). In the locally advanced pancreatic cancer group, 18 participants received no therapy or gemcitabine-based induction chemotherapy and 22 received FOLFIRINOX. The median OS from diagnosis was 17 months for both groups (95% CI: 7 months, 28 months and 15 months, 18 months, respectively; P = .26). For participants with postresection local recurrence, the median OS was 16 months from diagnosis of recurrence (95% CI: 11 months, 22 months) and 9 months from IRE (95% CI: 2 months, 16 months). After IRE, local recurrence developed in 23 of the 50 participants (46%). Tumor volume of 37 cm³ or greater (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; P = .02), pre-IRE carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level of 2000 U/mL or greater (HR, 12.1; P = .001), and decrease in CA 19-9 level of 50% or less 3 months after IRE (HR, 3.1; P = .01) were predictors of worse survival. Fourteen minor and 21 major complications occurred in 29 of the 50 participants (58%). Two participants died less than 90 days after IRE; one of these deaths was likely related to IRE. Conclusion The target median overall survival with CT-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation was exceeded in participants with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (17 months) and those with local recurrence (16 months). © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Goldberg in this issue.

Local radicality and survival outcome of pancreatic cancer surgery

Pancreatic cancer remains a therapeutic challenge. Surgical resection in combination with systemic chemotherapy is the only option promising long-term survival and potential cure. However, only about 20% of patients are diagnosed with tumors that are still in a resectable stage. Even after potentially curative resection and modern regimens for adjuvant chemotherapy, the majority of patients develop local and systemic recurrence resulting in median overall survival times of 28-54 months. The predominance of systemic recurrence and its impact on survival may lead to the assumption that surgical radicality and local control play only minor roles in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. This review provides an overview of the recent literature on surgical radicality and survival outcome in pancreatic cancer. The current evidence on the extent of lymphadenectomy, the prognostic impact of the extent of lymph node involvement, and the impact of the resection margin status on postresection survival are reviewed. Data from recent studies performed in the context of modern surgery and adjuvant therapy provide good evidence of a considerable impact of local radicality on survival after pancreatic cancer surgery. Surgical techniques that have been developed to refine oncological resections and to increase local control as well as resectability are highlighted. These techniques include artery-first approaches, level-3 dissection with removal of the periarterial nerve plexus, the triangle operation, and extended resections. Local radicality and quality of surgical resection remain among the most important parameters that determine the chances for survival in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Meta-analysis of recurrence pattern after resection for pancreatic cancer

Background

Initial recurrence mapping of resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) could help in stratifying patient subpopulations for optimal postoperative follow-up. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the initial recurrence patterns of PDAC and to correlate them with clinicopathological factors.

Methods

MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched systematically for studies reporting first recurrence patterns after PDAC resection. Data were extracted from the studies selected for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals were calculated to determine the clinicopathological factors related to the recurrence sites. The weighted average of median overall survival was calculated.

Results

Eighty-nine studies with 17 313 patients undergoing PDAC resection were included. The weighted median rates of initial recurrence were 20·8 per cent for locoregional sites, 26·5 per cent for liver, 11·4 per cent for lung and 13·5 per cent for peritoneal dissemination. The weighted median overall survival times were 19·8 months for locoregional recurrence, 15·0 months for liver recurrence, 30·4 months for lung recurrence and 14·1 months for peritoneal dissemination. Meta-analysis revealed that R1 (direct) resection (OR 2·21, 95 per cent c.i. 1·12 to 4·35), perineural invasion (OR 5·19, 2·79 to 9·64) and positive peritoneal lavage cytology (OR 5·29, 3·03 to 9·25) were significantly associated with peritoneal dissemination as initial recurrence site. Low grade of tumour differentiation was significantly associated with liver recurrence (OR 4·15, 1·71 to 10·07).

Conclusion

Risk factors for recurrence patterns after surgery could be considered for specific surveillance and treatments for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Surgery for Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer: Is It Effective?

Despite improvements to surgical procedures and novel combinations of drugs for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the recurrence rate after radical surgery is still high. Little is known about the role of surgery in the treatment of isolated recurrences of pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to review the current literature dealing with surgery for recurrent pancreatic cancer in order to examine its feasibility and effectiveness. An extensive literature review was conducted according to the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and 14 articles dealing with re-resections for recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma were analyzed, focusing on the characteristics of the primary neoplasm and its recurrence, the surgical procedures used, and patient outcomes. Data were retrieved on a total of 301 patients. The interval between surgery for primary pancreatic cancer and the detection of a recurrence ranged from 2 to 120 months. The recurrence was local or regional in 230 patients, and distant in 71. The median overall survival was 68.9 months (range 3–152) after resection of the primary tumor, and 26.0 months (range 0–112) after surgery for recurrent disease. The disease-free interval after the resection of recurrences was 14.2 months (range 4–29). Although data analysis was performed on a heterogeneous and limited number of patients, some of these may benefit from surgery for isolated recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Further studies are needed to identify these cases.

Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery

Pancreatic cancer is likely to become the second most frequent cause of cancer-associated mortality within the next decade. Surgical resection with adjuvant systemic chemotherapy currently provides the only chance of long-term survival. However, only 10-20% of patients with pancreatic cancer are diagnosed with localized, surgically resectable disease. The majority of patients present with metastatic disease and are not candidates for surgery, while surgery remains underused even in those with resectable disease owing to historical concerns regarding safety and efficacy. However, advances made over the past decade in the safety and efficacy of surgery have resulted in perioperative mortality of around 3% and 5-year survival approaching 30% after resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, owing to advances in both surgical techniques and systemic chemotherapy, the indications for resection have been extended to include locally advanced tumours. Many aspects of pancreatic cancer surgery, such as the management of postoperative morbidities, sequencing of resection and systemic therapy, and use of neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection for tumours previously considered unresectable, are rapidly evolving. In this Review, we summarize the current status of and new developments in pancreatic cancer surgery, while highlighting the most important research questions for attempts to further optimize outcomes.

Robotic assisted laparoscopic completion pancreatectomy for recurrent intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm after previous open pancreatoduodenectomy: A case report and literature review

Completion pancreatectomy (CP), is an effective, and potentially curative option for selected patients with local recurrence of pancreatic neoplasms in the remnant pancreas after initial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Traditionally CP has been performed via the open approach. Reports of minimally-invasive CP particularly after previous open PD are rare. We present a case of a 72-year old male who previously underwent open PD 5 years ago for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) with high grade dysplasia in the uncinate process. He had multifocal IPMN and low-risk lesions in the body and tail were managed conservatively. On routine surveillance, the cyst in the body was noted to be increasing in size with the development of a non-enhancing solid component confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent endoscopic ultrasonography. The patient underwent successful robotic assisted laparoscopic completion pancreatectomy. Final histology confirmed a recurrent IPMN with low-to-intermediate grade dysplasia. The postoperative recovery was uneventful and he was discharged on postoperative day 9.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy and salvage chemotherapy for patients with isolated locoregional recurrence after radical resection of primary pancreatic cancer

Purpose: The objective of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy and salvage chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients with isolated locoregional recurrence after radical resection and assess the factors associated with tumor response. Patients and methods: A retrospective study of isolated locoregional recurrent PC patients who were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy and salvage chemotherapy at our institution between 2012 and 2017 was conducted. Medium dose of 56.0 Gy (range: 54.0 Gy - 60.2 Gy) in 1.8 Gy to 2.15 Gy daily fractions was prescribed to the PTV-G and 50.4 Gy was prescribed to the PTV-C. Patients received chemotherapy before, at the same time with or after radiotherapy. The overall survival (OS) and freedom from locoregional progression (FFLP) rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was performed to compare survival curves. The Cox regression was used to identify factors affecting response to treatment and survival. Results: Thirty-one patients were included. The median interval from the resection of primary PC to the diagnosis of the locoregional recurrence (DFI) was 7.4 months (range 0.2-44.6). Within a median follow-up from the start of radiotherapy (RT) of 31.7 months (95% CI: 20.0-43.5 months), the medium OS and FFLP rates from the start of RT were 23.6 and 12.0 months, respectively. DFI >6 months was shown to be a significant factor associated with favorable OS. Acute and late toxicity of grade 3 occurred in 3 patients (9.7%) and 1 patient (3.2%) respectively. No grade 4 toxicity or higher occurred. Conclusions: This single-institution retrospective analysis identified definitive chemoradiotherapy and salvage chemotherapy to be a feasible and tolerable treatment strategy for patients with isolated locoregional recurrence after radical resection of primary PC.

Proton Radiotherapy for Isolated Local Recurrence of Primary Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for isolated local recurrence (ILR) of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after surgical resection remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy (PRT) for ILR of PDAC after surgery.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with ILR of PDAC after surgery who underwent proton beam therapy between 2011 and 2015 at Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 30 patients (14 women and 16 men) with a median age of 65 years (range 38-81 years) who had initially undergone pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 23) or distal pancreatectomy (n = 7) for their primary tumors. Upon ILR, PRT was administered with a median total cumulative dose of 67.5 gray equivalent (GyE) (range 50-67.5 GyE) using 19 to 25 fractions. For 25 patients, concurrent chemotherapy was administered using gemcitabine (n = 18) or S-1 (n = 7). Four patients (13.3%) experienced acute grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal toxicities. After a median follow-up period of 17.6 months (range 2.1-50.4 months), 23 patients had experienced tumor progression and 10 had died. Nine patients (30%) experienced local tumor progression. The median overall, progression-free, and local progression-free survival rates were 26.1, 12.3, and 41.2 months, respectively. Pre-PRT serum levels of cancer antigen 19-9 higher than 100 U/mL and duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 higher than 150 U/mL were significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton radiotherapy for ILR of PDAC after surgery is well tolerated and produces good locoregional control and should be considered for eligible patients.

Pancreatic cancer arising from the remnant pancreas after pancreatectomy: a multicenter retrospective study by the Kyushu Study Group of Clinical Cancer

BACKGROUND

After initial pancreatic resection, local recurrence of pancreatic cancer (PC) or new primary PC can develop in the remnant. There are limited data available regarding this so-called remnant PC. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify the clinical features and establish a treatment strategy for remnant PC.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study with the Kyushu Study Group of Clinical Cancer was carried out. Clinical data from 50 patients who developed remnant PC were analyzed. RAS mutation analysis of the initial tumor and of remnant PC was performed in 17 cases.

RESULTS

The initial pancreatic resections were performed for 37 invasive ductal carcinomas, and for 13 other tumors. Thirty-seven patients underwent a second pancreatectomy for remnant PC (resected group), while thirteen patients were not operated (unresected group). The median overall survival times were 42.2 months in the resected group and 12.3 months in the unresected group (HR 0.374; 95% CI 0.17-0.83). In RAS mutation analysis, 14 cases had at least 1 missense variant of KRAS, HRAS, or NRAS in the initial pancreatic tumor and/or remnant PC. The same missense variants between the initial tumor and remnant PC were discovered only in KRAS of one patient, and in HRAS of one patient. No case had completely consistent missense variants between the initial tumor and remnant PC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that repeated pancreatectomy for remnant PC can prolong patient survival, and RAS mutation analysis indicated that many remnant PCs are developed from metachronous multifocal origins.

Pancreatic cancer: French clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, AFC)

BACKGROUND

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA), updated in July 2018.

DESIGN

This collaborative work was produced under the auspices of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of PA. It is based on the previous guidelines, recent literature review and expert opinions. Recommendations were graded in three categories, according to the level of evidence.

RESULTS

Over the last seven years, significant changes in PA management have been implemented in clinical practice. Imaging/staging: diffusion magnetic resonance imaging is useful before surgery to rule out small liver metastases.

SURGERY

centralization of pancreatic surgery in expert centers is associated with a decreased postoperative mortality. Adjuvant chemotherapy: modified FOLFIRINOX in fit patients, or gemcitabine, or 5-FU, or gemcitabine plus capecitabine, to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. Locally advanced PA: no survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy. Metastatic PA: FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination are first-line standards in fit patients; second-line with 5FU/nal-IRI or 5FU/oxaliplatin combination after first-line gemcitabine.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines for management of PA are continuously evolving and need to be regularly updated. This constant progress is made possible through clinical and translational research. However, as each individual case is particular, they cannot substitute to multidisciplinary tumor board discussion.

Genetic assessment of recurrent pancreatic high-risk lesions in the remnant pancreas: Metachronous multifocal lesion or local recurrence?

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to determine whether a second high-risk lesion, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasm, is a metachronous multifocal lesion or represents local recurrence after resection of the first high-risk lesion. This study attempts to clarify the characteristics of second high-risk lesions in the remnant pancreas using genetic analyses.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data were collected from 12 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for a second high-risk lesion in the remnant pancreas. We performed mutational and immunohistochemical analyses of 4 major genes-KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4-associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression, as well as targeted next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

Mutations in the four genes in the second high-risk lesion were consistent with the first lesion in four patients but were inconsistent in the remaining eight patients, and thus we considered that the latter eight patients likely had metachronous multifocal high-risk lesions and the other four patients had local recurrence. The estimated cumulative recurrence rate after resection of the second high-risk lesion was greater in the local recurrence group compared with the metachronous multifocal group, and the estimated cumulative disease-specific survival rate was greater in the metachronous multifocal group. Targeted next-generation sequencing demonstrated that the second lesions in the metachronous multifocal high-risk lesion group showed differences in founder mutations compared with the first lesion. In the local recurrence group, the founder mutations in the second lesion were common with those in the first lesion.

CONCLUSION

Genetic assessment might help discriminate metachronous multifocal high-risk lesions from local recurrence.

Combined Systemic Chemotherapy and CT-Guided High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Isolated Local Manifestation of Pancreatic Cancer after Surgical Resection

BACKGROUND

Prospective data on the optimal management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) and isolated local manifestation (ILM) after surgery are lacking. Hence, no statements with respect to this entity have been released from most international guidelines including European Society for Medical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and American Society for Clinical Oncology.

METHODS

We report for the first time a case-series of 3 patients with PDA and ILM receiving combined systemic chemotherapy and CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT).

RESULTS

CT-HDRBT allowed in all patients with pronounced chemotherapy-induced side effects either a pause of cytostatic treatment or de-escalation to a "maintenance" therapy (dose reduction, interval prolongation, scheme modification with withdrawal of most toxic drugs).

CONCLUSION

Combining CT-HDRBT to systemic chemotherapy in patients with PDA and ILM is feasible and safe. As for patients with PDA and ILM no standard of care exists, designing an appropriate randomized prospective trial for this highly selected group of patients is challenging.

Prediction of overall survival after re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer with a novel prognostic model (the SCAD score)

PURPOSE

To develop a predictive model for stratification of patients with pancreatic cancer who may achieve survival benefits from re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS

The score was developed based on clinical predictors of OS in 31 patients receiving two courses of SBRT with Cox proportional hazards model. Results were then validated in another cohort with 11 participants to assess the performance of the score.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, the median BED₁₀ of the first and second SBRT was 59.5 Gy (48-85.5 Gy) and 50.2 Gy (43.7-66.9 Gy) in 5-8 fractions, while in the validation cohort, the median BED₁₀ of the first and second SBRT was 59.5 Gy (52.5-66.9 Gy) and 47.7 Gy (40.6-54.8 Gy) in 5-8 fractions. The interval between the first and second SBRT of the training cohort and validation cohort was 10.5 months (6.1-24.3 months) and 12.8 months (6.5-29.1 months), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that tumor stage (P = 0.005), BED₁₀ (P = 0.006) and CA19-9 response (P = 0.04) were significantly predictive of overall survival, which formed SCAD score (named after the initials of factors). Patients with the score < 3 points had a superior OS compared with those with the score ≥ 3 points in the validation cohort (median OS has not been reached vs. 15.9 months, P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

The SCAD score may have the potential to identify individuals benefiting from re-SBRT and be a step toward more personalized medicine.

Resection for recurrent pancreatic cancer in the remnant pancreas after pancreatectomy is clinically promising: Results of a project study for pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

BACKGROUND

A therapeutic strategy has not been established for recurrent pancreatic cancer in the remnant pancreas. The purpose of this multicenter survey was to clarify the clinical features of remnant pancreatic cancer and to assess the appropriate operative indications.

METHODS

Clinical data from 114 patients with remnant pancreatic cancer after initial pancreatectomy were collected retrospectively. Clinicopathologic factors and overall survival curves were analyzed, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were evaluated.

RESULTS

Variate analysis revealed that age (≥65 years), body mass index (<20 kg/m²), tumor size (≥20 mm), distance from the pancreatic stump (<10 mm), and resection of the remnant pancreatic cancer were significant prognostic factors. The median survival times of the resected (n = 90) and the nonresected group (n = 24) were 26 and 14 months, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.56; P = .012). When the patients were classified based on recurrence patterns after a second pancreatectomy, the median survival times were 30.5 months in the no recurrence group, 32.0 in the local recurrence group, and 23.0 in the distant metastasis group. A total of 8.9% of the patients had a postoperative complication of Clavien-Dindo classification III or higher, and the 90-day mortality rate was 1.1%.

CONCLUSION

Resection of the remnant pancreatic cancer could offer a favorable outcome and a chance for a cure. In particular, a young and healthy patient with a relatively small tumor at least 10 mm away from the pancreatic stump appears to be the best candidate for reoperation. Furthermore, the safety profile of resection is acceptable.