1
|
Mangieri CW, Valenzuela CD, Solsky IB, Erali RA, Votanopoulos KI, Shen P, Levine EA. Switching Perfusion Agents for Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Surgical Dogma or Evidence-Based Practice? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:384-391. [PMID: 35969300 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12392-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A common practice is to switch chemotherapy perfusion agents for repeat cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). However, there is a paucity of objective benefit with this practice. METHODS A retrospective review of our institutional registry involving repeat CRS-HIPEC cases was conducted, comparing cases that underwent a perfusion agent switch versus those cases with no switch. The primary outcome of this study was survival, measured by overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of primary etiology. RESULTS A total of 101 cases met selection criteria. Mitomycin C was used as the index perfusion agent in 84% of cases, while oxaliplatin was utilized in the remaining 16% of cases. In total, 66 cases underwent a perfusion switch, with 35 cases using the same agent. Analysis revealed no survival benefit with HIPEC perfusion switch. For OS, there were similar mean survival times of 5.2 (± 4.1) years and 5.1 (± 3.6) years for cases with perfusion switch and no perfusion switch, respectively (P = 0.985). The 5-year OS rates were also similar at 61.4% and 53.3% for switch and non-switch cases, respectively [odds ratio (OR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-3.56, P = 0.49]. Mean DFS was 4.0 (± 4.2) years and 3.6 (± 3.8) years for switch and non-switch cases, respectively (P = 0.74). The 5-year DFS rates had a greater difference with statistical trend, with rates of 53% versus 28% for switch and non-switch cases, respectively (OR 2.91, 95% CI 0.86-9.86, P = 0.081). Subgroup analysis had a similar trend to the main results. CONCLUSIONS The study findings revealed no survival benefit with switching perfusion agents. Analysis suggests that the practice of perfusion switch is ineffective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W Mangieri
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Cristian D Valenzuela
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Ian B Solsky
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Richard A Erali
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Perry Shen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Edward A Levine
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rieser CJ, Alvikas J, Phelos H, Hall LB, Zureikat AH, Lee A, Ongchin M, Holtzman MP, Pingpank JF, Bartlett DL, Choudry MHA. Failure to Thrive Following Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Causes and Consequences. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2630-2639. [PMID: 34988834 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11100-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to thrive (FTT) is a complex syndrome of nutritional failure and functional decline. Readmission for FTT following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS HIPEC) is common but underexamined. This study aims to determine features, risk factors, and prognostic significance of FTT following CRS HIPEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed patients who underwent CRS HIPEC from 2010 to 2018 at our institution. Patients were categorized into no readmission, FTT readmission, and other readmission. FTT was determined by coding and chart review. We compared baseline characteristics, oncologic data, perioperative outcomes, and survival among the three cohorts. RESULTS Of 1068 discharges examined, 379 patients (36%) were readmitted within 90 days, of which 134 (12.5%) were labeled as FTT. Patients with FTT readmission had worse preoperative functional status, higher rates of malnutrition, more complex resections, longer hospital stays, and more postoperative complications (all p < 0.001). Ostomy creation [relative risk ratio (RRR) 4.06], in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE), discharge to nursing home (RRR 2.48), pre-CRS HIPEC chemotherapy (RRR 1.98), older age (RRR 1.84), and female gender (RRR 1.69) were all independent predictors for FTT readmission on multinomial regression (all p < 0.01). FTT readmission was associated with worse median overall survival on multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.60, p < 0.001] after controlling for oncologic, perioperative, and baseline factors. CONCLUSIONS FTT is common following CRS HIPEC and appears to be associated with baseline patient characteristics, operative burden, and postoperative complications. Perioperative strategies for improving nutrition and activity, along with early recognition and intervention in FTT may improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Jurgis Alvikas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heather Phelos
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren B Hall
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: A case report and review of literature. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER: CASE REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpccr.2021.100126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
4
|
An Y, Zhou J, Lin G, Wu H, Cong L, Li Y, Qiu X, Shi W. Clinicopathological and Molecular Characteristics of Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Review. Pathol Oncol Res 2021; 27:1609859. [PMID: 34381313 PMCID: PMC8351516 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2021.1609859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a rare subtype of colorectal cancer (CRC) with unique characteristics. Due to the limited researches on it, a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of this subtype is still lacking. In this article, we summarize the clinicopathological features and molecular characteristics of colorectal SRCC based on a literature review. Clinically, SRCC has been associated with young age, proximal site preference, advanced tumor stage, high histological grade, high rate of lymph node involvement, frequent peritoneal metastasis, and a significantly poor prognosis. Regarding molecular characteristics, in SRCC, the mutation burden of the classic signaling pathways that include WNT/β-catenin, RAS/RAF/MAPK, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways are generally reduced. In contrast, some genes related to the “epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process” and the “stem cell properties”, including RNF43, CDH1, and SMAD4, as well as the related TGF-β signaling pathway have been observed more frequently altered in SRCC than in conventional adenocarcinoma (AC). In many studies but not in others, SRCC showed a higher frequency of BRAF mutation, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) positive status compared to AC. It has been proposed that colorectal SRCC consists of two subtypes, in which the MSI+/CIMP+/BRAF+/CD3+/PD-L1+ hypermethylated genotype is more common in the proximal colon, and may represent the potential candidate for immunotherapy. Understanding the special molecular mechanisms related to the aggressive biology of SRCC is of great importance, which may provide a theoretical basis for the development of more targeted and effective treatments for this refractory disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang An
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaolin Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Guole Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Huanwen Wu
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Cong
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yunhao Li
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyuan Qiu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weikun Shi
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rieser CJ, Jones H, Hall LB, Kang E, Altpeter S, Zureikat AH, Holtzman MP, Lee A, Ongchin M, Pingpank JF, Choudry MHA, Bartlett DL. Definition and Prediction of Early Recurrence and Mortality Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: Towards Predicting Oncologic Futility Preoperatively. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:9116-9125. [PMID: 34224045 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10289-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early recurrence (ER) is a significant challenge for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS HIPEC). Preoperative risk stratification for ER would improve preoperative decision making. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study examining patients who underwent CRS HIPEC for CRPM from 2000 to 2018. Optimal definition of ER was determined via minimum p-value approach based on differentiation of post-recurrence survival. Risk factors for ER were assessed in a derivation cohort by uni- and multivariate logistic regression. A predictive score for ER was generated using preoperative variables and validated in an independent cohort. RESULTS 384 patients were analyzed, 316 (82%) had documented recurrence. Optimal length of post-operative RFS to distinguish ER (n = 144, 46%) vs. late recurrence (LR) (n = 172, 63%) was 8 mos (p<0.01). ER patients had shorter median OS post-CRS-HIPEC (13.6 vs. 39.4 mos, p<0.01). Preoperative BMI (OR 1.88), liver lesions (OR 1.89), progression on chemotherapy (OR 2.14), positive lymph nodes (OR 2.47) and PCI score (16-20: OR 1.7; >20: OR 4.37) were significant predictors of ER (all p<0.05). Using this model, patients were assigned risk scores from 0 to 9. Intermediate (scores 4-6) and high-risk patients (score 7-9) had observed rates of ER of 56% and 79% and overall 2-year survival rates of 27% and 0% respectively. The model showed fair discrimination (AUC 0.72) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow GOF p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS ER predicts markedly worse OS following surgery. Preoperative factors can accurately stratify risk for ER and identify patients in whom CRS-HIPEC for CPRM is futile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Heather Jones
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren B Hall
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Eliza Kang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shannon Altpeter
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Characteristics of 206 Long-Term Survivors with Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Treated with Curative Intent Surgery: A Multi-Center Cohort from PSOGI. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13122964. [PMID: 34199234 PMCID: PMC8231850 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the characteristics of long-term survivors are not well documented. This study set out to investigate the patient characteristics associated with the long-term survival of peritoneal metastases from CRC. We retrospectively analyzed 206 long-term survivors who underwent CRS for peritoneal metastases from CRC. We found that most long-term survivors showed low peritoneal cancer index (PCI), low PCI of small bowel subsets, and complete cytoreduction (CC-0), while some exhibited characteristics considered associated with poor prognosis. Abstract Background: We conducted this study to review the patient characteristics associated with long-term survival in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS). Methods: We retrospectively investigated patients with peritoneal metastases from CRC treated with curative intent surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at 13 institutions worldwide between January 1985 and April 2015 and survived longer than five years after the first CRS for peritoneal metastases. Clinical and oncological features and therapeutic parameters were described and analyzed. Results: Two hundred six long-term survivors were available for study. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of this cohort was 4 (interquartile range (IQR), 2–7), and the median score of the small bowel regions of the PCI (SB-PCI) was 0 (IQR, 0–2). Complete cytoreduction (CC-0) was achieved in 180 (87.4%) patients. Recurrence was observed in 122 (59.2%) patients at a median of 1.8 (IQR, 1.2–2.6) years. Conclusions: While most long-term survivors showed low PCI/SB-PCI and CCR-0, some had characteristics considered associated with poor prognosis. Curative intent treatments may be considered in well-informed and fit patients showing negative factors affecting survival outcome.
Collapse
|
7
|
Bijelic L, Ramos I, Goeré D. The Landmark Series: Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4140-4150. [PMID: 33969466 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10049-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal metastases (PM) are a form of metastatic spread affecting approximately 5-15% of colon cancer patients. The attitude towards management of peritoneal metastases has evolved from therapeutic nihilism towards a more comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach, in large part due to the development of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), usually coupled with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), along with the constant improvement of systemic chemotherapy of colorectal cancer. Several landmark studies, including 5 randomized controlled trials have marked the development and refinement of surgical approaches to treating colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases. METHODS This review article focuses on these landmark studies and their influence in 4 key areas: the evidence supporting surgical resection of peritoneal metastases, the identification and standardization of important prognostic variables influencing patient selection, the role of surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy in prevention of colorectal PM and the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy as an adjuvant to surgical resection. RESULTS These landmark studies indicate that surgical resection of colorectal PM should be considered as a therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients and when adequate surgical expertise is available. Standardized prognostic variables including the Peritoneal Cancer Index and the Completeness of Cytoreduction Score should be used for evaluating both indications and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Current evidence does not support the use of second look surgery with oxaliplatin HIPEC or prophylactic oxaliplatin HIPEC in patients with high risk colon cancer nor the use of oxaliplatin HIPEC with CRS of colorectal PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lana Bijelic
- Peritoneal Malignancies Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Moises Broggi, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Isabel Ramos
- Peritoneal Malignancies Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Moises Broggi, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Diane Goeré
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Louis - APHP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rieser CJ, Hoehn RS, Zenati M, Hall LB, Kang E, Zureikat AH, Lee A, Ongchin M, Holtzman MP, Pingpank JF, Bartlett DL, Choudry MHA. Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Presentation and Outcomes in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Following Cytoreduction and Chemoperfusion: Persistent Inequalities in Outcomes at a High-Volume Center. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:3522-3531. [PMID: 33687614 PMCID: PMC8184539 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09627-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (CRS HIPEC) can offer significant survival advantage for select patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). Low socioeconomic status (SES) is implicated in disparities in access to care. We analyze the impact of SES on postoperative outcomes and survival at a high-volume tertiary CRS HIPEC center. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining patients who underwent CRS HIPEC for CRPM from 2000 to 2018. Patients were grouped according to SES. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival were examined between groups. RESULTS A total of 226 patients were analyzed, 107 (47%) low-SES and 119 (53%) high-SES patients. High-SES patients were younger (52 vs. 58 years, p = 0.01) and more likely to be White (95.0% vs. 91.6%, p = 0.06) and privately insured (83% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). They traveled significantly further for treatment and had lower burden of comorbidities and frailty (p = 0.01). Low-SES patients more often presented with synchronous peritoneal metastases (48% vs. 35%, p = 0.05). Following CRS HIPEC, low-SES patients had longer length of stay and higher burden of postoperative complications, 90-day readmission, and 30-day mortality. Median overall survival following CRS HIPEC was worse for low-SES patients (17.8 vs. 32.4 months, p = 0.02). This disparity persisted on multivariate survival analysis (low SES: HR = 1.46, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Despite improving therapies for CRPM, low-SES patients remain at a significant disadvantage. Even patients who overcome barriers to care experience worse short- and long-term outcomes. Improving access and addressing these disparities is crucial to ensure equitable outcomes and improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Richard S Hoehn
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mazen Zenati
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren B Hall
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Eliza Kang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kamada Y, Hida K, Ishibashi H, Sako S, Mizumoto A, Ichinose M, Padmanabhan N, Yoshida S, Yonemura Y. Thirty-three long-term survivors after cytoreductive surgery in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: a retrospective descriptive study. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:31. [PMID: 33509224 PMCID: PMC7845127 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02145-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improves survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC). However, little has been reported on characteristics and clinical course of long-term survivors with CRC-PM beyond 5 years. The objective of this study was to identify the clinical and oncological features affecting long-term survival of CRC-PM after comprehensive treatment. METHODS Between January 1990 and April 2015, CRC-PM patients who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC in two Japanese tertiary hospitals were analyzed. Clinicopathological parameters and therapeutic details for long-term survivors (patients surviving ≥ 5 years after CRS) were described and compared with those for non-survivors (patients surviving < 5 years). RESULTS The study identified 236 patients with CRC-PM who underwent CRS, with a median follow-up period of 2.5 years. Thirty-three patients (14.0%) were considered as long-term survivors. Compared with non-survivors, long-term survivors had a lower median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) [4 (1-27) vs 9 (0-39), p < 0.001]. Complete cytoreduction (CCR-0) was achieved in all long-term survivors, with a significantly higher rate [33/33 (100%) vs 141/203 (69.8%), p < 0.001]. Metachronous onsets of PM were more frequently observed in the long-term survivor group [26/33 (78.8%) vs 103/203 (50.3%), p = 0.018]. Regarding histopathology, long-term survivors more frequently had mucinous adenocarcinoma than non-survivors [8/33 (24.2%) vs 27/203 (13.3%)] and less likely exhibited poorly differentiated or signet ring cell carcinoma [2/33 (6.1%) vs 48/203 (23.7%)] (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS One in seven patients with CRC-PM achieved the long-term milestone after CRS. A long-term survival was associated with the presence of low PCI, CCR-0, metachronous onset, and mucinous histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuyuki Kamada
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54, Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Japan. .,NPO to support Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Japanese/Asian School of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Kyoto, Japan. .,Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan.
| | - Koya Hida
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54, Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Haruaki Ishibashi
- NPO to support Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Japanese/Asian School of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan
| | - Shouzou Sako
- NPO to support Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Japanese/Asian School of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Mizumoto
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Shiga, Japan
| | - Masumi Ichinose
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Shiga, Japan
| | - Naveen Padmanabhan
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Apollo Cancer Institute, Chennai, India
| | - Shinya Yoshida
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54, Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yutaka Yonemura
- NPO to support Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Japanese/Asian School of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan.,Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Shiga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brind'Amour A, Webb M, Parapini M, Sidéris L, Segedi M, Chung SW, Chartier-Plante S, Dubé P, Scudamore CH, Kim PTW. The role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the surgical management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Clin Exp Metastasis 2021; 38:187-196. [PMID: 33486670 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-021-10074-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis, particularly for patients with metastatic disease. Treatment for oligometastatic presentation has been reported in recent literature, but the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) remains unclear. We performed a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases in order to identify clinical trials and case-series reporting on the safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with PDAC-derived PM. Eight publications reporting on 85 patients were identified, using three different therapeutic strategies. First, 37 patients received cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for PDAC with PM. Grade 3 and 4 complications occurred in 37.8% of patients, without perioperative mortality. Median disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates varied from 4 to 36 months and 4 to 62 months, respectively. Secondly, 40 patients with resectable PDAC without PM received prophylactic HIPEC following pancreatic resection, with postoperative morbidity and mortality rates of 30% and 5%, and 5-year OS rates of 23-24%. Finally, eight patients with PDAC-derived peritoneal disease were converted to resectable disease after receiving neoadjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy and operated on with curative intent, achieving a median OS of 27.8 months. In conclusion, CRS with HIPEC for PDAC-derived PM appears to be safe, conferring the same postoperative morbidity and mortality as reported on non-pancreatic malignancies. In highly selected patients, it could be considered for short-term disease control. However, long-term survival remains poor. The addition of prophylactic HIPEC for resectable PDAC cannot be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Brind'Amour
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,Department of Surgical Oncology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, 2775 Laurel Street, 5th Floor, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| | - Mitchell Webb
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Marina Parapini
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lucas Sidéris
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Maja Segedi
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Stephen W Chung
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Pierre Dubé
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Charles H Scudamore
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter T W Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Seretis C, Gill J, Malik A, Elhassan AM, Shariff U, Youssef H. Low Preoperative Serum Albumin Levels Are Associated With Impaired Outcome After Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies. J Clin Med Res 2020; 12:773-779. [PMID: 33447310 PMCID: PMC7781284 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Preoperative hypoalbuminemia is known to be associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as with poor survival after gastrointestinal cancer surgery. However, limited data exist regarding the prognostic significance of hypoalbuminemia in patients with peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery, combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. We performed a systematic literature review of the previously published studies addressing the potential association between preoperative albumin levels and overall surgical outcomes after the performance of cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancies. Our research yielded a total of nine retrospective studies which met our inclusion criteria, and despite their heterogeneity; and we can conclude that preoperatively low albumin levels are associated with greater likelihood of overall and major morbidity, as well as less favorable oncological outcome after the performance of cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jagjit Gill
- George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Warwickshire, UK
| | - Adnan Malik
- George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Warwickshire, UK
| | | | - Umar Shariff
- General Surgery Department, Good Hope Hospital, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Haney Youssef
- General Surgery Department, Good Hope Hospital, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brind'Amour A, Dubé P, Tremblay JF, Soucisse ML, Mack L, Bouchard-Fortier A, McCart JA, Govindarajan A, Bischof D, Haase E, Giacomantonio C, Hebbard P, Younan R, MacNeill A, Boulanger-Gobeil C, Sidéris L. Canadian guidelines on the management of colorectal peritoneal metastases. Curr Oncol 2020; 27:e621-e631. [PMID: 33380878 PMCID: PMC7755452 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern management of colorectal cancer (crc) with peritoneal metastasis (pm) is based on a combination of cytoreductive surgery (crs), systemic chemotherapy, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hipec). Although the role of hipec has recently been questioned with respect to results from the prodige 7 trial, the role and benefit of a complete crs were confirmed, as observed with a 41-month gain in median survival in that study, and 15% of patients remaining disease-free at 5 years. Still, crc with pm is associated with a poor prognosis, and good patient selection is essential. Many questions about the optimal management approach for such patients remain, but all patients with pm from crc should be referred to, or discussed with, a pm surgical oncologist, because cure is possible. The objective of the present guideline is to offer a practical approach to the management of pm from crc and to reflect on the new practice standards set by recent publications on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Brind'Amour
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, chu de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City
| | - P Dubé
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - J F Tremblay
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - M L Soucisse
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - L Mack
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | | | - J A McCart
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - A Govindarajan
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - D Bischof
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - E Haase
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| | | | - P Hebbard
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - R Younan
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC
| | - A MacNeill
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | | | - L Sidéris
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prabhu A, Brandl A, Satoshi W, Sako S, Ishibashi H, Mizumoto A, Takao N, Ichinose M, Motoi S, Liu Y, Nishihara K, Yonemura Y. Dual Cancer: Papillary and Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma, Arising in a Patient Operated for Choledochal Cyst: an Unusual Histological Finding. Indian J Surg Oncol 2020; 11:143-147. [PMID: 33088152 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-020-01092-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aruna Prabhu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Thangam Cancer Center, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu India
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Wakama Satoshi
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4 Chome-27-1 Kamoricho,, Kishiwada, Osaka 596-004 Japan
| | - Shouzou Sako
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4 Chome-27-1 Kamoricho,, Kishiwada, Osaka 596-004 Japan
- Japanese/Asian School of Peritoneal, Surface Oncology, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Haruaki Ishibashi
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4 Chome-27-1 Kamoricho,, Kishiwada, Osaka 596-004 Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Mizumoto
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Kusatsu, Shiga Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Takao
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Kusatsu, Shiga Japan
| | - Masumi Ichinose
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Kusatsu, Shiga Japan
| | - Shunsuke Motoi
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Kusatsu, Shiga Japan
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4 Chome-27-1 Kamoricho,, Kishiwada, Osaka 596-004 Japan
| | - Kazuo Nishihara
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4 Chome-27-1 Kamoricho,, Kishiwada, Osaka 596-004 Japan
- Japanese/Asian School of Peritoneal, Surface Oncology, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Kusatsu, Shiga Japan
| | - Yutaka Yonemura
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, 4 Chome-27-1 Kamoricho,, Kishiwada, Osaka 596-004 Japan
- Japanese/Asian School of Peritoneal, Surface Oncology, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Kusatsu, Shiga Japan
- NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment, Peritoneal Metastasis Center, Kishiwada, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Prabhu A, Brandl A, Wakama S, Sako S, Ishibashi H, Mizumoto A, Takao N, Noguchi K, Motoi S, Ichinose M, Liu Y, Yonemura Y. Retrospective Analysis of Patients with Signet Ring Subtype of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis Treated with CRS & HIPEC. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2536. [PMID: 32906609 PMCID: PMC7565458 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Signet ring cell subtype (SRC) of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a rare subtype and occurs in approximately 1% of all patients with CRC. Patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) of SRC have a poor prognosis, and this subtype is frequently considered as a contra-indication for extensive surgical treatment. This retrospective study from two dedicated peritoneal surface malignancy centers in Japan included all patients treated with CRS ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) between July 1994 and December 2017 from a prospectively maintained database. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative parameters were recorded, including complication rates and follow-up. Sixty of the 320 patients treated with CRS due to CRC were diagnosed with SRC subtype. The mean age of the patients was 51.4 years, and the mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 13.1. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 61.7% of cases. The postoperative morbidity rate was 25% and the mortality rate was 1.7%. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.4 months. Cox regression analysis revealed small bowel PCI > 2 (hazard ratio (HR) 6.5; p = 0.008) as the most important factor for OS. With accurate patient selection (e.g., PCI ≤ 12 or small bowel PCI ≤ 2), even patients with PM of CRC with SRC subtype may benefit from CRS and HIPEC, with median OS from 17.8 to 20.8 months and 5-year OS of 11.6%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aruna Prabhu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Thangam Cancer Center, Namakkal 637001, Tamil Nadu, India;
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal;
| | - Satoshi Wakama
- Department of surgery, Graduate school of medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8303, Japan;
| | - Shouzou Sako
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Osaka 596-0042, Japan; (S.S.); (H.I.); (Y.L.)
- NPO to Support Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Japanese/Asian School of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Kyoto 600-8189, Japan
| | - Haruaki Ishibashi
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Osaka 596-0042, Japan; (S.S.); (H.I.); (Y.L.)
| | - Akiyoshi Mizumoto
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Shiga 525-8585, Japan; (A.M.); (N.T.); (K.N.); (S.M.); (M.I.)
| | - Nobuyuki Takao
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Shiga 525-8585, Japan; (A.M.); (N.T.); (K.N.); (S.M.); (M.I.)
| | - Kousuke Noguchi
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Shiga 525-8585, Japan; (A.M.); (N.T.); (K.N.); (S.M.); (M.I.)
| | - Shunsuke Motoi
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Shiga 525-8585, Japan; (A.M.); (N.T.); (K.N.); (S.M.); (M.I.)
| | - Masumi Ichinose
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Shiga 525-8585, Japan; (A.M.); (N.T.); (K.N.); (S.M.); (M.I.)
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Osaka 596-0042, Japan; (S.S.); (H.I.); (Y.L.)
| | - Yutaka Yonemura
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Osaka 596-0042, Japan; (S.S.); (H.I.); (Y.L.)
- NPO to Support Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Japanese/Asian School of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Kyoto 600-8189, Japan
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Shiga 525-8585, Japan; (A.M.); (N.T.); (K.N.); (S.M.); (M.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Govaerts K, Lurvink RJ, De Hingh IHJT, Van der Speeten K, Villeneuve L, Kusamura S, Kepenekian V, Deraco M, Glehen O, Moran BJ. Appendiceal tumours and pseudomyxoma peritonei: Literature review with PSOGI/EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:11-35. [PMID: 32199769 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (PMP) is a rare peritoneal malignancy, most commonly originating from a perforated epithelial tumour of the appendix. Given its rarity, randomized controlled trials on treatment strategies are lacking, nor likely to be performed in the foreseeable future. However, many questions regarding the management of appendiceal tumours, especially when accompanied by PMP, remain unanswered. This consensus statement was initiated by members of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) Executive Committee as part of a global advisory role in the management of uncommon peritoneal malignancies. The manuscript concerns an overview and analysis of the literature on mucinous appendiceal tumours with, or without, PMP. Recommendations are provided based on three Delphi voting rounds with GRADE-based questions amongst a panel of 80 worldwide PMP experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Govaerts
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
| | - R J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - I H J T De Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - K Van der Speeten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - L Villeneuve
- Service de Recherche et Epidémiologie Cliniques, Pôle de Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - S Kusamura
- Department of Surgery, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale Dei Tumori di Milano, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, Milano, Milan Cap, 20133, Italy
| | - V Kepenekian
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - M Deraco
- Department of Surgery, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale Dei Tumori di Milano, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, Milano, Milan Cap, 20133, Italy
| | - O Glehen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - B J Moran
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, North-Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jost E, Mack LA, Sideris L, Dube P, Temple W, Bouchard-Fortier A. Evaluation of repeat cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal and colorectal cancers: a multicentre Canadian study. Can J Surg 2020; 63:E71-E79. [PMID: 32080999 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.002519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Peritoneal recurrences after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for appendiceal and colorectal cancers are frequent. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, technical feasibility and perioperative and long-term outcomes of repeat CRS/HIPEC in patients with recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal and appendiceal origin. Methods Data were collected from patients treated from 2000 to 2016 for recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal or colorectal cancer with CRS/HIPEC at 2 specialist centres. Data on demographics, procedure details, morbidity and survival were recorded. Analyses compared the iterations of CRS/HIPEC to assess the safety and effectiveness of repeat surgery. Results Of all patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC in the 2 centres, 37 patients underwent a repeat procedure. Operative time was similar for the first and second surgeries (412.1 v. 412.5 min, p = 0.74) but patients had a significantly lower peritoneal carcinoma index score with the second surgery (21.8 in the first iteration v. 9.53 in the second iteration, p < 0.001) and significantly less blood loss (1762 mL in the first iteration v. 790 mL in the second iteration, p = 0.001). There was a nonsignificant decrease in grade III–IV complications and there was no 30-day mortality associated with repeat procedures. For patients with colorectal cancer, median disease-free survival was 9.6 months and median overall survival was 40 months. For patients with appendiceal cancer, median disease-free survival was 15 months and overall survival was 64.4 months. Conclusion Repeat CRS/HIPEC procedures for recurrent appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis are safe in well-selected patients, without increased morbidity or mortality, and they are associated with significant long-term survival, particularly for patients with appendiceal cancers. These results support the use of repeat CRS/HIPEC in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Jost
- From the Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Jost, Mack, Temple, Bouchard-Fortier); and the Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que. (Sideris, Dube)
| | - Lloyd A. Mack
- From the Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Jost, Mack, Temple, Bouchard-Fortier); and the Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que. (Sideris, Dube)
| | - Lucas Sideris
- From the Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Jost, Mack, Temple, Bouchard-Fortier); and the Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que. (Sideris, Dube)
| | - Pierre Dube
- From the Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Jost, Mack, Temple, Bouchard-Fortier); and the Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que. (Sideris, Dube)
| | - Walley Temple
- From the Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Jost, Mack, Temple, Bouchard-Fortier); and the Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que. (Sideris, Dube)
| | - Antoine Bouchard-Fortier
- From the Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Jost, Mack, Temple, Bouchard-Fortier); and the Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que. (Sideris, Dube)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yang SY, Kang JH, Kim HS, Han YD, Min BS, Lee KY. Status of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:1251-1265. [PMID: 31949946 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.01.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) was previously considered an incurable disease with a poor survival outcome. As our understanding of its biology evolved, the paradigm of the management of PC from colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed, including the combination of macroscopic disease control, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), maximal regional chemotherapy to treat residual microscopic disease, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). As with many surgical innovations, CRS with HIPEC has evolved faster than data to support it, leaving many skeptics and critics. This review highlights the recent evidence of current practice and outcome of CRS with HIPEC. Furthermore, it also summarizes the ongoing clinical trials and potential future progress of this treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Yoon Yang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Kang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho Seung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoon Dae Han
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byung Soh Min
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kang Young Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shannon NB, Tan JWS, Tan HL, Wang W, Chen Y, Lim HJ, Tan QX, Hendrikson J, Ng WH, Loo LY, Skanthakumar T, Wasudevan SD, Kon OL, Lim TKH, Tan GHC, Chia CS, Soo KC, Ong CAJ, Teo MCC. A set of molecular markers predicts chemosensitivity to Mitomycin-C following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastasis. Sci Rep 2019; 9:10572. [PMID: 31332257 PMCID: PMC6646658 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46819-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. We aim to generate and validate a biomarker set predicting sensitivity to Mitomycin-C to refine selection of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CPM) for this treatment. A signature predicting Mitomycin-C sensitivity was generated using data from Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer and The Cancer Genome Atlas. Validation was performed on CPM patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC (n = 62) using immunohistochemistry (IHC). We determined predictive significance of our set using overall survival as a surrogate endpoint via a logistic regression model. Three potential biomarkers were identified and optimized for IHC. Patients exhibiting lower expression of PAXIP1 and SSBP2 had poorer survival than those with higher expression (p = 0.045 and 0.140, respectively). No difference was observed in patients with differing DTYMK expression (p = 0.715). Combining PAXIP1 and SSBP2 in a set, patients with two dysregulated protein markers had significantly poorer survival than one or no dysregulated marker (p = 0.016). This set independently predicted survival in a Cox regression model (HR 5.097; 95% CI 1.731–15.007; p = 0.003). We generated and validated an IHC prognostic set which could potentially identify patients who are likely to benefit from HIPEC using Mitomycin-C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joey Wee-Shan Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hwee Leong Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Weining Wang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yudong Chen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hui Jun Lim
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Qiu Xuan Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Josephine Hendrikson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wai Har Ng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Li Yang Loo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Seettha D Wasudevan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Oi Lian Kon
- Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tony Kiat Hon Lim
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Hwei Ching Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Claramae Shulyn Chia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Khee Chee Soo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chin-Ann Johnny Ong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hallam S, Tyler R, Price M, Beggs A, Youssef H. Meta-analysis of prognostic factors for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastasis undergoing cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. BJS Open 2019; 3:585-594. [PMID: 31592510 PMCID: PMC6773657 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Up to 15 per cent of colorectal cancers present with peritoneal metastases (CPM). Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) aims to achieve macroscopic tumour resection combined with HIPEC to destroy microscopic disease. CRS + HIPEC is a major operation with significant morbidity and effects on quality of life (QoL). Improving patient selection is crucial to maximize patient outcomes while minimizing morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for patients with CPM undergoing CRS + HIPEC. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library electronic databases was performed using terms for colorectal cancer, peritoneal metastasis and CRS + HIPEC. Included studies focused on the impact of prognostic factors on overall survival following CRS + HIPEC in patients with CPM. Results Twenty-four studies described 3128 patients. Obstruction or perforation of the primary tumour (hazard ratio (HR) 2·91, 95 per cent c.i. 1·5 to 5·65), extent of peritoneal metastasis as described by the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) (per increase of 1 PCI point: HR 1·07, 1·02 to 1·12) and the completeness of cytoreduction (CC score above zero: HR 1·75, 1·18 to 2·59) were associated with reduced overall survival after CRS + HIPEC. Conclusion Primary tumour obstruction or perforation, PCI score and CC score are valuable prognostic factors in the selection of patients with CPM for CRS + HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hallam
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - R Tyler
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - M Price
- Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - A Beggs
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - H Youssef
- Colorectal Surgery, Good Hope Hospital University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Systematic Review of Variations in Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2018; 7:jcm7120567. [PMID: 30572653 PMCID: PMC6306814 DOI: 10.3390/jcm7120567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), combines radical surgery with abdominal heated chemotherapy, constituting a multimodal treatment approach. Since clear standards for HIPEC conduct in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) are lacking, we aimed to provide a comprehensive structured survey. Data sources and study eligibility criteria: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, with keywords “HIPEC” and “colorectal cancer”, according to established guidelines. Articles were systematically screened, selecting 87 publications complemented by 48 publications identified through extended search for subsequent synthesis and evaluation, extracting inter alia details on used drugs, dosage, temperature, exposure times, and carrier solutions. Results: Compiled publications contained 171 reports on HIPEC conduct foremost with mitomycin C and oxaliplatin, but also other drugs and drug combinations, comprising at least 60 different procedures. We hence provide an overview of interconnections between HIPEC protocols, used drugs and carrier solutions as well as their volumes. In addition, HIPEC temperatures and dosing benchmarks, as well as an estimate of in vivo resulting drug concentrations are demonstrated. Conclusions and implications: Owing to recent developments, HIPEC conduct and practices need to be reassessed. Unfortunately, imprecise and lacking reporting is frequent, which is why minimal information requirements should be established for HIPEC and the introduction of final drug concentrations for comparability reasons seems sensible.
Collapse
|
21
|
Brandl A, Pratschke J, Rau B. Chirurgisch-onkologische Therapie primärer und sekundärer peritonealer Neoplasien. Eur Surg 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-018-0553-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
22
|
Kuncewitch M, Levine EA, Shen P, Votanopoulos KI. The Role of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Appendiceal Tumors and Colorectal Adenocarcinomas. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2018; 31:288-294. [PMID: 30186050 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1642052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Peritoneal surface disease (PSD) has historically been used interchangeably with the term peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and has a dismal natural history. A variety of malignant pathologies, including colorectal and appendiceal primary tumors, can disseminate throughout the peritoneal cavity, leading to bowel obstruction and death. In general, peritoneal spread from high-grade appendiceal and colorectal primaries has the potential of hepatic and distant spread and best classified as PC. Low-grade appendiceal tumors are better categorized as PSD, due to low cellularity, high mucin production, and lack of potential spread outside the peritoneal cavity. Growing international experience with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) over the past 30 years has presented a therapeutic option to patients with PSD from colorectal and appendiceal tumors that can provide significant disease control, as well as potential for previously unattainable long-term survival. The proliferation of HIPEC centers and ongoing prospective trials are helping to standardize HIPEC techniques and patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kuncewitch
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Edward A Levine
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Perry Shen
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Guerrero W, Munene G, Dickson PV, Stiles ZE, Mays J, Davidoff AM, Glazer ES, Shibata D, Deneve JL. Outcome and factors associated with aborted cytoreduction for peritoneal carcinomatosis. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:664-673. [PMID: 30151262 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.04.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) offers a potential cure for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), whereas aborted cytoreduction is associated with a poor outcome. We evaluate factors associated with aborted CRS procedures. Methods An IRB approved retrospective review was performed from 12/2011 to 2/2016. Clinicopathologic variables and outcomes are described. Results Seventy-four patients underwent attempted CRS/HIPEC which was completed in 51 (69%) and aborted in 23 (31%). There was no difference in age, race, gender or prior treatment between groups. Patients who underwent aborted procedures had a higher peritoneal cancer index (PCI, 26.1±9.9 vs. 16.2±10.5, P=0.001). Overall survival (OS) was significantly improved for patients who underwent completed CRS/HIPEC (41.0±10.4 vs. 6.0±2.3 months, P<0.0001). Patients with an appendiceal and colorectal primary who underwent CRS/HIPEC had a significantly better outcome (median not reached vs. 6±5.4 months, P<0.0001, and 28.0±7.5 vs. 8.0±4.0 months, P<0.0001, respectively). Colorectal pathology (P=0.014) and PCI score (<0.0001) were independent predictors of aborted CRS procedures. Conclusions One-third of patients with PC had significant disease which prevented successful completion of CRS/HIPEC. PCI and colorectal primary tumor pathology were associated with a greater likelihood of aborted CRS procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney Guerrero
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Gitonga Munene
- Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker School of Medicine, West Michigan Cancer Center, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Paxton V Dickson
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Zachary E Stiles
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Johnathan Mays
- College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Andrew M Davidoff
- Department of Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Evan S Glazer
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - David Shibata
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jeremiah L Deneve
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Glockzin G, Zeman F, Croner RS, Königsrainer A, Pelz J, Ströhlein MA, Rau B, Arnold D, Koller M, Schlitt HJ, Piso P. Perioperative Systemic Chemotherapy, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients With Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Phase 2 COMBATAC Trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018; 17:285-296. [PMID: 30131226 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 07/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as parts of an interdisciplinary treatment concept including systemic chemotherapy can improve survival of selected patients with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer (pmCRC). Nevertheless, the sequence of the therapeutic options is still a matter of debate. Thus, the COMBATAC (COMBined Anticancer Treatment of Advanced Colorectal cancer) trial was conducted to evaluate a combined treatment regimen consisting of preoperative systemic polychemotherapy + cetuximab followed by CRS + HIPEC and postoperative systemic polychemotherapy + cetuximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS The COMBATAC trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, single-stage phase 2 trial. Twenty-six patients with synchronous or metachronous colorectal or appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis were included. Enrollment was terminated prematurely by the sponsor because of slow recruitment. Progression-free survival as primary end point and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Also evaluated were morbidity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 and feasibility of the combined treatment concept. RESULTS Median progression-free survival for the intention-to-treat population (n = 25) was 14.9 months. Median overall survival was not reached during the study duration. Ninety-two adverse events were documented in 16 patients, including 14 serious adverse events in 9 patients. The overall morbidity rate was 64%, and the grade 3/4 morbidity rate was 44%. Of all grade 3/4 morbidity events, 36.4% were related to systemic chemotherapy and 22.7% to surgery, whereas 40.9% were not directly related. There was no treatment-related mortality. CONCLUSION The results of the COMBATAC trial show that the multimodal treatment concept consisting of perioperative systemic chemotherapy and CRS + HIPEC is safe and feasible. Progression-free survival in selected patients with colorectal or appendiceal peritoneal metastasis might be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Glockzin
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgery, Klinikum Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany.
| | - Florian Zeman
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roland S Croner
- Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of Surgery, University of Tübingen, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Pelz
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Department of Surgery, St Bernward Hospital, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Michael A Ströhlein
- Department of Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumor Center Hamburg, AK Altona, Department of Oncology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Koller
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Goéré D, Sourrouille I, Gelli M, Benhaim L, Faron M, Honoré C. Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2018; 27:563-583. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2018.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
26
|
Grotz TE, Fournier KF, Mansfield PF. Patient Selection for Cytoreductive Surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2018; 27:443-462. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2018.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
27
|
Jacobson R, Sherman SK, Dahdaleh F, Turaga KK. Peritoneal Metastases in Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2145-2151. [PMID: 29748885 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6490-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Jacobson
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Scott K Sherman
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Kiran K Turaga
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Guerrero WL, Munene G, Dickson PV, Darby D, Davidoff AM, Martin MG, Glazer ES, Shibata D, Deneve JL. Early experience with cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at a newly developed center for peritoneal malignancy. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:338-347. [PMID: 29755773 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.01.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has improved outcomes for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). We present our experience from a newly developed peritoneal surface malignancy program. Methods An IRB approved retrospective review was performed for the first 50 patients treated with CRS/HIPEC with clinicopathologic data described. Results Patients treated with CRS/HIPEC were Caucasian (64%), female (66%) with a median age of 53 years (range, 11-73 years). Primary pathology included: appendix (40%, n=20), ovary (20%, n=10), colon (14%, n=7), desmoplastic small round cell tumor (14%, n=7) or other (12%, n=6). The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score was 15.5 (range, 1-39) and 92% underwent complete cytoreduction (CCR 0/1). Median hospital length of stay was 9.0 days (range, 6-35 days). Eight patients (16%) suffered major morbidity with 2 (4%) 30-day mortalities. Conclusions Short-term outcomes observed after CRS/HIPEC in a newly developed center for PC are consistent with published higher volume center experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney L Guerrero
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Gitonga Munene
- Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker School of Medicine, West Michigan Cancer Center, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Paxton V Dickson
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Dina Darby
- University of Tennessee Medical Practice, Surgical Oncology, Methodist Healthcare, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Andrew M Davidoff
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Evan S Glazer
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - David Shibata
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jeremiah L Deneve
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Reghunathan M, Kelly KJ, Valasek MA, Lowy AM, Baumgartner JM. Histologic Predictors of Recurrence in Mucinous Appendiceal Tumors with Peritoneal Dissemination after HIPEC. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 25:702-708. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6310-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
30
|
Scholer AJ, Oliver JB, Rosado J, Patel JS, Lynch LJ, Spiegler KM, Houck K, Chokshi RJ. Abdominal wall reconstruction after cytoreduction surgery-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Surg Res 2017; 221:266-274. [PMID: 29229138 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Revised: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreduction surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improve survival and decrease recurrence of peritoneal metastasis in a select population of patients. Abdominal wall resection is often needed to achieve complete CRS and the extent of abdominal wall resection may necessitate abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). We sought to investigate if postoperative morbidity and mortality was increased in patients who underwent AWR with CRS-HIPEC (AWR group) compared to CRS-HIPEC without AWR (non-AWR group) and to identify if patient, tumor, and operative risk factors were associated with poor outcomes following AWR. We postulate that AWR is a safe and viable treatment option in appropriately selected patients with peritoneal disease. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted from 2012 to 2015. Demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed and compared between the non-AWR group and the AWR group. RESULTS A total of 30 patients underwent CRS-HIPEC at our institution; 19 recruited in non-AWR group and 11 in the AWR arm. Median follow-up was 19.1 mo for the non-AWR group and 15.6 mo for AWR. Overall survival and complications were not significantly different between groups. Six patients in the non-AWR group and three patients in AWR group died during the follow-up period (32% versus 27%, P = 0.75). Grade III/IV Clavien-Dindo complications were similar in AWR compared to non-AWR group (64% versus 50%, P = 0.46) however estimated blood loss (1000 mL versus 450 mL, P = 0.01) and operative time (663 min versus 510 min, P = 0.02) were significantly increased in the AWR group. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study demonstrate that AWR is a safe and viable option and can improve wound closure and strength in select patient populations undergoing CRS-HIPEC. AWR is not associated with an increase in mortality or complication rate. Future studies will need larger sample sizes and randomization to identify patient and operative factors that increase morbidity with AWR and identify the ideal timing of AWR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J Scholer
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Joseph B Oliver
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Jesus Rosado
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Jimmy S Patel
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Lindsay J Lynch
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Kevin M Spiegler
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Karen Houck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Ravi J Chokshi
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Simkens GA, Rovers KP, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. Patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 9:259-266. [PMID: 28721098 PMCID: PMC5501638 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s119569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a viable option for selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal origin, resulting in long-term survival and even cure in some cases. However, adequate patient selection for this treatment is currently one of the major challenges. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of clinically relevant factors associated with overall survival. This may help to guide clinicians through the complex interplay of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics to adequately select patients who benefit the most from this extensive surgical treatment. First, basic principles of colorectal PM and the CRS and HIPEC treatment will be discussed. According to available literature, especially extent of peritoneal disease, completeness of cytoreduction, and signet ring cell histology have great influence on the outcome after CRS and HIPEC. Other factors that seem to have a negative prognostic value are the presence of liver metastases and the absence of treatment with neo-adjuvant systemic therapy. Prognostic models combining the above-mentioned factors, such as the Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Prognostic Surgical Score nomogram, may provide clinically relevant tools to use in everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Maciver AH, Lee N, Skitzki JJ, Boland PM, Francescutti V. Cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CS/HIPEC) in colorectal cancer: Evidence-based review of patient selection and treatment algorithms. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2017; 43:1028-1039. [PMID: 28029523 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2016] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Cytoreduction and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CS/HIPEC) is increasingly utilized as a treatment strategy for patients with peritoneal metastases from various primary tumor sites. For this heterogenous procedure, related to patient characteristics, patient selection, and the extent of surgical completeness of cytoreduction, high level evidence (ex: multiple randomized controlled trials) is not available to support efficacy. This review of the available literature supporting application of the procedure, focusing on colorectal cancer, provides a summary of current evidence for patient selection and treatment algorithms based on patient presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A H Maciver
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - N Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - J J Skitzki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - P M Boland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - V Francescutti
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kwakman R, Schrama AM, van Olmen JP, Otten RH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, de Cuba EM, Kazemier G, Te Velde EA. Clinicopathological Parameters in Patient Selection for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Metastases: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2017; 263:1102-11. [PMID: 26756756 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve patient selection for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) by evaluating various preoperatively assessable clinicopathological parameters as markers for survival after CRS and HIPEC. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Peritoneal metastases (PMs) originating from colorectal cancer are treated with CRS and HIPEC. Despite increasing survival, high morbidity and mortality warrant selection of patients with optimal benefit from this treatment. Many studies report a number of variables to be associated with survival after CRS and HIPEC, but no definitive analysis has been made to validate various markers. METHODS In concordance with PRISMA guidelines, we performed a literature search encompassing 4110 articles to select 50 articles that reported the influence of 1 or more clinicopathological variables on overall survival after CRS and HIPEC. In absence of RCTs, 25 cohort studies could be used to perform a meta-analysis on 10 prognostic variables. RESULTS We determined that concurrent liver metastasis, lymph node metastasis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor differentiation, and signet ring cell histology are all negative prognostic variables on overall survival after CRS and HIPEC. Conversely, sex and location of primary could not be validated as prognostic markers. More research is required to make definitive conclusions about neoadjuvant chemotherapy, onset of PMs, and mucinous histology. CONCLUSIONS Current clinical practice, which selects patients based on extraperitoneal metastasis, lymph node stage, performance status, and tumor histology, is validated by our pooled analysis. Our data merit further research into neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the setting of CRS and HIPEC for PMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riom Kwakman
- *Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands†Medical Library, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands‡Department of Biomedical Statistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands§Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Huang CQ, Min Y, Wang SY, Yang XJ, Liu Y, Xiong B, Yonemura Y, Li Y. Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves survival for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. Oncotarget 2017; 8:55657-55683. [PMID: 28903452 PMCID: PMC5589691 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The therapeutic efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is still under debate. This meta-analysis and systematic review of published literature on this comprehensive strategy aims to evaluate its efficacy on CRC patients with PC. Methods A systemic review with meta-analysis of published literatures on treatment of CRS plus HIPEC for patients with PC from CRC was performed. In addition, a summary of study results of published literatures concerning CRS plus HIPEC treating patients with PC from CRC was also conducted. Results A total of 76 studies were selected, including 1 randomized controlled trial, 14 non-randomized controlled studies, and 61 non-controlled studies. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) in the 15 researches for meta-analysis was 2.67 (95% CI, 2.21-3.23, I2= 0%, P < 0.00001), and no significant evidence of publication bias was found. The difference of chemotherapy regimens of HIPEC was not associated with OS and DFS (disease-free survival) after CRS and HIPEC, with no significant difference of heterogeneity (P = 0.27, I2 = 24.1%). In both groups of mitomycin C based HIPEC group and oxaliplatin group, patients received HIPEC had significant better survival (P < 0.00001). The mean mortality and morbidity for HIPEC program were 2.8% and 33.0%, respectively. Conclusions This meta-analysis revealed that comprehensive therapeutic strategy of CRS plus HIPEC could bring survival benefit for selected patients with PC from CRC with acceptable safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Qun Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center & Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Yao Min
- Department of Ophthalmology, Central Hospital of Wuhan Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Shu-Yi Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center & Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Xiao-Jun Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center & Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Yang Liu
- NPO to Support Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Osaka, Japan
| | - Bin Xiong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center & Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Yutaka Yonemura
- NPO to Support Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center & Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Wuhan, P.R. China.,Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital of the Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rovers KP, Simkens GA, Punt CJ, van Dieren S, Tanis PJ, de Hingh IH. Perioperative systemic therapy for resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: Sufficient evidence for its widespread use? A critical systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2017; 114:53-62. [PMID: 28477747 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2016] [Revised: 01/17/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Despite its widespread use, no randomised studies have investigated the value of perioperative systemic therapy as adjunct to cytoreduction and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases. This systematic review evaluated the available evidence, which consists of non-randomised studies only. METHODS A systematic search identified studies that investigated the influence of neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or perioperative systemic therapy on overall survival (OS). RESULTS The 11 included studies (n=1708) were clinically heterogeneous and subject to selection bias. Studies on neoadjuvant systemic therapy revealed OS benefit (n=3), no OS benefit (n=1), and superiority of chemotherapy with bevacizumab vs. chemotherapy (n=2). Studies on adjuvant systemic therapy showed no OS benefit (n=3). Studies on perioperative systemic therapy demonstrated OS benefit (n=1), and superiority of modern vs. conventional systemic therapy(n=1). CONCLUSION Significant limitations of available evidence question the widespread use of perioperative systemic therapy in this setting, stress the need for randomised studies, and impede conclusions regarding optimal timing and regimens. Included studies may suggest a survival benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kermanshahi TR, Magge D, Choudry H, Ramalingam L, Zhu B, Pingpank J, Ahrendt S, Holtzman M, Zeh H, Bartlett D, Zureikat A, Pai RK. Mucinous and Signet Ring Cell Differentiation Affect Patterns of Metastasis in Colorectal Carcinoma and Influence Survival. Int J Surg Pathol 2016; 25:108-117. [DOI: 10.1177/1066896916664990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Peritoneal metastasis in colorectal carcinoma is associated with a dismal prognosis; however, features that correlate with patterns of metastatic spread are not well characterized. We analyzed the clinicopathologic and molecular features of 166 patients with colorectal carcinomas stratified by metastases to the peritoneum or liver. Mucinous and signet ring cell differentiation were more frequently observed in colorectal carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination compared to colorectal carcinoma with liver metastasis (mucinous differentiation: 62% vs 23%, P < .001; signet ring cell differentiation: 21% vs 0%, P < .0001). The significant association of mucinous differentiation with peritoneal dissemination compared with liver metastasis was identified in patients with both synchronous and metachronous development of metastasis ( P < .01). In contrast, colorectal carcinomas with liver metastasis were more frequently low-grade (90% vs 72%, P = .005) and associated with dirty necrosis (81% vs 56%, P = .001) compared with colorectal carcinomas with peritoneal dissemination. No significant differences were identified between colorectal carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis versus liver metastasis with respect to KRAS mutations, BRAF mutation, or high levels of microsatellite instability. Patients with tumors involving the peritoneum had a significantly worse overall survival in comparison to patients with liver metastasis lacking peritoneal involvement ( P = .02). When including only those patients with peritoneal metastasis, the presence of any mucinous or signet ring cell differentiation was associated with a significantly worse overall survival ( P = .006). Our findings indicate that mucinous and signet ring cell differentiation may be histologic features that are associated with an increased risk of peritoneal dissemination and poor overall survival in patients with peritoneal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deepa Magge
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Haroon Choudry
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Benjamin Zhu
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James Pingpank
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Steven Ahrendt
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Herbert Zeh
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Bartlett
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer Zureikat
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Reetesh K. Pai
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Simkens GA, van Oudheusden TR, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Rutten HJ, Luyer MD, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. Development of a Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with Peritoneally Metastasized Colorectal Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:4214-4221. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5211-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
38
|
Simkens GA, Razenberg LG, Lemmens VE, Rutten HJ, Creemers GJ, de Hingh IH. Histological subtype and systemic metastases strongly influence treatment and survival in patients with synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:794-800. [PMID: 27055946 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 03/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment possibilities for colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) are increasing. It is however unclear how treatment choice and outcome are influenced by histological subtype and the presence of systemic metastases. Therefore, this study assessed the impact of histological subtype and systemic metastases on treatment choice and survival in patients with colorectal PM. METHODS This population-based study included patients with synchronous PM originating from colorectal adenocarcinoma (AC), mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC), or signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). Data of patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2014 were extracted from the National Cancer Registry (IKNL) of the Netherlands. Treatment strategy and survival were analyzed with logistic regression and cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS In total, 5516 patients were included, of whom 71.8% had an AC, 21.2% an MC, and 7.0% had an SRCC. The use of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was dependent on histological subtype and the presence of systemic metastases, and increased over time, especially in AC and MC patients. The relative survival gain of CRS + HIPEC, corrected for systemic metastases, was comparable in AC, MC, and SRCC patients (hazard ratio: 0.17, 0.21, and 0.13, respectively). Compared to supportive care only, the absolute survival gain was 30, 35, and 18 months, respectively. Systemic therapy improved survival in all histological subtypes. CONCLUSIONS Histological subtype and the presence of systemic metastases strongly influenced treatment choice and survival in patients with synchronous colorectal PM. These results can be used to optimize treatment strategy for patients with synchronous colorectal PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A Simkens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - L G Razenberg
- Department of Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), PO Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V E Lemmens
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), PO Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J Rutten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - G-J Creemers
- Department of Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - I H de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Newton AD, Bartlett EK, Karakousis GC. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a review of factors contributing to morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 7:99-111. [PMID: 26941988 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with prolonged survival for appropriately selected patients with peritoneal dissemination of abdominal malignancies. CRS and HIPEC has been criticized for perceived high rates of morbidity and mortality. Morbidity and mortality rates of CRS and HIPEC, however, do not appear dissimilar to those of other large abdominal surgeries, particularly when relevant patient and operative factors are accounted for. The risk of morbidity and mortality following this surgery for a given individual can be predicted in part by a variety of patient and operative factors. While strong data are lacking, the limited data that exists on the matter suggests that the independent contribution of the heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy to CRS and HIPEC morbidity is relatively small. A more thorough understanding of the patient and operative factors associated with CRS and HIPEC morbidity and mortality, as well as the specific complications related to the intraperitoneal chemotherapy, can better inform clinicians in multidisciplinary teams and patients alike in the decision-making for this surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Newton
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Edmund K Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lungoci C, Mironiuc AI, Muntean V, Oniu T, Leebmann H, Mayr M, Piso P. Multimodality treatment strategies have changed prognosis of peritoneal metastases. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 8:67-82. [PMID: 26798438 PMCID: PMC4714147 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i1.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Revised: 09/22/2015] [Accepted: 11/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
For a long time, treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM) was mostly palliative and thus, this status was link with “terminal status/despair”. The current multimodal treatment strategy, consisting of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), has been strenuously achieved over time, but seems to be the best treatment option for PM patients. As we reviewed the literature data, we could emphasize some milestones and also, controversies in the history of proposed multimodal treatment and thus, outline the philosophy of this approach, which seems to be an unusual one indeed. Initially marked by nihilism and fear, but benefiting from a remarkable joint effort of human and material resources (multi-center and -institutional research), over a period of 30 years, CRS and HIPEC found their place in the treatment of PM. The next 4 years were dedicated to the refinement of the multimodal treatment, by launching research pathways. In selected patients, with requires training, it demonstrated a significant survival results (similar to the Hepatic Metastases treatment), with acceptable risks and costs. The main debates regarding CRS and HIPEC treatment were based on the oncologists’ perspective and the small number of randomized clinical trials. It is important to statement the PM patient has the right to be informed of the existence of CRS and HIPEC, as a real treatment resource, the decision being made by multidisciplinary teams.
Collapse
|
41
|
Guend H, Patel S, Nash GM. Abdominal metastases from colorectal cancer: intraperitoneal therapy. J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 6:693-8. [PMID: 26697203 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer represent a distinct subset with regional disease rather than systemic disease. They often have poorer survival outcomes with systemic chemotherapy. Optimal cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) offers such patients a more directed therapy with improved survival. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis, evaluation and classification, as well as rational for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) secondary to colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamza Guend
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Sunil Patel
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Heaney RM, Shields C, Mulsow J. Outcome following incomplete surgical cytoreduction combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 7:445-454. [PMID: 26688707 PMCID: PMC4678391 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i12.445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2015] [Revised: 06/20/2015] [Accepted: 10/09/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy can improve survival in appropriately selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. Outcomes are best in those patients in whom a complete cytoreduction can be achieved. Unresectable disease is however encountered in approximately one-quarter of patients at laparotomy. The merits, or otherwise, of proceeding with an incomplete cytoreduction in this setting are unclear. We performed a review of published outcomes following incomplete cytoreduction for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Using the electronic databases, PubMed and MEDLINE, a systematic search of available literature published during the period January 1997 to September 2014 was conducted. Following application of exclusion criteria, 19 papers were identified and included in this review. These comprised fifteen case series, 3 case control studies and one randomised control trial. In the nineteen studies included in this review, 2790 patients underwent cytoreductive surgery with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin. Of these, 1732 (62%) underwent a complete cytoreduction while 986 (35%) patients underwent an incomplete cytoreduction. Median survival in the complete cytoreduction group ranged from 11 to 62 mo while survival in the latter group ranged from 2.4 to 32 mo. Of the 986 patients with an incomplete cytoreduction, 331 patients received intraperitoneal chemotherapy and survival in this cohort ranged from 4.5 to 32 mo. An incomplete cytoreduction, with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy, does not appear to confer a survival benefit. The limited available data points to a palliative benefit in a subset of patients. In the absence of high quality data, the decision as to whether or not to proceed with surgery should be made on an individual patient basis.
Collapse
|
43
|
Mogal HD, Levine EA, Russell G, Shen P, Stewart JH, Votanopoulos KI. Conditional Survival After Cytoreductive Surgery with Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Low- and High-Grade Appendiceal Primaries. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 23:534-8. [PMID: 26289808 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4821-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Survival of patients after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendiceal neoplasms is projected by conventional overall survival (OS) curves that do not address the survival time a patient has already accrued. We sought to study the conditional survival (CS) after CRS, contingent on patients surviving a fixed duration of time after surgery. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 493 appendiceal cancer patients from a prospective database was performed. OS was calculated for patients who achieved a complete CRS. CS was estimated based on Kaplan-Meier curves to determine what the patient's long-term survival (3-, 5-, 7-, or 10-year) would be if they were alive at 1, 2, or 3 years from surgery. RESULTS OS at 5 and 10 years for 137 low-grade patients with complete resections was 83.3 and 74.2 %, respectively. For low-grade patients still alive at 3 years, 5- and 10-year CS was 93.4 and 83.2 %, respectively. For the 35 high-grade patients with complete CRS who survived to 3 years, CS at 10 years was 41.7 %, while their 10-year conventional OS was 24.6 %. CONCLUSIONS Conventional analysis underestimates OS due to unpredictable variations in tumor biology. When adjusted for time already elapsed since surgery, improvements in survival estimates are more pronounced with high-grade tumors. CS outcomes can be used in determining the optimal frequency of long-term follow-up of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harveshp D Mogal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| | - Edward A Levine
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Greg Russell
- Department of Biostatistics, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Perry Shen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - John H Stewart
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nagtegaal ID, Hugen N. The Increasing Relevance of Tumour Histology in Determining Oncological Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2015; 11:259-266. [PMID: 26321889 PMCID: PMC4550646 DOI: 10.1007/s11888-015-0280-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is not just one type of cancer. Differences in outcome and reaction to treatment can at least be partly explained by different histological and molecular subtypes. Recognition of these differences may influence treatment decisions. However, there is huge variation in the amount of information that is available. Several tumour types such as mucinous carcinoma, signet ring cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma have such a distinct phenotype that they are readily recognised. However, due to the rarity of signet ring cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma, limited data are available. More recently defined subtypes, like medullary carcinoma, serrated adenocarcinoma and micropapillary carcinoma, are not adequately diagnosed, which limits research possibilities using large-scale data from registries. In the current review, we systematically describe the histologic subtypes with the clinical and molecular background. We evaluate their prognosis compared to adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified and speculate about the clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboudumc, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Niek Hugen
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Incidence and treatment of recurrent disease after cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneally metastasized colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41:1269-77. [PMID: 26175345 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Revised: 05/24/2015] [Accepted: 05/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The optimal treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal origin is a combination of cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + IPC). Although 5-year survival rates of up to 40% have been reported, recurrent disease remains common and is estimated to be a strong negative prognostic factor for survival. This systematic review elaborates on the incidence of recurrent disease and the possibilities to prevent and treat recurrence. METHODS Two searches were performed. To identify the magnitude of recurrent the disease, a search was performed in Pubmed and EMBASE until September 2014. A second search was performed in Pubmed to identify treatment of recurrent disease with secondary CRS + IPC. RESULTS The first search resulted in 139 and 94 articles in Pubmed and EMBASE respectively. Among those, 28 were included. Overall recurrence rates ranged from 22.5 to 82%. Local, systemic and combined local-systemic recurrence ranged from 6 to 42.5%, 10.4-43% and 5.8-21.5%. Median time to recurrence varied from 9 to 23 months, three-year disease free survival ranged from 14 to 41.5%. The second search resulted in 140 articles among which 17 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 190 patients underwent secondary CRS. Median survival after the second procedure ranged from 18 to 55.7 months. One, two and three-year survival ranged between 66 and 94, 44-50 and 0-66%. CONCLUSION Recurrence is very common after cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for PC of colorectal origin. Repeat cytoreductive surgery suggests a potential survival benefit for a highly selected group. Therefore, strategies to prevent recurrence are of the utmost importance.
Collapse
|
46
|
van Oudheusden TR, Braam HJ, Luyer MDP, Wiezer MJ, van Ramshorst B, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IHJT. Peritoneal cancer patients not suitable for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC during explorative surgery: risk factors, treatment options, and prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 22:1236-42. [PMID: 25319584 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4148-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is currently the only curative option for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. Despite meticulous preoperative assessment, CRS and HIPEC appear to be impossible in a subset of patients at the time of surgery. This study investigated which clinical factors may identify these patients before surgery and reported on factors influencing survival. METHODS All patients with PC of colorectal origin between April 2005 and November 2013 who underwent exploratory surgery to determine whether cytoreduction and HIPEC was feasible were included in this study. Details concerning preoperative patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, treatment and survival were compared. RESULTS In total, 350 patients with PC were referred to evaluate the possibility of CRS + HIPEC of which 268 (76.6 %) underwent CRS and HIPEC and 82 (23.4 %) had an open-close procedure. The main reason for discontinuing surgery was widespread peritoneal disease (50 %). A preoperative ostomy and an ASA score of 3 were associated with an increased risk for "open and close" (O&C). Median survival was 11.2 months in patients treated with palliative chemotherapy (75 %) compared with 2.7 months with palliative care only. CONCLUSIONS CRS and HIPEC were deemed unsuitable in almost a quarter of all patients undergoing surgery. No strong clinical predictors for O&C were found, stressing the need for better preoperative imaging modalities. Survival in these patients is limited, but the majority could be treated with palliative chemotherapy resulting in survival of almost 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T R van Oudheusden
- Department of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
van Oudheusden T, Braam H, Nienhuijs S, Wiezer M, van Ramshorst B, Luyer P, de Hingh I. Poor outcome after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis with signet ring cell histology. J Surg Oncol 2014; 111:237-42. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.23784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2014] [Accepted: 08/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - H.J. Braam
- Department of Surgery; St. Antonius Hospital; Nieuwegein The Netherlands
| | - S.W. Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery; Catharina Hospital; Eindhoven The Netherlands
| | - M.J. Wiezer
- Department of Surgery; St. Antonius Hospital; Nieuwegein The Netherlands
| | - B. van Ramshorst
- Department of Surgery; St. Antonius Hospital; Nieuwegein The Netherlands
| | - P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery; Catharina Hospital; Eindhoven The Netherlands
| | - I.H. de Hingh
- Department of Surgery; Catharina Hospital; Eindhoven The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Baumgartner JM, Tobin L, Heavey SF, Kelly KJ, Roeland EJ, Lowy AM. Predictors of progression in high-grade appendiceal or colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 22:1716-21. [PMID: 25145504 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3985-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term survival of patients with appendiceal or colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) may be achieved by combining cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). Unfortunately, such favorable outcomes are realized in a minority of patients. Given the morbidity of the CRS/HIPEC and the uncertain role of postresection systemic therapy, it is important that prognostic factors in high-grade PC be clearly defined. METHODS This single center, retrospective, cohort study examined the outcomes of CRS/HIPEC performed on patients with high-grade PC secondary to appendiceal or colorectal adenocarcinoma between 2007 and 2013. Cox regression analysis was utilized to evaluate the association between potential prognostic factors [age, sex, primary site, lymph node (LN) status, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, completeness of cytoreduction score (CC score), number of visceral resections, and systemic chemotherapy] and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS A total of 70 patients with high-grade appendiceal or colorectal PC underwent CRS/HIPEC during the study period; 82.9 % underwent complete (CC-0) cytoreduction with a median PFS of 9.7 months. Positive LNs at the time of CRS/HIPEC were predictors of worse PFS on univariate and multivariate analysis. No association was demonstrated between pre- or post-HIPEC systemic chemotherapy and PFS. CONCLUSIONS High-grade PC secondary to appendiceal or colorectal adenocarcinoma can be managed with CRS/HIPEC. The number of LN metastases at the time of CRS/HIPEC is the strongest predictor of progression and must be considered when determining patient eligibility for this aggressive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel M Baumgartner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|