1
|
Contel IJ, Fonseca-Alves CE, Ferrari HF, Laufer-Amorim R, Xavier-Júnior JCC. Review of the comparative pathological and immunohistochemical features of human and canine cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms. J Comp Pathol 2024; 211:26-35. [PMID: 38761560 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2024.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
Melanocytic neoplasms originate from melanocytes and melanoma, the malignant form, is a common canine neoplasm and the most aggressive human skin cancer. Despite many similarities between these neoplasms in both species, only a limited number of studies have approached these entities in a comparative manner. Therefore, this review compares benign and malignant melanocytic neoplasms in dogs and humans, exclusively those arising in the haired skin, with regard to their clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular aspects. Shared features include spontaneous occurrence, macroscopic features and microscopic findings when comparing human skin melanoma in the advanced/invasive stage and canine cutaneous melanoma, immunohistochemical markers and several histopathological prognostic factors. Differences include the apparent absence of active mutations in the BRAF gene in canine cutaneous melanoma and less aggressive clinical behaviour in dogs than in humans. Further studies are required to elucidate the aetiology and genetic development pathways of canine cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms. Evaluation of the applicability of histopathological prognostic parameters commonly used in humans for dogs are also needed. The similarities between the species and the recent findings regarding genetic mutations in canine cutaneous melanomas suggest the potential utility of dogs as a natural model for human melanomas that are not related to ultraviolet radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabeli J Contel
- Department of Pathology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, Av. Prof. Mário R. Guimarães Montenegro, s/n, Campus Botucatu, 18618-687, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
| | - Carlos E Fonseca-Alves
- Institute of Health Sciences, Paulista University, Rua Luiz Levorato, 140, Jardim Marabá, 17048-290, Bauru, SP, Brazil
| | - Heitor F Ferrari
- University Center of Adamantina, Rua Nove de Julho, 730, Centro, 17800-057, Adamantina, SP, Brazil
| | - Renee Laufer-Amorim
- Department of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, Campus de Botucatu, 18618-681, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
| | - José C C Xavier-Júnior
- Department of Pathology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, Av. Prof. Mário R. Guimarães Montenegro, s/n, Campus Botucatu, 18618-687, Botucatu, SP, Brazil; Salesian Catholic University Center Auxilium, Medical School, Rod. Sen. Teotônio Vilela, 3821, Jardim Alvorada, 16016-500, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vița O, Jurescu A, Văduva A, Cornea R, Cornianu M, Tăban S, Szilagyi D, Micșescu C, Natarâș B, Dema A. Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma: Evaluating the Prognostic Significance of Some Parameters Associated with Lymph Node Metastases. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1241. [PMID: 37512052 PMCID: PMC10385614 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59071241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the clinical-pathological profile of patients with invasive cutaneous melanomas and to identify the parameters with a prognostic role in the lymph nodal spread of this malignant tumor. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study on patients with invasive cutaneous melanomas who underwent surgery in the "Pius Brînzeu" County Clinical Emergency Hospital from Timișoara, Romania, and were evaluated for the status of loco-regional lymph nodes. We selected and analyzed some parameters searching for their relationship with lymph node metastases. Results: We identified 79 patients with invasive cutaneous melanomas (29 men and 50 women, mean age 59.36 years). A percentage of 58.3% of melanomas had Breslow tumor thickness >2 mm; 69.6% of melanomas showed a Clark level IV-V. Tumor ulceration was present in 59.5% of melanomas. A mitotic rate of ≥5 mitoses/mm2 was observed in 48.1% of melanomas. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), non-brisk, were present in 59.5% of cases and 22.8% of patients had satellite/in-transit metastasis (SINTM). Tumor regression was identified in 44.3% of cases. Lymph nodes metastases were found in 43.1% of patients. Statistical analysis showed that lymph node metastases were more frequent in melanomas with Breslow thickness >2 mm (p = 0.0002), high Clark level (p = 0.0026), mitotic rate >5 mitoses/mm2 (p = 0.0044), ulceration (p = 0.0107), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.0182), SINTM (p = 0.0302), and non-brisk TILs (p = 0.0302). Conclusions: The Breslow thickness >2 mm, high Clark level, high mitotic rate and ulceration are the most important prognostic factors for lymph nodal spread in cutaneous melanomas. However, some melanomas without these clinical-pathological features can have an unexpected, aggressive evolution, which entails the necessity of close and prolonged clinical follow-up of patients, including those with lesions considered without risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Octavia Vița
- Department of Microscopic Morphology-Morphopatology, ANAPATMOL Research Center, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Aura Jurescu
- Department of Microscopic Morphology-Morphopatology, ANAPATMOL Research Center, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Adrian Văduva
- Department of Microscopic Morphology-Morphopatology, ANAPATMOL Research Center, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
- Department of Pathology, "Pius Brînzeu" County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Remus Cornea
- Department of Microscopic Morphology-Morphopatology, ANAPATMOL Research Center, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
- Department of Pathology, "Pius Brînzeu" County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Marioara Cornianu
- Department of Microscopic Morphology-Morphopatology, ANAPATMOL Research Center, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
- Department of Pathology, "Pius Brînzeu" County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Sorina Tăban
- Department of Microscopic Morphology-Morphopatology, ANAPATMOL Research Center, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
- Department of Pathology, "Pius Brînzeu" County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Diana Szilagyi
- Department of Pathology, "Pius Brînzeu" County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Cristian Micșescu
- Department of Microscopic Morphology-Morphopatology, ANAPATMOL Research Center, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Bianca Natarâș
- Department of Microscopic Morphology-Morphopatology, ANAPATMOL Research Center, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
- Department of Pathology, "Pius Brînzeu" County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Alis Dema
- Department of Microscopic Morphology-Morphopatology, ANAPATMOL Research Center, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
- Department of Pathology, "Pius Brînzeu" County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timișoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Allard-Coutu A, Dobson V, Schmitz E, Shah H, Nessim C. The Evolution of the Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13020489. [PMID: 36836846 PMCID: PMC9966203 DOI: 10.3390/life13020489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The growing repertoire of approved immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy has revolutionized the adjuvant treatment of melanoma. While the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma remains wide local excision (WLE), the management of regional lymph nodes continues to evolve in light of practice-changing clinical trials and dramatically improved adjuvant therapy. With large multicenter studies reporting no benefit in overall survival for completion lymph node dissection (CLND) after a positive sentinel node biopsy (SLNB), controversy remains regarding patient selection and clinical decision-making. This review explores the evolution of the SLNB in cutaneous melanoma in the context of a rapidly changing adjuvant treatment landscape, summarizing the key clinical trials which shaped current practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Allard-Coutu
- Department of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Erika Schmitz
- Department of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Hely Shah
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Carolyn Nessim
- Department of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prognostic role of microsatellites in melanoma and implications in the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification system: A cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:338-347. [PMID: 36265824 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited information on microsatellite survival outcomes in patients with melanoma. OBJECTIVE To evaluate survival outcomes in patients with microsatellites, assess their role within stage III stratification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification, and assess the results of sentinel lymph node biopsies in patients with microsatellites. METHODS A retrospective bicenter cohort study from 1998 to 2019 included patients with a diagnosis of invasive cutaneous melanoma. RESULTS Of a total of 5216 patients, 108 (2.1%) had microsatellites at initial staging. Survival analysis showed that microsatellites were an independent risk factor with decreased overall survival (OS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and disease-free survival, with hazard ratios of 1.57, 1.76, and 1.76, respectively. Stratified analysis in patients with stage III melanoma showed a 5-year OS of 35% (95% CI, 17.3%-73.4%) and a MSS of 45% (95% CI, 23.1-87.5) for patients with stage IIIB melanoma with microsatellites. LIMITATIONS Retrospective design of the study. CONCLUSION Microsatellites were associated with other adverse melanoma prognostic factors. A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that they are an independent risk factor for worse OS, MSS, and disease-free survival. Patients with stage IIIB melanoma with microsatellites had worse OS and MSS, whereas patients with stage IIIC melanoma had worse OS but not MSS.
Collapse
|
5
|
Tissue Biomarkers Predicting Lymph Node Status in Cutaneous Melanoma. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 24:ijms24010144. [PMID: 36613587 PMCID: PMC9820052 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is a severe neoplasm that shows early invasiveness of the lymph nodes draining the primary site, with increased risk of distant metastases and recurrence. The tissue biomarker identification could be a new frontier to predict the risk of early lymph node invasiveness, especially in cases considered by current guidelines to be at low risk of lymph node involvement and not requiring evaluation of the sentinel lymph node (SLN). For this reason, we present a narrative review of the literature, seeking to provide an overview of current tissue biomarkers, particularly vascular endothelium growth factors (VEGF), Tetraspanin CD9, lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1), D2-40, and gene expression profile test (31-GEP). Among these, 31-GEP seems to be able to provide a distinction between low or high risk for positive SLN classes. VEGF receptor-3 and CD9 expression may be independent predictors of positive SLN. Lastly, LYVE-1 and D2-40 allow an easier assessment of lymph vascular invasion, which can be considered a good predictor of SLN status. In conclusion, biomarkers to assess the lymph node status of cutaneous melanoma patients may play an important role in those cases where the clinician is in doubt whether or not to perform SLN biopsy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sharp O, Garioch J, Moncrieff M. Seasonal variation in high-risk phenotypes of cutaneous malignant melanoma diagnosed in Eastern England: An observational study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:1923-1930. [PMID: 35153165 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite seasonal variation in malignant melanoma diagnosis being well described, data on the annual variation in high-risk melanomas are scarce. OBJECTIVES We set out to investigate the relationship between seasonality, the incidence of melanoma, and the distribution of melanoma characteristics, including Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and the presence of microsatellites. METHODS Primary cutaneous malignant melanomas diagnosed between 2011 and 2019 in Eastern England were identified from our prospectively maintained melanoma database (n = 2199). These were analysed by year and season of diagnosis, patient demographics, and melanoma characteristics. RESULTS There was a variation in rates of melanoma diagnosis across the year, with Summer having the highest incidence (p < 0.0001). There was a significant trend towards more male than female diagnosis in Winter (p = 0.0354). There were no significant seasonal trends in Breslow thickness, ulceration, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes, or mitotic rate. Multivariate analysis showed that microsatellites were more likely to be diagnosed in the Winter (OR=2.00 (1.19-3.43), p = 0.010), lymphovascular invasion significantly more likely to be diagnosed in Autumn (OR=1.78 (1.16-2.76), p = 0.009), and perineural invasion was more likely to be diagnosed in the Summer (OR=0.44 (0.23-0.79), p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS These data confirm that high-risk phenotypes are associated with increasing Breslow thickness and mitotic rate. However, season variability as an independent risk factor for the phenotypes is a novel finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Sharp
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, England NR4 7UY, UK.
| | - J Garioch
- Department of Dermatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, England NR4 7UY, UK
| | - M Moncrieff
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, England NR4 7UY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang H, Fu Z, Ji J, Huang J, Long X. Predictive Values of Pathological and Clinical Risk Factors for Positivity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:817510. [PMID: 35155254 PMCID: PMC8829564 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.817510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for thin melanoma are still unclear. This meta-analysis aims to determine the positive rate of SLNB in thin melanoma and to summarize the predictive value of different high-risk features for positive results of SLNB. Methods Four databases were searched for literature on SLNB performed in patients with thin melanoma published between January 2000 and December 2020. The overall positive rate and positive rate of each high-risk feature were calculated and obtained with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Both unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted ORs (AORs) of high-risk features were analyzed. Pooled effects were estimated using random-effects model meta-analyses. Results Sixty-six studies reporting 38,844 patients with thin melanoma who underwent SLNB met the inclusion criteria. The pooled positive rate of SLNB was 5.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9%-5.3%]. Features significantly predicted a positive result of SLNB were thickness≥0.8 mm [AOR 1.94 (95%CI 1.28-2.95); positive rate 7.0% (95%CI 6.0-8.0%)]; ulceration [AOR 3.09 (95%CI 1.75-5.44); positive rate 4.2% (95%CI 1.8-7.2%)]; mitosis rate >0/mm2 [AOR 1.63 (95%CI 1.13-2.36); positive rate 7.7% (95%CI 6.3-9.1%)]; microsatellites [OR 3.8 (95%CI 1.38-10.47); positive rate 16.6% (95%CI 2.4-36.6%)]; and vertical growth phase [OR 2.76 (95%CI 1.72-4.43); positive rate 8.1% (95%CI 6.3-10.1%)]. Conclusions The overall positive rate of SLNB in thin melanoma was 5.1%. The strongest predictor for SLN positivity identified was microsatellites on unadjusted analysis and ulceration on adjusted analysis. Breslow thickness ≥0.8 mm and mitosis rate >0/mm2 both predict SLN positivity in adjusted analysis and increase the positive rate to 7.0% and 7.7%. We suggest patients with thin melanoma with the above high-risk features should be considered for giving an SLNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanzi Huang
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ziyao Fu
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiang Ji
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiuzuo Huang
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Long
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yaney AC, Rossfeld KK, Wu TC, Agnese DM, Terando AM, Wuthrick EJ, Howard JH. Adjuvant Radiation Does Not Affect Locoregional Control Following Resection of Melanoma Satellitosis or In-Transit Disease. Am Surg 2021:31348211047492. [PMID: 34645291 DOI: 10.1177/00031348211047492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the association of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) with improved locoregional (LR) recurrence for resected melanoma satellitosis and in-transit disease (ITD). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were collected retrospectively for resected melanoma satellitosis/ITD from 1996 to 2017. RESULTS 99 patients were identified. 20 patients (20.2%) received adjuvant RT while 79 (79.8%) did not. Mean follow-up in the RT group was 4.3 years and 4.7 years in the non-RT group. 80% of patients who underwent RT suffered a complication, most commonly dermatitis. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 9 patients (45%) treated with adjuvant RT and 30 patients (38%) in the non-RT group (P = 0.805). Median LR-DFS was 5.8 years in the RT group and 9.5 years in the non-RT group (P = 0.604). On multivariable analysis, having a close or positive margin was the only independent predictor of LR-DFS (HR 3.8 95% CI 1.7-8.7). In-transit disease was associated with improved overall survival when compared to satellitosis (HR 0.260, 95% CI 0.08-0.82). DISCUSSION The use of adjuvant RT is not associated with improved locoregional control in resected melanoma satellitosis or ITD. Close or positive margin was the only treatment-related factor associated with decreased LR-DFS after surgical resection of satellitosis/ITD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander C Yaney
- 12306The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kara K Rossfeld
- 12306The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Trudy C Wu
- 21767UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Doreen M Agnese
- 12306The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Evan J Wuthrick
- 25301H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John H Howard
- 21822University of South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Subramanian S, Han G, Olson N, Leong SP, Kashani-Sabet M, White RL, Zager JS, Sondak VK, Messina JL, Pockaj B, Kosiorek HE, Vetto J, Fowler G, Schneebaum S, Han D. Regression is significantly associated with outcomes for patients with melanoma. Surgery 2021; 170:1487-1494. [PMID: 34120749 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic significance of regression in melanoma is debated. We present a large multicenter study correlating regression with sentinel lymph node metastasis and melanoma-specific survival. METHODS The Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group database was reviewed from 1993 to 2018. Patients with known regression and sentinel lymph node status were included. Clinicopathologic factors were correlated with regression, sentinel lymph node status, and melanoma-specific survival. RESULTS There were 4,790 patients; median follow-up was 39.6 months. Regression was present in 1,081 (22.6%) cases, and 798 (16.7%) patients had sentinel lymph node metastases. On multivariable analysis, male sex, truncal tumors, and decreasing thickness were significantly associated with regression (P < .05), whereas head/neck or leg tumors had lower rates of regression (P < .05). Regression was significantly correlated with a decreased risk of sentinel lymph node disease on multivariable analysis (odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.85; P = .0008). Multivariable analysis also showed that increasing age, male sex, increasing thickness, ulceration, lymphovascular invasion, microsatellitosis, and sentinel lymph node metastasis were significantly (P < .05) associated with worse melanoma-specific survival, while regression was significantly associated with better melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.99; P = .043). CONCLUSION This large study shows that regression is significantly associated with better outcomes in patients with melanoma and is correlated with a lower risk of sentinel lymph node metastasis and a better melanoma-specific survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarayu Subramanian
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR. https://twitter.com/dr_Sarayu
| | - Gang Han
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX
| | - Natalie Olson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX
| | - Stanley P Leong
- California Pacific Medical Center and Research Institute, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Richard L White
- Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | - John Vetto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Graham Fowler
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | | | - Dale Han
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Broman KK, Hughes TM, Dossett LA, Sun J, Carr MJ, Kirichenko DA, Sharma A, Bartlett EK, Nijhuis AA, Thompson JF, Hieken TJ, Kottschade L, Downs J, Gyorki DE, Stahlie E, van Akkooi A, Ollila DW, Frank J, Song Y, Karakousis G, Moncrieff M, Nobes J, Vetto J, Han D, Farma J, Deneve JL, Fleming MD, Perez M, Baecher K, Lowe M, Bagge RO, Mattsson J, Lee AY, Berman RS, Chai H, Kroon HM, Teras RM, Teras J, Farrow NE, Beasley GM, Hui JY, Been L, Kruijff S, Boulware D, Sarnaik AA, Sondak VK, Zager JS. Surveillance of Sentinel Node-Positive Melanoma Patients with Reasons for Exclusion from MSLT-II: Multi-Institutional Propensity Score Matched Analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2021; 232:424-431. [PMID: 33316427 PMCID: PMC8764869 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma, two randomized trials demonstrated equivalent melanoma-specific survival with nodal surveillance vs completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Patients with microsatellites, extranodal extension (ENE) in the SLN, or >3 positive SLNs constitute a high-risk group largely excluded from the randomized trials, for whom appropriate management remains unknown. STUDY DESIGN SLN-positive patients with any of the three high-risk features were identified from an international cohort. CLND patients were matched 1:1 with surveillance patients using propensity scores. Risk of any-site recurrence, SLN-basin-only recurrence, and melanoma-specific mortality were compared. RESULTS Among 1,154 SLN-positive patients, 166 had ENE, microsatellites, and/or >3 positive SLN. At 18.5 months median follow-up, 49% had recurrence (vs 26% in patients without high-risk features, p < 0.01). Among high-risk patients, 52 (31%) underwent CLND and 114 (69%) received surveillance. Fifty-one CLND patients were matched to 51 surveillance patients. The matched cohort was balanced on tumor, nodal, and adjuvant treatment factors. There were no significant differences in any-site recurrence (CLND 49%, surveillance 45%, p = 0.99), SLN-basin-only recurrence (CLND 6%, surveillance 14%, p = 0.20), or melanoma-specific mortality (CLND 14%, surveillance 12%, p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS SLN-positive patients with microsatellites, ENE, or >3 positive SLN constitute a high-risk group with a 2-fold greater recurrence risk. For those managed with nodal surveillance, SLN-basin recurrences were more frequent, but all-site recurrence and melanoma-specific mortality were comparable to patients treated with CLND. Most recurrences were outside the SLN-basin, supporting use of nodal surveillance for SLN-positive patients with microsatellites, ENE, and/or >3 positive SLN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristy K Broman
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
| | - Tasha M Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - James Sun
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Avinash Sharma
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Edmund K Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amanda Ag Nijhuis
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Lisa Kottschade
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jennifer Downs
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David E Gyorki
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emma Stahlie
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander van Akkooi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David W Ollila
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jill Frank
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Yun Song
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Marc Moncrieff
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny Nobes
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - John Vetto
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Dale Han
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Jeffrey Farma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeremiah L Deneve
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Martin D Fleming
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Matthew Perez
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Michael Lowe
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Mattsson
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ann Y Lee
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | | | - Harvey Chai
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Roland M Teras
- Surgery Clinic, North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Juri Teras
- Surgery Clinic, North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | | | - Jane Yc Hui
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Lukas Been
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Schelto Kruijff
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - David Boulware
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Amod A Sarnaik
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Vernon K Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Han D, Han G, Duque MT, Morrison S, Leong SP, Kashani-Sabet M, Vetto J, White R, Schneebaum S, Pockaj B, Mozzillo N, Sondak VK, Zager JS. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Is Prognostic in Thickest Melanoma Cases and Should Be Performed for Thick Melanomas. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:1007-1016. [PMID: 32524460 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08706-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended for intermediate thickness melanoma, but for thick melanoma, guidelines are less definitive about the use of SLNB in this population. We present a study on thick melanoma evaluating for prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group database was queried for thick (> 4 mm) melanoma cases that had a SLNB from 1993 to 2018. Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with SLN status and melanoma-specific survival (MSS). RESULTS There were 1235 patients. Median follow-up was 28 months. Median thickness was 5.9 mm, with 956, 175, and 104 cases presenting thickness > 4-8, > 8-12, and > 12 mm, respectively. SLN metastases were seen in 439 of 1235 (35.5%) cases and in 33.9%, 40.6%, and 42.3% of melanomas > 4-8, > 8-12, and > 12 mm, respectively. In each thickness group, MSS was significantly worse for SLN-positive compared with SLN-negative cases (all P < 0.005). Multivariable analysis showed that SLN metastasis, male gender, increasing thickness, lymphovascular invasion, and microsatellitosis significantly predicted worse MSS for melanomas > 4-8 mm, with SLN metastasis showing the greatest risk (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.64-2.87, P < 0.0001). For melanomas > 8 mm, only SLN metastasis significantly predicted MSS (> 8-12 mm: HR 3.93, 95% CI 2.00-7.73, P < 0.0001; > 12 mm: HR 3.58, 95% CI 1.56-8.22, p < 0.0027). CONCLUSIONS Thick melanoma patients with SLN metastasis have significantly worse MSS compared with SLN-negative patients, even in the thickest cases, and SLN status is the most powerful and/or only predictor of MSS. Given these results, SLNB shows important prognostic value in this population and is indicated for clinically localized thick melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dale Han
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Gang Han
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Monica T Duque
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Steven Morrison
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Stanley P Leong
- California Pacific Medical Center and Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - John Vetto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Richard White
- Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Nicola Mozzillo
- Instituto Tumori Napoli Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Allard-Coutu A, Heller B, Francescutti V. Surgical Management of Lymph Nodes in Melanoma. Surg Clin North Am 2019; 100:71-90. [PMID: 31753117 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive evaluation of surgical management of the lymph node basin in melanoma, with historical, anatomic, and evidence-based recommendations for practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Allard-Coutu
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton Street East, 6 North, Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
| | - Barbara Heller
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton Street East, 6 North, Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
| | - Valerie Francescutti
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton Street East, 6 North, Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lo MC, Heaton MJ, Snelling A, Moncrieff MD. Reconstructive burden and financial implications of wider excision margins for invasive primary cutaneous melanoma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 73:313-318. [PMID: 31680028 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For invasive primary cutaneous melanoma, wider excision is advocated to reduce local recurrence risk and improve patient outcomes. Excision detail is controversial, especially in intermediate- and high-risk primary melanoma (AJCC pT2-pT4). Guidance varies from sizes 1 to 3 cm (translating into large defects of 2-6 cm). The aim of this study was to determine the reconstructive and resource burden of wider excision margins (EMs). METHODS Data analysis from our prospective database (2008-2017) included 1184 patients (563F:621 M) with cutaneous melanoma (pT1b-pT4b). Procedure tariff data were sourced from our financial services department. RESULTS Two hundred twenty-nine patients had a narrower EM (1 cm) and 995 (80.7%) had a wider EM (2-3 cm). Reconstructive requirement significantly increased with a wider EM collectively (11.3% vs 29.3%, odds ratio (OR) = 3.2; p < 0.0001), in the extremities (15.2% vs 42.0%; p < 0.0001), and in the head and neck (H&N) (23.5 % vs 64.7%; p < 0.0001). Reconstruction significantly increased hospitalisation rates (26.6% vs 63.0%, OR = 4.7; p < 0.0001) collectively, in the H&N (26.8 % vs 53.9%), and in the upper (18.9 % vs 42.3%) and lower extremities (34.8% vs 77.3%). Narrower EMs significantly reduced hospitalisation rates in the upper and lower extremities (7.1% vs 28.5%; p = 0.004, 37.9% vs 58.5%; p = 0.005, respectively). Overall procedure cost significantly increased by £180 (mean, p < 0.0001) and £346 (median, p = 0.0004) per patient when reconstruction was required. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest substantial impact of wider EM on patients, which more than doubled in the functionally and cosmetically sensitive extremities and the H&N region. Reconstructions add significant financial and healthcare service burden. Without randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence demonstrating increased efficacy of wider EM, narrower EM is advocated whilst awaiting future planned RCT results specifically investigating on this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Chin Lo
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK.
| | - Martin J Heaton
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK
| | - Andrew Snelling
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK
| | - Marc Ds Moncrieff
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bartlett EK. Current management of regional lymph nodes in patients with melanoma. J Surg Oncol 2018; 119:200-207. [PMID: 30481384 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The publication of recent randomized trials has prompted a significant shift in both our understanding and the management of patients with melanoma. Here, the current management of the regional lymph nodes in patients with melanoma is discussed. This review focuses on selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy, management of the positive sentinel node, management of the clinically positive node, and the controversy over the therapeutic value of early nodal intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund K Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Karakousis GC, Gimotty PA, Leong SP, Pockaj BA, White RL, O’Donoghue C, Sinnamon AJ, Bartlett EK, Dueck AC, Gould Rothberg BE, Messina JL, Vetto JT, Sondak VK, Schneebaum S, Kashani-Sabet M, Han D, Faries MB, Zager JS. Microsatellitosis in Patients with Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:33-41. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-7006-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
16
|
Swetter SM, Tsao H, Bichakjian CK, Curiel-Lewandrowski C, Elder DE, Gershenwald JE, Guild V, Grant-Kels JM, Halpern AC, Johnson TM, Sober AJ, Thompson JA, Wisco OJ, Wyatt S, Hu S, Lamina T. Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 80:208-250. [PMID: 30392755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 320] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of primary cutaneous melanoma continues to increase each year. Melanoma accounts for the majority of skin cancer-related deaths, but treatment is usually curative following early detection of disease. In this American Academy of Dermatology clinical practice guideline, updated treatment recommendations are provided for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 0-IIC and pathologic stage III by virtue of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy). Biopsy techniques for a lesion that is clinically suggestive of melanoma are reviewed, as are recommendations for the histopathologic interpretation of cutaneous melanoma. The use of laboratory, molecular, and imaging tests is examined in the initial work-up of patients with newly diagnosed melanoma and for follow-up of asymptomatic patients. With regard to treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma, recommendations for surgical margins and the concepts of staged excision (including Mohs micrographic surgery) and nonsurgical treatments for melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type (including topical imiquimod and radiation therapy), are updated. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy as a staging technique for cutaneous melanoma is described, with recommendations for its use in clinical practice. Finally, current data regarding pregnancy and melanoma, genetic testing for familial melanoma, and management of dermatologic toxicities related to novel targeted agents and immunotherapies for patients with advanced disease are summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Swetter
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
| | - Hensin Tsao
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher K Bichakjian
- Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski
- Division of Dermatology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
| | - David E Elder
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Jane M Grant-Kels
- Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut; Department of Pathology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut; Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Allan C Halpern
- Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Timothy M Johnson
- Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Arthur J Sober
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John A Thompson
- Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Oliver J Wisco
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Shasa Hu
- Department of Dermatology, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida
| | - Toyin Lamina
- American Academy of Dermatology, Rosemont, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nurdjaja V, Yozu M, Mathy JA. Essential Components of Melanoma Histopathological Reporting: The Surgical Oncologist's Perspective. J Skin Cancer 2018; 2018:9838410. [PMID: 29854464 PMCID: PMC5954935 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9838410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 03/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Histopathological reporting plays a critical role in guiding the surgical oncologist's management plan in treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) espouses various components of structured histopathological reporting as "essential" or "recommended." From a surgical oncologist's perspective, we discuss the clinical relevance of each essential component, as well as prognostic and treatment implications with regard to treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinka Nurdjaja
- University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Masato Yozu
- Histopathology Department, Middlemore Hospital, Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jon A. Mathy
- University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Middlemore Hospital, Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
- New Zealand Melanoma Institute, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nagarajan P, Curry JL, Ning J, Piao J, Torres-Cabala CA, Aung PP, Ivan D, Ross MI, Levenback CF, Frumovitz M, Gershenwald JE, Davies MA, Malpica A, Prieto VG, Tetzlaff MT. Tumor Thickness and Mitotic Rate Robustly Predict Melanoma-Specific Survival in Patients with Primary Vulvar Melanoma: A Retrospective Review of 100 Cases. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 23:2093-2104. [PMID: 27864417 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-2126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 11/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Primary vulvar melanoma (PVM) is the second most common vulvar malignancy. Despite their distinct anatomic site and unique molecular-genetic alterations, PVMs are staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines for primary cutaneous melanomas (PCM). However, whether parameters derived for PCM also apply to PVM remain a critical yet largely unexplored clinical question. The objective of this study was to determine the parameters predictive of survival in PVM.Experimental Design: We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients with PVM and determined associations between clinical and histopathologic parameters and disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS).Results: Univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated older age (>56 years), greater tumor thickness, higher dermal mitotic rate, ulceration, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, microscopic satellitosis, and absence of precursor nevus associated with decreased OS. Furthermore, age, midline, and/or multifocal involvement, greater tumor thickness, higher dermal mitotic rate, ulceration, lack of regression, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and microscopic satellitosis associated with decreased DSS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor thickness, dermal mitotic rate, lymphovascular invasion, microscopic satellitosis, and absence of precursor nevus independently predicted shorter OS. Only tumor thickness and increased dermal mitotic rate (≥2/mm2) independently predicted reduced DSS. In comparison with the AJCC T-category, a novel, bivariate T-category based only on tumor thickness and dermal mitotic rate robustly predicted OS and DSS in our patient cohort.Conclusions: In the largest single institutional study of PVM, we demonstrate a combination of tumor thickness and mitotic rate comprise a simple but robust T-category to direct staging and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res; 23(8); 2093-104. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan L Curry
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jing Ning
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jin Piao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carlos A Torres-Cabala
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Phyu P Aung
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Doina Ivan
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Charles F Levenback
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Translational and Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anais Malpica
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Translational and Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. .,Department of Translational and Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Xie C, Pan Y, McLean C, Mar V, Wolfe R, Kelly JW. Scalp melanoma: Distinctive high risk clinical and histological features. Australas J Dermatol 2016; 58:181-188. [PMID: 26768190 DOI: 10.1111/ajd.12437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2015] [Accepted: 11/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Scalp melanoma has a worse prognosis than melanoma elsewhere, though the reasons for this are poorly understood. Current literature describing the clinicopathological associations of scalp melanoma is sparse. This study aims to compare clinical and histological features of scalp melanoma with other cutaneous head and neck melanomas (CHNM). METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed of all primary CHNM cases seen by the Victorian Melanoma Service between 1994 and 2014, using prospectively recorded clinical data. Invasive and in situ melanomas were compared separately. RESULTS Invasive scalp melanoma was associated with male sex (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9-3.9), increasing age (OR, 1.02 per year increase in age; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), being first noticed by a person other than self, spouse/relative or doctor (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5-5.7), amelanosis (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3), and increased growth rate (OR, 1.14 per 1 mm/month growth rate increase; 95% CI, 1.04-1.26). Compared with other CHNM, scalp melanoma had greater median Breslow thickness (2.8 vs 1.2 mm) and was independently associated with satellite metastases (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.9-11.5) and nodular subtype (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1). In situ scalp melanoma was associated with male sex, increasing age and solar keratoses. CONCLUSION Scalp melanoma tends to occur in older men, is often rapidly growing and amelanotic, and is associated with high risk histological features. As it is likely to be overlooked, increased recognition of the atypical presentations of scalp melanoma is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Xie
- Victorian Melanoma Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yan Pan
- Victorian Melanoma Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catriona McLean
- Victorian Melanoma Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria Mar
- Victorian Melanoma Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rory Wolfe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John W Kelly
- Victorian Melanoma Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Although now commonplace in contemporary cancer care, the systematic approach to classification of disease-specific cancers into a formalized staging system is a relatively modern concept. Overall, the goals of cancer staging are to characterize the status of cancer at a specific moment in time, risk stratify, facilitate prognostication, and inform clinical decision making. The revisions to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system over time reflect changes in our understanding of the biology of the disease. Since the 1st edition, where tumor thickness was defined anatomically by its relationship to the reticular or papillary dermis (Clark level) as well as tumor thickness (Breslow thickness), there have been significant strides in our use of clinicopathological variables to stratify low- versus high-risk patients. Management of the regional nodal basin has also changed dramatically over time, impacted by techniques such as lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and changes in pathological evaluation of the regional lymph nodes. Additionally, stratification of distant metastases has evolved as survival outcomes have been shown to vary based upon anatomic site of metastases and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels. The variables in use in the current (7th edition) AJCC staging system are surrogate markers of biology with validated impact of survival outcomes. Going forward, it is likely that these and additional clinicopathological factors will be integrated with molecular and other correlates of melanoma tumor biology to further refine and personalize melanoma staging.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
The current American Joint Commission for Cancer staging system for melanoma includes thickness, ulceration, and mitotic index as primary tumor factors for patients with stage I and II disease. Number and size of nodal metastases, presence of satellitosis and in-transit disease, and tumor ulceration status categorize patients with stage III disease. Presence and location of distant metastatic disease and increased lactate dehydrogenase level stratify prognosis in patients with stage IV disease. Factors predictive of sentinel lymph node positivity are also studied, particularly in patients with T1 melanomas, but are not always congruent with those predictive of survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund K Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 4 Silverstein, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 4 Silverstein, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gamsizkan M, Yilmaz I, Buyukbabani N, Demirkesen C, Demiriz M, Cetin ED, Ince U, Akalin T, Demirkan NC, Lebe B, Erdem O, Gokoz O, Sakiz D, Demireli PT, Astarci HM, Adim SB, Zemheri IE, Acikalin A, Yaman B, Aydin O, Bassorgun CI. A Retrospective Multicenter Evaluation of Cutaneous Melanomas in Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 15:10451-6. [DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.23.10451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|