1
|
Rosenkranz KM, Boughey JC. Locoregional Management of Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancers: A Review. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:473-480. [PMID: 38845236 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
The incidence of preoperatively diagnosed multiple ipsilateral breast cancer (MIBC) is increasing due to improved sensitivity of screening and preoperative staging modalities including digital breast tomosynthesis (3D breast mammography) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The surgical management of MIBC remains controversial. Many surgeons continue to recommend mastectomy due to high local recurrence rates in patients with MIBC undergoing breast conservation therapy reported in historic, retrospective studies. More recent retrospective studies report acceptable rates of local recurrence. Yet concerns persist due to a paucity of prospective data regarding recurrence as well as concerns for margin positivity, cosmetic outcomes and the feasibility of adequate and safe delivery of radiation following breast conserving surgery. Breast conservation has emerged as the preferred surgical strategy for eligible patients with unifocal disease. Benefits include improved quality of life, body image and sexual function and lower surgical complication rates. A recent prospective clinical trial has corroborated a large body of retrospective data confirming the safety of breast conserving therapy and adjuvant radiation in women with MIBC with good oncologic control, low rates of conversion to mastectomy and satisfactory patient-reported cosmetic outcomes. With the current rise in MIBC diagnoses, it is imperative that surgeons understand the existent evidence in order to guide shared decision-making conversations with patients diagnosed with MIBC. This comprehensive review synthesizes the best available data and offers current recommendations for management of both the primary sites of disease as well as management of the axilla in patients with MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari M Rosenkranz
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
| | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Lena É, Wong SM, Iny E, Mashal S, Basik M, Boileau JF, Martel K, Bassel MA, Meterissian S, Prakash I. Oncologic safety of breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with multiple ipsilateral breast cancer: A retrospective multi-institutional cohort study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108266. [PMID: 38492259 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The recent ACOSOG Z11102 trial demonstrated low recurrence rates with breast conserving surgery (BCS) in women with multiple ipsilateral breast cancers (MIBC). Questions remain regarding the oncologic safety of BCS in women with MIBC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent BCS following NAC for stage I-III breast cancer from 2012 to 2021 at two academic centers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to provide estimates for recurrence and survival outcomes. MIBC was defined as ≥2 foci of malignancy. RESULTS A total of 544 patients were included; 29.4% (n = 160) ER+/HER2-, 17.7% (n = 96) ER+/HER2+, 18.2% (n = 99) ER-/HER2+, and 34.7% (n = 189) with ER-/HER2-disease. Overall, 80.5% (n = 438) had unifocal breast cancer while 19.5% (n = 106) had MIBC. Of patients with MIBC, 90.6% (n = 96) had multifocal and 9.4% (n = 10) had multicentric disease. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 41.1% of patients with MIBC versus 41.5% of patients with unifocal disease (p = 0.94). At a median follow-up of 55 months (IQR 32-83); 4.8% of patients in the unifocal group and 4.7% of patients in the MIBC group had had a local recurrence (p = 0.97). There was no difference in 5-year local recurrence-free survival (p = 0.92), recurrence-free survival (p = 0.06), or overall survival (p = 0.07) between the groups. CONCLUSION In this large cohort of women undergoing BCS post-NAC, there was no significant difference in in breast tumor recurrence or survival outcomes between patients with unifocal disease and those with MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Élise Di Lena
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Goodman Cancer Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Stephanie M Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ericka Iny
- McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sarah Mashal
- McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark Basik
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jean-François Boileau
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Karyne Martel
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Sarkis Meterissian
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ipshita Prakash
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang M, Sun Y, Wu H, Xiao J, Chen W, Wang H, Yang B, Luo H. Prognostic analysis of cT1-3N1M0 breast cancer patients who have responded to neoadjuvant therapy undergoing various axillary surgery and breast surgery based on propensity score matching and competitive risk model. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1319981. [PMID: 38327751 PMCID: PMC10847357 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1319981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with positive clinical axillary lymph nodes (cN1+) remains a topic of controversy. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of various axillary and breast surgery approaches on the survival of cN1+ breast cancer patients who have responded positively to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Methods Patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed invasive ductal carcinoma of breast between 2010 and 2020 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. To mitigate confounding bias, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was employed. Prognostic factors for both overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated through COX regression risk analysis. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Furthermore, cumulative incidence and independent prognostic factors were assessed using a competing risk model. Results The PSM analysis matched 4,890 patients. Overall survival (OS) and BCSS were slightly worse in the axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) group (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.91-1.31, p = 0.322 vs. HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.87-1.29, p = 0.545). The mastectomy (MAST) group exhibited significantly worse OS and BCSS outcomes (HR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.50, p = 0.018 vs. HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.12-1.68, p = 0.002). The combination of different axillary and breast surgery did not significantly affect OS (p = 0.083) but did have a significant impact on BCSS (p = 0.019). Competing risk model analysis revealed no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of breast cancer-specific death (BCSD) in the axillary surgery group (Grey's test, p = 0.232), but it showed a higher cumulative incidence of BCSD in the MAST group (Grey's test, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≥ 70 years, black race, T3 stage, ER-negative expression, HER2-negative expression, and MAST were independent prognostic risk factors for both OS and BCSS (all p < 0.05). Conclusion For cN1+ breast cancer patients who respond positive to NAT, the optimal surgical approach is combining breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with SLNB. This procedure improves quality of life and long-term survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maoquan Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Sanming First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Sanming, Fujian, China
| | - Yingming Sun
- Department of Medical and Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Sanming First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Sanming, Fujian, China
| | - Huasheng Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Sanming First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Sanming, Fujian, China
| | - Jian Xiao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Sanming First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Sanming, Fujian, China
| | - Wenxin Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Sanming First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Sanming, Fujian, China
| | - Hebin Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Sanming First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Sanming, Fujian, China
| | - Binglin Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Sanming First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Sanming, Fujian, China
| | - Huatian Luo
- Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Sanming First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Sanming, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Galaychuk I. REPEATED BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERIES AS REFLECTION OF THE EVOLUTION IN BREAST CANCER TREATMENT (CASE REPORT WITH LITERATURE REVIEW). Exp Oncol 2023; 45:386-392. [PMID: 38186016 DOI: 10.15407/exp-oncology.2023.03.386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
The clinical case of a patient with multicentric breast cancer who underwent organ-sparing surgery after neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy is presented. An ipsilateral cancer recurrence was diagnosed 8 years after the first operation. The repeated organ-sparing surgery (lumpectomy) was done with a good cosmetic result and without disease progression during 1-year follow-up. The literature review shows that neoadjuvant systemic therapy accounting for molecular subtypes of cancer has radically changed breast cancer surgeries. The evolution of surgical approaches in stage I-II breast cancer patients consists in the de-escalation of surgery from mastectomy to organsparing or oncoplastic surgery, minimally directed surgery, and repeated breast-conserving surgery. De-escalation of surgical interventions in the area of the regional lymphatic collector consists in the transition from total axillary lymphatic dissection to sentinel lymph node biopsy or targeted removal of metastatic lymph nodes. The repeated breast-conserving surgery can be safely performed for ipsilateral recurrence in patients with all molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Galaychuk
- I. Horbachevsky National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu X, Wang Y, Cao K, Yao L, Hu L, Sun J, Zhang J, Xu Y, Xie Y. Impact of multifocal or multicentric disease on local recurrence and survival in breast cancer patients with or without BRCA1/2 variants. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 199:25-33. [PMID: 36930346 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06904-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multifocal or multicentric (MFMC) breast cancer is mainly focused on breast cancer patients with unknown BRCA status, the incidence and clinical relevance of MFMC disease in BRCA1/2 carriers is less explored to date. Our study was to investigate the incidence of MFMC disease in BRCA1/2 carriers and whether MFMC disease influences local recurrence and clinical outcomes. METHODS In this retrospective study, 479 breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 variants and 1437 age-matched noncarriers were enrolled and patients received either breast-conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy with or without radiotherapy. RESULTS The rates of MFMC disease in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, and noncarriers were 33.0% (61 of 185), 37.4% (110 of 294), and 31.2% (449 of 1437), respectively. MFMC disease in BRCA2 carriers was significantly higher than that in noncarriers (P = 0.039). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, among patients treated with BCT, BRCA2 carriers with MFMC disease experienced a significantly higher rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) than those with unifocal disease (16.7% vs 4.1%, P = 0.044). Moreover, BRCA2 carriers with MFMC disease had a significantly worse RFS (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.65 [95% CI 1.40-9.52]; P = 0.008), DRFS (unadjusted HR, 3.07 [95% CI 1.07-8.80]; P = 0.037), and OS (unadjusted HR, 4.96 [95% CI 1.18-20.02]; P = 0.029) than those with unifocal disease when treated with BCT. CONCLUSION MFMC breast cancer is more common in BRCA2 carriers, and BRCA2 carriers with MFMC disease treated with BCT exhibit a higher rate of IBTR and may have a poor survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejing Liu
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yanjie Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Kun Cao
- Department of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Lu Yao
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Li Hu
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Jie Sun
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Juan Zhang
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Ye Xu
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yuntao Xie
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pfob A, Dubsky P. The underused potential of breast conserving therapy after neoadjuvant system treatment - Causes and solutions. Breast 2023; 67:110-115. [PMID: 36669994 PMCID: PMC9982288 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast conserving therapy (BCT), consisting of breast conserving surgery and subsequent radiotherapy, is an equivalent option to mastectomy for women with early breast cancer. Although BCT after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) has been routinely recommend by international guidelines since many years, the rate of BCT worldwide varies largely and its potential is still underused. While the rate of BCT in western countries has increased over the past decades to currently about 70%, the rate of BCT is as low as 10% in other countries. In this review, we will evaluate the underused potential of breast conservation after NAST, identify causes, and discuss possible solutions. We identified clinical and non-clinical causes for the underuse of BCT after NAST including uncertainties within the community regarding oncologic outcomes, the correct tumor localization after NAST, the management of multifocal and multicentric tumors, margin assessment, disparities of socio-economic aspects on a patient and national level, and psychological biases affecting the shared decision-making process between patients and clinicians. Possible solutions to mitigate the underuse of BCT after NAST include interdisciplinary teams that keep the whole patient pathway in mind, optimized treatment counseling and shared decision-making, and targeted financial support to alleviate disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Pfob
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Peter Dubsky
- Breast Centre, Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna, Luzern, Switzerland,Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abdallah A, Hamdy O, Zuhdy M, Elbalka SS, Abdelkhalek M, Zaid AM, Atef A, Elmadawy MG, Refky B, Wahab KA, Bayoumi D, Ali KM, Metwally IH, Shetiwy M. The epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of multifocal/multicentric breast cancer in the Egyptian Delta and its impact on management strategies. Breast Dis 2023; 42:101-114. [PMID: 37066900 DOI: 10.3233/bd-220066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multifocal (MFBC)/multicentric (MCBC) breast cancer is being more recognized due to the improved imaging modalities and the greater orientation with this form of breast cancer, however, optimal surgical treatment, still poses a challenge. The standard surgical treatment is mastectomy, however, breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) may be appropriate in certain situations. METHODS A total of 464 cases of MF/MCBC out of 4798 cases of breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed from the database of the Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), between January 2008 and December 2019. RESULTS Radiologic involvement of multiple quadrants was reported in 27.9% by ultrasonography, 19% by mammography, and 59.1% by magnetic resonance imaging. BCS was performed in 32 cases (6.9%) while 432 cases underwent a mastectomy. Postoperative pathology revealed infiltration of other quadrants grossly in 23.5%, and under the microscope in 63.6% of the examined cases. Mean disease-free and overall survival were 95.5 and 164.6 months, respectively. When compared with MFBC, MCBC showed higher pathologic tumor size (p < 0.001), higher stages (p < 0.001), higher recurrence rates (p = 0.006), and lower DFS (P = 0.009) but with similar OS (P = 0.8). CONCLUSION Mastectomy is still the primary treatment option for MCBC with higher recurrence rates compared with MFBC. However, BCS for properly selected MFBC is considered oncologically safe, following the same rules of breast conservation for unifocal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Abdallah
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Omar Hamdy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mohammad Zuhdy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Saleh S Elbalka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Abdelkhalek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Amir M Zaid
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Atef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mohamed G Elmadawy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Basel Refky
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdel Wahab
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Dalia Bayoumi
- Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Khadiga M Ali
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Islam H Metwally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mosab Shetiwy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Toss A, Venturelli M, Civallero M, Piombino C, Domati F, Ficarra G, Combi F, Cabitza E, Caggia F, Barbieri E, Barbolini M, Moscetti L, Omarini C, Piacentini F, Tazzioli G, Dominici M, Cortesi L. Predictive factors for relapse in triple-negative breast cancer patients without pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1016295. [DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1016295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients who do not obtain pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) present higher rate of relapse and worse overall survival. Risk factors for relapse in this subset of patients are poorly characterized. This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for relapse in TNBC patients without pCR after NACT.MethodsWomen with TNBC treated with NACT from January 2008 to May 2020 at the Modena Cancer Center were included in the analysis. In patients without pCR, univariate and multivariable Cox analyses were used to determine factors predictive of relapse.ResultsWe identified 142 patients with a median follow-up of 55 months. After NACT, 62 patients obtained pCR (43.9%). Young age at diagnosis (<50 years) and high Ki-67 (20%) were signi!cantly associated with pCR. Lack of pCR after NACT resulted in worse 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Factors independently predicting EFS in patients without pCR were the presence of multifocal disease [hazard ratio (HR), 3.77; 95% CI, 1.45–9.61; p=0.005] and residual cancer burden (RCB) III (HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.09–9.9; p=0.04). Neither germline BRCA status nor HER2-low expression were associated with relapse.DiscussionThese data can be used to stratify patients and potentially guide treatment decision-making, identifying appropriate candidates for treatment intensi!cation especially in neo-/adjuvant setting.
Collapse
|
9
|
Sang Y, Zhou X, Chi W, Chen J, Yang B, Hao S, Huang X, Liu G, Shao Z, Wu J. Surgical options of the breast and clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A single-center retrospective study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:984587. [PMID: 36387082 PMCID: PMC9647014 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.984587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has evolved significantly and has been widely accepted for downstaging disease in early-stage and locally advanced breast cancer patients. Since the optimal surgical intervention for patients receiving NAC remains controversial, we aim to investigate the survival outcome of patients treated with different surgical management. METHODS A retrospective, nested case-control study was conducted in patients with invasive breast cancer that underwent NAC at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from January 2010 to June 2019. Based on surgical intervention, patients were divided into mastectomy and breast conservation groups. Patients were matched on age at diagnosis, menopausal status, the year of the surgery, post neoadjuvant therapy pathological tumor (ypT) stage, post neoadjuvant therapy pathological node (ypN) stage, molecular subtypes, and axillary surgery by propensity score matching. RESULTS A total of 2080 patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 1819 (87.5%) patients were categorized as mastectomy group, and 261 (12.5%) patients were classed as breast conservation group. Over 9-years of research, the proportion of breast conservation steadily increased in patients after NAC. Data showed that younger (P<0.001) and pre-menopausal (P<0.001) patients with normal BMI (P=0.022) were more likely to receive breast conservation. Patients at advanced ypT stage (P<0.001), ypN stage (P<0.001), and clinical TNM stage (P<0.001) were more often to undergo mastectomy, while breast conservation rate was significantly higher in patients with triple-negative tumors (P=0.023). Compared with the mastectomy group, significant benefits in overall survival were observed in patients who received breast conservation (Hazard ratio 0.41, [95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.97]; p=0.049) in the matched cohort. There was no statistical difference between groups related to disease-free survival and locoregional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Tumor biology can significantly impact the surgical decision in patients administrated with NAC. Breast conservation was a safe alternative for mastectomy in the NAC setting without compromising survival outcomes and locoregional control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuting Sang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xujie Zhou
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiru Chi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiajian Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Benlong Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuang Hao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoyan Huang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guangyu Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiong Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ngo MH, Gervais MK, Leblanc G, Dubé P, Sidéris L, Yassa M, Guilbert MC. Tumor bed extending to margins in breast cancer specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Incidence and clinical significance. Ann Diagn Pathol 2022; 61:152060. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2022.152060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
11
|
Özdemir Ö, Zengel B, Yildiz Y, Uluç BO, Cabuk D, Ozden E, Salim DK, Paydas S, Demir A, Diker O, Pilanci KN, Sönmez ÖU, Vatansever S, Dogan I, Gulmez A, Cakar B, Gursoy P, Yildirim ME, Ayhan M, Karadurmus N, Aykan MB, Cevik GT, Sakalar T, Hacibekiroglu I, Gülbagci BB, Dincer M, Garbioglu DB, Kemal Y, Nayir E, Taskaynatan H, Yilmaz M, Avci O, Sari M, Coban E, Atci MM, Esen SA, Telli TA, Karatas F, Inal A, Demir H, Kalkan NO, Yilmaz C, Tasli F, Alacacioglu A. The effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: Turkish Oncology Group study. Anticancer Drugs 2022; 33:663-670. [PMID: 35703239 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000001310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In our study, we aimed to evaluate the pathological response rates and side effect profile of adding pertuzumab to the treatment of HER2+ locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage breast cancer. This study was conducted by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) with data collected from 32 centers. Our study was multicentric, and a total of 364 patients were included. The median age of the patients was 49 years (18-85 years). Two hundred fifteen (60%) of the cases were hormone receptor/HER2+ positive(ER+ or PR+, or both), and 149 (40%) of them were HER2-rich (ER and PR negative). The number of complete responses was 124 (54%) in the docetaxel+trastuzumab+pertuzumab arm and 102 (45%) in the paclitaxel+trastuzumab+pertuzumab arm, and there was no difference between the groups in terms of complete response. In 226 (62%) patients with complete response, a significant correlation was found with DCIS, tumor focality, removed lymph node, and ER status P < 0.05. Anemia, nausea, vomiting, myalgia, alopecia, and mucosal inflammation were significantly higher in the docetaxel arm, P < 0.05. In our study, no statistical difference was found between the before-after echocardiography values. DCIS positivity in biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor focality; the number of lymph nodes removed and ER status were found to be associated with pCR. In conclusion, we think that studies evaluating pCR-related clinicopathological variables and radiological imaging features will play a critical role in the development of nonsurgical treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Baha Zengel
- General Surgery, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
| | - Yaşar Yildiz
- Department Medical of Oncology, Katip Çelebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir
| | | | - Devrim Cabuk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Kocaeli
| | - Ercan Ozden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Kocaeli
| | - Derya Kivrak Salim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Health Sciences University Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya
| | - Semra Paydas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
| | - Atakan Demir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Hospital, Istanbul
| | - Omer Diker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Near East University Hospital, Lefkosa, Cyprus
| | | | | | - Sezai Vatansever
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul
| | - Izzet Dogan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul
| | - Ahmet Gulmez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya
| | - Burcu Cakar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir
| | - Pinar Gursoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir
| | | | - Murat Ayhan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul
| | - Nuri Karadurmus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Health Sciences University Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara
| | - Musa Baris Aykan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Health Sciences University Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara
| | - Gökcen Tugba Cevik
- Department of Medical Oncology, Usak University Training and Research Hospital, Usak
| | - Teoman Sakalar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kahramanmaras Necip Fazil City Hospital, Kahramanmaras
| | - Ilhan Hacibekiroglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya
| | - Burcu Belen Gülbagci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya
| | - Murat Dincer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Eskisehir
| | - Duygu Bayir Garbioglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Eskisehir
| | - Yasemin Kemal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Park Hospital, Samsun
| | - Erdinc Nayir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Park Hospital, Mersin
| | | | - Mesut Yilmaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul
| | - Okan Avci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Namik Kemal University Hospital, Tekirdag
| | - Murat Sari
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital
| | - Ezgi Coban
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital
| | | | | | - Tugba Akin Telli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul
| | - Fatih Karatas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Karabuk University Faculty of Medicine, Karabuk
| | - Ali Inal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mersin City Training and Research Hospital, Mersin
| | - Hacer Demir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar
| | - Nurhan Onal Kalkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Van Yuzuncu Yil Faculty of Medicine, Van
| | | | - Funda Tasli
- Department of Pathology, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Alacacioglu
- Department Medical of Oncology, Katip Çelebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li S, Wu J, Huang O, He J, Chen W, Li Y, Chen X, Shen K. Association of Molecular Biomarker Heterogeneity With Treatment Pattern and Disease Outcomes in Multifocal or Multicentric Breast Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:833093. [PMID: 35814416 PMCID: PMC9259989 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the rates of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 heterogeneity in multifocal or multicentric breast cancer (MMBC) and its association with treatment pattern and disease outcomes. Methods MMBC patients with ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 results for each tumor focus were retrospectively analyzed using Kappa test and categorized into the homogeneous group (Homo group) and the heterogeneous group (Hetero group). Chi-square tests were performed to compare the clinical features and treatment options between the groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated from Kaplan–Meier curves and compared between two groups. Results A total of 387 patients were included, and 93 (24.0%) were classified into the Hetero group. Adjuvant endocrine therapy was more frequently assigned for patients in the Hetero group than in the Homo group (84.9% vs. 71.7%, p = 0.046). There was no difference in terms of adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy (28.3% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.196) and chemotherapy (69.9% vs. 69.8%, p = 0.987) usage between the two groups. At a median follow-up of 36 months, DFS rates were 81.2% for the Hetero group and 96.5% for the Homo group (p = 0.041; adjusted HR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.04–8.37). The estimated 3-year OS rates for the groups were 95.8% and 99.5%, respectively (p = 0.059; adjusted HR, 5.36; 95% CI, 0.97–29.69). Conclusion Heterogeneity of ER, PR, HER2, or Ki67 was present in 24.0% patients with MMBC. Biomarkers heterogeneity influenced adjuvant endocrine therapy usage and was associated with worse disease outcomes, indicating further clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kunwei Shen
- *Correspondence: Xiaosong Chen, ; Kunwei Shen,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Atzori G, Gipponi M, Cornacchia C, Diaz R, Sparavigna M, Gallo M, Ruelle T, Murelli F, Franchelli S, Depaoli F, Friedman D, Fregatti P. " No Ink on Tumor" in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071031. [PMID: 35887526 PMCID: PMC9320436 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aim: Patients with Stage I-II breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (BCS-NAC) were retrospectively assessed in order to evaluate the extent of a safe excision margin. Materials and Methods: Between 2003 and 2020, 151 patients underwent risk-adapted BCS-NAC; margin involvement was always assessed at definitive histology. Patients with complete pathological response (pCR) were classified as the RX group, whereas those with residual disease and negative margins were stratified as R0 < 1 mm (margin < 1 mm) and R0 > 1 mm (margin > 1 mm). Results: Totals of 29 (19.2%), 64 (42.4%), and 58 patients (38.4%) were included in the R0 < 1 mm, R0 > 1 mm, and RX groups, respectively, and 2 patients with margin involvement had a mastectomy. Ten instances of local recurrence (6.6%) occurred, with no statistically significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between the three groups. A statistically significant advantage of disease-free survival (p = 0.002) and overall survival (p = 0.010) was observed in patients with pCR. Conclusions: BCS-NAC was increased, especially in HER-2-positive and triple-negative tumors; risk-adapted BCS should be preferably pursued to highlight the cosmetic benefit of NAC. The similar rate of LRFS in the three groups of patients suggests a shift toward the “no ink on tumor” paradigm for patients undergoing BCS-NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Atzori
- Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.A.); (C.C.); (M.S.); (F.M.); (S.F.); (F.D.); (D.F.); (P.F.)
| | - Marco Gipponi
- Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.A.); (C.C.); (M.S.); (F.M.); (S.F.); (F.D.); (D.F.); (P.F.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-010-5558805
| | - Chiara Cornacchia
- Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.A.); (C.C.); (M.S.); (F.M.); (S.F.); (F.D.); (D.F.); (P.F.)
| | - Raquel Diaz
- Department Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (R.D.); (T.R.)
| | - Marco Sparavigna
- Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.A.); (C.C.); (M.S.); (F.M.); (S.F.); (F.D.); (D.F.); (P.F.)
| | - Maurizio Gallo
- Department of Internal Medicine (Di.M.I.), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy;
| | - Tommaso Ruelle
- Department Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (R.D.); (T.R.)
| | - Federica Murelli
- Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.A.); (C.C.); (M.S.); (F.M.); (S.F.); (F.D.); (D.F.); (P.F.)
- Department Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (R.D.); (T.R.)
| | - Simonetta Franchelli
- Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.A.); (C.C.); (M.S.); (F.M.); (S.F.); (F.D.); (D.F.); (P.F.)
| | - Francesca Depaoli
- Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.A.); (C.C.); (M.S.); (F.M.); (S.F.); (F.D.); (D.F.); (P.F.)
| | - Daniele Friedman
- Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.A.); (C.C.); (M.S.); (F.M.); (S.F.); (F.D.); (D.F.); (P.F.)
- Department Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (R.D.); (T.R.)
| | - Piero Fregatti
- Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.A.); (C.C.); (M.S.); (F.M.); (S.F.); (F.D.); (D.F.); (P.F.)
- Department Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (R.D.); (T.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mátrai Z, Kelemen P, Kósa C, Maráz R, Paszt A, Pavlovics G, Sávolt Á, Simonka Z, Tóth D, Kásler M, Kaprin A, Krivorotko P, Vicko F, Pluta P, Kolacinska-Wow A, Murawa D, Jankau J, Ciesla S, Dyttert D, Sabol M, Zhygulin A, Avetisyan A, Bessonov A, Lázár G. Modern Breast Cancer Surgery 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2022; 28:1610377. [PMID: 35783360 PMCID: PMC9240205 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This text is based on the recommendations accepted by the 4th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer, modified on the basis of the international consultation and conference within the frames of the Central-Eastern European Academy of Oncology. The recommendations cover non-operative, intraoperative and postoperative diagnostics, determination of prognostic and predictive markers and the content of cytology and histology reports. Furthermore, they address some specific issues such as the current status of multigene molecular markers, the role of pathologists in clinical trials and prerequisites for their involvement, and some remarks about the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Mátrai
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Kelemen
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Kósa
- Department of Surgery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Róbert Maráz
- Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
| | - Attila Paszt
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, SZTE ÁOK, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Ákos Sávolt
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Simonka
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, SZTE ÁOK, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Dezső Tóth
- Department of Surgery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Miklós Kásler
- Minister of Human Capacities, Government of Hungary, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Andrey Kaprin
- National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Petr Krivorotko
- N.N.Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Ferenc Vicko
- Medical Faculty Novi Sad, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina Sremska Kamenica, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Piotr Pluta
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Breast Diseases, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital–Research Institute in Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Kolacinska-Wow
- Department of Head and Neck Cancer Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Dawid Murawa
- Clinic of Surgical Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
- General and Oncological Surgery Clinic, Karol Marcinkowski University Hospital, Zielona Gora, Poland
| | - Jerzy Jankau
- Plastic Surgery Department, Medical University of Gdańsk/University Hospitals, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Slawomir Ciesla
- General and Oncological Surgery Clinic, Karol Marcinkowski University Hospital, Zielona Gora, Poland
| | - Daniel Dyttert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Medical Faculty, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Martin Sabol
- Department of Surgical Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Medical Faculty, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | | | - Alexander Bessonov
- Breast Cancer Department of the LOKOD, N.N.Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - György Lázár
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, SZTE ÁOK, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As breast cancer treatment options have multiplied and biologic diversity within breast cancer has been recognized, the use of the same treatment strategies for patients with early-stage and favorable disease, and for those with biologically aggressive disease, has been questioned. In addition, as patient-reported outcome measures have called attention to the morbidity of many common treatments, and as the cost of breast cancer care has continued to increase, reduction in the overtreatment of breast cancer has assumed increasing importance. AREAS COVERED Here we review selected aspects of surgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology for which scientific evidence supports de-escalation for invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ, and assess strategies to address overtreatment. EXPERT OPINION The problems of breast cancer overtreatment we face today are based on improved understanding of the biology of breast cancer and abandonment of the 'one-size-fits-all' approach. As breast cancer care becomes increasingly complex, and as our knowledge base continues to increase exponentially, these problems will only be magnified in the future. To continue progress, the move must be made from advocating the maximum-tolerated treatment to advocating the minimum-effective one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M Pak
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kwon MR, Chu J, Kook SH, Kim EY. Factors associated with radiologic-pathologic discordance in magnetic resonance imaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Clin Imaging 2022; 89:1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
17
|
Fitzal F, Bolliger M, Dunkler D, Geroldinger A, Gambone L, Heil J, Riedel F, de Boniface J, Andre C, Matrai Z, Pukancsik D, Paulinelli RR, Ostapenko V, Burneckis A, Ostapenko A, Ostapenko E, Meani F, Harder Y, Bonollo M, Alberti ASM, Tausch C, Papassotiropoulos B, Helfgott R, Heck D, Fehrer HJ, Acko M, Schrenk P, Trapp EK, Gunda PT, Clara P, Montagna G, Ritter M, Blohmer JU, Steffen S, Romics L, Morrow E, Lorenz K, Fehr M, Weber WP. Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis Comparing Conventional with Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Oncological and Surgical Outcomes in Women with High-Risk Breast Cancer from the OPBC-01/iTOP2 Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1061-1070. [PMID: 34647202 PMCID: PMC8724061 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10809-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Recent data suggest that margins ≥2 mm after breast-conserving surgery may improve local control in invasive breast cancer (BC). By allowing large resection volumes, oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCII; Clough level II/Tübingen 5-6) may achieve better local control than conventional breast conserving surgery (BCS; Tübingen 1-2) or oncoplastic breast conservation with low resection volumes (OBCI; Clough level I/Tübingen 3-4). Methods Data from consecutive high-risk BC patients treated in 15 centers from the Oncoplastic Breast Consortium (OPBC) network, between January 2010 and December 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. Results A total of 3,177 women were included, 30% of whom were treated with OBC (OBCI n = 663; OBCII n = 297). The BCS/OBCI group had significantly smaller tumors and smaller resection margins compared with OBCII (pT1: 50% vs. 37%, p = 0.002; proportion with margin <1 mm: 17% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). There were significantly more re-excisions due to R1 (“ink on tumor”) in the BCS/OBCI compared with the OBCII group (11% vs. 7%, p = 0.049). Univariate and multivariable regression analysis adjusted for tumor biology, tumor size, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment demonstrated no differences in local, regional, or distant recurrence-free or overall survival between the two groups. Conclusions Large resection volumes in oncoplastic surgery increases the distance from cancer cells to the margin of the specimen and reduces reexcision rates significantly. With OBCII larger tumors are resected with similar local, regional and distant recurrence-free as well as overall survival rates as BCS/OBCI. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10809-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Fitzal
- Department of General Surgery and Breast Health Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Michael Bolliger
- Department of General Surgery and Breast Health Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniela Dunkler
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Angelika Geroldinger
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Luca Gambone
- Department of General Surgery and Breast Health Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jörg Heil
- Departement of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Riedel
- Departement of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Departemt of Surgery, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Camilla Andre
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Zoltan Matrai
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Dávid Pukancsik
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Regis R Paulinelli
- Federal University of Goiás, Araújo Jorge Hospital, Goiás Anti-Cancer Association, Goiás, Brazil
| | - Valerijus Ostapenko
- National Cancer Institute Vilnius Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Arvydas Burneckis
- National Cancer Institute Vilnius Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Andrej Ostapenko
- National Cancer Institute Vilnius Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Edvin Ostapenko
- National Cancer Institute Vilnius Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Francesco Meani
- Centro di Senologia della Svizzera Italiana (CSSI), Lugano, Switzerland.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Yves Harder
- Centro di Senologia della Svizzera Italiana (CSSI), Lugano, Switzerland.,Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.,Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Marta Bonollo
- Centro di Senologia della Svizzera Italiana (CSSI), Lugano, Switzerland.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Andrea S M Alberti
- Centro di Senologia della Svizzera Italiana (CSSI), Lugano, Switzerland.,Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.,Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Ruth Helfgott
- Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz - Sisters of Charity, Linz, Austria
| | - Dietmar Heck
- Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz - Sisters of Charity, Linz, Austria
| | - Hans-Jörg Fehrer
- Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz - Sisters of Charity, Linz, Austria
| | - Markus Acko
- Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz - Sisters of Charity, Linz, Austria
| | - Peter Schrenk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Elisabeth K Trapp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Paliczek Clara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Giacomo Montagna
- Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mathilde Ritter
- Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sander Steffen
- Clinical Cancer Registry, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCCC), University Medical Center Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laszlo Romics
- New Victoria Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Morrow
- Department of Academic Surgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Katharina Lorenz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cantonal Hospital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Mathias Fehr
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cantonal Hospital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Walter Paul Weber
- Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cuttino LW, McCall L, Kubicky C, Ballman KV, Le-Petross H, Hunt KK, Haffty B, Rosenkranz KM, Boughey JC. The Feasibility of Radiation Therapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: An Initial Report from ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance) Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:636-642. [PMID: 34634438 PMCID: PMC8928138 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Historically, multiple ipsilateral breast cancer (MIBC) has been a contraindication to breast-conserving therapy. We report the feasibility of radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving therapy in MIBC from the Alliance Z11102 trial. Methods and Materials: Delineation of targets and organs at risk was performed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group contouring consensus definitions. RT was delivered to the whole breast to 45 to 50 Gy in standard daily fractions of 1.8 to 2.0 Gy. A boost of 10 to 16 Gy in 2.0-Gy daily fractions to each tumor bed was mandatory. Results: A total of 236 eligible patients were enrolled in the study between July 23, 2012 and August 19, 2016. Of those, 195 (83%) completed RT. No patient underwent mastectomy for failure to meet the RT dose constraints. Higher absolute boost volume was associated with increased incidence of grade 2 or higher dermatitis (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.041.41; P = .014). Higher relative boost volume as a percentage of the overall breast volume was not associated with increased dermatitis. Neither absolute nor relative boost volume appeared to significantly influence overall cosmesis. Conclusions: Breast conservation followed by whole breast RT plus boost to each tumor bed was feasible in the majority of patients with MIBC. Increasing radiation boost volume was associated with increased incidence of acute dermatitis, but was not associated with worse overall cosmesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie W Cuttino
- Sarah Cannon Cancer Institute at Henrico Doctors' Hospital, Richmond, Virginia.
| | - Linda McCall
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Karla V Ballman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Bruce Haffty
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: Is it reliable in the treatment of multifocal breast cancer? A preliminary report of a prospective randomized controlled trial. JOURNAL OF SURGERY AND MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.28982/josam.926930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
20
|
Wu Y, Yang S, Ma J, Chen Z, Song G, Rao D, Cheng Y, Huang S, Liu Y, Jiang S, Liu J, Huang X, Wang X, Qiu S, Xu J, Xi R, Bai F, Zhou J, Fan J, Zhang X, Gao Q. Spatiotemporal Immune Landscape of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis at Single-Cell Level. Cancer Discov 2021; 12:134-153. [PMID: 34417225 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 329] [Impact Index Per Article: 109.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Liver metastasis, the leading cause of colorectal cancer mortality, exhibits a highly heterogeneous and suppressive immune microenvironment. Here, we sequenced 97 matched samples by using single-cell RNA-seq and Spatial Transcriptomics. Strikingly, metastatic microenvironment underwent remarkable spatial reprogramming of immunosuppressive cells such as MRC1+ CCL18+ M2-like macrophages. We further developed scMetabolism, a computational pipeline for quantifying single-cell metabolism, and observed that those macrophages harbored enhanced metabolic activity. Interestingly, neoadjuvant chemotherapy could block this status and restore the antitumor immune balance in responsive patients, while the non-responsive patients deteriorated into a more suppressive one. Our work described the immune evolution of metastasis and uncovered the black box of how tumors respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingcheng Wu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, and Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Fudan University
| | - Shuaixi Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, and Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Fudan University
| | - Jiaqiang Ma
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology & Immunology, Institut Pasteur of Shanghai, Chinese Academy of Sciences
| | - Zechuan Chen
- Institut Pasteur of Shanghai, The Center for Microbes, Development and Health, Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Institut Pasteur of Shanghai, Chinese Academy of Sciences
| | - Guohe Song
- Hepatic oncology, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital and Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University, Key Laboratory for Carcinogenesis & Cancer Invasion, The Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
| | - Dongning Rao
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, and Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Fudan University
| | - Yifei Cheng
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, and Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
| | - Siyuan Huang
- Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University
| | - Yifei Liu
- Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
| | - Shan Jiang
- The Center for Microbes, Development and Health, Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Institut Pasteur of Shanghai, Chinese Academy of Sciences
| | - Jinxia Liu
- Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University; School of Medicine, Nantong University
| | - Xiaowu Huang
- Departmemt of liver surgery and tranplantation, Zhongshan Hospital
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Liver Cancer Institute, Fudan University
| | - Shuangjian Qiu
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
| | - Jianmin Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital
| | - Ruibin Xi
- School of Mathematical Sciences and Center for Statistical Science, School of Mathematical Sciences and Center for Statistical Science, Peking University
| | - Fan Bai
- Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University
| | - Jian Zhou
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
| | - Jia Fan
- Department of Liver Surgery, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
| | - Xiaoming Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Institute Pasteur of Shanghai, Chinese Academy of Sciences
| | - Qiang Gao
- Depart. of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhong Shan Hospital and Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University,
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dubsky P, Pinker K, Cardoso F, Montagna G, Ritter M, Denkert C, Rubio IT, de Azambuja E, Curigliano G, Gentilini O, Gnant M, Günthert A, Hauser N, Heil J, Knauer M, Knotek-Roggenbauerc M, Knox S, Kovacs T, Kuerer HM, Loibl S, Mannhart M, Meattini I, Penault-Llorca F, Radosevic-Robin N, Sager P, Španić T, Steyerova P, Tausch C, Peeters MJTFDV, Weber WP, Cardoso MJ, Poortmans P. Breast conservation and axillary management after primary systemic therapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the Lucerne toolbox. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e18-e28. [PMID: 33387500 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30580-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Primary systemic therapy is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer, but few guidelines specifically address optimal locoregional therapies. Therefore, we established an international consortium to discuss clinical evidence and to provide expert advice on technical management of patients with early-stage breast cancer. The steering committee prepared six working packages to address all major clinical questions from diagnosis to surgery. During a consensus meeting that included members from European scientific oncology societies, clinical trial groups, and patient advocates, statements were discussed and voted on. A consensus was reached in 42% of statements, a majority in 38%, and no decision in 21%. Based on these findings, the panel developed clinical guidance recommendations and a toolbox to overcome many clinical and technical requirements associated with the diagnosis, response assessment, surgical planning, and surgery of patients with early-stage breast cancer. This guidance could convince clinicians and patients of the major clinical advancements purported by primary systemic therapy, the use of less extensive and more targeted surgery to improve the lives of patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Dubsky
- Breast Centre, Hirslanden Klinik St Anna, Luzern, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Katja Pinker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Breast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center and Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Giacomo Montagna
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mathilde Ritter
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Oncology Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; l'Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Oreste Gentilini
- Breast Surgery, San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Günthert
- Breast Centre, Hirslanden Klinik St Anna, Luzern, Switzerland; Department of Breast Surgery, Gyn-zentrum Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Nik Hauser
- Breast Centre Aarau Cham Zug, Hirslanden Klinik, Aarau, Switzerland; Frauenarztzentrum Aargau Ag, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Joerg Heil
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Knauer
- Breast Center Eastern Switzerland, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Susan Knox
- Europa Donna-The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy
| | - Tibor Kovacs
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Breast Institute, Jiahui International Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Henry M Kuerer
- Division of Surgery, Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Meinrad Mannhart
- Breast Centre Aarau Cham Zug, Hirslanden Klinik, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology and Biopathology, Jean Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University Clermont Auvergne, INSERM U1240 IMoST, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nina Radosevic-Robin
- Department of Pathology and Biopathology, Jean Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University Clermont Auvergne, INSERM U1240 IMoST, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Tanja Španić
- Europa Donna-The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy
| | - Petra Steyerova
- Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnostic Center, Clinic of Radiology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Walter P Weber
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maria J Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center and Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Kankernetwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Analysis of tumor nuclear features using artificial intelligence to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 186:379-389. [PMID: 33486639 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06093-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is used to treat patients with high-risk breast cancer. The tumor response to NAC can be classified as either a pathological partial response (pPR) or pathological complete response (pCR), defined as complete eradication of invasive tumor cells, with a pCR conferring a significantly lower risk of recurrence. Predicting the response to NAC, however, remains a significant clinical challenge. The objective of this study was to determine if analysis of nuclear features on core biopsies using artificial intelligence (AI) can predict response to NAC. METHODS Fifty-eight HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer patients were included in this study (pCR n = 37, pPR n = 21). Multiple deep convolutional neural networks were developed to automate tumor detection and nuclear segmentation. Nuclear count, area, and circularity, as well as image-based first- and second-order features including mean pixel intensity and correlation of the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM-COR) were determined. RESULTS In univariate analysis, the pCR group had fewer multifocal/multicentric tumors, higher nuclear intensity, and lower GLCM-COR compared to the pPR group. In multivariate binary logistic regression, tumor multifocality/multicentricity (OR = 0.14, p = 0.012), nuclear intensity (OR = 1.23, p = 0.018), and GLCM-COR (OR = 0.96, p = 0.043) were each independently associated with likelihood of achieving a pCR, and the model was able to successful classify 79% of cases (62% for pPR and 89% for pCR). CONCLUSION Analysis of tumor nuclear features using digital pathology/AI can significantly improve models to predict pathological response to NAC.
Collapse
|
23
|
Zehni AZ, Batz F, Vattai A, Kaltofen T, Schrader S, Jacob SN, Mumm JN, Heidegger HH, Ditsch N, Mahner S, Jeschke U, Vilsmaier T. The Prognostic Impact of Retinoid X Receptor and Thyroid Hormone Receptor alpha in Unifocal vs. Multifocal/Multicentric Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:957. [PMID: 33478016 PMCID: PMC7835829 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of the steroid hormone receptor expression, counting the retinoid X receptor (RXR) and thyroid hormone receptors (THRs), on the two different breast cancer (BC) entities: multifocal/multicentric versus unifocal. The overall and disease-free survival were considered as the prognosis determining aspects and analyzed by uni- and multi-variate analysis. Furthermore, histopathological grading and TNM staging (T = tumor size, N = lymph node involvement, M = distant metastasis) were examined in relation to RXR and THRs expression. A retrospective statistical analysis was carried out on survival-related events in a series of 319 sporadic BC patients treated at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at the Ludwig-Maximillian's University in Munich between 2000 and 2002. The expression of RXR and THRs, including its two major isoforms THRα1 and THRα2, was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and showed to have a significant correlation for both BC entities in regard to survival analysis. Patients with multifocal/multicentric BC were exposed to a significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS) when expressing RXR. Patients with unifocal BC showed a significantly worse DFS when expressing THRα1. In contrast, a statistically significant positive association between THRα2 expression and enhanced DFS in multifocal/multicentric BC was shown. Especially the RXR expression in multifocal/multicentric BC was found to play a remarkably contradictory role for BC prognosis. The findings imply the need for a critical review of possible molecular therapies targeting steroid hormone receptors in BC treatment. Our results strengthen the need to further investigate the behavior of the nuclear receptor family, especially in relation to BC focality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaleh Zati Zehni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Munich, LMU, 80337 Munich, Germany; (A.Z.Z.); (F.B.); (A.V.); (T.K.); (S.S.); (H.H.H.); (N.D.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| | - Falk Batz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Munich, LMU, 80337 Munich, Germany; (A.Z.Z.); (F.B.); (A.V.); (T.K.); (S.S.); (H.H.H.); (N.D.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| | - Aurelia Vattai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Munich, LMU, 80337 Munich, Germany; (A.Z.Z.); (F.B.); (A.V.); (T.K.); (S.S.); (H.H.H.); (N.D.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| | - Till Kaltofen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Munich, LMU, 80337 Munich, Germany; (A.Z.Z.); (F.B.); (A.V.); (T.K.); (S.S.); (H.H.H.); (N.D.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| | - Svenja Schrader
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Munich, LMU, 80337 Munich, Germany; (A.Z.Z.); (F.B.); (A.V.); (T.K.); (S.S.); (H.H.H.); (N.D.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| | - Sven-Niclas Jacob
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, LMU, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Jan-Niclas Mumm
- Department of Urology, LMU, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Helene Hildegard Heidegger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Munich, LMU, 80337 Munich, Germany; (A.Z.Z.); (F.B.); (A.V.); (T.K.); (S.S.); (H.H.H.); (N.D.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Munich, LMU, 80337 Munich, Germany; (A.Z.Z.); (F.B.); (A.V.); (T.K.); (S.S.); (H.H.H.); (N.D.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Munich, LMU, 80337 Munich, Germany; (A.Z.Z.); (F.B.); (A.V.); (T.K.); (S.S.); (H.H.H.); (N.D.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| | - Udo Jeschke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Munich, LMU, 80337 Munich, Germany; (A.Z.Z.); (F.B.); (A.V.); (T.K.); (S.S.); (H.H.H.); (N.D.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Theresa Vilsmaier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Munich, LMU, 80337 Munich, Germany; (A.Z.Z.); (F.B.); (A.V.); (T.K.); (S.S.); (H.H.H.); (N.D.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rosenkranz KM, Ballman K, McCall L, McCarthy C, Kubicky CD, Cuttino L, Hunt KK, Giuliano A, Van Zee KJ, Haffty B, Boughey JC. Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conservation Surgery and Radiation for Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: Data from the Alliance Z11102 Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4650-4661. [PMID: 32699926 PMCID: PMC7554157 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08893-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnoses of multiple ipsilateral breast cancer (MIBC) are increasing. Historically, the primary treatment for MIBC has been mastectomy due to concerns about in-breast recurrence risk and poor cosmetic outcome. The Alliance Z11102 study prospectively assessed cosmetic outcomes in women with MIBC treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Z11102 was a multicenter trial enrolling women with two or three separate sites of biopsy-proven malignancy separated by ≥ 2 cm within the same breast. Cosmetic outcome was a planned secondary endpoint. Data were collected with a four-point cosmesis survey (1 = excellent, 4 = poor) and the BREAST-Q (scored 0-100). All patients undergoing successful breast-conserving therapy were treated with whole-breast radiation. Associations were assessed with Chi square or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate. RESULTS Cosmetic outcome data for 216 eligible women who completed therapy are included in this analysis. Of the 136 patients who completed the survey 2 years postoperatively, 70.6% (N = 96) felt the result was good or excellent, while 3.7% (N = 5) felt the result was poor. We found no significant differences in patient-reported cosmetic outcomes when stratifying by patient age, number of lesions (two or three), number of incisions, number of lumpectomies, or size of largest area of disease. Mean satisfaction score on the BREAST-Q was 77.2 at 6 months following whole-breast radiation and 73.7 at 3 years following surgery. CONCLUSIONS BCT performed for MIBC results in good or excellent cosmesis for the majority of women. From a cosmetic perspective, BCT is a valid surgical approach to women with MIBC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01556243.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karla Ballman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Linda McCall
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Laurie Cuttino
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Bruce Haffty
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women all over the world. The prognosis is generally good, with a five-year overall survival rate above 90% for all stages. It is still the second leading cause of cancer-related death among women. Surgical treatment of breast cancer has changed dramatically over the years. Initially, treatment involved major surgery with long hospitalization, but it is now mostly accomplished as an outpatient procedure with a quick recovery. Thanks to well-designed retrospective and randomly controlled prospective studies, guidelines are continually changing. We are presently in an era where safely de-escalating surgery is increasingly emphasized. Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease, where a "one-size-fits-all" treatment approach is not appropriate. There is often more than one surgical solution carrying equal oncological safety for an individual patient. In these situations, it is important to include the patient in the treatment decision-making process through well informed consent. For this to be optimal, the physician must be fully updated on the surgical options. A consequence of an improved prognosis is more breast cancer survivors, and therefore physical appearance and quality of life is more in focus. Modern breast cancer treatment is increasingly personalized from a surgical point of view but is dependent on a multidisciplinary approach. Detailed algorithms for surgery of the breast and the axilla are required for optimal treatment and quality control. This review illustrates how breast cancer treatment has changed over the years and how the current standard is based on high quality scientific research.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ozmen V, Ilgun S, Celet Ozden B, Ozturk A, Aktepe F, Agacayak F, Elbuken F, Alco G, Ordu C, Erdogan Iyigun Z, Emre H, Pilancı K, Soybir G, Ozmen T. Comparison of breast cancer patients who underwent partial mastectomy (PM) with mini latissimus dorsi flap (MLDF) and subcutaneous mastectomy with implant (M + I) regarding quality of life (QOL), cosmetic outcome and survival rates. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:87. [PMID: 32370753 PMCID: PMC7201547 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01858-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The latissimus dorsi muscle has long been used in breast cancer (BC) patients for reconstruction. This study aimed to compare early stage BC patients who had partial mastectomy (PM) with mini latissimus dorsi flap (MLDF) and subcutaneous mastectomy with implant (MI) with respect to quality of life (QoL), cosmetic outcome (CO), and survival rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS The data of patients who underwent PM + MLDF (Group 1) and M + I (Group 2) between January 2010 and January 2018 were evaluated. Both groups were compared in terms of demographics, clinical and pathological characteristics, surgical morbidity, survival, quality of life, and cosmetic results. The EORTC-QLQ C30 and EORTC-QLO BR23 questionnaires and the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) Cosmetic Evaluation Scale were used to assess the quality of life and the cosmetic outcome, respectively. RESULTS A total of 317 patients were included in the study, 242 (76.3%) of them in group 1 and 75 (23.6%) of them in group 2. Median follow-up time was 56 (14-116) months. There were no differences identified between the groups in terms of tumor histology, hormonal receptors and HER-2 positivity, surgical morbidity, and 5-year overall and disease-free survival. Group 2 patients were significantly younger than group 1 (p = 0.003). The multifocality/multicentricity rate was higher in group 2 (p ≤ 0.001), whereas tumor size (p = 0.009), body mass index (BMI, p = 0.006), histological grade (p ≤ 0.001), lymph node positivity (p = 0.002), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) rate (p = 0.005), and presence of lympho-vascular invasion (LVI, p = 0.013) were significantly higher in group 1. When the quality of life was assessed by using the EORTC QLQ C30 and BR23 questionnaires, it was seen that the body image perception (p < 0.001) and nausea/vomiting score (p = 0.024) were significantly better in PM + MLDF group whereas physical function score was significantly better in M + I group (p = 0.012). When both groups were examined in terms of cosmesis with JBCS Cosmetic Evaluation Scale, good cosmetic evaluation score was significantly higher in patients in MLDF group (p = 0.01). DISCUSSION The results of this study indicate that in comparison to M + I procedure, the PM + MLDF procedure provides significantly superior results in terms of body image and cosmetic result with similar morbidity and oncologic outcomes. In selected patients with small breasts and a high tumor/breast ratio, PM + MLDF may be an alternative to subcutaneous mastectomy and implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vahit Ozmen
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Serkan Ilgun
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Demiroglu Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Burcu Celet Ozden
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Altinbas University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alper Ozturk
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fatma Aktepe
- Department of Pathology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Filiz Agacayak
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Filiz Elbuken
- Department of Radiology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gul Alco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cetin Ordu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Erdogan Iyigun
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hocaoglu Emre
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kezban Pilancı
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bahcesehir Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gursel Soybir
- Department of General Surgery, Sisli Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tolga Ozmen
- Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Resende Paulinelli R, Oliveira VM, Bagnoli F, Letzkus Berríos J, Cézar Chade M, Bragatto Picoli L, Dias Santos T, Bastos de Carvalho AP, Jubé Ribeiro LF, Freitas‐Junior R. Oncoplastic mammaplasty with geometric compensation: Evolution of the technique, outcomes and follow‐up in a multicentre retrospective cohort. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121:967-974. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.25860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Régis Resende Paulinelli
- Breast Program, Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsFederal University of GoiásGoiânia Goiás Brazil
- Gynaecology and Breast UnitAraújo Jorge Hospital, ACCGGoiânia Goiás Brazil
| | | | - Fábio Bagnoli
- School of Medical SciencesSanta Casa de Misericórdia de São PauloSão Paulo SP Brazil
| | - Jaime Letzkus Berríos
- Breast Surgical Unit at San Borja ArriaránClinical HospitalSantiago Chile
- Medical SchoolUniversity of ChileSantiago Chile
| | - Milca Cézar Chade
- School of Medical SciencesSanta Casa de Misericórdia de São PauloSão Paulo SP Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Ruffo Freitas‐Junior
- Breast Program, Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsFederal University of GoiásGoiânia Goiás Brazil
- Gynaecology and Breast UnitAraújo Jorge Hospital, ACCGGoiânia Goiás Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zati zehni A, Jacob SN, Mumm JN, Heidegger HH, Ditsch N, Mahner S, Jeschke U, Vilsmaier T. Hormone Receptor Expression in Multicentric/Multifocal versus Unifocal Breast Cancer: Especially the VDR Determines the Outcome Related to Focality. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20225740. [PMID: 31731733 PMCID: PMC6888644 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20225740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact that hormone receptor (HR) expressions have on the two different breast cancer (BC) entities—multifocal versus unifocal BC. As the prognosis determining aspects, we investigated the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) by univariate and multivariate analysis. To underline the study’s conclusions, we additionally considered the histopathological grading and the tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging. A retrospective analysis was performed on survival-related events in a series of 320 breast cancer patients treated at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at the Ludwig Maximillian University in Munich between 2000 and 2002. All three steroid receptors analyzed by immunohistochemistry, namely, the estrogen receptor (ER), the progesterone receptor (PR), and the vitamin D receptor (VDR), showed a significantly positive influence on the course of the disease, but only for the unifocal breast tumor patients. The prognosis of patients with multifocal breast cancer was either not affected by estrogen and/or progesterone receptor expression or even involved a worse etiopathology for the vitamin D receptor-positive patients. The estrogen receptor in unifocal breast cancer and the vitamin D receptor in multifocal breast cancer were especially identified as an independent prognostic marker for overall survival, when adjusted for age, grading, and staging. Altogether, our results strengthen the need to further investigate the behavior of the hormone receptors in breast cancer and understand why they have different effects on each focality type. Moreover, the studies for an adopted vitamin D supplementation due to breast cancer focality type must be enlarged to fully comprehend the remarkable and interesting role played by the vitamin D receptor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaleh Zati zehni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Maistraße 11, 80337 Munich, Germany (H.H.H.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| | - Sven-Niclas Jacob
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, LMU, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Jan-Niclas Mumm
- Department of Urology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Helene Hildegard Heidegger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Maistraße 11, 80337 Munich, Germany (H.H.H.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany;
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Maistraße 11, 80337 Munich, Germany (H.H.H.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| | - Udo Jeschke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Maistraße 11, 80337 Munich, Germany (H.H.H.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-8214-0016-5505
| | - Theresa Vilsmaier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Maistraße 11, 80337 Munich, Germany (H.H.H.); (S.M.); (T.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Surgical Therapy for Women with Multiple Synchronous Ipsilateral Breast Cancer (MIBC): Current Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-019-0309-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
30
|
Aydiner A, Igci A, Cabioglu N, Ozer L, Sen F, Keskin S, Muslumanoglu M, Karanlik H, Arslan Ibis K, Kucucuk S, Dincer M, Yavuz E, Tuzlali S, Soran A. Decision Pathways in Breast Cancer Management. Breast Cancer 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96947-3_1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
31
|
Winters ZE, Bernaudo L. Evaluating the current evidence to support therapeutic mammoplasty or breast-conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy in the treatment of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers. Gland Surg 2018; 7:525-535. [PMID: 30687626 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2018.07.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The oncological safety of treating multiple ipsilateral breast cancers (MIBCs) with types of breast conserving surgery (BCS) compared to mastectomy remains uncertain. This is predicated on the absence of any randomised controlled trials or high-quality protocol defined prospective cohort studies. A single recently published systematic review by the first author, reports its summarised results in this review. Fundamentally the important question is the evaluation of clinical safety following BCS compared to mastectomy for treating MIBC, which is reported in only six studies. Consequently, current evidence doesn't support the latest St Gallen consensus suggesting the possibility of using BCS to treat all MIBC. There is minimal comparative outcomes data on multicentric (MC) cancers compared to multifocal (MF) cancers comparing BCS or mastectomy. There is also poor evidence of clinical outcomes following therapeutic mammoplasty (TM) for MIBC compared to mastectomy. The potential recommendation of two potential radiotherapy boosts to separate lumpectomy sites following BCS for MC cancers remains a novel treatment concept whose feasibility will be evaluated in the forthcoming NIHR funded randomised feasibility trial called MIAMI. This is a world first attempt to assess the feasibility of a randomised trial design alongside the on-going Alliance registry study (ACOSOG, American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z11102) in the USA, in which there is no comparative evaluation of mastectomy outcomes. The MIAMI trial aims to assess the clinical safety of multiple lumpectomies combined with TM compared to the standard of mastectomy in MIBC stratified by MF or MC cancers. There is limited evidence on the impacts of inter-tumoral heterogeneity relating to breast cancer subtypes in relation to individualised treatments and recommendations for types of breast surgery. Recent studies have highlighted the potential contributions of stromal epigenetic changes that are currently poorly understood regarding their contributions to either clinical unifocal or MF cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Ellen Winters
- Breast Cancer Surgery, Patient-Centred and Clinical Outcomes Research Group, Surgical and Interventional Trials Unit, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rosenkranz KM, Ballman K, McCall L, Kubicky C, Cuttino L, Le-Petross H, Hunt KK, Giuliano A, Van Zee KJ, Haffty B, Boughey JC. The Feasibility of Breast-Conserving Surgery for Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: An Initial Report from ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance) Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2858-2866. [PMID: 29987605 PMCID: PMC6192830 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6583-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Historically, multiple ipsilateral breast cancer (MIBC) has been a contraindication to breast-conserving therapy (BCT). We report the feasibility of BCT in MIBC from the ACOSOG Z11102 trial [Alliance], a single arm noninferiority trial of BCT for women with two or three sites of malignancy in the ipsilateral breast. METHODS Women who enrolled preoperatively in ACOSOG Z11102 were evaluated for conversion to mastectomy and need for reoperation to obtain negative margins. Characteristics of women who successfully underwent BCT and those who converted to mastectomy were compared. Factors were examined for association with the need for margin reexcision. RESULTS Of 198 patients enrolled preoperatively, 190 (96%) had 2 foci of disease. Median size of the largest tumor focus was 1.5 (range 0.1-7.0) cm; 49 patients (24.8%) had positive nodes. There were 14 women who underwent mastectomy due to positive margins, resulting in a conversion to mastectomy rate of 7.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9-10.6%). Of 184 patients who successfully completed BCT, 134 completed this in a single operation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis did not identify any factors significantly associated with conversion to mastectomy or need for margin reexcision. CONCLUSIONS Breast conservation is feasible in MIBC with 67.6% of patients achieving a margin-negative excision in a single operation and 7.1% of patients requiring conversion to mastectomy due to positive margins. No characteristic was identified that significantly altered the risk of conversion to mastectomy or need for reexcision. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01556243.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karla Ballman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Linda McCall
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Laurie Cuttino
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Huong Le-Petross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Bruce Haffty
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pop CF, Stanciu-Pop C, Drisis S, Radermeker M, Vandemerckt C, Noterman D, Moreau M, Larsimont D, Nogaret JM, Veys I. The impact of breast MRI workup on tumor size assessment and surgical planning in patients with early breast cancer. Breast J 2018; 24:927-933. [DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Catalin-Florin Pop
- Service of Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet; Université Libre de Bruxelles; Brussels Belgium
| | - Claudia Stanciu-Pop
- Department of Pathology, CHU UCL Namur; Université catholique de Louvain; Yvoir Belgium
| | - Stylianos Drisis
- Service of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet; Université Libre de Bruxelles; Brussels Belgium
| | - Magali Radermeker
- Service of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet; Université Libre de Bruxelles; Brussels Belgium
| | - Carine Vandemerckt
- Service of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet; Université Libre de Bruxelles; Brussels Belgium
| | - Danielle Noterman
- Service of Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet; Université Libre de Bruxelles; Brussels Belgium
| | - Michel Moreau
- Statistics Department, Institut Jules Bordet; Université Libre de Bruxelles; Brussels Belgium
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet; Université Libre de Bruxelles; Brussels Belgium
| | - Jean-Marie Nogaret
- Service of Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet; Université Libre de Bruxelles; Brussels Belgium
| | - Isabelle Veys
- Service of Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet; Université Libre de Bruxelles; Brussels Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Winters ZE, Horsnell J, Elvers KT, Maxwell AJ, Jones LJ, Shaaban AM, Schmid P, Williams NR, Beswick A, Greenwood R, Ingram JC, Saunders C, Vaidya JS, Esserman L, Jatoi I, Brunt AM. Systematic review of the impact of breast-conserving surgery on cancer outcomes of multiple ipsilateral breast cancers. BJS Open 2018; 2:162-174. [PMID: 30079385 PMCID: PMC6069349 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical effectiveness of treating ipsilateral multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) breast cancers using breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the standard of mastectomy is uncertain. Inconsistencies relate to definitions, incidence, staging and intertumoral heterogeneity. The primary aim of this systematic review was to compare clinical outcomes after BCS versus mastectomy for MF and MC cancers, collectively defined as multiple ipsilateral breast cancers (MIBC). Methods Comprehensive electronic searches were undertaken to identify complete papers published in English between May 1988 and July 2015, primarily comparing clinical outcomes of BCS and mastectomy for MIBC. All study designs were included, and studies were appraised critically using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. The characteristics and results of identified studies were summarized. Results Twenty‐four retrospective studies were included in the review: 17 comparative studies and seven case series. They included 3537 women with MIBC undergoing BCS; breast cancers were defined as MF in 2677 women, MC in 292, and reported as MIBC in 568. Six studies evaluated MIBC treated by BCS or mastectomy, with locoregional recurrence (LRR) rates of 2–23 per cent after BCS at median follow‐up of 59·5 (i.q.r. 56–81) months. BCS and mastectomy showed apparently equivalent rates of LRR (risk ratio 0·94, 95 per cent c.i. 0·65 to 1·36). Thirteen studies compared BCS in women with MIBC versus those with unifocal cancers, reporting LRR rates of 2–40 per cent after BCS at a median follow‐up of 64 (i.q.r. 57–73) months. One high‐quality study reported 10‐year actuarial LRR rates of 5·5 per cent for BCS in 300 women versus 6·5 per cent for mastectomy among 887 women. Conclusion The available studies were mainly of moderate quality, historical and underpowered, with limited follow‐up and biased case selection favouring BCS rather than mastectomy for low‐risk patients. The evidence was inconclusive, weakening support for the St Gallen consensus and supporting a future randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z E Winters
- Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes Research Group Surgical and Interventional Trials Unit (SITU) London UK
| | - J Horsnell
- Department of Breast Surgery Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Guildford UK
| | - K T Elvers
- Patient-Centred and Clinical Outcomes Research Group University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital Bristol UK
| | - A J Maxwell
- Nightingale Centre Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester UK
| | | | - A M Shaaban
- Department of Histopathology Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - P Schmid
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK
| | - N R Williams
- SITU, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences University College London London UK
| | - A Beswick
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital Bristol UK
| | - R Greenwood
- Research Design Service South West University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust Bristol UK
| | - J C Ingram
- Research Design Service South West University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust Bristol UK
| | - C Saunders
- Division of Surgery, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Fiona Stanley Hospital University of Western Australia Murdoch Western Australia Australia
| | - J S Vaidya
- SITU, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences University College London London UK
| | - L Esserman
- University of California San Francisco Carol Franc Buck Breast Care Centre San Francisco California USA
| | - I Jatoi
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Texas Health Science Centre San Antonio Texas USA
| | - A M Brunt
- Cancer Centre University Hospitals of North Midlands and Keele University Stoke-on-Trent UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant therapy and its impact in facilitating breast conservation in operable breast cancer. Br J Surg 2018; 105:469-481. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Revised: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for operable breast cancer may facilitate more breast-conserving surgery (BCS). It seems, however, that this benefit is not being realized fully.
Methods
A systematic review of the literature was performed. RCTs were included. The criteria for inclusion were: documentation of surgical assessment before and after NAT, surgery performed (BCS or mastectomy), and clinical and pathological responses.
Results
A total of 1452 patients from seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria. After NAT, the feasibility of BCS increased from 43·3 to 60·4 per cent (P < 0·001), but BCS was performed in only 51·8 per cent (P = 0·04). Only 31 per cent of patients who became eligible for BCS (assessed on clinical response) underwent BCS (pooled rate ratio 0·31, 95 per cent c.i. 0·22 to 0·44; P < 0·001). Of the mastectomy candidates who achieved a pathological complete response after NAT, only 41 per cent underwent BCS (pooled rate ratio 0·41, 0·23 to 0·74; P = 0·003). The main factors that influenced the decision not to shift to BCS, even though it was feasible, were clinical assessment before NAT, multicentricity and tumour size at presentation.
Conclusion
Breast surgery performed after NAT does not reflect tumour response, resulting in potentially unnecessary radical surgery, especially mastectomy. The barriers to maximizing the surgical benefits of NAT need to be better understood and explored.
Collapse
|
36
|
Christiansen P, Carstensen SL, Ejlertsen B, Kroman N, Offersen B, Bodilsen A, Jensen MB. Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: overall and relative survival-a population based study by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Acta Oncol 2018; 57:19-25. [PMID: 29168674 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1403042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observational studies have pointed at a better survival after breast conserving surgery (BCS) compared with mastectomy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether this remains true when more extensive tumor characteristics and treatment data were included. METHODS The cohort included patients registered after primary surgery for early invasive breast cancer in the database of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, in the period 1995-2012. The cohort was divided into three groups: (i) patients who primarily had a mastectomy, (ii) patients treated by BCS, and (iii) patients who primarily had BCS and then mastectomy [intention to treat (ITT) by BCS]. The association between overall mortality and standard mortality ratio (SMR) and risk factors was analyzed in univariate and multivariate Poisson regression models. RESULTS A total of 58,331 patients were included: 27,143 in the mastectomy group, 26,958 in the BCS group, and 4230 in the BCS-ITT group. After adjusting for patient and treatment characteristics, the relative risk (RR) was 1.20 (95% CI: 1.15-1.25) after mastectomy and 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01-1.15) after BCS first and then mastectomy, as compared to BCS. Statistically significant interactions were not observed for age, period of treatment, and nodal status, but patients with Charlson's Comorbidity Index (CCI) score 2+ had no increased mortality after mastectomy, as opposed to patients with CCI 0-1. Loco-regional radiation therapy (RT) in node positive patients did not reduce the increased risk associated with mastectomy [RR = 1.28 (95% CI 1.19-1.38)]. CONCLUSION Patients assigned to BCS have a better survival than patients assigned to mastectomy. Residual confounding after adjustment for registered characteristics presumably explained the different outcomes, thus consistent with selection bias. Diversities in RT did not appear to explain the observed difference in survival after BCS and mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peer Christiansen
- Breast Unit, Aarhus University Hospital/Randers Regional Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Stina Lyck Carstensen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Secretariat, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Secretariat, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Niels Kroman
- Department of Breast Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | - Anne Bodilsen
- Department of Surgery, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Maj-Britt Jensen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Secretariat, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Eggener S. Can Focal Treatment Replace Radical Treatment in Prostate Cancer? For Focal Therapy. Eur Urol Focus 2017; 3:522-523. [PMID: 29174615 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Revised: 11/12/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Eggener
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Santiago L, Whitman G, Wang C, Dogan BE. Clinical and Pathologic Features of Clinically Occult Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancers. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2017; 47:305-310. [PMID: 28935459 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Revised: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate clinicopathologic breast cancer characteristics associated with the identification of synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 311 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent diagnostic mammography, ultrasonography, and dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) at our institution. Tumor histology, grade, biomarker status (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2), TNM staging, and unifocal or multifocal/multicentric status were compared between the index tumors in the unilateral disease and the SBBC groups, as well as between the index tumors in the unilateral disease group and the synchronous contralateral tumors (SCT) in the SBBC group, using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS A total of 326 cancers in 311 patients were reviewed. Fifteen (4.8%) patients were diagnosed with SBBC. The index tumors in patients with SBBC were more frequently lower T stage (p = 0.007), lower grade (p = 0.04), and multifocal/multicentric (p = 0.004) compared with the index tumors in the unilateral group. Biomarkers, N status, and M status did not significantly differ between the index tumors in both groups. CONCLUSIONS SBBC was more likely to be identified in women with lower T stage, lower tumor grade and multifocal/multicentric tumors. Multimodality imaging including DCE-MRI is essential in detection and diagnosis of SBBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lumarie Santiago
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Gary Whitman
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Cuiyan Wang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Basak E Dogan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Riethdorf S, Müller V, Loibl S, Nekljudova V, Weber K, Huober J, Fehm T, Schrader I, Hilfrich J, Holms F, Tesch H, Schem C, von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Pantel K. Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumor Cells for Breast Cancer Patients Treated in the Neoadjuvant "Geparquattro" Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23:5384-5393. [PMID: 28679772 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of circulating tumor cells (CTC) detected in patients with operable or locally advanced breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) within the clinical trial GeparQuattro.Experimental Design: Data on CTCs enumerated with the CellSearch system were available for 213 and 207 patients before and after NT, respectively. Associations of CTCs with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by nonparametric Kaplan-Meier estimates and parametric Cox regression.Results: After a median follow-up of 67.1 months, the detection of ≥1 CTC/7.5 mL and ≥2 CTCs/7.5 mL before NT was associated with reduced DFS (P = 0.031 and P < 0.0001, respectively) and OS (P = 0.0057 and P < 0.0001, respectively), whereas CTCs detected after NT did not correlate with DFS or OS. In parametric univariate and multivariate Cox models, ≥1 CTC/7.5 mL, ≥2 CTCs/7.5 mL, and absolute CTC numbers before NT revealed to be independent prognostic parameters of DFS and OS. CTC-negative patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) exhibited the best prognosis, whereas those with CTCs and less tumor response were at high risk of tumor relapse. In HER2 (ERBB2)-positive and triple-negative patients, ≥2 CTCs/7.5 mL detected before NT also were significantly associated with worse DFS and OS.Conclusions: Detection of CTCs before NT is an independent prognostic factor of impaired clinical outcome, and combined with pCR, it could be helpful to stratify breast cancer patients for therapeutic interventions. Clin Cancer Res; 23(18); 5384-93. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Riethdorf
- Department of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Frank Holms
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Barbara-Klinik, Hamm-Heessen, Germany
| | | | - Christian Schem
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heliosklinik Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Pantel
- Department of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tan MP, Ong EM, Amy D, Tot T. Integrating anatomy, radiology, pathology, and surgery: An alternative approach in resecting multifocal and multicentric breast carcinoma. Breast J 2017; 23:663-669. [PMID: 28833864 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2016] [Revised: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The sick lobe hypothesis provides the basis for a lobar approach in radiology, pathology, and surgical treatment of breast cancer. This approach aims to remove the tumor together with the surrounding field of genetic aberrations. Detailed preoperative lobar imaging that properly maps the disease and assesses its extent guides the parenchymal resection. Integration of our knowledge of breast anatomy and pathology with the results of preoperative radiological mapping is critical in assessing the eligibility of patients with multifocal and/or multicentric breast cancer for breast conservation treatment. Through an appropriately selected incision, a multisegment resection of the diseased lobe(s) is performed, which leaves the residual parenchyma in a formation that allows dovetailing of one part into the other, like the way pieces of a jigsaw puzzle fit together. Detailed pathologic analysis of the surgical specimen provides valuable feedback to the radiologist, establishes the completeness of surgical intervention, and generates predictive information for therapeutic decisions. Our approach is a step in continuous search for ideal tailored therapy to avoid under or over-treatment of breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eugene M Ong
- Diagnostic Radiology, Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Tibor Tot
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Cytology, County Hospital Falun, Falun, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Gnant M, Dubsky P, Loibl S, Colleoni M, Regan MM, Piccart-Gebhart M, Senn HJ, Thürlimann B, André F, Baselga J, Bergh J, Bonnefoi H, Brucker SY, Cardoso F, Carey L, Ciruelos E, Cuzick J, Denkert C, Di Leo A, Ejlertsen B, Francis P, Galimberti V, Garber J, Gulluoglu B, Goodwin P, Harbeck N, Hayes DF, Huang CS, Huober J, Khaled H, Jassem J, Jiang Z, Karlsson P, Morrow M, Orecchia R, Osborne KC, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Pritchard K, Ro J, Rutgers EJT, Sedlmayer F, Semiglazov V, Shao Z, Smith I, Toi M, Tutt A, Viale G, Watanabe T, Whelan TJ, Xu B. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:1700-1712. [PMID: 28838210 PMCID: PMC6246241 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 716] [Impact Index Per Article: 102.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The 15th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 2017 in Vienna, Austria reviewed substantial new evidence on loco-regional and systemic therapies for early breast cancer. Treatments were assessed in light of their intensity, duration and side-effects, seeking where appropriate to escalate or de-escalate therapies based on likely benefits as predicted by tumor stage and tumor biology. The Panel favored several interventions that may reduce surgical morbidity, including acceptance of 2 mm margins for DCIS, the resection of residual cancer (but not baseline extent of cancer) in women undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, acceptance of sentinel node biopsy following neoadjuvant treatment of many patients, and the preference for neoadjuvant therapy in HER2 positive and triple-negative, stage II and III breast cancer. The Panel favored escalating radiation therapy with regional nodal irradiation in high-risk patients, while encouraging omission of boost in low-risk patients. The Panel endorsed gene expression signatures that permit avoidance of chemotherapy in many patients with ER positive breast cancer. For women with higher risk tumors, the Panel escalated recommendations for adjuvant endocrine treatment to include ovarian suppression in premenopausal women, and extended therapy for postmenopausal women. However, low-risk patients can avoid these treatments. Finally, the Panel recommended bisphosphonate use in postmenopausal women to prevent breast cancer recurrence. The Panel recognized that recommendations are not intended for all patients, but rather to address the clinical needs of the majority of common presentations. Individualization of adjuvant therapy means adjusting to the tumor characteristics, patient comorbidities and preferences, and managing constraints of treatment cost and access that may affect care in both the developed and developing world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Curigliano
- Breast Cancer Program, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Italy
| | - H J Burstein
- Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - E P Winer
- Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - M Gnant
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Dubsky
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Klinik St. Anna, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - M Colleoni
- Breast Cancer Program, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Italy
| | - M M Regan
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - M Piccart-Gebhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, UniversitÕ Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - H-J Senn
- Tumor and Breast Center ZeTuP, St. Gallen
| | - B Thürlimann
- Breast Center, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - F André
- Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - J Baselga
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - J Bergh
- Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Bonnefoi
- University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Y Brucker
- Universitäts-Frauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - F Cardoso
- Champalimaud Cancer Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - L Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - E Ciruelos
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - C Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Di Leo
- Azienda Usl Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy
| | | | - P Francis
- Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - V Galimberti
- Breast Cancer Program, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Italy
| | - J Garber
- Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - B Gulluoglu
- Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - P Goodwin
- University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - N Harbeck
- University of Munich, München, Germany
| | - D F Hayes
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann-Arbor, USA
| | - C-S Huang
- National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - H Khaled
- The National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - J Jassem
- Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Z Jiang
- Hospital Affiliated to Military Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - P Karlsson
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrensky University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Morrow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - R Orecchia
- Breast Cancer Program, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Italy
| | | | - O Pagani
- Institute of Oncology Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - A H Partridge
- Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - K Pritchard
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Ro
- National Cancer Center, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - E J T Rutgers
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Sedlmayer
- LKH Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Clinics, Salzburg, Austria
| | - V Semiglazov
- N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Z Shao
- Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - I Smith
- The Royal Marsden, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - M Toi
- Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto City, Japan
| | - A Tutt
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - G Viale
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - T Watanabe
- Hamamatsu Oncology Center, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | | | - B Xu
- National Cancer Center, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Teshome M, Kuerer H. Breast conserving surgery and locoregional control after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43:865-874. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2016] [Revised: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
|
43
|
Schwentner L, Helms G, Nekljudova V, Ataseven B, Bauerfeind I, Ditsch N, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hauschild M, Heil J, Kümmel S, Lebeau A, Schmatloch S, Schrenk P, Staebler A, Loibl S, Untch M, Von Minckwitz G, Liedtke C, Kühn T. Using ultrasound and palpation for predicting axillary lymph node status following neoadjuvant chemotherapy – Results from the multi-center SENTINA trial. Breast 2017; 31:202-207. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2016] [Revised: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/11/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
44
|
Landercasper J, Bennie B, Bray MS, Vang CA, Linebarger JH. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy affect morbidity, mortality, reoperations, or readmissions in patients undergoing lumpectomy or mastectomy for breast cancer? Gland Surg 2017; 6:14-26. [PMID: 28210548 PMCID: PMC5293640 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2016.08.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to breast cancer surgery on postoperative complications is unclear. Our objective was to determine whether NAC was associated with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lumpectomy or mastectomy without reconstruction. METHODS Patients meeting inclusion criteria were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database participant user files from 2005 through 2012, after which NSQIP discontinued the NAC variable. Primary outcome measures included a composite measure of morbidity and mortality (M&M) and reoperations and readmissions within 30 days of the index procedure. Rates of postoperative complications stratified by receipt of NAC were compared by χ2. A logistic regression model was then built that included confounding factors for M&M. RESULTS There were 30,309 patients meeting inclusion criteria. NAC was not associated with any postoperative outcomes from 2005 through 2012, but it was associated with higher M&M in lumpectomy patients during 2011 to 2012 [P=0.011, odds ratio (OR) 2.579; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.239-5.368]. CONCLUSIONS The finding that NAC was associated with higher M&M in lumpectomy patients during 2011 to 2012 warrants further investigation. Therefore, we recommend that the NSQIP database reinstitute the NAC variable to allow monitoring during anticipated changes in chemotherapy agents and protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Landercasper
- Department of Medical Research, Gundersen Medical Foundation, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Barbara Bennie
- Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Mallory S. Bray
- Department of Medical Education, Gundersen Medical Foundation, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Choua A. Vang
- Department of Medical Research, Gundersen Medical Foundation, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jared H. Linebarger
- Department of Medical Research, Gundersen Medical Foundation, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of General Surgery, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Breast-Conserving Surgery After Neoadjuvant Therapy. Breast Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48848-6_28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
46
|
Lim LY, Miao H, Lim JSJ, Lee SC, Bhoo‐Pathy N, Yip CH, Taib NABM, Chan P, Tan EY, Lim SH, Lim GH, Woo E, Tan YS, Lee JA, Wong M, Tan PH, Ong KW, Wong FY, Yap YS, Hartman M. Outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Asian breast cancer patients. Cancer Med 2017; 6:173-185. [PMID: 28000426 PMCID: PMC5269707 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
We aim to identify clinicopathologic predictors for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to evaluate the prognostic value of pathologic complete response (pCR) on survival in Asia. This study included 915 breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy at five public hospitals in Singapore and Malaysia. pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was defined as 1) no residual invasive tumor cells in the breast (ypT0/is) and 2) no residual invasive tumor cells in the breast and axillary lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0). Association between pCR and clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment were evaluated using chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test, stratified by other prognostic factors, were conducted to compare overall survival between patients who achieved pCR and patients who did not. Overall, 4.4% of nonmetastatic patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median age of preoperatively treated patients was 50 years. pCR rates were 18.1% (pCR ypT0/is) and 14.4% (pCR ypT0/is ypN0), respectively. pCR rate was the highest among women who had higher grade, smaller size, estrogen receptor negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease or receiving taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who achieved pCR had better overall survival than those who did not. In subgroup analysis, the survival advantage was only significant among women with estrogen receptor-negative tumors. Patients with poor prognostic profile are more likely to achieve pCR and particularly when receiving taxane-containing chemotherapy. pCR is a significant prognostic factor for overall survival especially in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Yan Lim
- Department of SurgeryNational University Health System1E Kent Ridge RoadSingapore119228Singapore
| | - Hui Miao
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public HealthNational University of SingaporeTahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2Singapore117549Singapore
| | - Joline S. J. Lim
- Department of Hematology OncologyNational University Health System1E Kent Ridge RoadSingapore119228Singapore
| | - Soo Chin Lee
- Department of Hematology OncologyNational University Health System1E Kent Ridge RoadSingapore119228Singapore
| | - Nirmala Bhoo‐Pathy
- Julius Centre University MalayaFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala Lumpur50603Malaysia
| | - Cheng Har Yip
- Department of SurgeryFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala Lumpur50603Malaysia
| | - Nur Aishah B. M. Taib
- Department of SurgeryFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala Lumpur50603Malaysia
| | - Patrick Chan
- Department of SurgeryTan Tock Seng Hospital11 Jalan Tan Tock SengSingapore308433Singapore
| | - Ern Yu Tan
- Department of SurgeryTan Tock Seng Hospital11 Jalan Tan Tock SengSingapore308433Singapore
| | - Swee Ho Lim
- Breast DepartmentKK Women's and Children's Hospital100 Bukit Timah RoadSingapore229899Singapore
| | - Geok Hoon Lim
- Breast DepartmentKK Women's and Children's Hospital100 Bukit Timah RoadSingapore229899Singapore
| | - Evan Woo
- Breast DepartmentKK Women's and Children's Hospital100 Bukit Timah RoadSingapore229899Singapore
| | - Yia Swam Tan
- Breast DepartmentKK Women's and Children's Hospital100 Bukit Timah RoadSingapore229899Singapore
| | - Jung Ah Lee
- Breast DepartmentKK Women's and Children's Hospital100 Bukit Timah RoadSingapore229899Singapore
| | - Mabel Wong
- Department of Medical OncologyNational Cancer Centre Singapore11 Hospital DriveSingapore169610Singapore
| | - Puay Hoon Tan
- Department of PathologySingapore General Hospital20 College RoadSingapore169856Singapore
| | - Kong Wee Ong
- Division of Surgical OncologyNational Cancer Centre Singapore11 Hospital DriveSingapore169610Singapore
| | - Fuh Yong Wong
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre Singapore11 Hospital DriveSingapore169610Singapore
| | - Yoon Sim Yap
- Breast DepartmentKK Women's and Children's Hospital100 Bukit Timah RoadSingapore229899Singapore
- Department of Medical OncologyNational Cancer Centre Singapore11 Hospital DriveSingapore169610Singapore
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public HealthNational University of SingaporeTahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2Singapore117549Singapore
- Department of SurgeryNational University of Singapore and National University Health System1E Kent Ridge RoadSingapore119228Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dominici LS, Morrow M, Mittendorf E, Bellon J, King TA. Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer. Curr Probl Surg 2016; 53:559-595. [PMID: 28160790 PMCID: PMC5298793 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2016.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Dominici
- Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Jennifer Bellon
- Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Tari A King
- Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Criscitiello C, Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Wong S, Esposito A, Viale G, Giuliano M, Veronesi U, Santangelo M, Golshan M. Breast conservation following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the modern era: Are we losing the opportunity? Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:1780-1786. [PMID: 27825710 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Revised: 09/21/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The main rationale for neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer is to provide effective systemic treatment while surgically down-staging the cancer. This down-staging was initially to convert inoperable patients to operable and later to increase rates of breast conservation in patients initially deemed mastectomy only candidates. Unexpectedly, in recent neoadjuvant trials lower rates of breast conservation have been observed than in past decades, despite remarkable advances in systemic therapies, which have increased pathologic complete response rates. These results point to factors aside from response and eligibility for breast conservation that may lead surgeons and/or patients to recommend and choose mastectomy. Here, we aim to examine the surgical benefits offered by the modern era neoadjuvant therapy and explore factors that have contributed to this decrease in breast conservation rates. If the main benefit of neoadjuvant therapy is to increase the opportunity for breast conservation, then our review suggests that to optimize less invasive surgical approaches, we will need to address both surgeon and patient-level variables and biases that may be limiting our ability to identify patients appropriate for less aggressive options. As an oncology community, we must be aware of the surgical overtreatment of breast cancer, especially in a time where systemic therapies have remarkably improved outcomes and responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Criscitiello
- Division of Experimental Therapeutics, European Institute of Oncology, Via G. Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
| | - G Curigliano
- Division of Experimental Therapeutics, European Institute of Oncology, Via G. Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
| | - H J Burstein
- Department of Breast Oncology Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - S Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - A Esposito
- Division of Experimental Therapeutics, European Institute of Oncology, Via G. Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
| | - G Viale
- Division of Experimental Therapeutics, European Institute of Oncology, Via G. Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
| | - M Giuliano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Corso Umberto I 40, Naples, Italy.
| | - U Veronesi
- Division of Experimental Therapeutics, European Institute of Oncology, Via G. Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
| | - M Santangelo
- General Surgery, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, University Federico II, Corso Umberto I 40, Naples, Italy.
| | - M Golshan
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Tan MP, Sitoh NY, Sitoh YY. Optimising Breast Conservation Treatment for Multifocal and Multicentric Breast Cancer: A Worthwhile Endeavour? World J Surg 2016; 40:315-22. [PMID: 26560151 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3336-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast conservation treatment (BCT) is an accepted treatment modality for early breast cancer. However, multifocal and multicentric breast cancer (MFMCBC) is a relative contraindication to BCT. This study was performed to compare BCT rates in MFMCBC and unifocal tumours and its outcomes. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed for patients with breast malignancies who underwent operative treatment between 2009 and 2011. Successful BCT was defined as the ability to obtain clear margins for all tumour foci through a single incision with acceptable resultant cosmesis. RESULTS A total of 160 patients were analysed, of which 40 were MFMCBC. Thirty-four of the 40 patients with MFMCBC underwent BCT (85 %). After a mean follow-up period of 55 months, there were no local recurrences in patients with MFMCBC. CONCLUSION BCT was achieved in 85 % of the patients with MFMCBC in this cohort without evidence of poorer local control. Further investigation is needed to confirm this finding for its potential contribution to improved survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona P Tan
- Breast Surgery, MammoCare, 38 Irrawaddy Road, #06-21, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Nadya Y Sitoh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yih Yiow Sitoh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ataseven B, von Minckwitz G. The Impact of Neoadjuvant Treatment on Surgical Options and Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:3093-9. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5364-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|