Is Hepatic Resection for Large or Multifocal Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Justified? Results from a Multi-Institutional Collaboration

Computational pathology: A survey review and the way forward

Computational Pathology (CPath) is an interdisciplinary science that augments developments of computational approaches to analyze and model medical histopathology images. The main objective for CPath is to develop infrastructure and workflows of digital diagnostics as an assistive CAD system for clinical pathology, facilitating transformational changes in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer that are mainly address by CPath tools. With evergrowing developments in deep learning and computer vision algorithms, and the ease of the data flow from digital pathology, currently CPath is witnessing a paradigm shift. Despite the sheer volume of engineering and scientific works being introduced for cancer image analysis, there is still a considerable gap of adopting and integrating these algorithms in clinical practice. This raises a significant question regarding the direction and trends that are undertaken in CPath. In this article we provide a comprehensive review of more than 800 papers to address the challenges faced in problem design all-the-way to the application and implementation viewpoints. We have catalogued each paper into a model-card by examining the key works and challenges faced to layout the current landscape in CPath. We hope this helps the community to locate relevant works and facilitate understanding of the field's future directions. In a nutshell, we oversee the CPath developments in cycle of stages which are required to be cohesively linked together to address the challenges associated with such multidisciplinary science. We overview this cycle from different perspectives of data-centric, model-centric, and application-centric problems. We finally sketch remaining challenges and provide directions for future technical developments and clinical integration of CPath. For updated information on this survey review paper and accessing to the original model cards repository, please refer to GitHub. Updated version of this draft can also be found from arXiv.

Has Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Evolved with the Evidence? Trends and Practice Patterns from the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) has advanced in recent decades, including randomized trial evidence supporting systemic therapy in the palliative and adjuvant setting. Mounting observational evidence suggests resection of IHC with multifocal disease (IHC-MF) or lymph node metastasis (IHC-LNM) should be limited. It is unknown how real-world practice has evolved in light of research advances. This study characterizes trends in management and outcomes of IHC without distant metastasis.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients treated for IHC without distant metastasis (M0) and identified subgroups with lymph node (cN1) or multifocal hepatic involvement (cT2b). Two-sided Cochran-Armitage tests evaluated trends in initial treating modality and perioperative chemotherapy. Logistic regression evaluated associations with choice of initial treating modality. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2020, 11,368 patients were treated for IHC without extrahepatic metastasis. Forty-three percent underwent resection. Initial management shifted from resection towards radiation or systemic therapy in IHC-MF and IHC-LNM. Use of perioperative chemotherapy increased from 39% pre-2010 to 70% in 2018-2020 (p < 0.001), most often delivered postoperatively. Across the entire cohort, median OS improved from 16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 15-18) to 27 months (95% CI 26-29). More modest improvements were observed in IHC-MF and IHC-LNM.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of perioperative chemotherapy has been widely adopted, predating randomized trial evidence in the adjuvant setting. Initial management of IHC-MF and IHC-LNM has shifted from resection to systemic and/or radiation therapy. While OS has improved overall, outcomes of IHC-MF and IHC-LNM remain poor, warranting further investigation.

Exploratory Analyses of Circulating Neoplastic-Immune Hybrid Cells as Prognostic Biomarkers in Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Existing clinical biomarkers do not reliably predict treatment response or disease progression in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Circulating neoplastic-immune hybrid cells (CHCs) have great promise as a blood-based biomarker for patients with advanced ICC. Peripheral blood specimens were longitudinally collected from patients with advanced ICC enrolled in the HELIX-1 phase II clinical trial (NCT04251715). CHCs were identified by co-expression of pan-cytokeratin (CK) and CD45, and levels were correlated to patient clinical disease course. Unsupervised machine learning was then performed to extract their morphological features to compare them across disease courses. Five patients were included in this study, with a median of nine specimens collected per patient. A median of 13.5 CHCs per 50,000 peripheral blood mononuclear cells were identified at baseline, and levels decreased to zero following the initiation of treatment in all patients. Counts remained undetectable in three patients who demonstrated end-of-trial clinical treatment response and conversely increased in two patients with evidence of therapeutic resistance. In the post-trial surveillance period, interval counts increased prior to or at the time of clinical progression in three patients and remain undetectable in one patient with continued long-term disease stability. Using our machine learning platform, treatment-resistant CHCs exhibited upregulation of CK and downregulation of CD45 relative to treatment-responsive CHCs. CHCs represent a promising blood-based biomarker to supplement traditional radiographic and biochemical measures.

Prognostic factors in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second commonly-seen liver malignancy and one of the most fatal cancers in Taiwan. Survival after diagnosis of ICC remains poor. This study aimed to investigate the survival and prognostic factors in patients with ICC. All patients with newly diagnosed ICC during 2004 to 2018 were identified from a national cancer database and followed until December 2020. Estimates of overall survival (OS) were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Initially, 7940 patients with ICC disease (stage IV: 55.6%, 4418/7940) were eligible for this study. Only 32.3% (2563/7940) patients with ICC underwent liver resection. After Propensity score matching, 969 pairs (N = 1938) of patients were matched and selected (mean age 62.8 ± 11.0 years, 53.1% were male, 29.7% had cirrhosis). The median follow-up time was 80.0 months (range 25-201 months). The 3-, 5-year OS rates were 44.0%, 36.4% in the surgical group and 26.0%, 23.7% in the non-surgical group, respectively. Surgery, young patients (≤ 54 years), small tumor size, no vascular invasion and chemotherapy were associated with better OS in patients with stages I-III disease. Surgery benefit was maximum in stage I disease followed by stage II. In patients with stage IV disease, factors such as surgery, young patients (≤ 64 years), single tumor, and no vascular invasion were associated with better OS. Chemotherapy was insignificantly associated with better OS. Long-term survival in patients with ICC is very poor. Compared to non-surgical patients, surgery conveys approximately 18% and 12% better OS rates at 3-year and 5-year, respectively. Early detection and surgical intervention may improve OS substantially in patients with ICC.

Establishing the clinical relevance of grade A post-hepatectomy liver failure

INTRODUCTION

The International Study Group of Liver Surgery's criteria stratifies post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) into grades A, B, and C. The clinical significance of these grades has not been fully established.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) hepatectomy-targeted database was analyzed. Outcomes between patients without PHLF, with grade A PHLF, and grade B or C PHLF were compared. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were performed.

RESULTS

Six thousand two hundred seventy-four adults undergoing elective major hepatectomy were included in the analysis. The incidence of grade A PHLF was 4.3% and grade B or C was 5.3%. Mortality was similar between patients without PHLF (1.2%) and with grade A PHLF (1.1%), but higher in those with grades B or C PHLF (25.4%). Overall morbidities rates were 19.3%, 41.7%, and 72.8% in patients without PHLF, with grade A PHLF, and with grade B or C PHLF, respectively (p < 0.001). Grade A PHLF was associated with increased morbidity (grade A: odds ratios [OR] 2.7 [95% CI: 2.0-3.5]), unplanned reoperation (grade A: OR 3.4 [95% CI: 2.2-5.1]), nonoperative intervention (grade A: OR 2.6 [95% CI: 1.9-3.6]), length of stay (grade A: OR 3.1 [95% CI: 2.3-4.1]), and readmission (grade A: OR 1.8 [95% CI: 1.3-2.5]) compared to patients without PHLF.

CONCLUSIONS

Although mortality was similar between patients without PHLF and with grade A PHLF, other postoperative outcomes were notably inferior. Grade A PHLF is a clinically distinct entity with relevant associated postoperative morbidity.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Evolving strategies in management and treatment

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most frequent primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. According to International Classification of Diseases-11 (ICD-11), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is identified by a specific diagnostic code, different with respect to perihilar-CCA or distal-CCA. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma originates from intrahepatic small or large bile ducts including the second-order bile ducts and has a silent presentation that combined with the highly aggressive nature and refractoriness to chemotherapy contributes to the alarming increasing incidence and mortality. Indeed, at the moment of the diagnosis, less than 40% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are suitable of curative surgical therapy, that is so far the only effective treatment. The main goals of clinicians and researchers are to make an early diagnosis, and to carry out molecular characterization to provide the patient with personalized treatment. Unfortunately, these goals are not easily achievable because of the heterogeneity of this tumor from anatomical, molecular, biological, and clinical perspectives. However, recent progress has been made in molecular characterization, surgical treatment, and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and, this article deals with these advances.

Liver Transplant for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) tends to be asymptomatic until late stages, leading most of the patients to present at advanced stages of the disease. A combination of medical and surgical therapy is crucial for patient management. Historically, poor outcomes resulted in liver transplantation being formally contraindicated for patients with iCCA; however, recent advances in patient selection and neoadjuvant therapy have resulted in a paradigm shift in liver transplant oncology. As a result, the feasibility of liver transplantation for iCCA is being reevaluated by several centers as a therapeutic alternative for select patients with locally advanced unresectable disease.

Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma through MRI Radiomics

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The clinical and MRI data of 129 pathologically confirmed HCC patients and 48 ICC patients treated at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College between April 2016 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly divided at a ratio of 7:3 into a training group of 124 patients (90 with HCC and 34 with ICC) and a validation group of 53 patients (39 with HCC and 14 with ICC). Radiomic features were extracted from axial fat suppression T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI) and axial arterial-phase (AP) and portal-venous-phase (PVP) dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) sequences, and the corresponding datasets were generated. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to select the best radiomic features. Logistic regression was used to establish radiomic models for each sequence (FS-T2WI, AP and PVP models), a clinical model for optimal clinical variables (C model) and a joint radiomics model (JR model) integrating the radiomics features of all the sequences as well as a radiomics-clinical model combining optimal radiomic features and clinical risk factors (RC model). The performance of each model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The AUCs of the FS-T2WI, AP, PVP, JR, C and RC models for distinguishing HCC from ICC were 0.693, 0.863, 0.818, 0.914, 0.936 and 0.977 in the training group and 0.690, 0.784, 0.727, 0.802, 0.860 and 0.877 in the validation group, respectively. The results of this study suggest that MRI-based radiomics may help noninvasively differentiate HCC from ICC. The model integrating the radiomics features and clinical risk factors showed a further improvement in performance.

Transplant Oncology: An Emerging Discipline of Cancer Treatment

Transplant oncology is an emerging concept of cancer treatment with a promising prospective outcome. The applications of oncology, transplant medicine, and surgery are the core of transplant oncology to improve patients' survival and quality of life. The main concept of transplant oncology is to radically cure cancer by removing the diseased organ and replacing it with a healthy one, aiming to improve the survival outcomes and quality of life of cancer patients. Subsequently, it seeks to expand the treatment options and research for hepatobiliary malignancies, which have seen significantly improved survival outcomes after the implementation of liver transplantation (LT). In the case of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the transplant setting, where the liver is the most common site of metastasis of patients who are considered to have unresectable disease, initial studies have shown improved survival for LT treatment compared to palliative therapy interventions. The indications of LT for hepatobiliary malignancies have been slowly expanded over the years beyond Milan criteria in a stepwise manner. However, the outcome improvements and overall patient survival are limited to the specifics of the setting and systematic intervention options. This review aims to illustrate the representative concepts and history of transplant oncology as an emerging discipline for the management of hepatobiliary malignancies, in addition to other emerging concepts, such as the uses of immunotherapy in a peri-transplant setting as well as the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for surveillance post-transplantation.

EASL-ILCA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) develops inside the liver, between bile ductules and the second-order bile ducts. It is the second most frequent primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma, and its global incidence is increasing. It is associated with an alarming mortality rate owing to its silent presentation (often leading to late diagnosis), highly aggressive nature and resistance to treatment. Early diagnosis, molecular characterisation, accurate staging and personalised multidisciplinary treatments represent current challenges for researchers and physicians. Unfortunately, these challenges are beset by the high heterogeneity of iCCA at the clinical, genomic, epigenetic and molecular levels, very often precluding successful management. Nonetheless, in the last few years, progress has been made in molecular characterisation, surgical management, and targeted therapy. Recent advances together with the awareness that iCCA represents a distinct entity amongst the CCA family, led the ILCA and EASL governing boards to commission international experts to draft dedicated evidence-based guidelines for physicians involved in the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic management of iCCA.

Prognostic influence of multiple hepatic lesions in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Presence of multiple hepatic lesions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is included in staging as a negative prognostic factor, but both prognostic value and therapeutic implications remain debated. The aim of this study was to systematically review the prognostic influence of multiple lesions on survival after resection for iCCA, with stratification for distribution and number of lesions.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were systematically searched to identify records (2010-2021) reporting survival for patients undergoing primary resection for iCCA. Included were original articles reporting overall survival, with data on multiple lesions including tumour distribution (satellites/other multiple lesions) and/or number. For meta-analysis, the random effects model and inverse variance method were used. PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were included for review. For meta-analysis, nine studies reporting data on the prognostic influence of satellite lesions (2737 patients) and six studies reporting data on multiple lesions other than satellites (1589 patients) were included. Satellite lesions (hazard ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.67-2.13) and multiple lesions other than satellites (hazard ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.72-3.37) were significant negative prognostic factors. Data stratified for tumour number, while limited, indicated increased risk per additional lesion.

CONCLUSION

Satellite lesions, as well as multiple lesions other than satellites, was a negative prognostic factor in resectable iCCA. Considering the prognostic impact, both tumour distribution and number of lesions should be evaluated together with other risk factors to allow risk stratification for iCCA patients with multiple lesions, rather than precluding resection for the entire patient group.

Validation of the Prognostic Role for Surgical Treatment in Stage II Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A SEER Population-Based Study

Background: This study aimed to determine the role of surgical treatment in patients with stage II intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Methods: Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We divided stage II iCCAs into solitary tumors with vascular invasion (T2sN0M0) and multiple tumors with/without vascular invasion (T2mN0M0) according to the criteria of AJCC v.8. The Kaplan−Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate differences in overall survival (OS). We performed two propensity score-matching analyses with (PSM2) or without (PSM1) surgical treatment. Results: 667 and 778 iCCA patients with stage II and IIIB were recruited. After PSM2, there was no survival difference in stage II iCCA patients in hypothetical conditions with similar surgical proportions (p = 0.079). However, OS was significantly worse in patients with T2mN0M0 than T2sN0M0 when the actual surgical proportion existed after PSM1 (p < 0.001). OS was similar between T2mN0M0 and IIIB regardless of whether PSM1 (p = 0.907) or PSM2 (p = 0.699) was performed. The surgical treatment was verified to associate with prognosis. Conclusions: The survival benefit by surgical treatment was existed in Stage II but not in Stage IIIB iCCA patients. The OS for T2mN0M0 will approach that of T2sN0M0 if the surgical proportion is gradually increased.

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves the Prognostic Outcomes in Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Curative-Intent Resection

Purpose

The prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed at investigating whether additional multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) would guide additional treatment and improve the prognostic outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.

Methods and Materials

This retrospective study included 256 patients undergoing dynamic enhanced computed tomography scan only (CT group) and 31 patients undergoing both mpMRI and computed tomography scans (CT+MR group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the potential selection bias and confounding effects. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were compared between the two groups.

Results

More nodules (n = 6), additional biliary dilation (n = 4), and peritumoral parenchymal arterial phase hyperenhancement (n = 18) were found with the additional mpMRI scan, which led to treatment modification. Cox regression analysis revealed the survival advantage of additional mpMRI imaging based on the OS (HR 0.396, 95% CI 0.239–0.657, p < 0.001; PSM HR 0.400, 95% CI 0.218–0.736, p = 0.003) and RFS (HR 0.558, 95% CI 0.352–0.882, p = 0.013; PSM HR 0.508, 95% CI 0.288–0.897, p = 0.020).

Conclusions

Additional mpMRI helps clinicians to select better treatment options, lower the risk of tumor recurrence, and improve the overall survival.

Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-A Multidisciplinary Approach

Simple Summary

This review discusses multimodality treatment strategies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC). Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative therapeutic option and the central cornerstone of treatment. Adjuvant systemic treatment will be recommended after resection or in the palliative setting. Increasing knowledge of phenotypic subclassification and molecular profiling allows investigation of targeted therapies as (neo-)adjuvant treatment. High-dose brachytherapy, internal radiation therapy, and transarterial chemoembolization are among the interventional treatment options being evaluated for unresectable iCC. Given the multiple options of multidisciplinary management, any treatment strategy should be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board and treatment should be directed by a specialized treatment center.

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) is distinguished as an entity from perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Recently, molecular profiling and histopathological features have allowed further classification. Due to the frequent delay in diagnosis, the prognosis for iCC remains poor despite major technical advances and multimodal therapeutic approaches. Liver resection represents the therapeutic backbone and only curative treatment option, with the functional residual capacity of the liver and oncologic radicality being deciding factors for postoperative and long-term oncological outcome. Furthermore, in selected cases and depending on national guidelines, liver transplantation may be a therapeutic option. Given the often advanced tumor stage at diagnosis or the potential for postoperative recurrence, locoregional therapies have become increasingly important. These strategies range from radiofrequency ablation to transarterial chemoembolization to selective internal radiation therapy and can be used in combination with liver resection. In addition, adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapies as well as targeted therapies and immunotherapies based on molecular profiles can be applied. This review discusses multimodal treatment strategies for iCC and their differential use.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Is there a role for liver transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation offers a potential for curative-intent treatment in patients presenting with non-metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma that is not amenable to partial hepatectomy. There is little empiric evidence evaluating the efficacy of liver transplantation in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients presenting with histologically confirmed clinical stage I to III intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 2004 and 2016. Propensity scoring was used to develop matched cohorts of patients undergoing treatment with liver transplantation, surgical resection, or chemotherapy alone. Kaplan Meier methods were used to compare rates of overall survival.

RESULTS

One thousand four hundred and eleven patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 66 (4.7%) underwent liver transplantation, 461 (32.7%) underwent surgical resection, and 884 (62.6%) were treated with chemotherapy alone. On adjusted analysis, patients undergoing liver transplantation were more likely to be male (odds ratio 4.35, 95% confidence interval [0.12, 0.42]), have a Charlson Comorbidity Score ≥2 (odds ratio 3.11, 95% confidence interval [1.44, 6.57]), and to receive both neoadjuvant (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval [1.36,5.75], and adjuvant (odds ratio 1.94, 95% confidence interval [0.97, 3.87]) systemic therapy than those undergoing resection. On Kaplan Meier analysis, patients undergoing liver transplantation demonstrated rates of 5-year overall survival (36.1% vs 34.7%, P = .53) that were statistically identical to those for stage-matched and margin-matched patients undergoing resection but significantly better than those for stage-matched patients treated with systemic therapy alone (36.1% vs 5.3%, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing liver transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma demonstrate overall survival profiles similar to stage-matched and margin-matched patients undergoing surgical resection. Liver transplantation is an effective treatment modality in select patients presenting with localized intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Clinical Value of Machine Learning-Based Ultrasomics in Preoperative Differentiation Between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the clinical value of machine learning-based ultrasomics in the preoperative noninvasive differentiation between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

The clinical data and ultrasonic images of 226 patients from three hospitals were retrospectively collected and divided into training set (n = 149), test set (n = 38), and independent validation set (n = 39). Manual segmentation of tumor lesion was performed with ITK-SNAP, the ultrasomics features were extracted by the pyradiomics, and ultrasomics signatures were generated using variance filtering and lasso regression. The prediction models for preoperative differentiation between HCC and ICC were established by using support vector machine (SVM). The performance of the three models was evaluated by the area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

RESULTS

The ultrasomics signatures extracted from the grayscale ultrasound images could successfully differentiate between HCC and ICC (p < 0.05). The combined model had a better performance than either the clinical model or the ultrasomics model. In addition to stability, the combined model also had a stronger generalization ability (p < 0.05). The AUC (along with 95% CI), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the combined model on the test set and the independent validation set were 0.936 (0.806-0.989), 0.900, 0.857, 0.868, and 0.874 (0.733-0.961), 0.889, 0.867, and 0.872, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The ultrasomics signatures could facilitate the preoperative noninvasive differentiation between HCC and ICC. The combined model integrating ultrasomics signatures and clinical features had a higher clinical value and a stronger generalization ability.

Safety and initial efficacy of ablative radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate safety, response, and survival after ablative glass microsphere ⁹⁰Y radioembolization for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 37 radioembolizations in 28 patients treated with single compartment dose of ≥190 Gy encompassing >75% of the largest tumor was performed. Tumors were assessed for stage, morphology, and arterial supply. Response per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), freedom from progression (FFP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), biochemical hepatic function, performance status, and adverse events were investigated.

RESULTS

The median highest dose per patient was 256.8 Gy (195.7-807.8). Objective response at 3 months was 94.1% (complete 44.1% and partial 50%). Median OS was not reached and the 30-month OS rate was 59%, with a median follow-up of 13.4 months (5.4-39.4). FFP in the radiated field and overall FFP at 30 months were 67% and 40%, respectively. Favorable arterial supply was associated with improved OS (p = 0.018). Unfavorable arterial supply was associated with worse OS [HR 5.7 (95% CI 1.1-28.9, p = 0.034)], and PFS [HR 5.9 (95% CI 1.9-18.4, p = 0.002)]. Patients with mass-forming tumors had a survival benefit (p = 0.002). Laboratory values and performance status did not significantly change 3 months after radioembolization. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 2 (7.1%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Radioembolization of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with ablative intent has a high response rate, promising survival, and is well tolerated.

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Report of an international multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. In patients where surgical resection is possible, outcome is influenced by perioperative morbidity and lymph node status. Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with improved clinical and oncological outcomes in primary and metastatic liver cancer compared with open liver resection, but evidence on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is still insufficient. The primary aim of this study was to compare overall survival for a large series of patients treated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by open or laparoscopic approach. Secondary objectives were to compare disease-free survival, predictors of death, and recurrence.

METHODS

Patients treated with laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from 2000 to 2018 from 3 large international databases were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient in the laparoscopic resection group (case) was matched with 1 open resection control (1:1 ratio), through a propensity score calculated on clinically relevant preoperative covariates. Overall and disease-free survival were compared between the matched groups. Predictors of mortality and recurrence were analyzed with Cox regression, and the Textbook Outcomes were described.

RESULTS

During the study period, 855 patients met the inclusion criteria (open liver resection = 709, 82.9%; laparoscopic liver resection = 146, 17.1%). Two groups of 89 patients each were analyzed after propensity score matching, with no significant difference regarding pre- and postoperative variables. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92%, 75%, and 63% in the laparoscopic liver resection group versus 92%, 58%, and 49% in the open liver resection group (P = .0043). Adjusted Cox regression revealed severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 10.5, 95% confidence interval [1.01-109] P = .049) and steatosis (hazard ratio: 13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.23-154] P = .033) as predictors of death, and transfusion (hazard ratio: 19.2, 95% confidence interval [4.04-91.4] P < .001) and severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 4.07, 95% confidence interval [1.15-14.4] P = .030) as predictors of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The survival advantage of laparoscopic liver resection over open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is equivocal, given historical bias and missing data.

Detection of Tumor Multifocality in Resectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Defining the Optimal Pre-operative Imaging Modality

BACKGROUND

Multiple tumor foci (MTF) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), including satellitosis and true multifocality, is a known negative prognostic factor and can inform pre-operative decision-making. Lack of standardized pre-operative liver staging practices may contribute to undiagnosed MTF and poor outcomes. We sought to investigate the sensitivity of different cross-sectional imaging modalities for MTF at our institution.

METHODS

We identified n = 52 patients with ICC who underwent curative-intent resection from 2004 to 2017 in a multidisciplinary hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer program. Timing and modality of pre-operative imaging were recorded. Blinded review of imaging was performed and modalities were evaluated for false-negative rate (FNR) in detecting MTF, satellitosis, and true multifocality.

RESULTS

Forty-one (79%) patients underwent CT and 20 (38%) underwent MRI prior to hepatectomy. MTF was pre-operatively identified in six (12%) patients. An additional seven patients had MTF discovered on final surgical pathology, despite a median interval from CT/MRI to surgery of 20 days. On blinded review the FNR of MRI compared to CT for multifocality was 0% vs. 38%, 50% vs 80% for satellitosis, and 22% vs 46% for MTF as a whole.

CONCLUSION

CT is inadequate for pre-operative diagnosis of MTF in resectable ICC, even when performed within 30 days of hepatectomy. We recommend liver-protocol MRI as the standard pre-operative imaging modality in non-metastatic ICC.

Reappraisal of the T Category for Solitary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Tumor Size in 611 Early-Stage (T1-2N0M0) Patients After Hepatectomy: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between tumor size and survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after hepatectomy is controversial, and the T category in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage for ICC is a topic of debate.

METHODS

Data from 611 T1-2N0M0 ICC patients classified by the AJCC 8th edition who underwent hepatectomy were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 1988-2015. Cancer-specific survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The optimal cutoff value of solitary tumor size was used an adjusted p value approach to discriminating patient survival.

RESULTS

In the AJCC 8th staging system, using a 5-cm cut-off value of tumor size for solitary ICC without vascular invasion (S/VI-) was not associated with survival in T1 category (p = 0.201), and multifocal ICC with vascular invasion had a worse survival than solitary ICC with vascular invasion (S/VI+) in T2 category (p = 0.014). Tumor size was a prognostic factor for both S/VI- and S/VI+, the optimal cutoff value of tumor size was obtained 8 cm for S/VI- and 3 cm for S/VI+. S/VI- ≤ 8 cm had a similar survival to S/VI+ ≤ 3 cm (p = 0.126), S/VI- > 8 cm had a similar survival to S/VI+ > 3 cm (p = 0.655), and multifocal ICC had a similar survival with S/VI- > 8 cm (p = 0.159) and S/VI+ > 3 cm (p = 0.196). When the cohort was divided into two groups-new T1 (S/VI- ≤ 8 cm and S/VI+ ≤ 3 cm) and new T2 (S/VI- > 8 cm, S/VI+ > 3 cm and multifocal ICC)-significant survival difference was observed (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The discriminatory power of the AJCC 8th edition for solitary ICC could be further enhanced by subdividing tumors according to size and vascular invasion (8 cm for S/VI- and 3 cm for S/VI+).

Current Surgical Management of Peri-Hilar and Intra-Hepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma accounts for approximately 10% of all hepatobiliary tumors and represents 3% of all new-diagnosed malignancies worldwide. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (i-CCA) accounts for 10% of all cases, perihilar (h-CCA) cholangiocarcinoma represents two-thirds of the cases, while distal cholangiocarcinoma accounts for the remaining quarter. Originally described by Klatskin in 1965, h-CCA represents one of the most challenging tumors for hepatobiliary surgeons, mainly because of the anatomical vascular relationships of the biliary confluence at the hepatic hilum. Surgery is the only curative option, with the goal of a radical, margin-negative (R0) tumor resection. Continuous efforts have been made by hepatobiliary surgeons in order to achieve R0 resections, leading to the progressive development of aggressive approaches that include extended hepatectomies, associating liver partition, and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, pre-operative portal vein embolization, and vascular resections. i-CCA is an aggressive biliary cancer that arises from the biliary epithelium proximal to the second-degree bile ducts. The incidence of i-CCA is dramatically increasing worldwide, and surgical resection is the only potentially curative therapy. An aggressive surgical approach, including extended liver resection and vascular reconstruction, and a greater application of systemic therapy and locoregional treatments could lead to an increase in the resection rate and the overall survival in selected i-CCA patients. Improvements achieved over the last two decades and the encouraging results recently reported have led to liver transplantation now being considered an appropriate indication for CCA patients.

Primary tumor resection improves survival in patients with multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on a population study

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of surgery on the survival and prognosis of patients with multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA). Patients with multifocal ICCA were selected from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database between 2010 and 2016. Kaplan–Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the difference in survival between the surgery group and the non-surgery group. We applied the Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). In total, 580 patients were enrolled in our study, including 151 patients who underwent surgery and 429 patients who did not. The median survival time of surgical patients was longer than non-surgical patients (OS: 25 months vs. 8 months, p < 0.001; CSS: 40 months vs. 25 months, p < 0.001). Similarly, the 5-year survival rate in the surgery group was significantly higher than those in the non-surgery group (5-year OS rate: 12.91% vs. 0%; p < 0.001; 5-year CSS rate:26.91% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that the OS (HR:0.299, 95% CI: 0.229–0.390, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR:0.305, 95% CI:0.222–0.419, p < 0.001) of patients undergoing surgical resection were significantly improved. Meanwhile, after propensity score matching (PSM) of the original data, we come to the same conclusion.

The Role of Surgical Resection and Liver Transplantation for the Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare and complex malignancy of the biliary epithelium. Due to its silent presentation, patients are frequently diagnosed late in their disease course, resulting in poor overall survival. Advances in molecular profiling and targeted therapies have improved medical management, but long-term survival is rarely seen with medical therapy alone. Surgical resection offers a survival advantage, but negative oncologic margins are difficult to achieve, recurrence rates are high, and the need for adequate future liver remnant limits the extent of resection. Advances in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments have broadened patient treatment options, and these agents are undergoing active investigation, especially in the setting of advanced, initially unresectable disease. For those who are not able to undergo resection, liver transplantation is emerging as a potential curative therapy in certain cases. Patient selection, favorable tumor biology, and a protocolized, multidisciplinary approach are ultimately necessary for best patient outcomes. This review will discuss the current surgical management of locally advanced, liver-limited intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as well as the role of liver transplantation for select patients with background liver disease.

Complex Liver Resections for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

The only curative treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is liver resection. Due to central tumor localization and vascular invasion, complex liver resections play an important role in curative treatment. However, the long-term outcomes after complex liver resection are not known. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted for all patients undergoing liver surgery for iCCA. Complex liver resections included ante situm resections, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and major liver resection with vascular reconstructions. Results: Forty-nine patients (34%) received complex liver resection, 66 patients (46%) received conventional liver resection and 28 patients (20%) were not resectable during exploration. Preoperative characteristics were not different between the groups, except for Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stages. The postoperative course for complex liver resections was associated with more complications and perioperative mortality. However, long-term survival was not different between complex and conventional resections. Independent risk factors for survival were R0 resections and UICC stage. Four patients underwent ante situm resection without any mortality. Conclusions: Complex liver resections are justified in selected patients and survival is comparable with conventional liver resections. Survival in iCCA is affected by UICC stage or resections margins and not by the complexity of the case.

Effect of Tumor Size on Long-Term Survival After Resection for Solitary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Background

The relationship between tumor size and survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic ability of tumor size for solitary ICC after resection and explore optimal cut-off values in different subgroups.

Methods

Patients with solitary ICC who underwent liver resection from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and Shandong Provincial Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the prognostic ability of tumor size. The log-rank test was used to determine the optimal cut-off values, and a minimum P was regarded as the optimal one in different subgroups.

Results

Large tumor size groups had worse overall survival (OS) than small tumor size groups. Cox regression analysis suggested that tumor size was an independent prognostic factor for OS for solitary ICC after resection. Subgroup analysis showed tumor size was associated with OS for both solitary ICC with and without vascular invasion (VI). Furthermore, the optimal cut-off values for solitary ICC with and without VI were found to be 8 and 3 cm, respectively, which could divide the patients into two groups with significant differences in OS.

Conclusion

Tumor size was an independent prognostic factor for solitary ICC after resection. The existing American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system could be improved if the cut-off value of the T1 stage was changed to 8 cm and if the T2 stage incorporated a tumor size with a cut-off value of 3 cm. Further studies with more cases are needed to validate these findings.

Repeated resection for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective German multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Tumour recurrence is common after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Repeated resection is a potential curative treatment, but outcomes are not well-defined thus far. The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to show the feasibility and survival of repeated resection of ICC recurrence.

METHODS

Data were collected from 18 German hepato-pancreatico-biliary centres for patients who underwent repeated exploration of recurrent ICC between January 2008 and December 2017. Primary end points were overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival from the day of primary and repeated resection.

RESULTS

Of 156 patients who underwent repeated exploration for recurrent ICC, 113 underwent re-resection. CA19-9 prior to primary resection, R status of first liver resection and median time to recurrence were significant determinants of repeated resectability. Median OS in the repeated resection group was 65.2 months, with consecutive 1-, 3- and 5-year OS of 98%, 78% and 57% respectively. After re-exploration, median OS from primary resection was 46.7 months, with a consecutive 1-, 3- and 5-year OS of 95%, 55% and 22% respectively. From the day of repeated resection, the median OS was 36.8 months, with a consecutive 1-, 3- and 5-year OS of 86%, 51% and 34% respectively. Minor morbidity (grade I+II) was present in 27%, grade IIIa-IVb morbidity in 20% and mortality in 3.5% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Repeated resection of ICC has acceptable morbidity and mortality and seems to be associated with improved long-term survival. Structured follow-up after resection of ICC is necessary for early identification of these patients.

Hepatolithiasis: clinical series, review and current management strategy

Objectives

Hepatolithiasis (HL) continues to be a problem due to its local and systemic complications, insufficiency in treatment modalities and high risk of recurrence. There are various surgical options available, ranging from endoscopic interventions to a small segment resection and ultimately to transplantation. In this article, patients with the diagnosis of HL and our treatment strategies were evaluated in the light of literature.

Material and Methods

The patients diagnosed with HL in our clinic between 2014-2019 were evaluated retrospectively by examining the patient files. Demographic characteristics of the patients, causes of the disease, complications and treatment options were evaluated.

Results

17 patients were included into the study. Mean age of the patients was 64.3 years (range 32-89 years). Seven patients had previous cholecystectomies. Stenosis was found to be developed in hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) site in three patients (two had HJ due to bile duct injury and one had HJ following the Whipple procedure), and in hepaticoduodenostomy site in one patient who had the history of biliary tract injury during cholecystectomy. Two patients with HL without previous cholecystectomies had no gallbladder stones. Nine patients underwent surgery. Left hepatectomy was performed in two patients and lateral sector resection was performed in 2 patients. Two patients with anastomotic stenosis underwent HJ revision and two patients with anastomotic stenosis and one patient with stent ingrowth underwent bifurcation resection and neo-hepaticojejunostomy. Eight patients were followed-up nonoperatively with medical and endoscopic approaches.

Conclusion

Hepatolithiasis is a serious condition that needs to be treated with a multimodal approach. Stenting and anastomotic stenosis facilitate the development of hepatolithiasis and increase the risk of its occurrence. In particular, by performing functional hepaticojejunostomy, the development of this complication will be decreased.

Diabetes and PKM2 affect prognosis in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common disease, but its effect on the prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has not been reported. The aim of the present study was to explore the prognostic significance of diabetes in patients with ICC treated with hepatectomy and to clarify the role of pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2). A consecutive retrospective cohort of 110 patients with ICC (28 with DM and 82 without DM) who underwent therapeutic hepatectomy was evaluated between January 2006 and January 2011. The clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups and the differences between overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed. The Cox proportional hazards model was further used to identify independent prognostic predictors. PKM2 expression was measured using immunohistochemical staining in tissues collected, after obtaining informed consent. Patients with ICC with DM exhibited significantly lower OS and RFS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years compared with patients with ICC without DM. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that DM was an independent predictor of poor OS and RFS. Additionally, high PKM2 expression was significantly higher in patients with ICC with DM compared with that in patients without DM. Overall, DM was associated with significantly lower OS and RFS rates in patients with ICC. The underlying biological rationale may be attributed to the higher PKM2 expression rate.

Developing a Selection-aided Model to Screen Cirrhotic Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma for Hepatectomy

Background: This study aimed to establish a model predicting the prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients with cirrhosis before liver resection (LR). Methods: An Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH) model using the preoperative factors was established in a training cohort (305 patients from 2006 to 2011) and validated in an internal validation cohort (113 patients from 2012 to 2014). Predictive performance and discrimination were evaluated and compared with other staging systems. Results: The EHBH model containing preoperative factors of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), radiological tumor diameter, tumor number, and satellite nodules outperformed other staging systems in predicting the prognosis of ICC. A contour plot of 3-year survival probability and a nomogram to form two differentiated groups of patients (high-risk group and low-risk group) were constructed based on the EHBH model to help surgeons predicting the overall survival (OS) before LR. Patients from the high-risk group (>86.56 points) in the training cohort had worse OS rates compared with those from the low-risk group (≤86.56 points). The one-, three-, and five-year OS rates were 50.4%, 29.0%, and 21.0% for the high-risk group and 68.2%, 45.5%, and 39.7% for the low-risk group, respectively (P<0.001). The same results were obtained in the internal validation patients. Conclusion: The contour plot is an easy-to-use tool to individually show the 3-year prognosis of ICC patients with different preoperative CA19-9 values and radiological characteristics before surgery. The EHBH model was suitable for selecting cirrhotic patients for LR to acquire a better survival.

Downstaging with Radioembolization or Chemotherapy for Initially Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the outcomes of patients resected for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with upfront surgery or after downstaging treatment.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with ICC between January 1997 and November 2017 were included in a single-center database and retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: upfront resection or resection after downstaging using either chemotherapy alone or selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) combined with chemotherapy. Survival rates of patients who underwent upfront surgery for ICC were compared with those of patients who underwent surgery after downstaging therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients resected for ICC were included: 137 underwent upfront surgery and 32 received downstaging treatment because their tumor was initially unresectable (13 received chemotherapy, 19 received SIRT). Median OS was not different between the two groups: 32.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 23.9-40.7] with primary surgery versus 45.9 months (95% CI 32.3-59.4) with downstaging treatment (p = 0.54, log-rank test). In a multivariable Cox regression model, downstaging treatment was not associated with a better or worse prognosis; however, delivery of SIRT as a downstaging treatment was associated with a significant benefit in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.84; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival of patients resected after downstaging treatment was not different compared with the OS of patients resected upfront. Patients should therefore again be discussed with the surgeon following medical treatment. SIRT may be an efficient neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable ICC, in order to improve surgical results.

Effect of surgical margin width after R0 resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A nationwide survey of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan

BACKGROUND

Data are inconsistent regarding the effects of a wide surgical margin for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on recurrence-free survival and overall survival. This study was performed to investigate the effect of surgical margin width in patients undergoing R0 resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, using a nationwide database in Japan.

METHODS

In total, 635 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who were treated by an R0 resection from 2000 to 2007 were identified from the database of a Japanese nationwide survey. Patients were divided into quartiles of the surgical margin width as follows: marginal (<1 mm), narrow (1-4 mm), intermediate (5-9 mm), and wide groups (≥10 mm). Multivariable Cox regression models for recurrence-free survival and overall survival were constructed with adjustment for preoperative and postoperative clinicopathologic factors.

RESULTS

Compared with the marginal group, the risk-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) in the narrow, intermediate, and wide groups for recurrence-free survival were 0.92 (0.62-1.37), 0.91 (0.61-1.37), and 0.81 (0.56-1.17), and those for overall survival were 0.79 (0.51-1.24), 0.93 (0.59-1.47), and 0.70 (0.46-1.08), respectively. In 398 patients without lymph node metastasis, the hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.62 (0.34-1.11), 0.63 (0.34-1.17), and 0.51 (0.29-0.90), and those of mass-forming type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were 0.48 (0.21-1.08), 0.43 (0.19-0.96), and 0.40 (0.19-0.82), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Surgical margin width appears to have a limited effect on the prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma except in patients without lymph node metastasis, where a wide surgical margin is associated with favorable outcomes. This survival benefit of a wide surgical margin is especially apparent for the mass-forming type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Multigene mutational profiling of biliary tract cancer is related to the pattern of recurrence in surgically resected patients

The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the mutational gene profile and recurrence in biliary tract cancers (BTC). A total of 103 specimens of patients with BTC, who underwent curative surgery in a single tertiary HPB surgery referral center from 1990 to 2012, were assessed for mutational status in 52 cancer-related genes. Considering the different types of BTC, the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 16.7% (median RFS 7 months) in gallbladder cancer, 42.9% (median RFS 26.4 months) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 19.7% (median RFS 16.5 months) in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, p = 0.166. At the multivariate analysis including clinical, pathological, and molecular features, the factors independently related to RFS were radicality of surgery (OR 2.050, CI 1.104-3.807, p = 0.023), LN status (OR 1.835, CI 1.006-3.348, p = 0.048), mutational status of ARID1A (OR 2.566, CI 1.174-5.608, p = 0.018), and TP53 (OR 2.805, CI 4.432-5.496, p = 0.003). ARID1A mutation was associated with a local and systemic recurrence in the 43% and 29% of cases, respectively; and TP53 mutation was associated with a local and systemic recurrence in the 29% and 41% of cases. Moreover, TP53 was most commonly mutated in tumor of patients with early recurrence, p = 0.044. ARID1A and TP53 mutations seem to be related to poor outcome after surgery and may be considered molecular predictors of the biological aggressiveness in BTC.

Risk prediction in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Direct comparison of the MEGNA score and the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC Cancer staging system

BACKGROUND

External validation of prognostic risk models is essential before they are implemented in clinical practice. This study evaluated the recently developed MEGNA score for survival prediction after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), with a focus on the direct comparison of its prognostic value to that of the current International Union Against Cancer (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer staging system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1997 and 2018, 417 consecutive patients with ICC were referred to our tertiary care centre and were retrospectively identified out of a dedicated clinical database. Of this group, 203 patients underwent surgical resection and met the inclusion criteria. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the predictors of the recently proposed MEGNA score regarding overall survival (OS). Concordance indices (C-indices) and integrated Brier scores (IBS) were calculated to assess the ability of both the MEGNA score and the current (8th) edition of the UICC/AJCC Cancer staging system to predict individual patient outcome.

RESULTS

Stratification according to the MEGNA score resulted in a median OS of 34.5 months, 26.1 months, 21.5 months, and 16.6 months for MEGNA scores 0, 1, 2, and ≥3, respectively (log rank p < 0.001). However, of the five factors that contribute to the MEGNA score, age > 60 years was not a predictor for poor OS in our cohort. The C-index for the MEGNA score was 0.58, the IBS was 0.193. The 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC system performed slightly better, with a C-index of 0.61 and an IBS of 0.186.

CONCLUSION

The ability of the MEGNA score to predict individual patient outcome was only moderate in this external validation. Its prognostic value did not reach that of the more widely known and used UICC/AJCC system. However, neither scoring system performed well enough to support clear-cut clinical decisions.

Liver resection and transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is increasing worldwide. Although several advances have been made in the past decades to better understand this complex malignancy and to develop new treatment strategies, the prognosis of iCCA remains dismal. Liver resection (LR) is the mainstay of treatment but only a minority of patients are amenable to surgery. In most cases, patients with iCCA will require a major hepatectomy for complete resection of the tumour. This may be contraindicated or increase the surgical burden in patients with chronic liver disease and small remnant liver volume. Lymphadenectomy with a minimal harvest of 6 lymph nodes is considered adequate, as microscopic nodal metastases have been shown in more than 40% of patients. Current 5-year overall survival following LR is in the range of 25%-40%. For locally advanced disease not amenable to upfront LR, neoadjuvant locoregional therapies may be used with the aim of converting these patients to resectability or even to transplantation in well-selected cases. Recent studies have shown that liver transplantation (LT) might be a treatment option for patients with unresectable very-early iCCA (i.e. ≤2 cm), with survival outcomes comparable to those of hepatocellular carcinoma. In patients with unresectable, advanced tumours, confined to the liver who achieve sustained response to neoadjuvant treatment, LT may be considered an option within prospective protocols. The role of adjuvant therapies in iCCA is still under debate. Herein, we review the recent advances in the surgical treatment of iCCA and examine its correlation with locoregional therapies, adjuvant and neo-adjuvant strategies.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Limitations for resectability, current surgical concepts and future perspectives

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common hepatic malignancy and its incidence has been shown to increase significantly during the past decades. Complete surgical resection is currently acknowledged as the only curative treatment option able to provide adequate long-term outcomes. We herein review technical, functional and oncologic limitations for resectability, discuss current surgical aspects as well as highlight the fields in which future research and practice should focus on in order to ameliorate long-term outcomes in patients with iCCA.

The MEGNA Score and Preoperative Anemia are Major Prognostic Factors After Resection in the German Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Cohort

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is associated with the best long-term results for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC); however, long-term outcomes are still poor.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to validate the recently proposed MEGNA score and to identify additional prognostic factors influencing short- and long-term survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of a German multicenter cohort operated at 10 tertiary centers from 2004 to 2013. Patients were clustered using the MEGNA score and overall survival was analyzed. Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors for both overall and 90-day survival.

RESULTS

A total of 488 patients undergoing liver resection for ICC fulfilled the inclusion criteria and underwent analysis. Median age was 67 years, 72.5% of patients underwent major hepatic resection, and the lymphadenectomy rate was 86.9%. Median overall survival was 32.2 months. The MEGNA score significantly discriminated the long-term overall survival: 0 (68%), I (48%), II (32%), and III (19%) [p <0.001]. In addition, anemia was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.29-2.45; p <0.01).

CONCLUSION

Hepatic resection provides the best long-term survival in all risk groups (19-65% overall survival). The MEGNA score is a good discriminator using histopathologic items and age for stratification. Correction of anemia should be attempted in every patient who responds to treatment. Perioperative liver failure remains a clinical challenge and contributes to a relevant number of perioperative deaths.

Prognostic Impact of Tumor Multinodularity in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of tumor multinodularity in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains debated. We aimed to evaluate the impact of tumor multinodularity according to the presence and distribution of multiples ICC's nodules.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing resection for ICC from January 1995 to September 2017 was performed. Prognostic factors for survival were assessed by multivariate Cox analysis. Tumoral nodules were defined according to their number (single and multiple) and localization (satellites and contralateral).

RESULTS

Out of 120 selected patients, 64 (53%) had single and 56 (47%) had multiple lesions. Multiple lesions included tumors with satellites (n = 40; 71.5%) and tumors with contralateral lesions (n = 16; 28.5%). Patients with multiple tumors had significantly larger mean main lesion size (p = 0.02), required a higher rate of perioperative transfusion (p = 0.04), had a greater rate of lymph node involvement (p < 0.0001), vascular invasion (p = 0.04), and poor differentiation (p = 0.04) than single tumors. Patients with single tumors experienced a 5-year survival significantly longer (40%) than patients with multiple tumors (14%; p = 0.004). Patients having tumors with satellites had inferior median overall survival and 5-year survival rates (20 months, 7%) compared with patients with contralateral tumors (33.6 months, 29%) (p = 0.09). Multivariable analysis identified tumor multinodularity, morbidity, tumor size < 5 cm, poor differentiation, and lymph node involvement as independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor multinodularity represents an independent risk factor for survival in ICCs and identifies a category of patients in need of more effective perioperative treatment.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tumor burden: A classification and regression tree model to define prognostic groups after resection

BACKGROUND

Tumor burden is an important factor in defining prognosis among patients with primary and secondary liver cancers. Although the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system has changed the criteria for staging patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to better define the effect of tumor burden on prognosis, the impact of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tumor burden on overall survival has not been examined using a machine-learning tool.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at 1 of 14 participating international hospitals between 1990 and 2015 were identified. Classical survival models and the Classification and Regression Tree model were used to identify groups of patients with a homogeneous risk of death and investigate the hierarchical association between variables and overall survival.

RESULTS

Among 1,116 patients included in the analysis, tumor size was ≤5 cm in 447 (40.1%) patients and >5 cm in 669 (59.9%) patients. Although 82.9% (n = 926) of patients had a single intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 9.9% (n = 110) and 7.2% (n = 80) of patients had 2 and ≥3 tumors, respectively. Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tumors ≤5 cm and >5 cm had a 5-year overall survival of 51.7% and 32.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). Five-year overall survival decreased from 44.6% among patients with a single intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to 28.1% and 14.2% among patients with 2 and ≥3 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, respectively (P < 0.001). Among the combinations of tumor size and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tumor number used to estimate tumor burden, logarithmic transformation of tumor size (log tumor size) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tumor number had the highest concordance index. The Classification and Regression Tree model identified 8 classes of patients with a homogeneous risk of death, illustrating the hierarchical relationship between tumor burden (log tumor size and number of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas) and other factors associated with prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tumor size and number demonstrated a strong nonlinear association with survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. A log-model Classification and Regression Tree-derived tumor burden score may be a better tool to estimate prognosis of patients undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma?

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors.

Extended resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

For complete removal of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), extended resection is often necessary. Information on the influence of visceral or vascular extension, extended resection, or postoperative morbidity on survival is scarce. The aim of this study was to show the impact of an aggressive surgical attitude on morbidity, mortality, and long-term outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All explorations at a high volume tertiary center between January 2008 and June 2018 with histological proof of ICC were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was the extent of resection, secondary outcomes were postoperative morbidity, and their influence on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Out of 210 patients, 150 underwent curative intended resection. A total of 87 extended, 26 major, and 37 minor resections were performed.In-hospital morbidity occurred in 46% of patients, with a 90-daymortality of 8%. Severity and frequency of morbidity did not differ significantly in the extended, major, or minor resection groups. If minor or major resections with visceral and/or vascular extensions were included in the extended resection group, minor (p = 0.005) and major (p = 0.042) resection had significantly better OSthan the extended resection group. All groups had significantly better OS than the exploration group. Comparing the different extended resection groups (segmental extended resection, segmental extended resection with visceral/vascular extension, minor/major resection with visceral/vascular extension), no difference was found (p = 0.977). Regarding RFSand the extent of resection, minor resection benefitted RFS, though not significantly (p = 0.051). Morbidity had no influence on RFS (p = 0.649).

CONCLUSION

Extended resection results in worse OS in patients with ICC than major or minor liver resection. Minor and major resection with visceral or vascular extension should be classified as extended resection. Despite worse OS, extended resection offers a chance for long-term survival and performs significantly better than the exploration group with manageable accompanied risks.

[Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma followed by vascular invasion: is surgical treatment justified?]

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is one of the most aggressive tumors associated with poor prognosis. Radical surgery is still the main method of treatment in resectable cases. Certain difficulties are observed in case of locally advanced tumors followed by inferior vena cava (IVC) and portal vein (PV) invasion.

AIM

To analyze safety of advanced liver resections combined with great vessels repair for locally advanced large and multiple cholangiocellular carcinoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Since January 2014 till April 2017 eighty ICC patients have undergone advanced liver resection. There were 62 patients with portal cholangiocarcinoma and 18 with ICC. 4 ICC patients required vascular repair: IVC replacement in 2 cases (i.e. under venous bypass in 1 of them), tangential and circular resection of portal vein bifurcation - in 2 cases.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications Clavien-Dindo IIIa developed in all cases. There were no vascular complications. The length of hospital-stay was 14 - 35 days. There were no lethal outcomes. Annual survival was 50%, 2-year - 25%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was used in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Advanced liver resection followed by IVC and PV repair for locally advanced ICC may be safely performed and subsequently allows chemotherapeutic treatment.

Serum tumor markers enhance the predictive power of the AJCC and LCSGJ staging systems in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

While several prognostic models have been developed to predict long-term outcomes in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), their prognostic discrimination remains limited. The addition of tumor markers might improve the prognostic power of the classification schemas proposed by the AJCC 8th edition and the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ).

METHODS

The prognostic discrimination of the AJCC and the LCSGJ were compared before and after the addition of CA 19-9 and CEA, using Harrell's C-index, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) in an international, multi-institutional cohort.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and five surgically treated patients with ICC that met the inclusion criteria were identified. On multivariable analysis, CEA5 ng/mL, 100IU/mL CA 19-9< 500IU/mL and CA 19-9500 IU/mL were associated with worse overall survival. The C-index of the AJCC and the LCSGJ improved from 0.540 to 0.626 and 0.553 to 0.626, respectively following incorporation of CA 19-9 and CEA. The NRI and IDI metrics confirmed the superiority of the modified AJCC and LCSGJ, compared to the original versions.

CONCLUSION

The inclusion of preoperative CA 19-9 and CEA in the AJCC and LCSGJ staging schemas may improve prognostic discrimination among surgically treated patients with ICC.

Resection for intrahepatic cholangiocellular cancer: new advances

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most prevalent primary liver neoplasm after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), corresponding to 10% to 15% of cases. Pathologies that cause chronic biliary inflammation and bile stasis are known predisposing factors for development of ICC. The incidence and cancer-related mortality of ICC is increasing worldwide. Most patients remain asymptomatic until advance stage, commonly presenting with a liver mass incidentally diagnosed. The only potentially curative treatment available for ICC is surgical resection. The prognosis is dismal for unresectable cases. The principle of the surgical approach is a margin negative hepatic resection with preservation of adequate liver remnant. Regional lymphadenectomy is recommended at time of hepatectomy due to the massive impact on outcomes caused by lymph node (LN) metastasis. Multicentric disease, tumor size, margin status and tumor differentiation are also important prognostic factors. Staging laparoscopy is warranted in high-risk patients to avoid unnecessary laparotomy. Exceedingly complex surgical procedures, such as major vascular, extrahepatic bile ducts and visceral resections, ex vivo hepatectomy and autotransplantation, should be implemented in properly selected patients to achieve negative margins. Neoadjuvant therapy may be used in initially unresectable lesions in order to downstage and allow resection. Despite optimal surgical management, recurrence is frustratingly high. Adjuvant chemotherapy with radiation associated with locoregional treatments should be considered in cases with unfavorable prognostic factors. Selected patients may undergo re-resection of tumor recurrence. Despite the historically poor outcomes of liver transplantation for ICC, highly selected patients with unresectable disease, especially those with adequate response to neoadjuvant therapy, may be offered transplant. In this article, we reviewed the current literature in order to highlight the most recent advances and recommendations for the surgical treatment of this aggressive malignancy.

Patterns of Distribution of Hepatic Nodules (Single, Satellites or Multifocal) in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic Impact After Surgery

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the clinicopathological features and survival after surgery of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) according to the patterns of distribution of hepatic nodules.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional series of 259 patients with resected ICC was carried out. Patients were further classified according to the pattern of distribution of hepatic nodules: single tumors (type I), single tumors with satellites in the same liver segment (type II), or multifocal tumors (type III).

RESULTS

Overall, 64.5% of patients had type I, 21.9% had type II, and 13.5% had type III. The 5-year overall survival rate was 49.4, 34.2, and 9.9% for types I, II, and III, respectively (p < 0.001). A multivariate survival analysis identified the following independent prognostic factors: pattern types II and III (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively), size ≥ 50 mm (p = 0.021), lymph node (LN) metastases (p = 0.005), and R1 resections (p = 0.019). We stratified survival for each type of pattern according to the other prognostic factors identified in the multivariate analysis. N0 and R0 patients with type II and III tumors had encouraging long-term results. Conversely, patients with LN metastases and R1 resections had poor prognosis, particularly patients with type III tumors.

CONCLUSION

ICC has distinct patterns of distribution with different prognoses that should be considered when making therapeutic decisions. Patients with type III tumors had a significantly worse prognosis, and the benefits of upfront surgery should be carefully evaluated.

Challenges of surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare malignancy arising from biliary tract epithelium within bile ducts proximal to the secondary biliary radicles. The majority of patients are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease at presentation. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative option, but poses unique challenges due to the large size and aggressive behavior of these tumors. Areas covered: The goal of surgical management of iCCA is margin negative (R0) hepatic resection with preservation of adequate size liver remnant and function. Data regarding role of staging laparoscopy, margin status, portal lymphadenectomy, and vascular resection for iCCA are reviewed. Perioperative systemic therapy may have value, although prospective data have been lacking. Recurrence rates remain high even after R0 resection; among patients with recurrent disease limited to the liver, re-resection or locoregional therapies may play a role. Liver transplantation may be an option for select patients with very early-stage iCCA, although this should be done on a protocol-only basis. Expert commentary: Appropriate preoperative patient selection and surgical technique are paramount to ensure optimal oncologic outcomes for patients with resectable iCCA. Improving systemic and locoregional therapy options may help decrease recurrence rates and improve long-term survival for this aggressive malignancy.