Characteristics of Multifocal and Multicentric Breast Cancers

Impact of multifocal or multicentric disease on local recurrence and survival in breast cancer patients with or without BRCA1/2 variants

PURPOSE

Multifocal or multicentric (MFMC) breast cancer is mainly focused on breast cancer patients with unknown BRCA status, the incidence and clinical relevance of MFMC disease in BRCA1/2 carriers is less explored to date. Our study was to investigate the incidence of MFMC disease in BRCA1/2 carriers and whether MFMC disease influences local recurrence and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 479 breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 variants and 1437 age-matched noncarriers were enrolled and patients received either breast-conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy with or without radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The rates of MFMC disease in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, and noncarriers were 33.0% (61 of 185), 37.4% (110 of 294), and 31.2% (449 of 1437), respectively. MFMC disease in BRCA2 carriers was significantly higher than that in noncarriers (P = 0.039). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, among patients treated with BCT, BRCA2 carriers with MFMC disease experienced a significantly higher rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) than those with unifocal disease (16.7% vs 4.1%, P = 0.044). Moreover, BRCA2 carriers with MFMC disease had a significantly worse RFS (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.65 [95% CI 1.40-9.52]; P = 0.008), DRFS (unadjusted HR, 3.07 [95% CI 1.07-8.80]; P = 0.037), and OS (unadjusted HR, 4.96 [95% CI 1.18-20.02]; P = 0.029) than those with unifocal disease when treated with BCT.

CONCLUSION

MFMC breast cancer is more common in BRCA2 carriers, and BRCA2 carriers with MFMC disease treated with BCT exhibit a higher rate of IBTR and may have a poor survival.

Multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter?

BACKGROUND

Multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) breast cancer cases have been increasingly diagnosed owing to the extensive use of improved preoperative breast imaging. The current tumor-node-metastasis staging system uses the dimension of the largest tumor and recommends reporting the pathological features of the largest tumor in MF/MC breast cancers.

AIM

This study aimed to explore whether the largest or aggregate dimensions of MF and MC breast cancers can better predict tumor behavior. We also attempted to study the histological and biological heterogeneities of separate foci in MF and MC breast cancers to determine whether it was necessary to examine each lesion.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 121 patients with MF/MC (103 with MF and 18 with MC) breast cancers and 484 patients with unifocal breast cancer who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Two methods were used to record the T stage (using the dimensions of the largest lesion and aggregate dimensions of all lesions). The histological grade, immunohistochemical parameters, and molecular subtypes of the largest lesion and other lesions in MF/MC breast cancers were studied to assess intertumoral heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The use of aggregate dimensions upstaged 63 patients with MF/MC breast cancers to a more advanced stage and removed the independent effect of cancer multiplicity on lymph node positivity compared with the use of the largest dimension. Mismatches were found in the pathological type (9.9%), histological grade (4.1%), and molecular subtype (8.3%) among different foci.

CONCLUSION

The tendency of MF/MC breast tumors to metastasize may be related to tumor load, which can be better predicted by the aggregate dimensions of all foci. The use of the current staging systems may require further evaluation and modification. Intertumoral heterogeneity indicates the necessity for pathological and immunohistochemical assessments of each lesion in patients with MF/MC breast cancers.

The epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of multifocal/multicentric breast cancer in the Egyptian Delta and its impact on management strategies

BACKGROUND

Multifocal (MFBC)/multicentric (MCBC) breast cancer is being more recognized due to the improved imaging modalities and the greater orientation with this form of breast cancer, however, optimal surgical treatment, still poses a challenge. The standard surgical treatment is mastectomy, however, breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) may be appropriate in certain situations.

METHODS

A total of 464 cases of MF/MCBC out of 4798 cases of breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed from the database of the Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), between January 2008 and December 2019.

RESULTS

Radiologic involvement of multiple quadrants was reported in 27.9% by ultrasonography, 19% by mammography, and 59.1% by magnetic resonance imaging. BCS was performed in 32 cases (6.9%) while 432 cases underwent a mastectomy. Postoperative pathology revealed infiltration of other quadrants grossly in 23.5%, and under the microscope in 63.6% of the examined cases. Mean disease-free and overall survival were 95.5 and 164.6 months, respectively. When compared with MFBC, MCBC showed higher pathologic tumor size (p < 0.001), higher stages (p < 0.001), higher recurrence rates (p = 0.006), and lower DFS (P = 0.009) but with similar OS (P = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

Mastectomy is still the primary treatment option for MCBC with higher recurrence rates compared with MFBC. However, BCS for properly selected MFBC is considered oncologically safe, following the same rules of breast conservation for unifocal disease.

Special Histologic Type and Rare Breast Tumors - Diagnostic Review and Clinico-Pathological Implications

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in females. While most carcinomas are categorized as invasive carcinoma, no special type (NST), a diverse group of tumors with distinct pathologic and clinical features is also recognized, ranging in incidence from relatively more common to rare. So-called "special histologic type" tumors display more than 90% of a specific, distinctive histologic pattern, while a spectrum of tumors more often encountered in the salivary gland may also arise in the breast. Metaplastic carcinomas can present diagnostic challenges. Some uncommon tumors harbor pathognomonic genetic alterations. This article provides an overview of the key diagnostic points and differential diagnoses for this group of disparate lesions, as well as the salient clinical characteristics of each entity.

Performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography in the detection of small and low-grade breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study compares the sensitivity of dedicated breast positron emission tomography (DbPET) and whole body positron emission tomography (WBPET) in detecting invasive breast cancer based on tumor size and biology. Further, we explored the relationship between maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of DbPET and biological features of the tumor.

METHODS

A total of 639 invasive breast cancer lesions subjected to both DbPET and WBPET before surgery, between January 2016 and May 2019, were included in the study. The sensitivity of DbPET and WBPET in detection and the biology of the tumor according to the clinicopathological features were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity of DbPET was higher than that of WBPET (91.4% vs. 80.3%, p < 0.001). Subcentimetric tumors were significant (80.9% vs. 54.3%, p < 0.001). Regardless of the nuclear grade, DbPET could detect more lesions than WBPET. The SUVmax was positively correlated with tumor size (R = 0.395, p < 0.001) and the nuclear grade (p < 0.001). Luminal A-like breast cancer had significantly lower SUVmax values than the other subtypes (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DbPET is superior to WBPET in the detection of subcentimetric, low-grade breast cancers. Further, by using SUVmax, DbPET can distinguish luminal A-like breast cancer from the other subtypes.

A Survey of Breast Pathologists' Practice in Staging Multiple Foci of Invasive Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system is the reference standard for describing the extent of neoplastic disease on the basis of the size of primary tumor (T), and the presence of regional lymph node (N) involvement and distant metastasis (M). Multiple foci of invasive breast carcinoma may pose staging challenges to the reporting pathologist. We set out to evaluate the practice of local breast pathologists with regard to staging of multiple foci of invasive carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Breast pathologists were surveyed at a Community of Interest in Breast Pathology meeting. The live voting survey contained 6 case-based scenarios of multiple foci of invasive mammary carcinoma of the same or different histologic type and with unilateral or bilateral involvement. A supporting illustration was provided for each case.

RESULTS

There was poor interobserver agreement with no consensus reached among the respondents in any of the cases. Staging choices varied from staging tumors together irrespective of histology or procedure type to staging tumors of the same histologic type together, or staging each tumor focus separately. Confusion was particularly evident when tumor foci with different histologic types were present.

CONCLUSION

Inconsistencies exist in the reporting of AJCC pathologic TNM stage for multiple foci of invasive carcinoma. The results serve as a reminder that education and strict adherence to the AJCC guidelines is essential for establishing standard practice in order to provide accurate cancer staging and ensure optimal clinical management.

Synchronous bilateral breast cancer: a nationwide study on histopathology and etiology

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to describe histopathologic characteristics of synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC), and by comparing SBBC to unilateral breast cancer (UBC), identify possible etiological mechanisms of SBBC.

METHODS

Patients with primary SBBC (diagnosed within 4 months) and UBC diagnosed in Denmark between 1999 and 2015 were included. Detailed data on histopathology were retrieved from the Danish Breast Cancer Group database and the Danish Pathology Register. Associations between bilateral disease and the different histopathologic characteristics were evaluated by odds ratios and estimated by multinomial regression models.

RESULTS

1214 patients with SBBC and 59,221 with UBC were included. Patients with SBBC more often had invasive lobular carcinomas (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.13-1.47), a clinically distinct subtype of breast cancer, than UBC patients. Further, they were older than UBC patients, more often had multifocal cancer (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.01-1.26), and a less aggressive subtype than UBC patients. Invasive lobular carcinoma was associated with having multiple tumors in breast tissue-both in the form of bilateral disease and multifocal disease, and this association was independent of laterality. No similar pattern was observed for other tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSION

We identified two etiological mechanisms that could explain some of the occurrence of SBBC. The high proportion of less aggressive carcinomas and higher age of SBBC compared to UBC patients suggests that many are diagnosed at a subclinical stage as slow-growing tumors have a higher probability of simultaneous diagnosis. The high proportion of invasive lobular carcinoma observed in bilateral and multifocal disease, being independent of laterality, suggests that these patients have an increased propensity to malignant tumor formation in breast tissue.

Multifocal breast cancers are more prevalent in BRCA2 versus BRCA1 mutation carriers

Multifocal (MF)/multicentric (MC) breast cancer is generally considered to be where two or more breast tumours are present within the same breast, and is seen in ~10% of breast cancer cases. This study investigates the prevalence of multifocality/multicentricity in a cohort of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast cancer from Northern Ireland via cross-sectional analysis. Data from 211 women with BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCA1-91, BRCA2-120) and breast cancer were collected including age, tumour focality, size, type, grade and receptor profile. The prevalence of multifocality/multicentricity within this group was 25% but, within subgroups, prevalence amongst BRCA2 carriers was more than double that of BRCA1 carriers (p = 0.001). Women affected by MF/MC tumours had proportionately higher oestrogen receptor positivity (p = 0.001) and lower triple negativity (p = 0.004). These observations are likely to be driven by the higher BRCA2 mutation prevalence observed within this cohort. The odds of a BRCA2 carrier developing MF/MC cancer were almost four-fold higher than a BRCA1 carrier (odds ratio: 3.71, CI: 1.77-7.78, p = 0.001). These findings were subsequently validated in a second, large independent cohort of patients with BRCA-associated breast cancers from a UK-wide multicentre study. This confirmed a significantly higher prevalence of MF/MC tumours amongst BRCA2 mutation carriers compared with BRCA1 mutation carriers. This has important implications for clinicians involved in the treatment of BRCA2-associated breast cancer, both in the diagnostic process, in ensuring that tumour focality is adequately assessed to facilitate treatment decision-making, and for breast surgeons, particularly if breast conserving surgery is being considered as a treatment option for these patients.

Multicentric breast cancer with heterogeneous histopathology: a multidisciplinary review

Multiple synchronous (multifocal or multicentric) ipsilateral breast cancers with heterogeneous histopathology are a rare clinical occurrence, however, their incidence is increasing due to the use of MRI for breast cancer screening and staging. Some studies have demonstrated poorer clinical outcomes for this pattern of breast cancer, but there is no evidence to guide clinical practice. In this multidisciplinary review, we reflect on pathology and molecular characteristics, imaging findings, surgical management including conservation and reconstructive options and approach to the axilla, and the role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Multidisciplinary discussions appear decisive in planning an appropriate surgical choice and defining the correct systemic treatment tailored to each clinical condition.

Differences in race, molecular and tumor characteristics among women diagnosed with invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinomas

BACKGROUND

The dominant invasive breast cancer histologic subtype, ductal carcinoma, shows intrinsic subtype diversity. However, lobular breast cancers are predominantly Luminal A. Both histologic subtypes show distinct relationships with patient and tumor characteristics, but it is unclear if these associations remain after accounting for intrinsic subtype.

METHODS

Generalized linear models were used to estimate relative frequency differences (RFDs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the associations between age, race, tumor characteristics, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RNA-based intrinsic subtype, TP53 status, and histologic subtype in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS, n = 3,182) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 808).

RESULTS

Relative to ductal tumors, lobular tumors were significantly more likely to be Luminal A [CBCS RNA RFD: 44.9%, 95% CI (39.6, 50.1); TCGA: RFD: 50.5%, 95% CI (43.9, 57.1)], were less frequent among young (≤ 50 years) and black women, were larger in size, low grade, less frequently had TP53 pathway defects, and were diagnosed at later stages. These associations persisted among Luminal A tumors (n = 242).

CONCLUSIONS

While histology is strongly associated with molecular characteristics, histologic associations with age, race, size, grade, and stage persisted after restricting to Luminal A subtype. Histology may continue to be clinically relevant among Luminal A breast cancers.

Evaluating the current evidence to support therapeutic mammoplasty or breast-conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy in the treatment of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers

The oncological safety of treating multiple ipsilateral breast cancers (MIBCs) with types of breast conserving surgery (BCS) compared to mastectomy remains uncertain. This is predicated on the absence of any randomised controlled trials or high-quality protocol defined prospective cohort studies. A single recently published systematic review by the first author, reports its summarised results in this review. Fundamentally the important question is the evaluation of clinical safety following BCS compared to mastectomy for treating MIBC, which is reported in only six studies. Consequently, current evidence doesn't support the latest St Gallen consensus suggesting the possibility of using BCS to treat all MIBC. There is minimal comparative outcomes data on multicentric (MC) cancers compared to multifocal (MF) cancers comparing BCS or mastectomy. There is also poor evidence of clinical outcomes following therapeutic mammoplasty (TM) for MIBC compared to mastectomy. The potential recommendation of two potential radiotherapy boosts to separate lumpectomy sites following BCS for MC cancers remains a novel treatment concept whose feasibility will be evaluated in the forthcoming NIHR funded randomised feasibility trial called MIAMI. This is a world first attempt to assess the feasibility of a randomised trial design alongside the on-going Alliance registry study (ACOSOG, American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z11102) in the USA, in which there is no comparative evaluation of mastectomy outcomes. The MIAMI trial aims to assess the clinical safety of multiple lumpectomies combined with TM compared to the standard of mastectomy in MIBC stratified by MF or MC cancers. There is limited evidence on the impacts of inter-tumoral heterogeneity relating to breast cancer subtypes in relation to individualised treatments and recommendations for types of breast surgery. Recent studies have highlighted the potential contributions of stromal epigenetic changes that are currently poorly understood regarding their contributions to either clinical unifocal or MF cancers.

Frequency and characteristics of additionally detected ipsilateral breast lesions following recall at screening mammography

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency and outcome of additionally detected ipsilateral breast abnormalities following recall at screening mammography.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We included a consecutive series of 130,338 screening mammograms obtained between January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2016. During 2-year follow-up, clinical data were collected of all recalls. Women with a bilateral recall (115) and women recalled for multiple lesions in one breast (165) were excluded from the analyses. Screening outcome parameters were determined for recalled women with or without evaluation of additional ipsilateral breast abnormalities following recall.

RESULTS

A total of 3995 women were recalled (recall rate, 3.1%). In 258 (6.4%) of these women, another lesion was detected in the ipsilateral breast than the one for which she had been recalled. Biopsy was more frequently performed of additionally detected ipsilateral lesions than of recalled lesions (55.8% (144/258)) versus 39.7% (1375/3457), (p < 0.001)). The proportion of malignancy in recalled lesions and additionally detected lesions was comparable (21.5% (743/3457) versus 19.0% (49/258), p = 0.34). Of all 144 biopsies of additionally detected ipsilateral lesions, 9 revealed a synchronous tumour in addition to a malignant recalled lesion, and 33 biopsies revealed multicentric or multifocal tumours. In 5 women, the recalled lesion turned out to be benign, whereas the additional lesion in a different quadrant was malignant at biopsy. A total of 97 biopsies showed benign findings.

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of women are analyzed for additional ipsilateral breast lesions following recall. These lesions are more frequently biopsied than recalled lesions, but have a comparable probability of being malignant. The majority of additionally detected cancerous lesions are part of multifocal or multicentric malignancies.

Expressional analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Mismatch repair proteins are ubiquitous keys in diverse cellular functions and protects the genome by correcting mismatch as post replication error correction machinery. Mismatch repair deficiency was associated with tumor development and progression therefore, current study was aimed to investigate MLH1 and MSH2 expression in breast cancer and correlate patients' clinicopathological factors with status of mismatch repair genes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Breast cancer tissues with adjacent normal tissue along with clinical details were collected during surgery from 80 cases. Immunohistochemistry was performed with primary and secondary antibodies for expressional analysis. Results were analyzed using SPSS version 24.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that both MLH1 and MSH2 were crucial in maintaining DNA repair system and loss of these 2 mismatch repair proteins may lead to adverse outcomes in breast cancer. Statistically significant association was found between loss of MLH1 (P = 0.0004; odds ratio 13.8; 95% confidence interval 4.6-41.1), MSH2 (P = 0.0002; odds ratio 14.0; 95% confidence interval 4.7-42.2) and breast cancer. Statistical analysis demonstrated that MLH1 and MSH2 deficiency may lead breast cancer progression to advanced stage, correlated with tumor focality (MLH1 P = 0.001; MSH2 P = 0.002) and chemotherapy (MLH1 P = 0.01; MSH2 P = 0.04). Presence of CK7, GATA 3, and E cadherin tends to increase in mismatch repair deficient breast cancer. Whereas, no association of mismatch repair deficiency was observed with age, tumor grade, positive lymph nodes, menopause, and ER and/or PR status.

CONCLUSION

Loss of mismatch repair proteins in breast cancer highlights its potential role in DNA repair mechanisms and helps tumor cells to become resistant against chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, mismatch repair deficiency may contribute to breast cancer progression.

Survival Study of Triple-Negative and Non-Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in a Brazilian Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical, pathological, and sociodemographic aspects between triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-TNBC in a Brazilian cohort and identify potential prognostic factors.

METHODS

This hospital-based retrospective cohort study included 447 women with breast cancer treated at referral centers in Southeastern Brazil. Overall and disease-free survival were compared; prognostic factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

Triple-negative breast cancer corresponded to 19.5% of breast cancer diagnosis and was more prevalent among nonwhite and less educated women. The patients with TNBC tended to present with stage III cancer, high p53 expression, lymphocytic infiltration, and multifocality and treated with radical surgery and chemotherapy. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival were 62.1% and 57.5% for TNBC and 80.8% and 75.3% for non-TNBC, respectively (P < .001). The TNBC recurrence was associated with multicentricity, whereas lymph node involvement increased the risk of both recurrence and death. Non-TNBC worse clinical course was associated with nonwhite ethnicity, lower education level, lymph node involvement, and advanced stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple-negative breast cancer exhibited a more aggressive behavior, earlier and more frequent recurrence, and worse survival compared with non-TNBC. While biological and social variables were associated with poorer prognosis in non-TNBC, only lymph node involvement and multicentricity were correlated with worse clinical outcomes in TNBC.

Personal history of proliferative breast disease with atypia and risk of multifocal breast cancer

BACKGROUND

A history of proliferative breast disease with atypia (PBDA) may be indicative of an increased risk not just of breast cancer but also of a more aggressive form of breast cancer.

METHODS

Multifocal breast cancer (MFBC), defined as 2 or more tumors in the same breast upon a diagnosis of cancer, is associated with a poorer prognosis than unifocal (single-tumor) breast cancer. PBDA, including atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypical lobular hyperplasia, is a known risk factor for breast cancer. Using New Hampshire Mammography Network data collected for 3567 women diagnosed with incident breast cancer from 2004 to 2014, this study assessed the risk of MFBC associated with a previous diagnosis of PBDA.

RESULTS

Women with a history of PBDA were found to be twice as likely to be subsequently diagnosed with MFBC as women with no history of benign breast disease (BBD; odds ratio [OR], 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-4.61). Ductal carcinoma in situ on initial biopsy was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of MFBC in comparison with invasive cancer (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.58-2.88). BBD and proliferative BBD without atypia were not associated with MFBC.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with a history of previous PBDA may be at increased risk for MFBC. Women with a history of PBDA may benefit from additional presurgical clinical workup. Cancer 2018;124:1350-7. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Virtual assessment of stereoscopic viewing of digital breast tomosynthesis projection images

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquires a series of projection images from different angles as an x-ray source rotates around the breast. Such imaging geometry lends DBT naturally to stereoscopic viewing as two projection images with a reasonable separation angle can easily form a stereo pair. This simulation study assessed the efficacy of stereo viewing of DBT projection images. Three-dimensional computational breast phantoms with realistically shaped synthetic lesions were scanned by three simulated DBT systems. The projection images were combined into a sequence of stereo pairs and presented to a stereomatching-based model observer for deciding lesion presence. Signal-to-noise ratio was estimated, and the detection performance with stack viewing of reconstructed slices was the benchmark. We have shown that: (1) stereo viewing of projection images may underperform stack viewing of reconstructed slices for current DBT geometries; (2) DBT geometries may impact the efficacy of the two viewing modes differently: narrow-arc and wide-arc geometries may be better for stereo viewing and stack viewing, respectively; (3) the efficacy of stereo viewing may be more robust than stack viewing to reductions in dose. While in principle stereo viewing is potentially effective for visualizing DBT data, effective stereo viewing may require specifically optimized DBT image acquisition.

Immunohistochemical features of multifocal and multicentric lobular breast carcinoma

PURPOSE

Patient age, tumor size, axillary lymph node status, expression of estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptors, as well as the histological grade, are widely accepted prognostic and predictive parameters in breast carcinoma. In invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the prognostic factors, such as nodal status and tumor size are believed to be the most valuable ones. The aim of this was set to determine the possible linkage between MFity/MCity of ILC and immunohistochemical predictive (ER, PR, HER2) and prognostic parameters (BRCA1, p53, E-cadherin, Ki-67).

MATERIAL/METHODS

Out of 2486 cases diagnosed with BC from south-eastern Serbia, the presence ILC was noted in 334 cases. Immunohistochemical characterization of predictive and prognostic parameters in ILC was done.

RESULTS

The occurrence of multifocal (MFC) and multicentric carcinoma (MCC) was observed in 18.9% of ILC. Bilateral (BL) BCs were found to be statistically significantly more frequent in younger women, compared to those with MFC, MCC or nonMFC/MCC/BL. No significant correlation was found between MFC/MCC and the presence of axillary lymph node metastases, and expression of immunohistochemical predictive and prognostic parameters. Based on literature data and the findings from the current work, MFity/MCtiy might represent negative morphologic prognostic parameters in ILC.

CONCLUSIONS

In 334 cases analyzed, no statistically significant correlations were observed between MF/MC and the expression of immunohistochemical predictive and prognostic parameters.

Racial Differences in Utilization of Breast Conservation Surgery: Results from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB)

BACKGROUND

Whether rates of breast-conservation surgery (BCS) vary based on race and ethnicity has not been clearly elucidated on a national leve.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to identify women who underwent surgery for invasive breast cancer during 2010 and 2011. The effect of race and ethnicity on BCS rates was determined, independent of patient demographics, tumor-related variables, and geographic region.

RESULTS

There were 299,827 patients with known race and ethnicity who underwent definitive breast surgery. BCS rates by race were as follows: 135,065/241,236 (56.0 %) for whites, 17,819/33,301 (53.5 %) for blacks, 4,722/9,508 (49.7 %) for Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 7,919/15,782 (50.2 %) for Hispanics (p < 0.001). Mean tumor size differed among the racial groups: 2.07 cm in whites, 2.54 cm in blacks, 2.23 cm in Asians, and 2.48 cm in Hispanics (p < 0.001). When stratified by tumor size, BCS was most common in blacks and least common in Asians for all tumors >2 cm (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis adjusted for age, tumor size, nodal status, grade, molecular type, geographic area, urban/rural residence, insurance status, and census-derived median income and education for the patient's zip code, the odds ratio for BCS for blacks compared to whites was 1.23 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.27, p < 0.001), for Asians was 0.84 (95 % CI 0.80-0.88, p < 0.001), and for Hispanics was 1.00 (95 % CI 0.96-1.05, p = 0.885).

CONCLUSIONS

When adjusted for patient demographics, tumor-related variables, and geographic area, BCS rates are higher in blacks and lower in Asians compared to whites.

Characteristics and treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer: 43,485 cases from the National Cancer Database treated in 2010 and 2011

BACKGROUND

Although identification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) positive breast cancer represents one of the greatest advances over the past 3 decades, it has not been studied extensively on a national level.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database is a joint project of the American Cancer Society and the American College of Surgeons and contains data on about 70% of the cancer cases in the United States. Data on Her2 have been collected since 2010 and was used for this study.

RESULTS

Of 298,937 cases of invasive breast cancer with known Her2 status diagnosed in 2010 and 2011, 43,485 (14.5%) were Her2 positive. Her2 positivity was greatest in Asian/Pacific Islanders and least in non-Hispanic Whites and was markedly more common in younger women. The incidence of Her2 positive tumors ranged from a low of 13.9% in the Mountain West region to a high of 16.0% in the West South Central region (P < .001). Compared with Her2 negative tumors, Her2 positive tumors were larger (2.6 vs 2.2 cm, P < .001), more likely to have positive nodes (39% vs 31% P < .001), have lymphovascular invasion (30% vs 20%, P < .001), and be high grade (56% vs 29%, P < .001). There were also differences by histology: invasive ductal 16.4%, invasive lobular 5.5%, tubular 2.3%, inflammatory 36%, and Paget's with invasion 59%. When adjusted for age, race, tumor size, and nodal status Her2 positive tumors were much more likely to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio = 5.5, confidence interval = 5.2 to 6.0) and somewhat less likely to undergo breast preservation (odds ratio = .78, confidence interval = .76 to .80).

CONCLUSIONS

Her2 positive tumors have distinct epidemiologic, clinical, and treatment characteristics.

Breast-conserving Surgery Rates in Breast Cancer Patients With Different Molecular Subtypes: An Observational Study Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database

This study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to compare breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rates across patients with different molecular subtypes.We identified female breast cancer patients who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2012 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients without available critical clinicopathological information were excluded. The chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to investigate factors associated with BCS.This study identified 85,415 T1-2N0-3M0 breast cancer patients. Among the patients with HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, and HR-/HER2- diseases, 63.5% (38,823/61,142), 51.2% (4850/9473), 43.2% (1740/4030), and 55.7% (6000/10,770), respectively, received BCS (P < 0.01). Patients with HR-/HER2+ (odds ratio 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.62) disease were significantly less likely to receive BCS than patients with HR+/HER2- disease after adjustment for T-stage, N-stage, age, tumor grade, county type, and race. Differences in BCS rates between the HR+/HER2- and HR-/HER2+ subgroups were 29.1%, 14.0%, 10.1%, 8.5%, and 0.2% in patients with tumor sizes <10 mm, 10 to 20 mm, 20 to 30 mm, 30 to 40 mm, and 40 to 50 mm, respectively. Differences in BCS rates between the HR+/HER2- and HR-/HER2+ subgroups were 20.3% and 5.7% in node-negative and node-positive patients, respectively. BCS rates in patients with grades I, II, and III tumors in the HR+/HER2- and HR-/HER2+ subgroups were 72.2% and 34.6%, 62.7% and 42.3%, and 54.7% and 43.4%, respectively.Our study demonstrated that BCS rates varied significantly across molecular subtypes, especially in patients with lower tumor burden. HR+/HER2- and HR-/HER2+ patients exhibited the highest and lowest BCS rates, respectively.

N-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids of Marine Origin and Multifocality in Human Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The microenvironment of breast epithelial tissue may contribute to the clinical expression of breast cancer. Breast epithelial tissue, whether healthy or tumoral, is directly in contact with fat cells, which in turn could influence tumor multifocality. In this pilot study we investigated whether the fatty acid composition of breast adipose tissue differed according to breast cancer focality.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive women presenting with non-metastatic breast cancer underwent breast-imaging procedures including Magnetic Resonance Imaging prior to treatment. Breast adipose tissue specimens were collected during breast surgery. We established a biochemical profile of adipose tissue fatty acids by gas chromatography. We assessed whether there were differences according to breast cancer focality.

RESULTS

We found that decreased levels in breast adipose tissue of docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids, the two main polyunsaturated n-3 fatty acids of marine origin, were associated with multifocality.

DISCUSSION

These differences in lipid content may contribute to mechanisms through which peritumoral adipose tissue fuels breast cancer multifocality.