Surgical downstaging in an open-label phase II trial of denosumab in patients with giant cell tumor of bone

Recurrent benign fibrous histiocytoma of the bone benefits from denosumab followed by malignant transformation: a case report

Benign fibrous histiocytoma of the bone (BFHB) is a rare mesenchymal tumor, representing less than 1% of all benign bone tumors. This controversial entity is characterized by a mixture of fibroblasts arranged in a storiform pattern, varying amounts of osteoclast-type giant cells and foamy macrophages. Curettage or simple resection is usually curative. However, it was reported that up to 11% of the patients suffer from relapse. Here, we report a case of malignant transformation of BFHB after long-lasting disease stabilization under denosumab therapy.

Denosumab combined with microwave ablation excisional scraping for giant cell tumor of the thoracic spine: a case report and literature review

Denosumab has recently become an important part of the treatment regime for spinal giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB). Its use has significantly reduced the risk of surgery and postoperative complications in patients with spinal GCTB. However, the use of denosumab has not yet been optimized to reap the maximum benefits. Here, we have reported the case of a patient who was treated with denosumab in combination with excision and scraping for GCTB of the T10 vertebrae, which achieved good tumor control and no recurrence at the 2-year postoperative follow-up. We have also reviewed the case in the light of relevant literature as well as presented our ideas and recommendations for the optimal use of denosumab.

Combined preoperative denosumab and adjuvant microwave ablation for high-risk giant cell tumor of bone: a retrospective study in a single center

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive neoplasm with a high propensity for recurrence following intralesional curettage. The introduction of denosumab, a RANKL inhibitor, has shown potential in facilitating joint-sparing surgery. However, concerns exist regarding its impact on local recurrence rates. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined preoperative denosumab with adjuvant microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of high-risk GCTB.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 19 patients with high-risk GCTB who underwent preoperative denosumab treatment followed by curettage and adjuvant MWA. The primary outcome measure was the local recurrence rate, with secondary outcomes including functional status assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and safety profile of the treatment.

RESULTS

In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the outcomes of 19 patients with high-risk GCTB treated with preoperative denosumab and adjuvant MWA. The median follow-up duration was 33.1 months, 3 patients (15.8%) experienced local recurrence at a median of 21.6 months postoperatively and the local recurrence-free survival was 81.2% at two years. Notably, no patient developed lung metastasis, and all recurrences were successfully managed with repeat curettage and MWA, with a mean MSTS score of 27.3. No patient required joint replacement due to tumor recurrence, resulting in a 100% joint preservation rate.

CONCLUSION

The combination of preoperative denosumab and adjuvant MWA is a feasible and effective strategy for the management of high-risk GCTB, providing effective local control with preserved joint function. This approach may offer a surgical alternative for young patients where joint preservation is paramount.

Efficacy and safety of denosumab de‑escalation in giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive intermediate bone tumor. Denosumab has shown effectiveness in GCTB treatment; however, the benefits of denosumab de-escalation for unresectable GCTB have not been well discussed. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of denosumab de-escalation for GCTB. The medical records of 9 patients with unresectable GCTB or resectable GCTB not eligible for resection, who received de-escalated denosumab treatment at Okayama University Hospital (Okayama, Japan) between April 2014 and December 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. The denosumab treatment interval was gradually extended to every 8, 12 and 24 weeks. The radiographic changes and clinical symptoms during standard and de-escalated denosumab therapy were assessed. The denosumab interval was de-escalated after a median of 12 months of a standard 4-weekly treatment. Imaging showed that the re-ossification of osteolytic lesions obtained with the 4-weekly treatment were sustained with 8- and 12-weekly treatments. The extraskeletal masses reduced significantly with standard treatment, while tumor reduction was sustained during de-escalated treatment. During the 24-weekly treatment, 2 patients remained stable, while 2 patients developed local recurrence. The clinical symptoms improved significantly with standard treatment and remained improved during de-escalated treatment. There were severe adverse events including osteonecrosis of the jaw (2 patients), atypical femoral fracture (1 patient) and malignant transformation of GCTB (1 patient). In conclusion, 12-weekly de-escalated denosumab treatment showed clinical benefits as a maintenance treatment in patients with unresectable GCTB, in addition to sustained stable tumor control and improved clinical symptoms with standard treatment. A 24-weekly treatment can also be administered, with careful attention paid to detecting local recurrence.

The risk of neurological deterioration while using neoadjuvant denosumab on patients with giant cell tumor of the spine presenting with epidural disease: a meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is most commonly a benign but locally aggressive primary bone tumor. Spinal GCTs account for 2.7% to 6.5% of all GCTs in bone. En bloc resection, which is the preferred treatment for GCT of the spine, may not always be feasible due to the location, extent of the tumor, and/or the patient's comorbidities. Neoadjuvant denosumab has recently been shown to be effective in downstaging GCT, decreasing the size and extent of GCTs. However, the risk of neurologic deterioration is of major concern for patients with epidural spinal cord compression due to spinal GCT. We experienced this concern when a patient presented to our institution with a midthoracic spinal GCT with progressive epidural disease. The patient was not a good surgical candidate due to severe cardiac disease and uncontrolled diabetes. In considering nonoperative management for this patient, we asked ourselves the following question: What is the risk that this patient will develop neurologic deterioration if we do not urgently operate and opt to treat him with denosumab instead?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the literature to (1) determine the risk of neurological deterioration in patients receiving neoadjuvant denosumab for the treatment of spinal GCT and (2) to evaluate the secondary outcomes including radiographic features, surgical/technical complexity, and histological features after treatment.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Meta-analysis of the literature.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Surgical cases of spinal GCT that (1) presented with type III Campanacci lesions, (2) had epidural disease classified as Bilsky type 1B or above and (3) received neoadjuvant denosumab therapy.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure of interest was neurologic status during denosumab treatment. Secondary outcome measures of interest included radiographic features, surgical/technical complexity, histological features, tumor recurrence, and metastasis.

METHODS

Using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, PubMed and Embase electronic databases were searched in August 2022 for articles reporting spinal GCTs treated with neoadjuvant denosumab and surgery. Keywords used were "Spine" AND "Giant Cell Tumor" AND "Denosumab."

RESULTS

A total of 428 articles were identified and screened. A total of 22 patients from 12 studies were included for review. 17 patients were female (17/22, 77%), mean age was 32 years (18-62 years) and average follow-up was 21 months. Most GCTs occurred in the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine (11 patients, 50%), followed by 36% in the lumbar spine and 14% in the cervical spine. Almost half of the patients had neurological deficits at presentation (10/22 patients, 45%), and more than 60% had Bilsky 2 or 3 epidural spinal cord compression. None of the patients deteriorated neurologically, irrespective of their neurological status at presentation (p-value=.02, CI -2.58 to -0.18). There were no local recurrences reported. One patient was found to have lung nodules postoperatively. More than 90% of cases had decreased overall tumor size and increased bone formation. Surgical dissection was facilitated in more than 85% of those who had documented surgical procedures. Four patients (18%) underwent initial spinal stabilization followed by neoadjuvant denosumab and then surgical excision of the GCT. Regarding the histologic analyses, denosumab eradicated the giant cells in 95% of cases. However, residual Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa B Ligand (RANKL)-positive stromal cells were noted, in 27% (6 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant denosumab was a safe and effective means of treating spinal GCTs prior to surgery. Neurologic status remained stable or improved in all cases included in our review, irrespective of the presenting neurologic status. The most appropriate dosage and duration of denosumab therapy is yet to be determined. We recommend future well-designed studies to further evaluate the use of neoadjuvant denosumab for patients with spinal GCT.

Evaluating Extended Curettage and Adjuvant Therapy Against Wide Resection and Reconstruction in the Management of Distal Radius Giant Cell Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of distal radius giant cell tumors (GCTs) remains challenging, and the optimal approach is still a matter of debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of extended curettage and wide resection, the mainstays of treatment.

METHODS

Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Embase databases were searched for comparative studies that assessed extended curettage with adjuvant therapy and wide resection with reconstruction in patients with GCTs of the distal radius up to April 2023. Data were collected and analyzed on rates of local recurrence, metastasis, overall complications, and functional outcomes. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to appraise the risk of bias within each study.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (n = 373 patients) were included and analyzed. Patients who underwent curettage were more likely to develop recurrence (risk ratio [RR] = 3.02 [95% confidence interval; CI, 1.87-4.89], P < .01), showed fewer complications (RR = 0.32 [95% CI, 0.21-0.49], P < .01), and showed greater improvement in Visual Analog Scale and lower Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores (P < .00001) than those who underwent wide resection. No significant difference was found regarding metastasis (RR = 1.03 [95% CI, 0.38-2.78], P = .95).

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding the surgical approach to GCT of the distal radius, curettage with adjuvant therapy was associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence compared with wide resection with reconstruction. Nevertheless, the curettage approach resulted in significantly lower rates of operative complications, decreased pain scores, and better functional outcomes in comparison to the resection group.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update

Curettage is recommended for the treatment of Campanacci stages 1-2 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, without preoperative denosumab treatment. In the distal femur, bone chips and plate fixation are utilized to reduce damage to the subchondral bone and prevent pathological fracture, respectively. For local recurrence, re-curettage may be utilized when feasible. En bloc resection is an option for very aggressive Campanacci stage 3 GCTB in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, combined with 1-3 doses of preoperative denosumab treatment. Denosumab monotherapy once every 3 months is currently the standard strategy for inoperable patients and those with metastatic GCTB. However, in case of tumor growth, a possible malignant transformation should be considered. Zoledronic acid appears to be as effective as denosumab; nevertheless, it is a more cost-effective option. Therefore, zoledronic acid may be an alternative treatment option, particularly in developing countries. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for malignant GCTB.

The efficacy and safety of short-course neoadjuvant denosumab for en bloc spondylectomy in spinal giant cell tumor of bone: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate whether short course of neoadjuvant denosumab treatment for spinal GCTB could (1) Induce radiological and histological response? (2) Facilitate en bloc resection? (3) Achieve satisfactory oncological and functional outcomes?

METHODS

The clinical information of ten consecutive patients between 2018 and 2022 with spinal GCTB treated with short course of neoadjuvant denosumab (≤ 5 doses) and en bloc spondylectomy was retrospectively reviewed. The radiological and histological response, operative data, oncological and functional outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean doses of neoadjuvant denosumab were 4.2 (range 3-5 doses). After neoadjuvant denosumab, there were 9 cases showing new ossification and 5 cases with reappearance of cortical integrity. The values of Hounsfield units (HU) of the soft tissue component were increased by > 50% in 7 cases. The signal intensity (SI) ratios of tumor/muscle in T2WI of plain MRI were decreased by > 10% in 60% of the cases. Shrinkage of soft tissue mass by > 10% was observed in 4 cases. The mean duration of operation was 575 ± 174 min, and the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 2790 ± 1934 ml. No obvious adhesion to dura mater or major vessels was encounter intraoperatively. There is no tumor collapse or breakage during surgery. Multinucleated giant cells were decreased in 6 cases (60%) with the remaining 4 cases showing absence of multinucleated giant cells. Mononuclear stromal cells existed in most of the cases (8 cases, 80%). New bone formation was noticed in 8 cases (80%). No patient had a worsening of neurologic function after surgery. No tumor recurrence was noticed within the mean follow-up of 24 ± 20 months.

CONCLUSION

Short-term neoadjuvant denosumab could yield radiological and histological responses and might facilitate en bloc spondylectomy by hardening the tumor and causing less adhesion to segmental vessels, major vessels and nerve roots, which was beneficial to achieve the optimal oncological and functional outcomes.

Denosumab for giant cell tumors of bone from 2010 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis

Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are considered moderately malignant bone tumors. Denosumab, as a neoadjuvant therapy, provides new possibilities for treating GCTB. However, even after multiple studies and long-term clinical trials, there are limitations in the treatment process. Research data and Medical Subject Headings terms related to denosumab and GCTB were collected from January 2010 to October 2022 using the Web of Science and MeSH ( https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov ) browsers. These data were imported into CiteSpace and VOSviewer softwares for bibliometric analysis. Overall, 445 publications on denosumab and GCTB were identified. Over the last 12 years, the growth rate of the total number of publications has remained relatively stable. The USA published the highest number of articles (83) and had the highest centrality (0.42). Amgen Inc. and Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) First Ortoped Rizzoli were identified as the most influential institutions. Many authors have made outstanding contributions to this field. Lancet Oncology had the highest journal impact factor (54.433). Local recurrence and drug dosage are current research hotspots, and future development trends will mainly focus on prognostic markers of GCTB and the development of new therapies. Further research is required to analyze denosumab's safety and efficacy and understand its local recurrence of GCTB, to identify the optimal dose. Future progress in this field will likely focus on exploring new diagnostic and recurrence markers to monitor disease progression and examine new therapeutic targets and treatment strategies.

Conversion in a Resectable Tumor after Denosumab Neoadjuvant in a Large Dorsal Giant Cells Tumor: A Case Report and a Literature Review

Giant cell tumors of bone are a rare entity, usually occurring in young patients and characteristically arising in the long bones. The spinal location is rare and usually presents with pain and/or neurological symptoms. The treatment of choice is surgery. Treatment with Denosumab, a bisphosphonate inhibitor of RANK-L, which is highly expressed in these tumors, has shown extensive activity in unresectable patients or those undergoing incomplete surgery. Preoperative treatment with this drug is gaining increasing interest, as its high potency in tumor reduction in this subtype of neoplasm has allowed resectability in selected patients. We present the case of a young patient with a large spinal tumor who, after neoadjuvant Denosumab, underwent complete en bloc surgery with clean margins and a great pathological response.

Revisiting En Bloc Resection Versus Piecemeal Resection for the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine

OBJECTIVE

Surgery for spinal giant cell tumors (GCTs) is challenging because these tumors often exhibit a poor clinical course owing to their locally aggressive features. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of GCT recurrence in the spine by focusing on surgical factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgery for spinal GCTs between January 2005 and December 2016. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, surgical variables were evaluated for disease-free survival (DFS). Since tumor violation may occur at the pedicle during en bloc resection of the spine, it was further analyzed as a separate variable. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed for other clinical and radiographic variables. A total of 28 patients (male:female = 8:20) were included. The mean follow-up period was 90.5 months (range, 15-184 months).

RESULTS

Among the 28 patients, gross total resection (GTR) was the most important factor for DFS (P = 0.001). Any form of tumor violation was also correlated with DFS (P = 0.049); however, use of en bloc resection technique did not show a significant DFS gain compared to piecemeal resection (P = 0.218). In the patient group that achieved GTR, the mode of resection was not a significant factor for DFS (P = 0.959). In the multivariate analysis, the extent of resection was the only significant variable that affected DFS (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Conflicting results on tumor violation from univariate and multivariate analyses suggest that GTR without tumor violation should be the treatment goal for spinal GCTs. However, when tumor violation is unavoidable, it would be important to prioritize GTR over adhering to en bloc resection.

The Role of Denosumab in the Treatment of Primary Tumors of Bone

Many hand surgeons treat benign bone tumors without referral to orthopedic oncologists. However, there have been considerable advances in medical therapy for some of these tumors, with which hand surgeons may not be as familiar. This review focuses on the mechanism and uses of denosumab in the treatment of benign tumors of bone. Although the hand surgeon may not be directly prescribing this therapy, they are often the only physician treating the patient for these conditions. As such, awareness regarding the use of this therapy in reducing pain, decreasing tumor volume, and treatment of potential lung metastases is critical to those taking on these cases without the support of an orthopedic oncologist. This article aims to familiarize hand surgeons with denosumab to help promote knowledge of this therapeutic option and the potential role of this medication in the treatment of primary bone tumors in the hand.

Current therapies and future prospective for locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors

Locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of soft tissue and bone tumors with intermediate histology, incompletely understood biology, and highly variable natural history. Despite having a limited to absent ability to metastasize and excellent survival prognosis, locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors can be symptomatic, require prolonged and repeat treatments including surgery and chemotherapy, and can severely impact patients' quality of life. The management of locally aggressive tumors has evolved over the years with a focus on minimizing morbid treatments. Extensive oncologic surgeries and radiation are pillars of care for high grade sarcomas, however, play a more limited role in management of locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors, due to propensity for local recurrence despite resection, and the risk of transformation to a higher-grade entity following radiation. Patients should ideally be evaluated in specialized sarcoma centers that can coordinate complex multimodal decision-making, taking into consideration the individual patient's clinical presentation and history, as well as any available prognostic factors into customizing therapy. In this review, we aim to discuss the biology, clinical management, and future treatment frontiers for three representative locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors: desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF), tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) and giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). These entities challenge clinicians with their unpredictable behavior and responses to treatment, and still lack a well-defined standard of care despite recent progress with newly approved or promising experimental drugs.

Giant cell tumour of bone in os sacrum of a prepubertal girl - Surgical and medical treatment with zoledronate and denosumab

A giant cell tumour of bone presented in the os sacrum of a prepubertal girl. Surgery with reconstruction was performed, but total resection was impossible. Zoledronate failed to avoid tumour regrowth, and treatment was changed to denosumab, despite not being recommended for use in growing children. Denosumab treatment for 21 months reduced and stabilized tumour size, the girl became pain free with asymptomatic side effects as mild hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia and sclerosis of newly formed bone.

Tumor Growth Rate in Spinal Giant Cell Tumors of Bone and Association With the Immune Microenvironment and Denosumab Treatment Responsiveness: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Currently, little is known about the prognostic value of tumor growth rate (TGR) in spinal giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation of TGR with clinicopathological features, immune microenvironment, prognosis, and response to denosumab treatment of spinal GCTB.

METHODS

A total of 128 patients with spinal GCTB treated at 5 centers from 2011 to 2021 were included. TGR was assessed by 2 independent neuroradiologists using at least 2 preoperative thin-section magnetic resonance imaging scans at a minimum interval of 2 months. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subtypes for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, PD-1, PD-L1, and Foxp3. Then, these parameters were analyzed for their associations with patient outcomes (progression-free survival and overall survival), clinicopathological features, and denosumab treatment responsiveness.

RESULTS

High TGR predicted both poor progression-free survival and overall survival (both P < .001). In addition, TGR was associated with postoperative neurological dysfunction ( P < .001), Enneking staging ( P = .016), denosumab treatment responsiveness ( P = .035), and the number of CD3 + ( P < .001), PD-1 + ( P = .009), PD-L1 + ( P < .001), and FoxP3 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte ( P = .02). Importantly, TGR outperformed the traditional Enneking, Campanacci, and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems in predicting the clinical outcomes of spinal GCTB.

CONCLUSION

These data support the use of TGR as a reliable predictive tool for clinically relevant outcomes and response to denosumab therapy of spinal GCTB, which may be helpful in guiding prognostic risk stratification and therapeutic optimization of patients.

Spinal tumours: recommendations of the Polish Society of Spine Surgery, the Polish Society of Oncology, the Polish Society of Neurosurgeons, the Polish Society of Oncologic Surgery, the Polish Society of Oncologic Radiotherapy, and the Polish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

PURPOSE

The purpose of these recommendations is to spread the available evidence for evaluating and managing spinal tumours among clinicians who encounter such entities.

METHODS

The recommendations were developed by members of the Development Recommendations Group representing seven stakeholder scientific societies and organizations of specialists involved in various forms of care for patients with spinal tumours in Poland. The recommendations are based on data yielded from systematic reviews of the literature identified through electronic database searches. The strength of the recommendations was graded according to the North American Spine Society's grades of recommendation for summaries or reviews of studies.

RESULTS

The recommendation group developed 89 level A-C recommendations and a supplementary list of institutions able to manage primary malignant spinal tumours, namely, spinal sarcomas, at the expert level. This list, further called an appendix, helps clinicians who encounter spinal tumours refer patients with suspected spinal sarcoma or chordoma for pathological diagnosis, surgery and radiosurgery. The list constitutes a basis of the network of expertise for the management of primary malignant spinal tumours and should be understood as a communication network of specialists involved in the care of primary spinal malignancies.

CONCLUSION

The developed recommendations together with the national network of expertise should optimize the management of patients with spinal tumours, especially rare malignancies, and optimize their referral and allocation within the Polish national health service system.

Association between Inflammatory Markers and Local Recurrence in Patients with Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Preliminary Result

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) has a high local recurrence rate of approximately 20%. Systemic inflammatory markers, such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), hemoglobin (Hb), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), have been reported as prognostic markers in patients with malignant tumors. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between these markers and the local recurrence rate of GCTB. In total, 103 patients with GCTB who underwent surgery at the authors' institutions between 1993 and 2021 were included. Thirty patients experienced local recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that tumor site, preoperative and postoperative denosumab treatment, and surgery were significantly associated with local recurrence-free survival. LDH was associated with local recurrence-free survival on univariate analysis only. NLR, mGPS, PNI, LMR, and PLR score did not correlate with the local recurrence rate. In conclusion, NLR, mGPS, PNI, LMR, PLR score, Hb, ALP, and LDH levels are not correlated with the local recurrence rate of GCTB. However, due to the small number of patients included in this study, this result should be re-evaluated in a multicenter study with a larger sample size.

Outcome of re-operation for local recurrence following pre-operative denosumab administration and curettage for giant cell tumour of bone with difficult joint preservation

PURPOSE

Denosumab enables joint-sparing surgery (curettage) and surgical downstaging in patients with giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), where joint preservation is not possible. However, denosumab treatment causes osteosclerosis of the lesion, making it difficult to curet the lesion, leaving the tumour behind, and increasing the local recurrence rate. We performed a three-centre retrospective study to investigate the postoperative local re-recurrence rate, joint preservation status, and functional outcomes of locally recurrent lesions after preoperative denosumab treatment and curettage in patients with difficult joint preservation.

METHODS

We included 38 of 142 patients with primary GCTB of the extremities who underwent preoperative denosumab and curettage between 2009 and 2021 with local recurrence. Preoperative denosumab was indicated in patients with minimal residual periarticular and subchondral bones, large extraosseous lesions (Campanacci stage 3), and pathological fractures that made joint preservation difficult.

RESULTS

Local re-recurrence occurred in 6 (15.8%) of the 38 patients. In 29 patients who underwent re-curettage, local re-recurrence occurred in six patients (20.7%); however, in nine patients who underwent en bloc resection, no local re-recurrence was observed. The joint preservation rate was 63.2% (24 of 38 patients), with a median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 28 (interquartile range: 26.8-29.0). The median follow-up period after surgery for local recurrence was 63.5 months (interquartile range: 42.5-82.4).

CONCLUSION

Since the local re-recurrence rate after re-curettage for local recurrence was low, and the joint preservation rate and affected limb function were good, preoperative denosumab administration may be considered in patients who require downstaging to maintain good limb function (joint preservation).

Resection and reconstruction with and without neoadjuvant denosumab in campanacci grade III giant cell tumors of proximal humerus: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumors (GCT) of the proximal humerus are rarely reported case that requires complex surgeries due to involvement of the shoulder joint. Therefore, we report the first retrospective comparative study where the postoperative functional outcomes, recurrence rate and complications in patients who underwent arthrodesis of shoulder after resection of grade III GCT with and without neoadjuvant denosumab are compared.

METHODS

A retrospective review of eight cases of grade III GCT of proximal humerus receiving resection and fibular strut graft and arthrodesis between January 2014 and December 2019 is performed. They were stratified into two groups: one group of four patients received once-weekly denosumab 120 mg for 4-weeks before resection and reconstruction, while the other group of four patients did not receive denosumab before surgery. Primary outcomes included the functional outcomes assessed by revised Musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score and shoulder pain and disability index (SPDI) at 6-weeks and 12-months postoperatively while secondary outcomes included complications and recurrences.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in terms of SPDI at 6 weeks and 12 months, MSTS at 12 months, complications, recurrence among denosumab and non-denosumab groups. At 6-weeks follow-up, a significantly better pain score in SPDI and MSTS was acquired in the denosumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection and reconstruction with or without neoadjuvant denosumab for Grade III GCT of proximal humerus had similar functional outcomes and with no major differences in recurrence and complications. Hence, postoperative pain relief while long-term benefits were not discovered with the use of neoadjuvant denosumab.

A Retrospective Observational Study on Disease Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Giant Cell Tumor of the Bone in China

Aims

Giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) is associated with considerable morbidity. As GCTB epidemiological data for China are limited, this study is aimed at describing the disease characteristics of GCTB in China and establishing the historical context for its treatment before recent advances in treatment options.

Methods

The disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and local GCTB recurrence rate after primary surgery for GCTB were evaluated in this single-center, retrospective, noninterventional, observational study of patients treated for GCTB at Ji Shui Tan Hospital, Beijing, from 2009 to 2016 based on medical chart review. Patients with unmet need were defined as those whose surgical treatment was difficult or who had to undergo high-morbidity surgery.

Results

Among the 668 patients with a primary GCTB diagnosis, 578 (86.5%) of target lesions were in the extremities, and 89 (13.3%) were in the pelvic or axial bone. Of these, 173 (25.9%) were characterized as having an unmet need. Almost all GCTB patients received surgical treatment at both primary diagnosis (666/668 (99.7%)) and last disease recurrence (196/200 (98.0%)). Additionally, about one-third of patients received nonsurgical treatment at primary diagnosis (205/668 (30.7%)) and disease recurrence (67/200 (33.5%)), with neoadjuvant therapy being the most common treatment. The rate of high-morbidity surgery increased for recurrent disease (65/200 (32.5%)) compared with primary diagnosis (111/668 (16.6%)). The 2-year cumulative incidence of postoperative disease recurrence was 29.2%, in line with rates observed in prior studies.

Conclusion

As many patients with primary and recurrent disease received high-morbidity surgery, more effective treatments are needed.

Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumour of Bone: A Review of Literature and the Experience of a Referral Centre

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a benign, locally aggressive primary bone neoplasm that represents 5% of all bone tumours. The principal treatment approach is surgery. Although generally GCTB is considered only a locally aggressive disease, it can metastasise, and lung metastases occur in 1–9% of patients. To date, only the use of denosumab has been approved as medical treatment for GCTB. Even more rarely, GCTB undergoes sarcomatous transformation into a malignant tumour (4% of all GCTB), but history of this malignant transformation is unclear and unpredictable. Considering the rarity of the event, the data in the literature are few. In this review, we summarise published data of GCTB malignant transformation and we analyse three cases of malignant transformation of GCTB, evaluating histopathology, genetics, and radiological aspects. Despite the rarity of this event, we conclude that a strict follow up is recommended to detect early malignant transformation.

Outcome of Reoperation for Local Recurrence Following En Bloc Resection for Bone Giant Cell Tumor of the Extremity

En bloc resection is typically performed to treat giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB), particularly when curettage can be challenging owing to extensive bone cortex destruction with soft tissue extension. Few reports have addressed the clinical outcomes after reoperation for local recurrence in patients with GCTB who underwent en bloc resection. In this multicenter retrospective study, we investigated local recurrence, distant metastasis, malignant transformation, mortality, and limb function in patients treated for local recurrence following en bloc resection for GCTB. Among 205 patients who underwent en bloc resection for GCTB of the extremities between 1980 and 2021, we included 29 with local recurrence. En bloc resection was performed for large tumors with soft tissue extension, pathological fractures with joint invasion, complex fractures, and dispensable bones, such as the proximal fibula and distal ulna. Local re-recurrence, distant metastasis, malignant transformation, and mortality rates were 41.4% (12/29), 34.5% (10/29), 6.9% (2/29), and 6.9% (2/29), respectively. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 26 (interquartile range, 23–28). The median follow-up period after surgery for local recurrence was 70.1 months (interquartile range, 40.5–123.8 months). Local recurrence following en bloc resection for GCTB could indicate an aggressive GCTB, necessitating careful follow-up.

Clinicopathological and histological analysis of secondary malignant giant cell tumors of bone without radiotherapy

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an intermediate bone tumor that rarely undergoes malignant transformation. Secondary malignant GCTB (SMGCTB) is defined as a lesion in which high-grade sarcoma occurs at the site of previously treated GCTB. The present study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with GCTB treated at Okayama University Hospital between April 1986 and April 2020. The clinicopathological and histological features of patients with SMGCTB without prior radiotherapy were investigated. A total of three patients (4%) with SMGCTB were detected, and the tumor sites were the distal ulna, distal femur and sacrum. Two of the patients had been treated with curettage and bone graft, and one had been treated with denosumab. In all cases, the lesions were made up of two components, the conventional GCTB component and the malignant component. The Ki67 labeling index was higher in the malignant components of SMGCTB and metastatic lesions compared with that in primary and recurrent conventional GCTB, or the conventional GCTB component of SMGCTB. Moreover, p53 expression was higher in these same components in patients who underwent curettage and bone grafting; however, there was no difference in the patient that received denosumab treatment. In this patient, clinical cancer genomic profiling revealed loss of CDKN2A, CDKN2B and MTAP expression. All three patients developed distant metastasis. The patients with SMGCTB in the ulna and femur died 13 and 54 months after detection of malignant transformation, respectively. The patient with SMGCTB in the sacrum received carbon-ion radiotherapy to the sacrum and pazopanib; the treatment was effective and the patient was alive at the last follow-up 3 years later. In conclusion, p53 may be associated with malignant transformation in GCTB. Future studies should investigate the association of between denosumab treatment and malignant transformation, as well as molecular targeted therapy to improve the clinical outcomes of SMGCTB.

Outcomes in Bone Giant Cell Tumors Treated With Surgical Resection With and Without Denosumab Injection: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study

Background: Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are rare, benign, aggressive, recurrent tumors that are most often found at the ends of long bones. They account for 5% of all primary bone tumors and 20% of all benign bone tumors. The clinical features of GCTB include local swelling, pain, and limitations in joint movement. Approximately half of GCTB arise around the knee joint, affecting either the distal femur or proximal tibia. Tissue biopsy reveals an excess of multinucleated giant cells on a stromal cell background, indicating a diagnosis. Intralesional curettage is used to treat GCTB and is associated with minimal disability; however, local recurrence may occur in many patients. Resection and endoprosthetic repair or bone graft reconstruction are often used to treat GCTB near the joint. To our knowledge, there are currently no studies on this topic in the city of Jeddah, where we conducted our study. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of surgical resection accompanied by denosumab injection compared to that of surgery alone in treating GCTB.

Methods: All cases of GCTB at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, between January 2008 and December 2018, that fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. All cases of GCTB in the pre-specified period were classified as surgical resection with denosumab injection or surgical resection alone. The outcomes of the two modalities were compared. Recurrence was investigated in patients belonging to both the groups.

Results: Twenty-six cases that met the inclusion criteria were included in the study and the data were analyzed. The subjects were divided into two groups: denosumab and surgery (n = 7) and surgery alone (n = 19). Patients treated with denosumab and surgery had a higher recurrence rate (57%); however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.407).

Conclusion: Our study showed that when comparing local recurrence after curettage in patients treated with denosumab and patients who did not receive it, preoperative denosumab therapy was associated with an increased incidence of local recurrence. We recommend a systematic review that can include more studies in this field to acquire more definitive results regarding this topic.

Updated concepts in treatment of giant cell tumor of bone

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) are intermediate, locally aggressive primary bone tumors. For conventional GCTB, surgery remains treatment of choice. For advanced GCTB, a more important role came into play for systemic therapy including denosumab and bisphosphonates over the last decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

In diagnostics, focus has been on H3F3A (G34) driver mutations present in GCTB. The most frequent mutation (G34W) can be detected using immunohistochemistry and is highly specific in differentiating GCTB from other giant cell containing tumors. PD-L1 expression can be used as biological marker to predict higher recurrence risks in GCTB patients.The use of bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement is under investigation in a randomized controlled trial. A new technique consisting of percutaneous microwave ablation and bisphosphonate-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cementoplasty was proposed for unresectable (pelvic) GCTB.Increased experience with use of denosumab raised concern on elevated recurrence rates. However, conclusions of meta-analyses should be interpreted with risk of indication bias in mind. Several small studies are published with short-course denosumab (varying from 3 to 6 doses). One small trial directly compared denosumab and zoledronic acid, with no statistical differences in radiological and clinical outcome, and nonsignificantly higher recurrence rate after denosumab. As bisphosphonates directly target neoplastic stromal cells in GCTB, larger directly comparative trials are still warranted.

SUMMARY

Neoadjuvant denosumab is highly effective for advanced GCTB, and a short-course is advised to facilitate surgery, whereas increased recurrence rates remain of concern. Randomized controlled trials are conducted on bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement and on optimal dose and duration of neoadjuvant denosumab. PD-L1 could be a potential new therapy target in GCTB.

En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor following Neoadjuvant Denosumab: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Introduction

The RANK ligand inhibitor denosumab has been used to treat cases of unresectable giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) or preoperatively to facilitate intralesional curettage. However, there are no clear guidelines for use of denosumab prior to en bloc resection.

Case Presentation

In this study, a 26-year-old patient presented with atraumatic lateral knee pain. X-rays demonstrated a destructive lesion within the proximal fibula, and biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of GCTB.

Management and Outcomes

The patient received 3 months of neoadjuvant denosumab with complete resolution of his pain and cortical rim formation surrounding the tumor. The tumor was removed en bloc with negative margins. At 6-month follow-up, the patient had returned to his functional baseline with no evidence of tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant denosumab can mitigate symptoms related to GCTB and promotes cortical bone formation, facilitating en bloc resection and permitting acceptable functional outcomes in select cases.

Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Multidisciplinary Medical Management Based on Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Real-World Evidence

Simple Summary

The widely accepted local therapy in extremity giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage; patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Abstract

(1) Despite the benign nature of the giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), it shows a local recurrence rate of up to 50% and a chance of malignant transformation. The widely accepted local therapy in extremity GCTB is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the RANKL and associated inhibition of the RANKL pathway, is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. (2) The literature review of patients with GCTB treated with denosumab is performed via PubMed, using suitable keywords from January 2009 to January 2021. (3) Current indications for denosumab use are not definitively clear and unambiguous. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage, and the role of denosumab in preoperative therapy in this patient population remains unclear. (4) However, patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Ultra-Short Course of Neo-Adjuvant Denosumab for Nerve-Sparing Surgery for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone in Sacrum

STUDY DEIGN

This was a retrospective study about sacral giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether ultra-short course of neo-adjuvant denosumab treatment for sacral GCTB could (1) induce radiological and histological response? (2) Facilitate nerve-sparing surgery? (3) Achieve satisfactory oncological and functional outcomes?

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous reports on long course of neo-adjuvant denosumab treatment for GCTB showed significant tumor response and a relatively high recurrent rate after curettage.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients with sacral GCTB treated with neoadjuvant denosumab and nerve-sparing surgery were categorized into ultra-short course group (≤3 doses and operation within D21 since 1st dose, 41 patients) or conventional group (>3 doses or operation after D21 since 1st dose, 25 patients). The radiological and histological response, operative data, oncological and functional outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The ultra-short course group demonstrated fewer doses of neo-adjuvant denosumab (mean: 2.1 vs. 4.8, P  < 0.001) and shorter time to surgery (12.2 days vs. 72.3 days, P < 0.001). Similar patterns of radiological and histological response were observed in the two groups with less fibrosis and ossification in the ultra-short course group. The operative duration (199.9 min vs. 187.8 min, P = 0.364) and estimated blood loss (1552.4 mL vs. 1474.0 mL, P = 0.740) were comparable. Most (94.8%) of the patients received adjuvant denosumab. After a mean follow-up of 29.4 months, three cases (8.8%) and five cases (20.8%) showed local recurrence in each group (P = 0.255). The estimated recurrence-free survival (56.2 vs. 51.2 months, P = 0.210) and the functional status [Motor-Urination-Defecation scores: 25.9 vs. 25.7, P = 0.762] did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Ultra-short course of neo-adjuvant denosumab for sacral GCTB could elicit radiological and histological responses as conventional course did. The less degree of fibrosis and ossification might facilitate nerve-sparing surgery and help to achieve satisfactory local control and functional status.Level of Evidence: 4.

Management of giant cell tumors of the distal radius: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The treatment of giant cell tumors (GCT) of the distal radius remains challenging, with no consensus on the optimal surgical management. Surgical management remains the mainstay of treatment with options including intralesional curettage and en-bloc resection with reconstruction. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of these two procedures.

METHODS

Using OVID-Medline and Embase databases, a systematic literature search was performed. Comparative studies, assessing intralesional curettage and en-bloc resection in patients with GCTs of the distal radius, were included. Data regarding rates of local recurrence, metastasis, overall complications, and functional outcomes, were collected and analyzed. The ROBINS-I tool was utilized for risk of bias appraisal within each study outcome.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (n = 373 patients) reporting on 191 intralesional curettage procedures and 182 en-bloc resections were included in the analysis. The average age of participants was 31.9 (SD ± 2.4) years and average follow-up was 7.1 (SD ± 3.6) years. Patients that underwent intralesional curettage were more likely to develop local recurrence (Risk Ratio (RR) 3.3, 95% CI, [2.1, 5.4], p < 0.00001) when compared to patients that underwent en-bloc resection. In Campanacci grade 3 lesions, the risk for local recurrence was 5.9 (95% CI, [2.2, 16.3], p = 0.0006) times higher in patients that received intralesional curettage. Patients that underwent intralesional curettage showed an 84% reduction in the relative risk of developing overall complications compared to en-bloc resection (95% CI, [0.1, 0.4], p < 0.00001), and a larger decrease in Visual Analog Scale and lower Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (p < 0.00001). Risk ratio for developing a local recurrence, with PMMA versus bone graft following an intralesional procedure was not significant (RR 1.2, 95% CI, [0.6, 2.6], p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

In the surgical management of GCT of the distal radius, intralesional curettage increased local recurrence compared to en-bloc resection with reconstruction, particularly in grade 3 tumors. However, it led to significantly fewer operative complications, lower pain scores, and improved functional outcomes compared to en-bloc resection. Both treatment options remain relevant in the contemporary management of GCTs of the distal radius. Surgical decision making should include both patient and tumor factors when determining the optimal treatment strategy for these patients. LEVEL 3 EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies.

Current management of giant-cell tumor of bone in the denosumab era

Giant-cell tumor of bone is a rare, locally aggressive and rarely metastasizing primary bone tumor. The mainstay of treatment remains controversial and is decided by the balance between adequate surgical margin and sufficient adjacent joint function. Although curettage with a high-speed burr and local adjuvants can maintain normal joint function, many reports have revealed a high local recurrence rate. Conversely, en bloc resection and reconstruction with prostheses for highly aggressive lesions have reportedly lower local recurrence rates and poorer functional outcomes. Denosumab-a full human monoclonal antibody that inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa β ligand-was approved by the Food and Drug Authority in 2013 for use in surgically unresectable or when resection is likely to result in severe morbidity for skeletally mature adolescents and adults with giant-cell tumor of bone. However, subsequent studies have suggested that the local recurrence rate would be increased by preoperative use of denosumab. In systematic reviews of the local recurrence rate after preoperative use of denosumab, conclusions vary due to the small sample sizes of the studies reviewed. Therefore, controversy regarding the treatment of giant-cell tumor of bone is ongoing. Here, this review elucidates the management of giant-cell tumor of bone, especially with the local adjuvant and neoadjuvant use of denosumab, and presents the current, evidence-based treatment for giant-cell tumor of bone.

Primary total knee arthroplasty assisted by computed tomography-free navigation for secondary knee osteoarthritis following massive calcium phosphate cement packing for distal femoral giant-cell bone tumor treatment: a case report

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an intermediate tumor commonly arising from the epiphysis of the distal femur and proximal tibia. Standard GCTB treatment is joint-preserving surgery performed using thorough curettage and the filling of the cavity with allo-, auto-, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), or synthetic bone graft. Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) is an artificial bone substitute, which has the benefit of being able to adjust defects, consequently inducing immediate mechanical strength, and promoting biological healing. Secondary osteoarthritis may occur following GCTB treatment and may need additional surgery if severe. However, details regarding surgery for secondary osteoarthritis have not been fully elucidated. There are no reports on the use of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of secondary osteoarthritis following CPC packing. The insertion of an alignment rod is a standard procedure in TKA; however, it was difficult to perform in this case due to CPC. Therefore, we used a computed tomography (CT)-free navigation system to assist the distal femur cut. This study presents a knee joint secondary osteoarthritis case following CPC packing for GCTB curettage that was treated with standard TKA.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 67-year-old Japanese woman, who was previously diagnosed with left distal femur GCTB and was treated by curettage and CPC packing 7 years ago, complained of severe knee pain. Left knee joint plain radiography revealed Kellgren and Lawrence (K-L) grade 4 osteoarthritis without evidence of tumor recurrence. Therefore, she was scheduled for TKA. There are no reports on the cutting of a femoral condyle surface with massive CPC with accurate alignment. Because it is difficult to insert the alignment rod intramedullary and cut the femoral condyle with CPC, we planned CT-free navigation-guided surgery for accurate bone cutting using an oscillating tip saw system to prevent CPC cracks. We performed standard TKA without complications, as planned. Postoperative X-ray showed normal alignment. Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) ameliorated from 27 and 29 to 64 and 68, respectively The patient can walk without a cane postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

There was no report about the surface TKA guided by CT-free navigation after primary GCT surgery with CPC. We believe that this case report will help in planning salvage surgery for secondary osteoarthritis after CPC packing.

Study of imaging changes following preoperative denosumab for giant cell tumor of bone

•

The preoperative application of denosumab can reduce tumor blood supply.

•

The decrease of blood supply was the most significant in the initial stage of treatment.

•

It is not recommended to apply denosumab long before surgical treatment.

Background

The changes in the characteristics of the tumor blood supply of giant cell tumor of bone over time after treatment with denosumab remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in the blood supply imaging characteristics of giant cell tumor of bone after preoperative denosumab treatment and to provide evidence for evaluating the reasonable time for preoperative treatment.

Methods

A total of 59 patients with giant cell tumor of bone who were treated in our hospital from 2014 to 2019 were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent enhanced CT examination of the tumor site before denosumab treatment and every month after treatment. The plain CT value and enhanced CT value of the tumor were measured, and the CT enhancement rate of the tumor was calculated. The change in the CT enhancement rate of the tumor over time after denosumab treatment was analyzed.

Results

The average tumor enhancement rates were 2.14 (1.22–4.05), 1.60 (1.12–2.53), 1.38 (1.02–2.24), and 1.25 (1–2.11) before denosumab treatment and one month, three months, and six months after treatment, respectively. After denosumab treatment, the average monthly CT enhancement rate decreased as follows: 0.54 (25.2%) in the first month, 0.11 (5.15%) in the second to third months, and 0.04 (1.87%) in the fourth to sixth months. The tumor enhancement rate was no longer significantly reduced three months post-treatment. There was a significant correlation between the reduction in the CT enhancement rate and the initial CT enhancement rate (P = 0.000).

Conclusion

The preoperative application of denosumab can reduce tumor blood supply. The decrease in the blood supply is the most significant in the initial stage of treatment. Following treatment, the decrease in the blood supply gradually reduces over time. Therefore, for the purpose of reducing intra-operative bleeding and facilitating surgery, application of denosumab treatment is not recommended more than three months before surgery.

Denosumab Does Not Decrease Local Recurrence in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Treated With En Bloc Resection

We performed a systematic analysis of existing studies to determine whether preoperative denosumab reduces the risk of local recurrence for patients with giant cell tumor of bone treated with en bloc resection and to address the optimal duration of preoperative denosumab with respect to the risk of local recurrence after en bloc resection. Denosumab did not decrease the risk of local recurrence after en bloc resection; the proportion of patients with local recurrence was 3.6% (2 of 56) in the en bloc resection with preoperative denosumab group vs 14.2% (40 of 280) in the en bloc resection alone group, with an overall pooled odds ratio of 0.76 (P=.67). Meta-regression models revealed no association between the duration of preoperative denosumab and the odds of local recurrence after en bloc resection (P=.83). Administration of denosumab for 3 months before en bloc resection is appropriate for sufficient bone hardening to reduce tumor cell spillage and does not result in denosumab-related complications. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):326-332.].

Establishment and characterization of the NCC-GCTB4-C1 cell line: a novel patient-derived cell line from giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare osteolytic intermediate bone tumor that harbors a pathogenic H3F3A gene mutation and exhibits characteristic histology. The standard curative treatment for GCTB is complete surgical resection, but it frequently results in local recurrence and, more rarely, metastasis. Therefore, effective multidisciplinary treatment is needed. Although patient-derived tumor cell lines are promising tools for preclinical and basic research, there are only four available cell lines for GCTB in public cell banks. Thus, the aim of this study was to establish a novel GCTB cell line. Using surgically resected tumor tissues from a patient with GCTB, we established a cell line named NCC-GCTB4-C1. The cells harbored the typical H3F3A gene mutation and exhibited constant proliferation and invasive capabilities. After characterizing NCC-GCTB4-C1 cell behaviors, we conducted high-throughput screening of 214 anti-tumor drugs and identified seven effective drugs. Comparing the results of high-throughput screening using NCC-GCTB4-C1 cell line with the results using NCC-GCTB1-C1, NCC-GCTB2-C1, and NCC-GCTB3-C1 cell lines that we previously established, four drugs were in common effective. This study showed potential drugs for the treatment of GCTB. These data indicate that NCC-GCTB4-C1 has the potential to be a powerful tool in preclinical and basic research on GCTB.

What's new in musculoskeletal oncology

We reviewed the recent literature related to primary musculoskeletal tumors and metastatic bone tumors. With regard to primary bone tumors, computer navigation systems and three-dimensional-printed prostheses seem to be new treatment options, especially in challenging anatomical locations, such as the sacrum and pelvis. Regarding the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone, recent studies have suggested that denosumab administration is related to a higher local recurrence rate following curettage, but a lower local recurrence rate following en bloc resection. In addition, there was no difference in the local recurrence rate at five years after surgery between short-term and long-term denosumab therapy. With regard to soft tissue tumors, percutaneous cryoablation appears to be a new treatment option for extra-abdominal desmoid tumors, with encouraging results. Regarding soft tissue sarcomas, a negative surgical margin of < 1 mm is sufficient to control local recurrence. Pexidartinib seems to be a promising systemic therapy for the treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumors for which surgery is not expected to improve the function of the affected limb. Finally, the life expectancy of patients is the most important factor in determining the optimal surgical procedure for patients with impending or pathological fractures of the long bone due to metastatic bone tumors. Elevated C-reactive protein level was found to be an independent poor prognostic factor at 1 year after surgery for long bone metastases.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone

Simple Summary

According to the 2020 World Health Organization classification, a giant cell tumor of bone is an intermediate malignant bone tumor. Denosumab treatment before curettage should be avoided due to the increased risk of local recurrence. Administration of denosumab before en bloc resection of the giant cell tumors of the pelvis and spine facilitates en bloc resection. Nerve-sparing surgery after embolization is a possible treatment for giant cell tumors of the sacrum. Denosumab therapy with or without embolization is indicated for inoperable giant cell tumors of the pelvis, spine, and sacrum. A wait-and-see approach is recommended for lung metastases at first, then denosumab should be administered to the growing lesions. Radiotherapy is not recommended owing to the risk of malignant transformation. Local recurrence after 2 years or more should be indicative of malignant transformation. This review summarizes the treatment approaches for non-malignant and malignant giant cell tumors of bone.

Abstract

The 2020 World Health Organization classification defined giant cell tumors of bone (GCTBs) as intermediate malignant tumors. Since the mutated H3F3A was found to be a specific marker for GCTB, it has become very useful in diagnosing GCTB. Curettage is the most common treatment for GCTBs. Preoperative administration of denosumab makes curettage difficult and increases the risk of local recurrence. Curettage is recommended to achieve good functional outcomes, even for local recurrence. For pathological fractures, joints should be preserved as much as possible and curettage should be attempted. Preoperative administration of denosumab for pelvic and spinal GCTBs reduces extraosseous lesions, hardens the tumor, and facilitates en bloc resection. Nerve-sparing surgery after embolization is a possible treatment for sacral GCTBS. Denosumab therapy with or without embolization is indicated for inoperable pelvic, spinal, and sacral GCTBs. It is recommended to first observe lung metastases, then administer denosumab for growing lesions. Radiotherapy is associated with a risk of malignant transformation and should be limited to cases where surgery is impossible and denosumab, zoledronic acid, or embolization is not available. Local recurrence after 2 years or more should be indicative of malignant transformation. This review summarizes the treatment approaches for non-malignant and malignant GCTBs.

Late Local Recurrence of Bone Giant Cell Tumors Associated with an Increased Risk for Malignant Transformation

Simple Summary

In giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), an intermediate malignant bone tumor, approximately 4% of cases can undergo malignant transformation. We analyzed risk factors for malignant transformation of GCTB treated without radiotherapy and retrospectively reviewed medical files of 461 patients with GCTB of the extremities who had undergone surgery alone, with no radiotherapy or denosumab therapy. Malignant transformation occurred in 15 of 461 patients (3.3%) at a median follow-up period of 192 months. The median follow-up duration was 89.4 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that local recurrence was an independent prognostic factor for unfavorable malignant transformation. The interval between the last surgery to local recurrence and malignant transformation was longer than that to local recurrence of benign GCTB, with a median of 15.2 (IQR, 5.2–25.4) years versus 1.3 (IQR, 0.8–2.6) months, respectively (p < 0.001). Late local recurrence of GCTB is associated with a higher risk of malignant transformation.

Abstract

In giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), an intermediate malignant bone tumor, approximately 4% of all cases undergo malignant transformation. Accordingly, we analyzed risk factors for malignant transformation of GCTB treated without radiotherapy. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 530 patients with GCTB of the extremities, admitted and treated at two institutions between January 1980 and December 2019. Overall, 4 patients with primary malignant GCTB, 4 patients with missing data, 3 patients with a history of radiotherapy, 22 patients with a follow-up of less than 6 months, and 36 patients who received denosumab were excluded. Accordingly, 461 patients were included for further analysis. Malignant transformation was observed in 15 of 461 patients (3.3%) at a median follow-up period of 192 months. The median follow-up duration was 89.4 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that local recurrence was an independent prognostic factor for unfavorable malignant transformation (Hazard ratio [HR], 11.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.33–55.13; p = 0.003 for once versus none and HR, 11.24; 95% CI, 1.76–71.96; and p = 0.011 for twice or more versus none). The interval between the last surgery to local recurrence and malignant transformation was longer than that to local recurrence of benign GCTB, with a median of 15.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 5.2–25.4) versus 1.3 months (IQR, 0.8–2.6), respectively (p < 0.001). Late local recurrence of GCTB is associated with a higher risk of malignant transformation.

The current standing on the use of denosumab in giant cell tumour of the bone

Giant cell tumour of the bone (GCTB) has been classically treated surgically. With the advent of denosumab, there is potential to use it as a targeted therapy to downstage the tumour and control its progression. Like all new therapies, the dosage, duration, and long-term effects of treatment can only be determined over the time through numerous trials and errors. The current recommendation of use of the monoclonal antibody is 3-4 months of neoadjuvant denosumab in patients with advanced GCTB for cases who were not candidates for primary curettage initially, and prolonged use for surgically unsalvageable GCTB. The use of Denosumab in the adjuvant setting to prevent recurrence is not established.

Role of denosumab before resection and reconstruction in giant cell tumors of bone: a single-centered retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Denosumab has been approved by Food and Drug Authority in 2013 for use in surgically unresectable Giant cell tumor (GCT) to achieve resectable tumor margins. The aim of this study is to investigate the functional outcome and surgical convenience with the use of neoadjuvant denosumab before resection and reconstruction in Campanacci grade III GCT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 70 cases of Campanacci grade III GCT receiving resection and reconstruction between January 2014 and December 2019. They were stratified into two groups: one group of 29 patients received once-weekly denosumab 120 mg for 4-weeks before resection and reconstruction, while the other group of 41 patients did not receive denosumab before resection and reconstruction. Quality of life by musculoskeletal tumor society score where 0-7 means poor, 8-14 means fair, 15-22 means good; above 22 means excellent, incidence of tumor recurrence, intraoperative duration in minutes and postoperative positive margins were assessed for each cohort after 12 months follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in musculoskeletal tumor society score (25.75 vs. 27.41; P  = 0.178), incidence of recurrence (3.45% vs. 4.88%; P  < 0.001), and postoperative positive margins (10.34% vs. 4.88%; P  = 0.38) for both groups. However, the intraoperative duration (133.38 vs. 194.49; P  < 0.001) was significantly higher in the non-denosumab group compared with denosumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant denosumab is equally effective considering postoperative functional outcomes and surgical convenience except intraoperative duration where it is highly helpful in saving the operating time duration. Easier identification, resection and lesser reconstruction are the key surgical convenience offered by neoadjuvant denosumab.

Denosumab Treatment for Giant Cell Tumors, Aneurysmal Bone Cysts, and Fibrous Dysplasia-Risks and Benefits

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes current understanding of the role of denosumab, an inhibitor of receptor activator of nuclear kappa-B ligand (RANKL), in the management of 3 skeletal neoplasms: giant cell tumors, aneurysmal bone cysts, and fibrous dysplasia.

RECENT FINDINGS

A growing body of literature supports denosumab use in giant cell tumors, a neoplasm in which RANKL plays a clear pathogenic role. Comparatively less data is available in aneurysmal bone cysts and fibrous dysplasia; however, the pathogenic similarity of these disorders to giant cell tumors, as well as encouraging preliminary data, suggests denosumab may be useful. Denosumab's inhibitory effects on bone turnover are fully reversible after drug discontinuation. This raises important unanswered questions for clinical management, including potential risks of tumor recurrence and bone turnover rebound. Denosumab is a promising potential treatment for skeletal neoplasms. However, its clinical use is impacted by ongoing safety concerns related to postdiscontinuation rebound, particularly in children. There is a critical need to understand denosumab treatment and discontinuation effects on tumor recurrence and to develop strategies for long-term treatment in patients who cannot be managed surgically.

Profiling of three H3F3A-mutated and denosumab-treated giant cell tumors of bone points to diverging pathways during progression and malignant transformation

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive lesion of intermediate malignancy. Malignant transformation of GCTB is a rare event. In 2013, the humanized monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor-κb-Ligand (RANKL) denosumab was approved for treatment of advanced GCTB. Since then, several reports have questioned the role of denosumab during occasional malignant transformation of GCTB. We report on three patients with H3F3A-mutated GCTBs, treated with denosumab. The tissue samples were analysed by histomorphology, immunohistochemistry, and in two instances by next generation panel sequencing of samples before and after treatment. One patient had a mutation of ARID2 in the recurrence of the GCTB under treatment with denosumab. One patient developed a pleomorphic sarcoma and one an osteoblastic osteosarcoma during treatment. Sequencing revealed a persisting H3F3A mutation in the osteosarcoma while the pleomorphic sarcoma lost the H3F3A mutation; however, a FGFR1 mutation, both in the recurrence and in the pleomorphic sarcoma persisted. In addition, the pleomorphic sarcoma showed an AKT2 and a NRAS mutation. These data are inconclusive concerning the role denosumab plays in the event of malignant progression/transformation of GCTB and point to diverging pathways of tumor progression of GCTB associated with this treatment.

Denosumab Treatment for Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine Including the Sacrum

STUDY DESIGN

This was a subanalysis of an international, multicenter, open-label study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of denosumab in a subset of patients with giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) of the spine including the sacrum from an international, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00680992).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Standard GCTB treatment is surgical removal, either by curettage or resection, combined with intraoperative adjuvant therapy; however, some sites may not be amenable to resection (e.g., skull, spine).

METHODS

Adults or skeletally mature adolescents with pathologically confirmed GCTB of the spine including the sacrum, and radiologically measurable evidence of active disease, were included. Patients received denosumab (120 mg subcutaneously) once every 4 weeks during the treatment phase, with loading doses on days 8 and 15 of the first cycle. Patients had surgically unsalvageable GCTB (Cohort 1), had planned surgery expected to result in severe morbidity (Cohort 2), or were enrolled from a previous GCTB study (Cohort 3).

RESULTS

Overall, 132 patients were included in the safety analysis (103 in Cohort 1, 24 in Cohort 2, and five in Cohort 3); 131 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimated probabilities of disease progression or recurrence were 3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0-6.2) at year 1 and 7.4% (95% CI, 2.1-12.7) at years 3 and 5 in Cohort 1, and not estimable in Cohorts 2 and 3. Of 23 patients (Cohort 2) with surgery planned at baseline, 10 (43%) had on-study surgery; of these, one patient had reported disease progression or recurrence after the on-study surgery. Clinical benefit was reported in 83% of patients overall (all cohorts).

CONCLUSION

Results from the analysis suggest that denosumab is potentially effective treatment for patients with GCTB of the spine including the sacrum. The adverse event profile was consistent with the full study population.Level of Evidence: 2.

The role of Denosumab in joint preservation for patients with giant cell tumour of bone

AIMS

Local recurrence remains a challenging and common problem following curettage and joint-sparing surgery for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). We previously reported a 15% local recurrence rate at a median follow-up of 30 months in 20 patients with high-risk GCTB treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab. The aim of this study was to determine if this initial favourable outcome following the use of Denosumab was maintained with longer follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with GCTB of the limb considered high-risk for unsuccessful joint salvage, due to minimal periarticular and subchondral bone, large soft tissue mass, or pathological fracture, were treated with Denosumab followed by extended intralesional curettage with the goal of preserving the joint surface. Patients were followed for local recurrence, metastasis, and secondary sarcoma.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 33.8 years (18 to 67) with high-risk GCTB received median six cycles of Denosumab before surgery. Tumours occurred most commonly around the knee (17/25, 68%). The median follow-up was 57 months (interquartile range (IQR) 13 to 88). The joint was salvaged in 23 patients (92%). Two required knee arthroplasty due to intra-articular fracture and arthritis. Local recurrence developed in 11 patients (44%) at a mean of 32.5 months (3 to 75) following surgery, of whom four underwent repeat curettage and joint salvage. One patient developed secondary osteosarcoma and another benign GCT lung metastases.

CONCLUSION

The use of Denosumab for joint salvage was associated with a higher than expected rate of local recurrence at 44%. Neoadjuvant Denosumab for joint-sparing procedures should be considered with caution in light of these results. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):184-191.

Preoperative Denosumab may increase the Risk of Local Recurrence of Giant-cell Tumor of Bone Treated with Curettage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of preoperative denosumab on the local recurrence of giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) treated with curettage. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched. The following data were analyzed using meta-analysis: local recurrence rate of patients receiving denosumab followed by curettage (denosumab group), local recurrence rate of patients receiving curettage only (control group), and a comparison of the local recurrence rates of the two groups. Results: Nine studies that contained 672 patients with GCTB were included in this review. Patients in the denosumab group (preoperative denosumab followed by curettage) had a higher risk of local recurrence compared with those in the control group (curettage only) (odds ratio = 3.04, 95% confidence interval = 1.48-6.22, P < 0.01). The association between preoperative denosumab and local recurrence remained significant in most of the subgroup analyses, except for those with sample sizes < 59 (P = 0.09), sacral GCTB (P = 0.42), and usage of postoperative denosumab (P = 0.38). Conclusions: Preoperative denosumab may increase the risk of local recurrence of GCTB treated with curettage and should be used with caution in the management of GCTB.