1
|
Limijadi EKS, Muniroh M, Prajoko YW, Tjandra KC, Respati DRP. The role of germline BRCA1 & BRCA2 mutations in familial pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299276. [PMID: 38809921 PMCID: PMC11135687 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) presents a notable risk, with 3-10% of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases having a family history. Studies link FPC to syndromes like HBOC, suggesting BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations play a role. BRCA gene functions in DNA repair impact FPC management, influencing sensitivity to therapies like PARP inhibitors. Identifying mutations not only aids FPC treatment but also reveals broader cancer risks. However, challenges persist in selectively applying genetic testing due to cost constraints. This Systematic Review focuses on BRCA1/BRCA2 significance in FPC, diagnostic criteria, prognostic value, and limitations. METHOD Original articles published from 2013 to January 2023 were sourced from databases such as Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect. Inclusion criteria comprised observational cohort or diagnostic studies related to the role of BRCA1/2 mutation in correlation to familial pancreatic cancer (FPC), while article reviews, narrative reviews, and non-relevant content were excluded. The assessment of bias used ROBINS-I, and the results were organized using PICOS criteria in a Google spreadsheet table. The systematic review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 checklist. RESULT We analyzed 9 diagnostic studies encompassing 1325 families and 4267 patients from Italy, USA, and Poland. Despite the limitation of limited homogenous PICO studies, our findings effectively present evidence. BRCA1/2 demonstrates benefits in detecting first-degree relatives FPC involvement with 2.26-10 times higher risk. These mutation findings also play an important role since with the BRCA1/2 targeted therapy, Poly-ADP Ribose Polymerase inhibitors (PARP) may give better outcomes of FPC treatment. Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 administration's impact on odds ratio (OR) based on six and five studies respectively. BRCA1 exhibited non-significant effects (OR = 1.26, P = 0.51), while BRCA2 showed significance (OR = 1.68, P = 0.04). No heterogeneity observed, indicating consistent results. Further research on BRCA1 is warranted. CONCLUSION Detecting the BRCA1/2 mutation gene offers numerous advantages, particularly in its correlation with FPC. For diagnostic and prognostic purposes, testing is strongly recommended for first-degree relatives, who face a significantly higher risk (2.26-10 times) of being affected. Additionally, FPC patients with identified BRCA1/2 mutations exhibit a more favorable prognosis compared to the non-mutated population. This is attributed to the availability of targeted BRCA1/2 therapy, which maximizes treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Kurnia Setiawan Limijadi
- Doctoral Study Program of Medical and Health Science, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Pathology, Universitas Diopnegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Muflihatul Muniroh
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Yan Wisnu Prajoko
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
- Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Kevin Christian Tjandra
- Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia
- Faculty of Medicine, Departement of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Danendra Rakha Putra Respati
- Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia
- Faculty of Medicine, Departement of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Micaily I, Blais EM, Carhart R, Lam S, Cohen SJ, Cannaday SJ, Halverson D, Matrisian LM, DeArbeloa P, Thach D, Petricoin E, Pishvaian MJ, Lavu H, Yeo CJ, Mallick AB. Association of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Location With DNA Damage Response Status and Response to Platinum-Based Therapy. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200648. [PMID: 38085059 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease with poor clinical outcomes. Primary pancreatic tumors originating from the head of the pancreas (H) have different prognostic implications than tumors arising from the body and tail (BT). This is thought to be largely due to anatomic differences, as molecular underpinnings of survival have not been fully explored. We hypothesized that differences in the primary site of H and BT tumors might account for differential molecular outcomes and response to chemotherapy. METHODS Retrospective data from a single high-volume academic center were analyzed for hypothesis generation. A large-scale, real-world retrospective cohort of 2015 patients with next-generation sequencing (NGS) results were analyzed from a Real-World Evidence database. Progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated from the initiation of first line of therapy for advanced disease until discontinuation because of progression. HR and P values were computed via Cox regression between first-line FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nanoparticle albumin-bound (gem/nab) paclitaxel. Differences in frequencies of genomic alterations between H and BT were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS Genomic alterations in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway (such as BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2) were enriched (unadjusted P value = .00244) in BT tumors (21.7% of 618) relative to H tumors (15.6% of 942) where BRCA2 was a top contributor within this pathway. Median PFS in BT tumors on first-line FOLFIRINOX was longer than first line gem/nab-paclitaxel (P = .006393); this difference was not identified in H tumors (P = .5546). CONCLUSION DDR pathway alterations including BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 are known predictors of increased benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy. NGS testing for germline and somatic mutations remains important in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, especially in BT tumors where DDR pathway alterations may be more common than in H tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Micaily
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Sophia Lam
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Shawna J Cannaday
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Harish Lavu
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Charles J Yeo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Atrayee Basu Mallick
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brugel M, Marulier T, Evrard C, Carlier C, Tougeron D, Piessen G, Truant S, Turpin A, Williet N, Botsen D, Brasseur M, Perrier M, Bouché O. Genetic counselling referral practices for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A French retrospective multicentre observational cohort study (CAPANCOGEN). Pancreatology 2023; 23:622-629. [PMID: 37394294 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Genetic counselling (GC) is a key step in the identification of inherited germline mutations. However, the oncogenetic practices are poorly described for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) in Europe. The CAPANCOGEN study aimed to describe the GC referral practices in France and assess the implementation of international guidelines in patients with PA. METHODS Information about GC referrals with PA was collected in 13 French centres from September 2019 to October 2021. In the 5 largest centres, personal and familial histories of cancers and diseases associated with a higher risk of germline mutations were collected in 460 patients, according to international, American, European and French GC referral guidelines. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the factors influencing GC referral. RESULTS Among 833 patients, a total of 100 patients (12%) had an indication of GC according to local multidisciplinary tumour board meetings (MTBM). Among these patients, 41% did not undergo GC. The median time between MTBM and GC was 55 days (IQR: 14.5-112). Among 460 patients with collected personal and familial history, 31.5% were not referred to a GC despite an existing indication. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, suspected CDKN2A (p = 0.032) or BRCA mutation (p < 0.001), familial pancreatic cancer history (p < 0.001) and controlled disease with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (p < 0.001) increased the referral rate. Conversely, older age (p = 0.002) and a locally advanced PA (p = 0.045) decreased the risk of GC referral. CONCLUSIONS GC referral is inadequate despite valuable information in patients' medical files.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Brugel
- Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France.
| | - Thibault Marulier
- Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France
| | - Camille Evrard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Claire Carlier
- Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Godinot Cancer Institute, Reims, France
| | - David Tougeron
- Department of Hepato-Gastro-enterology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, CHRU Lille, CANTHER Laboratory Inserm UMR-S1277, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation Department, CHRU Lille, CANTHER Laboratory Inserm UMR-S1277, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Anthony Turpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Lille, University of Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020 - UMR-S 1277, Canther - Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Lille, France
| | - Nicolas Williet
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, CHU Saint Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Damien Botsen
- Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Godinot Cancer Institute, Reims, France
| | - Mathilde Brasseur
- Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France
| | - Marine Perrier
- Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Risk Assessment and Pancreatic Cancer: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020351. [PMID: 36672301 PMCID: PMC9857317 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the deadliest cancers, and it is responsible for a number of deaths almost equal to its incidence. The high mortality rate is correlated with several explanations; the main one is the late disease stage at which the majority of patients are diagnosed. Since surgical resection has been recognised as the only curative treatment, a PC diagnosis at the initial stage is believed the main tool to improve survival. Therefore, patient stratification according to familial and genetic risk and the creation of screening protocol by using minimally invasive diagnostic tools would be appropriate. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are subsets of lesions which deserve special management to avoid overtreatment. The current PC screening programs are based on the annual employment of magnetic resonance imaging with cholangiopancreatography sequences (MR/MRCP) and/or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). For patients unfit for MRI, computed tomography (CT) could be proposed, although CT results in lower detection rates, compared to MRI, for small lesions. The actual major limit is the incapacity to detect and characterize the pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) by EUS and MR/MRCP. The possibility of utilizing artificial intelligence models to evaluate higher-risk patients could favour the diagnosis of these entities, although more data are needed to support the real utility of these applications in the field of screening. For these motives, it would be appropriate to realize screening programs in research settings.
Collapse
|
5
|
Vietri MT, D’Elia G, Caliendo G, Albanese L, Signoriello G, Napoli C, Molinari AM. Pancreatic Cancer with Mutation in BRCA1/2, MLH1, and APC Genes: Phenotype Correlation and Detection of a Novel Germline BRCA2 Mutation. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:321. [PMID: 35205366 PMCID: PMC8872383 DOI: 10.3390/genes13020321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the seventh leading cause of cancer death worldwide; most of cases are sporadic, however about 5% to 10% report a hereditary predisposition. Several hereditary syndromes have been associated with familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) onset, including hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), Familial atypical multiple mole melanoma (FAMMM), Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), and Hereditary pancreatitis (HP).The aim of this study was to determine the mutational status of a cohort of 56 HBOC families, 7 LS families, 3 FAP and FAMMM families, and 1 LFS family with at least one case of PDAC. Mutation analysis of BRCA1/2, ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, NBN, CDH1, TP53, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 genes, showedmutation in BRCA1/2, MLH1, and APC genes. We founda high mutation rate in patients belong HBOC and LS families, with a percentage of 28.6% in both syndromes and prevalence in HBOC of BRCA2 mutations with one case of double mutation in BRCA2 gene. In FAP family, we found a pathogenic mutation in APC gene in 1/3 families. We observed an early onset of PDAC and a lower survival in PDAC patients belonging to mutated families, while no evidence of possible pancreatic cancer cluster regions was found. Moreover, we identified a novel BRCA2 germline mutation, c.5511delT (p.Phe1837LeufsX3), not reported in any database, that segregated with disease in HBOC patients. Mutational analysis was extended to family membersof mutated patients, both healthy and cancer affected, which revealed 23 unaffected family members that inherited the proband's mutation. Although correlative by its nature, the presence of a BRCA mutation in PDAC patients may have benefits in terms of optimized treatment and longer outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Teresa Vietri
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
- Unity of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, AOU, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (G.D.); (G.C.); (L.A.)
| | - Giovanna D’Elia
- Unity of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, AOU, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (G.D.); (G.C.); (L.A.)
| | - Gemma Caliendo
- Unity of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, AOU, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (G.D.); (G.C.); (L.A.)
| | - Luisa Albanese
- Unity of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, AOU, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (G.D.); (G.C.); (L.A.)
| | - Giuseppe Signoriello
- Statistical Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Claudio Napoli
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
- Clinical Department of Internal Medicine and Specialistic Units, AOU, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Molinari
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
- Unity of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, AOU, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (G.D.); (G.C.); (L.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Monroy-Iglesias MJ, Dolly S, Sarker D, Thillai K, Van Hemelrijck M, Santaolalla A. Pancreatic Cancer Exposome Profile to Aid Early Detection and Inform Prevention Strategies. J Clin Med 2021; 10:1665. [PMID: 33924591 PMCID: PMC8069449 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PCa) is associated with a poor prognosis and high mortality rate. The causes of PCa are not fully elucidated yet, although certain exposome factors have been identified. The exposome is defined as the sum of all environmental factors influencing the occurrence of a disease during a life span. The development of an exposome approach for PCa has the potential to discover new disease-associated factors to better understand the carcinogenesis of PCa and help with early detection strategies. Our systematic review of the literature identified several exposome factors that have been associated with PCa alone and in combination with other exposures. A potential inflammatory signature has been observed among the interaction of several exposures (i.e., smoking, alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and inflammatory markers) that further increases the incidence and progression of PCa. A large number of exposures have been identified such as genetic, hormonal, microorganism infections and immune responses that warrant further investigation. Future early detection strategies should utilize this information to assess individuals' risk for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J. Monroy-Iglesias
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.J.M.-I.); (M.V.H.)
| | - Saoirse Dolly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (S.D.); (D.S.); (K.T.)
| | - Debashis Sarker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (S.D.); (D.S.); (K.T.)
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Kiruthikah Thillai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (S.D.); (D.S.); (K.T.)
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.J.M.-I.); (M.V.H.)
| | - Aida Santaolalla
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.J.M.-I.); (M.V.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thompson ED, Roberts NJ, Wood LD, Eshleman JR, Goggins MG, Kern SE, Klein AP, Hruban RH. The genetics of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the year 2020: dramatic progress, but far to go. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:2544-2563. [PMID: 32704031 PMCID: PMC8375585 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0629-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The publication of the "Pan-Cancer Atlas" by the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium, a partnership formed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), provides a wonderful opportunity to reflect on where we stand in our understanding of the genetics of pancreatic cancer, as well as on the opportunities to translate this understanding to patient care. From germline variants that predispose to the development of pancreatic cancer, to somatic mutations that are therapeutically targetable, genetics is now providing hope, where there once was no hope, for those diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth D Thompson
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas J Roberts
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laura D Wood
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James R Eshleman
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael G Goggins
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Scott E Kern
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P Klein
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Earl J, Galindo-Pumariño C, Encinas J, Barreto E, Castillo ME, Pachón V, Ferreiro R, Rodríguez-Garrote M, González-Martínez S, Ramon Y Cajal T, Diaz LR, Chirivella-Gonzalez I, Rodriguez M, de Castro EM, García-Seisdedos D, Muñoz G, Rosa JMR, Marquez M, Malats N, Carrato A. A comprehensive analysis of candidate genes in familial pancreatic cancer families reveals a high frequency of potentially pathogenic germline variants. EBioMedicine 2020; 53:102675. [PMID: 32113160 PMCID: PMC7100610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 5-year survival rate of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is around 5% due to the fact that the majority of patients present with advanced disease that is treatment resistant. Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) is a rare disorder that is defined as a family with at least two affected first degree relatives, with an estimated incidence of 4%-10%. The genetic basis is unknown in the majority of families although around 10%-13% of families carry germline mutations in known genes associated with hereditary cancer and pancreatitis syndromes. METHODS Panel sequencing was performed of 35 genes associated with hereditary cancer in 43 PDAC cases from families with an apparent hereditary pancreatic cancer syndrome. FINDINGS Pathogenic variants were identified in 19% (5/26) of PDAC cases from pure FPC families in the genes MLH1, CDKN2A, POLQ and FANCM. Low frequency potentially pathogenic VUS were also identified in 35% (9/26) of PDAC cases from FPC families in the genes FANCC, MLH1, PMS2, CFTR, APC and MUTYH. Furthermore, an important proportion of PDAC cases harboured more than one pathogenic, likely pathogenic or potentially pathogenic VUS, highlighting the multigene phenotype of FPC. INTERPRETATION The genetic basis of familial or hereditary pancreatic cancer can be explained in 21% of families by previously described hereditary cancer genes. Low frequency variants in other DNA repair genes are also present in 35% of families which may contribute to the risk of pancreatic cancer development. FUNDING This study was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Plan Estatal de I + D + i 2013-2016): ISCIII (PI09/02221, PI12/01635, PI15/02101 and PI18/1034) and co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund ''A way to achieve Europe'' (ERDF), the Biomedical Research Network in Cancer: CIBERONC (CB16/12/00446), Red Temática de investigación cooperativa en cáncer: RTICC (RD12/0036/0073) and La Asociación Española contra el Cáncer: AECC (Grupos Coordinados Estables 2016).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Earl
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Medical Oncology Research Laboratory, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
| | - Cristina Galindo-Pumariño
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Medical Oncology Research Laboratory, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Jessica Encinas
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Medical Oncology Research Laboratory, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Emma Barreto
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Medical Oncology Research Laboratory, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria E Castillo
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Medical Oncology Research Laboratory, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Vanessa Pachón
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Medical Oncology Research Laboratory, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Reyes Ferreiro
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Medical Oncology Research Laboratory, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes Rodríguez-Garrote
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Medical Oncology Research Laboratory, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Silvia González-Martínez
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Medical Oncology Research Laboratory, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Teresa Ramon Y Cajal
- Medical Oncology Department, Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Mas Casanovas, 90, 08041 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Luis Robles Diaz
- Familial and Hereditary Cancer Unit. Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre Hospital, Av. Cordoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - Isabel Chirivella-Gonzalez
- Genetic Counselling Unit, Valencia University Hospital Clinic, Av. de Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
| | - Montse Rodriguez
- A Coruña Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Teresa Herrera, Xubias de Arriba, 84, 15006 A Coruña, Spain.
| | - Eva Martínez de Castro
- Medical Oncology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Av. Valdecilla, 25, 39008 Santander, Spain.
| | - David García-Seisdedos
- Translational Genomics Core Facility, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Gloria Muñoz
- Translational Genomics Core Facility, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Rosa Rosa
- Pathology Department, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mirari Marquez
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuría Malats
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
| | - Alfredo Carrato
- Molecular Epidemiology and Predictive Tumor Markers Group, Medical Oncology Research Laboratory, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Carretera Colmenar Km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Network in Cancer (CIBERONC), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cao CX, Sharib JM, Blanco AM, Goldberg D, Bracci P, Mukhtar RA, Esserman LJ, Kirkwood KS. Abdominal Imaging of Pancreatic Cysts and Cyst-Associated Pancreatic Cancer in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 230:53-63.e1. [PMID: 31672679 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct-to-consumer BRCA testing will increase BRCA diagnoses and subsequent abdominal imaging. It is unclear whether BRCA carriers are at higher risk of developing pancreatic cysts (PCs) or cyst-associated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We investigated the prevalence of PCs in BRCA-tested patients, and whether BRCA-carriers have higher rates of PDAC when PCs are found. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients with BRCA testing and abdominal imaging between 1996 and 2018. Pancreatic cysts were identified on original imaging reports. Prevalence and risk characteristics of PCs, as well as incidence of PDAC, were compared between BRCA+, BRCA-, and BRCA-untested patients. RESULTS Pancreatic cysts were identified in 4,045 patients among 128,164 unique patients with abdominal imaging, including 33 patients with PCs in 1,113 BRCA-tested patients. There was no difference in PC prevalence between BRCA+, BRCA-, and untested patients (3.6%, 2.6%, 3.2%, respectively; p = 0.64). Pancreatic cysts were diagnosed in BRCA+ patients at a younger age (57.1 vs 65.3 years, p < 0.001); however, there was no difference in risk stratification compared with BRCA- or untested patients by consensus criteria. Across the population of imaged patients, patients with PCs had significantly higher rates of PDAC compared with those without PCs (18.2% vs 2.4%, p < 0.001). Incidence of cyst-associated PDAC was similar in BRCA+ and BRCA- patients (13.3% vs 22.2%, p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS BRCA+ patients have similar rates of PCs, high-risk features in their cysts, and PDAC as BRCA- and untested patients. BRCA+ patients likely do not require dedicated abdominal imaging to evaluate for PCs and should follow management guidelines similar to those as the untested general population if an incidental PC is identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie X Cao
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jeremy M Sharib
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Amie M Blanco
- University of California San Francisco Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, San Francisco, CA; University of California San Francisco Heller Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Dena Goldberg
- University of California San Francisco Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, San Francisco, CA
| | - Paige Bracci
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Rita A Mukhtar
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California San Francisco Heller Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Laura J Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California San Francisco Heller Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kimberly S Kirkwood
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California San Francisco Heller Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen F, Childs EJ, Mocci E, Bracci P, Gallinger S, Li D, Neale RE, Olson SH, Scelo G, Bamlet WR, Blackford AL, Borges M, Brennan P, Chaffee KG, Duggal P, Hassan MJ, Holly EA, Hung RJ, Goggins MG, Kurtz RC, Oberg AL, Orlow I, Yu H, Petersen GM, Risch HA, Klein AP. Analysis of Heritability and Genetic Architecture of Pancreatic Cancer: A PanC4 Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28:1238-1245. [PMID: 31015203 PMCID: PMC6606380 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-1235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is the fourth-leading cause of cancer death in both men and women in the United States. The currently identified common susceptibility loci account for a small fraction of estimated heritability. We sought to estimate overall heritability of pancreatic cancer and partition the heritability by variant frequencies and functional annotations. METHODS Analysis using the genome-based restricted maximum likelihood method (GREML) was conducted on Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4) genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from 3,568 pancreatic cancer cases and 3,363 controls of European Ancestry. RESULTS Applying linkage disequilibrium- and minor allele frequency-stratified GREML (GREML-LDMS) method to imputed GWAS data, we estimated the overall heritability of pancreatic cancer to be 21.2% (SE = 4.8%). Across the functional groups (intronic, intergenic, coding, and regulatory variants), intronic variants account for most of the estimated heritability (12.4%). Previously identified GWAS loci explained 4.1% of the total phenotypic variation of pancreatic cancer. Mutations in hereditary pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes are present in 4% to 10% of patients with pancreatic cancer, yet our GREML-LDMS results suggested these regions explain only 0.4% of total phenotypic variance for pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS Although higher than previous studies, our estimated 21.2% overall heritability may still be downwardly biased due to the inherent limitation that the contribution of rare variants in genes with a substantive overall impact on disease are not captured when applying these commonly used methods to imputed GWAS data. IMPACT Our work demonstrated the importance of rare and common variants in pancreatic cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Chen
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Erica J Childs
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Evelina Mocci
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Paige Bracci
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Donghui Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rachel E Neale
- Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sara H Olson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ghislaine Scelo
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - William R Bamlet
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael Borges
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Paul Brennan
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - Kari G Chaffee
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Priya Duggal
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Manal J Hassan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth A Holly
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rayjean J Hung
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael G Goggins
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert C Kurtz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ann L Oberg
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Irene Orlow
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Herbert Yu
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Gloria M Petersen
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Harvey A Risch
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Alison P Klein
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is lethal, and the majority of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease that is not amenable to cure. Thus, with surgical resection being the only curative modality, it is critical that disease is identified at an earlier stage to allow the appropriate therapy to be applied. Unfortunately, a specific biomarker for early diagnosis has not yet been identified; hence, no screening process exists. Recently, high-throughput screening and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have led to the identification of novel biomarkers for many disease processes, and work has commenced in PDAC. Genomic data generated by NGS not only have the potential to assist clinicians in early diagnosis and screening, especially in high-risk populations, but also may eventually allow the development of personalized treatment programs with targeted therapies, given the large number of gene mutations seen in PDAC. This review introduces the basic concepts of NGS and provides a comprehensive review of the current understanding of genetics in PDAC as related to discoveries made using NGS.
Collapse
|
12
|
Stoffel EM, McKernin SE, Brand R, Canto M, Goggins M, Moravek C, Nagarajan A, Petersen GM, Simeone DM, Yurgelun M, Khorana AA. Evaluating Susceptibility to Pancreatic Cancer: ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:153-164. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose An ASCO provisional clinical opinion (PCO) offers timely clinical direction to ASCO’s membership and other health care providers. This PCO addresses identification and management of patients and family members with possible predisposition to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature published from January 1998 to June 2018. Results of the databases searched were supplemented with hand searching of the bibliographies of systematic reviews and selected seminal articles and contributions from Expert Panel members’ curated files. Provisional Clinical Opinion All patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma should undergo assessment of risk for hereditary syndromes known to be associated with an increased risk for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Assessment of risk should include a comprehensive review of family history of cancer. Individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer affecting two first-degree relatives meet criteria for familial pancreatic cancer (FPC). Individuals (cancer affected or unaffected) with a family history of pancreatic cancer meeting criteria for FPC, those with three or more diagnoses of pancreatic cancer in same side of the family, and individuals meeting criteria for other genetic syndromes associated with increased risk for pancreatic cancer have an increased risk for pancreatic cancer and are candidates for genetic testing. Germline genetic testing for cancer susceptibility may be discussed with individuals diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, even if family history is unremarkable. Benefits and limitations of pancreatic cancer screening should be discussed with individuals whose family history meets criteria for FPC and/or genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Arun Nagarajan
- Taussig Cancer Institute and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | - Alok A. Khorana
- Taussig Cancer Institute and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Young EL, Thompson BA, Neklason DW, Firpo MA, Werner T, Bell R, Berger J, Fraser A, Gammon A, Koptiuch C, Kohlmann WK, Neumayer L, Goldgar DE, Mulvihill SJ, Cannon-Albright LA, Tavtigian SV. Pancreatic cancer as a sentinel for hereditary cancer predisposition. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:697. [PMID: 29945567 PMCID: PMC6020441 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4573-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) predisposition have been shown to play a role in pancreatic cancer susceptibility. Growing evidence suggests that pancreatic cancer may be useful as a sentinel cancer to identify families that could benefit from HBOC or CRC surveillance, but to date pancreatic cancer is only considered an indication for genetic testing in the context of additional family history. METHODS Preliminary data generated at the Huntsman Cancer Hospital (HCH) included variants identified on a custom 34-gene panel or 59-gene panel including both known HBOC and CRC genes for respective sets of 66 and 147 pancreatic cancer cases, unselected for family history. Given the strength of preliminary data and corresponding literature, 61 sequential pancreatic cancer cases underwent a custom 14-gene clinical panel. Sequencing data from HCH pancreatic cancer cases, pancreatic cancer cases of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and an unselected pancreatic cancer screen from the Mayo Clinic were combined in a meta-analysis to estimate the proportion of carriers with pathogenic and high probability of pathogenic variants of uncertain significance (HiP-VUS). RESULTS Approximately 8.6% of unselected pancreatic cancer cases at the HCH carried a variant with potential HBOC or CRC screening recommendations. A meta-analysis of unselected pancreatic cancer cases revealed that approximately 11.5% carry a pathogenic variant or HiP-VUS. CONCLUSION With the inclusion of both HBOC and CRC susceptibility genes in a panel test, unselected pancreatic cancer cases act as a useful sentinel cancer to identify asymptomatic at-risk relatives who could benefit from relevant HBOC and CRC surveillance measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L. Young
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Bryony A. Thompson
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Deborah W. Neklason
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
- Division of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Matthew A. Firpo
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Theresa Werner
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Russell Bell
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Justin Berger
- Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Alison Fraser
- Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Amanda Gammon
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Cathryn Koptiuch
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Wendy K. Kohlmann
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Leigh Neumayer
- Department of Surgery and Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
| | - David E. Goldgar
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Sean J. Mulvihill
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Lisa A. Cannon-Albright
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
- Division of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
- George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Sean V. Tavtigian
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ligiero Braga T, Santos-Oliveira R. PPoma Review: Epidemiology, Aetiopathogenesis, Prognosis and Treatment. Diseases 2018; 6:diseases6010008. [PMID: 29324681 PMCID: PMC5871954 DOI: 10.3390/diseases6010008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Revised: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Generally, pancreatic polypeptide-secreting tumor of the distal pancreas (PPoma) is classified as a rare tumor, and may occur sporadically or be associated in families or with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (NEM 1). It grows slowly, reaching large dimensions at the time of diagnosis and the symptomatology is fundamentally due to the mass effect, causing either non-specific abdominal pain or symptoms suggestive of obstruction of the pancreatic or biliary duct. Therefore, when detected, they are usually malignant, with metastases mainly in the liver. The combination of serum analysis of increased levels of chromogranin A and pancreatic polypeptide and pancreastatin is very useful with a sensitivity of up to 95%. However, in addition, scintigraphicexams with somatostatin analogues should be performed to better clarify the diagnosis. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice, despite surgical difficulty and because they are generally palliative due to the metastases. Surgeries for tumor volume reduction are also performed to relieve symptoms. Chemotherapy commonly uses streptozotocin and somatostatin analogues to treat residual disease. Unfortunately, the survival rates are still very low, less than 10%, and if metastases already exist, this percentage drops to 3%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thais Ligiero Braga
- Brazilian Nuclear Energy Commission, Nuclear Engineering Institute, Rio de Janeiro 21941906, Brazil.
| | - Ralph Santos-Oliveira
- Brazilian Nuclear Energy Commission, Nuclear Engineering Institute, Rio de Janeiro 21941906, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Pancreatic cancers arise through a series of genetic events both inherited and acquired. Inherited genetic changes, both high penetrance and low penetrance, are an important component of pancreatic cancer risk, and may be used to characterize populations who will benefit from early detection. Furthermore, pancreatic cancer patients with inherited mutations may be particularly sensitive to certain targeted agents, providing an opportunity to personalized treatment. Family history of pancreatic cancer is one of the strongest risk factors for the disease, and is associated with an increased risk of caners at other sites, including but not limited to breast, ovarian and colorectal cancer. The goal of this chapter is to discuss the importance of family history of pancreatic cancer, and the known genes that account for a portion of the familial clustering of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Chen
- Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas J Roberts
- Department of Pathology, Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P Klein
- Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Pathology, Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bujanda L, Herreros-Villanueva M. Pancreatic Cancer in Lynch Syndrome Patients. J Cancer 2017; 8:3667-3674. [PMID: 29151953 PMCID: PMC5688919 DOI: 10.7150/jca.20750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cancer type in Lynch syndrome (LS) families, patients have also increased lifetime risk of other types of tumors. The accumulated risk of pancreatic cancer (PC) in LS patients is around 3.7% and developed tumors often present a characteristically medullary appearance with prominent lymphocytic infiltration. LS patients are considered in high risk for PC development as they present 8.6-fold increase compared with the general population. Here we review PC cases reported in LS patients and current management guidelines. Literature data show that LS is clearly associated with PC and recent publications also demonstrated a connection with pancreatic neoplasic precursor lesions such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) in these patients. While screening techniques are well established for CRC detection, clear strategies are not yet uniform for PC. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or endoscopic ultrasound every 1-2 years in MMR mutation carriers with PC in a first or second-degree relative is recommended. Better pancreatic cancer detection strategies should be urgently defined due to the importance of early diagnosis in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Bujanda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Donostia/Instituto Biodonostia, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU, San Sebastián 20014, Spain
| | - Marta Herreros-Villanueva
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Donostia/Instituto Biodonostia, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU, San Sebastián 20014, Spain.,Faculty of Life Sciences, Universidad Isabel I, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cancer Care in Delaware: A National Model. Dela J Public Health 2017; 3:4-6. [PMID: 34466911 PMCID: PMC8396632 DOI: 10.32481/djph.2017.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
18
|
Vullierme MP, Lagadec M. Predisposing factors for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: What is the role of imaging? Diagn Interv Imaging 2016; 97:1233-1240. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|