1
|
Bjelovic M, Gunjic D, Babic T, Veselinovic M, Djukanovic M, Potkonjak D, Milosavljevic V. Safe Transition from Open to Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer Utilizing Process Management Methodology. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4364. [PMID: 39124631 PMCID: PMC11312586 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The global shift from open esophagectomy (OE) to minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for treating esophageal cancer is well-established. Recent data indicate that transitioning from hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (hMIE) to total minimally invasive esophagectomy (tMIE) can be challenging due to concerns about higher leakage rates and lower lymph node counts, especially at the beginning of the learning curve. This study aimed to demonstrate that a safe transition from OE to tMIE for cancer is possible using process management methodology. Methods: A step-change approach was adopted in process management planning, with hMIE serving as an intermediate step between OE and tMIE. This single-center, case-control study included 150 patients who underwent the Ivor Lewis procedure with curative intent for esophageal cancer. Among these patients, 50 underwent OE, 50 hMIE (laparoscopic procedure followed by conventional right thoracotomy), and 50 tMIE (laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach). A preceptored training scheme was implemented during execution, and treatment results were monitored and controlled to ensure a safe transition. Results: During the transition, the tMIE group was not worse than the hMIE and OE groups regarding operation duration (p = 0.135), overall postoperative complications (p = 0.020), anastomotic leakage rates (p = 0.773), 30-day mortality (p = 1.0), and oncological outcomes (based on R status (p = 0.628) and 2-year survival (p = 0.967)). Additionally, the tMIE group showed superior results in terms of major postoperative pulmonary complications (p = 0.004) and ICU stay duration (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Utilizing managerial methodology and practice in surgery, as a bridge between interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches, demonstrated that transitioning from OE to tMIE, with hMIE as an intermediate step, is safe and feasible without compromising outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milos Bjelovic
- Euromedic General Hospital, Bulevar umetnosti 29, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia;
- School of Medicine Foca, University East Sarajevo, Studentska 5, 73300 Foca, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Dragan Gunjic
- Euromedic General Hospital, Bulevar umetnosti 29, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia;
| | - Tamara Babic
- Department for Minimally Invasive Upper Digestive Surgery, Hospital for Digestive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica Street 6, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (T.B.); (M.V.); (D.P.)
| | - Milan Veselinovic
- Department for Minimally Invasive Upper Digestive Surgery, Hospital for Digestive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica Street 6, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (T.B.); (M.V.); (D.P.)
- School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Street 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Marija Djukanovic
- Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Hospital for Digestive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica Street 6, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
| | - Dario Potkonjak
- Department for Minimally Invasive Upper Digestive Surgery, Hospital for Digestive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica Street 6, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (T.B.); (M.V.); (D.P.)
| | - Vladimir Milosavljevic
- University Hospital Medical Center Bezanijska Kosa, Dr Zorza Matea Street, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tchelebi LT, Goodman KA. Esophagogastric Cancer: The Current Role of Radiation Therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:569-583. [PMID: 38485552 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is an effective treatment modality in the management of patients with esophageal cancer regardless of tumor location (proximal, middle, or distal esophagus) or histology (squamous cell vs adenocarcinoma). The addition of neoadjuvant CRT to surgery in patients who are surgical candidates has consistently shown a benefit in terms of locoregional recurrence, pathologic downstaging, and overall survival. For patients who are not surgical candidates, CRT has a role as definitive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila T Tchelebi
- Northwell, Lake Success, NY, USA; Department of Radiation Medicine, Northern Westchester Hospital, 400 East Main Street, Mount Kisco, NY 10549, USA; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1128, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA. https://twitter.com/KarynAGoodman
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu Y, Maitiyasen M, Li J, Peng H, Chen J, Song H, Yi J. Short-Term Prognostic Effect of Comprehensive Complication Index in Patients With Gastric Cardia Adenocarcinoma. J Surg Res 2024; 296:174-181. [PMID: 38277954 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC) has been traditionally used for assessing postoperative complications. Recently, the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) has been introduced as a new tool. However, its prognostic significance in Gastric Cardia Adenocarcinoma (GCA) is yet to be determined. METHODS The CCI and CDC of 203 patients who underwent radical surgery for GCA at Jinling Hospital from 2016 to 2023 were evaluated. Primary outcome variables included Hospital Length of Stay, duration of intensive care unit stay postoperatively, time to return to normal activities, and total hospitalization cost. The area under the curve was used to measure the correlation strength of the CCI and CDC for these outcomes. RESULTS The CCI demonstrated superior association strength, indicated by higher area under the curve values for all primary outcome variables compared to the CDC: Hospital Length of Stay (0.956 versus 0.910), intensive care unit stay duration (0.969 versus 0.954), time to return to normal activities (0.983 versus 0.962), and total hospitalization cost (0.925 versus 0.911). CONCLUSIONS The CCI showed a stronger positive association than the CDC with short-term postoperative complications in GCA. It has potential implications for improving postoperative patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvxuan Liu
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Maierhaba Maitiyasen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jingfen Li
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hao Peng
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University Of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, P.R.China
| | - Haizhu Song
- Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, P.R.China
| | - Jun Yi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ng AP, Chervu N, Branche C, Bakhtiyar SS, Marzban M, Toste PA, Benharash P. National clinical and financial outcomes associated with acute kidney injury following esophagectomy for cancer. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0300876. [PMID: 38547215 PMCID: PMC10977786 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy is a complex oncologic operation associated with high rates of postoperative complications. While respiratory and septic complications have been well-defined, the implications of acute kidney injury (AKI) remain unclear. Using a nationally representative database, we aimed to characterize the association of AKI with mortality, resource use, and 30-day readmission. METHODS All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy with a diagnosis of esophageal or gastric cancer were identified in the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Study cohorts were stratified based on presence of AKI. Multivariable regressions and Royston-Parmar survival analysis were used to evaluate the independent association between AKI and outcomes of interest. RESULTS Of an estimated 40,438 patients, 3,210 (7.9%) developed AKI. Over the 10-year study period, the incidence of AKI increased from 6.4% to 9.7%. Prior radiation/chemotherapy and minimally invasive operations were associated with reduced odds of AKI, whereas public insurance coverage and concurrent infectious and respiratory complications had greater risk of AKI. After risk adjustment, AKI remained independently associated with greater odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR: 4.59, 95% CI: 3.62-5.83) and had significantly increased attributable costs ($112,000 vs $54,000) and length of stay (25.7 vs 13.3 days) compared to patients without AKI. Furthermore, AKI demonstrated significantly increased hazard of 30-day readmission (hazard ratio: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01-1.32). CONCLUSIONS AKI after esophagectomy is associated with greater risk of mortality, hospitalization costs, and 30-day readmission. Given the significant adverse consequences of AKI, careful perioperative management to mitigate this complication may improve quality of esophageal surgical care at the national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha P. Ng
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Nikhil Chervu
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Corynn Branche
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Mehrab Marzban
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Paul A. Toste
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Triemstra L, de Jongh C, Tedone F, Brosens LAA, Luyer MDP, Stoot JHMB, Lagarde SM, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda JP. The Comprehensive Complication Index versus Clavien-Dindo grading after laparoscopic and open D2-gastrectomy in the multicenter randomized LOGICA-trial. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107095. [PMID: 37913608 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complications can be classified using the most-severe Clavien-Dindo-Classification (CDC) per patient or the total complication burden per patient expressed in the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). This study determined the additional value of CCI to CDC in examining the impact of complications after gastric cancer surgery. METHODS The CCI and CDC were determined in the multicenter randomized LOGICA-trial comparing laparoscopic versus open D2-gastrectomy for cancer (cT1-4aN0-3M0). Differences in median CCI between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy were compared for overall postoperative complications and cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, infectious, pulmonary, and other complications. CCI and CDC were correlated to hospitalization, ICU-stay and reoperations using Spearman's rho-test and compared with standard Fisher's z-transformation. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2018, 211 patients underwent laparoscopic (n = 106) or open (n = 105) D2-gastrectomy, and 157 (74%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median CCI was comparable between laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy regarding overall complications (CCI 0 [IQR 0-23.5] versus 0 [IQR 0-22.6]; p = 0.755) and subgroups of complications (p > 0.05). Both CCI and CDC showed moderate positive correlations for hospitalization (rs = 0.646 versus rs = 0.628; p = 0.001, difference clinically irrelevant), and reoperations (rs = 0.590 versus rs = 0.599; p = 0.070), and weak correlations for ICU-stay (rs = 0.446 versus rs = 0.440; p = 0.189). CONCLUSIONS The CCI is a composite scoring system based on the CDC and reflects a subjective interpretation of complication burden from the perspectives of both physicians and patients, following abdominal surgery other than gastrectomy. Implementing CCI showed no clinically relevant benefit and caused additional workload compared to CDC for assessing complication burden. Therefore, using the CCI alongside the CDC after gastric cancer surgery is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Triemstra
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cas de Jongh
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Fabrizio Tedone
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Misha D P Luyer
- Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Department of Surgery, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Sittard, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jelle P Ruurda
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Broadbent A, Rahman S, Grace B, Walker R, Noble F, Kelly J, Byrne J, Underwood T. The effect of surgical complications on long-term prognosis following oesophagectomy. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106930. [PMID: 37258358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Complications are frequent after oesophagectomy, and there is evidence these adversely impact long-term prognosis. However, the effect of multiple complications, and the absolute magnitude of effect on survival is unclear. This study aimed to examine these effects in a single high-volume UK unit. METHODS Patients undergoing oesophagectomy for cancer and who survived to 90 days post-oesophagectomy were analysed. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). The effect and magnitude of effect of complications on survival were assessed using multivariable cox regression and the risk-adjusted population attributable fraction. RESULTS In total, 380 patients were included. Complications occurred in 251 (66.1%). Suffering ≥3 complications (HR 1.89, 95%CI 1.13-3.16, p = 0.015) or an unplanned escalation in care (HR 2.22, 95%CI 1.43-3.45, p < 0.001) significantly reduced survival whereas pulmonary complications and anastomotic leak did not. Patients with a CCI>30 had worse overall survival (HR 1.91, 95%CI 1.32-2.76, p < 0.001) and CCI>30 due to multiple minor complications gave a worse prognosis compared to CCI>30 due to major complications (HR 2.44, 95%CI 1.14-5.20, p = 0.022). An estimated 9.1% (95%CI 3.4-14.4%) of deaths at 5 years were attributable to a CCI>30. CONCLUSION Long-term survival following oesophagectomy for cancer is significantly affected by complications and the cumulative effect of multiple complications. Interestingly, multiple minor complications had a worse effect on survival than major complications. The absolute magnitude of effect is substantial: minimising all types of postoperative complications could have significant benefit to overall outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Broadbent
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK; Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| | - S Rahman
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK; Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| | - B Grace
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK; Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| | - R Walker
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK; Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| | - F Noble
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK
| | - J Kelly
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK
| | - J Byrne
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK
| | - T Underwood
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK; Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Y, Lu H, Ji H, Li Y. Risk Factors for a High Comprehensive Complication Index after Splenectomy Plus Pericardial Devascularization for Portal Hypertension. THE TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF TURKISH SOCIETY OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2023; 34:1041-1051. [PMID: 37603301 PMCID: PMC10645282 DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Mathematical integration of all complications from the Clavien-Dindo classification into one number called the comprehensive complication index provides a novel method to capture morbidity. This objective of this study was to compare the evaluations of complications between the novel comprehensive complication index and Clavien-Dindo classification for portal hypertension patients who underwent splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients treated with either splenectomy plus simplified pericardial devascularization or splenectomy plus traditional pericardial devascularization were included retrospectively. Correlation and logistic regression analyses of the postoperative hospital stay and total hospitalization expense were compared between the comprehensive complication index and Clavien-Dindo classification. The cumulative sum-comprehensive complication index was generated and compared between operation types. RESULTS The Child-Pugh classification at admission, spleen thickness, and intraoperative blood loss were risk factors for high comprehensive complication index. Comprehensive complication index showed a stronger relationship with the postoperative hospital stay and total hospitalization expense than the Clavien-Dindo classification. Logistic regression analysis of the postoperative hospital stay demonstrated that the R2 values for the comprehensive complication index and Clavien-Dindo classification were 0.15 and 0.14, respectively. The cumulative sum-comprehensive complication index graph showed a steady dynamic decrease in the cumulative sum score for the individual operation type, with splenectomy plus simplified pericardial devascularization revealing a more notable decrease than splenectomy plus traditional pericardial devascularization. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive complication index is an excellent method to assess postoperative morbidity in portal hypertension patients. The cumulative sum-comprehensive complication index chart can better dynamically monitor and compare different operation types. Splenectomy plus simplified pericardial devascularization is better than splenectomy plus traditional pericardial devascularization at decreasing cumulative sum-comprehensive complication index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yafei Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hongwei Lu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Hong Ji
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Yiming Li
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schafrat PJM, Henckens SPG, Hagens ERC, Eshuis WJ, Gisbertz SS, Laméris W, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Clinical implications of chyle leakage following esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:doac047. [PMID: 35830862 PMCID: PMC9885733 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The clinical consequences of chyle leakage following esophagectomy are underexposed. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical implications of chyle leakage following esophagectomy. This retrospective study of prospectively collected data included patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy in 2017-2020. Routinely, the thoracic duct was resected en bloc as part of the mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Chyle leakage was defined as milky drain fluid for which specific treatment was initiated and/or a triglyceride level in drain fluid of ≥1.13 mmol/L, according to the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) classification. Primary endpoints were the clinical characteristics of chyle leakage (type, severity and treatment). Secondary endpoints were the impact of chyle leakage on duration of thoracic drainage and hospital stay. Chyle leakage was present in 43/314 patients (14%), of whom 24 (56%) were classified as severity A and 19 (44%) as severity B. All patients were successfully treated with either medium chain triglyceride diet (98%) or total parental nutrition (2%). There were no re-interventions for chyle leakage during initial admission, although one patient needed additional pleural drainage during readmission. Patients with chyle leakage had 3 days longer duration of thoracic drainage (bias corrected accelerated (BCa) 95%CI:0.46-0.76) and 3 days longer hospital stay (BCa 95%CI:0.07-0.36), independently of the presence of other complications. Chyle leakage is a relatively frequent complication following esophagectomy. Postoperative chyle leakage was associated with a significant longer duration of thoracic drainage and hospital admission. Nonsurgical treatment was successful in all patients with chyle leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascale J M Schafrat
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sofie P G Henckens
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eliza R C Hagens
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wietse J Eshuis
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wytze Laméris
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van der Zant FA, Kooijman BJL, Hentzen JEKR, Helfrich W, Ploeg EM, van Ginkel RJ, van Leeuwen BL, Been LB, Klaase JM, Hemmer PHJ, van der Hilst CS, Kruijff S. Impact of cumulative complications on 1-year treatment-related healthcare costs in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. BJS Open 2022; 6:6758035. [PMID: 36218348 PMCID: PMC9552551 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of all minor and major complications on treatment-related healthcare costs in patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastases (PMs). Method Patients with histologically proven colorectal PMs who underwent CRS + HIPEC from March 2006 to October 2019 in a tertiary referral centre were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were divided into six subgroups according to the severity of the complications, which were scored using the comprehensive complication index (CCI) (CCI 0–9.9, CCI 10–19.9, CCI 20–29.9, CCI 30–39.9, CCI 40–49.9, and CCI 50 or higher). Treatment-related healthcare costs up to 1 year after CRS + HIPEC were obtained from the financial department. Differences in costs and survival outcomes were compared using the chi-squared test and Kruskal–Wallis H test. Results A total of 142 patients were included (CCI 0–9.9, 53 patients; CCI 10–19.9, 0 patients; CCI 20–29.9, 45 patients; CCI 30–39.9, 14 patients; CCI 40–49, 9 patients; and CCI 50 or higher, 21 patients). Median (interquartile range) treatment-related healthcare costs increased significantly and exponentially for the CCI 30–39, CCI 40–49, and CCI 50 or higher groups (€48 993 (€44 262–€84 805); €57 167 (€43 047–€67 591); and €82 219 (€55 487–€145 314) respectively) compared with those for the CCI 0–9.9 and CCI 20–29.9 groups (€33 856 (€24 433–€40 779) and €40 621 (€31 501–€58 761) respectively, P < 0.010). Conclusion Treatment-related healthcare costs increase exponentially as more complications develop among patients who undergo CRS + HIPEC for the treatment of colorectal PMs. Anastomotic leakages after CRS + HIPEC lead to an increase of 295 per cent of treatment-related healthcare costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Femke A van der Zant
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bob J L Kooijman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wijnand Helfrich
- Department of Surgery, Laboratory for Translational Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Emily M Ploeg
- Department of Surgery, Laboratory for Translational Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J van Ginkel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara L van Leeuwen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas B Been
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick H J Hemmer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Christian S van der Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Schelto Kruijff
- Correspondence to: Schelto Kruijff, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mayanagi S, Haneda R, Inoue M, Ishii K, Tsubosa Y. Selective Lymphadenectomy for Salvage Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:4863-4870. [PMID: 35552931 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11625-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extensive lymph node dissection increases the risk of postoperative complications, especially in salvage surgery, after definitive chemoradiotherapy (≥ 50 Gy) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the outcomes of salvage esophagectomy with selective lymphadenectomy of only clinically positive lymph nodes. METHODS Clinically positive lymph nodes, diagnosed as metastases using computed and positron emission tomography performed before chemoradiotherapy or salvage surgery, were targeted for dissection in selective lymphadenectomy. We compared postoperative complications between 52 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy with selective lymphadenectomy and 207 controls who underwent nonsalvage esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy. We also analyzed postoperative recurrence pattern and survival in salvage group. RESULTS The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 12.9 in the salvage esophagectomy group compared with 48.1 in the 3-field lymphadenectomy group (p < 0.001). Differences in the number of postoperative complications, comparing Clavien-Dindo all-grade and ≥ grade 3, were not significant between the groups. Both 30- and 90-day mortality were 0% (0/52) in the salvage group. Five cases had recurrence only in the locoregional area without distant metastasis. Of these five cases, only one had recurrence in the subcarinal lymph node without prophylactic mediastinal lymphadenectomy. A 3-year recurrence-free survival and 3-year overall survival from salvage esophagectomy were 43.3% and 46.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS It may contribute to obtaining good short- and long-term outcomes by dissecting only clinically positive lymph nodes in salvage esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhei Mayanagi
- Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Ryoma Haneda
- Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masazumi Inoue
- Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Ishii
- Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Tsubosa
- Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fujita T, Okada N, Sato T, Sato K, Fujiwara H, Kojima T, Daiko H. Propensity-matched analysis of the efficacy of olanexidine gluconate versus chlorhexidine-alcohol as an antiseptic agent in thoracic esophagectomy. BMC Surg 2022; 22:20. [PMID: 35065644 PMCID: PMC8783436 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01480-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In the present matched-cohort study, we investigated the efficacy of olanexidine gluconate in comparison with chlorhexidine-alcohol as an antiseptic agent in thoracic esophagectomy.
Methods
A total of 372 patients with esophageal cancer who were scheduled to undergo thoracic esophagectomy between 2016 and 2018 were assigned to one of two groups based on the preoperative antiseptic agent used in thoracic esophagectomy. We investigated the incidence of surgical site infectious complications in the propensity-matched cohort.
Results
Based on the propensity score, 116 patients prepared with 1.5% olanexidine gluconate and 114 patients prepared with 1.0% chlorhexidine-alcohol as surgical skin antisepsis were selected. No significant intergroup differences were observed with respect to incisional surgical site infection (0.8% in the olanexidine group versus 0.8% in the chlorhexidine group) and deep fascial/organ space surgical site infection (1.7%/10.3% in the olanexidine group versus 3.5%/15.7% in the chlorhexidine group, p = 0.39/p = 0.03). Notably, the respective incidences of surgical site infection except anastomotic leakage were 1.7% and 7.0% in the olanexidine and chlorhexidine groups (p = 0.04).
Conclusions
Olanexidine gluconate was well tolerated and significantly reduced incidence of surgical site infection except anastomotic leakage in comparison with chlorhexidine-alcohol as an antiseptic agent in thoracic esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection.
Collapse
|
12
|
Concin N, Planchamp F, Abu-Rustum NR, Ataseven B, Cibula D, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Knapp P, Marth C, Morice P, Querleu D, Sehouli J, Stepanyan A, Taskiran C, Vergote I, Wimberger P, Zapardiel I, Persson J. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1508-1529. [PMID: 34795020 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of surgical care as a crucial component of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary management improves outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma, notably helping to avoid suboptimal surgical treatment. Quality indicators (QIs) enable healthcare professionals to measure their clinical management with regard to ideal standards of care. OBJECTIVE In order to complete its set of QIs for the surgical management of gynecological cancers, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) initiated the development of QIs for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS QIs were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and documentation of the scientific evidence, two consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians and patient representatives. QIs were defined using a structured format comprising metrics specifications, and targets. A scoring system was then developed to ensure applicability and feasibility of a future ESGO accreditation process based on these QIs for endometrial carcinoma surgery and support any institutional or governmental quality assurance programs. RESULTS Twenty-nine structural, process and outcome indicators were defined. QIs 1-5 are general indicators related to center case load, training, experience of the surgeon, structured multi-disciplinarity of the team and active participation in clinical research. QIs 6 and 7 are related to the adequate pre-operative investigations. QIs 8-22 are related to peri-operative standards of care. QI 23 is related to molecular markers for endometrial carcinoma diagnosis and as determinants for treatment decisions. QI 24 addresses the compliance of management of patients after primary surgical treatment with the standards of care. QIs 25-29 highlight the need for a systematic assessment of surgical morbidity and oncologic outcome as well as standardized and comprehensive documentation of surgical and pathological elements. Each QI was associated with a score. An assessment form including a scoring system was built as basis for ESGO accreditation of centers for endometrial cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria .,Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial Sloann Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Pawel Knapp
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Oncology Center of Bialystok, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Alsace, France
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Artem Stepanyan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Nairi Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, VKV American Hospital, Istambul, Turkey
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tagkalos E, van der Sluis PC, Berlth F, Poplawski A, Hadzijusufovic E, Lang H, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Müller-Stich BP, Ruurda JP, Schiesser M, Schneider PM, van Hillegersberg R, Grimminger PP. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial). BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1060. [PMID: 34565343 PMCID: PMC8474742 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08780-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or cancer of the gastroesophageal junction, radical esophagectomy with 2-field lymphadenectomy is the cornerstone of the multimodality treatment with curative intent. Both conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) were shown to be superior compared to open transthoracic esophagectomy considering postoperative complications. However, no randomized comparison exists between MIE and RAMIE in the Western World for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS This is an investigator-initiated and investigator-driven multicenter randomized controlled parallel-group superiority trial. All adult patients (age ≥ 18 and ≤ 90 years) with histologically proven, surgically resectable (cT1-4a, N0-3, M0) esophageal adenocarcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction and with European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2 will be assessed for eligibility and included after obtaining informed consent. Patients (n = 218) with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction are randomized to either RAMIE (n = 109) or MIE (n = 109). The primary outcome of this study is the total number of resected abdominal and mediastinal lymph nodes specified per lymph node station. CONCLUSION This is the first randomized controlled trial designed to compare RAMIE to MIE as surgical treatment for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in the Western World. The hypothesis of the proposed study is that RAMIE will result in a higher abdominal and mediastinal lymph node yield specified per station compared to conventional MIE. Short-term results and the primary endpoint (total number of resected abdominal and mediastinal lymph nodes per lymph node station) will be analyzed and published after discharge of the last randomized patient within this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04306458 . Registered 13th March 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04306458; Date of first enrolment 18.01.2021; Target sample size 218; Recruitment status: Recruiting; Protocol version 2; Issue date 10.03.2020; Rev. 02.02.2021; Authors ET, PCvdS, PPG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Tagkalos
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, D-55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - P C van der Sluis
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, D-55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - F Berlth
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, D-55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - A Poplawski
- Institute for Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - E Hadzijusufovic
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, D-55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - H Lang
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, D-55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Trauma Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Schiesser
- Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich, Klinik Hirslanden, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - P M Schneider
- Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich, Klinik Hirslanden, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - R van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P P Grimminger
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, D-55131, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tirotta F, Parente A, Hodson J, Desai A, Almond LM, Ford SJ. Cumulative Burden of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:7939-7949. [PMID: 33978886 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10059-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Correlations between postoperative complications and oncological outcomes have been reported in several malignancies, but their impact in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is unclear. Our study aimed to evaluate the association between postoperative complications and prognosis in patients with RPS. METHODS Patients undergoing surgery for primary RPS from 2008 to 2019 at a sarcoma center were evaluated. The cumulative burden of postoperative complications was quantified using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), and associations with local recurrence (LR), distant metastases (DM) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS Data were available for 191 patients, of whom 160 (82.9%) developed at least one postoperative complication, with a median CCI of 20.9 (interquartile range 8.7-33.5). After postoperative deaths were excluded (n = 3, 1.6%), the remaining patients were divided into those with a CCI of 0-20.9 (n = 97) and > 20.9 (n = 91). Patients with a CCI >20.9 had significantly shorter OS than those with a CCI of 0-20.9 (43.3% vs. 69.5% at 5 years; p = 0.005), and this difference remained significant after multivariable adjustment for patient- and treatment-related factors [hazard ratio (HR) 2.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-4.09; p = 0.004]. However, CCI > 20.9 was not found to be a significant independent predictor of either LR (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.76-2.23; p = 0.333) or DM (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.61-1.93; p = 0.786). CONCLUSION Increasing complication burden, as quantified by the CCI, is a significant independent predictor of OS; however, there is no evidence of a significant association with either LR or DM, which may be more related to tumor biological factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Tirotta
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Alessandro Parente
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - James Hodson
- Department of Medical Statistics, Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anant Desai
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Max Almond
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samuel J Ford
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fergusson J, Beenen E, Mosse C, Salim J, Cheah S, Wright T, Cerdeira MP, McQuillan P, Richardson M, Liem H, Spillane J, Yacob M, Albadawi F, Thorpe T, Dingle A, Cabalag C, Loi K, Fisher OM, Ward S, Read M, Johnson M, Bassari R, Bui H, Cecconello I, Sallum RAA, da Rocha JRM, Lopes LR, Tercioti V, Coelho JDS, Ferrer JAP, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Shea P, Yeung J, Allison F, Carroll P, Vargas-Barato F, Gonzalez F, Ortega J, Nino-Torres L, Beltrán-García TC, Castilla L, Pineda M, Bastidas A, Gómez-Mayorga J, Cortés N, Cetares C, Caceres S, Duarte S, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Faltova H, Sevcikova M, Mortensen PB, Katballe N, Ingemann T, Morten B, Kruhlikava I, Ainswort AP, Stilling NM, Eckardt J, Holm J, Thorsteinsson M, Siemsen M, Brandt B, Nega B, Teferra E, Tizazu A, Kauppila JS, Koivukangas V, Meriläinen S, Gruetzmann R, Krautz C, Weber G, Golcher H, Emons G, Azizian A, Ebeling M, Niebisch S, Kreuser N, Albanese G, Hesse J, Volovnik L, Boecher U, Reeh M, Triantafyllou S, Schizas D, Michalinos A, Mpali E, Mpoura M, Charalabopoulos A, Manatakis DK, Balalis D, Bolger J, Baban C, Mastrosimone A, McAnena O, Quinn A, Ó Súilleabháin CB, Hennessy MM, Ivanovski I, Khizer H, Ravi N, Donlon N, Cervellera M, Vaccari S, Bianchini S, Sartarelli L, Asti E, Bernardi D, Merigliano S, Provenzano L, Scarpa M, Saadeh L, Salmaso B, De Manzoni G, Giacopuzzi S, La Mendola R, De Pasqual CA, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, Irino T, Makuuchi R, Ishii K, Mwachiro M, Fekadu A, Odera A, Mwachiro E, AlShehab D, Ahmed HA, Shebani AO, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Elnagar HF, Makkai-Popa ST, Wong LF, Yunrong T, Thanninalai S, Aik HC, Soon PW, Huei TJ, Basave HNL, Cortés-González R, Lagarde SM, van Lanschot JJB, Cords C, Jansen WA, Martijnse I, Matthijsen R, Bouwense S, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, de Maat M, Evenett N, Johnston P, Patel R, MacCormick A, Young M, Smith B, Ekwunife C, Memon AH, Shaikh K, Wajid A, Khalil N, Haris M, Mirza ZU, Qudus SBA, Sarwar MZ, Shehzadi A, Raza A, Jhanzaib MH, Farmanali J, Zakir Z, Shakeel O, Nasir I, Khattak S, Baig M, Noor MA, Ahmed HH, Naeem A, Pinho AC, da Silva R, Matos H, Braga T, Monteiro C, Ramos P, Cabral F, Gomes MP, Martins PC, Correia AM, Videira JF, Ciuce C, Drasovean R, Apostu R, Ciuce C, Paitici S, Racu AE, Obleaga CV, Beuran M, Stoica B, Ciubotaru C, Negoita V, Cordos I, Birla RD, Predescu D, Hoara PA, Tomsa R, Shneider V, Agasiev M, Ganjara I, Gunjic´ D, Veselinovic´ M, Babič T, Chin TS, Shabbir A, Kim G, Crnjac A, Samo H, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Ramón JM, Dal Cero M, Rifá S, Rico M, Pagan Pomar A, Martinez Corcoles JA, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Pais SA, Turienzo SA, Alvarez LS, Campos PV, Rendo AG, García SS, Santos EPG, Martínez ET, Fernández Díaz MJ, Magadán Álvarez C, Concepción Martín V, Díaz López C, Rosat Rodrigo A, Pérez Sánchez LE, Bailón Cuadrado M, Tinoco Carrasco C, Choolani Bhojwani E, Sánchez DP, Ahmed ME, Dzhendov T, Lindberg F, Rutegård M, Sundbom M, Mickael C, Colucci N, Schnider A, Er S, Kurnaz E, Turkyilmaz S, Turkyilmaz A, Yildirim R, Baki BE, Akkapulu N, Karahan O, Damburaci N, Hardwick R, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Afzal Z, Shrotri M, Chan B, Exarchou K, Gilbert T, Amalesh T, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S, Wiggins TH, Kennedy R, McCain S, Harris A, Dobson G, Davies N, Wilson I, Mayo D, Bennett D, Young R, Manby P, Blencowe N, Schiller M, Byrne B, Mitton D, Wong V, Elshaer A, Cowen M, Menon V, Tan LC, McLaughlin E, Koshy R, Sharp C, Brewer H, Das N, Cox M, Al Khyatt W, Worku D, Iqbal R, Walls L, McGregor R, Fullarton G, Macdonald A, MacKay C, Craig C, Dwerryhouse S, Hornby S, Jaunoo S, Wadley M, Baker C, Saad M, Kelly M, Davies A, Di Maggio F, McKay S, Mistry P, Singhal R, Tucker O, Kapoulas S, Powell-Brett S, Davis P, Bromley G, Watson L, Verma R, Ward J, Shetty V, Ball C, Pursnani K, Sarela A, Sue Ling H, Mehta S, Hayden J, To N, Palser T, Hunter D, Supramaniam K, Butt Z, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Chaudry A, Moussa O, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B, Willem J, Bouras G, Evans R, Singh M, Warrilow H, Ahmad A, Tewari N, Yanni F, Couch J, Theophilidou E, Reilly JJ, Singh P, van Boxel G, Akbari K, Zanotti D, Sgromo B, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Ariyarathenam A, Reece-Smith A, Humphreys L, Choh C, Carter N, Knight B, Pucher P, Athanasiou A, Mohamed I, Tan B, Abdulrahman M, Vickers J, Akhtar K, Chaparala R, Brown R, Alasmar MMA, Ackroyd R, Patel K, Tamhankar A, Wyman A, Walker R, Grace B, Abbassi N, Slim N, Ioannidi L, Blackshaw G, Havard T, Escofet X, Powell A, Owera A, Rashid F, Jambulingam P, Padickakudi J, Ben-Younes H, Mccormack K, Makey IA, Karush MK, Seder CW, Liptay MJ, Chmielewski G, Rosato EL, Berger AC, Zheng R, Okolo E, Singh A, Scott CD, Weyant MJ, Mitchell JD. Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA). BJS Open 2021; 5:zrab010. [PMID: 35179183 PMCID: PMC8140199 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) have set standards in reporting outcomes after oesophagectomy. Reporting outcomes from selected high-volume centres or centralized national cancer programmes may not, however, be reflective of the true global prevalence of complications. This study aimed to compare complication rates after oesophagectomy from these existing sources with those of an unselected international cohort from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA). METHODS The OGAA was a prospective multicentre cohort study coordinated by the West Midlands Research Collaborative, and included patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer between April and December 2018, with 90 days of follow-up. RESULTS The OGAA study included 2247 oesophagectomies across 137 hospitals in 41 countries. Comparisons with the ECCG and DUCA found differences in baseline demographics between the three cohorts, including age, ASA grade, and rates of chronic pulmonary disease. The OGAA had the lowest rates of neoadjuvant treatment (OGAA 75.1 per cent, ECCG 78.9 per cent, DUCA 93.5 per cent; P < 0.001). DUCA exhibited the highest rates of minimally invasive surgery (OGAA 57.2 per cent, ECCG 47.9 per cent, DUCA 85.8 per cent; P < 0.001). Overall complication rates were similar in the three cohorts (OGAA 63.6 per cent, ECCG 59.0 per cent, DUCA 62.2 per cent), with no statistically significant difference in Clavien-Dindo grades (P = 0.752). However, a significant difference in 30-day mortality was observed, with DUCA reporting the lowest rate (OGAA 3.2 per cent, ECCG 2.4 per cent, DUCA 1.7 per cent; P = 0.013). CONCLUSION Despite differences in rates of co-morbidities, oncological treatment strategies, and access to minimal-access surgery, overall complication rates were similar in the three cohorts.
Collapse
|
16
|
Wölnerhanssen BK, Peterli R, Hurme S, Bueter M, Helmiö M, Juuti A, Meyer-Gerspach AC, Slawik M, Peromaa-Haavisto P, Nuutila P, Salminen P. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes of merged data from two randomized clinical trials (SLEEVEPASS and SM-BOSS). Br J Surg 2021; 108:49-57. [PMID: 33640917 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are both effective surgical procedures to achieve weight reduction in patients with obesity. The trial objective was to merge individual-patient data from two RCTs to compare outcomes after LSG and LRYGB. METHODS Five-year outcomes of the Finnish SLEEVEPASS and Swiss SM-BOSS RCTs comparing LSG with LRYGB were analysed. Both original trials were designed to evaluate weight loss. Additional patient-level data on type 2 diabetes (T2DM), obstructive sleep apnoea, and complications were retrieved. The primary outcome was percentage excess BMI loss (%EBMIL). Secondary predefined outcomes in both trials included total weight loss, remission of co-morbidities, improvement in quality of life (QoL), and overall morbidity. RESULTS At baseline, 228 LSG and 229 LRYGB procedures were performed. Five-year follow-up was available for 199 of 228 patients (87.3 per cent) after LSG and 199 of 229 (87.1 per cent) after LRYGB. Model-based mean estimate of %EBMIL was 7.0 (95 per cent c.i. 3.5 to 10.5) percentage points better after LRYGB than after LSG (62.7 versus 55.5 per cent respectively; P < 0.001). There was no difference in remission of T2DM, obstructive sleep apnoea or QoL improvement; remission for hypertension was better after LRYGB compared with LSG (60.3 versus 44.9 per cent; P = 0.049). The complication rate was higher after LRYGB than LSG (37.2 versus 22.5 per cent; P = 0.001), but there was no difference in mean Comprehensive Complication Index value (30.6 versus 31.0 points; P = 0.859). CONCLUSION Although LRYGB induced greater weight loss and better amelioration of hypertension than LSG, there was no difference in remission of T2DM, obstructive sleep apnoea, or QoL at 5 years. There were more complications after LRYGB, but the individual burden for patients with complications was similar after both operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B K Wölnerhanssen
- St Clara Research Ltd, St Clara Hospital, Basle, Switzerland.,University of Basle, Basle, Switzerland
| | - R Peterli
- University of Basle, Basle, Switzerland.,Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basle, Basle, Switzerland
| | - S Hurme
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - M Bueter
- Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - M Helmiö
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - A Juuti
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Abdominal Centre, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - A C Meyer-Gerspach
- St Clara Research Ltd, St Clara Hospital, Basle, Switzerland.,University of Basle, Basle, Switzerland
| | - M Slawik
- Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, St. Clara Hospital, Basle, Switzerland
| | - P Peromaa-Haavisto
- Department of Surgery, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.,Department of Surgery, Hatanpää City Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - P Nuutila
- Department of Endocrinology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P Salminen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Department of Surgery, Satasairaala Central Hospital, Pori, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ricci C, Ingaldi C, Grego DG, Alberici L, De Raffele E, Pagano N, Mosconi C, Di Marco M, Palloni A, Brandi G, Minni F, Casadei R. The use of comprehensive complication Index® in pancreatic surgery: a comparison with the Clavien-Dindo system in a high volume center. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:618-624. [PMID: 32958386 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) system and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) are both widely used methods for reporting the burden of postoperative complications. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the CDC and CCI® in predicting outcomes associated with pancreatic surgery. METHODS The CCI® and CDC were applied to 668 patients who underwent pancreatic resection. Length of postoperative stay (LOS) was chosen as the primary outcome variable. The comparison between CCI® and CDC was made with the Spearman test, reporting þs with standard error (SE) and logistic regression, reporting the Odds Ratio (OR) and Area Under the Curve with SE. RESULTS The median value with the interquartile range (IQR) of CCI® was 20.9 (0-29.6). Both CCI® (þs = 0.609) and CDC (0.590) were significantly (P < 0.001) correlated to LOS. CCI (OR 1.056 and OR 1.052) and CDC (OR 1.978, and OR 1.994) predicted (P < 0.001) LOS over the median and 75th percentile. The accuracy of CCI® was superior to CDC for LOS over 50th (0.785 vs. 0.740; P = 0.004) and over 75th (0.835 vs. 0.761; P < 0.001) percentile. CONCLUSION The accuracy of CCI® in measuring the complicated postoperative course was superior to CDC, correctly classifying eight patients every ten tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Ricci
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy.
| | - Carlo Ingaldi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Davide G Grego
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura Alberici
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Emilio De Raffele
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy
| | - Nico Pagano
- Division of Gastroenterology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy
| | - Cristina Mosconi
- Division of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy
| | - Mariacristina Di Marco
- Division of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Palloni
- Division of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanni Brandi
- Division of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Minni
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kastelowitz N, Marsh MD, McCarter M, Meguid RA, Bhardwaj NW, Mitchell JD, Weyant MJ, Scott C, Schefter T, Stumpf P, Leong S, Messersmith W, Lieu C, Leal AD, Davis SL, Purcell WT, Kane M, Wani S, Shah R, Hammad H, Edmundowicz S, Goodman KA. Impact of Radiation Dose on Postoperative Complications in Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers. Front Oncol 2021; 11:614640. [PMID: 33777751 PMCID: PMC7987936 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.614640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The impact of radiation prescription dose on postoperative complications during standard of care trimodality therapy for operable stage II-III esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers has not been established. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers treated between 2004 and 2016 with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection at a single institution. Post-operative complications within 30 days were reviewed and scored using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Results were compared between patients treated with <50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy, as well as to published CROSS study neoadjuvant chemoradiation group data (41.4 Gy). Results: Twenty-nine patients were treated with <50 Gy (range 39.6-46.8 Gy) and 53 patients were treated with ≥ 50 Gy (range 50.0-52.5 Gy) delivered using IMRT/VMAT (41%), 3D-CRT (46%), or tomotherapy IMRT (12%). Complication rates and CCI scores between our <50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy groups were not significantly different. Assuming a normal distribution of the CROSS data, there was no significant difference in CCI scores between the CROSS study neoadjuvant chemoradiation, <50 Gy, or ≥ 50 Gy groups. Rates of pulmonary complications were greater in the CROSS group (50%) than our <50 Gy (38%) or ≥ 50 Gy (30%) groups. Conclusions: In selected esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer patients, radiation doses ≥ 50 Gy do not appear to increase 30 day post-operative complication rates. These findings suggest that the use of definitive doses of radiotherapy (50-50.4 Gy) in the neoadjuvant setting may not increase post-operative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Kastelowitz
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Megan D. Marsh
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Martin McCarter
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Robert A. Meguid
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | | | - John D. Mitchell
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Michael J. Weyant
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Christopher Scott
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Tracey Schefter
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Priscilla Stumpf
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Stephen Leong
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Wells Messersmith
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Christopher Lieu
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Alexis D. Leal
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - S. Lindsey Davis
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | | | - Madeleine Kane
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Sachin Wani
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Raj Shah
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Hazem Hammad
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | | | - Karyn A. Goodman
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fabbi M, Hagens ERC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: definitions, diagnostics, and treatment. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34:doaa039. [PMID: 32476017 PMCID: PMC7801633 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe complications after esophagectomy and is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Several projects ranging from small retrospective studies to large collaborations have aimed to identify potential pre- and perioperative risk factors and to improve the diagnostic processes and management. Despite the increase in available literature, many aspects of anastomotic leakage are still debated, without the existence of widely accepted guidelines. The purpose of this review is to provide a cutting edge overview of the recent literature regarding the definition and classification of anastomotic leakage, risk factors, novel diagnostic modalities, and emerging therapeutic options for treatment and prevention of anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Fabbi
- Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - E R C Hagens
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kowalewski KF, Müller D, Mühlbauer J, Hendrie JD, Worst TS, Wessels F, Walach MT, von Hardenberg J, Nuhn P, Honeck P, Michel MS, Kriegmair MC. The comprehensive complication index (CCI): proposal of a new reporting standard for complications in major urological surgery. World J Urol 2020; 39:1631-1639. [PMID: 32813094 PMCID: PMC8166677 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03356-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a new tool for reporting the cumulative burden of postoperative complications on a continuous scale. This study validates the CCI for urological surgery and its benefits over the Clavien-Dindo-Classification (Clavien). MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from a prospectively maintained data base of all consecutive patients at a university care-center was analyzed. Complications after radical cystectomy (RC), radical prostatectomy (RP), and partial nephrectomy (PN) were classified using the CCI and Clavien system. Differences in complications between the CCI and the Clavien were assessed and correlation analyses performed. Sample size calculations for hypothetical clinical trials were compared between CCI and Clavien to evaluate whether the CCI would reduce the number of required patients in a clinical trial. RESULTS 682 patients (172 RC, 297 RP, 213 PN) were analyzed. Overall, 9.4-46.6% of patients had > 1 complication cumulatively assessed with the CCI resulting in an upgrading in the Clavien classification for 2.4-32.4% of patients. Therefore, scores between the systems differed for RC: CCI (mean ± standard deviation) 26.3 ± 20.8 vs. Clavien 20.4 ± 16.7, p < 0.001; PN: CCI 8.4 ± 14.7 vs. Clavien 7.0 ± 11.8, p < 0.001 and RP: CCI 5.8 ± 11.7 vs. Clavien 5.3 ± 10.6, p = 0.102. The CCI was more accurate in predicting LOS after RC than Clavien (p < 0.001). Sample size calculations based in the CCI (for future hypothetical trials) resulted in a reduction of required patients for all procedures (- 25% RC, - 74% PN, - 80% RP). CONCLUSION The CCI is more accurate to assess surgical complications and reduces required sample sizes that will facilitate the conduction of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K F Kowalewski
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - D Müller
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - J Mühlbauer
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - J D Hendrie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Prisma Health, 701 Grove Road, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA
| | - T S Worst
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - F Wessels
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M T Walach
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - J von Hardenberg
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - P Nuhn
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - P Honeck
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M S Michel
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M C Kriegmair
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Triantafyllou T, Wijnhoven B. Multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer: The role of active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020; 4:352-359. [PMID: 32724878 PMCID: PMC7382442 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The optimal treatment of esophageal cancer is still controversial. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy is a standard treatment. Morbidity after esophagectomy however is still considerable and has an impact on patients' quality of life. Given a pathologic complete response rate of approximately 30% in patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, active surveillance has been introduced as a new alternative approach. Active surveillance involves regular clinical response evaluations in patients after neoadjuvant therapy to detect residual or recurrent disease. As long as there is no suspicion of disease activity, surgery is withheld. Esophagectomy is reserved for patients presenting with an incomplete response or resectable recurrent disease. Active surveillance after neoadjuvant treatment has been previously applied in other types of malignancy with encouraging results. This paper discusses its role in esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Triantafyllou
- Department of SurgeryHippocration General Hospital of AthensNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cibula D, Planchamp F, Fischerova D, Fotopoulou C, Kohler C, Landoni F, Mathevet P, Naik R, Ponce J, Raspagliesi F, Rodolakis A, Tamussino K, Taskiran C, Vergote I, Wimberger P, Zahl Eriksson AG, Querleu D. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:3-14. [PMID: 31900285 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimizing and ensuring the quality of surgical care is essential to improve the management and outcome of patients with cervical cancer.To develop a list of quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice. METHODS Quality indicators were developed using a four-step evaluation process that included a systematic literature search to identify potential quality indicators, in-person meetings of an ad hoc group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large panel of European clinicians and patient representatives. RESULTS Fifteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were selected. Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are also detailed to define how the indicator will be measured in practice. Each indicator has a target which gives practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes. DISCUSSION Implementation of institutional quality assurance programs can improve quality of care, even in high-volume centers. This set of quality indicators from the European Society of Gynaecological Cancer may be a major instrument to improve the quality of surgical treatment of cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Daniela Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Center First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Christhardt Kohler
- Asklepios Hambourg Altona and Department of Gynecology, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Gynaecology, Universita degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Patrice Mathevet
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois Departement de gynecologie-obstetrique et genetique medicale, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raj Naik
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK
| | - Jordi Ponce
- University Hospital of Bellvitge (IDIBELL), LHospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | | | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athinon, Greece
| | | | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Clinical Research Unit, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zeng Y, Wang G, Liu Y, Li Z, Yi B, Zhu S. The "Micro Hand S" Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: Short-Term Outcomes at a Single Center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 30:363-368. [PMID: 32013727 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of using the Micro Hand S surgical robot for right colectomy by comparing the short-term efficacy of robot-assisted and laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC). Methods: Data from a total of 22 patients who underwent right colectomy from January 2018 to February 2019 in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, in the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, were collected retrospectively. This included 10 patients who underwent robot-assisted right colectomy with the Micro Hand S surgical robot (RRC group [Shangdong Wego Surgical Robot Co., LTD, Weihai, China]) and 12 patients who underwent LRC group. The operation time, blood loss, number of lymph nodes dissected, time to first flatus, comprehensive complication index (CCI), and postoperative hospital stay were compared. Results: Compared with the LRC group, the RRC group had a lower CCI (11.7 ± 8.3 versus 19.9 ± 6.4, P < .05), shorter hospital stay (11.4 ± 3.3 versus 15.2 ± 4.7 days, P < .05). The differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: The Micro Hand S robot-assisted right colectomy is safe and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yijia Zeng
- Department of General Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Guohui Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yong Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zheng Li
- Department of General Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Bo Yi
- Department of General Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shaihong Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Carroll PA, Jacob N, Yeung JC, Darling GE. Using Benchmarking Standards to Evaluate Transition to Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 109:383-388. [PMID: 31541632 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is performed in nearly 50% of patients worldwide. The effectiveness of the technique arises from a single randomized control trial and multiple single series cohorts. Consistent reporting of complications is varied. We describe our experience of transitioning to MIE compared with open esophagectomy (OE) with the use of Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) standardized complication benchmark definitions. METHODS Between 2007 and 2017, all patients undergoing esophagectomy were identified with the use of a prospectively curated database. Complications were defined by the ECCG and graded with the Clavien-Dindo (most severe complication) and comprehensive complication index (complexity of complications during hospital stay). RESULTS Of 383 patients, 299 (76%) were men with a median age of 64.5 years (range, 56-72 years). MIE was performed in 49.6%. No differences were found in age, histologic finding (P = .222), pT stage (P = .136), or nodal positivity (P = .918). Stage 3 cancers accounted for 42.0% of OEs and 47.9% of MIEs. A thoracic anastomosis was more frequent in MIEs (156 of 190; 82.1%) than in OEs (113 of 193; 58.5%; P = .001). Frequency, severity (Clavien-Dindo), and complexity (comprehensive complication index) of complications were better in the MIE group, without compromising operative outcomes. No differences were identified in individual complication groupings or grade in MIEs compared with OEs (pneumonia: 19.5% versus 26.9% ([P = .09]; intensive care unit readmission: 7.4% versus 9.3% [P = .519]; atrial fibrillation: 11.1% versus 6.7% [P = .082], or grade of leak [P = .99]). CONCLUSIONS These results compare favorably to those reported by ECCG. MIE can be the standard approach for surgical management of esophageal cancer. Introduction of the approach in each surgeon's practice should be benchmarked to international standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Carroll
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Hospital Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Nithin Jacob
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Hospital Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan C Yeung
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Hospital Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gail E Darling
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Hospital Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Based in the anatomical concept of the mesoesophagus, that at subcarinal level all the vessels come through a by-layer connective tissue plane from the aorta to the esophagus whereas supracarinally these structures will come from both sides, with vagal and recurrent laryngeal nerves, a minimally invasive mesoesophageal (MIME) resection model may be described. Based on this surgical plane concept, dissection of esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy can be performed along these structures establishing clear anatomical modules for an adequate oncological resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel A Cuesta
- Emeritus professor Gastrointestinal Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vumc Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dumitra S, Lee B. ASO Author Reflections: A Novel Tool to Assess and Describe HIPEC Complications. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:557-558. [PMID: 30600405 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-7053-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sinziana Dumitra
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Byrne Lee
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhang YF, Ji H, Lu HW, Lu L, Wang L, Wang JL, Li YM. Postoperative survival analysis and prognostic nomogram model for patients with portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:4499-4509. [PMID: 30356927 PMCID: PMC6196331 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i39.4499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Revised: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To analyse the postoperative survival of patients with portal hypertension and determine the factors that influence survival and construct nomograms.
METHODS We retrospectively followed 1045 patients who underwent splenectomy plus pericardial devascularisation (SPD) between January 2002 and December 2017. Two SPD types are used in our department: splenectomy plus simplified pericardial devascularisation (SSPD) and splenectomy plus traditional pericardial devascularisation (STPD). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the prognostic effects of multiple parameters on overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and bleeding-free survival (BFS). Significant prognostic factors were combined to build nomograms to predict the survival rate of individual patients.
RESULTS Five hundred and fifty-seven (53.30%) patients were successfully followed with 192 in the SSPD group and 365 in the STPD group; 93 (16.70%) patients died, of whom 42 (7.54%) died due to bleeding. Postoperative bleeding was observed in 84 (15.10%) patients. The 5- and 10-year OS, DSS and BFS rates in the group of patients who underwent SSPD were not significantly different from those in patients who underwent STPD. Independent prognostic factors for OS were age, operative time, alanine transaminase level and albumin-bilirubin score. Independent prognostic factors for BFS were male sex, age, intraoperative blood loss and time to first flatus. Independent prognostic factors for DSS were the Comprehensive Complication Index and age. These characteristics were used to establish nomograms, which showed good accuracy in predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year OS and BFS.
CONCLUSION SSPD achieves or surpasses the long-term survival effect of traditional pericardial devascularisation and is worthy of clinical promotion and application. Nomograms are effective at predicting prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Fei Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Hong Ji
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Hong-Wei Lu
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Le Lu
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Jin-Long Wang
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Yi-Ming Li
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Choudry MHA, Shuai Y, Jones HL, Pai RK, Pingpank JF, Ahrendt SS, Holtzman MP, Zeh HJ, Bartlett DL. Postoperative Complications Independently Predict Cancer-Related Survival in Peritoneal Malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3950-3959. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6823-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
29
|
Murakami Y, Hamai Y, Emi M, Hihara J, Imano N, Takeuchi Y, Takahashi I, Nishibuchi I, Kimura T, Okada M, Nagata Y. Long-term results of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by esophagectomy for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2018; 59:616-624. [PMID: 29939306 PMCID: PMC6151632 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rry047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2018] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
This study retrospectively evaluated the long-term results of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by esophagectomy for the patients with resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Altogether, 49 patients treated from 2008 to 2012 were analyzed. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. Radiotherapy was performed with a total dose of 40 Gy in 20 fractions for primary tumor, metastatic lymph nodes, and elective nodal area. Subsequently, transthoracic esophagectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy was performed. The median follow-up time for the survivors was 86 (range, 55-111) months. Pathological complete response from NCRT was observed in 17 (35%) patients. The 5-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates were 56% [95% confidence interval (CI): 43-71%] and 55% (95% CI: 41-69%), respectively. The 5-year locoregional control rate was 84% (95% CI: 74-95%). Multivariate analyses revealed body mass index, N-factor, and %ΔSUVmax as significant factors for overall survival. Recurrences and within-irradiation field failure were observed in 16 (31%) and 4 (8%) patients, respectively. Toxicities of NCRT were generally mild. Postoperative Grade IIIb or worse complications were seen in 14% of patients, including one Grade V case (2%). The 5-year incidence rate of late complications of Grade 3 or worse was 22% (95% CI: 7-36%). The cumulative 5-year incidence rate of metachronous malignancies was 13% (95% CI: 1-26%). NCRT followed by esophagectomy for patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC showed favorable locoregional control and overall survival, with acceptable postoperative complications. Long-term careful follow-up for late complications and metachronous malignancies is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoichi Hamai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Manabu Emi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Jun Hihara
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, 2-1-1 Kabe-minami, Asakita-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Nobuki Imano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yuki Takeuchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ippei Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ikuno Nishibuchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomoki Kimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Morihito Okada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nagata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Li XF, Song JK, Cai JW, Zeng YQ, Li M, Zhu J, Niu YM. No Association Between MicroRNA-608 rs4919510 G>C Polymorphism and Digestive System Cancers Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis Based on 10,836 Individuals. Front Physiol 2018; 9:705. [PMID: 29930517 PMCID: PMC5999779 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous epidemiologic studies have revealed a possible association between microRNA-608 rs4919510 G>C polymorphism and digestive system cancers (DSCs) risk, but the results were not consistent. We therefore performed an updated meta-analysis to explore the association between microRNA-608 rs4919510 G>C polymorphism and DSCs risk. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the relationship between the microRNA-608 rs4919510 G>C polymorphism and DSCs risk. Heterogeneity, cumulative analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias were also conducted to examine the statistical power. Eight published articles with nine independent case-control studies involving 10,836 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant association was found between microRNA-608 rs4919510 G>C polymorphism and DSCs risk in general populations. But some significant protective effects were observed in the subgroup of Caucasian population group in three genetic models (C vs. G: OR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.68–0.99, P = 0.03, I2 = 0%; CC vs. GG: OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.36–0.97, P = 0.04, I2 = 0%; GC+CC vs. GG: OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.37–0.99, P = 0.05, I2 = 0%). In summary, current evidence indicates that the microRNA-608 rs4919510 G>C polymorphism maybe an important factor of DSCs susceptibility, especially in Caucasian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Feng Li
- Department of Endocrinology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Ju-Kun Song
- Department of Oral and Maxillary Surgery, Gui Zhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China
| | - Jun-Wei Cai
- Department of Endocrinology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Yu-Qin Zeng
- Department of Endocrinology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Endocrinology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Jie Zhu
- Trade Union, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Yu-Ming Niu
- Department of Endocrinology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.,Department of Stomatology, Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hagens ERC, Anderegg MCJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. International Survey on the Management of Anastomotic Leakage After Esophageal Resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 106:1702-1708. [PMID: 29883644 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2017] [Revised: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe complications following esophageal surgery, leading to significant morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, considerable costs, decreased quality of life, and increased mortality. Management of anastomotic leakage is complicated and has currently not been standardized. The objective of this research is to gain insight into the different opinions on anastomotic leakage management among upper gastrointestinal surgeons and verify the need for diagnostic and treatment guidelines. METHODS Surgeons with interest in esophageal surgery were invited to participate in an international online questionnaire. The survey consisted of questions pertaining to the surgeons' experience, operation techniques, management routine, and opinion on future international guidelines on the treatment of anastomotic leakage. RESULTS Of the 331 invited surgeons, 40% participated in the survey. Among the 129 responders, 90.7% use laboratory diagnostics and 62.8% use imaging or endoscopy postoperatively on a routine basis to detect anastomotic leakage. In case of suspected anastomotic leakage, the most chosen diagnostic imaging modalities were computed tomography scan (35.7%) or dynamic swallow investigation (33.3%). Independent from the clinical manifestations, participants of this survey treat patients very differently. More than 70% of the responders agreed that there is a need for diagnostic and therapeutic international guidelines on anastomotic leakage management. CONCLUSIONS This survey shows that there is no standardized guideline for diagnostic workup or management of anastomotic leakage and that there is a need for an international guideline regarding the optimal management of anastomotic leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza R C Hagens
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten C J Anderegg
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
van der Kaaij RT, de Rooij MV, van Coevorden F, Voncken FEM, Snaebjornsson P, Boot H, van Sandick JW. Using textbook outcome as a measure of quality of care in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2018; 105:561-569. [PMID: 29465746 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Revised: 08/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome is a multidimensional measure representing an ideal course after oesophagogastric cancer surgery. It comprises ten perioperative quality-of-care parameters and has been developed recently using population-based data. Its association with long-term outcome is unknown. The objectives of this study were to validate the clinical relevance of textbook outcome at a hospital level, and to assess its relation with long-term survival after treatment for oesophagogastric cancer. METHODS All patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer scheduled for surgery with curative intent between January 2009 and June 2015 were selected from an institutional database. A Cox model was used to study the association between textbook outcome and survival. RESULTS A textbook outcome was achieved in 58 of 144 patients (40·3 per cent) with oesophageal cancer and in 48 of 105 (45·7 per cent) with gastric cancer. Factors associated with not achieving a textbook outcome were failure to achieve a lymph node yield of at least 15 (after oesophagectomy) and postoperative complications of grade II or more. After oesophagectomy, median overall survival was longer for patients with a textbook outcome than for patients without (median not reached versus 33 months; P = 0·012). After gastrectomy, median survival was 54 versus 33 months respectively (P = 0·018). In multivariable analysis, textbook outcome was associated with overall survival after oesophagectomy (hazard ratio 2·38, 95 per cent c.i. 1·29 to 4·42) and gastrectomy (hazard ratio 2·58, 1·25 to 5·32). CONCLUSION Textbook outcome is a clinically relevant measure in patients undergoing oesophagogastric cancer surgery as it can identify underperforming parameters in a hospital setting. Overall survival in patients with a textbook outcome is better than in patients without a textbook outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R T van der Kaaij
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M V de Rooij
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F van Coevorden
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F E M Voncken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Boot
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W van Sandick
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Serrano PE, Gafni A, Parpia S, Ruo L, Simunovic M, Meyers BM, Reiter H, Wei A, Gallinger S, Karanicolas P, Hallet J, Devaud N, Levine M. Simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases (RESECT), a pilot study. Int J Surg Protoc 2018; 8:1-6. [PMID: 31851740 PMCID: PMC6913566 DOI: 10.1016/j.isjp.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Revised: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, synchronous colorectal cancer and CRLM are resected separately. Many institutions have begun performing these procedures simultaneously. Minimal data support simultaneous resection including major liver resection. Complications will be investigated following simultaneous resection. This protocol will be implemented in 5 high-volume tertiary care centres worldwide.
Introduction The “traditional approach” to resect synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRLM) is to perform staged resections. Many institutions perform simultaneous resection. Disadvantages to the simultaneous approach include longer operating room times, which may increase major postoperative complication rates. Data supporting simultaneous resection are limited to retrospective studies that are subject to selection bias. Therefore, we have proposed a single-arm prospective cohort pilot study to evaluate the postoperative complications following simultaneous resection of synchronous CRLM. Methods and analysis This single-arm study will be performed in five high-volume hepatobiliary centres to prospectively evaluate the following objectives: (1) To determine the 90-day postoperative complication rate of patients diagnosed with synchronous CRLM undergoing a simultaneous colorectal and liver resection, including major liver resections; (2) To determine the postoperative mortality rate at 90 days following index surgery; (3) To determine change in global health-related Quality of Life (QoL) following simultaneous resection at three months compared to baseline; and (4) To build a costing model for simultaneous resection, We will also evaluate the feasibility of performing combined resection in these patients by evaluating the number of eligible patients enrolled in the study and determining the reasons eligible patients were not enrolled. This protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02954913). Ethics and dissemination This study has been provincially approved by the central research ethics board. Study results will inform the design a randomized controlled trial by providing information about the comprehensive complication index in this patient population used to calculate the sample size for the trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo E. Serrano
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Corresponding author at: Juravinski Hospital & Cancer Centre, 711 Concession St, B3 - Rm. 161, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada.
| | - Amiram Gafni
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sameer Parpia
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leyo Ruo
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marko Simunovic
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brandon M. Meyers
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Canada
| | - Harold Reiter
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Canada
| | - Alice Wei
- Department of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Department of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada
- Department of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul Karanicolas
- Department of Surgery Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Mark Levine
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Incidence and risk factors associated with a high comprehensive complication index score after splenectomy in cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism. J Surg Res 2017; 222:69-74. [PMID: 29273377 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.09.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2017] [Revised: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative complications after splenectomy are not rare and can be serious in cirrhotic patients. The purpose of this study was to assess postoperative complications using the comprehensive complication index (CCI) after splenectomy in cirrhotic patients and identify risk factors for those who developed a high postoperative CCI score. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 208 adult patients with viral hepatitis-related cirrhosis, who underwent elective splenectomy at our hospital from January 2002 to June 2012. The primary outcome was the CCI score. A CCI score >30 was considered to be a high CCI score. RESULTS The median CCI score in this cohort was 25.6 (range: 8.7-62.9), and 66 patients (31.7%) had a CCI score >30. Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that the risk factors independently associated with a high CCI score were a history of hypertension and a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥10 prior to splenectomy. CONCLUSIONS A high CCI score is common in cirrhotic patients undergoing splenectomy. The CCI is a useful grading system to assess postoperative morbidity in cirrhotic patients undergoing splenectomy. Preoperative blood pressure control is recommended and cirrhotic patients with an elevated MELD score should consider other treatment options for hypersplenism.
Collapse
|
36
|
Dumitra S, O'Leary M, Raoof M, Wakabayashi M, Dellinger TH, Han ES, Lee SJ, Lee B. The Comprehensive Complication Index: a New Measure of the Burden of Complications After Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 25:688-693. [PMID: 29260417 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6157-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are complex surgeries with multiple comorbidities. The Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) is the most commonly used method to report surgical morbidity, but limits it to the highest-grade complication. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) is a score ranging from 0 to 100, calculated using all 30-day complications and their treatment after abdominal surgery. The aim of this study is to assess the CCI's validity in the HIPEC patient population. METHODS A review of our institutional cytoreduction database from 2009 to 2015 was undertaken. Patient demographics, pathology, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI), complications and their treatments, and length of stay (LOS) were reviewed. The CCI was calculated for each patient. Linear regression was used to assess whether the CCI and CDC were predictors of LOS. RESULTS Of 157 patients reviewed, 110 (70.1%) underwent HIPEC. The majority were female (77, 66.9%), and the mean age was 53.7 years. Mean PCI was 13.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 7-18]. Median CDC was grade 2 (IQR 0-2), and only 9.8% had CDC of grade 4 or higher. Mean CCI was 21.4, while the median was 20.9 (IQR 0-30.8). Mean LOS was 16.2 days, while the median was 11 days (IQR 8-15 days). The CCI strongly correlated with LOS with coefficient of 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.54, p = 0.000]. CONCLUSIONS The CCI is an adequate tool to capture all complications and their overall burden in patients having undergone HIPEC. This study shows that the CCI can predict LOS and could be used to quantify and compare the burden of multiple complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Ernest S Han
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Stephen J Lee
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Defining Benchmarks for Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Analysis of Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Low Risk Patients. Ann Surg 2017; 266:814-821. [PMID: 28796646 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To define "best possible" outcomes in total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy (ttMIE). BACKGROUND TtMIE, performed by experts in patients with low comorbidity, may serve as a benchmark procedure for esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS From a cohort of 1057 ttMIE, performed over a 5-year period in 13 high-volume centers for esophageal surgery, we selected a study group of 334 patients (31.6%) that fulfilled criteria of low comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≤2, WHO/ECOG score ≤1, age ≤65 years, body mass index 19-29 kg/m). Endpoints included postoperative morbidity measured by the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index. Benchmark values were defined as the 75th percentile of the median outcome parameters of the participating centers to represent best achievable results. RESULTS Benchmark patients were predominantly male (82.9%) with a median age of 58 years (53-62). High intrathoracic (Ivor Lewis) and cervical esophagogastrostomy (McKeown) were performed in 188 (56.3%) and 146 (43.7%) patients, respectively. Median (IQR) ICU and hospital stay was 0 (0-2) and 12 (9-18) days, respectively. 56.0% of patients developed at least 1 complication, and 26.9% experienced major morbidity (≥grade III), mostly related to pulmonary complications (25.7%), anastomotic leakage (15.9%), and cardiac events (13.5%). Benchmark values at 30 days after hospital discharge were ≤55.7% and ≤30.8% for overall and major complications, ≤18.0% for readmission, ≤3.1% for positive resection margins, and ≥23 for lymph node yield. Benchmarks at 30 and 90 days were ≤1.0% and ≤4.6% for mortality, and ≤40.8 and ≤42.8 for the comprehensive complication index, respectively. CONCLUSION This outcome analysis of patients with low comorbidity undergoing ttMIE may serve as a reference to evaluate surgical performance in major esophageal resection.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kleive D, Sahakyan MA, Berstad AE, Verbeke CS, Gladhaug IP, Edwin B, Fosby B, Line PD, Labori KJ. Trends in indications, complications and outcomes for venous resection during pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2017; 104:1558-1567. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pancreatoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric–portal vein resection has become a common procedure in pancreatic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy plus venous resection at a high-volume centre, and to examine trends in management and outcome over a decade for the latter procedure.
Methods
This retrospective observational study included all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy with or without venous resection at Oslo University Hospital between January 2006 and December 2015. Trends were evaluated by assessing preoperative clinical and radiological characteristics, as well as perioperative outcomes in three time intervals (early, intermediate and late).
Results
A total of 784 patients had a pancreatoduodenectomy, of whom 127 (16·2 per cent) underwent venous resection. Venous resection resulted in a longer operating time (median 422 versus 312 min; P = 0·001) and greater estimated blood loss (EBL) (median 700 versus 500 ml; P = 0·004) than standard pancreatoduodenectomy. The rate of severe complications was significantly higher for pancreatoduodenectomy with venous resection (37·0 versus 26·3 per cent; P = 0·014). The overall burden of complications, evaluated using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), did not differ (median score 8·7 versus 8·7; P = 0·175). Trends in venous resection over time showed a significant reduction in EBL (median 1050 versus 375 ml; P = 0·001) and duration of hospital stay (median 14 versus 9 days; P = 0·011) between the early and late periods. However, despite an improvement in the intermediate period, severe complication rates returned to baseline in the late period (18 of 43 versus 9 of 42 versus 20 of 42 patients in early, intermediate and late periods respectively; P = 0·032), as did CCI scores (median 20·9 versus 0 versus 20·9; P = 0·041).
Conclusion
Despite an initial improvement in severe complications for venous resection during pancreatoduodenectomy, this was not maintained over time. Every fourth patient with venous resection needed relaparotomy, most frequently for bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Kleive
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M A Sahakyan
- Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - A E Berstad
- Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - C S Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - I P Gladhaug
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - B Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - B Fosby
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - P-D Line
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - K J Labori
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®): Added Value and Clinical Perspectives 3 Years "Down the Line". Ann Surg 2017; 265:1045-1050. [PMID: 28486288 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 204] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the added value of the comprehensive complication index (CCI) to standard assessment of postoperative morbidity, and to clarify potential controversies for its application. BACKGROUND The CCI was introduced about 3 years ago as a novel metric of postoperative morbidity, integrating in a single formula all complications by severity, ranging from 0 (uneventful course) to 100 (death). It remains unclear, how often the CCI adds to standard reporting of complications and how to apply it in complex postoperative courses. METHODS CCI data were prospectively collected over a 1-year period at our institution. The proportion of patients with more than 1 complication and the severity of those complications were assessed to determine the additional value of the CCI compared to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Complex and controversial cases were presented to 90 surgeons worldwide to achieve consensus in weighing each postoperative event. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate agreement among surgeons and to suggest solutions for consistent use of the CCI. RESULTS Complications were identified in 24% (290/1212) of the general surgical population. Of those, 44% (127/290) developed more than 1 complication by the time of discharge, and thereby CCI added information to the standard grading system of complications. Information gained by the CCI increased with the complexity of surgery and observation time. CONCLUSIONS The CCI adds information on postoperative morbidity in almost half of the patients developing complications, with particular value following extensive surgery and longer postoperative observation up to 3 months. Each single complication, independently of their inter-connection, should be included in the CCI calculation to best mirror the patients' postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
|
40
|
Klinkert M, de Jong MC, Sosef MN, van Nunen AB, Belgers HJ. Surgical treatment of a rare complication after endoscopic stent placement for anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection. World J Surg Proced 2017; 7:1-5. [DOI: 10.5412/wjsp.v7.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The best approach to achieve cure in esophageal cancer is a combination of chemo-radiation and surgery. However, complications occur in half of patients. The current report, reports a rare but severe complication: Complete obstruction of the esophagus, induced by preoperative chemo-radiation therapy. Normally, strictures are treated by repeated dilatations, however, in case of complete obstruction, the perforation rate of standard blind anterograde wire access and dilation is severely increased. In order to minimize the risk of perforations, the rendezvous technique was introduced. This technique involves an anterograde approach in combination with a retrograde approach in order to open and dilatate the esophagus. While technical success rates between 83% and 100% have been reported in literature, data on clinical outcomes are scarcer. The limited amount of studies available claim that success was achieved in almost half of patients. The patient in our case currently has an oral diet without restrictions and rates his quality of life with a VAS-score ten out of ten.
Collapse
|