Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Retroperitoneal Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma: Early Reoperation may not Provide Benefit

Advancements in Diagnosis and Multimodal Treatment Strategies for Retroperitoneal Tumors: A Comprehensive Review

Retroperitoneal tumors (RPTs) encompass both benign and malignant entities, constituting ~0.1% to 0.2% of all malignant tumors, of which 70% to 80% manifest malignancy. Predominantly, retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent the most prevalent subtype among RPT. With over 70 histologic forms identified, liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas emerge as the primary constituents of RPS. Accurate diagnosis of RPTs necessitates preoperative core-needle biopsy and comprehensive imaging assessment. The current staging protocol for RPS relies on the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM classification. Surgical excision remains the established gold standard for treating RPS. Therapeutic approaches vary according to the underlying pathophysiology. Although chemotherapy and radiotherapy exhibit efficacy in managing metastatic and recurrent unresectable RPS, their role in primary RPS remains unresolved, necessitating further clinical trials for validation. Concurrently, ongoing research explores the potential of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of existing research, delineating diagnostic pathways and optimal therapeutic strategies for RPT.

Case Report: Giant paratesticular liposarcoma was resected and refused radical orchiectomy

Paratesticular liposarcoma (PLS) causes scrotal mass changes, rarely in the urinary system. Before surgery, PLS causes scrotal mass changes that are difficult to distinguish from other causes. There has been a report of a giant paratestis liposarcoma resection and refusal to undergo orchiectomy. A 65-year-old man presented with finding the left scrotal mass after 2 years. Physical examination showed that the left scrotal mass was obviously difficult to retract. Pelvic CT showed that the left scrotal mass and flaky fat density shadow accompanied with left inguinal hernia. During surgery, laparoscopic exploration was performed to rule out inguinal hernia, and a scrotal exploration was also performed concurrently. The intraoperative frozen pathology considered lipogenic tumor, and the patient's wife refused to undergo simultaneous left radical orchiectomy. Later the mass was completely removed, and postoperative pathology confirmed paratestis liposarcoma. During a 15-month routine follow-up, the tumor did not recur locally or metastasize distantly. PLS should be focused on early diagnosis and treatment, preoperative examinations and postoperative pathology should be combined, and highly personalized treatment will be implemented.

Updated Review and Clinical Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Retroperitoneal Sarcoma by the Spanish Sarcoma Research Group (GEIS)

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are an uncommon and biologically heterogeneous group of tumors arising from mesenchymal cells. The incidence is estimated at five cases per 100,000 people per year. Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) account for 10-15% of all STS, and their management depends on their anatomical characteristics and histotype. Due to their very low incidence, it is recommended that RPS be treated in reference centers and evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team (MDT). In Spain, the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas (GEIS) brings together experts from various specialties to promote research on sarcomas and improve treatment results. This paper summarizes the GEIS recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with RPS.

Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that are potentially curable by complete surgical resection. A regular surveillance program is normally commenced following surgery due to the risk of local recurrence (LR), especially in low-intermediate grade disease, and distant metastases (DM), especially in high-grade RPS. Consensus guidelines usually advocate for more frequent imaging during the first 2-3 years and less intensive imaging over a prolonged period thereafter, reflecting the incidence pattern of LR and DM. Definitive evidence for the most effective imaging schedule has never been provided, and retrospective studies have not shown an association between follow-up intensity and survival. Improvement in the prediction of recurrence patterns has been sustained by prognostic dynamic nomograms, which are now capable of forecasting disease behaviour in each patient according to specific features. Incorporation of such tools in clinical practice may help to stratify patients and tailor ongoing surveillance to the risk of recurrence. This may help to relieve patients' anxiety while awaiting results of surveillance investigations, and also reduce the economic and environmental burden of repeated imaging. A randomized controlled study (SARveillance Trial) is proposed to shed light on this controversial topic, allowing clinicians to harmonize the follow-up protocol of patients undergoing surgery for RPS.

Management of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas

Recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare, with patterns of recurrence determined by the histologic subtype. A range of patient characteristics and treatment profiles combined with a myriad of presentations and clinical courses of recurrences make this diverse entity challenging to manage. Although surgical resection improves survival in select patients, the oncological outcomes are inferior to that of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas. Management options for unresectable disease include local ablative therapy, radiation and systemic therapy, with palliative surgery indicated occasionally. Attempts at disease control must be balanced with potential morbidity and impact on the patient's quality of life. This review aims to offer insights into the current understanding of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas and provide some guidance on management.

Surveillance Post Surgery for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Complete en bloc surgical resection offers the best opportunity for the cure of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The potential for disease recurrence, in the form of both loco-regional recurrence and distant metastases, underpins the rationale for postoperative surveillance. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence underpinning follow-up for RPS patients, and most practice guidelines draw from expert opinion and evidence from soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The available observational retrospective data analysis has failed to demonstrate that high-intensity radiological surveillance improves the overall survival in patients. The lack of a robust evidence base has given rise to variations in approaches to post-operative surveillance strategies adopted by specialist centres managing RPS across the world. More high-quality prospective research is needed and planned to more clearly support surveillance approaches that balance oncologic outcomes, patient-centric care, and health service value. Risk stratification tools exist and are available for use in routine practice. Their use will likely support more individualised post-operative surveillance moving forward. Surveillance will likely be underpinned by serial radiological imaging for the medium term. However, developments in genomics offer hope for biomarkers such as ctDNA to impact patient care positively in the future and further support individualised patient care pathways.

Prognosis and survival of patients diagnosed with well-differentiated and dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma

OBJECTIVES

The main objective is to establish the overall survival and disease-free survival profiles regarding the patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma, making a comparison based on the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated histological subtypes. The secondary objectives are to descriptively analyze the clinical characteristics of said patients and to identify and analyze other independent variables that might modify these survival profiles significantly.

METHODS

An observational and analytical study was performed using a retrospective historical cohort that was followed prospectively. The inclusion criteria consisted of: the procedure of liposarcoma located in the retroperitoneum, the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated histological subtypes, between January of 2002 and May of 2019. As a result, 32 patients took part in this study's sample. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to summarise the results and log-rank test was used in the comparative analysis.

RESULTS

The overall survival at 5 years was around 59%. No differences were found between the patients with a well-differentiated subtype compared to the dedifferentiated ones (p = 0.834). The disease-free survival at 2 years was 59% regarding the well-differentiated and 26% regarding the dedifferentiated, with these differences being statistically significant (p = 0.005). None of the other studied variables modified these survival profiles significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcomas show less disease-free survival than well-differentiated liposarcomas. However, regarding overall survival no differences can be claimed.

Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: a Current Review on Management

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are heterogeneous tumours with variable disease biology and outcomes. The prognosis is primarily related to tumour histology and grade as well as the ability to achieve margin negative resection. Surgery involves compartment or contiguous organ resection to achieve the above goal. Careful utilization of neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies like radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy can lead to improvement in margin status, thereby contributing to better local control and possibly reducing systemic dissemination. Use of targeted therapies has paved newer pathways of treatment integration centred on molecular and genetic targets. The aim of this review is to update the reader on all aspects of retroperitoneal sarcoma management including emphasis on pertinent and landmark trials in this regard.

Treatment algorithm and surgical outcome for primary and recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas: A long-term single-center experience of 242 cases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) are difficult to manage, rare malignant tumors. This single-center, retrospective study aimed to analyze the treatment algorithm and outcomes of aggressive surgical treatment in patients with primary and recurrent RPS.

METHODS

Data of 242 consecutive patients with RPS who underwent surgical treatment at the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between January 2010 and February 2021 were collected and analyzed. Indications for surgery were based on the treatment algorithm.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients with primary RPS and 97 with recurrent RPS were included. The recurrent cohort comprised more patients with multifocal tumors than the primary cohort (64.9% vs. 15.2%). R0/R1 resection was achieved in 94.5% and 81.4% of the primary and recurrent RPS cases, respectively. Major complication rates in the primary and recurrent cohorts were 17.9% and 30.9%, respectively. During a median follow-up of 51 months, the estimated 5-year overall survival, local recurrence, and distant metastasis rates for patients with primary and recurrent RPS were 61.0% versus 37.1%, 47.4% versus 71.3%, and 18.4% versus 17.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive surgical treatment achieved good local control and long-term survival in patients with primary RPS, whereas the prognosis in patients with recurrence were significantly worse.

Treatment for local control of retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas: A review of the literature

Retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas are uncommon tumors for which complete surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment. However, achieving complete gross resection with microscopically negative margins is challenging, and local recurrence rates can be high. Patients often succumb to uncontrolled local disease. Radiation therapy offers a potential means for sterilizing microscopic residual disease, although its use continues to be controversial. Chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiation continues to be investigated as an adjunct to surgery, along with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. In this review, we discuss the current management of retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas, focusing on studies of surgery and radiation therapy to maximize local control.

Management of Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), but local recurrence is common. Biologic behavior and recurrence patterns differ significantly among histologic types of RPS, with implications for management. The Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published a consensus approach to primary RPS, and to complement this, one for recurrent RPS in 2016. Since then, additional studies have been published, and collaborative discussion is ongoing to address the clinical challenges of local recurrence in RPS.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed, and the previous consensus statements for recurrent RPS were updated after review by TARPSWG members. The search included the most common RPS histologic types: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.

RESULTS

Recurrent RPS management was evaluated from diagnosis to follow-up evaluation. For appropriately selected patients, resection is safe. Nomograms currently are available to help predict outcome after resection. These and other new findings have been combined with expert recommendations to provide 36 statements, each of which is attributed a level of evidence and grade of recommendation. In this updated document, more emphasis is placed on histologic type and clarification of the intent for surgical treatment, either curative or palliative. Overall, the fundamental tenet of optimal care for patients with recurrent RPS remains individualized treatment after multidisciplinary discussion by an experienced team with expertise in RPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated consensus recommendations are provided to help guide decision-making for treatment of locally recurrent RPS and better selection of patients who would potentially benefit from surgery.

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model to Predict the Prognosis of Patients With Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: A Large International Population-Based Cohort Study

Background

Retroperitoneal liposarcomas (RPLs), sarcoma of mesenchymal origin, are the most common soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the retroperitoneum. Given the rarity of RPLs, the prognostic values of clinicopathological features in the patients remain unclear. The nomogram can provide a visual interface to aid in calculating the predicted probability that a patient will achieve a particular clinical endpoint and communication with patients.

Methods

We included a total of 1,392 RPLs patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. For nomogram construction and validation, patients in the SEER database were divided randomly into the training cohort and internal validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3, while 65 patients with RPLs from our center between 2010 and 2016 served as the external validation cohort. The OS curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed using the log-rank test. Moreover, Fine and Gray's competing-risk regression models were conducted to assess CSS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to select the prognostic factors for survival time. We constructed a predictive nomogram based on the results of the multivariate analyses.

Results

Through univariate and multivariate analyses, it is found that age, histological grade, classification, SEER stage, surgery constitute significant risk factors for OS, and age, classification, SEER stage, AJCC M stage, surgery, and tumor size constitute risk factors for CSS. We found that the nomogram provided a good assessment of OS and CSS at 1, 3, and 5 years in patients with RPLs (1-year OS: (training cohort: AUC = 0.755 (95% CI, 0.714, 0.796); internal validation cohort: AUC = 0.754 (95% CI, 0.681, 0.827); external validation cohort: AUC = 0.793 (95% CI, 0.651, 0.935)); 3-year OS: (training cohort: AUC = 0.782 (95% CI, 0.752, 0.811); internal validation cohort: AUC = 0.788 (95% CI, 0.736, 0.841); external validation cohort: AUC = 0.863 (95% CI, 0.773, 0.954)); 5-year OS: (training cohort: AUC = 0.780 (95% CI, 0.752, 0.808); internal validation cohort: AUC = 0.783 (95% CI, 0.732, 0.834); external validation cohort: AUC = 0.854 (95% CI, 0.762, 0.945)); 1-year CSS: (training cohort: AUC = 0.769 (95% CI, 0.717, 0.821); internal validation cohort: AUC = 0.753 (95% CI, 0.668, 0.838); external validation cohort: AUC = 0.799 (95% CI, 0.616, 0.981)); 3-year CSS: (training cohort: AUC = 0.777 (95% CI, 0.742, 0.811); internal validation cohort: AUC = 0.787 (95% CI, 0.726, 0.849); external validation cohort: AUC = 0.808 (95% CI, 0.673, 0.943)); 5-year CSS: (training cohort: AUC = 0.773 (95% CI, 0.741, 0.805); internal validation cohort: AUC = 0.768 (95% CI, 0.709, 0.827); external validation cohort: AUC = 0.829 (95% CI, 0.712, 0.945))). The calibration plots for the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts at 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS indicated that the predicted survival rates closely correspond to the actual survival rates.

Conclusion

We constructed and externally validated an unprecedented nomogram prognostic model for patients with RPLs. The nomogram can be used as a potential, objective, and supplementary tool for clinicians to predict the prognosis of RPLs patients around the world.

Case report: Two cases of primary paratesticular liposarcoma

Paratesticular liposarcoma is a sporadic urological tumor. We report the clinical presentation, treatment course, and prognosis of 2 cases of primary paratesticular liposarcoma with different pathological types, with the aim of further understanding the diagnosis and treatment of this rare disease. Case 1 was a 53-years-old male patient who presented with left scrotal enlargement with swelling 3 years ago and was considered to have a testicular malignancy on preoperative CT scan and enhanced MRI. The patient underwent resection of the left scrotal mass and left orchiectomy under general anaesthesia. Histopathological study confirmed the diagnosis of dedifferentiated liposarcoma. At the 4-months follow-up, no local recurrence or distant metastasis was observed. Case 2 is a 42-years-old male patient with a left scrotal mass which was discovered six months ago. Preoperatively, he underwent CT plain and enhanced MRI examinations suggesting an intra-scrotal occupancy. The patient underwent scrotoscopic excision of the left scrotal mass under general anesthesia. Histopathological studies confirmed the diagnosis of highly differentiated liposarcoma. At the 10-months follow-up, no local recurrence or distant metastasis was observed. Preoperative differential diagnosis of paratesticular liposarcoma should be noted with testicular tumor and extra-abdominal hernia. Extensive local excision and, if necessary, concomitant radical testicular resection is the treatment of choice. If the tumor in the scrotum spreads to the inguinal region, surgical removal with the aid of a scrotoscope may be attempted. This procedure avoids the formation of a large incision in the inguinal region compared to traditional open surgery. Patients commonly experience local recurrence and less distant metastases after surgery, so long-term follow-up is recommended.

Prognosis and survival of patients diagnosed with well-differentiated and dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma

OBJECTIVES

The main objective is to establish the overall survival and disease-free survival profiles regarding the patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma, making a comparison based on the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated histological subtypes. The secondary objectives are to descriptively analyze the clinical characteristics of said patients and to identify and analyze other independent variables that might modify these survival profiles significantly.

METHODS

An observational and analytical study was performed using a retrospective historical cohort that was followed prospectively. The inclusion criteria consisted of: the procedure of liposarcoma located in the retroperitoneum, the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated histological subtypes, between January 2002 and May 2019. As a result, 32 patients took part in this study's sample. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to summarize the results and log-rank test was used in the comparative analysis.

RESULTS

The overall survival at 5 years was around 59%. No differences were found between the patients with a well-differentiated subtype compared to the dedifferentiated ones (p=0.834). The disease-free survival at 2 years was 59% regarding the well-differentiated and 26% regarding the dedifferentiated, with these differences being statistically significant (p=0.005). None of the other studied variables modified these survival profiles significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcomas show less disease-free survival than well-differentiated liposarcomas. However, regarding overall survival no differences can be claimed.

The impact of postoperative radiological surveillance intensity on disease free and overall survival from primary retroperitoneal, abdominal and pelvic soft-tissue sarcoma

AIM

This observational study aimed to evaluate the impact of intensity of radiological surveillance on survival following resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma.

METHOD

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary resection of soft tissue sarcoma arising in the retroperitoneum, abdomen or pelvis at a single, high-volume sarcoma centre. Intensity of follow-up regimes up to 5 postoperative years were categorized as 'European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) compliant' (intense), or 'non-ESMO compliant' (less-intense). The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome measures were disease-free survival (DFS) and reoperation rate. Analyses were stratified by high (grade 2 or 3) or low (grade 1) tumour grade.

RESULTS

Of 168 patients, 67.1% had high-grade and 32.9% had low-grade disease. Overall, 40.0% of patients had ESMO-compliant radiological follow-up (high-grade:25.7%, low-grade:66.7%). 41.7% of patients died and 48.2% suffered local or distant recurrence by cessation of follow up. Upon univariable analysis for high-grade tumours, ESMO compliance reduced DFS (p = 0.066) but had no impact on OS. There was no significant difference in the reoperation rate in patients with ESMO-compliant and non-compliant follow-up (p = 0.097). In low-grade tumours, ESMO compliance significantly reduced DFS (p < 0.001), but without effecting OS. In risk-adjusted models for high-grade tumours, ESMO compliant follow-up was associated with reduced OS (HR:3.47, 1.40-8.61, p = 0.007) and no difference in DFS. In low-grade tumours, there was no association between overall ESMO compliance and OS or DFS.

CONCLUSION

This study did not find a benefit for high-intensity radiological surveillance and overall survival in patients undergoing primary resection for high or low-grade retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Paratesticular liposarcoma: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

Paratesticular liposarcoma accounts for approximately 7% of scrotal tumors. They are rare lesions of the reproductive system with approximately 90% of the lesions originating from the spermatic cord. Surgery, with the goal of complete resection, is the mainstay for treatment of this disease. However, treatment consisting of extended resection to decrease local recurrence remains controversial.

CASE SUMMARY

We report the cases of two patients with paratesticular liposarcomas who were treated with radical testicular tumor resection without adjuvant therapy. Follow-up investigations at 9 mo showed no sign of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Surgery is the first-line treatment, regardless of whether it is a recurrent or primary tumor. Extended resection carries a higher risk of complications and should not be performed routinely. Preoperative radiotherapy can reduce the local recurrence rate without affecting the overall survival.

Characteristics of primary and repeated recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: outcomes after aggressive surgeries at a single institution

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to investigate the characteristics of primary and repeated recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

METHODS

Patients treated with primary or recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma between 2005 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival time analysis of recurrence-free survival and overall survival was conducted using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma were analysed. Amongst them, 46 patients (88%) had undergone surgery. Histologic grades included well-differentiated (n = 21), dedifferentiated (n = 21), myxoid (n = 3) and pleomorphic (n = 1) subtypes. The patients undergoing R0 resection in the first surgery had significantly higher recurrence-free survival rates compared with the patients undergoing non-R0 resection (3-year recurrence-free survival: 80 versus 38%; 5-year recurrence-free survival: 49 versus 29%, P = 0.033). Although overall survival rates tended to be higher in the patients undergoing R0 resection compared with the non-R0 resection, it did not reach to a statistical significant difference (5-year overall survival: 93 versus 75%; 10-year overall survival: 93 versus 59%, P = 0.124). The recurrence rates were 65, 67, 73 and 100%, and the median recurrence-free survival times were 46, 20, 9 and 3 months after the first, second, third and fourth surgeries, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates were 82, 69, 40 and 0% after the first, second, third and fourth surgeries, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

With repeated recurrence and surgeries, the time to recurrence decreased and the recurrence rate increased. R0 resection in the first surgery was considered the most important for longer recurrence-free survival and radical cure.

Clinical features of multiply recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

To elucidate the clinicopathological features of multiply recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma referred to a tertiary center.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 40 patients with pathologically proven primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma treated between January 2015 and June 2019.

RESULTS

The initial pathology was well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) in 23 patients, dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) in 15 patients, and myxoid liposarcoma in two patients. Before and after referral to our hospital, the patients underwent 142 surgeries (median number of surgeries: 3) for initial and recurrent tumors. Of these, 35 (87.5%) patients underwent surgeries for recurrent tumors. In 11 (47.8%) of the 23 patients with initial WDLS, pathological progression (PP) to DDLS was observed in recurrent tumors at the median interval of 7.8 years. In eight patients (72.7%), the PP occurred at the first recurrence. In contrast, all 15 patients with DDLS recurred as DDLS. Distant metastases developed in eight patients (34.8%) with WDLS and five patients (29.4%) with DDLS/myxoid subtype. All eight WDLS patients who developed metastasis were alive with disease at the median interval of 3.6 years, whereas four of the five patients with primary diagnosis of DDLS/myxoid subtype died at the median interval of 5.6 months from the development of metastasis. The 5-year overall survival of the patients with initial WDLS and those with DDLS/myxoid subtype were 100% and 67.4% (p = 0.0006), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of the initial-WDLS patients was favorable despite multiple recurrences. In WDLS patients, if distant metastases develop, it is possible to remain alive with disease for years.

Single centre 30-year experience in treating retroperitoneal liposarcomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Liposarcomas form a diverse group of tumors that represent the majority of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. Radical excision of these retroperitoneal liposarcomas is often challenging due to their large size and proximity to visceral organs and major vessels. Here we present the 30-year experience of our multidisciplinary sarcoma team in the treatment of these tumors and analysis of factors influencing survival.

METHODS

Patients with retroperitoneal liposarcomas treated in Helsinki University Hospital from 1987 to 2017 were reviewed. Local recurrence-free survival, metastases-free survival, and disease-specific survival were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis, and factors influencing survival were evaluated with Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were identified. The median follow-up time was 5.4 years (interquartile range: 2.2-8.8 years). Local recurrence developed in 72% and metastases in 15% during follow-up. The 5-year disease-free survival was 31% and disease-specific survival was 66%. The multifactorial analysis revealed histological type and grade as predictors of disease-specific survival (P < .01) while multifocality carried a poor prognosis for local recurrence (P = .02) and higher histological grade for metastases (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal liposarcomas rarely metastasize but tend to recur locally. For tumors that have been resected with macroscopically clear margins, histological, type, and grade are significant predictors of survival.

Evaluating the Impact of Surveillance Follow-Up Intervals in Patients Following Resection of Primary Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma of the Retroperitoneum

BACKGROUND

Resection of recurrent retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma (RP-WDLPS) is unlikely to result in cure. Thus, most clinicians delay surgery after recurrence until symptom intolerance or increasing rate of disease progression. The aim of this study was to determine whether longer surveillance intervals in this population would impact outcomes or delay treatment in those who recur.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with primary RP-WDLPS who underwent resection between April 1996 and April 2017 and surveillance at MDACC (n = 91) was performed.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis of primary RP-WDLPS was 61 years; median tumor size was 30 cm. Complete resection was achieved in 85 (93.4%) patients. Among patients who underwent complete resection, recurrence occurred in 53 (60.2%) with median time to recurrence of 27.0 months. Thirty-six (69.6%) of these patients underwent resection of recurrent disease at a median 40.2 months from primary tumor resection. Surveillance imaging at 4-month (vs 3-month) intervals would not have impacted recurrence management in 84 (95.5%) patients; imaging at 6-month (vs 3-month) intervals would not have impacted management of recurrence in 80 (90.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence was common, often occurring beyond the early postoperative period following primary RP-WDLPS resection. More frequent surveillance imaging (q3-4 vs q6 months) in the first 2 years following primary RP-WDLPS resection may not significantly impact timing of surgery or systemic therapy for recurrence. If longer surveillance intervals were shown to be safe with equivalent outcomes in prospective studies, the resulting change in practice could lead to decreased anxiety and cost for patients and healthcare systems.

Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: An update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors that account for 1% of all adult malignancies, with over 100 different histologic subtypes occurring predominately in the trunk, extremity, and retroperitoneum. This low incidence is further complicated by their variable presentation, behavior, and long-term outcomes, which emphasize the importance of centralized care in specialized centers with a multidisciplinary team approach. In the last decade, there has been an effort to improve the quality of care for patients with STS based on anatomic site and histology, and multiple ongoing clinical trials are focusing on tailoring therapy to histologic subtype. This report summarizes the latest evidence guiding the histiotype-specific management of extremity/truncal and retroperitoneal STS with regard to surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.

Did outcomes improve in retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery?

In the last decades, the deeper understanding of the biological basis of the disease, along with the advances of surgical techniques and oncologic multimodal treatments, have led to an overall increase of survival of cancer patients. However, significant amelioration of the prognosis of rare and under-investigated tumors such as soft tissue sarcoma is less evident. In this review, main changes in the surgical management of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) are discussed in order to figure out whether actual improvement in RPS outcome has been occurred in the last years.